Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • PHI-413V Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity

    PHI-413V Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity

    Topic 2 DQ 1

    How can the Christian concept of the
    imago Dei
     inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community?

    Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “Discussion Question Rubric” and “Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

    This assignment aligns with AACN Core Competencies: 2.3

     

    The idea of the imago Dei, or the Christian conviction that every person was made in the image of God, has the power to significantly influence how a patient is seen holistically within their family and community. This idea, which forms the basis for appreciating the sanctity of human life, highlights every individual’s intrinsic value and dignity. When a patient is seen via the imago Dei, their distinct identity and value are recognized, impacting how healthcare professionals relate to and treat them. Healthcare providers must treat patients with dignity, respect, and compassion because they bear the imprint of God in them. This helps patients and their families feel important and valuable (Rabie-Boshoff, & Buitendag, 2021).

    ORDER PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Since the imago Dei emphasizes how interconnected everyone is, this viewpoint also encompasses the patient’s family and community. A relational approach to healthcare is necessary because every person is made in the image of God, and it acknowledges the significance of the patient’s social context and support networks (Szczerba, 2020). This holistic approach recognizes the influence of family dynamics and community support on health outcomes and urges healthcare providers to consider their patients’ physical and, emotional, social, and spiritual needs. Healthcare providers can foster a more compassionate and all-encompassing approach to treatment that considers the patient’s full being within the larger context of their relationships and community by appreciating and honoring the imago Dei in each patient PHI-413V Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity.

    References

    Rabie-Boshoff, A. C., & Buitendag, J. (2021). Imago Dei: We are but dust and shadow. 
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
    , 
    77
    (3).

    Szczerba, W. (2020, March). The Concept of Imago Dei as a Symbol of Religious Inclusion and Human Dignity. In 
    Forum Philosophicum
     (Vol. 25, No. 1).

    PHI-413V Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity sample 2

    The
    Christian concept of imago Dei, or the image of God
    , posits that every human being is created in the image and likeness of God, which imbues each individual with inherent dignity, value, and worth, regardless of their physical, mental, or social status (Szczerba, 2020). This principle can profoundly inform a holistic perspective of patient care within their family and community by emphasizing that every patient should be treated with the utmost respect, compassion, and empathy. When healthcare providers view patients through the lens of imago Dei, they recognize the intrinsic value of each person, beyond their illness or condition. This perspective encourages a care approach that respects the patient’s dignity, promotes their well-being, and acknowledges their unique needs and experiences. It shifts the focus from treating the disease to caring for the whole person, considering their physical, psychological, emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions.

    Incorporating the imago Dei into patient care encourages the development of a supportive and inclusive environment for the patient within their family and community. It fosters a sense of belonging and connection, crucial for healing and recovery (Sipos, 2022). Families are encouraged to participate actively in the care process, recognizing that they, too, are valued individuals who play a vital role in the patient’s life. This approach strengthens relationships, promotes mutual respect, and enhances communication between the patient, family, and healthcare providers. Communities can also be mobilized to support patients and families, creating networks of care that reflect the love, compassion, and solidarity rooted in the recognition of every individual’s worth as bearing the image of God. This holistic approach not only benefits the physical health of the patient but also addresses their emotional, spiritual, and social needs, contributing to a more comprehensive and meaningful healing process.

    Reference

    Szczerba, W. (2020, March). The Concept of Imago Dei as a Symbol of Religious Inclusion and Human Dignity. In Forum Philosophicum (Vol. 25, No. 1). 
    https://www.academia.edu/download/65914957/Imago_Dei_dignity.pdf

    Sipos, T. D. (2022). Integrating Spiritual Healthcare into Nursing Praxis: An Educational Intervention (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Mary Seminary and Graduate School of Theology). 
    https://search.proquest.com/openview/4a2d2883e29a15e5a5b5e53464fba6d1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

     

    PHI-413V Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity

    Topic 2 DQ 2

    How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about
    bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research
    ?

    Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to the “Discussion Question Rubric” and “Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

    Growing up with Buddhist teachings might have made me value kindness and seeing connections between all things. Since I have grown to adopt a Christian outlook, I have seen things differently, especially when it comes to bioethical topics like abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research. In Christianity, people believe that every human life is special because they’re made in God’s image. This idea often leads Christians to think that life should be protected from the very beginning until the very end. For example, I think that many Christians don’t support abortion unless the mother’s life is in danger because they see it as ending a life that’s valuable (Silber Mohamed, H., 2018). When it comes to designer babies, Christians might worry about changing what makes us human and what God intended. They might also be concerned about fairness and treating everyone equally. I find with stem cell research that Christians might feel torn. While they want medical progress, they also worry about using stem cells from embryos, which they see as the start of a human life. They often push for research methods that don’t involve harming embryos (Frohwirth, L. et al., 2018). So, while Buddhism and Christianity both care about life, they bring different ideas to discussions about these big questions.

     

    References:

    Frohwirth, L., Coleman, M., & Moore, A. M. (2018). Managing Religion and Morality Within the Abortion Experience: Qualitative Interviews With Women Obtaining Abortions in the U.S. World medical & health policy, 10(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.289

    Silber Mohamed, H. (2018). Embryonic Politics: Attitudes about Abortion, Stem Cell Research, and IVF. Politics and Religion. 2018;11(3):459-497. doi:10.1017/S175504831800010X

    PHI-413V Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity sample 2

    Worldviews are defined as the intellectual or philosophical lens in which humans understand and interpret their existence and their life events (Bogue, 2022 p. 87). My worldview may be different from other people’s worldviews. This is one reason that makes us different and unique. My worldview reflects who I am as a person and my personal beliefs and values. I feel that they are important, but they are not above anyone else’s personal beliefs and values. Everyone has the right to their own beliefs and values, and no one should feel bad for having different opinions. I personally believe that abortion is wrong; But this will not make me judge someone who considers abortions. Working with an OB/Gyn, I have seen many different situations in which patients have considered abortions ranging from sexual abuse to genetic disorders. As for designer babies, I am not opposed to this. Many couples need assistance forming a family due to infertility problems. My best friend being one of them, she tried many times to conceive and was not able to. Eventually she considered Invitro and after several failed attempts now she has a beautiful family. That does not mean that she didn’t suffer in the process. Invitro is called genetic engineered babies because you can pick and choose (Ranpara, 2019). Stem cell research is being used to research many diseases such as Type 1 diabetes, Parkinson’s, Heart failure and many others. This research could be very beneficial to patients, but I consider it to be unethical. I believe that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and values and should be treated with respect and dignity regardless of having a difference in opinions. Treating patients with respect and dignity allows us to create good patient-nurse relationships that allow us to create good patient outcomes PHI-413V Topic 2:
    God, Humanity, And Human Dignity
    .

    Bogue, D. W., Cota, M., De La Torre, V. J., Evans, K. A., Hoehner, P. J., Hogan, M., & White, N. H. (2022). 
    Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care
     (Third). Grand Canyon University. April 10, 2024, 
    https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/B1B4SGSSID7LR/epub/TItlePage.html#page_2

    Ranpara, M. (2019). Designer babies. 
    Canadian Medical Education Journal
    . 
    https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.68361

    PHI-413V Topic 2
    : God, Humanity, And Human Dignity

  • Off-label prescribing – Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

    Off-label prescribing – Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

    THE ASSIGNMENT (1–2 PAGES)

    Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

    Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?

    Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.

    Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

    Off-label prescribing – Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

    FDA-Approved Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder

    Management of underlying mood disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) among children requires the implementation of strategies and mechanisms for enhancing efficient mood disorder and achieving the desired outcomes. Fluoxetine is an FDA treatment used for the management of depressive disorder by improving the mood, enhancing coping mechanisms, and ensuring that the pediatric client receives the most effective treatment plan. The FDA-approved treatment is commonly used as the first-line therapy for managing the disorder and enhancing the quality of life of the affected persons (Pettitt et al., 2022). Some of the potential adverse effects that may occur with the treatment include sleep disturbances, gastrointestinal disturbances, and suicidal ideations. Therefore, the patient may require close monitoring and support to help cope with this condition and help mitigate the expected side effects. For instance, the client should be encouraged to take the medication in the morning with food to reduce insomnia and gastrointestinal disturbance manifestations.

    Off-label Treatment

    Off-label medications can also be used to manage the condition. Sertraline is another SSRI medication that is commonly used in the management of MDD in children and adolescents. The treatment offers various measures and outcomes, such as mood stabilization and reduction of symptoms. However, the medication is used as an off-label agent because it lacks formal evidence for use in the management of pediatric conditions and complications. Pediatric patients taking sertraline may experience conditions and side effects such as nausea, insomnia, and increased risk for suicidal ideation. The healthcare team using these treatment approaches to manage the condition must balance the risks and benefits and consider the medication when the benefits outweigh the risks (Dauchot et al., 2024). Therefore, it is necessary to provide detailed education and explanation to allow informed consent from the legal guardian or the parent to promote safe and effective management.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Non-pharmacological Interventions: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Managing major depressive disorder also requires the implementation of non-pharmacological measures and interventions to enhance the coping mechanisms of the affected child. The provider may use the treatment either solely or in combination with pharmacological therapies to enhance coping, promote emotional regulation, and reduce the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms and the overall quality of life. This non-pharmacological intervention provides optimal opportunities for managing the condition and empowering the patient and the family to manage the condition effectively and achieve the desired outcomes (Korczak et al., 2023). Implementing the non-pharmacological treatment requires a structured approach with regular sessions that empower the patient and the family to manage the desired outcomes collaboratively.

    Risk Assessment and Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Most assessment criteria are related to the risk assessment to evaluate the severity of MDD, patient history, side effects of a particular medication, and family preferences. Periodical-like clinical practice guidelines have been developed for children and adolescents. According to AACAP guidelines, the first-line pharmacologic treatment in this population is fluoxetine, which has demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in children and adolescents. Thus, safe practice recommendations for off-label uses of sertraline include its use only when first informed by patients and with monitoring of the beneficiaries (Korczak et al., 2023). CBT is considered first-line treatment therapy and, indeed, often used in the second line because it is evidenced and has a very low risk of adverse reaction. Therefore, the nurse practitioner should initiate strategies and mechanisms for managing the disorder and attaining the best outcomes.

     

    References

    Dauchot, D., Rettey, S., Melton, B. L., & Moeller, K. E. (2024). Antipsychotics in child and adolescent patients with major depressive disorder: A retrospective analysis of prescribing patterns.
    The Mental Health Clinician
    ,
    14
    (1), 10–16.
    https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2024.02.010

    Korczak, D. J., Westwell-Roper, C., & Sassi, R. (2023). Diagnosis and management of depression in adolescents.
    CMAJ
    ,
    195
    (21), 739–746.
    https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220966

    Pettitt, R. M., Brown, E. A., Delashmitt, J. C., & Pizzo, M. N. (2022). The management of anxiety and depression in pediatrics.
    Cureus
    ,
    14
    (10).
    https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30231

  • PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community?

    PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community?

    The idea of imago Dei, or being made in the image of God, provides a deep foundation for understanding healthcare within families and communities. It means seeing each person as having value and dignity because they reflect something divine (Szczerba, W., 2020). This idea challenges healthcare workers to treat patients with respect, care, and empathy, recognizing their worth as individuals. By understanding this, healthcare can become more than just fixing problems because it can be about helping people live better lives within their families and communities. Imago Dei also reminds us that people are meant to relate to others like how God exists in a community, people thrive when they have strong relationships. This means healthcare should consider not just the patient, but also their family and community. By supporting these relationships, healthcare can be more effective in helping patients and their loved ones cope and heal together. This approach focuses on the whole person, not just their medical needs, and respects the connections that make up their life. When healthcare providers acknowledge the importance of these relationships, they can tailor care plans to address not only the patient’s physical health but also their emotional, social, and spiritual well-being (Stahl, D. et al., 2017). Additionally, involving family members and community support in the care process can lead to better outcomes and a more positive experience for everyone involved. Ultimately, recognizing the imago Dei in each individual serves as a guiding principle for delivering compassionate and holistic healthcare that uplifts both the patient and their broader network of relationships.

    BUY A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER HERE

    References:

    Stahl, D., & Kilner, J. (2017). The image of God, bioethics, and persons with profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Christian Institute on Disability, 6(1–2), 19-40. https://halo.gcu.edu/resource/c00e4406-f50a-49f9-a174-816b575356f0?nestedResourceId=88d1d54c-794f-423c-84e2-d67b7b3e9e4a

    Szczerba, W. (2020). The Concept of Imago Dei as a Symbol of Religious Inclusion and Human Dignity. Forum Philosophicum. 25. 13-36. 10.35765/forphil.2020.2501.2.

     

    PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community? sample discussion post 2

    The Christian concept of the imago Dei, asserting that all individuals are created in the image of God, offers a profound framework for cultivating a holistic perspective of patients within their family and community in healthcare contexts. Dietrich von Hildebrand’s recognition of the imago Dei as a defense against dehumanizing ideologies underscores its critical importance in shaping ethical healthcare practices. The imago Dei signifies an inherent and inalienable worth bestowed upon every human, irrespective of their health status, ethnicity, or social standing (Ibrahim, 2023). This theological principle demands that healthcare practitioners view patients holistically, recognizing their physical ailments and spiritual and emotional dimensions. Embracing the relational mandate embedded in the imago Dei, healthcare providers are called to engage with patients as partners in the shared responsibility of maintaining and caring for creation. Moreover, the imago Dei underscores the spiritual dimension of human existence, reinforcing the understanding that individuals are more than mere physical entities (Henriksen, 2020). This necessitates a comprehensive approach to healthcare that addresses the multifaceted aspects of patients’ well-being, acknowledging their spiritual and emotional needs alongside the physical. In the familial and communal context, the imago Dei encourages healthcare practitioners to recognize and respect patients’ dignity within the broader context of their relationships and social frameworks. By upholding the imago Dei, healthcare providers affirm the sanctity of life, fostering a compassionate and dignified approach that transcends medical interventions to encompass the entirety of the patient’s being within their family and community. In essence, the imago Dei is an academically grounded and assertive foundation for a holistic healthcare perspective rooted in Christian principles.

    References

    Henriksen, J. O. (2020). Embodied, Relational, Desiring, Vulnerable–Reconsidering Imago Dei. 
    Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
    , 
    62
    (3), 267-294.

