My Blog

Category: Education > Curriculum & Instructional Design

  • [Solved] Education edu 599 week 5 assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Refer to attached document – a year ago **files (2)** – ## cf_Week_5_Assignment_Template_EDU599.docx – ## eduweek5assignment.docx **## cf_Week_5_Assignment_Template_EDU599.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-edu-599-week-5-assignment) EDU599 – Education Capstone – Wee…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Refer to attached document

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## cf_Week_5_Assignment_Template_EDU599.docx

    – ## eduweek5assignment.docx

    **## cf_Week_5_Assignment_Template_EDU599.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-edu-599-week-5-assignment) EDU599 – Education Capstone – Week 5

    Student Name:

    Date:

    Class:

    Professor:

    ## Week 5 Assignment Template

    Explain how the activity is based on the learning theory you described.

    Main Idea

    Explain

    Ethics

    Ethical Principle

    Explanation

    Learning

    Scope/Significance

    Sources

    Source

    Theory

    Activity

    Explain

    Identify

    Identify

    Explain

    © 2024 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    ## image1.png

    **## eduweek5assignment.docx**

    2

    **Overview**

    This week, you will explain the issue you have selected to focus on for the rest of the course (
    **addressing student mental health in higher education**). In addition, you will describe the use of a learning theory to create an educational activity about the issue and explain how you will follow ethical guidelines for your field of education in addressing the issue.

    **Prepare**

    To complete this mapping assignment, you can use the template provided, which includes SmartArt. Prepare yourself by watching this short video:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd)

    This resource tells how to navigate and edit SmartArt using the text pane:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane)

    **Instructions**

    Create a map using the following guidelines.

    1. Download the Week 5 Assignment Template Download Week 5 Assignment Template. Use it to create a plan for how you will address an issue in education. If you prefer, make your own map using an appropriate document or software.
    **(ATTACHED AS DOCUMENT)**

    2. Use the Main Idea area to outline an explanation of your issue, including evidence for its significance and impact on students or education. Cite at least 2 sources you have researched related to the issue.

    3. Use the Ethics area to identify an ethical principle that relates to the issue and/or your role in addressing the issue as an educator. Explain the relationship. Cite the code of ethics you have consulted.

    4. Use the Learning area to outline a plan of 3 or more steps for how the issue can be solved or improved through education.

    a. What do people need to learn about the issue?

    b. What topics can be addressed that will improve the problem or situation related to this educational issue?

    5. Use the Theory area to identify the learning theory you will use as the basis of an activity to teach students about the issue. Explain why you selected the theory based on the subject matter, student population, and/or desired outcome.

    6. Use the Activity area to describe an educational activity for the curriculum you will write in week 10. The activity should be about the issue and should demonstrate your ability to create an activity that aligns with the learning theory you selected.

    7. In addition to the 3 sources required above, use 2 sources that are no older than five years to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least once within your assignment.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    · Research a current issue in the field of education for the purpose of determining how it can be addressed through learning.

    · Justify the use of a learning theory to help address a current issue in the field of education.

    · Determine the relationship of diversity and ethics to a current issue in the field of education.

    **## eduweek5assignment.docx**

    2

    **Overview**

    This week, you will explain the issue you have selected to focus on for the rest of the course (
    **addressing student mental health in higher education**). In addition, you will describe the use of a learning theory to create an educational activity about the issue and explain how you will follow ethical guidelines for your field of education in addressing the issue.

    **Prepare**

    To complete this mapping assignment, you can use the template provided, which includes SmartArt. Prepare yourself by watching this short video:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd)

    This resource tells how to navigate and edit SmartArt using the text pane:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane)

    **Instructions**

    Create a map using the following guidelines.

    1. Download the Week 5 Assignment Template Download Week 5 Assignment Template. Use it to create a plan for how you will address an issue in education. If you prefer, make your own map using an appropriate document or software.
    **(ATTACHED AS DOCUMENT)**

    2. Use the Main Idea area to outline an explanation of your issue, including evidence for its significance and impact on students or education. Cite at least 2 sources you have researched related to the issue.

    3. Use the Ethics area to identify an ethical principle that relates to the issue and/or your role in addressing the issue as an educator. Explain the relationship. Cite the code of ethics you have consulted.

