Category: Sociology & Cultural Studies

  • [Solved] Change

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Change.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Relationship

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Relationship.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Review.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Social Science – Sociology Assignment 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) Please see attached file **files (6)** – ## SOCW6090_W03_RedFlags_KeyWords.pdf – ## SOCW6090_W03_Diagnosis_Assignment_Tips.pdf – ## casestudy.docx – ## Other_Specified_and_Unspecified_Diagnosis-220725_…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    Please see attached file

    **files (6)**

    – ## SOCW6090_W03_RedFlags_KeyWords.pdf

    – ## SOCW6090_W03_Diagnosis_Assignment_Tips.pdf

    – ## casestudy.docx

    – ## Other_Specified_and_Unspecified_Diagnosis-220725_Transcript.pdf

    – ## SOCW6090_W03_How_to_Write_Diagnosis_DSM5TR.pdf

    – DiagnosisofNeurodevelopmentaland.docx

    **## SOCW6090_W03_RedFlags_KeyWords.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    Red Flags and Their Key Words

    When evaluating clients, be aware of what is being said, what is unspoken, and any
    nonverbal messages the client is sending. There are certain words mentioned by a
    client that may lead you to evaluate for certain disorders first, and then followed by
    evaluating the differential diagnosis. Below are some words—i.e., “red flags”—to help
    you evaluate for certain disorders. You still need to be open to other possibilities, but
    this will give you a place to start.

    Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic
    Disorders

    I hear people talking to me.
    They are telling me . . .
    They are after me.
    Client’s speech does not make sense.

    Bipolar I’m on top of the world.
    I bought all this stuff.
    I do not need much sleep.
    Client’s speech is very fast

    Depressive Disorders I am depressed.
    I do not want to go out anymore.
    I do not want to wake up.
    I cannot sleep. I am so tired.
    I gained weight recently.
    I lost weight recently.
    I cannot concentrate.

    Anxiety Disorders I worry about everything.
    I am up at night thinking.
    I have anxiety attacks.
    I panicked out of nowhere.

    Obsessive compulsive disorders I worry about the dirt in my house.
    My thoughts go round and round.
    I do repetitive behaviors.
    I have repetitive thoughts.

    Trauma and Stressor-Related Disorders I am easily startled.
    I have nightmares.
    I do not want to talk about the situation.
    I no longer go to those places.
    I avoid those people.

    Dissociative Disorders I have gaps in my memory.
    “We”. . .
    “They”. . .

    **## SOCW6090_W03_Diagnosis_Assignment_Tips.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    Tips and Guidelines for Practice Diagnosis in This Course

    Consider printing this tip sheet. Keep it next to you as you work through each practice
    diagnosis.

    Remember: After the intake assessment, you must make a diagnosis. In this course,
    the details you would normally observe and assess are found in the written case study
    that you read. With the case studies, apply the criteria in an applicable assessment
    measure to gauge symptoms and severity based on details in a case study.

    Also, utilize the resources in the course, such as the American Psychiatric Association’s
    Online Assessment Measures (see the online classroom for the most up-to-date link).
    For these, you would use an applicable questionnaire to guide an interview and follow
    the guidance within each assessment measure.

    When diagnosing, place the diagnosis (i.e., the diagnostic code—F followed by the
    number and disorder name) before your summary. It must look like this:

    F33.3 Major depressive disorder, recurrent episode, with psychotic features

    F42 Obsessive-compulsive disorder, with poor insight

    F10.20 Alcohol use disorder, in sustained remission
    Z56.9 Other problem related to employment
    Z60.9 Unspecified problem related to social environment

    Other Tips

    1. ICD 10 codes MUST be used (e.g., F60.90).
    2. Z codes must be added. These are psychosocial and environmental stressors

    impacting the case over the last 12 months.
    3. Cases may include any diagnoses previously covered in earlier weeks.
    4. Look for all possible diagnoses for the case, not just those related to the readings

    for the week.
    o No cases will include diagnoses that have not been covered in earlier

    weeks.
    5. Differential diagnosis means the case has similar symptoms—it does not mean

    compare any case in the DSM-5-TR.
    6. When explaining your decision in the summary portion please include the criteria

    in the case that refer to the symptoms you are noting.
    7. Read the directions in the course.

    **## casestudy.docx**

    **Week 3: Case assignment**

    **CASE of OMARI**

    **INTAKE DATE: May xxxx**

    **IDENTIFYING/DEMOGRAPHIC DATA:** Omari is a 10-year-old male in the third grade. He lives in Houston, Texas with his parents. He is the only child of parents who have completed post-graduate education. The family is from St. Lucia and relocated to the United States when Omari was 6 months old for job opportunities. Omari is an intelligent young boy who presents with significant potential to excel academically.

    **CHIEF COMPLAINT/PRESENTING PROBLEM:** Omari was referred for an evaluation because
    his parents and teacher indicate that Omari is restless and often requires reminders to help him stay on task. Omari has difficulty focusing on and sitting still in class. He is described as "constantly running around" and presented with difficulties listening and following instructions. His teacher notes that he sometimes acts 'socially immature', and that he often demonstrates attention-seeking behavior.

    **HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:** Omari enjoys spending time with his friends. Most recently Omari was found in a neighbor’s house that he broke into.

    The friend group recently found fires in the woods and neighbors called the police. While Omari interacts well with peers about his own age, his parents believe he is easily led and influenced by others. Omari does get upset when he does not receive what he wants and acts out, forcing others to give things to him. He physically and verbally fights with his peers when this happens but then he gets back hanging around with his friends.

    Omari can 'hyper focus' on some activities of interest, however he often has difficulty sustaining his attention at school. Omari has been known to blurt out answers and interrupts other students in the classroom. His parents describe emotional reactivity as well as confrontational behaviors demonstrated both at home and at school. He is easily frustrated and emotionally impulsive and has had several incidents of hitting, crying outbursts, and inappropriate behavior. Behavioral concerns with aggression, lying, arguments, and disruptive behavior were noted in first and second grades.

    **PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:** This is the first evaluation for Omari.

    **SUBSTANCE USE HISTORY:** Omari denies any substance use.

    **PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:** Omari has had normal childhood illnesses. He has had all vaccinations.

    **FAMILY MEDICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:** Omari’s parents deny any psychiatric family history. There were noted medical histories from the family.  The family living in St. Lucia has a different perspective of medical and psychiatric illness than those living in the United States. They believe in more natural intervention for illnesses.

    **MENTAL STATUS EXAM:** Omari is dressed appropriately and looks like his stated age. At times during the interview, he would become frustrated and want to leave.  Omari was oriented to time, place and person. Omari was able to repeat the words given to him. He denied suicide and homicide ideation.

    **## Other_Specified_and_Unspecified_Diagnosis-220725_Transcript.pdf**

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 1

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    Program Transcript

    NARRATOR: You gather information from a client to diagnose during an intake. What

    happens if the client does not meet the required symptoms to make the diagnosis? It

    might have feeling tentative about what to diagnose. You may have heard or seen

    tentative, provisional, or rule-out diagnoses. Those terms may describe your

    uncertainty, but do they have a place and a diagnosis?

    The answer is a simple no for social workers. Some agencies utilize these terms after

    they code a diagnosis. Although, for best practice, you are strongly advised to avoid

    them. You'll see why soon. But first, let's focus on the best practice, using other

    specified or unspecified.

    In real-world settings, be prepared for clients who do not meet every required symptom

    of a disorder. A client may arrive with depression, lethargic, and experiencing a loss of

    pleasure or interest. They report a diminished ability to concentrate. These are some

    criteria for major depressive disorder. But to diagnose a depressive episode, you need

    five of the nine listed symptoms. And right now, you only have three. At this point, you

    cannot legitimately diagnose major depressive disorder.

    Still, your detective skills point you strongly in this direction. How do you diagnose? In

    every category of the DSM-5-TR, there are two options called other specified and

    unspecified disorders. Both mean the client does not meet the full criteria for a disorder.

    First, let's explore other specified disorder, which means the client is suspected to be in

    this category, but the full criteria are not met, despite showing some symptoms. You are

    diagnosing this fact and documenting the reason for the full disorder is not met, in this

    case, not meeting five out of the nine symptoms. You must record the name of the

    category followed by the specific reasons. F32.89 is the code for other specified

    depressive disorder followed by a comma, followed by the reason why they don't meet

    the criteria.

    You can also use unspecified disorder, also an option in every category. Here, you do

    not need to say why certain criteria are not met, while still recording a diagnosis that is

    acceptable. Note that the number code is different in each of these. These are

    legitimate diagnoses, and they are covered by insurance.

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 2

    Why should you not use tentative, provisional, or a rule-out diagnosis when you don't

    have all the criteria, even if an agency would allow it? There is no code that

    corresponds to the words tentative, provisional, or rule out. Using these as if they are

    implied from codes, is essentially saying the client meets the criteria for a disorder.

    Note the difference between the provisional code and the other specified code. One

    code records a specific disorder that may not be present. It may be recorded on records

    without the provisional noted, which could be confusing or ultimately inaccurate. When

    the code is submitted to insurance companies, there is not a spot for the word

    provisional, and sometimes just the code itself may appear on a form. So the insurance

    accepts this as the client's diagnosis when they never fully met the criteria, except, as

    we noted, we're not fully sure it's major depressive disorder yet.

