Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] week 6 discussion Advanced Decision Making

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    One of the keys to becoming a better decision maker is to learn how to avoid some of the more prevalent decision making traps. What are some individual and group decision making traps? The BABOK® Guide discusses decision making traps, but what about the trap of uncertainty? What are some decision ma…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    One of the keys to becoming a better decision maker is to learn how to avoid some of the more prevalent decision making traps. What are some individual and group decision making traps? The BABOK® Guide discusses decision making traps, but what about the trap of uncertainty? What are some decision making uncertainties you are finding that affect your own decisions? Once you have developed a set of solutions for a business problem or challenge, how would you go about assessing each on its merits to arrive at the best choice? Do groups deal with decision making uncertainty differently than individuals? In addition to peer-reviewed academic journal articles, back up all opinions with foundation knowledge from the BABOK Guide and in-class lessons

  • [Solved] Opioid Epidemic

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this assignment, create 10-minute presentation using a minimum of 10-15 PowerPoint slides (not including the title and reference slides) that discusses the factors that lead to the current opioid epidemic. Do these factors demonstrate an absence of a Christian worldview in the U.S. health care s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this assignment, create 10-minute presentation using a minimum of 10-15 PowerPoint slides (not including the title and reference slides) that discusses the factors that lead to the current opioid epidemic. Do these factors demonstrate an absence of a Christian worldview in the U.S. health care system?
    Address the following in your presentation:
    1. Background (Origin and Causes)
    2. Current State of the Opioid Epidemic
    3. Factors that Contributed
    4. Christian Worldview Analysis
    5. Associated Trends
    6. How to Combat the Epidemic
    In addition, make sure to integrate a variety of visuals to support the presentation.
    You will be graded on your ability to provide:
    1. Detailed and cited content (to include a brief introduction, as well as reference section containing a minimum of three academic resources)
    2. A comprehensive and consistent focus throughout the presentation
    3. Effective communication in your awareness of the audience
    4. Professionalism
    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    \
    httpswwsources.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/httpswwsources-docx "httpswwsources.docx")

  • [Solved] c4-ass1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf – ## c4-ass1.docx – ## C3-ASS3.docx **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf** Summary of Findings • Summary of the type of study • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article? • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis • Su…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf

    – ## c4-ass1.docx

    – ## C3-ASS3.docx

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    COMPLETE THE WORKSHEET THAT IS UPLOADED BELOW – ## cf_assessment_5_template.docx **## cf_assessment_5_template.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/prof-double-r-20933267)**Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/prof-double-r-20933267) …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    COMPLETE THE WORKSHEET THAT IS UPLOADED BELOW

    – ## cf_assessment_5_template.docx

    **## cf_assessment_5_template.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/prof-double-r-20933267)**Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/prof-double-r-20933267)

    ## Assessment 5 Template

    ### Inventory Management

    Respond to the following five questions using grammatically correct language. Save the document and submit it in the courseroom.

    1. To place the proper valuation on inventory, a business must determine which costs should be included in inventory cost.

    Getting goods ready to sell should include what items?

    _[Answer here]_

    2. If inventory is being valued at cost and the price level is steadily rising, which of the three methods of costing—FIFO (First In, First Out), LIFO (Last In, First Out), or weighted average cost—will yield the lowest annual after-tax net income?

    Which method will yield the highest after-tax net income in a scenario where the price level is steadily declining?

    _[Answer here]_

    3. Some circumstances justify departures from the historical cost approaches of FIFO, LIFO, and weighted average cost. Several additional inventory methods may be used when circumstances warrant.

    Identify each of these alternative methods.

    Describe each alternative method. Include an example of when each method may be applied.

    _[Answer here]_

    4. Given the following information, calculate the inventory turnover for a Company. Evaluate the trend results.

    · 2020: Cost of goods sold— $2,168,000; Beginning inventory— $408,000; Ending inventory— $489,000.

    · 2021: Cost of goods sold— $945,000; Beginning inventory— $436,000; Ending inventory— $408,000.

    _[Answer here]_

    5. Identify which methods could be used to determine whether there has been shrinkage or shortage in the physical inventory.

