My Blog

Category: Human Resource Management

  • [Solved] Human Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help – ## OrganizationalCultureasaToolforChange.pdf – ## TheNeedtoChallengeandMotivate.pdf – ## How_CHROs_Can_Use_Design_Thinking_to_Show_Results.pdf – Week5JWI556DonnaResponse.jpeg – Week5JWI556ShauntellResponse.jpeg – Week5JWI556Discussion.jpeg – JWI556Week5LectureNotes.pdf **#…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help

    – ## OrganizationalCultureasaToolforChange.pdf

    – ## TheNeedtoChallengeandMotivate.pdf

    – ## How_CHROs_Can_Use_Design_Thinking_to_Show_Results.pdf

    – Week5JWI556DonnaResponse.jpeg
    – Week5JWI556ShauntellResponse.jpeg
    – Week5JWI556Discussion.jpeg
    – JWI556Week5LectureNotes.pdf

    **## OrganizationalCultureasaToolforChange.pdf**

    Copyright of Stanford Social Innovation Review is the property of Stanford Social Innovation
    Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
    without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
    download, or email articles for individual use.

    **## TheNeedtoChallengeandMotivate.pdf**

    ◆

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    ◆

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    ◆

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    Copyright of Human Capital is the property of HR Information Services and its content may
    not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
    express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
    individual use.

    **## How_CHROs_Can_Use_Design_Thinking_to_Show_Results.pdf**

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    How CHROs Can Use Design Thinking to Show Results

    By Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D. and Patti P. Phillips, Ph.D.

    Learning and development professionals today are in a tight spot. C-suite leaders are funding
    learning functions differently than in past years, a shift you've likely noticed at your own organization.
    More and more executives are asking for proof of results before funding learning and development
    programs.

    Unfortunately, many CHROs aren't able to provide that proof, either because they don't know how to,
    or because they don't have the data to support a claim. One study conducted by the ROI Institute
    found that 74 percent of senior executives want to see ROI, yet only 4 percent actually see it up front.
    And 96 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs want to see the business connection, yet only 8 percent do.

    To protect funding in the future, learning and talent development programs must directly connect to
    the business objectives of the companies they're serving, and CHROs must learn how to show their
    value up front.

    The learning and development focus has shifted from a focus on job training, scale (in terms of
    volume), and reporting on inputs to a new focus on talent development, speed, adaptability, and
    results. CHROs are now expected to be value creators, not value capturers. Learning is now
    considered an investment, which makes ROI measurements a necessity.

    The key is to managing this change is to use design thinking-a concept popular in innovation-to
    create programs and reimagine the learning process. More specifically, L&D must design for
    success, which means including credible data connecting the learning directly to your business.

    Participants engaging in learning programs will reach one of the following levels of outcome, based
    on 6 categories of data that follow a logical flow or chain of impact. They are:

    • Level 0: Input
    • Level 1: Participant reaction
    • Level 2: Learning acquisition
    • Level 3: Application of knowledge and skills
    • Level 4: Impact on the organization
    • Level 5: Economic contribution, or ROI

    CHROs need Level 4 data, preferably Level 5, and these 8 steps can help you get there.

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    Step 1: Start with Why: Aligning Programs with the Business. Your end game shouldn't be
    having great programs that participants see as valuable. Instead, the end is an important
    business measure for the organization-the "why" for the program. No matter what type of
    growth you're trying to achieve, express it as a specific measure.

    Step 2: Make It Feasible: Selecting the Right Solution. When you've clarified the business
    need, land on your solution to improve the business measure. In other words, what should
    employees do or stop doing that will appropriately influence the business measure?

    Step 3: Expect Success: Designing for Results. Assessing your needs should define a
    clear set of objectives. Those objectives will define the success that's required at each
    level. At the payoff level, the ROI objective is the minimum acceptable return on
    investment. At the business impact level, it's the minimum amount of business
    improvement required to be successful. And so on. Specific objectives are important to the
    success of the program, and they define the expectations for everyone, from content
    designers and developers to facilitators, participants, and managers of the participants.

    Step 4: Make It Matter: Designing for Input, Reaction, and Learning. You should develop a
    program with content that is relevant, meaningful, important to the individuals and the
    organization, action-oriented, and useful. This requires prospective participants to decide if
    this is the right program for them.

