Category: Education > Curriculum & Instructional Design

  • [Solved] Article Summary

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Write a 250 word summary of the "The Longitudinal Trajectories of Online Engagement Over a Full Program" article I have attached. Include a discussion of the research problem, questions, methods, findings, and implications discussed by the authors. Ensure you are using the correct APA style with and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Write a 250 word summary of the "The Longitudinal Trajectories of Online Engagement Over a Full Program" article I have attached. Include a discussion of the research problem, questions, methods, findings, and implications discussed by the authors. Ensure you are using the correct APA style with and appropriate citation for the article included. Please provide at least 2 citations and provide the APA formatted reference.

    – [\
    \
    Article1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article1-pdf-10279419 "Article1.pdf")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] tina

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    topics: [Sustainable Renewable Energies](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278297), [Sustainable Use of Water](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278298) Pick 2 topics about which you learned something new on this course. Write one reflection for each topic…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    topics:  [Sustainable Renewable Energies](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278297), [Sustainable Use of Water](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278298)

    Pick 2 topics about which you learned something new on this course.  Write one reflection for each topic using the space provided in the  reflection guide table. You will submit two reflection guides, one for  each topic you decide to write about. Your reflection should clearly  state what did you learn and if and how it impacted your daily life.

    Item

    Meets Expectations

    Your Reflection

    Topic (20 points)

    The topic is clearly stated.

    Student mentions which part of the course the topic was discussed in.

    If appropriate the student includes an article, video or website from the course, directly related to the topic.

    What did you Learn?

    What did you learn from the course about this topic? Was this  new knowledge or did it reinforce things you knew already? Did the  knowledge acquired challenge your previous opinion on the subject?

    Impact

    Did what you learned about this topic impact your daily life?  How? Did you make changes in your behavior or routine because of what  you learned about this topic? Why? What were those changes?

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] des

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment – a year ago **files (1)** – ## thirdpaperguidelinesofSouthernLiteraure.docx **## thirdpaperguidelinesofSouthernLiteraure.docx** Third paper 3=5 pages, and if it is 43pages, it must be 3 full pages. The paper must be about Fried Green Tomatoes we have discussed. Topics Southern…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## thirdpaperguidelinesofSouthernLiteraure.docx

    **## thirdpaperguidelinesofSouthernLiteraure.docx**

    Third paper

    3=5 pages, and if it is 43pages, it must be 3 full pages.

    The paper must be about Fried Green Tomatoes we have discussed.

    Topics

    Southern Gothic characteristics

    Friendship

    Violence

    The complicated place of the Black characters

    Impact of racism

    Focus on gender inequality

    outsider

    contrast two women

    Community

    Trauma

    Resilience in the Face of Adversity

    Social Injustice

    Lesbianism

    MLA format

    Your paper should have a heading in the upper left-hand corner

    Your name

    My name

    Date

    Class

    The thesis has to be an argument about the text.

    The paper is due on Oct. 30th.

    It must have page numbers.

    It must have a title that connects to the argument and includes the title of the work.

    No cover pages.

    **## thirdpaperguidelinesofSouthernLiteraure.docx**

    Third paper

    3=5 pages, and if it is 43pages, it must be 3 full pages.

    The paper must be about Fried Green Tomatoes we have discussed.

    Topics

    Southern Gothic characteristics

    Friendship

    Violence

    The complicated place of the Black characters

    Impact of racism

    Focus on gender inequality

    outsider

    contrast two women

    Community

    Trauma

    Resilience in the Face of Adversity

    Social Injustice

    Lesbianism

    MLA format

    Your paper should have a heading in the upper left-hand corner

    Your name

    My name

    Date

    Class

    The thesis has to be an argument about the text.

    The paper is due on Oct. 30th.

    It must have page numbers.

    It must have a title that connects to the argument and includes the title of the work.

    No cover pages.

  • [Solved] brothers

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment – a year ago **files (3)** – ## DataAnalysis11.docx – ## SampleWriteupanalysis-1.pdf – ItemAnalysis1.xls **## DataAnalysis11.docx** **Data Analysis #1 (100 pts)** **Part 1:**(50 pts) Excel workbook: Using the attached Template; score and compute the following statistics for the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    – a year ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## DataAnalysis11.docx

    – ## SampleWriteupanalysis-1.pdf

    – ItemAnalysis1.xls

    **## DataAnalysis11.docx**

    **Data Analysis #1 (100 pts)**

    **Part 1:**(50 pts) Excel workbook: Using the attached Template; score and compute the following statistics for the participants.

    Item score: individual performance on each test item (minus the 2-3 essay items (2.5 pts)

    Individual raw and mean score: (2.5 pts)

    Item Difficulty: (10 pts)

    Item Discrimination: (10Pts)

    Test or Class Mean Median and Mode scores: (10 pts)

    Frequency Distribution & Curve: (5 pts)

    Standard Deviation: (5 pts)

    Skewness: (5pts)

    **Part 2:**(50 pts) Performance Analysis: Using your findings from Part 1 interpret the performance of the sample and make relevant suggestions. This should be completed in two reflective paragraphs no longer than 1 page total .

    1. Summary of Class results (25 points): Discuss and cite specific data that accurately summarizes your class/sample performance on the given assessment. Talk about measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode, frequency distribution, curve, skewness, and objective performance) their meanings and interpretations and what implications do they have on future instruction (how should you use these results).

    2. Item Analysis and Reliability (25 points): Discuss relative aspects and findings from your item analysis. What are some potential threats to these findings, how could they be improved and what implications do they have on future instruction (how should you use these results).

    **## SampleWriteupanalysis-1.pdf**

    Performance Analysis

    1. Based on the data analysis from this test, the class scored poorly. The mean score

    of the test was a score of fifty-one. A mean score from seventy-five to eighty-five would

    have been an optimal score. Because they scored lower on the mean than seventy-five,

    either the students didn’t know the material, the test was poorly written, or the mean was

    affected by outliers. The mode of the test was sixty-one. This is my most frequent score,

    but it only focuses on one group of students. The median score of the test was fifty-six. A

    reliable test should have the mean, median, and mode within five points of each other.

    My scores were fairly close to each other. The median and the mode were five points

    apart and the mean and the median were five points apart, but if you compare the mode to

    the median it is ten points apart. There are probably some reliability issues with my test. I

    should probably go back over the test and review each item to figure out which items the

    students did poorly on and which ones the students did well on. The highest score on the

    test out of all fifteen students was a seventy. The majority of the class failed the test. The

    frequency distribution graph was bimodal with a high peak and a low peak. There wasn’t

    a very good range of scores, so it did not make a bell curve. The graph was negatively

    skewed and the skew score was 2.27. This means that there were more scores below the

    mean. My standard deviation was 2.28. The standard deviation is the group score around

    the mean. A good score is 7-13. My standard deviation is low and this means that too

    many students scored close to the same level whether that level is good or bad. In this

    case, the students all scored on a low level. My mean score for test objective one was

    about forty-four and my mean score for test objective two was fifty. Neither of these

    mean scores was very high, so this indicates that the objectives were not covered

    effectively in class and the students were probably unprepared for the test. In order to

    help my students do better next time on the test, I should probably allow more time to

    cover the material and use different teaching methods than I used to prepare for this test. I

    could probably have a review with the students the day before to make sure they know

    the objectives before administering the test. Using this data from the analysis of the test

    scores, I can analyze what is wrong with the test items or determine a weakness in my

    teaching of a subject covered under the objective. This information will help solve the

    mystery of why the students did so poorly on the test. I should analyze any changes I

    made in teaching practices, because this probably affected the students’ ability to learn

    the material effectively. I can go back and look at each question and find out what items

    students struggled on. Based on the measures of central tendency, the skew, the

    frequency distribution, the standard deviation, and the mean scores of the test objectives,

    there is definitely good reason to go back and alter the test to make it more reliable for

    future students.

    Item Analysis and Reliability

    2. There was a mixture of results in my item analysis. According to item difficulty,

    items two, four, seven, ten, fourteen, and eighteen were a little too easy for the students.

    Multiple-choice items tend to have the best reliability when their item difficulty is about

    .69. According to the scores for item difficulty, items three, five, six, nine, eleven,

    twelve, thirteen, fifteen, twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-two, and

    twenty-three were too difficult for the students. In response to the scores on item

    difficulty, I should go back and work on making the easier questions a little more

    challenging and making the more difficult questions less difficult. Some of the scores fell

    around .69, so I would keep those. As far as item discrimination, some questions proved

    to be good items based on the discrimination between the upper and lower students. Item

    discrimination is meant to show the comparison of students who were prepared for the

    test minus the students who were less prepared and got the right answer on the item. An

    item discrimination of .4 or higher usually demonstrates a good item based on

    discrimination. All of the test items, except one, two, nine, sixteen, eighteen, nineteen,

    and twenty proved to be good items based on item discrimination. In order to fix the bad

    items from the test based on item discrimination, I should consider the readability, the

    distractors, and check to see if the item matches the objective being tested. I find that

    based on item difficulty and item discrimination, most of my test items should be revised

    and some items discarded. Two items that should be thrown out or revised are items five

    and nine. Using distractor analysis to analyze the questions, we can understand what

    might need to be changed to make the item better. On question five, options B and C

    should be discarded because the less-prepared students scored better than the better-

    prepared students. Option A is a good distractor because both the less-prepared students

    and the better-prepared students chose it equally. Option D was the correct answer and it

    is reliable because the less-prepared students scored lower than the better-prepared

    students. On question nine, options A, C, and D should be discarded or revised because

    the less-prepared students scored higher than the better-prepared students. Split-half

    reliability determines if the test was reliable as a whole. This test scored a .6 which is a

    good score to prove reliability. Some potential threats to the reliability of the test were the

    testing environment, a change in teaching practices, and if the items didn’t measure the

    objectives. I could improve these by changing the testing environment, altering my

    teaching methods to a more reliable method, and revising or discarding test items that

    didn’t measure the objectives. The results from this analysis can be used to make the test

    more reliable in the future. The mean scores of the essays were 2.53 and 1.8. I ensured

    the consistency of the essay scores by using a rubric. The essays were graded randomly to

    ensure reliability as well. The cover sheet with the student’s name was covered so the

    essays were graded anonymously.

    **ItemAnalysis1.xls**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/itemanalysis1-xls)

    **ItemAnalysis1.xls**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/itemanalysis1-xls)

    **## DataAnalysis11.docx**

    **Data Analysis #1 (100 pts)**

    **Part 1:**(50 pts) Excel workbook: Using the attached Template; score and compute the following statistics for the participants.

    Item score: individual performance on each test item (minus the 2-3 essay items (2.5 pts)

    Individual raw and mean score: (2.5 pts)

    Item Difficulty: (10 pts)

    Item Discrimination: (10Pts)

    Test or Class Mean Median and Mode scores: (10 pts)

    Frequency Distribution & Curve: (5 pts)

    Standard Deviation: (5 pts)

    Skewness: (5pts)

    **Part 2:**(50 pts) Performance Analysis: Using your findings from Part 1 interpret the performance of the sample and make relevant suggestions. This should be completed in two reflective paragraphs no longer than 1 page total .

    1. Summary of Class results (25 points): Discuss and cite specific data that accurately summarizes your class/sample performance on the given assessment. Talk about measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode, frequency distribution, curve, skewness, and objective performance) their meanings and interpretations and what implications do they have on future instruction (how should you use these results).

    2. Item Analysis and Reliability (25 points): Discuss relative aspects and findings from your item analysis. What are some potential threats to these findings, how could they be improved and what implications do they have on future instruction (how should you use these results).

    **## SampleWriteupanalysis-1.pdf**

    Performance Analysis

    1. Based on the data analysis from this test, the class scored poorly. The mean score

    of the test was a score of fifty-one. A mean score from seventy-five to eighty-five would

    have been an optimal score. Because they scored lower on the mean than seventy-five,

    either the students didn’t know the material, the test was poorly written, or the mean was

    affected by outliers. The mode of the test was sixty-one. This is my most frequent score,

    but it only focuses on one group of students. The median score of the test was fifty-six. A

    reliable test should have the mean, median, and mode within five points of each other.

    My scores were fairly close to each other. The median and the mode were five points

    apart and the mean and the median were five points apart, but if you compare the mode to

    the median it is ten points apart. There are probably some reliability issues with my test. I

    should probably go back over the test and review each item to figure out which items the

    students did poorly on and which ones the students did well on. The highest score on the

    test out of all fifteen students was a seventy. The majority of the class failed the test. The

    frequency distribution graph was bimodal with a high peak and a low peak. There wasn’t

    a very good range of scores, so it did not make a bell curve. The graph was negatively

    skewed and the skew score was 2.27. This means that there were more scores below the

    mean. My standard deviation was 2.28. The standard deviation is the group score around

    the mean. A good score is 7-13. My standard deviation is low and this means that too

    many students scored close to the same level whether that level is good or bad. In this

    case, the students all scored on a low level. My mean score for test objective one was

    about forty-four and my mean score for test objective two was fifty. Neither of these

    mean scores was very high, so this indicates that the objectives were not covered

    effectively in class and the students were probably unprepared for the test. In order to

    help my students do better next time on the test, I should probably allow more time to

    cover the material and use different teaching methods than I used to prepare for this test. I

    could probably have a review with the students the day before to make sure they know

    the objectives before administering the test. Using this data from the analysis of the test

    scores, I can analyze what is wrong with the test items or determine a weakness in my

    teaching of a subject covered under the objective. This information will help solve the

    mystery of why the students did so poorly on the test. I should analyze any changes I

    made in teaching practices, because this probably affected the students’ ability to learn

    the material effectively. I can go back and look at each question and find out what items

    students struggled on. Based on the measures of central tendency, the skew, the

    frequency distribution, the standard deviation, and the mean scores of the test objectives,

    there is definitely good reason to go back and alter the test to make it more reliable for

    future students.

