Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Cost and Managerial Analysis Retake A2.docx

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) file below – a year ago **files (1)** – ## CostandManagerialAnalysisRetakeA2.docx **## CostandManagerialAnalysisRetakeA2.docx** **Objective:** The objective of this assignment is to analyze the cost management…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    file below

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## CostandManagerialAnalysisRetakeA2.docx

    **## CostandManagerialAnalysisRetakeA2.docx**

    **Objective:** The objective of this assignment is to analyze the cost management practices and budgeting processes of a publicly traded company. This focused analysis will help you understand how organizations plan, control, and evaluate their financial resources.

    Instructions:

    1.
    **Company Selection:** Each student will select a publicly traded company from the following list (known for straightforward financial structures):

    · McDonald's Corporation (MCD)

    · Walmart Inc. (WMT)

    · Coca-Cola Company (KO)

    · Target Corporation (TGT)

    · Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

    2.
    **Cost Structure Analysis:**

    · Identify and categorize the major cost components (fixed vs. variable, direct vs. indirect) based on the company's financial reports.

    · Analyze the cost behavior patterns over the past two fiscal years.

    · Calculate and interpret the company's contribution margin and break-even point.

    3.
    **Budgeting Process:**

    · Describe the company's budgeting approach based on available information.

    · Analyze how the company allocates resources across different departments or segments.

    · Identify one specific budgeting challenge the company has faced and how it was addressed.

    4.
    **Performance Evaluation:**

    · Compare actual results to budgeted figures for at least one fiscal year.

    · Calculate and interpret relevant variances (spending, efficiency, etc.).

    5.
    **Presentation:**

    · Prepare a simple presentation (5-7 slides) highlighting your key findings.

    · Your presentation should be 5 minutes maximum. Please share the URL to the video where I can watch the presentation.

    6.
    **Report:**

    · Submit a concise written report summarizing your analysis.

    · The report should not exceed 5 pages (excluding references and appendices).

    · Focus on clarity rather than complexity in your explanations.

    Grading Criteria:

    · Accuracy of cost structure analysis (30%)

    · Understanding of budgeting principles (30%)

    · Quality of performance evaluation (25%)

    · Clarity of presentation and report (15%)

    Rubric

    **A2: Cost Management and Budgeting Analysis – Individual Assignment**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | A2: Cost Management and Budgeting Analysis – Individual Assignment |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCost Structure Analysis (30 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Accurately identifies and categorizes major cost components (fixed vs. variable, direct vs. indirect). Provides a strong analysis of cost behavior trends over two years. Contribution margin and break-even point are correctly calculated and well-interpreted. | **23 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Cost components are mostly correctly categorized. Cost trends over two years are analyzed with minor gaps. Contribution margin and break-even analysis are mostly accurate. | **20 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Basic cost component identification with some categorization errors. Cost behavior trends are noted but lack depth. Contribution margin and break-even analysis have minor mistakes. | **10 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>Incorrect or missing cost structure analysis. No meaningful discussion of cost behavior. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding of Budgeting Principles (30 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Clearly explains the company’s budgeting approach with strong supporting details. Analyzes resource allocation with depth and accuracy. Identifies and thoroughly discusses a real budgeting challenge and how it was addressed. | **23 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Budgeting approach is well explained but lacks minor details. Resource allocation is analyzed with reasonable depth. Budgeting challenge is identified and discussed with minor gaps. | **20 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Budgeting approach is somewhat described but lacks depth. Resource allocation is mentioned but not deeply analyzed. Budgeting challenge discussion is limited. | **10 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>Budgeting principles are not explained. No analysis of resource allocation or budgeting challenges. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerformance Evaluation & Variance Analysis (25 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Accurately compares actual results to budgeted figures for at least one year. Key variances (spending, efficiency, etc.) are correctly calculated and well-explained. Strong interpretation of financial implications. | **20 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Budget-to-actual comparison is mostly accurate with minor errors. Variances are calculated correctly but analysis lacks depth. | **15 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Budget-to-actual comparison has noticeable gaps. Variance analysis is attempted but with some calculation errors. | **7 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>No performance evaluation or variance analysis provided. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Presentation & Report (15 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Report is clear, concise, and well-organized. Presentation (slides and video) is professional, engaging, and visually effective. Information is well-structured and easy to follow. | **12 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Report and presentation are clear and mostly well-organized. Minor issues with clarity or engagement. | **9 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Report and presentation have some structure issues. Explanations lack depth. | **5 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>Report and presentation are unclear, incomplete, or missing. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 15 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **## CostandManagerialAnalysisRetakeA2.docx**

    **Objective:** The objective of this assignment is to analyze the cost management practices and budgeting processes of a publicly traded company. This focused analysis will help you understand how organizations plan, control, and evaluate their financial resources.

    Instructions:

    1.
    **Company Selection:** Each student will select a publicly traded company from the following list (known for straightforward financial structures):

    · McDonald's Corporation (MCD)

    · Walmart Inc. (WMT)

    · Coca-Cola Company (KO)

    · Target Corporation (TGT)

    · Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

    2.
    **Cost Structure Analysis:**

    · Identify and categorize the major cost components (fixed vs. variable, direct vs. indirect) based on the company's financial reports.

    · Analyze the cost behavior patterns over the past two fiscal years.

    · Calculate and interpret the company's contribution margin and break-even point.

    3.
    **Budgeting Process:**

    · Describe the company's budgeting approach based on available information.

