Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Alterations in Cellular Processes

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation: – Which genetic mutations are commonly associated with the disease? – Why is the patient presenting with the specific symptoms described? – Discuss the pathophysiological mechanism…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:
    – Which genetic mutations are commonly associated with the disease?
    – Why is the patient presenting with the specific symptoms described?
    – Discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease in detail.
    – What do the blood test results tell us about the disease and disease progression?

  • [Solved] questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference Any use of AI will result in automatic 0 \ questions8-25.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions8-25-docx "questions8-25.docx")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference   Any use of AI will result in automatic 0
    \
    questions8-25.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions8-25-docx "questions8-25.docx")

  • [Solved] Diagnostic Writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    2 page, MLA format, 12font, double space \ IMG_0379.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0379-jpeg-10384221 "IMG_0379.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    2 page, MLA format, 12font, double space
    \
    IMG_0379.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0379-jpeg-10384221 "IMG_0379.jpeg")

  • [Solved] PM2L D1R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering PM2L D1R.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Business

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment for instructions – ## 5111.pdf **## 5111.pdf** Assignment: Answer the following questions, only use the provided videos and article. Please do not use any outside resources. At least 450 words. 1. From the lecture, videos and articles that are posted for this class, what are t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment for instructions

    – ## 5111.pdf

    **## 5111.pdf**

    Assignment: Answer the following questions, only use the provided videos and article.
    Please do not use any outside resources. At least 450 words.

    1. From the lecture, videos and articles that are posted for this class, what are the
    most important themes from your perspective? Explain.

    2. As we begin the semester, do you have any notions or attitudes about collective
    bargaining being good, bad and/or neutral? Explain.

    Videos:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQYqrDw5Ag

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS7o7vaatsU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMExnkc3UWU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILaU78Oo7XM

    Article:
    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/jul/23/nfl-running-backs-meet-to-discuss-positi
    ons-depressed-wages

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQYqrDw5Ag](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQYqrDw5Ag)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS7o7vaatsU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS7o7vaatsU)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMExnkc3UWU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMExnkc3UWU)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILaU78Oo7XM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILaU78Oo7XM)

    **## 5111.pdf**

    Assignment: Answer the following questions, only use the provided videos and article.
    Please do not use any outside resources. At least 450 words.

    1. From the lecture, videos and articles that are posted for this class, what are the
    most important themes from your perspective? Explain.

    2. As we begin the semester, do you have any notions or attitudes about collective
    bargaining being good, bad and/or neutral? Explain.

    Videos:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQYqrDw5Ag

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS7o7vaatsU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMExnkc3UWU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILaU78Oo7XM

    Article:
    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/jul/23/nfl-running-backs-meet-to-discuss-positi
    ons-depressed-wages

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQYqrDw5Ag](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQYqrDw5Ag)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS7o7vaatsU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS7o7vaatsU)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMExnkc3UWU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMExnkc3UWU)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILaU78Oo7XM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILaU78Oo7XM)

  • [Solved] Education Quality Measurement Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx – ## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf **## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx** Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently dependi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx

    – ## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf

    **## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx**

    Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization.

    **Develop a section of an employee handbook in**
    **1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following:**

    ·
    **Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results.**

    ·
    **Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess?**

    ·
    **Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician.**

    **## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc

    Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric

    Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
    Their Responsibilities

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their

    Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health

    Care Results

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details

    and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is explained with appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples

    provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is not included.

    Collapse All

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
    or Improvement Tools Can Be Used

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or

    Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with

    appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially

    incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,

    inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
    Used to Measure and Document Quality

    28.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to

    Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals

    5. Target 28.5 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of

    an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.

    4. Acceptable 24.22 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with

    appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and

    physician are included.

    3. Approaching 21.38 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,

    and physician are included.

    2. Insufficient 18.53 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially

    incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or

    otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in

    language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect

    language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc

    Format/Documentation 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some

    obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent

    errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 95 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc

    Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric

    Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
    Their Responsibilities

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their

    Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health

    Care Results

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details

    and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is explained with appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples

    provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is not included.

