My Blog

Category: Curriculum & Instructional Design

  • [Solved] Education Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10) **files (2)** – ## Assignment8Chapters9-10.docx – TheSchoolSuperintendentTheoryPracticeAndCasesVol3.pdf **## Assignment8Chapters9-10.docx** Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10) After reading Kowalski, Chapters 9 and 10, respond to the following questions: 1.) Explain key functio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10)

    **files (2)**

    – ## Assignment8Chapters9-10.docx

    – TheSchoolSuperintendentTheoryPracticeAndCasesVol3.pdf

    **## Assignment8Chapters9-10.docx**

    Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10)

    After reading Kowalski, Chapters 9 and 10, respond to the following questions:

    1.)  Explain key functions included in fiscal management.

    2.)  List and describe planning documents which should provide the basis for building a district budget.

    3.)  Why is school facility planning an important superintendent responsibility?

    4.)  How are the fiscal management responsibilities (pp. 251-2) related to district strategic planning?

    5.)  Discuss the functions commonly included with Human Resources Administration (HRA).

    Rubrics

    Specific information provided;
    Addresses all aspects of the assignment questions and/or tasks;
    Provides a comprehensive or thorough response

    APA format is followed thoughout the document;

    Few or no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, sentence structure, etc.

    **TheSchoolSuperintendentTheoryPracticeAndCasesVol3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theschoolsuperintendenttheorypracticeandcasesvol3-pdf-10560279)

    **TheSchoolSuperintendentTheoryPracticeAndCasesVol3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theschoolsuperintendenttheorypracticeandcasesvol3-pdf-10560279)

    **## Assignment8Chapters9-10.docx**

    Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10)

    After reading Kowalski, Chapters 9 and 10, respond to the following questions:

    1.)  Explain key functions included in fiscal management.

    2.)  List and describe planning documents which should provide the basis for building a district budget.

    3.)  Why is school facility planning an important superintendent responsibility?

    4.)  How are the fiscal management responsibilities (pp. 251-2) related to district strategic planning?

    5.)  Discuss the functions commonly included with Human Resources Administration (HRA).

    Rubrics

    Specific information provided;
    Addresses all aspects of the assignment questions and/or tasks;
    Provides a comprehensive or thorough response

    APA format is followed thoughout the document;

    Few or no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, sentence structure, etc.

    **TheSchoolSuperintendentTheoryPracticeAndCasesVol3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theschoolsuperintendenttheorypracticeandcasesvol3-pdf-10560279)

    **## Assignment8Chapters9-10.docx**

    Assignment 8 (Chapters 9-10)

    After reading Kowalski, Chapters 9 and 10, respond to the following questions:

    1.)  Explain key functions included in fiscal management.

    2.)  List and describe planning documents which should provide the basis for building a district budget.

    3.)  Why is school facility planning an important superintendent responsibility?

    4.)  How are the fiscal management responsibilities (pp. 251-2) related to district strategic planning?

    5.)  Discuss the functions commonly included with Human Resources Administration (HRA).

    Rubrics

    Specific information provided;
    Addresses all aspects of the assignment questions and/or tasks;
    Provides a comprehensive or thorough response

    APA format is followed thoughout the document;

    Few or no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, sentence structure, etc.

    **TheSchoolSuperintendentTheoryPracticeAndCasesVol3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theschoolsuperintendenttheorypracticeandcasesvol3-pdf-10560279)

  • [Solved] Create a visual format to express the following: IT and Systems Management Proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Create a visual format to express the following:** **IT and Systems Management Proposal** **IT and Systems Management Proposal** Prompt: The organization is currently facing significant inefficiencies due to fragmented and outdated systems. Many of the operational functions, such as project manage…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Create a visual format to express the following:** **IT and Systems Management Proposal**

    **IT and Systems Management Proposal**

    Prompt: The organization is currently facing significant inefficiencies due to fragmented and outdated systems. Many of the operational functions, such as project management, communication, resource allocation, and reporting, are relying on a mix of manual processes and disconnected software tools. This is leading to inconsistent workflows, duplication of effort, and difficulty in tracking key performance metrics across teams. As Deputy Director of People and Operations, you are tasked with selecting and implementing a more integrated and efficient system to address these issues.

    What steps would you take to evaluate, select, and implement a new system or suite of systems to streamline these operational processes? Consider the following:

    – How would you assess the existing systems to identify inefficiencies and gaps?
    – What criteria would you use to evaluate potential systems (e.g., scalability, integration, user experience)?
    – How would you ensure that the selected systems align with both short-term operational needs and long-term strategic goals?
    – How would you handle the transition from the old systems to the new ones and ensure minimal disruption to ongoing operations?

    Key points to consider in the response:

    – Evaluation of current systems (audit, feedback from staff, pain points).
    – Criteria for selecting new systems (integration capabilities, scalability, ease of use, vendor reputation, cost).
    – Mapping operational workflows to identify key system requirements.
    – Change management strategies for system implementation (training, phased rollout, communication).
    – Addressing potential resistance to change and ensuring buy-in from stakeholders.
    – Monitoring and optimizing systems post-implementation (feedback loops, system upgrades).
    – Creating people-centered, culturally reflective processes and systems that support a liberatory workplace, respect the sanctity of Black labor and leadership, and supports the wellness of both the organization and its people.

    Please prepare a visual presentation of your work (e.g. a slideshow, a prezi, an info-graphic, flow-chart, mind-map, timeline, or slide deck) and consider audience engagement, learning styles, and accessibility. You may make assumptions about any information not included in these documents in order to support.