    Step 5: Make it Stick: Designing for Application and Impact. The reality is that if a person
    doesn't use what they've learned, then it has failed the organization. Sadly, research shows
    that much of what is learned in formal talent development programs is not used on the job.
    Yet, simple things can make an impact. Research shows that it takes only 30 to 60
    seconds for a participant's manager to make the transfer of learning, by having a brief
    discussion to set expectations with the participant prior to attending the program, and then
    another afterward to reinforce expectations.

    Step 6: Make It Credible: Measuring Results and Calculating ROI. Simple techniques can
    help you sort out the effects of your learning program from other influences. Often you and
    others can clearly see the connection of the program to business measures. If evaluation is
    needed at the ROI level, the impact measures are converted to money, the costs are
    tabulated, and the ROI is calculated.
    The traditional financial ROI is the comparison expressed as a percentage when the
    fractional values are multiplied by 100. In formula form, the ROI is:

    ROI (%) = Net Program Benefits x 100
    Program Costs

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Net benefits are program benefits minus costs. This formula is essentially the same as the ROI for
    capital investments. For example, when a firm builds a new plant, the ROI is developed by dividing
    annual earnings by the investment. The annual earnings are comparable to net benefits (annual
    benefits minus the cost). The investment is comparable to fully loaded program costs, which represent
    the investment in the program.

    Step 7: Tell the Story: Communicating Results to Key Stakeholders. There are many ways to
    communicate results to appropriate audiences, from detailed executive briefings to quick blog posts.
    The important point is to tell a story with results. The five levels of outcome data represent a
    compelling story with very credible, executive-friendly evidence and anecdotes.

    Step 8: Optimize Results: Using Black Box Thinking to Increase Funding. Steps 4, 5, and 6 indicate
    your success or failure. And you can now correct disappointing results with black box thinking. In the
    airline industry, investigators analyze black boxes to indicate the cause of a crash, and prevent the
    accident from occurring again. Likewise, CHROs can evaluate your programs and use the data to
    improve them and enhance the ROI. This presents the best case for increasing funding.

    In these ever-changing times, organizations need to invest more, not less, in learning. But you should
    stop asking for funding based on vague hopes and lofty promises, and start asking based on hard
    evidence that your programs work. If you can prove that the results will actually drive your business,
    funding is far more likely to happen, and you'll create a better, richer, and more fulfilling work
    experience for the entire company.

    The Authors:

    Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D., is chairman of ROI Institute, the leading provider of services for measurement,
    evaluation, metrics, and analytics. He provides consulting services for Fortune 100 companies and
    workshops for major conference providers worldwide. He is the coauthor of The Business Case for
    Learning: Using Design Thinking to Deliver Business Results and Increase the Investment in Talent
    Development.

    Patti Phillips, Ph.D., is president and CEO of ROI Institute. Her clients include Fortune 500 companies,
    federal and state government agencies, and NGOs. She serves as faculty for the UN System Staff
    College in Turin, Italy. She is the coauthor of The Business Case for Learning: Using Design Thinking
    to Deliver Business Results and Increase the Investment in Talent Development.

    **Week5JWI556DonnaResponse.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556donnaresponse-jpeg-10368911)

    **Week5JWI556ShauntellResponse.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556shauntellresponse-jpeg-10368913)

    **Week5JWI556Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556discussion-jpeg-10368915)

    **JWI556Week5LectureNotes.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jwi556week5lecturenotes-pdf)

    **JWI556Week5LectureNotes.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jwi556week5lecturenotes-pdf)

    **## OrganizationalCultureasaToolforChange.pdf**

    Copyright of Stanford Social Innovation Review is the property of Stanford Social Innovation
    Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
    without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
    download, or email articles for individual use.

    **## TheNeedtoChallengeandMotivate.pdf**

    ◆

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    ◆

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    ◆

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    Copyright of Human Capital is the property of HR Information Services and its content may
    not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
    express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
    individual use.

    **## How_CHROs_Can_Use_Design_Thinking_to_Show_Results.pdf**

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    How CHROs Can Use Design Thinking to Show Results

    By Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D. and Patti P. Phillips, Ph.D.