    Collapse All

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
    or Improvement Tools Can Be Used

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or

    Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with

    appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially

    incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,

    inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
    Used to Measure and Document Quality

    28.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to

    Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals

    5. Target 28.5 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of

    an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.

    4. Acceptable 24.22 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with

    appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and

    physician are included.

    3. Approaching 21.38 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,

    and physician are included.

    2. Insufficient 18.53 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially

    incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or

    otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in

    language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect

    language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc

    Format/Documentation 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some

    obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent

    errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 95 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx**

    Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization.

    **Develop a section of an employee handbook in**
    **1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following:**

    ·
    **Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results.**

    ·
    **Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess?**

    ·
    **Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician.**

    **## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc

    Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric

    Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
    Their Responsibilities

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their

    Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health

    Care Results

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details

    and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is explained with appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples

    provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is not included.

    Collapse All

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
    or Improvement Tools Can Be Used

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or

    Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with

    appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially

    incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,

    inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
    Used to Measure and Document Quality

    28.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to

    Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals

    5. Target 28.5 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of

    an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.

    4. Acceptable 24.22 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with

    appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and

    physician are included.

    3. Approaching 21.38 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,

    and physician are included.

    2. Insufficient 18.53 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially

    incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or

    otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in

    language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect

    language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc

    Format/Documentation 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some

    obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent

    errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 95 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx**

    Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization.

    **Develop a section of an employee handbook in**
    **1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following:**

    ·
    **Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results.**

    ·
    **Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess?**

    ·
    **Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician.**

    **## Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf**

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc

    Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals – Rubric

    Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and
    Their Responsibilities

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their

    Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health

    Care Results

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details

    and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is explained with appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples

    provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their

    responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health

    care results is not included.

    Collapse All

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement
    or Improvement Tools Can Be Used

    23.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or

    Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess

    5. Target 23.75 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

    4. Acceptable 20.19 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with

    appropriate details and support.

    3. Approaching 17.81 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided.

    2. Insufficient 15.44 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially

    incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete,

    inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or

    improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be
    Used to Measure and Document Quality

    28.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to

    Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals

    5. Target 28.5 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly

    explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of

    an administrator, clinician, and physician are included.

    4. Acceptable 24.22 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with

    appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and

    physician are included.

    3. Approaching 21.38 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but

    minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician,

    and physician are included.

    2. Insufficient 18.53 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially

    incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or

    otherwise deficient.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to

    measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

    structure, etc.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

    structure are used throughout.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

    structure are used.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in

    language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect

    language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    8/26/25, 10:40 AM

    Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc

    Format/Documentation 9.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

    appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    5. Target 9.5 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    4. Acceptable 8.08 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    3. Approaching 7.13 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some

    obvious errors.

    2. Insufficient 6.18 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent

    errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Total 95 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Human Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help – ## JWI_556_Assignment_4_1244.pdf **## JWI_556_Assignment_4_1244.pdf** JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First Assignment 4 © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help

    – ## JWI_556_Assignment_4_1244.pdf

    **## JWI_556_Assignment_4_1244.pdf**

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 1 of 5

    Assignment 4: Case Study, A Cultural Transformation at Southeastern Grocers
    Due: Monday, 9:00 am (eastern), Week 10 (30% of total course grade)

    Instructions:

    Read the case A Cultural Transformation at Southeastern Grocers. You will likely need to read the case
    several times and make notes. Allow yourself adequate time for this.

    Assume the role of chief people officer at Southeastern Grocers (SEG). Create a plan for a change
    initiative at SEG. Do not focus on sustaining the changes the company has already undergone. Instead,
    determine what other change(s) SEG needs to make in addition to those mentioned in the case. Your
    change initiative must be feasible, concrete, and HR-centric. Consider focusing on one particular workforce
    topic (e.g., diversity and inclusion, trust in company leadership, attracting new talent) in which HR can lead
    a significant change. Your plan should contain both an executive business brief and a change vision video:

    1. Executive Business Brief

    Write a 2-3-page brief that identifies a necessary organizational change. Think of this brief as a
    summary document to be shared with SEG’s senior leadership. Your brief must address the
    following prompts:

    A. How would you describe SEG’s company culture?
    B. Describe your change initiative. Why is it necessary?
    C. Explain your change plan:

    i. What is your change vision? How do you define it?
    ii. Is there a sense of urgency? How will you generate it?
    iii. How will you create a guiding coalition of key stakeholders and early adopters?
    iv. How will you communicate your change vision to SEG employees?
    v. What are the potential risks of your change initiative?
    vi. How will you determine whether the change initiative is successful?

