Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

    Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

    Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

    Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

    Resources

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    To Prepare:

    Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.

    Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.

    Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

    The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

    Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

    Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.

    How was the success of the program or policy measured?

    How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?

    How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?

    At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?

    What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

    What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?

    What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.

    Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?

    Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?

    Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

    Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

    Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

    Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

     

    The Support Team Assistance Response (STAR) program

    Description

    The STAR program in Denver, Colorado responds to individuals experiencing substance abuse, poverty, homelessness, depression, and mental health issues. The Star response is composed of a paramedic and mental health staff who swiftly responds to and supports people in crisis by connecting them with appropriate resources and care. The healthcare personnel move in a specially equipped van.  STAR began in June 2020 as a pilot program and operated for eight hours, between 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. The STAR program was designed based on Eugene’s Crisis Assistance Helping Out On The Streets (CAHOOTS) Program (Dee & Pyne, 2022).  Waters (2021) indicates that CAHOOTS is a service in Eugene, Oregon that sends an emergency medical technician and a mental health crisis personnel, rather than a law enforcement officer, to individuals experiencing severe mental health distress.

    STAR is dispatched via Denver’s 911 system with low risk for harm or violence to client, STAR teams or the public.  Expansion of STAR program started in early 2021. The program increased to five vans, eight medics, ten mental health clinicians, and one back up van.  Time of operation was expanded from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. in late 2022, STAR collaborated with a local behavioral health service organization (Servicios de La Raza), to offer direct services as well as follow-up connections to community providers for individuals encountered by STAR teams (Gillespie et al., 2023).

    How was the success of the program or policy measured?

     

    The success of the STAR program was measured by the effectiveness of STAR teams in responding to 911 calls. According to Gillespie et al. (2023) when making a response to a call, the focus of the STAR team is de-escalation of crises, connecting individuals with follow-up services like long-term mental health services, and meeting individual’s basic needs, for instance, medicine, shelter, clothes, and food. STAR program has been effectively in responding to 911 calls that eliminates the police response in psychiatric crises and ensuring that individuals obtain needed follow-up services by connecting them to community resources and support.

    How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?

     

    For the initial six months of implementation, STAR van diverted 748 calls 0r about 3 5 of all 911 calls for help in that region, that would otherwise have been made to the police. (Waters et al., 2021). There was a notable increase of STAR- eligible calls from 2020 to 2023. STAR teams have responded to about 24% of STAR-eligible calls since the start of the program. Compared to 16% in 2020, STAR teams responded to 38% pf calls for service in 2023 and these responses include clinical as well as nonclinical encounters. Also, their response to incidents that were identified by 911 as eligible for response by STAR teams.  These incidents usually happen when a response is made by another agency, but then identifies SAR as a suitable response agency. STAR made 7,899 such responses from June 2020 to December 2023(Gillespie et al., 2024). Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

    At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?

     

    The STAR was evaluated during the first six months of implementation and evaluation was continually done as the program continued its operations.

    What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

     

     STAR program evaluation was conducted by analysis of quantitative data.  Calls made by 911 that were identified as eligible for STAR response utilizing data from Denver Department of Safety. The evaluation also was performed on clinical STAR encounters, that is, encounters with STAR teams which there was the identification and documentation of fundamental service needs, utilizing data from Wellpower.  Another major component of the evaluation of the STAR programs was to understand community and client experiences with STAR and the way individuals who encountered STAR teams had connections to follow-up services. Data was obtained through interviews and surveys of individuals who had crises and STAR teams responded and referred them to the community partner network. Also, an electronic survey was conducted on community members who had interacted with the program (Gillespie et al., 2024).

    What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?

     

    Inadequate connection of people to follow-up services and lack of understanding of how STAR operates by hospitals and community service organizations were untended consequences of STAR. According to Gillespie et al. (2023), although the STAR program has effectively met the immediate needs of people, it is still challenging to connect people to long-term services. STAR staff stated that they were not able to connect individuals to geographically and culturally appropriate services due to their capacity and knowledge of providers. Many organizations are unaware of STAR or lack understanding of how the program works, made more complex by the plain clothes worn by STAR teams.

    What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.

     

    The STAR program staff, leaders, community partners, STAR clients and members of the community) were stakeholders identified in evaluation of the STAR program. Denver residents and the STAR staff would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program evaluation. This is because the program protects community members from traumatic police response and enables STAR team to appropriate de-escalate psychiatric crises. For example, the STAR program permits police to focus on the safety of the public since they are aware that STAR teams are increasingly effective in responding to behavioral health and mental health calls. Also, STAR has increased community and system awareness of behavioral and mental health resources and needs in Denver (Gillespie et al. 2023).

    Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?

     

     

    The STAR program met the original intent and objectives.  STAR staff, leaders, and community members reported that the program was immensely successful in its ability to offer an alternative response to crises fire, emergency medical services and police response community partners stress the gains of an alternative to calling the police when de-escalation is required during a mental health crisis. STAR works stressed their ability to utilize c problem-solving and creativity and take ample time to establish the best response, a process is not followed by first responders (Gillespie et al., 2023).

     

    Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?

     

    I would recommend implementing this program in my workplace to reduce the number of people assaulted or killed by police who respond to emergency calls. According to Dee and Yee (2022), having armed police as a first responder to substance use or mental health crises might increase the probability of inappropriate care and costly outcomes Rafla-Yuan et al. (2021), emphasize when police respond to psychiatric crises, they offer harm patients, especially people of color. There is evidence that police-based responses do not meet psychiatric patients’ needs, and there is heightened risk of apprehensions and deadly encounters Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

    Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.

     

    Nurses are uniquely knowledgeable in the healthcare needs of populations and patients and thus can offer leadership in policy evaluation. As a nurse advocate, I can be involved in evaluating a policy/ program a year post-implementation by measuring if the policy/program has achieved its objectives and the economic efficiency of the policy/ program. According to Porche (2021), policy evaluation process measures the effect of a policy and its implementation as intended by policymakers. The impact of a policy is measured based on its intent and impact on targeted and non- targeted groups. Real-world impacts of a policy are measured impact on target problem, impact on target and non-targeted groups, effect on immediate and future conditions of the problem, direct and indirect cost, and net analysis of costs and benefits. Economic efficiency is evaluated by measuring the net benefits associated with reallocation or allocation of resources.

    General Notes/Comments

                  The STAR program is a crisis response program that pairs behavioral health staff and paramedics to respond 911 calls. The program has been effective in offering an alternative to police responses, and psychiatric crises and has lessened the possibility of clients experiencing more trauma. Also, the program has been effective in connecting individuals with resources that assist them to stabilize and address long-term needs. Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

     

    References

    Dee, T., & Pyne, J. (2022). A community response approach to mental health and substance abuse crises reduced crime.
    Science Advances, 8
    (23):eabm2106. Doi:
    10.1126/sciadv.abm2106

    Gillespie, S., Curran-Groome, W., & Rogin, A. (2024). Evaluating Alternative Crisis Response in Denver’s Support Team Assisted Response (STAR) Program: Interim Findings.
    https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Evaluating_Alternative_Crisis_Response_in_Denvers_Support_Team_Assisted_Response_Program-Interim_Findings.pdf

    Gillespie, S., McGilton, M., & Rogin, A. (2023). Understanding Denver’s STAR Program

    Alternative Crisis Response in Denver.
    https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2023-08/Understanding%20Denver%E2%80%99s%20STAR%20Program.pdf

    Porche, D. J. (2021).
    Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Healthcare Professionals
    . Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Waters, R. (2021). Enlisting Mental Health Workers, Not Cops, In Mobile Crisis Response.
    Health Affairs, 40
    (6), 864
    https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00678
    -869.

    Rafla-Yuan, E., Chhabra, D. K., & Mensah, M. O. (2021). Decoupling Crisis Response from Policing — A Step Toward Equitable Psychiatric Emergency Services.
    New England Journal of Medicine, 384
    (18
    ),
    1769-1773. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMms2035710 Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

  • NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?

    Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?

    In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.

    Resources

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    To Prepare:

    In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making.

    Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.

    By Day 3 of Week 9

    Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.

    Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

    Post 
    an evaluation topic and a brief description of the evaluation. Discuss how social determinants impact this issue.

    By Day 6 of Week 9

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of your colleagues
    * on two different days
     by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

    *Note:
     Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    This topic is closed for comments.

    PA

    Precious Funanya Akaeze

    Oct 23, 2024 10:56pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 6:16am

    Reply from Precious Funanya Akaeze

    Policy Evaluation

    Precious Funanya Akaeze

    Walden University

    NURS-6050N: Policy & Advocacy for Pop Hlth-Fall

    Crissy Dodson

    October 23rd, 2024

     

    Evaluation of the Policy 

    A significant healthcare policy evaluation is the Affordable Care Act
     
    (ACA) as it particularly focuses on its Medicaid expansion (Artiga & Damico, 2021). The ACA’s Medicaid expansion policy aimed to provide broader access to healthcare for low income individuals by raising eligibility thresholds for Medicaid (Artiga & Damico, 2021). Evaluating this policy involves looking at criteria such as reduction in uninsured rates, access to care, health outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. The evaluation process also examines how states that adopted Medicaid expansion have progressed in terms of healthcare accessibility and financial stability compared to those that did not progress.

    The policy’s success has been mixed based on these evaluations. In other words, states that implemented Medicaid expansion saw substantial reductions in uninsured rates, particularly among minorities and low income groups (Artiga & Damico, 2021). Moreover, these states experienced improved health outcomes, as individuals gained access to timely treatments and preventative services. However, critics argue that the policy’s cost-effectiveness is debatable, as federal support  to states is limited, raising concerns about long-term sustainability (Berchick et al, 2019). The evaluation highlights a need to balance increased healthcare access with financial suitability, suggesting that the program’s effectiveness is multifaceted, depending on state level implementation and fiscal health.

     

    Social Determinants of Change

    Social determinants of health  significantly impact the effectiveness and outcomes of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), especially  in terms of health equity, access to care, and overall well-being. Factors such as education, income,  employment, housing stability, and geographical location shape individuals’ ability to access and benefit from healthcare services (Jaffe, 2021). For instance, lower income individuals, who are likely to depend on Medicaid, have benefited from the ACA’s Medicaid expansion in states that adopted it, gaining access to primary and preventive care (Jaffe, 2021). Whereas, states that decided not to expand Medicaid, caused millions of low-income people and those in rural areas to remain uninsured, highlighting disparities in coverage due to geographic and policy variations. Additionally, education and health literacy play a significant role in individuals’ ability to navigate the ACA’s complex enrollment processes and in understanding coverage options. This often leaves vulnerable populations, such as those with lower educational attainment, at a disadvantage. Employment status is another determinant, as people in part-time or low-wage jobs often lack employer-sponsored insurance and must depend on marketplace plans, which is still financially burdensome despite subsidies (Jaffe, 2021). Overall, the social determinants of health underscore the fact that while the ACA made strides in expanding access to healthcare, systemic inequities continue to limit its reach for marginalized groups, requiring more targeted interventions to address these disparities.

     

    Reference

    Berchick, E. R., Barnett, J. C., & Upton, R. D. (2019). Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2018. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-267.html

    Artiga, S., & Damico, A. (2021). The impact of the Affordable Care Act on health insurance coverage for low-income individuals. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/the-impact-of-the-affordable-care-act-on-health-insurance-coverage-for-low-income-individuals/

    Jaffe, S. (2021). The social determinants of health: A critical issue for the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. 
    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
    , 46(1), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8358716 NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    Expand discussion thread from Precious Funanya Akaeze

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    CK

    Chhinderpal Kaur

    Oct 23, 2024 10:34pm
    | Last reply Oct 25, 2024 10:43pm

    Reply from Chhinderpal Kaur

    Medicaid Expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)

    One important part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was the Medicaid expansion, which was created to allow low-income people with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty line to be eligible for Medicaid (Guth et al., 2020
    )
    . It sought to increase underprivileged communities’ access to healthcare and lower the rate of uninsured people. The main criteria used to evaluate Medicaid expansion include coverage rates, hospital uncompensated care reductions, access to healthcare services, health outcomes, and the financial impact on states (Guth et al., 2020).

    Evaluation Criteria

    Coverage rate includes new numbers of enrollment under the program in states that expanded Medicaid. This number was meant to increase with the expansion. It was also meant to improve access to quality care as needed by the people (Eguia et al., 2020). The health outcomes would be evaluated using health indicators including rates of chronic disease management, hospital admissions, and overall mortality rates. Also, the cost- effectiveness of the program would be evaluated in terms of funding and expenditures of the expansion. Another measure of the evaluation would be what the program would do to the economy, such as creating jobs for people.

    Social Determinants of Health and Medicaid Expansion

    The availability of healthcare is greatly impacted by social determinants of health like income, education, and housing security. These are addressed by the Medicaid expansion, which lowers the cost of healthcare for those with low incomes. Disparities still exist, though. For instance, people in states that have not expanded Medicaid or those who make just over the federal poverty level might still be without insurance (Dong et al., 2022). In rural locations, where healthcare professionals may be few, access to healthcare facilities is sometimes restricted, which lessens the advantages of insurance coverage. People with less education may have trouble navigating the healthcare system, which could hinder their capacity to make efficient use of the services. Even if they qualify for Medicaid, people who are homeless or suffering housing instability may encounter difficulties getting regular care (Dong et al., 2022). These social determinants play a key role in how effectively Medicaid expansion achieves its goals of improving health outcomes and reducing disparities in access to healthcare.

    References

    Dong, X., Gindling, T. H., & Miller, N. A. (2022). Effects of the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on health insurance coverage, health care access, and use for people with disabilities. 
    Disability and Health Journal
    , 
    15
    (1), 101180.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657421001461

    Eguia, E., Baker, M. S., Chand, B., Sweigert, P. J., & Kuo, P. C. (2020). The impact of the affordable care act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on access to minimally invasive surgical care. 
    The American Journal of Surgery
    , 
    219
    (1), 15-20.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961019307688

    Guth, M., Garfield, R., & Rudowitz, R. (2020). The effects of Medicaid expansion under the ACA: updated findings from a literature review. 
    Kaiser Family Foundation
    , 
    37
    (6), 944-50.https://affordablecareactlitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/report-the-effects-of-medicaid-expansion-under-the-aca-updated-findings-from-a-literature-review-1.pdf

    Expand discussion thread from Chhinderpal Kaur

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    MM

    Miriane Meigueu

    Oct 23, 2024 10:34pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 9:05pm

    Reply from Miriane Meigueu

    Healthcare program and policy evaluation

    The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program is a program initiative under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services aimed at strategically reducing and addressing hospital readmissions in health facilities (Wadhera et al., 2019). The program is a quality assurance initiative aiming to address negative care outcomes consistent with patient readmissions in hospital facilities and is run under the federal government’s goal of transforming healthcare practice consistent with the value of quality of care. Hospital readmissions remain a huge healthcare quality issue that is indicative of the failure to facilitate patient wellness and enforce the provision of good quality care (Gupta & Fonarow, 2020).

    The entire healthcare issue of hospital readmissions is affected by several factors. One of the prominent of these factors encompasses the social and economic factors affecting communities, such as high unemployment rates, which implies that most communities are unemployed and thus unable to afford quality healthcare services (Maddox et al., 2019). High levels of unemployment and consequent poverty also imply that most communities are unable to uphold the recommended standard healthy practices, such as proper diet and nutrition, conducting regular health check-ups, as well as affording quality healthcare services as facilitated by health insurance services (Maddox et al., 2019).

    Another social determinant of health affecting hospital readmissions includes the type of diagnosis that the patient is involved in. For example, patients diagnosed with complex health conditions whose onset is associated with multiple factors are highly likely to experience readmissions due to the multifactorial impacts on their health (Gruneir et al., 2020). In actual practice, patients diagnosed with conditions requiring long-term care or a continuum of care through home-based health service delivery are highly likely to fail to adhere to the recommended treatment plan, therefore, prompting them to be readmitted.

    Another social determinant of health affecting hospital readmissions includes the patients’ demographic factors, such as age. Studies have established that elderly patients have complex healthcare needs, which implies that they require increased attention and specialized care, which can only be provided in the context of healthcare facilities (Wyman et al., 2019). Elderly patients are also predisposed to complex health conditions, including disease conditions associated with reduced immunity because of physiological aging factors. In practice, this implies that such patients are highly likely to be readmitted due to the recurrence of symptoms and relapse of diseases (Ma et al., 2019).

    References

    Gruneir, A., Fung, K., Fischer, H. D., Bronskill, S. E., Panjwani, D., Bell, C. M., … & Anderson, G. (2020). Care setting and 30-day hospital readmissions among older adults: a population-based cohort study. 
    CMAJ
    , 
    190
    (38), E1124-E1133.

    Gupta, A., & Fonarow, G. C. (2020). The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program—learning from failure of a healthcare policy. 
    European Journal of Heart Failure
    , 
    20
    (8), 1169-1174.

    Ma, C., Bao, S., Dull, P., Wu, B., & Yu, F. (2019). Hospital readmission in persons with dementia: A systematic review. 
    International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
    , 
    34
    (8), 1170-1184.

    Maddox, K. E., Reidhead, M., Hu, J., Kind, A. J., Zaslavsky, A. M., Nagasako, E. M., & Nerenz, D. R. (2019). Adjusting for social risk factors impacts performance and penalties in the hospital readmissions reduction program. 
    Health Services Research
    , 
    54
    (2), 327-336.

    Wadhera, R. K., Yeh, R. W., & Maddox, K. E. J. (2019). The hospital readmissions reduction program—time for a reboot. 
    The New England journal of medicine
    , 
    380
    (24), 2289.

    Wyman, M. F., Shiovitz-Ezra, S., & Bengel, J. (2019). Ageism in the health care system: Providers, patients, and systems. In 
    Contemporary perspectives on ageism
     (pp. 193-212). Springer, Cham.

    Expand discussion thread from Miriane Meigueu

    8 Replies, 8 Unread

    8 Replies, 8 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    QF

    Qiana Felder

    Oct 23, 2024 10:26pm
    | Last reply Oct 27, 2024 1:15pm

    Reply from Qiana Felder

    Evaluation

    Policy implementation and outcome evaluation, which examines whether a specific public policy achieves its intended effects once enacted, is a crucial part of the policy process (Whitsel, 2024). The policy I chose to discuss is the impactful Affordable Care Act (ACA). Established in 2010 by the Obama administration, it aimed to increase access to healthcare, improve quality, and reduce healthcare costs (HHS, 2022). A policy such as the ACA is evaluated for its impact on society based on the number of individuals accessing affordable insurance compared to the previous years. For instance, nearly 20 million people in the United States would lose their health insurance, increasing the uninsured rate among nonelderly individuals by over 7 percent without the ACA (Rapagel, 2020). Additionally, the policy can be evaluated by all of the favorable provisions implemented into the policy, such as improving mental health access and protecting people with preexisting diseases from being discriminated against. Evaluating policies offers a comprehensive evaluation of the policy’s impact and can inform responsible decision-making for future policy development.

    Social Determinants

    The ACA’s continual advocacy to reduce social determinants is impactful, but the reality is that these factors still persist. For instance, in states that have not expanded Medicaid or in rural areas, the issue of limited healthcare coverage remains. In these non-expansion states, a noteworthy number of low-income adults find themselves in a coverage gap, earning too much to be eligible for Medicaid but too little to be eligible for ACA marketplace subsidies (Lantz, 2020). This results in a large number of individuals remaining uninsured, with low-income groups disproportionately affected.

     

    References

    Lantz, P. M., & Rosenbaum, S. (2020). The Potential and Realized Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Health Equity. 
    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
    , 
    45
    (5), 831–845. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8543298

    Rapfogel, N., Gee, E., & Calsyn, M. (2020, March 23). 
    10 Ways the ACA has improved health care in the past decade
    . Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/10-ways-aca-improved-health-care-past-decade/

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022, March 17). 
    About the affordable care act
    . U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-aca/index.html

    Whitsel, L. P., Honeycutt, S., Radcliffe, R., Johnson, J., Chase, P. J., & Noyes, P. (2024). Policy implementation and outcome evaluation: establishing a framework and expanding capacity for advocacy organizations to assess the impact of their work in public policy. 
    Health Research Policy and Systems
    , 
    22
    (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01110-0

     

    Expand discussion thread from Qiana Felder

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    TC

    Tamika Cheatham

    Oct 23, 2024 10:05pm
    | Last reply Oct 27, 2024 6:24pm

    Reply from Tamika Cheatham

    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) is the policy enacted at the federal level to make mental health and substance use disorders be provided health insurance benefits, like medical benefits. This policy evaluation assesses the extent to which this policy has been achieved by determining the level of realization of fair treatment to patients across the diverse categories by the health care service providers (CMS, 2023). Policies for performance measures include the degree of the insurance plans’ compliance with parity, patient access to care specifics, patient satisfaction, and clinical status improvements concerning mental health disorders ((Hogan & Goldman, 2020). Using these criteria, stakeholders can evaluate the effectiveness of the policy in terms of its goals and objectives and see where changes are needed.

    However, the ability of the MHPAEA is affected by many sociodemographic factors, including income, education, cultural practices, and communities. For example, people with low incomes may be able to attend practitioners’ offices because their treatment is paid for by insurance (Presskreischer et al., 2022). However, they cannot afford treatment due to the high cost after insurance rebates. The possible stigma associated with mental health in the culture of several societies will also prevent people with such a condition from seeking treatment. Moreover, it can be found that educational disparities can be blamed for low awareness of rights under the MHPAEA and, therefore, low uptake of mental health care services (Hall et al., 2023). It is thus essential to understand the determinants of these differences to evaluate policy effects among diverse populations.

    Thus, the assessment of the MHPAEA plays a crucial part in defining the optimal directions for the development of mental health policy in the United States. The law seeks to address the issue of parity in mental health care services, but despite efforts to right the system, a variety of social factors can narrow or even widen the gaps in its success across socially defined groups. Professional nurses are also critical to this evaluation, as they are on the frontline to help implement and modify policies they deal with daily with the patients. Through both quantitative and qualitative perspectives in conjunction with the contributions of nurses, stakeholders will be better placed to call for policy changes where it will be possible to develop ways to reach and ensure equitable access and positive mental health outcomes among afflicted individuals.

     

    References

    CMS. (2023, September 6). 
    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) | CMS
    . Www.cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/marketplace/private-health-insurance/mental-health-parity-addiction-equity

    Hall, S., Zivin, K., Dalton, V. K., Bell, S., Kolenic, G., & Admon, L. K. (2023). Association of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the Affordable Care Act on severe maternal morbidity. 
    General Hospital Psychiatry
    , 
    85
    , 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.10.006

    Hogan, M. F., & Goldman, M. L. (2020). New Opportunities to Improve Mental Health Crisis Systems. 
    Psychiatric Services
    , 
    72
    (2), appi.ps.2020001. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000114

    Presskreischer, R., Barry, C. L., Lawrence, A. K., McCourt, A., Mojtabai, R., & McGinty, E. E. (2022). Factors Affecting State-Level Enforcement of the Federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act: A Cross-Case Analysis of Four States. 
    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
    , 
    48
    (1). https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10171062

     

    Expand discussion thread from Tamika Cheatham

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    CP

    Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    Oct 23, 2024 9:22pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 8:36pm

    Reply from Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    Once a policy has been implemented it is necessary that the policy is reviewed. This shows whether the expected outcomes have been achieved, whether there are tweaks that need to be made to make the program more efficient and whether the interventions that were chosen to have any adverse effects. The evaluation is the process that measures the outcomes of the policy. This is an ongoing process that needs to be completed whether the policy is an intraoffice policy or one approved by federal legislature. The advanced practice nurse is able to advocate for the policy or suggest potential changes based on these findings.

    Falls are attributed to increased risks of mortality, disability and depression in the elderly. Social determinants of falls include age and poor living conditions (Quach, 2016). Fall prevention programs are implemented to reduce falls and these associated risks. The evaluation of the fall prevention program typically includes looking at measurable data with a given time frame such as the number of falls, falls with injuries, and interventions used. As an RN/APRN it is important to take the evaluation a step further than just the fall outcomes.

    Impact that Falls prevention program had on the patient’s life NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    Fall prevention programs often limit patients’ mobility by limiting their movement to a bed or wheelchair. One study found that elderly patients who were ambulatory two weeks prior to admission to the hospital spent an average of 83% of the hospital stay lying in bed (Brown et al., 2009). This has the potential to have long-term consequences such as muscle deterioration, increased risk for blood clots, bed sores and pneumonia (ZaggoCare, 2022). APRNs must look at all aspects of the policy in their implementation and evaluation to best advocate for their patients.

    References

    Brown, C. J., Redden, D. T., Flood, K. L., & Allman, R. M. (2009). The underrecognized epidemic of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(9), 1660–1665. 
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02393.x
    Links to an external site.

    Quach, Lien T., “Social Determinants of Falls: The Role of Social Support and Depression Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults” (2016). Graduate Doctoral Dissertations. 307. 
    https://scholarworks.umb.edu/doctoral_dissertations/307
    Links to an external site.

     

    ZaggoCare. (2022, March 31). Hospital Fall Prevention Programs: Pros and Cons. ZaggoCare. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://zaggocare.org/hospital-fall[1]prevention/#:~:text=What’s%20the%20negative%20impact%20of,of%20bed%20on %20their%20own.

    Expand discussion thread from Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    7 Replies, 7 Unread

    7 Replies, 7 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    EA

    Eric M Arutyunyan

    Oct 23, 2024 9:09pm
    | Last reply Oct 24, 2024 11:23am

    Reply from Eric M Arutyunyan

    There are many federal healthcare policies and programs established to improve healthcare provision and patient outcomes, but it is important to assess their efficiency and effectiveness. The efficiency of healthcare policies or programs shows the number of people who can be served through the policy and the effectiveness shows the quality of care and the patient outcome (Kaczmarek & Romaniuk, 2020). After the health policy is implemented, it is necessary to evaluate it to determine if it has achieved the expected results, whether there are need for change to make it more efficient and whether the interventions of the policy have adverse effects. The selected healthcare policy for evaluation is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which will be evaluated in terms of its impact on access to healthcare and health insurance coverage. The Affordable Care Act is a federal health policy that was established in 2010 to expand health insurance coverage and increase people’s access to healthcare. The focus of the policy was to lower the number of uninsured people in the US through expanding the insurance coverage both public and private, and reduce the healthcare costs for the government and individuals (Neiman et al., 2021). The main provision of the ACA policy includes Medicaid expansion, whereby, states in the US were given the option to expand the eligibility of Medicaid to individuals with income below the federal poverty level, provision of health insurance marketplaces and the set of benefits that all health insurance plans must cover. The measure or the evaluation of the effectiveness of the ACA policy can be based on the following criteria.  The first criterion is based on the level of coverage. This entails evaluating the percentage of the population with health insurance coverage in the US before the ACA program and after. According to Ercia (2021), the number of uninsured people in the US has declined significantly since the ACA policy was established. For instance, the number of uninsured people declined from 46.5 million people in 2010 to 25.6 million in 2022 (Damico et al., 2023). The second criterion is affordability, which involves assessing the changes in the cost of premiums, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. Through ACA, health insurance in the US has been made more affordable, although there are concerns about affordability for some people. The third criterion is access to care, which entails evaluating the number of available physicians, specialists and hospitals in different regions of the country (Neiman et al., 2021). For instance, the ACA policy has enhanced access to healthcare, especially for low-income people and minority races in the US. Finally, ACA is evaluated through the quality of healthcare, which entails examining the healthcare outcomes, patient satisfaction and rate of hospitalizations that can be prevented (Ercia, 2021). ACA has improved the quality of care through providing care such as the prevention of diseases, thus, reducing hospitalization and protecting people against infections acquired in hospitals; thus, enhancing the quality of healthcare. The effectiveness of ACA has been impacted significantly by social determinants of health such as education, income, employment and access to healthcare in different ways. For instance, individuals with low income and those unemployed or with no stable jobs may not be able to pay the health insurance, regardless of the subsidies that the ACA program provides (Lantz & Rosenbaum, 2020). People with low levels of education have low health literacy; thus, they fail to comprehend the options of health insurance and navigating the healthcare insurance system; thus, they may not fully understand ACA like well-educated people. Finally, geographic disparities have limited access to healthcare. Although ACA is determined to increase access to care, many people from rural regions still do not access health facilities and health providers.

