Tag: Care Plans

  • [Solved] When nurses participate in government, what impact can they have on the health care system? How can nurses impact the outcome of legal issues related to nursing and health care?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Contribute a minimum of 450 words for your initial post. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted, and cited in APA. When nurses participate in government, what impact can they have on the health care system? How can nurses impact the outcome of legal issues related to nursing and he…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Contribute a minimum of 450 words for your initial post. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted, and cited in APA.

    When nurses participate in government, what impact can they have on the health care system? How can nurses impact the outcome of legal issues related to nursing and health care?

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Week 4 DB Response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## response1week4.pdf **## response1week4.pdf** Table 1: Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Table 2: Postpartum Mental Health and Physical Disorders Mental Health Disorders Classificat ion Definition Gestatio nal Age in Weeks Maternal BP Proteinuria S ei z ur e s Gestat…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response1week4.pdf

    **## response1week4.pdf**

    Table 1: Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

    Table 2: Postpartum Mental Health and Physical Disorders

    Mental Health Disorders

    Classificat
    ion Definition

    Gestatio
    nal Age

    in Weeks

    Maternal
    BP Proteinuria

    S
    ei
    z
    ur
    e
    s

    Gestation
    al HTN

    New-onset HTN without
    proteinuria or end-organ
    dysfunction

    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    on 2
    occasion
    s

    No
    N
    o

    Mild
    Preeclam
    psia

    HTN with proteinuria or signs of
    mild end-organ dysfunction

    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    but
    <160/110

    Yes (≥300
    mg/24h or
    ≥1+ dipstick)

    N
    o

    Severe
    Preeclam
    psia

    Preeclampsia with severe
    features (e.g., high BP,
    thrombocytopenia, elevated
    LFTs)

    >20
    weeks ≥160/110 Yes

    N
    o

    Eclampsia
    Preeclampsia with seizures not
    attributable to other causes

    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    (may
    vary)

    Yes
    Y
    es

    Chronic
    HTN

    HTN diagnosed before 20 weeks
    or persists >12 weeks
    postpartum

    <20
    weeks or
    pre-
    existing

    ≥140/90
    No (unless
    superimpos
    ed)

    N
    o

    Superimp
    osed
    Preeclam
    psia

    Chronic HTN with new-onset
    proteinuria or worsening BP/
    organ dysfunction

    Any,
    usually
    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    (worseni
    ng trend)

    Yes
    N
    o

    Conditi
    on Definition Signs and Symptoms Management

    Postpar
    tum
    Blues

    Transient mood
    disturbance in first
    few days after
    delivery

    Crying, mood swings, irritability,
    anxiety, sleep disturbance;
    resolves <2 weeks

    Reassurance,
    support,
    monitoring

    Postpar
    tum
    Depres
    sion

    Major depressive
    episode within 12
    months postpartum

    Sadness, hopelessness, loss of
    interest, sleep/appetite
    changes, suicidal ideation

    Psychotherapy,
    SSRIs (e.g.,
    sertraline),
    screening

    Postpar
    tum
    OCD

    Obsessions and/or
    compulsions related
    to infant safety

    Intrusive thoughts (e.g., harm to
    infant), compulsive behaviors,
    intense distress

    CBT, SSRIs,
    psychiatric referral

    Postpar
    tum
    Psycho
    sis

    Rare, severe
    psychiatric
    emergency
    postpartum

    Delusions, hallucinations, mood
    swings, confusion, disorganized
    thinking

    Hospitalization,
    antipsychotics,
    safety precautions

    Postpartum Physical Conditions

    SOAP Note – Prenatal Visit

    Patient: Hannah (female)
    Age: 38
    Gravida/Para: G1P0
    Gestational Age: 32 weeks EGA

    Subjective

    Chief Complaint:
    "I’ve had a headache that won’t go away and I just don’t feel right."

    Condition Definition Presentation (Signs
    and Symptoms) Management

    Puerperal
    Fever

    Fever ≥100.4°F on
    ≥2 days postpartum
    (excluding day 1)

    Uterine tenderness, foul
    lochia, chills,
    tachycardia, elevated
    WBC

    Broad-spectrum
    antibiotics (e.g.,
    clindamycin +
    gentamicin)

    Postpartum
    Hematoma

    Collection of blood
    in vulva/vagina/
    pelvis after delivery

    Severe perineal pain,
    swelling, visible mass,
    hypotension (if large)

    Small: Ice, analgesia;
    Large: surgical
    evacuation

    Secondary
    Postpartum
    Hemorrhage

    Excessive bleeding
    >24h to 6 weeks
    postpartum

    Persistent bright red
    bleeding, passage of
    clots, uterine
    subinvolution

    Uterotonics, D&C for
    retained products,
    antibiotics if infected

    Sore
    Nipples

    Common during
    early breastfeeding

    Nipple pain, cracking,
    bleeding, latch pain

    Improve latch, lanolin,
    breast shields,
    lactation consult

    Mastitis
    Inflammation of
    breast tissue (often
    due to infection)

    Unilateral breast pain,
    redness, fever, flu-like
    symptoms

    Continue
    breastfeeding,
    antibiotics (e.g.,
    dicloxacillin)

    Breast
    Abscess

    Localized pus
    collection in breast

    Painful, fluctuant mass,
    erythema, fever

    Drainage (needle
    aspiration or I&D),
    antibiotics

    HPI:
    Hannah is a 38-year-old primigravida at 32 weeks gestation presenting for a routine prenatal
    visit. She reports experiencing a persistent, dull headache for the past 7 days that has not
    responded to acetaminophen. She also describes a general sense of malaise and “not feeling
    right.” She denies visual disturbances, nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, chest pain, shortness of
    breath, or recent illness. Fetal movements are present and normal.