    Ibrahim, E. A. (2023). Imago Dei in Eastern Orthodox Statements and Implications for Inclusion of People with Disabilities in the Church: A Dissonant Relationship. 
    Horizons
    , 
    50
    (1), 62-109.

     

    PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community? sample discussion post 3

    The idea that people are made in God’s image, or the imago dei, is central to Christian theology and profoundly affects how people are viewed and handled in society, particularly in healthcare and social services. The Imago Dei displays that the foundation of human worth is the poise of God. By grounding the healthcare story in a deep respect for human life, the imago Dei concept—which emphasizes each person’s intrinsic worth and dignity—reshapes the field (Melllows, 2022). The approach to patient care is radically changed when a medical professional recognizes the divine imprint in every patient. The focus is now more on treating the patient as a complex human with inherent value than treating their symptoms or health issues.

    The concept of dominion or stewardship, frequently associated with the imago Dei, molds a more expansive viewpoint in the healthcare field, expanding the idea of care beyond the clinical setting (Paterne, 2020). It highlights that caring for one another as fellow bearers of the divine image is an extension of humans’ duty to care for the Earth. This means that patient well-being is recognized to be highly influenced by a range of socio-economic and environmental factors, rather than being only dependent on medical interventions. According to this viewpoint, healthcare professionals should work with families, religious leaders, neighborhood associations, and other pertinent parties to establish a setting that promotes the patient’s overall health, understanding that genuine recovery frequently results from a caring and encouraging social setting.

    The idea that humans were made in God’s image, or the imago Dei, is fundamental to Christian life and practice. It may have even influenced or shaped every other Christian concept somehow. Imago Dei thus endows humanity with the responsibility to steward creation, defend the oppressed, and protect fellow human lives. PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community?

    Reference

    Mellows, S. P. (2022). 
    Social transformation through affirmation of human dignity: 
    A
     case study of ‘Learn to Earn’
     (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).

    Paterne, G. T. C. (2020). Evolution Science and Imago Dei: A Richer and More Robust Treatment of Theological Anthropology.

     

    PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community? sample discussion post 4

    The
    Christian concept of Imago Dei
    translates to the image of God. The concept is built around Genesis 1:26-27. According to the Bible verse, God created humans in his own image and likeness. God created humans on the sixth day after creating various things in the universe including the sun, moon and stars (Bohache, 2021). Humans were God’s special creation. God noted humans were special. Humans share a spiritual connection with God since they were created in his image and likeness. The concept of Imago Dei emphasizes key principles which include human dignity and worth, spiritual nature as well as responsibility and stewardship. It affirms the intrinsic worth and dignity associated with human life (Bohache, 2021). Additionally, it emphasizes that all humans are valuable regardless of their socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender or race. The concept of Imago Dei notes that humans reflect some of God’s attributes which include compassion and love (Penwarden, 2021). According to the concept, humans have an ethical imperative to treat others with compassion, dignity and respect.

    The concept is crucial in healthcare and promotes holistic patient care. A holistic perspective towards healthcare notes that humans’ needs go beyond physical needs (Penwarden, 2021). Humans have psychological and spiritual needs just like physical needs. Healthcare professionals have an obligation to attend to all these needs to promote holistic wellness. The concept of Imago Dei compels healthcare professionals to look beyond physical needs during care delivery and adopt a holistic approach towards healthcare delivery.

    References

    Bohache, T. (2021). Ingratitude is not an option: gratitude as imago Dei. 
    Anglican Theological Review
    , 
    103
    (3), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033286211023893

    Penwarden, S. (2021). A person as becoming over time: contrasting the theological view of a person as imago Dei with the narrative therapy notion of telos. 
    Practical Theology
    , 
    14
    (3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2020.1792676 PHI-413V Topic 2 DQ1 – How can the Christian concept of the imago Dei inform a holistic perspective of the patient within their family and community?

  • NRNP 6665 Week 3: Assignment 1 – Off-label prescribing – Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

    NRNP 6665 Week 3: Assignment 1 – Off-label prescribing – Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

    Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

    Introduction

    ADHD is an incurable mental health issue. Regardless, some standard treatments and interventions involve using medications purposely to relieve symptoms and education approaches to better the patients’ livelihoods and, more so, growth. According to Titheradge et al. (2022), the use of medication among children and adolescents with ADHD is received with controversies as, to some extent, the medications are not used. Some of the reasons for this stand include the challenges of balancing the benefits, perceived risks, and side effects of these medications (Titheradge et al., 2022). Due to the need for pharmacological interventions, off-label drug use (OLDU) is considered an alternative medication for the treatment of ADHD.

    Recommended Treatments

    One of the recommended on-label drugs in the treatment of ADHD among children is methylphenidate (Nanda et al., 2023). However, the drug is widely discouraged by children due to the extent of its side effects, which include sleep disorders and loss of appetite; significant reasons why off-label treatments and other non-pharmacological approaches are considered. For the off-label interventions, one of the critical drugs that can be used is Bupropion. This is a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor sold under the brand name Wellbutrin. From a different dimension, Bupropion is used in the cessation of smoking but can also act as an antidepressant, hence preferred for the treatment of ADHD (Clark et al., 2023). For non-pharmacological approaches, research guidelines by the US Department of Health and Human Services support increased exercise for at least one hour daily, as this helps improve cognitive functionality and overall wellness (Shrestha et al., 2020). Also, it is usually advised to use a form of behavioral therapy, or CBT, in addition to ADHD drugs. Children and adolescents can benefit from this type of treatment by way of making the shift from tight monitoring to more operational autonomy. Psychoeducational therapies that focus on improving abilities such as preparing, arranging, and restructuring the mind make up most of it. In sessions pertaining to communicating, managing irritation, and changing the kid’s conduct, parents and other relatives may also participate.

    ORDER PLAGIARISM-FREE WORK HERE

    Risk Assessment

    There are several elements considered when comparing the use of off-label and on-label medications, especially among children. First and foremost is the nature and extent of side effects. According to Nanda et al. (2023), methylphenidate is a highly effective medication that is known to increase brain activity controlling behavior, hence effective in treating ADHD. Regardless of this effectiveness and efficiency, the side effects are mainly intolerable among children as it is associated with sleep disorders and poor appetite, which, when taken for the long term, may predispose the child to risks of malnutrition and deficiencies and, consequently, growth issues. On the other hand, the off-line medication bupropion is considered not only an effective medication but also generally tolerable among children and adolescents. This means some of its side effects, including weight loss and constipation, insomnia, and nausea, are lesser than methylphenidate and hence highly preferable (Lee et al., 2022).

    ADHD Clinical Practice Guidelines

    According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the treatment guidelines for ADHD among children require that children between 4 and 6 years be treated with parent training and behavioral management and behavioral classroom education programs, if available, as the first line of treatment (AAFP, 2020). However, if the approaches fail to work, then guidelines require that the medical practitioners prescribe methylphenidate. For children above six years and adolescents, requirements entail prescribing medication only upon the patient’s approval, depending on their tolerance of the drug’s side effects (AAFP, 2020). In other words, the guideline recommends the consideration of the drugs with the least and, at the same time, highly tolerable side effects. In this evaluation, the off-line drugs and, in this case, Bupropion is one of these drugs with ascertained effectiveness and tolerable side effects. For this reason, researchers highly support the use of effective, efficient, and safe drugs in the treatment of diseases such as DHD, regardless of whether it is off-label or on-label NRNP 6665 Week 3: Assignment 1 – Off-label prescribing – Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

    Conclusion

    The use of OLDU in treating various diseases is a joint event, as ascertained by researchers. Though effective, some of these drugs have yet to be approved by the FDA for several logical and valid reasons, including the time-consuming process required to ascertain and approve the drugs, cost issues, and the complex process of filing for supplemental drug application. Meaning that not all off-label drugs are unsafe for disease management. For this case, for instance, the use of off-line medication, Bupropion, in the treatment of ADHD among children and adolescents is ascertained to be an effective and safer option compared to the on-label approach to the same using methylphenidate. In a nutshell, the choice of a drug for prescription in a medical and clinical setting is evaluated with consideration to not only effectiveness and efficiency but, more so, safety aspects and tolerability of the drug’s side effects.

     

     

    References

    AAFP. (2020). clinical practice guideline: ADHD in children and adolescents.
    aafp.org
    .
    https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all-clinical-recommendations/ADHD.html

    Clark, A., Tate, B., Urban, B., Schroeder, R., Gennuso, S., Ahmadzadeh, S., … & Kaye, A. D. (2023). Bupropion Mediated Effects on Depression, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and Smoking Cessation. 
    Health Psychology Research
    , 
    11
    .
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317506/

    Lee, S. Y., Wang, L. J., Yang, Y. H., & Hsu, C. W. (2022). The comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for youths with major depressive disorder: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. 
    Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
    , 
    13
    , 20406223221098114.
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20406223221098114?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.1

    Nanda, A., Janga, L. S. N., Sambe, H. G., Yasir, M., Man, R. K., Gogikar, A., & Mohammed, L. (2023). Adverse Effects of Stimulant Interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Comprehensive Systematic Review. 
    Cureus
    , 
    15
    (9). doi: 10.7759/cureus.45995

    Shrestha, M., Lautenschleger, J., & Soares, N. (2020). Non-pharmacologic management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a review. 
    Translational pediatrics
    , 
    9
    (Suppl 1), S114.
    https://tp.amegroups.org/article/view/32479/html#:~:text=Physiological%20interventions%20are%20regular%20physical,activity%20every%20day%20(43)
    .

    Titheradge, D., Godfrey, J., Eke, H., Price, A., Ford, T., & Janssens, A. (2022). Why young people stop taking their attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication: a thematic analysis of interviews with young people. 
    Child: Care, Health and Development
    , 
    48
    (5), 724-735.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545018/ 
     NRNP 6665 Week 3: Assignment 1 – Off-label prescribing – Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

  • How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

    How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

    The United Nations (UN) has defined human value, rights, and dignity as “inherent to all human beings irrespective of age, race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion or any other status”. Human beings should not be treated in degrading ways (Bogue et al., 2024). However, interpretations of human rights vary globally. For example, while access to healthcare is considered a human right in many European countries, it remains elusive in numerous developing nations. This underscores the importance for healthcare providers to cultivate cultural competence and comprehend patients’ perspectives regarding human value and beliefs when delivering care to individuals and communities.

    GET A PLAGIARISM-FREE ESSAY HERE

    Abortion has emerged as a prominent bioethical issue, capturing headlines, and stirring debate. It encompasses a spectrum of procedures, both natural and medical, aimed at terminating pregnancies. From my Christian worldview, I regard the embryo as a living entity deserving of respect, reflecting the commandment in Exodus 20:13, “You shall not murder.” Nonetheless, instances may arise where the fetus poses a threat to the life of the mother, complicating the ethical decisions. In such cases, healthcare interdisciplinary teams grapple with ethical dilemmas. The biblical injunction in Matthew 7:1, “Do not judge and criticize, so that you will not be judged,” underscores the need for humility and empathy in navigating these complex decisions. At the end, the mother must weigh her options and make the choice that aligns with her conscience (Bogue et al., 2024).

    References

    Bogue, D., Cota, M., Jr., De la Torre, V., & Hogan, M. (Eds.). (2024). 
    Practicing Dignity: An introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care (3
    rd
     ed.).
     Grand Canyon University.

    United Nations. (n.d.). 
    Universal declaration of human rights
    . United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

    How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research? sample 2

    My view on abortion is a complicated one, if there is an incestuous relationships that caused a pregnancy, rape, or a condition that is discovered that would put the life of the mother or fetus( any diagnosis that would cause concern for a  viable, survivable fetus)  in jeopardy,  I would advocate to abort the fetus. “An estimated 56 million women seek abortions each year; nurses and midwives are commonly involved in their care (Singh et al., 2018). If there are no trained healthcare workers to accommodate the need for a safe abortion procedure when needed, then we as healthcare providers are in a vicarious position. When it comes to the issue of ” designer babies,”  I am against that whole process. To me that process evokes the past failures of society when the breeding of the strongest slaves together to bring about stronger slaves to work the fields was conducted. Or, the many cruel Nazi experiments conducted on infants and children to understand their genetics. This science, technology is in itself unpredictable. The propensity for the wrong people to be in charge of making the wrong decision is too common place for me. My thoughts on stem cell research is more scientific that random. The ability to offer hope to those facing a dreaded disease or the opportunity to unlock a cure for virus that is now deemed incurable is an scientific opportunity towards humanity.”Stem cell-based therapy is an important branch of regenerative medicine with the ultimate goal of enhancing the body repair machinery via stimulation, modulation, and regulation of the endogenous stem cell population and/or replenishing the cell pool toward tissue homeostasis and regeneration .” O’Brien, T et.al. p856 (2009). From a christian worldview there is a conscientiousness effort to stay true to your  faith, and the comprehension of medical science.

    Singh, S., Remez, L., Sedgh, G., Kwok, L., & Onda, T. (2018). Abortion worldwide 2017: Uneven progress and unequal access.

    O’Brien, T. & Barry, F. P. Stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine. 
    Mayo Clin. Proc.
     
    84
    , 859–861 (2009).

     

    How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research? sample 3

    In my view, the abortion debate revolves around deeply held beliefs about the beginning of life and personal autonomy. I believe that life begins at conception, meaning that terminating a pregnancy is morally wrong as it ends the life of a developing human being. I agree that the developing fetus deserves the right to life, and abortion takes away that right. However, some people argue that a woman has right to control her own body in whatever means she can. They assert that women have the autonomy to make decisions about their reproductive health, including whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy (Watt, 2020).

    From my perspective, the concept of “designer babies” raises ethical concerns about genetic manipulation and its societal implications. Some individuals advocate for genetic enhancement, believing it could lead to significant medical advancements and the prevention of genetic diseases. They see it as a way to improve human health and well-being. However, I am concerned about the potential for creating a genetic elite and widening existing inequalities (Cota & de la Torre, 2024). I worry that genetic enhancement could increase societal disparities, as access to these technologies may be limited to the wealthy individuals. Additionally, there are ethical considerations regarding consent and autonomy, particularly concerning the rights of unborn children and the implications of altering their genetic makeup without their consent.