    The other specified code is in its own unique code that accounts for how the client

    actually presents. Using other specified and unspecified diagnoses are the best ways to

    still work within the parameters of proper diagnoses, but account for the reality of a

    complex process. They allow you to be accurate while you continue evaluating the client

    for the best treatment.

    **## SOCW6090_W03_How_to_Write_Diagnosis_DSM5TR.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 1

    How to Write a Diagnosis According to the DSM-5-TR

    Writing a Diagnosis

    A diagnosis is written as a simple list in order of priority to the current treatment
    needs. For example:

    F33.1 Major depressive disorder, moderate, recurrent, with seasonal pattern
    F41.1 Generalized anxiety disorder
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty

    Note: Each diagnosis needs a code that is written before the name of the diagnosis.

    How to Code

    A diagnostic code, even when using the DSM-5-TR, follows the ICD-10 code
    structure. The code structure is between three (3) and seven (7) characters. The
    figure below shows how each digit in the code is organized.

    Alpha
    (Not U) Numeric Characters 3–7 can be any combination

    of alpha or numeric

    1st
    digit

    2nd
    digit

    3rd
    digit • 4th

    digit
    5th
    digit

    6th
    digit

    7th
    digit

    Category Etiology, anatomical site, severity Extension

    For mental health conditions, codes always start with a letter F, followed by two to six
    (2– 6) digits. A code is not valid unless it has been coded to the full number of
    digits required.

    A code with only the first three digits is used only if that condition is not further
    subdivided within the DSM-5-TR. For example, for schizophrenia, there are no
    additional characters in Spaces 4, 5, 6, and 7.

    F20.9 Schizophrenia

    In other cases, numbers must be added in the 4th, 5th, or 6th spaces to individualize
    a condition. Spaces 4–6 provide greater detail of causes and severity. For example,
    here are two codes for mania:

    F31.11 Bipolar I disorder, current episode manic, mild

    2

    F31.13 Bipolar I disorder, current episode manic, severe

    Many disorders have more than one ICD code when there are common and clearly
    identified subtypes to the illness. The diagnostic criteria box always tells you if a
    code must be subdivided.

    If you do not see a code at the top of the diagnostic criteria box, look for the correct
    codes at the bottom of the box. Often the box prompts for further individualization by
    saying “Specify if” or “Specify whether.” You may also be asked to set a severity
    level.

    The wording “specify whether” tells you that the subtypes that follow are mutually
    exclusive.

    For example, here are two subtypes for schizoaffective disorder:

    F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type

    F25.1 Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type

    Always check for coding notes for further directions. For example, in addition to
    our subtypes for schizoaffective disorder, if catatonia is present, an additional code is
    found in the coding note.

    Coding note: Include the name of the medical condition in the name of the
    mental disorder (e.g., F06.1 catatonic disorder due to hepatic encephalopathy).
    The other medical condition should be coded and listed separately immediately
    before the catatonic disorder due to the medical condition (e.g., K72.90 hepatic
    encephalopathy; F06.1 catatonic disorder due to hepatic encephalopathy).

    Now the diagnosis looks like this:

    F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type
    F06.1 Catatonia (associated with another mental disorder)

    Some disorders, such as the substance/medication-induced disorders, have more
    complex codes for their subtypes. When this happens, there is always a table and a
    coding note found at the bottom of the diagnostic criteria box.

    How to List Multiple Codes

    Formal DSM-5-TR diagnosis combines into one list all relevant mental disorders,
    including personality disorders. The DSM-5-TR also expands the psychosocial
    stressors that a patient might be experiencing. These are called “Other conditions
    that may be a focus of clinical attention” and most begin with the letter “Z.”

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 3

    These conditions, which are critical to psychosocial treatment, are found near the
    end of the manual.

    In a diagnostic list, always place the principal diagnosis first (the reason for the
    visit, if in an outpatient setting). Other mental health comorbid diagnoses follow in
    order of priority to the treatment or focus of attention.

    RULE A: In this diagnostic list, a mental disorder was the reason for the visit.
    Other psychosocial factors relevant to the service are listed after mental health
    conditions

    F40.00 Agoraphobia
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty
    Z72.0 Tobacco use disorder, mild (nicotine use)

    The order of priority above is (a) principal mental health diagnosis, (b)
    psychosocial needs.

    RULE B: If the client above has a clinical diagnosis of a mental health problem
    as the principal diagnosis (all F codes), with the presence of a second, the
    diagnosis looks like this:

    F40.00 Agoraphobia
    F50.01 Anorexia nervosa, restricting subtype
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty
    Z72.0 Tobacco use disorder, mild (nicotine use)

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 4

    References

    American Psychiatric Association. (2022a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
    disorders (DSM-5-TR) (5th ed., text rev.).
    https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

    American Psychiatric Association. (2022b). DSM-5-TR online assessment measures.
    https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-
    resources/assessment-measures

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). ICD-10-CM official guidelines for
    coding and reporting: FY 2017 (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017).
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/10cmguidelines_2017_final.pdf

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). International classification of
    diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM). Retrieved from
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd-10-cm.htm

    CMS.gov. (2021). Provider resources.
    https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/PrevntionGenInfo/ProviderResources

    World Health Organization. (2022). ICD-11: International classification of diseases for
    mortality and morbidity statistics: Reference guide (11th ed.).
    https://icdcdn.who.int/icd11referenceguide/en/html/index.html

    **DiagnosisofNeurodevelopmentaland.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/diagnosisofneurodevelopmentaland-docx-10559665)

    **DiagnosisofNeurodevelopmentaland.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/diagnosisofneurodevelopmentaland-docx-10559665)

    **## SOCW6090_W03_RedFlags_KeyWords.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    Red Flags and Their Key Words

    When evaluating clients, be aware of what is being said, what is unspoken, and any
    nonverbal messages the client is sending. There are certain words mentioned by a
    client that may lead you to evaluate for certain disorders first, and then followed by
    evaluating the differential diagnosis. Below are some words—i.e., “red flags”—to help
    you evaluate for certain disorders. You still need to be open to other possibilities, but
    this will give you a place to start.

    Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic
    Disorders

    I hear people talking to me.
    They are telling me . . .
    They are after me.
    Client’s speech does not make sense.

    Bipolar I’m on top of the world.
    I bought all this stuff.
    I do not need much sleep.
    Client’s speech is very fast

    Depressive Disorders I am depressed.
    I do not want to go out anymore.
    I do not want to wake up.
    I cannot sleep. I am so tired.
    I gained weight recently.
    I lost weight recently.
    I cannot concentrate.

    Anxiety Disorders I worry about everything.
    I am up at night thinking.
    I have anxiety attacks.
    I panicked out of nowhere.

    Obsessive compulsive disorders I worry about the dirt in my house.
    My thoughts go round and round.
    I do repetitive behaviors.
    I have repetitive thoughts.

    Trauma and Stressor-Related Disorders I am easily startled.
    I have nightmares.
    I do not want to talk about the situation.
    I no longer go to those places.
    I avoid those people.

    Dissociative Disorders I have gaps in my memory.
    “We”. . .
    “They”. . .

    **## SOCW6090_W03_Diagnosis_Assignment_Tips.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    Tips and Guidelines for Practice Diagnosis in This Course

    Consider printing this tip sheet. Keep it next to you as you work through each practice
    diagnosis.

    Remember: After the intake assessment, you must make a diagnosis. In this course,
    the details you would normally observe and assess are found in the written case study
    that you read. With the case studies, apply the criteria in an applicable assessment
    measure to gauge symptoms and severity based on details in a case study.

    Also, utilize the resources in the course, such as the American Psychiatric Association’s
    Online Assessment Measures (see the online classroom for the most up-to-date link).
    For these, you would use an applicable questionnaire to guide an interview and follow
    the guidance within each assessment measure.

    When diagnosing, place the diagnosis (i.e., the diagnostic code—F followed by the
    number and disorder name) before your summary. It must look like this:

    F33.3 Major depressive disorder, recurrent episode, with psychotic features

    F42 Obsessive-compulsive disorder, with poor insight

    F10.20 Alcohol use disorder, in sustained remission
    Z56.9 Other problem related to employment
    Z60.9 Unspecified problem related to social environment

    Other Tips

    1. ICD 10 codes MUST be used (e.g., F60.90).
    2. Z codes must be added. These are psychosocial and environmental stressors

    impacting the case over the last 12 months.
    3. Cases may include any diagnoses previously covered in earlier weeks.
    4. Look for all possible diagnoses for the case, not just those related to the readings

    for the week.
    o No cases will include diagnoses that have not been covered in earlier

    weeks.
    5. Differential diagnosis means the case has similar symptoms—it does not mean

    compare any case in the DSM-5-TR.
    6. When explaining your decision in the summary portion please include the criteria

    in the case that refer to the symptoms you are noting.
    7. Read the directions in the course.

    **## casestudy.docx**

    **Week 3: Case assignment**

    **CASE of OMARI**

    **INTAKE DATE: May xxxx**

    **IDENTIFYING/DEMOGRAPHIC DATA:** Omari is a 10-year-old male in the third grade. He lives in Houston, Texas with his parents. He is the only child of parents who have completed post-graduate education. The family is from St. Lucia and relocated to the United States when Omari was 6 months old for job opportunities. Omari is an intelligent young boy who presents with significant potential to excel academically.