    **As Deputy Director of People and Operations, I’d approach this as a people change just as much as a systems change. The technology matters, but the real success is whether staff feel their work is easier, clearer, and more sustainable after we implement it.**

    **My guiding priorities would be:**

    **- Make people’s day-to-day work simpler, not heavier.**

    **- Increase clarity, transparency, and trust.**

    **- Build something that can grow with us, not something we’ll outgrow in a year or two.**

    **I’d structure the work in four main phases: understand, decide, implement, and improve.**

    **1. Understand: Assess the existing systems and pain points**

    **I’d start by listening before prescribing any solution.**

    **1. Map what we’re actually using**

    **- Create an inventory of all tools and processes used for:**

    **- Project and task management**

    **- Communication (internal and external)**

    **- Resource allocation (staffing, budgeting, scheduling)**

    **- Reporting and dashboards**

    **- Include both “official” systems and the workarounds people rely on (spreadsheets, group chats, personal docs).**

    **2. Listen to staff at all levels**

    **- Hold listening sessions and short interviews with a diverse cross-section of staff: program, operations, leadership, and especially those doing high-volume, detail-heavy work.**

    **- Ask simple, concrete questions:**

    **- Where do things fall through the cracks?**

    **- Where are you copying and pasting the same information into multiple places?**

    **- What tools do you wish you could stop using tomorrow?**

    **- What’s one thing that would make your job feel easier or less stressful?**

    **- Offer anonymous feedback options so people can be honest without worrying about hierarchy.**

    **3. Observe the workflow, not just the tools**

    **- Map a few representative workflows end to end (for example: “new project from idea to completion” or “monthly reporting cycle”).**

    **- Identify:**

    **- Manual handoffs**

    **- Duplicate data entry**

    **- Dependencies on one or two “hero” staff who hold all the knowledge in their heads**

    **- Bottlenecks that consistently slow work down**

    **4. Use data, but keep it humane**

    **- Where possible, look at:**

    **- Time spent on manual reporting**

    **- Number of tools used to accomplish a single task**

    **- Delays or rework in key processes**

    **- Combine the numbers with people’s lived experience so we don’t reduce staff to metrics.**

    **The outcome of this phase would be a clear, shared picture of:**

    **- Our biggest pain points**

    **- The most critical gaps and inefficiencies**

    **- A prioritized list of problems we are actually trying to solve**

    **2. Decide what we need: Define requirements and evaluation criteria**

    **Before looking at vendors, I’d co-create a set of requirements with staff so we’re not chasing shiny features.**

    **1. Clarify must-haves vs. nice-to-haves**

    **- Must-haves might include:**

    **- Centralized project tracking with clear ownership and deadlines**

    **- Integrated communication or at least strong integrations with current communication tools**

    **- Resource allocation visibility (who is working on what, and at what capacity)**

    **- Robust but usable reporting and dashboards**

    **- Nice-to-haves might include:**

    **- Built-in time tracking**

    **- Advanced automation**

    **- Additional collaboration features**

    **2. People-centered criteria**

    **I’d prioritize:**

    **- Ease of use: Intuitive interface, low learning curve for non-technical staff**

    **- Accessibility: Compliance with accessibility standards; usable with screen readers, good contrast, keyboard navigation**

    **- Language & inclusivity: Support for different language needs and a design that works for different working styles and roles**

    **- Minimizing cognitive load: A system that reduces context-switching and the number of places staff have to check each day**

    **3. Technical and organizational criteria**

    **- Scalability: Can the system grow with us in users, data, and complexity?**

    **- Integration: Ability to connect with core tools (email, calendar, file storage, HR/finance where appropriate). Open APIs or standard integrations are a big plus.**

    **- Configurability vs. customization: We want to configure without needing heavy custom development that locks us in.**

    **- Security and privacy: Role-based permissions, data protection, compliance with relevant regulations.**

    **- Total cost of ownership: Licensing, implementation, training, ongoing admin time—not just the sticker price.**

    **- Vendor support and stability: Quality of onboarding, documentation, and support; likelihood they’ll be around and evolving.**