    Item Analysis and Reliability

    2. There was a mixture of results in my item analysis. According to item difficulty,

    items two, four, seven, ten, fourteen, and eighteen were a little too easy for the students.

    Multiple-choice items tend to have the best reliability when their item difficulty is about

    .69. According to the scores for item difficulty, items three, five, six, nine, eleven,

    twelve, thirteen, fifteen, twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-two, and

    twenty-three were too difficult for the students. In response to the scores on item

    difficulty, I should go back and work on making the easier questions a little more

    challenging and making the more difficult questions less difficult. Some of the scores fell

    around .69, so I would keep those. As far as item discrimination, some questions proved

    to be good items based on the discrimination between the upper and lower students. Item

    discrimination is meant to show the comparison of students who were prepared for the

    test minus the students who were less prepared and got the right answer on the item. An

    item discrimination of .4 or higher usually demonstrates a good item based on

    discrimination. All of the test items, except one, two, nine, sixteen, eighteen, nineteen,

    and twenty proved to be good items based on item discrimination. In order to fix the bad

    items from the test based on item discrimination, I should consider the readability, the

    distractors, and check to see if the item matches the objective being tested. I find that

    based on item difficulty and item discrimination, most of my test items should be revised

    and some items discarded. Two items that should be thrown out or revised are items five

    and nine. Using distractor analysis to analyze the questions, we can understand what

    might need to be changed to make the item better. On question five, options B and C

    should be discarded because the less-prepared students scored better than the better-

    prepared students. Option A is a good distractor because both the less-prepared students

    and the better-prepared students chose it equally. Option D was the correct answer and it

    is reliable because the less-prepared students scored lower than the better-prepared

    students. On question nine, options A, C, and D should be discarded or revised because

    the less-prepared students scored higher than the better-prepared students. Split-half

    reliability determines if the test was reliable as a whole. This test scored a .6 which is a

    good score to prove reliability. Some potential threats to the reliability of the test were the

    testing environment, a change in teaching practices, and if the items didn’t measure the

    objectives. I could improve these by changing the testing environment, altering my

    teaching methods to a more reliable method, and revising or discarding test items that

    didn’t measure the objectives. The results from this analysis can be used to make the test

    more reliable in the future. The mean scores of the essays were 2.53 and 1.8. I ensured

    the consistency of the essay scores by using a rubric. The essays were graded randomly to

    ensure reliability as well. The cover sheet with the student’s name was covered so the

    essays were graded anonymously.

    **ItemAnalysis1.xls**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/itemanalysis1-xls)

    **## DataAnalysis11.docx**

    **Data Analysis #1 (100 pts)**

    **Part 1:**(50 pts) Excel workbook: Using the attached Template; score and compute the following statistics for the participants.

    Item score: individual performance on each test item (minus the 2-3 essay items (2.5 pts)

    Individual raw and mean score: (2.5 pts)

    Item Difficulty: (10 pts)

    Item Discrimination: (10Pts)

    Test or Class Mean Median and Mode scores: (10 pts)

    Frequency Distribution & Curve: (5 pts)

    Standard Deviation: (5 pts)

    Skewness: (5pts)

    **Part 2:**(50 pts) Performance Analysis: Using your findings from Part 1 interpret the performance of the sample and make relevant suggestions. This should be completed in two reflective paragraphs no longer than 1 page total .

    1. Summary of Class results (25 points): Discuss and cite specific data that accurately summarizes your class/sample performance on the given assessment. Talk about measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode, frequency distribution, curve, skewness, and objective performance) their meanings and interpretations and what implications do they have on future instruction (how should you use these results).

    2. Item Analysis and Reliability (25 points): Discuss relative aspects and findings from your item analysis. What are some potential threats to these findings, how could they be improved and what implications do they have on future instruction (how should you use these results).

    **## SampleWriteupanalysis-1.pdf**

    Performance Analysis

    1. Based on the data analysis from this test, the class scored poorly. The mean score

    of the test was a score of fifty-one. A mean score from seventy-five to eighty-five would

    have been an optimal score. Because they scored lower on the mean than seventy-five,

    either the students didn’t know the material, the test was poorly written, or the mean was

    affected by outliers. The mode of the test was sixty-one. This is my most frequent score,

    but it only focuses on one group of students. The median score of the test was fifty-six. A

    reliable test should have the mean, median, and mode within five points of each other.

    My scores were fairly close to each other. The median and the mode were five points

    apart and the mean and the median were five points apart, but if you compare the mode to

    the median it is ten points apart. There are probably some reliability issues with my test. I

    should probably go back over the test and review each item to figure out which items the

    students did poorly on and which ones the students did well on. The highest score on the

    test out of all fifteen students was a seventy. The majority of the class failed the test. The

    frequency distribution graph was bimodal with a high peak and a low peak. There wasn’t

    a very good range of scores, so it did not make a bell curve. The graph was negatively

    skewed and the skew score was 2.27. This means that there were more scores below the

    mean. My standard deviation was 2.28. The standard deviation is the group score around

    the mean. A good score is 7-13. My standard deviation is low and this means that too

    many students scored close to the same level whether that level is good or bad. In this

    case, the students all scored on a low level. My mean score for test objective one was

    about forty-four and my mean score for test objective two was fifty. Neither of these

    mean scores was very high, so this indicates that the objectives were not covered

    effectively in class and the students were probably unprepared for the test. In order to

    help my students do better next time on the test, I should probably allow more time to

    cover the material and use different teaching methods than I used to prepare for this test. I

    could probably have a review with the students the day before to make sure they know

    the objectives before administering the test. Using this data from the analysis of the test

    scores, I can analyze what is wrong with the test items or determine a weakness in my

    teaching of a subject covered under the objective. This information will help solve the

    mystery of why the students did so poorly on the test. I should analyze any changes I

    made in teaching practices, because this probably affected the students’ ability to learn

    the material effectively. I can go back and look at each question and find out what items

    students struggled on. Based on the measures of central tendency, the skew, the

    frequency distribution, the standard deviation, and the mean scores of the test objectives,

    there is definitely good reason to go back and alter the test to make it more reliable for

    future students.

    Item Analysis and Reliability

    2. There was a mixture of results in my item analysis. According to item difficulty,

    items two, four, seven, ten, fourteen, and eighteen were a little too easy for the students.

    Multiple-choice items tend to have the best reliability when their item difficulty is about

    .69. According to the scores for item difficulty, items three, five, six, nine, eleven,

    twelve, thirteen, fifteen, twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-two, and

    twenty-three were too difficult for the students. In response to the scores on item

    difficulty, I should go back and work on making the easier questions a little more

    challenging and making the more difficult questions less difficult. Some of the scores fell

    around .69, so I would keep those. As far as item discrimination, some questions proved

    to be good items based on the discrimination between the upper and lower students. Item

    discrimination is meant to show the comparison of students who were prepared for the

    test minus the students who were less prepared and got the right answer on the item. An

    item discrimination of .4 or higher usually demonstrates a good item based on

    discrimination. All of the test items, except one, two, nine, sixteen, eighteen, nineteen,

    and twenty proved to be good items based on item discrimination. In order to fix the bad

    items from the test based on item discrimination, I should consider the readability, the

    distractors, and check to see if the item matches the objective being tested. I find that

    based on item difficulty and item discrimination, most of my test items should be revised

    and some items discarded. Two items that should be thrown out or revised are items five

    and nine. Using distractor analysis to analyze the questions, we can understand what

    might need to be changed to make the item better. On question five, options B and C

    should be discarded because the less-prepared students scored better than the better-

    prepared students. Option A is a good distractor because both the less-prepared students

    and the better-prepared students chose it equally. Option D was the correct answer and it

    is reliable because the less-prepared students scored lower than the better-prepared

    students. On question nine, options A, C, and D should be discarded or revised because

    the less-prepared students scored higher than the better-prepared students. Split-half

    reliability determines if the test was reliable as a whole. This test scored a .6 which is a

    good score to prove reliability. Some potential threats to the reliability of the test were the

    testing environment, a change in teaching practices, and if the items didn’t measure the

    objectives. I could improve these by changing the testing environment, altering my

    teaching methods to a more reliable method, and revising or discarding test items that

    didn’t measure the objectives. The results from this analysis can be used to make the test

    more reliable in the future. The mean scores of the essays were 2.53 and 1.8. I ensured

    the consistency of the essay scores by using a rubric. The essays were graded randomly to

    ensure reliability as well. The cover sheet with the student’s name was covered so the

    essays were graded anonymously.

    **ItemAnalysis1.xls**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/itemanalysis1-xls)

  • [Solved] a davis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    topics: [Sustainable Renewable Energies](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278297 "Case 2 – Sustainable Renewable Energies"), [Sustainable Use of Water](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278298 "Case 3 – Sustainable Use of Water") Pick 2 topics about which…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    topics:  [Sustainable Renewable Energies](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278297 "Case 2 – Sustainable Renewable Energies"), [Sustainable Use of Water](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3330/modules/items/278298 "Case 3 – Sustainable Use of Water")

    Pick 2 topics about which you learned something new on this course.  Write one reflection for each topic using the space provided in the  reflection guide table. You will submit two reflection guides, one for  each topic you decide to write about. Your reflection should clearly  state what did you learn and if and how it impacted your daily life.

    Item

    Meets Expectations

    Your Reflection

    Topic (20 points)

    The topic is clearly stated.

    Student mentions which part of the course the topic was discussed in.

    If appropriate the student includes an article, video or website from the course, directly related to the topic.

    What did you Learn?

    What did you learn from the course about this topic? Was this  new knowledge or did it reinforce things you knew already? Did the  knowledge acquired challenge your previous opinion on the subject?

    Impact

    Did what you learned about this topic impact your daily life?  How? Did you make changes in your behavior or routine because of what  you learned about this topic? Why? What were those changes?

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] can anybody help me?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## DTE401_Assessment3_202406032.pdf **## DTE401_Assessment3_202406032.pdf** Page 1 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title DTE401: Design Thinking Assessment Folio B – Ideation and Prototyping Individual/Group Individual Length …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## DTE401_Assessment3_202406032.pdf

    **## DTE401_Assessment3_202406032.pdf**

    Page 1 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF

    Subject Code and Title DTE401: Design Thinking

    Assessment Folio B – Ideation and Prototyping

    Individual/Group Individual

    Length 1500 words equivalent (±10%)

    Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
    completion of the task below include:

    a) Articulate and apply the concepts and processes of Design
    Thinking.

    b) Identify and evaluate complex problems in a professional
    context.

    c) Analyse and critique own capacities and dispositions in
    relation to processes of innovation.

    d) Apply high-level research and communication skills to
    investigate, synthesise, and analyse information from
    multiple perspectives (including users and scholarship).

    Submission 12-week duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of Week
    12

    Weighting 40%

    Total Marks 100 marks

    Assessment Task

    Create a folio to demonstrate your knowledge of innovation and creativity about two stages of the
    design thinking process: ideation and prototyping.

    Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

    Page 2 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Context

    This assessment task provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate how your understanding of
    the design thinking process and concepts has developed through your engagement in the subject so
    far. To achieve this, the task requires you to establish a folio of posts, where you will respond to key
    aspects of the two stages (ideation and prototyping) of the design thinking process. This folio
    further extends your learning through design thinking in terms of identifying and evaluating complex
    problems in a professional context. It provides a space for you to reflect on your developing
    understanding of design thinking.

    Instructions

    As you conclude the design thinking process in this subject, you need to create your second
    folio. This final assessment (Assessment 3) is Folio B, covering ideation and prototyping. In
    Folio B, you are required to respond to the Discussion Forum activities undertaken in the two
    stages (ideation and prototyping) and reflect on the mindset (in terms of disposition) and the
    skills and knowledge you have applied. You will also include specific evidence of using the tools
    generated through the activities in Modules 4 and 5 to support your discussion.

    Consider the following elements:

    • Knowledge of the design thinking process in Module 4 – Ideation and Module 5 –

    Prototyping
    o You should read widely (including scholarly and non-scholarly sources) and

    incorporate this reading into your folio. You should explicitly reference
    resources consulted and activities undertaken in the subject.

    • Take part in the weekly Discussion Forum

    o Write posts and engage with the design thinking tools as prompted in the
    Discussion Forum activities in Modules 4.1, 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2. Your reflections
    should be written in the first person.

    • Apply the skills of academic writing and infographics outlined in the Academic Skills

    webpage.

