Assignment Prompt & Instructions
see attachment
**files (2)**
– ## PMTouchstone2Template.docx
– ## Touchstones2.docx
**## PMTouchstone2Template.docx**
Page 1
PM: Touchstone 2—Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws Project
Name:
Date:
Now that you’ve reviewed each of these documents for the project and shared them with Keshia and Homes for Paws, they have a few questions about these documents. Please write out the answer to each question to help them better understand what you’ve created.
**Directions:** Using what you have learned about the project charter and the planning components of the project management plan (PMP), including the scope management plan and the work breakdown structure (WBS) in Unit 2, respond to the following questions in response to the scenario. For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this Touchstone. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a reference.
| |
| — |
| **Question 1:**<br>**How does the project charter support the development of the scope management plan and the WBS? Provide at least two specific examples.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 2:**<br>**Why are “in scope” and “out of scope” listed on the scope management document? Also, what if we have 10 dogs we want to bring to the event next month?** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 3:**<br>**Identify all the items that are out of scope and explain why each is out of scope.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 4:**<br>**In the WBS, why is “3.5 Decorate with balloons” a subtask?** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 5:**<br>**Given the WBS for the Dough Paws project, identify two subtasks under the Marketing and Promotion work package. Explain how completing each subtask contributes to achieving the overall project objectives.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 6:**<br>**What is the difference between a deliverable and a work package? What work package does “5.3 Manage dog–customer interactions” fall under?** |
| Your answer: |
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |
**## Touchstones2.docx**
_Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass this unit’s assessments before you submit it. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score._
**Touchstone 2: Case Study Project – Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws: Planning**
**Overview**
What You Will Learn: In this touchstone, you will apply everything you’ve learned about creating the project charter, the scope management plan, and the work breakdown structure (WBS). It is essential during the planning phase of the project lifecycle that all tasks and subtasks are identified.
Why It Matters: This assignment will help you tie together various project planning documents that you’ve learned throughout the course.
What You Will Hand In: You will download the template and complete it with your own content and then upload it in the original MS Word (.doc or .docx) format.
Keys to Success:
· Develop and submit original work.
· Review the course content you’ve learned in the class.
· Follow grading criteria that align with the rows in the rubric.
Helpful Links:
·
[Academic Integrity Guidelines](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/touchstones-academic-integrity-guidelines)
·
[Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/ethical-standards-and-appropriate-use-of-ai)
[Share your feedback on Touchstones](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
**The Scenario**
Dough Paw is a retail store that sells high-quality baked goods for pets. The owner, Keshia Griffin, started this business after having worked in the corporate world as an accountant for 10 years. The main reason for starting this business was that the owner found the quality of pet treats purchased at most retail stores to be low, which negatively impacted her dog’s allergies. Because of this, she created a dog bakery that focuses on fresh, human-grade ingredients and avoids using common allergens, such as flour.
Currently, Keshia has a rotating schedule of a variety of baked goods for dogs. Some of them include things like bagel bites, which come in a 6-oz package, and other goods such as dog cookies, which come in a variety of shapes and are colorfully decorated. At any given time in the bakery, Keshia has approximately 10–12 fresh items available. In addition to this, she also sells a variety of high-quality packaged treats, dog leashes, dog collars, and high-quality dog toys.
When Keshia first opened this business, she was located in a small but very busy strip mall, which featured a large retail store. It was Keshia’s hope that by locating next to a large retail store, she’d have walk-in traffic, which turned out to be true! She’s now hired four additional part-time people to work in the store.
Recently, Keshia decided she wanted to work with a local animal rescue, called Homes for Paws, to host an adoption event on the first Saturday of every month.
Here are some additional details Keshia and Homes for Paws worked on for the event.
· The event will run between 10 AM and 2 PM.
· The event will have at least 8 dogs available for adoption.
· The event will require the following resources:
· 8 dog crates of varying sizes to give the dogs breaks
· 4-6 large sandwich board signs to place around the shopping complex
· 8 small tables
· Information about each dog available for adoption on printed sheets
· Balloons for attention
· Information posted on the Dough Paws website every month
· Social media posts about the event on Homes for Paws and Dough Paws accounts
Because Keshia is interested in focusing on sales and driving traffic to her shop with the event, and because Homes for Paws wants to focus on adoptions, Keshia has hired you to manage the project every month.
