Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Article Report
– a year ago
**files (2)**
– ## physicaleducationarticle1.docx
– ## KotzeChloeexample1.pdf
**## physicaleducationarticle1.docx**
Find three peer-reviewed articles pertaining to your research topic and write a report summarizing your findings. Each article needs to be summarized in your 3-4-page report. Each summary should include an explanation of the findings. Do not copy and paste the abstract of each article. At the end of your report, include an overview of how the articles impact the current climate of sports management, exercise science, physical education, etc. (use critical thinking here)
Cite each article using APA. If you are not familiar with or confident in using APA, I would strongly suggest reaching out to the Writing Center on campus. You can make an appointment
**here**
**Links to an external site.**. See format below.
This is what it should look like Example
Cover Page
Should include, research topic, name, date, and class
Towards Social Leverage of Sport Events (Chalip, 2006)
Summary of article
Small-Scale Event Sport Tourism (Gibson, Kaplanidou, & Kang, 2012)
Summary or article
Sport Tourism and Theory and Other Developments (Gibson, 2017)
Summary of article
Overview
Summary of overall findings
References (APA format)
Chalip, L. (2006). Towards social leverage of sport events. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 11(2), 109-127.
Gibson, H. (2017). Sport tourism and theory and other developments: some reflections. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 21(2), 153-158.
Gibson, H., Kaplanidou, K., and Kang, S.J. (2012). Small-scale event sport tourism: a case study in sustainable tourism. Sport Management Review, 15, 160-170.
·
research topic
1. Trends in Youth Fitness and Physical Activity Levels
(Examines how activity levels in children and teens have changed in recent years and what’s being done to encourage movement.)
**## KotzeChloeexample1.pdf**
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 1
Current Literature Concerning Return to Play for Athletes Post-Concussion
Chlöe Kotzé
Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation
College of Education and Human Sciences
Delta State University
PER 611 Current Literature and Trends in Physical Education
Dr. Caroline Fletcher
26 January 2024
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 2
Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players: comparative
analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE Consortium (2014–
2017)
(McCrea et al., 2020)
Sports-related concussions (SRCs) have gained enhanced awareness over the past 30
years, aiding in the increased number of individuals reporting concussions, as well as the
level of seriousness devoted to abiding by strict protocol for return-to-play (RTP). This study
focused on collegiate-level football players forming part of the NCAA, and suggested that an
initial 7-10 waiting period (at which cerebral vulnerability to enhanced damage is present) for
recovery and zero involvement in the contact sporting environment was necessary to mitigate
the potential risk for adverse neurological events post-SRC. Currently, athletes and coaches
are to adhere to the NCAA’s Concussion Safety Protocol, which considers athlete education
in the preseason, assessment of the athlete pre-participation, diagnoses of concussions, and
injury management post-SRCs to ensure appropriate and safe RTP. Future insights could
adopt a more holistic approach to this, including both subjective and objective assessment
methods for enhanced rehabilitation.
Biomarkers to aid the return to play decision following sports-related concussion: a
systematic review
(Seranatne et al., 2022)
The premature RTP for individuals post-SRC shows increased risks for both
neurological injury and the persistence of the symptoms associated therewith. Due to SRCs
being considered mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs), their assessment and compliance
with a suitable clinical protocol prior to the RTP for the respective athlete remains crucial,
with current assessments lacking required objectivity to ensure safe RTP without associated
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 3
prolonging of negative neurological effects. With biomarkers aiding in the rehabilitation of
mTBIs, the authors suggest considering the testing of these in accordance with the periodic
phasing of rehabilitation to monitor neurological symptoms that may surpass the
physiological improvements noted visually and via current assessment. For this reason,
biomarkers possess the ability to potentially identify pathological mechanisms and pathways
associated with SRCs, which could refine and improve current assessment and RTP
protocols.
Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-related concussion
(Wellm & Zentgraf, 2023)
This systematic review considered the current literature pertaining to the protocol for
RTP following a SRC and found that despite numerous criteria existing for gradual
progression into competition, these were inadequate in mitigating potential adverse cognitive
and neurological events associated with the condition. As many other physical injuries
(including tendon ruptures and/or torn ligaments) follow a more precise protocol for RTP,
interestingly, SRC protocols are considered less specific and highly subjective in nature, as
well as being placed under heightened pressure to be “resolved” in a timely manner, unlike
their musculoskeletal counterparts. The authors suggest the implementation of specialized
(objective) cognitive assessments concentrating on the individual areas of impairment post-
SRC, the skills required for the specific athlete’s sporting code, and the individual goals of
the athlete to ensure a holistic approach to the traumatic injury is achieved. With 50% of
SRCs going unreported, the need for appropriate assessments and protocols has become an
integral component of rehabilitation, especially considering the enormous economic driving
force behind collegiate and professional sport.