    Learning and development professionals today are in a tight spot. C-suite leaders are funding
    learning functions differently than in past years, a shift you've likely noticed at your own organization.
    More and more executives are asking for proof of results before funding learning and development
    programs.

    Unfortunately, many CHROs aren't able to provide that proof, either because they don't know how to,
    or because they don't have the data to support a claim. One study conducted by the ROI Institute
    found that 74 percent of senior executives want to see ROI, yet only 4 percent actually see it up front.
    And 96 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs want to see the business connection, yet only 8 percent do.

    To protect funding in the future, learning and talent development programs must directly connect to
    the business objectives of the companies they're serving, and CHROs must learn how to show their
    value up front.

    The learning and development focus has shifted from a focus on job training, scale (in terms of
    volume), and reporting on inputs to a new focus on talent development, speed, adaptability, and
    results. CHROs are now expected to be value creators, not value capturers. Learning is now
    considered an investment, which makes ROI measurements a necessity.

    The key is to managing this change is to use design thinking-a concept popular in innovation-to
    create programs and reimagine the learning process. More specifically, L&D must design for
    success, which means including credible data connecting the learning directly to your business.

    Participants engaging in learning programs will reach one of the following levels of outcome, based
    on 6 categories of data that follow a logical flow or chain of impact. They are:

    • Level 0: Input
    • Level 1: Participant reaction
    • Level 2: Learning acquisition
    • Level 3: Application of knowledge and skills
    • Level 4: Impact on the organization
    • Level 5: Economic contribution, or ROI

    CHROs need Level 4 data, preferably Level 5, and these 8 steps can help you get there.

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    Step 1: Start with Why: Aligning Programs with the Business. Your end game shouldn't be
    having great programs that participants see as valuable. Instead, the end is an important
    business measure for the organization-the "why" for the program. No matter what type of
    growth you're trying to achieve, express it as a specific measure.

    Step 2: Make It Feasible: Selecting the Right Solution. When you've clarified the business
    need, land on your solution to improve the business measure. In other words, what should
    employees do or stop doing that will appropriately influence the business measure?

    Step 3: Expect Success: Designing for Results. Assessing your needs should define a
    clear set of objectives. Those objectives will define the success that's required at each
    level. At the payoff level, the ROI objective is the minimum acceptable return on
    investment. At the business impact level, it's the minimum amount of business
    improvement required to be successful. And so on. Specific objectives are important to the
    success of the program, and they define the expectations for everyone, from content
    designers and developers to facilitators, participants, and managers of the participants.

    Step 4: Make It Matter: Designing for Input, Reaction, and Learning. You should develop a
    program with content that is relevant, meaningful, important to the individuals and the
    organization, action-oriented, and useful. This requires prospective participants to decide if
    this is the right program for them.

    Step 5: Make it Stick: Designing for Application and Impact. The reality is that if a person
    doesn't use what they've learned, then it has failed the organization. Sadly, research shows
    that much of what is learned in formal talent development programs is not used on the job.
    Yet, simple things can make an impact. Research shows that it takes only 30 to 60
    seconds for a participant's manager to make the transfer of learning, by having a brief
    discussion to set expectations with the participant prior to attending the program, and then
    another afterward to reinforce expectations.

    Step 6: Make It Credible: Measuring Results and Calculating ROI. Simple techniques can
    help you sort out the effects of your learning program from other influences. Often you and
    others can clearly see the connection of the program to business measures. If evaluation is
    needed at the ROI level, the impact measures are converted to money, the costs are
    tabulated, and the ROI is calculated.
    The traditional financial ROI is the comparison expressed as a percentage when the
    fractional values are multiplied by 100. In formula form, the ROI is:

    ROI (%) = Net Program Benefits x 100
    Program Costs

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Net benefits are program benefits minus costs. This formula is essentially the same as the ROI for
    capital investments. For example, when a firm builds a new plant, the ROI is developed by dividing
    annual earnings by the investment. The annual earnings are comparable to net benefits (annual
    benefits minus the cost). The investment is comparable to fully loaded program costs, which represent
    the investment in the program.