    Lastly, I believe that stem cell research holds promise for treating a wide range of diseases and injuries by harnessing the regenerative properties of stem cells. However, ethical debates arise, particularly regarding the use of embryonic stem cells obtained from embryos. I recognize the potential medical benefits of embryonic stem cells, such as treating Parkinson’s disease and spinal cord injuries. However, I am mindful of the moral concerns raised by their use, as it involves the destruction of human embryos, which is the beginning of human life.

    References

    Cota, M., Jr., & de la Torre, V. (Eds.). (2024). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care (3rd ed.). Grand Canyon University. 
    https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/B1B4SGSSID7LR/epub/Chapter1.html#page_41

    Watt, H. (2020). The Dignity of Human Life: Sketching Out an ‘Equal Worth’ Approach. 
    https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=fe712ff0-7c78-4287-99b8-448f6f531572%40redis

    How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research? sample 4

     was born into a Buddhist family. My family and I worship Buddha and follow the Buddha’s teachings which include the Four Noble Truths. The Four Noble Truths are the suffering itself, the origin of suffering, the end of suffering, and the path to the end of suffering (
    Basics of Buddhism
    , n.d.). According to Buddhism, suffering exists in this life. Suffering refers to the physical and emotional discomfort and pain that human beings experience in their lives. Suffering also refers to the unexpected changes that human beings are unable to accept. Buddhists believe that desire and ignorance are the root causes of all sufferings. Desire is an intrinsic part of human life such as lust, gluttony, sloth, wrath, envy, and pride (Furr, 2021. These human cravings can never be satisfied and only bring sufferings as a result. Another cause of all sufferings is the ignorance. According to Buddhism, ignorance refers to inability to see the world as it is or to value the true nature of things. To be free from all sufferings, the Buddha’s teachings emphasize the Noble Eightfold Path including right understanding, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration.

    Living my whole life with the human values I have been taught by the Buddha’s teachings, I am against abortion and designer babies. I believe that life starts at conception and any life should not be destroyed. I value the true nature of things, and everything should be accepted as it is. It is a blessing to have a baby and we should value whoever the baby is. Thus it is unethical to design a baby with the intervention of the genetic engineering. Even though it is believed that killing the embryo is not different from killing a human being, I am not against the stem cell research because the use of embryonic stem cell has a good intention for curing disease of the patient.

    References:

    Basics of Buddhism
    . (n.d.). 
    https://www.pbs.org/edens/thailand/buddhism.htm

    Furr, R. (2021, July 22). 
    Your deepest, darkest desire. . . | Breakthrough Marketing Secrets
    . Breakthrough Marketing Secrets. https://www.breakthroughmarketingsecrets.com/blog/your-deepest-darkest-desire/#:~:text=Greed%20%E2%80%94%20desire%20and%20wanton%20pursuit,to%20covet%20what%20others%20have.

    How does your worldview of human value affect your beliefs about bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

  • Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health Assessment

    Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health Assessment

    Socioeconomic, Spiritual, Lifestyle, and other Cultural Factors

    The patient is an African-American man who is homeless, has experienced alcohol withdrawal seizures, has run out of medication, lives in a shelter, and needs to smoke to calm down and function. A socioeconomic issue affecting this patient is homelessness, which affects his consistent healthcare and a stable environment in which he can thrive. According to Bedmar et al. (2022), homelessness is a complex issue that affects beyond the lack of a place to live. It leads to poor health conditions and premature death because of the limited access to healthcare and resources for those affected. Homeless individuals are also at risk of developing communicable diseases and foot infections, which tend to have a low adherence to pharmacological treatments (Bedmar et al., 2022). There is also an increased risk of cardiovascular and neurological diseases, including diabetes, which are the most prevalent. Hepatitis and HIV positivity (Bedmar et al., 2022). Given this patient’s homelessness condition, it is evident that the patient in this scenario is already suffering from some of the consequences, such as low drug adherence, as he runs out of his medication. This patient lacks understanding of his medication and needs to follow up with his cardiologist to refill his prescription Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health Assessment.

    A spiritual issue affecting this patient could be a lack of support from a religious group such as a church, a mosque, or any other affiliation, leading him to turn to smoking as therapy to calm down. The patient is struggling with functioning and stress. Spiritual support could offer him a reprieve and reduce the need to use substances for stress management and as a coping mechanism.

    ORDER HERE

    Lifestyle factors affecting this patient include substance use, medication adherence, and, likely, diet and exercise, given his hypertension. From the case information, the patient has a history of alcohol dependence that led to seizures from withdrawal. Additionally, drug adherence is difficult because of unstable living conditions. Lastly, limited access to healthy food, stress, and safe spaces for physical activity are likely to have limited the patient from observing a healthy diet and exercise, leading to his hypertension.

    Culturally, African Americans tend to experience healthcare inequality and disparities, leading to reduced trust in the healthcare system. Worse, the patient is a homeless African American male, which exposes him to a higher risk of discrimination in the healthcare system, according to a study by Willison et al. (2023) that found that African Americans are four times more likely to be homeless and discriminated against in the healthcare system compared to their white counterparts.

    Sensitive Issues

    An issue that a healthcare provider should be sensitive to when handling this patient is judgment and stigma. The healthcare worker must avoid using judgmental language or words considered racial slurs or inappropriate. It is also important to empathize with the patient’s homelessness, addiction, and smoking habits. The goal is to ensure that the patient develops trust in the healthcare worker. Additionally, African Americans tend to experience discrimination in healthcare settings because of their race, according to Willison et al. (2023); therefore, it is necessary to ensure that this experience is not replicated in this patient’s case.

    Another sensitive issue to consider when interacting with this patient is their privacy and dignity. The healthcare worker should ensure their discussions are private and confidential, remain respectful, and observe the patient’s dignity despite their socioeconomic status. Maintaining privacy and confidentiality is an ethical principle in healthcare that should be upheld regardless of a patient’s background, age, and condition.

    Communication Techniques

    A communication technique ideal when interacting with this patient is active listening, which entails paying close attention, being present, and asking questions for clarification (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). Active listening is essential in this case because it encourages the patient to continue sharing important information that could be useful in their management, helps develop nurse-patient trust, and promotes patient-cantered care (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). It is also essential to be empathetic during the interaction with the patient so that they can feel heard and develop trust towards the healthcare worker. Another ideal communication technique in this interaction is asking the patients open-ended questions, encouraging them to openly share their experiences without being judged. Using open-ended questions is essential in this case because it would encourage patient-centered care based on the information provided by the patient.

    Health History Interview

    What is your recent experience with alcohol withdrawal and other health issues you have been dealing with?

    Asking this question would help the healthcare worker understand the severity and context of the alcohol withdrawal and seizures, as well as other health concerns.

    How do you manage your blood pressure without medication? Do you have any other symptoms? Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health Assessment

    This question is essential in assessing the impact of operating without hypertensive medication to identify immediate health risks.

    How do you feel about your current living situation, and do you have any support?

    This question aims to gauge the patient’s emotional support system, crucial for his recovery and care.

    How does your typical day look like? What substances are you using?

    Asking this question helps to develop a comprehensive view of the patient’s lifestyle choices and how they affect their health. This information would be crucial in tailoring interventions for him.

    Do you experience any barriers when accessing healthcare or medication?

    This question establishes the specific obstacles preventing this patient from accessing consistent healthcare. The healthcare worker could have helpful information on how to circumvent these obstacles for the patient.

    Risk Assessment Instrument

    An appropriate risk assessment instrument to use on this patient is the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). This instrument is a 10-item tool developed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) (Brummer et al., 2023). It covers aspects such as drinking behaviors, frequency, and alcohol-related problems. The responses ranged from 0 to 4 in scoring, which made the highest possible score of 40. It is a valuable tool in identifying harmful drinking patterns and can help identify drinking as the cause of the illness presented to a patient (Brummer et al., 2023). It also provides a robust framework for risky drinkers to reduce their alcohol consumption and its impact.

               
    AUDIT would be ideal to use on this patient because the patient has a history of alcohol withdrawal seizures, which imply heavy alcohol use. It is, therefore, critical to assess his relapse risk and continued alcohol use using this risk assessment tool. Another reason for using AUDIT is that it is comprehensive in that it covers essential aspects of alcohol use, such as frequency, dependency, and effects. This information helps develop effective interventions for the patient.

    References

    Bedmar, M. A., Bennasar-Veny, M., Artigas-Lelong, B., Salvà-Mut, F., Pou, J., Capitán-Moyano, L., García-Toro, M., & Yáñez, A. M. (2022). Health and access to healthcare in homeless people: Protocol for a mixed-methods study.
    Medicine
    ,
    101
    (7), e28816.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028816

    Brummer, J., Bloomfield, K., Karriker-Jaffe, K. J., Pedersen, M. M., & Hesse, M. (2023). Using the alcohol use disorders identification test to predict hospital admission for alcohol-related conditions in the Danish general population: a record-linkage study.
    Addiction (Abingdon, England)
    ,
    118
    (1), 86–94.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16034

    Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021c). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward.
    BMC Nursing
    ,
    20
    (1).
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

    Willison, C., Unwala, N., Singer, P. M., Creedon, T. B., Mullin, B., & Cook, B. L. (2024). Persistent Disparities: Trends in Rates of Sheltered Homelessness Across Demographic Subgroups in the USA.
    Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
    ,
    11
    (1), 326–338.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01521-9 
     Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health Assessment

  • NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    In many realms of medicine, objective diagnoses can be made: A clavicula is broken.  An infection is present. TSH levels meet the diagnostic criteria for hypothyroidism. Psychiatry, on the other hand, deals with psychological phenomena and behaviors. Can these, too, be “defined objectively and by scientific criteria (Gergen, 1985), or are they social constructions?” (Boland, Verduin, & Ruiz, 2022).

    Thanks to myriad advances during recent decades, we know that psychopathology is caused by many interacting factors. Theoretical and clinical contributions to the field have come from the neural sciences, genetics, psychology, and social-cultural sciences. How do these factors impact the expression, classification, diagnosis, and prevalence of psychopathology, and why might it be important for a nurse practitioner to take a multidimensional, integrative approach?

    RESOURCES

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    TO PREPARE:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources, considering the many interacting factors that contribute to the development of psychopathology.

    Consider how theoretical perspective on psychopathology impacts the work of the PMHNP.

    BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 1

    Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology.

    Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses

    BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 1

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of your colleagues on 
    2 different days
     by explaining the implications of why, as an advanced practice nurse, it is important to adopt a multidimensional, integrative model of psychopathology.

    Note: 
    For
    this Discussion,
    you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on 
    Submit!

     

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Main Post

    The development of psychopathology is influenced by biological, psychological, social, cultural, and interpersonal factors. Genetics is a crucial biological factor that influences the development of psychopathology. Genetics is how traits are passed down from one generation to the next. Based on genetic research, psychiatric illnesses have been found to run in families (Boland et al., 2022).  From birth, biology produce learned behavior, such as infants born with a sucking reflex.

    Psychological factors that influence the development of psychopathy include early childhood adversity, childhood trauma, and bullying (Paetzold et al., 2023). Childhood adversity is linked to mental health issues for children and adults later in life. The social factors that influence the development of psychopathology are family dynamics, social support, and socioeconomic status. The support from leaders at school is a factor in the influence of psychopathology. Psychological factors can also have a positive impact on the development of psychopathy.  Teacher guidance at school significantly affects positive growth and career development (Xiong et al., 2023).

    BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Cultural factors play a significant role in influencing the development of psychopathology. Cultural beliefs and practices regarding mental health, illness, and treatment can shape an individual’s understanding of their mental well-being. Cultural norms and values regarding social expectations can impact how psychopathology is perceived and experienced within different cultural contexts. Parenting styles affect children’s developmental outcomes differently based on diverse cultural norms (Sahithy et al., 2019).

     

    Reference

    Boland, R. & Verduin, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). 
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry
     (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer

    Paetzold, I., Gugel, J., Schick, A., Kirtley, O. J., Achterhof, R., Hagemann, N., Hermans, K. S. F. M., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Lecei, A., Myin-Germeys, I., & Reininghaus, U. (2023). The role of threat anticipation in the development of psychopathology in adolescence: findings from the SIGMA Study. 
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
    , 
    32
    (11), 2119–2127. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02048-w
    Links to an external site.

    Sahithya, B. R., Manohari, S. M., & Vijaya, R. (2019). Parenting styles and its impact on children – a cross-cultural review focusing on India. 
    Mental Health, Religion & Culture
    , 
    22
    (4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1594178

    Xiong, Q., Fang, X., Wu, Y., Chen, H., Hu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Guidance and counseling relations to high school students’ positive development and psychopathology: A non-recursive modeling study. 
    Current Psychology
    , 
    42
    (6), 4609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01722-7
    Links to an external site.

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Initial Post

    Biological, Psychological, Social, Cultural and Interpersonal Factors Influencing the Development Psychopathology

    Psychopathology is the scientific study of mental illness and all the factors that are potentially responsible for them, paving the way to understanding their treatment. While there is no known cause of mental illness, various hypotheses have been suggested to explain the cause and their influence (Caspi et al., 2021). Biological factors play a vital role in the development of mental illnesses and revolve around neurotransmitters, disorders of neurodevelopment, and genetics. Disturbance of neurotransmitter levels has been thought to cause mental illness. For example, increased pain is responsible for schizophrenia, while a decrease in serotonin and noradrenaline is possible for depression (Troisi & Dieguez, 2022). Secondly, disorders in neurodevelopment are thought to play a vital role in presupposing the development of mental illnesses like autism and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (Caspi et al., 2021).

    For example, in autism, there are notable differences in the amygdala, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and temporoparietal cortex (Caspi et al., 2021). Lastly, genetics are equally thought to predispose to mental illness; a family history of some diseases increases the risk of having them. Troisi and Dieguez (2022) stated that autism has a hereditary component of 42-80%, making the majority of the cases possibly heritable. Some psychological factors equally influence the development of mental illness, including emotional attachments, beliefs, past experiences, life events, and coping responses. For example, experiencing a traumatic life event increases a person’s likelihood of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (Gureje et al., 2020).

    Similarly, emotional attachments in children to their parents predispose them to the development of separation anxiety disorder, which can be traumatic to them. Further, psychological stress due to finances and grief can equally predispose an individual to develop depression, according to (Collizi et al., 2020).

