Assignment Prompt & Instructions
The validity and reliability of the instruments or tools will be addressed. Discuss the methods for:
– ## Module7Assignment.docx
– ## Module7Assignment-RUBRIC.docx
**## Module7Assignment.docx**
This week the student will discuss the selection of instruments or tools to measure the clinical question variables. The validity and reliability of the instruments or tools will be addressed. Discuss the methods for:
· The distribution and collection of the tools,
· Addressing potential concerns for confidentiality,
· Protection of participants and,
· Application of analog or technology.
Be sure to answer all the questions for each bullet point completely.
Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper.
The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources.
2. Consider the discussion and any insights you gained from it.
3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**
·
**Length:** 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Include at least five (6)** **peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from**
**2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Check your spelling and review the rubric.**
**Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**
Masters, K. (2023).
_Role development inprofessional nursing practice_(6th ed.). Jones &
Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421. Read: chapters 8, 13, & review chapter 10.
Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022).
_Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice_(4thed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284228823. Read chapters 10, 11, & 13.
**Additional Resources**
_Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys_. (2018).
_Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys._[Video].https://aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://videoalexanderstreetcom.aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/p/mq2LWnG2E
_Strategies and research development_. (2008).
_Center for the Advancement of Research_
_Methods and Analysis_(CARMA). [Video].
https://aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://videoalexanderstreetcom.aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/p/mq2LWnG2E
****Note:**
Please find these in the Aspen Library Databases, Alexander Street: Academic Video Online (AVON)
**## Module7Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1
Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |
Total
/ 100
Quality of Written
Communication
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate or do
not address given
audience, purpose,
etc. Word choice is
excessively
redundant, clichéd,
and unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
paragraphing.
Surface errors are
pervasive enough
that they impede
communication of
meaning.
points
7
Style and voice are
somewhat
appropriate to given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is often
unspecific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd. Repetitive
mechanical errors
distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in
language, sentence
structure, and/or
word choice are
present.
8
points
Style and voice are
appropriate to the
given audience and
purpose. Word
choice is specific
and purposeful, and
somewhat varied
throughout.
Minimal mechanical
or typographical
errors are present,
but are not overly
distracting to the
reader. Correct
sentence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are used.
10
points
Style and voice are
not only appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose, but also
show originality and
creativity. Word
choice is specific,
purposeful, dynamic
and varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors. A variety of
sentence structures
and effective
figures of speech
are used. Writer is
clearly in command
of standard, written,
academic English.
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
1/6
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
**## Module7Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1
Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |
Total
/ 100
Quality of Written
Communication
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate or do
not address given
audience, purpose,
etc. Word choice is
excessively
redundant, clichéd,
and unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
paragraphing.
Surface errors are
pervasive enough
that they impede
communication of
meaning.
points
7
Style and voice are
somewhat
appropriate to given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is often
unspecific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd. Repetitive
mechanical errors
distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in
language, sentence
structure, and/or
word choice are
present.
8
points
Style and voice are
appropriate to the
given audience and
purpose. Word
choice is specific
and purposeful, and
somewhat varied
throughout.
Minimal mechanical
or typographical
errors are present,
but are not overly
distracting to the
reader. Correct
sentence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are used.
10
points
Style and voice are
not only appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose, but also
show originality and
creativity. Word
choice is specific,
purposeful, dynamic
and varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors. A variety of
sentence structures
and effective
figures of speech
are used. Writer is
clearly in command
of standard, written,
academic English.
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
1/6
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
**## Module7Assignment.docx**
This week the student will discuss the selection of instruments or tools to measure the clinical question variables. The validity and reliability of the instruments or tools will be addressed. Discuss the methods for:
· The distribution and collection of the tools,
· Addressing potential concerns for confidentiality,
· Protection of participants and,
· Application of analog or technology.
Be sure to answer all the questions for each bullet point completely.
Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper.
The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources.
2. Consider the discussion and any insights you gained from it.
3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**
·
**Length:** 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Include at least five (6)** **peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from**
**2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Check your spelling and review the rubric.**
**Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**
Masters, K. (2023).
