What is one evidence based intervention in autism ?
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →What is one evidence based intervention in autism ?
please find attached, use the template provided 3 pages – ## wk5SEARCHINGANDAPPRAISINGLITERATURE.docx – ## wk5rubricks.docx – wk5SON_Writing_Template_with_Instructions_.docx – wk5template.docx – wk5SignIn.docx – wk5AppendixFNonresearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx – wk5readingAppendixEResearchEvidence…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →please find attached, use the template provided
3 pages
– ## wk5SEARCHINGANDAPPRAISINGLITERATURE.docx
– ## wk5rubricks.docx
– wk5SON_Writing_Template_with_Instructions_.docx
– wk5template.docx
– wk5SignIn.docx
– wk5AppendixFNonresearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx
– wk5readingAppendixEResearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx
– wk5.docx
**## wk5SEARCHINGANDAPPRAISINGLITERATURE.docx**
SEARCHING AND APPRAISING LITERATURE
When conducting a literature review, what are the steps you should you take to successfully search the evidence? Once you have generated your results, how do you properly appraise the evidence, grade them, and select the ones you want to use?
When conducting a literature review, the goal is to produce a set of results that match your search criteria. The results you get will vary dramatically depending on the search engine(s) you utilize and which key words you choose to enter. Selecting the right database(s) is one skill; selecting the best key words is another. In this Assignment, you will hone your skills in both of these important aspects of the search process.
Keep in mind, the results of your search will vary in terms of quality, as well as appropriateness, and significance to your research goals. For this reason, searching is only the first step of the process. The second step is to appraise the results you identified, and based on your evaluations, select the literature that you will select.
TO PREPARE:
· Review the Learning Resources for this week which focus on how to successfully search and appraise search results.
· Review the course textbook Appendices E, F, and G, located in the Learning Resources for this week, which you will be required to complete and submit as part of this Assignment.
· Select
**one** organizational type and
**one** gap in practice or practice change on which to focus for this Assignment.
**Note:** You may select a new organizational type and gap in practice or practice change or, if you choose, you may reuse one on which you focused for a previous Assignment, Discussion, or Blog in this course.
**Also Note:** These may or may not be the same organizational type and gap in practice or practice change as those you will focus on for your Practicum and DNP Project.
· Consider all of the factors you should take into account when searching the evidence, then, using the Walden Library databases, conduct a search related to the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected.
· Consider all of the factors you should take into account when apprising evidence, then, using the course text Appendices E, F, and G, appraise the results of your search.
· Based on your appraisals, identify the
**three** recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you think are most relevant to your research goals.
**Note:** For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of
**five** documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).
**Be sure to review the grading rubric for this Assignment so you fully understand what is expected of you. To access the rubric, scroll down to the bottom of the Assignment page.**
THE ASSIGNMENT: (2–3 PAGES)
Write a paper in which you do the following:
· Describe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search you conducted.
· Describe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
· Which database(s) did you select? Why did you choose them?
· Which key words did you select? Why did you choose them?
· Describe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
· How many articles did you find?
· Based on what criteria did you decide on the
**three** recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected?
· Include copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected.
·
**Note:** For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of
**five** documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).
**Note:** Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations.
The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the
[College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=55487538) for your Assignment submission.
