Tag: Care Plans, Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

  • [Solved] Big Data Analysis Refinement

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Big Data Analysis Refinement** **files (3)** – ## Module6Assignment.docx – ## Module6Assignment-RUBRIC.docx – module4andinstrutorfeedback.docx **## Module6Assignment.docx** **Assignment Description:** **Big Data Analysis Refinement** Write a **2500-word** document that will refine the data and inf…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Big Data Analysis Refinement**

    **files (3)**

    – ## Module6Assignment.docx

    – ## Module6Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

    – module4andinstrutorfeedback.docx

    **## Module6Assignment.docx**

    **Assignment Description:**

    **Big Data Analysis Refinement**

    Write a
    **2500-word** document that will refine the data and information prepared in the Module 4 assignment to prepare for the Module 8 Signature Assignment. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at
    **least three (3) sources in your essay.** Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    **In the Module 6 assignment, use the feedback received on your Module 4 data analysis to refine your data presentation and its supporting information. Be sure your graphs are displayed well, are easy to read, and are labeled well.**

    In a Word document, display your three updated representations of data on your chosen public health topic. Create an essay on the background of your public health topic
    **, citing at least three scholarly sources**

    Start by reading and following these instructions:

    Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    The following specifications are required for this assignment:

    **Length: 2500 words**

    Structure: Include a title page and reference page which do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least THREE (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    **REFERENCES**

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021).
    _Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge_(5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. Read chapters 21 & 23.

    **ADDITIONAL RESOURCE**

    Schwartzberg, J. (2020).
    _Present your data like a pro._ Harvard Business Review: Analytics and Data Science
    _._ [https://hbr.org/2020/02/present-your-data-like-a-pro](https://hbr.org/2020/02/present-your-data-like-a-pro)

    Microsoft. (2022).
    _Excel video training_.
    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-video-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-video-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb)

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
    **Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **## Module6Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    6/1/26, 10:01 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335770/View 1/5

    1/5

    **module4andinstrutorfeedback.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module4andinstrutorfeedback-docx)

    **module4andinstrutorfeedback.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module4andinstrutorfeedback-docx)

    **## Module6Assignment.docx**

    **Assignment Description:**

    **Big Data Analysis Refinement**

    Write a
    **2500-word** document that will refine the data and information prepared in the Module 4 assignment to prepare for the Module 8 Signature Assignment. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at
    **least three (3) sources in your essay.** Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    **In the Module 6 assignment, use the feedback received on your Module 4 data analysis to refine your data presentation and its supporting information. Be sure your graphs are displayed well, are easy to read, and are labeled well.**

    In a Word document, display your three updated representations of data on your chosen public health topic. Create an essay on the background of your public health topic
    **, citing at least three scholarly sources**

    Start by reading and following these instructions:

    Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    The following specifications are required for this assignment:

    **Length: 2500 words**

    Structure: Include a title page and reference page which do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least THREE (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    **REFERENCES**

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021).
    _Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge_(5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. Read chapters 21 & 23.

    **ADDITIONAL RESOURCE**

    Schwartzberg, J. (2020).
    _Present your data like a pro._ Harvard Business Review: Analytics and Data Science
    _._ [https://hbr.org/2020/02/present-your-data-like-a-pro](https://hbr.org/2020/02/present-your-data-like-a-pro)

    Microsoft. (2022).
    _Excel video training_.
    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-video-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-video-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb)

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
    **Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **## Module6Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    6/1/26, 10:01 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335770/View 1/5

    1/5

    **module4andinstrutorfeedback.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module4andinstrutorfeedback-docx)

    **## Module6Assignment.docx**

    **Assignment Description:**

    **Big Data Analysis Refinement**

    Write a
    **2500-word** document that will refine the data and information prepared in the Module 4 assignment to prepare for the Module 8 Signature Assignment. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at
    **least three (3) sources in your essay.** Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    **In the Module 6 assignment, use the feedback received on your Module 4 data analysis to refine your data presentation and its supporting information. Be sure your graphs are displayed well, are easy to read, and are labeled well.**

    In a Word document, display your three updated representations of data on your chosen public health topic. Create an essay on the background of your public health topic
    **, citing at least three scholarly sources**

    Start by reading and following these instructions:

    Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    The following specifications are required for this assignment:

    **Length: 2500 words**

    Structure: Include a title page and reference page which do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least THREE (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    **REFERENCES**

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021).
    _Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge_(5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. Read chapters 21 & 23.

    **ADDITIONAL RESOURCE**

    Schwartzberg, J. (2020).
    _Present your data like a pro._ Harvard Business Review: Analytics and Data Science
    _._ [https://hbr.org/2020/02/present-your-data-like-a-pro](https://hbr.org/2020/02/present-your-data-like-a-pro)

    Microsoft. (2022).
    _Excel video training_.
    [https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-video-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-video-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb)

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
    **Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **## Module6Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    6/1/26, 10:01 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335770/View 1/5

    1/5

    **module4andinstrutorfeedback.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module4andinstrutorfeedback-docx)

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## Attemptfeedback2.docx – ## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx – ## MSN_Capstone_Part1_Revised1.docx **## Attemptfeedback2.docx** Attempt feedback You are on the right track and did well overall. Choose one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. Missing Conclusion p…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## Attemptfeedback2.docx

    – ## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx

    – ## MSN_Capstone_Part1_Revised1.docx

    **## Attemptfeedback2.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    You are on the right track and did well overall. Choose one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. Missing Conclusion paragraph as per APA.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## MSN_Capstone_Part1_Revised1.docx**

    1

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Alex De Cardenas

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 21, 2026

    **Abstract**

    Mild muscle stiffness is a common musculoskeletal issue that is seen in primary care and community health settings and is associated with working-age and older adults, often related to physical inactivity, prolonged postures at work and sedentary lifestyles. Although these conditions are common and have significant health service utilization and cost (likely in the United States, over $200 billion per year for all musculoskeletal conditions), self-management interventions are underutilized in community and primary care settings. This culminating proposal is an evidence-based program to decrease self-reported muscle stiffness through education and implementation of a short five minute stretching routine daily and is nurse-led. The target population for this study is adults in Miami-Dade County, FL who visit primary care providers and/or community health services and are experiencing mild muscle stiffness. The intervention will be assessed with a numeric stiffness rating scale at baseline and week 8. This program is designed to increase the self-efficacy of patients, minimize need for analgesic medications, minimize avoidable use of healthcare resources and optimize functional quality of life for a socioeconomically diverse and vulnerable patient population based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence Based Practice.

    Keywords:
    _muscle stiffness, stretching, self-care, nurse-led education, primary care, community health, Miami-Dade_

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Muscle stiffness is an increasingly common but undertreated health problem in adults in community and primary care practices. Muscle stiffness is often linked to sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy occupational postures, as well as physical inactivity, and is not only a problem for mobility but also for comfort and functional status (Zvetkova et al., 2023). While it's not a serious health condition, ongoing stiffness can be a significant quality-of-life problem and can over time lead to increased use of healthcare and a loss of independence. Musculoskeletal conditions, such as muscle, tendon, and connective tissue related to stiffness, impact the lives of about 126.6 million Americans annually with over $213 billion in treatment expenses, lost wages and economic burden (United States Bone and Joint Initiative, 2021). These statistics emphasize the need for strategies that prevent and intervene early in the course of musculoskeletal issues to prevent them from becoming chronic and expensive.

    Miami-Dade County is a uniquely burdened area for MS complaints at the local level. Florida is one of the highest states for musculoskeletal-related visits to the emergency department and primary care providers, and many of these visits are due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders among service-sector and manual labor employees (Florida Department of Health, 2022). These factors combine to decrease the chances residents have for timely, organized musculoskeletal care, with the Miami-Dade County uninsured rate estimated at about 19%, compared to the national average of 9.2% (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Uncontrolled muscle stiffness in this population comes with direct costs (such as increased consumption of pain medications) and indirect costs (such as unnecessary clinic visits, loss of working time, and exacerbated chronic pain problems). Minimally costly and specialized equipment-free nurse-led interventions, which are evidence-based and fiscally-sound, are strategies to reduce this burden.

    The aim of this proposed program is to determine if a nurse-led structured 5-minute daily stretching education program can significantly decrease muscle stiffness in adults over an 8 week period in a primary care or community health care setting. The expected results are clinically relevant decreases in stiffness scores (measured by patient-reported outcomes) at the end of the eight-week intervention period. The importance of this program is not just to reducing unnecessary clinic visits, but also less use of analgesic medicines and long-term functional health of a vulnerable adult population.

    **PICOT**

    In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple five-minute daily stretching routine (I), compared to usual care without structured stretching education (C), reduce self-reported muscle stiffness (O) over eight weeks (T)?

    The population of this project is adults with mild muscle stiffness, who are commonly seen in primary and community health services. This population includes individuals who are working age who have sedentary work, those who are older who have lower levels of physical activity and those who have discomfort in their musculoskeletal system, which is in early stages. Chronic musculoskeletal pain or stiffness is reported by about 54 million adults in the United States, and prevalence is higher among older people and those who are sedentary in their occupations (Theis et al., 2021). Low access to physical therapy, low health literacy, and lack of guidance on self-management strategies (Çimen, 2023) make this population vulnerable.

    Proposed intervention is a five-minute, standardized, nurse delivered stretching program done at the end of the visit with emphasis on major muscle groups that tend to become stiff when injured, such as the neck, shoulders, lower back and lower extremities. Systematic reviews provide evidence of the significant benefits of regular static and dynamic stretching programs, including decreases in musculoskeletal pain severity, range of motion, and perceived muscle stiffness in adults. (Behm et al., 2023) The briefness of the routine is deliberate because shorter structured exercise programs have been shown to have greater sustained patient adherence versus longer programs that utilize equipment or gym access.

    The comparison intervention is usually care plus verbal advice or referring to physical therapy for self-management training, but not providing a formal self-management program. There is a consistent body of evidence of less enduring improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms associated with passive care approaches compared to active, patient-centerd approaches like structured exercise or stretching education (Behm et al. 2023). The project is expected to yield statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of self-reported muscle stiffness scores (measured by a validated Numeric Rating Scale) at the end of the 8 weeks when compared to the baseline score. The eight-week duration is long enough to establish a pattern of stretching and to demonstrate measurable changes in muscle physiology such as increased tissue extensibility and decreased resting muscle tension (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this project are adults (ages 18) who live in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and present to their primary care clinics or community health centers with complaints of mild muscle stiffness. Miami-Dade is a diverse urban area with a concentration of population where most residents have sedentary service jobs and earn low wages in manual jobs. The two occupations are related to high levels of musculoskeletal complaints from the static position and repetitive motion patterns (Çimen, 2023). The occupational dimension of musculoskeletal disorder occurrence in and susceptibility of workers is demonstrated by the fact that service and manual labor workers make up a disproportionate share of the estimated 544,900 reported cases of MSDs that result in days away from work annually in the United States (BLS, 2022).

    The musculoskeletal burden of this population is heavily influenced by social determinants of health. Around 19% of Miami-Dade County residents do not have health insurance, which reduces their access to specialist musculoskeletal care, physical therapy referrals, and preventive health services (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Low income also makes it harder to join gyms, get ergonomic workstations, and access evidence-based self-care resources. Difficulty with language may impede seeking help and compliance to health guidelines in Spanish-speaking and Haitian Creole-speaking populations. In addition, long work hours and caregiving duties limit physical activity time which also contributes to stiffness and functional decline. Cultural and low barrier approaches to addressing social disadvantage are essential for these compounded social disadvantage groups (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Unless stiffness is treated early, it's likely to become a chronic pain problem, to result in reduced range of motion, and to be a fall risk, especially for older individuals in this group. In Miami-Dade, chronic musculoskeletal pain has been linked to emergency department visits that have an average cost of $1,389 per visit, while a structured nurse-led primary care intervention has average costs of about $120 per visit, indicating the cost-effectiveness of early preventive programming (Florida Department of Health, 2022). The differences highlight the need for proactive nursing interventions based in the community as a clinical priority and also a cost-effective approach to the healthcare system in Miami Dade.

    **Proposal**

    The proposed intervention is a nurse-led patient education program that will be delivered in a primary care or community health clinic in Miami-Dade County. If adults are identified on a regular basis in clinics for having mild muscle stiffness, a trained registered nurse or advanced practice registered nurse will provide a structured 15-minute educational session where the patient will be taught a standardized 5-minute stretching exercise. The routine concentrates on the cervical spine, shoulders, thoracic back, lumbar spine, hip flexors and hamstrings, each stretch being bilaterally performed for 30-60 seconds. A laminated take home reference card with illustrated instructions will be provided for patients to use independently each day. The evidence supports this educational approach, as Galmarini et al., (2024) showed that self-directed stretching programs that are supplemented with visual instructional materials are more likely to lead to improved patient adherence and musculoskeletal outcomes than verbal instruction alone.