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 4
Overview
Current literature regarding RTP protocols for athletes post-SRC remains outdated
due to highly subjective nature of testing methods adopted, as well as the inaccurate reporting
of physiological, neurological, and psychological factors from a coach and athlete standpoint.
For this reason, updated protocols and procedures combining objective and subjective
measures are required, thus reinforcing the need for a more holistic approach in
rehabilitation. In this way, the provision of equal attention and focus to these areas may
produce advances in rehabilitation that are long overdue.
References
McCrea, M., Broglio, S., McAllister, T., Zhou, W., Zhao, S., Katz, B., … & Guskiewicz, K.
M. (2020). Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players:
comparative analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE
Consortium (2014–2017). British journal of sports medicine, 54(2), 102-109.
Senaratne, N., Hunt, A., Sotsman, E., & Grey, M. J. (2022). Biomarkers to aid the return to
play decision following sports-related concussion: a systematic review. Journal of
Concussion, 6, 20597002211070735.
Wellm, D., & Zentgraf, K. (2023). Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-
related concussion. Journal of Concussion, 7, 20597002231183234.
**## KotzeChloeexample1.pdf**
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 1
Current Literature Concerning Return to Play for Athletes Post-Concussion
Chlöe Kotzé
Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation
College of Education and Human Sciences
Delta State University
PER 611 Current Literature and Trends in Physical Education
Dr. Caroline Fletcher
26 January 2024
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 2
Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players: comparative
analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE Consortium (2014–
2017)
(McCrea et al., 2020)
Sports-related concussions (SRCs) have gained enhanced awareness over the past 30
years, aiding in the increased number of individuals reporting concussions, as well as the
level of seriousness devoted to abiding by strict protocol for return-to-play (RTP). This study
focused on collegiate-level football players forming part of the NCAA, and suggested that an
initial 7-10 waiting period (at which cerebral vulnerability to enhanced damage is present) for
recovery and zero involvement in the contact sporting environment was necessary to mitigate
the potential risk for adverse neurological events post-SRC. Currently, athletes and coaches
are to adhere to the NCAA’s Concussion Safety Protocol, which considers athlete education
in the preseason, assessment of the athlete pre-participation, diagnoses of concussions, and
injury management post-SRCs to ensure appropriate and safe RTP. Future insights could
adopt a more holistic approach to this, including both subjective and objective assessment
methods for enhanced rehabilitation.
Biomarkers to aid the return to play decision following sports-related concussion: a
systematic review
(Seranatne et al., 2022)
The premature RTP for individuals post-SRC shows increased risks for both
neurological injury and the persistence of the symptoms associated therewith. Due to SRCs
being considered mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs), their assessment and compliance
with a suitable clinical protocol prior to the RTP for the respective athlete remains crucial,
with current assessments lacking required objectivity to ensure safe RTP without associated
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 3
prolonging of negative neurological effects. With biomarkers aiding in the rehabilitation of
mTBIs, the authors suggest considering the testing of these in accordance with the periodic
phasing of rehabilitation to monitor neurological symptoms that may surpass the
physiological improvements noted visually and via current assessment. For this reason,
biomarkers possess the ability to potentially identify pathological mechanisms and pathways
associated with SRCs, which could refine and improve current assessment and RTP
protocols.
Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-related concussion
(Wellm & Zentgraf, 2023)
This systematic review considered the current literature pertaining to the protocol for
RTP following a SRC and found that despite numerous criteria existing for gradual
progression into competition, these were inadequate in mitigating potential adverse cognitive
and neurological events associated with the condition. As many other physical injuries
(including tendon ruptures and/or torn ligaments) follow a more precise protocol for RTP,
interestingly, SRC protocols are considered less specific and highly subjective in nature, as
well as being placed under heightened pressure to be “resolved” in a timely manner, unlike
their musculoskeletal counterparts. The authors suggest the implementation of specialized
(objective) cognitive assessments concentrating on the individual areas of impairment post-
SRC, the skills required for the specific athlete’s sporting code, and the individual goals of
the athlete to ensure a holistic approach to the traumatic injury is achieved. With 50% of
SRCs going unreported, the need for appropriate assessments and protocols has become an
integral component of rehabilitation, especially considering the enormous economic driving
force behind collegiate and professional sport.
