Category: Clinical & Abnormal Psychology

  • [Solved] psych

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## theoriespersonalitywk1.docx – ## psycweek1.pdf **## theoriespersonalitywk1.docx** **500 words (p)** 1. Use the URL listed below and complete the online personality test based on Jung's theory. After taking the personality tests, discuss how you viewed the test, discuss the theory…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## theoriespersonalitywk1.docx

    – ## psycweek1.pdf

    **## theoriespersonalitywk1.docx**

    **500 words (p)**

    1. Use the URL listed below and complete the online personality test based on Jung's theory. After taking the personality tests, discuss how you viewed the test, discuss the theory being used, discuss whether or not the information useful/accurate, etc. Discuss if your results were as you expected and if not what did you discover about your personality. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using such test. Discuss if you believe tests such as these should be used to determine if a person is fit for employment; what types of jobs are these tests most beneficial?

    [Personality](http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type) [https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type](https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type)

    2.  Adler suggest that each child is treated differently within a family depending on the child's birth order. Considering your own birth order, describe how you experiences may have been different from a child with a different birth order. Discuss how the experiences caused by your birth order may have influenced your adult personality. Discuss if you agree with Adler on his ideas of characteristics of each child in each specific birth order.

    **## psycweek1.pdf**

    Chapter 1 Discussion Boards: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science (400
    words)

    Hello, Welcome to the Module 1 Discussion Board. This week discussion topic: Using
    Animals in Research. Your answer to the discussion question should be in paragraph
    format. A paragraph is a minimum of 5 complete sentences. You can add more sentences
    if you like. Be sure to include information from the textbook and to cite the textbook
    (according to the textbook or the textbook stated). You can also use outside sources if you
    like but be sure to reference them (APA format).

    Psychology’s Research Ethics

    You are part of the Animal Care Committee for your university. It is the committee’s
    responsibility to evaluate and either approve or reject research proposals submitted by
    faculty members who want to use animals for research or instructional purposes in
    psychology, biology, or medicine. The proposals describe the experiments, including the
    goals and potential benefits of the research as well as any discomfort or injury that they
    may cause the animal subjects.

    There are 4 proposals (see below). Choose 2 proposals and make a decision either to
    approve the research or deny permission for the experiments. You must thoroughly
    explain why you would approve the research or deny it. Use information from the
    textbook to support your decision.

    CASE 1

    Professor King is a psychobiologist working on the frontiers of a new and exciting research
    area of neuroscience, brain grafting. Research has shown that neural tissue can be
    removed from the brains of monkey fetuses and implant- ed into the brains of monkeys that
    have suLered brain damage. The neurons seem to make the proper connections and are
    sometimes eLective in improving performance in brain-damaged animals. These
    experiments oLer important animal models for human degenerative diseases such as
    Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Dr. King wants to transplant tissue from fetal monkey brains
    into the entorhinal cortex of adult monkeys; this is the area of the human brain that is
    involved with Alzheimer’s disease.

    The experiment will use 20 adult rhesus monkeys. First, the monkeys will be subjected to
    ablation surgery in the entorhinal cortex. This procedure will involve anesthetizing the
    animals, opening their skulls, and making lesions using a surgical instrument. After they
    recover, the monkeys will be tested on a learning task to make sure their memory is

    impaired. Three months later, half of the animals will be given transplant surgery. Tissue
    taken from the cortex of monkey fetuses will be implanted into the area of the brain
    damage. Control animals will be subjected to sham surgery, and all animals will be allowed
    to recover for 2 months. They will then learn a task to test the hypothesis that the animals
    having brain grafts will show better memory than the control group.

    Dr. King argues that this research is in the exploratory stages and can only be done using
    animals. She further states that by the year 2004 about 3 million Americans will have
    Alzheimer’s disease and that her research could lead to a treatment for the devastating
    memory loss that Alzheimer’s victims suLer.

    CASE 2

    Dr. Fine is a developmental psychobiologist. His research concerns the genetic control of
    complex behaviors. One of the major debates in his field concerns how behavior develops
    when an animal has no opportunity to learn a response. He hypothesizes that the complex
    grooming sequence of mice might be a behavior pattern that is built into the brain at birth,
    even though it is not expressed until weeks later. To investigate whether the motor patterns
    involved in grooming are acquired or innate, he wants to raise animals with no opportunity
    to learn the response. Rearing animals in social isolation is insuLicient because the mice
    could teach themselves the response. Certain random movements could accidentally
    result in the removal of debris. These would then be repeated and could be coordinated
    into the complex sequence that would appear to be instinctive but would actually be
    learned. To show that the behaviors are truly innate, he needs to demonstrate that animals
    raised with no opportunity to perform any grooming-like movements make the proper
    movements when they are old enough to exhibit the behavior.

    Dr. Fine proposes to conduct the experiment on 10 newborn mice. As soon as the animals
    are born, they will be anesthetized and their front limbs amputated. This procedure will
    ensure that they will not be reinforced for making random grooming movements that
    remove debris from their bodies. The mice will then be returned to their mothers. The
    animals will be observed on a regular schedule using standard observation techniques.
    Limb movements will be filmed and analyzed. If grooming is a learned behavior, then the
    mice should not make grooming movements with their stumps as the movements will not
    remove dirt. If, however, grooming movements are innately organized in the brain, then the
    animals should eventually show grooming-like movement with the stumps.

    In his proposal, Dr. Fine notes that experimental results cannot be directly applied to
    human behavior. He argues, however, that the experiment will shed light on an important

    theoretical debate in the field of developmental psycho- biology. He also stresses that the
    amputations are painless and the animals will be well treated after the operation.

    CASE 3

    Your university includes a college of veterinary medicine. In the past, the veterinary
    students have practiced surgical techniques on dogs procured from a local animal shelter.
    However, there have been some objections to this practice, and the veterinary school
    wants the approval of your committee to continue this practice. They make the following
    points.

    1. Almost all of these animals will eventually be killed at the animal shelter. It is
    wasteful of life to breed animals for the vet school when there is an ample supply of
    animals that are going to be killed anyway, either because their owners do not want
    them or because they are homeless.

    2. It costs at least 10 times as much to raise purebred animals for research purposes;
    this money could be better used to fund research that would benefit many animals.

    3. Research with dogs from animal shelters and the practice surgeries will, in the long
    run, aid the lives of animals by training veterinarians and producing treatments for
    diseases that aLlict animals.

    A local group of animal welfare activists has urged your committee to deny the veterinary
    school’s request. They argue that the majority of these animals are lost or stolen pets, and
    it is tragic to think that the dog you have grown to love will wind up on a surgical table or in
    an experiment. Furthermore, they claim that as people become aware that animals taken
    to shelters may end up in research laboratories, they will stop using the shelters. Finally,
    the activists point out that in countries such as England, veterinary students do not
    perform practice surgery; they learn surgical techniques in an extensive apprenticeship.

    CASE 4

    The Psychology Department is requesting permission from your committee to use 10 rats
    per semester for demonstration experiments in a physiological psychology course. The
    students will work in groups of three; each group will be given a rat. The students will first
    perform surgery on the rats. Each animal will be anesthetized. Following standard surgical
    procedures, an incision will be made in the scalp and two holes drilled in the animal’s skull.
    Electrodes will be lowered into the brain to create lesions on each side. The animals will
    then be allowed to recover. Several weeks later, the eLects of destroying this part of the

    animal’s brain will be tested in a shuttle avoidance task in which the animals will learn
    when to cross over an electrified grid.

    The instructor acknowledges that the procedure is a common demonstration and that no
    new scientific information will be gained from the experiment. He argues, however, that
    students taking a course in physiological psychology must have the opportunity to engage
    in small animal surgery and to see firsthand the eLects of brain lesions.

    **## psycweek1.pdf**

    Chapter 1 Discussion Boards: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science (400
    words)

    Hello, Welcome to the Module 1 Discussion Board. This week discussion topic: Using
    Animals in Research. Your answer to the discussion question should be in paragraph
    format. A paragraph is a minimum of 5 complete sentences. You can add more sentences
    if you like. Be sure to include information from the textbook and to cite the textbook
    (according to the textbook or the textbook stated). You can also use outside sources if you
    like but be sure to reference them (APA format).

    Psychology’s Research Ethics

    You are part of the Animal Care Committee for your university. It is the committee’s
    responsibility to evaluate and either approve or reject research proposals submitted by
    faculty members who want to use animals for research or instructional purposes in
    psychology, biology, or medicine. The proposals describe the experiments, including the
    goals and potential benefits of the research as well as any discomfort or injury that they
    may cause the animal subjects.

    There are 4 proposals (see below). Choose 2 proposals and make a decision either to
    approve the research or deny permission for the experiments. You must thoroughly
    explain why you would approve the research or deny it. Use information from the
    textbook to support your decision.

    CASE 1

    Professor King is a psychobiologist working on the frontiers of a new and exciting research
    area of neuroscience, brain grafting. Research has shown that neural tissue can be
    removed from the brains of monkey fetuses and implant- ed into the brains of monkeys that
    have suLered brain damage. The neurons seem to make the proper connections and are
    sometimes eLective in improving performance in brain-damaged animals. These
    experiments oLer important animal models for human degenerative diseases such as
    Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Dr. King wants to transplant tissue from fetal monkey brains
    into the entorhinal cortex of adult monkeys; this is the area of the human brain that is
    involved with Alzheimer’s disease.

    The experiment will use 20 adult rhesus monkeys. First, the monkeys will be subjected to
    ablation surgery in the entorhinal cortex. This procedure will involve anesthetizing the
    animals, opening their skulls, and making lesions using a surgical instrument. After they
    recover, the monkeys will be tested on a learning task to make sure their memory is

    impaired. Three months later, half of the animals will be given transplant surgery. Tissue
    taken from the cortex of monkey fetuses will be implanted into the area of the brain
    damage. Control animals will be subjected to sham surgery, and all animals will be allowed
    to recover for 2 months. They will then learn a task to test the hypothesis that the animals
    having brain grafts will show better memory than the control group.

    Dr. King argues that this research is in the exploratory stages and can only be done using
    animals. She further states that by the year 2004 about 3 million Americans will have
    Alzheimer’s disease and that her research could lead to a treatment for the devastating
    memory loss that Alzheimer’s victims suLer.