    · Analyze how the company allocates resources across different departments or segments.

    · Identify one specific budgeting challenge the company has faced and how it was addressed.

    4.
    **Performance Evaluation:**

    · Compare actual results to budgeted figures for at least one fiscal year.

    · Calculate and interpret relevant variances (spending, efficiency, etc.).

    5.
    **Presentation:**

    · Prepare a simple presentation (5-7 slides) highlighting your key findings.

    · Your presentation should be 5 minutes maximum. Please share the URL to the video where I can watch the presentation.

    6.
    **Report:**

    · Submit a concise written report summarizing your analysis.

    · The report should not exceed 5 pages (excluding references and appendices).

    · Focus on clarity rather than complexity in your explanations.

    Grading Criteria:

    · Accuracy of cost structure analysis (30%)

    · Understanding of budgeting principles (30%)

    · Quality of performance evaluation (25%)

    · Clarity of presentation and report (15%)

    Rubric

    **A2: Cost Management and Budgeting Analysis – Individual Assignment**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | A2: Cost Management and Budgeting Analysis – Individual Assignment |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCost Structure Analysis (30 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Accurately identifies and categorizes major cost components (fixed vs. variable, direct vs. indirect). Provides a strong analysis of cost behavior trends over two years. Contribution margin and break-even point are correctly calculated and well-interpreted. | **23 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Cost components are mostly correctly categorized. Cost trends over two years are analyzed with minor gaps. Contribution margin and break-even analysis are mostly accurate. | **20 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Basic cost component identification with some categorization errors. Cost behavior trends are noted but lack depth. Contribution margin and break-even analysis have minor mistakes. | **10 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>Incorrect or missing cost structure analysis. No meaningful discussion of cost behavior. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding of Budgeting Principles (30 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Clearly explains the company’s budgeting approach with strong supporting details. Analyzes resource allocation with depth and accuracy. Identifies and thoroughly discusses a real budgeting challenge and how it was addressed. | **23 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Budgeting approach is well explained but lacks minor details. Resource allocation is analyzed with reasonable depth. Budgeting challenge is identified and discussed with minor gaps. | **20 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Budgeting approach is somewhat described but lacks depth. Resource allocation is mentioned but not deeply analyzed. Budgeting challenge discussion is limited. | **10 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>Budgeting principles are not explained. No analysis of resource allocation or budgeting challenges. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerformance Evaluation & Variance Analysis (25 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Accurately compares actual results to budgeted figures for at least one year. Key variances (spending, efficiency, etc.) are correctly calculated and well-explained. Strong interpretation of financial implications. | **20 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Budget-to-actual comparison is mostly accurate with minor errors. Variances are calculated correctly but analysis lacks depth. | **15 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Budget-to-actual comparison has noticeable gaps. Variance analysis is attempted but with some calculation errors. | **7 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>No performance evaluation or variance analysis provided. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Presentation & Report (15 pts) | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 pts**<br>**Exceptional**<br>Report is clear, concise, and well-organized. Presentation (slides and video) is professional, engaging, and visually effective. Information is well-structured and easy to follow. | **12 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Report and presentation are clear and mostly well-organized. Minor issues with clarity or engagement. | **9 pts**<br>**Competent**<br>Report and presentation have some structure issues. Explanations lack depth. | **5 pts**<br>**Basic**<br>Report and presentation are unclear, incomplete, or missing. | **0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | | 15 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

  • [Solved] J. Moore Reese Scholarship

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (2)** – ## J.MooreReeseScholarship.docx – ReeseScholarship.pdf **## J.MooreReeseScholarship.docx** **_Note: My major is not in Criminal Justice, I will like and was told to apply for this scholarship. 1500 words_** Name: Ja’Kayla Moore Live/Reside in: Marion Junction, AL Age 18 …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## J.MooreReeseScholarship.docx

    – ReeseScholarship.pdf

    **## J.MooreReeseScholarship.docx**

    **_Note: My major is not in Criminal Justice, I will like and was told to apply for this scholarship. 1500 words_**

    Name: Ja’Kayla Moore

    Live/Reside in: Marion Junction, AL

    Age 18

    School Location: Keith High School Orrville, AL

    Even though the major is not in Criminal

    Major Business Administration

    Explain how the scholarship help can

    **Activity**

    National Honor Society

    Youth Sunday School

    Basketball

    Softball

    Volleyball

    1A Regional Basketball MVP 2024

    All-State Basketball North/South Team

    1A Area Champs Softball (2021, 2022, 2023, 2024)

    1A Area Run-Up Softball (2025)

    Selma Times Journal Newspaper Softball and Basketball Player of the Year (2024)

    Dallas County All Star Basketball, Volleyball, and Softball (2022, 2023, 2024)

    **ReeseScholarship.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reesescholarship-pdf)

    **ReeseScholarship.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reesescholarship-pdf)

    **## J.MooreReeseScholarship.docx**

    **_Note: My major is not in Criminal Justice, I will like and was told to apply for this scholarship. 1500 words_**

    Name: Ja’Kayla Moore

    Live/Reside in: Marion Junction, AL

    Age 18

    School Location: Keith High School Orrville, AL

    Even though the major is not in Criminal

    Major Business Administration

    Explain how the scholarship help can

    **Activity**

    National Honor Society

    Youth Sunday School

    Basketball

    Softball

    Volleyball

    1A Regional Basketball MVP 2024

    All-State Basketball North/South Team

    1A Area Champs Softball (2021, 2022, 2023, 2024)

