Assignment Prompt & Instructions
[>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)
Please see attached file
**files (2)**
– ## SOCW_6336_FinalProjectDirections.pdf
– ## FinalProjec2.docx
**## SOCW_6336_FinalProjectDirections.pdf**
© 2023 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 2
SOCW 6336 Final Project Directions
For your Final Project, you will apply concepts, theories, and approaches presented in
the course. The project must be presented as an 8- to 10-page (not including title page
or references), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper along with a presentation. The
written portion of the Final Project must be submitted by Day 7 of Week 10. The
presentation portion of the Final Project must be submitted by Day 7 of Week 11.
Throughout the course, there will be checkpoint assignments to help you draft the final
project. You will receive instructor feedback on each of these checkpoint assignments,
and you should apply that feedback to the Final Project.
For your Final Project, select one crisis type from any of the following categories:
• A crisis with an individual, couple, or family
• A crisis in the community
• A crisis in the nation
The crisis you select may be one you personally experienced, learned about through
this course, or heard about on the news. The crisis can be in the past or the present.
The crisis should be discussed from an academic lens and written in a scholarly voice.
There will be a checkpoint for you to formally present your topic.
By Day 7 of Week 10
• Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders,
victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrators.
• Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those
assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
• Explain the potential short-term and long-term effects that might be experienced
by the people impacted by the crisis.
• Describe the competencies you would need to work with people impacted by the
crisis. Justify why you selected these competencies.
• Explain the cultural, ethical, and legal implications that need to be considered
when working with individuals impacted by this crisis.
• Explain the anticipated outcomes for immediate, short-term, and long-term
interventions used.
• Suggest prevention efforts that may mitigate the impact of the crisis.
© 2023 Walden University, LLC Page 2 of 2
• Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide
APA citations and a reference list.
– SOCW 6336 Final Project Directions
– By Day 7 of Week 10
**## FinalProjec2.docx**
Final Project: Topic Proposal Checkpoint
Although the Final Project is not due until later in the course, there are several checkpoints to help you pace your work and receive Instructor feedback.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
[Reading](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
[Optional Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
**To prepare:**
· Review the Final Project Directions document in the Learning Resources.
· Choose a crisis on which to focus your Final Project. The FEMA and SAMHSA websites or an internet search of news coverage on crises and disasters should help you find a specific crisis. Then, respond to the parts of the prompt below.
Assignment below
**Submit a 2- to 3-page** paper in which you:
· Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.
· Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
· Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK3Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | **18.5 to >16.65 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**16.65 to >14.8 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**14.8 to >12.95 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**12.95 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | 18.5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the forms of assessment that you might use and a brief description of why you might use these forms. | **19 to >17.1 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**17.1 to >15.2 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the forms of assessments that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**15.2 to >13.3 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**13.3 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms. | 19 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list. | **5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds in the use of specific references as support.<br> <br>**4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Response is supported with specific references to resources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsFair** Response is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.<br> <br>**3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response is not supported with specific references. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | **7.5 to >6.75 ptsExceeds Expectations** Paper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error-free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error-free (two or fewer)… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6.75 to >6.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Paper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. Consistently documents sources in APA Style. Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to five). The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to five). Paper formatting is appropriate… There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6 to >5.25 ptsFair** Paper does not meet length requirements (either somewhat too short or too long). The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (5–10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus… Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. Attempts to document sources in APA Style. Citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions. A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. Paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page)… Occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**5.25 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Paper does not meet length requirements (either significantly too short or too long). The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus… Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more short quotes or three or more long quotes [over 40 words]) and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt has been made to document sources in APA Style. Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style… There is no distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity. | 7.5 pts |
Total Points: 50
## image1.jpeg
**## FinalProjec2.docx**
Final Project: Topic Proposal Checkpoint
Although the Final Project is not due until later in the course, there are several checkpoints to help you pace your work and receive Instructor feedback.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
[Reading](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
[Optional Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
**To prepare:**
· Review the Final Project Directions document in the Learning Resources.
· Choose a crisis on which to focus your Final Project. The FEMA and SAMHSA websites or an internet search of news coverage on crises and disasters should help you find a specific crisis. Then, respond to the parts of the prompt below.
Assignment below
**Submit a 2- to 3-page** paper in which you:
· Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.
· Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
· Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK3Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | **18.5 to >16.65 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**16.65 to >14.8 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**14.8 to >12.95 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**12.95 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | 18.5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the forms of assessment that you might use and a brief description of why you might use these forms. | **19 to >17.1 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**17.1 to >15.2 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the forms of assessments that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**15.2 to >13.3 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**13.3 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms. | 19 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list. | **5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds in the use of specific references as support.<br> <br>**4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Response is supported with specific references to resources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsFair** Response is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.<br> <br>**3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response is not supported with specific references. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | **7.5 to >6.75 ptsExceeds Expectations** Paper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error-free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error-free (two or fewer)… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6.75 to >6.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Paper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. Consistently documents sources in APA Style. Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to five). The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to five). Paper formatting is appropriate… There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6 to >5.25 ptsFair** Paper does not meet length requirements (either somewhat too short or too long). The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (5–10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus… Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. Attempts to document sources in APA Style. Citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions. A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. Paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page)… Occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**5.25 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Paper does not meet length requirements (either significantly too short or too long). The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus… Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more short quotes or three or more long quotes [over 40 words]) and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt has been made to document sources in APA Style. Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style… There is no distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity. | 7.5 pts |
Total Points: 50
## image1.jpeg
**## SOCW_6336_FinalProjectDirections.pdf**
© 2023 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 2
SOCW 6336 Final Project Directions
For your Final Project, you will apply concepts, theories, and approaches presented in
the course. The project must be presented as an 8- to 10-page (not including title page
or references), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper along with a presentation. The
written portion of the Final Project must be submitted by Day 7 of Week 10. The
presentation portion of the Final Project must be submitted by Day 7 of Week 11.
Throughout the course, there will be checkpoint assignments to help you draft the final
project. You will receive instructor feedback on each of these checkpoint assignments,
and you should apply that feedback to the Final Project.
For your Final Project, select one crisis type from any of the following categories:
• A crisis with an individual, couple, or family
• A crisis in the community
• A crisis in the nation
The crisis you select may be one you personally experienced, learned about through
this course, or heard about on the news. The crisis can be in the past or the present.
The crisis should be discussed from an academic lens and written in a scholarly voice.
There will be a checkpoint for you to formally present your topic.
By Day 7 of Week 10
• Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders,
victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrators.
• Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those
assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
• Explain the potential short-term and long-term effects that might be experienced
by the people impacted by the crisis.
• Describe the competencies you would need to work with people impacted by the
crisis. Justify why you selected these competencies.
• Explain the cultural, ethical, and legal implications that need to be considered
when working with individuals impacted by this crisis.
• Explain the anticipated outcomes for immediate, short-term, and long-term
interventions used.
• Suggest prevention efforts that may mitigate the impact of the crisis.
© 2023 Walden University, LLC Page 2 of 2
• Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide
APA citations and a reference list.
– SOCW 6336 Final Project Directions
– By Day 7 of Week 10
**## FinalProjec2.docx**
Final Project: Topic Proposal Checkpoint
Although the Final Project is not due until later in the course, there are several checkpoints to help you pace your work and receive Instructor feedback.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
[Reading](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
[Optional Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
**To prepare:**
· Review the Final Project Directions document in the Learning Resources.
· Choose a crisis on which to focus your Final Project. The FEMA and SAMHSA websites or an internet search of news coverage on crises and disasters should help you find a specific crisis. Then, respond to the parts of the prompt below.
Assignment below
**Submit a 2- to 3-page** paper in which you:
· Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.
· Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
· Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK3Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | **18.5 to >16.65 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**16.65 to >14.8 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**14.8 to >12.95 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**12.95 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | 18.5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the forms of assessment that you might use and a brief description of why you might use these forms. | **19 to >17.1 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**17.1 to >15.2 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the forms of assessments that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**15.2 to >13.3 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**13.3 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms. | 19 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list. | **5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds in the use of specific references as support.<br> <br>**4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Response is supported with specific references to resources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsFair** Response is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.<br> <br>**3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response is not supported with specific references. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | **7.5 to >6.75 ptsExceeds Expectations** Paper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error-free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error-free (two or fewer)… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6.75 to >6.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Paper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. Consistently documents sources in APA Style. Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to five). The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to five). Paper formatting is appropriate… There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6 to >5.25 ptsFair** Paper does not meet length requirements (either somewhat too short or too long). The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (5–10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus… Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. Attempts to document sources in APA Style. Citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions. A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. Paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page)… Occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**5.25 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Paper does not meet length requirements (either significantly too short or too long). The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus… Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more short quotes or three or more long quotes [over 40 words]) and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt has been made to document sources in APA Style. Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style… There is no distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity. | 7.5 pts |
Total Points: 50
## image1.jpeg
**## SOCW_6336_FinalProjectDirections.pdf**
© 2023 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 2
SOCW 6336 Final Project Directions
For your Final Project, you will apply concepts, theories, and approaches presented in
the course. The project must be presented as an 8- to 10-page (not including title page
or references), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper along with a presentation. The
written portion of the Final Project must be submitted by Day 7 of Week 10. The
presentation portion of the Final Project must be submitted by Day 7 of Week 11.
