[Solved] Bias

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## Untitleddocument52.pdf

**## Untitleddocument52.pdf**

Write as a freshman in
college

Week 2 Assignment:
Analysis of Personal
Beliefs and Biases

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 60
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

I am currently studying nursing because I want to make a positive impact on people’s
lives. A lot of who I am comes from my family, especially my parents, who immigrated
from Cuba and worked hard to build successful careers as doctors. Watching their
dedication taught me the importance of hard work, perseverance, and helping others.
Three beliefs that are important to me are that family should always come first, that hard
work leads to success, and that treating people with compassion and respect is one of
the most important things a person can do. These beliefs have influenced my decision
to become a nurse and shape how I interact with others. I also recognize that I may be
influenced by confirmation bias because I tend to look for information that supports what
I already believe, and optimism bias because I often believe things will work out if I put
in enough effort. My experiences in school, sports, work, and healthcare have all helped
shape my perspective on life and the way I view people and situations.

Who are you? What do you believe? What cognitive biases do you have? These are big
questions to answer, but necessary to consider before moving forward in your
professional life.

In a one- to two-page paper, consider the people and experiences that have shaped
how you see yourself, how you see life, and, most importantly, how they have shaped
your biases.

● List and then describe a minimum of three things you believe to be true,
such as the existence of God, right vs. wrong, morality, and what it means to
be a “good” person.

● Explain, in detail, how you acquired these beliefs (including the other people
or experiences that have influenced you most), why these beliefs are
important and how these beliefs will influence how you engage with people
and policies in your future career. Do not simply say something like, “I believe
in doing the right thing because it is the right thing.” You must really dig deep
into your psyche and analyze your own perspective of the world; make your
brain hurt!

● Most importantly, discuss at least two cognitive biases discussed in Chapter 1
that you might be most subject to and why. Integrate these into your three
beliefs and analyze the ways in which they shape you.

There is no right or wrong answer to these questions, but your in-depth insight is
important.

Your paper must be in APA Style, typed, and proofread. You do not need an abstract or
outside references for this paper.

Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Points: 60
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Rubric
Analysis of Personal Beliefs and Biases

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content

30 to >26.7 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a
sophisticated understanding of the topic. He/she presents a clear, focused
central idea (thesis) and supports it effectively with concrete details and
examples. Three or more beliefs are discussed in depth through the use of
critical thinking concepts. Discussion of biases is clear and well-integrated.

26.7 to >23.7 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a strong
understanding of the topic. He/she presents and supports a clear and
focused central idea (thesis). Supporting details are relevant but may lack
depth. Three beliefs are discussed effectively and critical thinking concepts
are used throughout the paper. Discussion of biases is mostly clear and
well-integrated.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates an
adequate understanding of the topic. He/she presents a central idea
(thesis), but it may be overly general/broad. He/she adequately supports the
central idea, but supporting details may at times be vague. At least two
beliefs are discussed in the paper. Critical thinking concepts are less than
adequately used to show understanding. Discussion of biases is less than
adequate.

20.7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer does not
demonstrate an adequate understanding of the topic. The central idea
(thesis) is unclear or missing, and the essay lacks focus. Supporting details
are insufficient and/or not relevant. Less than three beliefs are discussed in
the paper and integration of critical thinking concepts is minimal. Paper
lacks a discussion of biases.

30
pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Organization

18 to >16.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a clear
sense of direction. The paper includes an engaging introduction and
conclusion. Paragraphs are unified and arranged in a logical order. Each
paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea
of that paragraph. The writer smoothly transitions from paragraph to
paragraph, showing connections between related ideas. Supporting details
within paragraphs are well-organized, and research is well-integrated.

16.02 to >14.22 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a sense
of direction. The paper includes as strong introduction and conclusion.
Paragraphs are unified and include topic sentences, but they may lack
smooth transitions between ideas. The organization of supporting details
within paragraphs may need improvement.

14.22 to >12.42 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates
some direction and includes an adequate introduction and conclusion, but
topic sentences and transitions are weak. The paragraphs show unity, but
they are not arranged in any discernable order, and supporting details may
not always be well-organized.