    References

    Damico, A., Drake, P., & Tolbert, J. (2023, December 18). 
    Key facts about the uninsured population
    . KFF. Retrieved October 23, 2024, from 

    Key Facts about the Uninsured Population


    Links to an external site.

    Ercia, A. (2021). The impact of the Affordable Care Act on patient coverage and access to care: Perspectives from FQHC administrators in Arizona, California and Texas. 
    BMC Health Services Research
    , 
    21
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06961-9
    Links to an external site.

    Kaczmarek, K., & Romaniuk, P. (2020). The use of evaluation methods for the overall assessment of health policy: Potential and limitations. 
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
    , 
    18
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00238-4
    Links to an external site.

    Lantz, P. M., & Rosenbaum, S. (2020). The potential and realized impact of the Affordable Care Act on health equity. 
    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
    , 
    45
    (5), 831-845. 
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8543298
    Links to an external site.

    Neiman, P. U., Tsai, T. C., Bergmark, R. W., Ibrahim, A., Nathan, H., & Scott, J. W. (2021). The Affordable Care Act at 10 years: Evaluating the evidence and navigating an uncertain future. 
    Journal of Surgical Research
    , 
    263
    , 102-109. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.056
    Links to an external site.

     

    Expand discussion thread from Eric M Arutyunyan

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    LL

    Lorrissa Lingen

    Oct 23, 2024 8:56pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 9:08pm

    Reply from Lorrissa Lingen

    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA)

     

    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 is a federal law designed to ensure that health plans and insurers treat mental health and substance use disorder services fairly. This means they can not enforce strict benefit limits on these services than they do for regular medical and surgical care. This includes things such as copays, coinsurance, and visit limits, which need to be fair for mental health services as they are for other medical services (
    Mental health parity
    ). This law also states that there can’t be separate financial or treatment limits specifically for mental health and substance use, which helps prevent coverage discrimination. It also requires health plans and insurers to be transparent and provide important information about these benefits. It’s a large step toward equal treatment for mental health and substance use disorders, ensuring people receive the support they need and deserve (
    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA)
     2024).

    Determinants include income, employment, socioeconomic status, and education, as well as, housing, and social support. Also included are the conditions of communities and the ability to access affordable mental healthcare (Kirkbride et al., 2024). Social determinants include lower-income households, being employed with a small business, and living in rural areas. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) doesn’t directly apply to small-group health plans, but it’s linked to the Affordable Care Act’s requirements. So, it only influences plans for small employers, it is not a requirement. Small businesses such as 1-50 employees, or states can choose to expand this to 1-100 employees are not required to follow this policy (
    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA)
     2024).  Being in a rural area and working for a small business owner could be an issue since having low numbers of employees can affect the benefits of this policy.  Also, the rural area is hard to find mental health services as well as substance support. There are not many facilities, and sometimes long wait times.

     

    References:

     

    Kirkbride, J. B., Anglin, D. M., Colman, I., Dykxhoorn, J., Jones, P. B., Patalay, P., Pitman, A., Soneson, E., Steare, T., Wright, T., & Griffiths, S. L. (2024, January 12). 
    The social determinants of mental health and disorder: Evidence, prevention and recommendations
    . World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10786006/#:~:text=These%20structural%20conditions%20include%20factors,to%20access%20acceptable%20and%20affordable

     

    Mental health parity
    . Psychiatry.org – Mental Health Parity. (n.d.). 
    https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/advocacy/federal-affairs/health-insurance-coverage-access-to-care/mental-health-parity
    Links to an external site.

     

    The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). CMS.gov. (2024, September 10). https://www.cms.gov/marketplace/private-health-insurance/mental-health-parity-addiction-equity#Introduction

     

    Expand discussion thread from Lorrissa Lingen

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    KD

    Kayla Rena Davis

    Oct 23, 2024 8:35pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 7:13pm

    Reply from Kayla Rena Davis

    Florida’s rapidly increasing population, particularly among older adults, places significant pressure on its healthcare system. With approximately 300,000 new residents annually, the Florida Senate has passed legislation to expand the healthcare workforce and address rising demands (The Florida Senate, 2024). The 
    Live Healthy Florida Act
     aims to bolster healthcare capacity, improve access, and drive innovation, providing Floridians with enhanced opportunities for better health outcomes.

     

    The act targets chronic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular conditions, by promoting preventive care measures, including improved nutrition, physical activity, and expanded healthcare access. Additionally, it seeks to reduce healthcare disparities, particularly in underserved populations, through state-funded initiatives and collaborations with private and nonprofit organizations. Evaluation of the act’s effectiveness includes assessments of healthcare access, population health outcomes, cost-efficiency, and its impact on social determinants of health (SDOH).

     

    At the community level, success is measured by access to preventive services, public engagement, and health outcomes. Key initiatives include expanding clinical training in rural areas, improving chronic disease management, and incentivizing healthcare providers to practice in Florida through recruitment and autonomous practice for advanced practice nurses (WQCS, 2024).

     

    State-level evaluations by the Florida Department of Health focus on reducing racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health disparities, monitoring chronic disease outcomes, and assessing cost savings. The evaluation monitors the act’s ability to improve healthcare access for historically underserved populations and reduce chronic disease complications, including diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular conditions.

     

    Although Florida has not expanded Medicaid, the act addresses low-income residents’ needs through grants for free health screenings and the expansion of telehealth services across specialties (Harrell, 2024). Evaluators focus on whether the act narrows health disparities among racial minorities, low-income, and rural populations and on improved access to primary care, preventive services, and health education.

     

    The 
    Live Healthy Florida Act
     is evaluated based on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, healthcare access, and the reduction of health disparities. It emphasizes the role of social determinants of health, recognizing the influence of income, education, and housing on health outcomes. Through a multi-tiered approach, the act aims to create lasting public health improvements and reduce healthcare costs.

     

    References:

    The Florida Senate
    . Press Release – The Florida Senate. (2024). https://www.flsenate.gov/Media/PressReleases/Show/4508

     

    Harrell, S. G. (2024). 
    SB 7018 — Health Care Innovation
    . 2024 Bill Summaries – The Florida Senate. https://www.flsenate.gov/Committees/billsummaries/2024/html/3515

     

    WQCS. (2024, March 8). 
    Florida Senate approves package of “live healthy” bills
    . https://www.wqcs.org/2024-03-08/florida-senate-marks-the-passage-of-the-complete-live-healthy-agenda

     

    Expand discussion thread from Kayla Rena Davis

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    TC

    Tracy M Chaves

    Oct 23, 2024 8:24pm
    | Last reply Oct 27, 2024 12:27pm

    Reply from Tracy M Chaves

    The Affordable Care Act or ACA was established in 2010 and has since had several changes made to it by different presidential administrations (HHS, 2022). The goals of the ACA was to have explained access to care, reduce health care costs, and improve health care quality (Neiman et. al., 2021). This act created the largest expansion of health insurance coverage (HHS, 2022).

    Social determinants of health are nonmedical factors that effect an individuals health outcomes (CDC, n.d.) Based off the Affordable Care Act’s goals and interventions implemented, it helps several social determinants of health such as healthcare access, healthcare quality, and economic status.
     

    The ACA increased access to health care by increasing consumers enrolled in health insurance and expanding medicaid, it reduced cost by implementing new care models such as “bundled” payments, and it improved quality by linking payments to quality (Neiman et. al., 2021). An evaluation of this act is completed by using data based of numbers.

    When assessing state rates of uninsured individuals Massachusetts, where I live, the rates decreased by 1.4%; however, there were states like California that decreased as much as 11.7% (HHS, 2022). Other positive outcomes by the ACA is coverage for preventive care which improved cancer screenings leading to earlier diagnosis, improved percentage of minorities with insurance coverage, and reduced cost to surgical care (Neiman et. al., 2021). Overall the results of the ACA have been positive.

    Expand discussion thread from Tracy M Chaves

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    John Dulko
     (He/Him)

    Oct 23, 2024 7:40pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 6:27pm

    Reply from John Dulko

    Introduction

    “SSPs [Syringe Services Programs] protect the public and first responders by providing safe disposal of used needles and syringes. SSPs also prevent outbreaks of other diseases…” (Syringe, n.d.). Services include substance use disorder treatment, vaccination, testing, infectious disease care and treatment, counseling, and access to sterile injection supplies. The goal of these programs is to improve public health by offering treatment to a high-risk community and by making substance use safe for those who are unable or unwilling to stop. Are these SSPs working? How do we know?

    Evaluation of the Policy

    “Evaluation provides an informed means of feedback, improvement, and justification of expending resources for all health and social programming … Social policy and program evaluation relies on collecting continuous measurements and data points in a cyclical manner (similar to the nursing process) to ensure ongoing qualitative and quantitative programming, to consider innovation, and to engage key stakeholders” (Short, 2022, pp. 178-179). As the scholar stated in 
    The Importance of Program Evaluation 
    (2018), “If you can’t measure it, you won’t know if it’s effective or not.” So, what measurements are used to evaluate SSPs? Short (2022) suggested assessing effectiveness (short- and long-term performance measurements), assessing achievement of goals/aims (accountability measures), assessing efficiency (cost-benefit relationship), determining impact (unintended consequences), and establishing future improvements and goals.

    According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):

    “Nearly 30 years of research has shown that comprehensive SSPs are safe, effective, and cost-saving, do not increase illegal drug use or crime, and play an important role in reducing the transmission of viral hepatitis, HIV and other infections. Research shows that new users of SSPs are five times more likely to enter drug treatment and about three times more likely to stop using drugs than those who don’t use the programs. SSPs that provide naloxone also help decrease opioid overdose deaths. SSPs protect the public and first responders by facilitating the safe disposal of used needles and syringes …  in North Carolina alone, the rate of hospital discharge diagnoses for endocarditis related to drug dependence increased more than 12-fold from 2010 to 2015, with unadjusted hospital costs increasing from $1.1 million in 2010 to over $22 million in 2015.” (Safety, n.d.).

    These results would suggest that measurements of SSP effectiveness would include cost reduction of substance-use-related hospital visits, a decrease in illegal drug use, a decrease in crime, a decrease in the rate of blood-borne diseases like viral hepatitis, and HIV, an increase in the number of people participating in drug treatment programs, an increase in the number of people who stop using drugs, and a decrease in the number of opioid overdose deaths. Were these goals achieved? It is difficult to determine because these are challenging data points to collect. Most evaluations have been based on surveys and observations, two methods of data collection where implicit bias cannot be removed. Also, SSPs do not operate in a controlled setting; numerous variables also contribute to the measurements listed above. According to the CDC, the program’s perceived effectiveness has a positive impact on the community. However, the objective data is not there to support the claim because it is the data is challenging to collect objectively with a large enough sample.

    Social Determinants of Change

    It is a common issue where a policy is approved because there is positive research to support its positive potential, but it is challenging to implement. “This gap between research and practice is the result of several interacting factors, including limited time and resources of practitioners, insufficient training, lack of feedback and incentives for use of evidence-based practices, and inadequate infrastructure and systems organization to support translation” (Glasgow et al., 2003). SSPs have met resistance in implementation because some people feel it tolerates and even encourages drug use. Some feel like more people will start using substances because it is safer and easier to access supplies. For more support of this program, social determinants of change include irrefutable evidence, appropriate funding, training available for stakeholders, and power (relational, dispositional, and structural). “
    Relational power
     involves the interactions that exist between stakeholders and resources to achieve outcomes. 
    Dispositional power
     refers to the person’s hierarchical position in an organization that gives them legitimacy and authority in sharing knowledge and information as well as in allocating resources … 
    Structural power
     organizes and orchestrates the systemic interactions within and among groups, directing economic and political forces and ideological forces that shape public ideas, values and beliefs” (Short, 2022, p. 133). “…the effectiveness of a particular SEP may differ according to local environmental, social, legal and programmatic factors” (Bastos & Strathdee, 2000).

    Conclusion

    The policymaking process is like the nursing process: an ongoing process with evaluation affecting new actions. Like with the evaluation of SSPs, new problems are identified, and additional policies are created. For example, Peter Beilenson discussed how Baltimore’s Staying Alive Drug Overdose Program was started in response to complaints that SSPs were making it easier for people with a substance use disorder to access supplies, increasing their likelihood of overdose. He also mentioned training residents of Baltimore in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), rescue breathing, and Narcan administration to address the need for immediate bystander intervention to increase the chance of survival from overdose before first responders arrive (Walden, LLC, 2018, Peter). Policies should be like our patients’ goals: SMART—specific, measurable, accurate, realistic, and timely. In this way, policies will be routinely (timely) evaluated by determining whether the identified goals (specific, accurate, realistic) were met by assessing objective data points (measurable).

    References

    Bastos, F., & Strathdee, S. (2000). Evaluating effectiveness of syringe exchange programmes: current issues and future prospects. 
    Social Science & Medicine
    , 
    51
    (12), 1771–1782. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00109-x

    Glasgow, R.E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A.C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. 
    American Journal of Public Health
    , 93(8), 1261–1267. 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261.

    Safety and effectiveness of syringe services programs. (n.d.). U
    .S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . https://www.cdc.gov/syringe-services-programs/php/safety-effectiveness.html

    Syringe services programs. (n.d.). 
    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . https://www.cdc.gov/syringe-services-programs/php/index.html

    Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2018). 
    The Importance of Program Evaluation
     [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2018). 
    Peter Beilenson: Ethics and advocacy
     [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Expand discussion thread from John Dulko

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Amy Simmons

    Oct 23, 2024 5:49pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 8:35pm

    Reply from Amy Simmons

    Main Post

    Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are infections patients acquire during their stay in a healthcare facility, which were not present or incubating at admission or soon after discharge. Common HAIs include bloodstream infections, surgical site infections, such as Methicillin Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), ventilator-associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. These severely threaten healthcare safety (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n.d.). HAIs are one of the leading causes of readmissions in the United States.

    HAIs started to be recognized in the late 1950s and 1960s when steps started to be implemented in infection control policies. In the 19th and 20th centuries, the new phase in healthcare epidemiology is marked by rising consumer demands for greater transparency and accountability, heightened scrutiny and regulation, and a push for swift decreases in rates of HAIs (Habboush et al., 2023)

    Evaluation of the Policy

    Many HAI policies have proven successful in reducing infection and readmission rates. For example, using evidence-based protocols for hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic stewardship has led to declines in certain HAIs like 
    Clostridioides difficile
    infections and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Policies that require public reporting of HAI data (e.g., through the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network) promote transparency and accountability among healthcare providers. Infection surveillance systems, UV sterilization technologies, and antimicrobial surfaces enhance infection prevention efforts (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019) NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    Social Determinants of Change

    Several social factors, such as healthcare training, patient socioeconomic status, healthcare facility resources, public awareness, and advocacy, influence HAI policies. Effective healthcare implementation requires staff education on infection control, including regular hand hygiene practices and protocol adherence. Patient socioeconomic status plays a massive part as patients with limited access to healthcare may delay seeking treatment, increasing their risk of complications from HAIs when being admitted. Healthcare facility resources also play a significant factor because some healthcare facilities may struggle with staffing shortages, limited access to advanced infection control technologies, and outdated infrastructure. Growing awareness about HAIs to the public is a must to encourage patients to demand higher standards of care. Strengthening improvements for more robust infection control training, enhanced monitoring, holding accountability, and addressing inequities is the key to decreasing the chances of HAIs.

    My Story

    Infection control and its importance are very personal to me. Unfortunately, I was one of those patients who fell victim to a terrible case of MRSA, and I will forever pay for it. Here is my story, the short version. In August of 2019, I was nearing the end of my 12-hour shift on a med surg unit; I felt a sharp pain in my left shin; within one week, it was red, warm to the touch, and raised. I thought maybe it was a stress fracture. I saw the doctor, completed x-rays, and had an ultrasound to rule out a blood clot. Nothing was found, but he placed me in a boot anyway to ensure nothing was missed. One month later, I had the worst muscle spasms in my calf. I had never felt spasms like that before, and my back started to hurt on the same side. Fast forward to three months of agony, I finally was ordered an MRI of my back. I got called and was told to go to the emergency room right away; sepsis, arthritis, and osteomyelitis caused by MRSA, originating in the left calf. The 6 months off work, 8 days in the hospital, surgeries, and 2 months with a PICC line with Vanco infusions running every 12 hours will forever haunt me.

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). 
    About HAI’s
    . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/about/index.html

    Habboush, Y., Yarrarapu, S. N. S., & Guzman, N. (2023, September 4). 
    Infection control
    . StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519017/#:~:text=Infection%20control%20refers%20to%20the,1950s%20in%20the%20United%20States

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019, September 7). 
    Healthcare – associated infections
    . https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/health-care-associated-infections

     

    Expand discussion thread from Amy Simmons

    5 Replies, 5 Unread

    5 Replies, 5 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    LA

    Lailat Andu

    Oct 23, 2024 5:06pm

    Reply from Lailat Andu

    Individual Mandate in Healthcare Assessment (HR 3590)

    The Individual Mandate is a core provision of the Affordable Care Act which was designed to increase health insurance coverage by requiring most Americans to have health insurance or pay a penalty. This Bill was introduced in 2010 as it aimed to reduce the number of uninsured patients and mitigate the adverse selection that can occur when only the sick purchase insurance (Pope, 2018). By incentivizing healthy individuals to obtain coverage, the mandate was intended to create a more balanced risk pool, ultimately stabilizing insurance premiums and making healthcare more affordable. Evaluation of the Individual Mandate reveals both successes and challenges. Initially, the mandate contributed to a significant decrease in the uninsured rate, with millions gaining coverage through Medicaid expansion and health insurance marketplaces (Berchick, Barnett, & Upton, 2019). However, the policy faced criticism for its perceived coerciveness, leading to political backlash. In 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act effectively eliminated the financial penalty for failing to obtain insurance, raising concerns about a potential increase in the uninsured population and a destabilization of the insurance market (Blumberg, Holahan, & Buettgens, 2019). As a result, while the mandate played a crucial role in expanding access, its removal has prompted ongoing debate about the long-term viability of health reform in the U.S.

    I personally believe that the individual mandate plays a critical role in improving healthcare access for patients with chronic diseases, as it encourages continuous insurance coverage and preventive care. By requiring patients to obtain health insurance, the mandate helps ensure that those with chronic conditions, such as diabetes, COPD or hypertension, receive regular medical attention, necessary medications, and ongoing management of their health issues (Soni & Malsberger, 2018). Access to preventive services, which are often covered without copayment under the ACA, can lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment, ultimately reducing the long-term healthcare costs associated with unmanaged chronic diseases (Cohen & Yu, 2016). Additionally, by broadening the risk pool to include healthier individuals, the mandate stabilizes insurance premiums, making it more feasible for insurers to offer comprehensive plans that include essential health benefits for those with chronic conditions, thereby promoting better health outcomes across the population.

    Social Determinants

    This landmark legislation aimed to address the pressing issues of healthcare access, affordability, and quality of care. The passage of the ACA marked a significant shift in U.S. health policy, moving towards a model that prioritized universal coverage and preventive care (Obama, 2016). Despite its successes, the mandate’s implementation has encountered numerous legal and political challenges, particularly from states opposing federal healthcare requirements. Social determinants of health significantly influence the effectiveness of the individual mandate. Factors such as income, education, and geographic location play critical roles in individuals’ access to healthcare and insurance coverage. For example, low-income patients may struggle to afford premiums, even with subsidies, while those in rural areas may face limited options for providers (Artiga & Hill, 2020). These determinants can exacerbate disparities in health outcomes, indicating that while the individual mandate sought to expand coverage, broader systemic issues must be addressed to ensure equitable access to healthcare across diverse populations (Bachrach, Valenzuela, & Lutz, 2019).

    References

    Artiga, S., & Hill, L. (2020). The impact of social determinants on health disparities. Kaiser Family Foundation.

     

    Bachrach, D., Valenzuela, A., & Lutz, S. (2019). Health insurance coverage and access to care: The role of social determinants. Health Affairs, 38(7), 1149-1155.

     

    Berchick, E. R., Barnett, J. C., & Upton, R. D. (2019). Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2018. U.S. Census Bureau.

     

    Blumberg, L. J., Holahan, J., & Buettgens, M. (2019). The impact of the repeal of the ACA individual mandate. Urban Institute.

     

    Cohen, R. A., & Yu, W. (2016). The role of preventive services in chronic disease management. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(3), 398-405.

     

    Soni, A., & Malsberger, R. (2018). The impact of the ACA on chronic disease management. Health Affairs, 37(1), 112-120.

     

    Obama, B. (2016). The Affordable Care Act: A landmark law that will improve the lives of millions of Americans.

     

    Pope, J. (2018). The role of the individual mandate in expanding health insurance coverage. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 43(3), 481-500.

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DY

    Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    Oct 23, 2024 12:35pm
    | Last reply Oct 25, 2024 7:03pm

    Reply from Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA), implemented in 2010, has undergone various evaluations at the community, state, and federal levels to determine its effectiveness. Evaluations generally emphasize several critical criteria, such as coverage expansion, affordability, access to care, and health outcomes.

     
    Assessment of the ACA

    The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) have undertaken a significant evaluation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The evaluations have revealed the effectiveness of the ACA in increasing health insurance coverage throughout the United States. By 2024, more than 45 million individuals will have obtained coverage via the ACA’s Marketplaces and Medicaid expansion (Chu et al., 2022). This indicates a significant rise relative to prior years and a marked decrease in uninsured rates across all states and demographic groups.

    The criteria employed for the assessment of the ACA are as follows:

    Coverage Expansion: The increase in individuals obtaining insurance via ACA Marketplaces and Medicaid expansion.

    The influence of premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions on insurance affordability.

    Access to care has improved through enhancements in preventive services and the provision of regular health care.

    Health Outcomes: Variations in health status indicators within newly insured populations.

    The Influence of Social Determinants on the Affordable Care Act.

    The effectiveness of the ACA is significantly influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). The determinants encompass economic stability, education, social and community context, healthcare access, and neighborhood environment (Alliance for Health Policy, 2023).

    Social determinants of health significantly affect the accessibility and quality of healthcare services available to individuals. Individuals with stable employment and income are more likely to afford health insurance premiums, even when subsidies are available. Nonetheless, individuals experiencing poverty or unstable employment may continue to encounter obstacles despite the provisions of the ACA.

    Secondly, health literacy influences individuals’ ability to understand and select insurance options under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Higher education levels are typically associated with improved comprehension and use of accessible health services. NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    Discrimination and social cohesion influence mental health and access to care. The ACA contains measures designed to mitigate disparities among racial and ethnic minorities.

    Furthermore, access to healthcare is impacted when SDOH comes into play. Lyon et al. (2014) indicate that although the ACA has enhanced access to care for numerous individuals, disparities persist, especially in states that have opted not to expand Medicaid.

    Finally, regions characterized by inadequate health facilities may impede the effective use of health services under the ACA.

    The ACA has significantly expanded coverage and improved affordability; however, addressing social determinants is essential for enhancing its effectiveness and reducing health disparities among various populations.

    Reference

    Alliance for Health Policy. (2023, May 11). 
    Chapter 7: Social Determinants of Health | Alliance for Health Policy
    . https://www.allhealthpolicy.org/sourcebook-chapter/social-determinants-of-health

    Chu, R., Gonzales, A., & Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2022). The Affordable Care Act and its Accomplishments. In 
    Briefing Book
     [Report]. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/18cd655222dc3de64866b269143731ce/aca-briefing-book-aspe-03-2022.pdf

     
    In Celebration of 10 Years of ACA Marketplaces, the Biden-Harris Administration Releases Historic Enrollment Data | CMS
    . (2024, October 21). https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/celebration-10-years-aca-marketplaces-biden-harris-administration-releases-historic-enrollment-data

    Lyon, S. M., Douglas, I. S., & Cooke, C. R. (2014). Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Implications for Insurance-related Disparities in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep. 
    Annals of the American Thoracic Society
    , 
    11
    (4), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.201402-072ps

     

     

     

     

    Expand discussion thread from Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DT

    Deco Tanjong

    Oct 23, 2024 10:53am
    | Last reply Oct 24, 2024 1:41am

    Reply from Deco Tanjong

           Policy analysis is a technique used in the public administration sub-field of political science to enable civil servants, nonprofit organizations, and others to examine and evaluate the available options to implement the goals of laws and elected officials. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003).

    The Ohio Healthy Program (OHP) provides training, technical assistance, and designation to early care and education professionals to create healthy and active environments in early care and education settings. Ohio Department of Health (n,d). The overall goal of the Ohio Healthy program is to deliver consistent messaging to adults who care for children between the ages of 0 and 5 years to prevent Obesity in early childhood and reduce the risk of physical and mental health in childhood and adulthood. This is done through healthy eating, physical activities, and the modification of screen time. Ohio Department of Health(n,d).

    In 2020, OHD, in partnership with a national nonprofit, Wholesome Wave, due to the risk presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, offered nutrition education classes eventually, and participants received vouchers for fresh fruit and vegetables in the mail. At the end of the program, more than $200,000 in fruit and vegetable vouchers were redeemed at the local store and farm markets by approximately 2000 participants and families. Many participants who enrolled in this program experienced a decrease in biometric data, including hemoglobin A1C and Body mass index. Ohio Department of Health (n,d).

    70% of household participants who opted to participate in the survey shared their feedback. It was overwhelmingly positive, and they expressed their desire to see the project done again on a large scale.

    Reference

    Short, N. M. (2019). 
    Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 8, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 177–192)

     

    Early care education program
    . Ohio department of health. (n.d.).

    Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). 
    Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transitionLinks to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    . 
    American Journal of Public Health, 93
    (8), 1261–1267.

    Expand discussion thread from Deco Tanjong

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    NC

    Nicole Greco Carl

    Oct 23, 2024 2:32am
    | Last reply Oct 25, 2024 9:29pm

    Reply from Nicole Greco Carl

    A healthcare policy in the state of California is the California school immunization law. The law states “children in California are required to receive certain immunizations in order to attend public and private elementary and secondary schools, child care centers, family day care homes, nursery schools, day nurseries, and developmental center” (Health, 2024). If a child’s parents are not able to show proof of vaccination then the school “must exclude the child from further attendance until the child comes into compliance with the requirements” (Health, 2024).

    ​

    “Despite a growing literature documenting prevention and health promotion interventions that have proven successful in well-controlled research” (Glasgow, 2003), the number of people refusing vaccines is growing. This is now the biggest social deterrent with vaccines, more and more parents do not want to vaccinate their children. “Coverage with nearly all vaccines was lower among children born in 2020 and 2021 than it was among those born in 2018 and 2019, with declines ranging from 1.3 to 7.8 percentage points” (Hill, 2024). However, parents are no longer “allowed to submit a personal beliefs exemption to a currently-required vaccine” (Health, 2024). When a child does not have immunizations that are up-to-date when attending school, staff are to “refer parents to their doctor with a Letter to Parents: Immunizations Needed” (Health, 2024). Children who may be affected by this are foster children, children with families without health insurance, and children in families who are new to the country. The law states that in particular situations, these children can be admitted in conditional circumstances.

     

     

    References:

     

    Health, D. of P. (2024, August 21). 
    California law
    . California Law. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/Immunization/School/laws-california-law.aspx

    Hill, H. (2024, September 26). 
    Decline in vaccination coverage by age 24 months and vaccination inequities among children born in 2020 and 2021 – National Immunization Survey-child, United States, 2021–2023
    . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7338a3.htm#:~:text=Coverage%20with%20nearly%20all%20vaccines,1.3%20to%207.8%20percentage%20points.

    Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of   health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transitionLinks to an external site.. 
    American Journal of Public Health
    , 93(8), 1261–1267.

     

    Expand discussion thread from Nicole Greco Carl

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    BG

    Brandon Grundy

    Oct 22, 2024 11:46pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 9pm

    Reply from Brandon Grundy

    Main Post
     

    Evaluation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
     

    Brandon Grundy
     

    College of Nursing, Walden University 
     

    NURS-6050N-4: Policy & Advocacy for Population Health 
     

    Crissy Dodson
     

    October 22, 2024
     

     

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been one of the most impactful healthcare reforms in 
    U.S.
     history as the bill has endeavored to expand accessibility to healthcare, reduce costs, and enhance the standard of care. Evaluating its effectiveness requires examining various criteria, 
    such as access to health services, insurance coverage, and
     healt
    h outcomes. This evaluation will focus on how the ACA has impacted access to healthcare services, particularly in underserved populations. 

    Policy Description and Evaluation
     

    The ACA, signed into law in 2010, introduced several reforms designed to expand access to he
    alth insurance. Among the key provisions were the improvement of Medicaid, establishing health insurance marketplaces, and providing financial accommodations through subsidies for low- and middle-income households designed to make insurance more affordable. The primary objective was to reduce the number of uninsured Americans and provide them with preven
    tive services. 

    The 
    evaluation of the ACA can 
    be conducted
     using several criteria, such as the reduction in the number of uninsured individuals, access to primary care, and preventive services.
     Studies have shown that the ACA significantly reduced the uninsured rate, particularly among minority and low-in
    come populations. However, gaps in access remain due to varying state-level implementations, particularly in states that opted out of Medicaid expansion (Short, 2019) NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation. 

    Social Determinants and Impact
     

    Social determinants of health (SDOH), for instance, income, education, and geographic location, play a critical role in the effe
    ctiveness of the ACA. For instance, individuals living in rural areas or states that did not expand Medicaid continue to face barriers in accessing healthcare. Additionally, racial and ethnic minorities, who disproportionately experience poverty and unemployment, have benefited from the ACA’s expansion of Me
    dicaid and subsidies. 
    Yet
    , these groups still face higher rates of uninsured individuals and disparities in healthcare access compared to white populations (Shiramizu et al., 2016). 

     
    The ACA aimed to address these disparities by increasing access to healthcare services, but social determinants such as income inequality and education level still limit th
    e policy’s full impact. To further reduce health disparities, policymakers need to address these underlying factors while continuing to expand healthcare access. 

    Conclusion
     

    The ACA has made measurable gains by improving healthcare access and decreasin
    g the uninsured population. However, its effectiveness 
    is still influenced
     by social determinants of health, which affect how different populations experience healthcare services. 
    As nurses advocate for patient care, they must also 
    engage in the evaluation of
     healthcare policies like the ACA to ensure that all populations benefit equitably from healt
    hcare reforms.
     

     
    References
     

     
    Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.
     
    American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267. 

    Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. 
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4
    (5), 983–991.
     

    Short, N. M. (2019). 
    Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

    Expand discussion thread from Brandon Grundy

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Mihret Ghebreamlak

    Oct 22, 2024 10:10pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 7:49pm

    Reply from Mihret Ghebreamlak

    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

    Professional nurses supporting the passage of the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act of 2021 (S.596) must recognize the importance of monitoring trends in the effectiveness of such policy on improving obesity among beneficiaries under Medicare and Medicaid. These critical criteria would thrive in measuring such policies in terms of trends of obesity rates, utilization of newly covered services because of intense behavioral therapy and anti-obesity medications, health outcomes, and cost implications. Evaluation must consider individual outcomes and the settings within which the patients are treated; therefore, it is a multilevel approach to policy assessment (Glasgow et al., 2003). During implementation, registered nurses and APRNs are precisely positioned to evaluate this policy in that they witness firsthand its impact on patient care, medication access, and treatment adherence (Short, 2021). Their experience on the front lines can highlight both successes and barriers in the practical application of this policy; hence, their input becomes invaluable in the evaluation process. Through systematic data collection and analysis, nurses can provide critical feedback on whether the policy is meeting or not meeting its intended goals of improving access to obesity treatment services.

    The social determinants of health greatly affect the effectiveness of this policy and need to be taken into great consideration. Clinical practice has shown that despite improvements in Medicare coverage, nurses routinely witness how income levels determine access to nutritional food and safe spaces for exercise. Inequalities in education affect patients’ knowledge about strategies for obesity management, and age-related challenges impact treatment adherence among older adults (Shiramizu et al., 2016). These social determinants create complex barriers the policy must address to be effective. Health professionals can document such challenges, collect data about treatment outcomes across demographic groups, and provide evidence-based recommendations for policy improvements. This evaluation function is in full accord with a nurse’s professional responsibility to advocate for comprehensive and equitable healthcare solutions that take both the clinical and social determinants in properly influencing patient health outcomes. In addition, nurse engagement in policy evaluation strengthens the connection between legislative intent and clinical practice to ensure adequate services to diverse patient populations.

    References:

    Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition. 
    American Journal of Public Health
    , 
    93
    (8), 1261–1267. 
    https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261
    Links to an external site.

    Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by Success: Impact of a Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Program to Address Health Inequities. 
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
    , 
    4
    (5), 983–991. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-016-0302-4
    Links to an external site.

    Short, N. M. (2021). Milstead’s Health Policy & Politics: A Nurse’s Guide. (7th edition). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Expand discussion thread from Mihret Ghebreamlak

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    SV

    Selina Villanueva

    Oct 22, 2024 9:06pm
    | Last reply Oct 25, 2024 3:46pm

    Reply from Selina Villanueva

    An evaluation topic of interest is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), specifically its Medicaid expansion policy. This federal policy aimed to increase healthcare access by expanding Medicaid eligibility to individuals with lower incomes. One of the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the policy includes the increase in insured individuals, particularly in low-income and minority populations. Evaluations have also examined reductions in healthcare disparities and improvements in health outcomes among those previously uninsured.

    Social determinants of health significantly impact this issue, particularly in terms of socioeconomic status, geographic location, and access to resources. For instance, states that did not adopt Medicaid expansion often have higher rates of uninsured individuals, exacerbating health disparities in those communities (Glasgow et al., 2003). Social determinants like poverty, education, and race/ethnicity further influence access to care and overall health outcomes. Programs aimed at addressing health inequities, such as translational research infrastructure programs, have demonstrated success in improving health equity through targeted interventions (Shiramizu et al., 2016). Nurses play a critical role in both the implementation and evaluation of these policies by advocating for equitable healthcare access (Williams & Anderson, 2018).

     

    References

    Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness. 
    American Journal of Public Health, 93
    (8), 1261–1267.

    Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. 
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4
    (5), 983–991.

    Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. 
    Nursing Outlook, 66
    (4), 386–393.

    Expand discussion thread from Selina Villanueva

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    RS

    Romel Suason

    Oct 22, 2024 1:27pm
    | Last reply Oct 26, 2024 9:02pm

    Reply from Romel Suason

    The Role of RNs and APRNs in Policy Evaluation

    Policy evaluation is a critical strategy that allows nurse practitioners and other stakeholders to advocate for the patients’ and populations’ needs. Even though some may feel uncertain about this area, understanding the significance of policy evaluation involving RNs and APRNs is essential. This is usually due to perceived inadequacy in understanding policy issues or the ability to manage and evaluate policy processes. Nevertheless, nurses are in direct contact with clients; thus, their comparative insight makes them better placed to assess policies within healthcare and patient outcomes (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). Through engagement in policy evaluation, the nurses can guarantee that the formulated policies will meet the patient’s needs and promote optimal utilization of resources.

    Nurses as Patient Advocates

    Nurses understand patient needs best and are best positioned to design, develop, and evaluate policies that address the underlying needs. These needs are usually more complex and individual in patients and populations, and thus, it is necessary to create and constantly assess policies to achieve the necessary level of healthcare. This advocacy role carries over seamlessly to the assessment of policies as well. American Nurses Association (2020) acknowledges that nurses are in a strategic place to support policies like staffing ratios, resource distribution, staff training, and care for vulnerable populations. Participation in policy development also helps to understand how the policies work in practice rather than simply as ideas that will enhance patient outcomes. Thus, this shift from clinical advocacy for clients to assessing policies to bridge the healthcare delivery gaps that compromise patient care and quality of life.

     

    Overcoming Hesitation

    The transition process can experience significant challenges that compromise the capacity of nurses and other healthcare professionals to address the underlying needs. These barriers result in the inefficiency of the health policies and the inability to mitigate the population’s health needs. Thus, addressing these barriers is a critical strategy for enhancing health policy success and ensuring that professionals and stakeholders attain equity, equality, and efficiency in service delivery. Professional organizations provide tools and training on policy analysis and assessment to aid the nurses. Moreover, working with colleagues with prior policy experience can provide guidance and support (Jackson et al., 2022). Furthermore, the formulation of policy opinions can be nurtured by being proactive in the search for avenues of learning coupled with engagement in policy discourse, which can enhance nurses’ confidence in their ability to play an active and meaningful role in policy consideration and evaluation.

    The Significance of Evidence-Based Practice

    Another essential aspect that can be incorporated into the policy evaluation is the extent to which evidence-based practice was used. Based on the data, APRNs seem competent in assessing research, implementing research findings, and proposing solutions for any deficits. It can, therefore, be applied to evaluate the effects of health policies and health promotion interventions. Thus, using evidence-based research, nurses can segregate policies that positively impact health and those that need further evaluation or alteration (Chiu et al., 2021). Apart from strengthening nurses’ argument to engage in policy-making processes, this evidence-based approach also emphasizes the importance of research when developing appropriate policies in the health sector.

    Call to Action

    The direct involvement of APRNs and RNs in policy evaluation is the best way to establish whether or not specific policies are as helpful in achieving the intended population health needs in a given population group. As nurses are primarily involved with patient care, they can offer all the necessary information and knowledge for making health policies feasible and effective in addressing patient needs. Nurses can be policy co-creators by dismantling obstacles in policy engagement and looking for ways to be involved and invited as policymakers (Chiu et al., 2021). Therefore, the nursing profession must evaluate policies that have been seen to increase the quality of care and patient treatment outcomes, enabling it to effectively advocate for its patients on a much grander scale.

     

     

     

    References

    American Nurses Association. (2020). 
    Ethics and human rights
    . American Nurses Association. 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/
    Links to an external site.

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Makaroff, K. S. (2021). Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review. 
    Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
    , 
    22
    (4), 276–296. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611
    Links to an external site.

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses’ participation in the health policy-making process: A systematic review. 
    BMC Nursing
    , 
    20
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6
    Links to an external site.

    Jackson, J. J., Maben, J., & Anderson, J. E. (2022). What are nurses’ roles in modern healthcare? A qualitative interview study using interpretive description. 
    Journal of Research in Nursing
    , 
    27
    (6), 174498712110709. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871211070981
    Links to an external site.
     NURS-6050 Walden University Week 9: Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

  • Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

    Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

    Interviewer:
    Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?

    Interviewee
    : Healthcare organizations are increasingly exploring to improve the quality of care and cut healthcare costs. A post discharge follow-up telephone call program is my proposed healthcare program. According to Bhandari et al. (2022), the reduction of Medicare reimbursement to hospitals as a result of readmission is among the consequences of the enactment of the Affordable Care Act. The reimbursement penalty has made healthcare organizations to explore diverse strategies of improving care transitions and reducing rates of readmissions.  Among the widely recognized interventions is the implementation of post-discharge follow-up telephone call programs, a transitional care strategy aimed at improving patient’s adherence to discharge recommendations. No costs will be incurred in the design and implementation of the project because nurses and social workers will make phone calls using the hospitals landline number.

    The program is projected to reduce readmission rates, improve care quality and improve patient satisfaction. According to Bhandari et al. (2022), the aim of post-discharge telephone calls is to identify patients who need to be guided on their recovery, extend support and care after hospitalization, reduce hospital readmissions and improve patient satisfaction. The study by Woods et al (2019 revealed that telephone  follow-up calls  post discharge  can meet patient communication and information needs, improve patient satisfaction, improve follow-up appointment attendance  and self-management and reduce post discharge problems.

    Interviewer:
    Who is your target population?

    Interviewee:
    My target population is older adult patients 65 years and above

    Interviewer:
    What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?

    Interviewee
    : Numerous stakeholders influence the implementation of change in practice of best practices.  Also, these stakeholders are affected by practice change. Also, there exists strong drive for the active engagement of stakeholders in and making decisions about changing practice. To achieve these, the roles of the numerous stakeholders practice change implementation, which include managers, nurses, patients, families, and other healthcare professionals at macro, meso, and micro level of the health system must be understood. Being knowledgeable of   of the role of these stakeholders will help the implementation and adoption of innovative practices more effectively and efficiently, and eventual improvement of healthcare outcomes (Ham-Baloyi, 2022).

    The nurse can provide input for the design of the post discharge phone call program by deciding the number of times the patient should be called in a day or the specific time of the day the patient nurse or social worker should make the telephone call. For example, the nurse can assist the program design to decide if patients will be contacted three times a day over two consecutive days.  Also, the nurse can offer input on the information that the patient will be given during the phone call and the questions that the patient will be asked, Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

    Interviewer:
    What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?

    Interviewee
    : Nurses have tan ethical and professional obligation of advocating for patients. According to Kurt and Gurdogan (2023), patients are vulnerable and regarded potentially disadvantaged in healthcare settings. Thus, patients requires an advocate for decisions and information about their health. Since nurses are in direct contact with patients compared to other healthcare providers, they are the ideal providers to assist patients in managing themselves and making decisions about themselves. Through patient advocacy, increases patient satisfaction, ensure provision of safe and quality patient care, and results in positive patient outcomes. Also, patient advocacy positively influence nurses by increasing motivation, professional satisfaction, autonomy, and self-confidence.

    Post discharge follow-up telephone calls are important for older patients since they find it challenging with post discharge care. According to Yen et al. (2023),  older adult patients usually encounter problems following discharge, such inability to obtain adequate care services, unawareness of where to obtain continuing care services, and lack of understanding of the amount of time they require to recover and  where they can obtain information they require.  After discharge, 60-70 percent of elderly patients suffer emotional distress, with 90 percent and 20 to 40 percent suffering from physical disturbances and unmet demands. Compared to adults below 65 years, older patients have a high likelihood of h having numerous chronic conditions or debilitating problems such as poor walking ability, weight loss, decline in muscle endurance and heightened risk of fall.  Elderly patients require longer r times to recover and more active and continuous post-discharge services.

    Interviewer:
    What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?

    Interviewee
    : The discharge from hospital of elderly patients is challenging these patients have multiple care nee. It involves numerous steps that need coordination of the patient care team, in which nurses play a vital role. For discharge planning procedures to be effective, there is the need for them to be collaborated with post-discharge services to make sure patients have a smoot transition. Clear goals and responsibilities enhance the work of multidisciplinary team involved in patient discharge. However, due to heavy workloads, nurses are rarely involved in hospital discharge and post discharge follow-up care (Liljas et al., 2023).

    Interviewer
    : Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

    Interviewee:
    The members of the healthcare team most needed to implement the program are social workers, registered nurses and nurse practitioners. According to Hayajneh et al. (2022), a discharge planner can be a social worker, case manager, attending physician or nurse. Discharge planning entails timely identification and assessment of patients who need help; working with the multidisciplinary team, patient and family; proposing alternatives for care continuity and referring patients to facilities or programs to that meet patients’ need; and collaborating with care centers in the community to address service gaps.

    Registered nurses and social workers will be responsible for making phone calls to patients while nurse practitioners will be reviewing the calls made to discharge patients. Nurses will make a simple , scripted the initial call at 24-48 hours after discharge while social workers will make a  second call at 72 -96 hours post discharge. The nurse and social workers will call patient on the telephone number listed in their electronic medical record. If the patient do not pick the call, another call will be made to a caregiver number. Social workers will be given a daily roster of patients who the nurses had already contacted within 48 hours post discharge from the hospital. The social workers will complete the second reminder phone call while sitting beside a nurse to permit for real-time triage of patient-identified clinical concerns or obstacles.

     

    References

    Bhandari, N., Epane, J., Reeves, J., Cochran, C., & Shen, J. (2022). Post-Discharge Transitional Care Program and Patient Compliance With Follow-Up Activities.
    Journal of Patient Experience, 9,
    23743735221086756. doi:
    10.1177/23743735221086756

    Hayajneh, A. A., Hweidi, I. M., & Dieh, M. W. (2020). Nurses’ knowledge, perception and practice toward discharge planning in acute care settings: A systematic review.
    Nursing Open, 7
    (5), 1313–1320. doi:
    10.1002/nop2.547

    Ham-Baloyi, W. (2022). Nurses’ roles in changing practice through implementing best practices: A systematic review.
    Health SA, 27
    , 1776. doi:
    10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1776

    Kurt, D., &  Gurdogan, E. P. (2023). Professional autonomy and patient advocacy in nurses.
    Collegian, 30
    (2), 327-334.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.09.015

    Lilja, A. E., Jensen, N. K., Pulkki, J., & Agerholm, J. (2023). Nurses’ Roles, Responsibilities and Actions in the Hospital Discharge Process of Older Adults with Health and Social Care Needs in Three Nordic Cities: A Vignette Study.
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20
    (19), 6809. doi:
    10.3390/ijerph20196809

    Woods, C. E., Jones, R., O’Shea, E., Grist, E., Wigers, J., & Usher, K. 92019). Nurse-led postdischarge telephone follow-up calls: A mixed study systematic review.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28
    (19-20), 3386-3399.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14951

    Yen, H.Y., Liu, D., Chi, M. J., & Huang, H. Y. (2023). Awareness of and subjective needs for post-discharge healthcare services among older adult patients.
    BMC Nursing, 22
    , 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01247-3

     

    Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

    As their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.

    Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.

    In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

    Resources

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    To Prepare:

    Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

    Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.

    Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.

    The Assignment: (2–4 pages)

    In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

    Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?

    Who is your target population?

    What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?

    What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?

    What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?

    Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

    By Day 7 of Week 8

    Submit
     your interview transcript.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
    Turnitin Drafts
     from the 
    Start Here
     area.

    To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
    WK8Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial

    Then, click on 
    Start Assignment
     near the top of the page.

    Next, click on 
    Upload File
     and select 
    Submit Assignment
     for review.

    Rubric

    NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

    NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

    Criteria

    Ratings

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Program DesignIn a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions.·   Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?·   Who is your target population?·   What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?·   What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?

    45
     
    to >
    40.0
     pts
    Excellent
    Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program. …Response provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population. …Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples. …Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. …Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design.

    40
     
    to >
    35.0
     pts
    Good
    Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program. …Response provides an accurate description of the target population. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples. …Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. …Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design.

    35
     
    to >
    31.0
     pts
    Fair
    Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program. …Description of the target population is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples. …Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate.

    31
     
    to >
    0
     pts
    Poor
    Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing. …Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. …Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

    45
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Program Implementation·  What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation?How does this role vary between design and implantation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?·  Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this?

    40
     
    to >
    35.0
     pts
    Excellent
    Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. …Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples. …Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.

    35
     
    to >
    31.0
     pts
    Good
    Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. …Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs and may include some specific examples. …Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.

    31
     
    to >
    27.0
     pts
    Fair
    Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete. …Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples. …Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete.

    27
     
    to >
    0
     pts
    Poor
    Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.

    40
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    5
     
    to >
    4.0
     pts
    Excellent
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    4
     
    to >
    3.0
     pts
    Good
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    3
     
    to >
    2.0
     pts
    Fair
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    2
     
    to >
    0
     pts
    Poor
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing. 5  pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation 5   to >
    4.0
     pts
    Excellent
    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    4
     
    to >
    3.0
     pts
    Good
    Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    3
     
    to >
    2.0
     pts
    Fair
    Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    2
     
    to >
    0
     pts
    Poor
    Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

    5
     pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Written Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, margins, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (if sources are cited).

    5
     
    to >
    4.0
     pts
    Excellent
    Uses correct APA format with no errors.

    4
     
    to >
    3.0
     pts
    Good
    Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

    3
     
    to >
    2.0
     pts
    Fair
    Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

    2
     
    to >
    0
     pts
    Poor
    Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

    5
     pts

    Total Points: 
    100

  • The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making

    Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role. A “word cloud” is generated by the application that makes prominent the most-used terms, offering an image of the common thinking among participants of that role.

    What types of words would you use to build a nursing word cloud? 
    Empathetic, organized, hard-working, or advocate
     would all certainly apply. Would you add policy-maker to your list? Do you think it would be a very prominent component of the word cloud?

    Nursing has become one of the largest professions in the world, and as such, nurses have the potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses influence the politics that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients. Hence, policy-making has become an increasingly popular term among nurses as they recognize a moral and professional obligation to be engaged in healthcare legislation.

    Resources

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    To Prepare:

    Revisit the Congress.gov website provided in the Resources and consider the role of RNs and APRNs in policy-making.

    Reflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the policy-making process.

    By Day 3 of Week 8

    Post
     an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in 
    policy-making
    .
     Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 8

    Respond
     to at least two of your colleagues’
    *
     posts by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

    *Note:
     Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs in 
    policy-making.
     

    Registered Nurses (RN) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRN)  have various opportunities to engage in policy-making that can be crucial in influencing healthcare practices and systems. One of these opportunities is participation in professional nursing organizations, such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) or the National Association of Nurse Practitioners (NANP). These organizations often advocate for policy changes and provide platforms for members to participate in discussions on influence regulations affecting nursing practice, healthcare legislation, and engage in lobbying efforts (American Nurses Association, 2021). Another important opportunity is serving on governmental health advisory boards, where RNs and APRNs can provide expert insights on patient care standards, healthcare regulations, and public health initiatives (American Nurses Association, 2021). For example, nurses can apply to serve on boards at the state or federal level, such as  task forces addressing healthcare disparities, or health department committees. By leveraging their clinical experience and patient-centered perspective, RNs and APRNs can play a significant role in creating policies that improve healthcare systems and outcomes.

    Challenges that these opportunities and overcoming these challenges.

    Policy-making as RNs and APRNs can come with several challenges, such as limited knowledge of the political process, time constraints, and possible resistance from established policymakers. Nurses often face demanding work schedules and can potentially struggle to find time to actively participate in attending meetings. In this case, this can hinder their ability to consistently engage in policy-making activities (DeSantis & McCaffrey, 2020). Another challenge is that nurses may lack the confidence to navigate political environments, making it difficult to effectively advocate for policy changes (DeSantis & McCaffrey, 2020). Additionally, established policymakers may sometimes view nurses as less influential compared to other stakeholders, which can result in their input being undervalued or overlooked.

    To overcome the challenges of participating in policy-making as a nurse, I would focus on time management and enhancing my advocacy skills. One approach is to set aside specific times each month for advocacy work, such as attending virtual meetings of nursing organizations. This ensures consistent involvement without overwhelming my schedule. Additionally, I would seek out educational opportunities, such as policy training workshops to improve my understanding of the legislative process and build confidence in navigating political environments. To address potential undervaluing of my input, I would collaborate with experienced nurse advocates who can guide me on how to effectively communicate with policymakers. However, by building a strong professional network, I can amplify my voice, increasing the impact of my contributions to healthcare policy.

    Strategies to advocate for these opportunities 

    One of these strategies is to develop and distribute educational materials that focus on the importance of nursing involvement in advocacy. This could include creating a comprehensive resource guide that outlines several boards, organizations, and committees where nurses can participate (McGowan & Keane, 2020). For example, the guide will be detailed on how to join local chapters of professional organizations, participate in advocacy training programs and attend relevant webinars. In this case, distributing this guide through hospital newsletters, nursing schools, and social media platforms to raise awareness and encourage participation.

    Another strategy is to organize regular advocacy workshops within healthcare settings, where nurses can learn about current policy issues and engage in discussions on how to influence change. These events could feature experienced nurse advocates or representatives from professional organizations, who can share insights and provide practical tips for effective advocacy (McGowan & Keane, 2020). For instance, a workshop focuses on how to effectively communicate with legislators, and present case studies of successful nursing advocacy efforts. By empowering nurses with knowledge and skills, these strategies can help increase participation in policy-making and ensure that the voices of RNs and APRNs are represented in important healthcare discussions.

    Reference

    American Nurses Association. (2021). 
    Nursing advocacy and the role of the nurse.
    https://www.nursingworld.org/~49a83d/globalassets/our-initiatives/advocacy/advocacy-toolkit.pdf

    Cohn, S. (2019). 
    Nurses as change agents: A practical guide to advocacy in health care.
     Sigma Theta Tau International.

    DeSantis, L. J., & McCaffrey, R. (2020). 
    The role of nursing in health policy: How nurses can shape healthcare policy
    . Nursing Management, 51(7), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000682173.22038.7c

    McGowan, J. J., & Keane, D. J. (2020). 
    Advocacy in nursing: A strategy to advance nursing in policy and practice
    . Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(3), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000857

     

    Expand discussion thread from Precious Funanya Akaeze

    7 Replies, 1 Unread

    7 Replies, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    EA

    Eric M Arutyunyan

    Oct 16, 2024 10:16pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 12:55pm

    Reply from Eric M Arutyunyan

     

    Policymaking is an important aspect of the healthcare profession. There are opportunities where RNs and APRNs can be involved actively in making policies. The first opportunity exists in nursing organizations and professional bodies such as the American Nurses Association, where RNs and APRNs can be involved in providing expert advice on health policies. In this case, RNs and APRNs will examine health issues while in these organizations and contribute to the development of sustainable policies and solutions and also influence changes in the current policies to align with the healthcare needs (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). Besides, RNs and APRNs will sit on the boards of nursing organizations where health policies are made and reviewed. For instance, they can be engaged in serving on committees and advisory boards at local and state levels. The second opportunity that exists is for nurses engaging in elective offices, where they can engage in policy-making through legislation. In this opportunity, RNs and APRNs can have a direct influence on the legislation of health policies that can enhance patient care and improve the nursing profession.

    Challenges that may present and how to Overcome them

    One of the challenges that the identified opportunities may present is a lack of knowledge and skills in developing policies. RNs and APRNs can be unfamiliar with the policy-making processes due to the complexity of the systems, which can be confusing, and entails different committees and stakeholders (Foster & Flanders, 2021).  Besides, nurses may not have a deep understanding of the procedures, timeliness and terms that are involved in policy making. This challenge can be addressed by encouraging nurses to pursue further education and training in policy-making, particularly in the field of health. For instance, RNs and APRNs can be actively involved in health workshops and attending seminars, which will give them knowledge and skills in policy making.

    The other challenge is time constraints and workload, which can prevent nurses to engage in elective positions or get involved in legislative roles. Normally, RNS and APRNs have heavy patient workloads due to demanding schedules, which limits their availability to engage in policy-making (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). Besides, administrative tasks for nurses that involve huge paperwork and documentation can consume a significant of their time; thus, limiting their chances of participating in policymaking. This challenge can be addressed by seeking support from employers to consider allocating them time that they can use in engaging in policy making. Besides, employers can allow RNs and APRNs to join professional nursing organizations that can offer nurses with resources and support that make them engage in policy making.

    Recommended Strategies

    The first strategy to advocate for these opportunities is through proper education and training of RNs and APRNs for self-sufficiency. Chiu et al. (2021) provide that nursing organizations and professional nursing bodies should prepare programs such as workshops, seminars and professional conferences to train and educate RNS and APRNs on policy-making, especially on matters of health to make them good advocates and implementers of healthcare decisions. Exposing RNs and APRNs to nursing training and education on issues of healthcare policy will develop their knowledge and interest in getting involved in policymaking (Chiu et al., 2021). The other strategy is engaging employers of RNs and APRNs such as hospitals and other health organizations. In this case, employers can develop health policy committees in their organizations that can be involved in discussing the potential benefits of nurse advocacy (Matthews, 2019). Also, employers can create awareness for nurses on the need to engage in policymaking through legislation and provide the needed resources for the nurses to engage in policy development.

