Tag: Model Answer

[Solved] Sociology2

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Philosophy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-philosophy) – a year ago **files (2)** – ## UNIT4.docx – ## UNIT44.docx **## UNIT4.docx** **UNIT 4** **In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that inf…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Philosophy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-philosophy)

– a year ago

**files (2)**

– ## UNIT4.docx

– ## UNIT44.docx

**## UNIT4.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

**## UNIT44.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

**## UNIT44.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

**## UNIT4.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

**## UNIT44.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

**## UNIT4.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

**## UNIT44.docx**

**UNIT 4**

**In Unit 4, you’re going to tie everything together by reflecting on what you’ve learned and how you plan to use that information moving forward.**

**Be sure to reflect on each week. Below is a list of the titles of all of our assignments through the end of Unit 3 for a quick refresher:**

·
**Unit 1: Goals & Motivations Assignment**

·
**Unit 2: DAACS Assignment**

·
**Unit 3: Planning for Academic Success**

**Unlike in other weeks, there is no template this time, because this assignment should be uniquely “you.” Your submission could be a PowerPoint, a “documentary” style film, a written paper, a series of journal entries, a series of short-form videos stitched together, an infographic—whatever feels most comfortable to you. It’s best to submit it in one of the file types listed below*. If you want to submit in another file type, be sure to receive your professor’s approval first, as failing to do so may result in a zero grade if they’re unable to access it. In your submission, consider the above list of assignments and discussions. Think back on your impressions of what you learned this term—What did you learn? How will you use it moving forward? What are your key takeaways?**

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Education assignment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education assignment.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] THE APPLICATION OF DATA TO PROBLEM-SOLVING

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of propert…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of property. In these and other cases, data not only helps solve problems, but adds to the practitioner’s and the discipline’s body of knowledge.

Of course, the nursing profession also relies heavily on data. The field of nursing informatics aims to make sure nurses have access to the appropriate date to solve healthcare problems, make decisions in the interest of patients, and add to knowledge.

In this Discussion, you will consider a scenario that would benefit from access to data and how such access could facilitate both problem-solving and knowledge formation.

**To Prepare:**

– Reflect on the concepts of informatics and knowledge work as presented in the Resources.
– Consider a hypothetical scenario based on your own healthcare practice or organization that would require or benefit from the access/collection and application of data. Your scenario may involve a patient, staff, or management problem or gap

– **Post** a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Article Review

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Can someone help me complete this Article Review? – a year ago **files (3)** – ## Part2Instructions.docx – ## PY550ArticleReviewGuidlines2025.docx – Conceptionsoftheself.pdf **## Part2Instructions.docx** **Part 2 Instructions** The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to read and …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Can someone help me complete this Article Review?

– a year ago

**files (3)**

– ## Part2Instructions.docx

– ## PY550ArticleReviewGuidlines2025.docx

– Conceptionsoftheself.pdf

**## Part2Instructions.docx**

**Part 2 Instructions**

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to read and think critically about the ideas of early personality theorists (Freud, Jung, et al.) and how their theoretical frameworks relate to those of an alternate cultural framework (i.e., Eastern/Buddhist). For this assignment, I have chosen a reasonably short (although not simplistic) article titled "Conceptions of the Self in Western and Eastern Psychology" by Yozan Dirk Mosig, published in the Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Mosig begins with an overview of the Western view (Freud, et al.) I would like for you to assume the reader (your professor) needs no summary of the Western perspective. In the summary section of your paper, please do not include Mosig's summary of the Western conceptualization of the self. Instead,
focus on his description of the Eastern perspective and how it contrasts with the familiar Western conceptualizations.

In general, the structure of an article review is quite flexible and will vary according to the type of article, (e.g., scientific experiment, book review, editorial, or theoretical article, etc). The assigned article is conceptual (idea-based) and not a scientific study. Therefore, you won't find the typical introduction, method, results, and discussion sections found in an empirical journal.

Your task is to describe the author's thesis, explain important concepts in a concise manner, and summarize the author's most important conclusions along the way. This will be the summary, after which, you'll add your critical analysis. Although a critique is personal, your statements should be well-reasoned and objective. Your critique will be more convincing when you present a logical basis for your statements. Please avoid making statements such as "I really enjoyed this article." Instead, describe the attributes of the article that lead to your enjoyment.

APA style is much more than just APA formatting. In fact, students often focus tremendous efforts on formatting their papers, while completely ignoring style. Spend some time reading chapters 3 and 4 of the APA Publication Manual, you'll be glad you did.

**## PY550ArticleReviewGuidlines2025.docx**

**PY 550 Article Review Guidelines**

For this assignment, you are to write a scholarly/academic “critical review” for each of two journal articles. The first article is provided in the assignment. The second article is to be chosen from one of those provided in the articles folder. Each review should be 3-4 pages in length (not including title and reference pages).

Q: What is a critical review?

A: The word “critical” does not mean to criticize negatively, but rather to thoughtfully evaluate the quality of the paper.

**Structure of a Critical Review**

The review will include
_an introduction, summary, evaluation_, and
_conclusion_. (plus title page and reference page)

**Introduction**

1. Introduce the author(s), title, and topic of the article.

2. Make a brief statement about the purpose of the study and findings, or in the case of a conceptual/theoretical paper, the key arguments or propositions presented. Don’t go into detail here, you will do that in the summary

3. Make a very brief statement that “previews” your evaluation/critique of the article.

**Summary**

In this section, your goal is to convey the content of the article in a very concise and unbiased manner. There should not be any critique in the summary. To write an accurate summary, you must read and seek to fully comprehend the entire paper so that you may summarize in your own words (i.e., paraphrase) in a way that accurately reflects that which you have read. After reading the paper, reflect on its purpose, main points, and conclusions. Determining the main points of the article can sometimes be challenging. As you read, it may serve you well to create an outline of the article. Two very important guidelines are relevant to writing the summary.