    • Format and Structure for:

    o Part 1: Ideation (750 words equivalent)
    1. Participate in the weekly Discussion Forum by writing at least one post

    responding to the activities in Module 4.1 (Week 7) and Module 4.2 (Week 8).
    2. Provide evidence of your engagement with the tools (e.g. Crazy 8s) as stated in

    the activities.
    3. Explicitly identify the target people you empathise with.
    4. Then, transfer your posts to your Assessment 3: Folio B document, revise and

    edit it, add more ideas if necessary, update references and use in-text citations.

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap](https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap)

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap](https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap)

    Page 3 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    o Part 2: Prototyping (750 words equivalent)
    1. Participate in the weekly Discussion Forum by writing at least one post

    responding to the activities in Module 5.1 (Week 9) and Module 5.2 (Week 10).
    2. Provide evidence of your engagement with the tools (e.g. sketches, diagrams,

    storyboards) as stated in the activities.
    3. Then, transfer your posts to your Assessment 3: Folio B document, revise and

    edit it, add more ideas if necessary, update references and use in-text citations.

    Note: Alternatively, you can present your Assessment 3: Folio B as a video recording.
    Please refer to the Submission Instructions on pages 4–5 of this assessment brief for
    more details.

    • Referencing: add in-text citations and a reference list according to APA 7th style, using

    publications within the last 5–10 years wherever possible.

    • Your submission will be assessed against the following criteria as detailed in the marking

    rubric on pages 6–10 of this assessment brief:
    o Knowledge of, and engagement with, the design thinking process, skills and tools.
    o Depth and analysis in critiquing potential applications and limitations of design

    thinking.
    o Depth and analysis of reflection relating to the design thinking disposition.
    o Clarity of communication and integration of ideas (including spelling,

    punctuation and grammar.
    o Citation and referencing according to APA 7th conventions.

    Referencing

    You must use the APA 7th referencing style for this assessment. Please see more information on
    referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool](https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool)

    Page 4 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Please ensure that you have attached all components of Assessment 3 (the Written Folio B
    and List of References in ONE (1) document) to the Assessment 3 submission point before
    clicking on the Submit button.

    If want to include Appendix items in your submission, you can save them in a separate
    document. Please remember to attach this additional document to the Assessment 3 submission
    point before clicking the Submit button.

    Submission Instructions

    You have two submission options for this assessment:

    • Option A: Submit a 1500-word Written Folio B and a List of References. The List of
    References is not included in the word count.

    • Option B: Submit a 10–11-minute Video Presentation of Folio B, showing your face and
    slides in the video (using in-text citations wherever possible). You also need to submit an
    accompanying List of References in a separate document.

    Please ensure that your Written or Video Presentation of Folio B addresses the Format and
    Structure as outlined on pages 2–3 of this assessment brief.

    Option A: Written Folio B
    Submit your Written Folio B via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu of DTE401: Design
    Thinking in Blackboard.

    Note:

    Option B: Video Presentation of Folio B
    Submit your Video Presentation of Folio B by clicking on the ‘Write Submission’ button to access the
    Kaltura Media upload function via the Assessment 3 submission point provided in the Assessments
    area of DTE401: Design Thinking in Blackboard.

    Please click on the link below for the steps on how to upload your Video Presentation of Folio B.

    Learning with Technology:
    https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&c
    ontent_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset

    In the Learning with Technology site, please navigate to the ‘Submit a Video Assignment’ tab and
    watch the video demonstration entitled Submit a video using Kaltura Media. Alternatively, please
    refer to the technical guidance provided right below the video demonstration.

    [https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset](https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset)

    [https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset](https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset)

    Page 5 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Please ensure that you have attached all components of Assessment 3 (the Video Presentation
    of Folio B and List of References in a separate document) to the Assessment 3 submission
    point before clicking on the Submit button.

    If want to include Appendix items in your submission, you can save them in a separate
    document. Please remember to attach this additional document to the Assessment 3 submission
    point before clicking the Submit button.

    Note:

    Learning Facilitator Feedback

    The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in Blackboard. Feedback can be
    viewed in the My Grades section of DTE401: Design Thinking.

    Academic Integrity

    All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately
    referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need
    to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
    and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.

    Students must also keep a copy of all submitted materials and any assessment drafts.

    Special Consideration

    To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or
    extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework
    and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment
    Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=49177661](https://library.torrens.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=49177661)

    [http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms](http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1)

    Page 6 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Assessment Rubric

    Assessment
    Attributes

    Fail
    (Yet to achieve

    minimum standard) 0–
    49%

    Pass
    (Functional)

    50–64%

    Credit
    (Proficient)

    65–74%

    Distinction
    (Advanced)

    75–84%

    High Distinction
    (Exceptional)

    85–100%

    Knowledge of, and
    engagement with, the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages of
    the design thinking
    process, skills and tools

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 20%

    Demonstrates a limited
    knowledge of Ideation
    and Prototyping by:

    ● not meeting
    minimum standard as
    outlined in the format
    and structure for this
    assessment

    ● not discussing the
    relationship of
    Ideation and
    Prototyping, and the
    underlying concepts

    ● not engaging with the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping tools.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● discussing the concepts
    underpinning Ideation
    and Prototyping, but
    further elaboration is
    required

    ● focusing on Ideation and
    Prototyping
    strategies/tools without
    acknowledging
    overarching dispositions
    required.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● clearly discussing
    Ideation and
    Prototyping processes,
    skills, tools and
    innovation disposition

    ● exploring different
    Ideation and
    Prototyping
    strategies/tools from
    own research.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● clearly and consistently
    discussing Ideation and
    Prototyping processes,
    skills, tools and
    innovation disposition
    in depth in the
    achievement of insights

    • integrating a range of
    different Ideation and
    Prototyping
    strategies/tools beyond
    those outlined in the
    subject.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● clearly, consistently,
    systematically and
    critically discussing
    Ideation and
    Prototyping processes,
    skills, tools and
    innovation disposition
    in the achievement of
    insights

    ● integrating a broad
    range of strategies and
    tools beyond those
    outlined in the subject,
    including offering
    critique and analysis.

    Page 7 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Critiquing depth and
    analysis of the
    potential applications
    and limitations to the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages of
    the design thinking
    process

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 30%

    Demonstrates a partially
    developed analysis and
    critique of potential
    applications and
    limitations by:

    ● not attempting to
    consider the potential
    applications of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    beyond the subject
    experience

    ● not offering a critique
    regarding the limits of
    how the Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    might be applied.

    Demonstrates a functional
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● offering a developing
    analysis of the potential
    application of the
    Ideation and Prototyping
    stages; this is limited in
    scope and detail

    ● where critique is
    presented, it is
    adequately structured
    and supported by a
    limited range of
    evidence.

    Demonstrates proficient
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● thoroughly offering a
    critique of the
    appropriateness of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages in
    relation to professional
    contexts; experiences
    and literature are
    referenced that
    support or challenge
    the typical applications

    ● providing a well-
    developed analysis and
    critique of the Ideation
    and Prototyping stages;
    an adequate range of
    evidence supports the
    analysis well.

    Demonstrates advanced
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● analysing (in depth) the
    potential applications
    and limitations of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages,
    including the
    relationships and
    comparisons between
    them; professional
    contexts are carefully
    considered and there is
    limited reference to the
    broader scope beyond
    your professional
    contexts

    ● presenting new ideas
    within a professional
    context; relationships
    between the different
    limitations and
    challenges are analysed
    to a high level.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● systematically offering
    a sophisticated critique
    of the limitations in
    how the Ideation and
    Prototyping stages can
    be applied within a
    professional context;
    this includes
    considered reference
    to other contexts
    drawn from relevant
    literature

    ● comprehensively
    synthesising the key
    strengths and potential
    application of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    with insights drawn
    from own experiences
    and literature; original
    concepts and ideas are
    shared to develop the
    existing models and

    Page 8 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    new domains where

    the process might be
    applied.

    Depth and analysis
    of reflection
    relating to the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    of the design
    thinking disposition

    Total Percentage
    for this Assessment
    Attribute = 25%

    Demonstrates a partially
    developed analysis and
    reflection by:

    ● presenting
    description (i.e.
    recounting
    experience) with no
    attempt to analyse or
    draw meaning from
    this experience

    ● not attempting to
    move beyond own
    experience or to
    extend understanding
    through other
    positions or points of
    view.

    Demonstrates a functional
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● presenting description of
    experiences related to
    the topic and drawing
    out some key learnings

    ● focusing primarily on
    deepening
    understanding of own
    position or experience
    with limited analysis of
    positions/points of view
    of others beyond own
    context.

    Demonstrates proficient
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● presenting experiences
    related to the topic as a
    basis for identifying
    and discussing key
    developments in
    thinking about
    innovation

    ● acknowledging and
    analysing others’ points
    of view and revealing
    new questions and
    challenges.

    Demonstrates advanced
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● drawing on past and
    current experiences to
    engage with abstract
    concepts relating to
    empathy, synthesis,
    innovation and change

    ● articulating key
    changes in disposition
    and knowledge, taking
    into account the
    complexities of the
    issue(s) and a range of
    other points of view
    gained from literature.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● identifying
    developments in
    thinking and
    formulating
    conclusions and a
    substantial position
    regarding innovation in
    professional settings

    ● supporting this
    position with relevant
    experiences and
    insightful analysis of
    own and others’ points
    of view related to
    Ideation and
    Prototyping.

    Page 9 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Clarity of
    communication and
    integration of ideas

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 15%

    Demonstrates a partially
    developed
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● repeatedly obscuring
    meaning through
    errors in the
    communication of
    ideas, including
    structure, sequence,
    spelling, grammar,
    punctuation and/or
    the
    acknowledgement of
    sources

    ● rarely or inaccurately
    employing specialised
    language and
    terminology relating
    to design thinking.

    Demonstrates a functional
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● using a mode of
    communication that is
    usually coherent;
    expression that is
    generally clear, with
    persistent errors in
    spelling, punctuation, or
    grammar

    ● generally employing
    specialised language and
    terminology relating to
    design thinking with
    accuracy.

    Demonstrates proficient
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● providing a precise
    meaning that is easy to
    follow; information,
    arguments and
    evidence are
    structured and
    sequenced clearly and
    logically

    ● communicating ideas
    with occasional minor
    errors in spelling,
    grammar and/or
    punctuation

    ● accurately employing
    specialised language
    and terminology
    relating to design
    thinking.

    Demonstrates advanced
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● engaging audience’s
    interest; information,
    arguments and
    evidence are structured
    and sequenced in a
    way that is clear and
    persuasive

    ● accurately employing a
    wide range of
    specialised language
    and terminology
    relating to design
    thinking

    ● ensuring spelling,
    grammar and
    punctuation are free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● communicating
    eloquently; expressing
    meaning coherently,
    concisely and
    creatively within the
    given format

    ● discerningly selecting
    and precisely
    employing a wide
    range of specialised
    language and
    terminology relating to
    design thinking

    ● engaging and
    sustaining the
    audience’s interest

    ● outlining information,
    arguments and
    evidence that are
    insightful, persuasive
    and expertly
    presented.

    ● Ensuring spelling,

    grammar and
    punctuation are free
    from errors.

    Page 10 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 10%

    Demonstrates a limited
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence
    by:

    ● the inconsistent use
    of good quality,
    credible and relevant
    resources to support
    and develop ideas

    ● omitting the
    references or not
    using APA 7th
    referencing style.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key resources
    and evidence by:

    ● using credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    ideas, but use is not
    always explicit or well-
    developed

    ● providing references in a
    format resembling APA
    7th referencing style, with
    frequent or repeated
    errors.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence by:

    ● using credible
    resources to support
    and develop ideas

    ● providing references in
    a format resembling
    APA 7th referencing
    style, with occasional
    errors.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence by:

    ● using good quality,
    credible and relevant
    resources to support
    and develop arguments
    and statements

    ● showing a broad range
    of references sources
    within the organisation

    ● providing APA 7th
    referencing that is free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence by:

    ● demonstrating the use
    of high-quality,
    credible and relevant
    resources to support
    and develop
    arguments and
    position statements

    ● showing a wide scope
    of references sources
    within and beyond the
    organisation

    ● providing APA 7th
    referencing that is free
    from errors.

    Page 11 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment

    SLO a) Articulate and apply the concepts and processes of Design Thinking.
    SLO b) Identify and evaluate complex problems in a professional context.
    SLO c) Analyse and critique own capacities and dispositions in relation to processes of innovation.

    SLO d)
    Apply high-level research and communication skills to investigate, synthesise, and analyse information from multiple perspectives
    (including users and scholarship).

    – Assessment Task
    – Context
    – Instructions

    –  Knowledge of the design thinking process in Module 4 – Ideation and Module 5 –
    –  Format and Structure for:

    – Referencing
    – Submission Instructions

    – Option A: Written Folio B
    – Note:
    – Option B: Video Presentation of Folio B

    – Learning Facilitator Feedback
    – Academic Integrity
    – Special Consideration

    **## DTE401_Assessment3_202406032.pdf**

    Page 1 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF

    Subject Code and Title DTE401: Design Thinking

    Assessment Folio B – Ideation and Prototyping

    Individual/Group Individual

    Length 1500 words equivalent (±10%)

    Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
    completion of the task below include:

    a) Articulate and apply the concepts and processes of Design
    Thinking.

    b) Identify and evaluate complex problems in a professional
    context.

    c) Analyse and critique own capacities and dispositions in
    relation to processes of innovation.

    d) Apply high-level research and communication skills to
    investigate, synthesise, and analyse information from
    multiple perspectives (including users and scholarship).