    Obstetric History:

    • G1P0

    • No complications reported until this visit

    Medical History:

    • No known chronic conditions

    • No history of chronic hypertension or preeclampsia

    Medications:

    • Prenatal vitamins

    • Acetaminophen PRN (for headache)

    Allergies:

    • NKDA

    Social History:

    • Non-smoker, no alcohol or drug use

    • Supportive home environment

    ROS:

    • Neuro: Persistent headache

    • GU: No dysuria, vaginal bleeding, or leakage

    • Cardio/Resp: No chest pain, dyspnea

    • GI: No nausea, vomiting, or RUQ pain

    • Vision: No changes or disturbances reported

    • MSK: No swelling noted by patient

    O – Objective

    Vitals:

    • BP: 156/96 mmHg (repeated and confirmed)

    • HR: 86 bpm

    • RR: 16

    • Temp: 98.6°F

    • Weight: [Insert]

    • Fundal height: 32 cm

    • Fetal heart rate: 140 bpm (normal)

    • Fetal movement: Present by maternal report

    Physical Exam:

    • General: Alert, mildly anxious

    • HEENT: Normocephalic, no sinus tenderness

    • CV: Regular rhythm, no murmurs

    • Lungs: Clear to auscultation bilaterally

    • Abdomen: Non-tender, fundal height appropriate

    • Extremities: No significant edema noted

    • Neuro: No focal deficits, reflexes slightly brisk (3+)

    • Urine dip: 2+ proteinuria

    A – Assessment

    Primary Diagnosis:

    • Preeclampsia with severe features

    o ICD-10: O14.13 – Severe preeclampsia, third trimester

    Rationale:
    BP >140/90 with proteinuria and symptoms (persistent headache, not relieved by medication)
    indicates preeclampsia with severe features per ACOG criteria.

    P – Plan

    Immediate Management:

    • Hospital admission for further evaluation and management

    • Labs ordered:

    o CBC with platelets

    o CMP (AST/ALT, creatinine)

    o LDH

    o Coagulation profile

    o 24-hour urine collection or protein/creatinine ratio

    • Fetal monitoring:

    o Non-stress test (NST)

    o Biophysical profile (BPP)

    o Ultrasound for fetal growth and amniotic fluid index

    Medications/Interventions:

    • Labetalol or hydralazine IV as needed to control BP per hospital protocol

    • Magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis

    • Corticosteroids (e.g., betamethasone 12 mg IM q24h × 2) if delivery anticipated <34 weeks

    Education:

    • Explained signs of worsening preeclampsia (severe headache, visual changes, RUQ pain,
    reduced fetal movement)

    • Importance of hospital monitoring for maternal and fetal safety

    • Possible need for early delivery if condition worsens

    Follow-up:

    • Inpatient monitoring and coordination with OB/MFM team

    • Continued prenatal care per high-risk protocol

    1. Subjective

    a. Relevant HPI Questions:

    • When did the headache start? Describe its location, intensity, and whether it's continuous or
    intermittent.

    • Does the headache worsen with light, noise, or activity?

    • Are there any visual symptoms (blurred vision, flashing lights, scotomata)?

    • Do you have any upper abdominal (RUQ) pain?

    • Any nausea, vomiting, or swelling in your hands, face, or feet?

    • Fetal movement – has it changed?

    • Any recent illness, infections, or trauma?

    b. Medical History Questions:

    • Do you have a history of high blood pressure or kidney disease?

    • Any autoimmune disorders (e.g., lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome)?

    • Are you currently taking any medications, including over-the-counter or herbal supplements?

    • Any allergies or history of migraines?

    c. OB History Questions:

    • Have you had any complications so far in this pregnancy?

    • Any prior pregnancies, losses, or fertility treatments?

    • Results of prior ultrasounds or labs during this pregnancy?

    • Have you had any bleeding, cramping, or leaking fluid?

    2. Objective

    a. Physical Assessment:

    • Vitals: Blood pressure (repeat in both arms, after 5 mins of rest), pulse, temperature,
    respiratory rate, weight.

    • General appearance: Distress, alertness, signs of pain or swelling.

    • Neurological: Mental status, deep tendon reflexes (DTRs), clonus.

    • Cardiovascular: Heart sounds, edema in extremities.

    • Pulmonary: Breath sounds (rales/crackles may suggest pulmonary edema).

    • Abdomen: Fundal height, fetal movement, tenderness, RUQ or epigastric pain.

    • OB exam: Fetal heart tones (FHT), Leopold's maneuvers.

    b. Tests to Order and Rationale:

    • CBC with platelets: Check for thrombocytopenia (part of severe features).

    • CMP (LFTs, creatinine): Evaluate liver enzymes and renal function.

    • LDH: Marker of hemolysis.

    • Urine protein/creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine protein: Quantify proteinuria.

    • Non-stress test (NST): Assess fetal well-being.

    • Ultrasound: Assess fetal growth, amniotic fluid, and Dopplers if growth-restriction
    suspected.

    • Magnesium sulfate eligibility screen: For seizure prophylaxis.

    3. Assessment/Diagnosis

    a. Primary Diagnosis:

    • Preeclampsia with severe features

    o ICD-10: O14.13 – Severe preeclampsia, third trimester

    b. Differential Diagnoses:

    • Chronic hypertension with proteinuria (unlikely given gestational timing)

    • Migraine headache (no visual aura or typical features)

    • Gestational hypertension (but proteinuria and symptoms point beyond this)

    • HELLP syndrome (if labs show hemolysis, elevated LFTs, low platelets)

    • 4. Plan

    a. Outpatient Management?