    **CHIEF COMPLAINT/PRESENTING PROBLEM:** Omari was referred for an evaluation because
    his parents and teacher indicate that Omari is restless and often requires reminders to help him stay on task. Omari has difficulty focusing on and sitting still in class. He is described as "constantly running around" and presented with difficulties listening and following instructions. His teacher notes that he sometimes acts 'socially immature', and that he often demonstrates attention-seeking behavior.

    **HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:** Omari enjoys spending time with his friends. Most recently Omari was found in a neighbor’s house that he broke into.

    The friend group recently found fires in the woods and neighbors called the police. While Omari interacts well with peers about his own age, his parents believe he is easily led and influenced by others. Omari does get upset when he does not receive what he wants and acts out, forcing others to give things to him. He physically and verbally fights with his peers when this happens but then he gets back hanging around with his friends.

    Omari can 'hyper focus' on some activities of interest, however he often has difficulty sustaining his attention at school. Omari has been known to blurt out answers and interrupts other students in the classroom. His parents describe emotional reactivity as well as confrontational behaviors demonstrated both at home and at school. He is easily frustrated and emotionally impulsive and has had several incidents of hitting, crying outbursts, and inappropriate behavior. Behavioral concerns with aggression, lying, arguments, and disruptive behavior were noted in first and second grades.

    **PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:** This is the first evaluation for Omari.

    **SUBSTANCE USE HISTORY:** Omari denies any substance use.

    **PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:** Omari has had normal childhood illnesses. He has had all vaccinations.

    **FAMILY MEDICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:** Omari’s parents deny any psychiatric family history. There were noted medical histories from the family.  The family living in St. Lucia has a different perspective of medical and psychiatric illness than those living in the United States. They believe in more natural intervention for illnesses.

    **MENTAL STATUS EXAM:** Omari is dressed appropriately and looks like his stated age. At times during the interview, he would become frustrated and want to leave.  Omari was oriented to time, place and person. Omari was able to repeat the words given to him. He denied suicide and homicide ideation.

    **## Other_Specified_and_Unspecified_Diagnosis-220725_Transcript.pdf**

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 1

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    Program Transcript

    NARRATOR: You gather information from a client to diagnose during an intake. What

    happens if the client does not meet the required symptoms to make the diagnosis? It

    might have feeling tentative about what to diagnose. You may have heard or seen

    tentative, provisional, or rule-out diagnoses. Those terms may describe your

    uncertainty, but do they have a place and a diagnosis?

    The answer is a simple no for social workers. Some agencies utilize these terms after

    they code a diagnosis. Although, for best practice, you are strongly advised to avoid

    them. You'll see why soon. But first, let's focus on the best practice, using other

    specified or unspecified.

    In real-world settings, be prepared for clients who do not meet every required symptom

    of a disorder. A client may arrive with depression, lethargic, and experiencing a loss of

    pleasure or interest. They report a diminished ability to concentrate. These are some

    criteria for major depressive disorder. But to diagnose a depressive episode, you need

    five of the nine listed symptoms. And right now, you only have three. At this point, you

    cannot legitimately diagnose major depressive disorder.

    Still, your detective skills point you strongly in this direction. How do you diagnose? In

    every category of the DSM-5-TR, there are two options called other specified and

    unspecified disorders. Both mean the client does not meet the full criteria for a disorder.

    First, let's explore other specified disorder, which means the client is suspected to be in

    this category, but the full criteria are not met, despite showing some symptoms. You are

    diagnosing this fact and documenting the reason for the full disorder is not met, in this

    case, not meeting five out of the nine symptoms. You must record the name of the

    category followed by the specific reasons. F32.89 is the code for other specified

    depressive disorder followed by a comma, followed by the reason why they don't meet

    the criteria.

    You can also use unspecified disorder, also an option in every category. Here, you do

    not need to say why certain criteria are not met, while still recording a diagnosis that is

    acceptable. Note that the number code is different in each of these. These are

    legitimate diagnoses, and they are covered by insurance.

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 2

    Why should you not use tentative, provisional, or a rule-out diagnosis when you don't

    have all the criteria, even if an agency would allow it? There is no code that

    corresponds to the words tentative, provisional, or rule out. Using these as if they are

    implied from codes, is essentially saying the client meets the criteria for a disorder.

    Note the difference between the provisional code and the other specified code. One

    code records a specific disorder that may not be present. It may be recorded on records

    without the provisional noted, which could be confusing or ultimately inaccurate. When

    the code is submitted to insurance companies, there is not a spot for the word

    provisional, and sometimes just the code itself may appear on a form. So the insurance

    accepts this as the client's diagnosis when they never fully met the criteria, except, as

    we noted, we're not fully sure it's major depressive disorder yet.

    The other specified code is in its own unique code that accounts for how the client

    actually presents. Using other specified and unspecified diagnoses are the best ways to

    still work within the parameters of proper diagnoses, but account for the reality of a

    complex process. They allow you to be accurate while you continue evaluating the client

    for the best treatment.

    **## SOCW6090_W03_How_to_Write_Diagnosis_DSM5TR.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 1

    How to Write a Diagnosis According to the DSM-5-TR

    Writing a Diagnosis

    A diagnosis is written as a simple list in order of priority to the current treatment
    needs. For example:

    F33.1 Major depressive disorder, moderate, recurrent, with seasonal pattern
    F41.1 Generalized anxiety disorder
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty

    Note: Each diagnosis needs a code that is written before the name of the diagnosis.

    How to Code

    A diagnostic code, even when using the DSM-5-TR, follows the ICD-10 code
    structure. The code structure is between three (3) and seven (7) characters. The
    figure below shows how each digit in the code is organized.

    Alpha
    (Not U) Numeric Characters 3–7 can be any combination

    of alpha or numeric

    1st
    digit

    2nd
    digit

    3rd
    digit • 4th

    digit
    5th
    digit

    6th
    digit

    7th
    digit

    Category Etiology, anatomical site, severity Extension

    For mental health conditions, codes always start with a letter F, followed by two to six
    (2– 6) digits. A code is not valid unless it has been coded to the full number of
    digits required.

    A code with only the first three digits is used only if that condition is not further
    subdivided within the DSM-5-TR. For example, for schizophrenia, there are no
    additional characters in Spaces 4, 5, 6, and 7.

    F20.9 Schizophrenia

    In other cases, numbers must be added in the 4th, 5th, or 6th spaces to individualize
    a condition. Spaces 4–6 provide greater detail of causes and severity. For example,
    here are two codes for mania:

    F31.11 Bipolar I disorder, current episode manic, mild

    2

    F31.13 Bipolar I disorder, current episode manic, severe

    Many disorders have more than one ICD code when there are common and clearly
    identified subtypes to the illness. The diagnostic criteria box always tells you if a
    code must be subdivided.

    If you do not see a code at the top of the diagnostic criteria box, look for the correct
    codes at the bottom of the box. Often the box prompts for further individualization by
    saying “Specify if” or “Specify whether.” You may also be asked to set a severity
    level.

    The wording “specify whether” tells you that the subtypes that follow are mutually
    exclusive.

    For example, here are two subtypes for schizoaffective disorder:

    F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type

    F25.1 Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type

    Always check for coding notes for further directions. For example, in addition to
    our subtypes for schizoaffective disorder, if catatonia is present, an additional code is
    found in the coding note.

    Coding note: Include the name of the medical condition in the name of the
    mental disorder (e.g., F06.1 catatonic disorder due to hepatic encephalopathy).
    The other medical condition should be coded and listed separately immediately
    before the catatonic disorder due to the medical condition (e.g., K72.90 hepatic
    encephalopathy; F06.1 catatonic disorder due to hepatic encephalopathy).

    Now the diagnosis looks like this:

    F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type
    F06.1 Catatonia (associated with another mental disorder)

    Some disorders, such as the substance/medication-induced disorders, have more
    complex codes for their subtypes. When this happens, there is always a table and a
    coding note found at the bottom of the diagnostic criteria box.

    How to List Multiple Codes

    Formal DSM-5-TR diagnosis combines into one list all relevant mental disorders,
    including personality disorders. The DSM-5-TR also expands the psychosocial
    stressors that a patient might be experiencing. These are called “Other conditions
    that may be a focus of clinical attention” and most begin with the letter “Z.”

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 3

    These conditions, which are critical to psychosocial treatment, are found near the
    end of the manual.

    In a diagnostic list, always place the principal diagnosis first (the reason for the
    visit, if in an outpatient setting). Other mental health comorbid diagnoses follow in
    order of priority to the treatment or focus of attention.

    RULE A: In this diagnostic list, a mental disorder was the reason for the visit.
    Other psychosocial factors relevant to the service are listed after mental health
    conditions

    F40.00 Agoraphobia
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty
    Z72.0 Tobacco use disorder, mild (nicotine use)

    The order of priority above is (a) principal mental health diagnosis, (b)
    psychosocial needs.