    _[Answer here]_

    1

    1

    ## image1.emf

    **## cf_assessment_5_template.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/prof-double-r-20933267)**Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/prof-double-r-20933267)

    ## Assessment 5 Template

    ### Inventory Management

    Respond to the following five questions using grammatically correct language. Save the document and submit it in the courseroom.

    1. To place the proper valuation on inventory, a business must determine which costs should be included in inventory cost.

    Getting goods ready to sell should include what items?

    _[Answer here]_

    2. If inventory is being valued at cost and the price level is steadily rising, which of the three methods of costing—FIFO (First In, First Out), LIFO (Last In, First Out), or weighted average cost—will yield the lowest annual after-tax net income?

    Which method will yield the highest after-tax net income in a scenario where the price level is steadily declining?

    _[Answer here]_

    3. Some circumstances justify departures from the historical cost approaches of FIFO, LIFO, and weighted average cost. Several additional inventory methods may be used when circumstances warrant.

    Identify each of these alternative methods.

    Describe each alternative method. Include an example of when each method may be applied.

    _[Answer here]_

    4. Given the following information, calculate the inventory turnover for a Company. Evaluate the trend results.

    · 2020: Cost of goods sold— $2,168,000; Beginning inventory— $408,000; Ending inventory— $489,000.

    · 2021: Cost of goods sold— $945,000; Beginning inventory— $436,000; Ending inventory— $408,000.

    _[Answer here]_

    5. Identify which methods could be used to determine whether there has been shrinkage or shortage in the physical inventory.

    _[Answer here]_

    1

    1

    ## image1.emf

  • [Solved] FAMO Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_1434.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1434-png-10374081 "IMG_1434.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_1434.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1434-png-10374081 "IMG_1434.png")

  • [Solved] Human Resource Management Reflective assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## TheBaldrigeCoreValues2.pptx – ## BUS411Unit8Assignment.pdf **## TheBaldrigeCoreValues2.pptx** The Baldrige Core Values BUS 411 Business Policy Seminar What are the Core Values? The Baldrige Core Values are a set of attributes that can define quality. Quality in this sense is not just seen as th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## TheBaldrigeCoreValues2.pptx

    – ## BUS411Unit8Assignment.pdf

    **## TheBaldrigeCoreValues2.pptx**

    The Baldrige Core Values

    BUS 411 Business Policy Seminar

    What are the Core Values?

    The Baldrige Core Values are a set of attributes that can define quality. Quality in this sense is not just seen as the physical quality of a product or the output of a process. Quality is the mindset and attitude of the organization and business that wants to consider itself a “quality operation” ought to exhibit these characteristics.

    @Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    The Baldrige Core Values

    Visionary leadership

    Customer-centered excellence

    Organizational and personal learning

    Valuing workforce members and partners

    Agility

    Focus on the future

    Managing for innovation

    Management by fact

    Societal responsibility

    Focus on results and creating value

    Systems perspective

    @Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image1.png

    **## BUS411Unit8Assignment.pdf**

    Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Wednesday of Unit 8

    Points: 100

    Overview:

    One of the primary purposes of this course is to allow students who are about to

    complete their programs of study at the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business to

    demonstrate their familiarity with the Baldrige Core Values.

    Instructions:

    Write a reflective paper summarizing your experience of the BUS411 course. Refer to

    the Baldrige Core Values in this reflective exercise and discuss how these Core Values

    were exhibited in your work in this course and throughout your program of studies in the

    Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • Refer back to the Baldrige Core Values PowerPoint.

    • Discuss how these Core Values were exhibited in your work throughout this

    course and your program of study in the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • What are your key takeaways from your study of the Baldrige Core Values?

    • What will you utilize in your career that you have learned through these Core

    Values?

    Requirements:

    • Submit a four page, minimum, Word document covering the elements of the

    assignment.

    • Develop a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Use paragraph format and

    transitions.

    • Focus on the quality of writing and content.

    • Use elements of APA formatting (title, references, and in-text citations). Abstract

    is not required. The title page, reference page, and appendices are excluded in

    page length requirement.

    • Two or more academic references are present and formatted properly.

    Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
    you write and again after you write.

    BUS411 – Business Policy
    Seminar

    Baldridge Reflective Paper

    Evaluation Rubric for Baldridge Reflective Paper Assignment

    CRITERIA Deficient Needs
    Improvement

    Proficient Exemplary

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Introduction Unclear or
    incomplete.