    On the other hand, sociocultural factors also affect mental illness, including cultural practices, level of education, drug use behaviors, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. In cultural settings, for example, the beliefs influence the beliefs on causes of mental illness and how to treat them. According to Gureje et al. (2020), some people believe that mental illnesses

    are due to evil spirits and thus require divine power and not medical intervention. Similarly, culture also affects what people would otherwise what they would consider a mental illness in general (Collizzi et al., 2019). On social factors many factors also dictate mental illnesses. For example, mental illnesses like depression and psychosis are summoned in those using illicit drugs. Similarly, mental illnesses are common in people identifying with some sexual orientation, like the LGTBQ+ (Moagi et al., 2021). Further, people of low socioeconomic status equally have a higher prevalence of diseases like depression, unlike those of high socioeconomic class.

    Lastly, interpersonal factors play a vital role in the development of mental illness. Unlike those isolated, people with a support system have handled emotional demands well. For that reason, people without support systems, like those isolated elders, have high incidences of mental illnesses like depression (Collizi et al., 2019).

    References

    ‌Caspi, A., Houts, R., Fisher, H., Danese, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2023). The General Factor of Psychopathology (p): Choosing Among Competing Models and Interpreting p. Clinical Psychological Science, 216770262211478-216770262211478.https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221147872

    Colizzi, M., Lasalvia, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2020). Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: Is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for

    care? International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9

    Gureje, O., Lewis-Fernandez, R., Hall, B. J., & Reed, G. M. (2020). Cultural considerations in the classification of mental disorders: why and how in ICD-11. BMC Medicine, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-1493-4

    ‌Moagi, M. M., Der Wath, A. E. van, Jiyane, P. M., & Rikhotso, R. S. (2021). Mental health challenges of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: An integrated literature review. Health SA Gesondheid, 26(1487). https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1487

    ‌Troisi, A., & Dieguez, G. (2022). Etiology of Psychiatric Disorders: Lay Beliefs and the Role of Gender, Field of Study and Personality Traits. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 19(3), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220303

     

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

                                                                   Factors that Influence the Development of Psychopathology

    The development of psychopathology, therefore, is a complex process that involves biological, psychological, and social factors. From a biological perspective, genetic and neuroscientific factors can be identified as contributing to this behavior. Some factors have also been identified, including genetic predisposition, which may be inherited from family members. For instance, it has been realized that problems such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have genetic roots and specific genes have been identified to be involved in the development of these ailments. Consequently, neuroscientific research has also highlighted the brain and its structures and functions in relation to the development of psychopathology.

    Psychological factors include an individual’s thinking patterns, behavior, emotions, and the upbringing they have received. Behavioral styles conditioned or acquired from observing other people can influence the expression of psychopathology (Grasser & Jovanovic, 2021). For instance, negative thought processes that are developed in childhood may lead to the development of anxiety disorders in later life due to the use of ineffective problem-solving strategies. Likewise, positive constructs, including cognitive distortions or maladaptive schemas, can also sustain symptoms of depression or anxiety. Hence, emotional experiences, including attachment early in life, as well as traumatic experiences, inform psychological functioning and susceptibility to mental disorders.

    Social, cultural, and interpersonal factors are very influential in developing the psychopathology context. According to Fonagy et al. (2022), some of the social determinants include income, education, health care and social services, and social norms, which may influence the occurrence and progression of mental health disorders. Cultural beliefs and attitudes determine the perception of mental illness, which affects the seeking for assistance as well as recovery processes. Interpersonal relationships with family, friends, and other support systems also have a role in the onset of psychopathology.

    The conceptual foundation for the practice of NPs should incorporate a biopsychosocial model of mental disorders. Hence, it is ideal for practitioners to incorporate biological, psychological, and social aspects in their assessment and treatment plans to gain a comprehensive understanding of the client (Furness et al., 2020). This approach assists in identifying the unique requirements as well as constraints of the individual so that the interventions will be more appropriate.

    References

    Fonagy, P., Campbell, C., Constantinou, M., Higgitt, A., Allison, E., & Luyten, P. (2022). Culture and psychopathology: An attempt at reconsidering the role of social learning. 
    Development and Psychopathology
    , 
    34
    (4), 1205-1220. 
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/development-and-psychopathology/article/culture-and-psychopathology-an-attempt-at-reconsidering-the-role-of-social-learning/B74B6B06D06248BD896A5D6059F373C1
    Links to an external site.

    Furness, T., Giandinoto, J. A., Wordie‐Thompson, E., Woolley, S., Dempster, V., & Foster, K. (2020). Improving physical health outcomes for people with severe mental illness: A proof‐of‐concept study of nurse practitioner candidate practice. 
    International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
    , 
    29
    (2), 266-277. 
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/inm.12680
    Links to an external site.

    Grasser, L. R., & Jovanovic, T. (2021). Safety learning during development: Implications for the development of psychopathology. 
    Behavioural Brain Research
    , 
    408
    , 113297. 
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432821001856
    Links to an external site.

     

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Initial Discussion

    Week One

    In the study of psychopathology there is a focus on how mental illness occurs in human. Children and adolescents can be prone to predisposition of mental illness through gene transmissions (Butcher & Kendall,2018). Other influences include environmental factors that come along with socioeconomic factors such as violence, drug use and stunted development processes (Butcher & Kendall,2018). The researcher Dr. Engel alludes to the school of thought of nature versus nurture which asserts, if a person is nurtured or lacking nurturing the human behavior is altered and can influence mental health disorders (Kaplan & Sadocks,2022). This theory should be given a closer look because evidence demonstrates animals have environmental stressors and toxins that can mutate gene expression (Kaplan & Sadocks,2022).

    The emotional and developmental stage of adolescence is critical in developing cognitively (Jackson &Milberg, 2018). Cognitive alterations may show up as ADHD that affects processing information, reinforcing information and retrieval of information (Jackson &Milberg, 2018).

    Social, cultural, and interpersonal factors
    play a role in how people may be affected by psychopathology. Sometimes clinicians are biased which could present inaccuracies in diagnosis for a patient who is not dominant in Western countries (Cheug&Mak,2018). Luckily the DSM IV and 5 have included an outline for cultural formulation (OCF) which addresses mental health concerns affecting different cultures (Cheug&Mak,2018).

    These social, cultural, and interpersonal factors can play a part in the predisposition that contributes to mental disorders. Overall, many aspects of our adolescence play a role later on which results in how adults who have developed mental disorders cope with day-to-day experiences of this journey called life.

    References

    Boland, R. & Verduin, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    Butcher, J. N., & Kendall, P. C. (2018). Introduction to childhood and adolescent psychopathology. In J. N. Butcher & P. C. Kendall (Eds.), 
    https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1037/0000065-001
    Links to an external site.

    Cheung, F. M., & Mak, W. W. S. (2018). Sociocultural factors in psychopathology. In J. N. 
    https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1037/0000064-006
    Links to an external site.

    Jackson, C. E., & Milberg, W. P. (2018). Examination of neurological and neuropsychological features in psychopathology. 
    https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1037/0000064-004
    Links to an external site.

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    WK 1: Initial Discussion Post

    Factors that Influence the Development of Psychopathology

    According to research, numerous influences contribute to the development of psychopathology or the underlying factors that can affect an individual’s mental health negatively. This discussion will examine theoretical perspectives and categories of each facet that influence a reasonable behavior analysis. Studies show that both biological and psychological factors can create major depressive, bipolar, and schizophrenia disorders (Owen, 2023). Genetic predispositions mixed with traumatic environment interactions can cause a disorder to develop (Park & Kwan, 2018). Neuroscientific factors can include brain structure and function abnormalities, neurotransmitter imbalances, and neurodevelopmental factors involving prenatal or childhood stages like malnutrition or exposure to illness, which may contribute to adverse psychiatric conditions (Provencal et al., 2015). Psychological factors, including behavioral, cognitive, emotional, attachment, and development processes, can also contribute to maladaptive behavior (Koss & Gunnar, 2018). Behavioral processes can include learned and conditioned behaviors. Repetitive negative thinking patterns and abnormal information processing may trigger cognitive processes. Emotional processes can be affected by blatant difficulty in controlling emotions, while attachment and development are usually derived from caregivers’ neglect at critical development stages (Zeanah et al., 2016). Social, cultural, and interpersonal factors are also equally responsible triggers for an individual’s adverse mental health. Social isolation, stigmas surrounding mental health, discrimination issues, dysfunctional families, and poor peer relationships can all create an unstable mental health disposition if influenced by any combination of these factors during developmental periods that go unheeded without intervention or therapeutic response (Knapp & Wong., 2020).

    In conclusion, the development of psychopathology is influenced by an entanglement of biological, psychological, and social factors. Genetic predispositions, brain abnormalities, and early developmental issues can lead to disorders like depression and schizophrenia. Psychological aspects such as behavioral conditioning, cognitive distortions, and emotional dysregulation also play significant roles. Social influences, including isolation, stigma, and family dysfunction, further exacerbate mental health challenges. A comprehensive understanding and interdisciplinary approach are essential to address these factors and promote mental well-being.

     

    References

    Knapp, M. and Wong, G. (2020). Economics and mental health: the current scenario. World Psychiatry, 19: 3-14. 
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20692
    Links to an external site.

    Koss, K.J. and Gunnar, M.R. (2018). Annual Research Review: Early adversity, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, and child psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatr, 59: 327-346. 
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12784
    Links to an external site.

    Owen, M. J. (2023). Genomic insights into schizophrenia. 
    Royal Society Open Science
    , 
    10
    (2). 
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230125
    Links to an external site.

    Park, C., & Kwon, S. M. (2018). The role of emotion regulation in the relationship between genetic vulnerability and depression. 
    Journal of Affective Disorders, pp. 227
    , 350–356. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.012
    Links to an external site.

    Provençal N, Booij L, Tremblay RE. The developmental origins of chronic physical aggression: biological pathways triggered by early life adversity. J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 1;218(Pt 1):123-33. 
    https://doi: 10.1242/jeb.111401

    Zeanah, C. H., Chesher, T., & Boris, N. W. (2016). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder. 
    Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55
    (11), 990–1003. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.08.004
    Links to an external site.

     

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Week 1 Discussion Main Post

    There are several factors that contribute to the development of mental health disorders (Butcher & Kendall, 2018). Problems with neurotransmission are considered one factor in the development of mental health disorders, including the neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and glutamate (National Institutes of Health (US), 2007). Pharmacological treatment of mental health disorders helps regulate these neurotransmitters (Bains & Abdijadid, 2023). Some mental health disorders have been associated with genetics, with some disorders being passed down from genes inherited from family (Butcher & Kendall, 2018; Nestler et al., 2016). Genetic links have been found in disorders such as ADHD, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, MDD, and autism (American Psychological Association, 2013; National Institutes of Health (US), 2007). Although, gene expression is influenced by one’s environment (Butcher & Kendall, 2018). Genetics predisposes one to certain disorders, but it depends on the environment as to which genes will be expressed (Butcher & Kendall, 2018).

    Neuropsychological factors such as illness, injury, and hospitalization contribute to the development of mental health disorders in children and adolescents (Basu & Banerjee, 2020; Butcher & Kendall, 2018). Developmental factors, including age at onset of puberty, which impacts development of depression in children and adolescents, or age during a traumatic event, can influence behavior (Butcher & Kendall, 2018). Gender also plays a role in the development of certain mental health disorders. Adolescent girls are more likely to develop depression than adolescent boys (Butcher & Kendall, 2018).

    Stress also impacts the development of mental health disorders in children and adolescents (Butcher & Kendall, 2018). It has been found that severe stress early in life can cause structural changes in the cerebral cortex (Bains & Abdijadid, 2023). Academic and social pressure at school, as well as interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers, can impact mental health functioning (Basu & Banerjee, 2020; Butcher & Kendall, 2018). Low socioeconomic status has been shown to negatively impact psychological development (Basu & Banerjee, 2020; Butcher & Kendall, 2018). Mental health is also impacted by immigration and refugee status, with children from war-stricken countries experiencing more PTSD (Butcher & Kendall, 2018). The location of where one lives can also impact mental health as, for example, major depressive disorder is more common in rural than urban areas (Bains & Abdijadid, 2023). Other environmental factors that can contribute to mental health disorders include abuse, neglect, parental education level, social media, natural disasters, and abuse (Basu & Banerjee, 2020; National Institutes of Health (US), 2007).

     

    References

    American Psychological Association. (2013). Five major psychiatric disorders share genetic links. 
    Monitor on Psychology
    , 
    44
    (5), 10. 
    https://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/05/disorders
    Links to an external site.

    Bains, N., & Abdijadid, S. (2023, April 10). Major depressive disorder. In 
    StatPearls
    . StatPearls Publishing. 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559078/
    Links to an external site.

    Basu, S., & Banerjee, B. (2020). Impact of environmental factors on mental health of children and adolescents: A systematic review. 
    Children and Youth Services Review
    , 
    119
    , 105515. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105515
    Links to an external site.

    Butcher, J. N., & Kendall, P. C. (2018). Introduction to childhood and adolescent psychopathology. In 
    J. N. Butcher & P. C. Kendall (Eds.), APA handbook of psychopathology: Child and adolescent psychopathology., Vol. 2.
     (pp. 3–14). American Psychological Association. 
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000065-001
    Links to an external site.

    Butcher, J. N., & Kendall, P. C. (2018). Introduction to childhood and adolescent psychopathology. In 
    J. N. Butcher & P. C. Kendall (Eds.), APA handbook of psychopathology: Child and adolescent psychopathology., Vol. 2.
     (pp. 3–14). American Psychological Association. 
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000065-001
    Links to an external site.

    National Institutes of Health (US). (2007). Information about mental illness and the brain. 
    NIH Curriculum Supplemental Series [Internet]
    . 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20369/#:~:text=Most%20scientists%20believe%20that%20mental,certain%20medications%20for%20the%20illness.
    Links to an external site.

    Nestler, E. J., Peña, C. J., Kundakovic, M., Mitchell, A., & Akbarian, S. (2016). Epigenetic basis of mental illness. 
    The Neuroscientist
    , 
    22
    (5), 447–463. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415608147
    Links to an external site.

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    To accurately address and manage mental health conditions, it is important to analyze the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology. From literature reviews, it is evident that the above-mentioned factors are intertwined and thus play a vital role in the mental illness or wellness of an individual. Explained below are some specifics of how these factors affect the development of psychopathology.