## image1.jpeg
**## wk5rubricks.docx**
**NURS_8006_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8006_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search they conducted | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately and clearly explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately or vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately and vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted, or it is missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • Which database(s) did they select? Why did they choose them? • Which key words did they select? Why did you choose them? | **10 to >8.9 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**8.9 to >7.9 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**7.9 to >6.9 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. … OR … The response summarizes < 3 articles.<br> <br>**6.9 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • How many articles did you find? • Based on what criteria did you decide on the three recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected? | **20 to >17.8 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**17.8 to >15.8 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**15.8 to >13.8 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**13.8 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclude copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected. | **30 to >26.7 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes accurate and clear copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**26.7 to >23.7 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes adequate copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes inaccurate or vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**20.7 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes inaccurate and vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected. or it is missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:<br>Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 80
**wk5SON_Writing_Template_with_Instructions_.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5son-writing-template-with-instructions-docx)
**wk5template.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5template-docx-10367569)
**wk5SignIn.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5signin-docx)
**wk5AppendixFNonresearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5appendixfnonresearchevidenceappraisal-docx)
**wk5readingAppendixEResearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5readingappendixeresearchevidenceappraisal-docx)
**wk5.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5-docx-10367553)
**wk5.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5-docx-10367553)
**## wk5SEARCHINGANDAPPRAISINGLITERATURE.docx**
SEARCHING AND APPRAISING LITERATURE
When conducting a literature review, what are the steps you should you take to successfully search the evidence? Once you have generated your results, how do you properly appraise the evidence, grade them, and select the ones you want to use?
When conducting a literature review, the goal is to produce a set of results that match your search criteria. The results you get will vary dramatically depending on the search engine(s) you utilize and which key words you choose to enter. Selecting the right database(s) is one skill; selecting the best key words is another. In this Assignment, you will hone your skills in both of these important aspects of the search process.
Keep in mind, the results of your search will vary in terms of quality, as well as appropriateness, and significance to your research goals. For this reason, searching is only the first step of the process. The second step is to appraise the results you identified, and based on your evaluations, select the literature that you will select.
TO PREPARE:
· Review the Learning Resources for this week which focus on how to successfully search and appraise search results.
· Review the course textbook Appendices E, F, and G, located in the Learning Resources for this week, which you will be required to complete and submit as part of this Assignment.
· Select
**one** organizational type and
**one** gap in practice or practice change on which to focus for this Assignment.
**Note:** You may select a new organizational type and gap in practice or practice change or, if you choose, you may reuse one on which you focused for a previous Assignment, Discussion, or Blog in this course.
**Also Note:** These may or may not be the same organizational type and gap in practice or practice change as those you will focus on for your Practicum and DNP Project.
· Consider all of the factors you should take into account when searching the evidence, then, using the Walden Library databases, conduct a search related to the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected.
· Consider all of the factors you should take into account when apprising evidence, then, using the course text Appendices E, F, and G, appraise the results of your search.
· Based on your appraisals, identify the
**three** recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you think are most relevant to your research goals.
**Note:** For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of
**five** documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).
**Be sure to review the grading rubric for this Assignment so you fully understand what is expected of you. To access the rubric, scroll down to the bottom of the Assignment page.**
THE ASSIGNMENT: (2–3 PAGES)
Write a paper in which you do the following:
· Describe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search you conducted.
· Describe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
· Which database(s) did you select? Why did you choose them?
· Which key words did you select? Why did you choose them?
· Describe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
· How many articles did you find?
· Based on what criteria did you decide on the
**three** recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected?
· Include copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected.
·
**Note:** For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of
**five** documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).
**Note:** Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations.
The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the
[College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=55487538) for your Assignment submission.
## image1.jpeg
**## wk5rubricks.docx**
**NURS_8006_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8006_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search they conducted | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately and clearly explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately or vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately and vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted, or it is missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • Which database(s) did they select? Why did they choose them? • Which key words did they select? Why did you choose them? | **10 to >8.9 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**8.9 to >7.9 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**7.9 to >6.9 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. … OR … The response summarizes < 3 articles.<br> <br>**6.9 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • How many articles did you find? • Based on what criteria did you decide on the three recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected? | **20 to >17.8 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**17.8 to >15.8 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**15.8 to >13.8 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**13.8 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclude copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected. | **30 to >26.7 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes accurate and clear copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**26.7 to >23.7 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes adequate copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes inaccurate or vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**20.7 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes inaccurate and vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected. or it is missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:<br>Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 80
**wk5SON_Writing_Template_with_Instructions_.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5son-writing-template-with-instructions-docx)
**wk5template.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5template-docx-10367569)
**wk5SignIn.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5signin-docx)
**wk5AppendixFNonresearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5appendixfnonresearchevidenceappraisal-docx)
**wk5readingAppendixEResearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5readingappendixeresearchevidenceappraisal-docx)
**wk5.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5-docx-10367553)
**## wk5SEARCHINGANDAPPRAISINGLITERATURE.docx**
SEARCHING AND APPRAISING LITERATURE
When conducting a literature review, what are the steps you should you take to successfully search the evidence? Once you have generated your results, how do you properly appraise the evidence, grade them, and select the ones you want to use?