    2. Change Vision Video

    Using Zoom, create a 2-3-minute video that compellingly presents your change vision. Think of
    this video as a pitch to SEG employees. You need their buy-in for your initiative to accomplish
    anything; you have to generate excitement. Your main points should be simple and memorable,
    and you should convey an appropriate amount of urgency. Make sure you answer the following
    questions in your video:

    a. What is the change you are advocating for?
    b. Why is this change important and necessary for SEG?

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 2 of 5

    c. How will the company benefit?
    d. How will the individual employees benefit?
    e. What does success look like?

    Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Executive Business Brief:

    • Typed, double-spaced, professional font (size 10-12), including headings and subheadings (to
    identify main topics and subtopics), with one-inch margins on all sides.

    • Use headings to identify each of the assigned prompts. Separate paragraphs by a single space.

    • References must be included and provide appropriate information that enables the reader to
    locate the original source. Application of course materials and resources is expected, and
    additional research is welcome.

    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the
    course title, and the date.

    • The length is 2-3 pages, excluding your cover page and reference list.

    Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Change Vision Video:

    • Upload your video in .mp4 format. Include your first and last name in the filename.

    • This should be a video of just you. No PowerPoint slides or props are needed.

    • The length is 2-3 minutes.

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 3 of 5

    Rubric: Assignment 4

    30% of Total
    Course Grade

    Assignment 4: Case Study

    Criteria Honors High Pass Pass Low Pass Unsatisfactory

    1. Executive
    business brief
    identifies
    SEG’s
    company
    culture,
    identifies a
    change
    initiative, and
    assesses why
    the initiative
    is needed.

    Weight: 15%

    Provides an
    exemplary, clear,
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. The
    change initiative is
    described in great
    detail. The
    rationale for it is
    presented in an
    extremely
    compelling and
    convincing
    manner.

    Provides a
    complete, clear,
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. The change
    initiative is
    described in detail.
    The rationale for it
    is presented in a
    compelling and
    convincing manner.

    Satisfactorily
    provides a clear
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. Identifies
    the change
    initiative and
    rationale for it in
    some level of
    detail.

    Partially explains
    SEG’s company
    culture. Vaguely
    describes the
    change initiative
    and the rationale
    for it; the
    initiative and
    rationale have
    very little
    concrete detail.

    Does not or
    unsatisfactorily
    provides a clear
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. Does
    not or
    unsatisfactorily
    describes the
    change initiative
    and the rationale
    for it in a
    compelling or
    convincing
    manner.

    2. Executive
    business brief
    explains the
    change
    initiative plan
    according to
    the assigned
    prompts,
    detailing the
    change vision,
    sense of
    urgency,
    guiding
    coalition,
    communicatio
    n strategy,
    potential risks,
    and
    determination
    of success.
    Demonstrates
    understanding
    of the course
    concepts.

    Weight: 35%

    Provides an
    exemplary
    description of the
    change initiative
    plan. Addresses
    all six of the
    assigned prompts,
    offering unique
    insights and clear,
    persuasive
    arguments.
    Demonstrates a
    complete, detailed
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    Provides a
    complete
    description of the
    change initiative
    plan. Addresses all
    six of the assigned
    prompts.
    Demonstrates a
    detailed
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    Satisfactorily
    explains the
    change initiative
    plan. Addresses at
    least five of the
    assigned prompts.
    Demonstrates a
    satisfactory
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    Partially explains
    the change
    initiative plan.
    Addresses at
    least four of the
    assigned
    prompts.
    Demonstrates a
    partial
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts, but
    lacks a detailed
    grasp of them.