    References

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy advocacy and Nursing Organizations: A scoping review. 
    Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
    , 
    22
    (4), 276-296. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611
    Links to an external site.

    Foster, J., & Flanders. (2021, March 3). 
    Challenges in Clinical Nurse Specialist Education and practice
    . OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Retrieved October 16, 2024, from 
    https://preprodojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-19-2014/number-2-may-2014/challenges-in-cns-education-and-practice/
    Links to an external site.

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing Nurses’ Participation in the Health Policy-Making Process: A systematic review. 
    BMC Nursing
    , 
    20
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6
    Links to an external site.

    Matthews, J. (2019). Role of Professional Organizations in advocating for the Nursing Profession. 
    OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
    , 
    17
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.3912/ojin.vol17no01man03
    Links to an external site.

    Expand discussion thread from Eric M Arutyunyan

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    LL

    Lorrissa Lingen

    Oct 16, 2024 9:53pm
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 10:32pm

    Reply from Lorrissa Lingen

    Two opportunities

    Conducting research and implementing pilot programs to gather data is important. By running a pilot program, you can collect valuable data that serves as evidence when creating policies. This data can justify the need for new policies or highlight necessary changes. At my previous facility, we held meetings to express concerns and ran pilot programs. Nurses collected information and data on what worked and what didn’t. We then discussed these findings in follow-up meetings to determine if changes were needed and whether new policies should be implemented.

    The ANA represents nurses’ interests at local, state, and national levels. As a member, your voice gains strength through a united group that effectively advocates for legislative and police changes. Nurses are known for advocating for advancements in their profession, patient care, health systems, and public policy. Nursing organizations having become vital platforms for pushing for changes that benefit entire communities. They actively engage in political processes to initiate, implement and enforce policies that improve overall health outcomes (Chiu et al., 2021).

    Challenges

    Healthcare policies are constantly changing and evolving, and this can lead to challenges when individuals believe change isn’t necessary. People often struggle with change, especially when they feel their current methods are correct. By presenting factual evidence and demonstrating the benefits of these changes, we can address the concerns of some individuals and help ease the transition.

    Evidence-based changes are about using science methods to guide changes within an organization. Planned changes are more successful when they’re driven by science. Also, by incorporating insights from scientific research, understanding the organization’s concerns, and listening to patients and practitioner experiences, we can enhance the quality of decisions related to change. This approach ensures that changes aren’t just random but are thoughtfully planned and more likely to be successful (Have & Rousseau, 2022).

    Two Strategies

    Two strategies I would use to help create policies are running pilot programs and examining the plain facts along with proven research. By showcasing statistics and factual evidence on specific policy proposals, it becomes easier to counter any arguments against them. If the data can demonstrate improvements in services and patient care, it strengthens the case for implementing those policies. Research is essential for guiding and shaping effective policy making. Evidence based insights from research improve policy formulating, implementation and evaluation. By working together on policy-focused research and sharing findings, people can connect research with policy changes more effectively (
    The importance of research for effective policy making
     2023).

     

    References:

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021, November 17). 
    Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review
    . Policy, politics & nursing practice. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600587/

     

    Have, S., & Rousseau, D. M. (2022, March 12). 
    Evidence-based change management
    . Organizational Dynamics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261622000067

     

    The importance of research for effective policy making
    . The Importance of Research for Effective Policy Making. (2023, July 8). https://www.edmond.in/opinions/the-importance-of-research-for-effective-policy-making/

     

    Expand discussion thread from Lorrissa Lingen

    7 Replies, 2 Unread

    7 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    TC

    Tracy M Chaves

    Oct 16, 2024 9:08pm
    | Last reply Oct 20, 2024 11:33am

    Reply from Tracy M Chaves

    As we have been learning through this course, RNs and APRNs presence in policy making is important to ensure changes to policies are both beneficial to patients and professionals (Sharpnack, 2022).

    One strategy that RNs and APRNs can use to participate in policy making is joining committees that have power to make changes, for example the Federal Advisory Committees (FAC) created by the CDC. Per the CDC this committee gives participants the opportunity to participate in decision-making and offer recommendations to the federal government (n.d.)

    Another opportunity RNs and APRNs have for participating in policy-making is by joining a nurses association such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) or the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). These organizations have many resources for nurses and one of those is nurse advocacy (ANA, n.d.).

    A challenge one might face when trying to participate in policy-making is lack of time due to heavy workload on implementation versus development (Rasheed et. al., 2020). Another challenge presented in this research is that nurses may lack the knowledge and confidence in influencing political decision making. Nurses should be confidence as they have the power to educate, develop, and shape healthcare agendas (Sharpnack, 2022).

    Two ways to better advocate the opportunities of participating in policy-making is by having those discussions with colleagues. Joining an organization such as the ANA and vocalizing it to colleagues can incentivize others to join. Another strong avenue of communication and display of community and activity is social media. Sharing posts about events, changes, and opportunities can shed light onto the importance of policy-making. However, a nurse must want to be active and want to dedicate time to participate in policy-making.

     

    References

    ANA. (n.d.) Federal Advocacy. Retrieved on October 16, 2024 from 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
    Links to an external site.

    CDC. (n.d.). Federal Advisory Committees (FAC): Committees. Retrieved on October 16 2024 from
      
    https://www.cdc.gov/faca/committees/index.html
    Links to an external site.
     

    Rasheed, S. P., Younas, A., & Mehdi, F. (2020). Challenges, Extent of Involvement, and the Impact of Nurses’ Involvement in Politics and Policy Making in in Last Two Decades: An Integrative Review. 
    Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
    , 
    52
    (4), 446–455

    Sharpnack, P. (2022). Overview and summary: Nurses’ impact on advocacy and policy. 
    The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 27
    (2). https://www.doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol27No02ManOS
     

    Expand discussion thread from Tracy M Chaves

    6 Replies, 6 Unread

    6 Replies, 6 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    John Dulko
     (He/Him)

    Oct 16, 2024 8:11pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 8:31pm

    Reply from John Dulko

    Introduction

    “Nursing is the profession that leads on the delivery of care 24 hours a day, and it is nurses who have the experience, the expertise and the research evidence that gives them a unique insight into issues such as patient safety, and the coordination, effectiveness, efficiency and integration of services” (Catton & Shamian, 2023). Therefore, “Nurses’ political participation is required to optimize the quality and equity of health services provided to patients and to improve their working environments” (Han & Kim, 2024). But “Despite the frequent call for nurses to advocate, there is evidence of a nursing practice gap in the policy arena (Jurns, 2019). Two opportunities for nurses to participate in policy will be introduced along with their challenges, how to overcome them, and strategies for promoting these opportunities.

    Two Opportunities for Nurses to Participate in Policymaking

    Two opportunities for registered nurses (RNs) and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to actively participate in policymaking are professional nursing organization participation and patient safety advocacy. “State and national nurses’ associations have groups responsible for lobbying legislators and impacting policy that affects the administration of healthcare … Nursing associations maintain a list of members who agree to write letters and make phone calls to their state and federal representatives” (Morris, 2023). These are more specific actions nurses can take to actively participate in policymaking. Nurses can advocate for patient safety by providing “… the evidence-based information they [lobbyists] need to convince legislators of the positions they should take to help improve the healthcare system” (Morris, 2023) and interpreting “… research for their state and federal senate and house representatives” (Morris, 2023).

    Challenges

    Two challenges for professional organization participation are the two most invaluable resources: time and money. Joining a professional organization often requires an annual fee, or dues, to help keep the organization running. For example, it is 150 dollars annually for members of the American Nurses Association to maintain their membership. Nurses who recommend changes to current policy often meet resistance, not because the suggestion is outright unfavourability, but because of the financial hardship it would require to change and implement it. Time is another challenge. Some nurses have a genuine interest and would like to participate but are not afforded the time because they work full-time, maintain their licenses and certifications, and support their personal lives. Adding more committee meetings or hearings on top of that is a lot for a nurse to do.

    Two challenges for advocating patient safety are professional barriers and the implementation of accepted policies. Professional barriers “… such as stereotypes of the nursing profession, a lack of political nursing education for nurses, the political power of nursing representative organizations, and the limited support for nurses from these organizations (Han & Kim, 2024) impede this nursing opportunity in policymaking. Also, “… the adoption of an innovation does not ensure implementation; adopted policies may never be put into action, and adopted technologies may sit in unopened crates on the factory floor” (Klein & Sorra, 1996).

    Ways to Overcome the Challenges

    To address the time, nursing leadership should support nurses who have an interest in and potential in policy by allotting them time at work to contribute to these important issues. To address the finances, nursing leadership should also sponsor nurses to join professional nursing organizations to increase participation, even if that offers nurses to budget part of their paycheck to annual dues. To address the professional barriers and implementation challenges, nursing education and professional development need to include more healthcare politics so that nurses have the knowledge and resources to confidently tackle these tasks and have the finesse to support seeing their implementation.

    Two Strategies to Advocate for these Opportunities

    Two strategies for advocating for these opportunities are leading by example and supporting peers. “Families and friends of nurses need to encourage political activism. Nursing schools need to include healthcare policy education as part of the curriculum, as well as encourage some level of political involvement from nursing students. Furthermore, the faculty of nursing schools should also participate in policy changes, thereby acting as role models for their students. Finally, employers need to provide staff nurses with the time, resources, and opportunities to influence local, state and federal policy. After all, healthcare legislation ultimately affects us all” (Brokaw, 2016).

    Conclusion

    “By knowing how the system works and which strategies can effectively influence policy, any nurse can become an advocate at the local, state, or federal level” (Fredrik, 2013).

    References

    Brokaw, J.J. (2016 September 22). The nursing profession’s potential impact on policy and politics. 
    American Nurse
    . https://www.myamericannurse.com/nursing-professions-potential-impact-policy-politics/

    Catton, H. & Shamian, J. (2023 August 25). ‘Nurses and policy making: You have a seat at the table, so what?’ 
    Nursing Times
    . https://www.nursingtimes.net/opinion/nurses-and-policy-making-you-have-a-seat-at-the-table-so-what-25-08-2023/

    Han, N.K. & Kim, G.S. (2024 June 28). The barriers and facilitators influencing nurses’ political participation or healthcare policy intervention: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. 
    Journal of Nursing Management
    . https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2606855

    Jurns, C. (2019 September 6). Policy advocacy motivators and barrier: Research results and applications. 
    OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
    , 24(3). 10.3912/OJIN.Vol24No03PPT63

    Klein, K.. & Sorra, J. (1996 October). The challenge of innovation implementation. 
    Academy of Management Review
    , 21(4), 1055-1080.

    Morris, G. (2023 November 10). 10 ways nurses can get involved in policy. 
    NurseJournal
    . https://nursejournal.org/articles/ways-nurses-can-get-involved-in-policy/

    Expand discussion thread from John Dulko

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Amy Simmons

    Oct 16, 2024 5:47pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 8:38pm

    Reply from Amy Simmons

    Main Post

    Policy-Making Roles

    There are approximately 4 million nurses in the United States alone, making nursing the largest medical profession in the world. Nurses can leverage insight to create empowering initiatives that enhance their effectiveness and engagement in health policy development. Nurses play a critical role in shaping, influencing, and implementing health policies, making sure they reflect patient-centered care (Hajzadeh et al., 2021). Additionally, nurses are capable of transforming policy-making processes simply with their experiences of working closely with patients and as stated in the Health Policy and Politics video, “we are the experts” (Walden University, 2018). Nurses can get involved in policy-making by joining professional organizations such as the American Nurses Association (ANA), getting involved with their local and state representatives, attending town hall meetings, or collaborating with other health care professionals.

    Challenges

    While challenges exist, nurses’ involvement in policy-making is crucial for ensuring that the healthcare system works effectively and fairly for all. Their contributions are needed more than ever to ensure that healthcare policies are aligned with the realities of patient care and the workforce’s needs. According to Han & Kim (2024), challenges come from a lack of political interests, a lack of political nursing education, and personal beliefs and values. Participation is required to improve the quality and fairness of patient care while also improving nurses’ working conditions.

    Strategies

    To overcome the challenges of nurses being involved in policymaking, first and foremost, the nurse must be willing and committed to learn about political nursing education, join a professional organization, and get involved in various political activities. Morris (2023), reviews ways to get involved in policy-making, she makes a valid statement “without a seat at the table, legislators inexperienced in healthcare are making health-related decisions” (para 3.).

    References

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses participation in the health policy-making process: a systematic review. 
    BMC nursing
    , 
    20
    (1), 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6

    Han, N. K., & Kim, G. S. (2024). The barriers and facilitators influencing nurses’ political participation or healthcare policy intervention: A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis. 
    Journal of Nursing Management
    , 
    2024
    (1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2606855

    Morris, G. (2023, October 11). 
    10 ways nurses can get involved in policy
    . NurseJournal. https://nursejournal.org/articles/ways-nurses-can-get-involved-in-policy/

    Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2018). 
    Health policy and politics
     [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

     

    Expand discussion thread from Amy Simmons

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    LA

    Lailat Andu

    Oct 16, 2024 4:24pm
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 8:29pm

    Reply from Lailat Andu

    Two Opportunities

    Registered Nurses and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses often play multiple roles in shaping health policy through active participation in community health initiatives. These initiatives provide RN with the opportunity to advocate for health improvements and address social determinants of health within our communities. I believe that by engaging in community health programs, nurses can gather data, identify health disparities, and work collaboratively with community organizations to implement evidence-based interventions. This grassroots involvement not only enhances community health outcomes but also empowers nurses and APRN to influence local health policy (Hollander et al., 2018). Opportunity for RNs and APRNs to participate in policymaking can be through their involvement in professional organizations and associations. These organizations often engage in lobbying efforts, policy advocacy, and the development of position statements that guide health policy at various levels. By becoming active members, nurses and APRN can contribute their clinical expertise and firsthand knowledge of patient care to inform policy discussions and legislative initiatives. This participation allows RNs and APRNs to advocate for essential issues such as workforce development, access to care, and the integration of nursing perspectives into healthcare reform (American Nurses Association, 2020).

    Community health initiatives and professional organizations, RNs and APRNs can also influence policy through research and academic partnerships. By conducting research on healthcare practices and patient outcomes, we nurses can provide valuable evidence to support policy changes. Collaborating with academic institutions enables nurses to translate their findings into actionable recommendations for policymakers. This evidence-based approach ensures that health policies are grounded in current research, ultimately leading to improved healthcare delivery and patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Through these avenues, RNs and APRNs can significantly impact health policy and drive positive change within the healthcare system.

    Challenges

    Engaging in policymaking poses several challenges for RNs and APRNs. One significant hurdle is the limited time and resources available to nurses, who often juggle demanding work schedules with personal responsibilities (Pettit, 2019). This lack of time can hinder their ability to participate in advocacy activities or attend training sessions that enhance their policy-making skills. Additionally, many nurses may feel unprepared to navigate the complexities of legislative processes due to insufficient training in health policy and advocacy (Brous & Humes, 2020). These barriers can discourage nurses from taking an active role in shaping health policy, limiting their influence on critical issues affecting their profession and patient care.

    To overcome these challenges, nurses can adopt several strategies. First, prioritizing advocacy efforts by scheduling specific times dedicated to policy engagement can help manage their time effectively (Pettit, 2019). Professional organizations can offer workshops and resources to enhance knowledge and skills in policy advocacy, equipping nurses with the necessary tools (Brous & Humes, 2020). Also, fostering interprofessional collaborations can facilitate access to diverse perspectives and strengthen advocacy efforts (Labrador et al., 2018). By creating a supportive culture within healthcare organizations, where open discussions about policy issues are encouraged, nurses can feel more empowered to advocate for change without fear of repercussions (Harris et al., 2021). Engaging in these practices not only addresses the challenges but also enhances the collective voice of nurses in policymaking.

    Strategies Recommendation

    To effectively advocate for the existence of policy-making opportunities for RNs and APRNs, one effective strategy is to develop targeted educational workshops and seminars within healthcare organizations. These sessions can focus on the importance of nurse involvement in policy advocacy, outlining specific avenues such as legislative advocacy, participation in professional organizations, and local health initiatives. For instance, a workshop could include guest speakers from professional nursing organizations who can share firsthand experiences of successful advocacy efforts and provide practical tips on navigating the legislative process (Brous & Humes, 2020). By creating a platform for knowledge sharing, nurses can feel empowered and informed about the various ways they can engage in policymaking.

    Another strategy involves leveraging social media and digital platforms to create a dedicated campaign that highlights advocacy opportunities and success stories from nurses who have actively participated in policymaking. By utilizing platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, nurses can share articles, resources, and personal narratives that illustrate the impact of nurse advocacy on health policy. For example, a series of posts could spotlight individual nurses who have influenced legislation or participated in public health initiatives, effectively showcasing their journeys and encouraging others to get involved (American Nurses Association, 2020). This approach not only raises awareness but also fosters a sense of community and support among nurses, inspiring collective action toward greater involvement in health policy.

    References

    American Nurses Association. (2020). Advocacy in nursing: A guide for nurses. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/

    Brous, E., & Humes, C. (2020). Advocacy training for nurses: Enhancing policy engagement. Nursing Outlook, 68(3), 329-336.

    Harris, H., Craft, J., & Sargent, C. (2021). Creating a supportive environment for nurse advocacy. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(5), 1324-1330.

    Labrador, A., Vargas, M., & Ortega, M. (2018). Interprofessional collaboration in health care: A systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(2), 152-159.

    Pettit, J. (2019). Time management strategies for busy nurses. Nursing Times, 115(1), 22-24.

    Short, N. M. (2022). Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

    Expand discussion thread from Lailat Andu

    5 Replies, 5 Unread

    5 Replies, 5 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    SV

    Selina Villanueva

    Oct 16, 2024 4:21pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 9:29pm

    Reply from Selina Villanueva

    While I would include policy-maker into my list of words used to build a nursing word cloud, I do not think it would be a prominent component of the word cloud. However, the preceding claim depends on the people involved in building the word cloud. For instance, nurse practitioners and other healthcare professionals are more likely to include policy-makers in their list of words when building a nursing word cloud than the general public. The above assertion stems from existing public perceptions concerning the role of nurses in the healthcare profession. For instance, Zhou et al. (2024) and Blau et al. (2023) noted that the role of nurses as policy-makers and decision-makers is usually less visible to the public. Hence, most of the general public only perceives nurses as caregivers whose roles are limited to healthcare facilities.

    Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) can actively participate in policy-making by joining and participating in state and national nurses’ associations. This opportunity allows nurses to collectively lobby legislators on policies impacting public health and nursing working conditions (Chiu et al., 2021). Also, RNs and APRNs can participate in policy-making by attending and testifying before Congressional Committees and local or state legislative bodies. Attending legislative sessions allows RNs and APRNs to learn how the legislative process works and the steps involved in policy-making. Similarly, testifying before Congressional Committees can assist legislators in making informed decisions concerning the healthcare sector.

    The opportunities listed above face several challenges. First, time restrictions limit nurses’ ability to participate in nurses’ associations or attend legislative sessions actively (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). Also, a lack of collaboration and coordination among nurses due to the existence of multiple professional nursing organizations and nursing specialties reduces the impact of a unified voice representing the profession. However, the preceding challenges can be addressed through increased education on the benefits of collaboration and members’ insistence on coordination of lobbying efforts among the leaders of their professional organizations. This way, nurse leaders working for disparate nursing associations would be compelled by their members to partner in advocating for each organization’s members’ policy-change recommendations, leading to higher success rates. Furthermore, RNs and APRNs can appoint representatives from their healthcare facilities to represent their colleagues during legislative sessions and Congression hearings The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University.

    Finally, one can advocate for or communicate the existence of the opportunities listed above through changes in nursing school curricula and healthcare institutions. For example, nurse educators can implement policy advocacy training and information about legislative processes involved in policy-making in nursing education programs (Short, 2022). This approach would equip RNs and APRNs with political competency, enabling them to become more effective in participating in policy-making. Also, nurse leaders can promote policy-making participation by RNs and APRNs by promoting and supporting nurses’ involvement in policy-making through continuing education to improve their leadership roles. This can be reflected through increased nurses’ participation in public education, where RNs and APRNs educate the public on the relevant health policies affecting their health, thus shaping their voting decisions.

    References

    Blau, A., Sela, Y., & Grinberg, K. (2023). Public perceptions and attitudes on the image of nursing in the wake of COVID-19. 
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20
    (6), 4717-4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064717

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review. 
    Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 22
    (4), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses’ participation in the health policy-making process: A systematic review. 
    BMC Nursing, 20
    (1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

    Zhou, L., Godsey, J. A., Kallmeyer, R., Hayes, T., & Cai, E. (2024). Public perceptions of the brand image of nursing: Cross-cultural differences between the United States and China. 
    Nursing Outlook, 72
    (5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102220

    Expand discussion thread from Selina Villanueva

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Julia N Taylor

    Oct 16, 2024 4:09pm
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 2:43pm

    Reply from Julia N Taylor

    Role of RNs and APRNs in Policy Making

    Nursing is the largest medical profession in the world, with nearly 4 million nurses in the United States alone (ANA). Registered nurses and advanced practice nurses can participate in policymaking in many ways. When participating in the policy process, nurses are considered professional experts. Nurses consult committees to assist policymakers in developing new evidence-based legislation. Nurses involved with skilled nursing organizations can also advocate for change, such as allowing advanced practice nurses to operate with full practice authority in a particular state. When nurses are involved in research, they can assist policymakers in identifying problems, assist with risk management, and the cost that may affect these many changes. Like most healthcare workers, nurses help strengthen the health systems (NIH).

     
    Challenges and Solutions

    The ultimate goal of health policies is to promote public welfare. It consists of three stages: formulation, policy implementation, and policy reformation (BMC). One primary hurdle in policymaking and implementation is the financial aspect (BMC). Nurses must consider whether a proposed policy change will complement or disrupt existing plans. Can the healthcare facility afford to reallocate funds to accommodate the new practice? While the idea may be beneficial, the critical question remains: how can we minimize costs? This financial challenge is just one of the many obstacles in the policymaking process.

     
    Recommend strategies

    Nurses should participate in State and NationNurses’es’ Associations. This will give them an idea of what other states are implementing and what’s not—building relationships with state lawmakers. I am a big advocate of networking. Today’s world is not just what you know but who you know. Building relationships can understand what others think and why they feel a particular legislation is essential. The most important recommendation I think is to Contribute Evidence-Based Data. Lawmakers want to see the facts and why this legislation is so important to you.

    References

    American Nurses Association. nursingworld.org/NurseLegislatorDirectory.aspx. 2016.

    https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6
    Links to an external site.

    The nursing profession’s potential impact on policy and politics


    Links to an external site.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273557/
    Links to an external site.

    Expand discussion thread from Julia N Taylor

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Mihret Ghebreamlak

    Oct 16, 2024 3:43pm
    | Last reply Oct 17, 2024 10:12am

    Reply from Mihret Ghebreamlak

    Opportunities for Nurses to Participate in 
    Policymaking

    RNs and APRNs have various opportunities to participate in policymaking. Professional nursing organizations can extend opportunities for membership in policy committees and development regarding healthcare legislation and policy initiatives. These organizations have an advocacy section that focuses on influencing policy. Direct engagement with legislators is another critical avenue (Tummers & Bekkers, 2014). For instance, nurses can request meetings with local representatives, attend town halls, or participate in lobby days. By sharing personal experiences and clinical expertise, nurses can contribute to policy development by helping policymakers understand the practical implications of health legislation. This goes a long way toward ensuring that health professionals’ contributions underpin the foundation of decisions made at local, state, and national levels.

    Challenges and Solutions

    Despite such opportunities, there are several barriers to policy engagement for nurses. The first one is time, as most nurses face conflicting and demanding work schedules that prevent participation in policy activities, typically during business hours. The legislation process can be very discouragingly complex, which could further hinder the nurse’s engagement in the process (Short, 2022). Such challenges may be overcome by nurses setting realistic policy engagement goals and focusing on key issues annually. Confidence to engage in policy formulation can be instilled through mentorship from experienced nurse advocates or policy education resources through professional organizations.

    Advocacy Strategies

    The following activities can be implemented to foster the possibilities for policymaking among nurses. First, integrating policy learning into nursing education and continuing education will increase nurse awareness. These may include courses on the legislative process, healthcare policy analysis, and advocacy techniques, thus engendering a tradition of political participation in the profession (Flaubert et al., 2021). Moreover, web-based information about policy opportunities through social networking and other digital media will reach larger groups. These updates on policy issues should highlight success stories and how-to resources to get involved, and they must be shared in real-time by nursing organizations and leaders in an easy-to-access way.

     

    References:

    Flaubert, J. L., Menestrel, S. L., Williams, D. R., & Wakefield, M. K. (2021). Educating Nurses for the Future. In 
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    . National Academies Press (US). 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573912/
    Links to an external site.

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s Health Policy & Politics: A nurse’s guide.
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. J. J. M. (2014). 
    Policy Implementation, Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Importance of Discretion
    .

    Expand discussion thread from Mihret Ghebreamlak

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    TC

    Tamika Cheatham

    Oct 16, 2024 3:34pm
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 9:17pm

    Reply from Tamika Cheatham

    Registered Nurses and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses are endowed with skills, they can apply to influence the course of health policy. Such activities are possible by joining professional associations such as the National Association of Nurse Practitioners and the American Nurses Association. However, many nurses may still find the political system too overpowering or remain in the dark as to how the system can be leveraged to gain results. Further, if the person holds other responsibilities, balancing other tasks with participation becomes equally problematic. These problems should be solved with the opportunity of holding workshops where people can study advocacy skills and receive the necessary materials needed to understand the structure of legislation (Congress, 2023). Another advantage to flexible participation is working across time zones and having virtual meetings because there may be people with very tight schedules.

    In addition, they become involved in local or task forces on state health policy, which address specific issues such as mental health, chronic diseases, or health care for underserved populations. These task forces strive to come up with proposals for change in policies, but it is not an arbitrary process because there may be disagreements between members, or formal procedural barriers of the political system may hinder the changes being made (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019). How cohesive these strategies are within these groups could be enhanced by defining needs, aiming for goals and objectives within that scope, and also by supporting the right communication process enhancing common goals.

    On this basis, it is useful to perform educational workshops and training sessions to help support policy involvement. Such workshops also can raise awareness of the process of policy-making and the significance of involvement for RNs and APRNs (Chiu et al., 2021). For instance, a series named “Nursing Advocacy for example,” could be carried out at nursing schools and different conferences, whereby participants would be taught the basic tools and knowledge in advocacy. Also, using social media can increase awareness of policy initiatives and participation by the public. A campaign with a hashtag like #NursesAdvocatingChange can encourage RNs and APRNs to contribute their experiences within policy making with an advocacy-based community. Using such opportunities and successful experiences, RNs and APRNs can on occasion change the Health Policy Decision and overall nursing policy thereby improving patients’ outcomes and the healthcare system.

     

     

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). 
    The CDC policy process
    . CDC. 
    https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/policyprocess/index.html
    Links to an external site.

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Makaroff, K. S. (2021). Policy Advocacy and Nursing Organizations: A Scoping Review. 
    Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
    , 
    22
    (4), 276–296. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611
    Links to an external site.

    Congress. (2023). 
    Congress.gov | library of Congress
    . Congress.gov. 
    https://www.congress.gov/
    Links to an external site.

     

     

    Expand discussion thread from Tamika Cheatham

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    SS

    Stephania A Senter

    Oct 16, 2024 3:09pm
    | Last reply Oct 16, 2024 5:44pm

    Reply from Stephania A Senter

    Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) have many opportunities available to participate in policy-making. Nurses’ active involvement can help shape healthcare policy.

