Category: Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

  • [Solved] Contraception / IVF

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    answer the following: 01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual intercourse. 02. Difference between reproduction and procreation. 03. What are the two dimensions of intimacy? 04. Contraception: – What is it? – What is the intention of contraception? – Describe the three types of artificial con…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    answer the following:

    01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual intercourse.
    02. Difference between reproduction and procreation.
    03. What are the two dimensions of intimacy?
    04. Contraception:
    – What is it?
    – What is the intention of contraception?
    – Describe the three types of artificial contraception.
    – Risks / Side effects
    – Bioethical analysis and unfair dynamics of artificial contraception.
    05. Non-Therapeutic sterilization; bioethical analysis
    06. Principle of double effect; explain
    07. Bioethical analysis of:
    – Ectopic pregnancy
    – Cancerous reproductive system with pregnancy
    08. In Vitro Fertilization(IVF):
    – Process
    – Bioethical analysis of IVF
    09. Bioethical analysis of “to have a child”
    10. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #: 40, 41, 42, 48, 52, 53.
    11. https://www.usccb.org/resources/ethical-religious-directives-catholic-health-service-sixth-edition-2016-06_0.pdf

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – The post is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
    – If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style.

  • [Solved] W3A

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## SSW3A.docx – ## EvidenceMatrix.docx **## SSW3A.docx** For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem. **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & M…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## SSW3A.docx

    – ## EvidenceMatrix.docx

    **## SSW3A.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & MEDICATION SAFETY IN OLDER ADULTS**

    A. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.

    B. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/w3a-20975419)

    ## image1.png

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

    **## SSW3A.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & MEDICATION SAFETY IN OLDER ADULTS**

    A. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.

    B. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/w3a-20975419)

    ## image1.png

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

    **## SSW3A.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & MEDICATION SAFETY IN OLDER ADULTS**

    A. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.

    B. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/w3a-20975419)

    ## image1.png

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

  • [Solved] Nursing ASSIGNMENT 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## QIAsignment3Inst.docx **## QIAsignment3Inst.docx** **_Assignment 3_** **_Intervention Study Proposal Related to CMS Quality Indicator_** Building on the action plan developed in the previous module to meet the CMS Quality Indicator selected. · What evidence will need to be collect…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## QIAsignment3Inst.docx

    **## QIAsignment3Inst.docx**

    **_Assignment 3_**

    **_Intervention Study Proposal Related to CMS Quality Indicator_**

    Building on the action plan developed in the previous module to meet the CMS Quality Indicator selected.

    · What evidence will need to be collected?

    · Design a pilot study that could lead to a full intervention study to facilitate the evidence gathering.

    · Include the problem being studied, purpose of the study, research question(s), innovation being recommended and strategies to measure its effectiveness.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    **## QIAsignment3Inst.docx**

    **_Assignment 3_**

    **_Intervention Study Proposal Related to CMS Quality Indicator_**

    Building on the action plan developed in the previous module to meet the CMS Quality Indicator selected.

    · What evidence will need to be collected?

    · Design a pilot study that could lead to a full intervention study to facilitate the evidence gathering.

    · Include the problem being studied, purpose of the study, research question(s), innovation being recommended and strategies to measure its effectiveness.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

  • [Solved] Concept Map

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Concept Map.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering writing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Reply to classmate

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please write a 300 word reply to my classmate, her discussion post is below. APA format. NO AI. My professor is a stickler for AI. PLEASE NO AI. scholarly written, APA formatted and a minimum of 3 references (which may include the course textbook). "NSG 500: Module 3 Discussion In my long-term care …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please write a 300 word reply to my classmate, her discussion post is below. APA format. NO AI. My professor is a stickler for AI. PLEASE NO AI. scholarly written, APA formatted and a minimum of 3 references (which may include the course textbook).

    "NSG 500: Module 3 Discussion

    In my long-term care setting, pain assessment is part of nearly everything we do. Our residents are all older adults, and many of them have some degree of cognitive decline, so we cannot take a generalized approach. Documenting pain every shift is facility policy. The way we assess depends heavily on how well the resident can communicate on that particular day. Some mornings they are sharp and logical, but by evening they may not be.

    For residents who are still cognitively intact, we stick to the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). This scale is widely used, so our residents are often familiar with it. It is quick and does not interrupt the flow of care. Once dementia starts to interfere with abstract thinking, the NRS becomes more difficult to use because it becomes more of a guessing game than a reliable measurement. Recent research in nursing homes shows exactly that. Self-report becomes less dependable as dementia progresses, and staff have to lean more on behavioral cues and structured observations (Resnick et al., 2026).

    When someone has mild cognitive impairment, expressive aphasia, or even just struggles to find the right words, we use the Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. It is not perfect, but it gives the resident something to point to. I have had many residents who cannot give a number for their pain rating, but they can identify with one of the faces.

    Once dementia reaches a point where communication is almost gone, we rely on the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale. There are five behavioral categories that give us a structured way to interpret what is being observed: breathing, facial expressions, body language, negative vocalizations, and consolability. That gives us a structured way to interpret what is being observed, such as grimacing, stiff posture, sudden vocalizations inconsistent with the situation. Resnick et al. (2026) stress how important tools like PAINAD are in nursing homes, because pain in dementia is often misunderstood and seen as a behavior.

    **Using Scores in Treatment Plans**

    Our pain management protocol is conservative. Many of our residents juggle a long list of medications and comorbidities. For mild to moderate pain, we usually start with acetaminophen, unless contraindicated due to kidney or liver dysfunction. For localized pain, like arthritic joints, we use topical agents like Biofreeze or Bengay. This protocol works well for most of our residents. Interventions can be escalated if these do not effectively reduce or control their pain.

    After any intervention, staff reassess within 30 to 60 minutes, for a follow-up pain score. This tells us if we are effectively controlling their pain, or if we need to reevaluate.

    **Likes and Dislikes**

    What I like about the NRS and FACES is that they allow the resident to speak for themselves. The gold standard for pain rating is the patient self-report. The downside is that these tools are not useful when cognition declines.

    PAINAD fills the gap but is not considered foolproof. Behaviors like pacing or calling out can come from pain, but they can also come from anxiety, boredom, or even overstimulation. It does take clinical judgment to sort it out. Given the evidence, it is still the best option we have for residents who cannot tell us what hurts (Resnick et al., 2026).

    Another layer we cannot ignore is equity. I stumbled upon this in my research and it really caught my attention. Rambachan et al. (2023) found that pain assessment disparities persist across race, ethnicity, and language groups even in settings with standardized tools. In long-term care, so much depends on observation. Considering our own biases, assumptions, and communication habits is essential because it can shape the way we interpret pain.

    Finally, Argoff (2025) makes a point that resonated with me. Pain management has to be both evidence-based and patient-centered. That means we have to slow down long enough to match the tool to the resident. It means reassessing, adjusting, and not assuming that silence equals comfort.

    In the end, I think these scales do their job when we use them thoughtfully. No tool is perfect, but when we pair the right scale with the right resident, and follow up consistently, we get a clear picture of what they are experiencing.

    **References**

    Argoff, C. E. (2025). Evidence-based patient-centered pain management and the American Academy of Pain Medicine. _Pain Medicine, 26_(5), 229-230. [https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf021](https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf021)

    Rambachan, A., Noorulhunda, H., Fang, M. C., Bazinski, M., Manuel, S., Hubbard, C., & Prasad, P. (2023). Pain assessment disparities by race, ethnicity, and language in adult hospitalized patients. _Pain Management Nursing, 24_(4), 393-399 _._ [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2023.03.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2023.03.012)

    Resnick, B., Galik, E., McPherson, R., Kim, N., Levy, S., & Zhu, S. (2026). Pain assessment and management among nursing home residents living with dementia. _Pain Management Nursing, 27_(1), 3-9. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.04.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.04.005)"

  • [Solved] Nursing homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (4)** – ## MovieChoicesforReflectionPaper.docx – ## ReflectionPaperTemplate1.docx – ## ReflectionPaper.docx – ## ADNG2400PsychosocialNursingReflectionPaperRubric.docx **## MovieChoicesforReflectionPaper.docx** Movie choices for Reflection Paper · A Beautiful Mind (2001) Math Genius with Schi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (4)**

    – ## MovieChoicesforReflectionPaper.docx

    – ## ReflectionPaperTemplate1.docx

    – ## ReflectionPaper.docx

    – ## ADNG2400PsychosocialNursingReflectionPaperRubric.docx

    **## MovieChoicesforReflectionPaper.docx**

    Movie choices for Reflection Paper

    · A Beautiful Mind (2001) Math Genius with Schizophrenia

    · Patch Adams (1998) Depression

    · One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975) Psychotic Disorder (main character) other characters schizophrenia, Dissociative disorder, multiple personality, paranoia, PTSD

    · Girl, Interrupted (1999) Borderline Personality Disorder with suicide attempt

    · Silver Linings Playbook (2012) Bipolar Disorder

    **## ReflectionPaperTemplate1.docx**

    Reflection Paper

    Psychosocial 2400

    | |
    | — |
    | Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses: |

    | |
    | — |
    | Reflection: |

    | |
    | — |
    | Nursing Care Plan: |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Nursing Intervention | Rationale & Evaluations |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Reference page is a separate**

    **## ReflectionPaper.docx**

    **Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Assignment**

    **Psychosocial Nursing 2400- This is an outcome assignment. You must pass with 80% to pass this course; You will have 2 attempts.**

    This assignment is designed to help you reflect on your mental health clinical experience while applying the nursing process, ethical principles, therapeutic communication, and evidence-based nursing care. The goal is to consider how nurses advocate for and support clients experiencing mental health challenges and their families.

