Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] ASSESSMENT 1_6020

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering ASSESSMENT 1_6020.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] week6 re

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #1 I chose to discuss situation where a nurse manager was held legally responsible for their actions based on assignment, delegation, and supervision. In the case of Johnson v. Missouri State Board of Nursing (2004), Teresa Johnson was a nurse manager who was held legally responsible for failing to …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #1
    I chose to discuss situation where a nurse manager was held legally responsible for their actions based on assignment, delegation, and supervision. In the case of Johnson v. Missouri State Board of Nursing (2004), Teresa Johnson was a nurse manager who was held legally responsible for failing to ensure proper staffing, supervision, and delegation at a nursing home which resulted in multiple resident deaths.
    Nurse managers have a important role in maintaining adequate staffing, safe care environments, ensuring appropriate assignments, and supervising them appropriately. They need to ensure nurses have enough experience to be able to care for certain patients safely when making their assignments and delegating certain tasks, and they need to supervise in case someone needs help and to prevent harm from occurring. Knowing something has occurred but continuing to no change or monitor safely led to unmet professionally standards and harm to patients. Nurses in these situations should advocate for themselves and their patients, and nurse leaders should listen and make changes to maintain a safe environment. Nurses and leaders both have a large deal of responsibility, and communication and change can lead to safe and positive work environments. The nurse manager failed to ensure that tasks were assigned to staff members who were competent and prepared to provide safe care. This lack of proper delegation and supervision contributed to inadequate patient care and adverse outcomes, including multiple resident deaths. Two things I would incorporate is use of a nurse educator, as utilizing travel agency nurses can bridge the gap of short staffing but the nurse educator is a good tool to help ensure nurses are appropriately trained and can also lend a hand when needed. Another I would use is debriefs for open communication. If nurses notice something that needs changed, they have an opportunity to discuss it with the team as a whole to promote positive and safe change.
    _Johnson v. Missouri state board of nursing,_ Justia Law. (n.d.). https://law.justia.com/cases/missouri/court-of-appeals/2004/wd62429-2.htm
    #2
    Delegation allows nurses to manage workloads efficiently and ensure patient care needs are met, but it must comply with legal and professional standards. One real scenario that comes to mind, that occured at my previous facility, left a patient needing to be transferred to the critical care unit due a delegated task to an unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP) by a registered nurse (RN). The RN delegate a med pass to a UAP which lead the nurse leaders getting involved due to a negligence claim. The RN did not abide by the five rights of delegation which led to patient harm and legal issues. The role of the nurse leaders, in this case, includes conducting a root cause analysis (RCA), asses competency, provide training, and in severe cases initiate disciplinary action. Nurses have legal accountability, ethical responsibility, and professional repercussions from wrongfully delegating tasks. Nurse leaders, on the other hand, have organizational accountability, oversight responsibility, and legal exposure. Both the nurse and the nurse leader will be impacted by this event. The nurse is directly impacted while the nurse leader is indirectly impacted.
    The nurse who delegated the task broke several rights of Delegation. The nurse broke right task, right person, and right supervision/evaluation. First of all the UAP is not a licensed personnel and cannot medicare patients. Adherence to the five rights of delegation serves as a guiding framework that ensures tasks carried out safely(Tooman, 2024). The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) Guidelines offers the five rights of delegation and best practices. Along with the NCSBN, nurses can use their State's Nurse Practice Act (NPA) which outlines legal accountability for delegation

  • [Solved] AI/ Turnit in check

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Hi can you please check for me if ai or turnit in is detected and upload the results thank you! – ## Wk15-Evidence-Summary-AIediting….docx **## Wk15-Evidence-Summary-AIediting….docx** MAXIMIN 2 NUR 5314 NUR 5314 Evidence Summary Table Assignment Name: Bianca Maximin **Section 1 PICOT Question** …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Hi can you please check for me if ai or turnit in is detected and upload the results thank you!

    – ## Wk15-Evidence-Summary-AIediting….docx

    **## Wk15-Evidence-Summary-AIediting….docx**

    MAXIMIN 2

    NUR 5314

    NUR 5314 Evidence Summary Table Assignment

    Name: Bianca Maximin

    **Section 1 PICOT Question**

    1. State your PICOT question.

    In adults aged 30 to 70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting, does the use of continuous glucose monitoring (real-time or intermittently scanned), compared with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose by finger-stick, result in greater improvements in glycemic control—measured by reductions in HbA1c and/or increases in time-in-range—over a six-month period?

    2. Explain how your PICOT Question is pertinent to the role of the APRN. Minimum length one paragraph.

    APRNs are often the primary clinicians managing type 2 diabetes in outpatient and primary‑care settings. Determining whether CGM (vs SMBG) improves 6‑month glycemic outcomes directly informs patient selection, education, device prescribing, follow‑up workflows, and payer documentation. Evidence on HbA1c and CGM metrics (time‑in‑range, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia) guides therapy titration, reduces therapeutic inertia, and supports equitable access for patients not using prandial insulin.

    3. List your article references. Minimum of six references in APA format.

    Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bailey, R., Ruedy, K. J., Calhoun, P., Peters, A. L., … Bergenstal, R. M.; MOBILE Study Group. (2021). Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: A randomized clinical trial. *JAMA, 325*(22), 2262–2272.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444) (Article 1)

    Beck, R. W., Riddlesworth, T. D., Ruedy, K., Ahmann, A., Haller, S., Kruger, D., … Bergenstal, R.; DIAMOND Study Group. (2017). Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: A randomized trial. *Annals of Internal Medicine, 167*(6), 365–374.
    [https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855](https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855) (Article 2)

    Haak, T., Hanaire, H., Ajjan, R., Hermanns, N., Riveline, J.-P., & Rayman, G. (2016). Flash glucose‑sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin‑treated type 2 diabetes: A multicenter, open‑label randomized controlled trial. *Diabetes Therapy, 8*(1), 55–73.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6) (Article 3)

    Moon, S. J., Kim, K.-S., Lee, W. J., Lee, M. Y., Vigersky, R., & Park, C.-Y. (2023). Efficacy of intermittent short‑term use of a real‑time continuous glucose monitoring system in non‑insulin‑treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. *Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25*(1), 110–120.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852](https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852) (Article 4)

    Shields, S., Thomas, R., Durham, J., Moran, J., Clary, J., & Ciemins, E. L. (2024). Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care. *Scientific Reports, 14*, 31990.
    [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4) (Article 5)

    Grace, T. P., Hicks, C., Layne, J. E., & Walker, T. C. (2024). The Dexcom Community Glucose Monitoring Project: 6‑month results using continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes. *Clinical Diabetes, 42*(4), 359–368.
    [https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071](https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071) (Article 6)

    4. Show the alignment of your PICOT question components to your chosen articles. Input the information related to population, intervention, and outcome(s) in the following table.