    RULE B: If the client above has a clinical diagnosis of a mental health problem
    as the principal diagnosis (all F codes), with the presence of a second, the
    diagnosis looks like this:

    F40.00 Agoraphobia
    F50.01 Anorexia nervosa, restricting subtype
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty
    Z72.0 Tobacco use disorder, mild (nicotine use)

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 4

    References

    American Psychiatric Association. (2022a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
    disorders (DSM-5-TR) (5th ed., text rev.).
    https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

    American Psychiatric Association. (2022b). DSM-5-TR online assessment measures.
    https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-
    resources/assessment-measures

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). ICD-10-CM official guidelines for
    coding and reporting: FY 2017 (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017).
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/10cmguidelines_2017_final.pdf

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). International classification of
    diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM). Retrieved from
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd-10-cm.htm

    CMS.gov. (2021). Provider resources.
    https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/PrevntionGenInfo/ProviderResources

    World Health Organization. (2022). ICD-11: International classification of diseases for
    mortality and morbidity statistics: Reference guide (11th ed.).
    https://icdcdn.who.int/icd11referenceguide/en/html/index.html

    **DiagnosisofNeurodevelopmentaland.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/diagnosisofneurodevelopmentaland-docx-10559665)

    **## SOCW6090_W03_RedFlags_KeyWords.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    Red Flags and Their Key Words

    When evaluating clients, be aware of what is being said, what is unspoken, and any
    nonverbal messages the client is sending. There are certain words mentioned by a
    client that may lead you to evaluate for certain disorders first, and then followed by
    evaluating the differential diagnosis. Below are some words—i.e., “red flags”—to help
    you evaluate for certain disorders. You still need to be open to other possibilities, but
    this will give you a place to start.

    Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic
    Disorders

    I hear people talking to me.
    They are telling me . . .
    They are after me.
    Client’s speech does not make sense.

    Bipolar I’m on top of the world.
    I bought all this stuff.
    I do not need much sleep.
    Client’s speech is very fast

    Depressive Disorders I am depressed.
    I do not want to go out anymore.
    I do not want to wake up.
    I cannot sleep. I am so tired.
    I gained weight recently.
    I lost weight recently.
    I cannot concentrate.

    Anxiety Disorders I worry about everything.
    I am up at night thinking.
    I have anxiety attacks.
    I panicked out of nowhere.

    Obsessive compulsive disorders I worry about the dirt in my house.
    My thoughts go round and round.
    I do repetitive behaviors.
    I have repetitive thoughts.

    Trauma and Stressor-Related Disorders I am easily startled.
    I have nightmares.
    I do not want to talk about the situation.
    I no longer go to those places.
    I avoid those people.

    Dissociative Disorders I have gaps in my memory.
    “We”. . .
    “They”. . .

    **## SOCW6090_W03_Diagnosis_Assignment_Tips.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    Tips and Guidelines for Practice Diagnosis in This Course

    Consider printing this tip sheet. Keep it next to you as you work through each practice
    diagnosis.

    Remember: After the intake assessment, you must make a diagnosis. In this course,
    the details you would normally observe and assess are found in the written case study
    that you read. With the case studies, apply the criteria in an applicable assessment
    measure to gauge symptoms and severity based on details in a case study.

    Also, utilize the resources in the course, such as the American Psychiatric Association’s
    Online Assessment Measures (see the online classroom for the most up-to-date link).
    For these, you would use an applicable questionnaire to guide an interview and follow
    the guidance within each assessment measure.

    When diagnosing, place the diagnosis (i.e., the diagnostic code—F followed by the
    number and disorder name) before your summary. It must look like this:

    F33.3 Major depressive disorder, recurrent episode, with psychotic features

    F42 Obsessive-compulsive disorder, with poor insight

    F10.20 Alcohol use disorder, in sustained remission
    Z56.9 Other problem related to employment
    Z60.9 Unspecified problem related to social environment

    Other Tips

    1. ICD 10 codes MUST be used (e.g., F60.90).
    2. Z codes must be added. These are psychosocial and environmental stressors

    impacting the case over the last 12 months.
    3. Cases may include any diagnoses previously covered in earlier weeks.
    4. Look for all possible diagnoses for the case, not just those related to the readings

    for the week.
    o No cases will include diagnoses that have not been covered in earlier

    weeks.
    5. Differential diagnosis means the case has similar symptoms—it does not mean

    compare any case in the DSM-5-TR.
    6. When explaining your decision in the summary portion please include the criteria

    in the case that refer to the symptoms you are noting.
    7. Read the directions in the course.

    **## casestudy.docx**

    **Week 3: Case assignment**

    **CASE of OMARI**

    **INTAKE DATE: May xxxx**

    **IDENTIFYING/DEMOGRAPHIC DATA:** Omari is a 10-year-old male in the third grade. He lives in Houston, Texas with his parents. He is the only child of parents who have completed post-graduate education. The family is from St. Lucia and relocated to the United States when Omari was 6 months old for job opportunities. Omari is an intelligent young boy who presents with significant potential to excel academically.

    **CHIEF COMPLAINT/PRESENTING PROBLEM:** Omari was referred for an evaluation because
    his parents and teacher indicate that Omari is restless and often requires reminders to help him stay on task. Omari has difficulty focusing on and sitting still in class. He is described as "constantly running around" and presented with difficulties listening and following instructions. His teacher notes that he sometimes acts 'socially immature', and that he often demonstrates attention-seeking behavior.

    **HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:** Omari enjoys spending time with his friends. Most recently Omari was found in a neighbor’s house that he broke into.

    The friend group recently found fires in the woods and neighbors called the police. While Omari interacts well with peers about his own age, his parents believe he is easily led and influenced by others. Omari does get upset when he does not receive what he wants and acts out, forcing others to give things to him. He physically and verbally fights with his peers when this happens but then he gets back hanging around with his friends.

    Omari can 'hyper focus' on some activities of interest, however he often has difficulty sustaining his attention at school. Omari has been known to blurt out answers and interrupts other students in the classroom. His parents describe emotional reactivity as well as confrontational behaviors demonstrated both at home and at school. He is easily frustrated and emotionally impulsive and has had several incidents of hitting, crying outbursts, and inappropriate behavior. Behavioral concerns with aggression, lying, arguments, and disruptive behavior were noted in first and second grades.

    **PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:** This is the first evaluation for Omari.

    **SUBSTANCE USE HISTORY:** Omari denies any substance use.

    **PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:** Omari has had normal childhood illnesses. He has had all vaccinations.

    **FAMILY MEDICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:** Omari’s parents deny any psychiatric family history. There were noted medical histories from the family.  The family living in St. Lucia has a different perspective of medical and psychiatric illness than those living in the United States. They believe in more natural intervention for illnesses.

    **MENTAL STATUS EXAM:** Omari is dressed appropriately and looks like his stated age. At times during the interview, he would become frustrated and want to leave.  Omari was oriented to time, place and person. Omari was able to repeat the words given to him. He denied suicide and homicide ideation.

    **## Other_Specified_and_Unspecified_Diagnosis-220725_Transcript.pdf**

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 1

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    Program Transcript

    NARRATOR: You gather information from a client to diagnose during an intake. What

    happens if the client does not meet the required symptoms to make the diagnosis? It

    might have feeling tentative about what to diagnose. You may have heard or seen

    tentative, provisional, or rule-out diagnoses. Those terms may describe your

    uncertainty, but do they have a place and a diagnosis?

    The answer is a simple no for social workers. Some agencies utilize these terms after

    they code a diagnosis. Although, for best practice, you are strongly advised to avoid

    them. You'll see why soon. But first, let's focus on the best practice, using other

    specified or unspecified.

    In real-world settings, be prepared for clients who do not meet every required symptom

    of a disorder. A client may arrive with depression, lethargic, and experiencing a loss of

    pleasure or interest. They report a diminished ability to concentrate. These are some

    criteria for major depressive disorder. But to diagnose a depressive episode, you need

    five of the nine listed symptoms. And right now, you only have three. At this point, you

    cannot legitimately diagnose major depressive disorder.

    Still, your detective skills point you strongly in this direction. How do you diagnose? In

    every category of the DSM-5-TR, there are two options called other specified and

    unspecified disorders. Both mean the client does not meet the full criteria for a disorder.

    First, let's explore other specified disorder, which means the client is suspected to be in

    this category, but the full criteria are not met, despite showing some symptoms. You are

    diagnosing this fact and documenting the reason for the full disorder is not met, in this

    case, not meeting five out of the nine symptoms. You must record the name of the

    category followed by the specific reasons. F32.89 is the code for other specified

    depressive disorder followed by a comma, followed by the reason why they don't meet

    the criteria.

    You can also use unspecified disorder, also an option in every category. Here, you do

    not need to say why certain criteria are not met, while still recording a diagnosis that is

    acceptable. Note that the number code is different in each of these. These are

    legitimate diagnoses, and they are covered by insurance.

    Other Specified and Unspecified Diagnosis

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 2

    Why should you not use tentative, provisional, or a rule-out diagnosis when you don't

    have all the criteria, even if an agency would allow it? There is no code that

    corresponds to the words tentative, provisional, or rule out. Using these as if they are

    implied from codes, is essentially saying the client meets the criteria for a disorder.

    Note the difference between the provisional code and the other specified code. One

    code records a specific disorder that may not be present. It may be recorded on records

    without the provisional noted, which could be confusing or ultimately inaccurate. When

    the code is submitted to insurance companies, there is not a spot for the word

    provisional, and sometimes just the code itself may appear on a form. So the insurance

    accepts this as the client's diagnosis when they never fully met the criteria, except, as

    we noted, we're not fully sure it's major depressive disorder yet.

    The other specified code is in its own unique code that accounts for how the client

    actually presents. Using other specified and unspecified diagnoses are the best ways to

    still work within the parameters of proper diagnoses, but account for the reality of a

    complex process. They allow you to be accurate while you continue evaluating the client

    for the best treatment.

