Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • Analyzing Synthetic Patient Data for Clinical Insights

    Analyzing Synthetic Patient Data for Clinical Insights

    Based on the synthetic patient dataset and guided by the Module materials, I will develop three potential research questions aimed at identifying patterns that can support clinical decision-making and population health initiatives.

    Research Question

    Does patient age influence the likelihood of hospital readmission within 30 days?

    The key variables

    Independent: Age

    Dependent: Readmission within 30 days

    Rationale

    Age is a known risk factor for readmission. Quantifying this relationship can help target high-risk age groups for follow-up care.

    Clinical Relevance

    The insights can help support discharge planning and early intervention strategies, particularly for geriatric patients, aligning with quality improvement outcomes such as reduced readmission rates.

    Research Question

    Is there a difference in the average length of stay based on the discharge destination, such as home or a skilled nursing facility?

    The key Variables

    Independent: Discharge Destination

    Dependent: Length of Stay

    Rationale

    This relationship can reveal patterns in patient acuity and recovery needs.

    Clinical Relevance

    The results can guide nursing assessments and resource allocation for discharge planning and care transitions, which is consistent with data-driven quality improvement.

    Research Question

    Does the type of insurance, such as Medicare, Medicaid, or Private, affect the frequency of emergency department visits?

    The key Variables

    Independent: Insurance Type

    Dependent: Number of ED visits

    Rationale

    Emergency department utilization patterns may reflect access to preventive care and socioeconomic barriers.

    Clinical Relevance

    Understanding payer-based disparities can inform policy interventions and resource planning to improve equity, which aligns with healthy community planning.

    These questions demonstrate how understanding variable measurement levels, such as distinguishing nominal from ratio data, directly informs data analysis strategy. Following Pruinelli et al.’s (2020) roadmap, such exploratory questions form the basis for evidence-based practice and strategic population health interventions.

    References

    Pruinelli, L., Johnson, S. G., Fesenmaier, B., Winden, T. J., Coviak, C., & Delaney, C. W. (2020). An applied healthcare data science roadmap for nursing leaders: A workshop development, conceptualization, and application. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 38(10), 484-489.

  • CONNECTING PATHOPHYSIOLOGY TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD)

    CONNECTING PATHOPHYSIOLOGY TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: 25 points

    Instructions: Read the assigned textbook chapters. Choose
    ONE
    diagnosis from the readings for the current body system. Fill out the assignment below by connecting essential knowledge of pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis / problem a patient would have coming to the APRN’s clinical practice. Include a well-developed physical examination, relevant diagnostic tests, pharmacotherapy, and treatment plan – ALL based on the pathophysiology of the disease.  Show the connection between the pathophysiologic process of the disease and the clinical manifestations and the pharmacotherapeutic treatment and plan.

    It is required that at least 2 citations / 2 references (Ex. Rogers’ Textbook and Clinical Practice Guidelines) are used for this assignment. Points are included into the points listed for each section. A citation is required for the following sections: “Pathophysiology,” “Signs and Symptoms” (Body Systems; Subjective / HPI; Objective); “Labs and Diagnostics,” “Diagnosis” (Pathophysiology of differential diagnoses), and “Pharmacotherapy” (Plan, Guidelines, and SDoH).

     

    DIAGNOSIS CHOSEN FROM THE READINGS IN ROGERS’ TEXTBOOK ON THIS BODY SYSTEM
    :

    (It is required that a different population must be chosen for each of the next assignments. For example, if you choose an adult disease for cardiovascular system, then you should choose a pediatric disease for pulmonary assignment and then choose women’s health for GI assignment.

     

    Diagnosis: Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD)(Women’s Health)

     

    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PRIMARY MEDICAL CONCERN (Disease chosen – specific to the population)  (2 points)

     

     

     

     

    GERD happens when the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) does not close well. This muscle is supposed to stop food and acid from coming back up from the stomach. In women, hormones like estrogen and progesterone (during pregnancy or hormone therapy) can make the LES weak (Sharma & Yadlapati, 2020). Also, extra pressure in the belly (from being overweight or pregnant) can make GERD worse. If acid keeps coming up, it can hurt the esophagus and cause problems like esophagitis or Barrett’s esophagus.

     

    HOW WOULD YOU TEACH THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY TO THE PATIENT AND/OR FAMILY (1 point)

    I would explain to the patient that GERD is when the valve (LES) between the esophagus and stomach does not close tightly. This allows stomach acid to move up and cause burning in the chest. I will use pictures and easy words to help the patient understand.

     

     

     

     

    SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

     

    BODY SYSTEMS THAT ARE DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY THIS MEDICAL PROBLEM
    (2 points)

    EXPLAIN HOW EACH SYSTEM YOU CHOSE IS AFFECTED – IT CAN BE A POSSIBLE COMPLICATION OF THE DISEASE. (Ex. Integumentary affected from diabetes related to a diabetic wound OR Neurologic system affected by diabetes related to vision changes). (Minimum 3 body systems)

     

     

    Gastrointestinal System: The acid from the stomach irritates the esophagus and can cause inflammation or ulcers.

     

    Respiratory System: Acid can go into the lungs and cause coughing, wheezing, or even infection.

     

    Cardiovascular System) GERD does not harm the heart, but chest pain from GERD can feel like a heart problem

     

    PRIORITY SUBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS / HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS (HPI)

    (on SOAP notes – the S stands for subjective – which is information from the patient)

     

    Align the subjective symptoms to the pathophysiology of the disease. These are the things that a patient may tell you if they have the disease. 
    (2 points)

     

     

    Start of symptoms: A few weeks ago, getting worse

     

    Location: Burning pain in the chest, goes up to the throat

     

    How long it lasts: After eating, about 30–60 minutes

     

    What it feels like: Burning, sour liquid in mouth

     

    What makes it worse: Spicy foods, lying down, big meals

     

    What helps: Antacids, sitting up

     

    Treatment tried: Over-the-counter antacids

     

    Pain level: Moderate to strong, hard to sleep

     

     

     

    PRIORITY PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

    OBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS

    (on SOAP notes – the O stands for objective – which is information from the provider)

     

    Align the examination / findings to the body systems that affected.  (Minimum 2 systems)

    (2 points)

     

    You should build a “clinical picture” for each symptom to start ruling in or out diagnoses. In other words, viral pharyngitis vs strep vs tonsillitis vs epiglottitis, etc.

     

     

     

     

    General look: Slightly overweight, mild pain

     

    Mouth and throat (HEENT): Bad breath, no sore throat

     

    Heart: Normal sounds, no problem

     

    Lungs: Wheezing sometimes when lying down

     

    Stomach (GI): Tender in the upper belly, no serious signs

     

    Endocrine: Normal

     

    Arms/Legs (Extremities): Normal

     

    Skin, muscles, blood, and urinary systems: All normal

     

     

    MAKING THE CONNECTION:

    Patho-Clinical Manifestations

    Write a paragraph explaining how the subjective and objective findings are linked to the pathophysiology of the disease. 
    (150-300 words) (2 points)

     

     

     

    Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) occurs when the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), a ring-like muscle between the esophagus and stomach, becomes weak or relaxes inappropriately, allowing stomach acid to flow back into the esophagus. This backflow, or acid reflux, irritates the esophageal lining and leads to common symptoms such as heartburn and chest discomfort. When this happens frequently, it can cause inflammation, erosion, or other damage to the esophageal tissue (Sharma & Yadlapati, 2020). In women, hormonal changes, especially during pregnancy or menopause, can further weaken the LES, making reflux more likely. Additionally, the pressure from the growing uterus during pregnancy can worsen symptoms. GERD can also affect the respiratory system; when stomach acid reaches the throat or airways, it may cause chronic cough, wheezing, or a feeling of tightness in the chest. Upper abdominal pain, especially after meals or when lying down, indicates irritation in both the stomach and lower esophagus. Without proper management, GERD may lead to complications such as esophagitis or Barrett’s esophagus.

     

     

    LABS / DIAGNOSTIC TESTING

     

    LAB AND DIAGNOSTIC FINDINGS THAT MAY BE ABNORMAL

     

    List the appropriate tests / labs (minimum 2) and explain the normal / abnormal result and how the lab test helps the APRN differentiate this diagnosis from others on the differential list.
    (1 points)

     

    EGD (Endoscopy): Shows if the esophagus is red, swollen, or damaged. Normal is healthy pink tissue. Bad is red, ulcers, or white patches.

     

    24-Hour pH Test: Measures how often acid goes up into the esophagus. Normal is pH above 4 most of the time. Bad is pH below 4 many times a day.

     

     

     

    MAKING THE CONNECTION:

    Patho-Diagnostic Tests / Labs

    Write a paragraph explaining how the labs and/or diagnostic tests are linked to the pathophysiology of the disease. 
    (150 – 300 words) (2 points)

     

    Diagnostic tests are important to understand how serious GERD is and how it affects the esophagus. An upper endoscopy, also called esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), helps the provider see the lining of the esophagus and look for signs of acid damage, such as redness, swelling, or open sores (Chhabra & Ingole, 2022). This test shows if GERD has already caused inflammation or injury inside the esophagus. Another useful test is the esophageal pH monitoring, which measures how much acid is present in the esophagus over a 24-hour period. If the test shows high acid levels, it means the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is not closing properly. This proves that acid is flowing back into the esophagus from the stomach. These test results help confirm the diagnosis of GERD and show how strong or weak the LES is. With this information, the healthcare provider can choose the right treatment plan, such as medications or lifestyle changes, to prevent further acid damage and improve symptoms.