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | PICOT Question | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 | Article 5 | Article 6 |
    | Population | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Adults with T2D in U.S. primary‑care practices; using basal insulin without prandial insulin; baseline HbA1c ≈9.1%; mean age ≈57 years. | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Adults with long‑standing T2D (median duration 17 years) receiving multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at 25 North American endocrinology practices; baseline HbA1c 7.5–9.9% (mean 8.5%). | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Adults with insulin‑treated T2D (multiple daily injections or CSII) at 26 European centers; HbA1c 7.5–12.0%; frequent SMBG users. | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Non‑insulin‑treated adults with T2D uncontrolled on oral agents; multicenter Korean RCT; baseline HbA1c ≈8.2%. | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Primary‑care adults with T2D not using bolus insulin (non‑insulin or basal‑only); prospectively enrolled with matched controls in U.S. multispecialty group. | Adult patients in U.S. multispecialty primary care clinics aged 30-70 with type 2 diabetes who were not on bolus insulin (also referred to as non-insulin or basal-only therapy) were prospectively enrolled together with matched controls. | Adult patients 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes in Ohio primary and community practices, CGM naïve, insulin and non-insulin therapy combination users; baseline HbA1c 9.4%. |
    | Intervention | Real‑time CGM (Dexcom G6), unblinded, used continuously vs blood glucose meter (BGM) finger‑sticks; follow‑up 8 months. | Real‑time CGM vs usual care with SMBG; CGM use averaged 6.7 days/week over 24 weeks. | Intermittently scanned Flash CGM (FreeStyle Libre) vs SMBG for 6 months; unblinded; continued open‑access use to 12 months in intervention group. | Intermittent short RT‑CGM sessions (1 week once or twice, 3 months apart) vs control; all groups received education and brief blinded CGM; primary outcome at 6 months. | Unblinded CGM initiation in primary care vs matched usual care controls; CGM metrics and A1c assessed at 3 months (subset at 6 months). | CGM and HbA1c were measured at three months after initiation at primary care of unblinded CGM compared with matched controls in usual care (subset followed until six months). | A primary care-led health program in the community included minimal training and 6-month follow-up with unblinded RT-CGM (Dexcom G6). |
    | Outcome(s) | Primary: HbA1c at 8 months. Results: HbA1c 8.0% CGM vs 8.4% BGM (adj. diff −0.4%, 95% CI −0.8 to −0.1; P=.02). Secondary: TIR 59% vs 43% (diff +15%); time >250 mg/dL 11% vs 27% (diff −16%); mean glucose 179 vs 206 mg/dL (diff −26 mg/dL). | Primary: HbA1c at 24 weeks. Results: HbA1c 7.7% CGM vs 8.0% control (adj. diff −0.3%, 95% CI −0.5 to 0.0; P=.022). Hypoglycemia and QoL similar. | Primary: HbA1c change at 6 months (no between‑group difference overall). Key: Hypoglycemia reduced (−0.47 h/day <70 mg/dL; −0.22 h/day <55 mg/dL) and treatment satisfaction higher with Flash CGM; SMBG frequency dropped to ~0.3/day. | Primary: HbA1c change at 6 months. Results: Significantly reduced HbA1c at 6 months vs control only in twosession RTCGM group (adjusted −0.68%; P=.018); greater benefit in participants who performed SMBG ≥1.5×/day. | Primary: A1c difference at 3 months vs matched controls; CGM users had greater A1c reduction (−0.62%, P<.01). CGM metrics improved: TIR 39.7→61.9%, mean estimated glucose 212→173 mg/dL; sustained in a 6‑month subset. | HbA1c reduction −0.62% at 3 months (<br>_P_ <.01) vs controls; TIR improved from 39.7 %→61.9 %; mean estimated glucose 212→173 mg/dL; sustained in 6-month subset. | HbA1c dropped from 9.4 %→7.1 % (−2.4 %, <br>_P_ <.001); >50 % reached HbA1c <7 %; 82.7 % reached <8 %; CGM metrics improved (↑ TIR, ↓ time > 180 mg/dL). |