When conducting a literature review, the goal is to produce a set of results that match your search criteria. The results you get will vary dramatically depending on the search engine(s) you utilize and which key words you choose to enter. Selecting the right database(s) is one skill; selecting the best key words is another. In this Assignment, you will hone your skills in both of these important aspects of the search process.
Keep in mind, the results of your search will vary in terms of quality, as well as appropriateness, and significance to your research goals. For this reason, searching is only the first step of the process. The second step is to appraise the results you identified, and based on your evaluations, select the literature that you will select.
TO PREPARE:
· Review the Learning Resources for this week which focus on how to successfully search and appraise search results.
· Review the course textbook Appendices E, F, and G, located in the Learning Resources for this week, which you will be required to complete and submit as part of this Assignment.
· Select
**one** organizational type and
**one** gap in practice or practice change on which to focus for this Assignment.
**Note:** You may select a new organizational type and gap in practice or practice change or, if you choose, you may reuse one on which you focused for a previous Assignment, Discussion, or Blog in this course.
**Also Note:** These may or may not be the same organizational type and gap in practice or practice change as those you will focus on for your Practicum and DNP Project.
· Consider all of the factors you should take into account when searching the evidence, then, using the Walden Library databases, conduct a search related to the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected.
· Consider all of the factors you should take into account when apprising evidence, then, using the course text Appendices E, F, and G, appraise the results of your search.
· Based on your appraisals, identify the
**three** recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you think are most relevant to your research goals.
**Note:** For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of
**five** documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).
**Be sure to review the grading rubric for this Assignment so you fully understand what is expected of you. To access the rubric, scroll down to the bottom of the Assignment page.**
THE ASSIGNMENT: (2–3 PAGES)
Write a paper in which you do the following:
· Describe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search you conducted.
· Describe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
· Which database(s) did you select? Why did you choose them?
· Which key words did you select? Why did you choose them?
· Describe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
· How many articles did you find?
· Based on what criteria did you decide on the
**three** recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected?
· Include copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected.
·
**Note:** For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of
**five** documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).
**Note:** Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations.
The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the
[College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=55487538) for your Assignment submission.
## image1.jpeg
**## wk5rubricks.docx**
**NURS_8006_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8006_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search they conducted | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately and clearly explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately or vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately and vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted, or it is missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • Which database(s) did they select? Why did they choose them? • Which key words did they select? Why did you choose them? | **10 to >8.9 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**8.9 to >7.9 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**7.9 to >6.9 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. … OR … The response summarizes < 3 articles.<br> <br>**6.9 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • How many articles did you find? • Based on what criteria did you decide on the three recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected? | **20 to >17.8 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response accurately and clearly describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**17.8 to >15.8 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response adequately describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**15.8 to >13.8 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.<br> <br>**13.8 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclude copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected. | **30 to >26.7 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes accurate and clear copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**26.7 to >23.7 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes adequate copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes inaccurate or vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.<br> <br>**20.7 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes inaccurate and vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected. or it is missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:<br>Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.45 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 80
**wk5SON_Writing_Template_with_Instructions_.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5son-writing-template-with-instructions-docx)
**wk5template.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5template-docx-10367569)
**wk5SignIn.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5signin-docx)
**wk5AppendixFNonresearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5appendixfnonresearchevidenceappraisal-docx)
**wk5readingAppendixEResearchEvidenceAppraisal.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5readingappendixeresearchevidenceappraisal-docx)
**wk5.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk5-docx-10367553)
– 1
– 2
– 3
– 4
– 5
– 6
– 7
– 8
Congratulations on reaching the last step of your Final Project! The Final Project is a stepwise process, and its goal is to leave you well-prepared by the end of this course to execute on your qualitative research study plan. By now, you have completed the steps of this course that are good practic…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Congratulations on reaching the last step of your Final Project! The Final Project is a stepwise process, and its goal is to leave you well-prepared by the end of this course to execute on your qualitative research study plan. By now, you have completed the steps of this course that are good practice for developing a high-quality qualitative research study.