    1A Area Run-Up Softball (2025)

    Selma Times Journal Newspaper Softball and Basketball Player of the Year (2024)

    Dallas County All Star Basketball, Volleyball, and Softball (2022, 2023, 2024)

    **ReeseScholarship.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reesescholarship-pdf)

    **## J.MooreReeseScholarship.docx**

    **_Note: My major is not in Criminal Justice, I will like and was told to apply for this scholarship. 1500 words_**

    Name: Ja’Kayla Moore

    Live/Reside in: Marion Junction, AL

    Age 18

    School Location: Keith High School Orrville, AL

    Even though the major is not in Criminal

    Major Business Administration

    Explain how the scholarship help can

    **Activity**

    National Honor Society

    Youth Sunday School

    Basketball

    Softball

    Volleyball

    1A Regional Basketball MVP 2024

    All-State Basketball North/South Team

    1A Area Champs Softball (2021, 2022, 2023, 2024)

    1A Area Run-Up Softball (2025)

    Selma Times Journal Newspaper Softball and Basketball Player of the Year (2024)

    Dallas County All Star Basketball, Volleyball, and Softball (2022, 2023, 2024)

    **ReeseScholarship.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reesescholarship-pdf)

  • [Solved] CASE BRIEF: HIETT V. LAKE BARCROFT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    A case brief is a dissection of a legal opinion, summary of the basic components of that decision. “Briefing” a case (opinion) helps the student understand the rule oflaw as interpreted by that particular court. INSTRUCTIONS Each student will carefully read a legal opinion (Hiett v. Lake Barcroft Co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    A case brief is a dissection of a legal opinion, summary of the basic

    components of that decision. “Briefing” a case (opinion) helps the student understand the rule

    oflaw as interpreted by that particular court.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Each student will carefully read a legal opinion (Hiett v. Lake Barcroft Community

    Association). Upon reading said case, each student will complete a case brief following the

    instructions outlined below.

    After reading and analyzing the case, address the following issues:

    1. Do you believe that certain topics should be ‘off limits’ when it comes to the subject

    matter of contracts? For example, should the Courts uphold contracts dealing with

    illegal issues (e.g. drugs, prostitution, etc.)?

    2. Should triathlon participants be expected to honor their promise with respect to

    exculpatory clauses in contracts? In other words, does one’s promise ‘not to sue’

    matter, despite the Supreme Court’s ruling?

    3. Did you agree or disagree with the Court’s rationale in deciding the case?

    4. Which authority should have jurisdiction (power/authority) over the issue of

    contracts and enforcement among private parties? Civil government, Church,

    Family, Self?

    5. Reflect on the case in light of the truths outlined in the Christian worldview.

    Support your position using various Christian sources (e.g. Scripture, Catechisms,

    historic Christian Creeds, etc.).

    must be completed based on the following criteria:

    • 3 full pages;

    • 2 scholarly citations;

    • 1-inch margins;

    • Double-spaced;

    • 12-point, Times New Roman font;

    Put a title on the top line of the first page, and include your name. No other identifying

    information is needed. Do not include a separate cover page. Citations must be in APA format

    and included on a separate reference page.

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] hrms globex

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering hrms globex.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Case 4 – 25

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help pls – a year ago **files (1)** – ## Case4-25.docx **## Case4-25.docx** **Module 4 – Case** **Virtual Teams and Protecting Information Assets** **Assignment Overview** The Case Assignment for this module involves your analysis of what is known, somewhat known, not known, or "known but wro…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help pls

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Case4-25.docx

    **## Case4-25.docx**

    **Module 4 – Case**

    **Virtual Teams and Protecting Information Assets**

    **Assignment Overview**

    The Case Assignment for this module involves your analysis of what is known, somewhat known, not known, or "known but wrong" in the area of the management of virtual teams. Since this phenomenon has become the norm, more knowledge on managing these teams is needed. Most of the advice about virtual teams comes from one or more of four types of sources:

    · The small number of academically respectable research studies on virtual teams

    · The very large body of research done on the management of teams generally (dating back to the 1930s and of somewhat questionable generalizability  due to differences in tools, culture, society, and just about everything else)

    · The modest but steadily increasing body of informal or "practice wisdom" information, generally made available through blogs or other Internet sources

    · The quite large body of essentially uninformed but ready-to-be-shared opinion about the topic, also Internet-available

    The first two bodies of information are generally easy to identify and distinguish; they'll be found in academic journals, conference transactions, and other such sources. Unfortunately, distinguishing between the latter two types of information is much more complicated, since they may look a great deal like each other, depending on the technical abilities of the respective website designers.

    Mortensen, M., & Hadley C. (2020).
    [_How to prepare your virtual teams for the long haul_](https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul

    Alexander, A., De Smet, A., & Mysore, M. (2020).
    [_Reimagining the post pandemic workforce_](https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce). McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce#

    [_Managing Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494583&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leveraging Virtual and Hybrid Teams for Improved Effectiveness_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494581&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leading Remote Projects and Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494582&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    In addition, the optional readings expand on many of the central points; you may also want to do some independent research of your own to clarify any issues that concern you.