    **Section 2 Evidence Summary Table**

    1. Insert the appropriate information from each of your selected articles in the following table.

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Author(s), Year | Purpose of Study | Study Design<br>Level of Evidence | Sample<br>Setting | Major Variables | Measurement of Major Variables | Data Analysis (Statistical Tests) | Pertinent Results |
    | Martens et al., 2021 (JAMA) | Evaluate effectiveness of RT‑CGM vs BGM in adults with T2D on basal insulin in primary care. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Primary‑care practices in the United States. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: CGM vs BGM; Dependent: HbA1c at 8 months; TIR 70–180 mg/dL; time >250 mg/dL; mean glucose; severe hypoglycemia. | Laboratory HbA1c; CGM metrics downloaded; adverse events recorded. | Adjusted between‑group differences; 95% CIs; P values (e.g., ANCOVA). | HbA1c decreased 9.1→8.0% (CGM) vs 9.0→8.4% (BGM); adjusted diff −0.4% (95% CI −0.8 to −0.1; P=.02). TIR 59% vs 43% (diff +15%); time >250 mg/dL 11% vs 27% (diff −16%); mean glucose 179 vs 206 mg/dL; severe hypoglycemia 1% in both groups. |
    | Beck et al., 2017 (Ann Intern Med) | Assess CGM vs usual care/SMBG in adults with T2D using MDI over 24 weeks. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Endocrinology practices in North America. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: CGM vs SMBG; Dependent: HbA1c at 24 weeks; hypoglycemia; QoL. | HbA1c by central lab; CGM‑measured hypoglycemia; questionnaires. | Adjusted difference in mean change with 95% CIs; P values. | HbA1c at 24 weeks 7.7% (CGM) vs 8.0% (control); adjusted diff −0.3% (95% CI −0.5 to 0.0; P=.022). Hypoglycemia and QoL did not differ meaningfully; CGM use 6.7 days/week. |
    | Haak et al., 2016 (Diabetes Therapy) | Determine whether Flash CGM can replace SMBG in insulin‑treated T2D over 6 months. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. European diabetes centers (France, Germany, UK). (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: Flash CGM vs SMBG; Dependent: HbA1c change at 6 months; hypoglycemia; treatment satisfaction; SMBG frequency. | Central lab HbA1c; sensor‑derived hypoglycemia (time <70 and <55 mg/dL); Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. | Between‑group comparisons; p‑values for primary and secondary endpoints. | No between‑group difference in HbA1c at 6 months overall (−0.29% vs −0.31%; p=0.82). Significant reductions in hypoglycemia (−0.47 h/day <70 mg/dL; −0.22 h/day <55 mg/dL) and higher treatment satisfaction with Flash CGM; SMBG frequency dropped from ~3.8/day to 0.3/day. |
    | Moon et al., 2023 (Diabetes Obes Metab) | Test intermittent short‑term RT‑CGM sessions in non‑insulin‑treated T2D uncontrolled on OADs. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Korean tertiary hospitals/diabetes centers. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: RT‑CGM (1 vs 2 sessions) vs control; Dependent: HbA1c at 3 and 6 months; effect modification by SMBG frequency. | Laboratory HbA1c; blinded CGM at baseline; SMBG frequency. | Adjusted differences in HbA1c vs control; P values. | At 6 months, only the two‑session group had significant HbA1c reduction vs control (adjusted −0.68%; P=.018); benefits greater in those performing SMBG ≥1.5 times/day. |
    | Shields et al., 2024 (Scientific Reports) | Evaluate CGM effectiveness in primary care for T2D patients not on bolus insulin (non‑insulin or basal‑only). | Level III: Observational cohort with matched controls. | Adults aged 30–70 years. U.S. multispecialty primary‑care clinics. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: CGM initiation vs usual care; Dependent: HbA1c change at 3 months; CGM metrics (TIR, time >180/250 mg/dL, mean estimated glucose, GMI) at 3 and 6 months. | EHR‑derived HbA1c; CGM data from clinic accounts. | Difference‑in‑differences; regression models adjusting for covariates. | CGM group saw greater A1c reduction than controls (−0.62%, P<.01) at 3 months; TIR improved from 39.7% to 61.9%; mean estimated glucose 212→173 mg/dL; improvements persisted in 6‑month subset. |
    | Grace et al., 2024 (Clinical Diabetes) | Assess 6‑month outcomes of a primary care–driven CGM program in adults with T2D lacking CGM coverage. | Level III: Prospective cohort (pre/post). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Primary care practice in Ohio (U.S.) in partnership with the local health agency. | Independent: RT‑CGM program participation; Dependent: A1c change; CGM metrics (TIR, GMI, mean glucose). | Point‑of‑care A1c; CGM metrics from Dexcom Clarity (subset meeting data sufficiency). | Paired t‑tests for within‑group changes; significance P<.05. | Mean A1c decreased by 2.4% (9.4→7.1%, P<.001); proportion at A1c <7% rose from 0.4% to 54.0% and <8% from 18.6% to 82.7%; TIR increased by ~5.5 percentage points in analyzable subset. |

    **Section 3 Recommendations for APRN Professionals**

    1. Provide a summary of the research findings and make recommendations for if APRN professionals should incorporate these findings into their practice. Minimum length of two paragraphs.

    Across randomized trials and real‑world studies, CGM consistently improves glycemic outcomes compared with SMBG in adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes in primary care. In basal‑insulin users seen in primary care, RT‑CGM achieved a clinically meaningful HbA1c advantage of ~0.4% at ~8 months and substantial gains in time‑in‑range and reductions in hyperglycemia. In intensively insulin‑treated T2D, Flash CGM markedly reduced time in hypoglycemia (43–53%) and improved treatment satisfaction, despite no overall HbA1c difference at 6 months; a separate MDI RCT showed a 0.3% HbA1c benefit at 24 weeks. Among non‑insulin‑treated patients, a randomized trial showed that two short RT‑CGM sessions over 6 months reduced HbA1c by ~0.7% versus control, and pragmatic/real‑world primary‑care cohorts demonstrated significant A1c improvements and better CGM metrics, with benefits persisting to 6 months in subsets.

    Recommendations for APRNs: APRNs should incorporate CGM into care pathways for adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes in primary care who have suboptimal control on non‑insulin or basal‑only regimens, and for those on intensive insulin therapy with problematic hypoglycemia or glucose variability. Core elements include: (1) patient selection and shared decision‑making; (2) device onboarding and interpretation training (focus on TIR, GMI, time >180/250 mg/dL, and time <70 mg/dL); (3) structured follow‑up at ~2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months to use CGM data for medication titration and lifestyle coaching; and (4) documentation to support coverage and equitable access in primary care. Based on the cumulative evidence, APRNs **should** use CGM as a standard adjunct to SMBG for appropriate T2D patients to improve glycemic outcomes over 6 months.io

    **References**

    Beck, R. W., Riddlesworth, T. D., Ruedy, K., Ahmann, A., Haller, S., Kruger, D., … Bergenstal, R.; DIAMOND Study Group. (2017). Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: A randomized trial.
    _Annals of Internal Medicine, 167_(6), 365–374.
    [https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855](https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855)

    Grace, T. P., Hicks, C., Layne, J. E., & Walker, T. C. (2024). The Dexcom Community Glucose Monitoring Project: 6-month results using continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.
    _Clinical Diabetes, 42_(4), 359–368.
    [https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071](https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071)

    Haak, T., Hanaire, H., Ajjan, R., Hermanns, N., Riveline, J.-P., & Rayman, G. (2016). Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: A multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    _Diabetes Therapy, 8_(1), 55–73.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6)

    Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bailey, R., Ruedy, K. J., Calhoun, P., Peters, A. L., … Bergenstal, R. M.; MOBILE Study Group. (2021). Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: A randomized clinical trial.
    _JAMA, 325_(22), 2262–2272.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444)

    Moon, S. J., Kim, K.-S., Lee, W. J., Lee, M. Y., Vigersky, R., & Park, C.-Y. (2023). Efficacy of intermittent short-term use of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system in non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25_(1), 110–120.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852](https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852)

    Shields, S., Thomas, R., Durham, J., Moran, J., Clary, J., & Ciemins, E. L. (2024). Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care.
    _Scientific Reports, 14_, 31990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4

    **## Wk15-Evidence-Summary-AIediting….docx**

    MAXIMIN 2

    NUR 5314

    NUR 5314 Evidence Summary Table Assignment

    Name: Bianca Maximin

    **Section 1 PICOT Question**

    1. State your PICOT question.

    In adults aged 30 to 70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting, does the use of continuous glucose monitoring (real-time or intermittently scanned), compared with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose by finger-stick, result in greater improvements in glycemic control—measured by reductions in HbA1c and/or increases in time-in-range—over a six-month period?

    2. Explain how your PICOT Question is pertinent to the role of the APRN. Minimum length one paragraph.

    APRNs are often the primary clinicians managing type 2 diabetes in outpatient and primary‑care settings. Determining whether CGM (vs SMBG) improves 6‑month glycemic outcomes directly informs patient selection, education, device prescribing, follow‑up workflows, and payer documentation. Evidence on HbA1c and CGM metrics (time‑in‑range, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia) guides therapy titration, reduces therapeutic inertia, and supports equitable access for patients not using prandial insulin.