    Nurses and Policy Making

    Organizations, such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) provide RNs and APRNs a chance to engage in legislative advocacy. ANA often has committees that monitor healthcare policies, influence legislative agendas, and advocate for the nursing profession. Through this platform, nurses can lobby for healthcare reforms, meet with legislators, and testify at public hearings. According to Shariff (2014), participating in professional organizations empowers nurses to collectively influence healthcare policy collectively, ensuring the nursing perspective is included in legislative decisions.

    Challenges

    Time for involvement poses a challenge for nurses who may wish to be involved. Many nurses juggle clinical duties, family, and personal responsibilities, making it difficult to dedicate time to policy-making activities. Another challenge is that nurses may feel a lack of knowledge or lack of confidence in the understanding of the legislative process (Williams et al., 2018).

         To overcome time-related challenges, nurses can utilize virtual advocacy options, such as online meetings or webinars hosted by professional organizations. This will offer flexibility. Nurses who feel underprepared can utilize professional organizations that offer advocacy training programs, webinars, and mentorship opportunities to equip nurses with the necessary knowledge and skills to engage in policy-making (Williams et al., 2018).

    Advisory Boards

    RNs and APRNs can serve on healthcare advisory boards, such as hospital ethics committees, and quality improvement teams. These boards directly influence healthcare delivery, regulation, and quality improvement strategies. Participation in such boards assists nurses with experience in leadership and confidence which not all nurses may have.

         RNs and APRNs can also build their leadership and confidence by pursuing additional education, competencies, or certifications in healthcare leadership and management. Networking within their healthcare organizations and with interdisciplinary teams can also help nurses position themselves.  Mentorship from nurse leaders can also provide guidance.

    Hospitals, nursing schools, and professional organizations sometimes offer continuing education (CE) credits specifically focused on healthcare policy and advocacy. These programs raise awareness of the various policy-making opportunities available and equip nurses with the skills to engage in them. Hosting workshops on the legislative process or the role of nurses in policy advocacy can assist the process and encourage more participation.

    Conclusion

    By participating in professional nursing organizations’ legislative committees and serving on advisory boards or healthcare councils, RNs and APRNs can play a crucial role in shaping healthcare policies. Overcoming challenges such as time constraints, lack of preparation, and hierarchical barriers requires mentorship, leadership development, and flexibility in engagement opportunities. Increasing awareness through continuing education and structured mentorship programs can empower more nurses to participate actively in healthcare policy-making, ultimately improving patient care and advancing the nursing profession.

    References:

    Lamb, G., Schmid, A., & Spencer, R. (2018). Nurses’ participation in health policy development: Barriers and facilitators. 
    Journal of Nursing Management, 26
    (5), 663-671.

    Phillips, S. J. (2020). 28th annual APRN legislative update: Improving access to healthcare one state at a time. 
    The Nurse Practitioner, 45
    (1), 29-53.

    Shariff, N. (2014). Factors that act as facilitators and barriers to nurse leaders’ participation in health policy development. 
    BMC Nursing, 13
    (20). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-13-20

    Williams, S. D., Phillips, J. M., & Koyama, K. (2018). Nurse advocacy: Adopting a health in all policies approach. 
    Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23
    (3), 5. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No03Man05

    Expand discussion thread from Stephania A Senter

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    CK

    Chhinderpal Kaur

    Oct 16, 2024 2:17pm
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 8:35pm

    Reply from Chhinderpal Kaur

    Opportunities for policy-making

    RNs and APRNs have several opportunities to be part of policy-making in the USA. One such opportunity involves these nurses working with professional nursing organizations. The main role of professional nursing organizations is to advocate for nurses and nursing at the state or federal levels (Rasheed et al., 2020). An example of such an organization is the American Nurses Association (ANA). These organizations offer their members platforms to share their change ideas and meet with people involved in policy-making. A second opportunity involves nurses working in service boards or committees (Safari et al., 2020). For instance, they could be part of the hospital administration board, public service board, or a government health committee. These positions uniquely place the nurses in a position to shape policies that govern the institutions or the nursing profession. Serving on an advisory board can allow them to meet policymakers and offer their input on potential policy changes.

    Challenges

    A major challenge for nurses in harnessing these opportunities is a lack of awareness. Most of the time, nurses are just working as professionals in direct patient care and are not informed of the wider input they have in policy or policy-making process. They are not aware that they are in organizations that also offer them opportunities to change policies through the right channels. Another challenge is that even with information, positions in the advisory or any committees are sometimes difficult to achieve. Very few nurses make the position. Also, with little knowledge of the legal aspects of the law, nurses might find it quite intimidating to engage in policy-making fully (Rasheed et al., 2020).

    Overcoming the Challenges

    Educating nurses on their input in advocacy can improve awareness and engagement in the role. Also, online advocacy can help improve nurses engagement as most of the time they are engaged in bedside care. Another approach can be educating nurses on the process of policy making. This will improve their willingness to participate in the process of making policies or being in forums where policies are made (Safariet al., 2020).

    Strategies to Increase Advocacy Awareness

    The first strategy is setting up education campaigns. These are forums that get nurses together including conferences, workshops, meetings, and other social gatherings. Spreading the information will increase awareness in the nursing population. When nurses know that their input is important and valued, they will make an effort to be part of it. A second approach is providing mentorship for nurses. This is whereby nurses who have been in policy-making mentor novice nurses into policy-making by showing them how it is done. This approach builds confidence in novice nurses, allowing them to actively participate in policy-making to improve the practice (Safari et al., 2020).

    References

    Rasheed, S. P., Younas, A., & Mehdi, F. (2020). Challenges, extent of involvement, and the impact of nurses’ involvement in politics and policy making in in last two decades: an integrative review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(4), 446-455. https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jnu.12567

    Safari, M. B., Bahadori, M., & Alimohammadzadeh, K. (2020). The related factors of nurses’ participation and perceived benefits and barriers in health policy making. Journal of Nursing Research, 28(4), e103.https://journals.lww.com/jnr-twna/fulltext/2020/08000/the_related_factors_of_nurses__participation_and.6.aspx

    Expand discussion thread from Chhinderpal Kaur

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DT

    Deco Tanjong

    Oct 16, 2024 1:04pm
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 8:41pm

    Reply from Deco Tanjong

          Policy is an overarching term used to define both an entity and a process. The purpose of public policy is to direct problems to the government’s attention and to secure the government’s response. Short, N.M (2022). Nurses and APRNs have the opportunity to participate in policymaking, some challenges. Nurses will face the issue of how they may be able to overcome challenges.

    Two opportunities for Nurses and APRNs to participate in policymaking.

    Nurses can register and become active members of organizations like the American Nurses Association(ANA) to access advocacy resources and network with other nurses involved in policy work. Through American Nurse Association membership, members have the opportunity to engage and share their perspectives with policymakers.  The American Nurse Association also facilitates opportunities for members to advocate for their policy priority with lawmakers—American Nurse Association (n,d).

    Nurses may consider running for office to directly shape healthcare policy at the local level or state level. Nurses and APRNs have the opportunity to serve in Congress as lawmakers, just like Congresswoman Cori Bush, who served Missouri’s 1
    st
     Congressional District in 2020.

    Challenges that the opportunities may present.

    Lack of political awareness and education: many nurses and APRNs lack the necessary understanding of policy-making processes, legislative procedures, and how to effectively advocate for their position. The perception of low political influence within the healthcare system, restricted organizational cultures, and a lack of confidence in their ability to impact policy decisions. Short, N.M (2022).

     

    Insufficient mentorship and leadership opportunities: Lack of experienced nurse leaders who can guide and support nurses in navigating the policy landscape. Because of this lack of mentorship, sometimes nurses and APRNs may constantly doubt their competency if they really know what they are doing and try to avoid being embarrassed in front of other members.

    Overcome challenges.

    In order to overcome challenges, Nurses and APRNs, after obtaining a membership with an organizational association like the American Nurse Association, should try to get into the role of leadership within the association, which will help them build that confidence and how to overcome challenges associated with leadership. Which will help guide them when it comes to policymaking.

    Nurses and APRNs can strategize through social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook where secure, verifiable, and reliable videos, posting, and live videos can be made regarding important healthcare policies, where questions and answers can be provided and create awareness.

    Nurses and APRNs can join community mentorship programs where a lot of information can be gathered, building confidence from past policymakers like Congresswoman Cori Bush, Lauren Underwood, etc., who have healthcare backgrounds and have served in Congress.

    Reference:

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 4, “Policy Analysis and Design” (pp. 77–93)

    Chapter 9, “The Influence of Patient Health Data on Health Policy” (pp. 197–217)

    Chapter 10, “Financing Health Care” (pp. 247–257 only)

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). 
    Advocacy
    Links to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    . Retrieved September 20, 2018, from 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
    Links to an external site.

    Congress.govLinks to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    . (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

     

    Expand discussion thread from Deco Tanjong

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    KD

    Kayla Rena Davis

    Oct 16, 2024 10:53am
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 9:29pm

    Reply from Kayla Rena Davis

     

     

     

     

     

    Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) have numerous opportunities to engage in policy-making, ranging from minimal to extensive involvement. State and national nursing associations offer valuable platforms for networking and policy advocacy (Ko, 2022). These associations are typically required to maintain boards dedicated to advocacy and policy-making, providing members with access to active participation. Through these associations, nurses can connect with local leaders and policymakers, amplifying their voices on issues that affect the nursing profession.

    Additionally, RNs and APRNs can engage in lobbying efforts or interact directly with legislators by attending hearings, offering testimony, or collaborating with lobbyists. By understanding the intricacies of the policy-making process, fostering relationships with lawmakers, and presenting evidence-based information, nurses can effectively contribute to developing new policies (Ko, 2022).

     

    Barriers to nurse engagement in policy-making activities often arise from a lack of political awareness, limited resources, and insufficient understanding of the significance of involvement. These challenges can impede nurses from advocating for policy changes, meeting with legislators and lobbyists, and presenting evidence-based practices and research to support their perspectives, all requiring substantial knowledge and time (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). Incorporating policy advocacy into nursing education curricula is essential to enhance nurses’ knowledge in these areas. Educating future nurses about the importance of involvement from the outset can foster a deeper understanding of their role in policy-making (Chiu et al., 2021). However, the legislative process may seem overwhelming for many, especially for those without prior experience.

     

    Effective advocacy at this level demands considerable commitment, and nurses may encounter challenges in being recognized by policymakers who lack familiarity with the nursing role. Active participation in nursing associations already engaged in policy work can facilitate this process. Nursing associations should proactively encourage Chief Nursing Officers (CNOs) and other nursing leaders to engage with associations. These leaders can, in turn, promote involvement at the management and staff levels.

     

    The most effective strategy for nurses entering policy-making is to conduct thorough research, determine the best path aligned with their interests, and realistically assess the time they can dedicate to advocacy. For those unable to engage directly with legislators and lobbyists due to time constraints, joining nursing associations and advocating through their boards offers a viable alternative. Nurses should encourage each other to recognize their collective voice, as their unique experiences and insights are essential to shaping policies that promote safe, effective care.

     

    Reference:

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review. 
    Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
    , 
    22
    (4), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611

     

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses participation in the health policy-making process: A systematic review. 
    BMC Nursing
    , 
    20
    (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6

     

    Ko, N. (2022, November 15). 
    10 ways nurses can get involved in policy
    . NurseJournal.org. https://nursejournal.org/articles/ways-nurses-can-get-involved-in-policy/

     

     

     

     

    Expand discussion thread from Kayla Rena Davis

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    MM

    Miriane Meigueu

    Oct 16, 2024 5:02am
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 7:39pm

    Reply from Miriane Meigueu

    Opportunities that Exist for RNs and APRNs to Actively Participate in Policymaking

    Policymaking is an intricately complicated process that requires the strategic involvement of multiple stakeholders or parties. The policymaking process in congress allows some level of transparency and accountability, especially in policies that touch on professions, such as healthcare, where professionals are allowed to make their professional contributions to the policy development process (Milstead & Short, 2019). Registered Nurses and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses have opportunities to serve and participate in the policymaking process in various ways. One opportunity that APRNs and RNs have to contribute to the policymaking process is serving as committee members, where they can contribute or serve as consultants on professional matters. At the community participation level, the nursing professionals have an opportunity to argue crucial points as well as negotiate for vital changes and inputs that are necessary to help transform the intended aspects of nursing and healthcare practice (Tummers & Bekkers, 2014).

    Secondly, professional nursing practitioners have an opportunity to participate in the policymaking process through their professional associations, where they can make their contributions through lobbying. Professional nursing associations, such as the American Nurses Association, are committed to addressing various aspects of professional nursing importance (Chiu et al., 2021). Utilizing the opportunity presented in congress through public participation allows the American Nurses Association to make their valuable contributions on important matters of professional importance. By occupying the frontline lobbying position, the American Nurses Association representatives can actively represent vital policy-related matters regarding the nursing profession (Kalaitzidis & Jewell, 2020). Professional lobbying in nursing can be made even more effective by networking with political leaders to come up with policy proposals and interventions, which, when implemented, can help transform nursing as a profession and a practice (Wijk et al., 2022). The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

    The Underlining Challenges and how to Overcome them

    Participating in the policymaking process is often challenging. The entire policymaking process is a political process, which requires understanding the political field. Professional nurses have little understanding of the political process. In most cases, the professional nurses will seek to engage in the professional aspect of policy development and leave the politics to the political leadership. This may lead to compromises on the intended policies, which negatively affects the policymaking process (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). To become better advocates, I think professional nurses should have representation at the political level so as to increase the likelihood of having a substantial impact on the policymaking process that may otherwise be marred by politics. Additionally, nurses and nursing advocates should leverage social media platforms to create awareness in society. This helps to get the public interested in pushing for legislative reforms from their local political representatives.

    Reference

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review. 
    Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice
    , 
    22
    (4), 271–291.

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses participation in the health policy-making process: A systematic review. 
    BMC Nursing
    , 
    20
    (1), 1-9.

    Kalaitzidis, E., & Jewell, P. (2020). The concept of advocacy in nursing: A critical analysis. 
    The Health Care Manager
    , 
    39
    (2), 77-84.

    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (209). 
    Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. 
    Public Management Review,
     16(4), 527–547.

    Wijk, M., Lalleman, P. C. B., Cummings, G. G., & Engel, J. (2022). Public opinion leadership in nursing practice: A Rogerian concept analysis. 
    Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice
    , 
    23
    (1), 67–79.

    Expand discussion thread from Miriane Meigueu

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    NC

    Nicole Greco Carl

    Oct 16, 2024 1:47am
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 7:57pm

    Reply from Nicole Greco Carl

    RNs and APRNs opportunities in policy-making

    Nowadays the quickest way to get information out to many people in a short amount of time is to, “[b]uild a social media following as a nurse… Social media platforms allow you to gather a following of like-minded individuals who are interested in influencing policy decisions that affect healthcare”(Morris,2023). This can create a community that has the same knowledge about a topic and convince representatives of what is best for the people.

    Another way to get into policy makes is for, “nurses [to] consider building relationships with lawmakers who work on healthcare bills…You can start a relationship by calling your state legislator or writing to them”(Morris,2023).

    Challenges

    A challenge for social media is building that following in the first place and reaching your goal audience, “social media platforms are always tweaking their algorithms to give their users the best experience possible, so businesses need to constantly adjust their strategies to keep up”(Calus, 2024). It can be a full-time job creating constantly flowing entertaining content that the audience interacts with.

    A challenge to developing a relationship with a policymaker is getting them to respond to you in the first place since many have employees who might respond for them.

    Strategies you might make to better advocate

    The best advice to give for having a successful social media platform is to “stay on top of social media and constantly learn about new trends” (Calus, 2024). Once a decent following is secured, a social media manager can also be hired to expand faster and create engaging content.

    The best tip for getting a policymaker to respond is to “start with your own elected officials and identify in that group who might most be receptive to your message” (Walden University, 2018). Also, when writing or engaging with these officials to have done your research, to have a hook, and to bring up a topic that cannot be ignored and that they will want to discuss or is a hot topic in the community at the moment.

    References:

    Calus, V. (2024, April 23). 
    The biggest social media challenges according to 80 social media managers
    . Planable. https://planable.io/blog/social-media-challenges/#:~:text=The%20biggest%20social%20media%20challenge%20a%20business,constantly%20adjust%20their%20strategies%20to%20keep%20up.

    Morris, G. (2023, November 10). 
    10 ways nurses can get involved in policy
    . NurseJournal.org. https://nursejournal.org/articles/ways-nurses-can-get-involved-in-policy/

    Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2018). 
    Getting your Program Designed and Implemented
     [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Expand discussion thread from Nicole Greco Carl

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    CP

    Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    Oct 15, 2024 10:23pm
    | Last reply Oct 16, 2024 7:18pm

    Reply from Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    There are a number of opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs in taking part of the policy making processes. It is through professional organizations, such as American Nurses Association, which are active in the process of making policy decisions that could impact healthcare in a huge way. Furthermore, it is also in the workplace where RNs and ARNs will be active in the process of determining the type of policies that could be enacted in the workplace. In this discussion, I found two opportunities that could help the RNs and APRNs in policy making process
    .

     

    Two opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in policymaking actively. 

    Registered nurses and advanced practice nurses can participate in policy making in two ways. Nurses can be involved in the policy design process and research regarding health services (Milstead & Short, 2019). When participating in the policy design process, nurses are considered professional experts and are often asked to consult committees to assist policymakers in drafting new legislation (Milstead & Short, 2019). Nurses involved with professional nursing organizations are also able to advocate for change, such as allowing advanced practice nurses to operate with full practice authority in a particular state. Nurses can also bring social issues in healthcare to policymakers who, before this, may not have been aware the issue existed (Milstead & Short, 2019).

    Health services research focuses on multiple areas of the healthcare industry. Milstead & Short (2019) noted that health services research specifically related to the field of nursing could assist in improving quality of care, access to care, and patient safety. Nurses involved in research can assist policymakers in identifying problems, estimating the cost of potential change, and assist with identifying the risk versus the benefit of the change overall (Milstead & Short, 2019). This information is essential to consider as the goal is to achieve patient safety and the best patient outcomes possible for the community that is being served.

    Challenges that these opportunities may present

    The most common challenge that policymakers face is their budget. However, nurses can bring social issues to the forefront of the policy discussion when considering a policy change. It is essential to consider the cost of the change (Barzegar et al., 2020). How much is the new policy going to cost? How will the policy change impact the way the hospitals’ function or spend their funds? Governments need to know how their new policy will impact on the healthcare system and the citizens they serve (Barzegar et al., 2020). Health research is an integral part of determining the cost of the policy change and looking for the most cost-effective way to implement it (Milstead & Short, 2019).

    Two Strategies to Advocate for these Opportunities

    Nurses have the option to obtain membership in a professional nursing organization. As a member of a professional organization, nurses could assist with lobbying efforts for legislation. An example of a topic that has been at the forefront of nursing issues is the Nurse and Healthcare Worker Protection Act that was introduced to the 114
    th
     Congress (2015-2017) (Milstead & Short, 2019). This act was the result of lobbying completed by the American Nurses Association (ANA).  This legislation requires employers to purchase and maintain equipment to assist in lifting and transferring patients to protect nurses and nursing support staff from injury (Milstead & Short, 2019). Nurses should communicate with their colleagues who are members of their specific organization to get involved with lobbying efforts to assist with policy formation.

    Nurses can also get involved in their own organization’s committees to help influence policymaking within their facility. Many committees exist within a hospital to help shape policy and review evidence-based practices (Lavenberg et al., 2019). One example would be joining the facility’s safety committee. This committee looks at the safety issues in the hospital. It works to determine ways to prevent the safety issue from re-occurring and advocate for policy changes based on evidence-based practices (Lavenberg et al., 2019).

     References

    Barzegar Safari, M., Bahadori, M., & Alimohammadzadeh, K. (2020). The Related Factors of Nurses’ Participation and Perceived Benefits and Barriers in Health Policy Making. 
    The Journal of Nursing Research
     : JNR
    , 
    28
    (4), e103. 
    https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000385
    Links to an external site.

    Lavenberg, J. G., Cacchione, P. Z., Jayakumar, K. L., Leas, B. F., Mitchell, M. D., Mull, N. K., & Umscheid, C. A. (2019). Impact of a Hospital Evidence‐Based Practice Center (EPC) on Nursing Policy and Practice. 
    Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
    , 
    16
    (1), 4–11. 
    https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/wvn.12346
    Links to an external site.

     

    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6
    th
     ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Expand discussion thread from Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    QF

    Qiana Felder

    Oct 15, 2024 12:18pm
    | Last reply Oct 16, 2024 10:49am

    Reply from Qiana Felder

    Two Opportunities for Nurses to Participate in Policy-making
     

    There are multiple ways RNs and APRNs can participate in policy-making. One of the most influential ways is joining a nursing association like the American Nurses Association. Collaborating with this association allows nurses to network with other nurses interested in policy change and work together to make a change (American Nurse Association, 2019). Another powerful tool at your disposal is writing letters. This raises awareness of nursing issues in legislative settings and ensures that your voice is heard by policymakers, allowing you to share your firsthand experiences and insights and significantly impact policy decisions.

     

    Challenges and Solutions

    Nurses can play a significant role in policy changes; however, some barriers hinder nurses from participating in policy-making. Studies have shown that nurses do not participate because of a lack of knowledge, which reduces their confidence in their ability to advocate for change. Nurses also do not feel heard in their organizations, which is another reason there is a low level of nursing involvement in health policy-making (Safari, 2020). To overcome these challenges, nurses should receive proper preparation and mentorship in policy-making; by doing so, they would be guided and supported in influencing healthcare professionals and policymakers about the vital contributions nurses can make in this area, ensuring they feel confident and capable in their advocacy (Rasheed, 2020).

     

    Two Strategies to Advocate for These Opportunities
     

    Promoting mentorship programs that connect seasoned nurses with individuals interested in policy-making can promote awareness and encourage them to participate.

     
    Another strategy to consider is utilizing social media platforms. This can raise awareness and publicize information regarding nursing policies, how to connect with organizations, and how to attend conferences.

     

    References

    American Nurses Association. (2019). 
    Health policy
    . American Nurses Association. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/

    Rasheed, S. P., Younas, A., & Mehdi, F. (2020). Challenges, extent of involvement, and the impact of nurses’ involvement in politics and policy making in in last two decades: An integrative review. 
    Journal of Nursing Scholarship
    , 
    52
    (4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12567

    Safari, M. B., Bahadori, M., & Alimohammadzadeh, K. (2020). The related factors of nurses’ participation and perceived benefits and barriers in health policy making. 
    Journal of Nursing Research
    , 
    28
    (4). https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000385

     

    Expand discussion thread from Qiana Felder

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DY

    Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    Oct 15, 2024 11:13am
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 5:20pm

    Reply from Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    Main post

    The Role of the RN or APRN in Policy Making.

    Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) significantly influence healthcare policy development. Their distinct perspective, grounded in clinical practice, enables the identification of issues impacting patient care and supports advocacy for change. Some opportunities that exist for APRNs and RNs to participate actively in policy-making include:

    Serving as expert witnesses or Testifying at Legislative Hearings: Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) can provide expert testimony at state or federal legislative hearings on healthcare-related bills (Hajizadeh et al., 2021). This allows nurses to inform policymakers directly about a proposed legislation’s real-world impacts by giving them an idea of the policy’s impact on the general population.

    Rasheed et al. (2020) postulate that nurses can influence policy change by serving on local, state, or federal advisory boards and committees that provide recommendations on health policies. This enables continued participation in the formulation of policies. Nurses can positively impact the lives of numerous people in this way. For instance, the Federal Nursing Advisory Committee, specifically through the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice (NACNEP), is crucial in advising the US government on policies related to the nursing workforce, education, and healthcare access (National
     Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice | HRSA
    , 2024). It recommends to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Congress on enhancing nurse education, addressing workforce shortages, and improving the overall healthcare system.

    Lastly, Nurses can engage in media Advocacy by writing op-eds, giving interviews, or using social media to shape public opinion and influence policymakers on health issues (Aforbes, 2024). This raises awareness and builds public support for policy changes.

    Possible Challenges and Solutions

    In terms of serving as an expert witness. A possible challenge can be public speaking anxiety and Lack of experience in formal legislative settings. This problem can be solved by seeking public speaking training and practice sessions. Nurses and APRNs can observe other healthcare professionals testifying to become familiar with the process by developing confidence and becoming comfortable in such settings.

    Limited openings and competitive selection processes exist when serving on local, state, and federal advisory boards. A possible solution is to build relevant experience and network with current board members, which can pave the way for prospective future board members. Another option will be to highlight one unique nursing perspective when applying for the advisory board position.

    Finally, one’s career may suffer if media advocacy is applied without enough training in the media, particularly if the individual winds up on the wrong side of public opinion. It is therefore wise to obtain media training from nursing organizations and create a distinct personal brand and message consistent with one’s ethical standards to address this potential dilemma.

    Strategies for Advocacy

    To guarantee that APRNs and RNs are informed about and actively involved in policy-making possibilities, the following tactics might be employed:

    Creating educational campaigns and developing educational initiatives aimed at APRNs and RNs can raise awareness and promote involvement in policy-making. These advertisements ought to center on the following:

    Organize seminars that advise on how to join associations for professionals and advocate for laws. Guests who have effectively affected policy may share their experiences and best practices during these sessions. During these sessions, easily comprehensible resources—like pamphlets or infographics—that list the advantages of involvement, explain how to get engaged, and provide examples of successful policy efforts spearheaded by nurses should be on hand. These resources can also be distributed through hospitals, nursing schools, and professional associations to reach a larger audience.

    Another strategy will be the fostering of mentorship programs.

    Establishing mentorship programs that connect experienced nurse advocates with those new to policymaking can significantly enhance engagement. Mentors can provide guidance on navigating the complexities of policy advocacy, share personal experiences, and offer support to mentees as they engage in advocacy efforts.

     

    Reference

    Aforbes. (2024, February 22). 
    Why policy engagement is the next big nursing trend – NurseJournal.org
    . https://nursejournal.org/articles/the-role-of-nurses-in-policy-engagement/

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses participation in the health policymaking process: a systematic review. 
    BMC Nursing
    , 
    20
    (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6

    National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice | HRSA
    . (2024, January 1). https://www.hrsa.gov/advisory-committees/nursing

    Rasheed, S. P., Younas, A., & Mehdi, F. (2020). Challenges, the extent of involvement, and the impact of nurses’ involvement in politics and policy making in last two decades: an Integrative review. 
    Journal of Nursing Scholarship
    , 
    52
    (4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12567

    Nurses spend more time with patients than any other healthcare provider. So, decision-makers should make it their goal to include nurses. Nurses have a moral and professional obligation to be involved in legislation that affects them and their patients. Whenever nurses are involved in the political process, they can positively impact healthcare delivery. A way for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy-making would be to join a community like the American Nurses Association (ANA). Being a member of the American Nurses Association (ANA) allows nurses to significantly impact policymaking by providing a collective voice to advocate for patient care, nurse wellbeing, and overall healthcare system improvements through lobbying efforts, educating policymakers, and actively participating in the policy development process at both state and federal levels, effectively influencing legislation and regulations that directly affect nursing practice (American Nurses Association, n.d). Another way RNs and APRNs can advocate for policy-making would be by communicating with legislators. One way this can be done is to establish a relationship with a lawmaker. This can be calling the lawmaker or writing often to share experiences or recommendations (Morriss, 2023).

    Challenges and Solutions 

    Welliver

    (2023) stated, “Another barrier is the limited formal health care policy education in nursing. Time and resources are further obstacles to the nursing profession’s participation in politics. Additionally, studies show that nurses are not given sufficient support to generate the evidence needed to influence healthcare policy.” I feel this statement is very true regarding the lack of time and resources for nurses. A solution would be for nurses to join an organization like the ANA that is related to their field of work. This allows the nurse to gain access to tons of resources and research that can motivate them to advocate for policy changes.