    Submission 12-week duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of Week
    12

    Weighting 40%

    Total Marks 100 marks

    Assessment Task

    Create a folio to demonstrate your knowledge of innovation and creativity about two stages of the
    design thinking process: ideation and prototyping.

    Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

    Page 2 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Context

    This assessment task provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate how your understanding of
    the design thinking process and concepts has developed through your engagement in the subject so
    far. To achieve this, the task requires you to establish a folio of posts, where you will respond to key
    aspects of the two stages (ideation and prototyping) of the design thinking process. This folio
    further extends your learning through design thinking in terms of identifying and evaluating complex
    problems in a professional context. It provides a space for you to reflect on your developing
    understanding of design thinking.

    Instructions

    As you conclude the design thinking process in this subject, you need to create your second
    folio. This final assessment (Assessment 3) is Folio B, covering ideation and prototyping. In
    Folio B, you are required to respond to the Discussion Forum activities undertaken in the two
    stages (ideation and prototyping) and reflect on the mindset (in terms of disposition) and the
    skills and knowledge you have applied. You will also include specific evidence of using the tools
    generated through the activities in Modules 4 and 5 to support your discussion.

    Consider the following elements:

    • Knowledge of the design thinking process in Module 4 – Ideation and Module 5 –

    Prototyping
    o You should read widely (including scholarly and non-scholarly sources) and

    incorporate this reading into your folio. You should explicitly reference
    resources consulted and activities undertaken in the subject.

    • Take part in the weekly Discussion Forum

    o Write posts and engage with the design thinking tools as prompted in the
    Discussion Forum activities in Modules 4.1, 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2. Your reflections
    should be written in the first person.

    • Apply the skills of academic writing and infographics outlined in the Academic Skills

    webpage.

    • Format and Structure for:

    o Part 1: Ideation (750 words equivalent)
    1. Participate in the weekly Discussion Forum by writing at least one post

    responding to the activities in Module 4.1 (Week 7) and Module 4.2 (Week 8).
    2. Provide evidence of your engagement with the tools (e.g. Crazy 8s) as stated in

    the activities.
    3. Explicitly identify the target people you empathise with.
    4. Then, transfer your posts to your Assessment 3: Folio B document, revise and

    edit it, add more ideas if necessary, update references and use in-text citations.

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap](https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap)

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap](https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap)

    Page 3 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    o Part 2: Prototyping (750 words equivalent)
    1. Participate in the weekly Discussion Forum by writing at least one post

    responding to the activities in Module 5.1 (Week 9) and Module 5.2 (Week 10).
    2. Provide evidence of your engagement with the tools (e.g. sketches, diagrams,

    storyboards) as stated in the activities.
    3. Then, transfer your posts to your Assessment 3: Folio B document, revise and

    edit it, add more ideas if necessary, update references and use in-text citations.

    Note: Alternatively, you can present your Assessment 3: Folio B as a video recording.
    Please refer to the Submission Instructions on pages 4–5 of this assessment brief for
    more details.

    • Referencing: add in-text citations and a reference list according to APA 7th style, using

    publications within the last 5–10 years wherever possible.

    • Your submission will be assessed against the following criteria as detailed in the marking

    rubric on pages 6–10 of this assessment brief:
    o Knowledge of, and engagement with, the design thinking process, skills and tools.
    o Depth and analysis in critiquing potential applications and limitations of design

    thinking.
    o Depth and analysis of reflection relating to the design thinking disposition.
    o Clarity of communication and integration of ideas (including spelling,

    punctuation and grammar.
    o Citation and referencing according to APA 7th conventions.

    Referencing

    You must use the APA 7th referencing style for this assessment. Please see more information on
    referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool](https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool)

    Page 4 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Please ensure that you have attached all components of Assessment 3 (the Written Folio B
    and List of References in ONE (1) document) to the Assessment 3 submission point before
    clicking on the Submit button.

    If want to include Appendix items in your submission, you can save them in a separate
    document. Please remember to attach this additional document to the Assessment 3 submission
    point before clicking the Submit button.

    Submission Instructions

    You have two submission options for this assessment:

    • Option A: Submit a 1500-word Written Folio B and a List of References. The List of
    References is not included in the word count.

    • Option B: Submit a 10–11-minute Video Presentation of Folio B, showing your face and
    slides in the video (using in-text citations wherever possible). You also need to submit an
    accompanying List of References in a separate document.

    Please ensure that your Written or Video Presentation of Folio B addresses the Format and
    Structure as outlined on pages 2–3 of this assessment brief.

    Option A: Written Folio B
    Submit your Written Folio B via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu of DTE401: Design
    Thinking in Blackboard.

    Note:

    Option B: Video Presentation of Folio B
    Submit your Video Presentation of Folio B by clicking on the ‘Write Submission’ button to access the
    Kaltura Media upload function via the Assessment 3 submission point provided in the Assessments
    area of DTE401: Design Thinking in Blackboard.

    Please click on the link below for the steps on how to upload your Video Presentation of Folio B.

    Learning with Technology:
    https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&c
    ontent_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset

    In the Learning with Technology site, please navigate to the ‘Submit a Video Assignment’ tab and
    watch the video demonstration entitled Submit a video using Kaltura Media. Alternatively, please
    refer to the technical guidance provided right below the video demonstration.

    [https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset](https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset)

    [https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset](https://torrens.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_529_1&content_id=_5480654_1&mode=reset)

    Page 5 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Please ensure that you have attached all components of Assessment 3 (the Video Presentation
    of Folio B and List of References in a separate document) to the Assessment 3 submission
    point before clicking on the Submit button.

    If want to include Appendix items in your submission, you can save them in a separate
    document. Please remember to attach this additional document to the Assessment 3 submission
    point before clicking the Submit button.

    Note:

    Learning Facilitator Feedback

    The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in Blackboard. Feedback can be
    viewed in the My Grades section of DTE401: Design Thinking.

    Academic Integrity

    All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately
    referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need
    to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
    and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.

    Students must also keep a copy of all submitted materials and any assessment drafts.

    Special Consideration

    To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or
    extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework
    and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment
    Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

    [https://library.torrens.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=49177661](https://library.torrens.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=49177661)

    [http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms](http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1)

    [https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1](https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1)

    Page 6 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Assessment Rubric

    Assessment
    Attributes

    Fail
    (Yet to achieve

    minimum standard) 0–
    49%

    Pass
    (Functional)

    50–64%

    Credit
    (Proficient)

    65–74%

    Distinction
    (Advanced)

    75–84%

    High Distinction
    (Exceptional)

    85–100%

    Knowledge of, and
    engagement with, the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages of
    the design thinking
    process, skills and tools

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 20%

    Demonstrates a limited
    knowledge of Ideation
    and Prototyping by:

    ● not meeting
    minimum standard as
    outlined in the format
    and structure for this
    assessment

    ● not discussing the
    relationship of
    Ideation and
    Prototyping, and the
    underlying concepts

    ● not engaging with the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping tools.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● discussing the concepts
    underpinning Ideation
    and Prototyping, but
    further elaboration is
    required

    ● focusing on Ideation and
    Prototyping
    strategies/tools without
    acknowledging
    overarching dispositions
    required.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● clearly discussing
    Ideation and
    Prototyping processes,
    skills, tools and
    innovation disposition

    ● exploring different
    Ideation and
    Prototyping
    strategies/tools from
    own research.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● clearly and consistently
    discussing Ideation and
    Prototyping processes,
    skills, tools and
    innovation disposition
    in depth in the
    achievement of insights

    • integrating a range of
    different Ideation and
    Prototyping
    strategies/tools beyond
    those outlined in the
    subject.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of Ideation and
    Prototyping by:

    ● clearly, consistently,
    systematically and
    critically discussing
    Ideation and
    Prototyping processes,
    skills, tools and
    innovation disposition
    in the achievement of
    insights

    ● integrating a broad
    range of strategies and
    tools beyond those
    outlined in the subject,
    including offering
    critique and analysis.

    Page 7 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Critiquing depth and
    analysis of the
    potential applications
    and limitations to the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages of
    the design thinking
    process

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 30%

    Demonstrates a partially
    developed analysis and
    critique of potential
    applications and
    limitations by:

    ● not attempting to
    consider the potential
    applications of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    beyond the subject
    experience

    ● not offering a critique
    regarding the limits of
    how the Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    might be applied.

    Demonstrates a functional
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● offering a developing
    analysis of the potential
    application of the
    Ideation and Prototyping
    stages; this is limited in
    scope and detail

    ● where critique is
    presented, it is
    adequately structured
    and supported by a
    limited range of
    evidence.

    Demonstrates proficient
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● thoroughly offering a
    critique of the
    appropriateness of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages in
    relation to professional
    contexts; experiences
    and literature are
    referenced that
    support or challenge
    the typical applications

    ● providing a well-
    developed analysis and
    critique of the Ideation
    and Prototyping stages;
    an adequate range of
    evidence supports the
    analysis well.

    Demonstrates advanced
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● analysing (in depth) the
    potential applications
    and limitations of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages,
    including the
    relationships and
    comparisons between
    them; professional
    contexts are carefully
    considered and there is
    limited reference to the
    broader scope beyond
    your professional
    contexts

    ● presenting new ideas
    within a professional
    context; relationships
    between the different
    limitations and
    challenges are analysed
    to a high level.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    analysis and critique of
    potential applications and
    limitations by:

    ● systematically offering
    a sophisticated critique
    of the limitations in
    how the Ideation and
    Prototyping stages can
    be applied within a
    professional context;
    this includes
    considered reference
    to other contexts
    drawn from relevant
    literature

    ● comprehensively
    synthesising the key
    strengths and potential
    application of the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    with insights drawn
    from own experiences
    and literature; original
    concepts and ideas are
    shared to develop the
    existing models and

    Page 8 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    new domains where

    the process might be
    applied.

    Depth and analysis
    of reflection
    relating to the
    Ideation and
    Prototyping stages
    of the design
    thinking disposition

    Total Percentage
    for this Assessment
    Attribute = 25%

    Demonstrates a partially
    developed analysis and
    reflection by:

    ● presenting
    description (i.e.
    recounting
    experience) with no
    attempt to analyse or
    draw meaning from
    this experience

    ● not attempting to
    move beyond own
    experience or to
    extend understanding
    through other
    positions or points of
    view.

    Demonstrates a functional
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● presenting description of
    experiences related to
    the topic and drawing
    out some key learnings

    ● focusing primarily on
    deepening
    understanding of own
    position or experience
    with limited analysis of
    positions/points of view
    of others beyond own
    context.

    Demonstrates proficient
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● presenting experiences
    related to the topic as a
    basis for identifying
    and discussing key
    developments in
    thinking about
    innovation

    ● acknowledging and
    analysing others’ points
    of view and revealing
    new questions and
    challenges.

    Demonstrates advanced
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● drawing on past and
    current experiences to
    engage with abstract
    concepts relating to
    empathy, synthesis,
    innovation and change

    ● articulating key
    changes in disposition
    and knowledge, taking
    into account the
    complexities of the
    issue(s) and a range of
    other points of view
    gained from literature.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    analysis and reflection by:

    ● identifying
    developments in
    thinking and
    formulating
    conclusions and a
    substantial position
    regarding innovation in
    professional settings

    ● supporting this
    position with relevant
    experiences and
    insightful analysis of
    own and others’ points
    of view related to
    Ideation and
    Prototyping.

    Page 9 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Clarity of
    communication and
    integration of ideas

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 15%

    Demonstrates a partially
    developed
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● repeatedly obscuring
    meaning through
    errors in the
    communication of
    ideas, including
    structure, sequence,
    spelling, grammar,
    punctuation and/or
    the
    acknowledgement of
    sources

    ● rarely or inaccurately
    employing specialised
    language and
    terminology relating
    to design thinking.

    Demonstrates a functional
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● using a mode of
    communication that is
    usually coherent;
    expression that is
    generally clear, with
    persistent errors in
    spelling, punctuation, or
    grammar

    ● generally employing
    specialised language and
    terminology relating to
    design thinking with
    accuracy.

    Demonstrates proficient
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● providing a precise
    meaning that is easy to
    follow; information,
    arguments and
    evidence are
    structured and
    sequenced clearly and
    logically

    ● communicating ideas
    with occasional minor
    errors in spelling,
    grammar and/or
    punctuation

    ● accurately employing
    specialised language
    and terminology
    relating to design
    thinking.

    Demonstrates advanced
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● engaging audience’s
    interest; information,
    arguments and
    evidence are structured
    and sequenced in a
    way that is clear and
    persuasive

    ● accurately employing a
    wide range of
    specialised language
    and terminology
    relating to design
    thinking

    ● ensuring spelling,
    grammar and
    punctuation are free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    communication and
    integration of ideas by:

    ● communicating
    eloquently; expressing
    meaning coherently,
    concisely and
    creatively within the
    given format

    ● discerningly selecting
    and precisely
    employing a wide
    range of specialised
    language and
    terminology relating to
    design thinking

    ● engaging and
    sustaining the
    audience’s interest

    ● outlining information,
    arguments and
    evidence that are
    insightful, persuasive
    and expertly
    presented.