    CASE 2

    Dr. Fine is a developmental psychobiologist. His research concerns the genetic control of
    complex behaviors. One of the major debates in his field concerns how behavior develops
    when an animal has no opportunity to learn a response. He hypothesizes that the complex
    grooming sequence of mice might be a behavior pattern that is built into the brain at birth,
    even though it is not expressed until weeks later. To investigate whether the motor patterns
    involved in grooming are acquired or innate, he wants to raise animals with no opportunity
    to learn the response. Rearing animals in social isolation is insuLicient because the mice
    could teach themselves the response. Certain random movements could accidentally
    result in the removal of debris. These would then be repeated and could be coordinated
    into the complex sequence that would appear to be instinctive but would actually be
    learned. To show that the behaviors are truly innate, he needs to demonstrate that animals
    raised with no opportunity to perform any grooming-like movements make the proper
    movements when they are old enough to exhibit the behavior.

    Dr. Fine proposes to conduct the experiment on 10 newborn mice. As soon as the animals
    are born, they will be anesthetized and their front limbs amputated. This procedure will
    ensure that they will not be reinforced for making random grooming movements that
    remove debris from their bodies. The mice will then be returned to their mothers. The
    animals will be observed on a regular schedule using standard observation techniques.
    Limb movements will be filmed and analyzed. If grooming is a learned behavior, then the
    mice should not make grooming movements with their stumps as the movements will not
    remove dirt. If, however, grooming movements are innately organized in the brain, then the
    animals should eventually show grooming-like movement with the stumps.

    In his proposal, Dr. Fine notes that experimental results cannot be directly applied to
    human behavior. He argues, however, that the experiment will shed light on an important

    theoretical debate in the field of developmental psycho- biology. He also stresses that the
    amputations are painless and the animals will be well treated after the operation.

    CASE 3

    Your university includes a college of veterinary medicine. In the past, the veterinary
    students have practiced surgical techniques on dogs procured from a local animal shelter.
    However, there have been some objections to this practice, and the veterinary school
    wants the approval of your committee to continue this practice. They make the following
    points.

    1. Almost all of these animals will eventually be killed at the animal shelter. It is
    wasteful of life to breed animals for the vet school when there is an ample supply of
    animals that are going to be killed anyway, either because their owners do not want
    them or because they are homeless.

    2. It costs at least 10 times as much to raise purebred animals for research purposes;
    this money could be better used to fund research that would benefit many animals.

    3. Research with dogs from animal shelters and the practice surgeries will, in the long
    run, aid the lives of animals by training veterinarians and producing treatments for
    diseases that aLlict animals.

    A local group of animal welfare activists has urged your committee to deny the veterinary
    school’s request. They argue that the majority of these animals are lost or stolen pets, and
    it is tragic to think that the dog you have grown to love will wind up on a surgical table or in
    an experiment. Furthermore, they claim that as people become aware that animals taken
    to shelters may end up in research laboratories, they will stop using the shelters. Finally,
    the activists point out that in countries such as England, veterinary students do not
    perform practice surgery; they learn surgical techniques in an extensive apprenticeship.

    CASE 4

    The Psychology Department is requesting permission from your committee to use 10 rats
    per semester for demonstration experiments in a physiological psychology course. The
    students will work in groups of three; each group will be given a rat. The students will first
    perform surgery on the rats. Each animal will be anesthetized. Following standard surgical
    procedures, an incision will be made in the scalp and two holes drilled in the animal’s skull.
    Electrodes will be lowered into the brain to create lesions on each side. The animals will
    then be allowed to recover. Several weeks later, the eLects of destroying this part of the

    animal’s brain will be tested in a shuttle avoidance task in which the animals will learn
    when to cross over an electrified grid.

    The instructor acknowledges that the procedure is a common demonstration and that no
    new scientific information will be gained from the experiment. He argues, however, that
    students taking a course in physiological psychology must have the opportunity to engage
    in small animal surgery and to see firsthand the eLects of brain lesions.

    **## theoriespersonalitywk1.docx**

    **500 words (p)**

    1. Use the URL listed below and complete the online personality test based on Jung's theory. After taking the personality tests, discuss how you viewed the test, discuss the theory being used, discuss whether or not the information useful/accurate, etc. Discuss if your results were as you expected and if not what did you discover about your personality. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using such test. Discuss if you believe tests such as these should be used to determine if a person is fit for employment; what types of jobs are these tests most beneficial?

    [Personality](http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type) [https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type](https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type)

    2.  Adler suggest that each child is treated differently within a family depending on the child's birth order. Considering your own birth order, describe how you experiences may have been different from a child with a different birth order. Discuss how the experiences caused by your birth order may have influenced your adult personality. Discuss if you agree with Adler on his ideas of characteristics of each child in each specific birth order.

    **## psycweek1.pdf**

    Chapter 1 Discussion Boards: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science (400
    words)

    Hello, Welcome to the Module 1 Discussion Board. This week discussion topic: Using
    Animals in Research. Your answer to the discussion question should be in paragraph
    format. A paragraph is a minimum of 5 complete sentences. You can add more sentences
    if you like. Be sure to include information from the textbook and to cite the textbook
    (according to the textbook or the textbook stated). You can also use outside sources if you
    like but be sure to reference them (APA format).

    Psychology’s Research Ethics

    You are part of the Animal Care Committee for your university. It is the committee’s
    responsibility to evaluate and either approve or reject research proposals submitted by
    faculty members who want to use animals for research or instructional purposes in
    psychology, biology, or medicine. The proposals describe the experiments, including the
    goals and potential benefits of the research as well as any discomfort or injury that they
    may cause the animal subjects.

    There are 4 proposals (see below). Choose 2 proposals and make a decision either to
    approve the research or deny permission for the experiments. You must thoroughly
    explain why you would approve the research or deny it. Use information from the
    textbook to support your decision.

    CASE 1

    Professor King is a psychobiologist working on the frontiers of a new and exciting research
    area of neuroscience, brain grafting. Research has shown that neural tissue can be
    removed from the brains of monkey fetuses and implant- ed into the brains of monkeys that
    have suLered brain damage. The neurons seem to make the proper connections and are
    sometimes eLective in improving performance in brain-damaged animals. These
    experiments oLer important animal models for human degenerative diseases such as
    Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Dr. King wants to transplant tissue from fetal monkey brains
    into the entorhinal cortex of adult monkeys; this is the area of the human brain that is
    involved with Alzheimer’s disease.

    The experiment will use 20 adult rhesus monkeys. First, the monkeys will be subjected to
    ablation surgery in the entorhinal cortex. This procedure will involve anesthetizing the
    animals, opening their skulls, and making lesions using a surgical instrument. After they
    recover, the monkeys will be tested on a learning task to make sure their memory is

    impaired. Three months later, half of the animals will be given transplant surgery. Tissue
    taken from the cortex of monkey fetuses will be implanted into the area of the brain
    damage. Control animals will be subjected to sham surgery, and all animals will be allowed
    to recover for 2 months. They will then learn a task to test the hypothesis that the animals
    having brain grafts will show better memory than the control group.

    Dr. King argues that this research is in the exploratory stages and can only be done using
    animals. She further states that by the year 2004 about 3 million Americans will have
    Alzheimer’s disease and that her research could lead to a treatment for the devastating
    memory loss that Alzheimer’s victims suLer.

    CASE 2

    Dr. Fine is a developmental psychobiologist. His research concerns the genetic control of
    complex behaviors. One of the major debates in his field concerns how behavior develops
    when an animal has no opportunity to learn a response. He hypothesizes that the complex
    grooming sequence of mice might be a behavior pattern that is built into the brain at birth,
    even though it is not expressed until weeks later. To investigate whether the motor patterns
    involved in grooming are acquired or innate, he wants to raise animals with no opportunity
    to learn the response. Rearing animals in social isolation is insuLicient because the mice
    could teach themselves the response. Certain random movements could accidentally
    result in the removal of debris. These would then be repeated and could be coordinated
    into the complex sequence that would appear to be instinctive but would actually be
    learned. To show that the behaviors are truly innate, he needs to demonstrate that animals
    raised with no opportunity to perform any grooming-like movements make the proper
    movements when they are old enough to exhibit the behavior.

    Dr. Fine proposes to conduct the experiment on 10 newborn mice. As soon as the animals
    are born, they will be anesthetized and their front limbs amputated. This procedure will
    ensure that they will not be reinforced for making random grooming movements that
    remove debris from their bodies. The mice will then be returned to their mothers. The
    animals will be observed on a regular schedule using standard observation techniques.
    Limb movements will be filmed and analyzed. If grooming is a learned behavior, then the
    mice should not make grooming movements with their stumps as the movements will not
    remove dirt. If, however, grooming movements are innately organized in the brain, then the
    animals should eventually show grooming-like movement with the stumps.

    In his proposal, Dr. Fine notes that experimental results cannot be directly applied to
    human behavior. He argues, however, that the experiment will shed light on an important

    theoretical debate in the field of developmental psycho- biology. He also stresses that the
    amputations are painless and the animals will be well treated after the operation.

    CASE 3

    Your university includes a college of veterinary medicine. In the past, the veterinary
    students have practiced surgical techniques on dogs procured from a local animal shelter.
    However, there have been some objections to this practice, and the veterinary school
    wants the approval of your committee to continue this practice. They make the following
    points.

    1. Almost all of these animals will eventually be killed at the animal shelter. It is
    wasteful of life to breed animals for the vet school when there is an ample supply of
    animals that are going to be killed anyway, either because their owners do not want
    them or because they are homeless.

    2. It costs at least 10 times as much to raise purebred animals for research purposes;
    this money could be better used to fund research that would benefit many animals.

    3. Research with dogs from animal shelters and the practice surgeries will, in the long
    run, aid the lives of animals by training veterinarians and producing treatments for
    diseases that aLlict animals.

    A local group of animal welfare activists has urged your committee to deny the veterinary
    school’s request. They argue that the majority of these animals are lost or stolen pets, and
    it is tragic to think that the dog you have grown to love will wind up on a surgical table or in
    an experiment. Furthermore, they claim that as people become aware that animals taken
    to shelters may end up in research laboratories, they will stop using the shelters. Finally,
    the activists point out that in countries such as England, veterinary students do not
    perform practice surgery; they learn surgical techniques in an extensive apprenticeship.