The Final Project: Building a Qualitative Research Plan document in the Learning Resources contain the instructions for organizing the work you produced in Steps I through V. Be sure to incorporate revisions to your work based on feedback from your Instructor and classmates.
Submit your Final Project to your Instructor.
For Step VI, you are now asked to take a step back and reflect on the social change potential for your proposed research study.
Submit a video response reflecting on your next steps in preparation for the beginning of your capstone. Use this points to guide your reflection: – How qualitative research and their proposed research aligns with Walden's mission of social change; – What was learned about conducting qualitative res…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Submit a video response reflecting on your next steps in preparation for the beginning of your capstone. Use this points to guide your reflection:
– How qualitative research and their proposed research aligns with Walden's mission of social change;
– What was learned about conducting qualitative research;
– Consider your next steps for preparation for the dissertation –
1. Progress: What progress have you made in developing your idea for a research topic for your capstone? What have you learned from the course that has contributed to your clarity?
2. Problems: What obstacles have you discovered in the process of developing your research topic in this course? What still remains unknown or unclear?
3. Plans: What are you planning as the next step for transitioning into the capstone process? Who or what resources do you think will be important in creating a research proposal that meets the criteria for quality?
**To prepare:** – Review your research journal entries, Discussions, and Assignments throughout this course and reflect on the information you have learned about writing a literature review and the research process. – Review the “Guide to Academic Journaling” in the Learning Resources. – Review the …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →**To prepare:**
– Review your research journal entries, Discussions, and Assignments throughout this course and reflect on the information you have learned about writing a literature review and the research process.
– Review the “Guide to Academic Journaling” in the Learning Resources.
– Review the “Prospectus Form,” found on the “Doctoral Capstone and Project Resources” webpage in the Learning Resources.
– Review either the “Qualitative Checklist” or “Quantitative Checklist” found on the “Doctoral Capstone and Project Resources” webpage in the Learning Resources (under the “Dissertation Checklists” section).
– Based on your review of the above resources, consider what your strengths or weaknesses may be, including challenges with academic writing, statistics, research methodology, or other.
**Post** your response to the following:
– Explain at least one strength and one weakness you have regarding the research process.
– Explain the steps you might take to address areas of weakness and which Walden resources you might use to help you.
**Note:** Your posts should be substantial (500 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style.
· At least 750 words · Must support their assertions with broad references to the class sources in APA 7th Ed. format. · Draw from the sources broadly and cite per APA. \ IntegrationofFaithandLearning.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/integrationoffaithandlearning-docx-10367295 "IntegrationofF…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →· At least 750 words
· Must support their assertions with broad references to the class sources in APA 7th Ed. format.
· Draw from the sources broadly and cite per APA.