    4. Use the Learning area to outline a plan of 3 or more steps for how the issue can be solved or improved through education.

    a. What do people need to learn about the issue?

    b. What topics can be addressed that will improve the problem or situation related to this educational issue?

    5. Use the Theory area to identify the learning theory you will use as the basis of an activity to teach students about the issue. Explain why you selected the theory based on the subject matter, student population, and/or desired outcome.

    6. Use the Activity area to describe an educational activity for the curriculum you will write in week 10. The activity should be about the issue and should demonstrate your ability to create an activity that aligns with the learning theory you selected.

    7. In addition to the 3 sources required above, use 2 sources that are no older than five years to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least once within your assignment.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    · Research a current issue in the field of education for the purpose of determining how it can be addressed through learning.

    · Justify the use of a learning theory to help address a current issue in the field of education.

    · Determine the relationship of diversity and ethics to a current issue in the field of education.

    **## cf_Week_5_Assignment_Template_EDU599.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-edu-599-week-5-assignment) EDU599 – Education Capstone – Week 5

    Student Name:

    Date:

    Class:

    Professor:

    ## Week 5 Assignment Template

    Explain how the activity is based on the learning theory you described.

    Main Idea

    Explain

    Ethics

    Ethical Principle

    Explanation

    Learning

    Scope/Significance

    Sources

    Source

    Theory

    Activity

    Explain

    Identify

    Identify

    Explain

    © 2024 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    ## image1.png

    **## eduweek5assignment.docx**

    2

    **Overview**

    This week, you will explain the issue you have selected to focus on for the rest of the course (
    **addressing student mental health in higher education**). In addition, you will describe the use of a learning theory to create an educational activity about the issue and explain how you will follow ethical guidelines for your field of education in addressing the issue.

    **Prepare**

    To complete this mapping assignment, you can use the template provided, which includes SmartArt. Prepare yourself by watching this short video:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd)

    This resource tells how to navigate and edit SmartArt using the text pane:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane)

    **Instructions**

    Create a map using the following guidelines.

    1. Download the Week 5 Assignment Template Download Week 5 Assignment Template. Use it to create a plan for how you will address an issue in education. If you prefer, make your own map using an appropriate document or software.
    **(ATTACHED AS DOCUMENT)**

    2. Use the Main Idea area to outline an explanation of your issue, including evidence for its significance and impact on students or education. Cite at least 2 sources you have researched related to the issue.

    3. Use the Ethics area to identify an ethical principle that relates to the issue and/or your role in addressing the issue as an educator. Explain the relationship. Cite the code of ethics you have consulted.

    4. Use the Learning area to outline a plan of 3 or more steps for how the issue can be solved or improved through education.

    a. What do people need to learn about the issue?

    b. What topics can be addressed that will improve the problem or situation related to this educational issue?

    5. Use the Theory area to identify the learning theory you will use as the basis of an activity to teach students about the issue. Explain why you selected the theory based on the subject matter, student population, and/or desired outcome.

    6. Use the Activity area to describe an educational activity for the curriculum you will write in week 10. The activity should be about the issue and should demonstrate your ability to create an activity that aligns with the learning theory you selected.

    7. In addition to the 3 sources required above, use 2 sources that are no older than five years to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least once within your assignment.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    · Research a current issue in the field of education for the purpose of determining how it can be addressed through learning.

    · Justify the use of a learning theory to help address a current issue in the field of education.

    · Determine the relationship of diversity and ethics to a current issue in the field of education.

    **## cf_Week_5_Assignment_Template_EDU599.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-edu-599-week-5-assignment) EDU599 – Education Capstone – Week 5

    Student Name:

    Date:

    Class:

    Professor:

    ## Week 5 Assignment Template

    Explain how the activity is based on the learning theory you described.

    Main Idea

    Explain

    Ethics

    Ethical Principle

    Explanation

    Learning

    Scope/Significance

    Sources

    Source

    Theory

    Activity

    Explain

    Identify

    Identify

    Explain

    © 2024 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    ## image1.png

    **## eduweek5assignment.docx**

    2

    **Overview**

    This week, you will explain the issue you have selected to focus on for the rest of the course (
    **addressing student mental health in higher education**). In addition, you will describe the use of a learning theory to create an educational activity about the issue and explain how you will follow ethical guidelines for your field of education in addressing the issue.