    **Assignment Instructions**

    Write a
    **500-word reflection paper** based on one of the following experiences:

    · Your
    **mental health clinical rotation**

    · A
    **Med/Surg or other clinical patient** with psychosocial or mental health concerns

    · An approved
    **movie option listed in D2L** _(only if you have not yet attended your mental health rotation or cared for an appropriate patient)_

    Your paper should be organized using the following headings:
    **You MUST use the Template provided!**

    1. Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses

    2. Reflection

    3. Nursing Care Plan

    4. Nursing Intervention Rationales & Evaluations

    5. References
    _(separate page)_

    ·
    **PART 1. Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses (Approx. 125 words)**

    Provide a brief introduction to your client without using identifying information. Include:

    · Age range and relevant background information

    · Psychiatric diagnosis/diagnoses

    · Pertinent physical health diagnoses

    · Clinical setting or situation

    · Then identify your
    **top two priority nursing diagnoses** from your clinical observation sheet.

    **(Requirements for Nursing Diagnoses)**

    · Include:

    · One
    **3-part nursing diagnosis**

    · One
    **“Risk For” nursing diagnosis**

    · Nursing diagnoses must be written in correct NANDA format.

    · “Risk For” diagnoses should
    **not include evidence** because the problem has not yet occurred.

    ·
    **Include Rationale**

    Briefly explain why you selected each diagnosis using:

    · Client observations

    · Patient statements or quotations

    · Staff or family reports

    · Behavioral findings

    · Assessment data

    **PART 2. Reflection (Approx. 250 words)**

    Reflect on how nurses can provide the best possible care for this client and their family.

    Address the following questions:

    · What barriers may interfere with implementing your nursing interventions?

    · What ethical principles apply to this situation?

    · Do you believe the client is receiving the best possible care? Why or why not?

    · What additional supports, therapies, or community resources may benefit the client and family?

    · How can nurses advocate for improved mental health care?

    You may discuss:

    · Therapeutic communication

    · Family or group therapy

    · Community mental health resources

    · Integrative treatment options

    · Interdisciplinary collaboration

    · Social determinants of health

    **Ethical Principles to Consider**

    ·
    **Autonomy** – Respecting the patient’s right to make decisions

    ·
    **Beneficence** – Promoting the patient’s well-being

    ·
    **Nonmaleficence** – Avoiding harm

    ·
    **Justice** – Providing fair and equal care

    ·
    **Fidelity** – Maintaining commitment and trust

    ·
    **Veracity** – Communicating truthfully

    ·
    **PART 3: Reference Page (on separate page)**

    **## ADNG2400PsychosocialNursingReflectionPaperRubric.docx**

    ADNG 2400 Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Rubric

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceptional: Professional, clear, accurate, confident. Organization and mechanics are impeccable. Well-organized and easily understood. Shows reflective insight based on evidence and clear plans for implementation. No improvement needed.** | **Proficient: Professional, clear, accurate, confident with OCCASIONAL errors that are easily corrected. Is somewhat insightful.** | **Basic/Needs Improvement: MOSTLY professional and accurate. PARTIAL demonstration of professional understanding, sometimes unclear. Displays lack of confidence or inefficiencies in writing. SEVERAL areas of correction are required.** | **Below basic: SOMEWHAT professional and accurate. MINIMAL demonstration of professional understanding, frequently unclear. MULTIPLE areas of correction are required. Mid-term Personal Improvement Plan required** | **Marginal/Unacceptable: Unprofessional, inaccurate, unclear. Does not demonstrate understanding of concept. Lacks professionalism. NUMEROUS areas of correction that require resubmission. Any portion of the assignment that receives a 0 does not meet minimum requirements and must be resubmitted to earn a grade for the assignment.** |
    | |
    | Introduction <br>(5 points) | 1 pt. Basic client information (gender, age) without identifiers is provided. <br>3 pts. Psychiatric diagnosis(es) provided<br>1 pt. Physiological diagnosis(es) provided OR clarification that no pertinent physiological diagnoses exist for this client. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Diagnosis <br>(10 points) | 5 pts. A correctly formatted, three-part, NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc. <br>5 pts. A second correctly formatted, three-part OR a two-part (“risk for”) NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc.<br>Total length of this section is approximately 125 words. | 8-9 pts. One part of the 3-part nursing diagnosis and/or 2-part diagnosis is missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is somewhat unclear. | 6-7 pts. Two parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is difficult to follow. | 4-6 pts. Several parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is very unclear. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Reflection <br>(12 points) | 3 pts. Ideas for best care are provided and clearly relate to the chosen nursing diagnoses. <br>3 pts. At least two resources are referred to; one can be the textbook. <br>3 pts. Opportunities and barriers are discussed, community resources, etc. There is clear evidence of thought related to the possibilities for this patient. <br>3 pts. At least one ethical principle is chosen and briefly explained to support the proposal. <br>Total length of this section is approximately 250 words. | 10-11 pts. One or two items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 8-9 pts. Three or four items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 6-7 pts. Five or six items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Care Plan <br>(8 points) | 2 pts. A primary diagnosis is identified, and rationale is provided. Nursing Care Plan clearly relates to diagnoses and reflection above. <br>2 pts. Patient goal(s) provided. Uses SMART format. <br>2 pts. Interventions and rationales are clear and follow the formatting and style of Nurse Labs example. <br>2 pts. Evaluation methods are explained. It is clear how the nurse will know when the goal has been met | 6-7 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 4-5 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2-3 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Grammar & Mechanics<br>(5 points) | 2 pts. Follows all guidelines for spelling, usage, mechanics, grammar, etc. There are no mechanical errors. <br>2 pts. APA format is Times New Roman 12, double-spaced, standard margins, paragraphs indented, and APA headings (as provided) are used. (No abstract or over page is required). References (minimum of 2) are cited correctly. <br>1 pt. Length is 500 words. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires restructuring of paper and resubmission. <br>Was NOT created in required template |

    **## ADNG2400PsychosocialNursingReflectionPaperRubric.docx**

    ADNG 2400 Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Rubric

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceptional: Professional, clear, accurate, confident. Organization and mechanics are impeccable. Well-organized and easily understood. Shows reflective insight based on evidence and clear plans for implementation. No improvement needed.** | **Proficient: Professional, clear, accurate, confident with OCCASIONAL errors that are easily corrected. Is somewhat insightful.** | **Basic/Needs Improvement: MOSTLY professional and accurate. PARTIAL demonstration of professional understanding, sometimes unclear. Displays lack of confidence or inefficiencies in writing. SEVERAL areas of correction are required.** | **Below basic: SOMEWHAT professional and accurate. MINIMAL demonstration of professional understanding, frequently unclear. MULTIPLE areas of correction are required. Mid-term Personal Improvement Plan required** | **Marginal/Unacceptable: Unprofessional, inaccurate, unclear. Does not demonstrate understanding of concept. Lacks professionalism. NUMEROUS areas of correction that require resubmission. Any portion of the assignment that receives a 0 does not meet minimum requirements and must be resubmitted to earn a grade for the assignment.** |
    | |
    | Introduction <br>(5 points) | 1 pt. Basic client information (gender, age) without identifiers is provided. <br>3 pts. Psychiatric diagnosis(es) provided<br>1 pt. Physiological diagnosis(es) provided OR clarification that no pertinent physiological diagnoses exist for this client. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Diagnosis <br>(10 points) | 5 pts. A correctly formatted, three-part, NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc. <br>5 pts. A second correctly formatted, three-part OR a two-part (“risk for”) NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc.<br>Total length of this section is approximately 125 words. | 8-9 pts. One part of the 3-part nursing diagnosis and/or 2-part diagnosis is missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is somewhat unclear. | 6-7 pts. Two parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is difficult to follow. | 4-6 pts. Several parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is very unclear. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Reflection <br>(12 points) | 3 pts. Ideas for best care are provided and clearly relate to the chosen nursing diagnoses. <br>3 pts. At least two resources are referred to; one can be the textbook. <br>3 pts. Opportunities and barriers are discussed, community resources, etc. There is clear evidence of thought related to the possibilities for this patient. <br>3 pts. At least one ethical principle is chosen and briefly explained to support the proposal. <br>Total length of this section is approximately 250 words. | 10-11 pts. One or two items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 8-9 pts. Three or four items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 6-7 pts. Five or six items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Care Plan <br>(8 points) | 2 pts. A primary diagnosis is identified, and rationale is provided. Nursing Care Plan clearly relates to diagnoses and reflection above. <br>2 pts. Patient goal(s) provided. Uses SMART format. <br>2 pts. Interventions and rationales are clear and follow the formatting and style of Nurse Labs example. <br>2 pts. Evaluation methods are explained. It is clear how the nurse will know when the goal has been met | 6-7 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 4-5 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2-3 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Grammar & Mechanics<br>(5 points) | 2 pts. Follows all guidelines for spelling, usage, mechanics, grammar, etc. There are no mechanical errors. <br>2 pts. APA format is Times New Roman 12, double-spaced, standard margins, paragraphs indented, and APA headings (as provided) are used. (No abstract or over page is required). References (minimum of 2) are cited correctly. <br>1 pt. Length is 500 words. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires restructuring of paper and resubmission. <br>Was NOT created in required template |

    **## MovieChoicesforReflectionPaper.docx**

    Movie choices for Reflection Paper

    · A Beautiful Mind (2001) Math Genius with Schizophrenia

    · Patch Adams (1998) Depression

    · One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975) Psychotic Disorder (main character) other characters schizophrenia, Dissociative disorder, multiple personality, paranoia, PTSD

    · Girl, Interrupted (1999) Borderline Personality Disorder with suicide attempt

    · Silver Linings Playbook (2012) Bipolar Disorder

    **## ReflectionPaperTemplate1.docx**

    Reflection Paper

    Psychosocial 2400

    | |
    | — |
    | Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses: |

    | |
    | — |
    | Reflection: |

    | |
    | — |
    | Nursing Care Plan: |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Nursing Intervention | Rationale & Evaluations |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Reference page is a separate**

    **## ReflectionPaper.docx**

    **Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Assignment**

    **Psychosocial Nursing 2400- This is an outcome assignment. You must pass with 80% to pass this course; You will have 2 attempts.**

    This assignment is designed to help you reflect on your mental health clinical experience while applying the nursing process, ethical principles, therapeutic communication, and evidence-based nursing care. The goal is to consider how nurses advocate for and support clients experiencing mental health challenges and their families.