    Advocacy Strategies

    A solution would be for clinical nurse managers at hospitals or clinics to encourage this behavior within RNs. Nurses should be encouraged and informed about the ANA and what can be done to improve patient care. Another advocacy strategy would be to start a social media platform. Morris (2023) states, “
    Build a social media following as a nurse
     on the platform of your choice, sharing the information you’ve learned. Publish calls to action to galvanize the state or federal constituents to contact their representatives and make a difference in how decisions are made.” I believe this is a good idea due to all the new technological advances and how everyone is on social media. You are more likely to be seen if you share your thoughts on policies and changes that can be made.

    References:

    Health policy – american nurses association (ANA)
    . ANA. (2017, October 14). 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/#:~:text=Thanks%20to%20their%20frontline%20role,OUR%20HEALTH%20SYSTEM%20REFORM%20SECTION
    Links to an external site.

    Morris, G. (2023, November 10). 
    10 ways nurses can get involved in policy
    . NurseJournal.org. 
    https://nursejournal.org/articles/ways-nurses-can-get-involved-in-policy/
    Links to an external site.

    Welliver, M. (2023, November 9). 
    The nursing profession’s potential impact on policy and politics
    . American Nurse. 

    The nursing profession’s potential impact on policy and politics


    Links to an external site.

     

    Expand discussion thread from Kailey Wooton

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Ukamaka Okpalanwobi

    Oct 15, 2024 6:56am
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 9:24am

    Reply from Ukamaka Okpalanwobi

    Initial Post

    Role of RNs and APRNs in Policy Making
    :

    RNs and APRNs play a vital role in shaping healthcare policies that directly affect their practice and patient outcomes. As nurses, we have several opportunities to engage in the policy-making process, and I believe we must make the most of them. One of the most accessible ways for us to get involved is by participating in professional organizations like the American Nurses Association (ANA). These organizations advocate for healthcare policies that affect both our practice and patient outcomes. By joining policy committees or attending events like “Nurses’ Day at the Capitol,” we can have direct conversations with legislators. Although time constraints can be challenging for many of us, virtual advocacy platforms make it easier to participate in legislative efforts without leaving work. Additionally, mentorship from nurses experienced in policymaking can boost our confidence and help us navigate the process more effectively (American Nurses Association, 2023).

    Another key opportunity is directly communicating with legislators. Whether it’s writing letters, making calls, or attending town hall meetings, we have the unique ability to share real-life experiences from the frontlines of healthcare. This firsthand knowledge is invaluable in shaping effective policies. Though the political landscape can be daunting, using advocacy resources and templates from professional organizations simplifies the process. As an example, I recently found that using ANA’s advocacy tools made it much easier to express my concerns on healthcare issues (Milstead & Short, 2019).

    Additionally, submitting public comments on proposed healthcare regulations is another avenue for influence. Organizations like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regularly seek input from healthcare professionals during regulatory changes. It’s a great opportunity for us to ensure that the nursing perspective is represented in decision-making processes. However, many nurses aren’t aware of these opportunities, so raising awareness through workshops or webinars within our teams could be beneficial. Providing simple guides on how to submit these comments would encourage more participation (Centres for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2023) The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University.

    To better advocate for these opportunities, I think we can organize informational sessions during shifts or post updates on social media. Creating educational webinars on policymaking and offering continuing education credits would incentivize participation. Social media campaigns sharing advocacy success stories could also help spread the word about how easy it can be to get involved.

     

      References:

    American Nurses Association. (2023). 
    Nurses’ role in policy advocacy
    . https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/

    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). 
    Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). 
    Regulation and guidance
    . https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance

     

     

    Expand discussion thread from Ukamaka Okpalanwobi

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    BG

    Brandon Grundy

    Oct 15, 2024 5:08am
    | Last reply Oct 19, 2024 3:45pm

    Reply from Brandon Grundy

    Main Post

    Opportunities for RNs and APRNs to Participate in Policy-Making

    How can Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) make a difference in the legislative arena? One opportunity for RNs and APRNs to participate in policy-making is by serving on advisory boards and committees at the state or federal level. These boards provide platforms for healthcare professionals to directly influence healthcare policies. For instance, the Federal Nursing Advisory Committee offers nurses a chance to contribute to policies related to veterans’ healthcare (Congress.gov, n.d.). Involvement on this level enables RNs and APRNs to shape policy decisions that impact their profession and to target specific patient outcomes.

    RNs and APRNs can also participate in the policy making process by testifying before legislative bodies. While providing testimony during healthcare hearings, nurses are able to advocate for policies that address prominent issues such as workforce shortages or nurse-patient ratios. Engaging in this process provides visibility while ensuring that the voices of frontline healthcare workers are heard and included in the legislative process (Short, 2022).  The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

    Challenges and Solutions

    One challenge in regard to participation in policy-making is the demanding schedules of RNs and APRNs, which make it difficult to find time for these activities. A solution is to collaborate with professional organizations such as the American Nurses Association (ANA), which offer resources and advocacy programs to support nurses in policy engagement (ANA, n.d.).

    Another valid challenge is the lack of familiarity with the policy spectrum. For many bedside nurses, engaging in the legislative process is to step out of their comfort zone and into a different wheelhouse all-together. This unfamiliarity can be mitigated by participating in continuing education focused on health policy. Professional organizations such as the ANA provide webinars and resources to help nurses understand legislative issues and how to get involved (Short, 2022).

    Advocacy Strategies

    With time constraints and a lack of proficiency being established as limiting factors it is advantageous to identify workable strategies for engagement at a novice level. 
    The first strategy I identified to better advocate for policy participation is through leveraging professional organizations like the ANA or the Alliance of Black Nurses Association (ABNA) for example. These organizations often provide frequent updates on current legislative issues and guidance on how nurses can participate in the policy-making process (ANA, n.d.). For example, the ANA’s advocacy campaigns allow nurses to influence policy with relatively minimal time commitment. 

    Another strategy which may resonate with this technological era is to utilize social media platforms to raise awareness of policy participation opportunities. Nurses can use their social media platforms to share updates from Congress.gov and to advocate for legislative changes. Campaigns with targeted hashtags i.e #NursesInPolicy can serve to increase visibility and engagement and consequently foster healthcare policy discussions (Congress.gov, n.d.). 

    References

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). Advocacy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/ 

    Congress.gov. (n.d.). Federal Nursing Advisory Committee. https://www.congress.gov/ 

    Short, N. M. (2022). Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978

    Expand discussion thread from Brandon Grundy

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    MP

    Mehal Patel

    Oct 14, 2024 8:55pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 9:42am

    Reply from Mehal Patel

    Opportunities for RNs and APRNs in Policy-Making

    Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play vital roles in influencing healthcare policy. They can engage in policy-making primarily through participation in professional organizations, such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP), which advocate for nursing interests at various levels. By joining these organizations, RNs and APRNs can take part in policy discussions, contribute to position statements, and engage in lobbying efforts. Additionally, RNs and APRNs have the opportunity to serve on legislative committees or boards, where they can provide valuable insights into healthcare regulations, quality of care standards, and public health initiatives, thus advocating for policies that improve patient care.

    However, there are challenges that may hinder their participation. Many RNs and APRNs face time constraints due to busy work schedules and personal commitments, making it difficult to engage in policy-making activities. Moreover, there is often a lack of awareness about the opportunities available for involvement in this area and the significant impact they can have. To address these challenges, organizations can implement flexible participation options, such as virtual meetings and adaptable schedules, and develop mentoring programs that connect experienced nurse leaders with those new to policy advocacy. At my workplace, we hold UBC (unit based council) meetings every other month, which everyone (most of the nurses) attends. If nurses are not working on that day, they can attend UBC meeting virtually which gives them flexibility plus they are also getting paid if they attend meeting from home virtually. These meetings provide a platform to discuss various issues, such as short staffing, safety concerns, training or certification requirements etc.  Nursing leaders and charge nurses keep us (staff nurses)  informed about any upcoming changes in the unit and help refresh our understanding of policies.

    To enhance advocacy and communication about these opportunities, leveraging social media platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn can be effective. I have a LinkedIn account where I follow nursing leaders from various fields to gain insights into their perspectives on driving community change. This has enhanced my understanding of how such changes can occur, and I also learn from experienced nurses and doctors about new evidence-based practice articles. Evidence-based articles have not only expanded my knowledge but also keep me informed about recent policy changes in procedures aimed at achieving the best patient outcomes.

    Campaigns that share stories of nurses who have successfully influenced policy can motivate others to participate. At my work place, we receive updates on upcoming campaigns and are encouraged to participate. We have a storyboard called “Pulse” that highlights the significant achievements of team members and shares how they accomplished them to inspire others.

    References

    American Nurses Association. (n.d.). 
    Advocacy
    . Retrieved from 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/our-certifications/advocacy/

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (n.d.). 
    Policy and Advocacy
    . Retrieved from 
    https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/policy-and-advocacy

    Smith, J. A. (2022). The role of social media in nursing advocacy: A focus on LinkedIn. 
    Journal of Nursing Policy
    , 15(3), 45-56. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnp.2022.01.005

    Expand discussion thread from Mehal Patel

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    RS

    Romel Suason

    Oct 14, 2024 12:55pm

    Reply from Romel Suason

    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making

    Over the years, nursing roles have evolved to include additional activities beyond bedside care and being the doctors’ assistants. According to Milstead & Short (2019), the evolution has equally seen word cloud terms such as advocates, empathetic, and hardworking remain relevant to nursing practice. Still, in today’s healthcare settings, policy-making has become indiscernible, especially among RNs and APRNs, as their position, expertise, and training equip them with relevant facets to influence health policies impacting care delivery and the overall system. Policy-making among nurses may have traditionally been less prominent; however, the professionals have engaged in legislative processes and advocacy over the years, influencing the policy-making process enormously.

    Short (2022), in his work, identified that nurses’ participation in the policy process empowers them to advocate for better care practices and improved care delivery and patient experience. As such, including policy-making denotes a change in nurses’ role in healthcare legislation. The role denotes increasing recognition of nurses as critical stakeholders in the overall healthcare sector.

    There are different opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in or influence the policy-making process actively. One opportunity is through active participation in professional nursing organizations such as the American Nurses Association (ANA). According to the American Nurses Association (2021), different professional nurse organizations provide their members (nurses) with recognized avenues to influence policies in the health sector. These professional organizations offer training on advocacy and policy processes, meetings, and conferences for nurses to voice their views and perspectives on policies and legislation in healthcare. For example, the ANA’s platform allows its members to contribute directly to shaping policies that affect their professional practice and patient care.

    However, this platform or opportunity to influence policy-making faces one essential challenge: the need for more time and resources for nurse professionals to participate directly in policy-shaping forums while undertaking clinical and patient care roles. Due to nurses’ busy schedules, they may have limited time or no time to participate in the policy process (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019). Another challenge hindering their active participation is a lack of relevant knowledge and experience regarding policy-making practices, impairing nurses’ overall interest and involvement in the process.

    To address this challenge, nurse professionals can seek support from their organizations to get the know-how to impact the policy process and balance their policy-making and clinical duties. They can participate in continuous education to improve their understanding of their role in the policy process.

    Another opportunity that RNs and APRNs can seize to participate in policy-making actively is the engagement in advocacy groups or advocacy groups. By being appointed to advocacy groups and legislative advisory committees at their local, state, and federal levels, the nurses bring their understanding, experience, and expertise to healthcare policy-related discussions and ensure their voices are heard and factored in.

    Despite the advocacy groups offering nurses the opportunity to influence the policy process, one challenge hinders their ability to participate. This is due to difficulty accessing the opportunities provided by advocacy groups due to institutional or political barriers or even the lack of the necessary networks to get involved.

    Nevertheless, the challenge can be addressed by the development of professional networks as well as getting mentorship from experienced nurses, which can help ease the transition of nurses into policy making.

    Strategies To Advocate/ Communicate The Existence Of These Opportunities For Nurses To Participate In Policy-Making

    For nurses to actively participate in the policy processes, they must be aware of diverse opportunities for their input and the chance to influence policy-making. One is through education and awareness campaigns for nurses, which get the nurses to understand their importance as stakeholders in the healthcare sector. The campaigns can focus on ensuring nurses understand their feedback and views in the legislative process, which plays a key role in influencing the policy process and encourages them to participate in advocacy efforts.

    The third is teamwork or collaboration with policy experts. Hajizadeh et al. (2021) state that nurses can work with legislators or policy experts to enhance their policy-making skills and influence legislation decision-making. Including different experts (interdisciplinary) in the policy process can ease nurses’ participation in health reforms via the policy-making process. By integrating these measures, APRNs and RNs can be sure their voices are heard and help shape the healthcare sector’s future through policy and legislation processes.

     

     

    References

    American Nurses Association. (2021). 
    Nursing advocacy
    . American Nurses Association. 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
    Links to an external site.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). 
    The CDC policy process
    . CDC. 
    https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/policyprocess/index.html
    Links to an external site.

    Hajizadeh, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Kakemam, E., Bahreini, R., & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2021). Factors influencing nurses participation in the health policy-making process: a systematic review. 
    BMC nursing
    , 
    20
    (1), 128. 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6
    Links to an external site.

    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). 
    Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Short, N. M. (2022). Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

     

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    RP

    Rodrigue Cheumago Pondem

    Oct 14, 2024 9:24am
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 9:29am

    Reply from Rodrigue Cheumago Pondem

    Based on nurses’ important roles in patient care and even in healthcare systems, there is ample opportunity for them to become part of policy-making. This way, they are able to participate in operations that set health policies that affect their line of work and healthcare delivery practices. The goal of this discussion is to explore particular avenues for RNs and APRNs that can engage in policy-making, the potential issues they might face, and how those engagements can be encouraged. Therefore, this analysis supports the need to incorporate and promote the nurses’ full participation in the decision-making processes of the future of healthcare.

    Two Opportunities that Exist

    RNs and APRNs have essential avenues by which they can participate in policy creation through grassroots advocacy and by being involved on the hospital boards or as members of healthcare system leadership. Grassroots advocacy empowers the nurses by joining or creating awareness campaigns on certain aspects of the health care processes to lobby for change by directly addressing the legislators, presenting in public, or even spearheading a parliamentary petition for improvement of certain acts on health care (Jumbam et al., 2022). Moreover, nurses can directly attend the boards of directors in hospitals or boards of leadership in healthcare systems in order to affect the decisions on policies that are fundamental to patient care, the practice of nursing, and health systems. In these leadership positions, they are well-positioned to make healthcare policies patient-oriented, reflect quality healthcare, and advance nursing within the health system (Nilsen et al., 2020). Both pathways enable the nurses to be change agents in healthcare reforms at the policy level.

    Challenges the Opportunities Present

    Several issues may arise when RNs and APRNs engage in grassroots advocacy and work on the hospital boards or leadership teams. A typical disadvantage of grassroots advocacy for nurses is the demands of time that is spent in planning campaigns, arranging schedules of meetings with lawmakers, and trying to bring citizens into action (Jumbam et al., 2022). To counter this, the nurses can engage in nursing associations or advocacy agencies that offer support and assistance to help share the load and ensure that no one is overwhelmed to desist from participation. One possibility for nurses occupying a position within a hospital board or management team is the necessity to undertake leadership and business skills to affect change. Some of these duties may make many nurses feel incompetent when handling administrative or other organizational-related matters (Sevy & Warshawsky, 2020). To overcome this, the nurses can opt for leadership training or take a mentorship or professional development course to enhance their performance in governance and making decisions.

    Strategies for Advocacy

    Two strategies could be employed to improve advocacy for the existence of opportunities for nurses to engage in policy-making. First, it is possible to have formal mentorship or leadership development programs in internationally recognized bodies such as the ANA or similar-state nursing associations. Such programs could especially focus on ways of how to get involved in grassroots advocacy or hospital boards and cooperate with experienced nurse leaders to provide the necessary guidance and tools to nurses (Chiu et al., 2021). For instance, the ANA could provide advocacy workshops and provide a series of webinars on how to seek a position on a hospital board. Additionally, having an online portal or newsfeed for healthcare organizations to share information about such openings will be useful for the nurses. Facilities could post information through organizational communication outlets or possibly on an organization’s website and could spur the organization’s members to get involved by aiding how other nurses are already making a difference through illustration (Nilsen et al., 2020).

     

     

    References

    Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review. 
    Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice
    , 
    22
    (4), 271–291.

    Jumbam, D. T., Kanmounye, U. S., Alayande, B., Bekele, A., Maswime, S., Makasa, E. M. M., … & Chu, K. (2022). Voices beyond the Operating Room: Centring global surgery advocacy at the grassroots. 
    BMJ Global Health
    , 
    7
    (3), e008969.

    Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses, and assistant nurses. 
    BMC Health Services Research
    , 
    20
    , 1-8.

    Sevy Majers, J., & Warshawsky, N. (2020). Evidence-based decision-making for nurse leaders. 
    Nurse Leader
    , 
    18
    (5), 471–475.

     

    Expand discussion thread from Rodrigue Cheumago Pondem

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Reylynn M Dunn

    Oct 13, 2024 11:03pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 8:37pm

    Reply from Reylynn M Dunn

    While there are other words I would include in a word cloud, the top three words I would include I would be advocate, valuable, and caring. I think of nurses being advocates on a smaller scale than policy making and more on an individual level. I would not have thought to add policy maker to the word cloud, I believe because it is not a task I am regularly involved in with my day-to-day care of a patient. Just because I do not regularly participate in policymaking, I do still believe that policymaking as a nurse is a valuable role. Policy making would not be a prominent component of the word cloud, but advocacy would be. According to the American Nurses Association, “Nurses instinctively advocate for workplaces, and in their communities; but legislative and political advocacy is no less important to advancing the profession and patient care” (n.d). 
     

    One major way that nurses can start actively participating in policymaking is by joining a large nursing association. According to Short, organizations employ lobbyists who are able to take the concerns and knowledge of nurses to the government for legislative attention (2022, p. 18-19). Due to having the experience of the lobbyist available, nurses in the organizations may be empowered to voice information or concerns that they have. Another way a nurse can get involved in policy making is through a coalition. State Action Coalitions exist in individual states and include both nurses and business partners with the goal of improving health (Campaigns for Action, n.d.). Coalition are similar organizations as they allow for the collaboration between experienced professionals. These professionals can then identify a problem, prepare a potential solution, and present the solution to legislature. 
     

    One major challenge that may occur for nurses wanting to participate in policymaking is work-life balance. If the nurse is actively working a full time bedside job and trying to change policy, the individual would not have much time to focus on personal aspects of life. A solution to this would be to have more policy maker positions within the hospital setting, that would allow a nurse to spend some hours within a pay period on policy making instead of at the bedside. Another major challenge that may affect policy making for nurses is the idea of being in politics. Most nurses do not know that there are ways to affect policy change without directly being in the legislative session. Therefore, more education should be provided to nurses on ways to influence policy. 
    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

     

    References 

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). 
    Advocacy.
    Links to an external site.
     Retrieved October 13, 2024, from
     
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
    Links to an external site.
     

    Action coalitions – future of Nursing
    . Campaign for Action. (2023, August 15). 
    https://campaignforaction.org/our-network/state-action-coalitions/
    Links to an external site.
     

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s Health Policy & Politics
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett
     
    Learning. 
     

    Expand discussion thread from Reylynn M Dunn

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    ER

    Erin Roecker

    Oct 13, 2024 1:12pm
    | Last reply Oct 18, 2024 12:39am

    Reply from Erin Roecker

    There are several ways nurses and APRNs can participate in policymaking. By joining a professional nursing organization such as the ANA or AANP nurses are indirectly participating in policymaking. These organizations are often engaged in policy making and, in some cases, go to the national level. Per the ANA website, “As the lead organization representing the interests of the nation’s 5 million registered nurses, ANA’s role is to articulate that voice at the highest levels in order to influence health policy (American Nurses Association, n.d.).” Secondly, nurses can participate in policymaking by directly getting involved with the legislative process by attending or testifying at hearings. Some proposed health related policies may benefit from or even require the perspective from a nurse or APRN. According to our textbook, “Nurses cannot afford to limit their actions in relation to policy. Instead, nurses need to share their unique perspectives with bureaucrats, agency staff, legislators, and others in public service regarding what nurses do, what nurses and their patients need, and how their cost-effectiveness has long-term impacts on health care in the United States (Short, 2021, p. 19).”

    Engaging in policymaking does have its challenges for nurses and APRN’s. The most obvious being time and lack of knowledge. Most nurses work full time, may be in school continuing their education and a large majority have families of their own. While advocating for policy change is very important it would be hard for a number of nurses or APRN’s to actively participate. This is why joining a nursing organization is important so nurses can be indirectly involved in policy change. According to an article regarding nursing and health policies, “Health policy and implementation relies on nurses to bridge the gap between policy and practice (Annesley, 2019).” The second challenge would be lack of knowledge regarding policies and policy change. I’ll admit prior to this class I was not very informed about bills, policies, and those processes. Nursing schools should do a better job of explaining the importance of getting involved with health-related policies because they often directly affect health care workers and our patients.

    References:

    American Nurses Association. (n.d.). 
    Health policy
    . 
    https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/
    Links to an external site.

    Annesley, S. H. (2019). The implications of health policy for nursing. 
    British Journal of Nursing
    , 
    28
    (8), 496–502. 
    https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.8.496
    Links to an external site.

    Short, N. M. (2021). 
    Milstead’s Health Policy & Politics
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. 
    https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781284238723

    The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden University

  • NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

    NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

    The Preventing Vape Use Act.

    The Preventing Vape Use Act is a significant legislative effort aimed at tackling the urgent public health issue of youth vaping by enforcing stricter regulations on the sale and marketing of vaping products. This initiative seeks to limit youth access to these products and address the associated health risks of nicotine addiction. With research indicating that targeted interventions can effectively reduce vaping rates among adolescents, the act also focuses on education and awareness, providing parents, educators, and communities with the necessary resources to inform youth about the dangers of vaping.

    Brief background for the problem.

    The legislation was developed in response to a sharp increase in e-cigarette use among young people, with insights from health organizations, advocacy groups, and data supporting the need for comprehensive regulatory measures. Key components include reliance on research data, collaboration among various stakeholders, and public awareness campaigns to promote informed decision-making.

    Social Determinants Influencing the  Preventing Vape Use Act

    The effectiveness and development of the H.R. 9367 – Preventing Vape Use Act are significantly shaped by various social determinants. Socioeconomic status plays a crucial role, as communities with lower income often have higher vaping rates due to limited access to health education and resources. Education is also essential; increasing awareness about the risks of vaping among youth and parents can greatly enhance the act’s impact. Additionally, cultural norms surrounding smoking and vaping affect usage rates, suggesting that policies should engage community leaders to foster behavioral change. Finally, access to healthcare services is vital, as communities with better healthcare access can offer more prevention and cessation resources, aligning with the act’s objectives.

    Evidence Supporting the Preventing Vape Use Act

    The proposed H.R. 9367 – Preventing Vape Use Act is well-supported by a growing body of evidence highlighting the effectiveness of regulatory measures in reducing youth vaping rates. Research indicates that implementing stricter regulations on the sale and marketing of tobacco and vaping products is associated with lower usage rates among adolescents.

    Regulatory Impact
    : Evidence shows that stricter tobacco regulations lead to decreased smoking and vaping among youth (Soneji et al., 2017), suggesting that similar provisions in the Preventing Vape Use Act could effectively reduce youth vaping.

    Health Education
    : Comprehensive health education programs have been proven to significantly lower smoking and vaping rates among young people (Davis et al., 2020). The act’s focus on education is aligned with these findings, emphasizing the importance of informed decision-making among youth.

    Community Engagement
    : Community-level interventions, which include parental involvement and supportive local policies, have been shown to effectively decrease youth access to tobacco products (Flay et al., 2014). The act’s emphasis on community engagement reinforces this evidence.

    Overall, the H.R. 9367 – Preventing Vape Use Act is grounded in substantial research that underscores the importance of regulation, education, and community efforts in addressing the youth vaping epidemic.

    Example of evidence base to support the proposed policy and why.

    My younger cousin was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2019, having vaped frequently. She was in her late 20s at the time of her diagnosis. Initially, she used vaping products recreationally, but over time, her usage increased, especially on weekends when she would go out with friends. I believe that implementing stricter regulations on the marketing of vaping products and sharing personal stories can effectively address this issue among young adolescents. My cousin is part of an Asian cultural background, and during her visits to her pulmonologist and surgeon, they mentioned that this type of lung cancer is particularly common among young adults in the Asian population. This suggests that cultural beliefs play a significant role. Cultural attitudes toward smoking and vaping can affect usage rates among youth, so policies that take these norms into account and involve community leaders may be more effective in driving behavioral change.

    My cousin underwent radiation therapy and surgery to remove cancer from her lungs, which took a significant emotional, mental, physical, and financial toll on her and my uncle and aunt. Accepting her lung cancer diagnosis was incredibly difficult for me. Although she is doing well now, she endured a lot of suffering. It highlights the importance of protecting the public from vaping. This is a crucial public health safety concern.

    References

    Davis, K. C., Collins, L. K., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Kline, R. (2020). Impact of tobacco control policies on youth smoking: A longitudinal analysis. 
    Tobacco Control
    , 29(4), 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054598

    Flay, B. R., Snyder, F., & Petraitis, J. (2014). The development of self-regulation and the role of the family in preventing youth substance use. 
    Family Relations
    , 63(4), 512-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12092

    Soneji, S., Swan, K., & Sargent, J. D. (2017). The impact of tobacco control policies on youth smoking. 
    American Journal of Public Health
    , 107(4), 623-628. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303637

    U.S. Congress. (2022). H.R. 9367 – Preventing Vape Use Act. Retrieved from 
    Congress.gov
    Links to an external site.

    NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

    Evidence Base in Design

    When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

    In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

    Resources

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    To Prepare:

    Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.

    Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.

    By Day 3 of Week 7

    Post
     a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 6 of Week 7

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of your colleagues
    * on two different days
     by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.

    *Note:
     Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

    Main Post

    Telehealth utilization surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing patients to receive quality care without risking exposure to the virus. Before the pandemic, telehealth access was limited to patients residing in rural areas and required them to be located within a healthcare facility to participate (Noel, 2024). Although there were efforts to expand telehealth before the pandemic, various concerns slowed this progress. The Telehealth Modernization Act was introduced to address telehealth services’ rapid expansion and adoption.

     

    Telehealth has proven to be a critical tool for enhancing healthcare access, reducing disparities, and providing quality care irrespective of patients’ locations. The pandemic underscored the crucial role that telehealth can play in serving diverse populations, leading to temporary waivers and expansions. This act temporarily lifted geographic and site restrictions, enabling patients to receive care from their homes, expanding the range of providers eligible to deliver telehealth services, and ensuring reimbursement parity with in-person visits (Noel, 2024). Allowing this act to expire would reduce healthcare access, particularly for rural patients, as it would require them to be in a healthcare facility to use telehealth services, restrict mental and behavioral health services via telehealth, and limit the pool of eligible providers. Conversely, making the act permanent would ensure sustained access to care while providing fair reimbursement for providers.

     

    Social determinants of health (SDOH) significantly influence the implementation and impact of the Telehealth Modernization Act. Key determinants include access to technology, economic stability, and healthcare accessibility. Individuals lacking reliable internet access or digital literacy may face significant barriers to telehealth services, particularly in rural and low-income areas (Health Equity in Telehealth, 2024). Additionally, those with limited financial resources may struggle to afford essential telehealth technology, such as smartphones or computers. Healthcare accessibility is another crucial factor, as telehealth cannot entirely substitute in-person care for certain conditions, potentially affecting those with complex or chronic health needs.

