Category: Clinical & Abnormal Psychology

  • [Solved] CFOC Week 4 Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare**:Research one of the following companies and consider the company’s current organizational culture and diversity policies. – Boston Consulting Group – Costco – Southwest Airlines – St. Jude Children’s Hospital – Warby Parker – Zappos Submit a 2- to 3-page paper written in APA format an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare**:Research one of the following companies and consider the company’s current organizational culture and diversity policies.

    – Boston Consulting Group
    – Costco
    – Southwest Airlines
    – St. Jude Children’s Hospital
    – Warby Parker
    – Zappos

    Submit a 2- to 3-page paper written in APA format and style in which you analyze the organizational culture of the company you selected. Describe what it is about this company that makes it a “Best Place to Work.” What cultural benchmarks, models, theories, and/or systems can you identify? Include a rationale as to why these elements help define a “Best Place to Work.” Make sure to support your rationale with references to recent (within the last 5 years) peer-reviewed, scholarly sources and this week’s Learning Resources.

  • [Solved] D5-Field Notes Interview(s)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow instructions **files (3)** – ## VIDEO.docx – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc – Read-CreswellPothChapters5and7ApprendicesA-E.pdf **## VIDEO.docx** **VIDEO** [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## VIDEO.docx

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc

    – Read-CreswellPothChapters5and7ApprendicesA-E.pdf

    **## VIDEO.docx**

    **VIDEO**

    [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item_id=103967414](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item_id=103967414)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    EDCO 747

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    **Discussion Thread: Field Notes Interview(s)**

    By this point, you are required to have completed at least one of your field notes interviews. Describe your experience with the field notes interview(s) you have conducted to date. Include some details (technical, logistical, personal, professional, etc.) about the interview and the interview process itself. Use these prompts to help guide your description:

    · What did you enjoy about the experience?

    · What challenges (technical, personal, or otherwise) did you encounter?

    · How, if at all, was it different from what you expected, based on your course readings and your assumptions?

    · Based on your experience(s), how would you approach any subsequent qualitative interviewing?

    · What did you learn about qualitative data collection from this experience?

    The student will complete 7 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 200-250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years, and all references must be formatted in current APA style.

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters5and7ApprendicesA-E.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters5and7apprendicesa-e-pdf)

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters5and7ApprendicesA-E.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters5and7apprendicesa-e-pdf)

    **## VIDEO.docx**

    **VIDEO**

    [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item_id=103967414](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item_id=103967414)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    EDCO 747

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    **Discussion Thread: Field Notes Interview(s)**

    By this point, you are required to have completed at least one of your field notes interviews. Describe your experience with the field notes interview(s) you have conducted to date. Include some details (technical, logistical, personal, professional, etc.) about the interview and the interview process itself. Use these prompts to help guide your description:

    · What did you enjoy about the experience?

    · What challenges (technical, personal, or otherwise) did you encounter?

    · How, if at all, was it different from what you expected, based on your course readings and your assumptions?

    · Based on your experience(s), how would you approach any subsequent qualitative interviewing?

    · What did you learn about qualitative data collection from this experience?

    The student will complete 7 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 200-250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years, and all references must be formatted in current APA style.

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters5and7ApprendicesA-E.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters5and7apprendicesa-e-pdf)

    **## VIDEO.docx**

    **VIDEO**

    [https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item_id=103967414](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-the-primary-means-of-qualitative-data-collection-interviews?module_item_id=103967414)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    EDCO 747

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    **Discussion Thread: Field Notes Interview(s)**

    By this point, you are required to have completed at least one of your field notes interviews. Describe your experience with the field notes interview(s) you have conducted to date. Include some details (technical, logistical, personal, professional, etc.) about the interview and the interview process itself. Use these prompts to help guide your description:

    · What did you enjoy about the experience?

    · What challenges (technical, personal, or otherwise) did you encounter?

    · How, if at all, was it different from what you expected, based on your course readings and your assumptions?

    · Based on your experience(s), how would you approach any subsequent qualitative interviewing?

    · What did you learn about qualitative data collection from this experience?

    The student will complete 7 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 200-250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years, and all references must be formatted in current APA style.