    CASE 4

    The Psychology Department is requesting permission from your committee to use 10 rats
    per semester for demonstration experiments in a physiological psychology course. The
    students will work in groups of three; each group will be given a rat. The students will first
    perform surgery on the rats. Each animal will be anesthetized. Following standard surgical
    procedures, an incision will be made in the scalp and two holes drilled in the animal’s skull.
    Electrodes will be lowered into the brain to create lesions on each side. The animals will
    then be allowed to recover. Several weeks later, the eLects of destroying this part of the

    animal’s brain will be tested in a shuttle avoidance task in which the animals will learn
    when to cross over an electrified grid.

    The instructor acknowledges that the procedure is a common demonstration and that no
    new scientific information will be gained from the experiment. He argues, however, that
    students taking a course in physiological psychology must have the opportunity to engage
    in small animal surgery and to see firsthand the eLects of brain lesions.

    **## theoriespersonalitywk1.docx**

    **500 words (p)**

    1. Use the URL listed below and complete the online personality test based on Jung's theory. After taking the personality tests, discuss how you viewed the test, discuss the theory being used, discuss whether or not the information useful/accurate, etc. Discuss if your results were as you expected and if not what did you discover about your personality. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using such test. Discuss if you believe tests such as these should be used to determine if a person is fit for employment; what types of jobs are these tests most beneficial?

    [Personality](http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type) [https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type](https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/type)

    2.  Adler suggest that each child is treated differently within a family depending on the child's birth order. Considering your own birth order, describe how you experiences may have been different from a child with a different birth order. Discuss how the experiences caused by your birth order may have influenced your adult personality. Discuss if you agree with Adler on his ideas of characteristics of each child in each specific birth order.

    **## psycweek1.pdf**

    Chapter 1 Discussion Boards: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science (400
    words)

    Hello, Welcome to the Module 1 Discussion Board. This week discussion topic: Using
    Animals in Research. Your answer to the discussion question should be in paragraph
    format. A paragraph is a minimum of 5 complete sentences. You can add more sentences
    if you like. Be sure to include information from the textbook and to cite the textbook
    (according to the textbook or the textbook stated). You can also use outside sources if you
    like but be sure to reference them (APA format).

    Psychology’s Research Ethics

    You are part of the Animal Care Committee for your university. It is the committee’s
    responsibility to evaluate and either approve or reject research proposals submitted by
    faculty members who want to use animals for research or instructional purposes in
    psychology, biology, or medicine. The proposals describe the experiments, including the
    goals and potential benefits of the research as well as any discomfort or injury that they
    may cause the animal subjects.

    There are 4 proposals (see below). Choose 2 proposals and make a decision either to
    approve the research or deny permission for the experiments. You must thoroughly
    explain why you would approve the research or deny it. Use information from the
    textbook to support your decision.

    CASE 1

    Professor King is a psychobiologist working on the frontiers of a new and exciting research
    area of neuroscience, brain grafting. Research has shown that neural tissue can be
    removed from the brains of monkey fetuses and implant- ed into the brains of monkeys that
    have suLered brain damage. The neurons seem to make the proper connections and are
    sometimes eLective in improving performance in brain-damaged animals. These
    experiments oLer important animal models for human degenerative diseases such as
    Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Dr. King wants to transplant tissue from fetal monkey brains
    into the entorhinal cortex of adult monkeys; this is the area of the human brain that is
    involved with Alzheimer’s disease.

    The experiment will use 20 adult rhesus monkeys. First, the monkeys will be subjected to
    ablation surgery in the entorhinal cortex. This procedure will involve anesthetizing the
    animals, opening their skulls, and making lesions using a surgical instrument. After they
    recover, the monkeys will be tested on a learning task to make sure their memory is

    impaired. Three months later, half of the animals will be given transplant surgery. Tissue
    taken from the cortex of monkey fetuses will be implanted into the area of the brain
    damage. Control animals will be subjected to sham surgery, and all animals will be allowed
    to recover for 2 months. They will then learn a task to test the hypothesis that the animals
    having brain grafts will show better memory than the control group.

    Dr. King argues that this research is in the exploratory stages and can only be done using
    animals. She further states that by the year 2004 about 3 million Americans will have
    Alzheimer’s disease and that her research could lead to a treatment for the devastating
    memory loss that Alzheimer’s victims suLer.

    CASE 2

    Dr. Fine is a developmental psychobiologist. His research concerns the genetic control of
    complex behaviors. One of the major debates in his field concerns how behavior develops
    when an animal has no opportunity to learn a response. He hypothesizes that the complex
    grooming sequence of mice might be a behavior pattern that is built into the brain at birth,
    even though it is not expressed until weeks later. To investigate whether the motor patterns
    involved in grooming are acquired or innate, he wants to raise animals with no opportunity
    to learn the response. Rearing animals in social isolation is insuLicient because the mice
    could teach themselves the response. Certain random movements could accidentally
    result in the removal of debris. These would then be repeated and could be coordinated
    into the complex sequence that would appear to be instinctive but would actually be
    learned. To show that the behaviors are truly innate, he needs to demonstrate that animals
    raised with no opportunity to perform any grooming-like movements make the proper
    movements when they are old enough to exhibit the behavior.

    Dr. Fine proposes to conduct the experiment on 10 newborn mice. As soon as the animals
    are born, they will be anesthetized and their front limbs amputated. This procedure will
    ensure that they will not be reinforced for making random grooming movements that
    remove debris from their bodies. The mice will then be returned to their mothers. The
    animals will be observed on a regular schedule using standard observation techniques.
    Limb movements will be filmed and analyzed. If grooming is a learned behavior, then the
    mice should not make grooming movements with their stumps as the movements will not
    remove dirt. If, however, grooming movements are innately organized in the brain, then the
    animals should eventually show grooming-like movement with the stumps.

    In his proposal, Dr. Fine notes that experimental results cannot be directly applied to
    human behavior. He argues, however, that the experiment will shed light on an important

    theoretical debate in the field of developmental psycho- biology. He also stresses that the
    amputations are painless and the animals will be well treated after the operation.

    CASE 3

    Your university includes a college of veterinary medicine. In the past, the veterinary
    students have practiced surgical techniques on dogs procured from a local animal shelter.
    However, there have been some objections to this practice, and the veterinary school
    wants the approval of your committee to continue this practice. They make the following
    points.

    1. Almost all of these animals will eventually be killed at the animal shelter. It is
    wasteful of life to breed animals for the vet school when there is an ample supply of
    animals that are going to be killed anyway, either because their owners do not want
    them or because they are homeless.

    2. It costs at least 10 times as much to raise purebred animals for research purposes;
    this money could be better used to fund research that would benefit many animals.

    3. Research with dogs from animal shelters and the practice surgeries will, in the long
    run, aid the lives of animals by training veterinarians and producing treatments for
    diseases that aLlict animals.

    A local group of animal welfare activists has urged your committee to deny the veterinary
    school’s request. They argue that the majority of these animals are lost or stolen pets, and
    it is tragic to think that the dog you have grown to love will wind up on a surgical table or in
    an experiment. Furthermore, they claim that as people become aware that animals taken
    to shelters may end up in research laboratories, they will stop using the shelters. Finally,
    the activists point out that in countries such as England, veterinary students do not
    perform practice surgery; they learn surgical techniques in an extensive apprenticeship.

    CASE 4

    The Psychology Department is requesting permission from your committee to use 10 rats
    per semester for demonstration experiments in a physiological psychology course. The
    students will work in groups of three; each group will be given a rat. The students will first
    perform surgery on the rats. Each animal will be anesthetized. Following standard surgical
    procedures, an incision will be made in the scalp and two holes drilled in the animal’s skull.
    Electrodes will be lowered into the brain to create lesions on each side. The animals will
    then be allowed to recover. Several weeks later, the eLects of destroying this part of the

    animal’s brain will be tested in a shuttle avoidance task in which the animals will learn
    when to cross over an electrified grid.

    The instructor acknowledges that the procedure is a common demonstration and that no
    new scientific information will be gained from the experiment. He argues, however, that
    students taking a course in physiological psychology must have the opportunity to engage
    in small animal surgery and to see firsthand the eLects of brain lesions.

  • [Solved] Manage Stress

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Could I please have help with this assignment? **files (1)** – ## summerclass.docx **## summerclass.docx** **Weekly Research Paper**– Each week there is an assigned research paper based upon the weekly topic. This research paper should be 2-3 pages in APA format, consistent with the current APA Publ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Could I please have help with this assignment?

    **files (1)**

    – ## summerclass.docx

    **## summerclass.docx**

    **Weekly Research Paper**– Each week there is an assigned research paper based upon the weekly topic. This research paper should be 2-3 pages in APA format, consistent with the current APA Publication manual (currently the 6th Edition). Remember that a research paper must have multiple resources (usually 3-4 references), of which your text may be one. This paper should reflect graduate level academic ability. Pay close attention to grammar and writing structure. This paper is due by Friday night of each week

    ![Custom Item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/manage-stress)

    [**Week Three – Managing the Symptoms of Stress**](https://ultra.content.blackboardcdn.com/ultra/uiv4000.15.0-rel.26_661ef6f)

    Due date: 6/5/26, 11:59 PM (CDT)

    Last week we researched how the body responds to stress. This week, you should research different methods of managing the impact of stress on daily life activities. What are physical, social, and psychological strategies to more adequately manage the physical and emotional impacts of stress.

    ## image1.png

    **## summerclass.docx**

    **Weekly Research Paper**– Each week there is an assigned research paper based upon the weekly topic. This research paper should be 2-3 pages in APA format, consistent with the current APA Publication manual (currently the 6th Edition). Remember that a research paper must have multiple resources (usually 3-4 references), of which your text may be one. This paper should reflect graduate level academic ability. Pay close attention to grammar and writing structure. This paper is due by Friday night of each week

    ![Custom Item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/manage-stress)

    [**Week Three – Managing the Symptoms of Stress**](https://ultra.content.blackboardcdn.com/ultra/uiv4000.15.0-rel.26_661ef6f)

    Due date: 6/5/26, 11:59 PM (CDT)

    Last week we researched how the body responds to stress. This week, you should research different methods of managing the impact of stress on daily life activities. What are physical, social, and psychological strategies to more adequately manage the physical and emotional impacts of stress.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Mid-term project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me with this **files (1)** – ## CO547MidtermProjectAssignment.pdf **## CO547MidtermProjectAssignment.pdf** Page 1 of 4 Midterm Project Assignment  Select a term or concept that is frequently used in the literature in the field of cross- cultural education/counseling. Conduct an exh…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me with this

    **files (1)**

    – ## CO547MidtermProjectAssignment.pdf

    **## CO547MidtermProjectAssignment.pdf**

    Page 1 of 4

    Midterm Project Assignment

     Select a term or concept that is frequently used in the literature in the field of cross-
    cultural education/counseling. Conduct an exhaustive literature search of the definition
    and use of the term.

