Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Periodontal Disease and Systemic Conditions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In a 2-3 page paper, discuss and explain the link between periodontal disease and systemic conditions. Initially, identify the many systemic conditions linked to periodontal disease. Then, focus your paper on one specific condition. – Discuss any etiological and pathological links. – Discuss any r…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In a 2-3 page paper, discuss and explain the link between periodontal disease and systemic conditions. Initially, identify the many systemic conditions linked to periodontal disease. Then, focus your paper on one specific condition.
    – Discuss any etiological and pathological links.
    – Discuss any risk factors associated.
    – Discuss the effects between the systemic condition of your choice and periodontal condition.
    The LRC (Learning Resource Center) must be accessed in completion of this paper. Paper must be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point font, paper format and references cited should all be in APA format.
    ****Plagiarism score of 30% or higher will result in a zero. You have 3 attempts through Turnitin to make sure the score is below 30%.**
    Refer to the attached rubric for grading specifics.

  • [Solved] Criminal Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## USSCT.docx – ## CrackCocaineDisparity1.docx **## USSCT.docx** DISCUSSION (USSCT): The US Supreme Court is not bound by the traditional rules of ethics for judges. Should there be rules and if so, what should they be? At least 250 words Two outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed jou…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## USSCT.docx

    – ## CrackCocaineDisparity1.docx

    **## USSCT.docx**

    DISCUSSION

    (USSCT): The US Supreme Court is not bound by the traditional rules of ethics for judges. Should there be rules and if so, what should they be?

    At least 250 words

    Two outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    **## CrackCocaineDisparity1.docx**

    Read the passage on Crack Cocaine. Do you think these laws were discriminatory on the basis of race or ethnicity? Why or why not? In your opinion, which ethical foundation are you basing your position on.

    Crack Cocaine

    **HOW DESTRUCTIVE IS CRACK COCAINE?**

    News sources and government agencies in the 1980's and 1990's declared crack cocaine as “
    [the most dangerous and quickly addictive drug known to man](https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ondcp/119466.pdf).” (White House, National Drug Control Strategy, p. 3, Sept. 1989).
    _The New York Times_ [quoted](http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/25/nyregion/drug-researchers-try-to-treat-a-nearly-unbreakable-habit.html) a University of Pennsylvania medical school professor warning in 1988 that, “We see people who feel they lost control almost from the first time they used it. Most people who got started with crack were addicted in six months to a year.” Two years later, a
    _New York Times_ columnist, Anna Quindlen,
    [described](http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/opinion/public-private-hearing-the-cries-of-crack.html) crack as “a stimulant so powerful that it makes people forget everything they once loved or lived for.” Facing growing use of crack, these authorities were repeating the anecdotes about dangers that, even if not verifiable, were believed would discourage experimentation and use. But now, more than three decades later, some anti-drug campaigns and educational materials make similar claims: the Foundation for a Drug-Free World, which provides anti-drug pamphlets to US public schools (and which claims to have distributed over 50 million such pamphlets worldwide) includes
    [one user's warning](http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/crackcocaine.html) that “‘one pipe [of crack] can be all it takes to turn you into an immoral monster.’ — Audrey.” (Accessed, August 30, 2019)

    But these claims about crack are quite exaggerated. In reality:

    **MOST PEOPLE WHO TRY CRACK NEVER BECOME ADDICTED.**

    · While crack cocaine is addictive, it is not instantly or universally habit-forming as was claimed in the 1980s, or as some anti-drug materials insist. An analysis of 2016 data from the
    [National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) shows that while (0.2 percent) of Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 reported that they had used crack cocaine at some point in their lives, only 38,000 reported using it in the month prior to the survey. In 2016, an
    [estimated](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) 432,000 Americans over age 12 were current users of crack (p.17). That suggests that fewer than 6% of young people who tried crack became regular users, much less single-minded “crack fiends.”

    **MOST OF THE VIOLENCE ASSOCIATED WITH CRACK COMES FROM THE ILLEGAL MARKET AND GANG ACTIVITY, NOT THE EFFECTS OF THE DRUG ITSELF.**

    · Crack cocaine can cause paranoia, which can incline people to acts of violence. And withdrawal from crack, especially involuntary withdrawal when a user has no money or cannot find a dealer, can also make dependent crack users irritable and angry. But as
    [c](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/http:/www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) [olumnist Jacob Sullum](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) put it, “the vast majority of violence attributed to crack grew out of black-market disputes, as opposed to the drug’s pharmacological effects.” A
    [study](http://www.drugtext.org/Drug-Policy-Letter-march/april-1990/most-drug-related-murders-result-from-crack-sales-not-us.html) by researcher Paul Goldstein found that among drug-related homicides in New York City in 1988, 74% were a result of “systemic” violence, such as violence arising from commercial disputes, fights over turf, or drug sales. Only 15% of the drug-related homicides stemmed from the physical effects of intoxicants (with over two thirds caused by alcohol), and of those, only a small fraction were related to crack.

    **CRACK COCAINE IS NOT MORE POTENT THAN POWDER COCAINE—AND IT’S NOT THE MOST DANGEROUS FORM OF COCAINE USE.**

    ·
    [Crack cocaine is cocaine base, which is the active ingredient in powder cocaine.](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856) Crack is made out of powder cocaine in a simple preparation with baking soda and water. Upon evaporation, the mixture becomes a solid "rock" and when heated the cocaine base is vaporized (that is, "smoked"). Inhaling cocaine vapor, "smoking crack," leads to more intense sensations than snorting powder cocaine because inhaling cocaine vapor into the lungs allows the body to absorb a much greater dosage of the drug more quickly than by snorting – not because of any chemical difference between the two forms of cocaine. In fact, the most dangerous form of cocaine, measured by risk of overdose or death, isn’t crack, but
    [powder cocaine delivered through injection](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856).

    **“CRACK BABIES” ARE A MYTH.**

    · Media in the 1980's popularized the idea that children of women who used crack while pregnant were, as Charles Krauthammer put it, a neurologically damaged “
    [bio-underclass](http://articles.philly.com/1989-08-01/news/26148256_1_cocaine-babies-crack-babies-damage).” One expert testifying before the US Senate Government Affairs Committee dramatically predicted that these children would grow up “
    [unable to make rational decisions, without capacity for sympathy or even respect for human life](http://www.cjpf.org/child-abuse-pregnancy).” But now, follow-up research over decades has definitively debunked the claim of the irreversible impairment of “crack babies.” Although infants born to women who use crack during pregnancy are more likely to be born prematurely (which is a serious negative outcome and not to be minimized), those who are born at full term have
    [no worse outcomes](http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study) than demographically similar children born to women not using crack cocaine during pregnancy. Researchers of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) studying images of “crack babies” from the 1980's
    [believe](http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/04/science/alcohol-s-toll-on-fetuses-even-worse-than-thought.html) that the infants depicted may actually have been suffering from FAS, which continues to cause
    [far more harm](http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/health/27coca.html?_r=0) to newborns than the effects of crack.
    [More than 30 states](http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/documents/pub_bp_punishingwomen.pdf) passed laws that punish or imprison pregnant women addicted to crack, but despite the facts, they have not repealed them. The criminal justice consequences of crack laws for such mothers have had more striking negative outcomes on the psychological and social development of their children than the maternal use of crack cocaine. The handicaps caused by prenatal cocaine use are now
    [speculative](http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/28/crack-babies-dont-necessarily-turn-into-troubled-teens/), but the developmental and psychological harms of having an incarcerated parent are
    [well-documented](http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-42ParentsBehindBars.pdf).

    **WHY THIS MATTERS:**

    The myths about crack cocaine have led to staggering injustices in sentencing for crack cocaine offenses. For over two decades, crack cocaine distribution was punished 100 times more harshly than powder cocaine distribution on a months per gram basis set by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. (Crack possession much less frequently prosecuted in federal court than in state courts, if equal to or exceeding 5 grams, was subject to a mandatory 5 years of imprisonment. Possession of 5 grams of powder cocaine often resulted in a time served sentence or probation.)  Under the federal crack cocaine mandatory sentencing laws of 1986, distributing 5 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 5 years up to 40 years, and distributing 50 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 10 years up to life imprisonment. For powder cocaine, these sentences were triggered by at least 500 g. or 5000 g. respectively — the infamous "100-to-1" disparity. With the federal Sentencing Guidelines, beginning in 1987, quantities of these drugs larger than the minimum triggered sentences greater than the minimums.

    Though most crack cocaine users are white, as a result of U.S. Department of Justice case selection practices, over 80 percent of all crack cocaine defendants have been black. Thus, the intense federal enforcement of these laws from 1987 to 2010 led to very long prison sentences for large numbers of low-level African American crack offenders. Congress refused to fix the sentencing disparity for decades. The 2010
    [Fair Sentencing Act](http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/fair-sentencing-act-memo.pdf), which finally reduced the "100-to-1" disparity, left an
    [18-fold difference](http://famm.org/projects/federal/us-congress/crack-cocaine-mandatory-minimum-sentences/) between the trigger for crack and the trigger for powder cocaine.
    Today, a five-year mandatory minimum prison sentence is still triggered by 500 grams of powder cocaine but only 28 grams of crack cocaine.

    Do crack’s dangers justify this disparity? No. Chemically, crack and powder cocaine are just two types of mixtures that contain the same substance that affects the nervous system in just one way. We do not punish illegal alcohol possession differently depending on whether the user planned to drink whiskey or beer. In fact, the most lethal method of administering cocaine is injecting powder cocaine — the form of cocaine that federal law punishes less severely — not smoking crack.

    At least 250 words

    Outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    **## CrackCocaineDisparity1.docx**

    Read the passage on Crack Cocaine. Do you think these laws were discriminatory on the basis of race or ethnicity? Why or why not? In your opinion, which ethical foundation are you basing your position on.

    Crack Cocaine

    **HOW DESTRUCTIVE IS CRACK COCAINE?**

    News sources and government agencies in the 1980's and 1990's declared crack cocaine as “
    [the most dangerous and quickly addictive drug known to man](https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ondcp/119466.pdf).” (White House, National Drug Control Strategy, p. 3, Sept. 1989).
    _The New York Times_ [quoted](http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/25/nyregion/drug-researchers-try-to-treat-a-nearly-unbreakable-habit.html) a University of Pennsylvania medical school professor warning in 1988 that, “We see people who feel they lost control almost from the first time they used it. Most people who got started with crack were addicted in six months to a year.” Two years later, a
    _New York Times_ columnist, Anna Quindlen,
    [described](http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/opinion/public-private-hearing-the-cries-of-crack.html) crack as “a stimulant so powerful that it makes people forget everything they once loved or lived for.” Facing growing use of crack, these authorities were repeating the anecdotes about dangers that, even if not verifiable, were believed would discourage experimentation and use. But now, more than three decades later, some anti-drug campaigns and educational materials make similar claims: the Foundation for a Drug-Free World, which provides anti-drug pamphlets to US public schools (and which claims to have distributed over 50 million such pamphlets worldwide) includes
    [one user's warning](http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/crackcocaine.html) that “‘one pipe [of crack] can be all it takes to turn you into an immoral monster.’ — Audrey.” (Accessed, August 30, 2019)

    But these claims about crack are quite exaggerated. In reality:

    **MOST PEOPLE WHO TRY CRACK NEVER BECOME ADDICTED.**

    · While crack cocaine is addictive, it is not instantly or universally habit-forming as was claimed in the 1980s, or as some anti-drug materials insist. An analysis of 2016 data from the
    [National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) shows that while (0.2 percent) of Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 reported that they had used crack cocaine at some point in their lives, only 38,000 reported using it in the month prior to the survey. In 2016, an
    [estimated](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) 432,000 Americans over age 12 were current users of crack (p.17). That suggests that fewer than 6% of young people who tried crack became regular users, much less single-minded “crack fiends.”

    **MOST OF THE VIOLENCE ASSOCIATED WITH CRACK COMES FROM THE ILLEGAL MARKET AND GANG ACTIVITY, NOT THE EFFECTS OF THE DRUG ITSELF.**

    · Crack cocaine can cause paranoia, which can incline people to acts of violence. And withdrawal from crack, especially involuntary withdrawal when a user has no money or cannot find a dealer, can also make dependent crack users irritable and angry. But as
    [c](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/http:/www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) [olumnist Jacob Sullum](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) put it, “the vast majority of violence attributed to crack grew out of black-market disputes, as opposed to the drug’s pharmacological effects.” A
    [study](http://www.drugtext.org/Drug-Policy-Letter-march/april-1990/most-drug-related-murders-result-from-crack-sales-not-us.html) by researcher Paul Goldstein found that among drug-related homicides in New York City in 1988, 74% were a result of “systemic” violence, such as violence arising from commercial disputes, fights over turf, or drug sales. Only 15% of the drug-related homicides stemmed from the physical effects of intoxicants (with over two thirds caused by alcohol), and of those, only a small fraction were related to crack.

    **CRACK COCAINE IS NOT MORE POTENT THAN POWDER COCAINE—AND IT’S NOT THE MOST DANGEROUS FORM OF COCAINE USE.**

    ·
    [Crack cocaine is cocaine base, which is the active ingredient in powder cocaine.](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856) Crack is made out of powder cocaine in a simple preparation with baking soda and water. Upon evaporation, the mixture becomes a solid "rock" and when heated the cocaine base is vaporized (that is, "smoked"). Inhaling cocaine vapor, "smoking crack," leads to more intense sensations than snorting powder cocaine because inhaling cocaine vapor into the lungs allows the body to absorb a much greater dosage of the drug more quickly than by snorting – not because of any chemical difference between the two forms of cocaine. In fact, the most dangerous form of cocaine, measured by risk of overdose or death, isn’t crack, but
    [powder cocaine delivered through injection](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856).