    • No. This cannot be safely managed outpatient due to:

    o Severe range BP (≥160 systolic or ≥110 diastolic)

    o Persistent headache (a severe feature)

    o Proteinuria + systemic symptoms

    o Risk of rapid decompensation for mother and fetus

    b. Inpatient Management? Why?

    • Yes, inpatient is required for:

    o Close BP and neurological monitoring

    o Lab surveillance for HELLP or eclampsia

    o Seizure prophylaxis (magnesium sulfate)

    o Fetal monitoring for distress

    o Potential delivery if maternal or fetal conditions worsen

    c. Outpatient Plan (if symptoms were milder):
    N/A in this case due to severe features.

    d. Inpatient Plan:

    • Medications:

    o Magnesium sulfate IV for seizure prophylaxis

    o Labetalol or hydralazine IV for BP control

    o Corticosteroids (betamethasone 12 mg IM x 2 doses) if <34 weeks for fetal lung maturity

    • Tests:

    o Serial BP and neuro checks (q4h or more frequent)

    o Daily labs (CBC, CMP, LDH)

    o Continuous fetal monitoring

    o Ultrasound with Dopplers and amniotic fluid index

    • Discharge Planning:

    o If stabilized and not delivered: home on oral antihypertensives, twice-weekly NSTs, weekly
    labs, and BP checks

    o If delivered: follow up in 1–2 weeks post-discharge with BP monitoring and depression
    screening

    e. Patient Education:

    • Warning signs of worsening: severe headache, vision changes, RUQ pain, decreased fetal
    movement

    • Importance of medication compliance and follow-up visits

    • Rest and avoid high-sodium foods

    • Possible need for early delivery

    • Educate on signs of postpartum preeclampsia and eclampsia

    f. Complications if Untreated:

    • Maternal risks: Eclampsia (seizures), stroke, pulmonary edema, liver rupture, renal failure,
    HELLP syndrome, death

    • Fetal risks: IUGR, placental abruption, hypoxia, preterm delivery, stillbirth

    – Postpartum Physical Conditions
    – SOAP Note – Prenatal Visit

    – O – Objective
    – A – Assessment
    – P – Plan

    – 1. Subjective
    – 2. Objective
    – 3. Assessment/Diagnosis

    **## response1week4.pdf**

    Table 1: Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

    Table 2: Postpartum Mental Health and Physical Disorders

    Mental Health Disorders

    Classificat
    ion Definition

    Gestatio
    nal Age

    in Weeks

    Maternal
    BP Proteinuria

    S
    ei
    z
    ur
    e
    s

    Gestation
    al HTN

    New-onset HTN without
    proteinuria or end-organ
    dysfunction

    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    on 2
    occasion
    s

    No
    N
    o

    Mild
    Preeclam
    psia

    HTN with proteinuria or signs of
    mild end-organ dysfunction

    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    but
    <160/110

    Yes (≥300
    mg/24h or
    ≥1+ dipstick)

    N
    o

    Severe
    Preeclam
    psia

    Preeclampsia with severe
    features (e.g., high BP,
    thrombocytopenia, elevated
    LFTs)

    >20
    weeks ≥160/110 Yes

    N
    o

    Eclampsia
    Preeclampsia with seizures not
    attributable to other causes

    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    (may
    vary)

    Yes
    Y
    es

    Chronic
    HTN

    HTN diagnosed before 20 weeks
    or persists >12 weeks
    postpartum

    <20
    weeks or
    pre-
    existing

    ≥140/90
    No (unless
    superimpos
    ed)

    N
    o

    Superimp
    osed
    Preeclam
    psia

    Chronic HTN with new-onset
    proteinuria or worsening BP/
    organ dysfunction

    Any,
    usually
    >20
    weeks

    ≥140/90
    (worseni
    ng trend)

    Yes
    N
    o

    Conditi
    on Definition Signs and Symptoms Management

    Postpar
    tum
    Blues

    Transient mood
    disturbance in first
    few days after
    delivery

    Crying, mood swings, irritability,
    anxiety, sleep disturbance;
    resolves <2 weeks

    Reassurance,
    support,
    monitoring

    Postpar
    tum
    Depres
    sion

    Major depressive
    episode within 12
    months postpartum

    Sadness, hopelessness, loss of
    interest, sleep/appetite
    changes, suicidal ideation

    Psychotherapy,
    SSRIs (e.g.,
    sertraline),
    screening

    Postpar
    tum
    OCD

    Obsessions and/or
    compulsions related
    to infant safety

    Intrusive thoughts (e.g., harm to
    infant), compulsive behaviors,
    intense distress

    CBT, SSRIs,
    psychiatric referral

    Postpar
    tum
    Psycho
    sis

    Rare, severe
    psychiatric
    emergency
    postpartum

    Delusions, hallucinations, mood
    swings, confusion, disorganized
    thinking

    Hospitalization,
    antipsychotics,
    safety precautions

    Postpartum Physical Conditions

    SOAP Note – Prenatal Visit

    Patient: Hannah (female)
    Age: 38
    Gravida/Para: G1P0
    Gestational Age: 32 weeks EGA

    Subjective

    Chief Complaint:
    "I’ve had a headache that won’t go away and I just don’t feel right."