1. Many of us were taught that paraphrasing involves rearranging or replacing a few words from the source text so that you make the same statement using slightly different words. This is in fact, NOT proper paraphrasing. This is inadequate, and is actually a form of plagiarism. Please see the APA publication manual for guidance on paraphrasing and avoiding plagiarism.

2. Also, as a rule, you should avoid using word for word passages from the source text. This rule can occasionally be broken when the author has made a statement in such a way that to paraphrase would substantially lower its impact. Any word for word passage should be put in quotation marks, of course.

**Evaluation**

Think of this section as the critique. This will be the longest section of your paper. Here, you’ll discuss strengths, weaknesses, and the most notable, interesting, or controversial points. Your discussion should be well reasoned and not simple opinion with nothing to back it up. It is also better to avoid statements such as “I believe,” “I think,” and “Personally…” You may certainly believe something to be true and of course you have an opinion, however it is better not to use an “I believe” statement. Simply begin stating the arguments or facts upon which your opinion is based. There are many alternative phrases that work well, such as “Based on ________, it could be argued that _______.” Also, where needed, consider citing other sources to help bolster your commentary. This is useful for both disputing/questioning and supporting claims made in the article you are evaluating.

The overall structure of the evaluation/critique portion of your paper is a matter of preference and will differ according to what works best for the type of article you are reviewing. However, in every case, there should be a structure. In other words, your writing shouldn’t jump around with disconnected, rambling ideas and statements. There should be a flow that makes it coherent.

Here are some suggestions for structure.

· Order your commentary about the paper according to importance of each point or topic. This can be done either from most important to least important or reversed, i.e., from least important to most important.

· If your evaluation is more positive than negative, present the negative points first and the positive last. Likewise, if there is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last. Doing this will provide an easy transition to your conclusion.

**Conclusion**

This is a fairly short paragraph.

Restate your claims (above), but don’t be redundant. Restating doesn’t mean repeating the exact statements that you have already made. Think of this as a super concise summary of your evaluation section.

End with possible recommendations.

**References**

List all sources used in the review. If no other sources are cited, then only the article you reviewed will be in the reference page.

**Conceptionsoftheself.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/conceptionsoftheself-pdf)

**Conceptionsoftheself.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/conceptionsoftheself-pdf)

**## Part2Instructions.docx**

**Part 2 Instructions**

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to read and think critically about the ideas of early personality theorists (Freud, Jung, et al.) and how their theoretical frameworks relate to those of an alternate cultural framework (i.e., Eastern/Buddhist). For this assignment, I have chosen a reasonably short (although not simplistic) article titled "Conceptions of the Self in Western and Eastern Psychology" by Yozan Dirk Mosig, published in the Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Mosig begins with an overview of the Western view (Freud, et al.) I would like for you to assume the reader (your professor) needs no summary of the Western perspective. In the summary section of your paper, please do not include Mosig's summary of the Western conceptualization of the self. Instead,
focus on his description of the Eastern perspective and how it contrasts with the familiar Western conceptualizations.

In general, the structure of an article review is quite flexible and will vary according to the type of article, (e.g., scientific experiment, book review, editorial, or theoretical article, etc). The assigned article is conceptual (idea-based) and not a scientific study. Therefore, you won't find the typical introduction, method, results, and discussion sections found in an empirical journal.

Your task is to describe the author's thesis, explain important concepts in a concise manner, and summarize the author's most important conclusions along the way. This will be the summary, after which, you'll add your critical analysis. Although a critique is personal, your statements should be well-reasoned and objective. Your critique will be more convincing when you present a logical basis for your statements. Please avoid making statements such as "I really enjoyed this article." Instead, describe the attributes of the article that lead to your enjoyment.

APA style is much more than just APA formatting. In fact, students often focus tremendous efforts on formatting their papers, while completely ignoring style. Spend some time reading chapters 3 and 4 of the APA Publication Manual, you'll be glad you did.

**## PY550ArticleReviewGuidlines2025.docx**

**PY 550 Article Review Guidelines**

For this assignment, you are to write a scholarly/academic “critical review” for each of two journal articles. The first article is provided in the assignment. The second article is to be chosen from one of those provided in the articles folder. Each review should be 3-4 pages in length (not including title and reference pages).

Q: What is a critical review?

A: The word “critical” does not mean to criticize negatively, but rather to thoughtfully evaluate the quality of the paper.

**Structure of a Critical Review**

The review will include
_an introduction, summary, evaluation_, and
_conclusion_. (plus title page and reference page)

**Introduction**

1. Introduce the author(s), title, and topic of the article.

2. Make a brief statement about the purpose of the study and findings, or in the case of a conceptual/theoretical paper, the key arguments or propositions presented. Don’t go into detail here, you will do that in the summary

3. Make a very brief statement that “previews” your evaluation/critique of the article.

**Summary**

In this section, your goal is to convey the content of the article in a very concise and unbiased manner. There should not be any critique in the summary. To write an accurate summary, you must read and seek to fully comprehend the entire paper so that you may summarize in your own words (i.e., paraphrase) in a way that accurately reflects that which you have read. After reading the paper, reflect on its purpose, main points, and conclusions. Determining the main points of the article can sometimes be challenging. As you read, it may serve you well to create an outline of the article. Two very important guidelines are relevant to writing the summary.

1. Many of us were taught that paraphrasing involves rearranging or replacing a few words from the source text so that you make the same statement using slightly different words. This is in fact, NOT proper paraphrasing. This is inadequate, and is actually a form of plagiarism. Please see the APA publication manual for guidance on paraphrasing and avoiding plagiarism.

2. Also, as a rule, you should avoid using word for word passages from the source text. This rule can occasionally be broken when the author has made a statement in such a way that to paraphrase would substantially lower its impact. Any word for word passage should be put in quotation marks, of course.

