Executive Solution Overview
Follow the template and grading rubric Follow instruction **files (6)** – ## VIDEO.docx – ## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx – ## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc – ## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf – ## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf – Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf **## VIDEO.docx** **VID…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Follow the template and grading rubric
Follow instruction
**files (6)**
– ## VIDEO.docx
– ## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx
– ## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc
– ## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf
– ## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf
– Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf
**## VIDEO.docx**
**VIDEO**
https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200
**## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx**
EDCO 747
**Article Critique Template**
Format your article critiques in a double-spaced Word document as follows:
| |
| — |
| Title page<br>2–4-paragraph summary of the article<br>The last paragraph denotes the analysis section and begins with the words,<br>“The following information depicts how this study uses the ______________________ approach:”<br>and is followed with bulleted statements, just like Creswell & Poth’s work in the textbook.<br>· First evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Second evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Third evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Fourth evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>Reference page |
**## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc**
EDCO 747
**Article Critique Assignment Instructions**
**Overview**
Creswell and Poth (2023) state, “We have always felt that the best way to learn how to write a qualitative study is to view a number of published qualitative journal articles and to look closely at the way they were composed” (p. 135). Thus, you will be given the opportunity to examine articles about two different research approaches and write critiques about each of them in two separate modules/weeks (the first one in module 3:week 3 and the second in module 5: week 5).
**Instructions**
First, you must select a research approach that you would like to understand better from the Creswell and Poth textbook:
· Narrative (Appendix A)
· Phenomenological (Appendix B)
· Grounded Theory (Appendix C)
· Ethnography (Appendix D)
· Case Study (Appendix E)
Choose one of the above research approaches for the first critique and select a different approach for the second critique. You cannot do the same approach for both critiques.
After selecting the approach you want to study, read the corresponding article (e.g. one of the appendices in the textbook) for that approach and the accompanying textbook summary of the approach you selected (pp. 135-153).
Next, you must choose a research article that corresponds to your selected research approach from the lists in Chapter 4 of the text.
· Narrative (pp. 86-87)
· Phenomenology (pp. 95-96)
· Grounded Theory (pp. 105-106)
· Ethnography (pp. 113-114)
· Case Study (pp.122-123)
NOTE: You MUST choose an article from the text, found in the list above.
Critique this article by following Creswell and Poth’s written model and the format in the template provided. Reread how Creswell and Poth carefully interject quotes from the article into their clear and concise article summaries to help you write your own summary.
· Remember:
**The First Article Critique** is due in module 3: week 3 and the
**Second Article Critique** is due in module 5: week 5
· Please see the
**Article Critique Template** for specifications on length
· Follow APA formatting
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Pertinent
Information
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Well-constructed,
pertinent, and
concise
information is
present for all
content areas in
the table for all
five research
approaches
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Information is
mostly well
constructed,
pertinent, and
concise for all
content areas in
the table for all
five research
approaches
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Information is
constructed with
some pertinence
for all content
areas in the table
for all five
research
approaches
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Information is
poorly constructed
with limited
pertinence for all
content areas in the
table for all five
research
approaches
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
20 pts
Comprehension
of Approaches
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Table clearly
shows a solid
understanding of
the differences in
each of the five
approaches
through careful
word choice
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Table adequately
shows an
understanding of
the differences in
each of the five
approaches
through adequate
word choice
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Table somewhat
shows an
understanding of
the differences of
each of the five
approaches
through imprecise
word choice
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table vaguely
shows a limited
understanding of
the differences of
each of the five
approaches through
imprecise word
choice
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Table uses clear
and original
writing with short
phrases or short
sentences when
necessary; is
free of spelling
errors
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
The majority of the
table uses clear
and original writing
with short phrases
or short
sentences;
contains minimal
spelling errors
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Table uses a fair
amount of clear
and original
writing, short
phrases or short
sentences;
spelling errors are
present.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table uses a limited
amount of clear and
original writing,
short phrases or
short sentences;
spelling errors are
pervasive
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
10 pts
APA 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Citations are
appropriately
implemented and
are formatted per
current APA.