    **Prepare**

    To complete this mapping assignment, you can use the template provided, which includes SmartArt. Prepare yourself by watching this short video:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd)

    This resource tells how to navigate and edit SmartArt using the text pane:

    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/learn-more-about-smartart-graphics-6ea4fdb0-aa40-4fa9-9348-662d8af6ca2c?ns=winword&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zwd900&helpid=151847&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us#textpane)

    **Instructions**

    Create a map using the following guidelines.

    1. Download the Week 5 Assignment Template Download Week 5 Assignment Template. Use it to create a plan for how you will address an issue in education. If you prefer, make your own map using an appropriate document or software.
    **(ATTACHED AS DOCUMENT)**

    2. Use the Main Idea area to outline an explanation of your issue, including evidence for its significance and impact on students or education. Cite at least 2 sources you have researched related to the issue.

    3. Use the Ethics area to identify an ethical principle that relates to the issue and/or your role in addressing the issue as an educator. Explain the relationship. Cite the code of ethics you have consulted.

    4. Use the Learning area to outline a plan of 3 or more steps for how the issue can be solved or improved through education.

    a. What do people need to learn about the issue?

    b. What topics can be addressed that will improve the problem or situation related to this educational issue?

    5. Use the Theory area to identify the learning theory you will use as the basis of an activity to teach students about the issue. Explain why you selected the theory based on the subject matter, student population, and/or desired outcome.

    6. Use the Activity area to describe an educational activity for the curriculum you will write in week 10. The activity should be about the issue and should demonstrate your ability to create an activity that aligns with the learning theory you selected.

    7. In addition to the 3 sources required above, use 2 sources that are no older than five years to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least once within your assignment.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    · Research a current issue in the field of education for the purpose of determining how it can be addressed through learning.

    · Justify the use of a learning theory to help address a current issue in the field of education.

    · Determine the relationship of diversity and ethics to a current issue in the field of education.

  • [Solved] edu 599 week 5 discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please respond to the following: – Should students in school or adult learners be introduced to the topic of ethics? If yes, what topics will you discuss? If not, why not? – Provide specific topics that should be discussed and topics that should not be covered. – state your sources – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please respond to the following:

    – Should students in school or adult learners be introduced to the topic of ethics? If yes, what topics will you discuss? If not, why not?
    – Provide specific topics that should be discussed and topics that should not be covered.
    – state your sources

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Course Capstone Project 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need someone to help me with a community health issue – [\ \ IMG_2806.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2806-jpeg-10280071 "IMG_2806.jpeg") – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need someone to help me with a community health issue

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2806.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2806-jpeg-10280071 "IMG_2806.jpeg")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Reflect

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## Reflect2.pdf **## Reflect2.pdf** Reflect on the draft you created in your learning journal for the initial pilot you could implement with your existing resources and teachers in your organization. As you are creating a revised draft for this deliverable, be certain yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Reflect2.pdf

    **## Reflect2.pdf**

    Reflect on the draft you created in your learning journal for the initial pilot you could implement
    with your existing resources and teachers in your organization. As you are creating a revised
    draft for this deliverable, be certain you include the areas you already addressed, but now add
    examples from the professional literature to support your evaluation and rationale. While this
    plan may not be as large as your best-case scenario, it should still communicate the strength of
    your insights and knowledge of the sources to support your assertions.

    Be sure to include the following in your initial pilot plan:

    ● Clear connection from the student needs and identified teachers to the strategies in
    the Instructional Playbook you have created.

    ● Evaluation process for the pilot and how you would gather feedback from the
    teachers.

    ● Draft of the communication you would send to the building administration to request
    time to coach.

    ● Draft of your initial communication to teachers you would like to include.
    ● Timeline of the first steps if the teachers choose to participate.

    APA style and formatting should be followed

    **## Reflect2.pdf**

    Reflect on the draft you created in your learning journal for the initial pilot you could implement
    with your existing resources and teachers in your organization. As you are creating a revised
    draft for this deliverable, be certain you include the areas you already addressed, but now add
    examples from the professional literature to support your evaluation and rationale. While this
    plan may not be as large as your best-case scenario, it should still communicate the strength of
    your insights and knowledge of the sources to support your assertions.