    The resources needed for implementation are the printed patient education materials, an area in the clinical setting for demonstration and nurse time of 20 minutes per patient encounter. The estimated cost of the intervention is $15-$25, per patient, which is very practical in resource-limited community settings (Theis et al., 2021). Multilingual patient materials in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole will be developed to meet the language needs of Miami-Dade's diverse population and ensure equitable access to the intervention. Furthermore, the short duration of the routine and its ease of implementation will contribute to patient compliance.In addition, the routine is brief and straightforward, making it easier to implement.

    The program will take a total of 10 weeks: 2 weeks of staff training and program preparation, 8 weeks of open enrolment of patients and delivery of the intervention, and 8 weeks concurrently for outcome assessments, with a standardized numeric stiffness rating scale used at baseline and week 8. Advanced practice nurse overseeing program will review outcome data at 4 weeks to determine the progress that has been made and to discuss any challenges to adherence as needed (Behm et al., 2023). If the 8-week outcome data show statistical difference in stiffness scores, presentation will be made to clinic leadership for further consideration of wider program implementation.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This Capstone project is designed and implemented through a pair of complementary frameworks: Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice. These frameworks offer a clear and comprehensive basis for patient-centered education and for integrating evidence in clinical practice.

    In accordance with Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, patients have a natural ability for self-care and nursing can support, educate, and empower patients when their self-care ability falls short of their therapeutic needs (Tanaka, 2022). The five-minute stretching exercise is a self-care behavior and this theory can be directly applied to the proposed intervention. There is a lack of structured knowledge among adults in case of mild muscle stiffness, which can be compensated by nursing education and leads to a lack of self-care. The role of the nurse in this project is an educative-supportive role as the nurse provides patients with the knowledge, skill, and motivation to perform the daily stretches alone. The preventive focus of the intervention is also understood through Orem's framework; in doing so, the skills needed to successfully implement self-care behavior are introduced, thereby decreasing reliance on healthcare services and decreasing the accumulation of health deficits over time.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice offers a systematic approach to moving from evidence to practice. Based on the Iowa Model, Cullen et al. (2022) offer practitioners guidance for problem identification, evidence appraisal, pilot implementation, and outcome evaluation. Muscle Stiffness is determined as a clinically relevant trigger of practice change in this Capstone project. Systematic reviews and RCTs published and supporting stretching interventions are appraised and included in intervention design. A standardised 5 minute routine is rehearsed in the clinic and the patient's outcome is formally assessed at 8 weeks. When outcomes data show positive results, the model can be used to share the results and to consider the broader implementation at the healthcare organization level. This is a well-structured intervention that is theory driven, operationally astute, and can produce transferable clinical knowledge.

    **References**

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    _Sports Medicine-Open, 9_(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022).
    _Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses — 2021._ U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh.nr0.htm

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain.
    _Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40_(2), 329–332. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/omujecm/issue/79274/1282408

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics._ Sigma Theta Tau.

    Florida Department of Health. (2022).
    _Florida musculoskeletal health data and statistics._ https://www.floridahealth.gov

    Theis, K. A., Murphy, L. B., Guglielmo, D., Boring, M. A., Okoro, C. A., Duca, L. M., & Barbour, K. E. (2021). Prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation — United States, 2016–2018.
    _Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70_(40), 1401–1407.
    [https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2](https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2)

    Galmarini, E., Marciano, L., & Schulz, P. J. (2024). The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _BMC Health Services Research_,
    _24_(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11138-1

    Tanaka, M. (2022). Orem's nursing self-care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation.
    _Nursing Forum, 57_(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12696

    U.S. Census Bureau. (2023).
    _American Community Survey: Health insurance coverage in the United States._ https://www.census.gov/topics/health/health-insurance.html

    United States Bone and Joint Initiative. (2021).
    _The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States: Prevalence, societal and economic cost (4th ed.)._ https://www.bmus-ors.org/

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: A comprehensive review.
    _Applied Sciences, 13_(15), 8596. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158596

    **## MSN_Capstone_Part1_Revised1.docx**

    1

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Alex De Cardenas

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 21, 2026

    **Abstract**

    Mild muscle stiffness is a common musculoskeletal issue that is seen in primary care and community health settings and is associated with working-age and older adults, often related to physical inactivity, prolonged postures at work and sedentary lifestyles. Although these conditions are common and have significant health service utilization and cost (likely in the United States, over $200 billion per year for all musculoskeletal conditions), self-management interventions are underutilized in community and primary care settings. This culminating proposal is an evidence-based program to decrease self-reported muscle stiffness through education and implementation of a short five minute stretching routine daily and is nurse-led. The target population for this study is adults in Miami-Dade County, FL who visit primary care providers and/or community health services and are experiencing mild muscle stiffness. The intervention will be assessed with a numeric stiffness rating scale at baseline and week 8. This program is designed to increase the self-efficacy of patients, minimize need for analgesic medications, minimize avoidable use of healthcare resources and optimize functional quality of life for a socioeconomically diverse and vulnerable patient population based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence Based Practice.

    Keywords:
    _muscle stiffness, stretching, self-care, nurse-led education, primary care, community health, Miami-Dade_

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Muscle stiffness is an increasingly common but undertreated health problem in adults in community and primary care practices. Muscle stiffness is often linked to sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy occupational postures, as well as physical inactivity, and is not only a problem for mobility but also for comfort and functional status (Zvetkova et al., 2023). While it's not a serious health condition, ongoing stiffness can be a significant quality-of-life problem and can over time lead to increased use of healthcare and a loss of independence. Musculoskeletal conditions, such as muscle, tendon, and connective tissue related to stiffness, impact the lives of about 126.6 million Americans annually with over $213 billion in treatment expenses, lost wages and economic burden (United States Bone and Joint Initiative, 2021). These statistics emphasize the need for strategies that prevent and intervene early in the course of musculoskeletal issues to prevent them from becoming chronic and expensive.

    Miami-Dade County is a uniquely burdened area for MS complaints at the local level. Florida is one of the highest states for musculoskeletal-related visits to the emergency department and primary care providers, and many of these visits are due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders among service-sector and manual labor employees (Florida Department of Health, 2022). These factors combine to decrease the chances residents have for timely, organized musculoskeletal care, with the Miami-Dade County uninsured rate estimated at about 19%, compared to the national average of 9.2% (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Uncontrolled muscle stiffness in this population comes with direct costs (such as increased consumption of pain medications) and indirect costs (such as unnecessary clinic visits, loss of working time, and exacerbated chronic pain problems). Minimally costly and specialized equipment-free nurse-led interventions, which are evidence-based and fiscally-sound, are strategies to reduce this burden.

    The aim of this proposed program is to determine if a nurse-led structured 5-minute daily stretching education program can significantly decrease muscle stiffness in adults over an 8 week period in a primary care or community health care setting. The expected results are clinically relevant decreases in stiffness scores (measured by patient-reported outcomes) at the end of the eight-week intervention period. The importance of this program is not just to reducing unnecessary clinic visits, but also less use of analgesic medicines and long-term functional health of a vulnerable adult population.

    **PICOT**

    In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple five-minute daily stretching routine (I), compared to usual care without structured stretching education (C), reduce self-reported muscle stiffness (O) over eight weeks (T)?

    The population of this project is adults with mild muscle stiffness, who are commonly seen in primary and community health services. This population includes individuals who are working age who have sedentary work, those who are older who have lower levels of physical activity and those who have discomfort in their musculoskeletal system, which is in early stages. Chronic musculoskeletal pain or stiffness is reported by about 54 million adults in the United States, and prevalence is higher among older people and those who are sedentary in their occupations (Theis et al., 2021). Low access to physical therapy, low health literacy, and lack of guidance on self-management strategies (Çimen, 2023) make this population vulnerable.

    Proposed intervention is a five-minute, standardized, nurse delivered stretching program done at the end of the visit with emphasis on major muscle groups that tend to become stiff when injured, such as the neck, shoulders, lower back and lower extremities. Systematic reviews provide evidence of the significant benefits of regular static and dynamic stretching programs, including decreases in musculoskeletal pain severity, range of motion, and perceived muscle stiffness in adults. (Behm et al., 2023) The briefness of the routine is deliberate because shorter structured exercise programs have been shown to have greater sustained patient adherence versus longer programs that utilize equipment or gym access.

    The comparison intervention is usually care plus verbal advice or referring to physical therapy for self-management training, but not providing a formal self-management program. There is a consistent body of evidence of less enduring improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms associated with passive care approaches compared to active, patient-centerd approaches like structured exercise or stretching education (Behm et al. 2023). The project is expected to yield statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of self-reported muscle stiffness scores (measured by a validated Numeric Rating Scale) at the end of the 8 weeks when compared to the baseline score. The eight-week duration is long enough to establish a pattern of stretching and to demonstrate measurable changes in muscle physiology such as increased tissue extensibility and decreased resting muscle tension (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this project are adults (ages 18) who live in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and present to their primary care clinics or community health centers with complaints of mild muscle stiffness. Miami-Dade is a diverse urban area with a concentration of population where most residents have sedentary service jobs and earn low wages in manual jobs. The two occupations are related to high levels of musculoskeletal complaints from the static position and repetitive motion patterns (Çimen, 2023). The occupational dimension of musculoskeletal disorder occurrence in and susceptibility of workers is demonstrated by the fact that service and manual labor workers make up a disproportionate share of the estimated 544,900 reported cases of MSDs that result in days away from work annually in the United States (BLS, 2022).

    The musculoskeletal burden of this population is heavily influenced by social determinants of health. Around 19% of Miami-Dade County residents do not have health insurance, which reduces their access to specialist musculoskeletal care, physical therapy referrals, and preventive health services (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Low income also makes it harder to join gyms, get ergonomic workstations, and access evidence-based self-care resources. Difficulty with language may impede seeking help and compliance to health guidelines in Spanish-speaking and Haitian Creole-speaking populations. In addition, long work hours and caregiving duties limit physical activity time which also contributes to stiffness and functional decline. Cultural and low barrier approaches to addressing social disadvantage are essential for these compounded social disadvantage groups (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Unless stiffness is treated early, it's likely to become a chronic pain problem, to result in reduced range of motion, and to be a fall risk, especially for older individuals in this group. In Miami-Dade, chronic musculoskeletal pain has been linked to emergency department visits that have an average cost of $1,389 per visit, while a structured nurse-led primary care intervention has average costs of about $120 per visit, indicating the cost-effectiveness of early preventive programming (Florida Department of Health, 2022). The differences highlight the need for proactive nursing interventions based in the community as a clinical priority and also a cost-effective approach to the healthcare system in Miami Dade.

    **Proposal**

    The proposed intervention is a nurse-led patient education program that will be delivered in a primary care or community health clinic in Miami-Dade County. If adults are identified on a regular basis in clinics for having mild muscle stiffness, a trained registered nurse or advanced practice registered nurse will provide a structured 15-minute educational session where the patient will be taught a standardized 5-minute stretching exercise. The routine concentrates on the cervical spine, shoulders, thoracic back, lumbar spine, hip flexors and hamstrings, each stretch being bilaterally performed for 30-60 seconds. A laminated take home reference card with illustrated instructions will be provided for patients to use independently each day. The evidence supports this educational approach, as Galmarini et al., (2024) showed that self-directed stretching programs that are supplemented with visual instructional materials are more likely to lead to improved patient adherence and musculoskeletal outcomes than verbal instruction alone.

    The resources needed for implementation are the printed patient education materials, an area in the clinical setting for demonstration and nurse time of 20 minutes per patient encounter. The estimated cost of the intervention is $15-$25, per patient, which is very practical in resource-limited community settings (Theis et al., 2021). Multilingual patient materials in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole will be developed to meet the language needs of Miami-Dade's diverse population and ensure equitable access to the intervention. Furthermore, the short duration of the routine and its ease of implementation will contribute to patient compliance.In addition, the routine is brief and straightforward, making it easier to implement.

    The program will take a total of 10 weeks: 2 weeks of staff training and program preparation, 8 weeks of open enrolment of patients and delivery of the intervention, and 8 weeks concurrently for outcome assessments, with a standardized numeric stiffness rating scale used at baseline and week 8. Advanced practice nurse overseeing program will review outcome data at 4 weeks to determine the progress that has been made and to discuss any challenges to adherence as needed (Behm et al., 2023). If the 8-week outcome data show statistical difference in stiffness scores, presentation will be made to clinic leadership for further consideration of wider program implementation.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This Capstone project is designed and implemented through a pair of complementary frameworks: Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice. These frameworks offer a clear and comprehensive basis for patient-centered education and for integrating evidence in clinical practice.