Overall paper is
formatted per
current APA.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Minor errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current
APA formatting of
citations. Few
errors in paper
format per current
APA.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair number of
errors regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Several
errors in paper
format per APA.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current APA
formatting of
citations. Multiple
errors in paper
format per current
APA.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
5 pts
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 50
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
**## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Summary
Section
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Summary is
well-constructed
and uses clear, and
concise language;
includes important
article details,
properly cited, and
explains key
components of the
approach.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Summary is fairly
well-constructed
and uses language
that is fairly clear
and concise;
includes most of
the pertinent details
of the article and
explains key
components of the
approach fairly well
with some
appropriate
citations.
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Summary is
somewhat well
constructed; uses
language that has
some clarity and
conciseness;
includes some of
the pertinent details
of the article and
key components of
the approach
somewhat with a
few appropriate
citations.
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Summary is poorly
constructed; uses
language that lacks
clarity and
conciseness;
missing key details
of the article and
fails to explain key
components of the
approach well;
lacks adequate
citations.
0 pts
Not
present
15 pts
Analysis
Section
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Analysis is well
written and in the
candidate’s own
words; contains all
required elements
(correct
introduction &
bulleted
information) and at
least 4 statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Analysis is
adequately written,
mostly in the
candidate’s own
words; contains
most required
elements (correct
introduction &
bulleted
information) and
some statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Analysis is written
in some of the
candidate’s own
words; contains
some required
elements
(introduction &
bulleted
information) and a
few statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Analysis is vaguely
written and in some
of the candidate’s
own words;
contains a few
required elements
(correct
introduction &
bulleted
information);
vaguely delineates
how the article fits
the research
design.
0 pts
Not
present
20 pts
Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics
&
Composition
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Paper is free of
errors in spelling
and grammar.
Doctoral-level
writing style is
evident with
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Few errors in
spelling and
grammar.
Doctoral-level
writing style is
evident, displaying
basic composition
with most of the
following elements:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair amount of
errors in spelling,
grammar, or
punctuation.
Writing includes
several errors in
some of the
following
categories:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures, logical
progression, and
transitions.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors in
spelling, and
grammar. Writing
includes pervasive
errors in the
following
categories:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
0 pts
Not
present
5 pts
APA 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Citations are
appropriately
implemented and
are formatted per
current APA.
Overall paper is
formatted per
current APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentions,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Minor errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current APA
formatting of
citations. Few
errors in paper
format per current
APA: running head,
page numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentions,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
A fair amount of
errors regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Several
errors in paper
format per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentations,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Multiple
errors in paper
format per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentations,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
0 pts
Not
present
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
**Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)
**Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)
**## VIDEO.docx**
**VIDEO**
https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200
**## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx**
EDCO 747
**Article Critique Template**
Format your article critiques in a double-spaced Word document as follows:
| |
| — |
| Title page<br>2–4-paragraph summary of the article<br>The last paragraph denotes the analysis section and begins with the words,<br>“The following information depicts how this study uses the ______________________ approach:”<br>and is followed with bulleted statements, just like Creswell & Poth’s work in the textbook.<br>· First evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Second evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Third evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Fourth evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>Reference page |
**## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc**
EDCO 747
**Article Critique Assignment Instructions**
**Overview**
Creswell and Poth (2023) state, “We have always felt that the best way to learn how to write a qualitative study is to view a number of published qualitative journal articles and to look closely at the way they were composed” (p. 135). Thus, you will be given the opportunity to examine articles about two different research approaches and write critiques about each of them in two separate modules/weeks (the first one in module 3:week 3 and the second in module 5: week 5).
**Instructions**
First, you must select a research approach that you would like to understand better from the Creswell and Poth textbook:
· Narrative (Appendix A)
· Phenomenological (Appendix B)
· Grounded Theory (Appendix C)
· Ethnography (Appendix D)
· Case Study (Appendix E)
Choose one of the above research approaches for the first critique and select a different approach for the second critique. You cannot do the same approach for both critiques.