    **## SOCW6090_W03_How_to_Write_Diagnosis_DSM5TR.pdf**

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 1

    How to Write a Diagnosis According to the DSM-5-TR

    Writing a Diagnosis

    A diagnosis is written as a simple list in order of priority to the current treatment
    needs. For example:

    F33.1 Major depressive disorder, moderate, recurrent, with seasonal pattern
    F41.1 Generalized anxiety disorder
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty

    Note: Each diagnosis needs a code that is written before the name of the diagnosis.

    How to Code

    A diagnostic code, even when using the DSM-5-TR, follows the ICD-10 code
    structure. The code structure is between three (3) and seven (7) characters. The
    figure below shows how each digit in the code is organized.

    Alpha
    (Not U) Numeric Characters 3–7 can be any combination

    of alpha or numeric

    1st
    digit

    2nd
    digit

    3rd
    digit • 4th

    digit
    5th
    digit

    6th
    digit

    7th
    digit

    Category Etiology, anatomical site, severity Extension

    For mental health conditions, codes always start with a letter F, followed by two to six
    (2– 6) digits. A code is not valid unless it has been coded to the full number of
    digits required.

    A code with only the first three digits is used only if that condition is not further
    subdivided within the DSM-5-TR. For example, for schizophrenia, there are no
    additional characters in Spaces 4, 5, 6, and 7.

    F20.9 Schizophrenia

    In other cases, numbers must be added in the 4th, 5th, or 6th spaces to individualize
    a condition. Spaces 4–6 provide greater detail of causes and severity. For example,
    here are two codes for mania:

    F31.11 Bipolar I disorder, current episode manic, mild

    2

    F31.13 Bipolar I disorder, current episode manic, severe

    Many disorders have more than one ICD code when there are common and clearly
    identified subtypes to the illness. The diagnostic criteria box always tells you if a
    code must be subdivided.

    If you do not see a code at the top of the diagnostic criteria box, look for the correct
    codes at the bottom of the box. Often the box prompts for further individualization by
    saying “Specify if” or “Specify whether.” You may also be asked to set a severity
    level.

    The wording “specify whether” tells you that the subtypes that follow are mutually
    exclusive.

    For example, here are two subtypes for schizoaffective disorder:

    F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type

    F25.1 Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type

    Always check for coding notes for further directions. For example, in addition to
    our subtypes for schizoaffective disorder, if catatonia is present, an additional code is
    found in the coding note.

    Coding note: Include the name of the medical condition in the name of the
    mental disorder (e.g., F06.1 catatonic disorder due to hepatic encephalopathy).
    The other medical condition should be coded and listed separately immediately
    before the catatonic disorder due to the medical condition (e.g., K72.90 hepatic
    encephalopathy; F06.1 catatonic disorder due to hepatic encephalopathy).

    Now the diagnosis looks like this:

    F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type
    F06.1 Catatonia (associated with another mental disorder)

    Some disorders, such as the substance/medication-induced disorders, have more
    complex codes for their subtypes. When this happens, there is always a table and a
    coding note found at the bottom of the diagnostic criteria box.

    How to List Multiple Codes

    Formal DSM-5-TR diagnosis combines into one list all relevant mental disorders,
    including personality disorders. The DSM-5-TR also expands the psychosocial
    stressors that a patient might be experiencing. These are called “Other conditions
    that may be a focus of clinical attention” and most begin with the letter “Z.”

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 3

    These conditions, which are critical to psychosocial treatment, are found near the
    end of the manual.

    In a diagnostic list, always place the principal diagnosis first (the reason for the
    visit, if in an outpatient setting). Other mental health comorbid diagnoses follow in
    order of priority to the treatment or focus of attention.

    RULE A: In this diagnostic list, a mental disorder was the reason for the visit.
    Other psychosocial factors relevant to the service are listed after mental health
    conditions

    F40.00 Agoraphobia
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty
    Z72.0 Tobacco use disorder, mild (nicotine use)

    The order of priority above is (a) principal mental health diagnosis, (b)
    psychosocial needs.

    RULE B: If the client above has a clinical diagnosis of a mental health problem
    as the principal diagnosis (all F codes), with the presence of a second, the
    diagnosis looks like this:

    F40.00 Agoraphobia
    F50.01 Anorexia nervosa, restricting subtype
    Z60.3 Acculturation difficulty
    Z72.0 Tobacco use disorder, mild (nicotine use)

    © 2022 Walden University, LLC 4

    References

    American Psychiatric Association. (2022a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
    disorders (DSM-5-TR) (5th ed., text rev.).
    https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

    American Psychiatric Association. (2022b). DSM-5-TR online assessment measures.
    https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-
    resources/assessment-measures

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). ICD-10-CM official guidelines for
    coding and reporting: FY 2017 (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017).
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/10cmguidelines_2017_final.pdf

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). International classification of
    diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM). Retrieved from
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd-10-cm.htm

    CMS.gov. (2021). Provider resources.
    https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/PrevntionGenInfo/ProviderResources

    World Health Organization. (2022). ICD-11: International classification of diseases for
    mortality and morbidity statistics: Reference guide (11th ed.).
    https://icdcdn.who.int/icd11referenceguide/en/html/index.html

    **DiagnosisofNeurodevelopmentaland.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/diagnosisofneurodevelopmentaland-docx-10559665)

  • [Solved] Reconcile

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Reconcile.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SWK 5002| Week 9: Policy Analysis and Recomendations

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) Please see attached. **files (4)** – ## PolicySelectionandBackground.pdf – ExplorationofSocialJustice.pdf – PolicyAnalysisControlledSubstancesActandCriminalizationofSubstanceUseDisorder.pdf – Week9Instructions.pdf…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    Please see attached.

    **files (4)**

    – ## PolicySelectionandBackground.pdf

    – ExplorationofSocialJustice.pdf
    – PolicyAnalysisControlledSubstancesActandCriminalizationofSubstanceUseDisorder.pdf
    – Week9Instructions.pdf

    **## PolicySelectionandBackground.pdf**

    1

    Policy Selection and Background

    Tierainie C. Johnson, MS, MCAP

    Capella University

    SWK 5002- Social Welfare History Policy Practice

    Professor Anna Richmond, LAPSW, LISW

    May 10, 2026

    2

    Policy Selection and Background

    Social policy is largely concerned with social justice. However, policies aimed at tackling

    issues in society can also lead to inequality and oppression. The policy dynamic of social work is

    critical in recognizing the advantages and the unforeseen outcomes of policies in the social work

    field. The Controlled Substances Act is one of the key federal policies that exemplify this

    tension. The policy was introduced in 1970 in response to the need by the United States to

    regulate the use and distribution of drugs (Lampe, 2025). Despite aiming to safeguard the health

    of the population and minimize drug abuse, the policy has been widely criticized as having

    disproportionately impacted the Black and Hispanic communities and contributed to systemic

    inequality. Substance use and incarceration for drug-related problems are long-standing social

    justice issues that are both intersectional in nature and combine with race, socioeconomic status,

    and access to medical care and legal services. The issue is not new, but an extension of historical

    trends of discrimination embedded within legal and political systems. This paper explores the

    mission and objectives, programs and services, and the history of the Controlled Substances Act.

    Purpose of the Policy

    The main aim of the Controlled Substances Act is to regulate the production, distribution,

    and use of some drugs using a hierarchical classification system. This system classifies

    substances into five schedules rooted in their accepted medical use, potential abuse, and potential

    to cause dependency (Ortiz and Preuss, 2024). Schedule I drugs are the most dangerous and do

    not have an endorsement under medical use, and the likelihood of abuse is high. Conversely,

    Schedule V substances are considered to be less risky and have accepted medical use. The policy

    was developed to create a unified federal effort to regulate drugs, replacing inconsistent state

    regulations and giving them clear guidelines on rules of enforcement and control.

    3

    As Otiz and Preuss (2024) describe, the policy is a health intervention aimed at

    decreasing substance abuse and safeguarding communities. Nevertheless, practically, it has acted

    more as a criminal justice policy. Instead of focusing on treatment and prevention of controlled

    substances, the law focuses on the punishment of possessing, distributing, and manufacturing

    controlled substances. Studies have shown that such a punitive process has not helped decrease

    the rate of drug use but instead has also caused a rise in mass incarceration (DEA, 2025).

    Programs and Services Provided Through the Policy

    The Controlled Substances Act supports numerous programs and services aimed at drug

    enforcement, prevention, and treatment. The most conspicuous one is enforcement programs,

    which involve federal and state agencies that control the drug-related activities, carry out

    investigations, and prosecute individuals violating drug laws (Lampe, 2025). Such attempts

    include surveillance, arrests, and imprisonment, which form the backbone of the policy

    implementation.

    Prevention programs are also part of the policy framework and entail a public education

    campaign that discourages drug use. In many cases, these programs address the youth and strive

    to address the issue of raising awareness of the dangers of using the substance. Though

    prevention programs are important, it is often dominated by the enforcement programs that limit

    their overall effectiveness.

    Moreover, the policy offers assistance with treatment services. These services include

    substance-abuse rehabilitation programs, counseling, and medication-assisted therapeutic

    programs for individuals with substance abuse. However, these services are not equally

    accessible, particularly among marginalized populations (Lampe, 2025). High cost, absence of

    insurance, the fact that there are not enough treatment centers, and stigma are some of the

    4

    barriers that many individuals have to face. Consequently, services offered by the policy fail to

    sufficiently respond to the needs of all the impacted populations.