\
IntegrationofFaithandLearning.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/integrationoffaithandlearning-docx-10367295 "IntegrationofFaithandLearning.docx")
\
InstructionfortheDiscussionThread-ReviewandReflection.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionforthediscussionthread-reviewandreflection-docx "InstructionfortheDiscussionThread-ReviewandReflection.docx")
\
Philosophy_JamesL.MooreIII.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/philosophy-jamesl-mooreiii-pdf-10367299 "Philosophy_JamesL.MooreIII.pdf")
\
CRLT_no23Revised_Rubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crlt-no23revised-rubric-pdf-10367301 "CRLT_no23Revised_Rubric.pdf")
\
TeachingPortfoliosandCoursePortfolios_CRLT.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/teachingportfoliosandcourseportfolios-crlt-pdf-10367303 "TeachingPortfoliosandCoursePortfolios_CRLT.pdf")
\
PhilosophyofEducation-AmandaRockinson.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/philosophyofeducation-amandarockinson-pdf-10367305 "PhilosophyofEducation-AmandaRockinson.pdf")
\
TheTeachingPhilosophy_TeachingStatement_CRLT.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theteachingphilosophy-teachingstatement-crlt-pdf-10367307 "TheTeachingPhilosophy_TeachingStatement_CRLT.pdf")
\
CRLT_no23_revised.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crlt-no23-revised-pdf-10367309 "CRLT_no23_revised.pdf")
\
Read-TeachingPortfolioDevelopment.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-teachingportfoliodevelopment-pdf-10367311 "Read-TeachingPortfolioDevelopment.pdf")
**Respond to** at least **two** of your colleagues’ posts (on different days) in one of the following ways: – Ask a probing question and provide the foundation, or rationale, for the question. – Expand on your colleague’s posting by offering a new perspective or insight or offering additional (new) …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →**Respond to** at least **two** of your colleagues’ posts (on different days) in one of the following ways:
– Ask a probing question and provide the foundation, or rationale, for the question.
– Expand on your colleague’s posting by offering a new perspective or insight or offering additional (new) supporting information for consideration.
**Note:** Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.
For this assignment, you will link the public health system of interest to evidence-based best practices in management, governance, leadership, and collaborative planning and decision making. The best practices address challenges and strategies in the following areas: – Management. – Governance. – L…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →For this assignment, you will link the public health system of interest to evidence-based best practices in management, governance, leadership, and collaborative planning and decision making.
The best practices address challenges and strategies in the following areas:
– Management.
– Governance.
– Leadership.
– Community stakeholders.
– Collaboration and trust.
Use the Capella library and the Internet to locate references for your report. Remember to arrange your ideas around the core functions of public health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) 10 essential public health services. Refer to [The Public Health System and the 10 Essential Public Health ServicesLinks to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/publichealthservices/essentialhealthservices.html "Select this link to launch this material in a new window.").
Before you begin to research, creating a list of guiding questions will be helpful identifying examples of the challenges and strategies listed above.
## **Instructions**
Create a report on evidence-based best practices in public health system administration. You will be graded on how well you accomplish the following:
– Identify the core functions of public health and the 10 essential public health services.
– Describe evidence-based best practices in leadership, governance, and management in public health administration.
– Describe how to negotiate a collaborative partnership for delivery of public health services.
– Describe methods of mediating issues between stakeholders.
– Describe how legal or ethical constraints may affect a planned systemic change initiative.
– Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings.
– Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
## **Additional Requirements**
– **Length**: 5–7 double-spaced pages (plus cover page, abstract, and reference pages).
– **References**: At least five references from peer-reviewed professional journals. Use proper APA style and formatting. See [Evidence and APALinks to an external site.](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540 "Select this link to launch this material in a new window.").
– **Font**: Times New Roman 12-point.
**Note**: To fully understand how this assignment will be graded, carefully read the Best Practices in Public Health System Administration Rubric.
**Portfolio Prompt:** You may choose to save this learning activity to your [ePortfolioLinks to an external site.](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1688 "Select this link to launch this material in a new window.").