After selecting the approach you want to study, read the corresponding article (e.g. one of the appendices in the textbook) for that approach and the accompanying textbook summary of the approach you selected (pp. 135-153).
Next, you must choose a research article that corresponds to your selected research approach from the lists in Chapter 4 of the text.
· Narrative (pp. 86-87)
· Phenomenology (pp. 95-96)
· Grounded Theory (pp. 105-106)
· Ethnography (pp. 113-114)
· Case Study (pp.122-123)
NOTE: You MUST choose an article from the text, found in the list above.
Critique this article by following Creswell and Poth’s written model and the format in the template provided. Reread how Creswell and Poth carefully interject quotes from the article into their clear and concise article summaries to help you write your own summary.
· Remember:
**The First Article Critique** is due in module 3: week 3 and the
**Second Article Critique** is due in module 5: week 5
· Please see the
**Article Critique Template** for specifications on length
· Follow APA formatting
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Pertinent
Information
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Well-constructed,
pertinent, and
concise
information is
present for all
content areas in
the table for all
five research
approaches
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Information is
mostly well
constructed,
pertinent, and
concise for all
content areas in
the table for all
five research
approaches
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Information is
constructed with
some pertinence
for all content
areas in the table
for all five
research
approaches
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Information is
poorly constructed
with limited
pertinence for all
content areas in the
table for all five
research
approaches
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
20 pts
Comprehension
of Approaches
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Table clearly
shows a solid
understanding of
the differences in
each of the five
approaches
through careful
word choice
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Table adequately
shows an
understanding of
the differences in
each of the five
approaches
through adequate
word choice
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Table somewhat
shows an
understanding of
the differences of
each of the five
approaches
through imprecise
word choice
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table vaguely
shows a limited
understanding of
the differences of
each of the five
approaches through
imprecise word
choice
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Table uses clear
and original
writing with short
phrases or short
sentences when
necessary; is
free of spelling
errors
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
The majority of the
table uses clear
and original writing
with short phrases
or short
sentences;
contains minimal
spelling errors
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Table uses a fair
amount of clear
and original
writing, short
phrases or short
sentences;
spelling errors are
present.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table uses a limited
amount of clear and
original writing,
short phrases or
short sentences;
spelling errors are
pervasive
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
10 pts
APA 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Citations are
appropriately
implemented and
are formatted per
current APA.
Overall paper is
formatted per
current APA.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Minor errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current
APA formatting of
citations. Few
errors in paper
format per current
APA.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair number of
errors regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Several
errors in paper
format per APA.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current APA
formatting of
citations. Multiple
errors in paper
format per current
APA.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
5 pts
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 50
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
**## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Summary
Section
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Summary is
well-constructed
and uses clear, and
concise language;
includes important
article details,
properly cited, and
explains key
components of the
approach.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Summary is fairly
well-constructed
and uses language
that is fairly clear
and concise;
includes most of
the pertinent details
of the article and
explains key
components of the
approach fairly well
with some
appropriate
citations.
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Summary is
somewhat well
constructed; uses
language that has
some clarity and
conciseness;
includes some of
the pertinent details
of the article and
key components of
the approach
somewhat with a
few appropriate
citations.
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Summary is poorly
constructed; uses
language that lacks
clarity and
conciseness;
missing key details
of the article and
fails to explain key
components of the
approach well;
lacks adequate
citations.
0 pts
Not
present
15 pts
Analysis
Section
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Analysis is well
written and in the
candidate’s own
words; contains all
required elements
(correct
introduction &
bulleted
information) and at
least 4 statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Analysis is
adequately written,
mostly in the
candidate’s own
words; contains
most required
elements (correct
introduction &
bulleted
information) and
some statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Analysis is written
in some of the
candidate’s own
words; contains
some required
elements
(introduction &
bulleted
information) and a
few statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Analysis is vaguely
written and in some
of the candidate’s
own words;
contains a few
required elements
(correct
introduction &
bulleted
information);
vaguely delineates
how the article fits
the research
design.