    **“CRACK BABIES” ARE A MYTH.**

    · Media in the 1980's popularized the idea that children of women who used crack while pregnant were, as Charles Krauthammer put it, a neurologically damaged “
    [bio-underclass](http://articles.philly.com/1989-08-01/news/26148256_1_cocaine-babies-crack-babies-damage).” One expert testifying before the US Senate Government Affairs Committee dramatically predicted that these children would grow up “
    [unable to make rational decisions, without capacity for sympathy or even respect for human life](http://www.cjpf.org/child-abuse-pregnancy).” But now, follow-up research over decades has definitively debunked the claim of the irreversible impairment of “crack babies.” Although infants born to women who use crack during pregnancy are more likely to be born prematurely (which is a serious negative outcome and not to be minimized), those who are born at full term have
    [no worse outcomes](http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study) than demographically similar children born to women not using crack cocaine during pregnancy. Researchers of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) studying images of “crack babies” from the 1980's
    [believe](http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/04/science/alcohol-s-toll-on-fetuses-even-worse-than-thought.html) that the infants depicted may actually have been suffering from FAS, which continues to cause
    [far more harm](http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/health/27coca.html?_r=0) to newborns than the effects of crack.
    [More than 30 states](http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/documents/pub_bp_punishingwomen.pdf) passed laws that punish or imprison pregnant women addicted to crack, but despite the facts, they have not repealed them. The criminal justice consequences of crack laws for such mothers have had more striking negative outcomes on the psychological and social development of their children than the maternal use of crack cocaine. The handicaps caused by prenatal cocaine use are now
    [speculative](http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/28/crack-babies-dont-necessarily-turn-into-troubled-teens/), but the developmental and psychological harms of having an incarcerated parent are
    [well-documented](http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-42ParentsBehindBars.pdf).

    **WHY THIS MATTERS:**

    The myths about crack cocaine have led to staggering injustices in sentencing for crack cocaine offenses. For over two decades, crack cocaine distribution was punished 100 times more harshly than powder cocaine distribution on a months per gram basis set by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. (Crack possession much less frequently prosecuted in federal court than in state courts, if equal to or exceeding 5 grams, was subject to a mandatory 5 years of imprisonment. Possession of 5 grams of powder cocaine often resulted in a time served sentence or probation.)  Under the federal crack cocaine mandatory sentencing laws of 1986, distributing 5 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 5 years up to 40 years, and distributing 50 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 10 years up to life imprisonment. For powder cocaine, these sentences were triggered by at least 500 g. or 5000 g. respectively — the infamous "100-to-1" disparity. With the federal Sentencing Guidelines, beginning in 1987, quantities of these drugs larger than the minimum triggered sentences greater than the minimums.

    Though most crack cocaine users are white, as a result of U.S. Department of Justice case selection practices, over 80 percent of all crack cocaine defendants have been black. Thus, the intense federal enforcement of these laws from 1987 to 2010 led to very long prison sentences for large numbers of low-level African American crack offenders. Congress refused to fix the sentencing disparity for decades. The 2010
    [Fair Sentencing Act](http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/fair-sentencing-act-memo.pdf), which finally reduced the "100-to-1" disparity, left an
    [18-fold difference](http://famm.org/projects/federal/us-congress/crack-cocaine-mandatory-minimum-sentences/) between the trigger for crack and the trigger for powder cocaine.
    Today, a five-year mandatory minimum prison sentence is still triggered by 500 grams of powder cocaine but only 28 grams of crack cocaine.

    Do crack’s dangers justify this disparity? No. Chemically, crack and powder cocaine are just two types of mixtures that contain the same substance that affects the nervous system in just one way. We do not punish illegal alcohol possession differently depending on whether the user planned to drink whiskey or beer. In fact, the most lethal method of administering cocaine is injecting powder cocaine — the form of cocaine that federal law punishes less severely — not smoking crack.

    At least 250 words

    Outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    **## USSCT.docx**

    DISCUSSION

    (USSCT): The US Supreme Court is not bound by the traditional rules of ethics for judges. Should there be rules and if so, what should they be?

    At least 250 words

    Two outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    **## CrackCocaineDisparity1.docx**

    Read the passage on Crack Cocaine. Do you think these laws were discriminatory on the basis of race or ethnicity? Why or why not? In your opinion, which ethical foundation are you basing your position on.

    Crack Cocaine

    **HOW DESTRUCTIVE IS CRACK COCAINE?**

    News sources and government agencies in the 1980's and 1990's declared crack cocaine as “
    [the most dangerous and quickly addictive drug known to man](https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ondcp/119466.pdf).” (White House, National Drug Control Strategy, p. 3, Sept. 1989).
    _The New York Times_ [quoted](http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/25/nyregion/drug-researchers-try-to-treat-a-nearly-unbreakable-habit.html) a University of Pennsylvania medical school professor warning in 1988 that, “We see people who feel they lost control almost from the first time they used it. Most people who got started with crack were addicted in six months to a year.” Two years later, a
    _New York Times_ columnist, Anna Quindlen,
    [described](http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/opinion/public-private-hearing-the-cries-of-crack.html) crack as “a stimulant so powerful that it makes people forget everything they once loved or lived for.” Facing growing use of crack, these authorities were repeating the anecdotes about dangers that, even if not verifiable, were believed would discourage experimentation and use. But now, more than three decades later, some anti-drug campaigns and educational materials make similar claims: the Foundation for a Drug-Free World, which provides anti-drug pamphlets to US public schools (and which claims to have distributed over 50 million such pamphlets worldwide) includes
    [one user's warning](http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/crackcocaine.html) that “‘one pipe [of crack] can be all it takes to turn you into an immoral monster.’ — Audrey.” (Accessed, August 30, 2019)

    But these claims about crack are quite exaggerated. In reality:

    **MOST PEOPLE WHO TRY CRACK NEVER BECOME ADDICTED.**

    · While crack cocaine is addictive, it is not instantly or universally habit-forming as was claimed in the 1980s, or as some anti-drug materials insist. An analysis of 2016 data from the
    [National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) shows that while (0.2 percent) of Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 reported that they had used crack cocaine at some point in their lives, only 38,000 reported using it in the month prior to the survey. In 2016, an
    [estimated](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) 432,000 Americans over age 12 were current users of crack (p.17). That suggests that fewer than 6% of young people who tried crack became regular users, much less single-minded “crack fiends.”

    **MOST OF THE VIOLENCE ASSOCIATED WITH CRACK COMES FROM THE ILLEGAL MARKET AND GANG ACTIVITY, NOT THE EFFECTS OF THE DRUG ITSELF.**

    · Crack cocaine can cause paranoia, which can incline people to acts of violence. And withdrawal from crack, especially involuntary withdrawal when a user has no money or cannot find a dealer, can also make dependent crack users irritable and angry. But as
    [c](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/http:/www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) [olumnist Jacob Sullum](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) put it, “the vast majority of violence attributed to crack grew out of black-market disputes, as opposed to the drug’s pharmacological effects.” A
    [study](http://www.drugtext.org/Drug-Policy-Letter-march/april-1990/most-drug-related-murders-result-from-crack-sales-not-us.html) by researcher Paul Goldstein found that among drug-related homicides in New York City in 1988, 74% were a result of “systemic” violence, such as violence arising from commercial disputes, fights over turf, or drug sales. Only 15% of the drug-related homicides stemmed from the physical effects of intoxicants (with over two thirds caused by alcohol), and of those, only a small fraction were related to crack.

    **CRACK COCAINE IS NOT MORE POTENT THAN POWDER COCAINE—AND IT’S NOT THE MOST DANGEROUS FORM OF COCAINE USE.**

    ·
    [Crack cocaine is cocaine base, which is the active ingredient in powder cocaine.](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856) Crack is made out of powder cocaine in a simple preparation with baking soda and water. Upon evaporation, the mixture becomes a solid "rock" and when heated the cocaine base is vaporized (that is, "smoked"). Inhaling cocaine vapor, "smoking crack," leads to more intense sensations than snorting powder cocaine because inhaling cocaine vapor into the lungs allows the body to absorb a much greater dosage of the drug more quickly than by snorting – not because of any chemical difference between the two forms of cocaine. In fact, the most dangerous form of cocaine, measured by risk of overdose or death, isn’t crack, but
    [powder cocaine delivered through injection](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856).

    **“CRACK BABIES” ARE A MYTH.**

    · Media in the 1980's popularized the idea that children of women who used crack while pregnant were, as Charles Krauthammer put it, a neurologically damaged “
    [bio-underclass](http://articles.philly.com/1989-08-01/news/26148256_1_cocaine-babies-crack-babies-damage).” One expert testifying before the US Senate Government Affairs Committee dramatically predicted that these children would grow up “
    [unable to make rational decisions, without capacity for sympathy or even respect for human life](http://www.cjpf.org/child-abuse-pregnancy).” But now, follow-up research over decades has definitively debunked the claim of the irreversible impairment of “crack babies.” Although infants born to women who use crack during pregnancy are more likely to be born prematurely (which is a serious negative outcome and not to be minimized), those who are born at full term have
    [no worse outcomes](http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study) than demographically similar children born to women not using crack cocaine during pregnancy. Researchers of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) studying images of “crack babies” from the 1980's
    [believe](http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/04/science/alcohol-s-toll-on-fetuses-even-worse-than-thought.html) that the infants depicted may actually have been suffering from FAS, which continues to cause
    [far more harm](http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/health/27coca.html?_r=0) to newborns than the effects of crack.
    [More than 30 states](http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/documents/pub_bp_punishingwomen.pdf) passed laws that punish or imprison pregnant women addicted to crack, but despite the facts, they have not repealed them. The criminal justice consequences of crack laws for such mothers have had more striking negative outcomes on the psychological and social development of their children than the maternal use of crack cocaine. The handicaps caused by prenatal cocaine use are now
    [speculative](http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/28/crack-babies-dont-necessarily-turn-into-troubled-teens/), but the developmental and psychological harms of having an incarcerated parent are
    [well-documented](http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-42ParentsBehindBars.pdf).

    **WHY THIS MATTERS:**

    The myths about crack cocaine have led to staggering injustices in sentencing for crack cocaine offenses. For over two decades, crack cocaine distribution was punished 100 times more harshly than powder cocaine distribution on a months per gram basis set by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. (Crack possession much less frequently prosecuted in federal court than in state courts, if equal to or exceeding 5 grams, was subject to a mandatory 5 years of imprisonment. Possession of 5 grams of powder cocaine often resulted in a time served sentence or probation.)  Under the federal crack cocaine mandatory sentencing laws of 1986, distributing 5 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 5 years up to 40 years, and distributing 50 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 10 years up to life imprisonment. For powder cocaine, these sentences were triggered by at least 500 g. or 5000 g. respectively — the infamous "100-to-1" disparity. With the federal Sentencing Guidelines, beginning in 1987, quantities of these drugs larger than the minimum triggered sentences greater than the minimums.

    Though most crack cocaine users are white, as a result of U.S. Department of Justice case selection practices, over 80 percent of all crack cocaine defendants have been black. Thus, the intense federal enforcement of these laws from 1987 to 2010 led to very long prison sentences for large numbers of low-level African American crack offenders. Congress refused to fix the sentencing disparity for decades. The 2010
    [Fair Sentencing Act](http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/fair-sentencing-act-memo.pdf), which finally reduced the "100-to-1" disparity, left an
    [18-fold difference](http://famm.org/projects/federal/us-congress/crack-cocaine-mandatory-minimum-sentences/) between the trigger for crack and the trigger for powder cocaine.
    Today, a five-year mandatory minimum prison sentence is still triggered by 500 grams of powder cocaine but only 28 grams of crack cocaine.

    Do crack’s dangers justify this disparity? No. Chemically, crack and powder cocaine are just two types of mixtures that contain the same substance that affects the nervous system in just one way. We do not punish illegal alcohol possession differently depending on whether the user planned to drink whiskey or beer. In fact, the most lethal method of administering cocaine is injecting powder cocaine — the form of cocaine that federal law punishes less severely — not smoking crack.

    At least 250 words

    Outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    **## USSCT.docx**

    DISCUSSION

    (USSCT): The US Supreme Court is not bound by the traditional rules of ethics for judges. Should there be rules and if so, what should they be?

    At least 250 words

    Two outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    **## CrackCocaineDisparity1.docx**

    Read the passage on Crack Cocaine. Do you think these laws were discriminatory on the basis of race or ethnicity? Why or why not? In your opinion, which ethical foundation are you basing your position on.

    Crack Cocaine

    **HOW DESTRUCTIVE IS CRACK COCAINE?**

    News sources and government agencies in the 1980's and 1990's declared crack cocaine as “
    [the most dangerous and quickly addictive drug known to man](https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ondcp/119466.pdf).” (White House, National Drug Control Strategy, p. 3, Sept. 1989).
    _The New York Times_ [quoted](http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/25/nyregion/drug-researchers-try-to-treat-a-nearly-unbreakable-habit.html) a University of Pennsylvania medical school professor warning in 1988 that, “We see people who feel they lost control almost from the first time they used it. Most people who got started with crack were addicted in six months to a year.” Two years later, a
    _New York Times_ columnist, Anna Quindlen,
    [described](http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/opinion/public-private-hearing-the-cries-of-crack.html) crack as “a stimulant so powerful that it makes people forget everything they once loved or lived for.” Facing growing use of crack, these authorities were repeating the anecdotes about dangers that, even if not verifiable, were believed would discourage experimentation and use. But now, more than three decades later, some anti-drug campaigns and educational materials make similar claims: the Foundation for a Drug-Free World, which provides anti-drug pamphlets to US public schools (and which claims to have distributed over 50 million such pamphlets worldwide) includes
    [one user's warning](http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/crackcocaine.html) that “‘one pipe [of crack] can be all it takes to turn you into an immoral monster.’ — Audrey.” (Accessed, August 30, 2019)

    But these claims about crack are quite exaggerated. In reality:

    **MOST PEOPLE WHO TRY CRACK NEVER BECOME ADDICTED.**

    · While crack cocaine is addictive, it is not instantly or universally habit-forming as was claimed in the 1980s, or as some anti-drug materials insist. An analysis of 2016 data from the
    [National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) shows that while (0.2 percent) of Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 reported that they had used crack cocaine at some point in their lives, only 38,000 reported using it in the month prior to the survey. In 2016, an
    [estimated](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.pdf) 432,000 Americans over age 12 were current users of crack (p.17). That suggests that fewer than 6% of young people who tried crack became regular users, much less single-minded “crack fiends.”

    **MOST OF THE VIOLENCE ASSOCIATED WITH CRACK COMES FROM THE ILLEGAL MARKET AND GANG ACTIVITY, NOT THE EFFECTS OF THE DRUG ITSELF.**

    · Crack cocaine can cause paranoia, which can incline people to acts of violence. And withdrawal from crack, especially involuntary withdrawal when a user has no money or cannot find a dealer, can also make dependent crack users irritable and angry. But as
    [c](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/http:/www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) [olumnist Jacob Sullum](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/) put it, “the vast majority of violence attributed to crack grew out of black-market disputes, as opposed to the drug’s pharmacological effects.” A
    [study](http://www.drugtext.org/Drug-Policy-Letter-march/april-1990/most-drug-related-murders-result-from-crack-sales-not-us.html) by researcher Paul Goldstein found that among drug-related homicides in New York City in 1988, 74% were a result of “systemic” violence, such as violence arising from commercial disputes, fights over turf, or drug sales. Only 15% of the drug-related homicides stemmed from the physical effects of intoxicants (with over two thirds caused by alcohol), and of those, only a small fraction were related to crack.