    Target Population for Programs and Services

    The target population groups covered in programs and services in the Controlled

    Substances Act would include individual users of controlled substances, persons at risk of use of

    controlled substances, and victims of crime related to drug use. Ideally, this policy is applicable

    to all people irrespective of race or socioeconomic status. However, in actuality, its impacts have

    disproportionately affected the Black and Hispanic communities.

    As Rouhani et al. (2023) report, there is a comparatively equal distribution of drug use

    across racial lines. Minority groups have a significantly higher likelihood of being arrested,

    convicted, and imprisoned for committing drug crimes. Such a disproportion refers to structural,

    deep-rooted ills of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system has long-term

    implications on many people in these communities, including job loss, housing insecurity, and

    social stigma. The findings are also part of the poverty and inequality cycle that leaves the

    affected individuals in a difficult situation where they can hardly reconnect with society.

    Connection Between the Policy and the Social Justice Problem

    The Controlled Substances Act is directly related to the social justice issue of racial

    inequality in the enforcement of the act and the mass incarceration. The problem has been

    lingering for decades and appears to be a general tendency of systemic discrimination in the

    United States (Sonderlund et al., 2022). Although the policy was meant to deal with drug abuse,

    the implementation of the policy has helped cause unequal results among various racial and

    ethnic groups.

    5

    This social justice issue is a continuation of historical inequalities that have never been

    resolved completely. Criminalization of drug use has resulted in an unequal distribution of

    incarceration and other adverse consequences related to social and economic disadvantage

    towards the marginalized communities. Such inequalities do harm the processes of social justice,

    as they restrict access to opportunities and perpetuate inequality. As Cohen et al. (2022) indicate,

    the policies towards punishment for drugs do not work better compared with public health

    policies that emphasize treatment and harm reduction. The Controlled Substances Act did not

    prove effective in addressing the actual causes of substance abuse, such as poverty, trauma, and

    lack of access to healthcare (Cohen et al., 2022). Consequently, the policy still creates a social

    justice issue of its own that the policy was meant to address.

    Historical Issues and Context of the Policy

    The Controlled Substances Act was adopted during a period of many social and political

    changes in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Through this period, related issues such as the

    perceived threats to the population and the growing visibility around substance use informed

    policymakers to seek stringent regulatory actions. Congress passed the legislation with very

    strong bipartisan support and was signed into law by Richard Nixon, who framed drug abuse as a

    national crisis. As much as the policy was presented as a required public health response, it was

    also influenced by political interests and societal biases. Other academics show that the systemic

    enforcement measures were disproportionately directed elsewhere at Black communities and

    political activists (Manneh, 2025).

    The policy voting outcomes showed that there was a vast majority among political

    parties, which is possibly an indication of a single attitude towards drug control. Leadership in

    the legislature at that time pointed out that they needed to have a comprehensive framework that

    6

    would regulate the use of the substances and reduce crime. The policy was also expanded over

    the years as tougher sentencing legislation reforms were introduced, and inflexible measures of

    enforcement were also put in place. These tendencies enhanced a punitive approach and resulted

    in significant increases in incarceration rates among the minority population. Such inequalities

    are beginning to be accepted and reforms encouraged by policymakers today, although it is a

    slow and uneven process.

    The historical aspects of the policy continue to shape the implementation process. The

    emphasis on enforcement has directed resources to policing and incarceration at the expense of

    prevention and treatment services (Washington, 2021). This lack of balance has constrained the

    efficiency of the policy in addressing substance use as a health issue in society. In addition, the

    historical context of racial disparities has created a mistrust factor among the affected

    communities, which contributes to the resistance to responses and support.

    Conclusion

    The Controlled Substances Act illustrates that a policy formulated to address a burning

    social problem can contribute to inequality and injustice. Even though the policy was developed

    to regulate drug usage and have a positive impact on the overall health of the population, its

    implementation has disproportionately impacted marginalized populations and has increased

    systemic inequalities. The policy has placed a lot of emphasis on enforcing the programs and

    services instead of placing much emphasis on preventing and treating, which the policy has not

    addressed.

    7

    References

    Cohen, A., Vakharia, S. P., Netherland, J., & Frederique, K. (2022). How the war on drugs

    impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system. Annals of

    Medicine, 54(1), 2024–2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2100926

    DEA. (2025). The controlled substances act. Www.dea.gov. https://www.dea.gov/drug-

    information/csa

    Lampe, J. R. (2025, January 22). The Controlled Substances Act (CSA): A Legal Overview for

    the 119th Congress. Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45948

    Manneh, T. (2025, June 2). Controlled Substances, controlled people: How drug laws reinforce

    colonial power structures. Drug Science. https://www.drugscience.org.uk/controlled-

    substances-controlled-people

    Ortiz, N. R., & Preuss, C. V. (2024). Controlled Substance Act. In www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

    StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574544/

    Rouhani, S., Tomko, C., Silberzahn, B. E., Weicker, N. P., & Sherman, S. G. (2023). Racial

    disparities in drug arrest before and after “de facto” decriminalization in Baltimore.

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(4).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.004

    Sonderlund, A. L., Charifson, M., Ortiz, R., Khan, M., Schoenthaler, A., & Williams, N. J.

    (2022). A comprehensive framework for operationalizing structural racism in health

    research: The association between mass incarceration of Black people in the U.S. and

    adverse birth outcomes. SSM – Population Health, 19, 101225.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101225

    8

    Washington, M. (2021, November). Beyond Jails: Community-Based Strategies for Public

    Safety. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/beyond-jails-community-based-

    strategies-for-public-safety

    **ExplorationofSocialJustice.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/explorationofsocialjustice-pdf)

    **PolicyAnalysisControlledSubstancesActandCriminalizationofSubstanceUseDisorder.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/policyanalysiscontrolledsubstancesactandcriminalizationofsubstanceusedisorder-pdf)

    **Week9Instructions.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week9instructions-pdf)

    **Week9Instructions.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week9instructions-pdf)

    **## PolicySelectionandBackground.pdf**

    1

    Policy Selection and Background

    Tierainie C. Johnson, MS, MCAP

    Capella University

    SWK 5002- Social Welfare History Policy Practice

    Professor Anna Richmond, LAPSW, LISW

    May 10, 2026

    2

    Policy Selection and Background

    Social policy is largely concerned with social justice. However, policies aimed at tackling

    issues in society can also lead to inequality and oppression. The policy dynamic of social work is

    critical in recognizing the advantages and the unforeseen outcomes of policies in the social work

    field. The Controlled Substances Act is one of the key federal policies that exemplify this

    tension. The policy was introduced in 1970 in response to the need by the United States to

    regulate the use and distribution of drugs (Lampe, 2025). Despite aiming to safeguard the health

    of the population and minimize drug abuse, the policy has been widely criticized as having

    disproportionately impacted the Black and Hispanic communities and contributed to systemic

    inequality. Substance use and incarceration for drug-related problems are long-standing social

    justice issues that are both intersectional in nature and combine with race, socioeconomic status,

    and access to medical care and legal services. The issue is not new, but an extension of historical

    trends of discrimination embedded within legal and political systems. This paper explores the

    mission and objectives, programs and services, and the history of the Controlled Substances Act.

    Purpose of the Policy

    The main aim of the Controlled Substances Act is to regulate the production, distribution,

    and use of some drugs using a hierarchical classification system. This system classifies

    substances into five schedules rooted in their accepted medical use, potential abuse, and potential

    to cause dependency (Ortiz and Preuss, 2024). Schedule I drugs are the most dangerous and do

    not have an endorsement under medical use, and the likelihood of abuse is high. Conversely,

    Schedule V substances are considered to be less risky and have accepted medical use. The policy

    was developed to create a unified federal effort to regulate drugs, replacing inconsistent state

    regulations and giving them clear guidelines on rules of enforcement and control.

    3

    As Otiz and Preuss (2024) describe, the policy is a health intervention aimed at

    decreasing substance abuse and safeguarding communities. Nevertheless, practically, it has acted

    more as a criminal justice policy. Instead of focusing on treatment and prevention of controlled

    substances, the law focuses on the punishment of possessing, distributing, and manufacturing

    controlled substances. Studies have shown that such a punitive process has not helped decrease

    the rate of drug use but instead has also caused a rise in mass incarceration (DEA, 2025).

    Programs and Services Provided Through the Policy

    The Controlled Substances Act supports numerous programs and services aimed at drug

    enforcement, prevention, and treatment. The most conspicuous one is enforcement programs,

    which involve federal and state agencies that control the drug-related activities, carry out

    investigations, and prosecute individuals violating drug laws (Lampe, 2025). Such attempts

    include surveillance, arrests, and imprisonment, which form the backbone of the policy

    implementation.

    Prevention programs are also part of the policy framework and entail a public education

    campaign that discourages drug use. In many cases, these programs address the youth and strive

    to address the issue of raising awareness of the dangers of using the substance. Though

    prevention programs are important, it is often dominated by the enforcement programs that limit

    their overall effectiveness.

    Moreover, the policy offers assistance with treatment services. These services include

    substance-abuse rehabilitation programs, counseling, and medication-assisted therapeutic

    programs for individuals with substance abuse. However, these services are not equally

    accessible, particularly among marginalized populations (Lampe, 2025). High cost, absence of

    insurance, the fact that there are not enough treatment centers, and stigma are some of the

    4

    barriers that many individuals have to face. Consequently, services offered by the policy fail to

    sufficiently respond to the needs of all the impacted populations.