    **Assignment Instructions**

    Write a
    **500-word reflection paper** based on one of the following experiences:

    · Your
    **mental health clinical rotation**

    · A
    **Med/Surg or other clinical patient** with psychosocial or mental health concerns

    · An approved
    **movie option listed in D2L** _(only if you have not yet attended your mental health rotation or cared for an appropriate patient)_

    Your paper should be organized using the following headings:
    **You MUST use the Template provided!**

    1. Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses

    2. Reflection

    3. Nursing Care Plan

    4. Nursing Intervention Rationales & Evaluations

    5. References
    _(separate page)_

    ·
    **PART 1. Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses (Approx. 125 words)**

    Provide a brief introduction to your client without using identifying information. Include:

    · Age range and relevant background information

    · Psychiatric diagnosis/diagnoses

    · Pertinent physical health diagnoses

    · Clinical setting or situation

    · Then identify your
    **top two priority nursing diagnoses** from your clinical observation sheet.

    **(Requirements for Nursing Diagnoses)**

    · Include:

    · One
    **3-part nursing diagnosis**

    · One
    **“Risk For” nursing diagnosis**

    · Nursing diagnoses must be written in correct NANDA format.

    · “Risk For” diagnoses should
    **not include evidence** because the problem has not yet occurred.

    ·
    **Include Rationale**

    Briefly explain why you selected each diagnosis using:

    · Client observations

    · Patient statements or quotations

    · Staff or family reports

    · Behavioral findings

    · Assessment data

    **PART 2. Reflection (Approx. 250 words)**

    Reflect on how nurses can provide the best possible care for this client and their family.

    Address the following questions:

    · What barriers may interfere with implementing your nursing interventions?

    · What ethical principles apply to this situation?

    · Do you believe the client is receiving the best possible care? Why or why not?

    · What additional supports, therapies, or community resources may benefit the client and family?

    · How can nurses advocate for improved mental health care?

    You may discuss:

    · Therapeutic communication

    · Family or group therapy

    · Community mental health resources

    · Integrative treatment options

    · Interdisciplinary collaboration

    · Social determinants of health

    **Ethical Principles to Consider**

    ·
    **Autonomy** – Respecting the patient’s right to make decisions

    ·
    **Beneficence** – Promoting the patient’s well-being

    ·
    **Nonmaleficence** – Avoiding harm

    ·
    **Justice** – Providing fair and equal care

    ·
    **Fidelity** – Maintaining commitment and trust

    ·
    **Veracity** – Communicating truthfully

    ·
    **PART 3: Reference Page (on separate page)**

    **## ADNG2400PsychosocialNursingReflectionPaperRubric.docx**

    ADNG 2400 Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Rubric

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceptional: Professional, clear, accurate, confident. Organization and mechanics are impeccable. Well-organized and easily understood. Shows reflective insight based on evidence and clear plans for implementation. No improvement needed.** | **Proficient: Professional, clear, accurate, confident with OCCASIONAL errors that are easily corrected. Is somewhat insightful.** | **Basic/Needs Improvement: MOSTLY professional and accurate. PARTIAL demonstration of professional understanding, sometimes unclear. Displays lack of confidence or inefficiencies in writing. SEVERAL areas of correction are required.** | **Below basic: SOMEWHAT professional and accurate. MINIMAL demonstration of professional understanding, frequently unclear. MULTIPLE areas of correction are required. Mid-term Personal Improvement Plan required** | **Marginal/Unacceptable: Unprofessional, inaccurate, unclear. Does not demonstrate understanding of concept. Lacks professionalism. NUMEROUS areas of correction that require resubmission. Any portion of the assignment that receives a 0 does not meet minimum requirements and must be resubmitted to earn a grade for the assignment.** |
    | |
    | Introduction <br>(5 points) | 1 pt. Basic client information (gender, age) without identifiers is provided. <br>3 pts. Psychiatric diagnosis(es) provided<br>1 pt. Physiological diagnosis(es) provided OR clarification that no pertinent physiological diagnoses exist for this client. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Diagnosis <br>(10 points) | 5 pts. A correctly formatted, three-part, NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc. <br>5 pts. A second correctly formatted, three-part OR a two-part (“risk for”) NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc.<br>Total length of this section is approximately 125 words. | 8-9 pts. One part of the 3-part nursing diagnosis and/or 2-part diagnosis is missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is somewhat unclear. | 6-7 pts. Two parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is difficult to follow. | 4-6 pts. Several parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is very unclear. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Reflection <br>(12 points) | 3 pts. Ideas for best care are provided and clearly relate to the chosen nursing diagnoses. <br>3 pts. At least two resources are referred to; one can be the textbook. <br>3 pts. Opportunities and barriers are discussed, community resources, etc. There is clear evidence of thought related to the possibilities for this patient. <br>3 pts. At least one ethical principle is chosen and briefly explained to support the proposal. <br>Total length of this section is approximately 250 words. | 10-11 pts. One or two items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 8-9 pts. Three or four items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 6-7 pts. Five or six items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Care Plan <br>(8 points) | 2 pts. A primary diagnosis is identified, and rationale is provided. Nursing Care Plan clearly relates to diagnoses and reflection above. <br>2 pts. Patient goal(s) provided. Uses SMART format. <br>2 pts. Interventions and rationales are clear and follow the formatting and style of Nurse Labs example. <br>2 pts. Evaluation methods are explained. It is clear how the nurse will know when the goal has been met | 6-7 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 4-5 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2-3 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Grammar & Mechanics<br>(5 points) | 2 pts. Follows all guidelines for spelling, usage, mechanics, grammar, etc. There are no mechanical errors. <br>2 pts. APA format is Times New Roman 12, double-spaced, standard margins, paragraphs indented, and APA headings (as provided) are used. (No abstract or over page is required). References (minimum of 2) are cited correctly. <br>1 pt. Length is 500 words. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires restructuring of paper and resubmission. <br>Was NOT created in required template |

    **## MovieChoicesforReflectionPaper.docx**

    Movie choices for Reflection Paper

    · A Beautiful Mind (2001) Math Genius with Schizophrenia

    · Patch Adams (1998) Depression

    · One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975) Psychotic Disorder (main character) other characters schizophrenia, Dissociative disorder, multiple personality, paranoia, PTSD

    · Girl, Interrupted (1999) Borderline Personality Disorder with suicide attempt

    · Silver Linings Playbook (2012) Bipolar Disorder

    **## ReflectionPaperTemplate1.docx**

    Reflection Paper

    Psychosocial 2400

    | |
    | — |
    | Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses: |

    | |
    | — |
    | Reflection: |

    | |
    | — |
    | Nursing Care Plan: |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Nursing Intervention | Rationale & Evaluations |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Reference page is a separate**

    **## ReflectionPaper.docx**

    **Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Assignment**

    **Psychosocial Nursing 2400- This is an outcome assignment. You must pass with 80% to pass this course; You will have 2 attempts.**

    This assignment is designed to help you reflect on your mental health clinical experience while applying the nursing process, ethical principles, therapeutic communication, and evidence-based nursing care. The goal is to consider how nurses advocate for and support clients experiencing mental health challenges and their families.

    **Assignment Instructions**

    Write a
    **500-word reflection paper** based on one of the following experiences:

    · Your
    **mental health clinical rotation**

    · A
    **Med/Surg or other clinical patient** with psychosocial or mental health concerns

    · An approved
    **movie option listed in D2L** _(only if you have not yet attended your mental health rotation or cared for an appropriate patient)_

    Your paper should be organized using the following headings:
    **You MUST use the Template provided!**

    1. Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses

    2. Reflection

    3. Nursing Care Plan

    4. Nursing Intervention Rationales & Evaluations

    5. References
    _(separate page)_

    ·
    **PART 1. Introduction and Nursing Diagnoses (Approx. 125 words)**

    Provide a brief introduction to your client without using identifying information. Include:

    · Age range and relevant background information

    · Psychiatric diagnosis/diagnoses

    · Pertinent physical health diagnoses

    · Clinical setting or situation

    · Then identify your
    **top two priority nursing diagnoses** from your clinical observation sheet.

    **(Requirements for Nursing Diagnoses)**

    · Include:

    · One
    **3-part nursing diagnosis**

    · One
    **“Risk For” nursing diagnosis**

    · Nursing diagnoses must be written in correct NANDA format.

    · “Risk For” diagnoses should
    **not include evidence** because the problem has not yet occurred.

    ·
    **Include Rationale**

    Briefly explain why you selected each diagnosis using:

    · Client observations

    · Patient statements or quotations

    · Staff or family reports

    · Behavioral findings

    · Assessment data

    **PART 2. Reflection (Approx. 250 words)**

    Reflect on how nurses can provide the best possible care for this client and their family.