    **CRACK COCAINE IS NOT MORE POTENT THAN POWDER COCAINE—AND IT’S NOT THE MOST DANGEROUS FORM OF COCAINE USE.**

    ·
    [Crack cocaine is cocaine base, which is the active ingredient in powder cocaine.](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856) Crack is made out of powder cocaine in a simple preparation with baking soda and water. Upon evaporation, the mixture becomes a solid "rock" and when heated the cocaine base is vaporized (that is, "smoked"). Inhaling cocaine vapor, "smoking crack," leads to more intense sensations than snorting powder cocaine because inhaling cocaine vapor into the lungs allows the body to absorb a much greater dosage of the drug more quickly than by snorting – not because of any chemical difference between the two forms of cocaine. In fact, the most dangerous form of cocaine, measured by risk of overdose or death, isn’t crack, but
    [powder cocaine delivered through injection](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8918856).

    **“CRACK BABIES” ARE A MYTH.**

    · Media in the 1980's popularized the idea that children of women who used crack while pregnant were, as Charles Krauthammer put it, a neurologically damaged “
    [bio-underclass](http://articles.philly.com/1989-08-01/news/26148256_1_cocaine-babies-crack-babies-damage).” One expert testifying before the US Senate Government Affairs Committee dramatically predicted that these children would grow up “
    [unable to make rational decisions, without capacity for sympathy or even respect for human life](http://www.cjpf.org/child-abuse-pregnancy).” But now, follow-up research over decades has definitively debunked the claim of the irreversible impairment of “crack babies.” Although infants born to women who use crack during pregnancy are more likely to be born prematurely (which is a serious negative outcome and not to be minimized), those who are born at full term have
    [no worse outcomes](http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study) than demographically similar children born to women not using crack cocaine during pregnancy. Researchers of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) studying images of “crack babies” from the 1980's
    [believe](http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/04/science/alcohol-s-toll-on-fetuses-even-worse-than-thought.html) that the infants depicted may actually have been suffering from FAS, which continues to cause
    [far more harm](http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/health/27coca.html?_r=0) to newborns than the effects of crack.
    [More than 30 states](http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/documents/pub_bp_punishingwomen.pdf) passed laws that punish or imprison pregnant women addicted to crack, but despite the facts, they have not repealed them. The criminal justice consequences of crack laws for such mothers have had more striking negative outcomes on the psychological and social development of their children than the maternal use of crack cocaine. The handicaps caused by prenatal cocaine use are now
    [speculative](http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/28/crack-babies-dont-necessarily-turn-into-troubled-teens/), but the developmental and psychological harms of having an incarcerated parent are
    [well-documented](http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-42ParentsBehindBars.pdf).

    **WHY THIS MATTERS:**

    The myths about crack cocaine have led to staggering injustices in sentencing for crack cocaine offenses. For over two decades, crack cocaine distribution was punished 100 times more harshly than powder cocaine distribution on a months per gram basis set by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. (Crack possession much less frequently prosecuted in federal court than in state courts, if equal to or exceeding 5 grams, was subject to a mandatory 5 years of imprisonment. Possession of 5 grams of powder cocaine often resulted in a time served sentence or probation.)  Under the federal crack cocaine mandatory sentencing laws of 1986, distributing 5 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 5 years up to 40 years, and distributing 50 g. of crack carried a sentence of at least 10 years up to life imprisonment. For powder cocaine, these sentences were triggered by at least 500 g. or 5000 g. respectively — the infamous "100-to-1" disparity. With the federal Sentencing Guidelines, beginning in 1987, quantities of these drugs larger than the minimum triggered sentences greater than the minimums.

    Though most crack cocaine users are white, as a result of U.S. Department of Justice case selection practices, over 80 percent of all crack cocaine defendants have been black. Thus, the intense federal enforcement of these laws from 1987 to 2010 led to very long prison sentences for large numbers of low-level African American crack offenders. Congress refused to fix the sentencing disparity for decades. The 2010
    [Fair Sentencing Act](http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/fair-sentencing-act-memo.pdf), which finally reduced the "100-to-1" disparity, left an
    [18-fold difference](http://famm.org/projects/federal/us-congress/crack-cocaine-mandatory-minimum-sentences/) between the trigger for crack and the trigger for powder cocaine.
    Today, a five-year mandatory minimum prison sentence is still triggered by 500 grams of powder cocaine but only 28 grams of crack cocaine.

    Do crack’s dangers justify this disparity? No. Chemically, crack and powder cocaine are just two types of mixtures that contain the same substance that affects the nervous system in just one way. We do not punish illegal alcohol possession differently depending on whether the user planned to drink whiskey or beer. In fact, the most lethal method of administering cocaine is injecting powder cocaine — the form of cocaine that federal law punishes less severely — not smoking crack.

    At least 250 words

    Outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Research topic

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Researchtopicexamples.docx – ## ProblemStatement.docx – ## ResearchOutlineTemplate.docx – ## ResearchTopicforOgl570.docx – ## AppliedProjectProspectusthatisdueinweek6.docx **## Researchtopicexamples.docx** **Research topic examples** **Template:** The impact of [leadership approach/theory/prac…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Researchtopicexamples.docx

    – ## ProblemStatement.docx

    – ## ResearchOutlineTemplate.docx

    – ## ResearchTopicforOgl570.docx

    – ## AppliedProjectProspectusthatisdueinweek6.docx

    **## Researchtopicexamples.docx**

    **Research topic examples**

    **Template:** The impact of [leadership approach/theory/practice] on [organizational outcome/employee outcome] within [context/industry/organization type].

    **Examples** based on the above template:

    · The impact of transformational leadership on employee engagement in nonprofit organizations.

    · The role of ethical leadership in shaping decision-making within multinational corporations.

    · Servant leadership influence on trust and collaboration in virtual teams.

    **## ProblemStatement.docx**

    Problem Statement

    Despite widespread recognition of the importance of ethical leadership, ethical scandals continue to erode stakeholder trust and damage organizational legitimacy across industries. Prior research has primarily focused on identifying the traits and behaviors of ethical leaders, yet less is known about how organizational culture influences the effectiveness of those leadership practices. This gap is significant because leadership behaviors do not occur in isolation; they are shaped and constrained by the cultural norms, values, and practices of the organization. Without a clearer understanding of this interaction, organizations face challenges in designing leadership development initiatives and organizational policies that effectively promote ethical behavior at all levels. Therefore, the problem this study addresses is the limited understanding of how organizational culture moderates the relationship between ethical leadership and employee decision-making.

    **## ResearchOutlineTemplate.docx**

    **Research Outline Template**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Background and significance of the study

    · Statement of the problem

    · Purpose of the study

    · Research questions

    **II. Literature Review**

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 1: Leadership Theory/Approach**

    Key definitions and theoretical foundations
    Major findings in existing research
    Gaps/limitations

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 2: Organizational Context / Culture**

    Relevant contextual factors (e.g., industry, organizational size, cultural dimensions)
    Research on organizational culture and leadership interactions
    Identified gaps

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 3: Outcomes / Dependent Variables**

    Employee decision-making, performance, engagement, trust, etc.
    How these outcomes are measured in prior studies
    Limitations of current evidence

    **III. Conceptual Framework**

    · Model or framework connecting leadership → organizational culture → employee/organizational outcomes

    · Hypothesized relationships

    **IV. Methodology (Preview)**

    · Research design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods)

    · Population and sample

    · Data collection methods (e.g., survey, interviews, case study)

    · Data analysis approach

    **V. Implications**

    · Theoretical contributions (leadership theory, organizational culture theory)

    · Practical applications (leadership development, organizational policy)

    **VI. Conclusion**

    · Summary of research focus

    · Relevance to organizational leadership as a field

    2

    **## ResearchTopicforOgl570.docx**

    Research Topic, Problem Statement & Outline [due Aug 29]

    ·
    **Due** Friday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    ·
    **Available** after Aug 21 at 12am

    **Applied Project Prospectus Context:** For the Applied Project Prospectus, you will take a holistic look at your topic.
    **Remember that you have seven weeks in this class to do the Project Prospectus and six-seven weeks to complete the project (in OGL593). The project needs to be smaller and focused!** Refer to the
    **🛑** [**Applied Project Prospectus.**](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/pages/applied-project-prospectus)

    **Task:** Select a topic for the Applied Project Prospectus. The topic should be one that you will use for your capstone project to be completed in OGL 593.

    **Instructions**

    **Step 1:** Choose a
    **topic** for your capstone project with the Applied Project Prospectus in mind. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113432733?wrap=1)

    for research topic examples.)

    **Step 2:** Begin with a brief discussion of the context to identity the
    **problem** for which your research will lead to a solution. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113432749?wrap=1)

    for an example of a problem statement.)

    **Step 2:** Explain why the topic is important (research justification).

    **Step 3:** Describe how it aligns with three knowledge areas in leadership studies. Examples of some knowledge areas to consider: L
    **eadership**(purpose of leadership, leadership theories and practices); E
    **ngagement (** leadership engagement, employee relations and retention);
    **Organizational Culture** (a culture that supports or does not support employee engagement).

    **Step 4**: Provide a tentative outline of the issues to be addressed in the research. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113433165?wrap=1)

    for an outline template.)

    **Length** **and Format:** Your response should be about 500 words, and submitted as a Word document, 12 points font size, and double spaced. References, including in-text citations, should be APA Style, and do not count toward the word limit. Like any other writing assignment, it will be checked on Turnitin f

    **## AppliedProjectProspectusthatisdueinweek6.docx**

    🛑 Applied Project Prospectus that is due in week 6 (This is just an example of what the final paper will look like). You will not be turning this in until week 6)

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    **Purpose**: Complete an Applied Project Prospectus in OGL 570.

    **Specifics:**

    This is an outline for the final prospectus document. Please use APA formatting and the bolded headings and subheadings below to organize your document.

    · Use APA (7th edition) Style with a minimum of 15 sources. Make sure to use in-text citations.

    · Leave placeholders for pages or heading that you do not have the information for yet.

    · Paraphrase authors instead of quoting them. Then use citations/NO QUOTES

    · Do not use personal pronouns (I, me, we, us, they, them).

    · Do not use contractions (don’t, isn’t, won’t, etc..).

    · Use third person objective voice and write in past tense

    · Avoid the use of unnecessary adjectives or other descriptors (very, extremely,
    always, never,)

    · Be careful of over-reaching claims not supported by academic research (you do not
    have causal relationships and you do not have proof)

    · Numbers below 10 are written alphabetically (example, two, three, four). Numbers
    above 10 are written numerically (example, 10, 11, 12)

    Provide the following Pages and Headings.

    **Cover or Title page (page 1)**

    Running head:
    **[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters]**

    The Title of Your Paper (no longer than 12 words)

    First name Middle initial. Last name

    Analyzing Organizations (OGL 570)

    School of Applied Professional Studies

    Arizona State University

    Month Date, Year

    **Abstract (page 2)**

    **Abstract**

    Do not indent. Clearly and concisely summarize the project's purpose, methods, key findings, and practical implications. The abstract should be between 150-350 words.

    **Prospectus (page 3)**

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    Title

    **Introduction**

                One to three paragraphs. Capture the audience’s attention. Brief background of the topic, organization background and context. State the problem or key issues. Ground the problem in leadership theory or concepts – identify three knowledge areas. Transition by indicating that the applied project aims to address the problem or issue.

    **Purpose Statement and Scope**

    Purpose

                The purpose and scope describe the goal or aim of the project. It provides the possible solution to the problem or issue that you have identified. The purpose and scope should align with the leadership issue. State an explicit purpose – e.g., The purpose of this project is… The purpose statement should be specific, clear, goal-oriented, and deliverable focused. A formula that may be helpful: The purpose of this project is to [achieve what] in order to [solve/address what leadership challenge or opportunity] contributing to [broader organizational outcome].

    Scope

                The scope should include the deliverable, inclusions/exclusions and stakeholders involved.

    **Literature Review**

    Introduction

                Introduce the review of literature to the reader. Identify the knowledge areas. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #1

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #2

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #3

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Summary

                Summarize the knowledge areas and framework for your project.

    **Project Context**

                The project context is the backdrop of the issue. The context includes the organizational environment, the existing leadership practices, and the relevance of addressing the problem in the current landscape.

    Organizational Overview

                Name & provide an overview of the organization.

    Industry & Sectors

                Description of industry & sectors and other relevant information needed to situate your project in a broader context.

    Project Trends

                Description of trends related to project (past, present, & projected).

    External Factors

                External organizational factors (e.g., PESTLE, SWOT, or gap).

    Internal Factors

                Describe the Internal factors (e.g., culture, team dynamics or leadership style).

    **Participants & Positionality**

                Identify the participants. Include the sample population and why this sample population was chosen in the context of your research. Describe yourself in the research context and the lens you bring to the study.

    **Project Rationale**

    Problem Identification

                Identify a problem or issue that you would like to solve. Please note that the use of a problem is defined as an area of concern, a gap in existing knowledge, or a deviation in the norm or standard that points to the need for further understanding and investigation. Describe why the problem needs to be solved, the impact of the problem or issue, and who will benefit from solving it.

    Problem Statement

                Write a clear, concise problem statement that will guide the direction of the project. A well-formulated problem statement has the following: leadership issue; the importance of the issue; who’s impacted (stakeholders); and potential consequences of not addressing the issue.

    Rationale of Project

                Describe the The rationale for an applied leadership project is the justification for why the project is necessary and how it will help address leadership challenges. The rationale links the identified problem to broader organizational goals and external factors, showing the importance of the project and its potential impact on the organization’s success.

    **Research Questions**

                The research questions should stem from the purpose statement. It may be helpful to restate the purpose statement. A well-crafted research question will guide the entire process of data collection and analysis. Provide 1-3 research questions.

    **Research and Analytical Methods**

                 Describe the analytical methods to answer the research questions. Describe the approach or methodology (e.g. interviews, survey, secondary sources, archival sources, organizational records, web documents, etc.). Identify the process to collect and analyze (e.g. thematic coding, pattern identification, statistical analysis, etc.) the information you need to complete the project. For qualitative data, you may conduct interviews, surveys, or focus groups. For quantitative data, you may distribute surveys or collect performance metrics.