    Step 7: Tell the Story: Communicating Results to Key Stakeholders. There are many ways to
    communicate results to appropriate audiences, from detailed executive briefings to quick blog posts.
    The important point is to tell a story with results. The five levels of outcome data represent a
    compelling story with very credible, executive-friendly evidence and anecdotes.

    Step 8: Optimize Results: Using Black Box Thinking to Increase Funding. Steps 4, 5, and 6 indicate
    your success or failure. And you can now correct disappointing results with black box thinking. In the
    airline industry, investigators analyze black boxes to indicate the cause of a crash, and prevent the
    accident from occurring again. Likewise, CHROs can evaluate your programs and use the data to
    improve them and enhance the ROI. This presents the best case for increasing funding.

    In these ever-changing times, organizations need to invest more, not less, in learning. But you should
    stop asking for funding based on vague hopes and lofty promises, and start asking based on hard
    evidence that your programs work. If you can prove that the results will actually drive your business,
    funding is far more likely to happen, and you'll create a better, richer, and more fulfilling work
    experience for the entire company.

    The Authors:

    Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D., is chairman of ROI Institute, the leading provider of services for measurement,
    evaluation, metrics, and analytics. He provides consulting services for Fortune 100 companies and
    workshops for major conference providers worldwide. He is the coauthor of The Business Case for
    Learning: Using Design Thinking to Deliver Business Results and Increase the Investment in Talent
    Development.

    Patti Phillips, Ph.D., is president and CEO of ROI Institute. Her clients include Fortune 500 companies,
    federal and state government agencies, and NGOs. She serves as faculty for the UN System Staff
    College in Turin, Italy. She is the coauthor of The Business Case for Learning: Using Design Thinking
    to Deliver Business Results and Increase the Investment in Talent Development.

    **Week5JWI556DonnaResponse.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556donnaresponse-jpeg-10368911)

    **Week5JWI556ShauntellResponse.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556shauntellresponse-jpeg-10368913)

    **Week5JWI556Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556discussion-jpeg-10368915)

    **JWI556Week5LectureNotes.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jwi556week5lecturenotes-pdf)

    **## OrganizationalCultureasaToolforChange.pdf**

    Copyright of Stanford Social Innovation Review is the property of Stanford Social Innovation
    Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
    without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
    download, or email articles for individual use.

    **## TheNeedtoChallengeandMotivate.pdf**

    ◆

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    ◆

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    ◆

    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …
    …

    Copyright of Human Capital is the property of HR Information Services and its content may
    not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
    express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
    individual use.

    **## How_CHROs_Can_Use_Design_Thinking_to_Show_Results.pdf**

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    How CHROs Can Use Design Thinking to Show Results

    By Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D. and Patti P. Phillips, Ph.D.

    Learning and development professionals today are in a tight spot. C-suite leaders are funding
    learning functions differently than in past years, a shift you've likely noticed at your own organization.
    More and more executives are asking for proof of results before funding learning and development
    programs.

    Unfortunately, many CHROs aren't able to provide that proof, either because they don't know how to,
    or because they don't have the data to support a claim. One study conducted by the ROI Institute
    found that 74 percent of senior executives want to see ROI, yet only 4 percent actually see it up front.
    And 96 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs want to see the business connection, yet only 8 percent do.

    To protect funding in the future, learning and talent development programs must directly connect to
    the business objectives of the companies they're serving, and CHROs must learn how to show their
    value up front.

    The learning and development focus has shifted from a focus on job training, scale (in terms of
    volume), and reporting on inputs to a new focus on talent development, speed, adaptability, and
    results. CHROs are now expected to be value creators, not value capturers. Learning is now
    considered an investment, which makes ROI measurements a necessity.

    The key is to managing this change is to use design thinking-a concept popular in innovation-to
    create programs and reimagine the learning process. More specifically, L&D must design for
    success, which means including credible data connecting the learning directly to your business.

    Participants engaging in learning programs will reach one of the following levels of outcome, based
    on 6 categories of data that follow a logical flow or chain of impact. They are:

    • Level 0: Input
    • Level 1: Participant reaction
    • Level 2: Learning acquisition
    • Level 3: Application of knowledge and skills
    • Level 4: Impact on the organization
    • Level 5: Economic contribution, or ROI

    CHROs need Level 4 data, preferably Level 5, and these 8 steps can help you get there.