    DIAGNOSIS (ASSESSMENT)
    (on SOAP notes – the A stands for assessment – which is the diagnosis)

     

    2 POSSIBLE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES (DD) (1 point)

     

     

    1.      Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD)

    2.      Chest Pain from Muscles or Stress

     

    EXPLAIN THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF THE 2 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES

    (2 points)

     

    1.      PUD: Happens when the lining of the stomach or small intestine is damaged by acid. It can be from H. pylori or medicines like NSAIDs. Pain is usually in the stomach but not always with acid going up the esophagus.

    2.      Chest Pain from Stress or Muscles: Happens from tight muscles or anxiety. Not from acid. Pain can feel like GERD but is not helped by antacids.

    PHARMACOTHERAPY / NON-PHARMACOTHERAPY / PLAN

     

    PLAN

    (on SOAP notes – the P stands for plan)

    (2 points)

     

     

     

    EDUCATION (DISEASE, DIET, LIFESTYLE, ACTIVITY):

    Avoid spicy and greasy foods, eat small meals, stay upright after eating, sleep with head raised, lose weight if needed.

    MEDS:
    Omeprazole 20–40 mg once a day for 8 weeks.

     

    FURTHER TESTING:
    EGD if symptoms do not get better in 8 weeks or if there are serious signs like trouble swallowing

     

    FOLLOW-UP:
    Return in 8 weeks or sooner if worse

    CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THIS DISEASE:

    Look up the most recent clinical guidelines of the disease you have chosen and add the link to the guidelines here.

    (1  point)

     ACG clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (Katz et al. 2021)

    https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538

     

    MAKING THE CONNECTION:

    Patho-Pharm

    Write a paragraph explaining how the pharmacotherapy (medications) is linked to the pathophysiology of the disease.
      (150-300 words) (2 points)

     

    GERD occurs when acid from the stomach damages the lining of the esophagus. This happens because the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is weak and does not close well, allowing acid to move upward. Medications like omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), help by reducing the amount of acid the stomach makes. PPIs block the acid-producing pumps in the stomach lining, giving the esophagus time to heal and stopping the burning pain (Chhabra & Ingole, 2022). With less acid, there is also less chance of damage and inflammation. Omeprazole is often taken once daily and works best when used regularly. Other medications, such as antacids and H2 blockers, provide fast relief but do not last as long as PPIs. While antacids neutralize acid already in the stomach, and H2 blockers reduce acid for a few hours, PPIs are preferred for long-term control. All of these medicines help by targeting acid, which is the main cause of symptoms and injury in GERD.

     

     

    SOCIAL DETEREMINANTS OF HEALTH (SDoH)

    Identify one SDoH that could affect a patient with this disease. Explain how it would affect the individual and the disease process AND explain your plan – as the provider – to maneuver treatment with the SDoH concern
    .  (150-300 words)
    (2 points)

     

    Low income can make GERD worse because people with limited money often eat cheaper, unhealthy foods that trigger acid reflux, like fried or processed meals. They might not afford healthy groceries, medications, or regular doctor visits. Without health insurance, they may skip treatment or delay care until symptoms become severe. Stress from financial hardship can also increase stomach acid and make symptoms worse. As the provider, I would recommend affordable treatment options such as generic omeprazole, which is low-cost and available over the counter. I would use simple, clear language to explain the condition and treatment to make sure the patient understands. I would also suggest home remedies, like eating smaller meals, avoiding spicy food, and staying upright after meals. If needed, I would connect the patient with free or low-cost community resources, including food banks, health clinics, or prescription assistance programs. The goal is to give care that respects the patient’s financial situation while still improving health outcomes.

    THIS ASSIGNMENT ALIGNS WITH THE FOLLOWING COURSE OBJECTIVES:

    1.Apply the model of homeostasis to the understanding of the theoretical/empirical basis of physiologic regulation and pathophysiologic phenomena of the human body

    Describe abnormal physiological disorders in the human population.

    Examine the interaction between genetics and environmental factors in the development of a given disorder

    Distinguish the signs, symptoms, and diagnostic test results associated with disorders affecting the human population

    Integrate the cultural, socioeconomic, gender, and age-related differences in the pathophysiologic response and treatment associated to disease or injury.

    6.Interpret physiologic function and pathophysiologic dysfunction in the context of preparing to make competent clinical decisions in an advanced practice role

     

    References

    Chhabra, P., & Ingole, N. (2022). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): Highlighting diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle changes. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28563

    Katz, P. O., Dunbar, K. B., Schnoll-Sussman, F. H., Greer, K. B., Yadlapati, R., & Spechler, S. J. (2021). ACG clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 117(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538

    Sharma, P., & Yadlapati, R. (2020). Pathophysiology and treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Looking beyond acid. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1486(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14501

  • Nursing Shortage Analysis of a Pertinent Health Issue Essay

    Nursing Shortage Analysis of a Pertinent Health Issue Essay

    Analysis of a Pertinent Health Issue: Nursing Shortage

    Describe the national healthcare issue and its impact

    Nursing shortage is a significant national healthcare issue in the USA, and across the world, with widespread implications for patient care, the well-being of healthcare workers, and healthcare costs. The USA is experiencing a shortage of nursing personnel, an issue that has been exacerbated by burnout following the Covid-19 pandemic, increased healthcare demands, and an aging population. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that 59.4 full-time equivalent nurses are required per 10,000 population, but only about 10.26 full-time equivalent nurses are available per 10,000 population in the USA. The rural areas and underserved areas are especially hard hit by the nursing shortage (Al Mohajer, 2023).

    The nursing shortage has a significant impact on healthcare. It leads to higher healthcare costs as organizations must meet the nurse demand gap through travel and temporary nurses, who increase operational costs (Bae, 2022). In addition, it causes denied and delayed services as medical facilities are forced to reduce services or close units due to insufficient staff (Tamata & Mohammadnezhad, 2023). Besides that, it causes increased workload for existing staff, contributing to further turnover, absenteeism and burnout. Additionally, it compromises patient safety and care quality, as lower nurse-to-patient ratios lead to more errors and reduced quality of care (Galanis et al., 2023).

    GET A HUMAN-WRITTEN PAPER HERE

    Brief summary of two articles on the healthcare issue

    Al Mohajer (2023) presents the results of a policy brief that identified the nursing shortage as a national issue in the USA, and suggests strategies for addressing the issue. The author notes that the nursing shortage being experienced in the USA is caused by suboptimal service delivery, insufficient research, flawed technologies, inadequate governance, poor financial design, and workforce market mismatch. The article makes recommendations for addressing the nursing shortage, including investing in relevant research, developing a robust preparedness plan for addressing public health emergencies, strengthening nursing education, including nursing in health technology design, changing payment structures and policies, investing in nursing well-being, and strengthening the nursing role in advancing equity Nursing Shortage Analysis of a Pertinent Health Issue Essay.

    Tamata and Mohammadnezhad (2023) present the results of a systematic review exploring the factors that affect the nursing shortage. The study notes that the nursing shortage is caused by a combination of factors, including nurses’ stress and burnout, nursing staff turnover, barriers to training and enrolment, and policy and planning barriers. The authors recommend that these factors be addressed to reduce the nursing shortage.

    Strategies used to address the organizational impact of the healthcare issue

    Three strategies are identified for addressing the nursing shortage and its organizational impact. First, changing payment structures and policies to ensure nurses are reimbursed for their efforts in teleservices, school nursing, team-based care, and care coordination. Second, investing in nursing well-being by providing resilience and well-being programs, and a safe work environment. Third, investing in nursing education by increasing funding for staff attending nursing school and faculty salaries, and expanding scholarships and loan programs. Having pipeline programs that encourage those with an interest in nursing to pursue a nursing career program, and supporting bridge programs (Al Mohajer, 2023). Fourth, implementing nurse retention strategies that ensure nurses are not overworked, presenting attractive working conditions and providing adequate support. The retention strategies help to improve nurse-to-patient ratios, support mental health and wellness programs, and offer competitive salaries and benefits (Tamata & Mohammadnezhad, 2023). Nursing Shortage Analysis of a Pertinent Health Issue Essay

    References

    Al Mohajer, M. (2023). Understanding the Gap Between Nursing Workforce in the United States and Population Needs-A Policy Brief.
    Avicenna journal of medicine, 13
    (4), 206–214.
    https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775724

    Bae S. H. (2022). Noneconomic and economic impacts of nurse turnover in hospitals: A systematic review.
    International nursing review, 69
    (3), 392–404.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12769

    Galanis, P., Moisoglou, I., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Meimeti, E., & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). Increased Job Burnout and Reduced Job Satisfaction for Nurses Compared to Other Healthcare Workers after the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 13
    (3), 1090–1100.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030095

    Tamata, A. T., & Mohammadnezhad, M. (2023). A systematic review study on the factors affecting shortage of nursing workforce in hospitals.
    Nursing open, 10
    (3), 1247–1257.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1434
      Nursing Shortage Analysis of a Pertinent Health Issue Essay

  • Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

    Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

    Directions:
    Use this template to complete the Week 6 Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement assignment as outlined in the assignment instructions in Canvas.