    Be sure to include the following in your initial pilot plan:

    ● Clear connection from the student needs and identified teachers to the strategies in
    the Instructional Playbook you have created.

    ● Evaluation process for the pilot and how you would gather feedback from the
    teachers.

    ● Draft of the communication you would send to the building administration to request
    time to coach.

    ● Draft of your initial communication to teachers you would like to include.
    ● Timeline of the first steps if the teachers choose to participate.

    APA style and formatting should be followed

  • [Solved] Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Research clearly shows a direct correlation between thoughtful, well-planned lessons and students’ success. The time and effort required to plan lessons benefit both students and teachers and foster a productive learning environment. Using the “COE Lesson Plan Template,” begin the instructional plan…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Research clearly shows a direct correlation between thoughtful, well-planned lessons and students’ success. The time and effort required to plan lessons benefit both students and teachers and foster a productive learning environment.

    Using the “COE Lesson Plan Template,” begin the instructional planning process by selecting an age/grade level birth-Grade 3 and 1-2 state academic or early learning standards as the focus of the lesson. Complete all sections of the lesson plan template. Ensure the following is in the specified sections as you outline your lesson plan:

    – Multiple Means of Representation: Instruction that uses effective strategies and resources including the use of technology that is developmentally appropriate to meet the needs of all students.
    – Multiple Means of Engagement: Developmentally appropriate learning resources and technology that applies content knowledge to create meaningful and engaging opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master the content.
    – Multiple Means of Expression: Assessments aligned to early learning standards or state academic standards.
    – Extension Activity/Homework: Appropriate activities for the home environment or extensions to challenge or support learning.

    Cite any resources used to support your lesson plan.

    While APA Style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    _**Benchmark Information**_

    _This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:_

    _MEd Early Childhood and Early Childhood Special Education (ITL/NITL)_

    _3.1: Plan instruction that uses effective strategies and resources, including the equitable and appropriate use of technology, adapted to meet the needs of young learners with and without exceptionalities. [AAQEP 1a; EI/ECSE 6.3; NAEYC 4b; InTASC 2(a), 2(f), 2(h), 3(g), 7(b), 8(a), 8(g), 8(l), 8(n), 8(o); ISTE-E 5b; MC2]_

    _2.1: Apply in-depth content knowledge and learning resources, including technology, in the academic disciplines to create meaningful and engaging pedagogical practices for students to learn, practice, and master content. [AAQEP 1a; EI/ECSE 5.2; NAEYC 5b; InTASC 4(a), 4(b), 4(c), 4(h), 5(a), 5(b), 5(c); ISTE-E 3b; MC2]_

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Emergent Literacy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## Micro_Emergent_Part3_Mod2_Preschool_Assignment2.docx **## Micro_Emergent_Part3_Mod2_Preschool_Assignment2.docx** **![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)** | | | | — | — | | **![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Micro_Emergent_Part3_Mod2_Preschool_Assignment2.docx

    **## Micro_Emergent_Part3_Mod2_Preschool_Assignment2.docx**

    **![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)** | | |
    | — |
    | **Emergent Literacy Part 3:**<br>**Practicum:**<br>**Module 2: Assignment 2** | |

    For this
    **Assignment**, plan and implement a lesson to support alphabet knowledge and print awareness.

    **Preschool Assignment Planning Form:**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Planning for Small Group Instruction: Use informal assessment to determine which children will benefit from extra support and in what area they need to concentrate. Next, identify 2-3 children with whom to work. Finally, using the sample lesson plan as a guide, plan a small-group lesson.** |
    | **Step 1: Please describe the informal assessment you used to identify the need for additional support.** |
    | **Step 2: Identify 2-3 children with whom to work. Include each child’s age and use initials or pseudonyms to protect the child’s identity.**<br>Initials: Age: <br>Initials: Age: <br>Initials: Age: |
    | **Step 3: Plan your small-group lesson.** |
    | **Step 4: Implement the lesson and reflect on the process.** |
    | **Step 5: Pause and Try-It Out**<br>**Before continuing to complete the assignment, try your planned activity in your classroom.  Note how it went and how the children responded and come back to finish answering the reflection questions.** |
    | **Step 6: Answer the following questions.**<br>1. <br>**How did understanding the importance of alphabet knowledge and print awareness skills guide you as you planned?**<br>2. <br>**Which skill(s) did you focus on and what activities did you plan?**<br>3. <br>**Reflect on the engagement of the child(ren) during the shared reading or small group activities. What worked well? What would you do differently next time?**<br>4. <br>**How will you continue to use small-group or one-on-one instruction with the children in your care who need extra support?** |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Page 1 of 2 | ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505) |