     Students have the freedom to format the definition in a style that best suits their
    background, expertise, and interests however they must provide information that
    answers the following questions:

    1. Where did the term come from?
    2. What are the alternative definitions?
    3. What is the preferred definition and why?
    4. What one or two primary sources can one go to find out more about the term?

     The meaning of some terms changes over time so you may want to consider providing a
    short historical perspective in writing the definition.

     Definitions should be typed, doubled space throughout. Your assignment should be
    limited to about 2 pages (maximum of 350 – 400 words). The cover page and the
    reference page are not included in the 2-page minimum.

     The paper must be submitted in Microsoft Word; Times New Roman font; 12 pt.
    font size; margins 1” on all sides; double-spaced. The assignment should be written
    on a graduate level and references used should be cited within the discussion and
    documented in a reference list using APA styling.

     Post your paper, as a single document, to the grade book.

     Send your instructor an email when you are ready for your assignment to be graded.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c and 2F.2.h

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible

    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning (CACREP

    2F.2.a, 2F.2.c, 2F.2.h)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    Page 2 of 4

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c,

    2F.2.h)
    topic; no sense of

    purpose
    understanding of the

    assigned topic; focused

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c,
    2F.2.h)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    within the context

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural

    intelligence

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c,

    2F.2.h)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format

    Audience & Tone

    Audience appropriate and
    consistent tone

    No awareness of

    appropriate audience for
    assignment; tone is

    inappropriate

    Lacks awareness of

    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is

    inconsistent

    Effective and accurate

    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    Page 3 of 4

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    unable to write simple
    sentences

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with

    meaning

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    APA Format/Citations
    Correctly uses APA style and

    formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited

    supporting sources in-
    text; contains multiple
    errors in APA format

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually

    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate

    APA Format Guides

    The instructor has provided links to resources that provide assistance on APA format issues. Be
    sure to review these links and do not hesitate to ask for assistance if you are not sure about
    something. Ask yourself the questions below before you submit a paper. This list by no means
    addresses every possible mistake that could be made, but it will bring common mistakes to your
    attention.

     Is your paper double spaced?
     Are necessary abbreviations explained?

     Are references cited in-text present on your reference list? Remember that the website itself
    is a source.

    Page 4 of 4

     Did you include in-text citations for all the resources you used? Only references used to
    support your writing should be on your reference list.

     Numbers ten and below should be spelled out.

     Are quotes referenced correctly in-text? Quotes should be used sparingly. There should be
    no more than one quote in a three-page paper.

     Are your sources presented properly on your reference list? Pay close attention to indention
    rules and capitalization rules.

     Is your title page presented according to APA format?

     Is there a page break inserted for the reference page?

     Did you include an appropriate running heading for your paper?

     Did you proof your paper and have another person proof your paper before submitting the
    paper?

    Writing assignments are taken quite seriously. Graduate students are
    expected to write clearly and concisely, and the order of your thoughts should

    be logical. Know that each paper is read with these things in mind. If your
    writing is wordy or if you use awkward phrasing it will impact the format, style

    and grammar portion of your grade.

    **## CO547MidtermProjectAssignment.pdf**

    Page 1 of 4

    Midterm Project Assignment

     Select a term or concept that is frequently used in the literature in the field of cross-
    cultural education/counseling. Conduct an exhaustive literature search of the definition
    and use of the term.

     Students have the freedom to format the definition in a style that best suits their
    background, expertise, and interests however they must provide information that
    answers the following questions:

    1. Where did the term come from?
    2. What are the alternative definitions?
    3. What is the preferred definition and why?
    4. What one or two primary sources can one go to find out more about the term?

     The meaning of some terms changes over time so you may want to consider providing a
    short historical perspective in writing the definition.

     Definitions should be typed, doubled space throughout. Your assignment should be
    limited to about 2 pages (maximum of 350 – 400 words). The cover page and the
    reference page are not included in the 2-page minimum.

     The paper must be submitted in Microsoft Word; Times New Roman font; 12 pt.
    font size; margins 1” on all sides; double-spaced. The assignment should be written
    on a graduate level and references used should be cited within the discussion and
    documented in a reference list using APA styling.

     Post your paper, as a single document, to the grade book.

     Send your instructor an email when you are ready for your assignment to be graded.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c and 2F.2.h

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible

    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning (CACREP

    2F.2.a, 2F.2.c, 2F.2.h)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    Page 2 of 4

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c,

    2F.2.h)
    topic; no sense of

    purpose
    understanding of the

    assigned topic; focused

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c,
    2F.2.h)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    within the context

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural

    intelligence

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.a, 2F.2.c,

    2F.2.h)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format

    Audience & Tone

    Audience appropriate and
    consistent tone

    No awareness of

    appropriate audience for
    assignment; tone is

    inappropriate

    Lacks awareness of

    appropriate audience for
    the assignment; tone is

    inconsistent

    Effective and accurate

    awareness of audience;
    tone is appropriate for

    audience and
    assignment

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    Page 3 of 4

    Components Unacceptable
    (0 points)

    Revisions Required
    (5 points)

    Target
    (10 points)

    unable to write simple
    sentences

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with

    meaning

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly.

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    APA Format/Citations
    Correctly uses APA style and

    formatting

    Reference page includes
    frequent errors (more

    than 3); no attempt was
    made to cited

    supporting sources in-
    text; contains multiple
    errors in APA format

    Reference page in
    accurate and virtually

    free of errors (no more
    than 3); all supporting

    sources are cited in-text,
    but minor errors in APA

    format are present

    Reference page in
    accurate and free of
    errors; all supporting
    sources are properly

    cited in-text; APA format
    is correct and accurate

    APA Format Guides

    The instructor has provided links to resources that provide assistance on APA format issues. Be
    sure to review these links and do not hesitate to ask for assistance if you are not sure about
    something. Ask yourself the questions below before you submit a paper. This list by no means
    addresses every possible mistake that could be made, but it will bring common mistakes to your
    attention.

     Is your paper double spaced?
     Are necessary abbreviations explained?

     Are references cited in-text present on your reference list? Remember that the website itself
    is a source.

    Page 4 of 4

     Did you include in-text citations for all the resources you used? Only references used to
    support your writing should be on your reference list.

     Numbers ten and below should be spelled out.

     Are quotes referenced correctly in-text? Quotes should be used sparingly. There should be
    no more than one quote in a three-page paper.

     Are your sources presented properly on your reference list? Pay close attention to indention
    rules and capitalization rules.

     Is your title page presented according to APA format?

     Is there a page break inserted for the reference page?

     Did you include an appropriate running heading for your paper?

     Did you proof your paper and have another person proof your paper before submitting the
    paper?

    Writing assignments are taken quite seriously. Graduate students are
    expected to write clearly and concisely, and the order of your thoughts should

    be logical. Know that each paper is read with these things in mind. If your
    writing is wordy or if you use awkward phrasing it will impact the format, style

    and grammar portion of your grade.

  • [Solved] Self Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me complete this? **files (1)** – ## CO547ProjectIMPLICITSelf-AssessmentsResponse1.pdf **## CO547ProjectIMPLICITSelf-AssessmentsResponse1.pdf** Page 1 of 2 Project IMPLICIT Self-Assessments Response General Instructions  Visit Project Implicit on Harvard’s website: https://implicit…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me complete this?

    **files (1)**

    – ## CO547ProjectIMPLICITSelf-AssessmentsResponse1.pdf

    **## CO547ProjectIMPLICITSelf-AssessmentsResponse1.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Project IMPLICIT Self-Assessments Response

    General Instructions

     Visit Project Implicit on Harvard’s website:

    https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html

     Take self-assessments for four of the following: race, religion, gender, age, sexuality,

    and disability.

     Write up a brief 1-page response to your experience including your results and your

    reaction/response to this experience.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.d and 2F.2.g

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible

    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning (CACREP

    2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing (0

    points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited (5

    points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose (0 points)

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose (10 points)

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    (20 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance

    [https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html](https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html)

    Page 2 of 2

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    within the context (10
    points)

    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence (20 points)

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas (10

    points)

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs (0

    points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format (10

    points)

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure (5

    points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading (10

    points)

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered (0 points)

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning (5 points)

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly (0

    points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly (10

    points)

    **## CO547ProjectIMPLICITSelf-AssessmentsResponse1.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Project IMPLICIT Self-Assessments Response

    General Instructions

     Visit Project Implicit on Harvard’s website:

    https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html

     Take self-assessments for four of the following: race, religion, gender, age, sexuality,

    and disability.

     Write up a brief 1-page response to your experience including your results and your

    reaction/response to this experience.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.d and 2F.2.g

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible

    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning (CACREP

    2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing (0

    points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited (5

    points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough (10 points)

    Focus & Purpose
    Developed thesis and

    attentive focus on topic

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Missing thesis; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose (0 points)

    Simplistic and unfocused
    ideas; limited sense of

    purpose (10 points)

    Developed thesis;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    (20 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented
    and is placed properly

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    to enhance

    [https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html](https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html)

    Page 2 of 2

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    within the context (10
    points)

    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence (20 points)

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas (10

    points)

    Structure &
    Organization

    Text has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No paragraph structure;
    or single, rambling

    paragraph; or series of
    isolated paragraphs (0

    points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are
    missing or inappropriate

    (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format (10

    points)

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure (5

    points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading (10

    points)

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered (0 points)

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning (5 points)

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly (0

    points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly (10

    points)

  • [Solved] Amanda

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Amanda.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Post 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Antidepressantsactmainlyasmonoamineagonistsbyinterfer.docx **## Antidepressantsactmainlyasmonoamineagonistsbyinterfer.docx** · **Respond to one student. Posts are a minimum of 250 words, scholarly written, APA formatted (with some exceptions due to limitations in the D2L editor), …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Antidepressantsactmainlyasmonoamineagonistsbyinterfer.docx

    **## Antidepressantsactmainlyasmonoamineagonistsbyinterfer.docx**

    ·
    **Respond to one student. Posts are a minimum of 250 words, scholarly written, APA formatted (with some exceptions due to limitations in the D2L editor), and a minimum of 2 references (which may include the course textbook).**

    Student’s post:

    Antidepressants act mainly as monoamine agonists by interfering with serotonergic, noradrenergic, and/or dopaminergic systems, thereby reducing depression. They can be broadly divided into five major classes, each with different side effects and clinical considerations.

    Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) like fluoxetine and sertraline act on serotonin reuptake, which leads to an increase in the amount of serotonin in the synapses. They are first-line agents because of their safety and tolerability. Side effects are nausea, insomnia, sexual dysfunction and headaches. Clinicians should be vigilant for serotonin syndrome and follow the black-box warning for heightened suicidal ideation in individuals less than 25 years old (Chu & Wadhwa, 2023).

    Venlafaxine and duloxetine are both in a class of medications called serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), which block the reabsorption of both serotonin and norepinephrine. Common side effects are high blood pressure, nausea, dizziness and sexual dysfunction. It is important to avoid abrupt discontinuation of this medication because of the possibility of withdrawal syndrome and to monitor cardiovascular status (Gao et al., 2025).

    Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs) like amitriptyline are serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors with anticholinergic effects. Side effects are dry mouth, urinary retention, constipation, sedation and cardiac arrhythmias. The use of TCAs is contraindicated in overdose and should be used with caution in older adults and cardiac patients (Kamp et al., 2024).

    Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs), such as phenelzine, irreversibly inhibit monoamine oxidase, which increases serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. Side effects are orthostatic hypotension, insomnia and weight gain. One of the key factors is the potential for hypertensive crisis due to tyramine-rich food and with drug interactions (Gao et al., 2025).

    Atypical Antidepressants, such as bupropion and mirtazapine, target dopamine/norepinephrine and histamine/serotonin receptors, respectively. Bupropion has a lowering effect on seizure threshold, and mirtazapine is sedating and can lead to much weight gain. Both are employed in low-tolerance of other classes (Chu & Wadhwa, 2023).

    Knowing the differences in pharmacology, side effects, and clinical application of each antidepressant class is crucial to safe individualised patient care.

    **References**

    Chu, A., & Wadhwa, R. (2023). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In
    _StatPearls [internet]_. StatPearls Publishing.

    Kamp, C. B., Petersen, J. J., Faltermeier, P., Juul, S., Siddiqui, F., Barbateskovic, M., … & Jakobsen, J. C. (2024). Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
    _BMJ mental health_,
    _27_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730](https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730)

    Gao, K., Oruc, E. B., & Koparal, B. (2025). Pharmacological monotherapy for depressive disorders: current and future—a narrative review. Medicina, 61(4), 558.

    **## Antidepressantsactmainlyasmonoamineagonistsbyinterfer.docx**

    ·
    **Respond to one student. Posts are a minimum of 250 words, scholarly written, APA formatted (with some exceptions due to limitations in the D2L editor), and a minimum of 2 references (which may include the course textbook).**

    Student’s post:

    Antidepressants act mainly as monoamine agonists by interfering with serotonergic, noradrenergic, and/or dopaminergic systems, thereby reducing depression. They can be broadly divided into five major classes, each with different side effects and clinical considerations.

    Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) like fluoxetine and sertraline act on serotonin reuptake, which leads to an increase in the amount of serotonin in the synapses. They are first-line agents because of their safety and tolerability. Side effects are nausea, insomnia, sexual dysfunction and headaches. Clinicians should be vigilant for serotonin syndrome and follow the black-box warning for heightened suicidal ideation in individuals less than 25 years old (Chu & Wadhwa, 2023).

    Venlafaxine and duloxetine are both in a class of medications called serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), which block the reabsorption of both serotonin and norepinephrine. Common side effects are high blood pressure, nausea, dizziness and sexual dysfunction. It is important to avoid abrupt discontinuation of this medication because of the possibility of withdrawal syndrome and to monitor cardiovascular status (Gao et al., 2025).

    Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs) like amitriptyline are serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors with anticholinergic effects. Side effects are dry mouth, urinary retention, constipation, sedation and cardiac arrhythmias. The use of TCAs is contraindicated in overdose and should be used with caution in older adults and cardiac patients (Kamp et al., 2024).

    Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs), such as phenelzine, irreversibly inhibit monoamine oxidase, which increases serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. Side effects are orthostatic hypotension, insomnia and weight gain. One of the key factors is the potential for hypertensive crisis due to tyramine-rich food and with drug interactions (Gao et al., 2025).

    Atypical Antidepressants, such as bupropion and mirtazapine, target dopamine/norepinephrine and histamine/serotonin receptors, respectively. Bupropion has a lowering effect on seizure threshold, and mirtazapine is sedating and can lead to much weight gain. Both are employed in low-tolerance of other classes (Chu & Wadhwa, 2023).

    Knowing the differences in pharmacology, side effects, and clinical application of each antidepressant class is crucial to safe individualised patient care.

    **References**

    Chu, A., & Wadhwa, R. (2023). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In
    _StatPearls [internet]_. StatPearls Publishing.

    Kamp, C. B., Petersen, J. J., Faltermeier, P., Juul, S., Siddiqui, F., Barbateskovic, M., … & Jakobsen, J. C. (2024). Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
    _BMJ mental health_,
    _27_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730](https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730)

    Gao, K., Oruc, E. B., & Koparal, B. (2025). Pharmacological monotherapy for depressive disorders: current and future—a narrative review. Medicina, 61(4), 558.

  • [Solved] D3- Responses

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please follow the Instructions At least 100 words Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years and all references must be formatted in current APA style. – [\ \ ResponsetoKathrynParker.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/responsetokathrynparker-docx "ResponsetoKathrynPa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please follow the Instructions

    At least 100 words

    Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years and all references must be formatted in current APA style.

    – [\
    \
    ResponsetoKathrynParker.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/responsetokathrynparker-docx "ResponsetoKathrynParker.docx")
    – [\
    \
    RespondtoKimtreseSlaughter.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/respondtokimtreseslaughter-docx "RespondtoKimtreseSlaughter.docx")

  • [Solved] Cultural Identity Presentation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me complete this? **files (1)** – ## CO547CulturalIdentityPresentation.pdf **## CO547CulturalIdentityPresentation.pdf** Page 1 of 4 Cultural Identity Presentation General Instructions Cultural Self-Analysis – Create a PowerPoint (or similar project using a web-based platform) descri…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me complete this?

    **files (1)**

    – ## CO547CulturalIdentityPresentation.pdf

    **## CO547CulturalIdentityPresentation.pdf**

    Page 1 of 4

    Cultural Identity Presentation

    General Instructions

    Cultural Self-Analysis – Create a PowerPoint (or similar project using a web-based platform)

    describing your cultural identity and its impact on your life and interactions with others in terms

    of the following questions. Please be sure to explicitly address all of the questions in each

    section. The PowerPoint/Project should flow as a narrative story rather than a question and

    answer format.

     Race, Ethnicity, Geography, and National Origin

    What do you identify as your national background, racial group, and ethnic identity? In

    what geographic region were you reared? Are you the product of a rural or urban

    environment? What values are typical of that region? Where did your ancestors come

    from? Why and how did you or your ancestors come to the United States? In what ways

    did you/they adjust to this new home? What aspects of your/their culture of origin were

    retained? What impact does this way of entering the United States and the subsequent

    adjustment have on your culture? On your identity?

     Religion and Spirituality

    What was your religious affiliation (if any) during your childhood? How did this come to

    be in your family? How are conflicts due to religious values resolved? What do you think

    this religious preference reflects about your heritage/culture? What is your

    religious/spiritual affiliation now (if any)? If it has changed, how did that transformation

    happen?

     Gender and Sexuality

    What are your gender and sexual orientation? How are gender and orientation

    differences handled in your family of origin? How is sexism in your culture addressed?

    What behaviors, characteristics, beliefs, and values are defined by gender in your

    culture? How are gender roles divided? How is conflict between gender roles handled?

    What are some specific rules for marriage and childrearing in your culture?

     Age and Accessibility

    What is your age? Consider your interactions with your peers. Consider interactions

    with those in your age group. Give two examples of how you treat those the same age

    as your children or younger; your parents; your grandparents or older. How does your

    age affect your experience in your family of origin? How has your degree of ability and

    accessibility shaped you as a person?

     Class and Geography

    What is the socioeconomic history of your family? What role or meaning does

    Page 2 of 4

    socioeconomics have for people with backgrounds like yours? If your socioeconomic

    history is different now, how did that transformation happen? What were music, art, and

    clothing preferences like in your family of origin? What were the political preferences of

    your family of origin? How did this come to be in your family? What do you think this

    political preference reflects about your heritage/culture? What is your political preference

    now? If it has changed, how did that transformation happen?

     Personal Relationships

    Think of significant people in your life when you were a child/adolescent (i.e.

    parents/guardians, close relatives, teachers, clergy, siblings, etc.). What do you

    remember about their attitudes and feelings toward multicultural and diverse

    populations? How were racism, heterosexism, genderism, ageism, classism, etc.

    addressed? What did you overhear them saying about multicultural and diverse groups?

    Who determined the “social norms” and “rules” of your family? How were they enforced?

    How were they passed to younger members of the family/group? What events can you

    remember that involved personal contact with diverse groups? What were/are your

    thoughts, feelings, and reactions? How many of your close, long-time friends were

    members of multicultural and diverse groups? In what ways, if any, were these

    friendships different from other friendships you have with friends who reflect your own

    cultural groups? What significant events have affected your family and those closest to

    you?

     Group Membership

    When did you first become aware that you were a member of each of the groups that

    have shaped your identity, whether you chose to embrace or reject those aspects?

    Please add any other information you think is pertinent to your cultural identity.

    Each presentation should look like this:

    Introduction

    Introductory text for the entire PowerPoint/Project goes here.

    Race, Ethnicity, Geography, and National Origin

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Religion and Spirituality

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Gender and Sexuality

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Age and Accessibility

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Class and Geography

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Page 3 of 4

    Personal Relationships

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Group Membership

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Conclusion

    Concluding text for the entire PowerPoint/Project goes here.