**Evaluation**

Think of this section as the critique. This will be the longest section of your paper. Here, you’ll discuss strengths, weaknesses, and the most notable, interesting, or controversial points. Your discussion should be well reasoned and not simple opinion with nothing to back it up. It is also better to avoid statements such as “I believe,” “I think,” and “Personally…” You may certainly believe something to be true and of course you have an opinion, however it is better not to use an “I believe” statement. Simply begin stating the arguments or facts upon which your opinion is based. There are many alternative phrases that work well, such as “Based on ________, it could be argued that _______.” Also, where needed, consider citing other sources to help bolster your commentary. This is useful for both disputing/questioning and supporting claims made in the article you are evaluating.

The overall structure of the evaluation/critique portion of your paper is a matter of preference and will differ according to what works best for the type of article you are reviewing. However, in every case, there should be a structure. In other words, your writing shouldn’t jump around with disconnected, rambling ideas and statements. There should be a flow that makes it coherent.

Here are some suggestions for structure.

· Order your commentary about the paper according to importance of each point or topic. This can be done either from most important to least important or reversed, i.e., from least important to most important.

· If your evaluation is more positive than negative, present the negative points first and the positive last. Likewise, if there is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last. Doing this will provide an easy transition to your conclusion.

**Conclusion**

This is a fairly short paragraph.

Restate your claims (above), but don’t be redundant. Restating doesn’t mean repeating the exact statements that you have already made. Think of this as a super concise summary of your evaluation section.

End with possible recommendations.

**References**

List all sources used in the review. If no other sources are cited, then only the article you reviewed will be in the reference page.

**Conceptionsoftheself.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/conceptionsoftheself-pdf)

**## Part2Instructions.docx**

**Part 2 Instructions**

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to read and think critically about the ideas of early personality theorists (Freud, Jung, et al.) and how their theoretical frameworks relate to those of an alternate cultural framework (i.e., Eastern/Buddhist). For this assignment, I have chosen a reasonably short (although not simplistic) article titled "Conceptions of the Self in Western and Eastern Psychology" by Yozan Dirk Mosig, published in the Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Mosig begins with an overview of the Western view (Freud, et al.) I would like for you to assume the reader (your professor) needs no summary of the Western perspective. In the summary section of your paper, please do not include Mosig's summary of the Western conceptualization of the self. Instead,
focus on his description of the Eastern perspective and how it contrasts with the familiar Western conceptualizations.

In general, the structure of an article review is quite flexible and will vary according to the type of article, (e.g., scientific experiment, book review, editorial, or theoretical article, etc). The assigned article is conceptual (idea-based) and not a scientific study. Therefore, you won't find the typical introduction, method, results, and discussion sections found in an empirical journal.

Your task is to describe the author's thesis, explain important concepts in a concise manner, and summarize the author's most important conclusions along the way. This will be the summary, after which, you'll add your critical analysis. Although a critique is personal, your statements should be well-reasoned and objective. Your critique will be more convincing when you present a logical basis for your statements. Please avoid making statements such as "I really enjoyed this article." Instead, describe the attributes of the article that lead to your enjoyment.

APA style is much more than just APA formatting. In fact, students often focus tremendous efforts on formatting their papers, while completely ignoring style. Spend some time reading chapters 3 and 4 of the APA Publication Manual, you'll be glad you did.

**## PY550ArticleReviewGuidlines2025.docx**

**PY 550 Article Review Guidelines**

For this assignment, you are to write a scholarly/academic “critical review” for each of two journal articles. The first article is provided in the assignment. The second article is to be chosen from one of those provided in the articles folder. Each review should be 3-4 pages in length (not including title and reference pages).

Q: What is a critical review?

A: The word “critical” does not mean to criticize negatively, but rather to thoughtfully evaluate the quality of the paper.

**Structure of a Critical Review**

The review will include
_an introduction, summary, evaluation_, and
_conclusion_. (plus title page and reference page)

**Introduction**

1. Introduce the author(s), title, and topic of the article.

2. Make a brief statement about the purpose of the study and findings, or in the case of a conceptual/theoretical paper, the key arguments or propositions presented. Don’t go into detail here, you will do that in the summary

3. Make a very brief statement that “previews” your evaluation/critique of the article.

**Summary**

In this section, your goal is to convey the content of the article in a very concise and unbiased manner. There should not be any critique in the summary. To write an accurate summary, you must read and seek to fully comprehend the entire paper so that you may summarize in your own words (i.e., paraphrase) in a way that accurately reflects that which you have read. After reading the paper, reflect on its purpose, main points, and conclusions. Determining the main points of the article can sometimes be challenging. As you read, it may serve you well to create an outline of the article. Two very important guidelines are relevant to writing the summary.

1. Many of us were taught that paraphrasing involves rearranging or replacing a few words from the source text so that you make the same statement using slightly different words. This is in fact, NOT proper paraphrasing. This is inadequate, and is actually a form of plagiarism. Please see the APA publication manual for guidance on paraphrasing and avoiding plagiarism.

2. Also, as a rule, you should avoid using word for word passages from the source text. This rule can occasionally be broken when the author has made a statement in such a way that to paraphrase would substantially lower its impact. Any word for word passage should be put in quotation marks, of course.

**Evaluation**

Think of this section as the critique. This will be the longest section of your paper. Here, you’ll discuss strengths, weaknesses, and the most notable, interesting, or controversial points. Your discussion should be well reasoned and not simple opinion with nothing to back it up. It is also better to avoid statements such as “I believe,” “I think,” and “Personally…” You may certainly believe something to be true and of course you have an opinion, however it is better not to use an “I believe” statement. Simply begin stating the arguments or facts upon which your opinion is based. There are many alternative phrases that work well, such as “Based on ________, it could be argued that _______.” Also, where needed, consider citing other sources to help bolster your commentary. This is useful for both disputing/questioning and supporting claims made in the article you are evaluating.