    3. List your article references. Minimum of six references in APA format.

    Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bailey, R., Ruedy, K. J., Calhoun, P., Peters, A. L., … Bergenstal, R. M.; MOBILE Study Group. (2021). Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: A randomized clinical trial. *JAMA, 325*(22), 2262–2272.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444) (Article 1)

    Beck, R. W., Riddlesworth, T. D., Ruedy, K., Ahmann, A., Haller, S., Kruger, D., … Bergenstal, R.; DIAMOND Study Group. (2017). Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: A randomized trial. *Annals of Internal Medicine, 167*(6), 365–374.
    [https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855](https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855) (Article 2)

    Haak, T., Hanaire, H., Ajjan, R., Hermanns, N., Riveline, J.-P., & Rayman, G. (2016). Flash glucose‑sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin‑treated type 2 diabetes: A multicenter, open‑label randomized controlled trial. *Diabetes Therapy, 8*(1), 55–73.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6) (Article 3)

    Moon, S. J., Kim, K.-S., Lee, W. J., Lee, M. Y., Vigersky, R., & Park, C.-Y. (2023). Efficacy of intermittent short‑term use of a real‑time continuous glucose monitoring system in non‑insulin‑treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. *Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25*(1), 110–120.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852](https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852) (Article 4)

    Shields, S., Thomas, R., Durham, J., Moran, J., Clary, J., & Ciemins, E. L. (2024). Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care. *Scientific Reports, 14*, 31990.
    [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4) (Article 5)

    Grace, T. P., Hicks, C., Layne, J. E., & Walker, T. C. (2024). The Dexcom Community Glucose Monitoring Project: 6‑month results using continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes. *Clinical Diabetes, 42*(4), 359–368.
    [https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071](https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071) (Article 6)

    4. Show the alignment of your PICOT question components to your chosen articles. Input the information related to population, intervention, and outcome(s) in the following table.

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | PICOT Question | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 | Article 5 | Article 6 |
    | Population | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Adults with T2D in U.S. primary‑care practices; using basal insulin without prandial insulin; baseline HbA1c ≈9.1%; mean age ≈57 years. | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Adults with long‑standing T2D (median duration 17 years) receiving multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at 25 North American endocrinology practices; baseline HbA1c 7.5–9.9% (mean 8.5%). | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Adults with insulin‑treated T2D (multiple daily injections or CSII) at 26 European centers; HbA1c 7.5–12.0%; frequent SMBG users. | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Non‑insulin‑treated adults with T2D uncontrolled on oral agents; multicenter Korean RCT; baseline HbA1c ≈8.2%. | Adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes receiving care in a primary care setting. Primary‑care adults with T2D not using bolus insulin (non‑insulin or basal‑only); prospectively enrolled with matched controls in U.S. multispecialty group. | Adult patients in U.S. multispecialty primary care clinics aged 30-70 with type 2 diabetes who were not on bolus insulin (also referred to as non-insulin or basal-only therapy) were prospectively enrolled together with matched controls. | Adult patients 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes in Ohio primary and community practices, CGM naïve, insulin and non-insulin therapy combination users; baseline HbA1c 9.4%. |
    | Intervention | Real‑time CGM (Dexcom G6), unblinded, used continuously vs blood glucose meter (BGM) finger‑sticks; follow‑up 8 months. | Real‑time CGM vs usual care with SMBG; CGM use averaged 6.7 days/week over 24 weeks. | Intermittently scanned Flash CGM (FreeStyle Libre) vs SMBG for 6 months; unblinded; continued open‑access use to 12 months in intervention group. | Intermittent short RT‑CGM sessions (1 week once or twice, 3 months apart) vs control; all groups received education and brief blinded CGM; primary outcome at 6 months. | Unblinded CGM initiation in primary care vs matched usual care controls; CGM metrics and A1c assessed at 3 months (subset at 6 months). | CGM and HbA1c were measured at three months after initiation at primary care of unblinded CGM compared with matched controls in usual care (subset followed until six months). | A primary care-led health program in the community included minimal training and 6-month follow-up with unblinded RT-CGM (Dexcom G6). |
    | Outcome(s) | Primary: HbA1c at 8 months. Results: HbA1c 8.0% CGM vs 8.4% BGM (adj. diff −0.4%, 95% CI −0.8 to −0.1; P=.02). Secondary: TIR 59% vs 43% (diff +15%); time >250 mg/dL 11% vs 27% (diff −16%); mean glucose 179 vs 206 mg/dL (diff −26 mg/dL). | Primary: HbA1c at 24 weeks. Results: HbA1c 7.7% CGM vs 8.0% control (adj. diff −0.3%, 95% CI −0.5 to 0.0; P=.022). Hypoglycemia and QoL similar. | Primary: HbA1c change at 6 months (no between‑group difference overall). Key: Hypoglycemia reduced (−0.47 h/day <70 mg/dL; −0.22 h/day <55 mg/dL) and treatment satisfaction higher with Flash CGM; SMBG frequency dropped to ~0.3/day. | Primary: HbA1c change at 6 months. Results: Significantly reduced HbA1c at 6 months vs control only in twosession RTCGM group (adjusted −0.68%; P=.018); greater benefit in participants who performed SMBG ≥1.5×/day. | Primary: A1c difference at 3 months vs matched controls; CGM users had greater A1c reduction (−0.62%, P<.01). CGM metrics improved: TIR 39.7→61.9%, mean estimated glucose 212→173 mg/dL; sustained in a 6‑month subset. | HbA1c reduction −0.62% at 3 months (<br>_P_ <.01) vs controls; TIR improved from 39.7 %→61.9 %; mean estimated glucose 212→173 mg/dL; sustained in 6-month subset. | HbA1c dropped from 9.4 %→7.1 % (−2.4 %, <br>_P_ <.001); >50 % reached HbA1c <7 %; 82.7 % reached <8 %; CGM metrics improved (↑ TIR, ↓ time > 180 mg/dL). |