    The biological (genetic and neuroscientific): As it is in the medical sector whereby certain individuals are at risk for certain health conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and cancer due to their genetic makeup, so it is in psychiatry (Daníelsdóttir, et al., 2024). Certain individuals are predisposed to mental health conditions such as alcoholism, bipolar, and schizophrenia due to genetic factors. Imbalances in the brain relating to dopamine and serotonin levels in the brain associated with neurochemical imbalances in the brain can be attributed to the biological makeup of an individual’s brain chemistry.

    Psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental): The psychological factors have vital influences on the psychopathology of an individual. For example, some individuals engage in reckless or callous behaviors due to deficits in cognitive processing. The level of emotional intelligence and developmental level can also be reflected in psychopathological symptoms assessment

    Social, cultural, and interpersonal factors: The social, cultural, and interpersonal factors are values and beliefs that shape an individual’s lifestyle and choices can either foster mental wellness or illness. Cheung and Mak (2018), makes it clear that the social world is influenced by emotional and behavioral disorders. The perception of past experiences such as trauma, abuse, and neglect, or other major life events such as the death of a loved one can impact mental health. The availability or lack of social support, social socioeconomic status can also impact an individual’s psychopathology.

     

    References

    Cheung, F. M., & Mak, W. W. S. (2018). Sociocultural factors in psychopathology.

    In J. N. Butcher & J. M. Hooley (Eds.), APA handbook of psychopathology: Psychopathology: Understanding, assessing, and treating adult mental disorders., Vol. 1. (pp. 127–147). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000064-006

    Daníelsdóttir, H. B., Aspelund, T., Shen, Q., Halldorsdottir, T., Jakobsdóttir, J., Song, H., Lu, D.,

    Kuja-Halkola, R., Larsson, H., Fall, K., Magnusson, P. K. E., Fang, F., Bergstedt, J., & Valdimarsdóttir, U. A. (2024). Adverse Childhood Experiences and Adult Mental Health Outcomes. JAMA psychiatry, e240039. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0039

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Week 1 Main Post

    Genetic mapping studies help identify the genes implicated in heritable diseases, based on their chromosome location (Boland & Verduin, 2022). In psychiatric diseases, this may involve complex approaches. Family studies and gene mapping strategies also contribute to advances in psychiatry because they provide information about the aggregation of disease among relatives of affected individuals (Boland & Verduin, 2022).

    Neuroscientific includes neuropsychology defined as the study of brain behavior (Jackson & Milberg, 2018). Neuropsychology has helped transition psychopathology from symptom-based diagnosis to brain-based, behavioral relationships (Jackson & Milberg, 2018). Neuropsychological assessments have also evolved, based on the individual’s performance or current condition versus their baseline cognitive abilities.

    Psychological, which includes behavioral and cognitive processing as well as emotional development, involves clarifying sometimes-complicated phenomena. Its progression can be understood more clearly using the diagnosis of psychosis and its 5 stages breakdown as an example. Stage 1 is the prodromal stage very early in the process, stage 2 is the acute phase where there are feelings of being overwhelmed, stage 3 is the stabilization of struggling with psychosis and feeling vulnerable, stage 4 is recovery from living with these feelings of vulnerability and finally stage 5 the long-term management of life after psychosis (National Institute of Mental Health, 2024). I believe that many psychiatric disorders can be put into stages to better understand their prognosis and devise treatment plans to care for these individuals.

    Sociocultural factors influence the way society has created many disparities in mental health and it is well documented across the class, race/ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation.

    Boland, R., & Verduin, M.L. (Eds.). (2022). 
    Kaplan & sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry. 
    Wolters Kluwer.

    Cheung, F. M., & Mak, W. W. S. (2018). Sociocultural factors in psychopathology. In J. N. Butcher & J. M. Hooley (Eds.), 
    APA handbook of psychopathology: Psychopathology: Understanding, assessing, and treating adult mental disorders
    . 
    Vol. 1
    .
    Links to an external site.
     (pp. 127–147). American Psychological Association. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1037/0000064-006

    Jackson, C. E., & Milberg, W. P. (2018). Examination of neurological and neuropsychological features in psychopathology. In J. N. Butcher & J. M. Hooley (Eds.), (pp. 65–90). American Psychological Association. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1037/0000064-004

     

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology.

     

    Psychopathology is defined as the study of mental disorders related to diagnosis, treatment, and symptoms (Boland, 2021). The biological factors that contribute to development of psychopathology involve gene expression and brain development. Observing the childhood development where the serotonin gene expression leads to vulnerability of children to be neglected or abused which leads to Major Depressive Disorder (Boland, 2021). Studies have shown that glucocorticoids, neutrophines, and cytokines contribute to a child’s ability to endure adversity and resilience from a negative event (Boland, 2021). Other examples of biological impact on psychopathology include maternal stress having impact of adrenal hormones that the baby has (Boland, 2021).

    Emotional and social development contribute to psychological factors where smiling plays a factor with the infant depending on caregivers’ warmth and survival. This affects the psychopathology in that chemical neurotransmitters are released for both the infant and mother caregiver (Boland, 2021). Other psychological behaviors involve humans congregating and forming groups with similar characteristics and interests (Boland, 2021). Through the psychological process of congregating and developing bonds/relationships with other members of the same sex and different sex can contribute to psychopathology. The psychological factors of mimicking behavior that is beneficial for the individual and the group can positively benefit them and cause the brain to release chemical neurotransmitters such as “dopamine” to reward the brain  (Raypole, 2022).

    The psychosocial and behavioral concepts relating to psychopathology are derived from many theories such as Piaget’s cognitive development stages (Boland, 2021). The major stages include: 1.) Sensorimotor, 2.) preoperational thought, 3.) concrete operations, 4.) formal operations (Boland, 2021). These stages start with infants using their senses to make sense of the world such as sucking reflex to indicate hunger and transition into children using symbols and language for preoperational thought which move into concrete operations where children use concrete examples to make sense of the world and then transition to formal operations where the children (adolescent’s) thinking is simple, logical, symbolic, and systematic (Boland, 2021).

    The sociocultural aspect involves sociobiology and how the many characteristics involving evolution of humans and their actions involving aggression, altruism, reproduction, competition, and aggression play roles in psychopathology where disorders and adaptive strategies are utilized (Boland, 2021). The argument can be placed that sociobiology contributes to reasoning for psychopathology and how human species act in the form of social norms (Boland, 2021).

    The comparison of DSM V criteria for diagnosing psychiatric illnesses are based on a series of signs and symptoms that stand out from normal behavior of humans and are categorized in a way that allow a clinician to come up with a diagnosis for a particular mental illness (Smoller et. al., 2019). Psychiatric genomics consortium is a collaboration among scientists to study DNA level sequences and correlate them to psychiatric disorders and individuals with a family history of psychiatric illness (Smoller et. al., 2019).

    References

    Boland, R. (2021). 
    Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry
     (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health. 
    https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9781975145583
    Links to an external site.

    Raypole, C. & Saripalli, V (2022). How to hack your hormones for a better mood. Optum Serve. Retrieved from: healthline.com

    Smoller, J. W., Andreassen, O. A., Edenberg, H. J., Faraone, S. V., Glatt, S. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2019). Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology. 
    Molecular psychiatry
    , 
    24
    (3), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0010-4

     

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Psychopathology is the examination of mental disorders and mental illnesses (National Alliance on Mental Illness, 2024). There are numerous and infinite factors that can affect one’s mental health. One of the first factors that will be discussed will be biological factors. Some of the biological factors that can affect one’s mental health are hormones, genetic predisposition, brain structures, developmental acceleration, genetics, the endocrine system, neurotransmitters, and abnormalities of the brain (Ma et al., 2019). All factors can influence one’s mental health individually or in combination. These are the factors that an individual is provided with at birth.

    The next factors that will be discussed that can influence one’s mental health will be the psychological factors. These factors include trauma, childhood neglect, abuse, the death of an immediate family member, emotional attachments and responses, stressors, and beliefs (Haywood et al., 2022).   These factors can affect individuals in different ways.  Two individuals can experience the same life experiences and be affected differently. Some individuals will thrive after the events and others will become delayed in their development and coping ability. This is always a discussion and unclear as to why one individual is affected differently from another.

    Social factors that influence mental health are socioeconomic status, trust, income, education, food, community belonging, housing, social support, employment, and discrimination (Johns Hopkins Medicine, 2024). Any one of these factors can cause one to feel isolated from the rest of the population.  In this isolation, one’s mental health can decline and then the individual can become less functional to not functioning in society.  These factors are what make support groups beneficial in mental health treatment.

     

    Cultural factors that influence mental health are holistic care, immigration, mono-ethnicity, multi-ethnicity, cultural beliefs, rituals, stereotypes, support, adaptation, acculturation, values, access to services, stigmas, and prejudices (World Health Organization, 2024).    Someone’s cultural beliefs or their family’s beliefs can keep them from accessing care and treatment. If the cultural belief is that mental health does not exist then the client suffering from mental illness will have feelings of guilt, paranoia, and possibly distrust in the mental health system for treatment and will not obtain what they truly require for the resolution of mental illness.

     

    Lastly, we will cover interpersonal factors that influence psychopathology. Interpersonal factors are demographics, actions, thoughts, personality, problem behaviors, bonding, biogenetics, functioning level, and cognition (National Library of Medicine National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2024).  These are just a few examples of factors that affect psychopathology and mental health.  A human being is a sum of all of its parts and pieces as well as what they have experienced.   In mental health, a care provider is continuously investigating to better a client’s mental health, health, as well as overall well-being.

     

    References

    Haywood, D., Baughman, F., Mullan, B., & Heslop, K. (2022). What Accounts for the Factors of Psychopathology? An Investigation of the Neurocognitive Correlates of Internalising, Externalising, and thr p-Factor. 
    Brain Sciences
    , 
    12
    (4), 421. 
    https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040421
    Links to an external site.

    Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2024). 
    Johns Hopkins medicine
    . John Hopkins Medicine. 
    www.hopkinsmedicine.org

    Ma, S., Meng, Z., & Chen, R. (2019). The Hippo : Biology and Pathophysiology. 
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY
    , 
    88
    , 577–604. 
    http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111829
    Links to an external site.

    National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2024). 
    National Alliance on Mental Illness
    . NAMI. 
    www.nami.org

    National Library of Medicine National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2024). National Center for Biotechnology Information. 
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    World Health Organization. (2024). 
    World health organization
    . 
    www.who.int

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Week 1 Discussion Post

    A conception of psychopathology does not attempt to explain psychological phenomena deemed pathological. Instead, it identifies which psychological phenomena are considered pathological and thus require explanation. Conversely, a theory of psychopathology aims to explain the psychological phenomena and experiences identified by the conception as pathological. The way we understand psychopathology and related terms has significant implications for individuals, medical and mental health professionals, government agencies and programs, and society.

    Biological factors

    Behavior, including pathological behavior, originates from brain functioning. Many of our current treatments for pathological behavior are biological in nature; for example, we use drugs that alter neurotransmitter systems. Understanding psychopathology must ultimately encompass an understanding of its biological bases. Recent advances have been made in understanding and treating many psychological disorders using biological techniques. Early, often accidental, discoveries that certain drugs alleviated psychiatric symptoms led to the development of modern psychotherapeutic drugs and to the hypotheses of the 1950s and 1960s that many psychiatric disorders result from “imbalances” in neurotransmitter systems. However, the development of the brain is generally a complex interaction of genes, prenatal environment, and postnatal environment.

    Psychological factors

    Many psychologists argue that significant advancements include the development of explicit diagnostic criteria, the increasing use of structured interviews, and the proliferation of brief measures tailored for use by mental health professionals conducting empirically supported treatments (e.g., Antony & Barlow, 2022). However, some professionals disagree. Even the widely embraced use of explicit criteria for psychiatric diagnoses has been challenged (Beutler & Malik, 2002). For instance, Weiner (2000) criticized the current Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) as “a psychometrically shaky, inferential nosological scheme involving criteria and definitions that change from one revision to the next.”

    Behavioral assessment methods and psychophysiological assessments can provide valuable information. For example, diary measures can be used to ask a client to record and rate the frequency and intensity of panic attacks shortly after they occur or to monitor eating or smoking habits. Psychophysiological techniques are also useful; for instance, a polysomnographic evaluation conducted in a sleep lab can provide valuable information about a client’s sleep quality (Savard & Morin, 2002). Similarly, measures of psychological arousal can offer important insights in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder, particularly concerning treatment processes and outcomes (Litz, Miller, Ruef, & McTeague, 2022).

    Social, Cultural, and Interpersonal factors

    Central to the study of Cultural psychopathology is defining culture itself. The emphasis on values and beliefs highlights the psychological nature of culture. We argue that culture is manifested through interactions between people and is inherently social. Positioning practices (customs and rituals) alongside values and beliefs suggests that social practices are influenced by these values and beliefs. For instance, people are often thought to rely on their family during crises due to a strong sense of familism or family orientation. However, researchers rarely explore what aspects of the social world encourage or support this reliance on family. Culture is significant in various domains within psychopathology research. It plays a crucial role in the expression of disorders and distress, with cultural analysis revealing the variability in how mental illness is manifested. Social and cultural factors can also influence the etiology and prevalence of disorders by placing some individuals at greater risk than others for developing psychopathology.

    Mullings and Schulz (2006) note that “it is often difficult to pinpoint how the interaction, articulation, and simultaneity of race, class, and gender affect women and men in their daily lives, and the ways in which these forms of inequality interact in specific situations to condition health.” They suggest that gender, race, and class should be viewed as social relationships rather than individual characteristics.

    References.

    Beutler, L. E., & M. L. Malik (Eds.) (2002). Rethinking the DSM: A Psychological Perspective. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Litz, B. T., Miller, M. W., Ruef, A. M., & McTeague, L. M. (2022). Exposure to trauma in adults. In M. M. Antony & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders (pp. 215–258). New York: Guilford.

    Maddux, J. E., & Winstead, B. A. (2008). Psychopathology : Foundations for a Contemporary Understanding: Vol. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis [CAM].

    Mullings, L., & Schulz, A. (2006). Intersectionality and health: An introduction. In A. Schulz & L. Mullings (Eds.), Gender, race, class, & health (pp. 3–17).

    Savard, J., & Morin, C. M. (2002). Insomnia. In M. M. Antony & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders (pp. 523–555). New York: Guilford.