    **Assumptions and Limitations**

                 State the initial assumptions about the project. Identify the project’s limitations. Describe the scope of the study and what the study will not address.

    **Primary Audience, Anticipated Deliverables, and Contribution**

                Describe the intended audience (besides your classmates and the professor). Detail the specifics of your applied project deliverable. Keep in mind that the benchmark assignments are NOT the project deliverable, but the supporting materials to the deliverable. Be as specific as you can at this point to offer details about what your project deliverable will be, including length, size, etc. Provide the contribution your project can make to the organization and the discipline of organizational leadership.

    **Ethical Considerations**

                Explain how you ensured that your research will not harm participants and how you protected participants’ dignity and privacy. Declare any potential conflicts of interest. Explain how you will have accounted for potential bias in your project design, data collection, analysis, and delivery.

    **Results To be completed in OGL 593**

                You will not have the results yet because you have not done the research. This section is where you report the findings of your research based on the information gathered from the methodology used to answer the research questions. This section summarizes and presents the findings of the study to put in the context of your research questions. Findings often use text, tables, and/or figures. The discussion section shows the reader what your findings mean. The results chapter or section simply and objectively reports what you found, without speculating on why you found these results. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in context, and explains why they matter. In qualitative research, results and discussion are sometimes combined. But in quantitative research, it’s considered important to separate the objective results from your interpretation of them.

    **Conclusions To be completed in OGL 593**

                Restate your thesis (purpose), summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed in the project, and offer final impressions on the project. Describe greater understanding of the knowledge areas in the context of the project and implications for the future. The conclusion paragraph(s) should restate your thesis, summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed throughout the work, and offer your final impression on the central idea. This final summation should also contain the moral of your story or a revelation of a deeper truth or greater understanding of the topic under study.

    **Work Plan Schedule**

    The expected start date of your project is after your prospectus is approved and the final delivery date of your project is determined by when you are enrolled in OGL 593. Working backward from the completion/delivery date, break your project schedule down by describing the major project activities and milestones (e.g. identify current training practices, complete data collection process, complete analysis of findings, etc.).

    **References (new page)**

    **References**

    Use APA for references. The references should use a hanging indent and be in alphabetical order. There should be a minimum of 15 sources cited.

    **Appendix (new page)**

    **Appendix (Name)**

    Each appendix should have its own page with the name of the Appendix. Attach any forms listed and used for your project. Everyone should have the CITI Certification. You may also have survey questions, interview questions, consent forms, recruitment scripts, written permission forms from organization or IRB approval. NOTE: if need IRB approval, you will not be able to submit and get approval in the timeframe of the class. Proceed with human subject learning experiences with the classroom research document. The outcome of your human subject research MUST remain the confines of this course, it cannot be used for presentations or publications outside of the OGL593 course.

    **Grading:** the grading criteria is holistic based on clarity, organization, detail, style, an

    **## AppliedProjectProspectusthatisdueinweek6.docx**

    🛑 Applied Project Prospectus that is due in week 6 (This is just an example of what the final paper will look like). You will not be turning this in until week 6)

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    **Purpose**: Complete an Applied Project Prospectus in OGL 570.

    **Specifics:**

    This is an outline for the final prospectus document. Please use APA formatting and the bolded headings and subheadings below to organize your document.

    · Use APA (7th edition) Style with a minimum of 15 sources. Make sure to use in-text citations.

    · Leave placeholders for pages or heading that you do not have the information for yet.

    · Paraphrase authors instead of quoting them. Then use citations/NO QUOTES

    · Do not use personal pronouns (I, me, we, us, they, them).

    · Do not use contractions (don’t, isn’t, won’t, etc..).

    · Use third person objective voice and write in past tense

    · Avoid the use of unnecessary adjectives or other descriptors (very, extremely,
    always, never,)

    · Be careful of over-reaching claims not supported by academic research (you do not
    have causal relationships and you do not have proof)

    · Numbers below 10 are written alphabetically (example, two, three, four). Numbers
    above 10 are written numerically (example, 10, 11, 12)

    Provide the following Pages and Headings.

    **Cover or Title page (page 1)**

    Running head:
    **[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters]**

    The Title of Your Paper (no longer than 12 words)

    First name Middle initial. Last name

    Analyzing Organizations (OGL 570)

    School of Applied Professional Studies

    Arizona State University

    Month Date, Year

    **Abstract (page 2)**

    **Abstract**

    Do not indent. Clearly and concisely summarize the project's purpose, methods, key findings, and practical implications. The abstract should be between 150-350 words.

    **Prospectus (page 3)**

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    Title

    **Introduction**

                One to three paragraphs. Capture the audience’s attention. Brief background of the topic, organization background and context. State the problem or key issues. Ground the problem in leadership theory or concepts – identify three knowledge areas. Transition by indicating that the applied project aims to address the problem or issue.

    **Purpose Statement and Scope**

    Purpose

                The purpose and scope describe the goal or aim of the project. It provides the possible solution to the problem or issue that you have identified. The purpose and scope should align with the leadership issue. State an explicit purpose – e.g., The purpose of this project is… The purpose statement should be specific, clear, goal-oriented, and deliverable focused. A formula that may be helpful: The purpose of this project is to [achieve what] in order to [solve/address what leadership challenge or opportunity] contributing to [broader organizational outcome].

    Scope

                The scope should include the deliverable, inclusions/exclusions and stakeholders involved.

    **Literature Review**

    Introduction

                Introduce the review of literature to the reader. Identify the knowledge areas. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #1

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #2

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #3

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Summary

                Summarize the knowledge areas and framework for your project.

    **Project Context**

                The project context is the backdrop of the issue. The context includes the organizational environment, the existing leadership practices, and the relevance of addressing the problem in the current landscape.

    Organizational Overview

                Name & provide an overview of the organization.

    Industry & Sectors

                Description of industry & sectors and other relevant information needed to situate your project in a broader context.

    Project Trends

                Description of trends related to project (past, present, & projected).

    External Factors

                External organizational factors (e.g., PESTLE, SWOT, or gap).

    Internal Factors

                Describe the Internal factors (e.g., culture, team dynamics or leadership style).

    **Participants & Positionality**

                Identify the participants. Include the sample population and why this sample population was chosen in the context of your research. Describe yourself in the research context and the lens you bring to the study.

    **Project Rationale**

    Problem Identification

                Identify a problem or issue that you would like to solve. Please note that the use of a problem is defined as an area of concern, a gap in existing knowledge, or a deviation in the norm or standard that points to the need for further understanding and investigation. Describe why the problem needs to be solved, the impact of the problem or issue, and who will benefit from solving it.

    Problem Statement

                Write a clear, concise problem statement that will guide the direction of the project. A well-formulated problem statement has the following: leadership issue; the importance of the issue; who’s impacted (stakeholders); and potential consequences of not addressing the issue.

    Rationale of Project

                Describe the The rationale for an applied leadership project is the justification for why the project is necessary and how it will help address leadership challenges. The rationale links the identified problem to broader organizational goals and external factors, showing the importance of the project and its potential impact on the organization’s success.

    **Research Questions**

                The research questions should stem from the purpose statement. It may be helpful to restate the purpose statement. A well-crafted research question will guide the entire process of data collection and analysis. Provide 1-3 research questions.

    **Research and Analytical Methods**

                 Describe the analytical methods to answer the research questions. Describe the approach or methodology (e.g. interviews, survey, secondary sources, archival sources, organizational records, web documents, etc.). Identify the process to collect and analyze (e.g. thematic coding, pattern identification, statistical analysis, etc.) the information you need to complete the project. For qualitative data, you may conduct interviews, surveys, or focus groups. For quantitative data, you may distribute surveys or collect performance metrics.

    **Assumptions and Limitations**

                 State the initial assumptions about the project. Identify the project’s limitations. Describe the scope of the study and what the study will not address.

    **Primary Audience, Anticipated Deliverables, and Contribution**

                Describe the intended audience (besides your classmates and the professor). Detail the specifics of your applied project deliverable. Keep in mind that the benchmark assignments are NOT the project deliverable, but the supporting materials to the deliverable. Be as specific as you can at this point to offer details about what your project deliverable will be, including length, size, etc. Provide the contribution your project can make to the organization and the discipline of organizational leadership.

    **Ethical Considerations**

                Explain how you ensured that your research will not harm participants and how you protected participants’ dignity and privacy. Declare any potential conflicts of interest. Explain how you will have accounted for potential bias in your project design, data collection, analysis, and delivery.

    **Results To be completed in OGL 593**

                You will not have the results yet because you have not done the research. This section is where you report the findings of your research based on the information gathered from the methodology used to answer the research questions. This section summarizes and presents the findings of the study to put in the context of your research questions. Findings often use text, tables, and/or figures. The discussion section shows the reader what your findings mean. The results chapter or section simply and objectively reports what you found, without speculating on why you found these results. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in context, and explains why they matter. In qualitative research, results and discussion are sometimes combined. But in quantitative research, it’s considered important to separate the objective results from your interpretation of them.

    **Conclusions To be completed in OGL 593**

                Restate your thesis (purpose), summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed in the project, and offer final impressions on the project. Describe greater understanding of the knowledge areas in the context of the project and implications for the future. The conclusion paragraph(s) should restate your thesis, summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed throughout the work, and offer your final impression on the central idea. This final summation should also contain the moral of your story or a revelation of a deeper truth or greater understanding of the topic under study.

    **Work Plan Schedule**

    The expected start date of your project is after your prospectus is approved and the final delivery date of your project is determined by when you are enrolled in OGL 593. Working backward from the completion/delivery date, break your project schedule down by describing the major project activities and milestones (e.g. identify current training practices, complete data collection process, complete analysis of findings, etc.).

    **References (new page)**

    **References**

    Use APA for references. The references should use a hanging indent and be in alphabetical order. There should be a minimum of 15 sources cited.

    **Appendix (new page)**

    **Appendix (Name)**

    Each appendix should have its own page with the name of the Appendix. Attach any forms listed and used for your project. Everyone should have the CITI Certification. You may also have survey questions, interview questions, consent forms, recruitment scripts, written permission forms from organization or IRB approval. NOTE: if need IRB approval, you will not be able to submit and get approval in the timeframe of the class. Proceed with human subject learning experiences with the classroom research document. The outcome of your human subject research MUST remain the confines of this course, it cannot be used for presentations or publications outside of the OGL593 course.

    **Grading:** the grading criteria is holistic based on clarity, organization, detail, style, an

    **## Researchtopicexamples.docx**

    **Research topic examples**

    **Template:** The impact of [leadership approach/theory/practice] on [organizational outcome/employee outcome] within [context/industry/organization type].

    **Examples** based on the above template:

    · The impact of transformational leadership on employee engagement in nonprofit organizations.

    · The role of ethical leadership in shaping decision-making within multinational corporations.

    · Servant leadership influence on trust and collaboration in virtual teams.

    **## ProblemStatement.docx**

    Problem Statement

    Despite widespread recognition of the importance of ethical leadership, ethical scandals continue to erode stakeholder trust and damage organizational legitimacy across industries. Prior research has primarily focused on identifying the traits and behaviors of ethical leaders, yet less is known about how organizational culture influences the effectiveness of those leadership practices. This gap is significant because leadership behaviors do not occur in isolation; they are shaped and constrained by the cultural norms, values, and practices of the organization. Without a clearer understanding of this interaction, organizations face challenges in designing leadership development initiatives and organizational policies that effectively promote ethical behavior at all levels. Therefore, the problem this study addresses is the limited understanding of how organizational culture moderates the relationship between ethical leadership and employee decision-making.

    **## ResearchOutlineTemplate.docx**

    **Research Outline Template**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Background and significance of the study

    · Statement of the problem

    · Purpose of the study

    · Research questions

    **II. Literature Review**

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 1: Leadership Theory/Approach**

    Key definitions and theoretical foundations
    Major findings in existing research
    Gaps/limitations

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 2: Organizational Context / Culture**

    Relevant contextual factors (e.g., industry, organizational size, cultural dimensions)
    Research on organizational culture and leadership interactions
    Identified gaps

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 3: Outcomes / Dependent Variables**

    Employee decision-making, performance, engagement, trust, etc.
    How these outcomes are measured in prior studies
    Limitations of current evidence

    **III. Conceptual Framework**

    · Model or framework connecting leadership → organizational culture → employee/organizational outcomes

    · Hypothesized relationships

    **IV. Methodology (Preview)**

    · Research design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods)

    · Population and sample

    · Data collection methods (e.g., survey, interviews, case study)

    · Data analysis approach

    **V. Implications**

    · Theoretical contributions (leadership theory, organizational culture theory)

    · Practical applications (leadership development, organizational policy)

    **VI. Conclusion**

    · Summary of research focus

    · Relevance to organizational leadership as a field

    2

    **## ResearchTopicforOgl570.docx**

    Research Topic, Problem Statement & Outline [due Aug 29]

    ·
    **Due** Friday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    ·
    **Available** after Aug 21 at 12am

    **Applied Project Prospectus Context:** For the Applied Project Prospectus, you will take a holistic look at your topic.
    **Remember that you have seven weeks in this class to do the Project Prospectus and six-seven weeks to complete the project (in OGL593). The project needs to be smaller and focused!** Refer to the
    **🛑** [**Applied Project Prospectus.**](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/pages/applied-project-prospectus)

    **Task:** Select a topic for the Applied Project Prospectus. The topic should be one that you will use for your capstone project to be completed in OGL 593.

    **Instructions**

    **Step 1:** Choose a
    **topic** for your capstone project with the Applied Project Prospectus in mind. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113432733?wrap=1)

    for research topic examples.)

    **Step 2:** Begin with a brief discussion of the context to identity the
    **problem** for which your research will lead to a solution. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113432749?wrap=1)

    for an example of a problem statement.)

    **Step 2:** Explain why the topic is important (research justification).

    **Step 3:** Describe how it aligns with three knowledge areas in leadership studies. Examples of some knowledge areas to consider: L
    **eadership**(purpose of leadership, leadership theories and practices); E
    **ngagement (** leadership engagement, employee relations and retention);
    **Organizational Culture** (a culture that supports or does not support employee engagement).

    **Step 4**: Provide a tentative outline of the issues to be addressed in the research. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113433165?wrap=1)

    for an outline template.)