    Condition Definition Presentation (Signs
    and Symptoms) Management

    Puerperal
    Fever

    Fever ≥100.4°F on
    ≥2 days postpartum
    (excluding day 1)

    Uterine tenderness, foul
    lochia, chills,
    tachycardia, elevated
    WBC

    Broad-spectrum
    antibiotics (e.g.,
    clindamycin +
    gentamicin)

    Postpartum
    Hematoma

    Collection of blood
    in vulva/vagina/
    pelvis after delivery

    Severe perineal pain,
    swelling, visible mass,
    hypotension (if large)

    Small: Ice, analgesia;
    Large: surgical
    evacuation

    Secondary
    Postpartum
    Hemorrhage

    Excessive bleeding
    >24h to 6 weeks
    postpartum

    Persistent bright red
    bleeding, passage of
    clots, uterine
    subinvolution

    Uterotonics, D&C for
    retained products,
    antibiotics if infected

    Sore
    Nipples

    Common during
    early breastfeeding

    Nipple pain, cracking,
    bleeding, latch pain

    Improve latch, lanolin,
    breast shields,
    lactation consult

    Mastitis
    Inflammation of
    breast tissue (often
    due to infection)

    Unilateral breast pain,
    redness, fever, flu-like
    symptoms

    Continue
    breastfeeding,
    antibiotics (e.g.,
    dicloxacillin)

    Breast
    Abscess

    Localized pus
    collection in breast

    Painful, fluctuant mass,
    erythema, fever

    Drainage (needle
    aspiration or I&D),
    antibiotics

    HPI:
    Hannah is a 38-year-old primigravida at 32 weeks gestation presenting for a routine prenatal
    visit. She reports experiencing a persistent, dull headache for the past 7 days that has not
    responded to acetaminophen. She also describes a general sense of malaise and “not feeling
    right.” She denies visual disturbances, nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, chest pain, shortness of
    breath, or recent illness. Fetal movements are present and normal.

    Obstetric History:

    • G1P0

    • No complications reported until this visit

    Medical History:

    • No known chronic conditions

    • No history of chronic hypertension or preeclampsia

    Medications:

    • Prenatal vitamins

    • Acetaminophen PRN (for headache)

    Allergies:

    • NKDA

    Social History:

    • Non-smoker, no alcohol or drug use

    • Supportive home environment

    ROS:

    • Neuro: Persistent headache

    • GU: No dysuria, vaginal bleeding, or leakage

    • Cardio/Resp: No chest pain, dyspnea

    • GI: No nausea, vomiting, or RUQ pain

    • Vision: No changes or disturbances reported

    • MSK: No swelling noted by patient

    O – Objective

    Vitals:

    • BP: 156/96 mmHg (repeated and confirmed)

    • HR: 86 bpm

    • RR: 16

    • Temp: 98.6°F

    • Weight: [Insert]

    • Fundal height: 32 cm

    • Fetal heart rate: 140 bpm (normal)

    • Fetal movement: Present by maternal report

    Physical Exam:

    • General: Alert, mildly anxious

    • HEENT: Normocephalic, no sinus tenderness

    • CV: Regular rhythm, no murmurs

    • Lungs: Clear to auscultation bilaterally

    • Abdomen: Non-tender, fundal height appropriate

    • Extremities: No significant edema noted

    • Neuro: No focal deficits, reflexes slightly brisk (3+)

    • Urine dip: 2+ proteinuria

    A – Assessment

    Primary Diagnosis:

    • Preeclampsia with severe features

    o ICD-10: O14.13 – Severe preeclampsia, third trimester

    Rationale:
    BP >140/90 with proteinuria and symptoms (persistent headache, not relieved by medication)
    indicates preeclampsia with severe features per ACOG criteria.

    P – Plan

    Immediate Management:

    • Hospital admission for further evaluation and management

    • Labs ordered:

    o CBC with platelets

    o CMP (AST/ALT, creatinine)

    o LDH

    o Coagulation profile

    o 24-hour urine collection or protein/creatinine ratio

    • Fetal monitoring:

    o Non-stress test (NST)

    o Biophysical profile (BPP)

    o Ultrasound for fetal growth and amniotic fluid index

    Medications/Interventions:

    • Labetalol or hydralazine IV as needed to control BP per hospital protocol

    • Magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis

    • Corticosteroids (e.g., betamethasone 12 mg IM q24h × 2) if delivery anticipated <34 weeks

    Education:

    • Explained signs of worsening preeclampsia (severe headache, visual changes, RUQ pain,
    reduced fetal movement)

    • Importance of hospital monitoring for maternal and fetal safety

    • Possible need for early delivery if condition worsens

    Follow-up:

    • Inpatient monitoring and coordination with OB/MFM team

    • Continued prenatal care per high-risk protocol

    1. Subjective

    a. Relevant HPI Questions:

    • When did the headache start? Describe its location, intensity, and whether it's continuous or
    intermittent.

    • Does the headache worsen with light, noise, or activity?

    • Are there any visual symptoms (blurred vision, flashing lights, scotomata)?

    • Do you have any upper abdominal (RUQ) pain?

    • Any nausea, vomiting, or swelling in your hands, face, or feet?

    • Fetal movement – has it changed?

    • Any recent illness, infections, or trauma?

    b. Medical History Questions:

    • Do you have a history of high blood pressure or kidney disease?

    • Any autoimmune disorders (e.g., lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome)?

    • Are you currently taking any medications, including over-the-counter or herbal supplements?

    • Any allergies or history of migraines?

    c. OB History Questions:

    • Have you had any complications so far in this pregnancy?

    • Any prior pregnancies, losses, or fertility treatments?

    • Results of prior ultrasounds or labs during this pregnancy?

    • Have you had any bleeding, cramping, or leaking fluid?

    2. Objective

    a. Physical Assessment:

    • Vitals: Blood pressure (repeat in both arms, after 5 mins of rest), pulse, temperature,
    respiratory rate, weight.

    • General appearance: Distress, alertness, signs of pain or swelling.