Your first step was to create the project charter, which you created, and Keshia signed. Once the project charter was signed, you developed a scope management plan for Dough Paws and Homes for Paws. Since you had the information you needed, you’ve created a WBS for this project.
All three of your documents are linked below.
**Instructions**
Step 1: Read the Scenario (above)
Step 2: Review the Project Planning Documentation
Open or download the following project planning documents; you will need these to answer the questions in the PM Touchstone 2 Template.
DOWNLOAD
Project Dough Paw Planning Documentation
·
[Dough Paws Project – Project Charter.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62253-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Project%20Charter.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Scope Management Plan.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/63038-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Scope%20Management%20Plan.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS).pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62175-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Work%20Breakdown%20Schedule%20(WBS).pdf)
Step 3: Download the Project Template (This file contains the questions.)
DOWNLOAD
Download the
[PM Touchstone 2 Template.docx](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62176-PM%20Touchstone%202%20Template.docx)
Step 4: Review Helpful Tutorials
The following course tutorials are recommended for review before beginning the template. They contain key information relevant to the content you’ll be adding. Select the “+” icon to expand this listing.
[Helpful Tutorials](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
Step 5: Complete the Questions in the Project Template
While understanding the project scenario and using the charter, scope management plan, and WBS, answer each question in the PM Touchstone 2 Template. Make sure to add enough detail to satisfy the rubric below.
This project is your chance to bring the Dough Paws event to life through great planning! As you build your documents, imagine how your plan will help Keshia and the rescue team make each adoption day run smoothly. You’re not just practicing skills—you’re preparing to lead real-world projects that make a difference.
Step 6: Review and Submit Your Work
Review your work carefully and check the rubric to make sure you meet all the requirements. Submit the completed template as a Microsoft Word (.docx or .doc) file. Please only submit work entered directly into the template.
IMPORTANT: Be sure to include your name and the date at the top of the template. Submissions without these details will not be graded.
**Rubric**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Advanced (100%)** | **Proficient (85%)** | **Acceptable (75%)** | **Needs Improvement (50%)** | **Non-Performance (0%)** |
| **1. Interpreting Initiation and Planning Documents**<br>Interprets how combining documentation from the initiation and planning phases of a project’s lifecycle sets up the project management plan (PMP). (30%) | Demonstrates a thorough understanding of how the project charter, scope management plan, and WBS connect, supported by at least two specific examples. Clearly explains their roles in building a PMP and why these documents are critical. | Shows solid understanding of how initiation and planning documents connect to PMP, supported by at least two examples, though the explanation may be somewhat general or lack depth | Shows a basic understanding of initiation and planning supported by at least two examples, but the explanations are vague, superficial, or incomplete. | Shows minimal or inaccurate understanding of how initiation and planning phases connect, with fewer than expected supportive examples. Responses are underdeveloped or unclear. | No response or does not demonstrate comprehension of the initiation and planning connection. |
| **2. Scope Management Comprehension**<br>Identifies risks as in and out of scope and explains scope changes. (30%) | Accurately identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with detailed and logical explanations that show a clear understanding of project boundaries. Provides a thorough and accurate description of how scope changes are managed in a professional setting. | Correctly identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items and provides clear, reasonable explanations. Describes how scope changes are managed with generally accurate detail, though some points may lack depth. | Identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with basic or partial accuracy. Explanations show a general idea of scope management but are brief, vague, or missing supporting details. | Attempts to identify scope boundaries but shows significant confusion or misunderstanding. Explanations are unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate regarding scope and change management. | Does not address scope management or provide a relevant response. |
| **3. Analyzing the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)**<br>Explains how a WBS is devised, and why tasks are broken into work packages/subtasks. (30%) | Demonstrates a strong understanding of WBS structure. Clearly explains why tasks are grouped into work packages and subtasks and connects them to deliverables and project objectives. | Shows a good understanding of WBS with correct explanations of tasks and subtasks, though the reasoning may be somewhat general. | Shows partial understanding of the WBS structure. Explanations are vague, incomplete, or inconsistently tied to deliverables. | Demonstrates minimal understanding of WBS. Explanations are inaccurate, unclear, or missing key elements. | No demonstration of understanding of WBS or no response provided. |
| **4. Writing Conventions**<br>Meets conventions for grammar, punctuation, and spelling. (10%) | Writing is clear, well-organized, and professional. Virtually no errors. There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. | Writing is generally clear with minor errors that do not affect readability. There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability. | Writing has several errors that affect readability. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability. | Writing has frequent errors that significantly impact readability and professionalism. There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability. | Submission is incoherent, does not follow conventions, or is missing. Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded. |
**## Touchstones2.docx**
_Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass this unit’s assessments before you submit it. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score._
**Touchstone 2: Case Study Project – Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws: Planning**
**Overview**
What You Will Learn: In this touchstone, you will apply everything you’ve learned about creating the project charter, the scope management plan, and the work breakdown structure (WBS). It is essential during the planning phase of the project lifecycle that all tasks and subtasks are identified.
