Executive Solution Overview
**files (1)** – ## DebateAssignmentRubricDetails.docx **## DebateAssignmentRubricDetails.docx** Debate Assignment Topic: Con of needle exchange programs should receive full federal funding Assignment Rubric Details **Rubric for Evaluating Debates: Online Presentation** | | | | | — | — | — | | …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## DebateAssignmentRubricDetails.docx
**## DebateAssignmentRubricDetails.docx**
Debate Assignment
Topic: Con of needle exchange programs should receive full federal funding
Assignment Rubric Details
**Rubric for Evaluating Debates: Online Presentation**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Rubric for Evaluating Debates: Online Presentation |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro to the debate topic and stance with rationale (3 pts) Ethical Framework (3pts)<br>Provides intro to the debate topic and stance (3 pts); Provides rationale as to which ethical framework (such as deontology, utilitarianism, natural law, etc) fits stance (3 pts) | **6 ptsFull Marks** Provides intro to the debate topic and assigned stance. Why is this a debate-worthy topic? (3pts) Provides ethical framework and describes in minimum of 3-5 sentences how this framework fits with stance (3 pts)<br> <br>**3 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 6 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical Principles<br>At least three ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, fidelity, sanctity or quality of life). (minimum 2-3 sentences for each principle) | **9 ptsFull Marks** Provides 3 ethical principles and how they are related to stance. Minimum of 2-3 sentences explaining how principles relate.<br> <br>**6 ptsPartially Met**<br>**3 ptsMinimally Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 9 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources<br>At least two scholarly sources besides the ppt or a textbook. | **4 ptsFull Marks**<br>**2 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format/Spelling/Grammar<br>(i.e. professional style) | **5 ptsFull Marks**<br>**3 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRebuttal to Partner | **6 ptsFull Marks** Responds to partner respectfully but remaining with assigned stance. Provides additional reference to support rationale for assigned stance rather than just reiterating initial stance/references.<br> <br>**3 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 6 pts |
Total Points: 30
**## DebateAssignmentRubricDetails.docx**
Debate Assignment
Topic: Con of needle exchange programs should receive full federal funding
Assignment Rubric Details
**Rubric for Evaluating Debates: Online Presentation**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Rubric for Evaluating Debates: Online Presentation |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro to the debate topic and stance with rationale (3 pts) Ethical Framework (3pts)<br>Provides intro to the debate topic and stance (3 pts); Provides rationale as to which ethical framework (such as deontology, utilitarianism, natural law, etc) fits stance (3 pts) | **6 ptsFull Marks** Provides intro to the debate topic and assigned stance. Why is this a debate-worthy topic? (3pts) Provides ethical framework and describes in minimum of 3-5 sentences how this framework fits with stance (3 pts)<br> <br>**3 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 6 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical Principles<br>At least three ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, fidelity, sanctity or quality of life). (minimum 2-3 sentences for each principle) | **9 ptsFull Marks** Provides 3 ethical principles and how they are related to stance. Minimum of 2-3 sentences explaining how principles relate.<br> <br>**6 ptsPartially Met**<br>**3 ptsMinimally Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 9 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources<br>At least two scholarly sources besides the ppt or a textbook. | **4 ptsFull Marks**<br>**2 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format/Spelling/Grammar<br>(i.e. professional style) | **5 ptsFull Marks**<br>**3 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRebuttal to Partner | **6 ptsFull Marks** Responds to partner respectfully but remaining with assigned stance. Provides additional reference to support rationale for assigned stance rather than just reiterating initial stance/references.<br> <br>**3 ptsPartially Met**<br>**0 ptsNo Marks** | 6 pts |
Total Points: 30
Leave a Reply