    Target Population for Programs and Services

    The target population groups covered in programs and services in the Controlled

    Substances Act would include individual users of controlled substances, persons at risk of use of

    controlled substances, and victims of crime related to drug use. Ideally, this policy is applicable

    to all people irrespective of race or socioeconomic status. However, in actuality, its impacts have

    disproportionately affected the Black and Hispanic communities.

    As Rouhani et al. (2023) report, there is a comparatively equal distribution of drug use

    across racial lines. Minority groups have a significantly higher likelihood of being arrested,

    convicted, and imprisoned for committing drug crimes. Such a disproportion refers to structural,

    deep-rooted ills of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system has long-term

    implications on many people in these communities, including job loss, housing insecurity, and

    social stigma. The findings are also part of the poverty and inequality cycle that leaves the

    affected individuals in a difficult situation where they can hardly reconnect with society.

    Connection Between the Policy and the Social Justice Problem

    The Controlled Substances Act is directly related to the social justice issue of racial

    inequality in the enforcement of the act and the mass incarceration. The problem has been

    lingering for decades and appears to be a general tendency of systemic discrimination in the

    United States (Sonderlund et al., 2022). Although the policy was meant to deal with drug abuse,

    the implementation of the policy has helped cause unequal results among various racial and

    ethnic groups.

    5

    This social justice issue is a continuation of historical inequalities that have never been

    resolved completely. Criminalization of drug use has resulted in an unequal distribution of

    incarceration and other adverse consequences related to social and economic disadvantage

    towards the marginalized communities. Such inequalities do harm the processes of social justice,

    as they restrict access to opportunities and perpetuate inequality. As Cohen et al. (2022) indicate,

    the policies towards punishment for drugs do not work better compared with public health

    policies that emphasize treatment and harm reduction. The Controlled Substances Act did not

    prove effective in addressing the actual causes of substance abuse, such as poverty, trauma, and

    lack of access to healthcare (Cohen et al., 2022). Consequently, the policy still creates a social

    justice issue of its own that the policy was meant to address.

    Historical Issues and Context of the Policy

    The Controlled Substances Act was adopted during a period of many social and political

    changes in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Through this period, related issues such as the

    perceived threats to the population and the growing visibility around substance use informed

    policymakers to seek stringent regulatory actions. Congress passed the legislation with very

    strong bipartisan support and was signed into law by Richard Nixon, who framed drug abuse as a

    national crisis. As much as the policy was presented as a required public health response, it was

    also influenced by political interests and societal biases. Other academics show that the systemic

    enforcement measures were disproportionately directed elsewhere at Black communities and

    political activists (Manneh, 2025).

    The policy voting outcomes showed that there was a vast majority among political

    parties, which is possibly an indication of a single attitude towards drug control. Leadership in

    the legislature at that time pointed out that they needed to have a comprehensive framework that

    6

    would regulate the use of the substances and reduce crime. The policy was also expanded over

    the years as tougher sentencing legislation reforms were introduced, and inflexible measures of

    enforcement were also put in place. These tendencies enhanced a punitive approach and resulted

    in significant increases in incarceration rates among the minority population. Such inequalities

    are beginning to be accepted and reforms encouraged by policymakers today, although it is a

    slow and uneven process.

    The historical aspects of the policy continue to shape the implementation process. The

    emphasis on enforcement has directed resources to policing and incarceration at the expense of

    prevention and treatment services (Washington, 2021). This lack of balance has constrained the

    efficiency of the policy in addressing substance use as a health issue in society. In addition, the

    historical context of racial disparities has created a mistrust factor among the affected

    communities, which contributes to the resistance to responses and support.

    Conclusion

    The Controlled Substances Act illustrates that a policy formulated to address a burning

    social problem can contribute to inequality and injustice. Even though the policy was developed

    to regulate drug usage and have a positive impact on the overall health of the population, its

    implementation has disproportionately impacted marginalized populations and has increased

    systemic inequalities. The policy has placed a lot of emphasis on enforcing the programs and

    services instead of placing much emphasis on preventing and treating, which the policy has not

    addressed.

    7

    References

    Cohen, A., Vakharia, S. P., Netherland, J., & Frederique, K. (2022). How the war on drugs

    impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system. Annals of

    Medicine, 54(1), 2024–2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2100926

    DEA. (2025). The controlled substances act. Www.dea.gov. https://www.dea.gov/drug-

    information/csa

    Lampe, J. R. (2025, January 22). The Controlled Substances Act (CSA): A Legal Overview for

    the 119th Congress. Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45948

    Manneh, T. (2025, June 2). Controlled Substances, controlled people: How drug laws reinforce

    colonial power structures. Drug Science. https://www.drugscience.org.uk/controlled-

    substances-controlled-people

    Ortiz, N. R., & Preuss, C. V. (2024). Controlled Substance Act. In www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

    StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574544/

    Rouhani, S., Tomko, C., Silberzahn, B. E., Weicker, N. P., & Sherman, S. G. (2023). Racial

    disparities in drug arrest before and after “de facto” decriminalization in Baltimore.

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(4).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.004

    Sonderlund, A. L., Charifson, M., Ortiz, R., Khan, M., Schoenthaler, A., & Williams, N. J.

    (2022). A comprehensive framework for operationalizing structural racism in health

    research: The association between mass incarceration of Black people in the U.S. and

    adverse birth outcomes. SSM – Population Health, 19, 101225.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101225

    8

    Washington, M. (2021, November). Beyond Jails: Community-Based Strategies for Public

    Safety. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/beyond-jails-community-based-

    strategies-for-public-safety

    **ExplorationofSocialJustice.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/explorationofsocialjustice-pdf)

    **PolicyAnalysisControlledSubstancesActandCriminalizationofSubstanceUseDisorder.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/policyanalysiscontrolledsubstancesactandcriminalizationofsubstanceusedisorder-pdf)

    **Week9Instructions.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week9instructions-pdf)

    **## PolicySelectionandBackground.pdf**

    1

    Policy Selection and Background

    Tierainie C. Johnson, MS, MCAP

    Capella University

    SWK 5002- Social Welfare History Policy Practice

    Professor Anna Richmond, LAPSW, LISW

    May 10, 2026

    2

    Policy Selection and Background

    Social policy is largely concerned with social justice. However, policies aimed at tackling

    issues in society can also lead to inequality and oppression. The policy dynamic of social work is

    critical in recognizing the advantages and the unforeseen outcomes of policies in the social work

    field. The Controlled Substances Act is one of the key federal policies that exemplify this

    tension. The policy was introduced in 1970 in response to the need by the United States to

    regulate the use and distribution of drugs (Lampe, 2025). Despite aiming to safeguard the health

    of the population and minimize drug abuse, the policy has been widely criticized as having

    disproportionately impacted the Black and Hispanic communities and contributed to systemic

    inequality. Substance use and incarceration for drug-related problems are long-standing social

    justice issues that are both intersectional in nature and combine with race, socioeconomic status,

    and access to medical care and legal services. The issue is not new, but an extension of historical

    trends of discrimination embedded within legal and political systems. This paper explores the

    mission and objectives, programs and services, and the history of the Controlled Substances Act.

    Purpose of the Policy

    The main aim of the Controlled Substances Act is to regulate the production, distribution,

    and use of some drugs using a hierarchical classification system. This system classifies

    substances into five schedules rooted in their accepted medical use, potential abuse, and potential

    to cause dependency (Ortiz and Preuss, 2024). Schedule I drugs are the most dangerous and do

    not have an endorsement under medical use, and the likelihood of abuse is high. Conversely,

    Schedule V substances are considered to be less risky and have accepted medical use. The policy

    was developed to create a unified federal effort to regulate drugs, replacing inconsistent state

    regulations and giving them clear guidelines on rules of enforcement and control.

    3

    As Otiz and Preuss (2024) describe, the policy is a health intervention aimed at

    decreasing substance abuse and safeguarding communities. Nevertheless, practically, it has acted

    more as a criminal justice policy. Instead of focusing on treatment and prevention of controlled

    substances, the law focuses on the punishment of possessing, distributing, and manufacturing

    controlled substances. Studies have shown that such a punitive process has not helped decrease

    the rate of drug use but instead has also caused a rise in mass incarceration (DEA, 2025).

    Programs and Services Provided Through the Policy

    The Controlled Substances Act supports numerous programs and services aimed at drug

    enforcement, prevention, and treatment. The most conspicuous one is enforcement programs,

    which involve federal and state agencies that control the drug-related activities, carry out

    investigations, and prosecute individuals violating drug laws (Lampe, 2025). Such attempts

    include surveillance, arrests, and imprisonment, which form the backbone of the policy

    implementation.

    Prevention programs are also part of the policy framework and entail a public education

    campaign that discourages drug use. In many cases, these programs address the youth and strive

    to address the issue of raising awareness of the dangers of using the substance. Though

    prevention programs are important, it is often dominated by the enforcement programs that limit

    their overall effectiveness.

    Moreover, the policy offers assistance with treatment services. These services include

    substance-abuse rehabilitation programs, counseling, and medication-assisted therapeutic

    programs for individuals with substance abuse. However, these services are not equally

    accessible, particularly among marginalized populations (Lampe, 2025). High cost, absence of

    insurance, the fact that there are not enough treatment centers, and stigma are some of the

    4

    barriers that many individuals have to face. Consequently, services offered by the policy fail to

    sufficiently respond to the needs of all the impacted populations.