    Please refer to the APA 6 manual for details and examples for citing references. Since this is

    primarily a personal narrative, I do not expect a reference page or citations unless you are

    drawing facts and opinions from other sources.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.b, 2F.2.e and 2F.2.g

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible

    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning (CACREP

    2F.2.b, 2F.2.e, 2F.2.g)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing (0

    points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited (5

    points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough (10 points)

    Content
    Each component of the

    cultural identity is

    thoroughly addressed and

    answers to all questions are

    provided (CACREP 2F.2.b,

    2F.2.e, 2F.2.g)

    Responses are missing
    for one or more

    components; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose (0 points)

    Responses to each
    component are included,

    but are simplistic and
    unfocused; limited sense

    of purpose (10 points)

    Developed responses to
    each component;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    (20 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.b, 2F.2.e,
    2F.2.g)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    Page 4 of 4

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    and is placed properly
    within the context (10

    points)

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence (20 points)

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas (10

    points)

    Structure &
    Organization

    Presentation has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No structure or series of
    isolated ideas (0 points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    transitions are missing or
    inappropriate (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format (10

    points)

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure (5

    points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading (10

    points)

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered (0 points)

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning (5 points)

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly (0

    points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly (10

    points)

    **## CO547CulturalIdentityPresentation.pdf**

    Page 1 of 4

    Cultural Identity Presentation

    General Instructions

    Cultural Self-Analysis – Create a PowerPoint (or similar project using a web-based platform)

    describing your cultural identity and its impact on your life and interactions with others in terms

    of the following questions. Please be sure to explicitly address all of the questions in each

    section. The PowerPoint/Project should flow as a narrative story rather than a question and

    answer format.

     Race, Ethnicity, Geography, and National Origin

    What do you identify as your national background, racial group, and ethnic identity? In

    what geographic region were you reared? Are you the product of a rural or urban

    environment? What values are typical of that region? Where did your ancestors come

    from? Why and how did you or your ancestors come to the United States? In what ways

    did you/they adjust to this new home? What aspects of your/their culture of origin were

    retained? What impact does this way of entering the United States and the subsequent

    adjustment have on your culture? On your identity?

     Religion and Spirituality

    What was your religious affiliation (if any) during your childhood? How did this come to

    be in your family? How are conflicts due to religious values resolved? What do you think

    this religious preference reflects about your heritage/culture? What is your

    religious/spiritual affiliation now (if any)? If it has changed, how did that transformation

    happen?

     Gender and Sexuality

    What are your gender and sexual orientation? How are gender and orientation

    differences handled in your family of origin? How is sexism in your culture addressed?

    What behaviors, characteristics, beliefs, and values are defined by gender in your

    culture? How are gender roles divided? How is conflict between gender roles handled?

    What are some specific rules for marriage and childrearing in your culture?

     Age and Accessibility

    What is your age? Consider your interactions with your peers. Consider interactions

    with those in your age group. Give two examples of how you treat those the same age

    as your children or younger; your parents; your grandparents or older. How does your

    age affect your experience in your family of origin? How has your degree of ability and

    accessibility shaped you as a person?

     Class and Geography

    What is the socioeconomic history of your family? What role or meaning does

    Page 2 of 4

    socioeconomics have for people with backgrounds like yours? If your socioeconomic

    history is different now, how did that transformation happen? What were music, art, and

    clothing preferences like in your family of origin? What were the political preferences of

    your family of origin? How did this come to be in your family? What do you think this

    political preference reflects about your heritage/culture? What is your political preference

    now? If it has changed, how did that transformation happen?

     Personal Relationships

    Think of significant people in your life when you were a child/adolescent (i.e.

    parents/guardians, close relatives, teachers, clergy, siblings, etc.). What do you

    remember about their attitudes and feelings toward multicultural and diverse

    populations? How were racism, heterosexism, genderism, ageism, classism, etc.

    addressed? What did you overhear them saying about multicultural and diverse groups?

    Who determined the “social norms” and “rules” of your family? How were they enforced?

    How were they passed to younger members of the family/group? What events can you

    remember that involved personal contact with diverse groups? What were/are your

    thoughts, feelings, and reactions? How many of your close, long-time friends were

    members of multicultural and diverse groups? In what ways, if any, were these

    friendships different from other friendships you have with friends who reflect your own

    cultural groups? What significant events have affected your family and those closest to

    you?

     Group Membership

    When did you first become aware that you were a member of each of the groups that

    have shaped your identity, whether you chose to embrace or reject those aspects?

    Please add any other information you think is pertinent to your cultural identity.

    Each presentation should look like this:

    Introduction

    Introductory text for the entire PowerPoint/Project goes here.

    Race, Ethnicity, Geography, and National Origin

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Religion and Spirituality

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Gender and Sexuality

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Age and Accessibility

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Class and Geography

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Page 3 of 4

    Personal Relationships

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Group Membership

    Witty and insightful text goes here.

    Conclusion

    Concluding text for the entire PowerPoint/Project goes here.

    Please refer to the APA 6 manual for details and examples for citing references. Since this is

    primarily a personal narrative, I do not expect a reference page or citations unless you are

    drawing facts and opinions from other sources.

    CACREP Standards Addressed: 2F.2.b, 2F.2.e and 2F.2.g

    Scoring Guidelines

    Points available: 100.

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    Introduction
    Establishes historical

    background and defensible

    thesis that supports a logical

    line of reasoning (CACREP

    2F.2.b, 2F.2.e, 2F.2.g)

    Underdeveloped
    introduction; reason for

    culture selection is
    unclear or missing;

    historical background is
    inaccurate or missing (0

    points)

    Coherent introduction
    that includes a reason
    for culture selection;

    historical background is
    accurate but limited (5

    points)

    Engaging, well
    developed introduction
    that includes a detailed

    reason for culture
    selection; historical

    background is accurate
    and thorough (10 points)

    Content
    Each component of the

    cultural identity is

    thoroughly addressed and

    answers to all questions are

    provided (CACREP 2F.2.b,

    2F.2.e, 2F.2.g)

    Responses are missing
    for one or more

    components; confusion
    about or

    misunderstanding of
    topic; no sense of
    purpose (0 points)

    Responses to each
    component are included,

    but are simplistic and
    unfocused; limited sense

    of purpose (10 points)

    Developed responses to
    each component;
    represents sound

    understanding of the
    assigned topic; focused

    (20 points)

    Ideas, Support &
    Development

    Supports ideas and
    reflections using specific
    and relevant examples of

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.b, 2F.2.e,
    2F.2.g)

    No or limited
    evidence/experiences

    are provided to support
    ideas and reflections;

    evidence is incomplete,
    incorrect, oversimplified,
    or disconnected from the

    context (0 points)

    Provides necessary
    evidence/experiences to

    support ideas and
    reflections; the

    importance/relevance of
    all pieces of

    evidence/experiences is
    unclear or under

    developed but does
    support the ideas and
    reflections presented

    Relies on compelling and
    detailed

    evidence/experiences to
    support ideas and

    reflections; the
    importance/relevance of

    all pieces of
    evidence/experiences is
    clearly stated; considers
    alternate interpretations
    of evidence/experiences

    Page 4 of 4

    Components Unacceptable Revisions Required Target

    and is placed properly
    within the context (10

    points)

    to enhance
    demonstration of cultural
    intelligence (20 points)

    Conclusion
    Establishes clear conclusion

    based upon

    evidence/experiences

    (CACREP 2F.2.d, 2F.2.g)

    Missing or no connection
    of evidence and analysis
    to the reflections; fails to
    summarize the argument

    coherently (0 points)

    Limited connection
    between evidence and
    analysis to reflections;

    summarizes some ideas
    and thoughts but repeats

    ideas to support
    reflections (5 points)

    Engaging, strongly
    connects evidence and
    analysis to reflections;
    summarizes the main

    topics without repeating
    previous ideas (10

    points)

    Structure &
    Organization

    Presentation has unity and
    coherence to accomplish the

    focused purpose

    No structure or series of
    isolated ideas (0 points)

    Organization is
    confusing or disjointed;

    transitions are missing or
    inappropriate (5 points)

    Clear organizational
    structure; easily followed;

    includes transitions;
    structured format (10

    points)

    Sentence Structure
    Demonstrates varied

    sentence structures to
    enhance meaning

    Contains multiple and
    serious errors of

    sentence structure: i.e.
    fragments, run-ons;

    unable to write simple
    sentences (0 points)

    Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of

    simple sentences; errors
    in sentence structure (5

    points)

    Effective and varied
    sentences; errors (if

    present) due to lack of
    careful proofreading (10

    points)

    Mechanics
    The text has few

    grammatical, spelling and
    punctuation errors.

    Frequent errors in
    agreement, verb tense,

    spelling, and
    capitalization; intrusive

    and/or inaccurate
    punctuation;

    communication is
    hindered (0 points)

    Contains several errors
    in agreement, verb

    tense, spelling,
    capitalization, and

    punctuation (up to 6);
    errors interfere with
    meaning (5 points)

    Virtually free of errors in
    agreement, verb tense,
    spelling, capitalization,
    and punctuation (no

    more than 3); errors do
    not interfere with

    meaning (10 points)

    Vocabulary & Word
    Usage

    Uses extended and
    appropriate vocabulary

    Vocabulary is
    unsophisticated; or

    subject specific
    vocabulary or

    sophisticated vocabulary
    used incorrectly (0

    points)

    Proper, but simple
    vocabulary used; subject
    specific vocabulary used

    infrequently (5 points)

    Vocabulary is varied,
    specific and appropriate;

    uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly (10

    points)

  • [Solved] A3-Article Critique

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow the template and grading rubric Follow instruction **files (6)** – ## VIDEO.docx – ## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx – ## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc – ## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf – ## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf – Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf **## VIDEO.docx** **VID…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow the template and grading rubric

    Follow instruction

    **files (6)**

    – ## VIDEO.docx

    – ## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx

    – ## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc

    – ## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf

    – ## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf

    – Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf

    **## VIDEO.docx**

    **VIDEO**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200

    **## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx**

    EDCO 747

    **Article Critique Template**

    Format your article critiques in a double-spaced Word document as follows:

    | |
    | — |
    | Title page<br>2–4-paragraph summary of the article<br>The last paragraph denotes the analysis section and begins with the words,<br>“The following information depicts how this study uses the ______________________ approach:”<br>and is followed with bulleted statements, just like Creswell & Poth’s work in the textbook.<br>· First evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Second evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Third evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Fourth evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>Reference page |

    **## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    EDCO 747

    **Article Critique Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Creswell and Poth (2023) state, “We have always felt that the best way to learn how to write a qualitative study is to view a number of published qualitative journal articles and to look closely at the way they were composed” (p. 135). Thus, you will be given the opportunity to examine articles about two different research approaches and write critiques about each of them in two separate modules/weeks (the first one in module 3:week 3 and the second in module 5: week 5).