    In accordance with Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, patients have a natural ability for self-care and nursing can support, educate, and empower patients when their self-care ability falls short of their therapeutic needs (Tanaka, 2022). The five-minute stretching exercise is a self-care behavior and this theory can be directly applied to the proposed intervention. There is a lack of structured knowledge among adults in case of mild muscle stiffness, which can be compensated by nursing education and leads to a lack of self-care. The role of the nurse in this project is an educative-supportive role as the nurse provides patients with the knowledge, skill, and motivation to perform the daily stretches alone. The preventive focus of the intervention is also understood through Orem's framework; in doing so, the skills needed to successfully implement self-care behavior are introduced, thereby decreasing reliance on healthcare services and decreasing the accumulation of health deficits over time.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice offers a systematic approach to moving from evidence to practice. Based on the Iowa Model, Cullen et al. (2022) offer practitioners guidance for problem identification, evidence appraisal, pilot implementation, and outcome evaluation. Muscle Stiffness is determined as a clinically relevant trigger of practice change in this Capstone project. Systematic reviews and RCTs published and supporting stretching interventions are appraised and included in intervention design. A standardised 5 minute routine is rehearsed in the clinic and the patient's outcome is formally assessed at 8 weeks. When outcomes data show positive results, the model can be used to share the results and to consider the broader implementation at the healthcare organization level. This is a well-structured intervention that is theory driven, operationally astute, and can produce transferable clinical knowledge.

    **References**

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    _Sports Medicine-Open, 9_(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022).
    _Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses — 2021._ U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh.nr0.htm

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain.
    _Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40_(2), 329–332. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/omujecm/issue/79274/1282408

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics._ Sigma Theta Tau.

    Florida Department of Health. (2022).
    _Florida musculoskeletal health data and statistics._ https://www.floridahealth.gov

    Theis, K. A., Murphy, L. B., Guglielmo, D., Boring, M. A., Okoro, C. A., Duca, L. M., & Barbour, K. E. (2021). Prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation — United States, 2016–2018.
    _Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70_(40), 1401–1407.
    [https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2](https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2)

    Galmarini, E., Marciano, L., & Schulz, P. J. (2024). The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _BMC Health Services Research_,
    _24_(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11138-1

    Tanaka, M. (2022). Orem's nursing self-care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation.
    _Nursing Forum, 57_(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12696

    U.S. Census Bureau. (2023).
    _American Community Survey: Health insurance coverage in the United States._ https://www.census.gov/topics/health/health-insurance.html

    United States Bone and Joint Initiative. (2021).
    _The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States: Prevalence, societal and economic cost (4th ed.)._ https://www.bmus-ors.org/

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: A comprehensive review.
    _Applied Sciences, 13_(15), 8596. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158596

    **## Attemptfeedback2.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    You are on the right track and did well overall. Choose one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. Missing Conclusion paragraph as per APA.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## MSN_Capstone_Part1_Revised1.docx**

    1

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Alex De Cardenas

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 21, 2026

    **Abstract**

    Mild muscle stiffness is a common musculoskeletal issue that is seen in primary care and community health settings and is associated with working-age and older adults, often related to physical inactivity, prolonged postures at work and sedentary lifestyles. Although these conditions are common and have significant health service utilization and cost (likely in the United States, over $200 billion per year for all musculoskeletal conditions), self-management interventions are underutilized in community and primary care settings. This culminating proposal is an evidence-based program to decrease self-reported muscle stiffness through education and implementation of a short five minute stretching routine daily and is nurse-led. The target population for this study is adults in Miami-Dade County, FL who visit primary care providers and/or community health services and are experiencing mild muscle stiffness. The intervention will be assessed with a numeric stiffness rating scale at baseline and week 8. This program is designed to increase the self-efficacy of patients, minimize need for analgesic medications, minimize avoidable use of healthcare resources and optimize functional quality of life for a socioeconomically diverse and vulnerable patient population based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence Based Practice.

    Keywords:
    _muscle stiffness, stretching, self-care, nurse-led education, primary care, community health, Miami-Dade_

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Muscle stiffness is an increasingly common but undertreated health problem in adults in community and primary care practices. Muscle stiffness is often linked to sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy occupational postures, as well as physical inactivity, and is not only a problem for mobility but also for comfort and functional status (Zvetkova et al., 2023). While it's not a serious health condition, ongoing stiffness can be a significant quality-of-life problem and can over time lead to increased use of healthcare and a loss of independence. Musculoskeletal conditions, such as muscle, tendon, and connective tissue related to stiffness, impact the lives of about 126.6 million Americans annually with over $213 billion in treatment expenses, lost wages and economic burden (United States Bone and Joint Initiative, 2021). These statistics emphasize the need for strategies that prevent and intervene early in the course of musculoskeletal issues to prevent them from becoming chronic and expensive.

    Miami-Dade County is a uniquely burdened area for MS complaints at the local level. Florida is one of the highest states for musculoskeletal-related visits to the emergency department and primary care providers, and many of these visits are due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders among service-sector and manual labor employees (Florida Department of Health, 2022). These factors combine to decrease the chances residents have for timely, organized musculoskeletal care, with the Miami-Dade County uninsured rate estimated at about 19%, compared to the national average of 9.2% (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Uncontrolled muscle stiffness in this population comes with direct costs (such as increased consumption of pain medications) and indirect costs (such as unnecessary clinic visits, loss of working time, and exacerbated chronic pain problems). Minimally costly and specialized equipment-free nurse-led interventions, which are evidence-based and fiscally-sound, are strategies to reduce this burden.

    The aim of this proposed program is to determine if a nurse-led structured 5-minute daily stretching education program can significantly decrease muscle stiffness in adults over an 8 week period in a primary care or community health care setting. The expected results are clinically relevant decreases in stiffness scores (measured by patient-reported outcomes) at the end of the eight-week intervention period. The importance of this program is not just to reducing unnecessary clinic visits, but also less use of analgesic medicines and long-term functional health of a vulnerable adult population.

    **PICOT**

    In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple five-minute daily stretching routine (I), compared to usual care without structured stretching education (C), reduce self-reported muscle stiffness (O) over eight weeks (T)?

    The population of this project is adults with mild muscle stiffness, who are commonly seen in primary and community health services. This population includes individuals who are working age who have sedentary work, those who are older who have lower levels of physical activity and those who have discomfort in their musculoskeletal system, which is in early stages. Chronic musculoskeletal pain or stiffness is reported by about 54 million adults in the United States, and prevalence is higher among older people and those who are sedentary in their occupations (Theis et al., 2021). Low access to physical therapy, low health literacy, and lack of guidance on self-management strategies (Çimen, 2023) make this population vulnerable.

    Proposed intervention is a five-minute, standardized, nurse delivered stretching program done at the end of the visit with emphasis on major muscle groups that tend to become stiff when injured, such as the neck, shoulders, lower back and lower extremities. Systematic reviews provide evidence of the significant benefits of regular static and dynamic stretching programs, including decreases in musculoskeletal pain severity, range of motion, and perceived muscle stiffness in adults. (Behm et al., 2023) The briefness of the routine is deliberate because shorter structured exercise programs have been shown to have greater sustained patient adherence versus longer programs that utilize equipment or gym access.

    The comparison intervention is usually care plus verbal advice or referring to physical therapy for self-management training, but not providing a formal self-management program. There is a consistent body of evidence of less enduring improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms associated with passive care approaches compared to active, patient-centerd approaches like structured exercise or stretching education (Behm et al. 2023). The project is expected to yield statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of self-reported muscle stiffness scores (measured by a validated Numeric Rating Scale) at the end of the 8 weeks when compared to the baseline score. The eight-week duration is long enough to establish a pattern of stretching and to demonstrate measurable changes in muscle physiology such as increased tissue extensibility and decreased resting muscle tension (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this project are adults (ages 18) who live in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and present to their primary care clinics or community health centers with complaints of mild muscle stiffness. Miami-Dade is a diverse urban area with a concentration of population where most residents have sedentary service jobs and earn low wages in manual jobs. The two occupations are related to high levels of musculoskeletal complaints from the static position and repetitive motion patterns (Çimen, 2023). The occupational dimension of musculoskeletal disorder occurrence in and susceptibility of workers is demonstrated by the fact that service and manual labor workers make up a disproportionate share of the estimated 544,900 reported cases of MSDs that result in days away from work annually in the United States (BLS, 2022).

    The musculoskeletal burden of this population is heavily influenced by social determinants of health. Around 19% of Miami-Dade County residents do not have health insurance, which reduces their access to specialist musculoskeletal care, physical therapy referrals, and preventive health services (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Low income also makes it harder to join gyms, get ergonomic workstations, and access evidence-based self-care resources. Difficulty with language may impede seeking help and compliance to health guidelines in Spanish-speaking and Haitian Creole-speaking populations. In addition, long work hours and caregiving duties limit physical activity time which also contributes to stiffness and functional decline. Cultural and low barrier approaches to addressing social disadvantage are essential for these compounded social disadvantage groups (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Unless stiffness is treated early, it's likely to become a chronic pain problem, to result in reduced range of motion, and to be a fall risk, especially for older individuals in this group. In Miami-Dade, chronic musculoskeletal pain has been linked to emergency department visits that have an average cost of $1,389 per visit, while a structured nurse-led primary care intervention has average costs of about $120 per visit, indicating the cost-effectiveness of early preventive programming (Florida Department of Health, 2022). The differences highlight the need for proactive nursing interventions based in the community as a clinical priority and also a cost-effective approach to the healthcare system in Miami Dade.

    **Proposal**

    The proposed intervention is a nurse-led patient education program that will be delivered in a primary care or community health clinic in Miami-Dade County. If adults are identified on a regular basis in clinics for having mild muscle stiffness, a trained registered nurse or advanced practice registered nurse will provide a structured 15-minute educational session where the patient will be taught a standardized 5-minute stretching exercise. The routine concentrates on the cervical spine, shoulders, thoracic back, lumbar spine, hip flexors and hamstrings, each stretch being bilaterally performed for 30-60 seconds. A laminated take home reference card with illustrated instructions will be provided for patients to use independently each day. The evidence supports this educational approach, as Galmarini et al., (2024) showed that self-directed stretching programs that are supplemented with visual instructional materials are more likely to lead to improved patient adherence and musculoskeletal outcomes than verbal instruction alone.

    The resources needed for implementation are the printed patient education materials, an area in the clinical setting for demonstration and nurse time of 20 minutes per patient encounter. The estimated cost of the intervention is $15-$25, per patient, which is very practical in resource-limited community settings (Theis et al., 2021). Multilingual patient materials in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole will be developed to meet the language needs of Miami-Dade's diverse population and ensure equitable access to the intervention. Furthermore, the short duration of the routine and its ease of implementation will contribute to patient compliance.In addition, the routine is brief and straightforward, making it easier to implement.

    The program will take a total of 10 weeks: 2 weeks of staff training and program preparation, 8 weeks of open enrolment of patients and delivery of the intervention, and 8 weeks concurrently for outcome assessments, with a standardized numeric stiffness rating scale used at baseline and week 8. Advanced practice nurse overseeing program will review outcome data at 4 weeks to determine the progress that has been made and to discuss any challenges to adherence as needed (Behm et al., 2023). If the 8-week outcome data show statistical difference in stiffness scores, presentation will be made to clinic leadership for further consideration of wider program implementation.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This Capstone project is designed and implemented through a pair of complementary frameworks: Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice. These frameworks offer a clear and comprehensive basis for patient-centered education and for integrating evidence in clinical practice.

    In accordance with Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, patients have a natural ability for self-care and nursing can support, educate, and empower patients when their self-care ability falls short of their therapeutic needs (Tanaka, 2022). The five-minute stretching exercise is a self-care behavior and this theory can be directly applied to the proposed intervention. There is a lack of structured knowledge among adults in case of mild muscle stiffness, which can be compensated by nursing education and leads to a lack of self-care. The role of the nurse in this project is an educative-supportive role as the nurse provides patients with the knowledge, skill, and motivation to perform the daily stretches alone. The preventive focus of the intervention is also understood through Orem's framework; in doing so, the skills needed to successfully implement self-care behavior are introduced, thereby decreasing reliance on healthcare services and decreasing the accumulation of health deficits over time.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice offers a systematic approach to moving from evidence to practice. Based on the Iowa Model, Cullen et al. (2022) offer practitioners guidance for problem identification, evidence appraisal, pilot implementation, and outcome evaluation. Muscle Stiffness is determined as a clinically relevant trigger of practice change in this Capstone project. Systematic reviews and RCTs published and supporting stretching interventions are appraised and included in intervention design. A standardised 5 minute routine is rehearsed in the clinic and the patient's outcome is formally assessed at 8 weeks. When outcomes data show positive results, the model can be used to share the results and to consider the broader implementation at the healthcare organization level. This is a well-structured intervention that is theory driven, operationally astute, and can produce transferable clinical knowledge.