    **Length** **and Format:** Your response should be about 500 words, and submitted as a Word document, 12 points font size, and double spaced. References, including in-text citations, should be APA Style, and do not count toward the word limit. Like any other writing assignment, it will be checked on Turnitin f

    **## AppliedProjectProspectusthatisdueinweek6.docx**

    🛑 Applied Project Prospectus that is due in week 6 (This is just an example of what the final paper will look like). You will not be turning this in until week 6)

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    **Purpose**: Complete an Applied Project Prospectus in OGL 570.

    **Specifics:**

    This is an outline for the final prospectus document. Please use APA formatting and the bolded headings and subheadings below to organize your document.

    · Use APA (7th edition) Style with a minimum of 15 sources. Make sure to use in-text citations.

    · Leave placeholders for pages or heading that you do not have the information for yet.

    · Paraphrase authors instead of quoting them. Then use citations/NO QUOTES

    · Do not use personal pronouns (I, me, we, us, they, them).

    · Do not use contractions (don’t, isn’t, won’t, etc..).

    · Use third person objective voice and write in past tense

    · Avoid the use of unnecessary adjectives or other descriptors (very, extremely,
    always, never,)

    · Be careful of over-reaching claims not supported by academic research (you do not
    have causal relationships and you do not have proof)

    · Numbers below 10 are written alphabetically (example, two, three, four). Numbers
    above 10 are written numerically (example, 10, 11, 12)

    Provide the following Pages and Headings.

    **Cover or Title page (page 1)**

    Running head:
    **[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters]**

    The Title of Your Paper (no longer than 12 words)

    First name Middle initial. Last name

    Analyzing Organizations (OGL 570)

    School of Applied Professional Studies

    Arizona State University

    Month Date, Year

    **Abstract (page 2)**

    **Abstract**

    Do not indent. Clearly and concisely summarize the project's purpose, methods, key findings, and practical implications. The abstract should be between 150-350 words.

    **Prospectus (page 3)**

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    Title

    **Introduction**

                One to three paragraphs. Capture the audience’s attention. Brief background of the topic, organization background and context. State the problem or key issues. Ground the problem in leadership theory or concepts – identify three knowledge areas. Transition by indicating that the applied project aims to address the problem or issue.

    **Purpose Statement and Scope**

    Purpose

                The purpose and scope describe the goal or aim of the project. It provides the possible solution to the problem or issue that you have identified. The purpose and scope should align with the leadership issue. State an explicit purpose – e.g., The purpose of this project is… The purpose statement should be specific, clear, goal-oriented, and deliverable focused. A formula that may be helpful: The purpose of this project is to [achieve what] in order to [solve/address what leadership challenge or opportunity] contributing to [broader organizational outcome].

    Scope

                The scope should include the deliverable, inclusions/exclusions and stakeholders involved.

    **Literature Review**

    Introduction

                Introduce the review of literature to the reader. Identify the knowledge areas. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #1

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #2

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #3

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Summary

                Summarize the knowledge areas and framework for your project.

    **Project Context**

                The project context is the backdrop of the issue. The context includes the organizational environment, the existing leadership practices, and the relevance of addressing the problem in the current landscape.

    Organizational Overview

                Name & provide an overview of the organization.

    Industry & Sectors

                Description of industry & sectors and other relevant information needed to situate your project in a broader context.

    Project Trends

                Description of trends related to project (past, present, & projected).

    External Factors

                External organizational factors (e.g., PESTLE, SWOT, or gap).

    Internal Factors

                Describe the Internal factors (e.g., culture, team dynamics or leadership style).

    **Participants & Positionality**

                Identify the participants. Include the sample population and why this sample population was chosen in the context of your research. Describe yourself in the research context and the lens you bring to the study.

    **Project Rationale**

    Problem Identification

                Identify a problem or issue that you would like to solve. Please note that the use of a problem is defined as an area of concern, a gap in existing knowledge, or a deviation in the norm or standard that points to the need for further understanding and investigation. Describe why the problem needs to be solved, the impact of the problem or issue, and who will benefit from solving it.

    Problem Statement

                Write a clear, concise problem statement that will guide the direction of the project. A well-formulated problem statement has the following: leadership issue; the importance of the issue; who’s impacted (stakeholders); and potential consequences of not addressing the issue.

    Rationale of Project

                Describe the The rationale for an applied leadership project is the justification for why the project is necessary and how it will help address leadership challenges. The rationale links the identified problem to broader organizational goals and external factors, showing the importance of the project and its potential impact on the organization’s success.

    **Research Questions**

                The research questions should stem from the purpose statement. It may be helpful to restate the purpose statement. A well-crafted research question will guide the entire process of data collection and analysis. Provide 1-3 research questions.

    **Research and Analytical Methods**

                 Describe the analytical methods to answer the research questions. Describe the approach or methodology (e.g. interviews, survey, secondary sources, archival sources, organizational records, web documents, etc.). Identify the process to collect and analyze (e.g. thematic coding, pattern identification, statistical analysis, etc.) the information you need to complete the project. For qualitative data, you may conduct interviews, surveys, or focus groups. For quantitative data, you may distribute surveys or collect performance metrics.

    **Assumptions and Limitations**

                 State the initial assumptions about the project. Identify the project’s limitations. Describe the scope of the study and what the study will not address.

    **Primary Audience, Anticipated Deliverables, and Contribution**

                Describe the intended audience (besides your classmates and the professor). Detail the specifics of your applied project deliverable. Keep in mind that the benchmark assignments are NOT the project deliverable, but the supporting materials to the deliverable. Be as specific as you can at this point to offer details about what your project deliverable will be, including length, size, etc. Provide the contribution your project can make to the organization and the discipline of organizational leadership.

    **Ethical Considerations**

                Explain how you ensured that your research will not harm participants and how you protected participants’ dignity and privacy. Declare any potential conflicts of interest. Explain how you will have accounted for potential bias in your project design, data collection, analysis, and delivery.

    **Results To be completed in OGL 593**

                You will not have the results yet because you have not done the research. This section is where you report the findings of your research based on the information gathered from the methodology used to answer the research questions. This section summarizes and presents the findings of the study to put in the context of your research questions. Findings often use text, tables, and/or figures. The discussion section shows the reader what your findings mean. The results chapter or section simply and objectively reports what you found, without speculating on why you found these results. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in context, and explains why they matter. In qualitative research, results and discussion are sometimes combined. But in quantitative research, it’s considered important to separate the objective results from your interpretation of them.

    **Conclusions To be completed in OGL 593**

                Restate your thesis (purpose), summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed in the project, and offer final impressions on the project. Describe greater understanding of the knowledge areas in the context of the project and implications for the future. The conclusion paragraph(s) should restate your thesis, summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed throughout the work, and offer your final impression on the central idea. This final summation should also contain the moral of your story or a revelation of a deeper truth or greater understanding of the topic under study.

    **Work Plan Schedule**

    The expected start date of your project is after your prospectus is approved and the final delivery date of your project is determined by when you are enrolled in OGL 593. Working backward from the completion/delivery date, break your project schedule down by describing the major project activities and milestones (e.g. identify current training practices, complete data collection process, complete analysis of findings, etc.).

    **References (new page)**

    **References**

    Use APA for references. The references should use a hanging indent and be in alphabetical order. There should be a minimum of 15 sources cited.

    **Appendix (new page)**

    **Appendix (Name)**

    Each appendix should have its own page with the name of the Appendix. Attach any forms listed and used for your project. Everyone should have the CITI Certification. You may also have survey questions, interview questions, consent forms, recruitment scripts, written permission forms from organization or IRB approval. NOTE: if need IRB approval, you will not be able to submit and get approval in the timeframe of the class. Proceed with human subject learning experiences with the classroom research document. The outcome of your human subject research MUST remain the confines of this course, it cannot be used for presentations or publications outside of the OGL593 course.

    **Grading:** the grading criteria is holistic based on clarity, organization, detail, style, an

    **## Researchtopicexamples.docx**

    **Research topic examples**

    **Template:** The impact of [leadership approach/theory/practice] on [organizational outcome/employee outcome] within [context/industry/organization type].

    **Examples** based on the above template:

    · The impact of transformational leadership on employee engagement in nonprofit organizations.

    · The role of ethical leadership in shaping decision-making within multinational corporations.

    · Servant leadership influence on trust and collaboration in virtual teams.

    **## ProblemStatement.docx**

    Problem Statement

    Despite widespread recognition of the importance of ethical leadership, ethical scandals continue to erode stakeholder trust and damage organizational legitimacy across industries. Prior research has primarily focused on identifying the traits and behaviors of ethical leaders, yet less is known about how organizational culture influences the effectiveness of those leadership practices. This gap is significant because leadership behaviors do not occur in isolation; they are shaped and constrained by the cultural norms, values, and practices of the organization. Without a clearer understanding of this interaction, organizations face challenges in designing leadership development initiatives and organizational policies that effectively promote ethical behavior at all levels. Therefore, the problem this study addresses is the limited understanding of how organizational culture moderates the relationship between ethical leadership and employee decision-making.

    **## ResearchOutlineTemplate.docx**

    **Research Outline Template**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Background and significance of the study

    · Statement of the problem

    · Purpose of the study

    · Research questions

    **II. Literature Review**

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 1: Leadership Theory/Approach**

    Key definitions and theoretical foundations
    Major findings in existing research
    Gaps/limitations

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 2: Organizational Context / Culture**

    Relevant contextual factors (e.g., industry, organizational size, cultural dimensions)
    Research on organizational culture and leadership interactions
    Identified gaps

    ·
    **Knowledge Area 3: Outcomes / Dependent Variables**

    Employee decision-making, performance, engagement, trust, etc.
    How these outcomes are measured in prior studies
    Limitations of current evidence

    **III. Conceptual Framework**

    · Model or framework connecting leadership → organizational culture → employee/organizational outcomes

    · Hypothesized relationships

    **IV. Methodology (Preview)**

    · Research design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods)

    · Population and sample

    · Data collection methods (e.g., survey, interviews, case study)

    · Data analysis approach

    **V. Implications**

    · Theoretical contributions (leadership theory, organizational culture theory)

    · Practical applications (leadership development, organizational policy)

    **VI. Conclusion**

    · Summary of research focus

    · Relevance to organizational leadership as a field

    2

    **## ResearchTopicforOgl570.docx**

    Research Topic, Problem Statement & Outline [due Aug 29]

    ·
    **Due** Friday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    ·
    **Available** after Aug 21 at 12am

    **Applied Project Prospectus Context:** For the Applied Project Prospectus, you will take a holistic look at your topic.
    **Remember that you have seven weeks in this class to do the Project Prospectus and six-seven weeks to complete the project (in OGL593). The project needs to be smaller and focused!** Refer to the
    **🛑** [**Applied Project Prospectus.**](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/pages/applied-project-prospectus)

    **Task:** Select a topic for the Applied Project Prospectus. The topic should be one that you will use for your capstone project to be completed in OGL 593.

    **Instructions**

    **Step 1:** Choose a
    **topic** for your capstone project with the Applied Project Prospectus in mind. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113432733?wrap=1)

    for research topic examples.)

    **Step 2:** Begin with a brief discussion of the context to identity the
    **problem** for which your research will lead to a solution. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113432749?wrap=1)

    for an example of a problem statement.)

    **Step 2:** Explain why the topic is important (research justification).

    **Step 3:** Describe how it aligns with three knowledge areas in leadership studies. Examples of some knowledge areas to consider: L
    **eadership**(purpose of leadership, leadership theories and practices); E
    **ngagement (** leadership engagement, employee relations and retention);
    **Organizational Culture** (a culture that supports or does not support employee engagement).

    **Step 4**: Provide a tentative outline of the issues to be addressed in the research. (Click
    [here](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/227852/files/113433165?wrap=1)

    for an outline template.)

    **Length** **and Format:** Your response should be about 500 words, and submitted as a Word document, 12 points font size, and double spaced. References, including in-text citations, should be APA Style, and do not count toward the word limit. Like any other writing assignment, it will be checked on Turnitin f

    **## AppliedProjectProspectusthatisdueinweek6.docx**

    🛑 Applied Project Prospectus that is due in week 6 (This is just an example of what the final paper will look like). You will not be turning this in until week 6)

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    **Purpose**: Complete an Applied Project Prospectus in OGL 570.

    **Specifics:**

    This is an outline for the final prospectus document. Please use APA formatting and the bolded headings and subheadings below to organize your document.

    · Use APA (7th edition) Style with a minimum of 15 sources. Make sure to use in-text citations.

    · Leave placeholders for pages or heading that you do not have the information for yet.

    · Paraphrase authors instead of quoting them. Then use citations/NO QUOTES

    · Do not use personal pronouns (I, me, we, us, they, them).

    · Do not use contractions (don’t, isn’t, won’t, etc..).

    · Use third person objective voice and write in past tense

    · Avoid the use of unnecessary adjectives or other descriptors (very, extremely,
    always, never,)

    · Be careful of over-reaching claims not supported by academic research (you do not
    have causal relationships and you do not have proof)

    · Numbers below 10 are written alphabetically (example, two, three, four). Numbers
    above 10 are written numerically (example, 10, 11, 12)

    Provide the following Pages and Headings.

    **Cover or Title page (page 1)**

    Running head:
    **[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters]**

    The Title of Your Paper (no longer than 12 words)

    First name Middle initial. Last name

    Analyzing Organizations (OGL 570)

    School of Applied Professional Studies

    Arizona State University

    Month Date, Year

    **Abstract (page 2)**

    **Abstract**

    Do not indent. Clearly and concisely summarize the project's purpose, methods, key findings, and practical implications. The abstract should be between 150-350 words.

    **Prospectus (page 3)**

    **Applied Project Prospectus**

    Title

    **Introduction**

                One to three paragraphs. Capture the audience’s attention. Brief background of the topic, organization background and context. State the problem or key issues. Ground the problem in leadership theory or concepts – identify three knowledge areas. Transition by indicating that the applied project aims to address the problem or issue.

    **Purpose Statement and Scope**

    Purpose

                The purpose and scope describe the goal or aim of the project. It provides the possible solution to the problem or issue that you have identified. The purpose and scope should align with the leadership issue. State an explicit purpose – e.g., The purpose of this project is… The purpose statement should be specific, clear, goal-oriented, and deliverable focused. A formula that may be helpful: The purpose of this project is to [achieve what] in order to [solve/address what leadership challenge or opportunity] contributing to [broader organizational outcome].

    Scope

                The scope should include the deliverable, inclusions/exclusions and stakeholders involved.