    **Instructions**

    First, you must select a research approach that you would like to understand better from the Creswell and Poth textbook:

    · Narrative (Appendix A)

    · Phenomenological (Appendix B)

    · Grounded Theory (Appendix C)

    · Ethnography (Appendix D)

    · Case Study (Appendix E)

    Choose one of the above research approaches for the first critique and select a different approach for the second critique. You cannot do the same approach for both critiques.

    After selecting the approach you want to study, read the corresponding article (e.g. one of the appendices in the textbook) for that approach and the accompanying textbook summary of the approach you selected (pp. 135-153).

    Next, you must choose a research article that corresponds to your selected research approach from the lists in Chapter 4 of the text.

    · Narrative (pp. 86-87)

    · Phenomenology (pp. 95-96)

    · Grounded Theory (pp. 105-106)

    · Ethnography (pp. 113-114)

    · Case Study (pp.122-123)

    NOTE: You MUST choose an article from the text, found in the list above.

    Critique this article by following Creswell and Poth’s written model and the format in the template provided. Reread how Creswell and Poth carefully interject quotes from the article into their clear and concise article summaries to help you write your own summary.

    · Remember:
    **The First Article Critique** is due in module 3: week 3 and the
    **Second Article Critique** is due in module 5: week 5

    · Please see the
    **Article Critique Template** for specifications on length

    · Follow APA formatting

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Pertinent
    Information

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Well-constructed,
    pertinent, and
    concise
    information is
    present for all
    content areas in
    the table for all
    five research
    approaches

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Information is
    mostly well
    constructed,
    pertinent, and
    concise for all
    content areas in
    the table for all
    five research
    approaches

    16 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Information is
    constructed with
    some pertinence
    for all content
    areas in the table
    for all five
    research
    approaches

    15 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Information is
    poorly constructed
    with limited
    pertinence for all
    content areas in the
    table for all five
    research
    approaches

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    20 pts

    Comprehension
    of Approaches

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Table clearly
    shows a solid
    understanding of
    the differences in
    each of the five
    approaches
    through careful
    word choice

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    Table adequately
    shows an
    understanding of
    the differences in
    each of the five
    approaches
    through adequate
    word choice

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    Table somewhat
    shows an
    understanding of
    the differences of
    each of the five
    approaches
    through imprecise
    word choice

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Table vaguely
    shows a limited
    understanding of
    the differences of
    each of the five
    approaches through
    imprecise word
    choice

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    15 pts

    Format 10 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Table uses clear
    and original
    writing with short
    phrases or short
    sentences when
    necessary; is
    free of spelling
    errors

    9 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    The majority of the
    table uses clear
    and original writing
    with short phrases
    or short
    sentences;
    contains minimal
    spelling errors

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    Table uses a fair
    amount of clear
    and original
    writing, short
    phrases or short
    sentences;
    spelling errors are
    present.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Table uses a limited
    amount of clear and
    original writing,
    short phrases or
    short sentences;
    spelling errors are
    pervasive

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    10 pts

    APA 5 to >4 pts

    Advanced

    Citations are
    appropriately
    implemented and
    are formatted per
    current APA.
    Overall paper is
    formatted per
    current APA.

    4 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Minor errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current
    APA formatting of
    citations. Few
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    A fair number of
    errors regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Several
    errors in paper
    format per APA.

    2 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current APA
    formatting of
    citations. Multiple
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    5 pts

    Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Total Points: 50

    Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    **## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Summary
    Section

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Summary is
    well-constructed
    and uses clear, and
    concise language;
    includes important
    article details,
    properly cited, and
    explains key
    components of the
    approach.

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    Summary is fairly
    well-constructed
    and uses language
    that is fairly clear
    and concise;
    includes most of
    the pertinent details
    of the article and
    explains key
    components of the
    approach fairly well
    with some
    appropriate
    citations.

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    Summary is
    somewhat well
    constructed; uses
    language that has
    some clarity and
    conciseness;
    includes some of
    the pertinent details
    of the article and
    key components of
    the approach
    somewhat with a
    few appropriate
    citations.

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Summary is poorly
    constructed; uses
    language that lacks
    clarity and
    conciseness;
    missing key details
    of the article and
    fails to explain key
    components of the
    approach well;
    lacks adequate
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    15 pts

    Analysis
    Section

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Analysis is well
    written and in the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains all
    required elements
    (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and at
    least 4 statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Analysis is
    adequately written,
    mostly in the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains
    most required
    elements (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and
    some statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    16 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Analysis is written
    in some of the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains
    some required
    elements
    (introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and a
    few statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    15 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Analysis is vaguely
    written and in some
    of the candidate’s
    own words;
    contains a few
    required elements
    (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information);
    vaguely delineates
    how the article fits
    the research
    design.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    20 pts

    Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Mechanics
    &
    Composition

    5 to >4 pts

    Advanced

    Paper is free of
    errors in spelling
    and grammar.
    Doctoral-level
    writing style is
    evident with
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    4 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Few errors in
    spelling and
    grammar.
    Doctoral-level
    writing style is
    evident, displaying
    basic composition
    with most of the
    following elements:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    A fair amount of
    errors in spelling,
    grammar, or
    punctuation.
    Writing includes
    several errors in
    some of the
    following
    categories:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures, logical
    progression, and
    transitions.

    2 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors in
    spelling, and
    grammar. Writing
    includes pervasive
    errors in the
    following
    categories:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    5 pts

    APA 10 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Citations are
    appropriately
    implemented and
    are formatted per
    current APA.
    Overall paper is
    formatted per
    current APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentions,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    9 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    Minor errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current APA
    formatting of
    citations. Few
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA: running head,
    page numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentions,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    A fair amount of
    errors regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Several
    errors in paper
    format per APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentations,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Multiple
    errors in paper
    format per APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentations,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 50

    Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)

    **## VIDEO.docx**

    **VIDEO**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200

    **## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx**

    EDCO 747

    **Article Critique Template**

    Format your article critiques in a double-spaced Word document as follows:

    | |
    | — |
    | Title page<br>2–4-paragraph summary of the article<br>The last paragraph denotes the analysis section and begins with the words,<br>“The following information depicts how this study uses the ______________________ approach:”<br>and is followed with bulleted statements, just like Creswell & Poth’s work in the textbook.<br>· First evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Second evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Third evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Fourth evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>Reference page |

    **## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    EDCO 747

    **Article Critique Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Creswell and Poth (2023) state, “We have always felt that the best way to learn how to write a qualitative study is to view a number of published qualitative journal articles and to look closely at the way they were composed” (p. 135). Thus, you will be given the opportunity to examine articles about two different research approaches and write critiques about each of them in two separate modules/weeks (the first one in module 3:week 3 and the second in module 5: week 5).

    **Instructions**

    First, you must select a research approach that you would like to understand better from the Creswell and Poth textbook:

    · Narrative (Appendix A)

    · Phenomenological (Appendix B)

    · Grounded Theory (Appendix C)

    · Ethnography (Appendix D)

    · Case Study (Appendix E)

    Choose one of the above research approaches for the first critique and select a different approach for the second critique. You cannot do the same approach for both critiques.

    After selecting the approach you want to study, read the corresponding article (e.g. one of the appendices in the textbook) for that approach and the accompanying textbook summary of the approach you selected (pp. 135-153).

    Next, you must choose a research article that corresponds to your selected research approach from the lists in Chapter 4 of the text.

    · Narrative (pp. 86-87)

    · Phenomenology (pp. 95-96)

    · Grounded Theory (pp. 105-106)

    · Ethnography (pp. 113-114)

    · Case Study (pp.122-123)

    NOTE: You MUST choose an article from the text, found in the list above.

    Critique this article by following Creswell and Poth’s written model and the format in the template provided. Reread how Creswell and Poth carefully interject quotes from the article into their clear and concise article summaries to help you write your own summary.

    · Remember:
    **The First Article Critique** is due in module 3: week 3 and the
    **Second Article Critique** is due in module 5: week 5

    · Please see the
    **Article Critique Template** for specifications on length

    · Follow APA formatting

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Pertinent
    Information

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Well-constructed,
    pertinent, and
    concise
    information is
    present for all
    content areas in
    the table for all
    five research
    approaches

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Information is
    mostly well
    constructed,
    pertinent, and
    concise for all
    content areas in
    the table for all
    five research
    approaches

    16 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Information is
    constructed with
    some pertinence
    for all content
    areas in the table
    for all five
    research
    approaches

    15 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Information is
    poorly constructed
    with limited
    pertinence for all
    content areas in the
    table for all five
    research
    approaches

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    20 pts

    Comprehension
    of Approaches

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Table clearly
    shows a solid
    understanding of
    the differences in
    each of the five
    approaches
    through careful
    word choice

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    Table adequately
    shows an
    understanding of
    the differences in
    each of the five
    approaches
    through adequate
    word choice

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    Table somewhat
    shows an
    understanding of
    the differences of
    each of the five
    approaches
    through imprecise
    word choice

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Table vaguely
    shows a limited
    understanding of
    the differences of
    each of the five
    approaches through
    imprecise word
    choice

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    15 pts

    Format 10 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Table uses clear
    and original
    writing with short
    phrases or short
    sentences when
    necessary; is
    free of spelling
    errors

    9 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    The majority of the
    table uses clear
    and original writing
    with short phrases
    or short
    sentences;
    contains minimal
    spelling errors

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    Table uses a fair
    amount of clear
    and original
    writing, short
    phrases or short
    sentences;
    spelling errors are
    present.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Table uses a limited
    amount of clear and
    original writing,
    short phrases or
    short sentences;
    spelling errors are
    pervasive

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    10 pts

    APA 5 to >4 pts

    Advanced

    Citations are
    appropriately
    implemented and
    are formatted per
    current APA.
    Overall paper is
    formatted per
    current APA.

    4 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Minor errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current
    APA formatting of
    citations. Few
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    A fair number of
    errors regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Several
    errors in paper
    format per APA.

    2 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current APA
    formatting of
    citations. Multiple
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    5 pts

    Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Total Points: 50

    Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    **## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Summary
    Section

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Summary is
    well-constructed
    and uses clear, and
    concise language;
    includes important
    article details,
    properly cited, and
    explains key
    components of the
    approach.