    **References**

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    _Sports Medicine-Open, 9_(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022).
    _Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses — 2021._ U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh.nr0.htm

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain.
    _Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40_(2), 329–332. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/omujecm/issue/79274/1282408

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics._ Sigma Theta Tau.

    Florida Department of Health. (2022).
    _Florida musculoskeletal health data and statistics._ https://www.floridahealth.gov

    Theis, K. A., Murphy, L. B., Guglielmo, D., Boring, M. A., Okoro, C. A., Duca, L. M., & Barbour, K. E. (2021). Prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation — United States, 2016–2018.
    _Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70_(40), 1401–1407.
    [https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2](https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2)

    Galmarini, E., Marciano, L., & Schulz, P. J. (2024). The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _BMC Health Services Research_,
    _24_(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11138-1

    Tanaka, M. (2022). Orem's nursing self-care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation.
    _Nursing Forum, 57_(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12696

    U.S. Census Bureau. (2023).
    _American Community Survey: Health insurance coverage in the United States._ https://www.census.gov/topics/health/health-insurance.html

    United States Bone and Joint Initiative. (2021).
    _The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States: Prevalence, societal and economic cost (4th ed.)._ https://www.bmus-ors.org/

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: A comprehensive review.
    _Applied Sciences, 13_(15), 8596. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158596

    **## Attemptfeedback2.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    You are on the right track and did well overall. Choose one clinic setting within Miami-Dade to make it realistic. Missing Conclusion paragraph as per APA.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## MSN_Capstone_Part1_Revised1.docx**

    1

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Alex De Cardenas

    Florida National University

    MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01

    Dr. Carmen Lazo

    May 21, 2026

    **Abstract**

    Mild muscle stiffness is a common musculoskeletal issue that is seen in primary care and community health settings and is associated with working-age and older adults, often related to physical inactivity, prolonged postures at work and sedentary lifestyles. Although these conditions are common and have significant health service utilization and cost (likely in the United States, over $200 billion per year for all musculoskeletal conditions), self-management interventions are underutilized in community and primary care settings. This culminating proposal is an evidence-based program to decrease self-reported muscle stiffness through education and implementation of a short five minute stretching routine daily and is nurse-led. The target population for this study is adults in Miami-Dade County, FL who visit primary care providers and/or community health services and are experiencing mild muscle stiffness. The intervention will be assessed with a numeric stiffness rating scale at baseline and week 8. This program is designed to increase the self-efficacy of patients, minimize need for analgesic medications, minimize avoidable use of healthcare resources and optimize functional quality of life for a socioeconomically diverse and vulnerable patient population based on Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence Based Practice.

    Keywords:
    _muscle stiffness, stretching, self-care, nurse-led education, primary care, community health, Miami-Dade_

    **Reducing Muscle Stiffness Through a Brief Stretching Intervention:** **A Capstone PICOT Proposal**

    Muscle stiffness is an increasingly common but undertreated health problem in adults in community and primary care practices. Muscle stiffness is often linked to sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy occupational postures, as well as physical inactivity, and is not only a problem for mobility but also for comfort and functional status (Zvetkova et al., 2023). While it's not a serious health condition, ongoing stiffness can be a significant quality-of-life problem and can over time lead to increased use of healthcare and a loss of independence. Musculoskeletal conditions, such as muscle, tendon, and connective tissue related to stiffness, impact the lives of about 126.6 million Americans annually with over $213 billion in treatment expenses, lost wages and economic burden (United States Bone and Joint Initiative, 2021). These statistics emphasize the need for strategies that prevent and intervene early in the course of musculoskeletal issues to prevent them from becoming chronic and expensive.

    Miami-Dade County is a uniquely burdened area for MS complaints at the local level. Florida is one of the highest states for musculoskeletal-related visits to the emergency department and primary care providers, and many of these visits are due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders among service-sector and manual labor employees (Florida Department of Health, 2022). These factors combine to decrease the chances residents have for timely, organized musculoskeletal care, with the Miami-Dade County uninsured rate estimated at about 19%, compared to the national average of 9.2% (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Uncontrolled muscle stiffness in this population comes with direct costs (such as increased consumption of pain medications) and indirect costs (such as unnecessary clinic visits, loss of working time, and exacerbated chronic pain problems). Minimally costly and specialized equipment-free nurse-led interventions, which are evidence-based and fiscally-sound, are strategies to reduce this burden.

    The aim of this proposed program is to determine if a nurse-led structured 5-minute daily stretching education program can significantly decrease muscle stiffness in adults over an 8 week period in a primary care or community health care setting. The expected results are clinically relevant decreases in stiffness scores (measured by patient-reported outcomes) at the end of the eight-week intervention period. The importance of this program is not just to reducing unnecessary clinic visits, but also less use of analgesic medicines and long-term functional health of a vulnerable adult population.

    **PICOT**

    In adults with mild muscle stiffness (P), does teaching a simple five-minute daily stretching routine (I), compared to usual care without structured stretching education (C), reduce self-reported muscle stiffness (O) over eight weeks (T)?

    The population of this project is adults with mild muscle stiffness, who are commonly seen in primary and community health services. This population includes individuals who are working age who have sedentary work, those who are older who have lower levels of physical activity and those who have discomfort in their musculoskeletal system, which is in early stages. Chronic musculoskeletal pain or stiffness is reported by about 54 million adults in the United States, and prevalence is higher among older people and those who are sedentary in their occupations (Theis et al., 2021). Low access to physical therapy, low health literacy, and lack of guidance on self-management strategies (Çimen, 2023) make this population vulnerable.

    Proposed intervention is a five-minute, standardized, nurse delivered stretching program done at the end of the visit with emphasis on major muscle groups that tend to become stiff when injured, such as the neck, shoulders, lower back and lower extremities. Systematic reviews provide evidence of the significant benefits of regular static and dynamic stretching programs, including decreases in musculoskeletal pain severity, range of motion, and perceived muscle stiffness in adults. (Behm et al., 2023) The briefness of the routine is deliberate because shorter structured exercise programs have been shown to have greater sustained patient adherence versus longer programs that utilize equipment or gym access.

    The comparison intervention is usually care plus verbal advice or referring to physical therapy for self-management training, but not providing a formal self-management program. There is a consistent body of evidence of less enduring improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms associated with passive care approaches compared to active, patient-centerd approaches like structured exercise or stretching education (Behm et al. 2023). The project is expected to yield statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of self-reported muscle stiffness scores (measured by a validated Numeric Rating Scale) at the end of the 8 weeks when compared to the baseline score. The eight-week duration is long enough to establish a pattern of stretching and to demonstrate measurable changes in muscle physiology such as increased tissue extensibility and decreased resting muscle tension (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population for this project are adults (ages 18) who live in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and present to their primary care clinics or community health centers with complaints of mild muscle stiffness. Miami-Dade is a diverse urban area with a concentration of population where most residents have sedentary service jobs and earn low wages in manual jobs. The two occupations are related to high levels of musculoskeletal complaints from the static position and repetitive motion patterns (Çimen, 2023). The occupational dimension of musculoskeletal disorder occurrence in and susceptibility of workers is demonstrated by the fact that service and manual labor workers make up a disproportionate share of the estimated 544,900 reported cases of MSDs that result in days away from work annually in the United States (BLS, 2022).

    The musculoskeletal burden of this population is heavily influenced by social determinants of health. Around 19% of Miami-Dade County residents do not have health insurance, which reduces their access to specialist musculoskeletal care, physical therapy referrals, and preventive health services (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). Low income also makes it harder to join gyms, get ergonomic workstations, and access evidence-based self-care resources. Difficulty with language may impede seeking help and compliance to health guidelines in Spanish-speaking and Haitian Creole-speaking populations. In addition, long work hours and caregiving duties limit physical activity time which also contributes to stiffness and functional decline. Cultural and low barrier approaches to addressing social disadvantage are essential for these compounded social disadvantage groups (Zvetkova et al., 2023).

    Unless stiffness is treated early, it's likely to become a chronic pain problem, to result in reduced range of motion, and to be a fall risk, especially for older individuals in this group. In Miami-Dade, chronic musculoskeletal pain has been linked to emergency department visits that have an average cost of $1,389 per visit, while a structured nurse-led primary care intervention has average costs of about $120 per visit, indicating the cost-effectiveness of early preventive programming (Florida Department of Health, 2022). The differences highlight the need for proactive nursing interventions based in the community as a clinical priority and also a cost-effective approach to the healthcare system in Miami Dade.

    **Proposal**

    The proposed intervention is a nurse-led patient education program that will be delivered in a primary care or community health clinic in Miami-Dade County. If adults are identified on a regular basis in clinics for having mild muscle stiffness, a trained registered nurse or advanced practice registered nurse will provide a structured 15-minute educational session where the patient will be taught a standardized 5-minute stretching exercise. The routine concentrates on the cervical spine, shoulders, thoracic back, lumbar spine, hip flexors and hamstrings, each stretch being bilaterally performed for 30-60 seconds. A laminated take home reference card with illustrated instructions will be provided for patients to use independently each day. The evidence supports this educational approach, as Galmarini et al., (2024) showed that self-directed stretching programs that are supplemented with visual instructional materials are more likely to lead to improved patient adherence and musculoskeletal outcomes than verbal instruction alone.

    The resources needed for implementation are the printed patient education materials, an area in the clinical setting for demonstration and nurse time of 20 minutes per patient encounter. The estimated cost of the intervention is $15-$25, per patient, which is very practical in resource-limited community settings (Theis et al., 2021). Multilingual patient materials in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole will be developed to meet the language needs of Miami-Dade's diverse population and ensure equitable access to the intervention. Furthermore, the short duration of the routine and its ease of implementation will contribute to patient compliance.In addition, the routine is brief and straightforward, making it easier to implement.

    The program will take a total of 10 weeks: 2 weeks of staff training and program preparation, 8 weeks of open enrolment of patients and delivery of the intervention, and 8 weeks concurrently for outcome assessments, with a standardized numeric stiffness rating scale used at baseline and week 8. Advanced practice nurse overseeing program will review outcome data at 4 weeks to determine the progress that has been made and to discuss any challenges to adherence as needed (Behm et al., 2023). If the 8-week outcome data show statistical difference in stiffness scores, presentation will be made to clinic leadership for further consideration of wider program implementation.

    **Theoretical Framework**

    This Capstone project is designed and implemented through a pair of complementary frameworks: Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice. These frameworks offer a clear and comprehensive basis for patient-centered education and for integrating evidence in clinical practice.

    In accordance with Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, patients have a natural ability for self-care and nursing can support, educate, and empower patients when their self-care ability falls short of their therapeutic needs (Tanaka, 2022). The five-minute stretching exercise is a self-care behavior and this theory can be directly applied to the proposed intervention. There is a lack of structured knowledge among adults in case of mild muscle stiffness, which can be compensated by nursing education and leads to a lack of self-care. The role of the nurse in this project is an educative-supportive role as the nurse provides patients with the knowledge, skill, and motivation to perform the daily stretches alone. The preventive focus of the intervention is also understood through Orem's framework; in doing so, the skills needed to successfully implement self-care behavior are introduced, thereby decreasing reliance on healthcare services and decreasing the accumulation of health deficits over time.

    The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice offers a systematic approach to moving from evidence to practice. Based on the Iowa Model, Cullen et al. (2022) offer practitioners guidance for problem identification, evidence appraisal, pilot implementation, and outcome evaluation. Muscle Stiffness is determined as a clinically relevant trigger of practice change in this Capstone project. Systematic reviews and RCTs published and supporting stretching interventions are appraised and included in intervention design. A standardised 5 minute routine is rehearsed in the clinic and the patient's outcome is formally assessed at 8 weeks. When outcomes data show positive results, the model can be used to share the results and to consider the broader implementation at the healthcare organization level. This is a well-structured intervention that is theory driven, operationally astute, and can produce transferable clinical knowledge.

    **References**

    Behm, D. G., Alizadeh, S., Daneshjoo, A., Anvar, S. H., Graham, A., Zahiri, A., & Konrad, A. (2023). Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    _Sports Medicine-Open, 9_(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022).
    _Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses — 2021._ U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh.nr0.htm

    Çimen, O. (2023). The efficiency of ergonomics, active break and stretching exercise program in office workers with chronic neck and back pain.
    _Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 40_(2), 329–332. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/omujecm/issue/79274/1282408

    Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Tucker, S., & Edmonds, S. (2022).
    _Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics._ Sigma Theta Tau.