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters5and7ApprendicesA-E.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters5and7apprendicesa-e-pdf)

  • [Solved] refle 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached **files (2)** – ## reflex4.docx – ## rubric4.docx **## reflex4.docx** Of the multitude of strategies discussed this week for increasing work enjoyment for staff, what is your favorite/most preferred strategy discussed in this module? How will you integrate this strategy into your supervisio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## reflex4.docx

    – ## rubric4.docx

    **## reflex4.docx**

    Of the multitude of strategies discussed this week for increasing work enjoyment for staff, what is your favorite/most preferred strategy discussed in this module? How will you integrate this strategy into your supervision practice in the future? What will it look like when you implement it with a supervisee/trainee? Are there any practices discussed that you will avoid in your supervision in the future, and why?

    _Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module._

    _Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (_ [_as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site._](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html) _). Failing to do so will result in point deductions._

    **## rubric4.docx**

    **Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength<br>Number of words – excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper is between 150 and 500 words<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper is less than 150 words or more than 500 words<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** The reflection paper is less than 100 words. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Usage, and Spelling | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Utilization of Outside Resources<br>Inclusion of one peer reviewed behavioral source and one course assigned reading | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt<br>Author answers the questions presented in the prompt. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Directly and thoroughly responds to the assignment prompt, demonstrating clear understanding of the required topic. Develops ideas logically and coherently, using organized, empirical, and evidenceinformed writing.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Responds to the assignment prompt, but the development of ideas may be only partially clear, briefly addressed, or lacking depth. Organization may be uneven, with some logical flow but limited support for claims.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication<br>Author applies the week's readings/topics. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Shows strong application of the week’s assigned readings or topic, making explicit, accurate connections between course content and the student’s insights.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** References the week’s topic or readings only tangentially, without demonstrating real application or meaningful integration. Contains general or surfacelevel statements rather than wellsupported insights.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality<br>Author writes original and unique content. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author clearly articulates information that is not a direct summary of the materials presented in class or typical output from artificial intelligence.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author is able to articulate novel responses, but rudimentary summarization or typical output from artificial intelligence is detected.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s response is heavily verbatim or typical output of artificial intelligence. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 30

    **## rubric4.docx**

    **Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength<br>Number of words – excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper is between 150 and 500 words<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper is less than 150 words or more than 500 words<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** The reflection paper is less than 100 words. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Usage, and Spelling | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Utilization of Outside Resources<br>Inclusion of one peer reviewed behavioral source and one course assigned reading | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt<br>Author answers the questions presented in the prompt. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Directly and thoroughly responds to the assignment prompt, demonstrating clear understanding of the required topic. Develops ideas logically and coherently, using organized, empirical, and evidenceinformed writing.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Responds to the assignment prompt, but the development of ideas may be only partially clear, briefly addressed, or lacking depth. Organization may be uneven, with some logical flow but limited support for claims.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication<br>Author applies the week's readings/topics. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Shows strong application of the week’s assigned readings or topic, making explicit, accurate connections between course content and the student’s insights.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** References the week’s topic or readings only tangentially, without demonstrating real application or meaningful integration. Contains general or surfacelevel statements rather than wellsupported insights.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality<br>Author writes original and unique content. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author clearly articulates information that is not a direct summary of the materials presented in class or typical output from artificial intelligence.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author is able to articulate novel responses, but rudimentary summarization or typical output from artificial intelligence is detected.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s response is heavily verbatim or typical output of artificial intelligence. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 30

    **## reflex4.docx**

    Of the multitude of strategies discussed this week for increasing work enjoyment for staff, what is your favorite/most preferred strategy discussed in this module? How will you integrate this strategy into your supervision practice in the future? What will it look like when you implement it with a supervisee/trainee? Are there any practices discussed that you will avoid in your supervision in the future, and why?