    Address the following questions:

    · What barriers may interfere with implementing your nursing interventions?

    · What ethical principles apply to this situation?

    · Do you believe the client is receiving the best possible care? Why or why not?

    · What additional supports, therapies, or community resources may benefit the client and family?

    · How can nurses advocate for improved mental health care?

    You may discuss:

    · Therapeutic communication

    · Family or group therapy

    · Community mental health resources

    · Integrative treatment options

    · Interdisciplinary collaboration

    · Social determinants of health

    **Ethical Principles to Consider**

    ·
    **Autonomy** – Respecting the patient’s right to make decisions

    ·
    **Beneficence** – Promoting the patient’s well-being

    ·
    **Nonmaleficence** – Avoiding harm

    ·
    **Justice** – Providing fair and equal care

    ·
    **Fidelity** – Maintaining commitment and trust

    ·
    **Veracity** – Communicating truthfully

    ·
    **PART 3: Reference Page (on separate page)**

    **## ADNG2400PsychosocialNursingReflectionPaperRubric.docx**

    ADNG 2400 Psychosocial Nursing Reflection Paper Rubric

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceptional: Professional, clear, accurate, confident. Organization and mechanics are impeccable. Well-organized and easily understood. Shows reflective insight based on evidence and clear plans for implementation. No improvement needed.** | **Proficient: Professional, clear, accurate, confident with OCCASIONAL errors that are easily corrected. Is somewhat insightful.** | **Basic/Needs Improvement: MOSTLY professional and accurate. PARTIAL demonstration of professional understanding, sometimes unclear. Displays lack of confidence or inefficiencies in writing. SEVERAL areas of correction are required.** | **Below basic: SOMEWHAT professional and accurate. MINIMAL demonstration of professional understanding, frequently unclear. MULTIPLE areas of correction are required. Mid-term Personal Improvement Plan required** | **Marginal/Unacceptable: Unprofessional, inaccurate, unclear. Does not demonstrate understanding of concept. Lacks professionalism. NUMEROUS areas of correction that require resubmission. Any portion of the assignment that receives a 0 does not meet minimum requirements and must be resubmitted to earn a grade for the assignment.** |
    | |
    | Introduction <br>(5 points) | 1 pt. Basic client information (gender, age) without identifiers is provided. <br>3 pts. Psychiatric diagnosis(es) provided<br>1 pt. Physiological diagnosis(es) provided OR clarification that no pertinent physiological diagnoses exist for this client. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Diagnosis <br>(10 points) | 5 pts. A correctly formatted, three-part, NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc. <br>5 pts. A second correctly formatted, three-part OR a two-part (“risk for”) NANDA-approved, nursing diagnosis is provided with a brief rationale that explains why this is a priority diagnosis. Rationale includes observations, quotation, reports from staff or family, etc.<br>Total length of this section is approximately 125 words. | 8-9 pts. One part of the 3-part nursing diagnosis and/or 2-part diagnosis is missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is somewhat unclear. | 6-7 pts. Two parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is difficult to follow. | 4-6 pts. Several parts of the diagnoses are missing or incorrect. <br>Rationale is very unclear. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Reflection <br>(12 points) | 3 pts. Ideas for best care are provided and clearly relate to the chosen nursing diagnoses. <br>3 pts. At least two resources are referred to; one can be the textbook. <br>3 pts. Opportunities and barriers are discussed, community resources, etc. There is clear evidence of thought related to the possibilities for this patient. <br>3 pts. At least one ethical principle is chosen and briefly explained to support the proposal. <br>Total length of this section is approximately 250 words. | 10-11 pts. One or two items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 8-9 pts. Three or four items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 6-7 pts. Five or six items are missing from any of the sections on the left. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Nursing Care Plan <br>(8 points) | 2 pts. A primary diagnosis is identified, and rationale is provided. Nursing Care Plan clearly relates to diagnoses and reflection above. <br>2 pts. Patient goal(s) provided. Uses SMART format. <br>2 pts. Interventions and rationales are clear and follow the formatting and style of Nurse Labs example. <br>2 pts. Evaluation methods are explained. It is clear how the nurse will know when the goal has been met | 6-7 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 4-5 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2-3 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires revision meeting with instructor and resubmission. |
    | Grammar & Mechanics<br>(5 points) | 2 pts. Follows all guidelines for spelling, usage, mechanics, grammar, etc. There are no mechanical errors. <br>2 pts. APA format is Times New Roman 12, double-spaced, standard margins, paragraphs indented, and APA headings (as provided) are used. (No abstract or over page is required). References (minimum of 2) are cited correctly. <br>1 pt. Length is 500 words. | 4 pts. Any one item from the left column is missing. | 3 pts. Any two items from the left column are missing. | 2 pts. Any three items from the left column are missing. | 0 pts. Requires restructuring of paper and resubmission. <br>Was NOT created in required template |

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## Attemptfeedback.docx – ## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx – ## CapstoneProject1.docx **## Attemptfeedback.docx** Attempt feedback Overall, you did well. The Capstone should focus in one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. In the Review of Literature, expand on w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## Attemptfeedback.docx

    – ## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx

    – ## CapstoneProject1.docx

    **## Attemptfeedback.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    Overall, you did well. The Capstone should focus in one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. In the Review of Literature, expand on what you have already found but in futher details.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## CapstoneProject1.docx**

    2

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anisleidy Alvarez

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 23, 2026

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anxiety disorders are among the most common conditions among adult patients in the United States and are poorly treated in primary care. The National Center for Health Statistics reports that in 2022, about one in five of adults aged 18 and older had symptoms of anxiety, with the highest rates found in younger adults and in people living in lower-income households (Terlizzi & Zablotsky, 2024). It's not only an individual problem as anxiety also creates significant health care expenses. Anxiety disorders collectively cost the United States healthcare system tens of billions of dollars per year, with increased emergency department visits, unnecessary specialist referrals, and diminished workforce productivity (Banushi et al., 2023).

    Even with this high prevalence, mild anxiety is often underdiagnosed and is not adequately treated in primary care, where most persons with anxiety symptoms seek care. Mild anxiety patients who do not receive treatment are at great risk of the symptoms escalating to more severe anxiety, poor functioning and more frequent use of emergency services. Poor anxiety regulation also has a negative impact on treatment adherence of comorbid physical conditions, increasing healthcare utilization and costs.

    The purpose of this capstone project is to evaluate whether a nurse-led 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention improves self-reported anxiety symptoms among adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County over an eight-week period. The proposed intervention aims to provide a simple, low-cost, evidence-based strategy that promotes self-management and improves emotional well-being in a vulnerable population.

    **PICOT**

    The prevalence of mild anxiety is a topic of increasing clinical interest in outpatient primary care, especially in diverse, urban communities where care for mental health is scarce. The following PICOT question guides this capstone project:
    _In adult patients presenting with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), does teaching a 2-minute nurse-led deep breathing exercise (I), compared to no structured breathing intervention (C), reduce self-reported anxiety levels (O) over eight weeks (T)?_

    The population includes adults 18 years and older with mild anxiety symptoms presenting to primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County. This population often has limited access to mental health specialists and limited structured anxiety management during regular clinic visits.

    The intervention is a brief 2-minute-deep breathing technique to be taught by the nurse to each patient at the clinic visit, combined with an instructional card to be printed and given to the patient for practicing at home. Controlled breathing is effective at engaging the Parasympathetic Nervous System (PNS) which reduces the physiological stress response and self-reported anxiety (Magnon et al., 2021). The comparison is standard care, which means routine clinical management without any structured breathing instruction.

    The expected outcome is improvement in patient-reported anxiety symptoms following implementation of the nurse-led intervention. When available, Patient-reported symptom improvement may be discussed during routine follow-up visits as part of standard patient care. May be used as part of standard clinical assessment to monitor symptom improvement. Studies have shown that brief, structured breathwork exercises show significant decrease in physiological arousal and increase of mood compared to control conditions (Balban et al., 2023). The eight weeks is a reasonable amount of time to observe regular practice effects and is convenient in a capstone course that is structured on a semester basis.

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this intervention includes adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in community primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County, Florida. This population often experiences multiple social and healthcare barriers that may contribute to delayed recognition and treatment of anxiety symptoms. Many adults receiving care in community clinics may have coexisting chronic conditions, limited access to mental health specialists, and limited exposure to structured behavioral health interventions during routine primary care visits. As a result, primary care settings frequently serve as the first and sometimes only point of access for individuals seeking support for mental health concerns.

    Miami-Dade County has a population that is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse in the United States, with over 70% of the county's residents identifying as Hispanic and/or Latino (U.S Census Bureau, 2025). The stigma attached to mental health, low mental health literacy and a preference for physical explanations of distress over psychiatric explanations are commonly mentioned as cultural factors hindering help-seeking in this population (Forcén et al., 2023). Structural factors are also constraints to receiving mental health treatment: language, insurance status, cost of treatment, and transportation. The evidence shows that Hispanic and Latino adults are much less likely than adults of other races and ethnicities to receive mental health care, despite having clinically meaningful symptoms (Forcén et al., 2023).

    Anxiety disorders affect nearly one in five adults nationwide and is one of the most underdiagnosed conditions in primary care, with studies showing that only approximately 20% of affected patients receive appropriate treatment (Banushi et al., 2023; National Institute of Mental Health, 2024). Social determinants of health add to vulnerability in Miami-Dade and further increase this gap. A stressful urban environment, the economic instability, stressors related to immigration, and social isolation make the situation ripe for anxiety symptoms to continue and intensify without some degree of intervention. A straightforward, low cost, culturally appropriate approach, like deep breathing led by nurses, is therefore clinically appropriate and highly needed for this population.