    Target Population for Programs and Services

    The target population groups covered in programs and services in the Controlled

    Substances Act would include individual users of controlled substances, persons at risk of use of

    controlled substances, and victims of crime related to drug use. Ideally, this policy is applicable

    to all people irrespective of race or socioeconomic status. However, in actuality, its impacts have

    disproportionately affected the Black and Hispanic communities.

    As Rouhani et al. (2023) report, there is a comparatively equal distribution of drug use

    across racial lines. Minority groups have a significantly higher likelihood of being arrested,

    convicted, and imprisoned for committing drug crimes. Such a disproportion refers to structural,

    deep-rooted ills of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system has long-term

    implications on many people in these communities, including job loss, housing insecurity, and

    social stigma. The findings are also part of the poverty and inequality cycle that leaves the

    affected individuals in a difficult situation where they can hardly reconnect with society.

    Connection Between the Policy and the Social Justice Problem

    The Controlled Substances Act is directly related to the social justice issue of racial

    inequality in the enforcement of the act and the mass incarceration. The problem has been

    lingering for decades and appears to be a general tendency of systemic discrimination in the

    United States (Sonderlund et al., 2022). Although the policy was meant to deal with drug abuse,

    the implementation of the policy has helped cause unequal results among various racial and

    ethnic groups.

    5

    This social justice issue is a continuation of historical inequalities that have never been

    resolved completely. Criminalization of drug use has resulted in an unequal distribution of

    incarceration and other adverse consequences related to social and economic disadvantage

    towards the marginalized communities. Such inequalities do harm the processes of social justice,

    as they restrict access to opportunities and perpetuate inequality. As Cohen et al. (2022) indicate,

    the policies towards punishment for drugs do not work better compared with public health

    policies that emphasize treatment and harm reduction. The Controlled Substances Act did not

    prove effective in addressing the actual causes of substance abuse, such as poverty, trauma, and

    lack of access to healthcare (Cohen et al., 2022). Consequently, the policy still creates a social

    justice issue of its own that the policy was meant to address.

    Historical Issues and Context of the Policy

    The Controlled Substances Act was adopted during a period of many social and political

    changes in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Through this period, related issues such as the

    perceived threats to the population and the growing visibility around substance use informed

    policymakers to seek stringent regulatory actions. Congress passed the legislation with very

    strong bipartisan support and was signed into law by Richard Nixon, who framed drug abuse as a

    national crisis. As much as the policy was presented as a required public health response, it was

    also influenced by political interests and societal biases. Other academics show that the systemic

    enforcement measures were disproportionately directed elsewhere at Black communities and

    political activists (Manneh, 2025).

    The policy voting outcomes showed that there was a vast majority among political

    parties, which is possibly an indication of a single attitude towards drug control. Leadership in

    the legislature at that time pointed out that they needed to have a comprehensive framework that

    6

    would regulate the use of the substances and reduce crime. The policy was also expanded over

    the years as tougher sentencing legislation reforms were introduced, and inflexible measures of

    enforcement were also put in place. These tendencies enhanced a punitive approach and resulted

    in significant increases in incarceration rates among the minority population. Such inequalities

    are beginning to be accepted and reforms encouraged by policymakers today, although it is a

    slow and uneven process.

    The historical aspects of the policy continue to shape the implementation process. The

    emphasis on enforcement has directed resources to policing and incarceration at the expense of

    prevention and treatment services (Washington, 2021). This lack of balance has constrained the

    efficiency of the policy in addressing substance use as a health issue in society. In addition, the

    historical context of racial disparities has created a mistrust factor among the affected

    communities, which contributes to the resistance to responses and support.

    Conclusion

    The Controlled Substances Act illustrates that a policy formulated to address a burning

    social problem can contribute to inequality and injustice. Even though the policy was developed

    to regulate drug usage and have a positive impact on the overall health of the population, its

    implementation has disproportionately impacted marginalized populations and has increased

    systemic inequalities. The policy has placed a lot of emphasis on enforcing the programs and

    services instead of placing much emphasis on preventing and treating, which the policy has not

    addressed.

    7

    References

    Cohen, A., Vakharia, S. P., Netherland, J., & Frederique, K. (2022). How the war on drugs

    impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system. Annals of

    Medicine, 54(1), 2024–2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2100926

    DEA. (2025). The controlled substances act. Www.dea.gov. https://www.dea.gov/drug-

    information/csa

    Lampe, J. R. (2025, January 22). The Controlled Substances Act (CSA): A Legal Overview for

    the 119th Congress. Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45948

    Manneh, T. (2025, June 2). Controlled Substances, controlled people: How drug laws reinforce

    colonial power structures. Drug Science. https://www.drugscience.org.uk/controlled-

    substances-controlled-people

    Ortiz, N. R., & Preuss, C. V. (2024). Controlled Substance Act. In www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

    StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574544/

    Rouhani, S., Tomko, C., Silberzahn, B. E., Weicker, N. P., & Sherman, S. G. (2023). Racial

    disparities in drug arrest before and after “de facto” decriminalization in Baltimore.

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(4).

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.004

    Sonderlund, A. L., Charifson, M., Ortiz, R., Khan, M., Schoenthaler, A., & Williams, N. J.

    (2022). A comprehensive framework for operationalizing structural racism in health

    research: The association between mass incarceration of Black people in the U.S. and

    adverse birth outcomes. SSM – Population Health, 19, 101225.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101225

    8

    Washington, M. (2021, November). Beyond Jails: Community-Based Strategies for Public

    Safety. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/beyond-jails-community-based-

    strategies-for-public-safety

    **ExplorationofSocialJustice.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/explorationofsocialjustice-pdf)

    **PolicyAnalysisControlledSubstancesActandCriminalizationofSubstanceUseDisorder.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/policyanalysiscontrolledsubstancesactandcriminalizationofsubstanceusedisorder-pdf)

    **Week9Instructions.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week9instructions-pdf)

  • [Solved] DB 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) **files (1)** – ## DB4.docx **## DB4.docx** 300 word response Due 6/10/2026 1 reference/intext citation with open access In your opinion, how does the family influence juvenile delinquency? Provide an example from…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    **files (1)**

    – ## DB4.docx

    **## DB4.docx**

    300 word response

    Due 6/10/2026

    1 reference/intext citation with open access

    In your opinion, how does the family influence juvenile delinquency?  Provide an example from an outside source of when a child was delinquent because of the family's influence. (Use Lyle and Erik Menendez) as examples, You may use newspaper articles in your response.  Please be sure to provide a link to the source you use.

    **## DB4.docx**

    300 word response

    Due 6/10/2026

    1 reference/intext citation with open access

    In your opinion, how does the family influence juvenile delinquency?  Provide an example from an outside source of when a child was delinquent because of the family's influence. (Use Lyle and Erik Menendez) as examples, You may use newspaper articles in your response.  Please be sure to provide a link to the source you use.

  • [Solved] Designing a supervision plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) What is a supervision plan In Aba ?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    What is a supervision plan In Aba ?

  • [Solved] Call

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Call.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) **files (1)** – ## Assignment2-StagesofChangeManagement.docx **## Assignment2-StagesofChangeManagement.docx** **Assignment 2- Stages of Change Management** **Due 6/12/2026** Read the following online article: 6 Ch…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assignment2-StagesofChangeManagement.docx

    **## Assignment2-StagesofChangeManagement.docx**

    **Assignment 2- Stages of Change Management**

    **Due 6/12/2026**

    Read the following online article: 6 Change Management Stages: A Management Checklist to Guide Your Efforts in Managing Change (Heathfield, 2020)
    [https://www.liveabout.com/know-the-stages-in-change-management-1917802](https://www.liveabout.com/know-the-stages-in-change-management-1917802)
    Discuss each of the 6 stages in change management as outlined by Heathfield (initiation, investigation, intention, introduction, implementation, and integration). Identify potential limitations and barriers that may occur in each stage, as well as identify strategies for successfully achieving each stage. In your discussion, use examples from your workplace (Prison as an HVAC Mechanic) pertaining to current change that is taking place or change that you wish to implement. Develop an 8-page paper and support the discussion through additional research (5 references).

    SUBMIT IN THE ASSIGNMENT AREA AS A WORD DOCUMENT

    The assignment must have a cover page and a reference list in the Fischler College form and style.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/social-science-sociology-assignment-2-20976009)

    ## image1.png

    **## Assignment2-StagesofChangeManagement.docx**

    **Assignment 2- Stages of Change Management**

    **Due 6/12/2026**

    Read the following online article: 6 Change Management Stages: A Management Checklist to Guide Your Efforts in Managing Change (Heathfield, 2020)
    [https://www.liveabout.com/know-the-stages-in-change-management-1917802](https://www.liveabout.com/know-the-stages-in-change-management-1917802)
    Discuss each of the 6 stages in change management as outlined by Heathfield (initiation, investigation, intention, introduction, implementation, and integration). Identify potential limitations and barriers that may occur in each stage, as well as identify strategies for successfully achieving each stage. In your discussion, use examples from your workplace (Prison as an HVAC Mechanic) pertaining to current change that is taking place or change that you wish to implement. Develop an 8-page paper and support the discussion through additional research (5 references).

    SUBMIT IN THE ASSIGNMENT AREA AS A WORD DOCUMENT

    The assignment must have a cover page and a reference list in the Fischler College form and style.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/social-science-sociology-assignment-2-20976009)

    ## image1.png