Why It Matters: This assignment will help you tie together various project planning documents that you’ve learned throughout the course.
What You Will Hand In: You will download the template and complete it with your own content and then upload it in the original MS Word (.doc or .docx) format.
Keys to Success:
· Develop and submit original work.
· Review the course content you’ve learned in the class.
· Follow grading criteria that align with the rows in the rubric.
Helpful Links:
·
[Academic Integrity Guidelines](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/touchstones-academic-integrity-guidelines)
·
[Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/ethical-standards-and-appropriate-use-of-ai)
[Share your feedback on Touchstones](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
**The Scenario**
Dough Paw is a retail store that sells high-quality baked goods for pets. The owner, Keshia Griffin, started this business after having worked in the corporate world as an accountant for 10 years. The main reason for starting this business was that the owner found the quality of pet treats purchased at most retail stores to be low, which negatively impacted her dog’s allergies. Because of this, she created a dog bakery that focuses on fresh, human-grade ingredients and avoids using common allergens, such as flour.
Currently, Keshia has a rotating schedule of a variety of baked goods for dogs. Some of them include things like bagel bites, which come in a 6-oz package, and other goods such as dog cookies, which come in a variety of shapes and are colorfully decorated. At any given time in the bakery, Keshia has approximately 10–12 fresh items available. In addition to this, she also sells a variety of high-quality packaged treats, dog leashes, dog collars, and high-quality dog toys.
When Keshia first opened this business, she was located in a small but very busy strip mall, which featured a large retail store. It was Keshia’s hope that by locating next to a large retail store, she’d have walk-in traffic, which turned out to be true! She’s now hired four additional part-time people to work in the store.
Recently, Keshia decided she wanted to work with a local animal rescue, called Homes for Paws, to host an adoption event on the first Saturday of every month.
Here are some additional details Keshia and Homes for Paws worked on for the event.
· The event will run between 10 AM and 2 PM.
· The event will have at least 8 dogs available for adoption.
· The event will require the following resources:
· 8 dog crates of varying sizes to give the dogs breaks
· 4-6 large sandwich board signs to place around the shopping complex
· 8 small tables
· Information about each dog available for adoption on printed sheets
· Balloons for attention
· Information posted on the Dough Paws website every month
· Social media posts about the event on Homes for Paws and Dough Paws accounts
Because Keshia is interested in focusing on sales and driving traffic to her shop with the event, and because Homes for Paws wants to focus on adoptions, Keshia has hired you to manage the project every month.
Your first step was to create the project charter, which you created, and Keshia signed. Once the project charter was signed, you developed a scope management plan for Dough Paws and Homes for Paws. Since you had the information you needed, you’ve created a WBS for this project.
All three of your documents are linked below.
**Instructions**
Step 1: Read the Scenario (above)
Step 2: Review the Project Planning Documentation
Open or download the following project planning documents; you will need these to answer the questions in the PM Touchstone 2 Template.
DOWNLOAD
Project Dough Paw Planning Documentation
·
[Dough Paws Project – Project Charter.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62253-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Project%20Charter.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Scope Management Plan.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/63038-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Scope%20Management%20Plan.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS).pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62175-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Work%20Breakdown%20Schedule%20(WBS).pdf)
Step 3: Download the Project Template (This file contains the questions.)
DOWNLOAD
Download the
[PM Touchstone 2 Template.docx](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62176-PM%20Touchstone%202%20Template.docx)
Step 4: Review Helpful Tutorials
The following course tutorials are recommended for review before beginning the template. They contain key information relevant to the content you’ll be adding. Select the “+” icon to expand this listing.