    _Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module._

    _Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (_ [_as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site._](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html) _). Failing to do so will result in point deductions._

    **## rubric4.docx**

    **Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength<br>Number of words – excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper is between 150 and 500 words<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper is less than 150 words or more than 500 words<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** The reflection paper is less than 100 words. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Usage, and Spelling | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Utilization of Outside Resources<br>Inclusion of one peer reviewed behavioral source and one course assigned reading | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt<br>Author answers the questions presented in the prompt. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Directly and thoroughly responds to the assignment prompt, demonstrating clear understanding of the required topic. Develops ideas logically and coherently, using organized, empirical, and evidenceinformed writing.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Responds to the assignment prompt, but the development of ideas may be only partially clear, briefly addressed, or lacking depth. Organization may be uneven, with some logical flow but limited support for claims.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication<br>Author applies the week's readings/topics. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Shows strong application of the week’s assigned readings or topic, making explicit, accurate connections between course content and the student’s insights.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** References the week’s topic or readings only tangentially, without demonstrating real application or meaningful integration. Contains general or surfacelevel statements rather than wellsupported insights.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality<br>Author writes original and unique content. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author clearly articulates information that is not a direct summary of the materials presented in class or typical output from artificial intelligence.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author is able to articulate novel responses, but rudimentary summarization or typical output from artificial intelligence is detected.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s response is heavily verbatim or typical output of artificial intelligence. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 30

    **## reflex4.docx**

    Of the multitude of strategies discussed this week for increasing work enjoyment for staff, what is your favorite/most preferred strategy discussed in this module? How will you integrate this strategy into your supervision practice in the future? What will it look like when you implement it with a supervisee/trainee? Are there any practices discussed that you will avoid in your supervision in the future, and why?

    _Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module._

    _Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (_ [_as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site._](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html) _). Failing to do so will result in point deductions._

    **## rubric4.docx**

    **Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Paper Rubric 4.9.26 Edits |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength<br>Number of words – excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper is between 150 and 500 words<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper is less than 150 words or more than 500 words<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** The reflection paper is less than 100 words. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Usage, and Spelling | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectation** Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Utilization of Outside Resources<br>Inclusion of one peer reviewed behavioral source and one course assigned reading | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt<br>Author answers the questions presented in the prompt. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Directly and thoroughly responds to the assignment prompt, demonstrating clear understanding of the required topic. Develops ideas logically and coherently, using organized, empirical, and evidenceinformed writing.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** Responds to the assignment prompt, but the development of ideas may be only partially clear, briefly addressed, or lacking depth. Organization may be uneven, with some logical flow but limited support for claims.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication<br>Author applies the week's readings/topics. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Shows strong application of the week’s assigned readings or topic, making explicit, accurate connections between course content and the student’s insights.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** References the week’s topic or readings only tangentially, without demonstrating real application or meaningful integration. Contains general or surfacelevel statements rather than wellsupported insights.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality<br>Author writes original and unique content. | **5 to >3.0 ptsMeets Expectations** The author clearly articulates information that is not a direct summary of the materials presented in class or typical output from artificial intelligence.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 ptsPartially Meets Expectations** The author is able to articulate novel responses, but rudimentary summarization or typical output from artificial intelligence is detected.<br> <br>**0 ptsDoes not Meet Expectations** The author’s response is heavily verbatim or typical output of artificial intelligence. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 30

  • [Solved] WAQP Week 4 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To Prepare:** – Review Part 1 of the Dissertation Guidebook (Dissertation Process) found in this week’s Learning Resources Then – **Post** and explain what is meant by the cyclical or iterative nature of writing a dissertation. – How does this concept impact how you approach working on the prospec…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To Prepare:**

    – Review Part 1 of the Dissertation Guidebook (Dissertation Process) found in this week’s Learning Resources

    Then

    – **Post** and explain what is meant by the cyclical or iterative nature of writing a dissertation.
    – How does this concept impact how you approach working on the prospectus, proposal, final dissertation?
    – Describe how this iterative process is integral to your working relationship with your chair.

    – [\
    \
    Dissertation_Process_Worksheet_March_2026.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dissertation-process-worksheet-march-2026-docx "Dissertation_Process_Worksheet_March_2026.docx")

  • [Solved] WAQP Week 4 Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    If your chair has approved the previous sections (title, supporting literature, problem), this week you will complete the Purpose section of the Prospectus Form. The Appendix located in the Prospectus Form describes how each element should be completed with examples. Incorporating feedback from your…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    If your chair has approved the previous sections (title, supporting literature, problem), this week you will complete the Purpose section of the Prospectus Form. The Appendix located in the Prospectus Form describes how each element should be completed with examples.

