My Blog

Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] c4-1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## cf_example_of_screenshot1.pdf – ## c4-ass1.docx **## cf_example_of_screenshot1.pdf** Summary of Findings • Summary of the type of study • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article? • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis • Summary of the abi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## cf_example_of_screenshot1.pdf

    – ## c4-ass1.docx

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot1.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot1.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot1.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] AUGUST14

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## AUGUST14.docx **## AUGUST14.docx** **PART1** You should be thinking about the potential outcomes from the implementation of your project plan. What are those potential outcomes, and how could they be measured? Directions The assignment will be structured in a presentation format, with in-text a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## AUGUST14.docx

    **## AUGUST14.docx**

    **PART1**

    You should be thinking about the potential outcomes from the implementation of your project plan. What are those potential outcomes, and how could they be measured?

    Directions

    The assignment will be structured in a presentation format, with in-text and reference citations formatted consistently according to 7th edition APA guidelines.

    The presentation needs to include the following:

    ·
    **Slide 1**- Title slide

    ·
    **Slide 2**- The Problem Statement and the Aim Statement from your Unit 3 paper assignment.

    ·
    **Slide 3**- An overview of the strategy/intervention that you selected to address the problem from your Unit 5 assignment

    ·
    **Slide 4**- A brief overview of the anticipated/desired outcomes of your selected strategy/intervention, expanding on what you have identified in your Aim Statement

    ·
    **Slide 5**- An overview of the evaluation measure(s) you will utilize to determine if your selected strategy/intervention was effective.

    · Below are some examples of types of measures you may wish to approach or describe how you would evaluate the intervention:

    · A structure evaluation, which includes the characteristics of the setting where care occurs – the infrastructure, staffing, and policies in place (i.e., nurse-to-patient ratio).

    · A process evaluation refers to the actions or steps taken to provide care, including what is done during delivery (i.e., timely sepsis treatment).

    · An outcome evaluation is the result of care delivered – changes in patient health or behavior (i.e., 30-day readmissions rates).

    · Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are reports directly from patients about their health status, symptoms, or quality of life (i.e., PROMIS Global Health).

    · Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are reports from patients about their experience with care – communication, respect, and accessibility (i.e., HCAHPS, CAHPS, and Press Ganey)

    · A direct measure captures observable evidence of knowledge, behavior, or performance – actual outcomes or actions (i.e., reduction in hospital-acquired infections after implementing a new protocol).

    · An indirect measure reflects perceptions, satisfaction, or confidence and does not directly measure the activity or outcome itself (i.e., staff survey on perceived confidence using a new triage tool)

    · NOTE: Advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the identified measure(s). Consider utilizing the 'Notes' section of the slide if needed to provide additional details.

    ·
    **NOTE:** **Be sure to support your discussion of your identified processes with scholarly resources that will be used in your Unit 6 Matrix #11-15.**

    ·
    **Slide 6**- Provide an overview of the type of information/data you will need to collect and utilize in the evaluation process.

    · NOTE: Advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the information/data that will need to be collected/utilized; consider utilizing the 'Notes' section of the slide if needed to provide additional details

    · NOTE: Be sure to support your discussion of information/data with scholarly resources.

    ·
    **Slides 7 and 8**- Describe a
    **minimum of two approaches** you will utilize to gather the information/data required for evaluating the effect of the strategy/intervention.

    · NOTE: Advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the approaches that you plan to utilize; consider utilizing the 'Notes' section of the slide if needed to provide additional details

    · NOTE: Be sure to support your selected evaluation measure(s) and approaches with scholarly resources.

    ·
    **Slide 9**- Reference citations list

    **Direct access to full-text articles cited is essential for grading. Either upload all evidence along with your presentation or be sure an activated link is provided within your citation so that faculty evaluators can readily access the articles that you are referencing in your paper and add the presentation.**

    **## AUGUST14.docx**

    **PART1**

    You should be thinking about the potential outcomes from the implementation of your project plan. What are those potential outcomes, and how could they be measured?

    Directions

    The assignment will be structured in a presentation format, with in-text and reference citations formatted consistently according to 7th edition APA guidelines.

    The presentation needs to include the following:

    ·
    **Slide 1**- Title slide

    ·
    **Slide 2**- The Problem Statement and the Aim Statement from your Unit 3 paper assignment.

    ·
    **Slide 3**- An overview of the strategy/intervention that you selected to address the problem from your Unit 5 assignment

    ·
    **Slide 4**- A brief overview of the anticipated/desired outcomes of your selected strategy/intervention, expanding on what you have identified in your Aim Statement

    ·
    **Slide 5**- An overview of the evaluation measure(s) you will utilize to determine if your selected strategy/intervention was effective.