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    Summary is fairly
    well-constructed
    and uses language
    that is fairly clear
    and concise;
    includes most of
    the pertinent details
    of the article and
    explains key
    components of the
    approach fairly well
    with some
    appropriate
    citations.

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    Summary is
    somewhat well
    constructed; uses
    language that has
    some clarity and
    conciseness;
    includes some of
    the pertinent details
    of the article and
    key components of
    the approach
    somewhat with a
    few appropriate
    citations.

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Summary is poorly
    constructed; uses
    language that lacks
    clarity and
    conciseness;
    missing key details
    of the article and
    fails to explain key
    components of the
    approach well;
    lacks adequate
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    15 pts

    Analysis
    Section

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Analysis is well
    written and in the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains all
    required elements
    (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and at
    least 4 statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Analysis is
    adequately written,
    mostly in the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains
    most required
    elements (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and
    some statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    16 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Analysis is written
    in some of the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains
    some required
    elements
    (introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and a
    few statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    15 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Analysis is vaguely
    written and in some
    of the candidate’s
    own words;
    contains a few
    required elements
    (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information);
    vaguely delineates
    how the article fits
    the research
    design.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    20 pts

    Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Mechanics
    &
    Composition

    5 to >4 pts

    Advanced

    Paper is free of
    errors in spelling
    and grammar.
    Doctoral-level
    writing style is
    evident with
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    4 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Few errors in
    spelling and
    grammar.
    Doctoral-level
    writing style is
    evident, displaying
    basic composition
    with most of the
    following elements:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    A fair amount of
    errors in spelling,
    grammar, or
    punctuation.
    Writing includes
    several errors in
    some of the
    following
    categories:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures, logical
    progression, and
    transitions.

    2 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors in
    spelling, and
    grammar. Writing
    includes pervasive
    errors in the
    following
    categories:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    5 pts

    APA 10 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Citations are
    appropriately
    implemented and
    are formatted per
    current APA.
    Overall paper is
    formatted per
    current APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentions,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    9 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    Minor errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current APA
    formatting of
    citations. Few
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA: running head,
    page numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentions,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    A fair amount of
    errors regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Several
    errors in paper
    format per APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentations,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Multiple
    errors in paper
    format per APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentations,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 50

    Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)

    **## VIDEO.docx**

    **VIDEO**

    https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200

    **## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx**

    EDCO 747

    **Article Critique Template**

    Format your article critiques in a double-spaced Word document as follows:

    | |
    | — |
    | Title page<br>2–4-paragraph summary of the article<br>The last paragraph denotes the analysis section and begins with the words,<br>“The following information depicts how this study uses the ______________________ approach:”<br>and is followed with bulleted statements, just like Creswell & Poth’s work in the textbook.<br>· First evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Second evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Third evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Fourth evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>Reference page |

    **## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc**

    EDCO 747

    **Article Critique Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Creswell and Poth (2023) state, “We have always felt that the best way to learn how to write a qualitative study is to view a number of published qualitative journal articles and to look closely at the way they were composed” (p. 135). Thus, you will be given the opportunity to examine articles about two different research approaches and write critiques about each of them in two separate modules/weeks (the first one in module 3:week 3 and the second in module 5: week 5).

    **Instructions**

    First, you must select a research approach that you would like to understand better from the Creswell and Poth textbook:

    · Narrative (Appendix A)

    · Phenomenological (Appendix B)

    · Grounded Theory (Appendix C)

    · Ethnography (Appendix D)

    · Case Study (Appendix E)

    Choose one of the above research approaches for the first critique and select a different approach for the second critique. You cannot do the same approach for both critiques.

    After selecting the approach you want to study, read the corresponding article (e.g. one of the appendices in the textbook) for that approach and the accompanying textbook summary of the approach you selected (pp. 135-153).

    Next, you must choose a research article that corresponds to your selected research approach from the lists in Chapter 4 of the text.

    · Narrative (pp. 86-87)

    · Phenomenology (pp. 95-96)

    · Grounded Theory (pp. 105-106)

    · Ethnography (pp. 113-114)

    · Case Study (pp.122-123)

    NOTE: You MUST choose an article from the text, found in the list above.

    Critique this article by following Creswell and Poth’s written model and the format in the template provided. Reread how Creswell and Poth carefully interject quotes from the article into their clear and concise article summaries to help you write your own summary.

    · Remember:
    **The First Article Critique** is due in module 3: week 3 and the
    **Second Article Critique** is due in module 5: week 5

    · Please see the
    **Article Critique Template** for specifications on length

    · Follow APA formatting

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Pertinent
    Information

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Well-constructed,
    pertinent, and
    concise
    information is
    present for all
    content areas in
    the table for all
    five research
    approaches

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Information is
    mostly well
    constructed,
    pertinent, and
    concise for all
    content areas in
    the table for all
    five research
    approaches

    16 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Information is
    constructed with
    some pertinence
    for all content
    areas in the table
    for all five
    research
    approaches

    15 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Information is
    poorly constructed
    with limited
    pertinence for all
    content areas in the
    table for all five
    research
    approaches

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    20 pts

    Comprehension
    of Approaches

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Table clearly
    shows a solid
    understanding of
    the differences in
    each of the five
    approaches
    through careful
    word choice

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    Table adequately
    shows an
    understanding of
    the differences in
    each of the five
    approaches
    through adequate
    word choice

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    Table somewhat
    shows an
    understanding of
    the differences of
    each of the five
    approaches
    through imprecise
    word choice

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Table vaguely
    shows a limited
    understanding of
    the differences of
    each of the five
    approaches through
    imprecise word
    choice

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    15 pts

    Format 10 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Table uses clear
    and original
    writing with short
    phrases or short
    sentences when
    necessary; is
    free of spelling
    errors

    9 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    The majority of the
    table uses clear
    and original writing
    with short phrases
    or short
    sentences;
    contains minimal
    spelling errors

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    Table uses a fair
    amount of clear
    and original
    writing, short
    phrases or short
    sentences;
    spelling errors are
    present.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Table uses a limited
    amount of clear and
    original writing,
    short phrases or
    short sentences;
    spelling errors are
    pervasive

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    10 pts

    APA 5 to >4 pts

    Advanced

    Citations are
    appropriately
    implemented and
    are formatted per
    current APA.
    Overall paper is
    formatted per
    current APA.

    4 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Minor errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current
    APA formatting of
    citations. Few
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    A fair number of
    errors regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Several
    errors in paper
    format per APA.

    2 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current APA
    formatting of
    citations. Multiple
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    Not
    present

    5 pts

    Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Total Points: 50

    Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    **## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Summary
    Section

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    Summary is
    well-constructed
    and uses clear, and
    concise language;
    includes important
    article details,
    properly cited, and
    explains key
    components of the
    approach.

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    Summary is fairly
    well-constructed
    and uses language
    that is fairly clear
    and concise;
    includes most of
    the pertinent details
    of the article and
    explains key
    components of the
    approach fairly well
    with some
    appropriate
    citations.

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    Summary is
    somewhat well
    constructed; uses
    language that has
    some clarity and
    conciseness;
    includes some of
    the pertinent details
    of the article and
    key components of
    the approach
    somewhat with a
    few appropriate
    citations.

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Summary is poorly
    constructed; uses
    language that lacks
    clarity and
    conciseness;
    missing key details
    of the article and
    fails to explain key
    components of the
    approach well;
    lacks adequate
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    15 pts

    Analysis
    Section

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Analysis is well
    written and in the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains all
    required elements
    (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and at
    least 4 statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Analysis is
    adequately written,
    mostly in the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains
    most required
    elements (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and
    some statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    16 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Analysis is written
    in some of the
    candidate’s own
    words; contains
    some required
    elements
    (introduction &
    bulleted
    information) and a
    few statements
    delineating how the
    article fits the
    research design.

    15 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Analysis is vaguely
    written and in some
    of the candidate’s
    own words;
    contains a few
    required elements
    (correct
    introduction &
    bulleted
    information);
    vaguely delineates
    how the article fits
    the research
    design.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    20 pts

    Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Mechanics
    &
    Composition

    5 to >4 pts

    Advanced

    Paper is free of
    errors in spelling
    and grammar.
    Doctoral-level
    writing style is
    evident with
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    4 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Few errors in
    spelling and
    grammar.
    Doctoral-level
    writing style is
    evident, displaying
    basic composition
    with most of the
    following elements:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    A fair amount of
    errors in spelling,
    grammar, or
    punctuation.
    Writing includes
    several errors in
    some of the
    following
    categories:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures, logical
    progression, and
    transitions.

    2 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors in
    spelling, and
    grammar. Writing
    includes pervasive
    errors in the
    following
    categories:
    coherent, cohesive,
    effective sentence/
    paragraph
    structures; logical
    progression; and
    transitions.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    5 pts

    APA 10 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Citations are
    appropriately
    implemented and
    are formatted per
    current APA.
    Overall paper is
    formatted per
    current APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentions,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    9 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    Minor errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or current APA
    formatting of
    citations. Few
    errors in paper
    format per current
    APA: running head,
    page numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentions,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    A fair amount of
    errors regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Several
    errors in paper
    format per APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentations,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Pervasive errors
    regarding
    appropriate
    implementation
    and/or APA
    formatting of
    citations. Multiple
    errors in paper
    format per APA:
    running head, page
    numbers, title
    page, spacing,
    indentations,
    margins, reference
    page and
    headings.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    10 pts

    Total Points: 50

    Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

    **Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)

  • [Solved] WK 7_Assessing Postmortem damage

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Watch the National Geographic Documentary “ [Secrets of the Body Farm](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiIBpHC7Lfo)” 1) Summarize the importance and utility of combining information from multiple forensic experts (such as a forensic anthropologist and a forensic entomologist). 2) Find one outside so…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Watch the National Geographic Documentary “ [Secrets of the Body Farm](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiIBpHC7Lfo)”

    1) Summarize the importance and utility of combining information from multiple forensic experts (such as a forensic anthropologist and a forensic entomologist).

    2) Find one outside source that relates one of these two specialty areas to a specific forensic investigation

    3) Describe one of the cases discussed in the video and its outcome. How was the conclusions reached? Describe how knowledge gained from the body farm has contributed to the development of forensic knowledge.