    **Proposal and Intervention Plan**

    The proposed intervention is a 2-minute-deep breathing exercise taught to each adult patients with mild anxiety symptoms by a trained nurse during his or her usual primary care clinic in a community clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention includes instruction on slow diaphragmatic breathing with controlled inhalation and prolonged exhalation, an approach shown to promote relaxation and reduce anxiety-related physiological arousal through activation of the parasympathetic nervous system .The educational session is delivered individually by the nurse at the point of care and requires minimal time to implement during routine patient education. Patients will also receive a bilingual educational handout to encourage continued practice of the breathing technique at home. (Magnon et al., 2021).

    The resources required for implementation are minimal and include printed bilingual instruction cards, a standardized nurse teaching script, and a brief staff orientation session. It does not require a special setup or extra space and is very easy to do in a busy outpatient clinic.

    The proposed intervention is low-cost and feasible for implementation in a community primary care clinic. Resources required include printed bilingual educational handouts for patients, estimated at approximately $50 to $75, and a brief staff orientation session incorporated into regular nursing meetings without additional staffing expenses. Because the intervention is integrated into routine patient education, no additional personnel or specialized equipment are required. The low-cost nature of this intervention supports feasibility within an eight-week academic semester timeline.

    Involved in the intervention are bedside registered nurses teaching, Advanced practice nurses managing the intervention and adherence to the protocol, and the primary care physicians who identify patients during clinic visits. Clinic administrative staff support scheduling and patient education coordination and scheduling support.

    The implementation timeline takes place in three phases. In week 1 and 2 staff education takes place, and all patient materials are prepared and printed. From week 3 to 6, the nurses teach deep breathing techniques to patients during their routine clinic visits, and the patients practice deep breathing at home with the deep breathing instruction card. During weeks 7 and 8, nurses will reinforce patient education and encourage continued use of the deep breathing technique during routine follow-up visits.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This capstone project is largely based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. Nurses in Orem's framework are educators who recognize the patient's deficits in self-care and fill that gap with knowledge and skills so that the patient can maintain his or her health independently. According to Bekaert (2025) health education is a component of nursing, which is built upon Orem's theory, in which the nurse assists individuals in meeting their self-care needs by demonstrating and facilitating their ability to cope with stress and manage their emotional state. The 2-minute-deep breathing exercise directly targets the patient's self-care deficit by offering a practical and repeatable tool that patients can use independently to help with mild anxiety symptoms outside of the clinic and at the end of the intervention period.

    The intervention is implemented at the organizational level in the clinic, using Kurt Lewin's Change Theory. Lewin's model has three stages; Unfreezing, Change and Refreezing. In unfreezing, clinic staff are taught about the high prevalence of undiagnosed and unmanaged anxiety and the evidence supporting brief breathing techniques. The deep breathing teaching educational approach is introduced into regular nursing practice during the change phase. During the refreezing stage, the nurse-led deep breathing educational approach may become incorporated into routine patient education for adults with mild anxiety symptoms, supporting sustainability beyond the capstone timeline. Lewin's model is one of the most commonly used models in nurse-led change in healthcare organizations as it provides a simple structure to help guide complex changes to practice (Harrison et al., 2021). Combined, Orem's and Lewin's models guarantee the patient-centered and organizationally sustainable nature of the intervention. Orem leads direct patient care and Lewin leads institutional change for sustaining it.

    **Conclusion**

    Mild anxiety symptoms in people within primary care settings are prevalent, sometimes overlooked, and linked to diminished quality of life and heightened healthcare usage, especially among vulnerable groups facing obstacles to mental healthcare access. In culturally diverse areas like Miami-Dade County, socioeconomic determinants of health, such as restricted access to behavioral healthcare, linguistic obstacles, economic instability, and mental health stigma, may lead to postponed treatment and exacerbated symptoms. This capstone project suggests a nurse-led, 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention as a viable, cost-effective, and evidence-based approach to assist adults with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention, principally informed by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and reinforced by Lewin’s Change Theory, fosters patient self-management and facilitates integration into standard nursing practice. The proposed intervention is pragmatic, achievable within an eight-week academic timeframe, and possesses the capacity to enhance patient-reported anxiety symptoms while promoting overall emotional well-being. Educational interventions in primary care may enhance quality of life and mitigate the course of anxiety symptoms when implemented early in treatment.

    **References**

    Balban, M. Y., Neri, E., Kogon, M. M., Weed, L., Nouriani, B., Jo, B., Holl, G., Zeitzer, J. M., Spiegel, D., & Huberman, A. D. (2023). Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal.
    _Cell Reports Medicine_,
    _4_(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895

    Banushi, B., Brendle, M., Ragnhildstveit, A., Murphy, T., Moore, C., Egberts, J., & Robison, R. (2023). Breathwork Interventions for Adults with Clinically Diagnosed Anxiety Disorders: A Scoping Review.
    _Brain Sciences_,
    _13_(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020256

    Bekaert, S. (2025). Repositioning health education as a core nursing function: a commentary.
    _Journal of Research in Nursing_. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251358627

    Forcén, F. E., Flórez, M. C. V., Medina, R. B., Zambrano, J., Pérez, J. H., Rodríguez, A. M., & Santos, L. H. (2023). Deconstructing cultural aspects of mental health care in Hispanic/Latinx people.
    _Psychiatric Annals_,
    _53_(3), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230215-02

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change management, Improvement and Implementation meet? a Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of Healthcare Leadership_,
    _13_(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Magnon, V., Dutheil, F., & Vallet, G. T. (2021). Benefits from one session of deep and slow breathing on vagal tone and anxiety in young and older adults.
    _Scientific Reports_,
    _11_(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98736-9

    National Institute of Mental Health. (2024).
    _Any Anxiety Disorder_. Www.nimh.nih.gov; National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/any-anxiety-disorder

    Terlizzi, E. P., & Zablotsky, B. (2024). Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022.
    _National Health Statistics Reports_,
    _213_, CS353885. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/64018

    U.S Census Bureau. (2025).
    _QuickFacts: Miami-Dade County, Florida_. Census Bureau QuickFacts; United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/miamidadecountyflorida/BZA115223

    **## CapstoneProject1.docx**

    2

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anisleidy Alvarez

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 23, 2026

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anxiety disorders are among the most common conditions among adult patients in the United States and are poorly treated in primary care. The National Center for Health Statistics reports that in 2022, about one in five of adults aged 18 and older had symptoms of anxiety, with the highest rates found in younger adults and in people living in lower-income households (Terlizzi & Zablotsky, 2024). It's not only an individual problem as anxiety also creates significant health care expenses. Anxiety disorders collectively cost the United States healthcare system tens of billions of dollars per year, with increased emergency department visits, unnecessary specialist referrals, and diminished workforce productivity (Banushi et al., 2023).

    Even with this high prevalence, mild anxiety is often underdiagnosed and is not adequately treated in primary care, where most persons with anxiety symptoms seek care. Mild anxiety patients who do not receive treatment are at great risk of the symptoms escalating to more severe anxiety, poor functioning and more frequent use of emergency services. Poor anxiety regulation also has a negative impact on treatment adherence of comorbid physical conditions, increasing healthcare utilization and costs.

    The purpose of this capstone project is to evaluate whether a nurse-led 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention improves self-reported anxiety symptoms among adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County over an eight-week period. The proposed intervention aims to provide a simple, low-cost, evidence-based strategy that promotes self-management and improves emotional well-being in a vulnerable population.

    **PICOT**

    The prevalence of mild anxiety is a topic of increasing clinical interest in outpatient primary care, especially in diverse, urban communities where care for mental health is scarce. The following PICOT question guides this capstone project:
    _In adult patients presenting with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), does teaching a 2-minute nurse-led deep breathing exercise (I), compared to no structured breathing intervention (C), reduce self-reported anxiety levels (O) over eight weeks (T)?_

    The population includes adults 18 years and older with mild anxiety symptoms presenting to primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County. This population often has limited access to mental health specialists and limited structured anxiety management during regular clinic visits.

    The intervention is a brief 2-minute-deep breathing technique to be taught by the nurse to each patient at the clinic visit, combined with an instructional card to be printed and given to the patient for practicing at home. Controlled breathing is effective at engaging the Parasympathetic Nervous System (PNS) which reduces the physiological stress response and self-reported anxiety (Magnon et al., 2021). The comparison is standard care, which means routine clinical management without any structured breathing instruction.

    The expected outcome is improvement in patient-reported anxiety symptoms following implementation of the nurse-led intervention. When available, Patient-reported symptom improvement may be discussed during routine follow-up visits as part of standard patient care. May be used as part of standard clinical assessment to monitor symptom improvement. Studies have shown that brief, structured breathwork exercises show significant decrease in physiological arousal and increase of mood compared to control conditions (Balban et al., 2023). The eight weeks is a reasonable amount of time to observe regular practice effects and is convenient in a capstone course that is structured on a semester basis.

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this intervention includes adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in community primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County, Florida. This population often experiences multiple social and healthcare barriers that may contribute to delayed recognition and treatment of anxiety symptoms. Many adults receiving care in community clinics may have coexisting chronic conditions, limited access to mental health specialists, and limited exposure to structured behavioral health interventions during routine primary care visits. As a result, primary care settings frequently serve as the first and sometimes only point of access for individuals seeking support for mental health concerns.