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    Step 1: Start with Why: Aligning Programs with the Business. Your end game shouldn't be
    having great programs that participants see as valuable. Instead, the end is an important
    business measure for the organization-the "why" for the program. No matter what type of
    growth you're trying to achieve, express it as a specific measure.

    Step 2: Make It Feasible: Selecting the Right Solution. When you've clarified the business
    need, land on your solution to improve the business measure. In other words, what should
    employees do or stop doing that will appropriately influence the business measure?

    Step 3: Expect Success: Designing for Results. Assessing your needs should define a
    clear set of objectives. Those objectives will define the success that's required at each
    level. At the payoff level, the ROI objective is the minimum acceptable return on
    investment. At the business impact level, it's the minimum amount of business
    improvement required to be successful. And so on. Specific objectives are important to the
    success of the program, and they define the expectations for everyone, from content
    designers and developers to facilitators, participants, and managers of the participants.

    Step 4: Make It Matter: Designing for Input, Reaction, and Learning. You should develop a
    program with content that is relevant, meaningful, important to the individuals and the
    organization, action-oriented, and useful. This requires prospective participants to decide if
    this is the right program for them.

    Step 5: Make it Stick: Designing for Application and Impact. The reality is that if a person
    doesn't use what they've learned, then it has failed the organization. Sadly, research shows
    that much of what is learned in formal talent development programs is not used on the job.
    Yet, simple things can make an impact. Research shows that it takes only 30 to 60
    seconds for a participant's manager to make the transfer of learning, by having a brief
    discussion to set expectations with the participant prior to attending the program, and then
    another afterward to reinforce expectations.

    Step 6: Make It Credible: Measuring Results and Calculating ROI. Simple techniques can
    help you sort out the effects of your learning program from other influences. Often you and
    others can clearly see the connection of the program to business measures. If evaluation is
    needed at the ROI level, the impact measures are converted to money, the costs are
    tabulated, and the ROI is calculated.
    The traditional financial ROI is the comparison expressed as a percentage when the
    fractional values are multiplied by 100. In formula form, the ROI is:

    ROI (%) = Net Program Benefits x 100
    Program Costs

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Phone: 205-678-8101 ·
    Email: info@roiinstitute.net

    © 2017 ROI Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.

    This article was previously published on HR People + Strategy Blog, June 2017

    Net benefits are program benefits minus costs. This formula is essentially the same as the ROI for
    capital investments. For example, when a firm builds a new plant, the ROI is developed by dividing
    annual earnings by the investment. The annual earnings are comparable to net benefits (annual
    benefits minus the cost). The investment is comparable to fully loaded program costs, which represent
    the investment in the program.

    Step 7: Tell the Story: Communicating Results to Key Stakeholders. There are many ways to
    communicate results to appropriate audiences, from detailed executive briefings to quick blog posts.
    The important point is to tell a story with results. The five levels of outcome data represent a
    compelling story with very credible, executive-friendly evidence and anecdotes.

    Step 8: Optimize Results: Using Black Box Thinking to Increase Funding. Steps 4, 5, and 6 indicate
    your success or failure. And you can now correct disappointing results with black box thinking. In the
    airline industry, investigators analyze black boxes to indicate the cause of a crash, and prevent the
    accident from occurring again. Likewise, CHROs can evaluate your programs and use the data to
    improve them and enhance the ROI. This presents the best case for increasing funding.

    In these ever-changing times, organizations need to invest more, not less, in learning. But you should
    stop asking for funding based on vague hopes and lofty promises, and start asking based on hard
    evidence that your programs work. If you can prove that the results will actually drive your business,
    funding is far more likely to happen, and you'll create a better, richer, and more fulfilling work
    experience for the entire company.

    The Authors:

    Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D., is chairman of ROI Institute, the leading provider of services for measurement,
    evaluation, metrics, and analytics. He provides consulting services for Fortune 100 companies and
    workshops for major conference providers worldwide. He is the coauthor of The Business Case for
    Learning: Using Design Thinking to Deliver Business Results and Increase the Investment in Talent
    Development.