The overall structure of the evaluation/critique portion of your paper is a matter of preference and will differ according to what works best for the type of article you are reviewing. However, in every case, there should be a structure. In other words, your writing shouldn’t jump around with disconnected, rambling ideas and statements. There should be a flow that makes it coherent.

Here are some suggestions for structure.

· Order your commentary about the paper according to importance of each point or topic. This can be done either from most important to least important or reversed, i.e., from least important to most important.

· If your evaluation is more positive than negative, present the negative points first and the positive last. Likewise, if there is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last. Doing this will provide an easy transition to your conclusion.

**Conclusion**

This is a fairly short paragraph.

Restate your claims (above), but don’t be redundant. Restating doesn’t mean repeating the exact statements that you have already made. Think of this as a super concise summary of your evaluation section.

End with possible recommendations.

**References**

List all sources used in the review. If no other sources are cited, then only the article you reviewed will be in the reference page.

**Conceptionsoftheself.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/conceptionsoftheself-pdf)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Weekly Clinical Experience 2

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Weekly Clinical Experience 2.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Nursing homework

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (1)** – ## InstructionsNUR650.docx **## InstructionsNUR650.docx** **_Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1_** Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria: · **Slide 1:** Title Page. · **Slide 2:** SBIRT …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (1)**

– ## InstructionsNUR650.docx

**## InstructionsNUR650.docx**

**_Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1_**

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

·
**Slide 1:** Title Page.

·
**Slide 2:**  SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.

·
**Slide 3:** Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.

·
**Slide 4:**  Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patient’s score and the interpretation of the patient’s score are required.

·
**Slide 5:**  Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your client’s score and need for behavioral changes.

·
**Slide 6:** Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.

·
**Slide 7:** Evaluation of the process – Share the patient’s outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.

·
**Slide 8:** References –5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

**Submission Instructions:**

· The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

· The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.

· The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenter’s notes.

**## InstructionsNUR650.docx**

**_Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1_**

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

·
**Slide 1:** Title Page.

·
**Slide 2:**  SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.

·
**Slide 3:** Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.

·
**Slide 4:**  Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patient’s score and the interpretation of the patient’s score are required.

·
**Slide 5:**  Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your client’s score and need for behavioral changes.

·
**Slide 6:** Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.

·
**Slide 7:** Evaluation of the process – Share the patient’s outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.

·
**Slide 8:** References –5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

**Submission Instructions:**

· The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

· The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.

· The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenter’s notes.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] WHERE IN THE WORLD IS EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE?

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Post** a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Post** a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is grounded in EBP and why or why not. Finally, explain whether the information you discovered on the healthcare organization’s website has changed your perception of the healthcare organization. Be specific and provide examples.

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Nursing Homework

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (1)** – ## Screeningpowerpointinstructions.docx **## Screeningpowerpointinstructions.docx** **_Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1_** Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria: · **Slide 1:** Title P…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (1)**

– ## Screeningpowerpointinstructions.docx

**## Screeningpowerpointinstructions.docx**

**_Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1_**

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

·
**Slide 1:** Title Page.

·
**Slide 2:**  SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.

·
**Slide 3:** Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.

·
**Slide 4:**  Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patient’s score and the interpretation of the patient’s score are required.

·
**Slide 5:**  Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your client’s score and need for behavioral changes.

·
**Slide 6:** Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.

·
**Slide 7:** Evaluation of the process – Share the patient’s outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.

·
**Slide 8:** References –5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

**Submission Instructions:**

· The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

· The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.

· The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenter’s notes.

**## Screeningpowerpointinstructions.docx**

**_Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation #1_**

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

·
**Slide 1:** Title Page.

·
**Slide 2:**  SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.

·
**Slide 3:** Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.

·
**Slide 4:**  Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patient’s score and the interpretation of the patient’s score are required.

·
**Slide 5:**  Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your client’s score and need for behavioral changes.

·
**Slide 6:** Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.

·
**Slide 7:** Evaluation of the process – Share the patient’s outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.

·
**Slide 8:** References –5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

**Submission Instructions:**

· The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

· The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.

· The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenter’s notes.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Asssigment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (4)** – ## HeathPromotionpart1.docx – ## HealthProblemProposal1.docx – ResearchDevlopment1.jpg – LieratureReview1.jpg **## HeathPromotionpart1.docx** **4 pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)** **Follow APA format** **Cite a minimum of five research …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (4)**

– ## HeathPromotionpart1.docx

– ## HealthProblemProposal1.docx

– ResearchDevlopment1.jpg
– LieratureReview1.jpg

**## HeathPromotionpart1.docx**

**4 pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)**

**Follow APA format**

**Cite a minimum of five research articles- 6 references in total.**

**Please review the rubric prior to submission.**

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1

**Exercise Instructions**

**Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1**

**Description**

Over the duration of this course,
**you will submit a scholarly PowerPoint “Health Promotion Program Proposal,”**

**addressing existing nursing knowledge related to health promotion and a written proposal.**

In the written proposal, you will also develop a health promotion program to meet the health needs of a vulnerable

population in your potential concentration area or community. The PowerPoint portion is your presentation of that proposal.

The proposal must demonstrate graduate school-level writing and critical analysis. The final version of

your proposal is due in week 8.

For this assignment you will submit
**Part One** of your proposal, detailing a health problem that is

prevalent within
**your selected group** and demonstrating your
**research of health promotion strategies for**

**addressing this specific health problem**. At this point, you already developed in your discussions the core ideas of the topic contained in this assignment. You will use the same information, but it won’t be a copy-and-paste exercise. The purpose is that you enhance your ideas with the comments and outcomes of the weekly discussions and previous evaluations.

Directions

1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction".  (1 paragraph at least).

Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.

What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?

Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.

2. Describe the vulnerable population.  (1-3 paragraphs).

What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?

Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraphs, one for each article).

After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. (2-3 paragraphs).

4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal.  (2-3 paragraphs).