Week 5 Assignment: Best Practices in Public Health System Administration **Week 5 Assignment: Best Practices in Public Health System AdministrationCriteriaRatingsPts** Describe how to negotiate a collaborative partnership for delivery of public health services. **32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Describes how to negotiate a collaborative partnership for delivery of public health services, and identifies assumptions on which the negotiation was based. **27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENT** Describes how to negotiate a collaborative partnership for delivery of public health services. **22.4 to >0 ptsBASIC** Describes how to negotiate a collaborative partnership for delivery of public health services, but the description of the terms of the negotiation or the methods used is unclear or incomplete. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not describe how to negotiate a collaborative partnership for delivery of public health services./ 32 ptsDescribe methods of mediating issues between stakeholders. **28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Describes methods of mediating issues between stakeholders, and identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, and/or additional information (where further information could improve the outcome for the stakeholders). **23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENT** Describes methods of mediating issues between stakeholders. **19.6 to >0 ptsBASIC** Describes methods of mediating issues between stakeholders, but the description is unclear or the methods described were inappropriate. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not describe methods of mediating issues between stakeholders./ 28 ptsIdentify the core functions of public health and the 10 Essential Services. **28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Identifies the core functions of public health and the 10 Essential Services, and identifies criteria that could be used to evaluate how well stakeholders perform those functions and services. **23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENT** Identifies the core functions of public health and the 10 Essential Services. **19.6 to >0 ptsBASIC** Identifies some, but not all, of the core functions of public health and the 10 Essential Services. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not identify the core functions of public health and the 10 Essential Services./ 28 ptsDescribe how legal or ethical constraints may impact a planned systemic change initiative. **28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Describes how legal or ethical constraints may impact a planned systemic change initiative, and identifies assumptions underlying the possible impact(s). **23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENT** Describes how legal or ethical constraints may impact a planned systemic change initiative. **19.6 to >0 ptsBASIC** Describes how legal or ethical constraints may impact a planned systemic change initiative, but the description is unclear or incomplete. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not describe how legal or ethical constraints may impact a planned systemic change initiative./ 28 ptsDescribe best practices in leadership, governance, and management in public health administration. **28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Describes best practices in leadership, governance, and management in public health administration, and proposes criteria that could be used to evaluate the practices. **23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENT** Describes best practices in leadership, governance, and management in public health administration. **19.6 to >0 ptsBASIC** Describes best practices in leadership, governance, and management in public health administration, but the description is unclear or incomplete. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not describe best practices in leadership, governance, and management in public health administration./ 28 ptsSynthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings. **28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Synthesizes multiple sources into fully developed key themes or findings that support a clearly discernible thesis or central idea of the work. **23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENT** Synthesizes multiple sources into key themes or findings. **19.6 to >0 ptsBASIC** Cites multiple sources with no clear indication of key themes or findings. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings./ 28 ptsApply APA formatting to in-text citations and references. **28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHED** Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA formatting of in-text citations and references. **23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENT** Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references. **19.6 to >0 ptsBASIC** Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship. **0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCE** Does not apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references./ 28 ptsTotal Points: 0
**To prepare:** – Reflect on what you have learned through this course and how you will apply what you have learned to your dissertation research process. **Note:** It is important to make sure you save your Research Journal in a Word document outside of the course for future reference. **Assignment…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →**To prepare:**
– Reflect on what you have learned through this course and how you will apply what you have learned to your dissertation research process.
**Note:** It is important to make sure you save your Research Journal in a Word document outside of the course for future reference.
**Assignment:** 1–2 paragraphs. No cover page is required, as this is a continuous document used in Weeks 1–4 and Week 11. Instead, date each entry on the document just as you would in any other journal. Be sure to include references.
– List one sentence for each of the following:
– Social problem you investigated
– Gap you identified in the research literature
– Research problem you identified
– Draft purpose statement based on your preliminary outline. Note: Be sure you use the appropriate qualitative or quantitative language.
– Potential theoretical framework
– Then, based on these statements, review the Assignment you submitted last week and:
– Note any problems you see.
– Describe the next steps you will take to continue developing your dissertation research design.
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering biology.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.