    Florida Department of Health. (2022).
    _Florida musculoskeletal health data and statistics._ https://www.floridahealth.gov

    Theis, K. A., Murphy, L. B., Guglielmo, D., Boring, M. A., Okoro, C. A., Duca, L. M., & Barbour, K. E. (2021). Prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation — United States, 2016–2018.
    _Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70_(40), 1401–1407.
    [https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2](https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040a2)

    Galmarini, E., Marciano, L., & Schulz, P. J. (2024). The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _BMC Health Services Research_,
    _24_(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11138-1

    Tanaka, M. (2022). Orem's nursing self-care deficit theory: A theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation.
    _Nursing Forum, 57_(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12696

    U.S. Census Bureau. (2023).
    _American Community Survey: Health insurance coverage in the United States._ https://www.census.gov/topics/health/health-insurance.html

    United States Bone and Joint Initiative. (2021).
    _The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States: Prevalence, societal and economic cost (4th ed.)._ https://www.bmus-ors.org/

    Zvetkova, E., Koytchev, E., Ivanov, I., Ranchev, S., & Antonov, A. (2023). Biomechanical, healing and therapeutic effects of stretching: A comprehensive review.
    _Applied Sciences, 13_(15), 8596. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158596

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## Feedbackforlearner.docx – ## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx – ## Capstone_Part1.1.docx **## Feedbackforlearner.docx** **Feedback for learner** Follow my feedback and instructions for the Review of Literature. Discuss in further details. **Feedback for learner** Yes, the APRN sho…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## Feedbackforlearner.docx

    – ## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx

    – ## Capstone_Part1.1.docx

    **## Feedbackforlearner.docx**

    **Feedback for learner**

    Follow my feedback and instructions for the Review of Literature. Discuss in further details.

    **Feedback for learner**

    Yes, the APRN should be the leader in the Capstone. Be cautious that the BMI and weight should not require IRB approval.

    What is the cost associated with the health problem? Choose one setting/clinic to make the Capstone realistic. You need to remove the measuring of blood pressure and waist circumference as that requires IRB approval. The patient can self report weight. Otherwise, you are on the right track.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## Capstone_Part1.1.docx**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    The obesity epidemic is a public health problem that disproportionately affects low-income and Hispanic communities, as well as urban communities, and is one of the most crisis-stricken in the United States. These rates are even higher in Miami-Dade County, FL, where more than 67% of adults are either overweight or obese, and need systematic, evidence-based intervention through the primary care channel/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The prevalence of adult obesity nationally has risen to 40.3% from August 2021 to August 2023, and for those who were already overweight, the prevalence of severe obesity was 9.4% over this period (Karam et al., 2025). These figures equate with elevated rates of Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and hypertension – an economic burden for patients and the healthcare system. Nevertheless, few primary care offices have an obesity-focused education program that is consistent from one office to another, and patients are not knowledgeable enough or equipped to lower their body weight to a healthy level. This is a proposed Capstone project: To implement a structured lifestyle modification education program in PC clinics in Miami-Dade County, which will be administered to overweight and obese adults for 8-12 weeks.

    **PICOT Question**

    The clinical question guiding this project is: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)? The population consists of adults who are overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese and seek health care in primary care settings in counties with a majority Hispanic and Latino population, and often have challenges with access to nutritious food, health care literacy, and safe recreation areas (Williams et al., 2024). The intervention comprises one-on-one counseling provided by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, behavioral self-monitoring, and goal setting. Comparisons are with the current standard of care—the absence of any structured obesity education, with patients only receiving general clinical advice. The target is to lose a clinically significant amount of weight or BMI (around 5% of body weight compared with baseline level). A properly structured behavioural programme, as evidenced, can actively produce measurable anthropometric changes in 8-12 weeks time (Krishnasamy et al., 2024).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population includes overweight and obese adults in Miami-Dade County, home to nearly 2.5 million residents, the majority identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The intersecting social determinants of food insecurity, low household income, limited English language ability, and lack of affordable, nutritious food make this community vulnerable. Studies have found that racial and ethnic minorities and adults with low SES are at higher risk for obesity and less likely to access quality obesity treatment (Williams et al., 2024). Cultural dietary habits and community access to physical activity also contribute to weight gain and to the progression of chronic diseases. Primary care clinics are an ideal setting because they are the first point of contact between the patient and the healthcare system, allowing for early detection, frequent monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors during the intervention period.

    **Review of Evidence**

    There is significant peer-reviewed evidence for the effectiveness of structured lifestyle modification education programs in the primary care setting for weight and BMI reduction. Karam et al. (2025) conducted a review of obesity interventions that utilized primary care settings and identified behavioral therapies, such as motivational interviewing and lifestyle modification counseling, to be consistently associated with clinically significant weight loss, suggesting that APRNs and primary care providers are well-equipped to facilitate these therapies. Krishnasamy et al. (2024) assessed a nurse-led intervention in overweight and obese urban adults and found weight loss, BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure levels to be lower at follow-up; participants' perception of the intervention's success was due to the structured educational material and the ongoing nursing care. A systematic review and meta-analysis by García-Rodríguez et al. (2024) showed that nurse-led interventions resulted in an average weight loss of 2.59 kg, with an average BMI reduction of 1.05 kg/m² and a waist circumference reduction of 2.52 cm compared to traditional care, demonstrating that nurse-led education interventions have a consistent and measurable impact on anthropometric changes across diverse patient populations. Williams et al. (2024) also found that culturally responsive, social determinants of health-focused programming is needed to achieve equity in minority-majority communities like Miami-Dade. Overall, this information demonstrates the viability and efficacy of the intervention selected for the population and intervention setting.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The intervention will be an eight to twelve-week structured lifestyle modification education program provided in primary care clinics by APRNs and trained nurses. The screening of patients will be done during the routine visits according to the standard BMI evaluation, and patients will be enrolled when their BMI ≥ 25 kg/m². It will consist of at least four, 45-60 minute, individually scheduled sessions focusing on nutrition literacy, caloric balance, physical activity guidelines, portion control, and behavioral self-monitoring strategies every two weeks. To meet the linguistic need of Miami-Dade residents, all educational materials will be available in English and Spanish. For assessment of outcomes, anthropometric data such as weight, BMI and waist circumference will be collected at the start and end of the program. The program does not require any specific equipment other than the clinical equipment used in primary care and is designed to be integrated into clinical practice without a large financial investment. The implementation process takes 12 weeks; staff orientation (weeks 1-2), patient education (weeks 3-10) and outcome measurement and documentation (weeks 11-12).

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The project is based on Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (Orem, 1971) and Change Theory (Kurt Lewin, 1962). According to Orem's theory, nursing intervention must be implemented when patients don't know or have the ability to participate in needed self-care behaviors. There is a self care deficit in understanding what patients need to do in terms of diet, exercise and behavior modification for obesity management. The educational program proposed explicitly meets this need, and thus helps patients to learn how to manage their weight on their own for the long term. Isik and Fredland (2023) validated that Orem's theory is applicable to the development of self-care behaviors of patients through structured nursing education, which is very relevant to this intervention. Lewin's Change Theory is a model that helps to understand the process of change within behavioral change and how it can be made easier by unfreezing, changing and refreezing. In the unfreeze stage, patients will identify obesity as a risk factor that can be changed and express readiness for change through motivational discussion.Patients will voice readiness for change and recognize obesity as a modifiable risk in the unfreeze stage through motivational discussion. In the transition period, education will provide encouragement of new behaviors and reinforcement of healthier habits. Follow up visits and tools for self monitoring, embedded in the daily routine, continue to increase improvements in the refreezing stage. As such, the application of Lewin's theory in this primary care obesity education program was supported by the work of Amina et al. (2022) who showed that the theory is effective in guiding systematic improvements in healthcare and maintaining patient outcomes in the long-term. These frameworks work together to foster patient empowerment, evidence-based practice, and sustained patient behavior.

    **Conclusion**

    Obesity disproportionately burdens Miami-Dade County residents and contributes to preventable chronic disease, increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. A proposed evidence-based, structured lifestyle modification education program will be investigated as a way to address the critical lack of standardized obesity counseling offered in primary care within Primary Care Settings, having been inspired by complementary nutrition theories and strong evidence. This Capstone project is intended to achieve measurable BMI and weight loss within this viable, culturally responsive, APRN-led intervention for vulnerable adults over an 8–12 week period. It represents the critical need for advanced practice nursing to make a major contribution that significantly reduces population-level health disparities through education, advocacy, and evidence-based practice in perhaps the most limited setting possible: the quiet realm of routine primary care.

    **References**

    Amina, S., Khan, M. A., & Patel, M. (2022). Application of Lewin's change theory in healthcare practice improvement: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Nursing Management, 30_(4), 1122–1131.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571](https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023).
    _Adult obesity facts._ U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html)

    García-Rodríguez, R., Vázquez-Rodríguez, A., Bellahmar-Lkadiri, S., Salmonte-Rodríguez, A., Siverio-Díaz, A. R., De Paz-Pérez, P., & García-García, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a nurse-led telehealth intervention to improve adherence to healthy eating and physical activity habits in overweight or obese young adults.
    _Nutrients, 16_(14), 2217.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217)

    Isik, E., & Fredland, N. M. (2023). Orem's self-care deficit nursing theory as a framework for chronic disease self-management: An integrative review.
    _Nursing Science Quarterly, 36_(2), 131–139.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357](https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357)

    Karam, G., Agarwal, A., Sadeghirad, B., Jalink, M., Hitchcock, C. L., Ge, L., Bhatt, M., Zea, A. M., Milovanovic, M., Choudhuri, S., & Johnston, B. C. (2025). Addressing the challenge of obesity in primary care: A review of effective interventions and implementation strategies.
    _Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 17_(1), 108.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z)

    Krishnasamy, V., Jayaram, K. M., & Jayaseelan, V. (2024). A qualitative exploration of participants' experiences in a randomized controlled trial of weight reduction through a nurse-led intervention.
    _Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13_(1), 368. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1299_23Williams, M. S., McKinney, S. J., & Cheskin, L. J. (2024). Social and structural determinants of health and social injustices contributing to obesity disparities.
    _Current Obe sity Reports, 13_(3), 567–578.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9)

    **## Capstone_Part1.1.docx**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    The obesity epidemic is a public health problem that disproportionately affects low-income and Hispanic communities, as well as urban communities, and is one of the most crisis-stricken in the United States. These rates are even higher in Miami-Dade County, FL, where more than 67% of adults are either overweight or obese, and need systematic, evidence-based intervention through the primary care channel/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The prevalence of adult obesity nationally has risen to 40.3% from August 2021 to August 2023, and for those who were already overweight, the prevalence of severe obesity was 9.4% over this period (Karam et al., 2025). These figures equate with elevated rates of Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and hypertension – an economic burden for patients and the healthcare system. Nevertheless, few primary care offices have an obesity-focused education program that is consistent from one office to another, and patients are not knowledgeable enough or equipped to lower their body weight to a healthy level. This is a proposed Capstone project: To implement a structured lifestyle modification education program in PC clinics in Miami-Dade County, which will be administered to overweight and obese adults for 8-12 weeks.

    **PICOT Question**

    The clinical question guiding this project is: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)? The population consists of adults who are overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese and seek health care in primary care settings in counties with a majority Hispanic and Latino population, and often have challenges with access to nutritious food, health care literacy, and safe recreation areas (Williams et al., 2024). The intervention comprises one-on-one counseling provided by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, behavioral self-monitoring, and goal setting. Comparisons are with the current standard of care—the absence of any structured obesity education, with patients only receiving general clinical advice. The target is to lose a clinically significant amount of weight or BMI (around 5% of body weight compared with baseline level). A properly structured behavioural programme, as evidenced, can actively produce measurable anthropometric changes in 8-12 weeks time (Krishnasamy et al., 2024).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population includes overweight and obese adults in Miami-Dade County, home to nearly 2.5 million residents, the majority identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The intersecting social determinants of food insecurity, low household income, limited English language ability, and lack of affordable, nutritious food make this community vulnerable. Studies have found that racial and ethnic minorities and adults with low SES are at higher risk for obesity and less likely to access quality obesity treatment (Williams et al., 2024). Cultural dietary habits and community access to physical activity also contribute to weight gain and to the progression of chronic diseases. Primary care clinics are an ideal setting because they are the first point of contact between the patient and the healthcare system, allowing for early detection, frequent monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors during the intervention period.