[Helpful Tutorials](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
Step 5: Complete the Questions in the Project Template
While understanding the project scenario and using the charter, scope management plan, and WBS, answer each question in the PM Touchstone 2 Template. Make sure to add enough detail to satisfy the rubric below.
This project is your chance to bring the Dough Paws event to life through great planning! As you build your documents, imagine how your plan will help Keshia and the rescue team make each adoption day run smoothly. You’re not just practicing skills—you’re preparing to lead real-world projects that make a difference.
Step 6: Review and Submit Your Work
Review your work carefully and check the rubric to make sure you meet all the requirements. Submit the completed template as a Microsoft Word (.docx or .doc) file. Please only submit work entered directly into the template.
IMPORTANT: Be sure to include your name and the date at the top of the template. Submissions without these details will not be graded.
**Rubric**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Advanced (100%)** | **Proficient (85%)** | **Acceptable (75%)** | **Needs Improvement (50%)** | **Non-Performance (0%)** |
| **1. Interpreting Initiation and Planning Documents**<br>Interprets how combining documentation from the initiation and planning phases of a project’s lifecycle sets up the project management plan (PMP). (30%) | Demonstrates a thorough understanding of how the project charter, scope management plan, and WBS connect, supported by at least two specific examples. Clearly explains their roles in building a PMP and why these documents are critical. | Shows solid understanding of how initiation and planning documents connect to PMP, supported by at least two examples, though the explanation may be somewhat general or lack depth | Shows a basic understanding of initiation and planning supported by at least two examples, but the explanations are vague, superficial, or incomplete. | Shows minimal or inaccurate understanding of how initiation and planning phases connect, with fewer than expected supportive examples. Responses are underdeveloped or unclear. | No response or does not demonstrate comprehension of the initiation and planning connection. |
| **2. Scope Management Comprehension**<br>Identifies risks as in and out of scope and explains scope changes. (30%) | Accurately identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with detailed and logical explanations that show a clear understanding of project boundaries. Provides a thorough and accurate description of how scope changes are managed in a professional setting. | Correctly identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items and provides clear, reasonable explanations. Describes how scope changes are managed with generally accurate detail, though some points may lack depth. | Identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with basic or partial accuracy. Explanations show a general idea of scope management but are brief, vague, or missing supporting details. | Attempts to identify scope boundaries but shows significant confusion or misunderstanding. Explanations are unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate regarding scope and change management. | Does not address scope management or provide a relevant response. |
| **3. Analyzing the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)**<br>Explains how a WBS is devised, and why tasks are broken into work packages/subtasks. (30%) | Demonstrates a strong understanding of WBS structure. Clearly explains why tasks are grouped into work packages and subtasks and connects them to deliverables and project objectives. | Shows a good understanding of WBS with correct explanations of tasks and subtasks, though the reasoning may be somewhat general. | Shows partial understanding of the WBS structure. Explanations are vague, incomplete, or inconsistently tied to deliverables. | Demonstrates minimal understanding of WBS. Explanations are inaccurate, unclear, or missing key elements. | No demonstration of understanding of WBS or no response provided. |
| **4. Writing Conventions**<br>Meets conventions for grammar, punctuation, and spelling. (10%) | Writing is clear, well-organized, and professional. Virtually no errors. There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. | Writing is generally clear with minor errors that do not affect readability. There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability. | Writing has several errors that affect readability. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability. | Writing has frequent errors that significantly impact readability and professionalism. There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability. | Submission is incoherent, does not follow conventions, or is missing. Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded. |
**## PMTouchstone2Template.docx**
Page 1
PM: Touchstone 2—Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws Project
Name:
Date:
Now that you’ve reviewed each of these documents for the project and shared them with Keshia and Homes for Paws, they have a few questions about these documents. Please write out the answer to each question to help them better understand what you’ve created.
