My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] SLPStrike

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## MODULE4SLPMGT516.docx **## MODULE4SLPMGT516.docx** **Disputes in a unionized workplace** Before you start this assignment, be sure that you have read the background readings for this module. **Read the following scenario:** Jocko and Thomas are both hourly employees w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## MODULE4SLPMGT516.docx

    **## MODULE4SLPMGT516.docx**

    **Disputes in a unionized workplace**

    Before you start this assignment, be sure that you have read the background readings for this module.

    **Read the following scenario:**

    Jocko and Thomas are both hourly employees working as forklift drivers in a large grocery chain’s central California warehouse. Their workplace is unionized. They work in the same warehouse section under Bert, the second shift supervisor.

    Jocko has always found the job difficult, because the job was fast-paced, but repetitive; and even though the forklifts and machines do the heavy lifting and moving, there were situations in which a driver had to deal with slightly misplaced pallets or otherwise use ingenuity and “muscle” to keep things moving smoothly through the shift. Jocko was small in stature and obviously not as physically strong as his co-workers. Thomas made a point of never helping Jocko with these adjustments, even though he helped other drivers when such situations arose. Jocko was gay, and he thought Thomas resented having him there – Thomas never seemed to want to talk with Jocko on breaks, for example.

    Jocko thought Thomas was being a bad colleague, especially on those days when Jocko could have really used Thomas’s help. Jocko mentioned to Bert, the supervisor, that he wished Thomas would help him once in a while. After all, he would be willing to help Thomas if he asked. Bert replied that he did not think that was going to happen.

    It was not only Thomas who would never help Jocko. All of the other forklift drivers seemed to look the other way when Jocko found himself in a situation where there was “muscle” needed to keep things going.

    Recently, the company implemented a new stacking protocol. Soon thereafter, Jocko was not meeting his production numbers on some days. He thought it was because he could not get any help from his colleagues when needed and his supervisor, Bert, did not seem to care.

    Bert, his supervisor, did carefully record Jocko’s production numbers to highlight the shifts when he had underperformed. After a while, Jocko started skipping breaks and shortening his lunch break on some days so he could spend a little more time on the forklift and try to meet his production for the shift. No one seemed to care or notice.

    As Jocko came to realize that he was going to get a bad performance review if the situation continued, he asked Bert if he could order his co-workers to help him when situations arose where he needed help. Bert said he could not give Jocko any special treatment.

    Jocko grew more frustrated, especially by the lack of communication and what he considered to be the stubbornness of his co-workers in refusing to help him when he needed it. He reasoned that he had a family to feed, just as they did, and he had to do something about the unfair treatment he was receiving.

    Jocko told Bert that he was going to tell the union that he wanted to file a grievance, because he thought the way he was being treated was not right.

    Bert told Jocko that he’d never known a grievance to work out for the person who filed it, but Jocko should do what he thought he needed to do.

    Jocko felt very upset about what he perceived as Bert’s indifference. He filed a formal grievance with the union about the situation.

    Prepare a 2- to 3-page (not counting title and reference pages) paper that addresses the following:

    ·
    **What do you think will happen next? Why?**

    ·
    **Discuss the important steps in a grievance process that might take place to resolve this issue if Jocko files a grievance.**

    Discuss a plan of action to resolve an employee conflict in a unionized workplace.

    ·
    **If you were the HR manager in this warehouse, what would you do to get to the root of the issue? Why?**

    Use at least two Trident Online Library sources plus any applicable background readings to help strengthen your discussion.

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?

    ·
    **Timeliness**: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC on or before the module’s due date?

    **## MODULE4SLPMGT516.docx**

    **Disputes in a unionized workplace**

    Before you start this assignment, be sure that you have read the background readings for this module.

    **Read the following scenario:**

    Jocko and Thomas are both hourly employees working as forklift drivers in a large grocery chain’s central California warehouse. Their workplace is unionized. They work in the same warehouse section under Bert, the second shift supervisor.

    Jocko has always found the job difficult, because the job was fast-paced, but repetitive; and even though the forklifts and machines do the heavy lifting and moving, there were situations in which a driver had to deal with slightly misplaced pallets or otherwise use ingenuity and “muscle” to keep things moving smoothly through the shift. Jocko was small in stature and obviously not as physically strong as his co-workers. Thomas made a point of never helping Jocko with these adjustments, even though he helped other drivers when such situations arose. Jocko was gay, and he thought Thomas resented having him there – Thomas never seemed to want to talk with Jocko on breaks, for example.