    **Literature Review**

    Introduction

                Introduce the review of literature to the reader. Identify the knowledge areas. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #1

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #2

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Knowledge area #3

                Identify the knowledge area with a brief summary. Support the knowledge area with a minimum of 5 citations. Make sure to synthesize the literature. Is there literature that helps to justify the approach you are taking or the methods you are using to carry out your capstone project? You would also identify leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations. The knowledge areas should align with the problem or issue (context & rationale) and purpose statement. The Review of Literature is a synthesis of the literature that provides a framework for the importance and relevance of the research. It also justifies the approach (analysis method) you will take.

    Summary

                Summarize the knowledge areas and framework for your project.

    **Project Context**

                The project context is the backdrop of the issue. The context includes the organizational environment, the existing leadership practices, and the relevance of addressing the problem in the current landscape.

    Organizational Overview

                Name & provide an overview of the organization.

    Industry & Sectors

                Description of industry & sectors and other relevant information needed to situate your project in a broader context.

    Project Trends

                Description of trends related to project (past, present, & projected).

    External Factors

                External organizational factors (e.g., PESTLE, SWOT, or gap).

    Internal Factors

                Describe the Internal factors (e.g., culture, team dynamics or leadership style).

    **Participants & Positionality**

                Identify the participants. Include the sample population and why this sample population was chosen in the context of your research. Describe yourself in the research context and the lens you bring to the study.

    **Project Rationale**

    Problem Identification

                Identify a problem or issue that you would like to solve. Please note that the use of a problem is defined as an area of concern, a gap in existing knowledge, or a deviation in the norm or standard that points to the need for further understanding and investigation. Describe why the problem needs to be solved, the impact of the problem or issue, and who will benefit from solving it.

    Problem Statement

                Write a clear, concise problem statement that will guide the direction of the project. A well-formulated problem statement has the following: leadership issue; the importance of the issue; who’s impacted (stakeholders); and potential consequences of not addressing the issue.

    Rationale of Project

                Describe the The rationale for an applied leadership project is the justification for why the project is necessary and how it will help address leadership challenges. The rationale links the identified problem to broader organizational goals and external factors, showing the importance of the project and its potential impact on the organization’s success.

    **Research Questions**

                The research questions should stem from the purpose statement. It may be helpful to restate the purpose statement. A well-crafted research question will guide the entire process of data collection and analysis. Provide 1-3 research questions.

    **Research and Analytical Methods**

                 Describe the analytical methods to answer the research questions. Describe the approach or methodology (e.g. interviews, survey, secondary sources, archival sources, organizational records, web documents, etc.). Identify the process to collect and analyze (e.g. thematic coding, pattern identification, statistical analysis, etc.) the information you need to complete the project. For qualitative data, you may conduct interviews, surveys, or focus groups. For quantitative data, you may distribute surveys or collect performance metrics.

    **Assumptions and Limitations**

                 State the initial assumptions about the project. Identify the project’s limitations. Describe the scope of the study and what the study will not address.

    **Primary Audience, Anticipated Deliverables, and Contribution**

                Describe the intended audience (besides your classmates and the professor). Detail the specifics of your applied project deliverable. Keep in mind that the benchmark assignments are NOT the project deliverable, but the supporting materials to the deliverable. Be as specific as you can at this point to offer details about what your project deliverable will be, including length, size, etc. Provide the contribution your project can make to the organization and the discipline of organizational leadership.

    **Ethical Considerations**

                Explain how you ensured that your research will not harm participants and how you protected participants’ dignity and privacy. Declare any potential conflicts of interest. Explain how you will have accounted for potential bias in your project design, data collection, analysis, and delivery.

    **Results To be completed in OGL 593**

                You will not have the results yet because you have not done the research. This section is where you report the findings of your research based on the information gathered from the methodology used to answer the research questions. This section summarizes and presents the findings of the study to put in the context of your research questions. Findings often use text, tables, and/or figures. The discussion section shows the reader what your findings mean. The results chapter or section simply and objectively reports what you found, without speculating on why you found these results. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in context, and explains why they matter. In qualitative research, results and discussion are sometimes combined. But in quantitative research, it’s considered important to separate the objective results from your interpretation of them.

    **Conclusions To be completed in OGL 593**

                Restate your thesis (purpose), summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed in the project, and offer final impressions on the project. Describe greater understanding of the knowledge areas in the context of the project and implications for the future. The conclusion paragraph(s) should restate your thesis, summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed throughout the work, and offer your final impression on the central idea. This final summation should also contain the moral of your story or a revelation of a deeper truth or greater understanding of the topic under study.

    **Work Plan Schedule**

    The expected start date of your project is after your prospectus is approved and the final delivery date of your project is determined by when you are enrolled in OGL 593. Working backward from the completion/delivery date, break your project schedule down by describing the major project activities and milestones (e.g. identify current training practices, complete data collection process, complete analysis of findings, etc.).

    **References (new page)**

    **References**

    Use APA for references. The references should use a hanging indent and be in alphabetical order. There should be a minimum of 15 sources cited.

    **Appendix (new page)**

    **Appendix (Name)**

    Each appendix should have its own page with the name of the Appendix. Attach any forms listed and used for your project. Everyone should have the CITI Certification. You may also have survey questions, interview questions, consent forms, recruitment scripts, written permission forms from organization or IRB approval. NOTE: if need IRB approval, you will not be able to submit and get approval in the timeframe of the class. Proceed with human subject learning experiences with the classroom research document. The outcome of your human subject research MUST remain the confines of this course, it cannot be used for presentations or publications outside of the OGL593 course.

    **Grading:** the grading criteria is holistic based on clarity, organization, detail, style, an

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5

  • [Solved] Nursing Master program

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **your vision for your nursing practice as a master's prepared nurse**. Be sure to incorporate _:_ – The AACN Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education (specifically the 10 domains, competencies & sub-competencies for advanced level nursing practice – attached below) – The OU …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **your vision for your nursing practice as a master's prepared nurse**. Be sure to incorporate _:_
    – The AACN Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education (specifically the 10 domains, competencies & sub-competencies for advanced level nursing practice – attached below)
    – The OU Nursing Program Student Learning Outcomes (attached below)
    – Share you ideas for your _new level_ of nursing practice as an MSN prepared nurse
    – _Your elevated vision_ from your current role as a BSN prepared nurse
    – 3 scholarly references
    – An APA style title page and a reference pages are required as well as other APA requirements.
    \
    NewEssentialswithcompetenciesadvancedsubcompetencieswithMSNPSLOs.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/newessentialswithcompetenciesadvancedsubcompetencieswithmsnpslos-docx "NewEssentialswithcompetenciesadvancedsubcompetencieswithMSNPSLOs.docx")
    \
    OttawaUniversityMSNProgramStudentLearningOutcomes.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ottawauniversitymsnprogramstudentlearningoutcomes-docx "OttawaUniversityMSNProgramStudentLearningOutcomes.docx")
    \
    NewEssentialswithcompetenciessubcompetencies.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/newessentialswithcompetenciessubcompetencies-docx "NewEssentialswithcompetenciessubcompetencies.docx")

  • [Solved] e2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    We will explore the Reggio Emilia-inspired [_Beautiful Stuff_ project,](https://www.youclevermonkey.com/2014/07/beautiful-stuff-project.html) and you will practice writing a mock letter to families, in which you will: introduce and explain the project (including the use of loose parts and found mate…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    We will explore the Reggio Emilia-inspired [_Beautiful Stuff_ project,](https://www.youclevermonkey.com/2014/07/beautiful-stuff-project.html) and you will practice writing a mock letter to families, in which you will:  introduce and explain the project (including the use of loose parts and found materials) and explain how this project connects to constructivist theory
    will uploading reading later
    https://www.youclevermonkey.com/2014/07/beautiful-stuff-project.html

  • [Solved] assg

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering assg.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] ch 3 worksheet

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please read each case study listed below, and answer the associated questions.** – Don't base your answers on what you believe or have found through Goggle! – **Only use Practical Applications in Sports Nutrition as a reference**. – **Include the page numbers where you found the information.** – S…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please read each case study listed below, and answer the associated questions.**
    – Don't base your answers on what you believe or have found through Goggle!
    – **Only use Practical Applications in Sports Nutrition as a reference**.
    – **Include the page numbers where you found the information.**
    – Show your calculations based on her weight and activity level. It will be a range of numbers.
    – Must be typed-no handwritten papers
    – See [How to calculate a person's carbohydrate intake](https://cerritos.instructure.com/courses/98388/pages/calculating-a-persons-recommended-carbohydrate-intake?module_item_id=4166189)
    ## Calculating a person's recommended carbohydrate intake
    When calculating a person's carbohydrate recommendation, you can calculate it based on her/his weight and activity level (if given) from Table 3.6. Your recommendations should always be a range of numbers. You will  also need to justify/support your answer (as if you were talking to the person) and give suggestions based on the recommendations from _Practical Applications in Sports Nutrition_
    For example:
    Julie is interested in losing weight. She enjoys participating in step aerobics, kickboxing, and muscle conditioning group fitness classes 4 to 5 times per week, 45 minutes to 1.5 hour per class. She currently weighs 150 lbs and is 32 years-old.
    Based on **Table 3.6**, her training is moderate-high volume since her workouts are sometime less than 1 hour and sometimes over 1 hour.
    She weighs 150 lbs. Convert to kg:  150 lbs x 1 kg/2.2 lbs = 68.2 kg
    68.2 kg x 5 g CHO/kg (moderate intensity) = 341 g CHO
    and 68.2 kg x 10 g CHO/kg (high intensity) = 682 g CHO
    Answer: It is recommended that Julie consume 341-682 g carbohydrates daily. According to Fink and Mikesky, she should include fresh or frozen vegetables, fruits, and make sure that half of her grains are whole grains (brown rice, barley, quinoa).
    Since her food preference weren't stated, provide a few choices from the textbook (without quantities or meal plans). You should not base your recommendations on person preferences or what you personally believe it should be! Remember, that you are not the expert, so you will need to reference your textbook and ChooseMyPlate.gov.
    **TABLE 3.6** Daily Carbohydrate Intake RecommendationsType of trainingTraining duration (hours/day)Daily carbohydrate intake range (g/kg)Low-intensity or skill-based activities<1.03–5Moderate training~1.05–7High-volume training1.0–3.06–10Extreme commitment>4.0–5.08–12
    Kelly (66kg) is a 48 – year-old race walker who participates in half marathons. She walks 5 to 6 days per week, 1 to 2 hours per day, at a moderate to high intensity. Kelly makes an appointment with you to determine how much carbohydrate she should be consuming daily to keep her glycogen levels as high as possible. She is also interested in knowing how to properly “carbohydrate load” the week before a race.
    _Questions_:
    1. How many grams of carbohydrate would you recommend Kelly consume on a daily basis? Using Table 3.6 as a reference, show your calculations and units.
    2. What suggestion do you have for Kelly for carbohydrate loading 6-7 days prior to her race (Use Table 3.10. You can access and copy this information from the textbook for your answer).

  • [Solved] Nursing HOMEWORK

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## CertificationandLiionandLicensurePlanDiscussionResponse.docx **## CertificationandLiionandLicensurePlanDiscussionResponse.docx** eCCCCCCCrCertification and Liion and Licensure Plan LOUISE G Main Question Post Discussion: Certification and Licensure Plan Psych ARNPs, upon gaining full practice a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## CertificationandLiionandLicensurePlanDiscussionResponse.docx

    **## CertificationandLiionandLicensurePlanDiscussionResponse.docx**

    eCCCCCCCrCertification and Liion and Licensure Plan

    LOUISE G

    Main Question Post Discussion: Certification and Licensure Plan

    Psych ARNPs, upon gaining full practice authority, do not require physician supervision or collaboration. Full practice authority is achieved by completing 3,000 hours of practice under physician supervision, holding an active license. However, before this is achieved, the establishment of collaborative practice with physicians must be in place (Toney-Butler & Martin, 2023).

    To be a certified and licensed psych APRN in Florida, a person must hold an active Florida RN license and hold a minimum of a master’s degree in mental health from a program approved by the Florida Board of Nursing. Next, one needs to pass the national certification in their specialty and be certified by an accredited certifying body such as the ANCC. Finally, one applies for licensure as an APRN to the Florida Board of Nursing. The board reviews one’s educational credentials and national certification so as to determine the applicant’s eligibility for an APRN license (Toney-Butler & Martin, 2023). The Florida Board of Nursing website is
    [https://floridasnursinghomeadmin.gov/\
    Links to an external site.](https://floridasnursinghomeadmin.gov/).

    The scope of practice of psych ARNPs in Florida is defined by the general standard of practice for APRNs. Their scope of practice includes diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses with specified criteria for achieving autonomous practice to be able to offer services listed in their scope of practice without the need for a physician’s oversight (Toney-Butler & Martin, 2023). Getting a DEA license in Florida begins by securing a Florida license and CSP registration. This is followed by completing the mandatory 8-hour training, followed by submitting a DEA application. After this, one tracks the application process, and if successful, one receives and maintains their DEA license (DEA, 2025).

    Florida has a PMP program known as E-FORCSE in place, requiring all dispensers of controlled substances, including Psych ARNPs, to report dispensed schedule II-V medications to the Florida state database with an aim of reducing drug diversion and abuse (E-FORCSE Home Page | Florida Department of Health, n.d.). Psych ARNPs are allowed to prescribe controlled substances, including schedule II-V, as long as they are under a supervisory protocol with a registered physician.

    **GERMINE P**

    **Main Question Post**

    1. Certification & Licensure Process for APRNs in Minnesota

    To become an APRN in Minnesota (e.g., CNP, CNS, CNM, CRNA), you must:

    · Hold an active, unencumbered RN license in Minnesota.

    · Graduate from a nationally accredited graduate-level APRN program.

    · Obtain national certification in one of the six designated population foci (e.g., adult-gerontology, family across the lifespan, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric/mental health, or women’s and gender-related health) from a body approved by the Board of Nursing

    · Submit an APRN Licensure Application, including proof of program completion, certification verification, and a criminal background check if not completed within the past year

    · For CNPs and CNSs beginning after July 1, 2014, submit verification of 2,080 supervised practice hours in a collaborative management setting (hospital or integrated clinical environment)

    2. Application Process

    Applicants must:

    · Complete the online or paper APRN application for each APRN role sought, pay the fee ($105, plus $32 additional if a background check is required)

    · Arrange for certification documentation to be sent directly from the certifying body to the Minnesota Board of Nursing

    · Submit a Confirmation of Program Completion form via the educational institution directly to the Board.