    · Below are some examples of types of measures you may wish to approach or describe how you would evaluate the intervention:

    · A structure evaluation, which includes the characteristics of the setting where care occurs – the infrastructure, staffing, and policies in place (i.e., nurse-to-patient ratio).

    · A process evaluation refers to the actions or steps taken to provide care, including what is done during delivery (i.e., timely sepsis treatment).

    · An outcome evaluation is the result of care delivered – changes in patient health or behavior (i.e., 30-day readmissions rates).

    · Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are reports directly from patients about their health status, symptoms, or quality of life (i.e., PROMIS Global Health).

    · Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are reports from patients about their experience with care – communication, respect, and accessibility (i.e., HCAHPS, CAHPS, and Press Ganey)

    · A direct measure captures observable evidence of knowledge, behavior, or performance – actual outcomes or actions (i.e., reduction in hospital-acquired infections after implementing a new protocol).

    · An indirect measure reflects perceptions, satisfaction, or confidence and does not directly measure the activity or outcome itself (i.e., staff survey on perceived confidence using a new triage tool)

    · NOTE: Advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the identified measure(s). Consider utilizing the 'Notes' section of the slide if needed to provide additional details.

    ·
    **NOTE:** **Be sure to support your discussion of your identified processes with scholarly resources that will be used in your Unit 6 Matrix #11-15.**

    ·
    **Slide 6**- Provide an overview of the type of information/data you will need to collect and utilize in the evaluation process.

    · NOTE: Advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the information/data that will need to be collected/utilized; consider utilizing the 'Notes' section of the slide if needed to provide additional details

    · NOTE: Be sure to support your discussion of information/data with scholarly resources.

    ·
    **Slides 7 and 8**- Describe a
    **minimum of two approaches** you will utilize to gather the information/data required for evaluating the effect of the strategy/intervention.

    · NOTE: Advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the approaches that you plan to utilize; consider utilizing the 'Notes' section of the slide if needed to provide additional details

    · NOTE: Be sure to support your selected evaluation measure(s) and approaches with scholarly resources.

    ·
    **Slide 9**- Reference citations list

    **Direct access to full-text articles cited is essential for grading. Either upload all evidence along with your presentation or be sure an activated link is provided within your citation so that faculty evaluators can readily access the articles that you are referencing in your paper and add the presentation.**

  • [Solved] Create a Discussion using APA 7 format, and scholarly references no older than 5 years.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 400 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.** **Share with your classmates about the most important concept you have learned during this eight weeks and how this concept will help you during your clinical r…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 400 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.**
    **Share with your classmates about the most important concept you have learned during this eight weeks and how this concept will help you during your clinical rotations.**
    #### Laboratory for Diagnosis, Symptom and Illness Management
    #### _**COURSE DESCRIPTION**_
    This laboratory course focuses on the reasoning process through the taking and analysis of present and past health histories, physical findings, and diagnostic studies that contribute to the formulation of accurate diagnosis and differential diagnosis most encountered in primary care. This course will also place emphasis on effective communication, health promotion, and disease prevention, screening of adult and older populations, and providing culturally competent care. Professional, ethical, and legal issues are addressed along with preparing the family nurse practitioner on how to appropriately diagnose and manage common health issues in adult and geriatric population.
    _COURSE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES_
    _After completing this course, the student should be able to:_
    1.     Compare and examine the consequences of unethical behaviors in academia and practice (EOPSLO# 6).
    2.     Preparing and presenting evidence of necessary clinical rotation requirements (EOPSLO# 1).
    3.     Demonstrate effective communication skills by performing culturally sensitive health assessment interviews (EOPSLO# 1 and 5).
    4.     Apply knowledge to differentiate subjective and objective information to construct an accurate and thorough past medical history (PMH), history of present illness (HPI) and physical examination (PE) (EOPSLO# 1).
    5.     Formulate accurate differential diagnoses to promote health, prevent disease, and manage acute and chronic illness in adult and geriatric population (EOPSLO# 3 and 4).
    6.     Employs screening and diagnostic strategies in the development of diagnoses (EOPSLO# 8).
    7.     Critically analyze data and evidence for improving health outcomes (EOPSLO# 3, 4, and 9).

  • [Solved] WK1 QUESTIONS1 HP-216

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    COMPLETE ALL QUESTION IN DETAIL WITH INSTRUCTIONS – ## WK1QUESTION1HP-216.docx **## WK1QUESTION1HP-216.docx** Instructions: Assign the most appropriate ICD-10-CM diagnosis code. Question 1) Streptococcal pneumonia FILL IN BLANK 2) Hemorrhoids FILL IN BLANK 3) Type 2 diabetes mellitus due to Kimmelst…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    COMPLETE ALL QUESTION IN DETAIL WITH INSTRUCTIONS

    – ## WK1QUESTION1HP-216.docx

    **## WK1QUESTION1HP-216.docx**

    Instructions: Assign the most appropriate ICD-10-CM diagnosis code.