    Click into the box below to add your name and date.

    Click into each box where it says [Type Here] on the following slides.

    Remove the words [Type Here] to insert your responses.

    Name:
    [Type Here]
      

    Date: [Type Here]  

    Problem to Examine in Root Cause Analysis (RCA):

    Low rates of compliance with preventive care screenings and routine immunizations among adult patients in the primary care setting.

    Rationale for Problem Selection:

    Preventive screenings and vaccinations create essential conditions for early illness detection and decreased disease-related problems. Medical services that are vital for patient health receive inadequate attention from many patients, which subsequently generates higher healthcare expenses and raises disease severity levels.

     

    Brief Description of Literature Supporting the Need for Quality Improvement

    (At least 2-3 sentences, cite 1-2 sources):

    The CDC (2022) reports that influenza vaccination rates, together with shingles vaccination rates and pneumococcal disease vaccination rates, fall short of Healthy People 2030 objectives. Cheng et al. (2020) reveal that patients avoid preventive care because they receive wrong information from sources and face limited access to services and non-receptive provider guidance. The identified data indicates an obvious requirement for Quality Improvement methods that seek to boost acceptance rates Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

    There is a fundamental requirement for preventive care services that provide routine screenings and vaccinations to help people detect diseases early while improving long-term population health. Preventable illnesses, together with increased healthcare expenses, result from adult patients who postpone or avoid routine medical services. Our project aims to enhance preventive screening compliance rates within our patient demographic. The issue was chosen because it directly affects patient outcomes, while the CDC and other organizations have confirmed the widespread underutilization of preventive services. Resolving this gap would strengthen personal health outcomes and public well-being and decrease unnecessary healthcare costs. We aim to discover barriers and design specific interventions to enhance the desired outcomes.

    The fishbone diagram presents all the various factors that drive down preventive screening and vaccination adoption rates. The analysis grouped identified factors under four categories: Environment, People and Method/Process, and Equipment/Supplies. Four causes were examined beneath each group, where two factors were chosen for practical change initiatives while two others presented challenges for change. The team selected realistic factors, including limited access to appointments, insufficient patient education, and the absence of reminder tools and outdated EHR platforms, as areas for direct intervention. The team acknowledges flood zones and total patient refusal as unrealistic, although they cannot serve as short-term change opportunities. The systematic analysis helps identify practical areas where our quality improvement project can make a difference while guiding us in choosing the most effective interventions.

    Research showed inadequate screening reminders as the most realistic opportunity to enhance patient outcomes because they delivered high-impact results. Our team comprises primary care providers, EHR/IT personnel, care coordinators, and clinic managers. A SMART goal established to enhance adult patient completion rates of due preventive screenings by 20% through EHR-based automated reminder technology within three months. This goal contains specific, measurable objectives that can be achieved using existing tools for relevant clinical quality results while maintaining a time frame for accountability. The goal supports our organizational mission of encouraging proactive medical care and maximizing preventive health delivery Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

     

    An implementation protocol was created for automated reminders within our EHR system and trained our staff about its operation during the Plan phase. Our team deployed the system during the Do phase and conducted weekly reminder messages to appropriate adult patients. The hypothetical data showed a growth in screening completion rate from 50% to 70% during three months. Evaluation of the collected data was done in the Study phase to validate that our SMART goal had been successful. The Act phase led us to sustain the reminder system while extending vaccination notifications into the platform. The data success would have triggered a revision of our messaging approaches or the frequency of delivery methods.

    References (Hanging Indent Not Required)

    Cheng, H., Eames-Brown, R., Tutt, A., Laws, R., Blight, V., McKenzie, A., … & Denney-Wilson, E. (2020). Promoting healthy weight for all young children: a mixed methods study of child and family health nurses’ perceptions of barriers and how to overcome them. BMC nursing, 19, 1-14.
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12912-020-00477-z

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022).
    Vaccination coverage among adults in the United States
    .
    https://www.cdc.gov/adultvaxview/publications-resources/adult-vaccination-coverage-2022.html

     

    Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

    Complete this assignment following the steps below.

    Download the Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement assignment PowerPoint template (attached) Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader . Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used.

    Select a quality improvement (QI) problem that requires quality improvement.

    -Increasing Preventive Care Screenings and Vaccination Rates – Encouraging compliance with routine screenings and immunizations.-

    It may be a real problem you are currently encountering in practice or clinical rotations, a concern, or a problem from scholarly sources you are familiar with. You are encouraged to choose something relative to your practice. Form a problem statement with that information.

    Gather 1-2 scholarly sources that document this problem in healthcare and provide evidence supporting the need for quality improvement.

    Complete the sections in the template outlining the problem, the rationale for the selection of the problem, and the sources documenting the need for a solution. Each section should include detail in 2-3 sentences. Cite sources where specified.

    Use the fishbone diagram in the template to complete a root cause analysis of the problem.

    Briefly describe the problem

    Under each category (People, Environment, Method/Process, and Equipment/Supplies), list at least two contributing factors to the problem. The contributing factors may fall under more than one category. Mark each contributing factor as a realistic or unrealistic target for improvement efforts using the visual designations on the template. For example, staffing, while a contributing factor to many problems, is not a realistic target for improvement efforts.

    If you prefer, you can use green or red highlight on the text of the contributing factors instead of using the visual symbols on the template.

    Complete the PDSA Quality Improvement Project outline using the spaces provided on the template (replacing the [Type Here] instructions with your text). Write this section acting as if you have completed the QI project.

    Select one contributing factor from the fishbone diagram. This should be one of the realistic targets for improvement efforts identified on the fishbone diagram.

    List 2-4 interprofessional stakeholders involved in the project (delete any unused [Type Here] text).

    Write one SMART goal for the PDSA Quality Improvement Project. Include all elements of the SMART goal in one sentence.

    Under the “Plan” phase, write a plan for the quality improvement project to meet the SMART goal. How will you meet your SMART goal? Describe your plan in 2-3 sentences.

    Under the “Do” phase, imagine you have completed the project. Briefly describe how the Plan was hypothetically implemented. What were the results? Include hypothetical data. Describe your implementation in 2-3 sentences using past tense.

    Under the “Study” phase, imagine that you have successfully completed the project and have positive data that demonstrates successful implementation and goal attainment. Describe your evaluation using 2-3 sentences using past tense.

    Under the “Act” phase, imagine that you have completed the project. Briefly describe how to maintain the improvement or revise and repeat the PDSA process based on whether or not the goal was met. Describe your process in 2-3 sentences using past tense. See the example in the lesson.

    Click the Submit button at the top of this page to upload your completed assignment.

    Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly sources. Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references. Hanging indent is not required. Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

    Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scientific writing.

    Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).

    Description of the Problem

    State problem to examine in Root Cause Analysis (RCA).

    State rationale for problem selection.

    Include a brief description from a scholarly source(s) supporting the need for quality improvement (QI) in at least 2-3 sentences.

    Include in-text citations.

    Answer all questions/criteria with appropriate explanation and detail.

    Fishbone Diagram

    Identify the problem in the designated area.

    Identify appropriate contributing factors for each category.

    Include a brief description from scholarly source(s) supporting the need for quality improvement (QI) in at least 2-3 sentences.

    Identify each contributing factor as realistic or unrealistic targets for QI efforts.

    Correlation with Contributing Factor

    Select one realistic contributing factor from the fishbone diagram.

    List 2-4 interprofessional stakeholders involved in the project.

    Write one SMART goal for the PDSA Quality Improvement Project.

    Answer all questions/criteria with appropriate explanation and detail.

    PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act)

    Under the “Plan” phase, write a plan (in 2-3 sentences) for the quality improvement project to meet the SMART goal.

    Under the “Do” phase, briefly describe (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) how the Plan was hypothetically implemented and what data was collected.

    Under the “Study” phase, briefly evaluate (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) the data. Identify whether the goal was met or not met.

    Under the “Act” phase, briefly describe (in 2-3 sentences using past tense) how to maintain the improvement or revise and repeat the PDSA process based on whether or not the goal was met.

    Answer all questions/criteria with appropriate explanation and detail Fishbone and PDSA Quality Improvement

  • Dissemination strategies in evidence-based practice

    Dissemination strategies in evidence-based practice

    To Prepare:

    Review the Resources and reflect on the various strategies presented throughout the course that may be helpful in disseminating effective and widely cited EBP.

    This may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local, regional, state, and national levels, as well as publication in peer-reviewed journals.

    Reflect on which type of dissemination strategy you might use to communicate EBP.

    By Day 3 of Week 9

    Post
     at least two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why. Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why. Identify at least two barriers you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies you are most inclined to use. Be specific and provide examples. Explain how you might overcome the barriers you identified.