    · Complete Criminal Background Check and fingerprinting, unless done within the past year

    · Once all requirements are met—including 2,080 hours if applicable—the Board issues licensure

    3. Minnesota Board of Nursing Website

    The official Board of Nursing website is the central hub for APRN licensure, applications, forms, certification instructions, DEA registration guidance, and PMP enrollment- https://mn.gov/boards/nursing/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    4. Scope of Practice & Practice Authority

    · Minnesota grants Full Practice Authority (FPA) to APRNs: after completing the required 2,080 hours in a collaborative management setting, APRNs can practice independently without requiring supervision or co-signature

    · The scope of practice includes advanced assessment, diagnosis, prescribing (including controlled substances), ordering tests and therapeutic devices, and referral services

    5. Practice Agreement Requirements

    · A collaborative management agreement with a Minnesota-licensed physician or APRN (experienced in the same population focus) must document the scope of collaboration and supervisory oversight during the initial 2,080 hours

    · After completion, APRNs (except CRNAs treating pain) may practice and prescribe independently.

    6. DEA License & Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP)

    · APRNs must apply separately for a DEA registration number to obtain controlled-substance prescribing authority; the Board’s website offers guidance for this process and PMP enrollment.

    · Minnesota operates a Prescription Monitoring Program, requiring all prescribers of controlled substances to register and report dispensing data

    7. Controlled-Substance Prescriptive Authority

    · Once registered with the Board and the DEA, APRNs may prescribe Schedule II–V controlled substances, legend drugs, OTC medications, and therapeutic devices independently.

    8. Continuing Education & Renewal

    · APRNs must maintain national certification; renewal requirements are managed through their certifying organizations

    · APRNs with prescriptive authority must complete at least 2 hours of continuing education on controlled substances prescribing, and all DEA registrants must complete an 8-hour training on substance use disorders when registering or renewing

    9. Current Legislation & Future Direction

    · A bill introduced in early 2025 (HF 1794 / SF 1794) proposes to eliminate the mandatory 2,080-hour transition-to-practice requirement for new APRNs, signaling potential future changes toward even greater independence

    Summary: Regulations, Barriers, and Surprises

    · Regulatory Model: Minnesota combines full practice authority with a structured transition-to-practice requirement, balancing autonomy with initial collaborative oversight.

    · Barriers: The required 2,080 hours may delay full independence. Additionally, institutional policies or federal limits (e.g., Medicare restrictions on orthotic ordering and rehab certifications) may restrict APRNs despite their legal autonomy

    · Surprises:

    1. Minnesota’s forward-leaning model: granting independent authority relatively quickly after collaboration.

    2. The pending legislative effort to remove the transition hours requirement, which could further streamline APRN independence.

    RESPOND TO PEERS

    **Respond** to at least
    **two** of your colleagues on
    **2 different days** in one or more of the ways listed below.

    · Share an insight from having viewed your colleagues’ posts.

    · Suggest additional actions or perspectives.

    · Share insights after comparing state processes, roles, and limitations.

    · Suggest a way to advocate for the profession.

    · Share resources with those who are in your state.

    **## CertificationandLiionandLicensurePlanDiscussionResponse.docx**

    eCCCCCCCrCertification and Liion and Licensure Plan

    LOUISE G

    Main Question Post Discussion: Certification and Licensure Plan

    Psych ARNPs, upon gaining full practice authority, do not require physician supervision or collaboration. Full practice authority is achieved by completing 3,000 hours of practice under physician supervision, holding an active license. However, before this is achieved, the establishment of collaborative practice with physicians must be in place (Toney-Butler & Martin, 2023).

    To be a certified and licensed psych APRN in Florida, a person must hold an active Florida RN license and hold a minimum of a master’s degree in mental health from a program approved by the Florida Board of Nursing. Next, one needs to pass the national certification in their specialty and be certified by an accredited certifying body such as the ANCC. Finally, one applies for licensure as an APRN to the Florida Board of Nursing. The board reviews one’s educational credentials and national certification so as to determine the applicant’s eligibility for an APRN license (Toney-Butler & Martin, 2023). The Florida Board of Nursing website is
    [https://floridasnursinghomeadmin.gov/\
    Links to an external site.](https://floridasnursinghomeadmin.gov/).

    The scope of practice of psych ARNPs in Florida is defined by the general standard of practice for APRNs. Their scope of practice includes diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses with specified criteria for achieving autonomous practice to be able to offer services listed in their scope of practice without the need for a physician’s oversight (Toney-Butler & Martin, 2023). Getting a DEA license in Florida begins by securing a Florida license and CSP registration. This is followed by completing the mandatory 8-hour training, followed by submitting a DEA application. After this, one tracks the application process, and if successful, one receives and maintains their DEA license (DEA, 2025).

    Florida has a PMP program known as E-FORCSE in place, requiring all dispensers of controlled substances, including Psych ARNPs, to report dispensed schedule II-V medications to the Florida state database with an aim of reducing drug diversion and abuse (E-FORCSE Home Page | Florida Department of Health, n.d.). Psych ARNPs are allowed to prescribe controlled substances, including schedule II-V, as long as they are under a supervisory protocol with a registered physician.

    **GERMINE P**

    **Main Question Post**

    1. Certification & Licensure Process for APRNs in Minnesota

    To become an APRN in Minnesota (e.g., CNP, CNS, CNM, CRNA), you must:

    · Hold an active, unencumbered RN license in Minnesota.

    · Graduate from a nationally accredited graduate-level APRN program.

    · Obtain national certification in one of the six designated population foci (e.g., adult-gerontology, family across the lifespan, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric/mental health, or women’s and gender-related health) from a body approved by the Board of Nursing

    · Submit an APRN Licensure Application, including proof of program completion, certification verification, and a criminal background check if not completed within the past year

    · For CNPs and CNSs beginning after July 1, 2014, submit verification of 2,080 supervised practice hours in a collaborative management setting (hospital or integrated clinical environment)

    2. Application Process

    Applicants must:

    · Complete the online or paper APRN application for each APRN role sought, pay the fee ($105, plus $32 additional if a background check is required)

    · Arrange for certification documentation to be sent directly from the certifying body to the Minnesota Board of Nursing

    · Submit a Confirmation of Program Completion form via the educational institution directly to the Board.

    · Complete Criminal Background Check and fingerprinting, unless done within the past year

    · Once all requirements are met—including 2,080 hours if applicable—the Board issues licensure

    3. Minnesota Board of Nursing Website

    The official Board of Nursing website is the central hub for APRN licensure, applications, forms, certification instructions, DEA registration guidance, and PMP enrollment- https://mn.gov/boards/nursing/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    4. Scope of Practice & Practice Authority

    · Minnesota grants Full Practice Authority (FPA) to APRNs: after completing the required 2,080 hours in a collaborative management setting, APRNs can practice independently without requiring supervision or co-signature

    · The scope of practice includes advanced assessment, diagnosis, prescribing (including controlled substances), ordering tests and therapeutic devices, and referral services

    5. Practice Agreement Requirements

    · A collaborative management agreement with a Minnesota-licensed physician or APRN (experienced in the same population focus) must document the scope of collaboration and supervisory oversight during the initial 2,080 hours

    · After completion, APRNs (except CRNAs treating pain) may practice and prescribe independently.

    6. DEA License & Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP)

    · APRNs must apply separately for a DEA registration number to obtain controlled-substance prescribing authority; the Board’s website offers guidance for this process and PMP enrollment.

    · Minnesota operates a Prescription Monitoring Program, requiring all prescribers of controlled substances to register and report dispensing data

    7. Controlled-Substance Prescriptive Authority

    · Once registered with the Board and the DEA, APRNs may prescribe Schedule II–V controlled substances, legend drugs, OTC medications, and therapeutic devices independently.

    8. Continuing Education & Renewal

    · APRNs must maintain national certification; renewal requirements are managed through their certifying organizations

    · APRNs with prescriptive authority must complete at least 2 hours of continuing education on controlled substances prescribing, and all DEA registrants must complete an 8-hour training on substance use disorders when registering or renewing

    9. Current Legislation & Future Direction

    · A bill introduced in early 2025 (HF 1794 / SF 1794) proposes to eliminate the mandatory 2,080-hour transition-to-practice requirement for new APRNs, signaling potential future changes toward even greater independence

    Summary: Regulations, Barriers, and Surprises

    · Regulatory Model: Minnesota combines full practice authority with a structured transition-to-practice requirement, balancing autonomy with initial collaborative oversight.

    · Barriers: The required 2,080 hours may delay full independence. Additionally, institutional policies or federal limits (e.g., Medicare restrictions on orthotic ordering and rehab certifications) may restrict APRNs despite their legal autonomy

    · Surprises:

    1. Minnesota’s forward-leaning model: granting independent authority relatively quickly after collaboration.

    2. The pending legislative effort to remove the transition hours requirement, which could further streamline APRN independence.

    RESPOND TO PEERS

    **Respond** to at least
    **two** of your colleagues on
    **2 different days** in one or more of the ways listed below.

    · Share an insight from having viewed your colleagues’ posts.

    · Suggest additional actions or perspectives.

    · Share insights after comparing state processes, roles, and limitations.

    · Suggest a way to advocate for the profession.

    · Share resources with those who are in your state.

  • [Solved] Final Report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## 598w8.docx – ## Lessons_Learned_Template_with_Instructions.docx – Procurement_Strategy_Tool1.docx – SourceSelectionCriteria_Tool_with_Instructions21.docx – Procurement_Management_Plan_Tool3.docx – RequestforProposal1.docx **## 598w8.docx** This week, you are required to produce your…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## 598w8.docx

    – ## Lessons_Learned_Template_with_Instructions.docx

    – Procurement_Strategy_Tool1.docx
    – SourceSelectionCriteria_Tool_with_Instructions21.docx
    – Procurement_Management_Plan_Tool3.docx
    – RequestforProposal1.docx

    **## 598w8.docx**

    This week, you are required to produce your Final Course Project Report. You will consolidate all project deliverables produced in prior weeks into your Final Course Project Report.

    You will add one additional section for Lessons Learned. In this section, you will describe the strengths and areas of improvement within your project. The intent of the lessons learned is to serve as a repository for future projects as a function of continuous improvements. Upload a single ZIP/compressed file that includes all of your files together.

    I have attached files from previous weeks just in case.

    Please use the lesson learn tool.

    The Lessons Learned must contain the following sections.

    · Introduction

    · Lessons Learned Approach

    · Lessons Learned Table

    **## Lessons_Learned_Template_with_Instructions.docx**

    **[Insert Department/Project Logo] [Insert Department Name]**

    **[Insert Project Name]**

    **University of Prosperity**

    **Lessons Learned**

    **Tool**

    **University of Prosperity PPM Selection Project**

    **PPM Selection Project**

    **University of Prosperity**

    **Lessons Learned** | Page 9

    Table of Contents

    [1](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874) [Introduction](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874) [4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874)

    [2](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875) [Lessons Learned Approach](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875) [4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875)

    [3](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876) [Lessons Learned Table](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876) [5](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876)

    [Introduction to the Lessons Learned Tool\
    \
    The Lessons Learned deliverable serves as a continuous improvement mechanism in which successes and mistakes are documented. Lessons Leaned are fundamental for organizations and their journey to improve future performance. Furthermore, formally identifies, acknowledges, analyzes, and documents the lessons learned. Finally, collecting lessons learned over time adds to the organization’s body of knowledge related to project management and provides a rich source of information for current and future work. Lessons learned are produced at the end of a project, or they may take place between project phases to make the lessons learned available for later phases. \
    \
    The lessons learned tool would assist the project team to identify and document lessons learned. The tool provides guidelines and questions to consider about what worked well, what did not work well, and what needs to be done differently. The goal of documenting lessons learned is to identify both the positive and negative lessons learned from the project, as well as to recommend corrective actions based on negative lessons learned remarks \
    \
    The lessons learned tool provides general guidelines for accurately documenting the project lessons learned. Additional examples and suggestions are provided to help you produce your lessons-learned project deliverable. \
    \
    Template style conventions are as follows:\
    \
    | | |\
    | — | — |\
    | Style | Convention |\
    | Normal text | Indicates placeholder text that can be used for any project. |\
    | [Instructional text in brackets] | Indicates text that is to be replaced/edited/deleted by the user] |
    | _Example text in italics_ | _Indicates text that might be replaced/edited/deleted by the user_ |

    As you us this tool, please remember to delete all instructional text (including this section) and update the following items, as applicable:

    · title page

    · version history

    · table of contents

    · headers

    · footers](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876)

    ## Introduction

    [Provide a brief description of the purpose of lessons learned and details of what is included in the document. Feel free to make any assumptions as you feel necessary. Keep in mind the project for this course only addresses the planning for the PPM Selection, and does not address any execution, monitoring, and controls considerations. Hence, any lessons learned in your document need to address the scope of your project, and only address planning. Reference to below an example introduction. Feel free to conduct your own research and inform this section as you feel appropriate.


    _Lessons learned allow a project team to retrospectively contemplate and document the failures and successes experienced on a project to facilitate the knowledge transfer from one team to the next. Capturing this information in a formal fashion creates an artifact that can be utilized during future endeavors to reduce the risk of repeating a mistake. This lessons-learned document includes input from the project team as to what went well, what did not go well, why, and what could have been done differently._

    ## Lessons Learned Approach

    [Describe the process that was utilized to capture these lessons learned, including the approach (such as brainstorming, surveys, interviews, and self-reflection), and what types of information were gathered.]


    _Lessons Learned to identify and delineate considerations taking into consideration the following categories:_

    ·
    _Cost_

    ·
    _Communication_

    ·
    _Documentation_

    ·
    _Processes_

    ·
    _Procurements/Contracts_

    ·
    _Quality_

    ·
    _Resources/Staffing_

    ·
    _Schedule/Time_

    ·
    _Scope/Requirements_

    ·
    _Tools_

    _To encourage the thought process, you are encouraged to answer the following questions._

    ·
    _What worked well for this project?_

    ·
    _What did not work well for this project?_

    ·
    _What could have been done over or differently?_

    ·
    _What surprises did you deal with?_

    ·
    _What project circumstances were not anticipated?_

    ·
    _Were the project goals attained? If not, what changes need to be made to meet goals in the future?_

    _All lessons learned are documented in the table below._

    ## Lessons Learned Table

    [Complete the following table. Identify the categories as needed (such as cost, communication, documentation, processes, procurements/contracts, quality, resources/staffing, schedule/time, scope/requirements, and tools), the lesson learned, a description of the lesson learned, and a recommendation to implement the lesson learned.]