Throughout the course, there will be checkpoint assignments to help you draft the final
project. You will receive instructor feedback on each of these checkpoint assignments,
and you should apply that feedback to the Final Project.
For your Final Project, select one crisis type from any of the following categories:
• A crisis with an individual, couple, or family
• A crisis in the community
• A crisis in the nation
The crisis you select may be one you personally experienced, learned about through
this course, or heard about on the news. The crisis can be in the past or the present.
The crisis should be discussed from an academic lens and written in a scholarly voice.
There will be a checkpoint for you to formally present your topic.
By Day 7 of Week 10
• Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders,
victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrators.
• Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those
assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
• Explain the potential short-term and long-term effects that might be experienced
by the people impacted by the crisis.
• Describe the competencies you would need to work with people impacted by the
crisis. Justify why you selected these competencies.
• Explain the cultural, ethical, and legal implications that need to be considered
when working with individuals impacted by this crisis.
• Explain the anticipated outcomes for immediate, short-term, and long-term
interventions used.
• Suggest prevention efforts that may mitigate the impact of the crisis.
© 2023 Walden University, LLC Page 2 of 2
• Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide
APA citations and a reference list.
– SOCW 6336 Final Project Directions
– By Day 7 of Week 10
**## FinalProjec2.docx**
Final Project: Topic Proposal Checkpoint
Although the Final Project is not due until later in the course, there are several checkpoints to help you pace your work and receive Instructor feedback.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
[Reading](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
[Optional Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/229952/assignments/3247388?module_item_id=9768041)
**To prepare:**
· Review the Final Project Directions document in the Learning Resources.
· Choose a crisis on which to focus your Final Project. The FEMA and SAMHSA websites or an internet search of news coverage on crises and disasters should help you find a specific crisis. Then, respond to the parts of the prompt below.
Assignment below
**Submit a 2- to 3-page** paper in which you:
· Describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.
· Describe the forms of assessment you might use. Then, explain why those assessments are appropriate for this crisis.
· Use the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK3Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | **18.5 to >16.65 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**16.65 to >14.8 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**14.8 to >12.95 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.<br> <br>**12.95 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator. | 18.5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the forms of assessment that you might use and a brief description of why you might use these forms. | **19 to >17.1 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.<br> <br>**17.1 to >15.2 ptsMeets Expectations** Response fully describes the forms of assessments that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**15.2 to >13.3 ptsFair** Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.<br> <br>**13.3 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response makes little or no attempt to describe the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms. | 19 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list. | **5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds Expectations** Response meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds in the use of specific references as support.<br> <br>**4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Response is supported with specific references to resources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsFair** Response is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.<br> <br>**3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Response is not supported with specific references. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | **7.5 to >6.75 ptsExceeds Expectations** Paper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error-free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error-free (two or fewer)… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6.75 to >6.0 ptsMeets Expectations** Paper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas… Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. Consistently documents sources in APA Style. Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to five). The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to five). Paper formatting is appropriate… There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**6 to >5.25 ptsFair** Paper does not meet length requirements (either somewhat too short or too long). The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (5–10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus… Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. Attempts to document sources in APA Style. Citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions. A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. Paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page)… Occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.<br> <br>**5.25 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Paper does not meet length requirements (either significantly too short or too long). The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus… Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more short quotes or three or more long quotes [over 40 words]) and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt has been made to document sources in APA Style. Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style… There is no distinction between cited content and original thought… Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity. | 7.5 pts |
Total Points: 50
## image1.jpeg