    Jocko thought Thomas was being a bad colleague, especially on those days when Jocko could have really used Thomas’s help. Jocko mentioned to Bert, the supervisor, that he wished Thomas would help him once in a while. After all, he would be willing to help Thomas if he asked. Bert replied that he did not think that was going to happen.

    It was not only Thomas who would never help Jocko. All of the other forklift drivers seemed to look the other way when Jocko found himself in a situation where there was “muscle” needed to keep things going.

    Recently, the company implemented a new stacking protocol. Soon thereafter, Jocko was not meeting his production numbers on some days. He thought it was because he could not get any help from his colleagues when needed and his supervisor, Bert, did not seem to care.

    Bert, his supervisor, did carefully record Jocko’s production numbers to highlight the shifts when he had underperformed. After a while, Jocko started skipping breaks and shortening his lunch break on some days so he could spend a little more time on the forklift and try to meet his production for the shift. No one seemed to care or notice.

    As Jocko came to realize that he was going to get a bad performance review if the situation continued, he asked Bert if he could order his co-workers to help him when situations arose where he needed help. Bert said he could not give Jocko any special treatment.

    Jocko grew more frustrated, especially by the lack of communication and what he considered to be the stubbornness of his co-workers in refusing to help him when he needed it. He reasoned that he had a family to feed, just as they did, and he had to do something about the unfair treatment he was receiving.

    Jocko told Bert that he was going to tell the union that he wanted to file a grievance, because he thought the way he was being treated was not right.

    Bert told Jocko that he’d never known a grievance to work out for the person who filed it, but Jocko should do what he thought he needed to do.

    Jocko felt very upset about what he perceived as Bert’s indifference. He filed a formal grievance with the union about the situation.

    Prepare a 2- to 3-page (not counting title and reference pages) paper that addresses the following:

    ·
    **What do you think will happen next? Why?**

    ·
    **Discuss the important steps in a grievance process that might take place to resolve this issue if Jocko files a grievance.**

    Discuss a plan of action to resolve an employee conflict in a unionized workplace.

    ·
    **If you were the HR manager in this warehouse, what would you do to get to the root of the issue? Why?**

    Use at least two Trident Online Library sources plus any applicable background readings to help strengthen your discussion.

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?

    ·
    **Timeliness**: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC on or before the module’s due date?

  • [Solved] Response1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Response1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Research article critique (DUE JUNE 8)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In need of someone to complete a research article critique. You will review an article related to nursing and critique it. The critique should be written in APA 7 format I will provide you with the guide you need to follow with questions that should be answered and incorporated in the critique…. a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In need of someone to complete a research article critique. You will review an article related to nursing and critique it. The critique should be written in APA 7 format I will provide you with the guide you need to follow with questions that should be answered and incorporated in the critique…. attached is the rubric

    – [\
    \
    image0.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/image0-jpeg-10307239 "image0.jpeg")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Response.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Research Apprasial

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please get back to me Thank you! – a year ago **files (2)** – ## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx – ## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx** Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons The purpose of this assignment is for student…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please get back to me Thank you!

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx

    – ## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx

    **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx**

    Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate an understanding of the research process through the critical appraisal of published research. The interactive appraisal form presented in this assignment is based on Chapter 18 and other chapters of Gray et al. (2017).

    **Instructions**

    Read the article detailed below

    Tangnitipong, S., Vuttanon, N., Pothiban, L., & Chintanawat, R. (2022). Effectiveness of a home-based coping enhancement program for stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research , 26_(4), 585–599.

    Link
    [View of Effectiveness of a Home-Based Coping Enhancement Program for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial](https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259264/176902)

    The following document is a quantitative research appraisal form

    Rubric

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Research Appraisal 1—Section 1 |
    | | | |
    | **Research Appraisal 1—Section 1** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | **Introduction** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **State the Problem** | **5 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 5 pts** |
    | **Examine the Literature** | **8 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 8 pts** |
    | **Examine the Study Framework or Theory** | **4 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 4 pts** |
    | **Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses** | **6 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 6 pts** |
    | **APA** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **Total Points: 0** |

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

    **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx**

    Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate an understanding of the research process through the critical appraisal of published research. The interactive appraisal form presented in this assignment is based on Chapter 18 and other chapters of Gray et al. (2017).

    **Instructions**

    Read the article detailed below

    Tangnitipong, S., Vuttanon, N., Pothiban, L., & Chintanawat, R. (2022). Effectiveness of a home-based coping enhancement program for stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research , 26_(4), 585–599.