    **Review of Evidence**

    There is significant peer-reviewed evidence for the effectiveness of structured lifestyle modification education programs in the primary care setting for weight and BMI reduction. Karam et al. (2025) conducted a review of obesity interventions that utilized primary care settings and identified behavioral therapies, such as motivational interviewing and lifestyle modification counseling, to be consistently associated with clinically significant weight loss, suggesting that APRNs and primary care providers are well-equipped to facilitate these therapies. Krishnasamy et al. (2024) assessed a nurse-led intervention in overweight and obese urban adults and found weight loss, BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure levels to be lower at follow-up; participants' perception of the intervention's success was due to the structured educational material and the ongoing nursing care. A systematic review and meta-analysis by García-Rodríguez et al. (2024) showed that nurse-led interventions resulted in an average weight loss of 2.59 kg, with an average BMI reduction of 1.05 kg/m² and a waist circumference reduction of 2.52 cm compared to traditional care, demonstrating that nurse-led education interventions have a consistent and measurable impact on anthropometric changes across diverse patient populations. Williams et al. (2024) also found that culturally responsive, social determinants of health-focused programming is needed to achieve equity in minority-majority communities like Miami-Dade. Overall, this information demonstrates the viability and efficacy of the intervention selected for the population and intervention setting.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The intervention will be an eight to twelve-week structured lifestyle modification education program provided in primary care clinics by APRNs and trained nurses. The screening of patients will be done during the routine visits according to the standard BMI evaluation, and patients will be enrolled when their BMI ≥ 25 kg/m². It will consist of at least four, 45-60 minute, individually scheduled sessions focusing on nutrition literacy, caloric balance, physical activity guidelines, portion control, and behavioral self-monitoring strategies every two weeks. To meet the linguistic need of Miami-Dade residents, all educational materials will be available in English and Spanish. For assessment of outcomes, anthropometric data such as weight, BMI and waist circumference will be collected at the start and end of the program. The program does not require any specific equipment other than the clinical equipment used in primary care and is designed to be integrated into clinical practice without a large financial investment. The implementation process takes 12 weeks; staff orientation (weeks 1-2), patient education (weeks 3-10) and outcome measurement and documentation (weeks 11-12).

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The project is based on Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (Orem, 1971) and Change Theory (Kurt Lewin, 1962). According to Orem's theory, nursing intervention must be implemented when patients don't know or have the ability to participate in needed self-care behaviors. There is a self care deficit in understanding what patients need to do in terms of diet, exercise and behavior modification for obesity management. The educational program proposed explicitly meets this need, and thus helps patients to learn how to manage their weight on their own for the long term. Isik and Fredland (2023) validated that Orem's theory is applicable to the development of self-care behaviors of patients through structured nursing education, which is very relevant to this intervention. Lewin's Change Theory is a model that helps to understand the process of change within behavioral change and how it can be made easier by unfreezing, changing and refreezing. In the unfreeze stage, patients will identify obesity as a risk factor that can be changed and express readiness for change through motivational discussion.Patients will voice readiness for change and recognize obesity as a modifiable risk in the unfreeze stage through motivational discussion. In the transition period, education will provide encouragement of new behaviors and reinforcement of healthier habits. Follow up visits and tools for self monitoring, embedded in the daily routine, continue to increase improvements in the refreezing stage. As such, the application of Lewin's theory in this primary care obesity education program was supported by the work of Amina et al. (2022) who showed that the theory is effective in guiding systematic improvements in healthcare and maintaining patient outcomes in the long-term. These frameworks work together to foster patient empowerment, evidence-based practice, and sustained patient behavior.

    **Conclusion**

    Obesity disproportionately burdens Miami-Dade County residents and contributes to preventable chronic disease, increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. A proposed evidence-based, structured lifestyle modification education program will be investigated as a way to address the critical lack of standardized obesity counseling offered in primary care within Primary Care Settings, having been inspired by complementary nutrition theories and strong evidence. This Capstone project is intended to achieve measurable BMI and weight loss within this viable, culturally responsive, APRN-led intervention for vulnerable adults over an 8–12 week period. It represents the critical need for advanced practice nursing to make a major contribution that significantly reduces population-level health disparities through education, advocacy, and evidence-based practice in perhaps the most limited setting possible: the quiet realm of routine primary care.

    **References**

    Amina, S., Khan, M. A., & Patel, M. (2022). Application of Lewin's change theory in healthcare practice improvement: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Nursing Management, 30_(4), 1122–1131.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571](https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023).
    _Adult obesity facts._ U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html)

    García-Rodríguez, R., Vázquez-Rodríguez, A., Bellahmar-Lkadiri, S., Salmonte-Rodríguez, A., Siverio-Díaz, A. R., De Paz-Pérez, P., & García-García, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a nurse-led telehealth intervention to improve adherence to healthy eating and physical activity habits in overweight or obese young adults.
    _Nutrients, 16_(14), 2217.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217)

    Isik, E., & Fredland, N. M. (2023). Orem's self-care deficit nursing theory as a framework for chronic disease self-management: An integrative review.
    _Nursing Science Quarterly, 36_(2), 131–139.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357](https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357)

    Karam, G., Agarwal, A., Sadeghirad, B., Jalink, M., Hitchcock, C. L., Ge, L., Bhatt, M., Zea, A. M., Milovanovic, M., Choudhuri, S., & Johnston, B. C. (2025). Addressing the challenge of obesity in primary care: A review of effective interventions and implementation strategies.
    _Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 17_(1), 108.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z)

    Krishnasamy, V., Jayaram, K. M., & Jayaseelan, V. (2024). A qualitative exploration of participants' experiences in a randomized controlled trial of weight reduction through a nurse-led intervention.
    _Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13_(1), 368. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1299_23Williams, M. S., McKinney, S. J., & Cheskin, L. J. (2024). Social and structural determinants of health and social injustices contributing to obesity disparities.
    _Current Obe sity Reports, 13_(3), 567–578.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9)

    **## Feedbackforlearner.docx**

    **Feedback for learner**

    Follow my feedback and instructions for the Review of Literature. Discuss in further details.

    **Feedback for learner**

    Yes, the APRN should be the leader in the Capstone. Be cautious that the BMI and weight should not require IRB approval.

    What is the cost associated with the health problem? Choose one setting/clinic to make the Capstone realistic. You need to remove the measuring of blood pressure and waist circumference as that requires IRB approval. The patient can self report weight. Otherwise, you are on the right track.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## Capstone_Part1.1.docx**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    The obesity epidemic is a public health problem that disproportionately affects low-income and Hispanic communities, as well as urban communities, and is one of the most crisis-stricken in the United States. These rates are even higher in Miami-Dade County, FL, where more than 67% of adults are either overweight or obese, and need systematic, evidence-based intervention through the primary care channel/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The prevalence of adult obesity nationally has risen to 40.3% from August 2021 to August 2023, and for those who were already overweight, the prevalence of severe obesity was 9.4% over this period (Karam et al., 2025). These figures equate with elevated rates of Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and hypertension – an economic burden for patients and the healthcare system. Nevertheless, few primary care offices have an obesity-focused education program that is consistent from one office to another, and patients are not knowledgeable enough or equipped to lower their body weight to a healthy level. This is a proposed Capstone project: To implement a structured lifestyle modification education program in PC clinics in Miami-Dade County, which will be administered to overweight and obese adults for 8-12 weeks.

    **PICOT Question**

    The clinical question guiding this project is: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)? The population consists of adults who are overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese and seek health care in primary care settings in counties with a majority Hispanic and Latino population, and often have challenges with access to nutritious food, health care literacy, and safe recreation areas (Williams et al., 2024). The intervention comprises one-on-one counseling provided by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, behavioral self-monitoring, and goal setting. Comparisons are with the current standard of care—the absence of any structured obesity education, with patients only receiving general clinical advice. The target is to lose a clinically significant amount of weight or BMI (around 5% of body weight compared with baseline level). A properly structured behavioural programme, as evidenced, can actively produce measurable anthropometric changes in 8-12 weeks time (Krishnasamy et al., 2024).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population includes overweight and obese adults in Miami-Dade County, home to nearly 2.5 million residents, the majority identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The intersecting social determinants of food insecurity, low household income, limited English language ability, and lack of affordable, nutritious food make this community vulnerable. Studies have found that racial and ethnic minorities and adults with low SES are at higher risk for obesity and less likely to access quality obesity treatment (Williams et al., 2024). Cultural dietary habits and community access to physical activity also contribute to weight gain and to the progression of chronic diseases. Primary care clinics are an ideal setting because they are the first point of contact between the patient and the healthcare system, allowing for early detection, frequent monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors during the intervention period.

    **Review of Evidence**

    There is significant peer-reviewed evidence for the effectiveness of structured lifestyle modification education programs in the primary care setting for weight and BMI reduction. Karam et al. (2025) conducted a review of obesity interventions that utilized primary care settings and identified behavioral therapies, such as motivational interviewing and lifestyle modification counseling, to be consistently associated with clinically significant weight loss, suggesting that APRNs and primary care providers are well-equipped to facilitate these therapies. Krishnasamy et al. (2024) assessed a nurse-led intervention in overweight and obese urban adults and found weight loss, BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure levels to be lower at follow-up; participants' perception of the intervention's success was due to the structured educational material and the ongoing nursing care. A systematic review and meta-analysis by García-Rodríguez et al. (2024) showed that nurse-led interventions resulted in an average weight loss of 2.59 kg, with an average BMI reduction of 1.05 kg/m² and a waist circumference reduction of 2.52 cm compared to traditional care, demonstrating that nurse-led education interventions have a consistent and measurable impact on anthropometric changes across diverse patient populations. Williams et al. (2024) also found that culturally responsive, social determinants of health-focused programming is needed to achieve equity in minority-majority communities like Miami-Dade. Overall, this information demonstrates the viability and efficacy of the intervention selected for the population and intervention setting.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The intervention will be an eight to twelve-week structured lifestyle modification education program provided in primary care clinics by APRNs and trained nurses. The screening of patients will be done during the routine visits according to the standard BMI evaluation, and patients will be enrolled when their BMI ≥ 25 kg/m². It will consist of at least four, 45-60 minute, individually scheduled sessions focusing on nutrition literacy, caloric balance, physical activity guidelines, portion control, and behavioral self-monitoring strategies every two weeks. To meet the linguistic need of Miami-Dade residents, all educational materials will be available in English and Spanish. For assessment of outcomes, anthropometric data such as weight, BMI and waist circumference will be collected at the start and end of the program. The program does not require any specific equipment other than the clinical equipment used in primary care and is designed to be integrated into clinical practice without a large financial investment. The implementation process takes 12 weeks; staff orientation (weeks 1-2), patient education (weeks 3-10) and outcome measurement and documentation (weeks 11-12).

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The project is based on Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (Orem, 1971) and Change Theory (Kurt Lewin, 1962). According to Orem's theory, nursing intervention must be implemented when patients don't know or have the ability to participate in needed self-care behaviors. There is a self care deficit in understanding what patients need to do in terms of diet, exercise and behavior modification for obesity management. The educational program proposed explicitly meets this need, and thus helps patients to learn how to manage their weight on their own for the long term. Isik and Fredland (2023) validated that Orem's theory is applicable to the development of self-care behaviors of patients through structured nursing education, which is very relevant to this intervention. Lewin's Change Theory is a model that helps to understand the process of change within behavioral change and how it can be made easier by unfreezing, changing and refreezing. In the unfreeze stage, patients will identify obesity as a risk factor that can be changed and express readiness for change through motivational discussion.Patients will voice readiness for change and recognize obesity as a modifiable risk in the unfreeze stage through motivational discussion. In the transition period, education will provide encouragement of new behaviors and reinforcement of healthier habits. Follow up visits and tools for self monitoring, embedded in the daily routine, continue to increase improvements in the refreezing stage. As such, the application of Lewin's theory in this primary care obesity education program was supported by the work of Amina et al. (2022) who showed that the theory is effective in guiding systematic improvements in healthcare and maintaining patient outcomes in the long-term. These frameworks work together to foster patient empowerment, evidence-based practice, and sustained patient behavior.

    **Conclusion**

    Obesity disproportionately burdens Miami-Dade County residents and contributes to preventable chronic disease, increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. A proposed evidence-based, structured lifestyle modification education program will be investigated as a way to address the critical lack of standardized obesity counseling offered in primary care within Primary Care Settings, having been inspired by complementary nutrition theories and strong evidence. This Capstone project is intended to achieve measurable BMI and weight loss within this viable, culturally responsive, APRN-led intervention for vulnerable adults over an 8–12 week period. It represents the critical need for advanced practice nursing to make a major contribution that significantly reduces population-level health disparities through education, advocacy, and evidence-based practice in perhaps the most limited setting possible: the quiet realm of routine primary care.