    Miami-Dade County has a population that is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse in the United States, with over 70% of the county's residents identifying as Hispanic and/or Latino (U.S Census Bureau, 2025). The stigma attached to mental health, low mental health literacy and a preference for physical explanations of distress over psychiatric explanations are commonly mentioned as cultural factors hindering help-seeking in this population (Forcén et al., 2023). Structural factors are also constraints to receiving mental health treatment: language, insurance status, cost of treatment, and transportation. The evidence shows that Hispanic and Latino adults are much less likely than adults of other races and ethnicities to receive mental health care, despite having clinically meaningful symptoms (Forcén et al., 2023).

    Anxiety disorders affect nearly one in five adults nationwide and is one of the most underdiagnosed conditions in primary care, with studies showing that only approximately 20% of affected patients receive appropriate treatment (Banushi et al., 2023; National Institute of Mental Health, 2024). Social determinants of health add to vulnerability in Miami-Dade and further increase this gap. A stressful urban environment, the economic instability, stressors related to immigration, and social isolation make the situation ripe for anxiety symptoms to continue and intensify without some degree of intervention. A straightforward, low cost, culturally appropriate approach, like deep breathing led by nurses, is therefore clinically appropriate and highly needed for this population.

    **Proposal and Intervention Plan**

    The proposed intervention is a 2-minute-deep breathing exercise taught to each adult patients with mild anxiety symptoms by a trained nurse during his or her usual primary care clinic in a community clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention includes instruction on slow diaphragmatic breathing with controlled inhalation and prolonged exhalation, an approach shown to promote relaxation and reduce anxiety-related physiological arousal through activation of the parasympathetic nervous system .The educational session is delivered individually by the nurse at the point of care and requires minimal time to implement during routine patient education. Patients will also receive a bilingual educational handout to encourage continued practice of the breathing technique at home. (Magnon et al., 2021).

    The resources required for implementation are minimal and include printed bilingual instruction cards, a standardized nurse teaching script, and a brief staff orientation session. It does not require a special setup or extra space and is very easy to do in a busy outpatient clinic.

    The proposed intervention is low-cost and feasible for implementation in a community primary care clinic. Resources required include printed bilingual educational handouts for patients, estimated at approximately $50 to $75, and a brief staff orientation session incorporated into regular nursing meetings without additional staffing expenses. Because the intervention is integrated into routine patient education, no additional personnel or specialized equipment are required. The low-cost nature of this intervention supports feasibility within an eight-week academic semester timeline.

    Involved in the intervention are bedside registered nurses teaching, Advanced practice nurses managing the intervention and adherence to the protocol, and the primary care physicians who identify patients during clinic visits. Clinic administrative staff support scheduling and patient education coordination and scheduling support.

    The implementation timeline takes place in three phases. In week 1 and 2 staff education takes place, and all patient materials are prepared and printed. From week 3 to 6, the nurses teach deep breathing techniques to patients during their routine clinic visits, and the patients practice deep breathing at home with the deep breathing instruction card. During weeks 7 and 8, nurses will reinforce patient education and encourage continued use of the deep breathing technique during routine follow-up visits.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This capstone project is largely based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. Nurses in Orem's framework are educators who recognize the patient's deficits in self-care and fill that gap with knowledge and skills so that the patient can maintain his or her health independently. According to Bekaert (2025) health education is a component of nursing, which is built upon Orem's theory, in which the nurse assists individuals in meeting their self-care needs by demonstrating and facilitating their ability to cope with stress and manage their emotional state. The 2-minute-deep breathing exercise directly targets the patient's self-care deficit by offering a practical and repeatable tool that patients can use independently to help with mild anxiety symptoms outside of the clinic and at the end of the intervention period.

    The intervention is implemented at the organizational level in the clinic, using Kurt Lewin's Change Theory. Lewin's model has three stages; Unfreezing, Change and Refreezing. In unfreezing, clinic staff are taught about the high prevalence of undiagnosed and unmanaged anxiety and the evidence supporting brief breathing techniques. The deep breathing teaching educational approach is introduced into regular nursing practice during the change phase. During the refreezing stage, the nurse-led deep breathing educational approach may become incorporated into routine patient education for adults with mild anxiety symptoms, supporting sustainability beyond the capstone timeline. Lewin's model is one of the most commonly used models in nurse-led change in healthcare organizations as it provides a simple structure to help guide complex changes to practice (Harrison et al., 2021). Combined, Orem's and Lewin's models guarantee the patient-centered and organizationally sustainable nature of the intervention. Orem leads direct patient care and Lewin leads institutional change for sustaining it.

    **Conclusion**

    Mild anxiety symptoms in people within primary care settings are prevalent, sometimes overlooked, and linked to diminished quality of life and heightened healthcare usage, especially among vulnerable groups facing obstacles to mental healthcare access. In culturally diverse areas like Miami-Dade County, socioeconomic determinants of health, such as restricted access to behavioral healthcare, linguistic obstacles, economic instability, and mental health stigma, may lead to postponed treatment and exacerbated symptoms. This capstone project suggests a nurse-led, 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention as a viable, cost-effective, and evidence-based approach to assist adults with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention, principally informed by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and reinforced by Lewin’s Change Theory, fosters patient self-management and facilitates integration into standard nursing practice. The proposed intervention is pragmatic, achievable within an eight-week academic timeframe, and possesses the capacity to enhance patient-reported anxiety symptoms while promoting overall emotional well-being. Educational interventions in primary care may enhance quality of life and mitigate the course of anxiety symptoms when implemented early in treatment.

    **References**

    Balban, M. Y., Neri, E., Kogon, M. M., Weed, L., Nouriani, B., Jo, B., Holl, G., Zeitzer, J. M., Spiegel, D., & Huberman, A. D. (2023). Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal.
    _Cell Reports Medicine_,
    _4_(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895

    Banushi, B., Brendle, M., Ragnhildstveit, A., Murphy, T., Moore, C., Egberts, J., & Robison, R. (2023). Breathwork Interventions for Adults with Clinically Diagnosed Anxiety Disorders: A Scoping Review.
    _Brain Sciences_,
    _13_(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020256

    Bekaert, S. (2025). Repositioning health education as a core nursing function: a commentary.
    _Journal of Research in Nursing_. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251358627

    Forcén, F. E., Flórez, M. C. V., Medina, R. B., Zambrano, J., Pérez, J. H., Rodríguez, A. M., & Santos, L. H. (2023). Deconstructing cultural aspects of mental health care in Hispanic/Latinx people.
    _Psychiatric Annals_,
    _53_(3), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230215-02

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change management, Improvement and Implementation meet? a Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of Healthcare Leadership_,
    _13_(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Magnon, V., Dutheil, F., & Vallet, G. T. (2021). Benefits from one session of deep and slow breathing on vagal tone and anxiety in young and older adults.
    _Scientific Reports_,
    _11_(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98736-9

    National Institute of Mental Health. (2024).
    _Any Anxiety Disorder_. Www.nimh.nih.gov; National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/any-anxiety-disorder

    Terlizzi, E. P., & Zablotsky, B. (2024). Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022.
    _National Health Statistics Reports_,
    _213_, CS353885. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/64018

    U.S Census Bureau. (2025).
    _QuickFacts: Miami-Dade County, Florida_. Census Bureau QuickFacts; United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/miamidadecountyflorida/BZA115223

    **## Attemptfeedback.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    Overall, you did well. The Capstone should focus in one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. In the Review of Literature, expand on what you have already found but in futher details.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## CapstoneProject1.docx**

    2

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anisleidy Alvarez

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 23, 2026

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anxiety disorders are among the most common conditions among adult patients in the United States and are poorly treated in primary care. The National Center for Health Statistics reports that in 2022, about one in five of adults aged 18 and older had symptoms of anxiety, with the highest rates found in younger adults and in people living in lower-income households (Terlizzi & Zablotsky, 2024). It's not only an individual problem as anxiety also creates significant health care expenses. Anxiety disorders collectively cost the United States healthcare system tens of billions of dollars per year, with increased emergency department visits, unnecessary specialist referrals, and diminished workforce productivity (Banushi et al., 2023).

    Even with this high prevalence, mild anxiety is often underdiagnosed and is not adequately treated in primary care, where most persons with anxiety symptoms seek care. Mild anxiety patients who do not receive treatment are at great risk of the symptoms escalating to more severe anxiety, poor functioning and more frequent use of emergency services. Poor anxiety regulation also has a negative impact on treatment adherence of comorbid physical conditions, increasing healthcare utilization and costs.

    The purpose of this capstone project is to evaluate whether a nurse-led 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention improves self-reported anxiety symptoms among adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County over an eight-week period. The proposed intervention aims to provide a simple, low-cost, evidence-based strategy that promotes self-management and improves emotional well-being in a vulnerable population.

    **PICOT**

    The prevalence of mild anxiety is a topic of increasing clinical interest in outpatient primary care, especially in diverse, urban communities where care for mental health is scarce. The following PICOT question guides this capstone project:
    _In adult patients presenting with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), does teaching a 2-minute nurse-led deep breathing exercise (I), compared to no structured breathing intervention (C), reduce self-reported anxiety levels (O) over eight weeks (T)?_

    The population includes adults 18 years and older with mild anxiety symptoms presenting to primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County. This population often has limited access to mental health specialists and limited structured anxiety management during regular clinic visits.

    The intervention is a brief 2-minute-deep breathing technique to be taught by the nurse to each patient at the clinic visit, combined with an instructional card to be printed and given to the patient for practicing at home. Controlled breathing is effective at engaging the Parasympathetic Nervous System (PNS) which reduces the physiological stress response and self-reported anxiety (Magnon et al., 2021). The comparison is standard care, which means routine clinical management without any structured breathing instruction.