12.42 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates little
or no direction. The introduction and conclusion are weak. It is difficult to
identify a single subtopic for each paragraph because paragraphs are not
unified and lack clear topic sentences or transitions. The order of body
paragraphs seems random, as do the supporting details within them.

18
pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Style/Langua
ge

6 to >5.34 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer’s tone is confident,
engaging, and appropriate for the assignment and/or the intended
audience. The text demonstrates strong vocabulary skills and does not
suffer from errors in word choice. The writer expresses ideas concisely, only
using as many words as necessary to communicate a point. The writer
achieves flow and readability by employing sentence variety successfully.

5.34 to >4.74 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer’s tone is appropriate and
effective overall. The text demonstrates good use of vocabulary and
contains few (if any) errors in word choice. The writer expresses ideas
concisely and clearly most of the time. The writer makes an effort to employ
sentence variety.

4.74 to >4.14 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer’s tone suffers from
one or more possible problems. Depending on the assignment, it may be
too informal, too personal, not authoritative enough, etc. Numerous
sentences suffer from lack of variety, awkward constructions, wordiness,
limited vocabulary, and/or errors in word choice.

4.14 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer often fails to
communicate ideas effectively because the paper suffers from significant
problems with tone, language use, and/or wordiness.

6 pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Sentence
Structure,
Mechanics,
and APA
Formatting

6 to >5.34 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer makes minimal (if any)
errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. There are no fragments or
run-on sentences. The writer makes minimal (if any) errors in APA format,
citations, or references.

5.34 to >4.74 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer makes some errors in
grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation, but these errors do not significantly
distract the reader from the substance of the text. The paper contains few (if
any) fragments and/or run-on sentences. The writer makes some errors in
APA format, citations, or references.

4.74 to >4.14 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer makes numerous
errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure, which at
times distract the reader from the substance of the text. The writer makes
numerous errors in APA format, citations, or references.

4.14 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer makes a significant
number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence
structure, regularly distracting the reader from the substance of the text and
hindering comprehension. The writer makes significant errors in APA
format, citations, or references.

6 pts

Total Points: 60

– Write as a freshman in college
– Week 2 Assignment: Analysis of Personal Beliefs and Biases
– Rubric

**## Untitleddocument52.pdf**

Write as a freshman in
college

Week 2 Assignment:
Analysis of Personal
Beliefs and Biases

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 60
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

I am currently studying nursing because I want to make a positive impact on people’s
lives. A lot of who I am comes from my family, especially my parents, who immigrated
from Cuba and worked hard to build successful careers as doctors. Watching their
dedication taught me the importance of hard work, perseverance, and helping others.
Three beliefs that are important to me are that family should always come first, that hard
work leads to success, and that treating people with compassion and respect is one of
the most important things a person can do. These beliefs have influenced my decision
to become a nurse and shape how I interact with others. I also recognize that I may be
influenced by confirmation bias because I tend to look for information that supports what
I already believe, and optimism bias because I often believe things will work out if I put
in enough effort. My experiences in school, sports, work, and healthcare have all helped
shape my perspective on life and the way I view people and situations.

Who are you? What do you believe? What cognitive biases do you have? These are big
questions to answer, but necessary to consider before moving forward in your
professional life.

In a one- to two-page paper, consider the people and experiences that have shaped
how you see yourself, how you see life, and, most importantly, how they have shaped
your biases.

● List and then describe a minimum of three things you believe to be true,
such as the existence of God, right vs. wrong, morality, and what it means to
be a “good” person.

● Explain, in detail, how you acquired these beliefs (including the other people
or experiences that have influenced you most), why these beliefs are
important and how these beliefs will influence how you engage with people
and policies in your future career. Do not simply say something like, “I believe
in doing the right thing because it is the right thing.” You must really dig deep
into your psyche and analyze your own perspective of the world; make your
brain hurt!

● Most importantly, discuss at least two cognitive biases discussed in Chapter 1
that you might be most subject to and why. Integrate these into your three
beliefs and analyze the ways in which they shape you.

There is no right or wrong answer to these questions, but your in-depth insight is
important.

Your paper must be in APA Style, typed, and proofread. You do not need an abstract or
outside references for this paper.

Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Points: 60
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Rubric
Analysis of Personal Beliefs and Biases

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Content

30 to >26.7 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a
sophisticated understanding of the topic. He/she presents a clear, focused
central idea (thesis) and supports it effectively with concrete details and
examples. Three or more beliefs are discussed in depth through the use of
critical thinking concepts. Discussion of biases is clear and well-integrated.

26.7 to >23.7 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a strong
understanding of the topic. He/she presents and supports a clear and
focused central idea (thesis). Supporting details are relevant but may lack
depth. Three beliefs are discussed effectively and critical thinking concepts
are used throughout the paper. Discussion of biases is mostly clear and
well-integrated.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates an
adequate understanding of the topic. He/she presents a central idea
(thesis), but it may be overly general/broad. He/she adequately supports the
central idea, but supporting details may at times be vague. At least two
beliefs are discussed in the paper. Critical thinking concepts are less than
adequately used to show understanding. Discussion of biases is less than
adequate.

20.7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer does not
demonstrate an adequate understanding of the topic. The central idea
(thesis) is unclear or missing, and the essay lacks focus. Supporting details
are insufficient and/or not relevant. Less than three beliefs are discussed in
the paper and integration of critical thinking concepts is minimal. Paper
lacks a discussion of biases.

30
pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Organization

18 to >16.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a clear
sense of direction. The paper includes an engaging introduction and
conclusion. Paragraphs are unified and arranged in a logical order. Each
paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea
of that paragraph. The writer smoothly transitions from paragraph to
paragraph, showing connections between related ideas. Supporting details
within paragraphs are well-organized, and research is well-integrated.

16.02 to >14.22 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates a sense
of direction. The paper includes as strong introduction and conclusion.
Paragraphs are unified and include topic sentences, but they may lack
smooth transitions between ideas. The organization of supporting details
within paragraphs may need improvement.

14.22 to >12.42 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates
some direction and includes an adequate introduction and conclusion, but
topic sentences and transitions are weak. The paragraphs show unity, but
they are not arranged in any discernable order, and supporting details may
not always be well-organized.

12.42 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer demonstrates little
or no direction. The introduction and conclusion are weak. It is difficult to
identify a single subtopic for each paragraph because paragraphs are not
unified and lack clear topic sentences or transitions. The order of body
paragraphs seems random, as do the supporting details within them.

18
pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Style/Langua
ge

6 to >5.34 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer’s tone is confident,
engaging, and appropriate for the assignment and/or the intended
audience. The text demonstrates strong vocabulary skills and does not
suffer from errors in word choice. The writer expresses ideas concisely, only
using as many words as necessary to communicate a point. The writer
achieves flow and readability by employing sentence variety successfully.

5.34 to >4.74 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer’s tone is appropriate and
effective overall. The text demonstrates good use of vocabulary and
contains few (if any) errors in word choice. The writer expresses ideas
concisely and clearly most of the time. The writer makes an effort to employ
sentence variety.

4.74 to >4.14 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer’s tone suffers from
one or more possible problems. Depending on the assignment, it may be
too informal, too personal, not authoritative enough, etc. Numerous
sentences suffer from lack of variety, awkward constructions, wordiness,
limited vocabulary, and/or errors in word choice.

4.14 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer often fails to
communicate ideas effectively because the paper suffers from significant
problems with tone, language use, and/or wordiness.

6 pts

This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome

Sentence
Structure,
Mechanics,
and APA
Formatting

6 to >5.34 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writer makes minimal (if any)
errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. There are no fragments or
run-on sentences. The writer makes minimal (if any) errors in APA format,
citations, or references.

5.34 to >4.74 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writer makes some errors in
grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation, but these errors do not significantly
distract the reader from the substance of the text. The paper contains few (if
any) fragments and/or run-on sentences. The writer makes some errors in
APA format, citations, or references.

4.74 to >4.14 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writer makes numerous
errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure, which at
times distract the reader from the substance of the text. The writer makes
numerous errors in APA format, citations, or references.

4.14 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writer makes a significant
number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence
structure, regularly distracting the reader from the substance of the text and
hindering comprehension. The writer makes significant errors in APA
format, citations, or references.

6 pts

Total Points: 60

– Write as a freshman in college
– Week 2 Assignment: Analysis of Personal Beliefs and Biases
– Rubric