    Dissemination strategies in evidence-based practice

    Dissemination Strategies

    There are many project dissemination strategies that could be used for a proposed change project. Two of these that I feel most inclined to use include publication in peer-reviewed journals and organizational-level presentations. The rationale for choosing these two is that they effectively target distinct audiences while at the same time maximizing impact and credibility. According to Kwan et al. (2023), an advantage associated with publishing complete research study projects is that it is rigorously scrutinized by peers. The value in this is ensuring reliability and visibility within academic and professional communities. According to Connor et al. (2023), this is also important because it ensures that the research positively contributes to scholarly discourse and influencing future studies. In comparison, the key benefit associated with the organizational-level presentation dissemination method is allowing for direct engagement with stakeholders, policymakers, and practitioners from diverse specializations. Another benefit is that this format is more accessible and promotes immediate feedback and practical application of findings. Simply put, the use of the two strategies together helps balance broad, credible dissemination with targeted, actionable communication.

    GET A HUMAN-WRITTEN PAPER HERE

    Least Inclined

    From the list of available dissemination strategies, there are several that I feel are not ideal for my research study findings. Specifically, I am least inclined toward using two particular methods, including social media posts and opinion pieces usually published in popular or local media. This is justified by the fact that these two lack the necessary rigor and depth required to convey the intended message. Kwan et al. (2022) added that these two strategies are accessible to the masses, making it rather challenging to target a particular audience, for example, nurses or other healthcare professionals. In their research, Melnyk et al. (2017) observed that the use of social media is ineffective because it is prone to oversimplification and misinterpretation. This is caused by the limited control over the ways in which information is received and shared. In effect, this dilutes the credibility of the research. Opinion pieces in popular media tend to prioritize narrative appeal over factual precision despite being accessible to a general audience. As a result, there is a likelihood that the research will be distorted, rendering it inapplicable. All things considered, the use of either of these two methods makes them unsuitable when targeting academic audiences such as nurses or doctors.

    Barriers

    There are certain barriers faced when using publication in peer-reviewed journals and organizational-level presentations as dissemination strategies. Connor et al. (2023) mentioned that the peer-review process is lengthy and has audience-specific accessibility challenges. This renders the use of the peer-review process for journals time-consuming, sometimes taking up to several months or, in worst-case scenarios, years. As a result, this risk delays the timely dissemination of findings. Take, for example, a research study on a rapidly evolving public health issue. Delayed implementation risks losing relevance if publication is stalled because of multiple rounds of revisions. The use of organizational-level presentations faces unique barriers related to tailoring content for diverse audiences. Presenting complex data to stakeholders that have varying levels of expertise such as presenting to a mixed group of practitioners might struggle to balance technical detail with practical implications. According to Schmidt and Brown (2025), this could potentially reduce engagement or understanding.

    Overcoming Barriers

    The two barriers can be overcome by using specific strategies. Research by Schmidt and Brown (2025) recommends the use of strategic planning approach and adopting adaptation. On the one hand, the challenges associated with using the peer-review process, which potentially delays dissemination, the use of target journals would be a preferred approach. The advantage associated with this is ensuring the review of these research studies are done faster. What’s more, the use of target journals or open-access options helps expedite publication, saving valuable time, especially for interventions that urgently need implementation. An added feature of target journals as alternative methods of dissemination is that they supplement with preprints in unique platforms, for example, medRxiv. The value in this is that findings are shared quickly with the targeted academic community. On accessibility challenges identified when using organizational-level presentations, an alternative that would be used is designing tiered communication approaches. This would be done using clear visuals and simplified summaries to ensure that non-experts would understand the findings while at the same time providing detailed technical appendices or follow-up materials for specialists. Importantly, this would ensure all audience members are able to engage meaningfully with the content. Dissemination strategies in evidence-based practice

    References

    Connor, L., Dean, J., McNett, M., Tydings, D. M., Shrout, A., Gorsuch, P. F., … & Gallagher‐Ford, L. (2023). Evidence‐based practice improves patient outcomes and healthcare system return on investment: Findings from a scoping review. 
    Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing
    , 
    20
    (1), 6-15.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12621

    Kwan, B. M., Brownson, R. C., Glasgow, R. E., Morrato, E. H., & Luke, D. A. (2022). Designing for dissemination and sustainability to promote equitable impacts on health. 
    Annual Review of Public Health
    , 
    43
    (1), 331-353.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052220-112457

    Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Giggleman, M., & Choy, K. (2017). A test of the ARCC© model improves implementation of evidence‐based practice, healthcare culture, and patient outcomes. 
    Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing
    , 
    14
    (1), 5-9.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12188

    Schmidt, N. A. & Brown, J. M. (2025).
    Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research (6th ed.).
    Jones & Bartlett Learning Dissemination strategies in evidence-based practice

  • Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    SECTION 1: DISCOVERY – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Patient falls.

    Critical safety concern: injuries, extended hospital stay, and increased costs.

    Falls continue despite fall prevention measures.

    Affects many stakeholders.

    Patients.

    Healthcare staff.

    Healthcare organization.

    Patient falls in acute care settings are a critical safety concern that can lead to injuries, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Patient fall rates range from 0.4 to 9 per 1000 patient days. About 25% to 50 of falls result in injuries. Despite existing fall prevention measures that target fall risk factors, falls continue to occur due to various factors, such as patient mobility, medication effects, and environmental hazards (Satoh et al., 2023).

    The need to address patient falls is informed by the understanding that they affect many stakeholders. They affect patients through physical injuries, psychological impact, and mobility limitations. In addition, they affect healthcare staff, resulting in emotional distress and strain on relationships with patients. Besides that, they affect healthcare organizations by increasing costs, presenting potential for litigation, causing reputational damage, and highlighting a deficient safety culture (Takase, 2022).

     

    SECTION 1: DISCOVERY cont’d – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    P- (Population): Hospitalized adult patients

    I- (Intervention): Hourly nursing rounds

    C- (Comparison: Standard care without structured rounding

    O- (Outcome): Reduction in patient falls during hospitalization

    T- (Time frame in months): Over 3 months

    The PICOT question is presented as: In hospitalized adult patients (P), does the implementation of hourly nursing rounds (I) compared to standard care without structured rounding (C) reduce the incidence of patient falls during hospitalization (O) over 3 months (T)?

    The population was selected based on the high prevalence of falls in hospitalized adult patients, particularly those with mobility issues or at risk due to medications. The intervention, hourly rounding, was chosen because previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing falls by proactively addressing patient needs. The outcome focuses on fall reduction, as it is a key indicator of patient safety. The 3-month timeframe allows for sufficient data collection to assess changes in fall rates.

     BUY AN ESSAY HERE

     

    SECTION 2: SUMMARY – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Fall rates: 2.2 to 17.1 per 1,000 patient bed days.

    Hourly rounding as a proactive strategy to address falls.

    Every hour during the day and every 2 hours at night.

    Ensure frequent interaction.

    Minimize risk of high-risk activities without assistance.

    Mant et al. (2012) examine the impact of hourly rounding on fall rates among adult patients in acute care settings. Falls remain a leading cause of injury in hospitals, with rates ranging from 2.2 to 17.1 per 1,000 patient bed days. The review identifies intrinsic factors such as age, cognition and mobility issues and extrinsic factors such as environment and medications contributing to falls. The review highlights hourly rounding as a proactive strategy that significantly reduces falls by addressing pain, toileting needs, repositioning, and personal item accessibility.

    Pirrocco (2023) investigated fall reduction strategies in a medical-surgical unit in an urban hospital. The research directly applies to my PICOT question because it evaluates the impact of a structured hourly rounding approach combined with fall prevention tools in a population of hospitalized adults. The study implemented Patricia Dykes’ Fall TIPS tool alongside hourly rounding and found a 38% reduction in fall rates (p = 0.001). The project demonstrated that staff education and adherence to structured rounding logs significantly impacted fall prevention.

    Based on the evidence reviewed, the selected intervention is hourly nursing rounds, where nurses proactively visit patients every hour during the day and every two hours at night. This structured approach reduces patient falls by ensuring frequent interactions and minimizing the need for patients to attempt high-risk activities without assistance. The intervention addresses common fall risk factors such as unmet toileting needs, medication side effects, and environmental hazards.  By decreasing the unmet needs of the patient, hourly rounding directly decreases the incidence of falls.

     

    SECTION 3: TRANSLATION – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Hourly nursing rounds for hospitalized patients.

    Improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

    Check basic needs, safety, and comfort.

    Hospital inpatient unit.

     Result-driven culture of change.

    SMART goals.

    Clear expectations and accountability.

    Performance measurement.

    The evidence-based intervention involves implementing hourly nursing rounds for hospitalized patients. The purpose is to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction, address needs proactively, and enhance patient safety. The rounds are implemented as regularly scheduled visits that may occur every hour. The focus is on checking the patient’s basic needs, safety, and comfort, including toileting, positioning, pain management, and ensuring personal items are within reach. There are three elements in the nursing rounds. First, documentation of the rounds and interventions taken. Second, environmental assessment to ensure the patient’s environment is safe and conducive to comfort. Third, addressing the five Ps regarding personal care needs, the proximity of belongings, position, potty, and pain (Leamy et al., 2023).