    The expected outcome is improvement in patient-reported anxiety symptoms following implementation of the nurse-led intervention. When available, Patient-reported symptom improvement may be discussed during routine follow-up visits as part of standard patient care. May be used as part of standard clinical assessment to monitor symptom improvement. Studies have shown that brief, structured breathwork exercises show significant decrease in physiological arousal and increase of mood compared to control conditions (Balban et al., 2023). The eight weeks is a reasonable amount of time to observe regular practice effects and is convenient in a capstone course that is structured on a semester basis.

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this intervention includes adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in community primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County, Florida. This population often experiences multiple social and healthcare barriers that may contribute to delayed recognition and treatment of anxiety symptoms. Many adults receiving care in community clinics may have coexisting chronic conditions, limited access to mental health specialists, and limited exposure to structured behavioral health interventions during routine primary care visits. As a result, primary care settings frequently serve as the first and sometimes only point of access for individuals seeking support for mental health concerns.

    Miami-Dade County has a population that is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse in the United States, with over 70% of the county's residents identifying as Hispanic and/or Latino (U.S Census Bureau, 2025). The stigma attached to mental health, low mental health literacy and a preference for physical explanations of distress over psychiatric explanations are commonly mentioned as cultural factors hindering help-seeking in this population (Forcén et al., 2023). Structural factors are also constraints to receiving mental health treatment: language, insurance status, cost of treatment, and transportation. The evidence shows that Hispanic and Latino adults are much less likely than adults of other races and ethnicities to receive mental health care, despite having clinically meaningful symptoms (Forcén et al., 2023).

    Anxiety disorders affect nearly one in five adults nationwide and is one of the most underdiagnosed conditions in primary care, with studies showing that only approximately 20% of affected patients receive appropriate treatment (Banushi et al., 2023; National Institute of Mental Health, 2024). Social determinants of health add to vulnerability in Miami-Dade and further increase this gap. A stressful urban environment, the economic instability, stressors related to immigration, and social isolation make the situation ripe for anxiety symptoms to continue and intensify without some degree of intervention. A straightforward, low cost, culturally appropriate approach, like deep breathing led by nurses, is therefore clinically appropriate and highly needed for this population.

    **Proposal and Intervention Plan**

    The proposed intervention is a 2-minute-deep breathing exercise taught to each adult patients with mild anxiety symptoms by a trained nurse during his or her usual primary care clinic in a community clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention includes instruction on slow diaphragmatic breathing with controlled inhalation and prolonged exhalation, an approach shown to promote relaxation and reduce anxiety-related physiological arousal through activation of the parasympathetic nervous system .The educational session is delivered individually by the nurse at the point of care and requires minimal time to implement during routine patient education. Patients will also receive a bilingual educational handout to encourage continued practice of the breathing technique at home. (Magnon et al., 2021).

    The resources required for implementation are minimal and include printed bilingual instruction cards, a standardized nurse teaching script, and a brief staff orientation session. It does not require a special setup or extra space and is very easy to do in a busy outpatient clinic.

    The proposed intervention is low-cost and feasible for implementation in a community primary care clinic. Resources required include printed bilingual educational handouts for patients, estimated at approximately $50 to $75, and a brief staff orientation session incorporated into regular nursing meetings without additional staffing expenses. Because the intervention is integrated into routine patient education, no additional personnel or specialized equipment are required. The low-cost nature of this intervention supports feasibility within an eight-week academic semester timeline.

    Involved in the intervention are bedside registered nurses teaching, Advanced practice nurses managing the intervention and adherence to the protocol, and the primary care physicians who identify patients during clinic visits. Clinic administrative staff support scheduling and patient education coordination and scheduling support.

    The implementation timeline takes place in three phases. In week 1 and 2 staff education takes place, and all patient materials are prepared and printed. From week 3 to 6, the nurses teach deep breathing techniques to patients during their routine clinic visits, and the patients practice deep breathing at home with the deep breathing instruction card. During weeks 7 and 8, nurses will reinforce patient education and encourage continued use of the deep breathing technique during routine follow-up visits.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This capstone project is largely based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. Nurses in Orem's framework are educators who recognize the patient's deficits in self-care and fill that gap with knowledge and skills so that the patient can maintain his or her health independently. According to Bekaert (2025) health education is a component of nursing, which is built upon Orem's theory, in which the nurse assists individuals in meeting their self-care needs by demonstrating and facilitating their ability to cope with stress and manage their emotional state. The 2-minute-deep breathing exercise directly targets the patient's self-care deficit by offering a practical and repeatable tool that patients can use independently to help with mild anxiety symptoms outside of the clinic and at the end of the intervention period.

    The intervention is implemented at the organizational level in the clinic, using Kurt Lewin's Change Theory. Lewin's model has three stages; Unfreezing, Change and Refreezing. In unfreezing, clinic staff are taught about the high prevalence of undiagnosed and unmanaged anxiety and the evidence supporting brief breathing techniques. The deep breathing teaching educational approach is introduced into regular nursing practice during the change phase. During the refreezing stage, the nurse-led deep breathing educational approach may become incorporated into routine patient education for adults with mild anxiety symptoms, supporting sustainability beyond the capstone timeline. Lewin's model is one of the most commonly used models in nurse-led change in healthcare organizations as it provides a simple structure to help guide complex changes to practice (Harrison et al., 2021). Combined, Orem's and Lewin's models guarantee the patient-centered and organizationally sustainable nature of the intervention. Orem leads direct patient care and Lewin leads institutional change for sustaining it.

    **Conclusion**

    Mild anxiety symptoms in people within primary care settings are prevalent, sometimes overlooked, and linked to diminished quality of life and heightened healthcare usage, especially among vulnerable groups facing obstacles to mental healthcare access. In culturally diverse areas like Miami-Dade County, socioeconomic determinants of health, such as restricted access to behavioral healthcare, linguistic obstacles, economic instability, and mental health stigma, may lead to postponed treatment and exacerbated symptoms. This capstone project suggests a nurse-led, 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention as a viable, cost-effective, and evidence-based approach to assist adults with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention, principally informed by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and reinforced by Lewin’s Change Theory, fosters patient self-management and facilitates integration into standard nursing practice. The proposed intervention is pragmatic, achievable within an eight-week academic timeframe, and possesses the capacity to enhance patient-reported anxiety symptoms while promoting overall emotional well-being. Educational interventions in primary care may enhance quality of life and mitigate the course of anxiety symptoms when implemented early in treatment.

    **References**

    Balban, M. Y., Neri, E., Kogon, M. M., Weed, L., Nouriani, B., Jo, B., Holl, G., Zeitzer, J. M., Spiegel, D., & Huberman, A. D. (2023). Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal.
    _Cell Reports Medicine_,
    _4_(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895

    Banushi, B., Brendle, M., Ragnhildstveit, A., Murphy, T., Moore, C., Egberts, J., & Robison, R. (2023). Breathwork Interventions for Adults with Clinically Diagnosed Anxiety Disorders: A Scoping Review.
    _Brain Sciences_,
    _13_(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020256

    Bekaert, S. (2025). Repositioning health education as a core nursing function: a commentary.
    _Journal of Research in Nursing_. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251358627

    Forcén, F. E., Flórez, M. C. V., Medina, R. B., Zambrano, J., Pérez, J. H., Rodríguez, A. M., & Santos, L. H. (2023). Deconstructing cultural aspects of mental health care in Hispanic/Latinx people.
    _Psychiatric Annals_,
    _53_(3), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230215-02

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change management, Improvement and Implementation meet? a Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of Healthcare Leadership_,
    _13_(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Magnon, V., Dutheil, F., & Vallet, G. T. (2021). Benefits from one session of deep and slow breathing on vagal tone and anxiety in young and older adults.
    _Scientific Reports_,
    _11_(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98736-9

    National Institute of Mental Health. (2024).
    _Any Anxiety Disorder_. Www.nimh.nih.gov; National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/any-anxiety-disorder

    Terlizzi, E. P., & Zablotsky, B. (2024). Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022.
    _National Health Statistics Reports_,
    _213_, CS353885. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/64018

    U.S Census Bureau. (2025).
    _QuickFacts: Miami-Dade County, Florida_. Census Bureau QuickFacts; United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/miamidadecountyflorida/BZA115223

    **## Attemptfeedback.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    Overall, you did well. The Capstone should focus in one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. In the Review of Literature, expand on what you have already found but in futher details.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## CapstoneProject1.docx**

    2

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anisleidy Alvarez

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 23, 2026

    **Nurse-Led Deep Breathing Intervention to Reduce Mild Anxiety in Adult Primary Care Patients in a Community Clinic in Miami-Dade County**

    Anxiety disorders are among the most common conditions among adult patients in the United States and are poorly treated in primary care. The National Center for Health Statistics reports that in 2022, about one in five of adults aged 18 and older had symptoms of anxiety, with the highest rates found in younger adults and in people living in lower-income households (Terlizzi & Zablotsky, 2024). It's not only an individual problem as anxiety also creates significant health care expenses. Anxiety disorders collectively cost the United States healthcare system tens of billions of dollars per year, with increased emergency department visits, unnecessary specialist referrals, and diminished workforce productivity (Banushi et al., 2023).

    Even with this high prevalence, mild anxiety is often underdiagnosed and is not adequately treated in primary care, where most persons with anxiety symptoms seek care. Mild anxiety patients who do not receive treatment are at great risk of the symptoms escalating to more severe anxiety, poor functioning and more frequent use of emergency services. Poor anxiety regulation also has a negative impact on treatment adherence of comorbid physical conditions, increasing healthcare utilization and costs.