    **Section 2 Evidence Summary Table**

    1. Insert the appropriate information from each of your selected articles in the following table.

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Author(s), Year | Purpose of Study | Study Design<br>Level of Evidence | Sample<br>Setting | Major Variables | Measurement of Major Variables | Data Analysis (Statistical Tests) | Pertinent Results |
    | Martens et al., 2021 (JAMA) | Evaluate effectiveness of RT‑CGM vs BGM in adults with T2D on basal insulin in primary care. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Primary‑care practices in the United States. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: CGM vs BGM; Dependent: HbA1c at 8 months; TIR 70–180 mg/dL; time >250 mg/dL; mean glucose; severe hypoglycemia. | Laboratory HbA1c; CGM metrics downloaded; adverse events recorded. | Adjusted between‑group differences; 95% CIs; P values (e.g., ANCOVA). | HbA1c decreased 9.1→8.0% (CGM) vs 9.0→8.4% (BGM); adjusted diff −0.4% (95% CI −0.8 to −0.1; P=.02). TIR 59% vs 43% (diff +15%); time >250 mg/dL 11% vs 27% (diff −16%); mean glucose 179 vs 206 mg/dL; severe hypoglycemia 1% in both groups. |
    | Beck et al., 2017 (Ann Intern Med) | Assess CGM vs usual care/SMBG in adults with T2D using MDI over 24 weeks. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Endocrinology practices in North America. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: CGM vs SMBG; Dependent: HbA1c at 24 weeks; hypoglycemia; QoL. | HbA1c by central lab; CGM‑measured hypoglycemia; questionnaires. | Adjusted difference in mean change with 95% CIs; P values. | HbA1c at 24 weeks 7.7% (CGM) vs 8.0% (control); adjusted diff −0.3% (95% CI −0.5 to 0.0; P=.022). Hypoglycemia and QoL did not differ meaningfully; CGM use 6.7 days/week. |
    | Haak et al., 2016 (Diabetes Therapy) | Determine whether Flash CGM can replace SMBG in insulin‑treated T2D over 6 months. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. European diabetes centers (France, Germany, UK). (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: Flash CGM vs SMBG; Dependent: HbA1c change at 6 months; hypoglycemia; treatment satisfaction; SMBG frequency. | Central lab HbA1c; sensor‑derived hypoglycemia (time <70 and <55 mg/dL); Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. | Between‑group comparisons; p‑values for primary and secondary endpoints. | No between‑group difference in HbA1c at 6 months overall (−0.29% vs −0.31%; p=0.82). Significant reductions in hypoglycemia (−0.47 h/day <70 mg/dL; −0.22 h/day <55 mg/dL) and higher treatment satisfaction with Flash CGM; SMBG frequency dropped from ~3.8/day to 0.3/day. |
    | Moon et al., 2023 (Diabetes Obes Metab) | Test intermittent short‑term RT‑CGM sessions in non‑insulin‑treated T2D uncontrolled on OADs. | Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial (individual). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Korean tertiary hospitals/diabetes centers. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: RT‑CGM (1 vs 2 sessions) vs control; Dependent: HbA1c at 3 and 6 months; effect modification by SMBG frequency. | Laboratory HbA1c; blinded CGM at baseline; SMBG frequency. | Adjusted differences in HbA1c vs control; P values. | At 6 months, only the two‑session group had significant HbA1c reduction vs control (adjusted −0.68%; P=.018); benefits greater in those performing SMBG ≥1.5 times/day. |
    | Shields et al., 2024 (Scientific Reports) | Evaluate CGM effectiveness in primary care for T2D patients not on bolus insulin (non‑insulin or basal‑only). | Level III: Observational cohort with matched controls. | Adults aged 30–70 years. U.S. multispecialty primary‑care clinics. (primary care relevant population focus) | Independent: CGM initiation vs usual care; Dependent: HbA1c change at 3 months; CGM metrics (TIR, time >180/250 mg/dL, mean estimated glucose, GMI) at 3 and 6 months. | EHR‑derived HbA1c; CGM data from clinic accounts. | Difference‑in‑differences; regression models adjusting for covariates. | CGM group saw greater A1c reduction than controls (−0.62%, P<.01) at 3 months; TIR improved from 39.7% to 61.9%; mean estimated glucose 212→173 mg/dL; improvements persisted in 6‑month subset. |
    | Grace et al., 2024 (Clinical Diabetes) | Assess 6‑month outcomes of a primary care–driven CGM program in adults with T2D lacking CGM coverage. | Level III: Prospective cohort (pre/post). | Adults aged 30–70 years. Primary care practice in Ohio (U.S.) in partnership with the local health agency. | Independent: RT‑CGM program participation; Dependent: A1c change; CGM metrics (TIR, GMI, mean glucose). | Point‑of‑care A1c; CGM metrics from Dexcom Clarity (subset meeting data sufficiency). | Paired t‑tests for within‑group changes; significance P<.05. | Mean A1c decreased by 2.4% (9.4→7.1%, P<.001); proportion at A1c <7% rose from 0.4% to 54.0% and <8% from 18.6% to 82.7%; TIR increased by ~5.5 percentage points in analyzable subset. |

    **Section 3 Recommendations for APRN Professionals**

    1. Provide a summary of the research findings and make recommendations for if APRN professionals should incorporate these findings into their practice. Minimum length of two paragraphs.

    Across randomized trials and real‑world studies, CGM consistently improves glycemic outcomes compared with SMBG in adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes in primary care. In basal‑insulin users seen in primary care, RT‑CGM achieved a clinically meaningful HbA1c advantage of ~0.4% at ~8 months and substantial gains in time‑in‑range and reductions in hyperglycemia. In intensively insulin‑treated T2D, Flash CGM markedly reduced time in hypoglycemia (43–53%) and improved treatment satisfaction, despite no overall HbA1c difference at 6 months; a separate MDI RCT showed a 0.3% HbA1c benefit at 24 weeks. Among non‑insulin‑treated patients, a randomized trial showed that two short RT‑CGM sessions over 6 months reduced HbA1c by ~0.7% versus control, and pragmatic/real‑world primary‑care cohorts demonstrated significant A1c improvements and better CGM metrics, with benefits persisting to 6 months in subsets.

