Tag: PayPal Instant Download

[Solved] Education CLC PPT Assignment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (2)** – ## CLCPPTAssignment.docx – ## EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf **## CLCPPTAssignment.docx** Create a 6 -slide presentation with detailed speaker notes that addresses the following areas: 1. The chosen area of health care research which is **HMIS….

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (2)**

– ## CLCPPTAssignment.docx

– ## EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf

**## CLCPPTAssignment.docx**

Create a 6 -slide presentation with detailed speaker notes that addresses the following areas:

1. The chosen area of health care research which is
**HMIS.**

2. The potential ethical issues associated with this area of health care research (the health care research is
**HMIS. Health Management Information Systems**

· Include at least three references to support your positions.

**## EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf**

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

CLC – Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation –

Rubric

Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of

health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health

care research.

Collapse All

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues

associated with the chosen area of health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen

area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated

with the chosen area of health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical

research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research

and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care
Research

11 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues

surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care

research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use

of current and developing technology in health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current

and developing technology in health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of

current and developing technology in health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding

the use of current and developing technology in health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Presentation of Content 33 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent 33 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and

relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good 28.05 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory 24.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent 11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is

appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good 9.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the

content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies

appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,

long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance

readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall

readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,

dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations

of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)

11 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

5. Excellent 11 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and

word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

4. Good 9.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice

are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident.

Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates

writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 4.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 110 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

**## EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf**

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

CLC – Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation –

Rubric

Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of

health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health

care research.

Collapse All

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues

associated with the chosen area of health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen

area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated

with the chosen area of health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical

research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research

and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care
Research

11 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues

surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care

research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use

of current and developing technology in health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current

and developing technology in health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of

current and developing technology in health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding

the use of current and developing technology in health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Presentation of Content 33 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent 33 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and

relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good 28.05 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory 24.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent 11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is

appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good 9.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the

content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies

appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,

long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance

readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall

readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,

dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations

of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)

11 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

5. Excellent 11 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and

word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

4. Good 9.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice

are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident.

Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates

writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 4.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 110 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

**## CLCPPTAssignment.docx**

Create a 6 -slide presentation with detailed speaker notes that addresses the following areas:

1. The chosen area of health care research which is
**HMIS.**

2. The potential ethical issues associated with this area of health care research (the health care research is
**HMIS. Health Management Information Systems**

· Include at least three references to support your positions.

**## EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf**

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

CLC – Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation –

Rubric

Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of

health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health

care research.

Collapse All

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues

associated with the chosen area of health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen

area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated

with the chosen area of health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical

research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research

and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care
Research

11 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues

surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care

research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use

of current and developing technology in health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current

and developing technology in health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of

current and developing technology in health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding

the use of current and developing technology in health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Presentation of Content 33 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent 33 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and

relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good 28.05 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory 24.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent 11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is

appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good 9.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the

content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies

appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,

long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance

readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall

readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,

dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations

of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)

11 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

5. Excellent 11 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and

word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

4. Good 9.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice

are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident.

Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates

writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 4.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 110 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

**## CLCPPTAssignment.docx**

Create a 6 -slide presentation with detailed speaker notes that addresses the following areas:

1. The chosen area of health care research which is
**HMIS.**

2. The potential ethical issues associated with this area of health care research (the health care research is
**HMIS. Health Management Information Systems**

· Include at least three references to support your positions.

**## EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf**

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

CLC – Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation –

Rubric

Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of

health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health

care research.

Collapse All

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues

associated with the chosen area of health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen

area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated

with the chosen area of health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical

research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research

and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care
Research

11 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues

surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care

research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use

of current and developing technology in health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current

and developing technology in health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of

current and developing technology in health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding

the use of current and developing technology in health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Presentation of Content 33 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent 33 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and

relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good 28.05 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory 24.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent 11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is

appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good 9.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the

content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies

appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,

long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance

readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall

readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,

dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations

of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)

11 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

5. Excellent 11 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and

word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

4. Good 9.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice

are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident.

Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates

writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 4.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 110 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Draw a three-generation genogram of your family

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Draw a three-generation genogram of your family. How do you think your family has contributed to your development and self-definition? The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor. Eastern Time. T…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Draw a three-generation genogram of your family. How do you think your family has contributed to your development and self-definition?

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor. Eastern Time. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor.

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] IA2

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) The purpose of the internet assignments for this course is to help you learn how to use the web to find political information. In this @ssignment, you will investigate information concerning civil liberties and rights by looki…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

The purpose of the internet assignments for this course is to help you learn how to use the web to find political information. In this @ssignment, you will investigate information concerning civil liberties and rights by looking at current issues involving the rights of individuals as presented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Institute for Justice. Do NOT cut and paste your answers from these websites. Summarize and respond in your own words. **Complete your @ssignment using MS Word**

Direction

Begin by going to the [ACLU website](http://www.aclu.org/).

– What is the mission of this organization?
– Click on ‘Issues’. You will see several campaigns listed. Choose one and read the background material, including some of the additional resources (Current Issues and The Latest news/press releases.) Why is the ACLU so concerned about this issue? Summarize two current issues or press releases. What is your reaction?
– Click on ‘ [Know Your Rights](https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/)' and choose an area that interests you. What are the most important things that citizens should know regarding that right? Did anything you learned about this topic surprise you?
– Click on ‘ [Defending Our Rights’](https://www.aclu.org/defending-our-rights). Read and summarize 2 cases that the ACLU is involved. Do you agree with the ACLU’s position on those cases? Why or why not?

Next, go to the [Institute for Justice](http://www.ij.org/).

– What is the mission of this organization? What kinds of issues are they most concerned about?
– Under ‘Issues’ in the menu bar, choose ‘First Amendment’ and one other category. Summarize and react to at least one case from each category.
– After reviewing this material, how would you assess the efforts of these two organizations?

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] 1 response DB Week 1

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

see attachment – a year ago **files (1)** – ## Week1DBresponse.pdf **## Week1DBresponse.pdf** Denise, a 19-year-old female presents to the clinic for an annual physical exam. She is G0P0, and presents with irregular menses only occurring every 3-4months apart within the past 2 years. She is sexually…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

see attachment

– a year ago

**files (1)**

– ## Week1DBresponse.pdf

**## Week1DBresponse.pdf**

Denise, a 19-year-old female presents to the clinic for an annual physical exam. She is
G0P0, and presents with irregular menses only occurring every 3-4months apart within
the past 2 years. She is sexually active and only using condoms occasionally. She is not
on any other birth control methods. She denies any significant medical or surgical health
history and denies any other current health problems. She has never had a Pap smear or
any pelvic exam tests before today. Her pregnancy test is negative and her vital signs are
all WNL.

SOAP NOTE

S – Subjective

CC: "I want birth control and my periods are irregular."

HPI:
Denise is a 19-year-old G0P0 female presenting for her annual exam. She reports
irregular menses occurring every 3–4 months for the past 2 years. She is sexually active
and occasionally uses condoms. She denies any history of abnormal vaginal discharge,
pelvic pain, or previous STIs. Denies fatigue, weight gain/loss, or hirsutism.

Additional questions to ask:

• When was your last menstrual period (LMP)?
• Any recent changes in stress, weight, or exercise habits?
• Any family history of PCOS, thyroid disorders, or reproductive issues?
• Number of lifetime partners? Current partner status?
• History of STI testing?
• Desire for pregnancy in the next year?

Medical History: Denies chronic illnesses, surgeries, or hospitalizations.

Social History:

• Home: Lives with parents.
• Education: In college.
• Alcohol/Drugs: Denies drug use, occasional alcohol socially.
• Smoking: Denies.
• Sexuality: Heterosexual, sexually active.
• Contraception: Inconsistent condom use.