    • Neurological: Mental status, deep tendon reflexes (DTRs), clonus.

    • Cardiovascular: Heart sounds, edema in extremities.

    • Pulmonary: Breath sounds (rales/crackles may suggest pulmonary edema).

    • Abdomen: Fundal height, fetal movement, tenderness, RUQ or epigastric pain.

    • OB exam: Fetal heart tones (FHT), Leopold's maneuvers.

    b. Tests to Order and Rationale:

    • CBC with platelets: Check for thrombocytopenia (part of severe features).

    • CMP (LFTs, creatinine): Evaluate liver enzymes and renal function.

    • LDH: Marker of hemolysis.

    • Urine protein/creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine protein: Quantify proteinuria.

    • Non-stress test (NST): Assess fetal well-being.

    • Ultrasound: Assess fetal growth, amniotic fluid, and Dopplers if growth-restriction
    suspected.

    • Magnesium sulfate eligibility screen: For seizure prophylaxis.

    3. Assessment/Diagnosis

    a. Primary Diagnosis:

    • Preeclampsia with severe features

    o ICD-10: O14.13 – Severe preeclampsia, third trimester

    b. Differential Diagnoses:

    • Chronic hypertension with proteinuria (unlikely given gestational timing)

    • Migraine headache (no visual aura or typical features)

    • Gestational hypertension (but proteinuria and symptoms point beyond this)

    • HELLP syndrome (if labs show hemolysis, elevated LFTs, low platelets)

    • 4. Plan

    a. Outpatient Management?

    • No. This cannot be safely managed outpatient due to:

    o Severe range BP (≥160 systolic or ≥110 diastolic)

    o Persistent headache (a severe feature)

    o Proteinuria + systemic symptoms

    o Risk of rapid decompensation for mother and fetus

    b. Inpatient Management? Why?

    • Yes, inpatient is required for:

    o Close BP and neurological monitoring

    o Lab surveillance for HELLP or eclampsia

    o Seizure prophylaxis (magnesium sulfate)

    o Fetal monitoring for distress

    o Potential delivery if maternal or fetal conditions worsen

    c. Outpatient Plan (if symptoms were milder):
    N/A in this case due to severe features.

    d. Inpatient Plan:

    • Medications:

    o Magnesium sulfate IV for seizure prophylaxis

    o Labetalol or hydralazine IV for BP control

    o Corticosteroids (betamethasone 12 mg IM x 2 doses) if <34 weeks for fetal lung maturity

    • Tests:

    o Serial BP and neuro checks (q4h or more frequent)

    o Daily labs (CBC, CMP, LDH)

    o Continuous fetal monitoring

    o Ultrasound with Dopplers and amniotic fluid index

    • Discharge Planning:

    o If stabilized and not delivered: home on oral antihypertensives, twice-weekly NSTs, weekly
    labs, and BP checks

    o If delivered: follow up in 1–2 weeks post-discharge with BP monitoring and depression
    screening

    e. Patient Education:

    • Warning signs of worsening: severe headache, vision changes, RUQ pain, decreased fetal
    movement

    • Importance of medication compliance and follow-up visits

    • Rest and avoid high-sodium foods

    • Possible need for early delivery

    • Educate on signs of postpartum preeclampsia and eclampsia

    f. Complications if Untreated:

    • Maternal risks: Eclampsia (seizures), stroke, pulmonary edema, liver rupture, renal failure,
    HELLP syndrome, death

    • Fetal risks: IUGR, placental abruption, hypoxia, preterm delivery, stillbirth

    – Postpartum Physical Conditions
    – SOAP Note – Prenatal Visit

    – O – Objective
    – A – Assessment
    – P – Plan

    – 1. Subjective
    – 2. Objective
    – 3. Assessment/Diagnosis

  • [Solved] Week 1: Discussion RESPONSEs

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Respond** to **at least two** of your colleagues on **2 different days** and respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. In your explanation, include why their explanations make physiological sense or why they do not. – [\ \ NURS-6501-WEEK1-COLLEGU…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Respond** to **at least two** of your colleagues on **2 different days** and respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. In your explanation, include why their explanations make physiological sense or why they do not.

    – [\
    \
    NURS-6501-WEEK1-COLLEGUERESPONSES.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs-6501-week1-collegueresponses-docx "NURS-6501-WEEK1-COLLEGUERESPONSES.docx")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Week 1 discussion question Perspectives on Graduate Study for Advanced Nursing Practice Response SA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Respond** to your colleagues' posts by suggesting additional individuals and/or teams with whom you wish to collaborate or by offering additional networking strategies. As an ICU nurse with seven years of experience, I have always envisioned advancing my education. Yet, the demands of raising chil…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Respond** to your colleagues' posts by suggesting additional individuals and/or teams with whom you wish to collaborate or by offering additional networking strategies.

    As an ICU nurse with seven years of experience, I have always envisioned advancing my education. Yet, the demands of raising children while working full-time have made this aspiration challenging to achieve. However, I now recognize that this is the perfect moment for me to return to school and earn a higher degree. Nursing has opened countless doors for me, and I am eager to embark on this transformative journey.

    My experience in critical care has not only built my confidence but has also deepened my understanding of the vital role that life-saving measures play in patient care. This realization has fueled my passion to become an Acute Care Nurse Practitioner (NP). I aspire to be an integral part of solutions within the unit and advocate for my patients, driving better outcomes and improved quality of care.

    After diligently researching several universities and Acute Care NP programs, I keep hearing outstanding things about Walden University from colleagues who have successfully graduated from its diverse offerings. The self-paced format allows students to balance their demanding lives while still pursuing education, making it an ideal choice for professionals like me.