    Question

    1) Streptococcal pneumonia FILL IN BLANK

    2) Hemorrhoids FILL IN BLANK

    3) Type 2 diabetes mellitus due to Kimmelstiel-Wilson disease FILL IN BLANK

    4) Primary malignant neoplasm of lower lobe of right lung FILL IN BLANK

    5) Metastatic (secondary) neoplasm of stomach FILL IN BLANK

    6) Adverse effect of the therapeutic use of Tylenol (acetaminophen) (initial encounter) FILL IN BLANK

    7) Coma, hepatic FILL IN BLANK

    8) Hypertrophic tonsils FILL IN BLANK

    9) Corneal edema, right eye, due to wearing contact lenses FILL IN BLANK

    10) Retinitis, left eye FILL IN BLANK

    **## WK1QUESTION1HP-216.docx**

    Instructions: Assign the most appropriate ICD-10-CM diagnosis code.

    Question

    1) Streptococcal pneumonia FILL IN BLANK

    2) Hemorrhoids FILL IN BLANK

    3) Type 2 diabetes mellitus due to Kimmelstiel-Wilson disease FILL IN BLANK

    4) Primary malignant neoplasm of lower lobe of right lung FILL IN BLANK

    5) Metastatic (secondary) neoplasm of stomach FILL IN BLANK

    6) Adverse effect of the therapeutic use of Tylenol (acetaminophen) (initial encounter) FILL IN BLANK

    7) Coma, hepatic FILL IN BLANK

    8) Hypertrophic tonsils FILL IN BLANK

    9) Corneal edema, right eye, due to wearing contact lenses FILL IN BLANK

    10) Retinitis, left eye FILL IN BLANK

  • [Solved] Nursing philosophy hw

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Think about nursing as we know it today. Develop your own professional nursing practice philosophy, and apply your beliefs and values within the context of the four (4) meta-paradigm concepts of: 1 person 2 health 3 environment 4 nursing (the actions of holistic caring) Organize it and make it in a …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Think about nursing as we know it today. Develop your own professional nursing practice philosophy, and apply your beliefs and values within the context of the four (4) meta-paradigm concepts of:
        1    person
        2    health
        3    environment
        4    nursing (the actions of holistic caring)
    Organize it and make it in a systematic in manner. The content should be no more than 4 pages (include a cover page and a reference page).
        •    adhere to APA style Links to an external site.
    (https://libraryguides.mdc.edu/apa)
    include introduction, body, conclusion

  • [Solved] Community Trauma assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Personal crisis: On February 14, 2018, a mass shooting occurred when 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz opened fire on students and staff at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, part of the Miami metropolitan area, Parkland, Florida, killing 17 people and injuring 18 others. **Purpose** 1. To apply principl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Personal crisis: On February 14, 2018, a mass shooting occurred when 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz opened fire on students and staff at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, part of the Miami metropolitan area, Parkland, Florida, killing 17 people and injuring 18 others.
    **Purpose**
    1. To apply principles of community trauma/crisis/disaster assessment in your local community
    2. To consider ground-level interventions that a PMHNP can apply in a community emergency/disaster situation
    **Instructions**
    1. Select a recent crisis/disaster event that occurred in your local area. Briefly describe the event.
    – The event should be a DSM type of traumatic event that occurred in your local community. This could include, but is not limited to: natural disasters, mass shootings, terrorist attacks, or the death of a local figure that was traumatic to the community (example: murder of J.F.K. would be ok b/c threat to the nation, fear of more attacks, etc. Death of Elvis Presley not ok – upsetting and personally devastating, yes. Traumatic, no.)
    – Remember that just because something is really difficult does not automatically make it a trauma. Adverse life events are not the same as trauma.
    – The event must have occurred in your local community and in your lifetime where you were old enough to witness the impact that the event had on the community. If you cannot think of something from your town, move up to something in the next biggest town or something in your state.
    2. Use the following questions to reflect on the event:
    Reaction – What was the community reaction to the event? Or, did you see strong reactions in individuals?
    Source – What was the source of that reaction? Why was it so difficult? – The source of the reaction is often the emotions that are underlying. Are they acting out of fear or rage? Are they caring for the individuals that were harmed because the community is so close and full of love?
    Implications – What did this mean for the individual or the community? How was the community changed by this event? What were the outcomes of this event?
    3. Let's say that you were a PMHNP at the time that this event occurred. Develop a plan for intervention.  As a PMHNP, what could you do to positively affect this situation, at the individual and community level?
    – Your plan should include ground-level interventions that the PMHNP could perform in the weeks following the traumatic event. Will you offer therapy or support groups? Education? Is there a specific program that you would start to relieve the immediate needs following the event? Volunteer with disaster relief?
    – Use the disaster response resources in the module for some initial ideas, but you can expand beyond this if appropriate for your scenario.
    – This is NOT a work on social issues or policy change. Although these are important issues, the purpose of this work is to focus on the immediate needs after a crisis or disaster. Your plan should not be about advocating for policy change. We're looking for ground-level interventions that you can do immediately.
    4. Total assignment should be minimum 2 pgs in essy style with APA format. Cite references as needed, but not required.