    Incorporating feedback from your chair, additional reading, and further thinking about your topic, revise all parts of your prospectus as needed to assure alignment. Particular attention should be directed toward the Problem, revising the research and social problems align them precisely with the Purpose.

    **To prepare:**

    – Use your Prospectus Form to complete this week’s assignment.

    ###### **Assignment**

    – Complete the Purpose section of the Prospectus Form.

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Quantitative Research Questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help with my assignment. Can someone please help? **files (1)** – ## QuantitativeResearchArticleEvaluationWorksheet1.docx **## QuantitativeResearchArticleEvaluationWorksheet1.docx** SOWK 580 **Quantitative Research Article Evaluation Worksheet** 1. Provide the proper APA reference entry for …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help with my assignment. Can someone please help?

    **files (1)**

    – ## QuantitativeResearchArticleEvaluationWorksheet1.docx

    **## QuantitativeResearchArticleEvaluationWorksheet1.docx**

    SOWK 580

    **Quantitative Research Article Evaluation Worksheet**

    1. Provide the proper APA reference entry for the article.

    2. What is the purpose of the research study?

    3. What is/are the research question (s) guiding this study?

    4. Explain how the research question(s) contribute to the body of knowledge for social work.

    5. Describe the purpose and significance of the study in its context.

    6. What gap(s) in the literature is the researcher attempting to address?

    7. List the variables and discuss how the researchers explained the problem using the variables. (For example, did the discussion suggest a connection between the dependent and independent variables or did the researcher use a theory to explain the problem)

    8. Describe how the participants were recruited. Was the recruitment method appropriate for the study’s aims? Why or why not?

    9. Describe the study’s setting and sample. Include information about who participated and the context in which data were collected. What are your thoughts regarding how the setting and sample impacts the generalizability of the study’s findings?

    10. Was the study reviewed by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)? Describe any ethical protections the researcher implemented for participants.

    11. Identify the research design. Was this design appropriate for answering the research question(s)? Explain.

    12. Describe how data was collected (surveys, measurement tools, etc.)

    13. Identify the measurement tools the researchers used in the study. Describe the effectiveness of the tools used to measure the variables (reliability and validity).

    14. Discuss the internal and external validity of the study.

    15. Summarize how the researcher discussed reliability.

    16. In your own words, summarize the main findings and how they were determined. Do the findings seem credible? Why or why not?

    17. Continuing from question 16, explain why the data analysis method was appropriate based on what the researchers wanted to determine.

    18. How do descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression each contribute to understanding the relationships among variables in this study?

    19. In your own words, discuss the strengths and limitations of the study. Discuss any limitations you think were overlooked.

    20. Describe the threats to internal and external validity.

    21. In your own words, discuss the suggestions for future research. Based on what you’ve read, what gaps remain in the literature?

    22. In your own words, summarize the findings’ implications for social work practice.

    23. How does this article compare to others you’ve read on this topic? What themes or patterns do you see when comparing the assigned article to other articles?

    24. How can you apply a Christian worldview perspective to the findings?

    **## QuantitativeResearchArticleEvaluationWorksheet1.docx**

    SOWK 580

    **Quantitative Research Article Evaluation Worksheet**

    1. Provide the proper APA reference entry for the article.

    2. What is the purpose of the research study?

    3. What is/are the research question (s) guiding this study?

    4. Explain how the research question(s) contribute to the body of knowledge for social work.

    5. Describe the purpose and significance of the study in its context.

    6. What gap(s) in the literature is the researcher attempting to address?

    7. List the variables and discuss how the researchers explained the problem using the variables. (For example, did the discussion suggest a connection between the dependent and independent variables or did the researcher use a theory to explain the problem)

    8. Describe how the participants were recruited. Was the recruitment method appropriate for the study’s aims? Why or why not?

    9. Describe the study’s setting and sample. Include information about who participated and the context in which data were collected. What are your thoughts regarding how the setting and sample impacts the generalizability of the study’s findings?

    10. Was the study reviewed by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)? Describe any ethical protections the researcher implemented for participants.