**Directions:** Using what you have learned about the project charter and the planning components of the project management plan (PMP), including the scope management plan and the work breakdown structure (WBS) in Unit 2, respond to the following questions in response to the scenario. For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this Touchstone. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a reference.
| |
| — |
| **Question 1:**<br>**How does the project charter support the development of the scope management plan and the WBS? Provide at least two specific examples.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 2:**<br>**Why are “in scope” and “out of scope” listed on the scope management document? Also, what if we have 10 dogs we want to bring to the event next month?** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 3:**<br>**Identify all the items that are out of scope and explain why each is out of scope.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 4:**<br>**In the WBS, why is “3.5 Decorate with balloons” a subtask?** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 5:**<br>**Given the WBS for the Dough Paws project, identify two subtasks under the Marketing and Promotion work package. Explain how completing each subtask contributes to achieving the overall project objectives.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 6:**<br>**What is the difference between a deliverable and a work package? What work package does “5.3 Manage dog–customer interactions” fall under?** |
| Your answer: |
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |
**## Touchstones2.docx**
_Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass this unit’s assessments before you submit it. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score._
**Touchstone 2: Case Study Project – Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws: Planning**
**Overview**
What You Will Learn: In this touchstone, you will apply everything you’ve learned about creating the project charter, the scope management plan, and the work breakdown structure (WBS). It is essential during the planning phase of the project lifecycle that all tasks and subtasks are identified.
Why It Matters: This assignment will help you tie together various project planning documents that you’ve learned throughout the course.
What You Will Hand In: You will download the template and complete it with your own content and then upload it in the original MS Word (.doc or .docx) format.
Keys to Success:
· Develop and submit original work.
· Review the course content you’ve learned in the class.
· Follow grading criteria that align with the rows in the rubric.
Helpful Links:
·
[Academic Integrity Guidelines](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/touchstones-academic-integrity-guidelines)
·
[Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/ethical-standards-and-appropriate-use-of-ai)
[Share your feedback on Touchstones](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
**The Scenario**
Dough Paw is a retail store that sells high-quality baked goods for pets. The owner, Keshia Griffin, started this business after having worked in the corporate world as an accountant for 10 years. The main reason for starting this business was that the owner found the quality of pet treats purchased at most retail stores to be low, which negatively impacted her dog’s allergies. Because of this, she created a dog bakery that focuses on fresh, human-grade ingredients and avoids using common allergens, such as flour.
Currently, Keshia has a rotating schedule of a variety of baked goods for dogs. Some of them include things like bagel bites, which come in a 6-oz package, and other goods such as dog cookies, which come in a variety of shapes and are colorfully decorated. At any given time in the bakery, Keshia has approximately 10–12 fresh items available. In addition to this, she also sells a variety of high-quality packaged treats, dog leashes, dog collars, and high-quality dog toys.
When Keshia first opened this business, she was located in a small but very busy strip mall, which featured a large retail store. It was Keshia’s hope that by locating next to a large retail store, she’d have walk-in traffic, which turned out to be true! She’s now hired four additional part-time people to work in the store.
Recently, Keshia decided she wanted to work with a local animal rescue, called Homes for Paws, to host an adoption event on the first Saturday of every month.
Here are some additional details Keshia and Homes for Paws worked on for the event.
· The event will run between 10 AM and 2 PM.
· The event will have at least 8 dogs available for adoption.
· The event will require the following resources:
· 8 dog crates of varying sizes to give the dogs breaks
· 4-6 large sandwich board signs to place around the shopping complex
· 8 small tables
· Information about each dog available for adoption on printed sheets
· Balloons for attention
· Information posted on the Dough Paws website every month
· Social media posts about the event on Homes for Paws and Dough Paws accounts
Because Keshia is interested in focusing on sales and driving traffic to her shop with the event, and because Homes for Paws wants to focus on adoptions, Keshia has hired you to manage the project every month.
Your first step was to create the project charter, which you created, and Keshia signed. Once the project charter was signed, you developed a scope management plan for Dough Paws and Homes for Paws. Since you had the information you needed, you’ve created a WBS for this project.
All three of your documents are linked below.
**Instructions**
Step 1: Read the Scenario (above)
Step 2: Review the Project Planning Documentation
Open or download the following project planning documents; you will need these to answer the questions in the PM Touchstone 2 Template.
DOWNLOAD
Project Dough Paw Planning Documentation
·
[Dough Paws Project – Project Charter.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62253-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Project%20Charter.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Scope Management Plan.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/63038-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Scope%20Management%20Plan.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS).pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62175-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Work%20Breakdown%20Schedule%20(WBS).pdf)
Step 3: Download the Project Template (This file contains the questions.)