    The change project will be conducted in a hospital’s inpatient medicine unit. The unit provides comprehensive medical care to patients who require extended or overnight stays for diagnosis, treatment, or monitoring of chronic or acute medical conditions. It is designed to be a safe and comfortable environment for patients. Patient falls are a concern for the unit as they lead to psychological and physical harm, reduce quality of life, and increase healthcare costs. Implementing an effective fall prevention strategy that addresses the risk factors is expected to improve patient safety (Johnson, 2023). The organization adopts a result-driven culture of change. This culture focuses on tangible outcomes and motivates personnel to prioritize accountability and performance, which leads to higher organizational performance. It emphasizes achieving SMART goals rather than just focusing on processes or activities. In addition, there are clear expectations as the personnel understand what is expected of them and how they contribute to the organization’s overall success. Besides that, there is accountability as the personnel are held responsible for their actions and outcomes. This fosters a sense of ownership and pride in the work done. Additionally, performance measurement with regular feedback and performance evaluations tracks progress and identifies improvement areas. Focusing on results encourages continuous learning and improvement (Johnson, 2023).

     

    SECTION 3: TRANSLATION cont’d – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Primary care physician.

    Nurse.

    Unit nurse manager.

    Patient care representative.

    Nurse informaticist.

    An interprofessional hospital committee is needed to address patient falls as a safety issue. The committee, which has five members, is comprised of various health professionals who work collaboratively to identify, analyze, and implement interventions that enhance patient safety and reduce fall incidences. First, primary care physicians review the patient’s medical histories to identify those at risk of falls. They may recommend approaches to reduce fall risk, spot hidden injuries resulting from a fall, and evaluate medication side effects that may increase the risk of falling. Second, nurses who provide primary care conduct hourly rounds to assess patient needs and document findings. Third, the unit nurse manager provides leadership and supports the team, ensuring the project is aligned with the organizational goals, supports best practices, ensures compliance, and addresses any issues that arise. Fourth, a patient care representative who ensures the intervention is patient-centered and addresses their concerns. Fifth, nurse informaticist or quality improvement staff who provides expertise in data collection, analysis, and process improvement (Johnson, 2023).

     

    SECTION 4: INTEGRATION – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Rate of total falls per 1,000 patient days.

    Rate of injurious falls per 1,000 patient days.

    Three phases

    Phase one – 2 weeks – preparation and training.

    Phase two – 9 weeks – implementation.

    Phase three – 1 week – closing and evaluating performance.

    Data tools.

    EHR.

    Data aggregation.

    Analytics.

    Two key performance indicators, identified by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI), will be tracked to monitor the progress of the change project. First, the rate of total falls per 1,000 patient days, and second, the rate of injurious falls per 1,000 patient days (Turner et al., 2022). The intervention is targeted at reducing the incidences of falls during hospitalization. It will be monitored and evaluated for effectiveness by evaluating data on fall incidences during the intervention. This will provide an overview of whether there have been any changes to fall incidences reported.  In addition, the nurses involved in implementing the intervention will be engaged to provide feedback that evaluates its effectiveness while making suggestions for improvements (Ogrinc et al., 2022). The change project’s progress will be tracked against established milestones by comparing performance against the established baseline data and goals. This will examine the patient-focused interventions regarding the changes in fall incidences and the number of nursing staff trained. It will apply a standardized system for reporting falls, including the date, time, location, patient details, and nature of the falls. This will then proceed to data analysis to identify trends, assess the effectiveness of the intervention, and make necessary adjustments. The tools used for tracking the progress are the fall risk assessment tools to assess fall risk and track changes over time, databases to organize and track fall data, and electronic health records (EHR) to store and track fall data (Ogrinc et al., 2022).

    The project will be conducted in three phases over three months (12 weeks). Phase one, conducted over two weeks, will involve preparing a nurse hourly rounding schedule that identifies key focus areas and engaging nurse stakeholders to address their input and concerns. In addition, baseline data and goals regarding fall risk assessment will be established. Besides that, training is provided to ensure nurses understand the need for the project, what it entails, and their position in implementing it. Phase two, conducted over nine weeks, will involve project kick-off and performance, in which the nurse hourly rounding will be conducted, and feedback will be collected to understand areas that can be improved. Phase three, conducted over one week, will involve closing the project by evaluating the performance, consolidating findings and recommendations, and delivering the final report (Johnson, 2023).

    Data tools will be leveraged to collect, aggregate, and analyze data using informatics effectively. In this case, electronic health records (EHR) will facilitate the digital storage and retrieval of patients’ fall data, enabling easier access and sharing. In addition, data aggregation will be applied by aggregating data from multiple sources to gain a more holistic view of the patients and identify trends and patterns that might not be visible otherwise. Analytics will also be applied to discover patterns and insights within the data sets (Miller, 2025).

     

    SECTION 5: EVALUATION – Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

    Client data privacy.

    Data encryption.

    Access control.

    Data minimization.

    Compliance with regulations.

    Disseminate findings.

    Presentation and posters.

    Educational materials.

    Social media and local media.

    Next steps.

    Continued implementation.

    Ongoing evaluation.

    Continuous improvement.

    Client data privacy and security will be ensured in the project by implementing robust data encryption, enforcing strong access controls, conducting security audits, and complying with relevant protection regulations like HIPAA. Data encryption will be applied to protect data at rest and in transit by making it unreadable to unauthorized persons who may access or intercept the data. In addition, access control will be applied by limiting access to only authorized persons with a legitimate need to know. This will be through password policies, role-based access control, and multi-factor authentication. Besides that, data minimization will be applied by only collecting and storing the necessary data. All unnecessary data fields will be identified and eliminated. Additionally, compliance with regulations by ensuring adherence to relevant data protection laws and regulations, such as HIPAA (Miller, 2025).

    Four strategies are identified for disseminating the outcomes of the change project. First, presentations to stakeholders and posters that inform them about the project results and present evidence that argues for change to improve outcomes. Second, creating and distributing educational materials, such as journal articles, that inform the scholarly community and other stakeholders about the project results. Third, utilizing social media and local media outlets to reach a wider audience with the project results and advocate for change (White et al., 2025).

    After the project and outcome identification are completed, the next steps involve implementing the findings on a larger scale, evaluating their effectiveness, and using the information to continuously improve.  This targets continued implementation by disseminating the findings, developing and implementing evidence-based interventions, and adapting and modifying nursing care practices. In addition, it targets ongoing evaluation that assesses the impact of the intervention, uses data to inform future practice, and makes use of the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model to test changes, analyze results, and make adjustments based on findings. Besides that, it targets continuous improvement by refining nursing practices, promoting evidence-based practice, and supporting nursing professional development (White et al., 2025).

    REFERENCES

    Johnson, D. (2023).
    Hospital Quality: Implementing, Managing, and Sustaining an Effective Quality Management System
    . Taylor & Francis.

    Leamy, M., Sims, S., Levenson, R., Davies, N., Brearley, S., Gourlay, S., Favato, G., Ross, F., & Harris, R. (2023). Intentional rounding: a realist evaluation using case studies in acute and care of older people hospital wards.
    BMC health services research, 23
    (1), 1341.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10358-1

    Mant, T., Dunning, T., & Hutchinson, A. (2012). The clinical effectiveness of hourly rounding on fall-related incidents involving adult patients in an acute care setting: a systematic review.
    JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 10
    (56 Suppl), 1–12.
    https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-258

    Miller, K. S. (2025). 
    Informatics and Nursing: Opportunities and Challenges
    (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

    Ogrinc, G. S., Headrick, L. A., Barton, A. J., Dolansky, M. A., Madigosky, W. S., Miltner, R. S. & Mate, K. (2022).
    Fundamentals of Health Care Improvement: A Guide to Improving Your Patient’s Care
    . Joint Commission Resources.

    Pirrocco, J. A. (2023). A Multi-Modality Approach to Reducing Falls in an Acute Care Community Hospital.
    ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
    .
    https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_proquest_journals_2800604148

    Satoh, M., Miura, T., Shimada, T., & Hamazaki, T. (2023). Risk stratification for early and late falls in acute care settings.
    Journal of clinical nursing, 32
    (3-4), 494–505.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16267

    Takase M. (2022). Falls as the result of interplay between nurses, patient and the environment: Using text-mining to uncover how and why falls happen.
    International journal of nursing sciences, 10
    (1), 30–37.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.12.003

    Turner, K., Staggs, V. S., Potter, C., Cramer, E., Shorr, R. I., & Mion, L. C. (2022). Fall Prevention Practices and Implementation Strategies: Examining Consistency Across Hospital Units.
    Journal of patient safety, 18
    (1), e236–e242.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000758

    White, K. M., Terhaar, M. F., & Dudley-Brown, S. (Eds.) (2025).
    Translation of Evidence into Nursing and Healthcare
     (4th ed.).Springer Publishing Company.

    Capstone Project Dissemination of Change Instructions

    Complete the Dissemination of the Change Project template by building on your selected nursing clinical practice problem and the feedback from previous assignments throughout the course.