    Does not or
    unsatisfactorily
    explains the
    change initiative
    plan according
    to the assigned
    prompts.
    Demonstrates
    little to no
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 4 of 5

    Criteria Honors High Pass Pass Low Pass Unsatisfactory

    3. Executive
    business brief
    is logical,
    professionally
    formatted, and
    free from
    grammatical
    errors.

    Weight: 10%

    Executive
    business brief is
    highly logical and
    professionally
    formatted. All
    sources are
    consistently cited
    in-text and
    references are
    included in a
    manner that
    enables the reader
    to easily identify
    sources. There are
    no mechanical or
    usage errors.

    Executive
    business brief is
    logical and
    professional
    formatted. Most
    sources are
    consistently
    cited in-text and
    the reference list
    is included.
    Mechanical and
    usage errors, if
    any, are minor
    and have no
    impact on the
    flow of the brief.

    Executive business
    brief is satisfactorily
    logical and
    professional in
    format. Sources are
    mostly cited in-text
    and the reference
    list is adequately
    formatted. There
    are a few
    mechanical and
    usage errors, but
    they do not
    seriously impact
    the flow of the brief.

    Executive
    business brief is
    somewhat
    professional in
    format and
    contains some
    mechanical and
    usage errors.
    Sources are not
    consistently cited
    and/or the
    reference list is
    incompletely or
    improperly
    formatted.

    Executive
    business brief
    is illogical,
    unprofessional,
    and contains
    multiple
    mechanical
    and usage
    errors.
    References
    and citations
    may be
    missing.

    4. The change
    vision video is
    presented in a
    compelling
    manner that
    engages
    listeners. Video
    addresses all 5
    questions
    about the
    change vision.

    Weight: 30%

    The change vision
    video is presented
    in exemplary
    fashion. It
    thoroughly details
    the rationale for
    change, creates a
    strong sense of
    urgency,
    comprehensively
    lays out how SEG
    and its employees
    benefit, and
    succinctly explains
    what success
    looks like. Video is
    highly compelling,
    engaging, and
    addresses all 5
    questions about
    the change vision.

    The change vision
    video is well-
    presented. It details
    the rationale for
    change, creates a
    sense of urgency,
    lays out how SEG
    and its employees
    benefit, and
    succinctly explains
    what success looks
    like. Video is
    compelling,
    engaging, and
    addresses all 5
    questions about the
    change vision.

    The change
    vision video is
    satisfactorily
    presented. It
    details the
    rationale for
    change, creates
    some sense of
    urgency, lays out
    how SEG and its
    employees
    benefit, and
    explains what
    success looks
    like in general
    terms. Video is
    fairly engaging
    and addresses 4
    of the questions
    about the
    change vision,
    albeit not in
    detail.

    The change
    vision video is
    presented. It
    partially depicts
    the rationale for
    change, but does
    not create a
    sense of
    urgency. It
    partially explains
    what success
    looks like, but
    not how SEG
    and its
    employees
    benefit. The
    video is not very
    engaging and
    addresses 3 of
    the questions
    about the
    change vision.

    The change
    vision video is
    unsatisfactorily
    presented. Little
    to no synthesis
    of ideas is
    demonstrated
    and logical
    reasoning is not
    included or
    evident. Video is
    not engaging
    and does not
    address any of
    the 5 questions
    about the
    change vision.

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 5 of 5

    Criteria Honors High Pass Pass Low Pass Unsatisfactory

    5. The change
    vision video
    has a
    professional
    look and feel
    and stays
    within the
    timeframe.

    Weight: 10%

    The change
    vision video is
    extremely
    professional. The
    student is
    professionally
    dressed, has an
    appropriate
    background,
    makes eye
    contact, voice is
    dynamic, and
    verbal cues are
    applied in
    exemplary
    fashion. Video
    adheres to the 2-
    3-minute time
    limit.

    The change vision
    video is very
    professional. The
    student is
    professionally
    dressed, has an
    appropriate
    background, makes
    eye contact, voice
    is mostly dynamic,
    and verbal cues are
    completely applied.
    Video may be over
    the 3-minute time
    limit, but by no
    more than 1
    minute.