DOWNLOAD
Download the
[PM Touchstone 2 Template.docx](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62176-PM%20Touchstone%202%20Template.docx)
Step 4: Review Helpful Tutorials
The following course tutorials are recommended for review before beginning the template. They contain key information relevant to the content you’ll be adding. Select the “+” icon to expand this listing.
[Helpful Tutorials](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
Step 5: Complete the Questions in the Project Template
While understanding the project scenario and using the charter, scope management plan, and WBS, answer each question in the PM Touchstone 2 Template. Make sure to add enough detail to satisfy the rubric below.
This project is your chance to bring the Dough Paws event to life through great planning! As you build your documents, imagine how your plan will help Keshia and the rescue team make each adoption day run smoothly. You’re not just practicing skills—you’re preparing to lead real-world projects that make a difference.
Step 6: Review and Submit Your Work
Review your work carefully and check the rubric to make sure you meet all the requirements. Submit the completed template as a Microsoft Word (.docx or .doc) file. Please only submit work entered directly into the template.
IMPORTANT: Be sure to include your name and the date at the top of the template. Submissions without these details will not be graded.
**Rubric**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Advanced (100%)** | **Proficient (85%)** | **Acceptable (75%)** | **Needs Improvement (50%)** | **Non-Performance (0%)** |
| **1. Interpreting Initiation and Planning Documents**<br>Interprets how combining documentation from the initiation and planning phases of a project’s lifecycle sets up the project management plan (PMP). (30%) | Demonstrates a thorough understanding of how the project charter, scope management plan, and WBS connect, supported by at least two specific examples. Clearly explains their roles in building a PMP and why these documents are critical. | Shows solid understanding of how initiation and planning documents connect to PMP, supported by at least two examples, though the explanation may be somewhat general or lack depth | Shows a basic understanding of initiation and planning supported by at least two examples, but the explanations are vague, superficial, or incomplete. | Shows minimal or inaccurate understanding of how initiation and planning phases connect, with fewer than expected supportive examples. Responses are underdeveloped or unclear. | No response or does not demonstrate comprehension of the initiation and planning connection. |
| **2. Scope Management Comprehension**<br>Identifies risks as in and out of scope and explains scope changes. (30%) | Accurately identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with detailed and logical explanations that show a clear understanding of project boundaries. Provides a thorough and accurate description of how scope changes are managed in a professional setting. | Correctly identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items and provides clear, reasonable explanations. Describes how scope changes are managed with generally accurate detail, though some points may lack depth. | Identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with basic or partial accuracy. Explanations show a general idea of scope management but are brief, vague, or missing supporting details. | Attempts to identify scope boundaries but shows significant confusion or misunderstanding. Explanations are unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate regarding scope and change management. | Does not address scope management or provide a relevant response. |
| **3. Analyzing the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)**<br>Explains how a WBS is devised, and why tasks are broken into work packages/subtasks. (30%) | Demonstrates a strong understanding of WBS structure. Clearly explains why tasks are grouped into work packages and subtasks and connects them to deliverables and project objectives. | Shows a good understanding of WBS with correct explanations of tasks and subtasks, though the reasoning may be somewhat general. | Shows partial understanding of the WBS structure. Explanations are vague, incomplete, or inconsistently tied to deliverables. | Demonstrates minimal understanding of WBS. Explanations are inaccurate, unclear, or missing key elements. | No demonstration of understanding of WBS or no response provided. |
| **4. Writing Conventions**<br>Meets conventions for grammar, punctuation, and spelling. (10%) | Writing is clear, well-organized, and professional. Virtually no errors. There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. | Writing is generally clear with minor errors that do not affect readability. There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability. | Writing has several errors that affect readability. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability. | Writing has frequent errors that significantly impact readability and professionalism. There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability. | Submission is incoherent, does not follow conventions, or is missing. Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded. |
**## PMTouchstone2Template.docx**
Page 1
PM: Touchstone 2—Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws Project
Name:
Date:
Now that you’ve reviewed each of these documents for the project and shared them with Keshia and Homes for Paws, they have a few questions about these documents. Please write out the answer to each question to help them better understand what you’ve created.