    Link
    [View of Effectiveness of a Home-Based Coping Enhancement Program for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial](https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259264/176902)

    The following document is a quantitative research appraisal form

    Rubric

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Research Appraisal 1—Section 1 |
    | | | |
    | **Research Appraisal 1—Section 1** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | **Introduction** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **State the Problem** | **5 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 5 pts** |
    | **Examine the Literature** | **8 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 8 pts** |
    | **Examine the Study Framework or Theory** | **4 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 4 pts** |
    | **Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses** | **6 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 6 pts** |
    | **APA** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **Total Points: 0** |

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

    **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx**

    Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate an understanding of the research process through the critical appraisal of published research. The interactive appraisal form presented in this assignment is based on Chapter 18 and other chapters of Gray et al. (2017).

    **Instructions**

    Read the article detailed below

    Tangnitipong, S., Vuttanon, N., Pothiban, L., & Chintanawat, R. (2022). Effectiveness of a home-based coping enhancement program for stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research , 26_(4), 585–599.

    Link
    [View of Effectiveness of a Home-Based Coping Enhancement Program for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial](https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259264/176902)

    The following document is a quantitative research appraisal form

    Rubric

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Research Appraisal 1—Section 1 |
    | | | |
    | **Research Appraisal 1—Section 1** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | **Introduction** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **State the Problem** | **5 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 5 pts** |
    | **Examine the Literature** | **8 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 8 pts** |
    | **Examine the Study Framework or Theory** | **4 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 4 pts** |
    | **Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses** | **6 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 6 pts** |
    | **APA** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **Total Points: 0** |

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

  • [Solved] w4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need some help! – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need some help!

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] discussion response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ONLY RESPONSE NEEDED X2 -LISTED TO DIFFERENT PEERS ### Initial Response- #### Instructions: When developing new clinical interventions or practice changes, a systems approach can help maintain a culture of safety and minimize liability. For this discussion, answer the following question prompts: 1. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ONLY RESPONSE NEEDED X2 -LISTED TO DIFFERENT PEERS

    ### Initial Response-

    #### Instructions:

    When developing new clinical interventions or practice changes, a systems approach can help maintain a culture of safety and minimize liability. For this discussion, answer the following question prompts:

    1. Outline the potential risks associated with the one of the proposed practice changes examined in your Unit 3 Gap Analysis.
    2. When harm does occur, what is your organization's/system's policy on disclosure?
    3. Locate and discuss your state's apology law and provide an overview of what it encompasses.
    4. Are there formal policies within your organization/system about what to do when harm occurs? Are these aligned with your state's apology law?

    Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

    Your initial response is due by Wednesday at 11:59 pm CT.

    Estimated time to complete: 2 – 4 hours

    ### Peer Response

    #### Instructions:

    Please read and respond to at least two of your peers' initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers:

    – Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.
    – How are they similar or how are they different?
    – What information can you add that would help support the responses of your peers?
    – Ask your peers a question for clarification about their post.
    – What most interests you about their responses?

    Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

    All peer responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.

    Estimated time to complete:  1 hour

    ### Reply from Zemen Aberra

    Zemen Aberra

    Herzing University

    Professionalism and Leadership for Advanced Practice (NU726-7K)

    Dr. Sandra Chen-Walta

    **Maintaining a Culture of Safety Discussion**

    Prolonged antibiotic delivery in patients with suspected sepsis has a considerable impact on patient outcomes, making it a serious safety issue. One recommended practice improvement from my Unit 3 Gap Analysis is the use of Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based sepsis notifications to encourage early detection and treatment. While this strategy has the potential to significantly reduce delays, it is not without risk.

    **Possible Risks of Recommended Practice Changes**

    Incorporating EHR-based sepsis alerts carries concerns such as alert fatigue, which occurs when clinicians start disregarding or overriding alerts due to frequent or nonspecific warnings (Hwang et al., 2020). Furthermore, if the alarm system fails to detect early sepsis or produces false positives, it may result in unnecessary antibiotic administration, elevated resistance, or missed intervention opportunities. Integration challenges and reliance on EHR data accuracy may further restrict the tool's effectiveness, potentially harming patients if key clinical indicators are missed (Shappell & Rhee, 2020).

    **Disclosure Policies in My Organization**

    When harm occurs, Dignity Health – Sacramento adheres to the CommonSpirit Health system-wide Disclosure of Unanticipated Outcomes policy. When unexpected complications occur, this policy promotes timely, empathetic, and honest communication with patients and their loved ones. The organization advocates for complete disclosure, which is consistent with Just Culture values, and provides openness while supporting healthcare professionals involved in the event (CommonSpirit Health, 2024).