    The change vision
    video is
    professional. The
    student is
    somewhat
    professionally
    dressed, has an
    appropriate
    background, makes
    good eye contact,
    voice is somewhat
    dynamic, and
    verbal cues are
    satisfactorily
    applied. Video may
    be over the 3-
    minute time limit,
    but by no more
    than 2 minutes.

    The change
    vision video is
    partially
    professional.
    The student is
    fairly
    professionally
    dressed, has a
    somewhat
    appropriate
    background,
    makes little to
    no eye
    contact, voice
    is fairly
    dynamic, and
    verbal cues
    are partially
    applied. Video
    may not
    adhere to the
    2-3- minute
    time limit.

    The change
    vision video is
    not professional.
    The student is
    not
    professionally
    dressed, does
    not have an
    appropriate
    background,
    makes no eye
    contact, voice is
    not dynamic,
    and verbal cues
    are
    unsatisfactorily
    applied. Video
    does not adhere
    to the 2-3-
    minute time
    limit.

    – Instructions:
    – 1. Executive Business Brief
    – 2. Change Vision Video
    – Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Executive Business Brief:
    –  Typed, double-spaced, professional font (size 10-12), including headings and subheadings (to identify main topics and subtopics), with one-inch margins on all sides.
    –  Use headings to identify each of the assigned prompts. Separate paragraphs by a single space.
    –  References must be included and provide appropriate information that enables the reader to locate the original source. Application of course materials and resources is expected, and additional research is welcome.
    –  Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
    –  The length is 2-3 pages, excluding your cover page and reference list.
    – Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Change Vision Video:

    **## JWI_556_Assignment_4_1244.pdf**

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 1 of 5

    Assignment 4: Case Study, A Cultural Transformation at Southeastern Grocers
    Due: Monday, 9:00 am (eastern), Week 10 (30% of total course grade)

    Instructions:

    Read the case A Cultural Transformation at Southeastern Grocers. You will likely need to read the case
    several times and make notes. Allow yourself adequate time for this.

    Assume the role of chief people officer at Southeastern Grocers (SEG). Create a plan for a change
    initiative at SEG. Do not focus on sustaining the changes the company has already undergone. Instead,
    determine what other change(s) SEG needs to make in addition to those mentioned in the case. Your
    change initiative must be feasible, concrete, and HR-centric. Consider focusing on one particular workforce
    topic (e.g., diversity and inclusion, trust in company leadership, attracting new talent) in which HR can lead
    a significant change. Your plan should contain both an executive business brief and a change vision video:

    1. Executive Business Brief

    Write a 2-3-page brief that identifies a necessary organizational change. Think of this brief as a
    summary document to be shared with SEG’s senior leadership. Your brief must address the
    following prompts:

    A. How would you describe SEG’s company culture?
    B. Describe your change initiative. Why is it necessary?
    C. Explain your change plan:

    i. What is your change vision? How do you define it?
    ii. Is there a sense of urgency? How will you generate it?
    iii. How will you create a guiding coalition of key stakeholders and early adopters?
    iv. How will you communicate your change vision to SEG employees?
    v. What are the potential risks of your change initiative?
    vi. How will you determine whether the change initiative is successful?

    2. Change Vision Video

    Using Zoom, create a 2-3-minute video that compellingly presents your change vision. Think of
    this video as a pitch to SEG employees. You need their buy-in for your initiative to accomplish
    anything; you have to generate excitement. Your main points should be simple and memorable,
    and you should convey an appropriate amount of urgency. Make sure you answer the following
    questions in your video:

    a. What is the change you are advocating for?
    b. Why is this change important and necessary for SEG?

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 2 of 5

    c. How will the company benefit?
    d. How will the individual employees benefit?
    e. What does success look like?

    Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Executive Business Brief:

    • Typed, double-spaced, professional font (size 10-12), including headings and subheadings (to
    identify main topics and subtopics), with one-inch margins on all sides.

    • Use headings to identify each of the assigned prompts. Separate paragraphs by a single space.

    • References must be included and provide appropriate information that enables the reader to
    locate the original source. Application of course materials and resources is expected, and
    additional research is welcome.

    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the
    course title, and the date.