0 pts
Not
present
20 pts
Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics
&
Composition
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Paper is free of
errors in spelling
and grammar.
Doctoral-level
writing style is
evident with
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Few errors in
spelling and
grammar.
Doctoral-level
writing style is
evident, displaying
basic composition
with most of the
following elements:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair amount of
errors in spelling,
grammar, or
punctuation.
Writing includes
several errors in
some of the
following
categories:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures, logical
progression, and
transitions.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors in
spelling, and
grammar. Writing
includes pervasive
errors in the
following
categories:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
0 pts
Not
present
5 pts
APA 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Citations are
appropriately
implemented and
are formatted per
current APA.
Overall paper is
formatted per
current APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentions,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Minor errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current APA
formatting of
citations. Few
errors in paper
format per current
APA: running head,
page numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentions,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
A fair amount of
errors regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Several
errors in paper
format per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentations,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Multiple
errors in paper
format per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentations,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
0 pts
Not
present
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
**Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)
**## VIDEO.docx**
**VIDEO**
https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200
**## ArticleCritiqueTemplate.docx**
EDCO 747
**Article Critique Template**
Format your article critiques in a double-spaced Word document as follows:
| |
| — |
| Title page<br>2–4-paragraph summary of the article<br>The last paragraph denotes the analysis section and begins with the words,<br>“The following information depicts how this study uses the ______________________ approach:”<br>and is followed with bulleted statements, just like Creswell & Poth’s work in the textbook.<br>· First evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Second evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Third evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>· Fourth evidence statement (with or without citation from textbook)<br>Reference page |
**## ArticleCritiqueAssignmentInstructions.doc**
EDCO 747
**Article Critique Assignment Instructions**
**Overview**
Creswell and Poth (2023) state, “We have always felt that the best way to learn how to write a qualitative study is to view a number of published qualitative journal articles and to look closely at the way they were composed” (p. 135). Thus, you will be given the opportunity to examine articles about two different research approaches and write critiques about each of them in two separate modules/weeks (the first one in module 3:week 3 and the second in module 5: week 5).
**Instructions**
First, you must select a research approach that you would like to understand better from the Creswell and Poth textbook:
· Narrative (Appendix A)
· Phenomenological (Appendix B)
· Grounded Theory (Appendix C)
· Ethnography (Appendix D)
· Case Study (Appendix E)
Choose one of the above research approaches for the first critique and select a different approach for the second critique. You cannot do the same approach for both critiques.
After selecting the approach you want to study, read the corresponding article (e.g. one of the appendices in the textbook) for that approach and the accompanying textbook summary of the approach you selected (pp. 135-153).
Next, you must choose a research article that corresponds to your selected research approach from the lists in Chapter 4 of the text.
· Narrative (pp. 86-87)
· Phenomenology (pp. 95-96)
· Grounded Theory (pp. 105-106)
· Ethnography (pp. 113-114)
· Case Study (pp.122-123)
NOTE: You MUST choose an article from the text, found in the list above.
Critique this article by following Creswell and Poth’s written model and the format in the template provided. Reread how Creswell and Poth carefully interject quotes from the article into their clear and concise article summaries to help you write your own summary.