    Recommendations for APRNs: APRNs should incorporate CGM into care pathways for adults aged 30–70 years with type 2 diabetes in primary care who have suboptimal control on non‑insulin or basal‑only regimens, and for those on intensive insulin therapy with problematic hypoglycemia or glucose variability. Core elements include: (1) patient selection and shared decision‑making; (2) device onboarding and interpretation training (focus on TIR, GMI, time >180/250 mg/dL, and time <70 mg/dL); (3) structured follow‑up at ~2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months to use CGM data for medication titration and lifestyle coaching; and (4) documentation to support coverage and equitable access in primary care. Based on the cumulative evidence, APRNs **should** use CGM as a standard adjunct to SMBG for appropriate T2D patients to improve glycemic outcomes over 6 months.io

    **References**

    Beck, R. W., Riddlesworth, T. D., Ruedy, K., Ahmann, A., Haller, S., Kruger, D., … Bergenstal, R.; DIAMOND Study Group. (2017). Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: A randomized trial.
    _Annals of Internal Medicine, 167_(6), 365–374.
    [https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855](https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2855)

    Grace, T. P., Hicks, C., Layne, J. E., & Walker, T. C. (2024). The Dexcom Community Glucose Monitoring Project: 6-month results using continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.
    _Clinical Diabetes, 42_(4), 359–368.
    [https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071](https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0071)

    Haak, T., Hanaire, H., Ajjan, R., Hermanns, N., Riveline, J.-P., & Rayman, G. (2016). Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: A multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    _Diabetes Therapy, 8_(1), 55–73.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6)

    Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bailey, R., Ruedy, K. J., Calhoun, P., Peters, A. L., … Bergenstal, R. M.; MOBILE Study Group. (2021). Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: A randomized clinical trial.
    _JAMA, 325_(22), 2262–2272.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444)

    Moon, S. J., Kim, K.-S., Lee, W. J., Lee, M. Y., Vigersky, R., & Park, C.-Y. (2023). Efficacy of intermittent short-term use of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system in non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25_(1), 110–120.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852](https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14852)

    Shields, S., Thomas, R., Durham, J., Moran, J., Clary, J., & Ciemins, E. L. (2024). Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care.
    _Scientific Reports, 14_, 31990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4

  • [Solved] PHASE IV

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ALSO YOU WILL HAVE PART 1,2,3 FOR YOU TO GUIDE FOR THIS NEW SECTION PART 4 NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM IS ACCEPTED WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN DUE DATE AUGUST 14, 2025 1 PAGE FOR ABSTRACT \ INSTRUCTIONSPHASEIV.pdf](https://www.sweet…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
    ALSO YOU WILL HAVE PART 1,2,3 FOR YOU TO GUIDE FOR THIS NEW SECTION PART 4
    NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM IS ACCEPTED WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN
    DUE DATE AUGUST 14, 2025
    1 PAGE FOR ABSTRACT
    \
    INSTRUCTIONSPHASEIV.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionsphaseiv-pdf "INSTRUCTIONSPHASEIV.pdf")
    \
    PHASE1ASSIGNMENT.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phase1assignment-docx-10374287 "PHASE1ASSIGNMENT.docx")
    \
    PHASEIIASSIGNMENT.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phaseiiassignment-docx-10374289 "PHASEIIASSIGNMENT.docx")
    \
    PhaseIIIResult.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phaseiiiresult-docx "PhaseIIIResult.docx")
    \
    RUBRIC.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10375129 "RUBRIC.pdf")

  • [Solved] SOAP 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TOPIC: ENDOMETRIOSIS ICD10- N80.9 FEMALE: 30 Y/O CHIEF COMPLAINT: I HAVE A CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN WITH INFLAMMATION NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN PLEASE NOTE TEMPLATE AND EXAMPLE ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER DO YOUR BEST DUE DATE AUGUST 13, 2025 \ EXAMPLE.docx](…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TOPIC: ENDOMETRIOSIS
    ICD10- N80.9
    FEMALE: 30 Y/O
    CHIEF COMPLAINT: I HAVE A CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN WITH INFLAMMATION
    NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN
    PLEASE NOTE TEMPLATE AND EXAMPLE ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER
    DO YOUR BEST
    DUE DATE AUGUST 13, 2025
    \
    EXAMPLE.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/example-docx-10374295 "EXAMPLE.docx")
    \
    SOUTHU.SOAPNOTESTURINININ.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/southu-soapnotesturininin-docx-10374297 "SOUTHU.SOAPNOTESTURINININ.docx")

  • [Solved] c4-ass1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf – ## c4-ass1.docx – ## C3-ASS3.docx **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf** Summary of Findings • Summary of the type of study • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article? • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis • Su…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf

    – ## c4-ass1.docx

    – ## C3-ASS3.docx

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    **## cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf**

    Summary of Findings

    • Summary of the type of study
    • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article?
    • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis
    • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population

    Article Link

    • Include link to article here.

    Reference

    Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.

    WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.

    Credibility Factors

    • Factor 1 (list factor here)
    • Factor 2 (list factor here)
    • Factor 3 (list factor here)
    • Etc.

    Type of Study

    Type of Study: Qualitative or
    Quantitative

    Level of Evidence: (list level of
    evidence)

    Methodology: (list methodology)

    **## c4-ass1.docx**

    **Assessment 1**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

    **Preparation**

    Review the
    [What Is Scholarly?](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951) Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:

    · What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    · Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the
    [Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP) library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.

    **Instructions**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
    [Example of Screenshot [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791179/download) document). You can refer to the instructions in the
    [Taking Screenshots [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/files/8791181/download) document.

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.

    · Identify the credibility factors of an article.

    · Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    ·
    **Criterion 1**

    ·
    **Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.

    ·
    **Criterion 2**

    ·
    **Identify the credibility factors of an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.

    ·
    **Criterion 3**

    ·
    **Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.

    ·
    **Criterion 4**

    ·
    **Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.

    · .

    ·
    **Criterion 5**

    ·
    **Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.**

    ·
    **Distinguished**

    · Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.

    **## C3-ASS3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2476056&content_id=887230) [**Resources**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2476063&content_id=887230)

    Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.

    **Instructions**

    **Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.**

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:

    · Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.

    · Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.

    · Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.

    2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.

    3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.

    4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · You may wish to use the
    [Concept Map Template [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49339/files/8806660/download), but are also free to create your own.

    5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    ·
    **Diagnosis:** Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    · Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.

    ·
    **Concept Map:** Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    ·
    **Organization:** The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    ·
    **Professional Communication:** The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.

    ·
    **APA format and style:** The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Concept Map:** 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.

    ·
    **SIM Report:** Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.

    ·
    **Reference List:** Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.

    ·
    **APA Style:** Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

    · Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.

    · Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.

    · The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.

    · Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.

    · Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.

    · Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.

    · The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    · The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.**

    **Criterion 4**

    **The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.

    **Criterion 5**

    **The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.

    **Criterion 6**

    **The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.**

    **Distinguished**

    The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.

    PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] week 6 assi

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## week6assi.docx **## week6assi.docx** Nurse Leader Interview and Strategic Leadership Brief Reflection Paper **Assignment Overview:** This assignment is designed to deepen your understanding of the challenges and responsibilities faced by nurse leaders in today’s healthcare environment. You will…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## week6assi.docx

    **## week6assi.docx**

    Nurse Leader Interview and Strategic Leadership Brief Reflection Paper

    **Assignment Overview:**
    This assignment is designed to deepen your understanding of the challenges and responsibilities faced by nurse leaders in today’s healthcare environment. You will explore leadership practices, patient advocacy, legal and ethical responsibilities, and DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) principles. You will also present your Unit 4 Strategic Leadership Brief Infographic to a nurse leader and gather feedback. Your reflection paper will summarize the interview findings and feedback received and discuss the implications for your nursing practice and leadership growth. Support your reflection with statistics and scholarly evidence to highlight the importance of the issues and their impact on healthcare organizations.