     

    Evidence-based practice supports the Telehealth Modernization Act, with studies consistently demonstrating that telehealth enhances healthcare access, especially for rural and underserved populations. Research links telehealth to improved patient satisfaction, convenience, and care quality, particularly in routine follow-ups, mental health services, and chronic disease management (O’Reilly, 2024). Moreover, telehealth has shown potential cost savings by reducing travel expenses and minimizing emergency room visits. However, evidence also emphasizes addressing the digital divide to ensure equitable access across all populations. Therefore, while the Telehealth Modernization Act is well-supported, policymakers must ensure its implementation does not exacerbate health disparities. Efforts to enhance digital literacy, expand broadband access, and provide affordable technology are essential to realizing the act’s full potential.

     

    Reference:

    Health equity in Telehealth
    . telehealth.hhs.gov. (2024, August). https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/health-equity-in-telehealth

     

    Noel, A. (2024, September 13). 
    The evolution of the telehealth modernization act: Expanding access to virtual care
    . CTeL.org. https://www.ctel.org/breakingnews/telehealth-access-is-at-risk-how-did-we-get-here

     

    O’Reilly, K. B. (2024, April 5). 
    7 ways telehealth is reshaping medicine for the better
    . American Medical Association. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/7-ways-telehealth-reshaping-medicine-better

    Description of the Policy

    The Better Mental Health Care for Americans Act was introduced to the US Congress by Senators of Colorado, Michael Bennet and Senator Ron Wyden to help Americans with Medicare, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D to have access to mental and behavioral healthcare services. The policy aims to address barriers to healthcare access to mental and behavioral health by ensuring there is a full integration of mental health services by expanding access, improving the outcome and reducing the cost of care (Bennet, 2023). More specifically, this proposed health policy provides that there should be parity for the behavior and mental health services in Medicare and Medicaid. The policy would ensure that the plans in Medicare Advantage will maintain accurate directories of the providers that are updated to ensure beneficiaries understand who is in the in-network. Encourages the integration of behavioral and mental health with physical care by increasing the Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates (AHA, 2023). Besides, it requires the CMS to establish and implement plans that align with the system of payment, access and quality and enhance prevention services of behavioral and mental healthcare. The bill has been read twice and has been forwarded to the Senate Committee of Finance for consideration.

    Problem being Addressed

    The issue being addressed by this health policy is the massive mental and behavioral healthcare crisis in the US.   According to McGinty (2023), despite the high prevalence of mental and behavioral health issues in the US, many people continue to struggle to get affordable and effective health care.   According to Senator Michael Bennet, the US needs to act urgently by improving access to mental and behavioral healthcare. Senator Wayden asserted that mental and behavioral healthcare in the US should be made affordable, accessible and reliable. According to NIMH. (2024), nearly 1 out of 5 adults in the US suffer mental and behavioral health challenges, while 1 in 4 older people have reported having issues of depression and anxiety. Despite around ¼ of beneficiaries of Medicare having mental and behavioral challenges, it is only less than 50% get the treatment. Therefore, the problem the bill seeks to address is the wide gap existing in access to mental and behavioral healthcare services in the US, particularly to vulnerable people such as minority races and low-income people.

    Social Determinants Affecting this Policy

    The main social determinant affecting this policy is the socio-economic status of the people. In this case, individuals from low-income backgrounds, are highly likely to experience mental and behavioral health challenges, and more likely to be exposed to barriers to assessments of mental health. For instance, the high cost, limited health insurance coverage and lack of affordable treatment options make it hard for low-income individuals to access mental healthcare (Whitman et al., 2022). Rural areas and communities that are underserved such as the ethnic minority communities, usually have limited access to professionals in mental and behavioral health. Finally, in low-income communities, negative attitudes and discrimination lead to stigma, which often discourages individuals from seeking mental and behavioral healthcare services.

    The Evidence-Based to support the Proposed Policy

    There is evidence that supports the proposed policy. There are studies showing that by enhancing access to mental and behavioral healthcare, particularly among the vulnerable population, health outcomes will be improved and the cost of healthcare will reduce. For instance, Winkelman & Chang (2018), conducted a study that examined the relationship between Medicaid expansion and improvement of mental healthcare in low-income families.  This study established that the expansion of Medicaid in terms of access and affordability to low-income families led to significant improvements in mental health outcomes. In another evidence-based study by Breslau et al. (2020) examined the impact of expanding insurance on mental health and behavioral services. Accumulation evidence on the effect of Medicaid expansion on mental health and behavioral care, it was established that the expansion improves healthcare utilization in mental care. Therefore, the policy has been supported by different evidence on the need to make mental and behavioral healthcare affordable and accessible.

     

     

    References

    AHA. (2023, November 6). 
    AHA comments on the better mental health care, lower-cost drugs, and extenders act | AHA
    . American Hospital Association. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from 
    https://www.aha.org/lettercomment/2023-11-06-aha-comments-better-mental-health-care-lower-cost-drugs-and-extenders-act
    Links to an external site.

    Bennet, M. (2023, March 22). 
    Bennet, Wyden introduce bill to increase access to mental and behavioral health care for kids, seniors, and low-income Americans
    . Michael Bennet. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from 
    https://www.bennet.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2023/3/bennet-wyden-introduce-bill-to-increase-access-to-mental-and-behavioral-health-care-for-kids-seniors-and-low-income-americans
    Links to an external site.

    Breslau, J., Han, B., Lai, J., & Yu, H. (2020). Impact of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on utilization of mental health care. 
    Medical Care
    , 
    58
    (9), 757-762. 
    https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001373
    Links to an external site.

    McGinty, B. (2023, March 2). 
    Medicare’s mental health coverage: What’s included, what’s changed, and what gaps remain
    . Commonwealth Fund. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from 
    https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/explainer/2023/mar/medicare-mental-health-coverage-included-changed-gaps-remain
    Links to an external site.

    NIMH. (2024, September). 
    Mental illness
    . National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Retrieved October 9, 2024, from 
    https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness
    Links to an external site.

    Whitman, A., De Lew, N., Chappel, A., Aysola, V., Zuckerman, R., & Sommers, B. D. (2022). Addressing social determinants of health: Examples of successful evidence-based strategies and current federal efforts. 
    Off Heal Policy
    , 
    1
    , 1-30.

    Winkelman, T. N., & Chang, V. W. (2018). Medicaid expansion, mental health, and access to care among childless adults with and without chronic conditions. 
    Journal of General Internal Medicine
    , 
    33
    (3), 376-383. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4217-5
    Links to an external site.

    Expand discussion thread from Eric M Arutyunyan

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Julia N Taylor

    Oct 10, 2024 7:19am
    | Last reply Oct 13, 2024 5:01pm

    Reply from Julia N Taylor

    MENTAL HEALTH CARE IS HEALTHCARE; Congressional Record Vol. 170, No. 86

    Mental health includes several things, such as emotional, psychological, and social well-being. It affects how we think, feel, and act; you may not even realize it. It helps determine how we handle stress and everyday life decisions. Mental health is important at every stage of life, from the beginning to the end. Mental health plays a huge role in a person’s physical and well-being. For example, depression and anxiety can increase the risk for many types of physical health problems, such as hypertension, kidney disease, etc. Chronic conditions can increase the risk of mental illness.

    Social determinants of mental health consider conditions to which people are exposed across the life course to death. These structural conditions include income, socioeconomic status, education, food security, housing, social support, and discrimination. They can also include the social and physical conditions in which people live and the ability to access affordable health care. However, psychiatric rehabilitation has been better defined, and its starting assumptions and paradigms have been refined and consolidated by evidence-based research (NCBI).

    There are many evidence-based resources related to Mental Health and Mental Disorders. The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recommends mental health benefits legislation to improve financial protection and increase the appropriate use of mental health services for people with mental health conditions (healthy people). There are many people today who refuse to seek mental health for many reasons, such as religion, culture, or simply being unable to afford it. Mental health disorders are proliferating, especially after the covid 19 pandemic. In 2021-2022, 23% of adults experienced a mental illness in the past year, equivalent to nearly 60 million Americans (MHA).

    References

    https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/mental-health-and-mental-disorders/evidence-based-resources

    https://www.mhanational.org/issues/state-mental-health-america
    Links to an external site.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435578/

    Reply 

    H.R.485 – Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act of 2023, is a bill sponsored by Representative McMorris Rogers. It was introduced on 24th January 2023. This bill deals with how federal health care programs like Medicaid and health insurance for government employees make decisions about costs and who gets covered for medical treatments.It seeks to prohibit the use of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) by federal health programs when it comes to pricing of services and thresholds for coverage, reimbursements, or incentive programs. The use of QALY is considered discount the value of life on the basis of disability, age, or an existing terminal illness. Apart from that, the bill also seeks to ensure that the Government Accountability Office generates annual reports on how the use of QALYs has a negative impact on individuals who have intellectual and developmental disabilities. Additionally, the bill also reduces funding for the Prevention and Public Health Fund for FY2024-FY2029. The current status of the bill is it has passed House and is currently in the Senate.

    This proposed bill mainly affects quality and access to healthcare as a social determinant of health. As previously explained,the use of QALYS is considered to be limiting as it may devalue the need for care for certain patient populations. This bill seeks to ensure that decisions.made in relation to health are access are not biased against patient populations on the basis of age or existing conditions.

    Evidence to support this policy exists. According to Sawhney et al. (2023), no one, including the federal government’s berent should make healthcare decisions based on QALYS. This is explained from a mathematical perspective and not from am economist’s perspective. It is explained that as unitary measure should be consistent, linear, symmetrical, and should align with societal values. QALYs lack these properties, thus undervalues the positive effects of therapeutics on people with disabilities.

    References

    H.R.485 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act of 2023. (2024, February 8). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/485

    Sawhney, T. G., Dobes, A., & O’Charoen, S. (2023). QALYs: The Math Doesn’t Work. Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 10(2), 10–13. 
    https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.83387
    Links to an external site.

     

    Reply 

     Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 (H.R.7666)

     

    A description for Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 (H.R.7666)

    The Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 (H.R.7666) aims to enhance mental health services and improve responses to mental health crises in the United States (U.S. Congress, 2022). This legislation proposes to establish comprehensive frameworks for crisis response, emphasizing the role of mobile crisis teams and fostering collaboration among various stakeholders, such as law enforcement, healthcare providers, and community organizations. The act also seeks to strengthen the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, ensuring that individuals in crisis receive effective and timely support (U.S. Congress, 2022). In other words, it focuses on increasing access to services for low-income  populations, including veterans, children, and those with apparent disorders (U.S. Congress, 2022). This approach reflects a growing recognition of the importance of mental health care and aims to address systemic gaps in services​ (U.S. Congress, 2022).

     

    A Brief background for the issue Being Addressed.

    The Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 addresses the pressing issues surrounding mental health and substance use disorders, which have increasingly escalated  in recent years, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic (American Psychological Association, 2020). The U.S. has seen a significant rise in mental health crises, with reports revealing increased depression, anxiety, and substance abuse across all demographics (American Psychological Association, 2020). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) noted a surge in mental health-related emergency room visits during the pandemic, highlighting the urgent need for improved crisis response systems (U.S. Congress, 2022)​. Additionally, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) emphasizes that millions of Americans lack access to adequate mental health services, resulting in many individuals facing barriers to care (U.S. Congress, 2022). The legislation aims to create a more integrated approach to mental health care, emphasizing the need for effective crisis intervention and the expansion of services to vulnerable populations​.

     

    Which Social Determinant Most Affects this Policy 

    The social determinant most affecting the Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 is access to healthcare services. This policy specifically targets gaps in mental health and substance use disorder treatment, which disproportionately impact individuals who face barriers to healthcare, such as those in rural or underserved communities. Many individuals in these areas lack access to timely, affordable mental health services, often leading to crises that overwhelm emergency rooms and law enforcement (U.S. Congress, 2022). The act aims to improve crisis response systems and expand access to specialized care, ensuring that vulnerable populations receive the appropriate treatment they need in a timely manner (U.S. Congress, 2022). By addressing these disparities, the policy seeks to reduce the burden on emergency services and provide better long-term mental health care for individuals from all backgrounds (U.S. Congress, 2022)​.

     

    Evidence Base to Support the Policy

    Yes, there is a strong evidence base supporting the Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022. Mental health crises in the U.S. have reached extreme levels, with outstanding data underscoring the need for enhanced crisis intervention systems (U.S. Congress, 2022). For example, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) reports that suicide is a leading cause of death in the U.S., particularly among youth and veterans, and that timely intervention can significantly reduce suicide rates (U.S. Congress, 2022). Similarly, studies show that mobile crisis response teams are effective in reducing the reliance on law enforcement in providing more appropriate care, mental health emergencies, and lowering the risk of adverse outcomes (U.S. Congress, 2022). Further evidence supports the efficacy of community based mental health initiatives. Research published by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) highlights that programs merging mental health care with emergency services like those proposed in this act improve long-term health and reduce hospitalizations outcomes for people experiencing mental health crises. Additionally, the expansion of the 988 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, proposed in this act, is backed by research showing that crisis hotlines are an effective tool for immediate decrease and connecting individuals to long-term care (​Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2020). Overall, this evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of coordinated mental health interventions and supports the necessity of the proposed policy reforms to improve crisis care and reduce mental health-related fatalities (​Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2020).

     

    Reference

    American Psychological Association. (2020). 
    Stress in America™ 2020: A national mental health crisis
    . 
    https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2020/report
    Links to an external site.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). 
    2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health
    . https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2020-nsduh-annual-national-report

    U.S. Congress. (2022). 
    Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022
     (H.R.7666, 117th Congress). 
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7666/text
    Links to an external site.

    Reply from

    Health Policy

    The bill H.R. 3811 – 118
    th
     Congress (2023-2024), known as the Veterans Mental and Behavioral Health Quality Act, was introduced in the House of Representatives on June 5, 2023. The Veterans Mental and Behavioral Health Quality Act “requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to use an independent and objective outside organization to study the difference in the quality of care between behavioral and mental health care provided by VA providers and care provided by non-VA providers” (U.S. Senate, n.d.). It was referred to the House Committee on Veterans Affairs on that same date and then referred to the Subcommittee on Health a month later on July 5, 2023. The social determinant that most affects this bill is economic status. Healthcare is expensive, and while the VA offers healthcare to its veterans at a more affordable rate, the quality and access to VA healthcare have been challenged. Therefore, patients may need a service and choose to wait for the VA because they are financially unable to go to the private sector, and their condition worsens due to the delay. Data to study the problems will lead to potential solutions that could save more people.

    Background for the Problem

    The mental health crisis in America is not unique to civilians. A history of military service increases an American’s risk for mental health issues, such as suicide and post-traumatic stress disorder. “Only about half of all veterans who need mental health care ever receive it, according to RAND research (Navigating Mental Health, n.d.). The Veterans Health Administration is “the largest integrated health care system in the United States, providing care at 1,380 health care facilities, including 170 VA Medical Centers and 1,193 outpatient sites of care of varying complexity (VHA outpatient clinics) to over 9.1 million Veterans enrolled in the VA health care program” (Veterans Health Administration, 2024). However, there is some criticism that the VHA does not offer its veterans high-quality care. “High-quality health care is defined as care that is safe, patient-centered, effective, equitable, timely, and efficient” (Navigating Mental Health, n.d.).  “Over and over, the hospitals and clinics in the VA’s sprawling health care network have fallen short when it comes to treating people with mental illness. That conclusion emerges from a ProPublica review of all the reports published by the VA’s inspector general since 2020. That includes 162 regular surveys of facilities and 151 investigations that were triggered by a complaint or call to the office on a wide variety of alleged health care problems. (McGrory & Bedi, 2024). Feedback from veterans, such as “Changes that OEF/OIF/OND [Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn] veterans would like to see at the VA include making the process for scheduling appointments easier, better quality services and customer service, and more available services or facilities” (National Academies, 2018). The request from these individuals for better quality services may be due to “… shortages in the mental health workforce can make it difficult for veterans to schedule a timely appointment. Some providers aren’t as extensively trained as they could be in evidence-based practices, which means fewer veterans are likely to receive the highest-quality care in the private sector (Navigating Mental Health, n.d.).

    Evidence to Support the Policy

    I support the Veterans and Mental Behavioral Quality Act because objective evidence that the VHA provides its patients with high-quality health care, just like or better than the private sector, will be valuable. The public evidence will reach more veterans and motivate those with mental health issues to seek help. The studies that do exist are encouraging. For example, “… the DoD and VA have taken dramatic steps over the past decade to address barriers to care. For instance, the VA has hired more mental health providers and has established outreach programs to help veterans overcome logistical issues (Navigating Mental Health, n.d.). This could have contributed to the fact that:

    … VA hospitals outperformed non-VA hospitals in two major independent, nationwide reviews for patient satisfaction and care quality:

    Patient Satisfaction Survey: VA outperformed non-VA hospitals in the most recent Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems star ratings, with 79% of VA facilities receiving a summary star rating of 4 or 5 stars compared to 40% of non-VA hospitals. This represents the ninth consecutive quarter in which VA facilities have outperformed non-VA counterparts.

    Hospital Quality Ratings: In this year’s CMS Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings, more than 58% of VA hospitals included received 4- or 5-star ratings compared to 40% of non-VA hospitals. This is only the second year VA hospitals have been included in this review, and VA has outperformed non-VA health care in both years (VA health care, 2024).

    Two other claims suggest that VHA is already providing high-quality care. “
    Psychiatric Services
    , a peer-reviewed journal of the American Psychiatric Association, has published a report showing that the quality of mental health care provided by VA is superior to that provided to a comparable population in the private sector … These findings were based on review of more than 836,500 Veterans and more than 545,400 patients seeking mental health care in the private sector (VA mental health, 2016). The other study showed that “… the available data indicate overall comparable health care quality in VA facilities compared to non-VA facilities with regard to safety and effectiveness. Rates of complications and availability of services had the least favorable results, but these results were mixed rather than consistently poor” (O’Hanlon et al., 2017).

    Conclusion

    “Many nurses are embracing the whole range of options available in the various parts of the policy process” (Short, 2019, p. 19). Professional associations have laid the foundation for this work by possessing organized ways to participate in public policy. To become involved in political action, like further support for H.R. 3811, nurses who belong to the American Nurses Association may sign up for notifications about latest updates and advocacy campaigns, join the Political Advocacy Committee, donate, or participate in a research study. Two ways to advocate for these opportunities are to lead by example and ensure others are given the time to join if they want. Mental and veteran health have come a long way, but there is still plenty of room for improvement. Nurses can contribute strategies to identify the barriers and develop tangible solutions to make Americans, including our veterans, healthier.

    References

    McGrory, K. & Bedi, N. (2024 January 9). How the VA Fails Veterans on Mental Health. 
    ProPublica
    . https://www.propublica.org/article/how-veterans-affairs-fails-mental-health-patients

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Committee to Evaluate the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services. 
    Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services
    . Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018 Jan 31. 16, Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499500/

    Navigating Mental Health Care for Veterans. (n.d.). 
    RAND
    . https://www.rand.org/health-care/projects/navigating-mental-health-care-for-veterans

    O’Hanlon, C., Huang, C., Sloss, E. Price, R.A., Hussey, P., Farmer, C. &Gigdenfil, G. Comparing VA and non-VA quality of care: A systematic review. 
    Journal of General Internal Medicine
    , 2017 Jan, 32(1): 105-121. 10.1007/s11606-016-3775-2.

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s Health Policy & Politics
    . (7th
     
    ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    VA mental health care found superior to care in the private sector. (2016 April 15). 
    VA News
    . VA mental health care found superior to care in the private sector – VA News.

    VA health care outperforms non-VA care in two independent, nationwide quality and patient satisfaction reviews. (2024 September 3). 
    VA News
    .

    Veterans Health Administration. (2024 September 12). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. https://www.va.gov/health/aboutvha.asp https://news.va.gov/press-room/va-health-care-outperforms-non-va-care-in-two-independent-nationwide-quality-and-patient-satisfaction-. reviews/

    Veterans Mental and Behavioral Health Quality Act, H.R. 3811, 118th Cong., 1st Sess., (2023).  U.S. Senate. (n.d.).

    Expand discussion thread from John Dulko

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    LL

    Lorrissa Lingen

    Oct 9, 2024 9:37pm
    | Last reply Oct 12, 2024 10:03pm

    Reply from Lorrissa Lingen

    Right to IVF

    Everyone should have the right to access fertility treatments, such as vitro fertilization, and make personal decisions about their reproductive state, such as embryos, without any restrictions or interference. Health care providers and insurers are empowered to offer and cover these services, ensuring that individuals receive the support they need. Also, manufacturers of necessary drugs or devices can provide these essential products. This bill ensures that fertility treatments are covered under Medicare and Medicaid, as well as for members of the uniformed services and veterans. It also mandates that private insurers who cover obstetrical services must include fertility treatments in their coverage (
    S.4445 – right to IVF act 118th Congress (2023-2024)
    ).

    Sexual and reproductive health rights are key to achieving sustainable development goals, as they support gender equality, health, and well-being. Article 16 of the Human Rights Declaration states that everyone has the right to marry and start a family, highlighting infertility as a human rights issue. Because of this access to infertility treatments like IVF should be considered a fundamental right.

    Infertility is complex and unlike other medical conditions, as treatments like IVF are costly, time-consuming, and have uncertain success rates. This unpredictable and expense can cause significant psychological stress, and the emotional impact of failed treatments can be particularly hard on women. Studies show there can be long term mental impact for women who struggle with infertility (Bagade et al., 2023).

    Health inequality is present in a lot of medical specialties, including infertility prevention and treatment. When looking at the cost of treatment, access to care, and differences in success rates, it’s clear that social determinants of health significantly impact individuals struggling with infertility. It’s important to consider how financial, educational, racial, and social differences influence access to and outcomes of fertility treatments in the United States (Byers, 2020).

     

    References

     

    Bagade, T., Mersha, A. G., & Majeed, T. (2023, December 13). 
    The social determinants of

    mental health disorders among women with infertility: A systematic review
    . BMC women’s health. 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10720205/#:~:text=On%20the%20contrary,%20higher%20education%20of%20partners,%20social%20stigma,%20older
    Links to an external site.

     

    Byers, A. V. (2020, November 25). 
    Women’s Health Education Program Scholars
    . College of

    Medicine. 
    https://drexel.edu/medicine/academics/womens-health-and-
    Links to an external site.
    leadership/womens-health-education-program/whep-scholars/

     

    S.4445 – right to IVF act 118th Congress (2023-2024)
    . S.4445 – Right to IVF Act. (n.d.).

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4445

     

     

    Expand discussion thread from Lorrissa Lingen

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    LA

    Lailat Andu

    Oct 9, 2024 9:30pm
    | Last reply Oct 11, 2024 9:47pm

    Reply from Lailat Andu

    Telehealth

    Telehealth may be described as the delivery of healthcare services through digital communication technologies, allowing patients and providers to interact remotely. It has gained significant traction due to its convenience and the ability to reduce healthcare costs while maintaining quality care (Bashshur et al., 2016). The issue that was being addressed with Telehealth is the expansion of healthcare service. Telehealth Services Expansion Act was enacted in March 2021, which provided temporary measures to expand telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposed policy seeks to make many of these measures permanent (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2021). Telehealth simply aims to expand access to healthcare services by using video conferencing, mobile health apps, and remote patient monitoring for healthcare delivery, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. The need for telehealth has become increasingly apparent after the COVID pandemic due to various challenges in the traditional healthcare system. Geographical barriers, high healthcare costs, transportation and provider shortages often limit access to essential health services. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the necessity for remote care solutions, as many patients were reluctant or unable to visit healthcare facilities in person. The sudden shift towards telehealth prompted policymakers to develop frameworks that ensure equitable access, reimbursement for services, and the maintenance of care quality, addressing both immediate healthcare needs and long-term system improvements. I believe telehealth simply represents a significant advancement in the healthcare system, aiming to bridge gaps in access and enhance the delivery of care to diverse populations.

    The social determinant most affected by the policy of telehealth expansion is access to healthcare. By improving telehealth services, the policy aims to enhance access for patients, particularly in underserved and rural communities, where traditional healthcare facilities may be limited. This expansion can reduce barriers such as transportation issues, geographical isolation, and the availability of healthcare providers, ultimately leading to better health outcomes and equity in healthcare access. Other social determinants, such as socioeconomic status and education, may also see positive impacts as telehealth can provide more affordable and convenient healthcare options. I believe access remains the most direct and significant factor influenced by telehealth initiatives.

    There are multiple evidence supporting that telehealth policy improves access to care, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes. Multiple studies have shown that telehealth significantly improves access to care for patients in rural and underserved areas. For instance, a study by Kruse et al. (2017) found that telehealth interventions increased access to specialists, particularly for patients in remote locations, reducing travel time and costs. It has been proven to be effective in managing chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension. A systematic review by Pinnock et al. (2017) indicated that telemonitoring and remote consultations led to better clinical outcomes, including improved blood glucose levels and blood pressure control, compared to traditional in-person visits. Another study by Reay et al. (2020) reported that patients appreciated the convenience, time savings, and comfort of receiving care from home. The study highlighted that over 90% of participants expressed satisfaction with their telehealth experiences. Bakhshaie et al. (2018) indicates that telehealth consultations for mental health services not only improved patient access but also reduced overall healthcare expenditures by decreasing emergency room visits and hospitalizations. NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

    References

    American Telemedicine Association. (2021). Telehealth: A resource for health care providers. https://www.americantelemed.org/

    Bakhshaie, J., et al. (2018). Economic evaluation of telehealth for mental health. Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(10), 780-788.

    Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Smith, B. R., & Schrop, S. (2020). The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(6), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0155

    Caffery, L. J., Farago, G., & J. C. (2020). Telehealth in Rural and Remote Australia: A Review of the Evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124587

    Kruse, C. S., et al. (2017). Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23(9), 874-885.

    Luxton, D. D., et al. (2016). Telepsychology: A new approach to therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 14-20.

    Pinnock, H., et al. (2017). Integrated self-management support for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. Health Services Research, 52(2), 645-664.

    Reay, T., et al. (2020). The impact of telehealth on patient experience: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 87.

    Short, N. M. (2022). Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

    Expand discussion thread from Lailat Andu

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    BG

    Brandon Grundy

    Oct 9, 2024 9:04pm
    | Last reply Oct 12, 2024 10:33pm

    Reply from Brandon Grundy

    Main Post
     

    Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act of 2023 (H.R.485)

    Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers introduced the Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act (H.R.485) in 2023 to prohibit 
    the use of
     Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and similar measures in federal healthcare programs for coverage and payment options. QALYs analyze and determine the value of medical interventions 
    in relation to
     the potential quality and quantity of life they offer. However, opponents argue that using QALYs can lead to the devaluation of 
    lives
     of vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, disabled, or the terminally ill, as it may prioritize younger or healthier individuals in healthcare decisions (Congress.gov, 2023). 

    Background
     

    As the opening synopsis states, H.R.485 endeavors to address equity issues in healthcare 
    availability
    , particularly concerning how medical “value” is determined for disadvantaged populations. Currently, QALYs are employed in healthcare economics to assign treatments based on cost-effectiveness, often weighing treatments by their potential to increase both the quality and duration of life. This methodology is problematic as disparities in treatment access are often the result, especially for individuals whose lives may not meet these metrics of “quality” improvement, such as those living with disabilities or chronic illness (National Council on Disability, 2019; Ubel & Jagsi, 2020). H.R.485 is meant to level the playing field by eliminating systemic bias in healthcare decis
    ions. In theory, with the passing of H.R.485, all lives, regardless of health status or age, are valued equally. 