· Remember:
**The First Article Critique** is due in module 3: week 3 and the
**Second Article Critique** is due in module 5: week 5
· Please see the
**Article Critique Template** for specifications on length
· Follow APA formatting
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Pertinent
Information
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Well-constructed,
pertinent, and
concise
information is
present for all
content areas in
the table for all
five research
approaches
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Information is
mostly well
constructed,
pertinent, and
concise for all
content areas in
the table for all
five research
approaches
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Information is
constructed with
some pertinence
for all content
areas in the table
for all five
research
approaches
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Information is
poorly constructed
with limited
pertinence for all
content areas in the
table for all five
research
approaches
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
20 pts
Comprehension
of Approaches
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Table clearly
shows a solid
understanding of
the differences in
each of the five
approaches
through careful
word choice
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Table adequately
shows an
understanding of
the differences in
each of the five
approaches
through adequate
word choice
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Table somewhat
shows an
understanding of
the differences of
each of the five
approaches
through imprecise
word choice
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table vaguely
shows a limited
understanding of
the differences of
each of the five
approaches through
imprecise word
choice
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Table uses clear
and original
writing with short
phrases or short
sentences when
necessary; is
free of spelling
errors
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
The majority of the
table uses clear
and original writing
with short phrases
or short
sentences;
contains minimal
spelling errors
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Table uses a fair
amount of clear
and original
writing, short
phrases or short
sentences;
spelling errors are
present.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table uses a limited
amount of clear and
original writing,
short phrases or
short sentences;
spelling errors are
pervasive
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
10 pts
APA 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Citations are
appropriately
implemented and
are formatted per
current APA.
Overall paper is
formatted per
current APA.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Minor errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current
APA formatting of
citations. Few
errors in paper
format per current
APA.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair number of
errors regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Several
errors in paper
format per APA.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current APA
formatting of
citations. Multiple
errors in paper
format per current
APA.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
5 pts
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 50
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
**## ArticleCritiqueGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Summary
Section
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Summary is
well-constructed
and uses clear, and
concise language;
includes important
article details,
properly cited, and
explains key
components of the
approach.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Summary is fairly
well-constructed
and uses language
that is fairly clear
and concise;
includes most of
the pertinent details
of the article and
explains key
components of the
approach fairly well
with some
appropriate
citations.
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Summary is
somewhat well
constructed; uses
language that has
some clarity and
conciseness;
includes some of
the pertinent details
of the article and
key components of
the approach
somewhat with a
few appropriate
citations.
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Summary is poorly
constructed; uses
language that lacks
clarity and
conciseness;
missing key details
of the article and
fails to explain key
components of the
approach well;
lacks adequate
citations.
0 pts
Not
present
15 pts
Analysis
Section
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Analysis is well
written and in the
candidate’s own
words; contains all
required elements
(correct
introduction &
bulleted
information) and at
least 4 statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Analysis is
adequately written,
mostly in the
candidate’s own
words; contains
most required
elements (correct
introduction &
bulleted
information) and
some statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Analysis is written
in some of the
candidate’s own
words; contains
some required
elements
(introduction &
bulleted
information) and a
few statements
delineating how the
article fits the
research design.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Analysis is vaguely
written and in some
of the candidate’s
own words;
contains a few
required elements
(correct
introduction &
bulleted
information);
vaguely delineates
how the article fits
the research
design.
0 pts
Not
present
20 pts
Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics
&
Composition
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Paper is free of
errors in spelling
and grammar.
Doctoral-level
writing style is
evident with
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Few errors in
spelling and
grammar.
Doctoral-level
writing style is
evident, displaying
basic composition
with most of the
following elements:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair amount of
errors in spelling,
grammar, or
punctuation.
Writing includes
several errors in
some of the
following
categories:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures, logical
progression, and
transitions.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors in
spelling, and
grammar. Writing
includes pervasive
errors in the
following
categories:
coherent, cohesive,
effective sentence/
paragraph
structures; logical
progression; and
transitions.
0 pts
Not
present
5 pts
APA 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Citations are
appropriately
implemented and
are formatted per
current APA.
Overall paper is
formatted per
current APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentions,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Minor errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or current APA
formatting of
citations. Few
errors in paper
format per current
APA: running head,
page numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentions,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
A fair amount of
errors regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Several
errors in paper
format per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentations,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors
regarding
appropriate
implementation
and/or APA
formatting of
citations. Multiple
errors in paper
format per APA:
running head, page
numbers, title
page, spacing,
indentations,
margins, reference
page and
headings.
0 pts
Not
present
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Article Critique Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
**Read-CreswellPothChapters4.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-creswellpothchapters4-pdf-10557133)
Leave a Reply