    11. Identify the research design. Was this design appropriate for answering the research question(s)? Explain.

    12. Describe how data was collected (surveys, measurement tools, etc.)

    13. Identify the measurement tools the researchers used in the study. Describe the effectiveness of the tools used to measure the variables (reliability and validity).

    14. Discuss the internal and external validity of the study.

    15. Summarize how the researcher discussed reliability.

    16. In your own words, summarize the main findings and how they were determined. Do the findings seem credible? Why or why not?

    17. Continuing from question 16, explain why the data analysis method was appropriate based on what the researchers wanted to determine.

    18. How do descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression each contribute to understanding the relationships among variables in this study?

    19. In your own words, discuss the strengths and limitations of the study. Discuss any limitations you think were overlooked.

    20. Describe the threats to internal and external validity.

    21. In your own words, discuss the suggestions for future research. Based on what you’ve read, what gaps remain in the literature?

    22. In your own words, summarize the findings’ implications for social work practice.

    23. How does this article compare to others you’ve read on this topic? What themes or patterns do you see when comparing the assigned article to other articles?

    24. How can you apply a Christian worldview perspective to the findings?

  • [Solved] PSY 605 Week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attached **files (1)** – ## PSY605Week3Assignment.docx **## PSY605Week3Assignment.docx** Choose a Developmental Stage Prior to beginning work on this assignment, · Review Chapters 7, 8, and 9 from your course textbook, _Development Through the Lifespan_ (7th ed.). · Review the reading from the c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attached

    **files (1)**

    – ## PSY605Week3Assignment.docx

    **## PSY605Week3Assignment.docx**

    Choose a Developmental Stage

    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

    · Review Chapters 7, 8, and 9 from your course textbook,
    _Development Through the Lifespan_ (7th ed.).

    · Review the reading from the chapter that covers the age group you have selected (review the previous week’s reading or read ahead if you have chosen one of the adult life stages).

    Additionally, begin preliminary work on your final assignment in the course, creating a Developmental Resource Guide, which is due in Week 6. To begin, select an age group or developmental stage from the following list:

    · infancy and toddlerhood (0 to 3 years)

    · early childhood (3 to 5 years)

    · middle childhood (6 to 12 years)

    · adolescence (13 to 18 years)

    · young adulthood (18 to 40 years)

    · middle to late adulthood (40 years and older)

    · death and dying

    In your paper,

    · Identify the age group and developmental stage selected.

    · Describe that age group’s important physical, emotional, cognitive, and social features.

    · Analyze that developmental stage from the point of view of at least three developmental theorists (but not limited to Piaget, Freud, Erickson, etc.).

    · Summarize the theory you find most useful in explaining that developmental stage.

    Support your selections and conclusions with reasoned arguments, citing a minimum of five peer-reviewed articles.

    The Choose a Developmental Stage paper

    · must be 4 to 6 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.

    · must include a separate title page with the following in title case:

    · title of paper in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · student’s name

    · name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · course name and number

    · instructor’s name

    · due date

    · must utilize academic voice.

    · Review the
    [_Academic Voice_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.

    · must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.

    · Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    · For assistance in writing
    [_Introductions & Conclusions_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) and
    [_Writing a Thesis Statement_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis), refer to the Writing Center resources.

    · must use at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles, published in the last 10 years, in addition to the course text.

    · The
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

    · To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, refer to this
    [_Quick and Easy Library Research_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

    · You may also refer to the
    [_How to Use Library OneSearch_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/How+to+Use+Library+OneSearch/0_sijzep60) tutorial, which explains keyword searching process in the library to find scholarly articles.

    · must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.

    · must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.

    · Refer to the
    [_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

    **## PSY605Week3Assignment.docx**

    Choose a Developmental Stage

    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

    · Review Chapters 7, 8, and 9 from your course textbook,
    _Development Through the Lifespan_ (7th ed.).

    · Review the reading from the chapter that covers the age group you have selected (review the previous week’s reading or read ahead if you have chosen one of the adult life stages).

    Additionally, begin preliminary work on your final assignment in the course, creating a Developmental Resource Guide, which is due in Week 6. To begin, select an age group or developmental stage from the following list:

    · infancy and toddlerhood (0 to 3 years)

    · early childhood (3 to 5 years)

    · middle childhood (6 to 12 years)

    · adolescence (13 to 18 years)

    · young adulthood (18 to 40 years)

    · middle to late adulthood (40 years and older)

    · death and dying

    In your paper,

    · Identify the age group and developmental stage selected.