    Your task is to
    **identify 3 to 5 significant questions regarding the management of virtual teams that relate to "practice wisdom**" advice found in the readings, that you believe are sufficiently important that good quality research might help resolve their validity. Trivial questions don't really warrant research, because the research costs money and other resources that are in scarce supply. We want to reserve our research resources to address those questions that really seem important to practice—particularly issues where the practice wisdom might be divided, with one group saying one set of things and one group another, or where there is no advice available at all. So what you're looking for in the blogs are situations where advice seems to contradict other advice, or where advice given seems to contradict your own intuition or common sense, or otherwise where ambiguity seems to exist. The two systematic research studies will give you an idea of how such research might be done.

    When you identify some topic of interest, you should be able to specify:

    The research question itself; what are we trying to find out?

    Why is this question interesting? Who might care what the results would be?

    Where might we do such a study? How might we carry it out? (Please note: You're not being assessed here on the quality of your research expertise; just give us some general ideas about how you think we might answer your question.)

    What would you expect the results to be?

    Any other thoughts or ideas you might have regarding this research issue.

    So your paper is to consist of your thoughts on these questions regarding each of the 3 to 5 issues that you have been able to identify from your perusal of the readings of virtual teams.

    **Case Assignment**

    Thus, when you have read through the articles and related material, compose a 4- to 6-page critical analysis paper as outlined above, on the topic:

    · Three to five significant ideas about the management of virtual teams that could be usefully assessed by conducting systematic organizational research

    As we said, your research recommendations need to be supported by the literature and the evidence. Obviously, as noted below, this will obligate you to actually be able to present such evidence in an academically respectable manner.

    **You Will Be Particularly Assessed On**

    · Your ability to see what the module is all about and to structure your paper accordingly.

    · Your informed commentary and analysis—simply repeating what your sources say does not constitute an adequate paper.

    · Your ability to apply the professional language and terminology of management and virtual teams correctly and in context; you are expected to be familiar with this language and use it appropriately.

    · Your effective and appropriate use of in-text citations to the assigned readings and other source material to support your arguments. Refer to Trident's “Writing Style Guide” for guidance on APA formatting and style. The guide can be accessed under "My Resources" in the TLC Portal.

    **Assignment Expectations**

    **Length:** Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    **Assignment-driven criteria (25 points):** Demonstrates clear understanding of the subject and addresses all key elements of the assignment.

    **Critical thinking (10 points):** Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem. Shows analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of required material.

    **Scholarly writing (5 points):** Demonstrates writing proficiency at the academic level of the course; addresses the Learning Outcomes of the assignment.

    **Quality of references (4 points) and assignment organization (3 points):** Uses relevant and credible sources to support assertions. Assignment is well organized and follows the structure of a well-written paper.

    **Citing sources (3 points):** Uses in-text citations and properly formats references in APA style.

    Please use Trident's
    [_Introduction to APA_](https://careered.libguides.com/tui/library/apa) for proper formatting and style.

    **Module 4 – Resources**

    **Virtual Teams and Protecting Information Assets**

    **Required Reading**

    Murray, B., Dulebohn, J. H., & Stone, D. L. (2022).
    _Managing team centricity in modern organizations_ (1st ed.). Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.

    Mortensen, M.,& Hadley C. (2020).
    [_How to prepare your virtual teams for the long haul._](https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul) Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul

    Alexander, A., De Smet, A., & Mysore, M. (2020).
    [_Reimagining the post pandemic workforce_](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce). McKinsey &amp; Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce#

    [_Managing Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494573&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leveraging Virtual and Hybrid Teams for Improved Effectiveness_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494574&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leading Remote Projects and Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494575&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    Ocker, R. J., & Fjermestad, J. (2008). Communication differences in virtual design teams: Findings from a multi-method analysis of high and low performing experimental teams,
    _ACM SIGMIS Database, 39_(1), 51-67. Available from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    **## Case4-25.docx**

    **Module 4 – Case**

    **Virtual Teams and Protecting Information Assets**

    **Assignment Overview**

    The Case Assignment for this module involves your analysis of what is known, somewhat known, not known, or "known but wrong" in the area of the management of virtual teams. Since this phenomenon has become the norm, more knowledge on managing these teams is needed. Most of the advice about virtual teams comes from one or more of four types of sources:

    · The small number of academically respectable research studies on virtual teams

    · The very large body of research done on the management of teams generally (dating back to the 1930s and of somewhat questionable generalizability  due to differences in tools, culture, society, and just about everything else)

    · The modest but steadily increasing body of informal or "practice wisdom" information, generally made available through blogs or other Internet sources

    · The quite large body of essentially uninformed but ready-to-be-shared opinion about the topic, also Internet-available

    The first two bodies of information are generally easy to identify and distinguish; they'll be found in academic journals, conference transactions, and other such sources. Unfortunately, distinguishing between the latter two types of information is much more complicated, since they may look a great deal like each other, depending on the technical abilities of the respective website designers.

    Mortensen, M., & Hadley C. (2020).
    [_How to prepare your virtual teams for the long haul_](https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul

    Alexander, A., De Smet, A., & Mysore, M. (2020).
    [_Reimagining the post pandemic workforce_](https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce). McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce#

    [_Managing Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494583&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leveraging Virtual and Hybrid Teams for Improved Effectiveness_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494581&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leading Remote Projects and Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494582&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    In addition, the optional readings expand on many of the central points; you may also want to do some independent research of your own to clarify any issues that concern you.