    **California's Apology Law Overview**

    California's apology legislation is detailed in California Evidence Code Section 1160, which states that any expression of compassion, empathy, or general generosity offered by a medical professional to a patient or family is inadmissible as proof in a civil lawsuit. However, declarations admitting mistakes or negligence may still be admissible ( _California Code, EVID 1160_, n.d.). This statute enables healthcare workers to express compassion without fear of legal repercussions, but warns against expressing direct admissions of fault.

    **Alignment of Organizational Policies and State Law**

    Dignity Health's disclosure procedures are consistent with California's apology law, enabling healthcare professionals to provide patients with empathic communication and support following unfortunate occurrences without expressly admitting fault ( _California Code, EVID 1160_, n.d.). Training in efficient communication throughout disclosures ensures that providers adhere to legal and ethical limitations while preserving confidence with patients and families. These policies demonstrate a dedication to a safety environment that balances transparency and legal safeguards (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021).

    **References:**

    _California Code, EVID 1160_. (n.d.). **Division 9. Evidence affected or excluded by extrinsic policies [1100 – 1162]** https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1160&lawCode=EVID

    CommonSpirit Health. (2024). _Commonspirit h_ ealth _Governance policy addendum_ [Report]. https://www.dignityhealth.org/content/dam/dignity-health/documents/california-december-2024/CA-Addendum.pdf

    Hwang, M., Bond, W., & Powell, E. (2020). Sepsis alerts in Emergency Departments: A Systematic review of accuracy and quality measure impact. _Western Journal of Emergency Medicine_, _21_(5). [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7514413/Links to an external site.](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7514413/)

    Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. _BMC Nursing_, _20_(1). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8414690/

    Shappell, C. N., & Rhee, C. (2020). Leveraging electronic health record data to improve sepsis surveillance. _BMJ Quality & Safety_, _29_(9), 706–710. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9011359/

    [**Natalie Scriboni**](https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/46683/users/94250) May 28 8:32pmManage Discussion by Natalie Scriboni

    ### Reply from Natalie Scriboni

    **NU 726: Unit 4 Discussion Examination of Policies and Regulations – Maintaining a Culture of Safety – Natalie Scriboni**

    One of the proposed changes from my Unit 3 Gap Analysis involves ensuring consistent reassessment and documentation of pain after interventions, including both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches. This change addresses a critical gap in practice, as pain is often reassessed verbally but not consistently charted. Failure to document pain reassessment poses several risks. The most vital risk is inadequate pain management (Dach et al., 2024). Risks also include missed signs of complications, communication issues, and incomplete charting (Dach et al., 2024). The literature emphasizes the importance of documenting reassessments to support continuity of care and reduce harm (Samara et al., 2024; Rowe & Best, 2024).

    When harm does occur at my organization, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (MUMH) follows a formal Sentinel Event Policy that reflects a systems-based approach. The policy mandates immediate notification of the supervisor and Risk Management (Medstar Union Memorial, 2023). Then, a thorough analysis of the event occurs, and the Patient Communication Consult Service (PCCS) is notified. The PCCS helps to support and inform patients and their families (Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, 2023). This structured process ensures transparency while supporting staff.

    Maryland’s apology law allows healthcare providers to express sympathy, compassion, or apology without these words to be used as an admission of guilt in court (Thomson Reuters Westlaw, 2025). However, if a provider admits fault, such as saying they made a mistake, that statement can be used in legal court (Thomson Reuters Westlaw, 2025). The law helps to encourage emotional support and communication for patients and providers.

    In addition, MUMH has formal procedures in place when harm occurs, including disclosure processes and a system-wide promise for safety through risk management (Medstar Union Memorial, 2025). The Risk Assessment Plan is a key part of the organization that helps identify and resolve potential hazards. This procedure is aligned with Maryland’s apology law as it reduces the likelihood of harm and ensures staff are prepared to communicate compassionately.

    **References**

    Dach, A., Anderson, R., & Borandi, J. A. (2024). An Integrative, Non-Pharmacological Pain Management Approach In Severe Lumbar Spine Degeneration: A Case Report. _Integrative Medicine: A Clinician’s Journal_, _23_(6), 14–20.

    MedStar Union Memorial. (2025). _Environment of care: Risk assessment_ [Internal hospital policy document]

    MedStar Union Memorial Hospital. (2023). _Sentinel event policy: MedStar Union Memorial Hospital and MedStar Samaritan Hospital._ [Internal hospital policy document].