    ● Ensuring spelling,

    grammar and
    punctuation are free
    from errors.

    Page 10 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    Citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence

    Total Percentage for
    this Assessment
    Attribute = 10%

    Demonstrates a limited
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence
    by:

    ● the inconsistent use
    of good quality,
    credible and relevant
    resources to support
    and develop ideas

    ● omitting the
    references or not
    using APA 7th
    referencing style.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key resources
    and evidence by:

    ● using credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    ideas, but use is not
    always explicit or well-
    developed

    ● providing references in a
    format resembling APA
    7th referencing style, with
    frequent or repeated
    errors.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence by:

    ● using credible
    resources to support
    and develop ideas

    ● providing references in
    a format resembling
    APA 7th referencing
    style, with occasional
    errors.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence by:

    ● using good quality,
    credible and relevant
    resources to support
    and develop arguments
    and statements

    ● showing a broad range
    of references sources
    within the organisation

    ● providing APA 7th
    referencing that is free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of citation and
    referencing of key
    resources and evidence by:

    ● demonstrating the use
    of high-quality,
    credible and relevant
    resources to support
    and develop
    arguments and
    position statements

    ● showing a wide scope
    of references sources
    within and beyond the
    organisation

    ● providing APA 7th
    referencing that is free
    from errors.

    Page 11 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603

    The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment

    SLO a) Articulate and apply the concepts and processes of Design Thinking.
    SLO b) Identify and evaluate complex problems in a professional context.
    SLO c) Analyse and critique own capacities and dispositions in relation to processes of innovation.

    SLO d)
    Apply high-level research and communication skills to investigate, synthesise, and analyse information from multiple perspectives
    (including users and scholarship).

    – Assessment Task
    – Context
    – Instructions

    –  Knowledge of the design thinking process in Module 4 – Ideation and Module 5 –
    –  Format and Structure for:

    – Referencing
    – Submission Instructions

    – Option A: Written Folio B
    – Note:
    – Option B: Video Presentation of Folio B

    – Learning Facilitator Feedback
    – Academic Integrity
    – Special Consideration

  • [Solved] Hills like white elephant’s

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (2)** – ## HillsLikeWhiteElephants-ErnestHemingway.pdf – ## LiteraryAnalysisEssayStructure.pdf **## HillsLikeWhiteElephants-ErnestHemingway.pdf** “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway from Charters, Ann, Ed. The Story and its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## HillsLikeWhiteElephants-ErnestHemingway.pdf

    – ## LiteraryAnalysisEssayStructure.pdf

    **## HillsLikeWhiteElephants-ErnestHemingway.pdf**

    “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway

    from Charters, Ann, Ed. The Story and its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. 6th Ed.
    Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2003.

    **## LiteraryAnalysisEssayStructure.pdf**

    Literary Analysis Essay Structure

    INTRODUCTION:

    The first paragraph of your essay. It begins creatively in order to catch your reader ’s interest, provides

    essential background about the literary work, and prepares the reader for your major thesis. The

    introduction must include the author and title of the work as well as an explanation of the theme to be

    discussed.

    The essential background may include setting, an introduction of main characters, etc. The major thesis

    goes in this paragraph usually at the end. Because the major thesis sometimes sounds tacked on, make

    special attempts to link it to the sentence that precedes it by building on a keyword or idea.

    Creative Opening/Hook:

    the beginning sentences of the introduction that catch the reader’s interest. Ways of beginning

    creatively include the following:

    A startling fact or a bit of information

    Example: Nearly two hundred citizens were arrested as witches during the Salem witch scare of 1692.

    Eventually, nineteen were hanged, and another was pressed to death (Marks 65).

    A snatch of dialogue between two characters

    "It is another thing. You [Frederic Henry] cannot know about it unless

    you have it."

    " Well," I said. "If I ever get it I will tell you [priest]." (Hemingway 72).

    With these words, the priest in Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms sends

    the hero, Frederic, in search of the ambiguous "it" in his life.

    A meaningful quotation

    Example: "To be, or not to be, that is the question" (3.1.57). This familiar statement expresses the young

    prince’s moral dilemma in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.

    A universal idea

    Example:

    The terrifying scenes a soldier experiences on the front probably follow him throughout his life—if he

    manages to survive the war.

    A rich, vivid description of the setting

    Example:

    Sleepy Maycomb, like other Southern towns, suffers considerably

    during the Great Depression. Poverty reaches from the privileged families, like

    the Finches who live on the outskirts of town. Harper Lee paints a vivid picture of life in this humid

    Alabama town where tempers and bigotry explode into conflict.

    The Thesis:

    Your thesis is a statement that provides the subject and overall argument of your essay. For a literary

    analysis, your major thesis must

    (1) relate to the theme and Character in the work and

    (2) suggest how this theme and character are revealed in the text

    A good thesis may also suggest the organization of the paper.

    "Through Paul’s experience behind the lines, at a Russian prisoner of war camp, and especially under

    bombardment in the trenches, Erich Maria Remarque realistically shows how war dehumanizes a man."

    Sometimes a thesis becomes too cumbersome to fit into one sentence. In such cases, you may express

    the major thesis as two sentences.

    "In a Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens shows the process by which a wasted life can be redeemed.

    Sidney Carton, through his love for Lucie Manette, is transformed from a hopeless, bitter man into a hero

    whose life and death have meaning."

    The BODY – PARAGRAPHS

    paragraphs support the thesis of your essay. These paragraphs contain supporting examples: (concrete

    details) and analysis/explanation (commentary) for your topic sentences.

    Each paragraph in the body includes

    (1) a topic sentence,

    (2) textual evidence (quotes from your reading) and commentary (explanation), and

    (3) a concluding sentence.

    In its simplest form, each body paragraph is organized as follows:

    1. A topic sentence

    2. A lead-in sentence to textual evidence

    3. textual evidence (cite text)

    4. commentary

    5. transition and lead-in to outside evidence

    6. outside evidence (cite outside source)

    7. commentary

    8. concluding or clincher sentence

    Topic Sentence:

    the first sentence of a body or support paragraph. It identifies one aspect of the major thesis and states

    a primary reason why the major thesis is true.

    "When he first appears in the novel, Sidney Carton is a loveless outcast

    who sees little worth in himself or in others."

    Textual Evidence:

    a specific example from the work used to provide evidence for your topic sentence. Textual evidence

    can be a combination of paraphrase and direct quotation from the work.

    When Carlton and Darnay first meet at the tavern, Carlton tells him, "I

    care for no man on this earth, and no man cares for me" (Dickens 105).

    Commentary:

    "Carton makes this statement as if he were excusing his rude behavior to Darnay. Carton, however, is

    only pretending to be polite, perhaps to amuse himself. With this seemingly off-the-cuff remark, Carton

    reveals a deeper cynicism and his emotional isolation."

    Transitions:

    words or phrases that connect or "hook" one idea to the next, both between and within paragraphs.

    Transition devices include using connecting words as well as repeating key words or using synonyms.

    Finally, in the climax…

    Another example: …

    Later in the story…

    In contrast to this behavior…

    Not only…

    but also…

    Furthermore…

    Lead-In:

    phrase or sentence that prepares the reader for textual evidence by introducing the speaker, setting,

    and/or situation.

    Later, however, when the confident Sidney Carton returns alone to his

    home, his alienation and unhappiness become apparent: "Climbing into a high

    chamber in a well of houses, he threw himself down in his clothes on a neglected

    bed, and its pillow was wet with wasted tears" (Dickens 211).

    Clincher/Concluding Sentence:

    The last sentence of the body paragraph. It concludes the paragraph by tying the textual evidence and

    commentary back to the thesis.

    Thus, before Carton experiences love, he is able to convince himself

    that the world has no meaning.

    CONCLUSION paragraph:

    This is the last paragraph in your essay. This paragraph should begin by echoing your major thesis

    without repeating the words exactly. Then, the conclusion should broaden from the thesis statements to

    answer the "so what?" question your reader may have after reading your essay. he

    The conclusion should do one or more of the following:

    1) Reflect on how your essay topic relates to the book as a whole

    2) Evaluate how successful the author is in achieving his or her goal or message

    3) Give a personal statement about the topic

    4) Make predictions

    5) Connect back to your creative opening

    6) Give your opinion of the novel’s value or significance

    HOW TO CITE TEXTUAL EVIDENCE WITHIN YOUR PAPER

    PRIMARY SOURCE:

    The literary work (novel, play, story, poem) to be discussed in an essay.

    Example: Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men

    Edgar Allan Poe’s "The Tell-tale Heart"

    SECONDARY SOURCE:

    • Any source (other than the primary source) referred to in the essay.

    • Secondary sources can include articles that are critical analyses, biographies of the author,

    reviews, articles, academic journals, etc.

    • When citing primary or secondary sources, follow MLA style for parenthetical documentation for

    dand "Works Cited" page.

    WORKS CITED:

    • In a separate page list all the works cited in an essay. It simplifies documentation because it

    permits you to make only brief references to those works in the test (parenthetical

    documentation).

    • A "Works Cited" page differs from a "Bibliography" in that the latter includes sources researched

    but not actually cited in the paper.

    • All the entries on a "Works Cited" page are double spaced.

    PARENTHETICAL DOCUMENTATION:

    In-Text Citation

    Most often you will use the author’s last name and page number (MLA 8) after a direct quote referring

    to a source listed on the "Works Cited" page.

    However, if you quote for the first time, it is advised that you include in the sentence the title of the

    work.

    Marlo Shien in his article, "Hemingway and the Writer," states that "Hemingway’s writing declined in his

    later career due his mental health" (Shien 789).

    If you cite the author in the text of your paper, you only need the page number in parentheses:

    According to Francis Guerin, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn reflects, "those same nightmarish

    shadows that even in our own time threaten to obscure the American Dream" (49).

    If two works by the same author appear in your "Works Cited," add the title or a shortened version of it

    to distinguish your sources:

    "He wouldn’t rest until he had run a mile or more" (Dickens, A Tale 78).

    BLOCK QUOTATION:

    For quotations that are more than four lines of prose or three lines of verse, place quotations in a free-

    standing block of text and omit quotation marks. Start the quotation on a new line, with the entire

    quote indented ½ inch from the left margin; maintain double-spacing.

    For any prose dialogue involving 2 or more speakers, start the quotation (dialogue) after a colon and

    have each line of dialogue as its own paragraph (.5 inch indentation), placing the citation information

    after the end punctuation.

    During the trial scene, Bob Ewell immediately shows his disrespect

    for both the court and his family:

    "Are you the father of Mayella Ewell?" was the next question.

    "Well, if I ain’t I can’t do nothing about it now, her ma’s dead," was the answer. (Lee 172)

    – INTRODUCTION:
    – Creative Opening/Hook:
    – A startling fact or a bit of information
    – A snatch of dialogue between two characters
    – A meaningful quotation
    – A universal idea
    – A rich, vivid description of the setting
    – The Thesis:
    – The BODY – PARAGRAPHS
    – Topic Sentence:
    – Textual Evidence:
    – Commentary:
    – Transitions:
    – Lead-In:
    – Clincher/Concluding Sentence:
    – CONCLUSION paragraph:

    **## LiteraryAnalysisEssayStructure.pdf**

    Literary Analysis Essay Structure

    INTRODUCTION:

    The first paragraph of your essay. It begins creatively in order to catch your reader ’s interest, provides

    essential background about the literary work, and prepares the reader for your major thesis. The

    introduction must include the author and title of the work as well as an explanation of the theme to be

    discussed.

    The essential background may include setting, an introduction of main characters, etc. The major thesis

    goes in this paragraph usually at the end. Because the major thesis sometimes sounds tacked on, make

    special attempts to link it to the sentence that precedes it by building on a keyword or idea.

    Creative Opening/Hook:

    the beginning sentences of the introduction that catch the reader’s interest. Ways of beginning

    creatively include the following:

    A startling fact or a bit of information

    Example: Nearly two hundred citizens were arrested as witches during the Salem witch scare of 1692.

    Eventually, nineteen were hanged, and another was pressed to death (Marks 65).

    A snatch of dialogue between two characters

    "It is another thing. You [Frederic Henry] cannot know about it unless

    you have it."

    " Well," I said. "If I ever get it I will tell you [priest]." (Hemingway 72).

    With these words, the priest in Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms sends

    the hero, Frederic, in search of the ambiguous "it" in his life.

    A meaningful quotation

    Example: "To be, or not to be, that is the question" (3.1.57). This familiar statement expresses the young

    prince’s moral dilemma in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.

    A universal idea

    Example:

    The terrifying scenes a soldier experiences on the front probably follow him throughout his life—if he

    manages to survive the war.

    A rich, vivid description of the setting

    Example:

    Sleepy Maycomb, like other Southern towns, suffers considerably

    during the Great Depression. Poverty reaches from the privileged families, like

    the Finches who live on the outskirts of town. Harper Lee paints a vivid picture of life in this humid

    Alabama town where tempers and bigotry explode into conflict.