    **I’d translate this into a simple scoring rubric so we can compare options transparently and fairly.**

    **3. Evaluate and select: Involve the people who will use it**

    **1. Create a short list**

    **- Based on requirements, identify 3–4 systems (or suites of systems) that:**

    **- Cover most of our core needs**

    **- Are known to be strong in collaboration/project management, resource visibility, and reporting**

    **2. Run demos and hands-on trials**

    **- Arrange short, focused demos tailored to our real workflows, not generic sales pitches.**

    **- Provide sandbox access for a small cross-functional working group to test:**

    **- Typical day-to-day tasks**

    **- Reporting needs**

    **- Ease of onboarding for new staff**

    **3. Center staff voices in the decision**

    **- Form a selection committee with representation from different teams, roles, and identities.**

    **- Use the scoring rubric plus qualitative feedback:**

    **- How did it feel to use this?**

    **- What would be easier with this system?**

    **- What trade-offs are we willing to accept?**

    **4. Make a clear, documented choice**

    **- Recommend a primary system (or tightly integrated suite) with:**

    **- Rationale tied back to our original problems**

    **- Risks and mitigation plans**

    **- High-level implementation timeline and resource needs**

    **4. Implement with care: Change management and roll-out**

    **This is where many good tools fail—so I’d be very intentional here.**

    **Tell the story of the change**

    **- Communicate early and often:**

    **- Why we’re changing (rooted in what staff told us)**

    **- What will be better for people’s daily work**

    **- What will stay the same**

    **- How staff will be supported through the transition**

    **- Use multiple channels: live meetings, written updates, FAQs, and space for questions.**

    **Pilot before full rollout**

    **- Start with 1–2 teams as a pilot:**

    **- Configure the system to their workflows**

    **- Test data migration and integrations**

    **- Gather real feedback and refine setup**

    **- Adjust training, configuration, and documentation based on what we learn.**

    **Invest in training and support**

    **- Offer:**

    **- Role-based training sessions (managers, project leads, general staff)**

    **- Short “how-to” guides and video snippets for common tasks**

    **- Drop-in office hours or “system clinics”**

    **- Identify and support a network of “power users” or champions in each team to help peers and provide feedback.**

    **4. Manage data migration carefully**

    **- Clean and standardize data before moving it.**

    **- Run tests with a subset of data to avoid surprises.**

    **- Where needed, run old and new systems in parallel for a short, defined period to reduce risk**

    **5. Measure, learn, and iterate**

    **Finally, I’d treat this as an ongoing practice, not a one-time project.**

    **Define what success looks like**

    **- Examples:**

    **- Reduction in duplicate data entry**

    **- Faster time to generate key reports**

    **- Increased on-time project completion**

    **- Improved staff satisfaction with tools and workflows**

    **Check in regularly**

    **- 30/60/90-day check-ins with teams and leadership.**

    **- Quick pulse surveys to understand how the system is landing.**

    **- A simple feedback channel for staff to suggest improvements or flag issues.**

    **3. Establish light governance**

    **- Clarify ownership:**

    **- Who administers the system?**

    **- How are changes requested and approved?**

    **- How do we onboard and offboard users?**

    **- Keep configuration changes aligned with our original goals: simplicity, transparency, and ease of use.**

    – [\
    \
    FBC.txt](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/fbc-txt "FBC.txt")

  • [Solved] Catherine Owens- Online Resources

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Catherine Owens- Online Resources

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Catherine Owens- Online Resources

  • [Solved] 526- Data Driven

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The foundation of a successful RTI model is to monitor both student learning and instructional practices and use information gathered to make data-driven decisions. Teachers should utilize effective classroom assessments to monitor student progress across all tiers of instruction, especially during …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The foundation of a successful RTI model is to monitor both student learning and instructional practices and use information gathered to make data-driven decisions. Teachers should utilize effective classroom assessments to monitor student progress across all tiers of instruction, especially during intervention and remediation. Formative assessments are frequently used to evaluate student learning to make intentional instructional decisions about intervention and remediation. Important factors to consider include reliable and valid progress monitoring measures that align with student learning goals, consistent and ethical assessment administration, scoring and graphing data, analyzing data to make data-driven instructional decisions, and respectfully communicating progress to all stakeholders.

    **Part 1: Analyzing Student Data**

    Utilizing Savannah’s, Grayson’s, and Alejandro’s case studies from “RTI: Progress Monitoring,” imagine you are meeting with the RTI team to discuss the next steps for these students.

    deliverables to complete this assignment:

    – 2-page RTI meeting agenda with facilitation notes, including documentation of resources

    Utilizing the deliverable of your choice, present your data analysis and recommended next steps for each student to the RTI team. Include the following information about each student:

    – An initial summary and analysis of each student’s progress monitoring data.
    – Recommendations for instructional next steps (e.g., continue with intervention/remediation, add additional intervention/remediation, or discontinue the current intervention/remediation), including an explanation of how the data supports each student’s instructional recommendation.
    – If recommending that intervention be added or continued, identify one individual goal based on the assessment data and describe steps to progress monitor the individual goal.

    **Part 2: Student and Family Communication**

    Write a 250 word summary on how you will partner with students and families to make data-driven instructional decisions. In your summary explain the following information:

    – How you use data to guide and engage students in self-analysis, literacy goal setting, and reflecting on learning.
    – Provide an example of a system/strategy to use with students to track their learning and goal progress and discuss how it can also be used to inform your future instructional planning based on identified learning gaps and patterns.
    – At least two ways to communicate data and student progress to families.
    – How you communicate data to students and families showing respect and dignity while still conveying the urgent need for an intervention plan.

    Support your deliverable with a minimum of two scholarly resources.

    https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/case-study/rti-progress-monitoring/

  • [Solved] 526-5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Answer each question in 150 words each with at least 1 reference 1. After exploring “Fidelity Tools” on the National Center on Intensive Intervention website, define fidelity in the context of education and the implementation of interventions and assessments. Explain why fidelity is vital in implem…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Answer each question in 150 words each with at least 1 reference

    1. After exploring “Fidelity Tools” on the National Center on Intensive Intervention website, define fidelity in the context of education and the implementation of interventions and assessments. Explain why fidelity is vital in implementing an intervention and assessment program and how you will ensure fidelity when planning literacy intervention and assessment in your future classroom.

    2. How can a teacher support students in self-evaluating and tracking their own progress during interventions? Provide a technology tool that could be used with students to support self-reflection and student data tracking.

    Reference for question 1 https://intensiveintervention.org/implementation-intervention/fidelity

  • [Solved] brumsey

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachments **files (2)** – ## RhetoricalAnalysisPrewriting-Summer2026.docx – ## ENGL102Essay2-RhetoricalAnalysis-Summer2026.docx **## RhetoricalAnalysisPrewriting-Summer2026.docx** **Rhetorical Analysis Prewriting** 1) Which specific book, film, or TV show do you plan to write about? **(…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachments

    **files (2)**

    – ## RhetoricalAnalysisPrewriting-Summer2026.docx

    – ## ENGL102Essay2-RhetoricalAnalysis-Summer2026.docx

    **## RhetoricalAnalysisPrewriting-Summer2026.docx**

    **Rhetorical Analysis Prewriting**

    1) Which specific book, film, or TV show do you plan to write about?
    **(This must be no older than 5 years).**

    2) Why have you chosen this text? Explain your decision in 3-5 sentences.

    3) Which specific judgment(s) are making about this text? Why? Explain why this judgement is positive, negative, or partially both.

    4) In a minimum of 5-8 sentences, write a
    **summary** (purely what happens) in the film, tv show, or novel that you chose above.