    · Describe that age group’s important physical, emotional, cognitive, and social features.

    · Analyze that developmental stage from the point of view of at least three developmental theorists (but not limited to Piaget, Freud, Erickson, etc.).

    · Summarize the theory you find most useful in explaining that developmental stage.

    Support your selections and conclusions with reasoned arguments, citing a minimum of five peer-reviewed articles.

    The Choose a Developmental Stage paper

    · must be 4 to 6 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.

    · must include a separate title page with the following in title case:

    · title of paper in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · student’s name

    · name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · course name and number

    · instructor’s name

    · due date

    · must utilize academic voice.

    · Review the
    [_Academic Voice_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.

    · must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.

    · Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    · For assistance in writing
    [_Introductions & Conclusions_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) and
    [_Writing a Thesis Statement_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis), refer to the Writing Center resources.

    · must use at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles, published in the last 10 years, in addition to the course text.

    · The
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

    · To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, refer to this
    [_Quick and Easy Library Research_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

    · You may also refer to the
    [_How to Use Library OneSearch_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/How+to+Use+Library+OneSearch/0_sijzep60) tutorial, which explains keyword searching process in the library to find scholarly articles.

    · must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.

    · must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.

    · Refer to the
    [_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

  • [Solved] Problem Statement: Employee burnout and retention among HR professionals

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I am completing a doctoral-level research topic investigation in Industrial and Organizational Psychology that examines employee burnout as a contributing factor to retention challenges among human resource professionals. – [\ \ Untitleddocument5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/untitleddocum…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I am completing a doctoral-level research topic investigation in Industrial and Organizational Psychology that examines employee burnout as a contributing factor to retention challenges among human resource professionals.

    – [\
    \
    Untitleddocument5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/untitleddocument5-pdf-10563925 "Untitleddocument5.pdf")

  • [Solved] CULTURAL IMMERSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    CULTURAL, I'VE ATTACHED PROPOSAL **files (2)** – ## AmyrreahEaton_Approval_Assignment1.pdf – ## CO547CulturalImmersionPaper.pdf **## AmyrreahEaton_Approval_Assignment1.pdf** Amyrreah Eaton Approval Assignment May 20, 026 Cultural Immersion Proposal For this cultural immersion project, I chose to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    CULTURAL, I'VE ATTACHED PROPOSAL

    **files (2)**

    – ## AmyrreahEaton_Approval_Assignment1.pdf

    – ## CO547CulturalImmersionPaper.pdf

    **## AmyrreahEaton_Approval_Assignment1.pdf**

    Amyrreah Eaton

    Approval Assignment

    May 20, 026

    Cultural Immersion Proposal

    For this cultural immersion project, I chose to research the Indigenous/Native American
    community, specifically American Indian and Alaska Native populations. I selected this
    group because I want to better understand the historical trauma, cultural values, and
    mental health barriers Indigenous communities face. As someone interested in the
    counseling/helping profession, I believe it is important to learn how culture and history
    affect wellness and communication.

    I also chose this group because, before this course, I realized most of my knowledge came
    from stereotypes, media, or limited information taught in school. One bias I may have is
    assuming Indigenous communities all share the same beliefs and traditions, when in
    reality every tribe and community is different. I also want to better understand how
    historical loss and discrimination still impact Indigenous families today.

    Through this research and immersion experience, I hope to become more culturally aware
    and learn how to provide more respectful and effective support to people from Indigenous
    communities.

    **## CO547CulturalImmersionPaper.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Paper

    General Instructions

    Use textbooks, class materials, outside sources, and use APA format (Note: first person
    expression is expected). Reflect on your experiences and your prior preconceived ideas.
    Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and why? What have you
    learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over? Take what you have learned
    about this group and yourself and apply it in a counseling context. Assume you have a client
    from this group and discuss each of the following:

    • Use the insights you gained into your preconceived ideas of this group to identify ways

    you will cope with your internal dialogue about clients from this group. Have your biases

    shifted, and how will you keep your internalized biases at bay?