    Introduction
    with a partially
    developed
    thesis.

    Introduction
    with a mostly
    developed
    thesis.

    Clear, well-
    developed,
    introduction
    and thesis.

    0-17 points 18-23 points 24-26 points 27-30 points

    Reflection Lacks specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    inadequate or
    missing.

    Not adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    somewhat
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks detail.

    Adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks some
    detail.

    Well-supported
    with a broad
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is well-
    developed,
    very thoughtful,
    and
    persuasive.

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Conclusion Conclusion not
    included.

    Some attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    it is not well
    written.

    Good attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    more
    development
    needed.

    Well written
    and fully
    developed
    conclusion.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    Clear and
    Professional
    Writing

    Writing is
    frequently
    difficult to
    understand
    because of
    several errors
    in grammar,
    punctuation,
    and spelling.
    Word choice
    is sometimes

    Writing is
    somewhat
    difficult to
    understand
    with errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    somewhat

    Writing is easy
    to understand
    despite minor
    errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic

    Writing is free
    of almost all
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar
    errors.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic
    setting.

    inappropriate
    for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    unclear.

    used for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    somewhat
    clear.

    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    mostly clear.

    Sentence
    structure is
    clear.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    APA
    Formatting
    and
    References

    Paper has no
    APA
    formatting, or
    paper has an
    APA title, but
    no references
    or in-text
    citations.
    No academic
    references
    present or
    reference
    formatting has
    significant
    errors.

    Paper lacks
    multiple
    elements of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    One academic
    reference
    present but
    errors in
    formatting.

    Paper lacks
    one element of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    Two academic
    references
    present but
    may have a
    few errors in
    formatting.

    Paper has all
    elements of
    APA formatting
    (title,
    references,
    and in-text
    citations).
    Two or more
    academic
    references are
    present and
    formatted
    properly.

    **## BUS411Unit8Assignment.pdf**

    Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Wednesday of Unit 8

    Points: 100

    Overview:

    One of the primary purposes of this course is to allow students who are about to

    complete their programs of study at the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business to

    demonstrate their familiarity with the Baldrige Core Values.

    Instructions:

    Write a reflective paper summarizing your experience of the BUS411 course. Refer to

    the Baldrige Core Values in this reflective exercise and discuss how these Core Values

    were exhibited in your work in this course and throughout your program of studies in the

    Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • Refer back to the Baldrige Core Values PowerPoint.

    • Discuss how these Core Values were exhibited in your work throughout this

    course and your program of study in the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • What are your key takeaways from your study of the Baldrige Core Values?

    • What will you utilize in your career that you have learned through these Core

    Values?

    Requirements:

    • Submit a four page, minimum, Word document covering the elements of the

    assignment.

    • Develop a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Use paragraph format and

    transitions.

    • Focus on the quality of writing and content.

    • Use elements of APA formatting (title, references, and in-text citations). Abstract

    is not required. The title page, reference page, and appendices are excluded in

    page length requirement.

    • Two or more academic references are present and formatted properly.

    Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
    you write and again after you write.

    BUS411 – Business Policy
    Seminar

    Baldridge Reflective Paper

    Evaluation Rubric for Baldridge Reflective Paper Assignment

    CRITERIA Deficient Needs
    Improvement

    Proficient Exemplary

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Introduction Unclear or
    incomplete.

    Introduction
    with a partially
    developed
    thesis.

    Introduction
    with a mostly
    developed
    thesis.

    Clear, well-
    developed,
    introduction
    and thesis.

    0-17 points 18-23 points 24-26 points 27-30 points

    Reflection Lacks specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    inadequate or
    missing.

    Not adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    somewhat
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks detail.

    Adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks some
    detail.

    Well-supported
    with a broad
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is well-
    developed,
    very thoughtful,
    and
    persuasive.

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Conclusion Conclusion not
    included.

    Some attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    it is not well
    written.

    Good attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    more
    development
    needed.