    5) Below, state THREE CRITERIA that you plan to use to critique your text, and
    **provide at least ONE EXAMPLE** of this criterion as it appears in your book, film, or TV show.
    **At least one of the criteria that you discuss below should contain a theme.**

    · EXAMPLE:
    Criterion #1: Theme of Good vs. Evil

    i. Judgment: The theme of good vs. evil is effectively used in
    _Peaky Blinders._

    ii. Example: In the pilot episode, protagonist Thomas Shelby states, “Quote” (Citation).

    iii. Explanation: In this example, the theme of good vs. evil is fully explored because …

    ·
    Criterion #1
    **(THEME)**:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    ·
    Criterion #2:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    ·
    Criterion #3:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    6) Write a draft of your thesis sentence.
    _The thesis should include your judgement(s) and criteria._

    7) Below,
    **INCLUDE THE WORKS CITED (MLA) or REFERENCE (APA) CITATION for FOUR sources** that you could use for this essay.

    **Remember to include the text you are critiquing as one of these sources.**

    **## ENGL102Essay2-RhetoricalAnalysis-Summer2026.docx**

    1

    Miller

    **ENGL 102 Essay #2: Rhetorical Analysis**

    Essay Deadlines:

    · Prewriting: Sunday, June 14th (11:59 p.m.)

    · Rough Draft: Wednesday, June 17th (11:59 p.m.)

    ·
    **Final Draft: Sunday, June 21st (11:59 p.m.)**

    Rubric: ENGL 102 Rubric (Bb)

    Assignment Objectives:

    · Analyze the rhetorical context of a given text, including visual texts such as films or TV shows (genre, purpose, intended audience)

    · Differentiate between summary and analysis

    · Choose and analyze a position (or judgement)

    · Identify and evaluate specific criteria (parts of the text)

    · Provide examples and analysis of those examples in support of that position

    · Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis

    · Use MLA or APA to cite information from sources (in-text and Works Cited or References); and

    · Engage in writing as a process, and use grammatical, stylistic, and mechanical formats and conventions appropriate for different audiences and writing situations.

    Assignment Description:

    · Choose a
    **recent** film, TV show, or book that you know well
    **AND IS NO OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS**. The first body paragraph should provide a summary of the major plot points of the text. Limit the summary to only one body paragraph.

    · You will first make either a positive or negative
    **judgment** about that text. For example: Is the text entertaining? Informative? Does it successfully convey the author’s intended message? How successfully does the text reach the intended audience(s)? Etc. If your judgement is split (some aspects of the text are effective, but others are not), this should be made clear in your thesis.

    · Next, you will identify at least
    **three** **criteria** (subtopics or aspects of the text that you will use to support your judgment). While appropriate subtopics may vary slightly depending on the type of text you select (as films and TV shows add another dimension that is not present in a book), possible criteria that could be selected included: characterization, the quality of the acting, directing, writing, costume design, set design (or setting for a book), special effects, the effectiveness of the music, the pacing of the story, and a variety of themes that are expressed throughout the story.
    **Each student should select at least one theme to use a criterion for this assignment.**

    · Once your criteria have been selected, identify examples from the text that show how these criteria are effective (if your judgment is positive) or are not effective (if your judgment is negative). Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis. It can be helpful to examine profession film/TV/book reviews from professional critics to help support the points that you are making. Also, searching for interviews with the actors, director, composers, etc. can provide helpful primary source information that can help you to support your analysis. Including specific textual analysis for each criterion, however, is essential.

    · Keep in mind that this is different from summarizing, and textual evidence should be taken directly from the film/TV show/book you are critiquing. Directly quoting from the text is encouraged. Avoid summarizing large plot points in the latter body paragraphs; you will have already provided this information in the first body paragraph.

    · Students can, if they wish, provide some background information in the introduction (release date, box office figures/number of copies sold, etc. as long as this information does not overwhelm the introduction. The thesis sentence should clearly state the judgment and criteria that will be discussed in the essay.

    Essay Requirements:

    ·
    **Word Count: A minimum of 1000 words** (This will be roughly three to four pages.)

    · Include the Word Count on page one below the date.

    · In-text citations and Works Cited (MLA) or Reference (APA) citations are included in this word count.

    · Use MLA (Modern Language Associate) or APA (American Psychological Association) format.

    ·
    **Use a minimum of four sources (This includes the source you are analyzing).**

    · You may not use Wikipedia or other similar sources (such as Encyclopedias) for this assignment.

    · You may use first- or third-person point of view.

    ·
    **Only original work will be graded. Students should not submit an essay or assignment that was previously submitted for another course or instructor. Do not use AI to generate your response. Doing so will result in a score of zero for the assignment.**

    **## ENGL102Essay2-RhetoricalAnalysis-Summer2026.docx**

    1

    Miller

    **ENGL 102 Essay #2: Rhetorical Analysis**

    Essay Deadlines:

    · Prewriting: Sunday, June 14th (11:59 p.m.)

    · Rough Draft: Wednesday, June 17th (11:59 p.m.)

    ·
    **Final Draft: Sunday, June 21st (11:59 p.m.)**

    Rubric: ENGL 102 Rubric (Bb)

    Assignment Objectives:

    · Analyze the rhetorical context of a given text, including visual texts such as films or TV shows (genre, purpose, intended audience)

    · Differentiate between summary and analysis

    · Choose and analyze a position (or judgement)

    · Identify and evaluate specific criteria (parts of the text)

    · Provide examples and analysis of those examples in support of that position

    · Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis

    · Use MLA or APA to cite information from sources (in-text and Works Cited or References); and

    · Engage in writing as a process, and use grammatical, stylistic, and mechanical formats and conventions appropriate for different audiences and writing situations.

    Assignment Description:

    · Choose a
    **recent** film, TV show, or book that you know well
    **AND IS NO OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS**. The first body paragraph should provide a summary of the major plot points of the text. Limit the summary to only one body paragraph.