For this assignment, a conclusion paragraph is not required.

Writing Assignment Requirements

**Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)**

**Follow APA format**

**Cite a minimum of five research articles- 6 references in total.**

**Please review the rubric prior to submission.**

Sample APA paper for your reference:

**APA 7 – Professional Sample Paper – 2020.pdf**

**## HealthProblemProposal1.docx**

2

**Health Problem Proposal**

Antonio Estremera

Florida National University

Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo

May 17, 2025

**Health Problem Proposal**

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder marked by insulin resistance and the inability of the body to effectively regulate blood glucose levels. It presents a major public health challenge due to its rapidly increasing prevalence and significant impact on mortality and morbidity. T2DM typically leads to severe complications, including cardiovascular disease, kidney impairment, blindness, and peripheral neuropathy. Complications drain medical systems and reduce the quality of life for tens of millions of people worldwide. Despite the treatable nature of T2DM through lifestyle modification and timely interventions, inequality in receiving education, resources, and treatment accelerates its spread and prevalence, particularly in low-income and minority populations and the underserved. Identification and management of T2DM in global, national, and local settings are key components of sound public health planning and health equity promotion.

**Global Relevance of Type 2 Diabetes**

Globally, the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes has reached startling proportions. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), in 2021, close to 537 million adults aged 20–79 years had diabetes worldwide, and the number is estimated to increase to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by 2045 (Yameny, 2024). This rising phenomenon is attributed to fast-paced urbanization, less active lifestyles, poor diets, and aging populations. Most of these cases are categorized as T2DM. Low- and middle-income nations have the highest burden, with close to 75% of all cases of diabetes across the world. For instance, in the Western Pacific countries of China and India, T2DM prevalence has experienced rapid rises in line with economic progress and diet and lifestyle changes (Sun et al., 2022). Additionally, diabetes takes the lives of more than 6.7 million people yearly, further emphasizing the global public health issue it poses and the demand for concerted prevention efforts and policy responses.

Aside from the human impact, T2DM has huge economic implications for global healthcare. IDF estimates global health expenditure on diabetes at USD 966 billion in 2021, representing 316% growth in the last 15 years (Recica & Naumovska, 2024). These costs stem from hospitalizations, complications management, and long-term care, often consuming significant portions of national health budgets, especially in resource-constrained settings. Thus, tackling T2DM requires international collaboration, investment in primary care infrastructure, and widespread public health campaigns focusing on prevention and lifestyle interventions.

**National Relevance in the United States**

In the United States, T2DM is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases. According to Chen et al. (2025), over 37.3 million Americans had diabetes in 2022, and about 90–95% of these cases were type 2. Additionally, around 96 million adults were identified as having prediabetes, placing them at high risk for developing T2DM. The economic impact is substantial, with total direct and indirect costs of diagnosed diabetes reaching $327 billion in 2017, a number that continues to grow (Khavjou et al., 2024). T2DM is also a leading cause of kidney failure, lower-limb amputations, and adult blindness in the United States.

The burden of T2DM is not evenly distributed across populations. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Native American communities exhibit disproportionately higher prevalence rates due to systemic social and economic inequalities, limited access to healthcare, and cultural or behavioral risk factors. For instance, the CDC reports that American Indian and Alaska Native adults are 2.5 times more likely than white adults to have diagnosed diabetes. The disparities stem from structural determinants, which include poverty, food insecurity, and insufficient access to preventive care. The statistics demonstrate the urgent requirement for diabetes prevention and management strategies, which must be culturally appropriate to address both behavioral and social determinants of health.

**Local Relevance and Community Perspective**

The T2DM prevalence and outcomes between different communities across the nation become evident through the example of Los Angeles County. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) reports that 10% of Los Angeles adults have diabetes, while another 30% show signs of prediabetes. The diabetes prevalence in low-income areas reaches higher levels, particularly among Latino and Black communities. The South Los Angeles area, which serves as a historically underserved community, reports a diabetes diagnosis rate of 20%, which exceeds the county average by half. The population faces multiple obstacles to healthcare access because they lack insurance coverage, experience transportation problems and language challenges, and have restricted access to nutritious food choices. The Los Angeles community health assessments reveal that diabetes patients receive insufficient disease management education while experiencing delayed medical diagnoses because they infrequently visit healthcare facilities (CDC, 2024). Public health initiatives such as mobile health clinics, culturally competent health educators, and partnerships with local organizations have been launched to address these gaps. However, these efforts remain underfunded and fragmented. To mitigate the impact of T2DM locally, consistent investment in community-based health promotion programs, early screening, and chronic disease self-management education is essential.

**Justification for Multilevel Health Promotion Strategies**

Global, national, and local data evidence indicates that Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus needs comprehensive health promotion strategies at multiple levels. Health systems worldwide must invest in early detection, universal healthcare access, and international partnerships to promote healthy lifestyles. U.S. policymakers must tackle structural inequalities and boost preventive service funding nationally, particularly for marginalized communities. Local outreach programs combined with education campaigns that respect cultural backgrounds will enable people to choose better health options, receive timely care, and effectively manage their condition. A unified response between health systems and governance levels will decrease T2DM prevalence while minimizing this disease's avoidable human and economic costs. Reducing T2DM outcome disparities is a medical necessity and a moral and social requirement to achieve health equity and quality of life for everyone.