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)

    © 2023 University of Florida Lastinger Center for Learning

    ## image1.emf

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    ## image4.emf

    **## Micro_Emergent_Part3_Mod2_Preschool_Assignment2.docx**

    **![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)** | | |
    | — |
    | **Emergent Literacy Part 3:**<br>**Practicum:**<br>**Module 2: Assignment 2** | |

    For this
    **Assignment**, plan and implement a lesson to support alphabet knowledge and print awareness.

    **Preschool Assignment Planning Form:**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Planning for Small Group Instruction: Use informal assessment to determine which children will benefit from extra support and in what area they need to concentrate. Next, identify 2-3 children with whom to work. Finally, using the sample lesson plan as a guide, plan a small-group lesson.** |
    | **Step 1: Please describe the informal assessment you used to identify the need for additional support.** |
    | **Step 2: Identify 2-3 children with whom to work. Include each child’s age and use initials or pseudonyms to protect the child’s identity.**<br>Initials: Age: <br>Initials: Age: <br>Initials: Age: |
    | **Step 3: Plan your small-group lesson.** |
    | **Step 4: Implement the lesson and reflect on the process.** |
    | **Step 5: Pause and Try-It Out**<br>**Before continuing to complete the assignment, try your planned activity in your classroom.  Note how it went and how the children responded and come back to finish answering the reflection questions.** |
    | **Step 6: Answer the following questions.**<br>1. <br>**How did understanding the importance of alphabet knowledge and print awareness skills guide you as you planned?**<br>2. <br>**Which skill(s) did you focus on and what activities did you plan?**<br>3. <br>**Reflect on the engagement of the child(ren) during the shared reading or small group activities. What worked well? What would you do differently next time?**<br>4. <br>**How will you continue to use small-group or one-on-one instruction with the children in your care who need extra support?** |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Page 1 of 2 | ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505) |

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/emergent-literacy-20903505)

    © 2023 University of Florida Lastinger Center for Learning

    ## image1.emf

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    ## image4.emf

  • [Solved] Theology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    submit a 1100-1500 word on either 1 Thess. 4:13-5:11 or 2 Thess. 2:1-12. include the following: – Identify the author's message to his original audience. In doing so, take the context into consideration (surrounding passages, overall theme of the gospel). Provide references, citations, and/or brief …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    submit a 1100-1500 word on either 1 Thess. 4:13-5:11 or 2 Thess. 2:1-12.  include the following:

    – Identify the author's message to his original audience. In doing so, take the context into consideration (surrounding passages, overall theme of the gospel). Provide references, citations, and/or brief quotations from the gospel to support your points.
    – Identify any keywords (and their meanings) that contribute to the overall message of the passage.
    – Briefly suggest how this message can be applied to the message of the Kingdom of God today.

    You should consult three to five commentaries (recommend best commentary.com), journal articles, Bible dictionaries, etc., to complete this assignment. Include footnotes and bibliography in Turabian format. No cover page is required.

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] news

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering news.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Implementation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Implementation.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Education Physician Aid In Dying Case Study Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (2)** – ## PhysicianAidCaseStudyAssignment.docx – ## HLT-305Rubric-PhysicianAid-in-DyingCaseStudy.pdf **## PhysicianAidCaseStudyAssignment.docx** Physician Aid-in-Dying is a practice that is legal in a number of states within the United States due to the passing of the Death wit…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## PhysicianAidCaseStudyAssignment.docx

    – ## HLT-305Rubric-PhysicianAid-in-DyingCaseStudy.pdf

    **## PhysicianAidCaseStudyAssignment.docx**

    Physician Aid-in-Dying is a practice that is legal in a number of states within the United States due to the passing of the Death with Dignity Act.
    Please make sure to research this topic prior to beginning this assignment, as you will need to apply this research to your paper.