    NRNP 6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

    Main Discussion Post

    The development of psychopathology or psychiatric disorders is influenced by an interplay of various factors. The factors can be broadly classified as biological, genetic, neuroscientific, psychological, cognitive, behavioral, developmental, social, cultural, or interpersonal factors. Describing how these factors result in the development of mental disorders or conditions is crucial in the understanding of the progression and etiology of psychiatric disorders.

    Biological Processes that Impact the Development of Psychopathology

    Genetic abnormalities, vulnerabilities, or predispositions significantly contribute to the development of various psychiatric disorders, including alcoholism, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, depression, and attention deficit disorder (Smoller et al., 2019). Family studies, early twin studies, and population-based twin studies have continuously demonstrated substantial genetic influences on psychiatric disorders. For instance, schizophrenia is a complex mental disorder that is highly heritable, with genetic susceptibility contributing to approximately eighty percent of its risk (Merikangas et al., 2022). Research also shows that there is a combination of genes that mutate to affect the serotonergic, glutamate, and dopaminergic systems, resulting in the development of psychiatric conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (Strom et al., 2021). Various neuroscientific factors have also been linked to the development of psychopathology. Neurotransmitter alterations of dopamine, glutamate, and serotonin have been associated with the development of schizophrenia, anxiety, and depression (Sheffler et al., 2023). Neuroimaging studies have established the linkage between structural brain abnormalities and various psychiatric disorders. For example, the dysregulation of neuroendocrine systems, such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system, is associated with increased secretion of the HPA hormone that substantially contributes to the development of depression (Hinds & Sanchez, 2022).

    Psychological Factors that Impact the Development of Psychopathology

    Behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and developmental processes are some of the critical psychological factors that contribute to the development of psychopathology. According to Smoller et al. (2019), adverse childhood events, neglect, losing close family members, early developmental trauma, and insecure attachment to caregivers are some of the factors that alter normal development, contributing to the development of psychiatric disorders. Emotional dysregulation, characterized by the inability to regulate emotions and prolonged negative emotions such as anger or fear, can lead to the development of mood disorders such as depression (Gray et al., 2020). Reduced behavioral activation, such as participating in less pleasurable activities, and problematic coping behaviors, such as substance use, are behavioral factors that contribute to the development of psychopathology (Carreira-Míguez et al., 2022).

    Social, Cultural, and Interpersonal Factors Impacting the Development of Psychopathology

    Low socio-economic status, low income and education levels, discrimination, stressful life events, and exposure to traumatic experiences are some of the social and environmental factors that lead to the development of psychiatric disorders. Limited access to health care is a common social disparity, particularly among marginalized populations, which prevents individuals from seeking and obtaining the required therapy, making them more vulnerable to poor mental health outcomes (Schlax et al., 2019). At the interpersonal level, persistent interpersonal conflicts, loneliness, isolation, group dynamics, and lack of support systems in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood are some of the factors that significantly contribute to the development of psychopathology (Boland et al., 2022).

    References

    Boland, R. & Verduin, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). 
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry
     (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer

    Carreira-Míguez, M., Navarro-Jiménez, E., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2022). Behavioral patterns of depression patients and control population. 
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    , 
    19
    (15), 9506. 
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159506
    Links to an external site.

    Gray, V., Douglas, K. M., & Porter, R. J. (2020). Emotion processing in depression and anxiety disorders in older adults: systematic review. 
    BJPsych Open
    , 
    7
    (1), e7. 
    https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.143
    Links to an external site.

    Hinds, J. A., & Sanchez, E. R. (2022). The role of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis in test-induced anxiety: assessments, physiological responses, and molecular details. 
    Stresses
    , 
    2
    (1), 146-155.
     https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2010011
    Links to an external site.

    Merikangas, A. K., Shelly, M., Knighton, A., Kotler, N., Tanenbaum, N., & Almasy, L. (2022). What genes are differentially expressed in individuals with schizophrenia? A systematic review. 
    Molecular Psychiatry
    , 
    27
    (3), 1373–1383. 
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01420-7
    Links to an external site.

    Schlax, J., Jünger, C., Beutel, M. E., Münzel, T., Pfeiffer, N., Wild, P., Blettner, M., Kerahrodi, J. G., Wiltink, J., & Michal, M. (2019). Income and education predict elevated depressive symptoms in the general population: results from the Gutenberg health study. 
    BMC Public Health
    , 
    19
    (1), 430.
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6730-4
    Links to an external site.

    Sheffler, Z. M., Reddy, V., & Pillarisetty, L. S. (2023). Physiology, neurotransmitters. In 
    StatPearls
    . StatPearls Publishing.

    Smoller, J. W., Andreassen, O. A., Edenberg, H. J., Faraone, S. V., Glatt, S. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2019). Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology. 
    Molecular Psychiatry
    , 
    24
    (3), 409–420.
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0010-4
    Links to an external site.

    Strom, N. I., Soda, T., Mathews, C. A., & Davis, L. K. (2021). A dimensional perspective on the genetics of obsessive-compulsive disorder. 
    Translational Psychiatry
    , 
    11
    (1), 401. 
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01519-z
    Links to an external site.

  • FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY – NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion Essay

    FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY – NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion Essay Sample 1

       Main Discussion Post

    Psychopathology, which helps clinicians explore mental health disorders and progress, is influenced by several factors, such as biological, psychological, social, and interpersonal factors. The theoretical perspective on psychopathology that a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) adopts significantly influences their approach to diagnosis, treatment, and patient interaction (Schultze-Lutter et al., 2018).

    Biological Factors that Affect the Development of Psychopathology

    Biological factors such as genetic predisposition and neuroscientific affect psychopathology because genetic predisposition plays a role in how many mental health disorders are developed. There is various research to support that genetics plays a role in conditions such as schizophrenia and other mental disorders due to the significant heritable components (Wilson & Rhee, 2022).
     
    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple genetic variants associated with psychiatric conditions such as ADHD, depression, and schizophrenia, meaning that genetic variations contribute to the risk of many mental health disorders (Waszczuk, 2022). Understanding these genetic influences helps psychiatric providers consider family history and genetic counseling in their practice. Research on neurobiology has provided insights into identifying structures of the brain associated with mental disorders, including depression and anxiety. For example, a reduction in the structural connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and amygdala has been linked with depression and anxiety. Neural patterns have also been used to predict future symptoms of depression and anxiety (Craske et al., 2023).

     Psychological Factors that Affect the Development of Psychopathology

    Several behavioral and cognitive theories explain how maladaptive behaviors can be learned and maintained and how thought patterns affect mental health, thus both affecting psychopathologies. Exposure to stressful or traumatic events can condition individuals to develop anxiety disorders. Studies during the COVID-19 period have shown the adverse effects of loneliness on physical and mental health that could affect psychopathology (Admon & Klavir, 2021). Cognitive theories focus on how thought patterns influence emotions and behaviors. Negative cognitive biases and distorted thinking patterns have been linked to depression and anxiety (Admon & Klavir, 2021).

    An individual’s emotional regulation and developmental experiences significantly influence mental health and affect psychopathology. Studies support that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) such as abuse and neglect are linked to increased rates of substance abuse, anxiety, and depression (Zitzmann et al., 2024).

    BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

    Social, Cultural, and Interpersonal Factors

    Social determinants of health, such as unemployment, education, socioeconomic status, and social support, are linked to higher rates of mental disorders throughout their lives. People in lower socioeconomic tiers often experience higher stress levels, limited access to healthcare, and increased exposure to violence, all of which contribute to the development of psychopathology. Studies support the association of mental health disorders with life circumstances (Kirkbride et al., 2024).

    Culture affects psychopathology. Cultural background affects how individuals express, perceive, and cope, whether the individual seeks help or the course of mental illness. Cultural factors can also protect individuals from the development of mental health disorders (Guruje et al., 2020).

    Interpersonal factors are also important in mental health and affect psychopathology. Poor quality and abusive relationships can contribute to the onset of mental disorders, while solid support systems can prevent mental health problems (Fleck et al., 2023). For example, the relationship between a parent or caregiver and a child significantly impacts the child’s development. It forms the basis for developing social and cognitive abilities, secure attachment, and physical and mental health. An individual’s interpersonal relationships can protect them from mental health issues or increase their risk of developing psychopathology (Fleck et al., 2023).

    Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNP) should keep in perspective the many factors that contribute to psychopathology and adopt them when assessing, diagnosing, treating, and even interacting with patients. The multifaceted nature of psychopathology emphasizes the need for PMHNPs to adopt an integrative approach in their clinical practice.

                                                                                                       References

    Admon, R., & Klavir, O. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral patterns across psychiatric conditions. 
    Brain Sciences
    , 
    11
    (12), 1560.                             https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121560

    Craske, M.G., Herzalleh, M.M., Nusslock, R., Patel, V
    .
     (2023). From neural circuits to communities: An integrative, multidisciplinary roadmap for       global mental health. 
    Nature Mental Health
    , 1, 12-24. 
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-022-00012-w
    Links to an external site.

    Fleck, L., Fuchs, A., & Kaess, M. (2023). The Significance of relationships in developmental. Psychopathology and Youth Mental Health.      
    Psychopathology
    , 
    56
    (1-2), 5–7. 
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000529417
    Links to an external site.

    Gureje, O., Lewis-Fernandez, R., Hall, B. J., & Reed, G. M. (2020). Cultural considerations in the classification of mental disorders: Why and how     in ICD-11. 
    BMC Medicine
    , 
    18
    (1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-1493-4

    Kirkbride, J. B., Anglin, D. M., Colman, I., Dykxhoorn, J., Jones, P. B., Patalay, P., Pitman, A., Soneson, E., Steare, T., Wright, T., & Griffiths, S. L.     (2024). The social determinants of mental health and disorder: evidence, prevention and recommendations. 
    World Psychiatry: Official Journal of     the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)
    , 
    23
    (1), 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21160

    Waszczuk, M.A. (2021). The utility of hierarchical models of psychopathology in genetics and biomarker research. 
    World Psychiatry
    , 20: 65-66.      
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20811
    Links to an external site.

    Wilson, S., & Rhee, S. H. (2022). Special issue editorial: Leveraging genetically informative study designs to understand the development and familial transmission of psychopathology. 
    Development and Psychopathology
    , 
    34
    (5), 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000955

    Schultze-Lutter, F., Schmidt, S. J., & Theodoridou, A. (2018). Psychopathology-a precision tool in need of re-sharpening. 
    Frontiers in Psychiatry
    , 
    9
    ,     446. 
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00446
    Links to an external site.

    Zitzmann, J., Rombold-George, L., Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2024). Emotion regulation, parenting, and psychopathology: A systematic       review. 
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
    , 
    27
    (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-023-00452-5

     

     

    FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY – NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion Essay Sample 2

    Week 1 Discussion: Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

    The development of psychopathology is a multifaceted phenomenon influenced by a complex interplay of various factors, including biological, psychological, and social/cultural/interpersonal elements. Understanding the multidimensional nature of mental disorders is crucial for nurse practitioners (NPs) in providing comprehensive and effective care (Hennessy et al., 2022). This discussion explores the biological (genetic and neuroscientific), psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental), and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that contribute to psychopathology’s expression, classification, diagnosis, and prevalence, highlighting the importance of an integrative approach.

    Biological Factors

    Genetic predispositions and neuroscientific findings play a significant role in the development of psychopathology. Genetic factors can increase an individual’s vulnerability to certain mental disorders. For instance, studies have shown that individuals with a family history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder have a higher risk of developing these conditions (Boland et al., 2022). Specific gene variations and interactions have been linked to various mental disorders, such as the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) and its association with depression and anxiety disorders (Boland et al., 2022).

    Neuroscientific research has revealed that abnormalities in brain structure, function, and neurotransmitter systems can contribute to the manifestation of mental disorders. For example, imbalances in neurotransmitters like serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine have been implicated in the development of depression, anxiety, and other mood disorders (McNaughton, 2020). Structural and functional abnormalities in brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus have also been associated with various psychopathologies, including schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (McNaughton, 2020).

    Psychological Factors

    Psychological factors, encompassing behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional regulation, and developmental stages, significantly influence the development of psychopathology. Maladaptive thought patterns, such as negative self-talk, overgeneralization, and cognitive distortions, can perpetuate and exacerbate mental health issues like depression and anxiety disorders (Hennessy et al., 2022). Additionally, difficulties in regulating emotions and coping with stress can increase the risk of developing psychopathology (Hennessy et al., 2022). Individuals with poor emotion regulation strategies may resort to maladaptive behaviors, such as substance abuse or self-harm, as a means of coping with intense emotions.

    Developmental factors also play a crucial role in the manifestation of mental disorders. Adverse childhood experiences, such as abuse, neglect, or trauma, can have long-lasting effects on an individual’s psychological and emotional well-being (Hennessy et al., 2022). These experiences can shape an individual’s perception of the world, interpersonal relationships, and coping mechanisms, increasing their vulnerability to psychopathology. Additionally, disruptions in attachment patterns and insecure attachment styles have been linked to the development of various mental disorders, including personality disorders and anxiety disorders.

    Social, Cultural, and Interpersonal Factors

    Social, cultural, and interpersonal factors play a crucial role in the development, expression, and perception of psychopathology. Societal stigma and discrimination surrounding mental health issues can exacerbate psychological distress and hinder individuals from seeking treatment (Hennessy et al., 2022). Cultural beliefs, norms, and values can influence the interpretation and expression of psychological distress and the acceptability of certain behaviors or symptoms (Hennessy et al., 2022). For example, somatic symptoms may be more readily acknowledged and accepted in some cultures than emotional or psychological symptoms.

    Interpersonal factors, such as family dynamics, social support systems, and relationships, can either serve as protective factors or contribute to the development of psychopathology. Dysfunctional family environments, including poor communication, conflict, and lack of emotional support, have been associated with an increased risk of mental health problems (Hennessy et al., 2022). Conversely, strong social support networks and positive relationships can buffer against the detrimental effects of stress and adversity, promoting psychological resilience. Furthermore, socioeconomic factors, such as poverty, lack of access to health care, and exposure to violence or trauma, can contribute to the development and perpetuation of mental health issues (Hennessy et al., 2022). These factors can create chronic stress, limit access to resources and support systems, and exacerbate existing vulnerabilities.