    • The length is 2-3 pages, excluding your cover page and reference list.

    Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Change Vision Video:

    • Upload your video in .mp4 format. Include your first and last name in the filename.

    • This should be a video of just you. No PowerPoint slides or props are needed.

    • The length is 2-3 minutes.

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 3 of 5

    Rubric: Assignment 4

    30% of Total
    Course Grade

    Assignment 4: Case Study

    Criteria Honors High Pass Pass Low Pass Unsatisfactory

    1. Executive
    business brief
    identifies
    SEG’s
    company
    culture,
    identifies a
    change
    initiative, and
    assesses why
    the initiative
    is needed.

    Weight: 15%

    Provides an
    exemplary, clear,
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. The
    change initiative is
    described in great
    detail. The
    rationale for it is
    presented in an
    extremely
    compelling and
    convincing
    manner.

    Provides a
    complete, clear,
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. The change
    initiative is
    described in detail.
    The rationale for it
    is presented in a
    compelling and
    convincing manner.

    Satisfactorily
    provides a clear
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. Identifies
    the change
    initiative and
    rationale for it in
    some level of
    detail.

    Partially explains
    SEG’s company
    culture. Vaguely
    describes the
    change initiative
    and the rationale
    for it; the
    initiative and
    rationale have
    very little
    concrete detail.

    Does not or
    unsatisfactorily
    provides a clear
    and concise
    explanation of
    SEG’s company
    culture. Does
    not or
    unsatisfactorily
    describes the
    change initiative
    and the rationale
    for it in a
    compelling or
    convincing
    manner.

    2. Executive
    business brief
    explains the
    change
    initiative plan
    according to
    the assigned
    prompts,
    detailing the
    change vision,
    sense of
    urgency,
    guiding
    coalition,
    communicatio
    n strategy,
    potential risks,
    and
    determination
    of success.
    Demonstrates
    understanding
    of the course
    concepts.

    Weight: 35%

    Provides an
    exemplary
    description of the
    change initiative
    plan. Addresses
    all six of the
    assigned prompts,
    offering unique
    insights and clear,
    persuasive
    arguments.
    Demonstrates a
    complete, detailed
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    Provides a
    complete
    description of the
    change initiative
    plan. Addresses all
    six of the assigned
    prompts.
    Demonstrates a
    detailed
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    Satisfactorily
    explains the
    change initiative
    plan. Addresses at
    least five of the
    assigned prompts.
    Demonstrates a
    satisfactory
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    Partially explains
    the change
    initiative plan.
    Addresses at
    least four of the
    assigned
    prompts.
    Demonstrates a
    partial
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts, but
    lacks a detailed
    grasp of them.

    Does not or
    unsatisfactorily
    explains the
    change initiative
    plan according
    to the assigned
    prompts.
    Demonstrates
    little to no
    understanding of
    the course
    concepts.

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 4 of 5

    Criteria Honors High Pass Pass Low Pass Unsatisfactory

    3. Executive
    business brief
    is logical,
    professionally
    formatted, and
    free from
    grammatical
    errors.

    Weight: 10%

    Executive
    business brief is
    highly logical and
    professionally
    formatted. All
    sources are
    consistently cited
    in-text and
    references are
    included in a
    manner that
    enables the reader
    to easily identify
    sources. There are
    no mechanical or
    usage errors.

    Executive
    business brief is
    logical and
    professional
    formatted. Most
    sources are
    consistently
    cited in-text and
    the reference list
    is included.
    Mechanical and
    usage errors, if
    any, are minor
    and have no
    impact on the
    flow of the brief.

    Executive business
    brief is satisfactorily
    logical and
    professional in
    format. Sources are
    mostly cited in-text
    and the reference
    list is adequately
    formatted. There
    are a few
    mechanical and
    usage errors, but
    they do not
    seriously impact
    the flow of the brief.

    Executive
    business brief is
    somewhat
    professional in
    format and
    contains some
    mechanical and
    usage errors.
    Sources are not
    consistently cited
    and/or the
    reference list is
    incompletely or
    improperly
    formatted.