**References**

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024).
_National Diabetes statistics report_. Diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html

Chen, X., Zhang, L., & Chen, W. (2025). Global, regional, and national burdens of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents from 1990 to 2021, with forecasts to 2030: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.
_BMC medicine_,
_23_(1), 48.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w)

Khavjou, O. A., Sun, M., D’Angelo, S. R., Neuwahl, S. J., Hoerger, T. J., Cho, P., … & Zhang, P. (2024). Economic Costs Attributed to Diagnosed Diabetes in Each US State and the District of Columbia: 2021.
_Diabetes Care_, dc240832.
[https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0832](https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0832)

Recica, V., & Naumovska, Z. (2024). Diabetes in the Republic of North Macedonia: epidemiology and economic burden, 2018-2021.
_Archives of Public Health_,
_16_(1).
[https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2024.6117](https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2024.6117)

Sun, P., Wen, H., Liu, X., Ma, Y., Jang, J., & Yu, C. (2022). Time trends in type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence across the BRICS from 1990 to 2019: an age-period-cohort analysis.
_BMC Public Health_,
_22_, 1-14.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12485-y](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12485-y)

Yameny, A. A. (2024). Diabetes Mellitus Overview 2024.
_Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research_,
_10_(3), 641-645.
[https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.382794](https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.382794)

**ResearchDevlopment1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdevlopment1-jpg-10304119)

**LieratureReview1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lieraturereview1-jpg-10304121)

**LieratureReview1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lieraturereview1-jpg-10304121)

**## HeathPromotionpart1.docx**

**4 pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)**

**Follow APA format**

**Cite a minimum of five research articles- 6 references in total.**

**Please review the rubric prior to submission.**

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1

**Exercise Instructions**

**Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1**

**Description**

Over the duration of this course,
**you will submit a scholarly PowerPoint “Health Promotion Program Proposal,”**

**addressing existing nursing knowledge related to health promotion and a written proposal.**

In the written proposal, you will also develop a health promotion program to meet the health needs of a vulnerable

population in your potential concentration area or community. The PowerPoint portion is your presentation of that proposal.

The proposal must demonstrate graduate school-level writing and critical analysis. The final version of

your proposal is due in week 8.

For this assignment you will submit
**Part One** of your proposal, detailing a health problem that is

prevalent within
**your selected group** and demonstrating your
**research of health promotion strategies for**

**addressing this specific health problem**. At this point, you already developed in your discussions the core ideas of the topic contained in this assignment. You will use the same information, but it won’t be a copy-and-paste exercise. The purpose is that you enhance your ideas with the comments and outcomes of the weekly discussions and previous evaluations.

Directions

1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction".  (1 paragraph at least).

Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.

What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?

Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.

2. Describe the vulnerable population.  (1-3 paragraphs).

What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?

Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraphs, one for each article).

After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. (2-3 paragraphs).

4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal.  (2-3 paragraphs).

For this assignment, a conclusion paragraph is not required.

Writing Assignment Requirements

**Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)**

**Follow APA format**

**Cite a minimum of five research articles- 6 references in total.**

**Please review the rubric prior to submission.**

Sample APA paper for your reference:

**APA 7 – Professional Sample Paper – 2020.pdf**

**## HealthProblemProposal1.docx**

2

**Health Problem Proposal**

Antonio Estremera

Florida National University

Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo

May 17, 2025

**Health Problem Proposal**

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder marked by insulin resistance and the inability of the body to effectively regulate blood glucose levels. It presents a major public health challenge due to its rapidly increasing prevalence and significant impact on mortality and morbidity. T2DM typically leads to severe complications, including cardiovascular disease, kidney impairment, blindness, and peripheral neuropathy. Complications drain medical systems and reduce the quality of life for tens of millions of people worldwide. Despite the treatable nature of T2DM through lifestyle modification and timely interventions, inequality in receiving education, resources, and treatment accelerates its spread and prevalence, particularly in low-income and minority populations and the underserved. Identification and management of T2DM in global, national, and local settings are key components of sound public health planning and health equity promotion.

**Global Relevance of Type 2 Diabetes**

Globally, the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes has reached startling proportions. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), in 2021, close to 537 million adults aged 20–79 years had diabetes worldwide, and the number is estimated to increase to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by 2045 (Yameny, 2024). This rising phenomenon is attributed to fast-paced urbanization, less active lifestyles, poor diets, and aging populations. Most of these cases are categorized as T2DM. Low- and middle-income nations have the highest burden, with close to 75% of all cases of diabetes across the world. For instance, in the Western Pacific countries of China and India, T2DM prevalence has experienced rapid rises in line with economic progress and diet and lifestyle changes (Sun et al., 2022). Additionally, diabetes takes the lives of more than 6.7 million people yearly, further emphasizing the global public health issue it poses and the demand for concerted prevention efforts and policy responses.

Aside from the human impact, T2DM has huge economic implications for global healthcare. IDF estimates global health expenditure on diabetes at USD 966 billion in 2021, representing 316% growth in the last 15 years (Recica & Naumovska, 2024). These costs stem from hospitalizations, complications management, and long-term care, often consuming significant portions of national health budgets, especially in resource-constrained settings. Thus, tackling T2DM requires international collaboration, investment in primary care infrastructure, and widespread public health campaigns focusing on prevention and lifestyle interventions.

**National Relevance in the United States**

In the United States, T2DM is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases. According to Chen et al. (2025), over 37.3 million Americans had diabetes in 2022, and about 90–95% of these cases were type 2. Additionally, around 96 million adults were identified as having prediabetes, placing them at high risk for developing T2DM. The economic impact is substantial, with total direct and indirect costs of diagnosed diabetes reaching $327 billion in 2017, a number that continues to grow (Khavjou et al., 2024). T2DM is also a leading cause of kidney failure, lower-limb amputations, and adult blindness in the United States.

The burden of T2DM is not evenly distributed across populations. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Native American communities exhibit disproportionately higher prevalence rates due to systemic social and economic inequalities, limited access to healthcare, and cultural or behavioral risk factors. For instance, the CDC reports that American Indian and Alaska Native adults are 2.5 times more likely than white adults to have diagnosed diabetes. The disparities stem from structural determinants, which include poverty, food insecurity, and insufficient access to preventive care. The statistics demonstrate the urgent requirement for diabetes prevention and management strategies, which must be culturally appropriate to address both behavioral and social determinants of health.