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 4
Overview
Current literature regarding RTP protocols for athletes post-SRC remains outdated
due to highly subjective nature of testing methods adopted, as well as the inaccurate reporting
of physiological, neurological, and psychological factors from a coach and athlete standpoint.
For this reason, updated protocols and procedures combining objective and subjective
measures are required, thus reinforcing the need for a more holistic approach in
rehabilitation. In this way, the provision of equal attention and focus to these areas may
produce advances in rehabilitation that are long overdue.
References
McCrea, M., Broglio, S., McAllister, T., Zhou, W., Zhao, S., Katz, B., … & Guskiewicz, K.
M. (2020). Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players:
comparative analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE
Consortium (2014–2017). British journal of sports medicine, 54(2), 102-109.
Senaratne, N., Hunt, A., Sotsman, E., & Grey, M. J. (2022). Biomarkers to aid the return to
play decision following sports-related concussion: a systematic review. Journal of
Concussion, 6, 20597002211070735.
Wellm, D., & Zentgraf, K. (2023). Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-
related concussion. Journal of Concussion, 7, 20597002231183234.
**## physicaleducationarticle1.docx**
Find three peer-reviewed articles pertaining to your research topic and write a report summarizing your findings. Each article needs to be summarized in your 3-4-page report. Each summary should include an explanation of the findings. Do not copy and paste the abstract of each article. At the end of your report, include an overview of how the articles impact the current climate of sports management, exercise science, physical education, etc. (use critical thinking here)
Cite each article using APA. If you are not familiar with or confident in using APA, I would strongly suggest reaching out to the Writing Center on campus. You can make an appointment
**here**
**Links to an external site.**. See format below.
This is what it should look like Example
Cover Page
Should include, research topic, name, date, and class
Towards Social Leverage of Sport Events (Chalip, 2006)
Summary of article
Small-Scale Event Sport Tourism (Gibson, Kaplanidou, & Kang, 2012)
Summary or article
Sport Tourism and Theory and Other Developments (Gibson, 2017)
Summary of article
Overview
Summary of overall findings
References (APA format)
Chalip, L. (2006). Towards social leverage of sport events. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 11(2), 109-127.
Gibson, H. (2017). Sport tourism and theory and other developments: some reflections. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 21(2), 153-158.
Gibson, H., Kaplanidou, K., and Kang, S.J. (2012). Small-scale event sport tourism: a case study in sustainable tourism. Sport Management Review, 15, 160-170.
·
research topic
1. Trends in Youth Fitness and Physical Activity Levels
(Examines how activity levels in children and teens have changed in recent years and what’s being done to encourage movement.)
**## KotzeChloeexample1.pdf**
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 1
Current Literature Concerning Return to Play for Athletes Post-Concussion
Chlöe Kotzé
Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation
College of Education and Human Sciences
Delta State University
PER 611 Current Literature and Trends in Physical Education
Dr. Caroline Fletcher
26 January 2024
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 2
Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players: comparative
analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE Consortium (2014–
2017)
(McCrea et al., 2020)
Sports-related concussions (SRCs) have gained enhanced awareness over the past 30
years, aiding in the increased number of individuals reporting concussions, as well as the
level of seriousness devoted to abiding by strict protocol for return-to-play (RTP). This study
focused on collegiate-level football players forming part of the NCAA, and suggested that an
initial 7-10 waiting period (at which cerebral vulnerability to enhanced damage is present) for
recovery and zero involvement in the contact sporting environment was necessary to mitigate
the potential risk for adverse neurological events post-SRC. Currently, athletes and coaches
are to adhere to the NCAA’s Concussion Safety Protocol, which considers athlete education
in the preseason, assessment of the athlete pre-participation, diagnoses of concussions, and
injury management post-SRCs to ensure appropriate and safe RTP. Future insights could
adopt a more holistic approach to this, including both subjective and objective assessment
methods for enhanced rehabilitation.