    · You will first make either a positive or negative
    **judgment** about that text. For example: Is the text entertaining? Informative? Does it successfully convey the author’s intended message? How successfully does the text reach the intended audience(s)? Etc. If your judgement is split (some aspects of the text are effective, but others are not), this should be made clear in your thesis.

    · Next, you will identify at least
    **three** **criteria** (subtopics or aspects of the text that you will use to support your judgment). While appropriate subtopics may vary slightly depending on the type of text you select (as films and TV shows add another dimension that is not present in a book), possible criteria that could be selected included: characterization, the quality of the acting, directing, writing, costume design, set design (or setting for a book), special effects, the effectiveness of the music, the pacing of the story, and a variety of themes that are expressed throughout the story.
    **Each student should select at least one theme to use a criterion for this assignment.**

    · Once your criteria have been selected, identify examples from the text that show how these criteria are effective (if your judgment is positive) or are not effective (if your judgment is negative). Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis. It can be helpful to examine profession film/TV/book reviews from professional critics to help support the points that you are making. Also, searching for interviews with the actors, director, composers, etc. can provide helpful primary source information that can help you to support your analysis. Including specific textual analysis for each criterion, however, is essential.

    · Keep in mind that this is different from summarizing, and textual evidence should be taken directly from the film/TV show/book you are critiquing. Directly quoting from the text is encouraged. Avoid summarizing large plot points in the latter body paragraphs; you will have already provided this information in the first body paragraph.

    · Students can, if they wish, provide some background information in the introduction (release date, box office figures/number of copies sold, etc. as long as this information does not overwhelm the introduction. The thesis sentence should clearly state the judgment and criteria that will be discussed in the essay.

    Essay Requirements:

    ·
    **Word Count: A minimum of 1000 words** (This will be roughly three to four pages.)

    · Include the Word Count on page one below the date.

    · In-text citations and Works Cited (MLA) or Reference (APA) citations are included in this word count.

    · Use MLA (Modern Language Associate) or APA (American Psychological Association) format.

    ·
    **Use a minimum of four sources (This includes the source you are analyzing).**

    · You may not use Wikipedia or other similar sources (such as Encyclopedias) for this assignment.

    · You may use first- or third-person point of view.

    ·
    **Only original work will be graded. Students should not submit an essay or assignment that was previously submitted for another course or instructor. Do not use AI to generate your response. Doing so will result in a score of zero for the assignment.**

    **## RhetoricalAnalysisPrewriting-Summer2026.docx**

    **Rhetorical Analysis Prewriting**

    1) Which specific book, film, or TV show do you plan to write about?
    **(This must be no older than 5 years).**

    2) Why have you chosen this text? Explain your decision in 3-5 sentences.

    3) Which specific judgment(s) are making about this text? Why? Explain why this judgement is positive, negative, or partially both.

    4) In a minimum of 5-8 sentences, write a
    **summary** (purely what happens) in the film, tv show, or novel that you chose above.

    5) Below, state THREE CRITERIA that you plan to use to critique your text, and
    **provide at least ONE EXAMPLE** of this criterion as it appears in your book, film, or TV show.
    **At least one of the criteria that you discuss below should contain a theme.**

    · EXAMPLE:
    Criterion #1: Theme of Good vs. Evil

    i. Judgment: The theme of good vs. evil is effectively used in
    _Peaky Blinders._

    ii. Example: In the pilot episode, protagonist Thomas Shelby states, “Quote” (Citation).

    iii. Explanation: In this example, the theme of good vs. evil is fully explored because …

    ·
    Criterion #1
    **(THEME)**:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    ·
    Criterion #2:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    ·
    Criterion #3:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    6) Write a draft of your thesis sentence.
    _The thesis should include your judgement(s) and criteria._

    7) Below,
    **INCLUDE THE WORKS CITED (MLA) or REFERENCE (APA) CITATION for FOUR sources** that you could use for this essay.

    **Remember to include the text you are critiquing as one of these sources.**

    **## ENGL102Essay2-RhetoricalAnalysis-Summer2026.docx**

    1

    Miller

    **ENGL 102 Essay #2: Rhetorical Analysis**

    Essay Deadlines:

    · Prewriting: Sunday, June 14th (11:59 p.m.)

    · Rough Draft: Wednesday, June 17th (11:59 p.m.)

    ·
    **Final Draft: Sunday, June 21st (11:59 p.m.)**

    Rubric: ENGL 102 Rubric (Bb)

    Assignment Objectives:

    · Analyze the rhetorical context of a given text, including visual texts such as films or TV shows (genre, purpose, intended audience)

    · Differentiate between summary and analysis

    · Choose and analyze a position (or judgement)

    · Identify and evaluate specific criteria (parts of the text)

    · Provide examples and analysis of those examples in support of that position

    · Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis

    · Use MLA or APA to cite information from sources (in-text and Works Cited or References); and

    · Engage in writing as a process, and use grammatical, stylistic, and mechanical formats and conventions appropriate for different audiences and writing situations.

    Assignment Description:

    · Choose a
    **recent** film, TV show, or book that you know well
    **AND IS NO OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS**. The first body paragraph should provide a summary of the major plot points of the text. Limit the summary to only one body paragraph.

    · You will first make either a positive or negative
    **judgment** about that text. For example: Is the text entertaining? Informative? Does it successfully convey the author’s intended message? How successfully does the text reach the intended audience(s)? Etc. If your judgement is split (some aspects of the text are effective, but others are not), this should be made clear in your thesis.