    _The lessons learned table provided below serves as an example only. Feel free to inform this table as you feel necessary._

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | ID | Process Phase | Category | Lesson Learned | Description | Recommendation |
    | _1_ | _Planning_ | _Resources_ | _Not enough staff_ | _The Planning Process Phase for this project took significant effort to develop plans and methodology and to navigate the Project Approval Lifecycle. Only one resource was allocated for this work._ | _The full scope of activities during the Planning Process Phase needs to be taken into consideration when resourcing the work. If additional resources are not available, the schedule must be pushed out._ |
    | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | |

    **Procurement_Strategy_Tool1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/procurement-strategy-tool1-docx)

    **SourceSelectionCriteria_Tool_with_Instructions21.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sourceselectioncriteria-tool-with-instructions21-docx)

    **Procurement_Management_Plan_Tool3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/procurement-management-plan-tool3-docx)

    **RequestforProposal1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/requestforproposal1-docx-10385399)

    **RequestforProposal1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/requestforproposal1-docx-10385399)

    **## 598w8.docx**

    This week, you are required to produce your Final Course Project Report. You will consolidate all project deliverables produced in prior weeks into your Final Course Project Report.

    You will add one additional section for Lessons Learned. In this section, you will describe the strengths and areas of improvement within your project. The intent of the lessons learned is to serve as a repository for future projects as a function of continuous improvements. Upload a single ZIP/compressed file that includes all of your files together.

    I have attached files from previous weeks just in case.

    Please use the lesson learn tool.

    The Lessons Learned must contain the following sections.

    · Introduction

    · Lessons Learned Approach

    · Lessons Learned Table

    **## Lessons_Learned_Template_with_Instructions.docx**

    **[Insert Department/Project Logo] [Insert Department Name]**

    **[Insert Project Name]**

    **University of Prosperity**

    **Lessons Learned**

    **Tool**

    **University of Prosperity PPM Selection Project**

    **PPM Selection Project**

    **University of Prosperity**

    **Lessons Learned** | Page 9


    Table of Contents

    [1](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874) [Introduction](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874) [4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874)

    [2](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875) [Lessons Learned Approach](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875) [4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875)

    [3](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876) [Lessons Learned Table](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876) [5](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876)

    [Introduction to the Lessons Learned Tool\
    \
    The Lessons Learned deliverable serves as a continuous improvement mechanism in which successes and mistakes are documented. Lessons Leaned are fundamental for organizations and their journey to improve future performance. Furthermore, formally identifies, acknowledges, analyzes, and documents the lessons learned. Finally, collecting lessons learned over time adds to the organization’s body of knowledge related to project management and provides a rich source of information for current and future work. Lessons learned are produced at the end of a project, or they may take place between project phases to make the lessons learned available for later phases. \
    \
    The lessons learned tool would assist the project team to identify and document lessons learned. The tool provides guidelines and questions to consider about what worked well, what did not work well, and what needs to be done differently. The goal of documenting lessons learned is to identify both the positive and negative lessons learned from the project, as well as to recommend corrective actions based on negative lessons learned remarks \
    \
    The lessons learned tool provides general guidelines for accurately documenting the project lessons learned. Additional examples and suggestions are provided to help you produce your lessons-learned project deliverable. \
    \
    Template style conventions are as follows:\
    \
    | | |\
    | — | — |\
    | Style | Convention |\
    | Normal text | Indicates placeholder text that can be used for any project. |\
    | [Instructional text in brackets] | Indicates text that is to be replaced/edited/deleted by the user] |\
    | _Example text in italics_ | _Indicates text that might be replaced/edited/deleted by the user_ |\
    \
    As you us this tool, please remember to delete all instructional text (including this section) and update the following items, as applicable:\
    \
    · title page\
    \
    · version history\
    \
    · table of contents\
    \
    · headers\
    \
    · footers](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876)

    ## Introduction

    [Provide a brief description of the purpose of lessons learned and details of what is included in the document. Feel free to make any assumptions as you feel necessary. Keep in mind the project for this course only addresses the planning for the PPM Selection, and does not address any execution, monitoring, and controls considerations. Hence, any lessons learned in your document need to address the scope of your project, and only address planning. Reference to below an example introduction. Feel free to conduct your own research and inform this section as you feel appropriate.


    _Lessons learned allow a project team to retrospectively contemplate and document the failures and successes experienced on a project to facilitate the knowledge transfer from one team to the next. Capturing this information in a formal fashion creates an artifact that can be utilized during future endeavors to reduce the risk of repeating a mistake. This lessons-learned document includes input from the project team as to what went well, what did not go well, why, and what could have been done differently._

    ## Lessons Learned Approach

    [Describe the process that was utilized to capture these lessons learned, including the approach (such as brainstorming, surveys, interviews, and self-reflection), and what types of information were gathered.]


    _Lessons Learned to identify and delineate considerations taking into consideration the following categories:_

    ·
    _Cost_

    ·
    _Communication_

    ·
    _Documentation_

    ·
    _Processes_

    ·
    _Procurements/Contracts_

    ·
    _Quality_

    ·
    _Resources/Staffing_

    ·
    _Schedule/Time_

    ·
    _Scope/Requirements_

    ·
    _Tools_

    _To encourage the thought process, you are encouraged to answer the following questions._

    ·
    _What worked well for this project?_

    ·
    _What did not work well for this project?_

    ·
    _What could have been done over or differently?_

    ·
    _What surprises did you deal with?_

    ·
    _What project circumstances were not anticipated?_

    ·
    _Were the project goals attained? If not, what changes need to be made to meet goals in the future?_

    _All lessons learned are documented in the table below._

    ## Lessons Learned Table

    [Complete the following table. Identify the categories as needed (such as cost, communication, documentation, processes, procurements/contracts, quality, resources/staffing, schedule/time, scope/requirements, and tools), the lesson learned, a description of the lesson learned, and a recommendation to implement the lesson learned.]


    _The lessons learned table provided below serves as an example only. Feel free to inform this table as you feel necessary._

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | ID | Process Phase | Category | Lesson Learned | Description | Recommendation |
    | _1_ | _Planning_ | _Resources_ | _Not enough staff_ | _The Planning Process Phase for this project took significant effort to develop plans and methodology and to navigate the Project Approval Lifecycle. Only one resource was allocated for this work._ | _The full scope of activities during the Planning Process Phase needs to be taken into consideration when resourcing the work. If additional resources are not available, the schedule must be pushed out._ |
    | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | |

    **Procurement_Strategy_Tool1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/procurement-strategy-tool1-docx)

    **SourceSelectionCriteria_Tool_with_Instructions21.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sourceselectioncriteria-tool-with-instructions21-docx)

    **Procurement_Management_Plan_Tool3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/procurement-management-plan-tool3-docx)

    **RequestforProposal1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/requestforproposal1-docx-10385399)

    **## 598w8.docx**

    This week, you are required to produce your Final Course Project Report. You will consolidate all project deliverables produced in prior weeks into your Final Course Project Report.

    You will add one additional section for Lessons Learned. In this section, you will describe the strengths and areas of improvement within your project. The intent of the lessons learned is to serve as a repository for future projects as a function of continuous improvements. Upload a single ZIP/compressed file that includes all of your files together.

    I have attached files from previous weeks just in case.

    Please use the lesson learn tool.

    The Lessons Learned must contain the following sections.

    · Introduction

    · Lessons Learned Approach

    · Lessons Learned Table

    **## Lessons_Learned_Template_with_Instructions.docx**

    **[Insert Department/Project Logo] [Insert Department Name]**

    **[Insert Project Name]**

    **University of Prosperity**

    **Lessons Learned**

    **Tool**

    **University of Prosperity PPM Selection Project**

    **PPM Selection Project**

    **University of Prosperity**

    **Lessons Learned** | Page 9


    Table of Contents

    [1](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874) [Introduction](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874) [4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329874)

    [2](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875) [Lessons Learned Approach](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875) [4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329875)

    [3](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876) [Lessons Learned Table](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876) [5](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876)

    [Introduction to the Lessons Learned Tool\
    \
    The Lessons Learned deliverable serves as a continuous improvement mechanism in which successes and mistakes are documented. Lessons Leaned are fundamental for organizations and their journey to improve future performance. Furthermore, formally identifies, acknowledges, analyzes, and documents the lessons learned. Finally, collecting lessons learned over time adds to the organization’s body of knowledge related to project management and provides a rich source of information for current and future work. Lessons learned are produced at the end of a project, or they may take place between project phases to make the lessons learned available for later phases. \
    \
    The lessons learned tool would assist the project team to identify and document lessons learned. The tool provides guidelines and questions to consider about what worked well, what did not work well, and what needs to be done differently. The goal of documenting lessons learned is to identify both the positive and negative lessons learned from the project, as well as to recommend corrective actions based on negative lessons learned remarks \
    \
    The lessons learned tool provides general guidelines for accurately documenting the project lessons learned. Additional examples and suggestions are provided to help you produce your lessons-learned project deliverable. \
    \
    Template style conventions are as follows:\
    \
    | | |\
    | — | — |\
    | Style | Convention |\
    | Normal text | Indicates placeholder text that can be used for any project. |\
    | [Instructional text in brackets] | Indicates text that is to be replaced/edited/deleted by the user] |\
    | _Example text in italics_ | _Indicates text that might be replaced/edited/deleted by the user_ |\
    \
    As you us this tool, please remember to delete all instructional text (including this section) and update the following items, as applicable:\
    \
    · title page\
    \
    · version history\
    \
    · table of contents\
    \
    · headers\
    \
    · footers](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/final-report-20935999#_Toc133329876)

    ## Introduction

    [Provide a brief description of the purpose of lessons learned and details of what is included in the document. Feel free to make any assumptions as you feel necessary. Keep in mind the project for this course only addresses the planning for the PPM Selection, and does not address any execution, monitoring, and controls considerations. Hence, any lessons learned in your document need to address the scope of your project, and only address planning. Reference to below an example introduction. Feel free to conduct your own research and inform this section as you feel appropriate.


    _Lessons learned allow a project team to retrospectively contemplate and document the failures and successes experienced on a project to facilitate the knowledge transfer from one team to the next. Capturing this information in a formal fashion creates an artifact that can be utilized during future endeavors to reduce the risk of repeating a mistake. This lessons-learned document includes input from the project team as to what went well, what did not go well, why, and what could have been done differently._

    ## Lessons Learned Approach

    [Describe the process that was utilized to capture these lessons learned, including the approach (such as brainstorming, surveys, interviews, and self-reflection), and what types of information were gathered.]


    _Lessons Learned to identify and delineate considerations taking into consideration the following categories:_

    ·
    _Cost_

    ·
    _Communication_

    ·
    _Documentation_

    ·
    _Processes_

    ·
    _Procurements/Contracts_

    ·
    _Quality_

    ·
    _Resources/Staffing_

    ·
    _Schedule/Time_

    ·
    _Scope/Requirements_

    ·
    _Tools_

    _To encourage the thought process, you are encouraged to answer the following questions._

    ·
    _What worked well for this project?_

    ·
    _What did not work well for this project?_

    ·
    _What could have been done over or differently?_

    ·
    _What surprises did you deal with?_

    ·
    _What project circumstances were not anticipated?_

    ·
    _Were the project goals attained? If not, what changes need to be made to meet goals in the future?_

    _All lessons learned are documented in the table below._

    ## Lessons Learned Table

    [Complete the following table. Identify the categories as needed (such as cost, communication, documentation, processes, procurements/contracts, quality, resources/staffing, schedule/time, scope/requirements, and tools), the lesson learned, a description of the lesson learned, and a recommendation to implement the lesson learned.]


    _The lessons learned table provided below serves as an example only. Feel free to inform this table as you feel necessary._

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | ID | Process Phase | Category | Lesson Learned | Description | Recommendation |
    | _1_ | _Planning_ | _Resources_ | _Not enough staff_ | _The Planning Process Phase for this project took significant effort to develop plans and methodology and to navigate the Project Approval Lifecycle. Only one resource was allocated for this work._ | _The full scope of activities during the Planning Process Phase needs to be taken into consideration when resourcing the work. If additional resources are not available, the schedule must be pushed out._ |
    | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | |

    **Procurement_Strategy_Tool1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/procurement-strategy-tool1-docx)

    **SourceSelectionCriteria_Tool_with_Instructions21.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sourceselectioncriteria-tool-with-instructions21-docx)

    **Procurement_Management_Plan_Tool3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/procurement-management-plan-tool3-docx)

    **RequestforProposal1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/requestforproposal1-docx-10385399)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6

  • [Solved] Solutions Focused Family Therapy Video Critique

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Objectives:** 1. Critically appraise the therapy session and determine if the applicable principles are applied throughout the shown session. 2. Demonstrate your ability to evaluate your own reactions to the session. 3. Analyze how you feel this therapeutic modality may affect, enhance or apply to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Objectives:**
    1. Critically appraise the therapy session and determine if the applicable principles are applied throughout the shown session.
    2. Demonstrate your ability to evaluate your own reactions to the session.
    3. Analyze how you feel this therapeutic modality may affect, enhance or apply to your future PMHNP practice.
    **Purpose:**
    1. IS NOT to evaluate the acting in the portrayals.
    2. Is to demonstrate you can identify (include in your write-up) the principles of the applicable therapeutic modality.
    3. Is to include how you felt the principles of the modality is or is not included in the therapeutic exchange.
    **Directions:**
    1. Review the video clip and critique the psychotherapy counseling session using the assessment tools below.
    2. You can review the critique tool below and then click on the link below to download the [MH708 Video Critique form-3.docx](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4965/files/2908962?wrap=1). [Download MH708 Video Critique form-3.docx](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4965/files/2908962/download?download_frd=1). Complete the assignment and then upload completed assignment file for submission
    3. Please answer the questions directly on that form. Do not long paragraphs.
    4. For Question 2, use this handout from Module 2 to pick out the communication techniques: [TherapeuticCommunication handout.pdf](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4965/files/2908845/download?wrap=1)
    Video: https://youtu.be/6Fe8D0hAQh0
    \
    blankMH708VideoCritiqueform.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/blankmh708videocritiqueform-docx "blankMH708VideoCritiqueform.docx")
    \
    TherapeuticCommunicationhandout.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/therapeuticcommunicationhandout-pdf-10385445 "TherapeuticCommunicationhandout.pdf")