    **References**

    Amina, S., Khan, M. A., & Patel, M. (2022). Application of Lewin's change theory in healthcare practice improvement: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Nursing Management, 30_(4), 1122–1131.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571](https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023).
    _Adult obesity facts._ U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html)

    García-Rodríguez, R., Vázquez-Rodríguez, A., Bellahmar-Lkadiri, S., Salmonte-Rodríguez, A., Siverio-Díaz, A. R., De Paz-Pérez, P., & García-García, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a nurse-led telehealth intervention to improve adherence to healthy eating and physical activity habits in overweight or obese young adults.
    _Nutrients, 16_(14), 2217.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217)

    Isik, E., & Fredland, N. M. (2023). Orem's self-care deficit nursing theory as a framework for chronic disease self-management: An integrative review.
    _Nursing Science Quarterly, 36_(2), 131–139.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357](https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357)

    Karam, G., Agarwal, A., Sadeghirad, B., Jalink, M., Hitchcock, C. L., Ge, L., Bhatt, M., Zea, A. M., Milovanovic, M., Choudhuri, S., & Johnston, B. C. (2025). Addressing the challenge of obesity in primary care: A review of effective interventions and implementation strategies.
    _Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 17_(1), 108.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z)

    Krishnasamy, V., Jayaram, K. M., & Jayaseelan, V. (2024). A qualitative exploration of participants' experiences in a randomized controlled trial of weight reduction through a nurse-led intervention.
    _Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13_(1), 368. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1299_23Williams, M. S., McKinney, S. J., & Cheskin, L. J. (2024). Social and structural determinants of health and social injustices contributing to obesity disparities.
    _Current Obe sity Reports, 13_(3), 567–578.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9)

    **## Feedbackforlearner.docx**

    **Feedback for learner**

    Follow my feedback and instructions for the Review of Literature. Discuss in further details.

    **Feedback for learner**

    Yes, the APRN should be the leader in the Capstone. Be cautious that the BMI and weight should not require IRB approval.

    What is the cost associated with the health problem? Choose one setting/clinic to make the Capstone realistic. You need to remove the measuring of blood pressure and waist circumference as that requires IRB approval. The patient can self report weight. Otherwise, you are on the right track.

    **## CapstonePartIIintrucctions.docx**

    Capstone Part II: Review of Literature

    **CAPSTONE: PART II due 10/4/2025 by 11:59pm**

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4-6 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Capstone II.docx**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE
    Integration of
    Knowledge
    25 points
    Thoroughly selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    25
    Briefly selected and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    20
    Vaguely selected
    and present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    15
    Did not select and
    present an
    appropriate
    Evidence Based
    Practice for the
    health problem and
    change.
    0
    Topic Focus
    25 points
    The health problem
    is focused narrowly
    enough for the
    scope of this
    assignment. A topic
    statement provides
    direction for the
    paper. The topic is
    consistently well
    thought out,
    thorough offers
    insight into the topic,
    and includes cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    25
    The health problem
    is focused but
    lacks direction. The
    paper is about a
    specific topic, but
    the writer has not
    established a
    position. The topic
    is somewhat well
    thought out, offers
    limited insight into
    the topic, but does
    not include cited
    evidence to support
    the topic.
    20
    The health problem
    is too broad for the
    scope of this
    assignment.
    15
    The health problem
    is unclear or
    unrelated to the
    discussion topic
    with little or no
    supporting
    evidence.
    0
    Depth of
    Discussion and
    Cohesiveness
    25 points
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in all
    sections of the
    paper.
    Ties together
    information from all
    sources. Paper flows
    from one issue to
    the next with no
    headings. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of the
    relationship among
    material obtained
    from all sources
    Mostly, it ties
    together information
    from all sources.
    In-depth discussion
    and elaboration in
    most sections of
    the paper.
    Mostly, it ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. Paper
    flows with only
    some
    disjointedness. The
    author’s writing
    demonstrates an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    among material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    The writer has
    omitted content.
    Quotations from
    others outweigh the
    writer’s own ideas
    excessively.
    Sometimes ties
    together
    information from all
    sources. The paper
    does not flow.
    Disjointedness is
    apparent. The
    author’s writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    the relationship
    between material
    obtained from all
    sources.
    Cursory discussion
    in all the sections
    of the paper or brief
    discussion in only a
    few sections.
    It does not tie
    together
    information. Paper
    does not flow and
    appears to be
    created from
    disparate issues.
    Headings are
    necessary to link
    concepts. Writing
    does not
    demonstrate an
    understanding of
    any relationship.

    25 20
    15
    0
    Spelling and
    Grammar
    10 points
    Fewer than 5
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization, or
    punctuation errors.
    Required word count
    has been met.
    8
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 25 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    6
    More than 10
    grammatical,
    spelling,
    capitalization &
    punctuation errors
    Required word
    count is 50 words
    below the minimum
    required count.
    5
    An unacceptable
    number of spelling
    and/or grammar
    mistakes.
    Required word
    count is more than
    50 words below the
    minimum required
    count.
    0
    Sources
    10 points
    Over 5 current
    sources, of which at
    least 3 are peer-
    review journal
    articles or scholarly
    books. Sources
    include both general
    background sources
    and specialized
    sources. Special-
    interest sources and
    popular literature
    and acknowledged
    as such if they are
    cited. All websites
    utilized are
    authoritative.
    5 current sources,
    of which at least 2
    are peer-review
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are authoritative.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books. All
    websites utilized
    are credible.
    Fewer than 5
    current sources or
    fewer than 2 of 5
    are peer-reviewed
    journal articles or
    scholarly books.
    Not all websites
    utilized are credible,
    and/or sources are
    not current.
    Citations
    5 points
    Fewer than 5
    incomplete citations
    and/or quotations,
    and APA format
    errors
    5
    More than 5 but
    fewer than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, and
    APA format errors.
    4
    More than 10
    incomplete
    citations and/or
    quotations, or APA
    format errors.
    3
    The citation style is
    inconsistent or
    incorrect. It does
    not cite sources.

    **## Capstone_Part1.1.docx**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    **Lifestyle Modification Education for Obesity Management in Primary Care: A Capstone Proposal**

    The obesity epidemic is a public health problem that disproportionately affects low-income and Hispanic communities, as well as urban communities, and is one of the most crisis-stricken in the United States. These rates are even higher in Miami-Dade County, FL, where more than 67% of adults are either overweight or obese, and need systematic, evidence-based intervention through the primary care channel/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The prevalence of adult obesity nationally has risen to 40.3% from August 2021 to August 2023, and for those who were already overweight, the prevalence of severe obesity was 9.4% over this period (Karam et al., 2025). These figures equate with elevated rates of Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and hypertension – an economic burden for patients and the healthcare system. Nevertheless, few primary care offices have an obesity-focused education program that is consistent from one office to another, and patients are not knowledgeable enough or equipped to lower their body weight to a healthy level. This is a proposed Capstone project: To implement a structured lifestyle modification education program in PC clinics in Miami-Dade County, which will be administered to overweight and obese adults for 8-12 weeks.

    **PICOT Question**

    The clinical question guiding this project is: In overweight or obese adults attending primary care clinics in Miami-Dade County (P), how does structured lifestyle modification education (I), compared to no standardized education (C), affect body weight or BMI reduction (O) over 8–12 weeks (T)? The population consists of adults who are overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese and seek health care in primary care settings in counties with a majority Hispanic and Latino population, and often have challenges with access to nutritious food, health care literacy, and safe recreation areas (Williams et al., 2024). The intervention comprises one-on-one counseling provided by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, behavioral self-monitoring, and goal setting. Comparisons are with the current standard of care—the absence of any structured obesity education, with patients only receiving general clinical advice. The target is to lose a clinically significant amount of weight or BMI (around 5% of body weight compared with baseline level). A properly structured behavioural programme, as evidenced, can actively produce measurable anthropometric changes in 8-12 weeks time (Krishnasamy et al., 2024).

    **Vulnerable Population and Setting**

    The target population includes overweight and obese adults in Miami-Dade County, home to nearly 2.5 million residents, the majority identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The intersecting social determinants of food insecurity, low household income, limited English language ability, and lack of affordable, nutritious food make this community vulnerable. Studies have found that racial and ethnic minorities and adults with low SES are at higher risk for obesity and less likely to access quality obesity treatment (Williams et al., 2024). Cultural dietary habits and community access to physical activity also contribute to weight gain and to the progression of chronic diseases. Primary care clinics are an ideal setting because they are the first point of contact between the patient and the healthcare system, allowing for early detection, frequent monitoring, and reinforcement of healthy behaviors during the intervention period.

    **Review of Evidence**

    There is significant peer-reviewed evidence for the effectiveness of structured lifestyle modification education programs in the primary care setting for weight and BMI reduction. Karam et al. (2025) conducted a review of obesity interventions that utilized primary care settings and identified behavioral therapies, such as motivational interviewing and lifestyle modification counseling, to be consistently associated with clinically significant weight loss, suggesting that APRNs and primary care providers are well-equipped to facilitate these therapies. Krishnasamy et al. (2024) assessed a nurse-led intervention in overweight and obese urban adults and found weight loss, BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure levels to be lower at follow-up; participants' perception of the intervention's success was due to the structured educational material and the ongoing nursing care. A systematic review and meta-analysis by García-Rodríguez et al. (2024) showed that nurse-led interventions resulted in an average weight loss of 2.59 kg, with an average BMI reduction of 1.05 kg/m² and a waist circumference reduction of 2.52 cm compared to traditional care, demonstrating that nurse-led education interventions have a consistent and measurable impact on anthropometric changes across diverse patient populations. Williams et al. (2024) also found that culturally responsive, social determinants of health-focused programming is needed to achieve equity in minority-majority communities like Miami-Dade. Overall, this information demonstrates the viability and efficacy of the intervention selected for the population and intervention setting.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The intervention will be an eight to twelve-week structured lifestyle modification education program provided in primary care clinics by APRNs and trained nurses. The screening of patients will be done during the routine visits according to the standard BMI evaluation, and patients will be enrolled when their BMI ≥ 25 kg/m². It will consist of at least four, 45-60 minute, individually scheduled sessions focusing on nutrition literacy, caloric balance, physical activity guidelines, portion control, and behavioral self-monitoring strategies every two weeks. To meet the linguistic need of Miami-Dade residents, all educational materials will be available in English and Spanish. For assessment of outcomes, anthropometric data such as weight, BMI and waist circumference will be collected at the start and end of the program. The program does not require any specific equipment other than the clinical equipment used in primary care and is designed to be integrated into clinical practice without a large financial investment. The implementation process takes 12 weeks; staff orientation (weeks 1-2), patient education (weeks 3-10) and outcome measurement and documentation (weeks 11-12).

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The project is based on Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (Orem, 1971) and Change Theory (Kurt Lewin, 1962). According to Orem's theory, nursing intervention must be implemented when patients don't know or have the ability to participate in needed self-care behaviors. There is a self care deficit in understanding what patients need to do in terms of diet, exercise and behavior modification for obesity management. The educational program proposed explicitly meets this need, and thus helps patients to learn how to manage their weight on their own for the long term. Isik and Fredland (2023) validated that Orem's theory is applicable to the development of self-care behaviors of patients through structured nursing education, which is very relevant to this intervention. Lewin's Change Theory is a model that helps to understand the process of change within behavioral change and how it can be made easier by unfreezing, changing and refreezing. In the unfreeze stage, patients will identify obesity as a risk factor that can be changed and express readiness for change through motivational discussion.Patients will voice readiness for change and recognize obesity as a modifiable risk in the unfreeze stage through motivational discussion. In the transition period, education will provide encouragement of new behaviors and reinforcement of healthier habits. Follow up visits and tools for self monitoring, embedded in the daily routine, continue to increase improvements in the refreezing stage. As such, the application of Lewin's theory in this primary care obesity education program was supported by the work of Amina et al. (2022) who showed that the theory is effective in guiding systematic improvements in healthcare and maintaining patient outcomes in the long-term. These frameworks work together to foster patient empowerment, evidence-based practice, and sustained patient behavior.

    **Conclusion**

    Obesity disproportionately burdens Miami-Dade County residents and contributes to preventable chronic disease, increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. A proposed evidence-based, structured lifestyle modification education program will be investigated as a way to address the critical lack of standardized obesity counseling offered in primary care within Primary Care Settings, having been inspired by complementary nutrition theories and strong evidence. This Capstone project is intended to achieve measurable BMI and weight loss within this viable, culturally responsive, APRN-led intervention for vulnerable adults over an 8–12 week period. It represents the critical need for advanced practice nursing to make a major contribution that significantly reduces population-level health disparities through education, advocacy, and evidence-based practice in perhaps the most limited setting possible: the quiet realm of routine primary care.

