Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– ## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx
– ## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf
**## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx**
Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization.
**Develop a section of an employee handbook in**
**1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following:**
·
**Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results.**
·
**Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess?**
·
**Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician.**
**## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc
Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric
Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
Their Responsibilities
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their
Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health
Care Results
5. Target 23.75 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details
and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is explained with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples
provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is not included.
Collapse All
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
or Improvement Tools Can Be Used
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or
Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess
5. Target 23.75 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with
appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but
minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially
incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
Used to Measure and Document Quality
28.5 points
Criteria Description
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to
Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals
5. Target 28.5 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of
an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.
4. Acceptable 24.22 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with
appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and
physician are included.
3. Approaching 21.38 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but
minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,
and physician are included.
2. Insufficient 18.53 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially
incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc
Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 9.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc
Format/Documentation 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 9.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some
obvious errors.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent
errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 95 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc
Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric
Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
Their Responsibilities
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their
Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health
Care Results
5. Target 23.75 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details
and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is explained with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples
provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is not included.
Collapse All
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
or Improvement Tools Can Be Used
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or
Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess
5. Target 23.75 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with
appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but
minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially
incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
Used to Measure and Document Quality
28.5 points
Criteria Description
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to
Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals
5. Target 28.5 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of
an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.
4. Acceptable 24.22 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with
appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and
physician are included.
3. Approaching 21.38 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but
minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,
and physician are included.
2. Insufficient 18.53 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially
incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc
Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 9.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc
Format/Documentation 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 9.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some
obvious errors.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent
errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 95 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx**
Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization.
**Develop a section of an employee handbook in**
**1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following:**
·
**Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results.**
·
**Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess?**
·
**Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician.**
**## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc
Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric
Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
Their Responsibilities
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their
Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health
Care Results
5. Target 23.75 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details
and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is explained with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples
provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is not included.
Collapse All
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
or Improvement Tools Can Be Used
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or
Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess
5. Target 23.75 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with
appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but
minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially
incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
Used to Measure and Document Quality
28.5 points
Criteria Description
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to
Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals
5. Target 28.5 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of
an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.
4. Acceptable 24.22 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with
appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and
physician are included.
3. Approaching 21.38 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but
minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,
and physician are included.
2. Insufficient 18.53 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially
incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc
Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 9.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc
Format/Documentation 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 9.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some
obvious errors.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent
errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 95 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx**
Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization.
**Develop a section of an employee handbook in**
**1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following:**
·
**Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results.**
·
**Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess?**
·
**Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician.**
**## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc
Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric
Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
Their Responsibilities
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their
Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health
Care Results
5. Target 23.75 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details
and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is explained with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples
provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their
responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health
care results is not included.
Collapse All
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
or Improvement Tools Can Be Used
23.75 points
Criteria Description
Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or
Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess
5. Target 23.75 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable 20.19 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with
appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching 17.81 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but
minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient 15.44 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially
incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or
improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
Used to Measure and Document Quality
28.5 points
Criteria Description
Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to
Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals
5. Target 28.5 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly
explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of
an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.
4. Acceptable 24.22 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with
appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and
physician are included.
3. Approaching 21.38 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but
minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,
and physician are included.
2. Insufficient 18.53 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially
incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to
measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc
Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 9.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8/26/25, 10:40 AM
Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc
Format/Documentation 9.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 9.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 8.08 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 7.13 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some
obvious errors.
2. Insufficient 6.18 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent
errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 95 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
– 1
– 2