    Well written
    and fully
    developed
    conclusion.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    Clear and
    Professional
    Writing

    Writing is
    frequently
    difficult to
    understand
    because of
    several errors
    in grammar,
    punctuation,
    and spelling.
    Word choice
    is sometimes

    Writing is
    somewhat
    difficult to
    understand
    with errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    somewhat

    Writing is easy
    to understand
    despite minor
    errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic

    Writing is free
    of almost all
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar
    errors.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic
    setting.

    inappropriate
    for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    unclear.

    used for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    somewhat
    clear.

    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    mostly clear.

    Sentence
    structure is
    clear.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    APA
    Formatting
    and
    References

    Paper has no
    APA
    formatting, or
    paper has an
    APA title, but
    no references
    or in-text
    citations.
    No academic
    references
    present or
    reference
    formatting has
    significant
    errors.

    Paper lacks
    multiple
    elements of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    One academic
    reference
    present but
    errors in
    formatting.

    Paper lacks
    one element of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    Two academic
    references
    present but
    may have a
    few errors in
    formatting.

    Paper has all
    elements of
    APA formatting
    (title,
    references,
    and in-text
    citations).
    Two or more
    academic
    references are
    present and
    formatted
    properly.

    **## TheBaldrigeCoreValues2.pptx**

    The Baldrige Core Values

    BUS 411 Business Policy Seminar

    What are the Core Values?

    The Baldrige Core Values are a set of attributes that can define quality. Quality in this sense is not just seen as the physical quality of a product or the output of a process. Quality is the mindset and attitude of the organization and business that wants to consider itself a “quality operation” ought to exhibit these characteristics.

    @Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    The Baldrige Core Values

    Visionary leadership

    Customer-centered excellence

    Organizational and personal learning

    Valuing workforce members and partners

    Agility

    Focus on the future

    Managing for innovation

    Management by fact

    Societal responsibility

    Focus on results and creating value

    Systems perspective

    @Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image1.png

    **## BUS411Unit8Assignment.pdf**

    Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Wednesday of Unit 8

    Points: 100

    Overview:

    One of the primary purposes of this course is to allow students who are about to

    complete their programs of study at the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business to

    demonstrate their familiarity with the Baldrige Core Values.

    Instructions:

    Write a reflective paper summarizing your experience of the BUS411 course. Refer to

    the Baldrige Core Values in this reflective exercise and discuss how these Core Values

    were exhibited in your work in this course and throughout your program of studies in the

    Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • Refer back to the Baldrige Core Values PowerPoint.

    • Discuss how these Core Values were exhibited in your work throughout this

    course and your program of study in the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • What are your key takeaways from your study of the Baldrige Core Values?

    • What will you utilize in your career that you have learned through these Core

    Values?

    Requirements:

    • Submit a four page, minimum, Word document covering the elements of the

    assignment.

    • Develop a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Use paragraph format and

    transitions.

    • Focus on the quality of writing and content.

    • Use elements of APA formatting (title, references, and in-text citations). Abstract

    is not required. The title page, reference page, and appendices are excluded in

    page length requirement.

    • Two or more academic references are present and formatted properly.

    Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
    you write and again after you write.

    BUS411 – Business Policy
    Seminar

    Baldridge Reflective Paper

    Evaluation Rubric for Baldridge Reflective Paper Assignment

    CRITERIA Deficient Needs
    Improvement

    Proficient Exemplary

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Introduction Unclear or
    incomplete.

    Introduction
    with a partially
    developed
    thesis.

    Introduction
    with a mostly
    developed
    thesis.

    Clear, well-
    developed,
    introduction
    and thesis.

    0-17 points 18-23 points 24-26 points 27-30 points

    Reflection Lacks specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    inadequate or
    missing.

    Not adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    somewhat
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks detail.

    Adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks some
    detail.

    Well-supported
    with a broad
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is well-
    developed,
    very thoughtful,
    and
    persuasive.

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Conclusion Conclusion not
    included.

    Some attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    it is not well
    written.

    Good attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    more
    development
    needed.

    Well written
    and fully
    developed
    conclusion.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    Clear and
    Professional
    Writing

    Writing is
    frequently
    difficult to
    understand
    because of
    several errors
    in grammar,
    punctuation,
    and spelling.
    Word choice
    is sometimes

    Writing is
    somewhat
    difficult to
    understand
    with errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    somewhat

    Writing is easy
    to understand
    despite minor
    errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic

    Writing is free
    of almost all
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar
    errors.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic
    setting.

    inappropriate
    for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    unclear.

    used for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    somewhat
    clear.

