Executive Solution Overview
– a year ago **files (1)** – ## 6020assess2Criterion.docx **## 6020assess2Criterion.docx** **Criterion 1** **Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.** **Distinguished** Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks, providing support for wh…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– a year ago
**files (1)**
– ## 6020assess2Criterion.docx
**## 6020assess2Criterion.docx**
**Criterion 1**
**Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.**
**Distinguished**
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks, providing support for why these are the most appropriate interventions.
**Proficient**
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
**Basic**
Designs interventions, though they may not be supported by evidence or the most effective for mitigating population health risks.
**Non Performance**
Does not design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
**Criterion 2**
**Demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.**
**Distinguished**
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations, and describes how inclusive needs, including potential biases, were identified and addressed in the process of developing a plan.
**Proficient**
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
**Basic**
Demonstrates ethical decision making, though without addressing important opportunities for inclusion in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
**Non Performance**
Does not demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
**Criterion 3**
**Lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.**
**Distinguished**
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities, providing role-specific details to help make the plan actionable.
**Proficient**
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
**Basic**
Develops a plan that takes into consideration some interprofessional roles and responsibilities, though leaving out other important roles and responsibilities.
**Non Performance**
Does not lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
**Criterion 4**
**Evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.**
**Distinguished**
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level, providing examples of strengths and weaknesses.
**Proficient**
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
**Basic**
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters, though the evaluation may not look at the most important elements or not those on a systems level.
**Non Performance**
Does not evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
**Criterion 5**
**Evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.**
**Distinguished**
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, providing examples to illustrate the pros and cons of the recommendations.
**Proficient**
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
**Basic**
Makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, but without evaluating important options.
**Non Performance**
Does not evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
**Criterion 6**
**Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.**
**Distinguished**
Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
**Proficient**
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
**Basic**
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.
**Non Performance**
Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.
[**WalkMe**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43274/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2176672)
**## 6020assess2Criterion.docx**
**Criterion 1**
**Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.**
**Distinguished**
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks, providing support for why these are the most appropriate interventions.
**Proficient**
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
**Basic**
Designs interventions, though they may not be supported by evidence or the most effective for mitigating population health risks.
**Non Performance**
Does not design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
**Criterion 2**
**Demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.**
**Distinguished**
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations, and describes how inclusive needs, including potential biases, were identified and addressed in the process of developing a plan.
**Proficient**
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
**Basic**
Demonstrates ethical decision making, though without addressing important opportunities for inclusion in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
**Non Performance**
Does not demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
**Criterion 3**
**Lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.**
**Distinguished**
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities, providing role-specific details to help make the plan actionable.
**Proficient**
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
**Basic**
Develops a plan that takes into consideration some interprofessional roles and responsibilities, though leaving out other important roles and responsibilities.
**Non Performance**
Does not lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
**Criterion 4**
**Evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.**
**Distinguished**
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level, providing examples of strengths and weaknesses.
**Proficient**
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
**Basic**
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters, though the evaluation may not look at the most important elements or not those on a systems level.
**Non Performance**
Does not evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
**Criterion 5**
**Evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.**
**Distinguished**
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, providing examples to illustrate the pros and cons of the recommendations.
**Proficient**
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
**Basic**
Makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, but without evaluating important options.
**Non Performance**
Does not evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
**Criterion 6**
**Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.**
**Distinguished**
Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
**Proficient**
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
**Basic**
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.
**Non Performance**
Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.
[**WalkMe**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43274/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2176672)
Leave a Reply