    Executive
    business brief
    is illogical,
    unprofessional,
    and contains
    multiple
    mechanical
    and usage
    errors.
    References
    and citations
    may be
    missing.

    4. The change
    vision video is
    presented in a
    compelling
    manner that
    engages
    listeners. Video
    addresses all 5
    questions
    about the
    change vision.

    Weight: 30%

    The change vision
    video is presented
    in exemplary
    fashion. It
    thoroughly details
    the rationale for
    change, creates a
    strong sense of
    urgency,
    comprehensively
    lays out how SEG
    and its employees
    benefit, and
    succinctly explains
    what success
    looks like. Video is
    highly compelling,
    engaging, and
    addresses all 5
    questions about
    the change vision.

    The change vision
    video is well-
    presented. It details
    the rationale for
    change, creates a
    sense of urgency,
    lays out how SEG
    and its employees
    benefit, and
    succinctly explains
    what success looks
    like. Video is
    compelling,
    engaging, and
    addresses all 5
    questions about the
    change vision.

    The change
    vision video is
    satisfactorily
    presented. It
    details the
    rationale for
    change, creates
    some sense of
    urgency, lays out
    how SEG and its
    employees
    benefit, and
    explains what
    success looks
    like in general
    terms. Video is
    fairly engaging
    and addresses 4
    of the questions
    about the
    change vision,
    albeit not in
    detail.

    The change
    vision video is
    presented. It
    partially depicts
    the rationale for
    change, but does
    not create a
    sense of
    urgency. It
    partially explains
    what success
    looks like, but
    not how SEG
    and its
    employees
    benefit. The
    video is not very
    engaging and
    addresses 3 of
    the questions
    about the
    change vision.

    The change
    vision video is
    unsatisfactorily
    presented. Little
    to no synthesis
    of ideas is
    demonstrated
    and logical
    reasoning is not
    included or
    evident. Video is
    not engaging
    and does not
    address any of
    the 5 questions
    about the
    change vision.

    JWI 556: Leading Change by Putting People First
    Assignment 4

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This
    document is subject to change based on the needs of the class.

    JWI 556 Assignment 4 (1244) Page 5 of 5

    Criteria Honors High Pass Pass Low Pass Unsatisfactory

    5. The change
    vision video
    has a
    professional
    look and feel
    and stays
    within the
    timeframe.

    Weight: 10%

    The change
    vision video is
    extremely
    professional. The
    student is
    professionally
    dressed, has an
    appropriate
    background,
    makes eye
    contact, voice is
    dynamic, and
    verbal cues are
    applied in
    exemplary
    fashion. Video
    adheres to the 2-
    3-minute time
    limit.

    The change vision
    video is very
    professional. The
    student is
    professionally
    dressed, has an
    appropriate
    background, makes
    eye contact, voice
    is mostly dynamic,
    and verbal cues are
    completely applied.
    Video may be over
    the 3-minute time
    limit, but by no
    more than 1
    minute.

    The change vision
    video is
    professional. The
    student is
    somewhat
    professionally
    dressed, has an
    appropriate
    background, makes
    good eye contact,
    voice is somewhat
    dynamic, and
    verbal cues are
    satisfactorily
    applied. Video may
    be over the 3-
    minute time limit,
    but by no more
    than 2 minutes.

    The change
    vision video is
    partially
    professional.
    The student is
    fairly
    professionally
    dressed, has a
    somewhat
    appropriate
    background,
    makes little to
    no eye
    contact, voice
    is fairly
    dynamic, and
    verbal cues
    are partially
    applied. Video
    may not
    adhere to the
    2-3- minute
    time limit.

    The change
    vision video is
    not professional.
    The student is
    not
    professionally
    dressed, does
    not have an
    appropriate
    background,
    makes no eye
    contact, voice is
    not dynamic,
    and verbal cues
    are
    unsatisfactorily
    applied. Video
    does not adhere
    to the 2-3-
    minute time
    limit.