    **References**

    Amina, S., Khan, M. A., & Patel, M. (2022). Application of Lewin's change theory in healthcare practice improvement: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Nursing Management, 30_(4), 1122–1131.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571](https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13571)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023).
    _Adult obesity facts._ U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html)

    García-Rodríguez, R., Vázquez-Rodríguez, A., Bellahmar-Lkadiri, S., Salmonte-Rodríguez, A., Siverio-Díaz, A. R., De Paz-Pérez, P., & García-García, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a nurse-led telehealth intervention to improve adherence to healthy eating and physical activity habits in overweight or obese young adults.
    _Nutrients, 16_(14), 2217.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217)

    Isik, E., & Fredland, N. M. (2023). Orem's self-care deficit nursing theory as a framework for chronic disease self-management: An integrative review.
    _Nursing Science Quarterly, 36_(2), 131–139.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357](https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231153357)

    Karam, G., Agarwal, A., Sadeghirad, B., Jalink, M., Hitchcock, C. L., Ge, L., Bhatt, M., Zea, A. M., Milovanovic, M., Choudhuri, S., & Johnston, B. C. (2025). Addressing the challenge of obesity in primary care: A review of effective interventions and implementation strategies.
    _Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 17_(1), 108.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01925-z)

    Krishnasamy, V., Jayaram, K. M., & Jayaseelan, V. (2024). A qualitative exploration of participants' experiences in a randomized controlled trial of weight reduction through a nurse-led intervention.
    _Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13_(1), 368. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1299_23Williams, M. S., McKinney, S. J., & Cheskin, L. J. (2024). Social and structural determinants of health and social injustices contributing to obesity disparities.
    _Current Obe sity Reports, 13_(3), 567–578.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-024-00578-9)

  • [Solved] writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering writing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Quality and safety proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need help with formulating a PowerPoint presentation. Choosing the topic as Fall and fall related injuries in adult patients, post-surgery patients, post stroke patients. – [\ \ QualitySafetyProposal-Su26NURS301-02Transitions-MinnesotaStateUnive.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/qualitysafetyp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need help with formulating a PowerPoint presentation. Choosing the topic as Fall and fall related injuries in adult patients, post-surgery patients, post stroke patients.

    – [\
    \
    QualitySafetyProposal-Su26NURS301-02Transitions-MinnesotaStateUnive.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/qualitysafetyproposal-su26nurs301-02transitions-minnesotastateunive-pdf "QualitySafetyProposal-Su26NURS301-02Transitions-MinnesotaStateUnive.pdf")

  • [Solved] Provider attitudes

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## Providerattitudes.docx – Ukwuomaetal2023AttitudesBPD.pdf – DeLucia2024Providerattitudesautism.pdf **## Providerattitudes.docx** **Please follow APA format, add citations and references from the articles. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!** **Topic:** …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## Providerattitudes.docx

    – Ukwuomaetal2023AttitudesBPD.pdf
    – DeLucia2024Providerattitudesautism.pdf

    **## Providerattitudes.docx**

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references from the articles. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Topic:** **Provider attitudes**

    Please read the article in the Week 4 Readings

    The peer-reviewed literature is full of articles that examine provider attitudes. I have provided some articles as examples. Please provide in your discussion and responses how provider attitudes influence clinical decision making with respect to mental health and/or psychiatry. I am looking specifically for provider attitudes toward individuals with particular diagnoses.
    I am not looking for provider attitudes toward particular sociological and cultural characteristics.

    All references correctly must me cited in APA style. Please observe conventions of APA style as outlines in chapters two and three of the APA manual. I am strict with APA.

    **Do not use email – Your responses should be posted on the discussion board within your assigned group.**

    **You must search and cite two original peer-reviewed articles from the literature as your original discussion post (about 250 words).** You will then offer two brief (100 words) responses to your peers with at least one original peer-reviewed article.

    _Each student is expected to fully engage in these online discussions. You are responsible for an original post and at least two responses each week._

    Post your response and discuss answers through Sunday in your Group Discussion Board.

    The rubric.

    2 points
    **not** gained for incorrect or improper APA

    2 points
    **not** gained for failure to post initial discussion

    1 points
    **not** gained for failing to hand in a discussion response

    **Please read the instructions. Although I may be interested in your opinions and personal experiences outside of the class; however, for the sake of this class, I am not. Your postings should not express agreement, absolutes, opinion, or place a value on your peers comments. I asks that you simply expand from the scientific literature based on the postings.**

    **Postings should not appear like journalism, chats, or social media.**

    **Ukwuomaetal2023AttitudesBPD.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ukwuomaetal2023attitudesbpd-pdf)

    **DeLucia2024Providerattitudesautism.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/delucia2024providerattitudesautism-pdf)

    **DeLucia2024Providerattitudesautism.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/delucia2024providerattitudesautism-pdf)

    **## Providerattitudes.docx**

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references from the articles. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Topic:** **Provider attitudes**

    Please read the article in the Week 4 Readings

    The peer-reviewed literature is full of articles that examine provider attitudes. I have provided some articles as examples. Please provide in your discussion and responses how provider attitudes influence clinical decision making with respect to mental health and/or psychiatry. I am looking specifically for provider attitudes toward individuals with particular diagnoses.
    I am not looking for provider attitudes toward particular sociological and cultural characteristics.

    All references correctly must me cited in APA style. Please observe conventions of APA style as outlines in chapters two and three of the APA manual. I am strict with APA.

    **Do not use email – Your responses should be posted on the discussion board within your assigned group.**

    **You must search and cite two original peer-reviewed articles from the literature as your original discussion post (about 250 words).** You will then offer two brief (100 words) responses to your peers with at least one original peer-reviewed article.

    _Each student is expected to fully engage in these online discussions. You are responsible for an original post and at least two responses each week._

    Post your response and discuss answers through Sunday in your Group Discussion Board.

    The rubric.

    2 points
    **not** gained for incorrect or improper APA

    2 points
    **not** gained for failure to post initial discussion

    1 points
    **not** gained for failing to hand in a discussion response

    **Please read the instructions. Although I may be interested in your opinions and personal experiences outside of the class; however, for the sake of this class, I am not. Your postings should not express agreement, absolutes, opinion, or place a value on your peers comments. I asks that you simply expand from the scientific literature based on the postings.**

    **Postings should not appear like journalism, chats, or social media.**

    **Ukwuomaetal2023AttitudesBPD.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ukwuomaetal2023attitudesbpd-pdf)

    **DeLucia2024Providerattitudesautism.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/delucia2024providerattitudesautism-pdf)

    **## Providerattitudes.docx**

    **Please follow APA format, add citations and references from the articles. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!**

    **Topic:** **Provider attitudes**

    Please read the article in the Week 4 Readings

    The peer-reviewed literature is full of articles that examine provider attitudes. I have provided some articles as examples. Please provide in your discussion and responses how provider attitudes influence clinical decision making with respect to mental health and/or psychiatry. I am looking specifically for provider attitudes toward individuals with particular diagnoses.
    I am not looking for provider attitudes toward particular sociological and cultural characteristics.

    All references correctly must me cited in APA style. Please observe conventions of APA style as outlines in chapters two and three of the APA manual. I am strict with APA.

    **Do not use email – Your responses should be posted on the discussion board within your assigned group.**

    **You must search and cite two original peer-reviewed articles from the literature as your original discussion post (about 250 words).** You will then offer two brief (100 words) responses to your peers with at least one original peer-reviewed article.

    _Each student is expected to fully engage in these online discussions. You are responsible for an original post and at least two responses each week._

    Post your response and discuss answers through Sunday in your Group Discussion Board.

    The rubric.

    2 points
    **not** gained for incorrect or improper APA

    2 points
    **not** gained for failure to post initial discussion

    1 points
    **not** gained for failing to hand in a discussion response

    **Please read the instructions. Although I may be interested in your opinions and personal experiences outside of the class; however, for the sake of this class, I am not. Your postings should not express agreement, absolutes, opinion, or place a value on your peers comments. I asks that you simply expand from the scientific literature based on the postings.**

    **Postings should not appear like journalism, chats, or social media.**

    **Ukwuomaetal2023AttitudesBPD.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ukwuomaetal2023attitudesbpd-pdf)

    **DeLucia2024Providerattitudesautism.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/delucia2024providerattitudesautism-pdf)

  • [Solved] Nursing Your Project Assignment is to prepare a PowerPoint presentation about Organizational Change. You can discuss reasons for change, resistance to change, overcoming and dealing with change, and/or managing change.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Your Project Assignment is to prepare a PowerPoint presentation about Organizational Change. You can discuss reasons for change, resistance to change, overcoming and dealing with change, and/or managing change. You can also use examples about how this occurs in specific companies or industries. The …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Your Project Assignment is to prepare a PowerPoint presentation about Organizational Change. You can discuss reasons for change, resistance to change, overcoming and dealing with change, and/or managing change. You can also use examples about how this occurs in specific companies or industries. The choice is yours, however research and cited sources are required. Be sure to include a Reference slide with at least 3 references listed in APA format. You need a minimum of 10 slides but no more than 15 slides with researched content included, and 1 title slide and 1 reference slide. The title slide and reference slides are in addition to the content slides. You can use the textbook as one of your references, but you will need to use two other sources from the Keiser Online Library to support your research. Be sure to include in-text citations on every slide to support your sources.

  • [Solved] Contraception / IVF

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    answer the following: 01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual intercourse. 02. Difference between reproduction and procreation. 03. What are the two dimensions of intimacy? 04. Contraception: – What is it? – What is the intention of contraception? – Describe the three types of artificial con…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    answer the following:

    01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual intercourse.
    02. Difference between reproduction and procreation.
    03. What are the two dimensions of intimacy?
    04. Contraception:
    – What is it?
    – What is the intention of contraception?
    – Describe the three types of artificial contraception.
    – Risks / Side effects
    – Bioethical analysis and unfair dynamics of artificial contraception.
    05. Non-Therapeutic sterilization; bioethical analysis
    06. Principle of double effect; explain
    07. Bioethical analysis of:
    – Ectopic pregnancy
    – Cancerous reproductive system with pregnancy
    08. In Vitro Fertilization(IVF):
    – Process
    – Bioethical analysis of IVF
    09. Bioethical analysis of “to have a child”
    10. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #: 40, 41, 42, 48, 52, 53.
    11. https://www.usccb.org/resources/ethical-religious-directives-catholic-health-service-sixth-edition-2016-06_0.pdf

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – The post is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
    – If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style.

  • [Solved] W3A

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## SSW3A.docx – ## EvidenceMatrix.docx **## SSW3A.docx** For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem. **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & M…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## SSW3A.docx

    – ## EvidenceMatrix.docx

    **## SSW3A.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & MEDICATION SAFETY IN OLDER ADULTS**

    A. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.

    B. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/w3a-20975419)

    ## image1.png

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

    **## SSW3A.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & MEDICATION SAFETY IN OLDER ADULTS**

    A. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.

    B. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/w3a-20975419)

    ## image1.png

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

    **## SSW3A.docx**

    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    **TOPIC: POLYPHARMACY & MEDICATION SAFETY IN OLDER ADULTS**

    A. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.

    B. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.

    C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The introduction is original work and logically organized.

    · The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/w3a-20975419)

    ## image1.png

    **## EvidenceMatrix.docx**

    **Evidence Matrix**

    **Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Author** | **Journal**<br>**Name/ Year of Publication** | **Research Design** | **Sample Size** | **Outcome Variables Measured** | **Quality**<br>**(A, B, C)** | **Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion** |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |
    | | | | | | | |

    Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study

    Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.

    Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:

    A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

    B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

    C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

  • [Solved] Nursing ASSIGNMENT 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## QIAsignment3Inst.docx **## QIAsignment3Inst.docx** **_Assignment 3_** **_Intervention Study Proposal Related to CMS Quality Indicator_** Building on the action plan developed in the previous module to meet the CMS Quality Indicator selected. · What evidence will need to be collect…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## QIAsignment3Inst.docx

    **## QIAsignment3Inst.docx**

    **_Assignment 3_**

    **_Intervention Study Proposal Related to CMS Quality Indicator_**

    Building on the action plan developed in the previous module to meet the CMS Quality Indicator selected.

    · What evidence will need to be collected?

    · Design a pilot study that could lead to a full intervention study to facilitate the evidence gathering.

    · Include the problem being studied, purpose of the study, research question(s), innovation being recommended and strategies to measure its effectiveness.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    **## QIAsignment3Inst.docx**

    **_Assignment 3_**

    **_Intervention Study Proposal Related to CMS Quality Indicator_**

    Building on the action plan developed in the previous module to meet the CMS Quality Indicator selected.

    · What evidence will need to be collected?

    · Design a pilot study that could lead to a full intervention study to facilitate the evidence gathering.

    · Include the problem being studied, purpose of the study, research question(s), innovation being recommended and strategies to measure its effectiveness.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.