  • [Solved] Nursing Comprehensive Health History Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Find a patient, such as a friend or family member, to conduct an entire health history interview. 2. Use the [Health History Guideline](https://mdc.instructure.com/courses/130902/files/51562313?wrap=1 "Health_History_Guide.pdf") attatched to gather patient information. 3. Type the history data in…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Find a patient, such as a friend or family member, to conduct an entire health history interview.
    2. Use the [Health History Guideline](https://mdc.instructure.com/courses/130902/files/51562313?wrap=1 "Health_History_Guide.pdf") attatched to gather patient information.
    3. Type the history data in a Word document.
    4. Your homework should have:
    – factual information.
    – Subjective, meaning that you are only to document what the patient tells you.
    – Written professionally and concisely.
    – Typed in [APA styleLinks to an external site.](https://libraryguides.mdc.edu/apa) format with title page, margins, page numbers, headings, subheadings, and citations.
    \
    Health_History_Guide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/health-history-guide-pdf-10385915 "Health_History_Guide.pdf")

  • [Solved] Nursing Nursing Philosophy 2 Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Instructions:** 1. Write or develop your own professional nursing practice philosophy, at least one paragraph. 2. Include the following in your philosophy: – Describe the four (4) Nursing Meta-paradigm Concepts you believe or value about those concepts. – Then, compare your discussion of philosoph…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Instructions:**
    1. Write or develop your own professional nursing practice philosophy, at least one paragraph.
    2. Include the following in your philosophy:
    – Describe the four (4) Nursing Meta-paradigm Concepts you believe or value about those concepts.
    – Then, compare your discussion of philosophy with the Module 1.1 and 1.2 discussions, focusing on the concepts from any nursing theorist's theory, such as Orem's Theory or Watson's Theory. I would like to know your conclusion.
    Module 1.1 Discussion Answer:
    I believe Florence Nightingale made a great contribution to nursing because she really wanted nurses to work closely with physicians to obtain a better patient outcome. I think this was meant to improve patient care and not to limit nurses’ roles. She also was hesitant about formal licensure because she believed it could limit access to nursing. Nightingale did not see mental health nursing as part of the profession since she focused on hospital care and patient hygiene. Still, her focus on patient care, and professional education is very relevant today. Modern nurses continue to apply her principles through evidence-based practice, patient safety, and ongoing professional development.
    Module 1.2 is creating a resume or a curriculum vita based on what you read about the life and work of Florence Nightingale. Then, create your own resume and compare and contrast the two documents What do you think? Is Florence still relevant?
    \
    FlorenceNightingaleCurriculumVitae.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/florencenightingalecurriculumvitae-pdf-10385963 "FlorenceNightingaleCurriculumVitae.pdf")

  • [Solved] Nursing Chapter 2 – Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Review the Manager vs Leader Statement. 2. Then, follow the instructions and complete the assignment. – One (1) page – Typed according to APA Writing style for margins, formatting and spacing standards. \ Chpt2a_Manager_vs._Leader_Statements.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chpt2a-mana…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Review the Manager vs Leader Statement.
    2. Then, follow the instructions and complete the assignment.
    – One (1) page
    – Typed according to APA Writing style for margins, formatting and spacing standards.
    \
    Chpt2a_Manager_vs._Leader_Statements.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chpt2a-manager-vs-leader-statements-docx-10385771 "Chpt2a_Manager_vs._Leader_Statements.docx")

  • [Solved] Nursing Chapter 3a – Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1.Explain why you may be low in any particular area. Review Results attached. 2. Finally, answer the following questions below: 1. Addressing the components of EI, can you think of an occurrence at at the hospital as a nurse where EI was used and then why it helped in this particular situation? 2. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1.Explain why you may be low in any particular area. Review Results attached.
    2. Finally, answer the following questions below:
    1. Addressing the components of EI, can you think of an occurrence at at the hospital as a nurse where EI was used and then why it helped in this particular situation?
    2. What is your opinion of EI, is it worth the time learning or is just another fad that will fade away in a couple of years?
    3. Your answers should be:
    – One (1) page in APA format
    \
    EmotionalIntelligenceTest-ResultsPerez.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/emotionalintelligencetest-resultsperez-pdf "EmotionalIntelligenceTest-ResultsPerez.pdf")