    Rowe, S., & Best, K. M. (2024). Individualized numeric rating scale to assess pain in critically ill children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. _American Journal of Critical Care_, _33_(4), 280–288. [https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024343Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024343)

    Samara, H., O’Hara, L., & Singh, K. (2024). Nurses' knowledge and attitudes about adult post-operative pain assessment and management: Cross sectional study in Qatar. _Nursing Reports_, _14_(3), 2061–2071. [https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030153Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030153)

    Thomson Reuters Westlaw. (2025). _Maryland code and court rules: Apologies or expressions of regret by health care providers._ [https://govt.westlaw.com/mdc/Document/Links to an external site.](https://govt.westlaw.com/mdc/Document/) N744BF500A64911 DBB5DDAC3692B918BCviewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=(sc.Default)

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] YULE- DISCUSSION 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DISCUSSION FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND RUBRIC DUE DATE JUNE 1, 2025 NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIRISM APA STYLE – [\ \ DISCUSSIONW5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussionw5-pdf-10307085 "DISCUSSIONW5.pdf") – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DISCUSSION FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND RUBRIC

    DUE DATE JUNE 1, 2025

    NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIRISM

    APA STYLE

    – [\
    \
    DISCUSSIONW5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussionw5-pdf-10307085 "DISCUSSIONW5.pdf")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Your Role As A Manager In Creating A Positive, Inclusive Workplace Culture

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) **Your Role As A Manager In Creating A Positive, Inclusive Workplace Culture: Toward A More Positive And Inclusive Culture** For your final presentation to managers, you will focus on helping managers to creat…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    **Your Role As A Manager In Creating A Positive, Inclusive Workplace Culture: Toward A More Positive And Inclusive Culture**

    For your final presentation to managers, you will focus on helping managers to create a more positive, inclusive culture. As in the prior 2 weeks, provide 2–3 bullet points per slide, along with an accompanying script in the Notes section of each slide that you would use if you were delivering the presentation to a group of managers. As in Weeks 1 and 2, be sure your presentation ends with a clear, actionable Call to Action.

    As you prepare your presentation and script, be sure to cover all items outlined, including the incorporation of references to appropriate academic sources, such as those found in the Learning Resources or those in the Walden Library.

    **To prepare for this Assignment:**

    · Review, as needed, the following resource, which includes links to helpful information about using Microsoft PowerPoint:

    o OASIS: Academic Skills Center. (n.d.). [_Microsoft PowerPoint_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint). Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint

    · Download the [Week 3 Assignment Template (PowerPoint presentation)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724898?wrap=1) [Download Week 3 Assignment Template (PowerPoint presentation)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/171484/files/13724898/download?download_frd=1).

    **Submit** your presentation. Using the PowerPoint template provided, address the following topics and questions in approximately 9–10 slides, excluding references:

    **Part 1: Toward a More Positive Culture**

    · Synthesize the effects of having a positive work culture—as well as the effects of not having one.

    o How does this impact the organization?

    o How does this impact individuals and teams?

    · **Call to Action:** Propose a set of key steps that managers in your selected organization can take to move toward greater positivity.

    **Part 2: Toward a More Inclusive Culture**

    · Examine what it means for an organization to have an inclusive culture.

    · Distinguish between diversity and inclusion.

    o In what ways are they the same?

    o In what ways are they different?

    · Analyze the importance of diversity and inclusion to an organization.

    o What are the positive effects of incorporating diversity and inclusion into the culture?

    o What challenges might you encounter when incorporating these ideas into the culture?

    · **Call to Action:** Develop a list of key steps managers in your selected organization can take to better incorporate diversity and inclusion into organizational culture and practices.

    – [\
    \
    Week3LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week3learningresources-managingpeopleandpromotingcollab-docx-10306287 "Week3LearningResources-ManagingPeopleandPromotingCollab.docx")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] When nurses participate in government, what impact can they have on the health care system? How can nurses impact the outcome of legal issues related to nursing and health care?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Contribute a minimum of 450 words for your initial post. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted, and cited in APA. When nurses participate in government, what impact can they have on the health care system? How can nurses impact the outcome of legal issues related to nursing and he…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Contribute a minimum of 450 words for your initial post. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted, and cited in APA.

    When nurses participate in government, what impact can they have on the health care system? How can nurses impact the outcome of legal issues related to nursing and health care?

    – a year ago