    Your task is to
    **identify 3 to 5 significant questions regarding the management of virtual teams that relate to "practice wisdom**" advice found in the readings, that you believe are sufficiently important that good quality research might help resolve their validity. Trivial questions don't really warrant research, because the research costs money and other resources that are in scarce supply. We want to reserve our research resources to address those questions that really seem important to practice—particularly issues where the practice wisdom might be divided, with one group saying one set of things and one group another, or where there is no advice available at all. So what you're looking for in the blogs are situations where advice seems to contradict other advice, or where advice given seems to contradict your own intuition or common sense, or otherwise where ambiguity seems to exist. The two systematic research studies will give you an idea of how such research might be done.

    When you identify some topic of interest, you should be able to specify:

    The research question itself; what are we trying to find out?

    Why is this question interesting? Who might care what the results would be?

    Where might we do such a study? How might we carry it out? (Please note: You're not being assessed here on the quality of your research expertise; just give us some general ideas about how you think we might answer your question.)

    What would you expect the results to be?

    Any other thoughts or ideas you might have regarding this research issue.

    So your paper is to consist of your thoughts on these questions regarding each of the 3 to 5 issues that you have been able to identify from your perusal of the readings of virtual teams.

    **Case Assignment**

    Thus, when you have read through the articles and related material, compose a 4- to 6-page critical analysis paper as outlined above, on the topic:

    · Three to five significant ideas about the management of virtual teams that could be usefully assessed by conducting systematic organizational research

    As we said, your research recommendations need to be supported by the literature and the evidence. Obviously, as noted below, this will obligate you to actually be able to present such evidence in an academically respectable manner.

    **You Will Be Particularly Assessed On**

    · Your ability to see what the module is all about and to structure your paper accordingly.

    · Your informed commentary and analysis—simply repeating what your sources say does not constitute an adequate paper.

    · Your ability to apply the professional language and terminology of management and virtual teams correctly and in context; you are expected to be familiar with this language and use it appropriately.

    · Your effective and appropriate use of in-text citations to the assigned readings and other source material to support your arguments. Refer to Trident's “Writing Style Guide” for guidance on APA formatting and style. The guide can be accessed under "My Resources" in the TLC Portal.

    **Assignment Expectations**

    **Length:** Follow the number of pages required in the assignment excluding cover page and references. Each page should have about 300 words.

    **Assignment-driven criteria (25 points):** Demonstrates clear understanding of the subject and addresses all key elements of the assignment.

    **Critical thinking (10 points):** Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem. Shows analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of required material.

    **Scholarly writing (5 points):** Demonstrates writing proficiency at the academic level of the course; addresses the Learning Outcomes of the assignment.

    **Quality of references (4 points) and assignment organization (3 points):** Uses relevant and credible sources to support assertions. Assignment is well organized and follows the structure of a well-written paper.

    **Citing sources (3 points):** Uses in-text citations and properly formats references in APA style.

    Please use Trident's
    [_Introduction to APA_](https://careered.libguides.com/tui/library/apa) for proper formatting and style.

    **Module 4 – Resources**

    **Virtual Teams and Protecting Information Assets**

    **Required Reading**

    Murray, B., Dulebohn, J. H., & Stone, D. L. (2022).
    _Managing team centricity in modern organizations_ (1st ed.). Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.

    Mortensen, M.,& Hadley C. (2020).
    [_How to prepare your virtual teams for the long haul._](https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul) Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/how-to-prepare-your-virtual-teams-for-the-long-haul

    Alexander, A., De Smet, A., & Mysore, M. (2020).
    [_Reimagining the post pandemic workforce_](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce). McKinsey &amp; Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce#

    [_Managing Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494573&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leveraging Virtual and Hybrid Teams for Improved Effectiveness_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494574&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    [_Leading Remote Projects and Virtual Teams_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=222966&type=lti&rcode=TUI-494575&srcou=57240) from LinkedIn Learning

    Ocker, R. J., & Fjermestad, J. (2008). Communication differences in virtual design teams: Findings from a multi-method analysis of high and low performing experimental teams,
    _ACM SIGMIS Database, 39_(1), 51-67. Available from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

  • [Solved] hello i need help for this assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf **## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf** Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal Individual/Group Indi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf

    **## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf**

    Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF

    Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader

    Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal

    Individual/Group Individual

    Length 1600 words (+/- 10%)

    Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of
    the task below include:

    a) Articulate and evaluate the leadership skills, knowledge and
    disposition required to achieve success in your educational
    context

    b) Critically reflect on the factors that enable or limit your
    capacity to be an educational leader

    d) Demonstrate an evidence based approach, articulating the basis
    for decision making in your context

    Submission 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of Week 12

    6-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of week 6

    Weighting 35 %

    Total Marks 100 marks

    Task Summary

    In this assessment you will use the Journal tool in Blackboard to write a personal reflection on your

    personal and professional development within 4 separate modules across the subject. You will

    reflect on the course materials in relation to assessing your leadership style and best practices to be

    used in the practical application to your educational context.

    Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

    Context

    The concern with reflective thinking is that one may use the process as a tool to reaffirm your

    position rather than engaging critically and examining new perspectives that could lead to

    developments in practice. In this assessment you are asked to honestly and critically reflect on your

    experiences and/or future leadership endeavours. The purpose of this task is to enable you to

    engage in a self-reflection process that helps you to identify your personal and professional

    strengths, challenges, concerns and aspirations as a future educational leader. You are required to

    draw upon the course content and engage in wide reading to challenge your preconceived ideas of

    educational leadership within your chosen context.