    • What are some likely counseling issues you might expect from this group and why?

    • What approaches (counseling and systemic) will you use and why?

    • What are the ethical and legal issues inherent in counseling a client from this group?

    • What will you do now to be ready to meet this future client?

    • What did you learn in this experience that you will use with future multicultural/diverse

    clients?

    • Write 8-10 pages; Graded; 25 pts, APA and outside resources required

    • If you are a non-counseling major, instead of applying your experience to the

    "counseling" area, please apply it to your area of education (i.e. teacher, administrator,

    etc..)

    • Also, place your Cultural Immersion papers in the Discussion Board if you wish to share

    with your classmates.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b, and 2F.2.h

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible
    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough

    Page 2 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of

    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    within the context

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural

    intelligence

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon
    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format

    Audience & Tone
    Audience appropriate and

    consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is

    inconsistent

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Page 3 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with

    meaning

    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    APA Format/Citations
    Correctly uses APA style and

    formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited

    supporting sources in-
    text; contains multiple
    errors in APA format

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate

    – Cultural Immersion Paper
    – General Instructions
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## CO547CulturalImmersionPaper.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Paper

    General Instructions

    Use textbooks, class materials, outside sources, and use APA format (Note: first person
    expression is expected). Reflect on your experiences and your prior preconceived ideas.
    Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and why? What have you
    learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over? Take what you have learned
    about this group and yourself and apply it in a counseling context. Assume you have a client
    from this group and discuss each of the following:

    • Use the insights you gained into your preconceived ideas of this group to identify ways

    you will cope with your internal dialogue about clients from this group. Have your biases

    shifted, and how will you keep your internalized biases at bay?

    • What are some likely counseling issues you might expect from this group and why?

    • What approaches (counseling and systemic) will you use and why?

    • What are the ethical and legal issues inherent in counseling a client from this group?

    • What will you do now to be ready to meet this future client?

    • What did you learn in this experience that you will use with future multicultural/diverse

    clients?

    • Write 8-10 pages; Graded; 25 pts, APA and outside resources required

    • If you are a non-counseling major, instead of applying your experience to the

    "counseling" area, please apply it to your area of education (i.e. teacher, administrator,

    etc..)

    • Also, place your Cultural Immersion papers in the Discussion Board if you wish to share

    with your classmates.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b, and 2F.2.h

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible
    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough

    Page 2 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of

    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    within the context

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural

    intelligence

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon
    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format

    Audience & Tone
    Audience appropriate and

    consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is

    inconsistent

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Page 3 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with

    meaning

    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    APA Format/Citations
    Correctly uses APA style and

    formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited

    supporting sources in-
    text; contains multiple
    errors in APA format

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate

    – Cultural Immersion Paper
    – General Instructions
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## AmyrreahEaton_Approval_Assignment1.pdf**

    Amyrreah Eaton

    Approval Assignment

    May 20, 026

    Cultural Immersion Proposal

    For this cultural immersion project, I chose to research the Indigenous/Native American
    community, specifically American Indian and Alaska Native populations. I selected this
    group because I want to better understand the historical trauma, cultural values, and
    mental health barriers Indigenous communities face. As someone interested in the
    counseling/helping profession, I believe it is important to learn how culture and history
    affect wellness and communication.

    I also chose this group because, before this course, I realized most of my knowledge came
    from stereotypes, media, or limited information taught in school. One bias I may have is
    assuming Indigenous communities all share the same beliefs and traditions, when in
    reality every tribe and community is different. I also want to better understand how
    historical loss and discrimination still impact Indigenous families today.

    Through this research and immersion experience, I hope to become more culturally aware
    and learn how to provide more respectful and effective support to people from Indigenous
    communities.

    **## CO547CulturalImmersionPaper.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Paper

    General Instructions

    Use textbooks, class materials, outside sources, and use APA format (Note: first person
    expression is expected). Reflect on your experiences and your prior preconceived ideas.
    Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and why? What have you
    learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over? Take what you have learned
    about this group and yourself and apply it in a counseling context. Assume you have a client
    from this group and discuss each of the following:

    • Use the insights you gained into your preconceived ideas of this group to identify ways

    you will cope with your internal dialogue about clients from this group. Have your biases

    shifted, and how will you keep your internalized biases at bay?