    _Case Study: Physician Aid-in-Dying in Portland, Oregon_
    A 35-year-old male named Zachary Davis has lived in and been a legal resident of Portland for almost 20 years. In the fall of 2018 he began having terrible headaches. After months of suffering with these, Zachary made the decision to see his primary care provider. His provider decided that scans should be done to rule out anything serious before beginning treatment for what he thought was probably migraine headaches. Zachary had the routine scans and at 5:00 p.m. he received a call from his doctor with the results. Zachary was diagnosed with advanced stage glioblastoma multiforme brain cancer, one of the deadliest brain tumors with a very low survival rate. Zachary immediately began aggressive treatment. After 12 weeks of treatment, they saw no improvement in his condition. At that time, his doctors sat down with him to discuss options. He was given approximately 6 months to live, giving him the dreaded diagnosis of being terminally ill. They discussed hospice care and other end-of-life options. After surveying the options, Zachary expressed the wish to participate in Physician Aid-In-Dying.

    Considering all aspects of the Death With Dignity legislation that has been passed into law in Oregon, consider the following in a paper of
    1,000-1,250 words:

    1. Does Zachary meet the requirements to take part in this practice? Why? Be detailed and specific in your evaluation of this practice.

    2. Considering Death With Dignity legislation, is mental health a component that is evaluated and considered? Do you support this aspect of the legislation?

    3. As we near end of life it is often that a surrogate is put in place for our medical decisions. How does this work with the practice of Physician Aid-in-dying?

    4. What do you anticipate seeing in the future with this controversial practice in health care?

    **PLEASE USE REFERENCES**

    **## HLT-305Rubric-PhysicianAid-in-DyingCaseStudy.pdf**

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

    Physician Aid-in-Dying Case Study – Rubric

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements 18 points

    Criteria Description

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully considers whether the requirements

    are met to proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly considers whether the requirements are met to

    proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with Physician

    Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not consider whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    Collapse All

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses whether mental health is

    a component that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity

    legislation.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses whether mental health is a component

    that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses whether mental health is a component that is evaluated and

    considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses how surrogate decision-

    making works with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses how surrogate decision-making works

    with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the practice of

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying 18 points

    Criteria Description

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully anticipates what the future may

    hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly anticipates what the future may hold for

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not anticipate what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

    Thesis Development and Purpose 7 points

    Criteria Description

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    5. Excellent 7 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    4. Good 5.95 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    3. Satisfactory 5.25 points

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.55 points

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

    Argument Logic and Construction 8 points

    Criteria Description

    Argument Logic and Construction

    5. Excellent 8 points

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

    and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    4. Good 6.8 points

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

    evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

    conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    3. Satisfactory 6 points

    Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

    presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

    thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

    There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

    credibility.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

    not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

    sources.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
    language use)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

    distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

    appropriate language are employed.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

    correct but not varied.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
    assignment)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    All format elements are correct.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

    style.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

    errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

    followed correctly.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

    Documentation of Sources 5 points

    Criteria Description

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment and style)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

    is mostly correct.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

    some formatting errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## HLT-305Rubric-PhysicianAid-in-DyingCaseStudy.pdf**

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

    Physician Aid-in-Dying Case Study – Rubric

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements 18 points

    Criteria Description

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully considers whether the requirements

    are met to proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly considers whether the requirements are met to

    proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with Physician

    Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not consider whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    Collapse All

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses whether mental health is

    a component that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity

    legislation.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses whether mental health is a component

    that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses whether mental health is a component that is evaluated and

    considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses how surrogate decision-

    making works with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses how surrogate decision-making works

    with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the practice of

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying 18 points

    Criteria Description

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully anticipates what the future may

    hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly anticipates what the future may hold for

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not anticipate what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

    Thesis Development and Purpose 7 points

    Criteria Description

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    5. Excellent 7 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    4. Good 5.95 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    3. Satisfactory 5.25 points