    · Next, you will identify at least
    **three** **criteria** (subtopics or aspects of the text that you will use to support your judgment). While appropriate subtopics may vary slightly depending on the type of text you select (as films and TV shows add another dimension that is not present in a book), possible criteria that could be selected included: characterization, the quality of the acting, directing, writing, costume design, set design (or setting for a book), special effects, the effectiveness of the music, the pacing of the story, and a variety of themes that are expressed throughout the story.
    **Each student should select at least one theme to use a criterion for this assignment.**

    · Once your criteria have been selected, identify examples from the text that show how these criteria are effective (if your judgment is positive) or are not effective (if your judgment is negative). Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis. It can be helpful to examine profession film/TV/book reviews from professional critics to help support the points that you are making. Also, searching for interviews with the actors, director, composers, etc. can provide helpful primary source information that can help you to support your analysis. Including specific textual analysis for each criterion, however, is essential.

    · Keep in mind that this is different from summarizing, and textual evidence should be taken directly from the film/TV show/book you are critiquing. Directly quoting from the text is encouraged. Avoid summarizing large plot points in the latter body paragraphs; you will have already provided this information in the first body paragraph.

    · Students can, if they wish, provide some background information in the introduction (release date, box office figures/number of copies sold, etc. as long as this information does not overwhelm the introduction. The thesis sentence should clearly state the judgment and criteria that will be discussed in the essay.

    Essay Requirements:

    ·
    **Word Count: A minimum of 1000 words** (This will be roughly three to four pages.)

    · Include the Word Count on page one below the date.

    · In-text citations and Works Cited (MLA) or Reference (APA) citations are included in this word count.

    · Use MLA (Modern Language Associate) or APA (American Psychological Association) format.

    ·
    **Use a minimum of four sources (This includes the source you are analyzing).**

    · You may not use Wikipedia or other similar sources (such as Encyclopedias) for this assignment.

    · You may use first- or third-person point of view.

    ·
    **Only original work will be graded. Students should not submit an essay or assignment that was previously submitted for another course or instructor. Do not use AI to generate your response. Doing so will result in a score of zero for the assignment.**

    **## RhetoricalAnalysisPrewriting-Summer2026.docx**

    **Rhetorical Analysis Prewriting**

    1) Which specific book, film, or TV show do you plan to write about?
    **(This must be no older than 5 years).**

    2) Why have you chosen this text? Explain your decision in 3-5 sentences.

    3) Which specific judgment(s) are making about this text? Why? Explain why this judgement is positive, negative, or partially both.

    4) In a minimum of 5-8 sentences, write a
    **summary** (purely what happens) in the film, tv show, or novel that you chose above.

    5) Below, state THREE CRITERIA that you plan to use to critique your text, and
    **provide at least ONE EXAMPLE** of this criterion as it appears in your book, film, or TV show.
    **At least one of the criteria that you discuss below should contain a theme.**

    · EXAMPLE:
    Criterion #1: Theme of Good vs. Evil

    i. Judgment: The theme of good vs. evil is effectively used in
    _Peaky Blinders._

    ii. Example: In the pilot episode, protagonist Thomas Shelby states, “Quote” (Citation).

    iii. Explanation: In this example, the theme of good vs. evil is fully explored because …

    ·
    Criterion #1
    **(THEME)**:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    ·
    Criterion #2:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    ·
    Criterion #3:

    i. Judgment:

    ii. Example:

    iii. Explanation:

    6) Write a draft of your thesis sentence.
    _The thesis should include your judgement(s) and criteria._

    7) Below,
    **INCLUDE THE WORKS CITED (MLA) or REFERENCE (APA) CITATION for FOUR sources** that you could use for this essay.

    **Remember to include the text you are critiquing as one of these sources.**

    **## ENGL102Essay2-RhetoricalAnalysis-Summer2026.docx**

    1

    Miller

    **ENGL 102 Essay #2: Rhetorical Analysis**

    Essay Deadlines:

    · Prewriting: Sunday, June 14th (11:59 p.m.)

    · Rough Draft: Wednesday, June 17th (11:59 p.m.)

    ·
    **Final Draft: Sunday, June 21st (11:59 p.m.)**

    Rubric: ENGL 102 Rubric (Bb)

    Assignment Objectives:

    · Analyze the rhetorical context of a given text, including visual texts such as films or TV shows (genre, purpose, intended audience)

    · Differentiate between summary and analysis

    · Choose and analyze a position (or judgement)

    · Identify and evaluate specific criteria (parts of the text)

    · Provide examples and analysis of those examples in support of that position

    · Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis

    · Use MLA or APA to cite information from sources (in-text and Works Cited or References); and

    · Engage in writing as a process, and use grammatical, stylistic, and mechanical formats and conventions appropriate for different audiences and writing situations.

    Assignment Description:

    · Choose a
    **recent** film, TV show, or book that you know well
    **AND IS NO OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS**. The first body paragraph should provide a summary of the major plot points of the text. Limit the summary to only one body paragraph.

    · You will first make either a positive or negative
    **judgment** about that text. For example: Is the text entertaining? Informative? Does it successfully convey the author’s intended message? How successfully does the text reach the intended audience(s)? Etc. If your judgement is split (some aspects of the text are effective, but others are not), this should be made clear in your thesis.

    · Next, you will identify at least
    **three** **criteria** (subtopics or aspects of the text that you will use to support your judgment). While appropriate subtopics may vary slightly depending on the type of text you select (as films and TV shows add another dimension that is not present in a book), possible criteria that could be selected included: characterization, the quality of the acting, directing, writing, costume design, set design (or setting for a book), special effects, the effectiveness of the music, the pacing of the story, and a variety of themes that are expressed throughout the story.
    **Each student should select at least one theme to use a criterion for this assignment.**

    · Once your criteria have been selected, identify examples from the text that show how these criteria are effective (if your judgment is positive) or are not effective (if your judgment is negative). Use information from outside sources to further support this analysis. It can be helpful to examine profession film/TV/book reviews from professional critics to help support the points that you are making. Also, searching for interviews with the actors, director, composers, etc. can provide helpful primary source information that can help you to support your analysis. Including specific textual analysis for each criterion, however, is essential.