Biomarkers to aid the return to play decision following sports-related concussion: a
systematic review
(Seranatne et al., 2022)
The premature RTP for individuals post-SRC shows increased risks for both
neurological injury and the persistence of the symptoms associated therewith. Due to SRCs
being considered mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs), their assessment and compliance
with a suitable clinical protocol prior to the RTP for the respective athlete remains crucial,
with current assessments lacking required objectivity to ensure safe RTP without associated
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 3
prolonging of negative neurological effects. With biomarkers aiding in the rehabilitation of
mTBIs, the authors suggest considering the testing of these in accordance with the periodic
phasing of rehabilitation to monitor neurological symptoms that may surpass the
physiological improvements noted visually and via current assessment. For this reason,
biomarkers possess the ability to potentially identify pathological mechanisms and pathways
associated with SRCs, which could refine and improve current assessment and RTP
protocols.
Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-related concussion
(Wellm & Zentgraf, 2023)
This systematic review considered the current literature pertaining to the protocol for
RTP following a SRC and found that despite numerous criteria existing for gradual
progression into competition, these were inadequate in mitigating potential adverse cognitive
and neurological events associated with the condition. As many other physical injuries
(including tendon ruptures and/or torn ligaments) follow a more precise protocol for RTP,
interestingly, SRC protocols are considered less specific and highly subjective in nature, as
well as being placed under heightened pressure to be “resolved” in a timely manner, unlike
their musculoskeletal counterparts. The authors suggest the implementation of specialized
(objective) cognitive assessments concentrating on the individual areas of impairment post-
SRC, the skills required for the specific athlete’s sporting code, and the individual goals of
the athlete to ensure a holistic approach to the traumatic injury is achieved. With 50% of
SRCs going unreported, the need for appropriate assessments and protocols has become an
integral component of rehabilitation, especially considering the enormous economic driving
force behind collegiate and professional sport.
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 4
Overview
Current literature regarding RTP protocols for athletes post-SRC remains outdated
due to highly subjective nature of testing methods adopted, as well as the inaccurate reporting
of physiological, neurological, and psychological factors from a coach and athlete standpoint.
For this reason, updated protocols and procedures combining objective and subjective
measures are required, thus reinforcing the need for a more holistic approach in
rehabilitation. In this way, the provision of equal attention and focus to these areas may
produce advances in rehabilitation that are long overdue.
References
McCrea, M., Broglio, S., McAllister, T., Zhou, W., Zhao, S., Katz, B., … & Guskiewicz, K.
M. (2020). Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players:
comparative analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE
Consortium (2014–2017). British journal of sports medicine, 54(2), 102-109.
Senaratne, N., Hunt, A., Sotsman, E., & Grey, M. J. (2022). Biomarkers to aid the return to
play decision following sports-related concussion: a systematic review. Journal of
Concussion, 6, 20597002211070735.
Wellm, D., & Zentgraf, K. (2023). Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-
related concussion. Journal of Concussion, 7, 20597002231183234.
**## physicaleducationarticle1.docx**
Find three peer-reviewed articles pertaining to your research topic and write a report summarizing your findings. Each article needs to be summarized in your 3-4-page report. Each summary should include an explanation of the findings. Do not copy and paste the abstract of each article. At the end of your report, include an overview of how the articles impact the current climate of sports management, exercise science, physical education, etc. (use critical thinking here)
Cite each article using APA. If you are not familiar with or confident in using APA, I would strongly suggest reaching out to the Writing Center on campus. You can make an appointment
**here**
**Links to an external site.**. See format below.
This is what it should look like Example
Cover Page
Should include, research topic, name, date, and class
Towards Social Leverage of Sport Events (Chalip, 2006)
Summary of article
Small-Scale Event Sport Tourism (Gibson, Kaplanidou, & Kang, 2012)
Summary or article
Sport Tourism and Theory and Other Developments (Gibson, 2017)
Summary of article
Overview
Summary of overall findings
References (APA format)
Chalip, L. (2006). Towards social leverage of sport events. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 11(2), 109-127.
Gibson, H. (2017). Sport tourism and theory and other developments: some reflections. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 21(2), 153-158.
Gibson, H., Kaplanidou, K., and Kang, S.J. (2012). Small-scale event sport tourism: a case study in sustainable tourism. Sport Management Review, 15, 160-170.
·
research topic
1. Trends in Youth Fitness and Physical Activity Levels
(Examines how activity levels in children and teens have changed in recent years and what’s being done to encourage movement.)