    References

    Boland, R., Verduin, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). 
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry
     (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    Hennessy, E., Heary, C., & Michail, M. (2022). 
    Understanding youth mental health perspectives from theory and practice
    . Open Univ Press.

    McNaughton N. (2020). Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: Should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors? 
    Personality Neuroscience
    , 
    3
    , e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2020.5

     

    FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY – NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion Essay Sample 3

    Factors that Influence the Development of Psychopathology – Discussion

    Several factors play a significant role in the development of psychopathology. Psychopathology refers to the study of mental illness. Human beings are different. The variations in sequencing of the human genome contribute to the phenotypical differences and differences in susceptibility to diverse pathologies. Psychopathology can arise from complex etiological traits because of polygenic inheritance, locus heterogeneity, presence of phenocopies, and incomplete penetrance.  Studies reveal that psychological, biological, social, and cultural factors can affect the development of psychopathology. An in-depth understanding of the development of a mental disorder simplifies the process of identifying the right intervention. The discussion explores the different factors that influence the development of psychopathology.

    Biological Factors

    The biological factors that influence the development of psychopathology mainly involve genetic and neuroscientific factors. Genome studies identify that mental health disorders are polygenic, which indicates a combination of rare variants of larger effects and several common variants of small effects. For instance, schizophrenia is a result of SNP variation (Smoller et al., 2019). In effect, specific genetic variations are associated with an increased risk of developing certain psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, psychiatric disorders are associated with neuroscientific factors that include brain chemistry, function, and structure. Neurotransmission has been associated with several mental illnesses. For instance, serotonin is significantly lower among people diagnosed with depression. The finding results in the identification that changes in neurotransmitters add to the complexity concerning the development of psychiatric disorders. Brain imaging studies have also been linked to psychopathology. For example, people with schizophrenia have different brain structures compared to other people. The changes are mainly evidenced in reduced gray matter, and total cerebrum volume with enlarged brain ventricles, including the cerebrospinal fluid fills the cavities.

    Psychological Factors

    Studies identify the correlation between emotional and social processing to psychiatric disorders. Attention biases, including positive and threat biases, contribute to the development of various psychiatric disorders. For example, children exhibiting attention biases to threat are more likely to possess anxiety symptoms with less effective emotion-regulation skills, and more social avoidance (Troller-Renfree et al., 2018). In contrast, children with positive biases tend to have adaptive emotion-regulation skills, approach behavior, and positive affect. Emotional factors are also associated with the development of mental disorders. The link between the deleterious effects of early psychosocial deprivation on social and cognitive behaviors shows that stress has an effect on the development of the brain. From this lens, the experiences during the early developmental stages might result in the development of psychiatric conditions. Studies also reveal that children who have a history of trauma with poor attachment styles are more likely to suffer from psychiatric disorders later in life (Troller-Renfree et al., 2018). Finally, emotional dysregulation is linked to difficulties in the management of one’s emotions, which can worsen one’s psychopathology. Such children might exhibit issues with managing their emotions or they can become extremely sensitive. FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY – NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion Essay

    Social, Cultural, and Interpersonal Factors

    Social, cultural, and interpersonal factors have a significant effect on the development of psychopathy. A myriad of social factors within one’s environment contribute to one having mental health issues. The social environment involves the existing societal dynamics, family dynamics, one’s socioeconomic status, education level, and social support. Having adequate resources, such as being employed and having social support are closely associated with positive psychiatric development. Nonetheless, experiencing social stressors, such as a lack of financial resources or exposure to stigmatization or discrimination is linked to the development of psychopathy (Lebowitz, & Appelbaum, 2019). Moreover, the culture of a patient and cultural experiences affect psychopathy. One’s culture defines how they view the world. Culture describes a shared set of values, norms, and beliefs. Cultural context affects how people view things in life ranging from responses to psychological distress. They also affect how one interprets and views mental illnesses and the accompanying symptoms. Culture can also affect whether an individual seeks help when diagnosed with mental health disorders, which can reduce the development of other mental issues. Studies have also revealed that interpersonal relationships have a significant effect on mental health. Interpersonal relationships are evidenced based on how one interacts with peers, the family dynamics, and how one navigates romantic relationships. Having healthy relationships translates into positive mental health effects. However, lack of social support and poor relationships can exacerbate psychopathology.

    Conclsion

    Psychopathology is multifaceted. The development of psychopathology is highly influenced by a myriad of factors, including biological, psychosocial, social, cultural, and interpersonal factors. However, it is essential to understand that the interaction between these factors has a major effect on psychopathology. Consequently, comprehending the interplay between these factors and the contribution of individual factors in the development of psychopathology aids in the identification of the most effective intervention. Thus, an understanding of the factors associated with the development of psychology fosters the adoption of a holistic approach, which addresses the diverse dimensions.

    References

    Lebowitz, M. S., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2019). Biomedical Explanations of Psychopathology and Their Implications for Attitudes and Beliefs about Mental Disorders. 
    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 
    15, 555–577. 
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095416
    Links to an external site.

    Smoller, J. W., Andreassen, O. A., Edenberg, H. J., Faraone, S. V., Glatt, S. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2019). Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology. 
    Molecular Psychiatry, 24(
    3), 409–420. 
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0010-4
    Links to an external site.

    Troller-Renfree, S., Zeanah, C. H., Nelson, C. A., & Fox, N. A. (2018). Neural and Cognitive Factors Influencing the Emergence of Psychopathology: Insights From the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. 
    Child Development Perspectives, 12(
    1), 28–33. 
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12251
    Links to an external site.
      FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY – NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion Essay

  • NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion

    NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY sample 1

    Psychopathology is the study of mental disorders and unusual behavior that can be influenced by many factors, including biology (Genetic and neuroscientific), psychology (thoughts), and social factors (social surroundings). Psychopathology is the discipline that provides psychiatrists with basic knowledge about the abnormal phenomena that affect the human mind and with a valid, reliable method to appraise them (Stranghellini & Broome, 2014).

    Biological Factors: Genetic and Neuroscientific Influences.

    Genetic Influence: 
    The genetic influence in mental disorders, known as heritability, has been studied mainly in conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. Studies show that people with relatives affected by these disorders are more likely to experience similar mental health challenges. Family studies using modern methodology show substantial familial aggregation for all major psychiatric disorders, including depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and alcohol dependence, as well as many syndromes, such as panic disorders (Smoller et al., 2019). Also, certain genes and genetic variations can influence mental disorders.

    Neuroscientific influence
    : Neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate, play a significant role in how we feel and think. When these chemicals are out of balance, it can lead to conditions like depression, schizophrenia, or anxiety. Also, things that happen when we are growing up, or what our mothers were exposed to while pregnant, can influence conditions like autism or ADHD.

    Psychological Factors: Behavioral and Cognitive Processes, Emotional, Developmental.

    Behavioral and Cognitive Process: 
    This approach suggests that normal and abnormal behaviors are learned or influenced by their environment. Maladaptive behaviors can be learned through operant and classical conditioning. Operant (instrumental) and classical (Pavlovian) conditioning are taught as the simplest forms of associative learning (Colomb & Brembs, 2010). According to the cognitive processes of psychopathology, abnormal behavior results from faulty mental processes or thinking patterns, such as overgeneralization, which can significantly contribute to disorders like depression and anxiety.

    BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Emotional and Developmental: 
    Emotional processes play a crucial role in mental disorders, particularly in terms of emotion regulation and stress management. For example, someone suffering from depression may struggle with chronic sadness and anhedonia. Developmentally, early childhood experiences such as abuse can lead to the development of mental disorders and sometimes result in an insecure attachment style. Mental disorders can also develop during critical developmental periods or stages, such as adolescence.

    Social, Cultural, and Interpersonal Factors

    Socioeconomic status and social support can impact the development of mental disorders. An individual’s financial situation and the support they receive from others can impact their mental health. Financial struggles and living in poor conditions can contribute to higher stress levels, resulting in mental disorders. Cultural norms have a significant impact on how people express, understand, and deal with mental illness. Some may feel ashamed, avoid seeking help, or worry that others might judge others. Managing these cultural differences can be very stressful. Furthermore, strong interpersonal relationships are crucial for mental well-being. Supportive friends and family can help reduce stress, whereas social isolation can increase the risk of mental health issues.

    In conclusion, mental health problems arise from a combination of biological factors, cognitive patterns, and social interactions. Understanding these components is crucial for developing effective interventions and treatments for mental health conditions.

    References

    Stanghellini G, Broome MR. Psychopathology is the basic science of psychiatry. 
    British Journal of Psychiatry
    . 2014;205(3):169-170. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.138974

    Colomb, J., & Brembs, B. (2010). The biology of psychology: ‘Simple’ conditioning? 
    Communicative & Integrative Biology
    , 
    3
    (2), 142-145. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.3.2.10334

    Smoller, J. W., Andreassen, O. A., Edenberg, H. J., Faraone, S. V., Glatt, S. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2019). Psychiatric Genetics and the Structure of Psychopathology. 
    Molecular Psychiatry
    , 
    24
    (3), 409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0010-4

     

    NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY sample 2

    Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

    A detailed understanding of the complex interplay of factors that influence the development of mental health disorders is crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. One such factor is genetics. The existing research indicates that conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder have significant hereditary components (Haywood et al., 2022). For example, there are higher concordance rates for these disorders among identical twins than fraternal twins, demonstrating a strong genetic link (Haywood et al., 2022). In addition, apart from genetics, another major biological factor that predisposes an individual to psychiatric complications is neuroscience. According to Remes et al. (2021), dysregulation of neurotransmitters, particularly serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, is associated with depression and anxiety. Furthermore, structural anomalies, such as enlarged ventricles seen in some individuals with schizophrenia, and functional irregularities, like reduced prefrontal cortex activity in those with depression, highlight the importance of brain structure and function in psychopathology (Remes et al., 2021).

    Aside from biological variables, psychological factors are also highly implicated in mental health issues. In this case, behavioral theories emphasize the role of conditioning and learning in developing maladaptive behaviors (Deckert et al., 2023). For instance, phobias arise through conditioning, where an initially neutral stimulus becomes associated with a fear response due to past experiences (Deckert et al., 2023). Likewise, in relation to cognition, negative automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes contribute significantly to disorders like depression and anxiety (Deckert et al., 2023). It is well-documented that individuals with depression exhibit negative thoughts about themselves, their world, and their future, which perpetuates their symptoms (Deckert et al., 2023). Besides, still in relation to psychological factors, emotional regulation, and early attachment experiences are crucial for mental health. According to Bosmans and Borelli (2022), there is no dispute that secure attachment in early childhood fosters healthy emotional development, while insecure attachment leads to increased vulnerability to mental disorders.

    Lastly, sociocultural factors also impact mental health. This is because strong social support networks are known to improve resilience and aid recovery from mental health issues (Remes et al., 2021). Likewise, cultural norms and values shape the expression, perception, and classification of mental disorders. In this case, somatic symptoms of depression are more commonly reported in some cultures compared to others, hence reflecting cultural variations in how psychological distress is manifested (Remes et al., 2021).

     

    References

    Bosmans, G., & Borelli, J. (2022). Attachment and the Development of Psychopathology: Introduction to the Special Issue. 
    Brain Sci
    , 
    12
    (2). 
    https://doi.org/ 10.3390/brainsci12020174
    Links to an external site.

    Deckert, J., Eichner, F. A., Kohls, M., Störk, S., Heuschmann, P. U., Hein, G., Gelbrich, G., Weißbrich, B., Dölken, L., Kurzai, O., Ertl, G., Barth, M., & Morbach, C. (2023). Differential network interactions between psychosocial factors, mental health, and health-related quality of life in women and men. 
    Psychiatric Reports
    , 
    13
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38525-8
    Links to an external site.

    Haywood, D., Baughman, F., Mullan, B., & Heslop, K. (2022). What accounts for the factors of psychopathology? An investigation of the neurocognitive correlates of internalizing, externalizing, and the P-factor. 
    Brain Sci
    , 
    12
    (4). 
    https://doi.org/ 10.3390/brainsci12040421
    Links to an external site.

    Remes, O., Mendes, J. F., & Templeton, P. (2021). Biological, Psychological, and Social Determinants of Depression: A Review of Recent Literature. 
    Brain Sci
    , 
    11
    (12). 
    https://doi.org/ 10.3390/brainsci11121633
    Links to an external site.

     

    NRNP-6635 Week 1: Discussion – FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY sample 3

    Week 1 initial Discussion  post

    Factors Influencing the Development of Psychopathology

    The emergence of psychopathology, which involves the presentation of mental disorders, is a multifaceted process impacted by biological, psychological, and social factors. Each of these components plays a crucial function in influencing an individual’s mental well-being.

    Psychopathology refers to the field of research that focuses on mental diseases and maladaptive behaviors. It is commonly known as unusual psychology. According to Butcher and Kendall (2018), it is imperative for mental health professionals in the fields of psychiatry, psychology, and social work to possess a comprehensive understanding of the etiology of mental disorders. According to Butcher and Kendall (2018), child and teenage psychopathology is more intricate and potentially more adaptable than adult psychopathology. Psychopathology is composed of various elements including physical, physiological, genetic, and neurological components such as neurotransmitters, neurophysiology, and neuroanatomy (Butcher & Kendall, 2020).

    Biological psychologists focus on the psychological factors that influence the behavior of both humans and animals. MacDuffie and Truman (2019) seek to understand the influence of various cognitive processes, such as genetics and neurochemical composition, on human behavior. Psychologists can deepen their understanding of the development of psychopathology by studying the brain and physiological mechanisms that influence cognitive, behavioral, and emotional processes. An analysis of the biological factors that influence psychopathology is highly significant as it provides valuable insights for developing and implementing ways to avoid and intervene in psychopathological illnesses.

    Psychological variables refer to the long-lasting mental, emotional, and behavioral processes that occur across a person’s lifetime. This process involves changes in three areas: behavior, cognition, and social-emotional functioning (Sadoc et al., 2018). Personality traits are typically understood as essential qualities that cover an individual’s behavioral patterns, emotional reactions to social encounters, and the act of self-reflection and evaluation throughout their life. However, individuals may occasionally display joy, tears, anger, introspection, or vicious behavior. It is important to emphasize that the variability of an individual’s “personality” is not the main focus. Instead, the key feature is the overall balance of their cognition, affect, and behavior, rather than their immediate reactions to specific situations. Sigmund Freud emphasized the importance of the early parent-child bond in the development of mental illness (Sadoc et al., 2018).