    Page 2 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Task Instructions

    You will be required to write four entries in your Reflective Journal (approximately 400 words per

    entry) which will be submitted at the end of Week 12. The modules you will write the four entries

    on will be:

    • Module 1: The role of the Educational Leader

    • Module 3 : Developing an Effective Leader

    • Module 4: Leading People

    • Module 6: Reflection as a means of Professional Development

    In the second week of each of these modules you will be required to reflect on what you have learnt

    about yourself and becoming a high achieving professional leader. You will critically analyse the skills

    and characteristics that are explored in each module, which relate to effective leadership within the

    educational context of your choice. You will draw on personal experiences to reflect on your own

    capabilities whilst also looking to the future and what you hope to achieve within your context. As

    you reflect on your professional goals you will draw upon the course material and your own research

    to support your professional development as a leader. Therefore, you will need to cite theory and

    literature accurately and include a reference list using APA 7th edition formatting.

    Please refer to each of the 4 modules mentioned above for writing prompts to guide your reflection.

    You are encouraged to be open in your reflection about your development, understanding and

    challenges as you encounter these in the course material.

    You will be assessed on your ability to critically reflect on:

    • Your learning of the course material

    • Challenges you may have experienced towards your leadership style

    • Any changes to your current practice as a result of your learning

    • Your thoughts towards practical application

    You will also be assessed on your ability to:

    • Write concisely in a reflective academic style

    • Cite and reference sources using APA 7th Edition style.

    Please see the assessment rubrics for the marking criteria.

    Referencing

    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more

    information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

    [http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing](http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing)

    sharondransfield

    Cross-Out

    Page 3 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Assessment Rubric

    Assessment
    Attributes

    Fail
    (Yet to achieve

    minimum standard)
    0-49%

    Pass
    (Functional)

    50-64%

    Credit
    (Proficient)

    65-74%

    Distinction
    (Advanced)

    75-84%

    High Distinction
    (Exceptional)

    85-100%

    Knowledge and
    understanding of
    Educational Leadership

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 40%

    Demonstrates a partially-
    developed understanding
    of Educational Leadership

    Does not identify any
    changes needed to
    develop leadership skills.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Identifying
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Discussing the challenges
    associated with your own
    practice

    Demonstrates a limited
    awareness of the changes
    needed to develop leadership
    skills.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Discussing
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Considering the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Discussing new
    knowledge with regard
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context.

    Identifies changes needed
    to develop your leadership
    skills with consideration
    towards practical
    application.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Analysing the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Evaluating new
    knowledge with
    consideration towards
    own practice and
    educational context.

    Demonstrates
    understanding of the need
    to address changes in order
    to develop your leadership
    skills and discusses practical
    applications.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Evaluating the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Analysing and
    critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Integrating new
    knowledge with
    serious contemplation
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context

    Demonstrates a
    transformation in approach
    and practice to educational
    leadership within your
    context.

    Analysis of reflection
    with synthesis of new

    Limited synthesis and
    analysis.

    Demonstrated analysis and
    synthesis of new knowledge
    with application.

    Well-developed analysis
    and synthesis with
    application of

    Thoroughly developed and
    creative analysis and

    Highly sophisticated and
    creative analysis, synthesis

    Page 4 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    knowledge towards
    practice

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 30%

    Limited application/
    recommendations based
    upon analysis.

    No attempt is made to
    move beyond own
    experience or to extend
    understanding through
    other positions or points
    of view.

    Shows the ability to identify
    relevant information relating
    to Educational Leadership in
    relation to your own practice.

    Other positions/points of
    view are not a feature of the
    discussion.

    recommendations to own
    practice linked to
    analysis/synthesis.

    The description provides an
    adequate focus for further
    reflection. It includes a
    reasonably thorough
    statement of observations
    and comment on personal
    behaviour.

    Discusses own practice in
    relation to other
    positions/points of view.

    synthesis of new with
    existing knowledge.

    Demonstrates a capacity to
    draw on past and current
    experience to engage with
    key concepts relating to
    Educational Leadership, and
    articulates key changes in
    disposition and knowledge,
    taking into account the
    complexities of the issue(s)
    and a range of other points
    of view.

    of new with existing
    knowledge.

    Interprets developments in
    thinking and formulates
    conclusions and a
    substantial position
    regarding own skills,
    knowledge and experiences
    as an educational leader.
    This position is supported
    with relevant experience
    and insightful analysis of
    own and others’ points of
    view.

    Clarity of
    communication and
    integration of ideas

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 20%

    Descriptive writing only.
    There is no discussion
    beyond description.

    Meaning is consistently
    obscured by errors in the
    communication of ideas,
    including errors in
    spelling, grammar and
    punctuation.

    Difficult to follow the line
    of reasoning.

    Mainly descriptive writing.
    There is little discussion
    beyond description.

    The mode of communication
    is generally coherent;
    expression is generally clear;
    no persistent errors in
    spelling, punctuation, or
    grammar.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are well
    presented with mostly clear
    flow of ideas and
    arguments.

    Care is taken to ensure
    accuracy of punctuation,
    spelling, and grammatical
    structure.

    Line of reasoning is easy to
    follow.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are very well
    presented; the presentation
    is logical and clear.

    The work is fluent and
    demonstrates confidence
    with the material; the
    method and style of
    presentation is entirely
    appropriate, as are
    vocabulary and syntax.