    Walden University stands out not just for its flexibility but for its commitment to developing a diverse community of scholar-practitioners. The university's mission aligns perfectly with my goals, emphasizing a 100% online learning experience that nurtures professional problem-solving skills and encourages global advancement. Graduates from Walden are renowned for their robust knowledge and practical skills, making a significant positive impact in healthcare facilities and hospitals.

    Moreover, Walden exemplifies excellence in education through its focus on critical literacy equipping students with the tools to identify challenges and implement effective solutions while evaluating their results. The university’s core values, quality, integrity, and a student-centered approach peak to its commitment to maintaining high standards of excellence without compromising honesty or student development. I am excited about the opportunity to join Walden University and to enhance my skills as I strive to make a meaningful difference in the lives of my patients.

    Burtis, S. (n.d.). _Academics: Catalog : About Walden_. Academics.waldenu.edu. https://academics.waldenu.edu/catalog/about-walden

    Burtis, S. (2024). _Academics: College of Nursing: College of Nursing_. Academics.waldenu.edu. https://academics.waldenu.edu/catalog/nursing

    Walden University. (2024). _Academics: Student Handbook: Vision, Mission, and Goals_. Academics.waldenu.edu. https://academics.waldenu.edu/handbook/vision-mission-goals

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Week 1 Discussion question Perspectives on Graduate Study for Advanced Nursing Practice Response EC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Respond** to at least **two** of your colleagues' posts by suggesting additional individuals and/or teams with whom you wish to collaborate or by offering additional networking strategies. **Introduction** My name is Elmana Comete. I reside in Broward County, Florida. I started my Nursing career a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Respond** to at least **two** of your colleagues' posts by suggesting additional individuals and/or teams with whom you wish to collaborate or by offering additional networking strategies.

    **Introduction**

    My name is Elmana Comete. I reside in Broward County, Florida. I started my Nursing career as an LPN and proceeded to obtain my BSN. I have been a nurse for 9 years. Psychiatric nursing is my primary occupation. I wanted to become a nurse because of my experience with compassionate nurses at a young age. Being part of the profession has opened my eyes to the possibility of improvement and, thereby, foster the desire to expand my leadership skills and expertise.

    **Walden’s Mission and Vision Relating to my Professional and Academic Goals**

    Walden’s vision is to foster a community-focused online learning environment that gives rise to prioritization of expertise for the greater good on an indiscriminating approach (Walden University, 2024). I have always envisioned taking part in a learning environment that facilitates my goal of pursuing an education towards health advancement. Walden’s mission with goals of forming professionals that positively influence social changes aligns with my goal to positively influence health care outcomes in my community.

    **The College of Nursing Mission and Vision in Relating to my Academics Aspirations and Professional Practices**

    The College of Nursing s’ mission is to build experts in specialties that reinforce health equity. I want to be part of the group of professionals aiming to diminish health disparities. The College of Nursing’s vision is to establish and be known for approaches that innovate the healthcare system and boost community health. My vision is to make a difference in my community by providing holistic care that yields favorable community health outcomes.

    **MSN Learning Outcomes Relating to my Career Aspirations**

    Program learning outcome is to demonstrate competency in providing cost-effective care with diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of regimen (Walden University, 2024). The program learning outcome aligns with my aspiration to provide safe, effective, and affordable care that positively influences population health.

    **The Importance of Networking**

    Networking, an important tool of securing jobs and career positions, has gotten more popularity in the healthcare system. BluePipes, (n.d,) emphasized that the vast majority of jobs today are secured through networking. Whether it’s from employee referrals, limited employer options, the need to foster a sense of belonging, connection is proven to be the most successful way in landing a job (BluePipes, n.d). With the advancement of healthcare and technology, it is essential to stay updated on the latest and most current healthcare drifts. The most secure ways to do that are sharing peer support, request and exchange of services, being part of organizations that support your cause and/or those with a vision that aligns with your aspiration and goals. Nurse.Org (2018), reinforced this idea by enumerating ways nurses can create great connections through social media, family, friend, and past and current employer even when networking is not their strong s

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Research article critique (DUE JUNE 8)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In need of someone to complete a research article critique. You will review an article related to nursing and critique it. The critique should be written in APA 7 format I will provide you with the guide you need to follow with questions that should be answered and incorporated in the critique…. a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In need of someone to complete a research article critique. You will review an article related to nursing and critique it. The critique should be written in APA 7 format I will provide you with the guide you need to follow with questions that should be answered and incorporated in the critique…. attached is the rubric

    – [\
    \
    image0.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/image0-jpeg-10307239 "image0.jpeg")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Research Apprasial

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please get back to me Thank you! – a year ago **files (2)** – ## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx – ## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx** Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons The purpose of this assignment is for student…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please get back to me Thank you!

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx

    – ## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx

    **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx**

    Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate an understanding of the research process through the critical appraisal of published research. The interactive appraisal form presented in this assignment is based on Chapter 18 and other chapters of Gray et al. (2017).

    **Instructions**

    Read the article detailed below

    Tangnitipong, S., Vuttanon, N., Pothiban, L., & Chintanawat, R. (2022). Effectiveness of a home-based coping enhancement program for stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research , 26_(4), 585–599.

    Link
    [View of Effectiveness of a Home-Based Coping Enhancement Program for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial](https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259264/176902)

    The following document is a quantitative research appraisal form

    Rubric

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Research Appraisal 1—Section 1 |
    | | | |
    | **Research Appraisal 1—Section 1** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | **Introduction** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **State the Problem** | **5 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 5 pts** |
    | **Examine the Literature** | **8 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 8 pts** |
    | **Examine the Study Framework or Theory** | **4 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 4 pts** |
    | **Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses** | **6 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 6 pts** |
    | **APA** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **Total Points: 0** |

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

    **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx**

    Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate an understanding of the research process through the critical appraisal of published research. The interactive appraisal form presented in this assignment is based on Chapter 18 and other chapters of Gray et al. (2017).