    Patti Phillips, Ph.D., is president and CEO of ROI Institute. Her clients include Fortune 500 companies,
    federal and state government agencies, and NGOs. She serves as faculty for the UN System Staff
    College in Turin, Italy. She is the coauthor of The Business Case for Learning: Using Design Thinking
    to Deliver Business Results and Increase the Investment in Talent Development.

    **Week5JWI556DonnaResponse.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556donnaresponse-jpeg-10368911)

    **Week5JWI556ShauntellResponse.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556shauntellresponse-jpeg-10368913)

    **Week5JWI556Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5jwi556discussion-jpeg-10368915)

    **JWI556Week5LectureNotes.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jwi556week5lecturenotes-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6
    – 7

  • [Solved] Deliverable 1 – The Foundation of Healthcare Quality

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #### **Scenario** You are the Quality Director of a local health system. Your organization has decided to seek accreditation through the Joint Commission. Your first task has been penned by the CEO to prepare for the accreditation process by conducting a literature review on the impact of accreditat…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #### **Scenario**
    You are the Quality Director of a local health system. Your organization has decided to seek accreditation through the Joint Commission. Your first task has been penned by the CEO to prepare for the accreditation process by conducting a literature review on the impact of accreditation on quality of care. The review of literature should include the historical underpinnings of quality initiatives since the publishing of the blockbuster report by the Institute of Medicine – To Err is Human – and an evaluation of the developments in quality initiatives over the past two decades. Upon completing the review of literature, you are asked to compile a report highlighting the history of quality improvement and the significance of quality initiatives on the future of care delivery. Your report should support the organization’s goal of earning accreditation through the Joint Commission.
    #### **Instructions**
    Complete a report that encompasses the history of Quality Healthcare, which focuses on the ways in which quality improvement has changed over time and how past initiatives shape current and future quality initiatives. At a minimum, your report should include:
    – An assessment of the accreditation process and its role in improving quality of care.
    – A review of the quality initiatives that have been developed in recent years and the impact of the initiatives on the quality of care delivered.
    – Support for accreditation based on the review of literature on quality from the historical perspective to future implications.
    – A discussion on the fundamental changes that have been implemented since the IOM’s report and potential for continuous quality improvement.
    Recommendations for your organization to prepare for the accreditation process based on your review of literature and your assessment of the overall process.

  • [Solved] human resources

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Have you ever wondered what makes a team work really well together? It is not just about throwing people in a room and having them come together as a team. There is more to it than that. This assignment is about figuring out what makes a team click. What ingredients do you need for a truly successfu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Have you ever wondered what makes a team work really well together? It is not just about throwing people in a room and having them come together as a team. There is more to it than that. This assignment is about figuring out what makes a team click. What ingredients do you need for a truly successful team?
    We're going to be reading the article, _5 Conditions for an Effective Team_ and the video, _Good Teamwork and Bad Teamwork: Tips for Effective Teamwork_, to help us out with this assignment. We'll explore the key things a team needs to have in place to do its best work, why each of those things is so important, and what you need to think about when you're setting goals for your team. Get ready to discover the secrets to building teams that not only get stuff done but also enjoy working together!
    Read this article: [_Good Teamwork and Bad Teamwork: Tips for Effective Teamwork_](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92ht92Do-tk).
    Watch this video: [_5 Conditions for an Effective Team_](https://www.execucoach.co.za/2019/02/15/5-conditions-for-an-effective-team/).
    Answer the following questions in a 3 pgs:
    – What are the 5 conditions needed for a team to function effectively?
    – What are the critical points to consider when setting team goals?
    – What are some examples of team goals?
    – Why is it important that the team goals align with the company goals?