    Engages and sustains
    audience’s interest in the
    topic, demonstrates high
    levels of cultural sensitivity

    The work is extremely well-
    written, logical and
    persuasive with a clarity
    and maturity of
    presentation. There is a
    clear flow of ideas and
    information with little to no
    ambiguity.

    Page 5 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Correct citation of key
    resources and evidence

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 10%

    Demonstrates
    inconsistent use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    ideas.

    Referencing is omitted or
    does not resemble APA.

    Demonstrates use of credible
    and relevant resources to
    support and develop ideas,
    but these are not always
    explicit or well developed.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with frequent or repeated
    errors.

    Demonstrates use of
    credible resources to
    support and develop ideas.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with occasional errors.

    Demonstrates use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within the
    organisation for sourcing
    evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates use of high-
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and position
    statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within and without
    the organisation for
    sourcing evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

    **## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf**

    Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF

    Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader

    Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal

    Individual/Group Individual

    Length 1600 words (+/- 10%)

    Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of
    the task below include:

    a) Articulate and evaluate the leadership skills, knowledge and
    disposition required to achieve success in your educational
    context

    b) Critically reflect on the factors that enable or limit your
    capacity to be an educational leader

    d) Demonstrate an evidence based approach, articulating the basis
    for decision making in your context

    Submission 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of Week 12

    6-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of week 6

    Weighting 35 %

    Total Marks 100 marks

    Task Summary

    In this assessment you will use the Journal tool in Blackboard to write a personal reflection on your

    personal and professional development within 4 separate modules across the subject. You will

    reflect on the course materials in relation to assessing your leadership style and best practices to be

    used in the practical application to your educational context.

    Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

    Context

    The concern with reflective thinking is that one may use the process as a tool to reaffirm your

    position rather than engaging critically and examining new perspectives that could lead to

    developments in practice. In this assessment you are asked to honestly and critically reflect on your

    experiences and/or future leadership endeavours. The purpose of this task is to enable you to

    engage in a self-reflection process that helps you to identify your personal and professional

    strengths, challenges, concerns and aspirations as a future educational leader. You are required to

    draw upon the course content and engage in wide reading to challenge your preconceived ideas of

    educational leadership within your chosen context.

    Page 2 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Task Instructions

    You will be required to write four entries in your Reflective Journal (approximately 400 words per

    entry) which will be submitted at the end of Week 12. The modules you will write the four entries

    on will be:

    • Module 1: The role of the Educational Leader

    • Module 3 : Developing an Effective Leader

    • Module 4: Leading People

    • Module 6: Reflection as a means of Professional Development

    In the second week of each of these modules you will be required to reflect on what you have learnt

    about yourself and becoming a high achieving professional leader. You will critically analyse the skills

    and characteristics that are explored in each module, which relate to effective leadership within the

    educational context of your choice. You will draw on personal experiences to reflect on your own

    capabilities whilst also looking to the future and what you hope to achieve within your context. As

    you reflect on your professional goals you will draw upon the course material and your own research

    to support your professional development as a leader. Therefore, you will need to cite theory and

    literature accurately and include a reference list using APA 7th edition formatting.

    Please refer to each of the 4 modules mentioned above for writing prompts to guide your reflection.

    You are encouraged to be open in your reflection about your development, understanding and

    challenges as you encounter these in the course material.

    You will be assessed on your ability to critically reflect on:

    • Your learning of the course material

    • Challenges you may have experienced towards your leadership style

    • Any changes to your current practice as a result of your learning

    • Your thoughts towards practical application

    You will also be assessed on your ability to:

    • Write concisely in a reflective academic style

    • Cite and reference sources using APA 7th Edition style.

    Please see the assessment rubrics for the marking criteria.

    Referencing

    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more

    information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

    [http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing](http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing)

    sharondransfield

    Cross-Out

    Page 3 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Assessment Rubric

    Assessment
    Attributes

    Fail
    (Yet to achieve

    minimum standard)
    0-49%

    Pass
    (Functional)

    50-64%

    Credit
    (Proficient)

    65-74%

    Distinction
    (Advanced)

    75-84%

    High Distinction
    (Exceptional)

    85-100%

    Knowledge and
    understanding of
    Educational Leadership

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 40%

    Demonstrates a partially-
    developed understanding
    of Educational Leadership

    Does not identify any
    changes needed to
    develop leadership skills.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Identifying
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Discussing the challenges
    associated with your own
    practice

    Demonstrates a limited
    awareness of the changes
    needed to develop leadership
    skills.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Discussing
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Considering the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Discussing new
    knowledge with regard
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context.

    Identifies changes needed
    to develop your leadership
    skills with consideration
    towards practical
    application.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Analysing the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Evaluating new
    knowledge with
    consideration towards
    own practice and
    educational context.

    Demonstrates
    understanding of the need
    to address changes in order
    to develop your leadership
    skills and discusses practical
    applications.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Evaluating the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Analysing and
    critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Integrating new
    knowledge with
    serious contemplation
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context

    Demonstrates a
    transformation in approach
    and practice to educational
    leadership within your
    context.

    Analysis of reflection
    with synthesis of new

    Limited synthesis and
    analysis.

    Demonstrated analysis and
    synthesis of new knowledge
    with application.