    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    mostly clear.

    Sentence
    structure is
    clear.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    APA
    Formatting
    and
    References

    Paper has no
    APA
    formatting, or
    paper has an
    APA title, but
    no references
    or in-text
    citations.
    No academic
    references
    present or
    reference
    formatting has
    significant
    errors.

    Paper lacks
    multiple
    elements of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    One academic
    reference
    present but
    errors in
    formatting.

    Paper lacks
    one element of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    Two academic
    references
    present but
    may have a
    few errors in
    formatting.

    Paper has all
    elements of
    APA formatting
    (title,
    references,
    and in-text
    citations).
    Two or more
    academic
    references are
    present and
    formatted
    properly.

    **## TheBaldrigeCoreValues2.pptx**

    The Baldrige Core Values

    BUS 411 Business Policy Seminar

    What are the Core Values?

    The Baldrige Core Values are a set of attributes that can define quality. Quality in this sense is not just seen as the physical quality of a product or the output of a process. Quality is the mindset and attitude of the organization and business that wants to consider itself a “quality operation” ought to exhibit these characteristics.

    @Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    The Baldrige Core Values

    Visionary leadership

    Customer-centered excellence

    Organizational and personal learning

    Valuing workforce members and partners

    Agility

    Focus on the future

    Managing for innovation

    Management by fact

    Societal responsibility

    Focus on results and creating value

    Systems perspective

    @Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image1.png

    **## BUS411Unit8Assignment.pdf**

    Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Wednesday of Unit 8

    Points: 100

    Overview:

    One of the primary purposes of this course is to allow students who are about to

    complete their programs of study at the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business to

    demonstrate their familiarity with the Baldrige Core Values.

    Instructions:

    Write a reflective paper summarizing your experience of the BUS411 course. Refer to

    the Baldrige Core Values in this reflective exercise and discuss how these Core Values

    were exhibited in your work in this course and throughout your program of studies in the

    Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • Refer back to the Baldrige Core Values PowerPoint.

    • Discuss how these Core Values were exhibited in your work throughout this

    course and your program of study in the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business.

    • What are your key takeaways from your study of the Baldrige Core Values?

    • What will you utilize in your career that you have learned through these Core

    Values?

    Requirements:

    • Submit a four page, minimum, Word document covering the elements of the

    assignment.

    • Develop a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Use paragraph format and

    transitions.

    • Focus on the quality of writing and content.

    • Use elements of APA formatting (title, references, and in-text citations). Abstract

    is not required. The title page, reference page, and appendices are excluded in

    page length requirement.

    • Two or more academic references are present and formatted properly.

    Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
    you write and again after you write.

    BUS411 – Business Policy
    Seminar

    Baldridge Reflective Paper

    Evaluation Rubric for Baldridge Reflective Paper Assignment

    CRITERIA Deficient Needs
    Improvement

    Proficient Exemplary

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Introduction Unclear or
    incomplete.

    Introduction
    with a partially
    developed
    thesis.

    Introduction
    with a mostly
    developed
    thesis.

    Clear, well-
    developed,
    introduction
    and thesis.

    0-17 points 18-23 points 24-26 points 27-30 points

    Reflection Lacks specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    inadequate or
    missing.

    Not adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    somewhat
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks detail.

    Adequately
    supported with
    a limited
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is
    thoughtful and
    persuasive but
    lacks some
    detail.

    Well-supported
    with a broad
    spectrum of
    specific,
    credible, and
    relevant
    reflection.
    Discussion of
    Baldridge Core
    Values is well-
    developed,
    very thoughtful,
    and
    persuasive.

    0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

    Conclusion Conclusion not
    included.

    Some attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    it is not well
    written.

    Good attempt
    at a
    conclusion, but
    more
    development
    needed.

    Well written
    and fully
    developed
    conclusion.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    Clear and
    Professional
    Writing

    Writing is
    frequently
    difficult to
    understand
    because of
    several errors
    in grammar,
    punctuation,
    and spelling.
    Word choice
    is sometimes

    Writing is
    somewhat
    difficult to
    understand
    with errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    somewhat

    Writing is easy
    to understand
    despite minor
    errors in
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic

    Writing is free
    of almost all
    punctuation,
    spelling, and
    grammar
    errors.
    Appropriate
    word choice is
    used for an
    academic
    setting.

    inappropriate
    for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    unclear.

    used for an
    academic
    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    somewhat
    clear.

    setting.
    Sentence
    structure is
    mostly clear.