    **Instructions**

    Read the article detailed below

    Tangnitipong, S., Vuttanon, N., Pothiban, L., & Chintanawat, R. (2022). Effectiveness of a home-based coping enhancement program for stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research , 26_(4), 585–599.

    Link
    [View of Effectiveness of a Home-Based Coping Enhancement Program for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial](https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259264/176902)

    The following document is a quantitative research appraisal form

    Rubric

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Research Appraisal 1—Section 1 |
    | | | |
    | **Research Appraisal 1—Section 1** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | **Introduction** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **State the Problem** | **5 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 5 pts** |
    | **Examine the Literature** | **8 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 8 pts** |
    | **Examine the Study Framework or Theory** | **4 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 4 pts** |
    | **Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses** | **6 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 6 pts** |
    | **APA** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **Total Points: 0** |

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

    **## EthicsApprasial1Section1Researchdirectons.docx**

    Apprasial 1 Section 1 Research directons

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate an understanding of the research process through the critical appraisal of published research. The interactive appraisal form presented in this assignment is based on Chapter 18 and other chapters of Gray et al. (2017).

    **Instructions**

    Read the article detailed below

    Tangnitipong, S., Vuttanon, N., Pothiban, L., & Chintanawat, R. (2022). Effectiveness of a home-based coping enhancement program for stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
    _Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research , 26_(4), 585–599.

    Link
    [View of Effectiveness of a Home-Based Coping Enhancement Program for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial](https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259264/176902)

    The following document is a quantitative research appraisal form

    Rubric

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Research Appraisal 1—Section 1 |
    | | | |
    | **Research Appraisal 1—Section 1** |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | **Introduction** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **State the Problem** | **5 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 5 pts** |
    | **Examine the Literature** | **8 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 8 pts** |
    | **Examine the Study Framework or Theory** | **4 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 4 pts** |
    | **Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses** | **6 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 6 pts** |
    | **APA** | **2 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>**0 pts**<br>**No Marks** | **/ 2 pts** |
    | **Total Points: 0** |

    **## EthicsResearch_Appraisal_assignment.docx**

    NUR 5314 Scientific Inquiry

    Name:

    Assignment Article Reference:

    **Research Appraisal 1 Form**

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to demonstrate how to interpret and appraise a quantitative research study. This appraisal form is based on Chapter 18 of Gray & Grove (2021).

    Directions: Use this form to complete Research Appraisal 1 (RA 1). In general, paraphrase information from the provided assignment article. If you quote directly from the article, use the appropriate APA citation format.

    Scoring: Points are allotted as indicated in each section of the form with a section for APA at the bottom. Total points for RA 1 = 100.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **SECTION 1 (25 points total)** | |
    | Introduction (2 points) | |
    | a. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise (PhD?), clinical experience, and education preparation (credentials). (2 point) | |
    | State the Problem (5 points) | |
    | a. What is the problem that formed the basis of this study? (2 point) | |
    | b. What evidence was used to support that the issue is a problem? (2 point) | |
    | c. State the purpose of the study. (1 points) | |
    | Examine the Literature (8 points) | |
    | a. Were relevant previous studies and theories described? If so, why are they relevant? (2 point) | |
    | b. Were the references current? Give the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years. (2 point) | |
    | c. Was a summary provided of the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem? (1 point) | |
    | d. Does the purpose of the study clearly address the gap in nursing knowledge? If so, how? (3 point) | |
    | Examine the Study Framework or Theory (4 points) | |
    | a. Was there a framework or theory explicitly stated? If yes, identify the framework or theory. (2 points) | |
    | b. Did the framework identify, define, and describe the relationship among the concepts of interest? Provide an example of this. (1 point) | |
    | c. Is the framework or theory presented with clarity? If a model or conceptual map is present, is it adequate for explaining the phenomenon of concern? (1 point) | |
    | Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses (6 points) | |
    | a. List any research objectives, questions, or hypotheses that were identified in the study. (2 points) | |
    | b. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | c. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships in the theoretical framework? Explain your answer. (2 point) | |
    | **SECTION 2 (16 points total)** | |
    | Study Variables (9 points) | |
    | a. Identify the study variables or concepts that were identified in the objectives, questions, or hypotheses. If there are no stated objectives, questions, or hypothesis; identify and define the variables in the study purpose. Classify these variables as either independent, dependent, or research variables. (6 points) | |
    | b. Identify demographic variables used to describe the sample. (3 points) | |
    | Research Design (7 points) | |
    | a. Identify the specific research design of the study. (1 point) | |
    | b. Did the study include a treatment or intervention? If so, state the protocol. (1 point) | |
    | c. If the study had more than one group, how were the participants assigned to groups? (1 points) | |
    | d. Was the study design used in the study the most appropriate design to obtain the needed data for the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | e. Based on the research design, what is the level of evidence for this study? (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 3 (25 points total)** | |
    | Population, Sampling, and Setting (13 points) | |
    | a. Identify the inclusion and exclusion eligibility criteria that designated the target population. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria appropriate for the type of study conducted? Why or why not? (4 points) | |
    | b. Identify the specific type of probability or nonprobability sampling method used to obtain the sample. (1 point) | |
    | c. Was the sampling method adequate for producing a sample that was representative of the target population? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the potential biases in the sampling method? (2 point) | |
    | e. Identify the sample size. Discuss the power analysis if this process was used to determine sample size. (1 points) | |
    | f. Discuss the institutional review board approval. Describe the informed consent process used in the study. (1 points) | |
    | g. Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose. (2 points) | |
    | Measurement (12 points) | |
    | a. Identify each study variable that was measured and link it to the measurement method. (6 points) | |
    | b. Did the measurement methods selected for the study adequately measure the study variables? (2 point) | |
    | c. Describe the reliability and validity of each scale. (2 points) | |
    | d. Did the measurement methods used in the study have adequate validity and reliability? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | **SECTION 4 (26 points total)** | |
    | Data Collection, Management, and Analysis (8 points) | |
    | a. List the statistical tests conducted to describe the sample. (2 points) | |
    | b. Explain which statistical tests were used to address the purpose statement or research questions/objectives/ hypotheses. (4 points) | |
    | c. Were the statistical tests appropriate given the purpose of the study? Explain your answer. (2 points) | |
    | Interpretation of Study Results (8 points) | |
    | a. Interpret the statistical results to demonstrate your understanding of the results. (4 points) | |
    | b. Did the author discuss how the results were consistent with previous literature? Give an example if they did so. (2 points) | |
    | c. How did the researchers generalize the findings? (2 points) | |
    | Discussion and Limitation (10 points) | |
    | a. Did the conclusions fit the results from the data analyses? Were the conclusions based on statistically significant and clinical important results? (4 points) | |
    | b. What study limitations did the researcher identify? (1 point) | |
    | c. Did the study have weaknesses not identified by the researcher? Name one. (2 points) | |
    | d. What were the implications of the findings for nursing or healthcare? (2 points) | |
    | e. Were suggestions for further study identified? If so, what are the suggestions. (1 point) | |
    | **APA (8 points)** | |