    · Keep in mind that this is different from summarizing, and textual evidence should be taken directly from the film/TV show/book you are critiquing. Directly quoting from the text is encouraged. Avoid summarizing large plot points in the latter body paragraphs; you will have already provided this information in the first body paragraph.

    · Students can, if they wish, provide some background information in the introduction (release date, box office figures/number of copies sold, etc. as long as this information does not overwhelm the introduction. The thesis sentence should clearly state the judgment and criteria that will be discussed in the essay.

    Essay Requirements:

    ·
    **Word Count: A minimum of 1000 words** (This will be roughly three to four pages.)

    · Include the Word Count on page one below the date.

    · In-text citations and Works Cited (MLA) or Reference (APA) citations are included in this word count.

    · Use MLA (Modern Language Associate) or APA (American Psychological Association) format.

    ·
    **Use a minimum of four sources (This includes the source you are analyzing).**

    · You may not use Wikipedia or other similar sources (such as Encyclopedias) for this assignment.

    · You may use first- or third-person point of view.

    ·
    **Only original work will be graded. Students should not submit an essay or assignment that was previously submitted for another course or instructor. Do not use AI to generate your response. Doing so will result in a score of zero for the assignment.**

  • [Solved] human services

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – finaldocument.docx **finaldocument.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finaldocument-docx-10560785) **finaldocument.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finaldocumen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – finaldocument.docx

    **finaldocument.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finaldocument-docx-10560785)

    **finaldocument.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finaldocument-docx-10560785)

  • [Solved] questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference Any use of AI will result in automatic 0 – [\ \ questions6-8.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions6-8-docx "questions6-8.docx") – 7.5

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference   Any use of AI will result in automatic 0

    – [\
    \
    questions6-8.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions6-8-docx "questions6-8.docx")

    – 7.5

  • [Solved] quay

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Cost Estimates for World Satellite Telephone Exchange Project NSDC has a contract to produce eight satellites to support a worldwide telephone system (for Alaska Telecom, Inc.) that allows individuals to use a single, portable telephone in any location on earth to call in and out. NSDC will develop …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Cost Estimates for World Satellite Telephone Exchange Project

    NSDC has  a contract to produce eight satellites to support a worldwide telephone  system (for Alaska Telecom, Inc.) that allows individuals to use a  single, portable telephone in any location on earth to call in and out.  NSDC will develop and produce the eight units. NSDC has estimated that  the R&D costs will be NOK (Norwegian Krone) 12,000,000. Material  costs are expected to be NOK 6,000,000. They have estimated that the  design and production of the first satellite will require 100,000 labor  hours, and an 80 percent improvement curve is expected. Skilled labor  cost is NOK 300 per hour. Desired profit for all projects is 25 percent  of total costs.

    1. How many labor hours should the eighth satellite require?
    2. How many labor hours for the whole project of eight satellites?
    3. What price would you ask for the project? Why?
    4. Midway  through the project, your design and production people realize that a 75  percent improvement curve is more appropriate. What impact does this  have on the project?
    5. Near  the end of the project, Deutsch Telefon AG requests a cost estimate for  four satellites identical to those you have already produced. What price  will you quote them? Justify your price.

    **Instructions**, analyze the case above.  Provide calculations in an Appendix. The analysis must correlate  concepts and problem-solving. Support your responses with **at least two scholarly journal references**  (in addition to your book).

  • [Solved] j jordan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment **files (1)** – ## LiteratureReviewStructureAssignmentInstructions.docx **## LiteratureReviewStructureAssignmentInstructions.docx** HSCI 702 **Literature Review Structure: Assignment Instructions** **Overview** Using the headings below, write a 3-5 page essay in current APA for…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## LiteratureReviewStructureAssignmentInstructions.docx

    **## LiteratureReviewStructureAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    HSCI 702

    **Literature Review Structure: Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Using the headings below, write a 3-5 page essay in current APA format. This essay will serve as the structure and framework to your literature review.

    **Instructions**

    The use of artificial intelligence tools to generate, compose, or outsource any portion of your written work is strictly prohibited. Submitting AI‑produced or AI‑assisted writing constitutes a violation of the academic integrity expectations for this doctoral course. All submissions must reflect your own original scholarly analysis and writing.

    Submit the literature review structure as a formatted Word document. Your essay should be clear, have a logical flow, and be organized in headings per current APA format. The headings below are examples of the content required in each section. However you need to create your own headings based on your topic. You should still retain this specific order of headings.

    **Introduction**

    · Provide an introductory section that sets the context for your literature review.

    · Elaborate on the purpose and scope of the review.

    · State the research question (singular) and objectives that will guide your literature review.

    **Theoretical Framework: (Create your own heading that reflects the theoretical framework for your literature review).**

    · Explain the structure of the theoretical framework for your review of literature in this section.

    · Summarize the key concepts and principles of the theoretical framework that will inform your literature review.

    **Main Sections: (Create your own headings that reflect the main sections for your literature review).**

    · Identify the main sections that will comprise your literature review.

    · Each main section should correspond to a thematic or conceptual category relevant to your literature review topic. Explain the content under each section.

    **Subsections: (Create your own headings that reflect the subsections for your literature review).**

    · Within each main section, identify subsections that will further delineate specific aspects or themes.

    · Subsections should facilitate the organization and synthesis of related literature. Explain the content under each subsection.

    **Key Themes and Concepts: (Create your own headings that reflect each of the key themes and concepts for your literature review).**

    · Highlight key themes, concepts, or theories that will be explored within each section and subsection.

    · Provide a brief description or explanation of each theme and concept to guide the literature review process.

    **Methodological Approaches: (Create your own heading that reflects the methodological approaches).**

    · Identify the various methodological approaches relevant to your topic.

    · Discuss and elaborate on the each of the research methodologies relevant to

    · your topic, discussing the pros and cons of each, in the context of your topic.