**Local Relevance and Community Perspective**

The T2DM prevalence and outcomes between different communities across the nation become evident through the example of Los Angeles County. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) reports that 10% of Los Angeles adults have diabetes, while another 30% show signs of prediabetes. The diabetes prevalence in low-income areas reaches higher levels, particularly among Latino and Black communities. The South Los Angeles area, which serves as a historically underserved community, reports a diabetes diagnosis rate of 20%, which exceeds the county average by half. The population faces multiple obstacles to healthcare access because they lack insurance coverage, experience transportation problems and language challenges, and have restricted access to nutritious food choices. The Los Angeles community health assessments reveal that diabetes patients receive insufficient disease management education while experiencing delayed medical diagnoses because they infrequently visit healthcare facilities (CDC, 2024). Public health initiatives such as mobile health clinics, culturally competent health educators, and partnerships with local organizations have been launched to address these gaps. However, these efforts remain underfunded and fragmented. To mitigate the impact of T2DM locally, consistent investment in community-based health promotion programs, early screening, and chronic disease self-management education is essential.

**Justification for Multilevel Health Promotion Strategies**

Global, national, and local data evidence indicates that Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus needs comprehensive health promotion strategies at multiple levels. Health systems worldwide must invest in early detection, universal healthcare access, and international partnerships to promote healthy lifestyles. U.S. policymakers must tackle structural inequalities and boost preventive service funding nationally, particularly for marginalized communities. Local outreach programs combined with education campaigns that respect cultural backgrounds will enable people to choose better health options, receive timely care, and effectively manage their condition. A unified response between health systems and governance levels will decrease T2DM prevalence while minimizing this disease's avoidable human and economic costs. Reducing T2DM outcome disparities is a medical necessity and a moral and social requirement to achieve health equity and quality of life for everyone.

**References**

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024).
_National Diabetes statistics report_. Diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html

Chen, X., Zhang, L., & Chen, W. (2025). Global, regional, and national burdens of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents from 1990 to 2021, with forecasts to 2030: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.
_BMC medicine_,
_23_(1), 48.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w)

Khavjou, O. A., Sun, M., D’Angelo, S. R., Neuwahl, S. J., Hoerger, T. J., Cho, P., … & Zhang, P. (2024). Economic Costs Attributed to Diagnosed Diabetes in Each US State and the District of Columbia: 2021.
_Diabetes Care_, dc240832.
[https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0832](https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0832)

Recica, V., & Naumovska, Z. (2024). Diabetes in the Republic of North Macedonia: epidemiology and economic burden, 2018-2021.
_Archives of Public Health_,
_16_(1).
[https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2024.6117](https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2024.6117)

Sun, P., Wen, H., Liu, X., Ma, Y., Jang, J., & Yu, C. (2022). Time trends in type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence across the BRICS from 1990 to 2019: an age-period-cohort analysis.
_BMC Public Health_,
_22_, 1-14.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12485-y](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12485-y)

Yameny, A. A. (2024). Diabetes Mellitus Overview 2024.
_Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research_,
_10_(3), 641-645.
[https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.382794](https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.382794)

**ResearchDevlopment1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdevlopment1-jpg-10304119)

**LieratureReview1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lieraturereview1-jpg-10304121)

**## HeathPromotionpart1.docx**

**4 pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)**

**Follow APA format**

**Cite a minimum of five research articles- 6 references in total.**

**Please review the rubric prior to submission.**

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1

**Exercise Instructions**

**Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1**

**Description**

Over the duration of this course,
**you will submit a scholarly PowerPoint “Health Promotion Program Proposal,”**

**addressing existing nursing knowledge related to health promotion and a written proposal.**

In the written proposal, you will also develop a health promotion program to meet the health needs of a vulnerable

population in your potential concentration area or community. The PowerPoint portion is your presentation of that proposal.

The proposal must demonstrate graduate school-level writing and critical analysis. The final version of

your proposal is due in week 8.

For this assignment you will submit
**Part One** of your proposal, detailing a health problem that is

prevalent within
**your selected group** and demonstrating your
**research of health promotion strategies for**

**addressing this specific health problem**. At this point, you already developed in your discussions the core ideas of the topic contained in this assignment. You will use the same information, but it won’t be a copy-and-paste exercise. The purpose is that you enhance your ideas with the comments and outcomes of the weekly discussions and previous evaluations.

Directions

1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction".  (1 paragraph at least).

Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.

What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?

Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.

2. Describe the vulnerable population.  (1-3 paragraphs).

What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?

Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraphs, one for each article).

After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. (2-3 paragraphs).

4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal.  (2-3 paragraphs).

For this assignment, a conclusion paragraph is not required.

Writing Assignment Requirements

**Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)**

**Follow APA format**

**Cite a minimum of five research articles- 6 references in total.**

**Please review the rubric prior to submission.**

Sample APA paper for your reference:

**APA 7 – Professional Sample Paper – 2020.pdf**

**## HealthProblemProposal1.docx**

2

**Health Problem Proposal**

Antonio Estremera

Florida National University

Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo

May 17, 2025

**Health Problem Proposal**

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder marked by insulin resistance and the inability of the body to effectively regulate blood glucose levels. It presents a major public health challenge due to its rapidly increasing prevalence and significant impact on mortality and morbidity. T2DM typically leads to severe complications, including cardiovascular disease, kidney impairment, blindness, and peripheral neuropathy. Complications drain medical systems and reduce the quality of life for tens of millions of people worldwide. Despite the treatable nature of T2DM through lifestyle modification and timely interventions, inequality in receiving education, resources, and treatment accelerates its spread and prevalence, particularly in low-income and minority populations and the underserved. Identification and management of T2DM in global, national, and local settings are key components of sound public health planning and health equity promotion.