**## KotzeChloeexample1.pdf**
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 1
Current Literature Concerning Return to Play for Athletes Post-Concussion
Chlöe Kotzé
Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation
College of Education and Human Sciences
Delta State University
PER 611 Current Literature and Trends in Physical Education
Dr. Caroline Fletcher
26 January 2024
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 2
Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players: comparative
analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE Consortium (2014–
2017)
(McCrea et al., 2020)
Sports-related concussions (SRCs) have gained enhanced awareness over the past 30
years, aiding in the increased number of individuals reporting concussions, as well as the
level of seriousness devoted to abiding by strict protocol for return-to-play (RTP). This study
focused on collegiate-level football players forming part of the NCAA, and suggested that an
initial 7-10 waiting period (at which cerebral vulnerability to enhanced damage is present) for
recovery and zero involvement in the contact sporting environment was necessary to mitigate
the potential risk for adverse neurological events post-SRC. Currently, athletes and coaches
are to adhere to the NCAA’s Concussion Safety Protocol, which considers athlete education
in the preseason, assessment of the athlete pre-participation, diagnoses of concussions, and
injury management post-SRCs to ensure appropriate and safe RTP. Future insights could
adopt a more holistic approach to this, including both subjective and objective assessment
methods for enhanced rehabilitation.
Biomarkers to aid the return to play decision following sports-related concussion: a
systematic review
(Seranatne et al., 2022)
The premature RTP for individuals post-SRC shows increased risks for both
neurological injury and the persistence of the symptoms associated therewith. Due to SRCs
being considered mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs), their assessment and compliance
with a suitable clinical protocol prior to the RTP for the respective athlete remains crucial,
with current assessments lacking required objectivity to ensure safe RTP without associated
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 3
prolonging of negative neurological effects. With biomarkers aiding in the rehabilitation of
mTBIs, the authors suggest considering the testing of these in accordance with the periodic
phasing of rehabilitation to monitor neurological symptoms that may surpass the
physiological improvements noted visually and via current assessment. For this reason,
biomarkers possess the ability to potentially identify pathological mechanisms and pathways
associated with SRCs, which could refine and improve current assessment and RTP
protocols.
Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-related concussion
(Wellm & Zentgraf, 2023)
This systematic review considered the current literature pertaining to the protocol for
RTP following a SRC and found that despite numerous criteria existing for gradual
progression into competition, these were inadequate in mitigating potential adverse cognitive
and neurological events associated with the condition. As many other physical injuries
(including tendon ruptures and/or torn ligaments) follow a more precise protocol for RTP,
interestingly, SRC protocols are considered less specific and highly subjective in nature, as
well as being placed under heightened pressure to be “resolved” in a timely manner, unlike
their musculoskeletal counterparts. The authors suggest the implementation of specialized
(objective) cognitive assessments concentrating on the individual areas of impairment post-
SRC, the skills required for the specific athlete’s sporting code, and the individual goals of
the athlete to ensure a holistic approach to the traumatic injury is achieved. With 50% of
SRCs going unreported, the need for appropriate assessments and protocols has become an
integral component of rehabilitation, especially considering the enormous economic driving
force behind collegiate and professional sport.
CONCUSSION PROTOCOL FOR RETURN TO PLAY 4
Overview
Current literature regarding RTP protocols for athletes post-SRC remains outdated
due to highly subjective nature of testing methods adopted, as well as the inaccurate reporting
of physiological, neurological, and psychological factors from a coach and athlete standpoint.
For this reason, updated protocols and procedures combining objective and subjective
measures are required, thus reinforcing the need for a more holistic approach in
rehabilitation. In this way, the provision of equal attention and focus to these areas may
produce advances in rehabilitation that are long overdue.
References
McCrea, M., Broglio, S., McAllister, T., Zhou, W., Zhao, S., Katz, B., … & Guskiewicz, K.
M. (2020). Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players:
comparative analysis from the NCAA Concussion Study (1999–2001) and CARE
Consortium (2014–2017). British journal of sports medicine, 54(2), 102-109.
Senaratne, N., Hunt, A., Sotsman, E., & Grey, M. J. (2022). Biomarkers to aid the return to
play decision following sports-related concussion: a systematic review. Journal of
Concussion, 6, 20597002211070735.
Wellm, D., & Zentgraf, K. (2023). Diagnostic tools for return-to-play decisions in sports-
related concussion. Journal of Concussion, 7, 20597002231183234.