    The PowerPoint should be 7 slides in length (following the template).

    In the notes section, on each slide, add speaker notes by answering each question on the template with explanation and detail. Click in the notes section where it says [TYPE HERE] and remove the words [TYPE HERE] to add your speaker notes.

    The information on the slides should highlight important information from the speaker notes to accompany a presentation. On each slide, add bullets with key information from your speaker notes. Do not change the font size; ensure your information fits on the slide. Slides should be professional, uncluttered, and readable.

    Correctly cite and reference information from at least three scholarly sources that help support the assignment. Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

    Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.

    Section 1: Discovery (See Week 2 assignment)

    Discuss your selected nursing clinical practice problem.

    Discuss why this selected problem is important in your current or past practice area.

    State your PICOT question.

    Section 2: Summary (See
    Week 2 assignment
    )

    Discuss the findings from the selected systematic review.

    Discuss the findings from the selected quantitative research study.

    Explain why the evidence is relevant to your selected nursing clinical practice problem.

    Section 3: Translation (See Week 4 assignment)

    Discuss the intervention that will be implemented to address the clinical nursing practice problem.

    Discuss the setting where the change project will occur, including the organization’s current culture of change.

    Discuss the interprofessional committee needed to plan the implementation of the intervention. Explain how each team member will be involved.

    Section 4: Integration (See
    Week 4 assignment
    )

    Discuss the key performance indicators that will be tracked to monitor the progress of the change project.

    Explain the anticipated timeline for implementing the change project.

    Discuss how you will use informatics or healthcare technologies to collect, aggregate, and analyze data.

    Section 5: Evaluation

    Discuss how you will ensure the privacy and security of the client’s data during the evaluation of the change project.

    Explain how you will disseminate the outcomes of the change project.

    Describe the next steps for the use of the change project information

    Capstone Project Dissemination of Change

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in healthcare

    Week 1 Discussion Post – Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in healthcare

    The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare offers several potential benefits that can significantly enhance clinical practice. One key advantage is the increased efficiency and precision that AI brings to patient care. By reducing human error, AI facilitates quicker, evidence-based decision-making, which is vital for improving patient outcomes (Li, 2025). Furthermore, advancements such as telemedicine and AI-powered triage platforms have notably improved access to care, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas. This is crucial for patients who might otherwise encounter obstacles due to limited healthcare resources (Balakrishnan et al., 2025).

    However, alongside these benefits, there are significant challenges to consider. One of the most critical hurdles is the demand for robust infrastructure; high-quality data and reliable digital systems are essential for AI to function effectively. Unfortunately, these resources are not always available, especially in rural or resource-limited settings (Dankwa-Mullan, 2024). Additionally, trust and transparency are pivotal issues, as many AI systems operate as “black boxes.” This lack of transparency can lead to hesitance among providers who are keen to understand the rationale behind AI-driven decisions (Weiner et al., 2025).

    GET WRITING HELP HERE

    Ethical considerations also loom large in the conversation about AI in healthcare. For example, there is a risk of bias and inequity, as algorithms trained on non-diverse datasets may reinforce existing health disparities rather than alleviate them (Gurevich, 2022). Concerns about privacy further complicate the landscape, as the processing of patient information by AI systems raises important questions regarding confidentiality and informed consent. Moreover, accountability remains a pressing issue; when AI recommendations lead to poor outcomes, it becomes unclear who should bear the responsibility—the healthcare provider, the AI system’s developer, or the system itself (Weiner et al., 2025). Hence, addressing these ethical complexities is crucial for ensuring that AI supports safe and equitable care.  Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in healthcare

    In summary, while AI holds great promise for improving patient outcomes through early detection and personalized care, it is vital to thoughtfully consider the implications of its integration within the healthcare system.

     

    References

    Balakrishnan, K., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in rural healthcare delivery: Bridging gaps and enhancing equity through innovation. 
    ArXiv.
     https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11738

    Dankwa-Mullan, I. (2024). Health equity and ethical considerations in using artificial intelligence in public health and medicine. 
    Preventing Chronic Disease, 21
    (245). 
    https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2024/24_0245.htmLinks to an external site.

    Gurevich, E. (2022). Equity within AI systems: What can health leaders expect? 
    Journal of Medical Systems, 46
    (8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01787-3

    Li, D. M. (2025). A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare. 
    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8
    , 1545869. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1545869

    Weiner, E. B., et al. (2025). Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice. 
    ArXiv.
     
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03576Links to an external site.

     

    Discussion Response: Reflection on AI Integration in Advanced Practice Nursing

    Hi,

    Your discussion post offers an insightful and well-balanced overview of the promises and pitfalls of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in healthcare in general, and advanced practice nursing (APN) in particular. While well presented, I would like to further explore that issues identified, particularly the philosophical and systemic dimensions underpinning the technological shift towards AI as it related to equity, epistemology, and the evolving role of clinical judgment.

    First, the discussion post notes that AI-powered tools like triage and telemedicine platforms have expanded care access and improved equity, especially in underserved regions. While this is demonstrated, it is important to interrogate the inclusivity and sustainability of the AI-powered tools. The digital divide has exacerbated health inequities as seen digital literacy, device availability, and internet access disparities. For instance, populations in rural regions may benefit from the use of AI-powered tools, such as AI-driven diagnostics, only of they possess the infrastructure to support such technologies. This then raises concerns regarding whether the AI-powered tools and system are designed with contextual adaptability, or if they are perpetuating a one-size-fits-all model that simply privileges technologically advanced settings (Carroll, 2024). Additionally, the algorithmic bias noted in the discussion is a good point, but can be advanced to indicate that it is not mere a technical flaw, but a reflection of the broader societal inequities. Gurevich (2022) supports these sentiments, highlighting that training datasets may lack representation from marginalized communities, resulting in skewed risk assessments and diagnostic inaccuracies. There is a need to address this through a paradigm shift in data governance towards informed data collection, with a focus on prioritizing participatory design and community Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in healthcare .

    Second, the discussion post explores the need to reframe clinical judgement and epistemic authority. Many AI systems have a “black box” nature that introduces a profound epistemological tension in clinical practice. Traditionally, decision-making in the healthcare environment is grounded in the combination of patient narratives, clinical experience, and empirical evidence. By contrast, AI operates using opaque algorithms that may not be aligned with human reasoning. This creates a disconnect that may erode the confidence of clinicians, and compromise shared decision-making (Kudyba, 2022). Weirner et al. (2025) underscore the need to have explainable AI systems, but acknowledge that this is difficult to achieve since it extends beyond a technical challenge to become a philosophical challenge. There is a need for AI to reconcile the machine-generated insights with nuanced, context-dependent nature of human health. A promising solution to this challenge is to develop “human-in-the-loop” models, in which clinical judgement is augmented by, rather than replaced with, AI. This presents a hybrid mode that helps to preserve the epistemic authority of healthcare providers while leveraging the computational strengths of AI (Carroll, 2024).

    Third, the discussion post is salient on ethics and accountability. AI-mediated care diffuses responsibility between institutions, clinicians, and developers. This poses a significant ethical dilemma. There is a need to establish a clear framework for oversight and accountability, and cultivate a culture of ethical reflexivity. This may involve providing ongoing education to clinicians about AI ethics, having transparent communication with patients about AI being involved in their care, and interdisciplinary collaboration between healthcare professionals, ethicists, and technologists (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2024).

    In conclusion, the discussion post makes it evident that AI offers transformative potential for healthcare. However, AI integration must be guided by principles of equity, transparency, and ethics. The goal should not be for AI to replace human care. Rather, the goal should be for AI to be fused in technological innovation, while remaining anchored in justice, context, and compassion. Overall, your discussion post is well presented, but can be improved by including the above mentioned points.

    References

    Carroll, W. (2024).
    Nursing Informatics: Truths, Talent, and Transforming the Future
    . Taylor & Francis.

    Gurevich, E. (2022). Equity within AI systems: What can health leaders expect?
    Journal of Medical Systems, 46
    (8), 1–9.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01787-3

    Kudyba, S. P. (2022). 
    Healthcare Informatics: Improving Efficiency Through Technology, Analytics, and Management
    . Taylor & Francis Group.

    McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2024).
    Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge
    (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Weiner, E. B., et al. (2025). Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.
    ArXiv
    .
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03576
      Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in healthcare

  • Week 4 Assignment Translation into Practice

    Week 4 Assignment Translation into Practice

    Week 4 Assignment

    Translation into Practice

     

    Directions:

    Complete the Translation into Practice template building on your selected nursing clinical practice problem and Week 2 Evidence Summary assignment.

    Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

    Correctly cite and reference information from at least
    two
    scholarly sources that help support the discussion.Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

    PICOT Question:

    In hospitalized adult patients (P), does the implementation of hourly nursing rounds (I) compared to standard care without structured rounding (C) reduce the incidence of patient falls during hospitalization (O) over 3 months (T)?

     

    Section 1: Evidence-Based Intervention

    Describe the specific evidence-based intervention to be implemented in the change project.