_Role development inprofessional nursing practice_(6th ed.). Jones &
Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421. Read: chapters 8, 13, & review chapter 10.
Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022).
_Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice_(4thed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284228823. Read chapters 10, 11, & 13.
**Additional Resources**
_Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys_. (2018).
_Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys._[Video].https://aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://videoalexanderstreetcom.aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/p/mq2LWnG2E
_Strategies and research development_. (2008).
_Center for the Advancement of Research_
_Methods and Analysis_(CARMA). [Video].
https://aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://videoalexanderstreetcom.aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/p/mq2LWnG2E
****Note:**
Please find these in the Aspen Library Databases, Alexander Street: Academic Video Online (AVON)
**## Module7Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1
Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |
Total
/ 100
Quality of Written
Communication
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate or do
not address given
audience, purpose,
etc. Word choice is
excessively
redundant, clichéd,
and unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
paragraphing.
Surface errors are
pervasive enough
that they impede
communication of
meaning.
points
7
Style and voice are
somewhat
appropriate to given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is often
unspecific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd. Repetitive
mechanical errors
distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in
language, sentence
structure, and/or
word choice are
present.
8
points
Style and voice are
appropriate to the
given audience and
purpose. Word
choice is specific
and purposeful, and
somewhat varied
throughout.
Minimal mechanical
or typographical
errors are present,
but are not overly
distracting to the
reader. Correct
sentence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are used.
10
points
Style and voice are
not only appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose, but also
show originality and
creativity. Word
choice is specific,
purposeful, dynamic
and varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors. A variety of
sentence structures
and effective
figures of speech
are used. Writer is
clearly in command
of standard, written,
academic English.
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
1/6
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
**## Module7Assignment.docx**
This week the student will discuss the selection of instruments or tools to measure the clinical question variables. The validity and reliability of the instruments or tools will be addressed. Discuss the methods for:
· The distribution and collection of the tools,
· Addressing potential concerns for confidentiality,
· Protection of participants and,
· Application of analog or technology.
Be sure to answer all the questions for each bullet point completely.
Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper.
The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources.
2. Consider the discussion and any insights you gained from it.
3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**
·
**Length:** 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Include at least five (6)** **peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from**
**2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Check your spelling and review the rubric.**
**Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**
Masters, K. (2023).
_Role development inprofessional nursing practice_(6th ed.). Jones &
Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421. Read: chapters 8, 13, & review chapter 10.
Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022).
_Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice_(4thed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284228823. Read chapters 10, 11, & 13.
**Additional Resources**
_Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys_. (2018).
_Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys._[Video].https://aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://videoalexanderstreetcom.aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/p/mq2LWnG2E
_Strategies and research development_. (2008).
_Center for the Advancement of Research_
_Methods and Analysis_(CARMA). [Video].
https://aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://videoalexanderstreetcom.aspenuniversity.idm.oclc.org/p/mq2LWnG2E
****Note:**
Please find these in the Aspen Library Databases, Alexander Street: Academic Video Online (AVON)
**## Module7Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1
Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |
Total
/ 100
Quality of Written
Communication
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate or do
not address given
audience, purpose,
etc. Word choice is
excessively
redundant, clichéd,
and unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
paragraphing.
Surface errors are
pervasive enough
that they impede
communication of
meaning.
points
7
Style and voice are
somewhat
appropriate to given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is often
unspecific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd. Repetitive
mechanical errors
distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in
language, sentence
structure, and/or
word choice are
present.
8
points
Style and voice are
appropriate to the
given audience and
purpose. Word
choice is specific
and purposeful, and
somewhat varied
throughout.
Minimal mechanical
or typographical
errors are present,
but are not overly
distracting to the
reader. Correct
sentence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are used.
10
points
Style and voice are
not only appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose, but also
show originality and
creativity. Word
choice is specific,
purposeful, dynamic
and varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors. A variety of
sentence structures
and effective
figures of speech
are used. Writer is
clearly in command
of standard, written,
academic English.
8/26/25, 12:33 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
1/6
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956664/View 1/6
– 1
– 2