    4

  • [Solved] Create a Reply for a discussion using APA 7 format, and scholarly references no older than 5 years.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please ensure that the Reply includes more than 200 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.** **Reply # 1** **Current Healthcare Policy or Initiative Aimed at Addressing SDOH and the Potential to Reduce Health Disparities** Medicaid expansion is one of the pr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please ensure that the Reply includes more than 200 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.**

    **Reply # 1**

    **Current Healthcare Policy or Initiative Aimed at Addressing SDOH and the Potential to Reduce Health Disparities**

    Medicaid expansion is one of the principal terms of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This essential healthcare policy help to reduce health dispropotion and address several social determinants of health (SDOH). This program expands access to health care to millions of low-income adults or low socioeconomic level, the mayority of whom were uninsured before, by expanding Medicaid eligibility to those earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level.

    Medicaid expansion addresses several important SDOH drivers directly. Medicaid expansion promotes equality by reducing out-of-pocket medical spending when it is greater than a low threshold, and this lessens the financial burden on low-income populations (Whitman et al., 2022). In fact, patients taking advantage of expanded Medicaid are less likely to experience devastating healthcare costs that can drive eviction or homelessness, resulting in greater housing stability. In particular, the policy provides better access to health services (Harker & Sharer, 2024), especially low socioeconomic levels of communities, by amplifying the insurance coverage and stimulating the introduction of health services in these areas.

    The good part of Medicaid expansion for reducing health inequities are well-documented, such us research on lower uninsured rates, helping to improve the  health outcomes, and reducing in racial/ethnic disparities in access to care (Lin et al., 2021). Expansion has been associated with large decreases in mortality among low-income adults in states that adopted it (Harker & Sharer, 2024). It also help to improve the continuity of care and decreases the visits to the emergency room, which is quite often a last resort for the uninsured. However, limitations exist. There is a coverage gap because not all states have expanded Medicaid. In addition, Medicaid reimbursement rates are still low, which can prevent providers from accepting Medicaid patients, meaning that coverage may not translate to access.

    Advanced practice nurses (APNs) are vital in advocating for and improving policies such as Medicaid expansion. They can also assist by performing and sharing research that demonstrates the ability of Medicaid expansion to reduce disparities. Furthermore, through culturally appropriate care and community-based interventions, APNs can also contribute to closing the gap between policy and practice.

    **Conclusion**

    Medicaid expansion is an effective tool in meeting social determinants of health needs, specifically healthcare access among high-risk populations. It helps establish better health equity by removing barriers to access and reducing costs. However, successful implementation requires more than simply adopting a policy. Continued advocacy and healthcare workers' involvement are imperative. These professionals lead the way in clinical, community, and policy settings so that the expansion of benefits accrues to those most in need.

    **References**

    Harker, L., & Sharer, B. (2024). _Medicaid expansion: Frequently asked questions_. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/medicaid-expansion-frequently-asked-questions-0

    Lin, Y., Monnette, A., & Shi, L. (2021). Effects of medicaid expansion on poverty disparities in health insurance coverage. _International Journal for Equity in Health_, _20_(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01486-3

    Whitman, A., De Lew, N., Chappel, A., Aysola, V., Zuckerman, R., & Sommers, B. (2022). _Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Examples of Successful Evidence-Based Strategies and Current Federal Efforts_. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/e2b650cd64cf84aae8ff0fae7474af82/SDOH-Evidence-Review.pdf

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Create a Discussion using APA 7 format, and scholarly references no older than 5 years.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 400 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.** – [\ \ Assignmentinstructions.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignmentinstructions-docx-10307419 "Assignmentinstructions.docx") – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 400 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.**

    – [\
    \
    Assignmentinstructions.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignmentinstructions-docx-10307419 "Assignmentinstructions.docx")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] discussion map

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    nursing concepts – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    nursing concepts

    – a year ago