  • [Solved] Mod 6 Employee Spotlight

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Mod 6 Employee Spotlight.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Mod 6 HR Inbox

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Mod 6 HR Inbox.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Human Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help \ Assignment3556.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment3556-jpeg "Assignment3556.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help
    \
    Assignment3556.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment3556-jpeg "Assignment3556.jpeg")

  • [Solved] human resources

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Assignment Details** Conflict is an unavoidable reality of teamwork. Conflict may arise do to clashing personalities, disagreements about strategy, or stress. But, conflict is not always bad. In fact, when dealt with and handled, it can lead to positive change and stronger teams. The key lies in h…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Assignment Details**
    Conflict is an unavoidable reality of teamwork. Conflict may arise do to clashing personalities, disagreements about strategy, or stress. But, conflict is not always bad. In fact, when dealt with and handled, it can lead to positive change and stronger teams. The key lies in how the team lead or manager navigates these tricky situations. Their approach sets the tone for the entire team, shaping how conflict is perceived and resolved. Then, it's up to the team to work together to resolve it and return to a good level of performance. The team may even reflect on the lesson learned and be able to grow.
    Read this article: [7 Workplace Conflict Examples (Plus How to Handle Each One)](https://www.themuse.com/advice/workplace-conflict-examples).
    3-4pg  addressing the following questions:
    – From the article, describe one reason a team conflict may arise.
    – How can conflict affect a team's ability to meet deadlines or achieve their goals?
    – What are some of the specific methods that you would use to resolve a conflict?
    – What can a team learn from a conflict?
    Download this template to help complete the assignment: [U4 IP Template](https://resources.careered.com/LCMSFileSharePreview/Resources/MSWordDocument/HRMT345_U4_IP_Template.docx).

  • [Solved] discuss

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    hw help – ## SystemsTheoryandChange.pdf **## SystemsTheoryandChange.pdf** For this commentary, select only one of the following cues. Your effort will require creativity, as the ideas are challenging. Try to relate an example of the phenomenon featured in the cue from your experience as part of a te…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    hw help

    – ## SystemsTheoryandChange.pdf

    **## SystemsTheoryandChange.pdf**

    For this commentary, select only one of the following cues. Your effort will require
    creativity, as the ideas are challenging. Try to relate an example of the phenomenon
    featured in the cue from your experience as part of a team or organization. The
    participants in this class possess a wealth of deep organizational experience. This task
    is an opportunity to share insights from that experience.

    The aim of this exercise is to motivate energetic thinking rather than to test whether you
    seem to have understood the selected concept. Multiple perspectives are available to
    answer each cue. Be creative, but be sure to formalize your writing as well, to meet the
    rhetorical expectations described in the syllabus.

    Please treat your main commentary (not the replies) as an essay rather than an informal
    discussion. That is, write correctly and formally. Proofread your work by reading it again
    and making changes before posting it.

    The minimum length for the main commentary is 350 words

    Use in-text citations, and provide a complete reference section at the end of your main
    commentary. Correctly cite the textbook and at least two peer-reviewed, scholarly
    sources in correct APA style (cf. the purple section of the syllabus)

    A peer-reviewed, scholarly journal article is the product of studied intellectual activity. It
    has entered a published venue through the judgment and approval of other scholars in
    the same research discipline. Library databases try to code articles as peer-reviewed or
    scholarly, but they err. Learners must apply independent judgment to make this
    determination about an article. To practice the requisite thought processes, this course
    applies the following criteria to count an article as a qualifying source:

    1. The article is pdf-downloadable in its true published form via links that
    originate from within Troy University’s online library.*

    2. The article contains more than one page, uses volume-embedded pagination
    (rather than an article number), and has a volume number. Volume, issue,
    and page range annotations occur at the end of a reference entry in APA
    style (e.g., 7(2), 23–29, hence volume 7, issue 2, pages 23–29).**

    3. The article has one or more named human authors and is inconstruable as a
    book review, editorial, or obituary.

    4. The article both cites (in text) and lists (in a reference section, endnotes, or
    footnotes) at least six of its own bibliographic references (rather than uncited
    recommended readings).

    5. The article has a document object identifier (doi-number). Publishers have
    assigned doi-numbers retrospectively to articles that predate this 21st-century
    practice (under ISO 26324), so you may find an assigned doi-number on the

    journal’s external website even if a published article excludes it. To check,
    enter the article title in a search engine, confirm that it is the correct article (cf.
    author and year), and look for the telltale formula (see the APA Style slide
    deck in the Start Here Module). For JSTOR articles (but only if the publisher
    has never assigned a doi-number), use JSTOR’s “stable URL” to satisfy the
    doi-number requirement.

    Bridging vs. buffering (Lynn, 2005). Explain bridging and buffering in terms of
    systems theory. Based on your analysis, should we expect a difference in the
    comparative strength of the respective dynamics at different lifecycle stages?