**Directions:** Using what you have learned about the project charter and the planning components of the project management plan (PMP), including the scope management plan and the work breakdown structure (WBS) in Unit 2, respond to the following questions in response to the scenario. For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this Touchstone. You may use your Sophia tutorials as a reference.
| |
| — |
| **Question 1:**<br>**How does the project charter support the development of the scope management plan and the WBS? Provide at least two specific examples.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 2:**<br>**Why are “in scope” and “out of scope” listed on the scope management document? Also, what if we have 10 dogs we want to bring to the event next month?** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 3:**<br>**Identify all the items that are out of scope and explain why each is out of scope.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 4:**<br>**In the WBS, why is “3.5 Decorate with balloons” a subtask?** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 5:**<br>**Given the WBS for the Dough Paws project, identify two subtasks under the Marketing and Promotion work package. Explain how completing each subtask contributes to achieving the overall project objectives.** |
| Your answer: |
| **Question 6:**<br>**What is the difference between a deliverable and a work package? What work package does “5.3 Manage dog–customer interactions” fall under?** |
| Your answer: |
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |
**## Touchstones2.docx**
_Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass this unit’s assessments before you submit it. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score._
**Touchstone 2: Case Study Project – Monthly Adoption Event at Dough Paws: Planning**
**Overview**
What You Will Learn: In this touchstone, you will apply everything you’ve learned about creating the project charter, the scope management plan, and the work breakdown structure (WBS). It is essential during the planning phase of the project lifecycle that all tasks and subtasks are identified.
Why It Matters: This assignment will help you tie together various project planning documents that you’ve learned throughout the course.
What You Will Hand In: You will download the template and complete it with your own content and then upload it in the original MS Word (.doc or .docx) format.
Keys to Success:
· Develop and submit original work.
· Review the course content you’ve learned in the class.
· Follow grading criteria that align with the rows in the rubric.
Helpful Links:
·
[Academic Integrity Guidelines](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/touchstones-academic-integrity-guidelines)
·
[Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/ethical-standards-and-appropriate-use-of-ai)
[Share your feedback on Touchstones](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
**The Scenario**
Dough Paw is a retail store that sells high-quality baked goods for pets. The owner, Keshia Griffin, started this business after having worked in the corporate world as an accountant for 10 years. The main reason for starting this business was that the owner found the quality of pet treats purchased at most retail stores to be low, which negatively impacted her dog’s allergies. Because of this, she created a dog bakery that focuses on fresh, human-grade ingredients and avoids using common allergens, such as flour.
Currently, Keshia has a rotating schedule of a variety of baked goods for dogs. Some of them include things like bagel bites, which come in a 6-oz package, and other goods such as dog cookies, which come in a variety of shapes and are colorfully decorated. At any given time in the bakery, Keshia has approximately 10–12 fresh items available. In addition to this, she also sells a variety of high-quality packaged treats, dog leashes, dog collars, and high-quality dog toys.
When Keshia first opened this business, she was located in a small but very busy strip mall, which featured a large retail store. It was Keshia’s hope that by locating next to a large retail store, she’d have walk-in traffic, which turned out to be true! She’s now hired four additional part-time people to work in the store.
Recently, Keshia decided she wanted to work with a local animal rescue, called Homes for Paws, to host an adoption event on the first Saturday of every month.
Here are some additional details Keshia and Homes for Paws worked on for the event.
· The event will run between 10 AM and 2 PM.
· The event will have at least 8 dogs available for adoption.
· The event will require the following resources:
· 8 dog crates of varying sizes to give the dogs breaks
· 4-6 large sandwich board signs to place around the shopping complex
· 8 small tables
· Information about each dog available for adoption on printed sheets
· Balloons for attention
· Information posted on the Dough Paws website every month
· Social media posts about the event on Homes for Paws and Dough Paws accounts
Because Keshia is interested in focusing on sales and driving traffic to her shop with the event, and because Homes for Paws wants to focus on adoptions, Keshia has hired you to manage the project every month.
Your first step was to create the project charter, which you created, and Keshia signed. Once the project charter was signed, you developed a scope management plan for Dough Paws and Homes for Paws. Since you had the information you needed, you’ve created a WBS for this project.
All three of your documents are linked below.
**Instructions**
Step 1: Read the Scenario (above)
Step 2: Review the Project Planning Documentation
Open or download the following project planning documents; you will need these to answer the questions in the PM Touchstone 2 Template.