    The Thesis:

    Your thesis is a statement that provides the subject and overall argument of your essay. For a literary

    analysis, your major thesis must

    (1) relate to the theme and Character in the work and

    (2) suggest how this theme and character are revealed in the text

    A good thesis may also suggest the organization of the paper.

    "Through Paul’s experience behind the lines, at a Russian prisoner of war camp, and especially under

    bombardment in the trenches, Erich Maria Remarque realistically shows how war dehumanizes a man."

    Sometimes a thesis becomes too cumbersome to fit into one sentence. In such cases, you may express

    the major thesis as two sentences.

    "In a Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens shows the process by which a wasted life can be redeemed.

    Sidney Carton, through his love for Lucie Manette, is transformed from a hopeless, bitter man into a hero

    whose life and death have meaning."

    The BODY – PARAGRAPHS

    paragraphs support the thesis of your essay. These paragraphs contain supporting examples: (concrete

    details) and analysis/explanation (commentary) for your topic sentences.

    Each paragraph in the body includes

    (1) a topic sentence,

    (2) textual evidence (quotes from your reading) and commentary (explanation), and

    (3) a concluding sentence.

    In its simplest form, each body paragraph is organized as follows:

    1. A topic sentence

    2. A lead-in sentence to textual evidence

    3. textual evidence (cite text)

    4. commentary

    5. transition and lead-in to outside evidence

    6. outside evidence (cite outside source)

    7. commentary

    8. concluding or clincher sentence

    Topic Sentence:

    the first sentence of a body or support paragraph. It identifies one aspect of the major thesis and states

    a primary reason why the major thesis is true.

    "When he first appears in the novel, Sidney Carton is a loveless outcast

    who sees little worth in himself or in others."

    Textual Evidence:

    a specific example from the work used to provide evidence for your topic sentence. Textual evidence

    can be a combination of paraphrase and direct quotation from the work.

    When Carlton and Darnay first meet at the tavern, Carlton tells him, "I

    care for no man on this earth, and no man cares for me" (Dickens 105).

    Commentary:

    "Carton makes this statement as if he were excusing his rude behavior to Darnay. Carton, however, is

    only pretending to be polite, perhaps to amuse himself. With this seemingly off-the-cuff remark, Carton

    reveals a deeper cynicism and his emotional isolation."

    Transitions:

    words or phrases that connect or "hook" one idea to the next, both between and within paragraphs.

    Transition devices include using connecting words as well as repeating key words or using synonyms.

    Finally, in the climax…

    Another example: …

    Later in the story…

    In contrast to this behavior…

    Not only…

    but also…

    Furthermore…

    Lead-In:

    phrase or sentence that prepares the reader for textual evidence by introducing the speaker, setting,

    and/or situation.

    Later, however, when the confident Sidney Carton returns alone to his

    home, his alienation and unhappiness become apparent: "Climbing into a high

    chamber in a well of houses, he threw himself down in his clothes on a neglected

    bed, and its pillow was wet with wasted tears" (Dickens 211).

    Clincher/Concluding Sentence:

    The last sentence of the body paragraph. It concludes the paragraph by tying the textual evidence and

    commentary back to the thesis.

    Thus, before Carton experiences love, he is able to convince himself

    that the world has no meaning.

    CONCLUSION paragraph:

    This is the last paragraph in your essay. This paragraph should begin by echoing your major thesis

    without repeating the words exactly. Then, the conclusion should broaden from the thesis statements to

    answer the "so what?" question your reader may have after reading your essay. he

    The conclusion should do one or more of the following:

    1) Reflect on how your essay topic relates to the book as a whole

    2) Evaluate how successful the author is in achieving his or her goal or message

    3) Give a personal statement about the topic

    4) Make predictions

    5) Connect back to your creative opening

    6) Give your opinion of the novel’s value or significance

    HOW TO CITE TEXTUAL EVIDENCE WITHIN YOUR PAPER

    PRIMARY SOURCE:

    The literary work (novel, play, story, poem) to be discussed in an essay.

    Example: Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men

    Edgar Allan Poe’s "The Tell-tale Heart"

    SECONDARY SOURCE:

    • Any source (other than the primary source) referred to in the essay.

    • Secondary sources can include articles that are critical analyses, biographies of the author,

    reviews, articles, academic journals, etc.

    • When citing primary or secondary sources, follow MLA style for parenthetical documentation for

    dand "Works Cited" page.

    WORKS CITED:

    • In a separate page list all the works cited in an essay. It simplifies documentation because it

    permits you to make only brief references to those works in the test (parenthetical

    documentation).

    • A "Works Cited" page differs from a "Bibliography" in that the latter includes sources researched

    but not actually cited in the paper.

    • All the entries on a "Works Cited" page are double spaced.

    PARENTHETICAL DOCUMENTATION:

    In-Text Citation

    Most often you will use the author’s last name and page number (MLA 8) after a direct quote referring

    to a source listed on the "Works Cited" page.

    However, if you quote for the first time, it is advised that you include in the sentence the title of the

    work.

    Marlo Shien in his article, "Hemingway and the Writer," states that "Hemingway’s writing declined in his

    later career due his mental health" (Shien 789).

    If you cite the author in the text of your paper, you only need the page number in parentheses:

    According to Francis Guerin, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn reflects, "those same nightmarish

    shadows that even in our own time threaten to obscure the American Dream" (49).

    If two works by the same author appear in your "Works Cited," add the title or a shortened version of it

    to distinguish your sources:

    "He wouldn’t rest until he had run a mile or more" (Dickens, A Tale 78).

    BLOCK QUOTATION:

    For quotations that are more than four lines of prose or three lines of verse, place quotations in a free-

    standing block of text and omit quotation marks. Start the quotation on a new line, with the entire

    quote indented ½ inch from the left margin; maintain double-spacing.

    For any prose dialogue involving 2 or more speakers, start the quotation (dialogue) after a colon and

    have each line of dialogue as its own paragraph (.5 inch indentation), placing the citation information

    after the end punctuation.

    During the trial scene, Bob Ewell immediately shows his disrespect

    for both the court and his family:

    "Are you the father of Mayella Ewell?" was the next question.

    "Well, if I ain’t I can’t do nothing about it now, her ma’s dead," was the answer. (Lee 172)

    – INTRODUCTION:
    – Creative Opening/Hook:
    – A startling fact or a bit of information
    – A snatch of dialogue between two characters
    – A meaningful quotation
    – A universal idea
    – A rich, vivid description of the setting
    – The Thesis:
    – The BODY – PARAGRAPHS
    – Topic Sentence:
    – Textual Evidence:
    – Commentary:
    – Transitions:
    – Lead-In:
    – Clincher/Concluding Sentence:
    – CONCLUSION paragraph:

    **## HillsLikeWhiteElephants-ErnestHemingway.pdf**

    “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway

    from Charters, Ann, Ed. The Story and its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. 6th Ed.
    Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2003.

    **## LiteraryAnalysisEssayStructure.pdf**

    Literary Analysis Essay Structure

    INTRODUCTION:

    The first paragraph of your essay. It begins creatively in order to catch your reader ’s interest, provides

    essential background about the literary work, and prepares the reader for your major thesis. The

    introduction must include the author and title of the work as well as an explanation of the theme to be

    discussed.

    The essential background may include setting, an introduction of main characters, etc. The major thesis

    goes in this paragraph usually at the end. Because the major thesis sometimes sounds tacked on, make

    special attempts to link it to the sentence that precedes it by building on a keyword or idea.

    Creative Opening/Hook:

    the beginning sentences of the introduction that catch the reader’s interest. Ways of beginning

    creatively include the following:

    A startling fact or a bit of information

    Example: Nearly two hundred citizens were arrested as witches during the Salem witch scare of 1692.

    Eventually, nineteen were hanged, and another was pressed to death (Marks 65).

    A snatch of dialogue between two characters

    "It is another thing. You [Frederic Henry] cannot know about it unless

    you have it."

    " Well," I said. "If I ever get it I will tell you [priest]." (Hemingway 72).

    With these words, the priest in Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms sends

    the hero, Frederic, in search of the ambiguous "it" in his life.

    A meaningful quotation

    Example: "To be, or not to be, that is the question" (3.1.57). This familiar statement expresses the young

    prince’s moral dilemma in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.

    A universal idea

    Example:

    The terrifying scenes a soldier experiences on the front probably follow him throughout his life—if he

    manages to survive the war.

    A rich, vivid description of the setting

    Example:

    Sleepy Maycomb, like other Southern towns, suffers considerably

    during the Great Depression. Poverty reaches from the privileged families, like

    the Finches who live on the outskirts of town. Harper Lee paints a vivid picture of life in this humid

    Alabama town where tempers and bigotry explode into conflict.

    The Thesis:

    Your thesis is a statement that provides the subject and overall argument of your essay. For a literary

    analysis, your major thesis must

    (1) relate to the theme and Character in the work and

    (2) suggest how this theme and character are revealed in the text

    A good thesis may also suggest the organization of the paper.

    "Through Paul’s experience behind the lines, at a Russian prisoner of war camp, and especially under

    bombardment in the trenches, Erich Maria Remarque realistically shows how war dehumanizes a man."

    Sometimes a thesis becomes too cumbersome to fit into one sentence. In such cases, you may express

    the major thesis as two sentences.

    "In a Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens shows the process by which a wasted life can be redeemed.

    Sidney Carton, through his love for Lucie Manette, is transformed from a hopeless, bitter man into a hero

    whose life and death have meaning."

    The BODY – PARAGRAPHS

    paragraphs support the thesis of your essay. These paragraphs contain supporting examples: (concrete

    details) and analysis/explanation (commentary) for your topic sentences.

    Each paragraph in the body includes

    (1) a topic sentence,

    (2) textual evidence (quotes from your reading) and commentary (explanation), and

    (3) a concluding sentence.

    In its simplest form, each body paragraph is organized as follows:

    1. A topic sentence

    2. A lead-in sentence to textual evidence

    3. textual evidence (cite text)

    4. commentary

    5. transition and lead-in to outside evidence

    6. outside evidence (cite outside source)

    7. commentary

    8. concluding or clincher sentence

    Topic Sentence:

    the first sentence of a body or support paragraph. It identifies one aspect of the major thesis and states

    a primary reason why the major thesis is true.

    "When he first appears in the novel, Sidney Carton is a loveless outcast

    who sees little worth in himself or in others."

    Textual Evidence:

    a specific example from the work used to provide evidence for your topic sentence. Textual evidence

    can be a combination of paraphrase and direct quotation from the work.

    When Carlton and Darnay first meet at the tavern, Carlton tells him, "I

    care for no man on this earth, and no man cares for me" (Dickens 105).

    Commentary:

    "Carton makes this statement as if he were excusing his rude behavior to Darnay. Carton, however, is

    only pretending to be polite, perhaps to amuse himself. With this seemingly off-the-cuff remark, Carton

    reveals a deeper cynicism and his emotional isolation."

    Transitions:

    words or phrases that connect or "hook" one idea to the next, both between and within paragraphs.

    Transition devices include using connecting words as well as repeating key words or using synonyms.

    Finally, in the climax…

    Another example: …

    Later in the story…

    In contrast to this behavior…

    Not only…

    but also…

    Furthermore…

    Lead-In:

    phrase or sentence that prepares the reader for textual evidence by introducing the speaker, setting,

    and/or situation.

    Later, however, when the confident Sidney Carton returns alone to his

    home, his alienation and unhappiness become apparent: "Climbing into a high

    chamber in a well of houses, he threw himself down in his clothes on a neglected

    bed, and its pillow was wet with wasted tears" (Dickens 211).

    Clincher/Concluding Sentence:

    The last sentence of the body paragraph. It concludes the paragraph by tying the textual evidence and

    commentary back to the thesis.

    Thus, before Carton experiences love, he is able to convince himself

    that the world has no meaning.

    CONCLUSION paragraph:

    This is the last paragraph in your essay. This paragraph should begin by echoing your major thesis

    without repeating the words exactly. Then, the conclusion should broaden from the thesis statements to

    answer the "so what?" question your reader may have after reading your essay. he

    The conclusion should do one or more of the following:

    1) Reflect on how your essay topic relates to the book as a whole

    2) Evaluate how successful the author is in achieving his or her goal or message

    3) Give a personal statement about the topic

    4) Make predictions

    5) Connect back to your creative opening

    6) Give your opinion of the novel’s value or significance

    HOW TO CITE TEXTUAL EVIDENCE WITHIN YOUR PAPER

    PRIMARY SOURCE:

    The literary work (novel, play, story, poem) to be discussed in an essay.

    Example: Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men

    Edgar Allan Poe’s "The Tell-tale Heart"

    SECONDARY SOURCE:

    • Any source (other than the primary source) referred to in the essay.

    • Secondary sources can include articles that are critical analyses, biographies of the author,

    reviews, articles, academic journals, etc.

    • When citing primary or secondary sources, follow MLA style for parenthetical documentation for

    dand "Works Cited" page.

    WORKS CITED:

    • In a separate page list all the works cited in an essay. It simplifies documentation because it

    permits you to make only brief references to those works in the test (parenthetical

    documentation).

    • A "Works Cited" page differs from a "Bibliography" in that the latter includes sources researched

    but not actually cited in the paper.

    • All the entries on a "Works Cited" page are double spaced.