    Sentence
    structure is
    clear.

    0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

    APA
    Formatting
    and
    References

    Paper has no
    APA
    formatting, or
    paper has an
    APA title, but
    no references
    or in-text
    citations.
    No academic
    references
    present or
    reference
    formatting has
    significant
    errors.

    Paper lacks
    multiple
    elements of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    One academic
    reference
    present but
    errors in
    formatting.

    Paper lacks
    one element of
    APA (title,
    references, or
    in-text
    citations).
    Two academic
    references
    present but
    may have a
    few errors in
    formatting.

    Paper has all
    elements of
    APA formatting
    (title,
    references,
    and in-text
    citations).
    Two or more
    academic
    references are
    present and
    formatted
    properly.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 6016_Assessment 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 6016_Assessment 1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Criminal Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## SPELUNCEAN.docx **## SPELUNCEAN.docx** Analyze the following using the Theories of Law: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers was created by Lon Fuller in his article, "The Case of the Speluncean Explorers," Harvard Law Review, vol. 62, no. 4 (1949) pp. 616-645. The case tells the story of a gro…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## SPELUNCEAN.docx

    **## SPELUNCEAN.docx**

    Analyze the following using the Theories of Law: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers was created by Lon Fuller in his article, "The Case of the Speluncean Explorers," Harvard Law Review, vol. 62, no. 4 (1949) pp. 616-645. The case tells the story of a group of spelunkers (cave-explorers) in the Commonwealth of Newgarth, trapped in a cave by a landslide. As they approach the point of starvation, they make radio contact with the rescue team. Engineers on the team estimate that the rescue will take another 10 days. The men describe their physical condition to physicians at the rescue camp and ask whether they can survive another 10 days without food. The physicians think this very unlikely. Then the spelunkers ask whether they could survive another 10 days if they killed and ate a member of their party. The physicians reluctantly answer that they would. Finally, the men ask whether they ought to hold a lottery to determine whom to kill and eat. No one at the rescue camp is willing to answer this question. The men turn off their radio, and sometime later hold a lottery, kill the loser, and eat him. When they are rescued, they are prosecuted for murder, which in Newgarth carries a mandatory death penalty.

    How would judges rule on this situation using the legal theories?

    Legal Formalism

    Legal Realism

    Natural Law

    Rational Choice (Law and Economics)

    Marxist (Conflict theorist)

    **NO AI – PLEASE SUBMIT TO TURNITIN.COM

    **## SPELUNCEAN.docx**

    Analyze the following using the Theories of Law: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers was created by Lon Fuller in his article, "The Case of the Speluncean Explorers," Harvard Law Review, vol. 62, no. 4 (1949) pp. 616-645. The case tells the story of a group of spelunkers (cave-explorers) in the Commonwealth of Newgarth, trapped in a cave by a landslide. As they approach the point of starvation, they make radio contact with the rescue team. Engineers on the team estimate that the rescue will take another 10 days. The men describe their physical condition to physicians at the rescue camp and ask whether they can survive another 10 days without food. The physicians think this very unlikely. Then the spelunkers ask whether they could survive another 10 days if they killed and ate a member of their party. The physicians reluctantly answer that they would. Finally, the men ask whether they ought to hold a lottery to determine whom to kill and eat. No one at the rescue camp is willing to answer this question. The men turn off their radio, and sometime later hold a lottery, kill the loser, and eat him. When they are rescued, they are prosecuted for murder, which in Newgarth carries a mandatory death penalty.

    How would judges rule on this situation using the legal theories?

    Legal Formalism

    Legal Realism

    Natural Law

    Rational Choice (Law and Economics)

    Marxist (Conflict theorist)

    **NO AI – PLEASE SUBMIT TO TURNITIN.COM

  • [Solved] ASSESSMENT 1_6020

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering ASSESSMENT 1_6020.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] assistance English

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering assistance English.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.