DOWNLOAD
Project Dough Paw Planning Documentation
·
[Dough Paws Project – Project Charter.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62253-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Project%20Charter.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Scope Management Plan.pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/63038-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Scope%20Management%20Plan.pdf)
·
[Dough Paws Project – Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS).pdf](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62175-Dough%20Paws%20Project%20-%20Work%20Breakdown%20Schedule%20(WBS).pdf)
Step 3: Download the Project Template (This file contains the questions.)
DOWNLOAD
Download the
[PM Touchstone 2 Template.docx](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/62176-PM%20Touchstone%202%20Template.docx)
Step 4: Review Helpful Tutorials
The following course tutorials are recommended for review before beginning the template. They contain key information relevant to the content you’ll be adding. Select the “+” icon to expand this listing.
[Helpful Tutorials](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/project-management-21-touchstone-2-1)
Step 5: Complete the Questions in the Project Template
While understanding the project scenario and using the charter, scope management plan, and WBS, answer each question in the PM Touchstone 2 Template. Make sure to add enough detail to satisfy the rubric below.
This project is your chance to bring the Dough Paws event to life through great planning! As you build your documents, imagine how your plan will help Keshia and the rescue team make each adoption day run smoothly. You’re not just practicing skills—you’re preparing to lead real-world projects that make a difference.
Step 6: Review and Submit Your Work
Review your work carefully and check the rubric to make sure you meet all the requirements. Submit the completed template as a Microsoft Word (.docx or .doc) file. Please only submit work entered directly into the template.
IMPORTANT: Be sure to include your name and the date at the top of the template. Submissions without these details will not be graded.
**Rubric**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Advanced (100%)** | **Proficient (85%)** | **Acceptable (75%)** | **Needs Improvement (50%)** | **Non-Performance (0%)** |
| **1. Interpreting Initiation and Planning Documents**<br>Interprets how combining documentation from the initiation and planning phases of a project’s lifecycle sets up the project management plan (PMP). (30%) | Demonstrates a thorough understanding of how the project charter, scope management plan, and WBS connect, supported by at least two specific examples. Clearly explains their roles in building a PMP and why these documents are critical. | Shows solid understanding of how initiation and planning documents connect to PMP, supported by at least two examples, though the explanation may be somewhat general or lack depth | Shows a basic understanding of initiation and planning supported by at least two examples, but the explanations are vague, superficial, or incomplete. | Shows minimal or inaccurate understanding of how initiation and planning phases connect, with fewer than expected supportive examples. Responses are underdeveloped or unclear. | No response or does not demonstrate comprehension of the initiation and planning connection. |
| **2. Scope Management Comprehension**<br>Identifies risks as in and out of scope and explains scope changes. (30%) | Accurately identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with detailed and logical explanations that show a clear understanding of project boundaries. Provides a thorough and accurate description of how scope changes are managed in a professional setting. | Correctly identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items and provides clear, reasonable explanations. Describes how scope changes are managed with generally accurate detail, though some points may lack depth. | Identifies in-scope and out-of-scope items with basic or partial accuracy. Explanations show a general idea of scope management but are brief, vague, or missing supporting details. | Attempts to identify scope boundaries but shows significant confusion or misunderstanding. Explanations are unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate regarding scope and change management. | Does not address scope management or provide a relevant response. |
| **3. Analyzing the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)**<br>Explains how a WBS is devised, and why tasks are broken into work packages/subtasks. (30%) | Demonstrates a strong understanding of WBS structure. Clearly explains why tasks are grouped into work packages and subtasks and connects them to deliverables and project objectives. | Shows a good understanding of WBS with correct explanations of tasks and subtasks, though the reasoning may be somewhat general. | Shows partial understanding of the WBS structure. Explanations are vague, incomplete, or inconsistently tied to deliverables. | Demonstrates minimal understanding of WBS. Explanations are inaccurate, unclear, or missing key elements. | No demonstration of understanding of WBS or no response provided. |
| **4. Writing Conventions**<br>Meets conventions for grammar, punctuation, and spelling. (10%) | Writing is clear, well-organized, and professional. Virtually no errors. There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. | Writing is generally clear with minor errors that do not affect readability. There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability. | Writing has several errors that affect readability. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability. | Writing has frequent errors that significantly impact readability and professionalism. There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability. | Submission is incoherent, does not follow conventions, or is missing. Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded. |