     

    The evidence-based intervention involves implementing hourly nursing rounds for hospitalized patients. The purpose is to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction, address needs proactively, and enhance patient safety. The rounds are implemented as regularly scheduled visits that may occur every hour. The focus is on checking the patient’s basic needs, safety, and comfort, including toileting, positioning, pain management, and ensuring personal items are within reach. There are three elements in the nursing rounds. First, documentation of the rounds and interventions taken. Second, environmental assessment to ensure the patient’s environment is safe and conducive to comfort. Third, addressing the five Ps regarding personal care needs, the proximity of belongings, position, potty, and pain (Leamy et al., 2023).

     

    Describe factors that influence the need for this change, such as national quality standards, reimbursement, accreditation, or practice guidelines. Cite the scholarly source that help support this discussion.

     

    Two main factors influence the need for the change. First is reimbursement, as falls have financial implications for the facility. The intervention implements a fall prevention program that ameliorates the cost of falls and fall-related injuries. Should a fall occur, the facility would have to absorb the cost of the post-fall injuries. Additionally, it may lose some reimbursement and risk financial penalties for failing to meet fall benchmarks (Kizy, 2023). Second, practice guidelines recommend hourly nursing rounding involving nurses conducting rounds on patients every hour to address fundamental patient needs and enhance safety and experience. This presents an opportunity for assessment and intervention, communication, documentation, promoting safety, and enhancing patient care (Leamy et al., 2023).

     

    GET ASSIGNMENT HELP HERE

     

    Describe the potential barriers or challenges to implementing the intervention and how they will be addressed.

     

    Two potential challenges are identified. first, lack of staff-buy in. If they do not see the benefits and value of hourly nursing rounding, then they are less likely to comply, thus hindering successful implementation. In addition, there may be insufficient staff education and training on the purpose, process, and benefits of the hourly rounding, leading to resistance and confusion. These challenges will be addressed through education and training that emphasizes the benefits of the change and provides opportunities for participation and skill development (Cheraghi et al., 2023).

     

    Summarize how the intervention will be monitored and evaluated for effectiveness.

     

    The intervention is targeted at reducing the incidences of falls during hospitalization. It will be monitored and evaluated for effectiveness by evaluating data on fall incidences during the intervention. This will provide an overview of whether there have been any changes to fall incidences reported.  In addition, the nurses involved in implementing the intervention will be engaged to provide feedback that evaluates its effectiveness while making suggestions for improvements (Ogrinc et al., 2022).

     

    Section 2: Planning

    Discuss who needs to be on the project team involved in the change project and explain how they will be involved.

     

    The project team comprises five members. First, primary care physicians review the patient’s medical histories to identify those at risk of falls. They may recommend approaches to reduce fall risk, spot hidden injuries resulting from a fall, and evaluate medication side effects that may increase the risk of falling. Second, nurses who provide primary care conduct hourly rounds to assess patient needs and document findings. Third, the unit nurse manager provides leadership and supports the team, ensuring the project is aligned with the organizational goals, supports best practices, ensures compliance, and addresses any issues that arise. Fourth, a patient care representative who ensures the intervention is patient-centered and addresses their concerns. Fifth, nurse informaticist or quality improvement staff who provides expertise in data collection, analysis, and process improvement (Johnson, 2023).

     

    Explain how you will prepare them for the change project.

     

    Preparing for the change involves creating a sense of urgency among stakeholders by helping them see the need for the change and the importance of acting immediately. In addition, the preparation will pull together the project team responsible for guiding the change. Besides that, it will develop the change vision and strategy by clarifying how the future will be different from the past and how the change will make the envisioned future a reality. Additionally, it will communicate for understanding and buy-in by ensuring as many other stakeholders as possible understand and access the change vision and strategy (Johnson, 2023).

     

     

    Explain the anticipated timeline for implementing the change project.

     

    The project will be conducted in three phases over three months (12 weeks). Phase one, conducted over two weeks, will involve preparing a nurse hourly rounding schedule that identifies key focus areas and engaging nurse stakeholders to address their input and concerns. In addition, baseline data and goals regarding fall risk assessment will be established. Besides that, training is provided to ensure nurses understand the need for the project, what it entails, and their position in implementing it. Phase two, conducted over nine weeks, will involve project kick-off and performance, in which the nurse hourly rounding will be conducted, and feedback will be collected to understand areas that can be improved. Phase three, conducted over one week, will involve closing the project by evaluating the performance, consolidating findings and recommendations, and delivering the final report (Johnson, 2023). Week 4 Assignment Translation into Practice

     

     

    Discuss how you will track the progress of the change project against established milestones.

     

    The change project’s progress will be tracked against established milestones by comparing performance against the established baseline data and goals. This will examine the patient-focused interventions regarding the changes in fall incidences and the number of nursing staff trained. It will apply a standardized system for reporting falls, including the date, time, location, patient details, and nature of the falls. This will then proceed to data analysis to identify trends, assess the effectiveness of the intervention, and make necessary adjustments. The tools used for tracking the progress are the fall risk assessment tools to assess fall risk and track changes over time, databases to organize and track fall data, and electronic health records (EHR) to store and track fall data (Ogrinc et al., 2022).

     

    Section 3: Culture of Change

    Summarize and describe the setting where the change project will occur.
    Do not list specific organization names.

     

    The change project will be conducted in a hospital’s inpatient medicine unit. The unit provides comprehensive medical care to patients who require extended or overnight stays for diagnosis, treatment, or monitoring of chronic or acute medical conditions. It is designed to be a safe and comfortable environment for patients. Patient falls are a concern for the unit as they lead to psychological and physical harm, reduce quality of life, and increase healthcare costs. Implementing an effective fall prevention strategy that addresses the risk factors is expected to improve patient safety (Johnson, 2023).

     

    Discuss the organization’s current culture of change.

     

    The organization adopts a results-driven culture of change. This culture focuses on tangible outcomes and motivates personnel to prioritize accountability and performance, which leads to higher organizational performance. It emphasizes achieving SMART goals rather than just focusing on processes or activities. In addition, there are clear expectations as the personnel understand what is expected of them and how they contribute to the organization’s overall success. Besides that, there is accountability as the personnel are held responsible for their actions and outcomes. This fosters a sense of ownership and pride in the work done. Additionally, performance measurement with regular feedback and performance evaluations tracks progress and identifies improvement areas. Focusing on results encourages continuous learning and improvement (Johnson, 2023).

     

    Describe how you will advocate for the change.

     

    Two strategies will be applied to advocate for the change. First, research to gather data on the problem (patient falls) and identify a solution (hourly nursing rounding). This will be presented as evidence that educates and engages other stakeholders by raising awareness, sharing the research, and building coalitions. Second, lobbying the decision-makers, petitioning, and volunteering to manage the change (Johnson, 2023).

     

    Describe the communication and engagement strategies you will employ to involve the team and develop support for the change project.

     

    Four communication strategies will be employed. First, visual aids to explain information and processes. Second, written communication reinforces verbal communication and promotes understanding. Third, stakeholder education to explain the project process and relevant information in a way that they can understand and support. Fourth, encourage and provide constructive feedback (Johnson, 2023).

     

    Section 4: Considerations

    Discuss the current policies or procedures that should be considered before implementing the change project.

     

    Two current policies should be considered before implementing the project. First, risk assessment procedures that identify the fall risk assessment tools, what is considered in the assessment, and when it is conducted. The project is looking to have a fall risk assessment done upon admission and throughout the patient’s stay, with continuous assessment as the patient’s condition changes. Second, staff training policies to understand whether staff are trained on fall prevention procedures and protocols (Levin & Lauder, 2025).

     

    Explain the cost analysis needed before implementing the change project and who should be involved.

     

    Cost analysis looks at the cost of patient falls and the cost savings that can be made by preventing falls. The occurrence of patient falls has cost implications for the facility, especially if the fall is medically treated. The hourly nursing rounding would save costs by reducing healthcare resources used to treat fall-related injuries, including decreased use of emergency services and shorter hospital stays (Gliner et al., 2022).

     

    Describe the possible financial, human, and material resources required to implement the change project. Week 4 Assignment Translation into Practice

     

    The human resources required to implement the hourly nursing rounding project are the unit nurse manager and nurse personnel. A unit champion is needed from among the nurse personnel to lead and educate the other staff on the project’s importance. The material resources required for the project are rounding maps that support teamwork and ensure on-time rounds, checklists to ensure consistent and thorough rounds, and rounding logs to document and monitor rounding performance (Levin & Lauder, 2025).

     

     

    References:

    Cheraghi, R., Ebrahimi, H., Kheibar, N., & Sahebihagh, M. H. (2023). Reasons for resistance to change in nursing: an integrative review.
    BMC nursing, 22
    (1), 310.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01460-0

    Gliner, M., Dorris, J., Aiyelawo, K., Morris, E., Hurdle-Rabb, D., & Frazier, C. (2022). Patient Falls, Nurse Communication, and Nurse Hourly Rounding in Acute Care: Linking Patient Experience and Outcomes.
    Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP, 28
    (2), E467–E470.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001387

    Johnson, D. (2023).
    Hospital Quality: Implementing, Managing, and Sustaining an Effective Quality Management System
    . Taylor & Francis.