    Well-developed analysis
    and synthesis with
    application of

    Thoroughly developed and
    creative analysis and

    Highly sophisticated and
    creative analysis, synthesis

    Page 4 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    knowledge towards
    practice

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 30%

    Limited application/
    recommendations based
    upon analysis.

    No attempt is made to
    move beyond own
    experience or to extend
    understanding through
    other positions or points
    of view.

    Shows the ability to identify
    relevant information relating
    to Educational Leadership in
    relation to your own practice.

    Other positions/points of
    view are not a feature of the
    discussion.

    recommendations to own
    practice linked to
    analysis/synthesis.

    The description provides an
    adequate focus for further
    reflection. It includes a
    reasonably thorough
    statement of observations
    and comment on personal
    behaviour.

    Discusses own practice in
    relation to other
    positions/points of view.

    synthesis of new with
    existing knowledge.

    Demonstrates a capacity to
    draw on past and current
    experience to engage with
    key concepts relating to
    Educational Leadership, and
    articulates key changes in
    disposition and knowledge,
    taking into account the
    complexities of the issue(s)
    and a range of other points
    of view.

    of new with existing
    knowledge.

    Interprets developments in
    thinking and formulates
    conclusions and a
    substantial position
    regarding own skills,
    knowledge and experiences
    as an educational leader.
    This position is supported
    with relevant experience
    and insightful analysis of
    own and others’ points of
    view.

    Clarity of
    communication and
    integration of ideas

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 20%

    Descriptive writing only.
    There is no discussion
    beyond description.

    Meaning is consistently
    obscured by errors in the
    communication of ideas,
    including errors in
    spelling, grammar and
    punctuation.

    Difficult to follow the line
    of reasoning.

    Mainly descriptive writing.
    There is little discussion
    beyond description.

    The mode of communication
    is generally coherent;
    expression is generally clear;
    no persistent errors in
    spelling, punctuation, or
    grammar.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are well
    presented with mostly clear
    flow of ideas and
    arguments.

    Care is taken to ensure
    accuracy of punctuation,
    spelling, and grammatical
    structure.

    Line of reasoning is easy to
    follow.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are very well
    presented; the presentation
    is logical and clear.

    The work is fluent and
    demonstrates confidence
    with the material; the
    method and style of
    presentation is entirely
    appropriate, as are
    vocabulary and syntax.

    Engages and sustains
    audience’s interest in the
    topic, demonstrates high
    levels of cultural sensitivity

    The work is extremely well-
    written, logical and
    persuasive with a clarity
    and maturity of
    presentation. There is a
    clear flow of ideas and
    information with little to no
    ambiguity.

    Page 5 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Correct citation of key
    resources and evidence

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 10%

    Demonstrates
    inconsistent use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    ideas.

    Referencing is omitted or
    does not resemble APA.

    Demonstrates use of credible
    and relevant resources to
    support and develop ideas,
    but these are not always
    explicit or well developed.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with frequent or repeated
    errors.

    Demonstrates use of
    credible resources to
    support and develop ideas.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with occasional errors.

    Demonstrates use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within the
    organisation for sourcing
    evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates use of high-
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and position
    statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within and without
    the organisation for
    sourcing evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

  • [Solved] feedback professor

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Hi Barbara, Nice start! Given that some traits, like symptoms, change over time and others, like IQ, remain stable, which model (CTT or IRT) do you think would be better for measuring self-esteem? Dr. Kelly – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Hi Barbara, Nice start! Given that some traits, like symptoms, change over time and others, like IQ, remain stable, which model (CTT or IRT) do you think would be better for measuring self-esteem? Dr. Kelly

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] FACILITY AND EVENTS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    INSTRUCTIONS Must bE in current APA format. It must include a title page, abstract, and reference list per current APA guidelines. The body must be at least 8 pages, using Times New Roman 12-point font, with 1 inch margins all around. The title page, abstract and reference list are not considered in…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Must bE in current APA format. It must include a title page,

    abstract, and reference list per current APA guidelines. The body must be at least 8

    pages, using Times New Roman 12-point font, with 1 inch margins all around. The title page,

    abstract and reference list are not considered in the page count. A third-person writing style

    (impartial voice) should be used. The primary focus is to present information on

    your selected topic and current academic research related to that topic. Each of the following

    should be included :

    • Title page

    • Abstract

    • Brief overview of your selected topic with connection to the textbook/class (1 page)

    • Detailed explanation of the topic based on trade/news sources (3 pages)

    • A review of relevant academic research based on peer-reviewed journal articles (2 pages)

    • A description of biblical principles that can be applied to the topic (1 page)

    • Conclusion (1 paragraph)

    • Reference list

    must include a minimum of 6 references (at least 2 of which must be peer-reviewed

    journal articles), in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. The main ideas

    need to be supported by these sources. The library web site has a good tutorial on what peer-

    reviewed sources are, and how to find them.

    While you are encouraged to use as much reference material as possible to find your information,

    the entire written project must be your own work. Severe penalties will be enforced for

    plagiarizing information which includes cutting and pasting, copying from internet sources, or

    failing to cite your sources. All information used (articles, websites, etc.) should be referenced

    using current APA format.

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] English English Financing Sport homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering English English Financing Sport homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Education Voluntary or Regulated Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need some help answering the question pictured. – [\ \ IMG_2805.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2805-jpeg-10280069 "IMG_2805.jpeg") – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need some help answering the question pictured.

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2805.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2805-jpeg-10280069 "IMG_2805.jpeg")

    – a year ago