O – Objective

Vital Signs: WNL
General: Alert, cooperative
POCT:

• Urine pregnancy test (Negative – already obtained)
• Gonorrhea/Chlamydia NAAT (recommended)
• TSH if concern for endocrine cause of irregular menses
• Consider HbA1c or fasting glucose if PCOS suspected

Pap smear: Not indicated at this time. According to USPSTF and ACOG guidelines,
cervical cancer screening with Pap smear begins at age 21 regardless of sexual activity.
She may have the option now if she consents, but it is not mandatory until age 21

Pelvic exam: May perform if patient consents, especially for STI testing or symptoms

A – Assessment

Primary Diagnosis:

• Irregular menses, likely secondary to an-ovulation (ICD-10: N92.6 – Irregular
menstruation, unspecified)

Differential Diagnoses:

• Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) – Consider due to menstrual irregularity and
adolescent age

• Hypothyroidism – Should rule out with TSH if symptomatic

P – Plan

Pharmacologic:

• Prescribe Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (COCP): e.g., Ethinyl estradiol 30
mcg/norgestimate 0.25 mg PO daily, 28-day pack. 12-month supply, 0 refills

o Rationale: Effective birth control and cycle regulation
o Consider patient preference: patch, ring, or progestin-only if COCP contraindicated

Non-Pharmacologic:

• Educate on condom use for STI protection
• Offer HPV vaccine if not received
• Offer STI screening: GC/Chlamydia, HIV

Education:

• Discuss expected changes with COCP (lighter, more regular periods)
• Discuss adherence importance: same time daily
• Common side effects: nausea, breast tenderness, spotting
• Risk/benefit: COCP decreases ovarian/endometrial cancer risk but increases risk of

DVT in smokers or those with risk factors
• Reinforce safe sex practices and routine STI testing
• Encourage follow-up in 3 months for contraceptive tolerance and cycle regularity

Referrals:

• None needed at this time unless abnormal labs

Follow-up:

• Return in 3 months or sooner if side effects present themselves
• Annual physical exam and STI testing per guidelines

**## Week1DBresponse.pdf**

Denise, a 19-year-old female presents to the clinic for an annual physical exam. She is
G0P0, and presents with irregular menses only occurring every 3-4months apart within
the past 2 years. She is sexually active and only using condoms occasionally. She is not
on any other birth control methods. She denies any significant medical or surgical health
history and denies any other current health problems. She has never had a Pap smear or
any pelvic exam tests before today. Her pregnancy test is negative and her vital signs are
all WNL.

SOAP NOTE

S – Subjective

CC: "I want birth control and my periods are irregular."

HPI:
Denise is a 19-year-old G0P0 female presenting for her annual exam. She reports
irregular menses occurring every 3–4 months for the past 2 years. She is sexually active
and occasionally uses condoms. She denies any history of abnormal vaginal discharge,
pelvic pain, or previous STIs. Denies fatigue, weight gain/loss, or hirsutism.

Additional questions to ask:

• When was your last menstrual period (LMP)?
• Any recent changes in stress, weight, or exercise habits?
• Any family history of PCOS, thyroid disorders, or reproductive issues?
• Number of lifetime partners? Current partner status?
• History of STI testing?
• Desire for pregnancy in the next year?

Medical History: Denies chronic illnesses, surgeries, or hospitalizations.

Social History:

• Home: Lives with parents.
• Education: In college.
• Alcohol/Drugs: Denies drug use, occasional alcohol socially.
• Smoking: Denies.
• Sexuality: Heterosexual, sexually active.
• Contraception: Inconsistent condom use.

O – Objective

Vital Signs: WNL
General: Alert, cooperative
POCT:

• Urine pregnancy test (Negative – already obtained)
• Gonorrhea/Chlamydia NAAT (recommended)
• TSH if concern for endocrine cause of irregular menses
• Consider HbA1c or fasting glucose if PCOS suspected

Pap smear: Not indicated at this time. According to USPSTF and ACOG guidelines,
cervical cancer screening with Pap smear begins at age 21 regardless of sexual activity.
She may have the option now if she consents, but it is not mandatory until age 21

Pelvic exam: May perform if patient consents, especially for STI testing or symptoms

A – Assessment

Primary Diagnosis:

• Irregular menses, likely secondary to an-ovulation (ICD-10: N92.6 – Irregular
menstruation, unspecified)

Differential Diagnoses:

• Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) – Consider due to menstrual irregularity and
adolescent age

• Hypothyroidism – Should rule out with TSH if symptomatic

P – Plan

Pharmacologic:

• Prescribe Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (COCP): e.g., Ethinyl estradiol 30
mcg/norgestimate 0.25 mg PO daily, 28-day pack. 12-month supply, 0 refills

o Rationale: Effective birth control and cycle regulation
o Consider patient preference: patch, ring, or progestin-only if COCP contraindicated

Non-Pharmacologic:

• Educate on condom use for STI protection
• Offer HPV vaccine if not received
• Offer STI screening: GC/Chlamydia, HIV

Education:

• Discuss expected changes with COCP (lighter, more regular periods)
• Discuss adherence importance: same time daily
• Common side effects: nausea, breast tenderness, spotting
• Risk/benefit: COCP decreases ovarian/endometrial cancer risk but increases risk of

DVT in smokers or those with risk factors
• Reinforce safe sex practices and routine STI testing
• Encourage follow-up in 3 months for contraceptive tolerance and cycle regularity

Referrals:

• None needed at this time unless abnormal labs

Follow-up:

• Return in 3 months or sooner if side effects present themselves
• Annual physical exam and STI testing per guidelines

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Human Resource Management Assignment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**YOU must prepare a 3-4 page [not including title and reference page] summarizing all the topics discussed throughout the course.** **topics** **Issues in Diversity Today** **Diversity in Organizations** **Affirmative Action and Reverse Discrimination** **Multi-racials and Multi-ethnics** **Relig…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**YOU must prepare a 3-4 page [not including title and reference page] summarizing all the topics discussed throughout the course.**

**topics**

**Issues in Diversity Today**

**Diversity in Organizations**

**Affirmative Action and Reverse Discrimination**

**Multi-racials and Multi-ethnics**

**Religious Rights and Diversity**

**Sexual Identity**

**The Disabled**

– [\
\
Draft.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/draft-docx-10287587 "Draft.docx")
– [\
\
Ranaassignment.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ranaassignment-docx "Ranaassignment.docx")

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Why it is important for nurses to be involved in scholarship?

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Why it is important for nurses to be involved in scholarship?.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Journal Entry

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (1)** – ## JournalEntry.docx **## JournalEntry.docx** Journal Entry Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while a…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (1)**

– ## JournalEntry.docx

**## JournalEntry.docx**

Journal Entry

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes.

Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement, the progress you made, and what insights you will carry forward into your next practicum

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCE**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163332/modules/items/6578552)

To Prepare

· Refer to the “Advanced Nursing Practice Competencies and Guidelines” found in the Week 1 Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced nursing practice nurses must possess in your specialty of interest.

· Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1, and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

· Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek, and consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience. Reflect on your observations and experiences.

**In 450–500 words, address the following:**

**Learning From Experiences**

· Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

· Reflect on the three (3) most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?

· What did you learn from this experience?

· What resources did you have available?

· What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?

· What new skills are you learning?

· What would you do differently?

· How are you managing patient flow and volume?

**Communicating and Feedback**

· Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.

· Answer the questions: How am I doing? What is missing?

· Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

By Day 7

**Submit** your Journal Entry.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK11Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.

Rubric

**PRAC_6635_Week11_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| PRAC_6635_Week11_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | **50 to >49.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.<br>**49 to >39.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br>**39 to >30.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.<br>**30 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | **30 to >29.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.<br>**29 to >19.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.<br>**19 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.<br>**9 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.<br>**14 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br>**10 to >5.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br>**5 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>No APA errors<br>**4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one to two (1–2) APA errors<br>**3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three to five (3–5) APA errors<br>**1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains more than five (> 5) APA errors | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

[Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163332/modules/items/6578550)

[Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163332/modules/items/6578552)

**## JournalEntry.docx**

Journal Entry

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes.

Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement, the progress you made, and what insights you will carry forward into your next practicum

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCE**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163332/modules/items/6578552)

To Prepare

· Refer to the “Advanced Nursing Practice Competencies and Guidelines” found in the Week 1 Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced nursing practice nurses must possess in your specialty of interest.

· Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1, and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

· Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek, and consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience. Reflect on your observations and experiences.

**In 450–500 words, address the following:**

**Learning From Experiences**

· Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

· Reflect on the three (3) most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?

· What did you learn from this experience?

· What resources did you have available?

· What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?

· What new skills are you learning?

· What would you do differently?

· How are you managing patient flow and volume?

**Communicating and Feedback**

· Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.

· Answer the questions: How am I doing? What is missing?

· Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

By Day 7

**Submit** your Journal Entry.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK11Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.

Rubric

**PRAC_6635_Week11_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| PRAC_6635_Week11_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | **50 to >49.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.<br>**49 to >39.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br>**39 to >30.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.<br>**30 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | **30 to >29.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.<br>**29 to >19.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.<br>**19 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.<br>**9 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.<br>**14 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br>**10 to >5.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br>**5 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>No APA errors<br>**4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one to two (1–2) APA errors<br>**3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three to five (3–5) APA errors<br>**1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains more than five (> 5) APA errors | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

[Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163332/modules/items/6578550)

[Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163332/modules/items/6578552)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Use of Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM)

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– Project sponsors need an idea as to how much time and money a project will require. – Give an example of a rough order of magnitude, budgetary, and definitive cost estimates for an IT software development project. – Give an example as to how you would use the analogous, parametric, and bottom-up c…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– Project sponsors need an idea as to how much time and money a project will require.
– Give an example of a rough order of magnitude, budgetary, and definitive cost estimates for an IT software development project.
– Give an example as to how you would use the analogous, parametric, and bottom-up cost estimates.

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] human resource

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

I need your help – [\ \ LinkedinAssignment.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/linkedinassignment-jpeg-10287443 "LinkedinAssignment.jpeg") – a year ago

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

I need your help

– [\
\
LinkedinAssignment.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/linkedinassignment-jpeg-10287443 "LinkedinAssignment.jpeg")

– a year ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] chap 11

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Chapter 11 Qualitative research is a valuable approach for understanding human behavior, culture, and social phenomena through methods like participant observation, ethnographic interviews, and the collection of various types of qualitative data. _**How does qualitative research differ from quantita…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Chapter 11

Qualitative research is a valuable approach for understanding human behavior, culture, and social phenomena through methods like participant observation, ethnographic interviews, and the collection of various types of qualitative data. _**How does qualitative research differ from quantitative research in terms of its objectives and methods? What types of research questions or situations are best suited for a qualitative approach? Discuss the role of cultural sensitivity and ethical considerations in qualitative research, especially when conducting participant observation or ethnographic interviews within unfamiliar or sensitive communities.**_

_**Q.2 Write a reply for friend post,**_

Your post brought up a lot of important points about how culture, gender roles, and family support shape our experiences. As a mother and a school counselor in training, I’ve seen firsthand how cultural values and family structure can influence the way children develop emotionally, socially, and even academically. I appreciated your explanation of collectivist versus individualist cultures. In my home, we’ve tried to emphasize both, encouraging independence while also making sure our kids know they are part of something bigger than themselves. Your mention of conflict resolution really stood out. Addressing issues in the moment, rather than letting them build, has made a big difference in my home, especially with four kids at different developmental stages. Like you, I’ve worked on improving communication. We talk openly about emotions and expectations, and I’ve noticed that this helps my children feel safer and more confident. I also liked how you’ve intentionally created space for family connection by organizing gatherings and introducing your children to extended family. It reminds me that even small steps like writing letters, FaceTiming relatives, or having family dinners can strengthen those bonds. As you said, culture remains a key influence, but it can be adapted in a way that supports emotional growth and stronger relationships. Would you say your views on gender roles in families have shifted after this course, or do they still align with what you were raised with?

– [\
\
Chap11.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chap11-pptx "Chap11.pptx")

– a year ago

November 5, 2026