    PARENTHETICAL DOCUMENTATION:

    In-Text Citation

    Most often you will use the author’s last name and page number (MLA 8) after a direct quote referring

    to a source listed on the "Works Cited" page.

    However, if you quote for the first time, it is advised that you include in the sentence the title of the

    work.

    Marlo Shien in his article, "Hemingway and the Writer," states that "Hemingway’s writing declined in his

    later career due his mental health" (Shien 789).

    If you cite the author in the text of your paper, you only need the page number in parentheses:

    According to Francis Guerin, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn reflects, "those same nightmarish

    shadows that even in our own time threaten to obscure the American Dream" (49).

    If two works by the same author appear in your "Works Cited," add the title or a shortened version of it

    to distinguish your sources:

    "He wouldn’t rest until he had run a mile or more" (Dickens, A Tale 78).

    BLOCK QUOTATION:

    For quotations that are more than four lines of prose or three lines of verse, place quotations in a free-

    standing block of text and omit quotation marks. Start the quotation on a new line, with the entire

    quote indented ½ inch from the left margin; maintain double-spacing.

    For any prose dialogue involving 2 or more speakers, start the quotation (dialogue) after a colon and

    have each line of dialogue as its own paragraph (.5 inch indentation), placing the citation information

    after the end punctuation.

    During the trial scene, Bob Ewell immediately shows his disrespect

    for both the court and his family:

    "Are you the father of Mayella Ewell?" was the next question.

    "Well, if I ain’t I can’t do nothing about it now, her ma’s dead," was the answer. (Lee 172)

    – INTRODUCTION:
    – Creative Opening/Hook:
    – A startling fact or a bit of information
    – A snatch of dialogue between two characters
    – A meaningful quotation
    – A universal idea
    – A rich, vivid description of the setting
    – The Thesis:
    – The BODY – PARAGRAPHS
    – Topic Sentence:
    – Textual Evidence:
    – Commentary:
    – Transitions:
    – Lead-In:
    – Clincher/Concluding Sentence:
    – CONCLUSION paragraph:

    **## HillsLikeWhiteElephants-ErnestHemingway.pdf**

    “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway

    from Charters, Ann, Ed. The Story and its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. 6th Ed.
    Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2003.

    **## LiteraryAnalysisEssayStructure.pdf**

    Literary Analysis Essay Structure

    INTRODUCTION:

    The first paragraph of your essay. It begins creatively in order to catch your reader ’s interest, provides

    essential background about the literary work, and prepares the reader for your major thesis. The

    introduction must include the author and title of the work as well as an explanation of the theme to be

    discussed.

    The essential background may include setting, an introduction of main characters, etc. The major thesis

    goes in this paragraph usually at the end. Because the major thesis sometimes sounds tacked on, make

    special attempts to link it to the sentence that precedes it by building on a keyword or idea.

    Creative Opening/Hook:

    the beginning sentences of the introduction that catch the reader’s interest. Ways of beginning

    creatively include the following:

    A startling fact or a bit of information

    Example: Nearly two hundred citizens were arrested as witches during the Salem witch scare of 1692.

    Eventually, nineteen were hanged, and another was pressed to death (Marks 65).

    A snatch of dialogue between two characters

    "It is another thing. You [Frederic Henry] cannot know about it unless

    you have it."

    " Well," I said. "If I ever get it I will tell you [priest]." (Hemingway 72).

    With these words, the priest in Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms sends

    the hero, Frederic, in search of the ambiguous "it" in his life.

    A meaningful quotation

    Example: "To be, or not to be, that is the question" (3.1.57). This familiar statement expresses the young

    prince’s moral dilemma in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.

    A universal idea

    Example:

    The terrifying scenes a soldier experiences on the front probably follow him throughout his life—if he

    manages to survive the war.

    A rich, vivid description of the setting

    Example:

    Sleepy Maycomb, like other Southern towns, suffers considerably

    during the Great Depression. Poverty reaches from the privileged families, like

    the Finches who live on the outskirts of town. Harper Lee paints a vivid picture of life in this humid

    Alabama town where tempers and bigotry explode into conflict.

    The Thesis:

    Your thesis is a statement that provides the subject and overall argument of your essay. For a literary

    analysis, your major thesis must

    (1) relate to the theme and Character in the work and

    (2) suggest how this theme and character are revealed in the text

    A good thesis may also suggest the organization of the paper.

    "Through Paul’s experience behind the lines, at a Russian prisoner of war camp, and especially under

    bombardment in the trenches, Erich Maria Remarque realistically shows how war dehumanizes a man."

    Sometimes a thesis becomes too cumbersome to fit into one sentence. In such cases, you may express

    the major thesis as two sentences.

    "In a Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens shows the process by which a wasted life can be redeemed.

    Sidney Carton, through his love for Lucie Manette, is transformed from a hopeless, bitter man into a hero

    whose life and death have meaning."

    The BODY – PARAGRAPHS

    paragraphs support the thesis of your essay. These paragraphs contain supporting examples: (concrete

    details) and analysis/explanation (commentary) for your topic sentences.

    Each paragraph in the body includes

    (1) a topic sentence,

    (2) textual evidence (quotes from your reading) and commentary (explanation), and

    (3) a concluding sentence.

    In its simplest form, each body paragraph is organized as follows:

    1. A topic sentence

    2. A lead-in sentence to textual evidence

    3. textual evidence (cite text)

    4. commentary

    5. transition and lead-in to outside evidence

    6. outside evidence (cite outside source)

    7. commentary

    8. concluding or clincher sentence

    Topic Sentence:

    the first sentence of a body or support paragraph. It identifies one aspect of the major thesis and states

    a primary reason why the major thesis is true.

    "When he first appears in the novel, Sidney Carton is a loveless outcast

    who sees little worth in himself or in others."

    Textual Evidence:

    a specific example from the work used to provide evidence for your topic sentence. Textual evidence

    can be a combination of paraphrase and direct quotation from the work.

    When Carlton and Darnay first meet at the tavern, Carlton tells him, "I

    care for no man on this earth, and no man cares for me" (Dickens 105).

    Commentary:

    "Carton makes this statement as if he were excusing his rude behavior to Darnay. Carton, however, is

    only pretending to be polite, perhaps to amuse himself. With this seemingly off-the-cuff remark, Carton

    reveals a deeper cynicism and his emotional isolation."

    Transitions:

    words or phrases that connect or "hook" one idea to the next, both between and within paragraphs.

    Transition devices include using connecting words as well as repeating key words or using synonyms.

    Finally, in the climax…

    Another example: …

    Later in the story…

    In contrast to this behavior…

    Not only…

    but also…

    Furthermore…

    Lead-In:

    phrase or sentence that prepares the reader for textual evidence by introducing the speaker, setting,

    and/or situation.

    Later, however, when the confident Sidney Carton returns alone to his

    home, his alienation and unhappiness become apparent: "Climbing into a high

    chamber in a well of houses, he threw himself down in his clothes on a neglected

    bed, and its pillow was wet with wasted tears" (Dickens 211).

    Clincher/Concluding Sentence:

    The last sentence of the body paragraph. It concludes the paragraph by tying the textual evidence and

    commentary back to the thesis.

    Thus, before Carton experiences love, he is able to convince himself

    that the world has no meaning.

    CONCLUSION paragraph:

    This is the last paragraph in your essay. This paragraph should begin by echoing your major thesis

    without repeating the words exactly. Then, the conclusion should broaden from the thesis statements to

    answer the "so what?" question your reader may have after reading your essay. he

    The conclusion should do one or more of the following:

    1) Reflect on how your essay topic relates to the book as a whole

    2) Evaluate how successful the author is in achieving his or her goal or message

    3) Give a personal statement about the topic

    4) Make predictions

    5) Connect back to your creative opening

    6) Give your opinion of the novel’s value or significance

    HOW TO CITE TEXTUAL EVIDENCE WITHIN YOUR PAPER

    PRIMARY SOURCE:

    The literary work (novel, play, story, poem) to be discussed in an essay.

    Example: Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men

    Edgar Allan Poe’s "The Tell-tale Heart"

    SECONDARY SOURCE:

    • Any source (other than the primary source) referred to in the essay.

    • Secondary sources can include articles that are critical analyses, biographies of the author,

    reviews, articles, academic journals, etc.

    • When citing primary or secondary sources, follow MLA style for parenthetical documentation for

    dand "Works Cited" page.

    WORKS CITED:

    • In a separate page list all the works cited in an essay. It simplifies documentation because it

    permits you to make only brief references to those works in the test (parenthetical

    documentation).

    • A "Works Cited" page differs from a "Bibliography" in that the latter includes sources researched

    but not actually cited in the paper.

    • All the entries on a "Works Cited" page are double spaced.

    PARENTHETICAL DOCUMENTATION:

    In-Text Citation

    Most often you will use the author’s last name and page number (MLA 8) after a direct quote referring

    to a source listed on the "Works Cited" page.

    However, if you quote for the first time, it is advised that you include in the sentence the title of the

    work.

    Marlo Shien in his article, "Hemingway and the Writer," states that "Hemingway’s writing declined in his

    later career due his mental health" (Shien 789).

    If you cite the author in the text of your paper, you only need the page number in parentheses:

    According to Francis Guerin, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn reflects, "those same nightmarish

    shadows that even in our own time threaten to obscure the American Dream" (49).

    If two works by the same author appear in your "Works Cited," add the title or a shortened version of it

    to distinguish your sources:

    "He wouldn’t rest until he had run a mile or more" (Dickens, A Tale 78).

    BLOCK QUOTATION:

    For quotations that are more than four lines of prose or three lines of verse, place quotations in a free-

    standing block of text and omit quotation marks. Start the quotation on a new line, with the entire

    quote indented ½ inch from the left margin; maintain double-spacing.

    For any prose dialogue involving 2 or more speakers, start the quotation (dialogue) after a colon and

    have each line of dialogue as its own paragraph (.5 inch indentation), placing the citation information

    after the end punctuation.

    During the trial scene, Bob Ewell immediately shows his disrespect

    for both the court and his family:

    "Are you the father of Mayella Ewell?" was the next question.

    "Well, if I ain’t I can’t do nothing about it now, her ma’s dead," was the answer. (Lee 172)

    – INTRODUCTION:
    – Creative Opening/Hook:
    – A startling fact or a bit of information
    – A snatch of dialogue between two characters
    – A meaningful quotation
    – A universal idea
    – A rich, vivid description of the setting
    – The Thesis:
    – The BODY – PARAGRAPHS
    – Topic Sentence:
    – Textual Evidence:
    – Commentary:
    – Transitions:
    – Lead-In:
    – Clincher/Concluding Sentence:
    – CONCLUSION paragraph:

  • [Solved] hello i need help for this assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf **## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf** Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal Individual/Group Indi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf

    **## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf**

    Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF

    Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader

    Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal

    Individual/Group Individual

    Length 1600 words (+/- 10%)

    Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of
    the task below include:

    a) Articulate and evaluate the leadership skills, knowledge and
    disposition required to achieve success in your educational
    context

    b) Critically reflect on the factors that enable or limit your
    capacity to be an educational leader

    d) Demonstrate an evidence based approach, articulating the basis
    for decision making in your context

    Submission 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of Week 12

    6-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of week 6

    Weighting 35 %

    Total Marks 100 marks

    Task Summary

    In this assessment you will use the Journal tool in Blackboard to write a personal reflection on your

    personal and professional development within 4 separate modules across the subject. You will

    reflect on the course materials in relation to assessing your leadership style and best practices to be

    used in the practical application to your educational context.

    Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

    Context

    The concern with reflective thinking is that one may use the process as a tool to reaffirm your

    position rather than engaging critically and examining new perspectives that could lead to

    developments in practice. In this assessment you are asked to honestly and critically reflect on your

    experiences and/or future leadership endeavours. The purpose of this task is to enable you to

    engage in a self-reflection process that helps you to identify your personal and professional

    strengths, challenges, concerns and aspirations as a future educational leader. You are required to

    draw upon the course content and engage in wide reading to challenge your preconceived ideas of

    educational leadership within your chosen context.

    Page 2 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Task Instructions

    You will be required to write four entries in your Reflective Journal (approximately 400 words per

    entry) which will be submitted at the end of Week 12. The modules you will write the four entries

    on will be:

    • Module 1: The role of the Educational Leader

    • Module 3 : Developing an Effective Leader

    • Module 4: Leading People

    • Module 6: Reflection as a means of Professional Development

    In the second week of each of these modules you will be required to reflect on what you have learnt

    about yourself and becoming a high achieving professional leader. You will critically analyse the skills

    and characteristics that are explored in each module, which relate to effective leadership within the

    educational context of your choice. You will draw on personal experiences to reflect on your own

    capabilities whilst also looking to the future and what you hope to achieve within your context. As

    you reflect on your professional goals you will draw upon the course material and your own research

    to support your professional development as a leader. Therefore, you will need to cite theory and

    literature accurately and include a reference list using APA 7th edition formatting.

    Please refer to each of the 4 modules mentioned above for writing prompts to guide your reflection.

    You are encouraged to be open in your reflection about your development, understanding and

    challenges as you encounter these in the course material.