    Kizy, D. (2023).
    Implementation of Purposeful Hourly Rounding to Decrease Fall Rates
    . [Doctoral project, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences]. SOAR @ USA: Student Scholarly Projects Collection.
    https://doi.org/10.46409/sr.XRQX4127

    Leamy, M., Sims, S., Levenson, R., Davies, N., Brearley, S., Gourlay, S., Favato, G., Ross, F., & Harris, R. (2023). Intentional rounding: a realist evaluation using case studies in acute and care of older people hospital wards.
    BMC health services research, 23
    (1), 1341.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10358-1

    Levin, R. F., & Lauder, B. (Eds.) (2025).
    Evidence-Based Practice Improvement: Merging Evidence-Based Practice and Quality Improvement
    . Springer Publishing Company.

    Ogrinc, G. S., Headrick, L. A., Barton, A. J., Dolansky, M. A., Madigosky, W. S., Miltner, R. S. & Mate, K. (2022).
    Fundamentals of Health Care Improvement: A Guide to Improving Your Patient’s Care
    . Joint Commission Resources. Week 4 Assignment Translation into Practice

  • REASSESSMENT OF STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES

    REASSESSMENT OF STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES

     

    For this Assignment, you return to your
    Week 1 Self-Assessment
    to gain a new perspective on what you need to do moving forward.

     

    To prepare:

    Review your completed AGACNP or AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form from Week 1, as well as the record of procedures you have performed throughout the practicum.

    Assignment (1 page)

    Perform a new self-assessment. Rate yourself on clinical skills, based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.

    Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it, perhaps in your next practicum experience.

     

     
    Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities

     

    Student Name:

    The Program and Institution:

    Course Title:

    Instructor’s Name:

    Month, Date, Year:

     

    Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities

    Self-Assessment Summary

    During this practicum, I made significant advancements in AGPCNP clinical skills. The first improvement is that I am now completely independent in several procedures that formerly required my supervision, including gait and balance assessment, herpes culture, pap smear, peak flow meter, and prostate examination. Also, my skill at fluorescein staining of the eye has become proficient, and I am now confident enough to conduct and interpret the test. I have also improved my ability to perform wart removal for the first time under supervision, which gave me valuable procedural competence. Additionally, my rationale in diagnostics has been deeper, facilitated by increased autonomy in ordering and also analyzing the tests. Hence, my overall self-rating has changed from needing supervision on most of the key skills to being independent in most of the areas, with only some procedures remaining to enhance my overall clinical ability.

    Goals Achieved and Those Not Achieved

    Concerning my goals, I have accomplished majority of my practicum goals since I am proficient in nearly all of the procedures that had previously needed to be supervised, including preparation for gait and balance assessment and pap smear. I also succeeded in becoming highly confident with fluorescein staining of the eye, and I did wart removal under supervision, which met my procedural goal. However, my proficiency in the removal of warts is still not sufficient since I did not get enough patient opportunities to warrant full autonomy. In further development of these skills, I shall seek focused clinical practice experience on my next practicum, with a focus on dermatology-specific communication and procedure exposure under the guidance of preceptors. Such an approach will enable me to develop my competency and preparedness for practice independence.

  • Week 2 Assignment Evidence Summary

    Week 2 Assignment Evidence Summary

    Week 2 Assignment

    Evidence Summary

     

    Directions:
    Identify a nursing clinical practice problem in your current or previous practice. Use this template to complete the Evidence Summary Assignment addressing your selected nursing clinical practice problem.

    Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

     

    Correctly cite and reference information from scholarly sources that help support the discussion. Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

     

    Section 1: Discovery

     

    Describe your selected nursing clinical practice problem. Explain your rationale for choosing this topic and summarize why this nursing clinical practice problem is the most important in your current or past practice area.

    GET ASSIGNMENT HELP HERE

     

    Patient falls in acute care settings is a critical safety concern that leads to injuries, extended hospital stays and increased healthcare costs. Despite existing fall prevention measures, falls continue to occur due to various factors such as patient mobility, medication effects and environmental hazards.

     

    Define each PICOT element

     

    P- (Population):
    Hospitalized adult patients

    I- (Intervention):
    Hourly nursing rounds

     

    C- (Comparison:
    Standard care without structured rounding

     

    O- (Outcome):
    Reduction in patient falls during hospitalization

     

    T- (Time frame in months):
    Over 3 months

     

     

    Write out your PICOT question using the standard format below:

    In _____ (P), how does _____ (I) compared to _____ (C) affect _____ (O) within _____ (T)?

    NOTE: In this standardized format, “affect” can be substituted with another verb, such as reduce, increase, or improve, to articulate the anticipated outcome more precisely.

     

    In hospitalized adult patients (P), does the implementation of hourly nursing rounds (I) compared to standard care without structured rounding (C) reduce the incidence of patient falls during hospitalization (O) over 3 months (T)?

     

     

    Describe how you selected the population, intervention, outcome, and time frame.

    The population was selected based on the high prevalence of falls in hospitalized adult patients, particularly those with mobility issues or at risk due to medications. The intervention, hourly rounding, was chosen because previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing falls by proactively addressing patient needs. The outcome focuses on fall reduction, as it is a key indicator of patient safety. The 3-month timeframe allows for sufficient data collection to assess changes in fall rates.

     

    Section 2: Evidence Summary Systematic Review

    Using only the Chamberlain University Library, locate one systematic review relevant to your chosen nursing clinical practice problem that supports the intervention and has been published within the past 5 years.

     

    Provide the complete APA reference to the evidence, including the permalink. State which database you found the evidence in.

     

    https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837027025

    Mant, T., Dunning, T., & Hutchinson, A. (2012). The clinical effectiveness of hourly rounding on fall-related incidents involving adult patients in an acute care setting: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 10(56 Suppl), 1–12. 
    https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-258

     

    Explain how the evidence is relevant to your selected nursing clinical practice problem and population.

     

    The systematic review examines the impact of hourly rounding on fall rates among adult patients in acute care settings. Falls remain a leading cause of injury in hospitals, with rates ranging from 2.2 to 17.1 per 1,000 patient bed days. The review identifies intrinsic factors such as age, cognition and mobility issues and extrinsic factors such as environment and medications contributing to falls.

     

     

     

    Explain how the evidence is relevant to your selected intervention. What data from the article helps support the implementation of this intervention into practice?

     

    The review highlights hourly rounding as a proactive strategy that significantly reduces falls by addressing pain, toileting needs, repositioning, and personal item accessibility.

     

     

    Section 3: Evidence Summary Peer-Reviewed Quantitative Research Study

    Using only the Chamberlain University Library, locate one peer-reviewed quantitative research study relevant to your chosen nursing clinical practice problem that supports the intervention and has been published within the past 5 years.

     

    Provide the complete APA reference to the evidence, including the permalink. State which database you found the evidence in.

     

    https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_proquest_journals_2800604148

    Pirrocco, J. A. (2023). A Multi-Modality Approach to Reducing Falls in an Acute Care Community Hospital. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

     

    Explain how the evidence is relevant to your selected nursing practice problem and population.

     

    This study investigates fall reduction strategies in a medical-surgical unit in an urban hospital. The research directly applies to my PICOT question because it evaluates the impact of a structured hourly rounding approach combined with fall prevention tools in a population of hospitalized adults.

     

    Explain how the evidence is relevant to your selected intervention. What data from the article helps support the implementation of this intervention into practice?

     

    The study implemented Patricia Dykes’ Fall TIPS tool alongside hourly rounding and found a 38% reduction in fall rates (p = 0.001). The project demonstrated that staff education and adherence to structured rounding logs significantly impacted fall prevention.

     

     

    Section 4: Evidence-Based Interventions

     

    Describe the selected evidence-based nursing intervention in detail. How do you believe this intervention could be implemented in your practice area?

     

    The selected intervention is hourly nursing rounds, where nurses proactively visit patients every hour during the day and every two hours at night. This structured approach reduces patient falls by ensuring frequent interactions, minimizing the need for patients to attempt high-risk activities without assistance.

     

     

     

    Explain how the intervention supports the outcome and addresses your identified nursing clinical practice problem.

     

    The intervention addresses common fall risk factors such as unmet toileting needs, medication side effects and environmental hazards.  By decreasing the unmet needs of the patient, hourly rounding directly decreases the incidence of falls.

     

    What interprofessional team members would it be important to collaborate with? Explain

     

    Nursing Staff – Direct patient care and compliance with rounding protocols.

    Nursing Leadership – Ensures adherence to evidence-based practice.

    Physicians – Address medication-related fall risks.

     

     

    References:
    Provide complete references for all citations.

     

     

    Mant, T., Dunning, T., & Hutchinson, A. (2012). The clinical effectiveness of hourly rounding on fall-related incidents involving adult patients in an acute care setting: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 10(56 Suppl), 1–12.
    https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-258

     

     

    Pirrocco, J. A. (2023). A Multi-Modality Approach to Reducing Falls in an Acute Care Community Hospital. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Week 2 Assignment Evidence Summary