**Global Relevance of Type 2 Diabetes**

Globally, the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes has reached startling proportions. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), in 2021, close to 537 million adults aged 20–79 years had diabetes worldwide, and the number is estimated to increase to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by 2045 (Yameny, 2024). This rising phenomenon is attributed to fast-paced urbanization, less active lifestyles, poor diets, and aging populations. Most of these cases are categorized as T2DM. Low- and middle-income nations have the highest burden, with close to 75% of all cases of diabetes across the world. For instance, in the Western Pacific countries of China and India, T2DM prevalence has experienced rapid rises in line with economic progress and diet and lifestyle changes (Sun et al., 2022). Additionally, diabetes takes the lives of more than 6.7 million people yearly, further emphasizing the global public health issue it poses and the demand for concerted prevention efforts and policy responses.

Aside from the human impact, T2DM has huge economic implications for global healthcare. IDF estimates global health expenditure on diabetes at USD 966 billion in 2021, representing 316% growth in the last 15 years (Recica & Naumovska, 2024). These costs stem from hospitalizations, complications management, and long-term care, often consuming significant portions of national health budgets, especially in resource-constrained settings. Thus, tackling T2DM requires international collaboration, investment in primary care infrastructure, and widespread public health campaigns focusing on prevention and lifestyle interventions.

**National Relevance in the United States**

In the United States, T2DM is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases. According to Chen et al. (2025), over 37.3 million Americans had diabetes in 2022, and about 90–95% of these cases were type 2. Additionally, around 96 million adults were identified as having prediabetes, placing them at high risk for developing T2DM. The economic impact is substantial, with total direct and indirect costs of diagnosed diabetes reaching $327 billion in 2017, a number that continues to grow (Khavjou et al., 2024). T2DM is also a leading cause of kidney failure, lower-limb amputations, and adult blindness in the United States.

The burden of T2DM is not evenly distributed across populations. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Native American communities exhibit disproportionately higher prevalence rates due to systemic social and economic inequalities, limited access to healthcare, and cultural or behavioral risk factors. For instance, the CDC reports that American Indian and Alaska Native adults are 2.5 times more likely than white adults to have diagnosed diabetes. The disparities stem from structural determinants, which include poverty, food insecurity, and insufficient access to preventive care. The statistics demonstrate the urgent requirement for diabetes prevention and management strategies, which must be culturally appropriate to address both behavioral and social determinants of health.

**Local Relevance and Community Perspective**

The T2DM prevalence and outcomes between different communities across the nation become evident through the example of Los Angeles County. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) reports that 10% of Los Angeles adults have diabetes, while another 30% show signs of prediabetes. The diabetes prevalence in low-income areas reaches higher levels, particularly among Latino and Black communities. The South Los Angeles area, which serves as a historically underserved community, reports a diabetes diagnosis rate of 20%, which exceeds the county average by half. The population faces multiple obstacles to healthcare access because they lack insurance coverage, experience transportation problems and language challenges, and have restricted access to nutritious food choices. The Los Angeles community health assessments reveal that diabetes patients receive insufficient disease management education while experiencing delayed medical diagnoses because they infrequently visit healthcare facilities (CDC, 2024). Public health initiatives such as mobile health clinics, culturally competent health educators, and partnerships with local organizations have been launched to address these gaps. However, these efforts remain underfunded and fragmented. To mitigate the impact of T2DM locally, consistent investment in community-based health promotion programs, early screening, and chronic disease self-management education is essential.

**Justification for Multilevel Health Promotion Strategies**

Global, national, and local data evidence indicates that Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus needs comprehensive health promotion strategies at multiple levels. Health systems worldwide must invest in early detection, universal healthcare access, and international partnerships to promote healthy lifestyles. U.S. policymakers must tackle structural inequalities and boost preventive service funding nationally, particularly for marginalized communities. Local outreach programs combined with education campaigns that respect cultural backgrounds will enable people to choose better health options, receive timely care, and effectively manage their condition. A unified response between health systems and governance levels will decrease T2DM prevalence while minimizing this disease's avoidable human and economic costs. Reducing T2DM outcome disparities is a medical necessity and a moral and social requirement to achieve health equity and quality of life for everyone.

**References**

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024).
_National Diabetes statistics report_. Diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html

Chen, X., Zhang, L., & Chen, W. (2025). Global, regional, and national burdens of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents from 1990 to 2021, with forecasts to 2030: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.
_BMC medicine_,
_23_(1), 48.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w)

Khavjou, O. A., Sun, M., D’Angelo, S. R., Neuwahl, S. J., Hoerger, T. J., Cho, P., … & Zhang, P. (2024). Economic Costs Attributed to Diagnosed Diabetes in Each US State and the District of Columbia: 2021.
_Diabetes Care_, dc240832.
[https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0832](https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0832)

Recica, V., & Naumovska, Z. (2024). Diabetes in the Republic of North Macedonia: epidemiology and economic burden, 2018-2021.
_Archives of Public Health_,
_16_(1).
[https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2024.6117](https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2024.6117)

Sun, P., Wen, H., Liu, X., Ma, Y., Jang, J., & Yu, C. (2022). Time trends in type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence across the BRICS from 1990 to 2019: an age-period-cohort analysis.
_BMC Public Health_,
_22_, 1-14.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12485-y](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12485-y)

Yameny, A. A. (2024). Diabetes Mellitus Overview 2024.
_Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research_,
_10_(3), 641-645.
[https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.382794](https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.382794)

**ResearchDevlopment1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchdevlopment1-jpg-10304119)

**LieratureReview1.jpg**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lieraturereview1-jpg-10304121)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Business

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) **Healthcare Admin Change Ldrshp** Complete Part 1 of an in-depth analysis of the case study. Your 6-8 page analysis will focus on the problems facing the organization and the approach(es…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

**Healthcare Admin Change Ldrshp**

Complete Part 1 of an in-depth analysis of the case study. Your 6-8 page analysis will focus on the problems facing the organization and the approach(es) it used to position itself for the necessary changes.

– a year ago

November 5, 2026