    Individuals from lower socioeconomic levels exhibit a greater incidence of mental illness compared to those from higher socioeconomic groups. Social cultural aspects refer to a variety of beliefs, attitudes, and conceptions that have an impact on the development and maturity of an individual. Ethnicity is a fundamental aspect of cultural identity and should be distinguished from the notion of race. Ethnicity is the state of belonging to a group that is defined by common cultural, traditional, and familial connections. The term “race” refers to a group of people who have common physical characteristics, as well as cultural and historical histories (MacDuffie & Strauman, 2019). The absence of understanding concerning a patient’s racial and ethnic differences leads to inconsistencies in the procedures of evaluating, diagnosing, and treating. The fundamental elements of their composition mostly comprise habits, morals, and actions. Cheung and Mak (2017) contend that social cultural factors play a crucial role in shaping an individual’s level of community involvement and level of maturity. There exists a robust link between emotional and behavioral disorders and environmental factors. While mental illnesses may share many similarities, the study of abnormal psychology is primarily shaped by social interpretations and cultural beliefs. The presentation, expression, categorization, and treatment of illnesses display differences based on cultural circumstances (Cheung & Mak, 2017).

    References

    Butcher, J. N., & Kendall, P. C. (2020). Introduction to childhood and adolescent psychopathology. In J. N. Butcher & P. C. Kendall (Eds.), APA handbook of psychopathology: 
    Child and adolescent psychopathology., Vol. 2
    . (pp. 3–14). American Psychological Association. 
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000065-001.

    Cheung, F. M., & Mak, W. W. S. (2016). Sociocultural factors in psychopathology. In J. N. Butcher & J. M. Hooley (Eds.), APA handbook of psychopathology: 
    Psychopathology:
     
    Understanding, assessing, and treating adult mental disorders., Vol. 1. 
    (pp. 127–147). American Psychological Association. 
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000064-006.
    Links to an external site.

    Jackson, C. E., & Milberg, W. P. (2017). Examination of neurological and neuropsychological features in psychopathology. In J. N. Butcher & J. M. Hooley (Eds.), APA handbook of psychopathology: 
    Psychopathology: Understanding, assessing, and treating adult mental disorders., Vol. 1
    . (pp. 65–90). American Psychological Association

    MacDuffie, K. E., & Strauman, T. J. (2019). Understanding Our Own Biology: 
    The Relevance of Auto‐Biological Attributions for Mental Health
    . Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 24(1), 50–68.

    Mechanic, D., & McAlpine, D. D. (2012). The Influence of Social Factors on Mental Health. 
    Principles and Practice of Geriatric Psychiatry
    , 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470846410.ch17

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2018). Kaplan & Sadock’s 
    synopsis of psychiatry
     (11thed.). Wolters Kluwer.

  • NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment

    NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment – ASSESSING, DIAGNOSING, AND TREATING ADULTS WITH MOOD DISORDERS

    It is important for the PMHNP to have a comprehensive understanding of mood disorders in order to assess and accurately formulate a diagnosis and treatment plan for patients presenting with these disorders. Mood disorders may be diagnosed when a patient’s emotional state meets the diagnostic criteria for severity, functional impact, and length of time. Those with a mood disorder may find that their emotions interfere with work, relationships, or other parts of their lives that impact daily functioning. Mood disorders may also lead to substance abuse or suicidal thoughts or behaviors, and although they are not likely to go away on their own, they can be managed with an effective treatment plan and understanding of how to manage symptoms.

    In this
    Assignment
    you will assess, diagnose, and devise a treatment plan for a patient in a case study who is presenting with a mood disorder.

    RESOURCES

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment WEEKLY RESOURCES

    TO PREPARE

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing, diagnosing, and treating mood disorders.

    Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.

    Review the video, 
    Case Study: Petunia Park
    . You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.

    Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.

    Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.

    Consider patient diagnostics missing from the video:
    Provider Review outside of interview:

    Temp 
    98.2
      Pulse  
    90
     Respiration 
    18
      B/P  
    138/88

    Laboratory Data Available
    : Urine drug and alcohol screen negative.  CBC within normal ranges, CMP within normal ranges. Lipid panel within normal ranges. Prolactin Level 8; TSH 6.3 (H)

    THE ASSIGNMENT

    Develop a Focused SOAP Note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

    Subjective: 
    What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomatology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?

    Objective: 
    What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?

    Assessment:
     Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest to lowest priority. Compare the 
    DSM-5-TR
     diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what 
    DSM-5
     criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

    Plan:
     What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

    Reflection notes:
     Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4

    Submit
     your Focused SOAP Note.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Before submitting your
    final assignment
    , you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
    Turnitin Drafts
     from the 
    Start Here
     area.

    To submit your completed NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.

    Then, click on 
    Start Assignment
     near the top of the page.

    Next, click on 
    Upload File
     and select 
    Submit Assignment
     for review.

    Rubric

    NRNP_6665_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

    NRNP_6665_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

    Criteria

    Ratings

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Create documentation in the
    Focused SOAP Note Template
    about the patient in the case study. In the Subjective section, provide: • Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Past psychiatric history• Medication trials and current medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history• Allergies• ROS

    15
     
    to >
    13.0
     pts

    Excellent

    The response throughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

    13
     
    to >
    11.0
     pts

    Good

    The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

    11
     
    to >
    10.0
     pts

    Fair

    The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies.

    10
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or the subjective documentation is missing.

    15
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    In the Objective section, provide:• Review of Systems (ROS) documentation and relate if pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses

    15
     
    to >
    13.0
     pts

    Excellent

    The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s ROS for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.

    13
     
    to >
    11.0
     pts

    Good

    The response accurately documents the patient’s ROS for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.

    11
     
    to >
    10.0
     pts

    Fair

    Documentation of the patient’s ROS is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor inaccuracies.

    10
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s ROS. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed. Or the objective documentation is missing.

    15
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    In the Assessment section, provide:• Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form• At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

    20
     
    to >
    17.0
     pts

    Excellent

    The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected.

    17
     
    to >
    15.0
     pts

    Good

    The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected.

    15
     
    to >
    13.0
     pts

    Fair

    The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy. Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.

    13
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or the assessment documentation is missing. NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment

    20
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    In the Plan section, provide:• Your plan for psychotherapy• Your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies. Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. • Incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

    25
     
    to >
    22.0
     pts

    Excellent

    The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient. The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A strong rationale for the plan is provided that demonstrates critical thinking and content understanding. … The response includes at least one evidence-based health promotion activity and one evidence-based patient education strategy.

    22
     
    to >
    19.0
     pts

    Good

    The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient. The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. An adequate rationale for the plan is provided. … The response includes at least one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

    19
     
    to >
    17.0
     pts

    Fair

    The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient. The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is weak or general. … The response includes one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy, but it may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.

    17
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient. The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is inaccurate or missing. … The health promotion and patient education strategies are incomplete or missing.

    25
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    • Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    5
     
    to >
    4.0
     pts

    Excellent

    Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.

    4
     
    to >
    3.5
     pts

    Good

    Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.

    3.5
     
    to >
    3.0
     pts

    Fair

    Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.

    3
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

    5
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).

    10
     
    to >
    8.0
     pts

    Excellent

    The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.

    8
     
    to >
    7.0
     pts

    Good

    The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.

    7
     
    to >
    6.0
     pts

    Fair

    Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.

    6
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    Two or fewer resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.

    10
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.

    5
     
    to >
    4.0
     pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct APA format with no errors

    4
     
    to >
    3.5
     pts

    Good

    Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors

    3.5
     
    to >
    3.0
     pts

    Fair

    Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

    3
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

    5
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation

    5
     
    to >
    4.0
     pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

    4
     
    to >
    3.5
     pts

    Good

    Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

    3.5
     
    to >
    3.0
     pts

    Fair

    Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

    3
     
    to >
    0
     pts

    Poor

    Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

    5
     pts

    Total Points: 
    100 NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment

     

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Adults with Mood Disorders: Petunia Park

    Subjective:

    CC
    (chief complaint): The patient complains of noncompliance with prescriptions, getting frequent agitation, and having alternating mood swings of “being joyful and being depressed.”

    HPI
    : The patient is a 25-year-old female with a previous history of mental illness. The onset of her current symptoms was about seven days ago. She describes her symptoms as being “squashed” some of the time and believes that it is her hard work ethic that is making her mentally unstable. Symptoms are intermittent in duration but can last for up to seven consecutive days. Symptom characteristics include being severe, unrelenting, and recalcitrant. They are aggravated by being wakeful and somewhat relieved by sleep and medications. The timing of her symptoms is anytime day or night. She rates their severity at 6/10.

    Substance Current Use:
    She is a tobacco smoker and consumes a pack a day. She denies use of any other drugs or substances.

    Medical History:
    She suffers from polycystic ovarian syndrome or PCOS as well as hypothyroidism.

    Current Medications
    :

    Levothyroxine 100 mcg by mouth every day (for hypothyroidism).

    Allergies
    : NKDA.

    Reproductive Hx
    : She describes herself as a heterosexual female currently in a relationship. She has n children and her LMP was 05/29/2024.

    Review of Systems or ROS
    :

    GENERAL: Denies fever, chills, fatigue, weight loss, or malaise.

    HEENT: Negative for headaches, light sensitivity, ear discharge, ear pain, rhinorrhea, sore throat or difficulty swallowing.

    SKIN: Negative for itching, eczema, or rashes.

    CARDIOVASCULAR: Denies chest pain, palpitations, or peripheral edema.

    RESPIRATORY: Denies coughing, dyspnea, wheezing, or producing sputum.

    GASTROINTESTINAL: Denies N/V/D as well as changes in bowel movements.

    GENITOURINARY: Negative for dysuria, cloudy urine, or abnormal vaginal discharge.

    NEUROLOGICAL: Denies dizziness, syncope, ataxia, paresis, paralysis, pins and needles, or loss of bowel and/ or bladder control. NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment

    MUSCULOSKELETAL: Denies muscle pain, back pain, or joint pain.

    HEMATOLOGIC: Negative for a history of blood and/or clotting disorders.

    LYMPHATICS: Denies lymphadenopathy or having had a splenectomy before.

    ENDOCRINOLOGIC: Negative for excessive thirst, excessive drinking of water, excessive eating, excessive sweating, heat/ cold intolerance, or a history of hormonal therapy/ treatment.

    Objective:

    Vitals:
    T 98.2; P 90 ; R 18 ; B/P  138/88

    Diagnostic Lab Results
    : Urine drug tests, CMP, and full blood count were unremarkable. TSH was elevated at 6.3 on testing.

    Psychometric test:
    Young Mania Rating Scale or YMRS tool.

    Assessment:

    Mental Status Examination
    : The patient is a 25-year-old female who is well-groomed for the occasion, time of the day, and the weather. She has normal appearance and gait with no obvious physical abnormalities. She is concious and aware of the place, time, space, person, and event. She is cooperative and maintains good eye contact throughout. Her speech is clear, coherent, and goal-oriented although pressured in rate. She displays no obvious mannerisms or tics. Her self-reported mood is “happy” and the observed affect is euphoric hence mood-congruent. She denies having suicidal or homicidal thoughts. She also denies getting hallucinations or delusions. Her immediate, short-term, and long-term memory is good. Her abstraction is also good as she can make sense of idioms. Her insight and judgment are somewhat impaired. Impression: Bipolar I disorder (APA, 2022; Boland et al., 2021; Stahl, 2021).

    Diagnosis and Differential Diagnoses

    Bipolar I Disorder: 296.42 (F31.12)

    The euphoria and “happiness” described in the MSE means that this patient is in the manic phase of bipolar I disease. In her CC she stated that she usually has alternating depressive feelings and elation. She thus meets the diagnostic criteria for BD I as one requirement is that the patient must have had at least one manic episode (APA, 2022; Boland et al., 2021). According to the DSM-5-TR, the diagnostic criteria also include insomnia, excessive excitement, abnormally high self-esteem, talkativeness, distractibility, and excessive energy amongst others.

    Major Depressive Disorder (MDD):
    296.22 (F32.1)

    One of the poles of BD I is depression. This patient can thus be mistakenly diagnosed with MDD when she is on the depression pole (APA, 2022). However, this cannot be true as she has also experienced mania making this BD instead.

    Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder or ADHD: 314.01 (F90.2)

    ADHD is a distant possibility but still plausible since it usually starts in childhood but goes up to adulthood. The irritability, distractibility, insomnia, social isolation (from peers), and inattentiveness amongst others may lead to a wrong diagnosis of ADHD. However, it may also be comorbid with the BD I. NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment

    Case Formulation and Treatment Plan:

    Cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) brief therapy 45/ session x 8 weeks (Corey, 2023).

    Lithium (Eskalith) 300 mg orally BID (Stahl, 2020).

    Regular physical activity and a diet rich in fresh fruits and vegetables.

    Reflection

    I did everything according to the book for the patient (Carlat, 2023). I also observed all ethical principles including autonomy, fidelity, justice, beneficence, and nonmaleficence (Haswell, 2019). Social determinants of health applicable to the client included low educational achievement and poor access to quality mental health care. I tailored health education for her according to these and then gave her a return date for follow up after 4 weeks.

     

     
    References

    American Psychiatric Association [APA] (2022).
    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), 5
    th
    ed
    . Author.

    Boland, R., Verdiun, M., & Ruiz, P. (Eds) (2021).
    Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry, 12
    th
    ed
    . Wolters Kluwer.

    Carlat, D.J. (2023).
    The psychiatric interview, 5
    th
    ed
    . Wolters Kluwer.

    Corey, G. (2023).
    Theory and practice of counselling and psychotherapy, 11
    th
    ed
    . Cengage Learning.

    Haswell, N. (2019). The four ethical principles and their application in aesthetic practice.
    Journal of Aesthetic Nursing
    , 8(4), 177-179.
    https://doi.org/10.12968/joan.2019.8.4.177

    Stahl, S. M. (2021).
    Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications, 5
    th
    ed
    . Cambridge University Press.

    Stahl, S.M. (2020).
    Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Prescriber’s guide, 7
    th
    ed
    . Cambridge University Press. NRNP-6665 Week 4: Assignment