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.55 points

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

    Argument Logic and Construction 8 points

    Criteria Description

    Argument Logic and Construction

    5. Excellent 8 points

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

    and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    4. Good 6.8 points

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

    evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

    conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    3. Satisfactory 6 points

    Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

    presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

    thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

    There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

    credibility.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

    not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

    sources.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
    language use)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

    distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

    appropriate language are employed.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

    correct but not varied.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
    assignment)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    All format elements are correct.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

    style.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

    errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

    followed correctly.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

    Documentation of Sources 5 points

    Criteria Description

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment and style)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

    is mostly correct.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

    some formatting errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## PhysicianAidCaseStudyAssignment.docx**

    Physician Aid-in-Dying is a practice that is legal in a number of states within the United States due to the passing of the Death with Dignity Act.
    Please make sure to research this topic prior to beginning this assignment, as you will need to apply this research to your paper.

    _Case Study: Physician Aid-in-Dying in Portland, Oregon_
    A 35-year-old male named Zachary Davis has lived in and been a legal resident of Portland for almost 20 years. In the fall of 2018 he began having terrible headaches. After months of suffering with these, Zachary made the decision to see his primary care provider. His provider decided that scans should be done to rule out anything serious before beginning treatment for what he thought was probably migraine headaches. Zachary had the routine scans and at 5:00 p.m. he received a call from his doctor with the results. Zachary was diagnosed with advanced stage glioblastoma multiforme brain cancer, one of the deadliest brain tumors with a very low survival rate. Zachary immediately began aggressive treatment. After 12 weeks of treatment, they saw no improvement in his condition. At that time, his doctors sat down with him to discuss options. He was given approximately 6 months to live, giving him the dreaded diagnosis of being terminally ill. They discussed hospice care and other end-of-life options. After surveying the options, Zachary expressed the wish to participate in Physician Aid-In-Dying.

    Considering all aspects of the Death With Dignity legislation that has been passed into law in Oregon, consider the following in a paper of
    1,000-1,250 words:

    1. Does Zachary meet the requirements to take part in this practice? Why? Be detailed and specific in your evaluation of this practice.

    2. Considering Death With Dignity legislation, is mental health a component that is evaluated and considered? Do you support this aspect of the legislation?

    3. As we near end of life it is often that a surrogate is put in place for our medical decisions. How does this work with the practice of Physician Aid-in-dying?

    4. What do you anticipate seeing in the future with this controversial practice in health care?

    **PLEASE USE REFERENCES**

    **## HLT-305Rubric-PhysicianAid-in-DyingCaseStudy.pdf**

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

    Physician Aid-in-Dying Case Study – Rubric

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements 18 points

    Criteria Description

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully considers whether the requirements

    are met to proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly considers whether the requirements are met to

    proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with Physician

    Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not consider whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    Collapse All

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses whether mental health is

    a component that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity

    legislation.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses whether mental health is a component

    that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses whether mental health is a component that is evaluated and

    considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses how surrogate decision-

    making works with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses how surrogate decision-making works

    with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the practice of

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying 18 points

    Criteria Description

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully anticipates what the future may

    hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly anticipates what the future may hold for

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not anticipate what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

    Thesis Development and Purpose 7 points

    Criteria Description

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    5. Excellent 7 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    4. Good 5.95 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    3. Satisfactory 5.25 points

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.55 points

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

    Argument Logic and Construction 8 points

    Criteria Description

    Argument Logic and Construction

    5. Excellent 8 points

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

    and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    4. Good 6.8 points

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

    evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

    conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    3. Satisfactory 6 points

    Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

    presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

    thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

    There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

    credibility.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

    not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

    sources.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
    language use)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

    distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

    appropriate language are employed.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

    correct but not varied.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
    assignment)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    All format elements are correct.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

    style.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

    errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

    followed correctly.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

    Documentation of Sources 5 points

    Criteria Description

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment and style)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

    is mostly correct.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

    some formatting errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## PhysicianAidCaseStudyAssignment.docx**

    Physician Aid-in-Dying is a practice that is legal in a number of states within the United States due to the passing of the Death with Dignity Act.
    Please make sure to research this topic prior to beginning this assignment, as you will need to apply this research to your paper.