    **Assignment Instructions:**

    1.
    **Select and Schedule an Interview**

    1.

    · Identify an RN nurse leader/manager in a healthcare organization who supervises nursing staff and is willing to participate in the interview. Ideally, this should be the same individual identified in your Unit 1 Check-In. If you are in a leadership role, choose an interviewee at your level or higher.

    · Arrange to conduct the interview in person, virtually, or by phone.

    · Collect background information on the interviewee’s academic and professional history, as well as details about their healthcare organization.

    2.
    **Interview Questions for Background Information:**

    ·
    **Organizational Role and Hierarchy:** "Could you describe your current role and where it fits within the organizational structure?"

    ·
    **Services Offered by the Organization:** "What types of services does your organization provide? For example, does it mainly focus on outpatient, inpatient, or a mix of services?"

    ·
    **Type of Healthcare Facility:** "How would you classify your organization? Would you describe it as a community hospital, a research institution, or private practice?"

    ·
    **Patient Population and Volume:** “What is the common demographic of the patient including ethnic, socioeconomic, and cultural norms? Approximately how many patients does your unit, and the organization as a whole serve annually?"

    3.
    **To prepare for your interview, develop a set of thoughtful, open-ended questions that address the following topics. Encourage the interviewee to provide specific examples to illustrate their responses:**

    · Leadership and management styles they use in daily operations.

    · Strategies they employ for decision-making during challenging situations.

    · The significance of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the workplace and how it is fostered.

    · Common legal or ethical challenges they encounter in their role as a nurse leader.

    · Their role in strategic planning at both the unit level and the organizational level.

    · Methods they use to promote and maintain a healthy work environment.

    4.
    **Presentation and Feedback**

    · During the interview, present your
    **Unit 4 Strategic Leadership Brief Infographic Presentation** to the nurse leader and request their feedback on the following areas:

    1.
    **SWOT Analysis:** Suggestions for refining your findings, including any areas for improvement or change.

    2.
    **Implementation Recommendations:** Feedback on your proposed changes and strategies for putting them into practice.

    3.
    **Barriers and Solutions:** Insights on potential challenges to implementation and strategies for overcoming them.

    4.
    **Stakeholder Engagement:** Advice on how nurse leaders can effectively engage key stakeholders to support the proposed changes.

    5.
    **Policy Alignment:** Evaluation of whether current policies and procedures support the recommended changes.

    6.
    **Team Support:** Strategies for nurse leaders to reinforce and support changes within the team or unit.

    7.
    **Measuring Success** **(key performance indicators (KPIs) (performance measures, or metrics),** **performance benchmarks):** Suggestions on ways to measure whether the proposed changes are successful, such as tracking progress or outcomes over time.

    5.
    **Reflect on the Interview**

    5. Discuss how the feedback received influenced your understanding and its implications for your nursing practice. Address:

    . How the feedback refined or improved your understanding of the SWOT analysis and recommendations, including specific suggestions for improvement.

    . Insights gained regarding leadership practices, patient advocacy, and ethical responsibilities, and how the nurse leader’s approach compares to your own.

    . Strategies or recommendations provided for implementing the proposed changes and their potential impact on patient safety, quality of care, and staff well-being.

    . How presenting your infographic influenced your understanding and strategic approach.

    . Whether the feedback validated or challenged your initial analysis and how it will shape your leadership practice.

    .
    **Email Thank You:**

    · Once you've completed your interview, send a brief thank-you email to the nurse leader. This thoughtful gesture expresses your appreciation for their time and strengthens professional connections.

    ·
    **Paper Requirements Include:**

    ·

    ·
    **Title Page and Formatting:** Create an APA-formatted title page. Ensure your paper follows APA guidelines.

    ·
    **Body of Paper:** Write a 3–5-page paper (excluding the title page, references, and appendices). Use level headings to structure your content and guide the reader through different sections.

    ·
    **Introduction:** Provide an introduction of the interviewee, including the interviewee’s name and role, organizational hierarchy, organization type (i.e.- clinic, hospital, for-profit, nonprofit), services provided, and patient population and volume (number of patients served annually). Be sure to state the purpose of your paper.

    ·
    **Key Findings:** Summarize the interview, covering the interviewee’s leadership style, decision-making strategies they employ, philosophy of DEI practices and gaps, legal/ethical challenges they face, and their role in strategic planning, and how they help to create and support a healthy work environment. Incorporates statistics and scholarly evidence to support discussion points as needed.

    ·
    **Feedback on Unit 4 Strategic Leadership Brief Infographic Presentation:** Summarize the feedback received on your SWOT analysis, including areas of improvement, implementation strategies, potential barriers, stakeholder engagement, policy alignment, team support, and performance measures/metrics, supported with direct examples that relate to each point.

    ·
    **Reflection:** Discuss how the feedback influenced your understanding, addressing how it enhanced or refined your SWOT analysis, insights gained about leadership practices, patient advocacy, and ethical responsibilities, and how the nurse leader’s approach compares to your own. Include strategies for implementing proposed changes and their potential impact on patient safety and care quality. Incorporates statistics and scholarly evidence to support discussion points as needed.

    ·
    **Identify and discuss 2-3 key** **takeaways** from the interview and the infographic presentation. Key takeaway should be insightful, relevant to nursing practice, and demonstrate understanding of leadership and strategic application. Incorporates scholarly evidence to support discussion points as needed.

    ·
    **Conclusion:** Summarize the main takeaways and potential changes to your future practice.

    ·
    **References Page:** Include a reference page formatted in APA style. Cite any external sources following APA guidelines. For personal communications, such as interviews, use in-text citations only (e.g., Nurse Leader’s Name, personal communication, Month Day, Year).

    · Ensure that all references include a
    **correct active DOI, permalink, or URL** to provide direct access to the scholarly source.

    · Note: Please ensure you send a follow-up thank you email to the interviewee.

    ·
    **Appendices-following reference page.**

    ·
    **Appendix A:** Attach the list of interview questions asked.

    ·
    **Appendix B:** Include a copy of the follow-up thank-you email sent to the interviewee.