    The purpose of this capstone project is to evaluate whether a nurse-led 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention improves self-reported anxiety symptoms among adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County over an eight-week period. The proposed intervention aims to provide a simple, low-cost, evidence-based strategy that promotes self-management and improves emotional well-being in a vulnerable population.

    **PICOT**

    The prevalence of mild anxiety is a topic of increasing clinical interest in outpatient primary care, especially in diverse, urban communities where care for mental health is scarce. The following PICOT question guides this capstone project:
    _In adult patients presenting with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), does teaching a 2-minute nurse-led deep breathing exercise (I), compared to no structured breathing intervention (C), reduce self-reported anxiety levels (O) over eight weeks (T)?_

    The population includes adults 18 years and older with mild anxiety symptoms presenting to primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County. This population often has limited access to mental health specialists and limited structured anxiety management during regular clinic visits.

    The intervention is a brief 2-minute-deep breathing technique to be taught by the nurse to each patient at the clinic visit, combined with an instructional card to be printed and given to the patient for practicing at home. Controlled breathing is effective at engaging the Parasympathetic Nervous System (PNS) which reduces the physiological stress response and self-reported anxiety (Magnon et al., 2021). The comparison is standard care, which means routine clinical management without any structured breathing instruction.

    The expected outcome is improvement in patient-reported anxiety symptoms following implementation of the nurse-led intervention. When available, Patient-reported symptom improvement may be discussed during routine follow-up visits as part of standard patient care. May be used as part of standard clinical assessment to monitor symptom improvement. Studies have shown that brief, structured breathwork exercises show significant decrease in physiological arousal and increase of mood compared to control conditions (Balban et al., 2023). The eight weeks is a reasonable amount of time to observe regular practice effects and is convenient in a capstone course that is structured on a semester basis.

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this intervention includes adults with mild anxiety symptoms receiving care in community primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County, Florida. This population often experiences multiple social and healthcare barriers that may contribute to delayed recognition and treatment of anxiety symptoms. Many adults receiving care in community clinics may have coexisting chronic conditions, limited access to mental health specialists, and limited exposure to structured behavioral health interventions during routine primary care visits. As a result, primary care settings frequently serve as the first and sometimes only point of access for individuals seeking support for mental health concerns.

    Miami-Dade County has a population that is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse in the United States, with over 70% of the county's residents identifying as Hispanic and/or Latino (U.S Census Bureau, 2025). The stigma attached to mental health, low mental health literacy and a preference for physical explanations of distress over psychiatric explanations are commonly mentioned as cultural factors hindering help-seeking in this population (Forcén et al., 2023). Structural factors are also constraints to receiving mental health treatment: language, insurance status, cost of treatment, and transportation. The evidence shows that Hispanic and Latino adults are much less likely than adults of other races and ethnicities to receive mental health care, despite having clinically meaningful symptoms (Forcén et al., 2023).

    Anxiety disorders affect nearly one in five adults nationwide and is one of the most underdiagnosed conditions in primary care, with studies showing that only approximately 20% of affected patients receive appropriate treatment (Banushi et al., 2023; National Institute of Mental Health, 2024). Social determinants of health add to vulnerability in Miami-Dade and further increase this gap. A stressful urban environment, the economic instability, stressors related to immigration, and social isolation make the situation ripe for anxiety symptoms to continue and intensify without some degree of intervention. A straightforward, low cost, culturally appropriate approach, like deep breathing led by nurses, is therefore clinically appropriate and highly needed for this population.

    **Proposal and Intervention Plan**

    The proposed intervention is a 2-minute-deep breathing exercise taught to each adult patients with mild anxiety symptoms by a trained nurse during his or her usual primary care clinic in a community clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention includes instruction on slow diaphragmatic breathing with controlled inhalation and prolonged exhalation, an approach shown to promote relaxation and reduce anxiety-related physiological arousal through activation of the parasympathetic nervous system .The educational session is delivered individually by the nurse at the point of care and requires minimal time to implement during routine patient education. Patients will also receive a bilingual educational handout to encourage continued practice of the breathing technique at home. (Magnon et al., 2021).

    The resources required for implementation are minimal and include printed bilingual instruction cards, a standardized nurse teaching script, and a brief staff orientation session. It does not require a special setup or extra space and is very easy to do in a busy outpatient clinic.

    The proposed intervention is low-cost and feasible for implementation in a community primary care clinic. Resources required include printed bilingual educational handouts for patients, estimated at approximately $50 to $75, and a brief staff orientation session incorporated into regular nursing meetings without additional staffing expenses. Because the intervention is integrated into routine patient education, no additional personnel or specialized equipment are required. The low-cost nature of this intervention supports feasibility within an eight-week academic semester timeline.

    Involved in the intervention are bedside registered nurses teaching, Advanced practice nurses managing the intervention and adherence to the protocol, and the primary care physicians who identify patients during clinic visits. Clinic administrative staff support scheduling and patient education coordination and scheduling support.

    The implementation timeline takes place in three phases. In week 1 and 2 staff education takes place, and all patient materials are prepared and printed. From week 3 to 6, the nurses teach deep breathing techniques to patients during their routine clinic visits, and the patients practice deep breathing at home with the deep breathing instruction card. During weeks 7 and 8, nurses will reinforce patient education and encourage continued use of the deep breathing technique during routine follow-up visits.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This capstone project is largely based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. Nurses in Orem's framework are educators who recognize the patient's deficits in self-care and fill that gap with knowledge and skills so that the patient can maintain his or her health independently. According to Bekaert (2025) health education is a component of nursing, which is built upon Orem's theory, in which the nurse assists individuals in meeting their self-care needs by demonstrating and facilitating their ability to cope with stress and manage their emotional state. The 2-minute-deep breathing exercise directly targets the patient's self-care deficit by offering a practical and repeatable tool that patients can use independently to help with mild anxiety symptoms outside of the clinic and at the end of the intervention period.

    The intervention is implemented at the organizational level in the clinic, using Kurt Lewin's Change Theory. Lewin's model has three stages; Unfreezing, Change and Refreezing. In unfreezing, clinic staff are taught about the high prevalence of undiagnosed and unmanaged anxiety and the evidence supporting brief breathing techniques. The deep breathing teaching educational approach is introduced into regular nursing practice during the change phase. During the refreezing stage, the nurse-led deep breathing educational approach may become incorporated into routine patient education for adults with mild anxiety symptoms, supporting sustainability beyond the capstone timeline. Lewin's model is one of the most commonly used models in nurse-led change in healthcare organizations as it provides a simple structure to help guide complex changes to practice (Harrison et al., 2021). Combined, Orem's and Lewin's models guarantee the patient-centered and organizationally sustainable nature of the intervention. Orem leads direct patient care and Lewin leads institutional change for sustaining it.

    **Conclusion**

    Mild anxiety symptoms in people within primary care settings are prevalent, sometimes overlooked, and linked to diminished quality of life and heightened healthcare usage, especially among vulnerable groups facing obstacles to mental healthcare access. In culturally diverse areas like Miami-Dade County, socioeconomic determinants of health, such as restricted access to behavioral healthcare, linguistic obstacles, economic instability, and mental health stigma, may lead to postponed treatment and exacerbated symptoms. This capstone project suggests a nurse-led, 2-minute deep breathing educational intervention as a viable, cost-effective, and evidence-based approach to assist adults with mild anxiety symptoms in a community primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The intervention, principally informed by Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and reinforced by Lewin’s Change Theory, fosters patient self-management and facilitates integration into standard nursing practice. The proposed intervention is pragmatic, achievable within an eight-week academic timeframe, and possesses the capacity to enhance patient-reported anxiety symptoms while promoting overall emotional well-being. Educational interventions in primary care may enhance quality of life and mitigate the course of anxiety symptoms when implemented early in treatment.

    **References**

    Balban, M. Y., Neri, E., Kogon, M. M., Weed, L., Nouriani, B., Jo, B., Holl, G., Zeitzer, J. M., Spiegel, D., & Huberman, A. D. (2023). Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal.
    _Cell Reports Medicine_,
    _4_(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895

    Banushi, B., Brendle, M., Ragnhildstveit, A., Murphy, T., Moore, C., Egberts, J., & Robison, R. (2023). Breathwork Interventions for Adults with Clinically Diagnosed Anxiety Disorders: A Scoping Review.
    _Brain Sciences_,
    _13_(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020256

    Bekaert, S. (2025). Repositioning health education as a core nursing function: a commentary.
    _Journal of Research in Nursing_. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251358627

    Forcén, F. E., Flórez, M. C. V., Medina, R. B., Zambrano, J., Pérez, J. H., Rodríguez, A. M., & Santos, L. H. (2023). Deconstructing cultural aspects of mental health care in Hispanic/Latinx people.
    _Psychiatric Annals_,
    _53_(3), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230215-02

    Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change management, Improvement and Implementation meet? a Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.
    _Journal of Healthcare Leadership_,
    _13_(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

    Magnon, V., Dutheil, F., & Vallet, G. T. (2021). Benefits from one session of deep and slow breathing on vagal tone and anxiety in young and older adults.
    _Scientific Reports_,
    _11_(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98736-9

    National Institute of Mental Health. (2024).
    _Any Anxiety Disorder_. Www.nimh.nih.gov; National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/any-anxiety-disorder

    Terlizzi, E. P., & Zablotsky, B. (2024). Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022.
    _National Health Statistics Reports_,
    _213_, CS353885. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/64018

    U.S Census Bureau. (2025).
    _QuickFacts: Miami-Dade County, Florida_. Census Bureau QuickFacts; United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/miamidadecountyflorida/BZA115223

  • [Solved] IBP 6/14 –

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering IBP 6/14 -.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assignament 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Assignament 4.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.