    You will be assessed on your ability to critically reflect on:

    • Your learning of the course material

    • Challenges you may have experienced towards your leadership style

    • Any changes to your current practice as a result of your learning

    • Your thoughts towards practical application

    You will also be assessed on your ability to:

    • Write concisely in a reflective academic style

    • Cite and reference sources using APA 7th Edition style.

    Please see the assessment rubrics for the marking criteria.

    Referencing

    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more

    information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

    [http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing](http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing)

    sharondransfield

    Cross-Out

    Page 3 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Assessment Rubric

    Assessment
    Attributes

    Fail
    (Yet to achieve

    minimum standard)
    0-49%

    Pass
    (Functional)

    50-64%

    Credit
    (Proficient)

    65-74%

    Distinction
    (Advanced)

    75-84%

    High Distinction
    (Exceptional)

    85-100%

    Knowledge and
    understanding of
    Educational Leadership

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 40%

    Demonstrates a partially-
    developed understanding
    of Educational Leadership

    Does not identify any
    changes needed to
    develop leadership skills.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Identifying
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Discussing the challenges
    associated with your own
    practice

    Demonstrates a limited
    awareness of the changes
    needed to develop leadership
    skills.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Discussing
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Considering the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Discussing new
    knowledge with regard
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context.

    Identifies changes needed
    to develop your leadership
    skills with consideration
    towards practical
    application.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Analysing the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Evaluating new
    knowledge with
    consideration towards
    own practice and
    educational context.

    Demonstrates
    understanding of the need
    to address changes in order
    to develop your leadership
    skills and discusses practical
    applications.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Evaluating the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Analysing and
    critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Integrating new
    knowledge with
    serious contemplation
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context

    Demonstrates a
    transformation in approach
    and practice to educational
    leadership within your
    context.

    Analysis of reflection
    with synthesis of new

    Limited synthesis and
    analysis.

    Demonstrated analysis and
    synthesis of new knowledge
    with application.

    Well-developed analysis
    and synthesis with
    application of

    Thoroughly developed and
    creative analysis and

    Highly sophisticated and
    creative analysis, synthesis

    Page 4 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    knowledge towards
    practice

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 30%

    Limited application/
    recommendations based
    upon analysis.

    No attempt is made to
    move beyond own
    experience or to extend
    understanding through
    other positions or points
    of view.

    Shows the ability to identify
    relevant information relating
    to Educational Leadership in
    relation to your own practice.

    Other positions/points of
    view are not a feature of the
    discussion.

    recommendations to own
    practice linked to
    analysis/synthesis.

    The description provides an
    adequate focus for further
    reflection. It includes a
    reasonably thorough
    statement of observations
    and comment on personal
    behaviour.

    Discusses own practice in
    relation to other
    positions/points of view.

    synthesis of new with
    existing knowledge.

    Demonstrates a capacity to
    draw on past and current
    experience to engage with
    key concepts relating to
    Educational Leadership, and
    articulates key changes in
    disposition and knowledge,
    taking into account the
    complexities of the issue(s)
    and a range of other points
    of view.

    of new with existing
    knowledge.

    Interprets developments in
    thinking and formulates
    conclusions and a
    substantial position
    regarding own skills,
    knowledge and experiences
    as an educational leader.
    This position is supported
    with relevant experience
    and insightful analysis of
    own and others’ points of
    view.

    Clarity of
    communication and
    integration of ideas

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 20%

    Descriptive writing only.
    There is no discussion
    beyond description.

    Meaning is consistently
    obscured by errors in the
    communication of ideas,
    including errors in
    spelling, grammar and
    punctuation.

    Difficult to follow the line
    of reasoning.

    Mainly descriptive writing.
    There is little discussion
    beyond description.

    The mode of communication
    is generally coherent;
    expression is generally clear;
    no persistent errors in
    spelling, punctuation, or
    grammar.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are well
    presented with mostly clear
    flow of ideas and
    arguments.

    Care is taken to ensure
    accuracy of punctuation,
    spelling, and grammatical
    structure.

    Line of reasoning is easy to
    follow.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are very well
    presented; the presentation
    is logical and clear.

    The work is fluent and
    demonstrates confidence
    with the material; the
    method and style of
    presentation is entirely
    appropriate, as are
    vocabulary and syntax.

    Engages and sustains
    audience’s interest in the
    topic, demonstrates high
    levels of cultural sensitivity

    The work is extremely well-
    written, logical and
    persuasive with a clarity
    and maturity of
    presentation. There is a
    clear flow of ideas and
    information with little to no
    ambiguity.

    Page 5 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Correct citation of key
    resources and evidence

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 10%

    Demonstrates
    inconsistent use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    ideas.

    Referencing is omitted or
    does not resemble APA.

    Demonstrates use of credible
    and relevant resources to
    support and develop ideas,
    but these are not always
    explicit or well developed.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with frequent or repeated
    errors.

    Demonstrates use of
    credible resources to
    support and develop ideas.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with occasional errors.

    Demonstrates use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within the
    organisation for sourcing
    evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates use of high-
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and position
    statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within and without
    the organisation for
    sourcing evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

    **## EDUC6000_Assessment31.pdf**

    Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF

    Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader

    Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal

    Individual/Group Individual

    Length 1600 words (+/- 10%)

    Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of
    the task below include:

    a) Articulate and evaluate the leadership skills, knowledge and
    disposition required to achieve success in your educational
    context

    b) Critically reflect on the factors that enable or limit your
    capacity to be an educational leader

    d) Demonstrate an evidence based approach, articulating the basis
    for decision making in your context

    Submission 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of Week 12

    6-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of week 6

    Weighting 35 %

    Total Marks 100 marks

    Task Summary

    In this assessment you will use the Journal tool in Blackboard to write a personal reflection on your

    personal and professional development within 4 separate modules across the subject. You will

    reflect on the course materials in relation to assessing your leadership style and best practices to be

    used in the practical application to your educational context.

    Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

    Context

    The concern with reflective thinking is that one may use the process as a tool to reaffirm your

    position rather than engaging critically and examining new perspectives that could lead to

    developments in practice. In this assessment you are asked to honestly and critically reflect on your

    experiences and/or future leadership endeavours. The purpose of this task is to enable you to

    engage in a self-reflection process that helps you to identify your personal and professional

    strengths, challenges, concerns and aspirations as a future educational leader. You are required to

    draw upon the course content and engage in wide reading to challenge your preconceived ideas of

    educational leadership within your chosen context.

    Page 2 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Task Instructions

    You will be required to write four entries in your Reflective Journal (approximately 400 words per

    entry) which will be submitted at the end of Week 12. The modules you will write the four entries

    on will be:

    • Module 1: The role of the Educational Leader

    • Module 3 : Developing an Effective Leader

    • Module 4: Leading People

    • Module 6: Reflection as a means of Professional Development

    In the second week of each of these modules you will be required to reflect on what you have learnt

    about yourself and becoming a high achieving professional leader. You will critically analyse the skills

    and characteristics that are explored in each module, which relate to effective leadership within the

    educational context of your choice. You will draw on personal experiences to reflect on your own

    capabilities whilst also looking to the future and what you hope to achieve within your context. As

    you reflect on your professional goals you will draw upon the course material and your own research

    to support your professional development as a leader. Therefore, you will need to cite theory and

    literature accurately and include a reference list using APA 7th edition formatting.

    Please refer to each of the 4 modules mentioned above for writing prompts to guide your reflection.

    You are encouraged to be open in your reflection about your development, understanding and

    challenges as you encounter these in the course material.

    You will be assessed on your ability to critically reflect on:

    • Your learning of the course material

    • Challenges you may have experienced towards your leadership style

    • Any changes to your current practice as a result of your learning

    • Your thoughts towards practical application

    You will also be assessed on your ability to:

    • Write concisely in a reflective academic style

    • Cite and reference sources using APA 7th Edition style.

    Please see the assessment rubrics for the marking criteria.

    Referencing

    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more

    information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

    [http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing](http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing)

    sharondransfield

    Cross-Out

    Page 3 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Assessment Rubric

    Assessment
    Attributes

    Fail
    (Yet to achieve

    minimum standard)
    0-49%

    Pass
    (Functional)

    50-64%

    Credit
    (Proficient)

    65-74%

    Distinction
    (Advanced)

    75-84%

    High Distinction
    (Exceptional)

    85-100%

    Knowledge and
    understanding of
    Educational Leadership

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 40%

    Demonstrates a partially-
    developed understanding
    of Educational Leadership

    Does not identify any
    changes needed to
    develop leadership skills.

    Demonstrates a functional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Identifying
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Discussing the challenges
    associated with your own
    practice

    Demonstrates a limited
    awareness of the changes
    needed to develop leadership
    skills.

    Demonstrates proficient
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Discussing
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Considering the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Discussing new
    knowledge with regard
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context.

    Identifies changes needed
    to develop your leadership
    skills with consideration
    towards practical
    application.

    Demonstrates advanced
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Analysing the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Evaluating new
    knowledge with
    consideration towards
    own practice and
    educational context.

    Demonstrates
    understanding of the need
    to address changes in order
    to develop your leadership
    skills and discusses practical
    applications.

    Demonstrates exceptional
    knowledge of Educational
    Leadership by:

    • Evaluating the
    characteristics of
    effective leadership

    • Analysing and
    critiquing the
    challenges associated
    with your own practice

    • Integrating new
    knowledge with
    serious contemplation
    towards own practice
    and educational
    context

    Demonstrates a
    transformation in approach
    and practice to educational
    leadership within your
    context.

    Analysis of reflection
    with synthesis of new

    Limited synthesis and
    analysis.

    Demonstrated analysis and
    synthesis of new knowledge
    with application.

    Well-developed analysis
    and synthesis with
    application of

    Thoroughly developed and
    creative analysis and

    Highly sophisticated and
    creative analysis, synthesis

    Page 4 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    knowledge towards
    practice

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 30%

    Limited application/
    recommendations based
    upon analysis.

    No attempt is made to
    move beyond own
    experience or to extend
    understanding through
    other positions or points
    of view.

    Shows the ability to identify
    relevant information relating
    to Educational Leadership in
    relation to your own practice.

    Other positions/points of
    view are not a feature of the
    discussion.

    recommendations to own
    practice linked to
    analysis/synthesis.

    The description provides an
    adequate focus for further
    reflection. It includes a
    reasonably thorough
    statement of observations
    and comment on personal
    behaviour.

    Discusses own practice in
    relation to other
    positions/points of view.

    synthesis of new with
    existing knowledge.

    Demonstrates a capacity to
    draw on past and current
    experience to engage with
    key concepts relating to
    Educational Leadership, and
    articulates key changes in
    disposition and knowledge,
    taking into account the
    complexities of the issue(s)
    and a range of other points
    of view.

    of new with existing
    knowledge.

    Interprets developments in
    thinking and formulates
    conclusions and a
    substantial position
    regarding own skills,
    knowledge and experiences
    as an educational leader.
    This position is supported
    with relevant experience
    and insightful analysis of
    own and others’ points of
    view.

    Clarity of
    communication and
    integration of ideas

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 20%

    Descriptive writing only.
    There is no discussion
    beyond description.

    Meaning is consistently
    obscured by errors in the
    communication of ideas,
    including errors in
    spelling, grammar and
    punctuation.

    Difficult to follow the line
    of reasoning.

    Mainly descriptive writing.
    There is little discussion
    beyond description.

    The mode of communication
    is generally coherent;
    expression is generally clear;
    no persistent errors in
    spelling, punctuation, or
    grammar.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are well
    presented with mostly clear
    flow of ideas and
    arguments.

    Care is taken to ensure
    accuracy of punctuation,
    spelling, and grammatical
    structure.

    Line of reasoning is easy to
    follow.

    Information, arguments and
    evidence are very well
    presented; the presentation
    is logical and clear.

    The work is fluent and
    demonstrates confidence
    with the material; the
    method and style of
    presentation is entirely
    appropriate, as are
    vocabulary and syntax.

    Engages and sustains
    audience’s interest in the
    topic, demonstrates high
    levels of cultural sensitivity

    The work is extremely well-
    written, logical and
    persuasive with a clarity
    and maturity of
    presentation. There is a
    clear flow of ideas and
    information with little to no
    ambiguity.

    Page 5 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603

    Correct citation of key
    resources and evidence

    Percentage for this
    criterion = 10%

    Demonstrates
    inconsistent use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    ideas.

    Referencing is omitted or
    does not resemble APA.

    Demonstrates use of credible
    and relevant resources to
    support and develop ideas,
    but these are not always
    explicit or well developed.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with frequent or repeated
    errors.

    Demonstrates use of
    credible resources to
    support and develop ideas.

    Referencing resembles APA,
    with occasional errors.

    Demonstrates use of good
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within the
    organisation for sourcing
    evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

    Demonstrates use of high-
    quality, credible and
    relevant resources to
    support and develop
    arguments and position
    statements.

    Show evidence of wide
    scope within and without
    the organisation for
    sourcing evidence.

    APA referencing is free
    from errors.

  • [Solved] Education Voluntary or Regulated Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need some help answering the question pictured. – [\ \ IMG_2805.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2805-jpeg-10280069 "IMG_2805.jpeg") – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need some help answering the question pictured.

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2805.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2805-jpeg-10280069 "IMG_2805.jpeg")

    – a year ago