    _Case Study: Physician Aid-in-Dying in Portland, Oregon_
    A 35-year-old male named Zachary Davis has lived in and been a legal resident of Portland for almost 20 years. In the fall of 2018 he began having terrible headaches. After months of suffering with these, Zachary made the decision to see his primary care provider. His provider decided that scans should be done to rule out anything serious before beginning treatment for what he thought was probably migraine headaches. Zachary had the routine scans and at 5:00 p.m. he received a call from his doctor with the results. Zachary was diagnosed with advanced stage glioblastoma multiforme brain cancer, one of the deadliest brain tumors with a very low survival rate. Zachary immediately began aggressive treatment. After 12 weeks of treatment, they saw no improvement in his condition. At that time, his doctors sat down with him to discuss options. He was given approximately 6 months to live, giving him the dreaded diagnosis of being terminally ill. They discussed hospice care and other end-of-life options. After surveying the options, Zachary expressed the wish to participate in Physician Aid-In-Dying.

    Considering all aspects of the Death With Dignity legislation that has been passed into law in Oregon, consider the following in a paper of
    1,000-1,250 words:

    1. Does Zachary meet the requirements to take part in this practice? Why? Be detailed and specific in your evaluation of this practice.

    2. Considering Death With Dignity legislation, is mental health a component that is evaluated and considered? Do you support this aspect of the legislation?

    3. As we near end of life it is often that a surrogate is put in place for our medical decisions. How does this work with the practice of Physician Aid-in-dying?

    4. What do you anticipate seeing in the future with this controversial practice in health care?

    **PLEASE USE REFERENCES**

    **## HLT-305Rubric-PhysicianAid-in-DyingCaseStudy.pdf**

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

    Physician Aid-in-Dying Case Study – Rubric

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements 18 points

    Criteria Description

    Meeting Physician Aid-in-Dying Requirements

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully considers whether the requirements

    are met to proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly considers whether the requirements are met to

    proceed with Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with Physician

    Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely considers whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not consider whether the requirements are met to proceed with

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    Collapse All

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Mental Health in Death With Dignity Legislation

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses whether mental health is

    a component that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity

    legislation.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses whether mental health is a component

    that is evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses whether mental health is a component that is evaluated and

    considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss whether mental health is a component that is

    evaluated and considered in Death With Dignity legislation.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying 17 points

    Criteria Description

    Surrogate Medical Decisions in Physician Aid-In-Dying

    5. Excellent 17 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully discusses how surrogate decision-

    making works with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 14.45 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly discusses how surrogate decision-making works

    with the practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 12.75 points

    Essay discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the practice of

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.05 points

    Essay vaguely discusses how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not discuss how surrogate decision-making works with the

    practice of Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying 18 points

    Criteria Description

    The Future of Physician Aid-in-Dying

    5. Excellent 18 points

    Essay clearly, thoroughly, and insightfully anticipates what the future may

    hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    4. Good 15.3 points

    Essay clearly and thoroughly anticipates what the future may hold for

    Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

    Essay anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

    Essay vaguely anticipates what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Essay does not anticipate what the future may hold for Physician Aid-in-Dying.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

    Thesis Development and Purpose 7 points

    Criteria Description

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    5. Excellent 7 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    4. Good 5.95 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    3. Satisfactory 5.25 points

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.55 points

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

    Argument Logic and Construction 8 points

    Criteria Description

    Argument Logic and Construction

    5. Excellent 8 points

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

    and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    4. Good 6.8 points

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

    evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

    conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    3. Satisfactory 6 points

    Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

    presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

    thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

    There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

    credibility.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

    not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

    sources.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
    language use)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

    distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

    appropriate language are employed.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

    correct but not varied.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
    assignment)

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    All format elements are correct.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

    style.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

    errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

    followed correctly.

    5/3/25, 1:44 PM

    Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

    Documentation of Sources 5 points

    Criteria Description

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment and style)

    5. Excellent 5 points

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    4. Good 4.25 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

    is mostly correct.

    3. Satisfactory 3.75 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

    some formatting errors may be present.

    2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.25 points

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    Total 100 points

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)