    • What are some likely counseling issues you might expect from this group and why?

    • What approaches (counseling and systemic) will you use and why?

    • What are the ethical and legal issues inherent in counseling a client from this group?

    • What will you do now to be ready to meet this future client?

    • What did you learn in this experience that you will use with future multicultural/diverse

    clients?

    • Write 8-10 pages; Graded; 25 pts, APA and outside resources required

    • If you are a non-counseling major, instead of applying your experience to the

    "counseling" area, please apply it to your area of education (i.e. teacher, administrator,

    etc..)

    • Also, place your Cultural Immersion papers in the Discussion Board if you wish to share

    with your classmates.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b, and 2F.2.h

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible
    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough

    Page 2 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of

    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    within the context

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural

    intelligence

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon
    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format

    Audience & Tone
    Audience appropriate and

    consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is

    inconsistent

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Page 3 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with

    meaning

    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    APA Format/Citations
    Correctly uses APA style and

    formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited

    supporting sources in-
    text; contains multiple
    errors in APA format

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate

    – Cultural Immersion Paper
    – General Instructions
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## AmyrreahEaton_Approval_Assignment1.pdf**

    Amyrreah Eaton

    Approval Assignment

    May 20, 026

    Cultural Immersion Proposal

    For this cultural immersion project, I chose to research the Indigenous/Native American
    community, specifically American Indian and Alaska Native populations. I selected this
    group because I want to better understand the historical trauma, cultural values, and
    mental health barriers Indigenous communities face. As someone interested in the
    counseling/helping profession, I believe it is important to learn how culture and history
    affect wellness and communication.

    I also chose this group because, before this course, I realized most of my knowledge came
    from stereotypes, media, or limited information taught in school. One bias I may have is
    assuming Indigenous communities all share the same beliefs and traditions, when in
    reality every tribe and community is different. I also want to better understand how
    historical loss and discrimination still impact Indigenous families today.

    Through this research and immersion experience, I hope to become more culturally aware
    and learn how to provide more respectful and effective support to people from Indigenous
    communities.

    **## CO547CulturalImmersionPaper.pdf**

    Page 1 of 3

    Cultural Immersion Paper

    General Instructions

    Use textbooks, class materials, outside sources, and use APA format (Note: first person
    expression is expected). Reflect on your experiences and your prior preconceived ideas.
    Which of those preconceived ideas are now open to re-interpretation and why? What have you
    learned about yourself and “them” now that the immersion is over? Take what you have learned
    about this group and yourself and apply it in a counseling context. Assume you have a client
    from this group and discuss each of the following:

    • Use the insights you gained into your preconceived ideas of this group to identify ways

    you will cope with your internal dialogue about clients from this group. Have your biases

    shifted, and how will you keep your internalized biases at bay?

    • What are some likely counseling issues you might expect from this group and why?

    • What approaches (counseling and systemic) will you use and why?

    • What are the ethical and legal issues inherent in counseling a client from this group?

    • What will you do now to be ready to meet this future client?

    • What did you learn in this experience that you will use with future multicultural/diverse

    clients?

    • Write 8-10 pages; Graded; 25 pts, APA and outside resources required

    • If you are a non-counseling major, instead of applying your experience to the

    "counseling" area, please apply it to your area of education (i.e. teacher, administrator,

    etc..)

    • Also, place your Cultural Immersion papers in the Discussion Board if you wish to share

    with your classmates.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b, and 2F.2.h

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible
    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough

    Page 2 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of

    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    within the context

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural

    intelligence

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon
    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.b,
    2F.2.h)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format

    Audience & Tone
    Audience appropriate and

    consistent tone

    No awareness of
    appropriate audience for

    assignment; tone is
    inappropriate

    Lacks awareness of
    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is

    inconsistent

    Effective and accurate
    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    Page 3 of 3

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with

    meaning

    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    APA Format/Citations
    Correctly uses APA style and

    formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited

    supporting sources in-
    text; contains multiple
    errors in APA format

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually
    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate

    – Cultural Immersion Paper
    – General Instructions
    – Scoring Guidelines