    **Conclusion:**

    · Conclude your paper with a summary and conclusion that include the overarching themes and objectives of the literature review.

    · Emphasize the significance of the literature review in advancing understanding within your field of study.

    Format of assignment: Current APA edition.

    A minimum of 7 sources are required in addition to the Galvan and Galvan course text and the Bible both of which must be used and cited. Biblical integration must be present.

    Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years (current year, plus prior 4 years) and seminal works for the theoretical framework (which can be more than 5 years old). You may include older articles provided you also meet the minimum requirement for 7 peer-reviewed sources published within the past 5 years (current year plus prior 4 years). If you exclude older articles, you may miss important information.

    Page counts do
    _not_ include front matter and back matter. Minimum 3 full pages is required.

    For all assignments in this course, you are expected to demonstrate progression by incorporating instructor feedback from prior assignments in this course.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    At this stage in your doctoral journey, and specifically for this course, do not use the following or any secondary sources in your reference list: systematic reviews, integrative reviews, scoping reviews, and meta‑analyses. These are secondary sources, and citing them is essentially the same as citing a review of other studies, rather than the original research. For your assignments, you must rely on primary, peer‑reviewed research articles. Primary sources report original data, methods, and findings, and these are essential for developing the critical research skills needed at the doctoral level. You may read systematic reviews and other secondary sources to help you understand your topic more broadly. However, if you come across useful studies within those reviews, locate and cite the original (primary) research articles from the reference lists rather than citing the review itself.

    At this stage in your doctoral journey, you are in the coursework phase. Coursework prepares you for the dissertation phase, but it is not a substitute for the work required once you begin your dissertation. When you enter the dissertation phase, you will follow the direction and expectations of your Dissertation Chair. For now, please complete all assignments according to the requirements of this course, knowing that dissertation‑level guidance will come later from the Chair of your dissertation committee.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## LiteratureReviewStructureAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    HSCI 702

    **Literature Review Structure: Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Using the headings below, write a 3-5 page essay in current APA format. This essay will serve as the structure and framework to your literature review.

    **Instructions**

    The use of artificial intelligence tools to generate, compose, or outsource any portion of your written work is strictly prohibited. Submitting AI‑produced or AI‑assisted writing constitutes a violation of the academic integrity expectations for this doctoral course. All submissions must reflect your own original scholarly analysis and writing.

    Submit the literature review structure as a formatted Word document. Your essay should be clear, have a logical flow, and be organized in headings per current APA format. The headings below are examples of the content required in each section. However you need to create your own headings based on your topic. You should still retain this specific order of headings.

    **Introduction**

    · Provide an introductory section that sets the context for your literature review.

    · Elaborate on the purpose and scope of the review.

    · State the research question (singular) and objectives that will guide your literature review.

    **Theoretical Framework: (Create your own heading that reflects the theoretical framework for your literature review).**

    · Explain the structure of the theoretical framework for your review of literature in this section.

    · Summarize the key concepts and principles of the theoretical framework that will inform your literature review.

    **Main Sections: (Create your own headings that reflect the main sections for your literature review).**

    · Identify the main sections that will comprise your literature review.

    · Each main section should correspond to a thematic or conceptual category relevant to your literature review topic. Explain the content under each section.

    **Subsections: (Create your own headings that reflect the subsections for your literature review).**

    · Within each main section, identify subsections that will further delineate specific aspects or themes.

    · Subsections should facilitate the organization and synthesis of related literature. Explain the content under each subsection.

    **Key Themes and Concepts: (Create your own headings that reflect each of the key themes and concepts for your literature review).**

    · Highlight key themes, concepts, or theories that will be explored within each section and subsection.

    · Provide a brief description or explanation of each theme and concept to guide the literature review process.

    **Methodological Approaches: (Create your own heading that reflects the methodological approaches).**

    · Identify the various methodological approaches relevant to your topic.

    · Discuss and elaborate on the each of the research methodologies relevant to

    · your topic, discussing the pros and cons of each, in the context of your topic.

    **Conclusion:**

    · Conclude your paper with a summary and conclusion that include the overarching themes and objectives of the literature review.

    · Emphasize the significance of the literature review in advancing understanding within your field of study.

    Format of assignment: Current APA edition.

    A minimum of 7 sources are required in addition to the Galvan and Galvan course text and the Bible both of which must be used and cited. Biblical integration must be present.

    Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years (current year, plus prior 4 years) and seminal works for the theoretical framework (which can be more than 5 years old). You may include older articles provided you also meet the minimum requirement for 7 peer-reviewed sources published within the past 5 years (current year plus prior 4 years). If you exclude older articles, you may miss important information.

    Page counts do
    _not_ include front matter and back matter. Minimum 3 full pages is required.

    For all assignments in this course, you are expected to demonstrate progression by incorporating instructor feedback from prior assignments in this course.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    At this stage in your doctoral journey, and specifically for this course, do not use the following or any secondary sources in your reference list: systematic reviews, integrative reviews, scoping reviews, and meta‑analyses. These are secondary sources, and citing them is essentially the same as citing a review of other studies, rather than the original research. For your assignments, you must rely on primary, peer‑reviewed research articles. Primary sources report original data, methods, and findings, and these are essential for developing the critical research skills needed at the doctoral level. You may read systematic reviews and other secondary sources to help you understand your topic more broadly. However, if you come across useful studies within those reviews, locate and cite the original (primary) research articles from the reference lists rather than citing the review itself.

    At this stage in your doctoral journey, you are in the coursework phase. Coursework prepares you for the dissertation phase, but it is not a substitute for the work required once you begin your dissertation. When you enter the dissertation phase, you will follow the direction and expectations of your Dissertation Chair. For now, please complete all assignments according to the requirements of this course, knowing that dissertation‑level guidance will come later from the Chair of your dissertation committee.

    Page 2 of 2