    – Instructions:
    – 1. Executive Business Brief
    – 2. Change Vision Video
    – Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Executive Business Brief:
    –  Typed, double-spaced, professional font (size 10-12), including headings and subheadings (to identify main topics and subtopics), with one-inch margins on all sides.
    –  Use headings to identify each of the assigned prompts. Separate paragraphs by a single space.
    –  References must be included and provide appropriate information that enables the reader to locate the original source. Application of course materials and resources is expected, and additional research is welcome.
    –  Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
    –  The length is 2-3 pages, excluding your cover page and reference list.
    – Professional Formatting and Submission Requirements for Change Vision Video:

  • [Solved] Wildlife

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Wildlife.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NUR 601 Module 1 Discussion CASE 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## NUR 601 Module 1 Discussion _**Foundation for Health Promotion**_ For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you a case number. **CASE 1** – Melanie Cortazar – Justina Marie Fera – Natalya V Kosyreva – Nadya Marie Leblanc Moriniere – Diana Soler **CASE 2** – Anairis Castillo Palacio – Keyer…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## NUR  601 Module 1 Discussion
    _**Foundation for Health Promotion**_
    For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you a case number.
    **CASE 1**
    – Melanie Cortazar
    – Justina Marie Fera
    – Natalya V Kosyreva
    – Nadya Marie Leblanc Moriniere
    – Diana Soler
    **CASE 2**
    – Anairis Castillo Palacio
    – Keyer Dominguez
    – Meydel Rangel Ulloa
    – Yoslaida Ruiz
    – Angel Thomas
    **CASE 3**
    – Carolina Maria Bao
    – Krista Oliver
    – Maria C. Ricardo-Tollens
    – Mary Amanda Rodriguez Finales
    – Melissa Marie Santos
    – **Note:** Please post all submissions directly into the discussion board post and not as an attachment.
    **Case 1Case 2Case 3 Cases**
    J.R. is a nurse practitioner who serves an urban Chinese community. The challenges she faces daily include coordinating health care for the community members, fostering compliance with treatment regimens, and teaching the community about health prevention and early detection of diseases and conditions.
    J.R. has learned that one of the main reasons the community members do not adhere to their treatment regimens is because of mistrust of Western medicine. Many of the patients are older adults who rely on homeopathic treatments they learned in China as children. These patients prefer to take Chinese herbs in lieu of prescription medications. Additionally, these patients do not like to attend health screenings or take part in immunization clinics because they do not believe these measures are beneficial to their health.
    L.W. is a nurse practitioner in an urban community. Many of her clients recently immigrated to the United States from various countries. She is challenged by the many different cultures she encounters and the different values and beliefs they hold toward Western medicine.
    She is determined to earn her clients’ trust. She does this by providing health care services that are respectful of each client’s health beliefs and practices and cultural needs. She knows she must set aside her own values and beliefs to focus on what is important to her clients in order for them to have successful outcomes.
    D.H. is a nurse administrator at a large primary practice. His duties include maintaining the nurses’ schedules to keep within the facility’s budget; overseeing the hiring and training of nurses; ensuring that the work environment for the nurses is safe; and resolving any employment issues with the nurses that require disciplinary action, termination, or reporting adverse nursing care to the state board.
    One of his primary initiatives during the nurses’ orientation is to reiterate the importance of incorporating the goals of Healthy People 2020 into the nurses’ care.
    **Questions for the case**
    **What type of prevention J.R. is trying to achieve when she encourages her patient population to attend the blood pressure screening events?**
    **Please elaborate your answer; compare prevention types, give examples and share similar challenges you might have faced during your practice.**
    **Give at least two examples of emerging populations in the United States and describe their cultural characteristics that might interfere with their healthcare.**
    **How you as a health care professional should proceed if you suspect that a client has finances concerns about being able to afford their health care.**
    **Use APA 7th edition headings guidelines to label/list the responses to the questions when completing your discussions**.
    **Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above**. **Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:**
    1. **Identify the different roles and responsibilities of the nurse.**
    2. **Please discuss the challenges you anticipate facing when fulfilling the various roles of a nurse practitioner. How would you work to improve your weaknesses? Identify your strengths.**
    3. **Which patient population is most likely to experience health disparities and why?**
    **Submission Instructions:**
    – Your instructor will assign you your case number and you will post on the case number you have been assigned.
    – You will reply to **the other two case studies (One of each)**.
    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.