    Source: Lynn, M. L. (2005). Organizational buffering: Managing boundaries and cores.
    Organization Studies, 26(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605046348

    [https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605046348](https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605046348)

    **## SystemsTheoryandChange.pdf**

    For this commentary, select only one of the following cues. Your effort will require
    creativity, as the ideas are challenging. Try to relate an example of the phenomenon
    featured in the cue from your experience as part of a team or organization. The
    participants in this class possess a wealth of deep organizational experience. This task
    is an opportunity to share insights from that experience.

    The aim of this exercise is to motivate energetic thinking rather than to test whether you
    seem to have understood the selected concept. Multiple perspectives are available to
    answer each cue. Be creative, but be sure to formalize your writing as well, to meet the
    rhetorical expectations described in the syllabus.

    Please treat your main commentary (not the replies) as an essay rather than an informal
    discussion. That is, write correctly and formally. Proofread your work by reading it again
    and making changes before posting it.

    The minimum length for the main commentary is 350 words

    Use in-text citations, and provide a complete reference section at the end of your main
    commentary. Correctly cite the textbook and at least two peer-reviewed, scholarly
    sources in correct APA style (cf. the purple section of the syllabus)

    A peer-reviewed, scholarly journal article is the product of studied intellectual activity. It
    has entered a published venue through the judgment and approval of other scholars in
    the same research discipline. Library databases try to code articles as peer-reviewed or
    scholarly, but they err. Learners must apply independent judgment to make this
    determination about an article. To practice the requisite thought processes, this course
    applies the following criteria to count an article as a qualifying source:

    1. The article is pdf-downloadable in its true published form via links that
    originate from within Troy University’s online library.*

    2. The article contains more than one page, uses volume-embedded pagination
    (rather than an article number), and has a volume number. Volume, issue,
    and page range annotations occur at the end of a reference entry in APA
    style (e.g., 7(2), 23–29, hence volume 7, issue 2, pages 23–29).**

    3. The article has one or more named human authors and is inconstruable as a
    book review, editorial, or obituary.

    4. The article both cites (in text) and lists (in a reference section, endnotes, or
    footnotes) at least six of its own bibliographic references (rather than uncited
    recommended readings).

    5. The article has a document object identifier (doi-number). Publishers have
    assigned doi-numbers retrospectively to articles that predate this 21st-century
    practice (under ISO 26324), so you may find an assigned doi-number on the

    journal’s external website even if a published article excludes it. To check,
    enter the article title in a search engine, confirm that it is the correct article (cf.
    author and year), and look for the telltale formula (see the APA Style slide
    deck in the Start Here Module). For JSTOR articles (but only if the publisher
    has never assigned a doi-number), use JSTOR’s “stable URL” to satisfy the
    doi-number requirement.

    Bridging vs. buffering (Lynn, 2005). Explain bridging and buffering in terms of
    systems theory. Based on your analysis, should we expect a difference in the
    comparative strength of the respective dynamics at different lifecycle stages?

    Source: Lynn, M. L. (2005). Organizational buffering: Managing boundaries and cores.
    Organization Studies, 26(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605046348

    [https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605046348](https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605046348)

  • [Solved] Human Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help \ 522Week7LilliasResponse.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/522week7lilliasresponse-jpeg "522Week7LilliasResponse.jpeg") \ 522Week7FlorentinesResponse.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/522week7florentinesresponse-jpeg "522Week7FlorentinesResponse.jpeg") \ 522Week7Dicuss…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help
    \
    522Week7LilliasResponse.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/522week7lilliasresponse-jpeg "522Week7LilliasResponse.jpeg")
    \
    522Week7FlorentinesResponse.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/522week7florentinesresponse-jpeg "522Week7FlorentinesResponse.jpeg")
    \
    522Week7Dicussion.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/522week7dicussion-jpeg "522Week7Dicussion.jpeg")

  • [Solved] human resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help \ GroupAssignment.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/groupassignment-jpeg-10377557 "GroupAssignment.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help
    \
    GroupAssignment.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/groupassignment-jpeg-10377557 "GroupAssignment.jpeg")