    **## week6assi.docx**

    Nurse Leader Interview and Strategic Leadership Brief Reflection Paper

    **Assignment Overview:**
    This assignment is designed to deepen your understanding of the challenges and responsibilities faced by nurse leaders in today’s healthcare environment. You will explore leadership practices, patient advocacy, legal and ethical responsibilities, and DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) principles. You will also present your Unit 4 Strategic Leadership Brief Infographic to a nurse leader and gather feedback. Your reflection paper will summarize the interview findings and feedback received and discuss the implications for your nursing practice and leadership growth. Support your reflection with statistics and scholarly evidence to highlight the importance of the issues and their impact on healthcare organizations.

    **Assignment Instructions:**

    1.
    **Select and Schedule an Interview**

    1.

    · Identify an RN nurse leader/manager in a healthcare organization who supervises nursing staff and is willing to participate in the interview. Ideally, this should be the same individual identified in your Unit 1 Check-In. If you are in a leadership role, choose an interviewee at your level or higher.

    · Arrange to conduct the interview in person, virtually, or by phone.

    · Collect background information on the interviewee’s academic and professional history, as well as details about their healthcare organization.

    2.
    **Interview Questions for Background Information:**

    ·
    **Organizational Role and Hierarchy:** "Could you describe your current role and where it fits within the organizational structure?"

    ·
    **Services Offered by the Organization:** "What types of services does your organization provide? For example, does it mainly focus on outpatient, inpatient, or a mix of services?"

    ·
    **Type of Healthcare Facility:** "How would you classify your organization? Would you describe it as a community hospital, a research institution, or private practice?"

    ·
    **Patient Population and Volume:** “What is the common demographic of the patient including ethnic, socioeconomic, and cultural norms? Approximately how many patients does your unit, and the organization as a whole serve annually?"

    3.
    **To prepare for your interview, develop a set of thoughtful, open-ended questions that address the following topics. Encourage the interviewee to provide specific examples to illustrate their responses:**

    · Leadership and management styles they use in daily operations.

    · Strategies they employ for decision-making during challenging situations.

    · The significance of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the workplace and how it is fostered.

    · Common legal or ethical challenges they encounter in their role as a nurse leader.

    · Their role in strategic planning at both the unit level and the organizational level.

    · Methods they use to promote and maintain a healthy work environment.

    4.
    **Presentation and Feedback**

    · During the interview, present your
    **Unit 4 Strategic Leadership Brief Infographic Presentation** to the nurse leader and request their feedback on the following areas:

    1.
    **SWOT Analysis:** Suggestions for refining your findings, including any areas for improvement or change.

    2.
    **Implementation Recommendations:** Feedback on your proposed changes and strategies for putting them into practice.

    3.
    **Barriers and Solutions:** Insights on potential challenges to implementation and strategies for overcoming them.

    4.
    **Stakeholder Engagement:** Advice on how nurse leaders can effectively engage key stakeholders to support the proposed changes.

    5.
    **Policy Alignment:** Evaluation of whether current policies and procedures support the recommended changes.

    6.
    **Team Support:** Strategies for nurse leaders to reinforce and support changes within the team or unit.

    7.
    **Measuring Success** **(key performance indicators (KPIs) (performance measures, or metrics),** **performance benchmarks):** Suggestions on ways to measure whether the proposed changes are successful, such as tracking progress or outcomes over time.

    5.
    **Reflect on the Interview**

    5. Discuss how the feedback received influenced your understanding and its implications for your nursing practice. Address:

    . How the feedback refined or improved your understanding of the SWOT analysis and recommendations, including specific suggestions for improvement.

    . Insights gained regarding leadership practices, patient advocacy, and ethical responsibilities, and how the nurse leader’s approach compares to your own.

    . Strategies or recommendations provided for implementing the proposed changes and their potential impact on patient safety, quality of care, and staff well-being.

    . How presenting your infographic influenced your understanding and strategic approach.

    . Whether the feedback validated or challenged your initial analysis and how it will shape your leadership practice.

    .
    **Email Thank You:**

    · Once you've completed your interview, send a brief thank-you email to the nurse leader. This thoughtful gesture expresses your appreciation for their time and strengthens professional connections.

    ·
    **Paper Requirements Include:**

    ·

    ·
    **Title Page and Formatting:** Create an APA-formatted title page. Ensure your paper follows APA guidelines.

    ·
    **Body of Paper:** Write a 3–5-page paper (excluding the title page, references, and appendices). Use level headings to structure your content and guide the reader through different sections.

    ·
    **Introduction:** Provide an introduction of the interviewee, including the interviewee’s name and role, organizational hierarchy, organization type (i.e.- clinic, hospital, for-profit, nonprofit), services provided, and patient population and volume (number of patients served annually). Be sure to state the purpose of your paper.

    ·
    **Key Findings:** Summarize the interview, covering the interviewee’s leadership style, decision-making strategies they employ, philosophy of DEI practices and gaps, legal/ethical challenges they face, and their role in strategic planning, and how they help to create and support a healthy work environment. Incorporates statistics and scholarly evidence to support discussion points as needed.

    ·
    **Feedback on Unit 4 Strategic Leadership Brief Infographic Presentation:** Summarize the feedback received on your SWOT analysis, including areas of improvement, implementation strategies, potential barriers, stakeholder engagement, policy alignment, team support, and performance measures/metrics, supported with direct examples that relate to each point.

    ·
    **Reflection:** Discuss how the feedback influenced your understanding, addressing how it enhanced or refined your SWOT analysis, insights gained about leadership practices, patient advocacy, and ethical responsibilities, and how the nurse leader’s approach compares to your own. Include strategies for implementing proposed changes and their potential impact on patient safety and care quality. Incorporates statistics and scholarly evidence to support discussion points as needed.

    ·
    **Identify and discuss 2-3 key** **takeaways** from the interview and the infographic presentation. Key takeaway should be insightful, relevant to nursing practice, and demonstrate understanding of leadership and strategic application. Incorporates scholarly evidence to support discussion points as needed.

    ·
    **Conclusion:** Summarize the main takeaways and potential changes to your future practice.

    ·
    **References Page:** Include a reference page formatted in APA style. Cite any external sources following APA guidelines. For personal communications, such as interviews, use in-text citations only (e.g., Nurse Leader’s Name, personal communication, Month Day, Year).

    · Ensure that all references include a
    **correct active DOI, permalink, or URL** to provide direct access to the scholarly source.

    · Note: Please ensure you send a follow-up thank you email to the interviewee.

    ·
    **Appendices-following reference page.**

    ·
    **Appendix A:** Attach the list of interview questions asked.

    ·
    **Appendix B:** Include a copy of the follow-up thank-you email sent to the interviewee.

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Bj ppt week 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Bj ppt week 6.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Presentation healthcare communication

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Power point for health care information communication

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Power point for health care information communication