    Social Determinant Impact
     

    “Health Equity” is the social determinant of health most impacted by this policy. H.R.485 aims at ensuring that vulnerable populations (the elderly, disabled, and terminally ill) are not forced to submit to discriminatory healthcare 
    policies. Removing QALYs from federal healthcare decisions promotes fairer access to necessary treatments and reduces the disparities caused by economic-based healthcare rationing 
    (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [PCORI], 2020)
    . 

    Evidence Base and Support
     

    There is considerable support for the ethical arguments behind this bill, though the evidence base for 
    completely
     eliminating QALYs is mixed. 
    Advocacy organizations, such as the National Council on Disability,
     argue that QALYs undervalue the lives of individuals with disabilities, leading to inequitable access to life-saving treatments (National Council on Disability, 2019). PCORI has supported patient-centered research that challenges the equality of QALY-based decisions. PCORI has advocated for alternative measures that do not diminish the value of vulnerable/marginalized individuals (PC
    ORI, 2020). 
    On the other hand, proponents of QALYs argue that they help prioritize healthcare resources efficiently in ways that improve overall population health (Ubel & Jagsi, 2020).
     

    Conclusion

    While the Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act of 2023 has an ethically solid foundation, the debate over whether or not eliminating QALYs will enhance equity without compromising resource allocation continues. Further research is needed to determine the long-term impact of such reforms. 

    References
     

    Congress.gov. (2023). 
    H.R.485 – Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act of 2023
    .
     Library of Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/485 

     

    National Council on Disability. (2019). 
    Quality-adjusted life years and the devaluation of life with a disability
    .
     https://ncd.gov/publications/2019/ncd-letter-pcori 

     

    Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). (2020). 
    Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: Evaluating the role of QALYs
    . https://www.pcori.org/research-results/2020 

     

    Ubel, P. A., & Jagsi, R. (2020). 
    Can QALYs be used to decide which patients to treat? Ethical challenges in using quality-adjusted life years in healthcare allocation
    . 
    Journal of Medical Ethics
    , 46(7), 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105836 

     

    Expand discussion thread from Brandon Grundy

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    SS

    Stephania A Senter

    Oct 9, 2024 8:45pm
    | Last reply Oct 12, 2024 10:19pm

    Reply from Stephania A Senter

    Ohio Administrative Code 4723-4: Standards of Practice Relative to Registered Nurse or Licensed Practical Nurse

    Description of the Policy
    :

    Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 4723-4 outlines the 
    scope of practice
     for Registered Nurses (RNs) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) in Ohio. This policy defines the standards of safe and effective nursing care, establishes the procedures nurses can perform, and sets boundaries to ensure that tasks are aligned with the nurse’s education and competency. It also emphasizes patient assessment, care planning, implementation of treatments, and the evaluation of care outcomes.

    Background of the Problem or Issue Being Addressed

    The primary issue addressed by OAC 4723-4 is patient safety and quality of care. The regulation aims to prevent nurses from engaging in tasks that exceed their training or experience, which could lead to unsafe or ineffective care. By imposing a clear scope of practice, the policy seeks to standardize nursing procedures across the state and ensure that nurses are practicing within their legal and professional limits. This also mitigates risks associated with miscommunication or misinterpretation of professional roles in healthcare settings, reducing the potential for medical errors.

    Social Determinants Affecting This Policy

    The social determinant of health that most affects this policy is access to education and training. Nurses must meet specific educational requirements to practice safely and competently. In rural or underserved areas, where access to higher education might be limited, nurses may face barriers in acquiring the advanced training needed to meet the demands of increasingly complex healthcare systems.

    Evidence Base Supporting the Policy

    There is a strong evidence base supporting the structure and limits outlined in OAC 4723-4, particularly in relation to ensuring patient safety. Research consistently shows that clearly defined scopes of practice help reduce errors and improve patient care outcomes. A study published in 
    Health Affairs
     found that when nurses are allowed to practice within well-defined scopes and in collaboration with physicians, patient outcomes improve, and the risk of errors decreases (Aiken et al., 2020). This underscores the importance of a regulated practice framework like OAC 4723-4.

    Conclusion

    Ohio Administrative Code 4723-4 is an evidence-based policy designed to standardize and regulate nursing practice to ensure safe, high-quality care. The policy addresses issues related to the scope of practice, particularly the need for competency-based nursing procedures. Education and training are key social determinants affecting this policy, and there is strong evidence supporting the structured framework it provides for nursing practice in Ohio.

     

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). (2023). State practice environment for NPs. Retrieved from [AANP website].

    Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). 
    Position statement: full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care.Links to an external site
    Links to an external site.
    . 
    Nursing Outlook, 65
    (6), 761–765.

    Ohio Board of Nursing. (2023). APRN practice and prescriptive authority guidelines. Retrieved from [Ohio Board of Nursing Website].

    Expand discussion thread from Stephania A Senter

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    QF

    Qiana Felder

    Oct 9, 2024 8:03pm

    Reply from Qiana Felder

    Health Policy

    The health policy selected is H.R.3305, the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act. This policy, with its potential to significantly improve the maternal health of vulnerable populations such as racial minority groups, veterans, and incarcerated individuals (Congress, 2024), offers a beacon of hope. The bill will ensure that social determinants of maternal health are addressed to increase access to maternal health by improving programs, funds, and access to healthcare.

    Background for the Problem

    Regardless of how empowered, informed, or motivated a person may be to change their behavior, they might be unable to do so due to structural factors contributing to health inequities (Crear-Perry, 2021). Social determinants in valuable communities significantly impact maternal health. The first one we will touch base on is healthcare access. Prenatal care is imperative to the care of the mom and baby. Underserved communities have inadequate access to healthcare, preventing them from getting the necessary care needed in order to avoid complications and increasing the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. Another important social determinant to consider is financial stability. Lower-income women need help obtaining quality healthcare, prenatal services, and adequate nutrition.

    Evidence to Support the Policy

    The research underscores the urgent need for action, revealing that pregnant individuals from underserved groups often face the highest rates of adverse health outcomes. Black women, in particular, face maternal morbidity and mortality rates that are several times higher than those of other groups (NLM, 2022). The rate of severe maternal morbidity during deliveries was 87% higher for non-Hispanic Black individuals compared to non-Hispanic White individuals in 2019 (NLM, 2022). A policy such as the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act needs to be taken seriously by Congress to improve the quality of maternal care.

     

    References

    Congress. (2023). 
    H.R.3305 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act
    . Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3305?s=1&r=4&q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22Black+Maternal+Health+Momnibus+Act%22%7D

    Crear-Perry, J., Correa-de-Araujo, R., Lewis Johnson, T., McLemore, M. R., Neilson, E., & Wallace, M. (2021). Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health. 
    Journal of Women’s Health
    , 
    30
    (2). https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8882

    National Library of Medicine. (2022). MATERNAL HEALTH. In 
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    . Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587184/

     

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    TC

    Tracy M Chaves

    Oct 9, 2024 7:31pm
    | Last reply Oct 11, 2024 9:12pm

    Reply from Tracy M Chaves

    On March 22, 2023 Mr Bennet introduced to Senate the bill S.923 – 118th Congress also known as the Better Mental Health Care for Americans Act (2023). This Act is attempting to modify the payment rates for behavioral health services under Medicare and Medicare Advantage Programs. It also would change restrictions on medications prescribed for behavioral health diagnosis. In short, this bill would require Medicare and Medicare Advantage programs to pay no less for behavioral health treatment as it would for other medical treatments. This bill is making sure that behavioral health services can be integrated into other areas of health services such as primary care practice, preventative screens, and telehealth treatment.

    Why is this important? Historically behavioral health providers have reported lower payment rates than those of physical health providers (Office of Attorney, 2020). Due to this, there has been an increase in behavioral health providers not accepting insurances.
     

    The social determinant of health that would most be affected by this policy would be economic stability. If providers of behavioral health are not taking insurances due to low reimbursement rates that means patients have to pay out of pocket for much needed services. If patients cannot afford the services they are going untreated.
     

    In 2020 the state of Massachusetts was able to work with several private insurances and come to an agreement to improve behavioral health services coverage (Office of Attorney, 2020). Part of this agreement was to have same if not higher provider reimbursement rates, but also just as important, reducing the need for prior authorizations for behavior health services to match the requirements for physical health services. This agreement has been success for the state of Massachusetts through changes with private insurances so I believe if Congress could implement a bill like this one it would improve behavioral health service coverage across the country.

     

    References

    Better Mental Health Care for Americans Act, S. 923, 118 Cong. (2023).

    Office of Attorney General Maura Healey. (2020). AG Healey announces groundbreaking agreements that expand access to behavioral health services for more than one million residents. 
    Mass.gov
    . https://www.mass.gov/news/ag-healey-announces-groundbreaking-agreements-that-expand-access-to-behavioral-health-services-for-more-than-one-million-residents

    Expand discussion thread from Tracy M Chaves

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Amy Simmons

    Oct 9, 2024 6:48pm

    Reply from Amy Simmons

    Main Post

    Health Policy:
     
    S.1120 — 118th Congress (2023-2024)

    Health policy S.1120 is intended to broaden the options for eligible product developers in case of delays in obtaining covered products necessary for developing generic drugs or biosimilar biological products (S. 1120 – 118th Congress (2023-2024). Medication costs have emerged as a significant concern in the public, causing an incredible amount of anxiety about the increasing price of medications in the United States. Many patients struggle to access essential treatments due to financial barriers, leading to detrimental health outcomes and increased reliance on the healthcare system. Various factors, including research and development costs, market dynamics, and the role of insurance companies, influence drug pricing.

    Background for the Problem
     
    and Social Determinants

    Millions of Americans face the stark choice between paying for their medication and meeting basic needs like rent, food, or utilities (Vincent Rajkumar, 2020). This is not a choice anyone should have to make in one of the wealthiest nations in the world. Chronic illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer often require ongoing medication. When patients are unable to afford these treatments, they are forced to ration their medications or go without them entirely. The human cost of high drug prices is immeasurable, but the financial cost is equally staggering. Unaffordable medications lead to untreated conditions, preventable hospitalizations, and emergency room visits, all of which strain our healthcare system.

    Evidence to Support the Policy

    Support for S.1120, the Improved Access to Affordable Medication Act, can be evidenced through several key points. According to Scialli et al., 2021, studies indicate that high medication costs lead to non-adherence, where patients skip doses or avoid medications altogether, resulting in worse health outcomes. An advocacy group, the American Heart Association, has expressed support for policies aimed at lowering drug costs due to non-adherence, resulting in over 100,000 deaths a year that could have been prevented; this aligns with the goals of S.1120. States that have implemented drug pricing transparency and affordability measures have shown positive outcomes in lowering costs and improving patient access. These points collectively support the need for S.1120 and highlight its potential benefits in improving access to affordable medications.

    References

    American Heart Association. (n.d.). 
    Facts – a tough pill to swallow: – Medication adherence
     … https://www.heart.org/-/media/Files/About-                                    Us/Policy-Research/Fact-Sheets/Access-to-Care/Medication-Adherence-and-CVD-Fact-Sheet.pdf

    S.1120 – 118th Congress (2023-2024). Improved access to affordable medication act. (2023, March 30). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-                      congress/senate-bill/1120?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22S1120%22%7D&s=5&r=1

    Scialli, A. R., Saavedra, K., & Fugh-Berman, A. (2021, March 25). The benefits and risks of adherence to medical therapy.
     Published in the Journal of                      Scientific Practice and Integrity
    . https://www.jospi.org/article/21386-the-benefits-and-risks-of-adherence-to-medical-therapy

    Vincent Rajkumar, S. (2020). The high cost of prescription drugs: Causes and solutions. 
    Blood Cancer Journal
    , 
    10
    (6).                                                                        https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-020-0338-x

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Mihret Ghebreamlak

    Oct 9, 2024 6:40pm

    Reply from Mihret Ghebreamlak

     HR 5221 – The Urban Indian Health Confer Act

    The Urban Indian Health Confer Act (HR 5221) is a health policy that creates a statutory, permanent conference between the Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Urban Indian Organizations (UIOs). The policy fills the absence of involvement of UIOs in federal healthcare policymaking, which influenced the healthcare inequality among urban Native Americans (U.S. Congress, 2021). While native peoples residing in reservations can easily access IHS services, urban Indians seldom have access to most of these services since most IHS services are targeted at reservation natives.

    Problem Background

    The issue at the center of information campaigns is that UIOs are left out of federal policymaking, which has dire consequences for urban Native Americans in terms of healthcare availability and service. Some of the difficulties include a lack of culturally sensitive health services, inadequate UIO funding, and a considerably higher prevalence of chronic diseases, mental disorders, and alcohol dependence than in the nonindigenous population and among Native Americans residing on reservations (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022). These disparities are why the Urban Indian Health Confer Act was passed to legalize the representation of the UIO in federal health policies.

    Social Determinant Most Affected

    Among social determinants of health, the most relevant to the Urban Indian Health Confer Act is access to healthcare facilities. Many of the urban Native Americans have had their access to unique treatments hindered by geographical distances to tribal-delivered health services that are primarily available in the reservations only. Furthermore, there is unemployment has remained high among Native Americans dwelling in urban areas, limiting their ability to pay for health care services; they experience prejudice or disrespect of their culture within the health care facilities. They lead to a higher prevalence of chronic diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular issues, mental health disorders, and substance abuse. However, their outcomes worsen because of a lack of culturally competent healthcare services.

    Evidence Base Supporting the Policy

    There is substantial evidence that supports the need for this policy. Based on available research, it is evident that native Americans in urban areas have poorer health indicators than not only the overall population but also those still residing on reservations. For example, aboriginal people living in urban areas are much more likely to suffer from diabetes, substance dependence, or poor mental health because they have minimal access to healthcare services (Smye et al., 2021). Community-based UIOs that provide culturally appropriate care effectively improve performance but lack adequate resources and are marginalized in decision-making. People’s health is enhanced when UIOs adapt to receive sufficient resources and inclusion (NCUIH, 2024). For instance, examples of effective cross-culturally sensitive diabetes management by organizations such as the UIOs improved patients’ health; this called for policy reforms to include UIOs in federal health planning.

     

    References:

    H.R.5221 – 117th Congress (2021-2022): Urban Indian Health Confer Act. (2021). Congress.gov. 
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5221#citation
    Links to an external site.

    NCUIH. (2024, July 11). Expanding Maternal Health Services at Urban Indian Organizations. YouTube.

    Links to an external site.

    Smye, V., Browne, A. J., Josewski, V., Keith, B., & Mussell, W. (2023). Social Suffering: Indigenous Peoples’ Experiences of Accessing Mental Health and Substance Use Services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3288. 
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043288
    Links to an external site.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022, July 20). Testimony from P. Benjamin Smith, Deputy Director, Indian Health Service on H.R. 5221 – Urban Indian Health Confer Act before Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. HHS.gov. 
    https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/asl/testimony/2022/07/20/hr-5221-urban-indian-health-confer-act.html
    Links to an external site.

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    NC

    Nicole Greco Carl

    Oct 9, 2024 4:21pm
    | Last reply Oct 9, 2024 4:23pm

    Reply from Nicole Greco Carl

    S.644 – Modernizing Opioid Treatment Access Act

    This bill’s goal is to “access to methadone for an individual’s unsupervised use to treat opioid use disorder (OUD)”( CRS, 2023). Currently, the only way to get methadone is to have it “dispensed to individuals in person through opioid treatment programs” (CRS, 2023), by a practitioner who has obtained “registration from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to prescribe and dispense methadone to treat OUD” (CRS, 2023) The bill proposes to waive this, however, for methadone to be prescribed to individuals “electronic prescribing, establishes prescription limits, and sets out requirements for informed consent” will be required and “telehealth to provide methadone treatment”( CRS, 2023) instead of the current in-person requirement.

     

    What is methadone and what is it used for?

    Methadone is a “man-made opioid (also known as an opiate)” (National Health Service, 2021). One of its uses is to assist individuals in stopping their use of heroin, “it reduces your withdrawal symptoms, such as shaking, shivering and other flu-like symptoms” (National Health Service, 2021). Heroin-addicted women can be put on methadone to help the mother “stop taking heroin and having withdrawals… it can also be given to newborn babies in hospital, to help with heroin or methadone withdrawal symptoms” (National Health Service, 2021). Another use for Methadone is “end-of-life care and severe pain” (National Health Service, 2021), management. NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

     

    Social determinants

    According to the National Library of Medicine, the people with the biggest social determinants are “minoritized groups; people with low income; elderly individuals; people involved in the criminal justice system; pregnant women; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and all sexual and gender minority (LGBTQIA+) individuals; and individuals with HIV/AIDS” (Stroud, 2022).

    Research dictates  “increased access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has the power to substantially reduce overdose rates” however “ racially minoritized individuals, who are experiencing some of the greatest rises in overdose rates today, have less access to medications for opioid use disorder” (Stroud, 2022). Studies show that “white patients are more likely to be referred to a medical professional and receive medication as part of their treatment plan, and less likely to leave against medical advice or be terminated by the facility than are racially minoritized patients”(Stroud, 2022).

    Social barriers to “methadone treatment include stigma, discrimination in health care settings, lack of culturally responsive and respectful care, and the inequalities present in the criminal justice system” (Stroud, 2022).

     

    My Belief

    I do believe that the bill has evidence to support it. This will give many individuals the ability to not have to go in person to get their methadone treatment. Also, it will provide practitioners with more flexibility to prescribe and use telehealth. The research shows Methadone Maintenance treatment (MMT), “reduces drug injecting, reduces HIV transmission, significantly reduces the death rate associated with opioid dependence

    Expand discussion thread from Nicole Greco Carl

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    CP

    Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    Oct 9, 2024 1:54pm
    | Last reply Oct 11, 2024 7:46pm

    Reply from Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    Health Policy

     

    H.R. 7666 – Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022

    The health policy H.R. 7666 “Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Wellbeing Act of 2022” (H.R. 7666, 2022). It is a bill addressing mental and behavioral health issues by expanding and modifying programs, grants, and activities focused on these areas. Yet, this bill would open more opportunities for help to at-risk youth and adults, people with eating disorders, people affected by homelessness and suffering from mental illness and underage drinking, and maternal mental health and substance use disorders. The bill covers just about anyone who is affected by mental and behavioral health issues.

    Background for the Problem
     
    and Social Determinant
     
    that Most Affects H.R. 7666

    The social determinants that most affect this policy are income, education, transportation and safe housing. Based on household income, most people will not seek mental and behavioral health help because they fear they are unable to afford it. Education is one of the key social determinants that affect this bill. Geist Hardt and Kloha (2018) state, “Education should begin in K-12 health education but should also be the focus education for adults through broadening the focus of health promotion programs, as well as through public service and social media campaigns” (p. 350). Thus, without the education of how to access resources, people live in silence and suffer. There are many who require mental and behavioral health assistance; however, getting to where the assistance is available may pose a problem due to the lack of transportation services. Regarding those who are homeless, they are more focused on finding shelter day-by-day, instead of their mental and behavioral health needs. These social determinants need to be addressed in the bill for it to be successful. If the awareness of health policies is integrated into institutions, this will allow for the awareness of such policies at an early level helping those needing the services get the help they need (Milstead & Short, 2019).

    Evidence based to support the proposed Policy

    I believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy. The evidence is for a mental and behavioral health bill should be very visible to Americans today. You read about it, you see it in the media, and for most they are living it. Mental and behavioral health have been an issue for decades; however, the availability of social media and the last few years during the pandemic, mental illness has risen to a level never seen before. As reported, “During June 24–30, 2020, U.S. adults reported considerably elevated adverse mental health conditions associated with COVID-19. Younger adults, racial/ethnic minorities, essential workers, and unpaid adult caregivers reported having experienced disproportionately worse mental health outcomes, increased substance use, and elevated suicidal ideation” (Czeisler et al., 2020). Mental illness has exceeded boundaries. All socio-economic classes and statuses have experienced the effects of this problem. Many people are suffering and usually the result of this suffering is death, whether it be suicide or mass shootings. The evidence is all around us.

    References

    Czeisler, M., Lane, R. I., Petrosky, E., Wiley, J. F., Christensen, A., Njai, R., Weaver, M. D., Robbins, R., Facer-Childs, E. R., Barger, L. K., Czeisler, C. A., Howard, M. E., & Rajaratnam, S. M. (2020). Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(32), 1049–1057. 
    https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1
    Links to an external site.

     

    H.R.7666 – 117th Congress (2021-2022): Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022. (2022, June 23). 
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7666
    Links to an external site.

    Geist Hardt, C., & Kloha, A. (2018). Gaining Support for Child and Family Policies by Raising Awareness of the Link between Physical and Mental Health and the Impact of Social Determinants on Both. Social Work in Public Health, 33(6), 342–353. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2018.1482253
    Links to an external site.

    Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide. Jones & Bartlett Learning

    Expand discussion thread from Christelle Njieukeng Piemba

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DT

    Deco Tanjong

    Oct 9, 2024 12:25pm
    | Last reply Oct 12, 2024 8:21pm

    Reply from Deco Tanjong

                          Policy consideration for artificial intelligence in healthcare.

    Artificial intelligence(AI) in healthcare uses machine learning and natural language processing to analyze medical data and improve patient and healthcare professional experiences( National Institutes of Health).  Artificial intelligence has great potential to revolutionize healthcare by developing new cures, improving healthcare delivery, and reducing administrative burdens as well as overall healthcare spending. Edward Markey  (2023).

    Artificial intelligence will help develop a better standard of care, increase time access to care perhaps most importantly, discover innovative treatments, including monitoring the progress of disease and the effectiveness of those treatments. Edward Markey (2023).

    Despite the advantages of Artificial intelligence in healthcare, barriers to artificial intelligence exist, like privacy concerns. In some cases, it might be possible to anonymize the data enough to let the AI machine do its work; however, other areas may be more problematic, such as image-dependent diagnostics like Ultrasounds. And the rising capabilities of cyberattacks.

    Lack of empathy and explainability: As a bedside nurse, during an interaction with a patient, the healthcare professional shows empathy, and the level or means of explanation is based on the patient’s behavior or understanding, which helps build trust among the patient and the healthcare provider. Artificial intelligence has no empathy and is explained as programmed, which will create mistrust. Thus hindering patient care and putting patients at risk.

    Lastly, Big technology companies Edward Markey (2023)  implement technologies on patients and workers without their knowledge and without appropriate testing to prevent harm, discrimination, or interference in their clinical judgment, which shows that big technology companies focus more on profit making as opposed to the healthcare of the people.

    Reference:

    Congress.govLinks to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    . (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Chapter 4, “Policy Analysis and Design” (pp. 77–93)

    Chapter 9, “The Influence of Patient Health Data on Health Policy” (pp. 197–217)

    Chapter 10, “Financing Health Care” (pp. 247–257 only)

     

    Expand discussion thread from Deco Tanjong

    4 Replies, 2 Unread

    4 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    MM

    Miriane Meigueu

    Oct 9, 2024 11:39am

    Reply from Miriane Meigueu

    S.631 – COVID–19 Mental Health Research Act

    One of the recent congress policy proposals in line with healthcare was the S.631 – COVID–19 Mental Health Research Act (Congress.gov, 2021). Introduced in March 2021, the legislation proposes directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the Director of the National Institute of Mental Health, to expedite research on the mental health effects of the current COVID-19 pandemic and the SARS–CoV– 2 pandemic on nurses who have been directly involved in frontline nursing response as part of the coordinated population health intervention (Congress.gov, 2021). The directive to expedite research and allocate more resources on the mental health impacts of pandemics on frontline-responder nurses supposedly should highlight the traumatic stress impacts, psychological distress impacts, psychiatric disorder impacts, and long-term stress impacts, including burnout, that such nurses experienced because of involvement in the health service provision during the pandemic (Deng & Naslund, 2020). According to the proposed law, increasing research on these areas will help provide insights into how pandemics affect frontline health workers and thus devise strategies on how to increase their effectiveness and efficiency while reducing the underlining impacts (Congress.gov, 2021).

    Proposed Legislation

    The proposed legislation focuses on the broad issue of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health status of healthcare workers involved in frontline nursing. Health and social care workers have, in this regard, played a crucial frontline role in responding to the COVID crisis (Congress.gov, 2021). The underlining healthcare burden involved in the first-line response to pandemics implies that such nurses worked under the most constraining environments of severe understaffing as well as operating under constrained and challenging situations, including working for extended durations of time (Cheng et al., 2022). The resultant impact thereof is that most frontline health and social care workers suffer burnout. Prolonged exposure to burnout results in severe mental health instability and negative impacts on the nurses’ psychological well-being (De Kock et al., 2020).

    Social Determinants of Health

    One of the leading social determinants of nurses mental health during the corona virus pandemic has been the existence of health disparities, especially within the health facilities. In practice, health facilities have limited capacities to balance between the availing and allocating sufficient nurses and mainlining their health and wellness through proper allotting of duties and responsibilities. Social economic obstacles in health facilities imply that some facilities have to compel nurses to work under difficult environments of limited human capital resources. This forces nurses to work under difficult circumstances leading to burnout and fatigue (Sauerland, 2021).

    As hinted above, therefore, there is an extensive amount of evidence pointing out the need to extend research and understanding of how frontline healthcare and social care workers, working under constrained environments of pressure and limited workforce supply, affect their psychological well-being and mental health stability (Soubra et al., 2023). The scale of the coronavirus pandemic, for instance, has been far more daunting than any other pandemic experienced in the recent past (Khanal et al., 2020). The extensive impact of the pandemic on the healthcare system, including the sheer volume of patients flocking healthcare facilities in need of emergency health services, threatened to generally overthrow the capacity of the healthcare system in general. Nurses, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, were forced to work for extended durations of time beyond the recommended 8-hour shifts daily (Ali et al., 2021).

    Evidence-based Support

    The underlining mental health impact significantly affects their mental health capacity, and extending research into this area, as proposed in the bill, helps the healthcare sector, in general, to be better prepared to minimize such negative impacts in the future. For example, understanding how working under the constraining challenges of a pandemic affects frontline nurses’ mental and psychological well-being could help to devise strategies for providing mental health counseling services designed to improve the nurse’s mental health capacity and well-being as well as recovery from the traumatic experiences involved in frontline working during a pandemic. The proposed bill of extending research in this area is thus evidence-based, and the outcomes of such an extended and expedited research should help the healthcare sector to be responsive and alert during pandemics while also minimizing the underlining mental health impacts on nurses (van der Goot et al., 2021).

    References

    Ali, S. K., Shah, J., & Talib, Z. (2021). COVID-19 and mental well-being of nurses in a tertiary facility in Kenya. 
    Plos One
    , 
    16
    (7), e0254074. 
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254074
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Cheng, J., Zhu, L., Zuo, Q., Weixue, P., & Jiang, X. (2022). The changes in the nursing practice environment brought by COVID-19 and improvement recommendations from the nurses’ perspective: A cross-sectional study. 
    BMC Health Services Research
    , 
    22
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08135-7
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Congress.gov. (2021, March 9). 
    S.631 – 117th Congress (2021-2022): COVID–19 mental health research act
    . 
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/631/text?r=9&s=7
    Links to an external site.

    De Kock, J. H., Latham, H. A., Leslie, S. J., Grindle, M., Munoz, S. A., Ellis, L., … & O’Malley, C. M. (2021). A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: Implications for supporting psychological well-being. 
    BMC Public Health
    , 
    21
    (1), 1-18. 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10070-3
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Deng, D., & Naslund, J. A. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on frontline health workers in low- and middle-income countries. 
    Harvard public health review (Cambridge, Mass.)
    , 
    28
    , 
    http://harvardpublichealthreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Deng-and-Naslund-2020-28.pdf
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Jeanie Sauerland, M. A. (2021). The social determinants of health, COVID-19, and structural competence. 
    Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
    , 
    26
    (2), 1-13. 
    https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol26No02PPT67
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Khanal, P., Devkota, N., Dahal, M., Paudel, K., & Joshi, D. (2020). Mental health impacts among health workers during COVID-19 in a low resource setting: A cross-sectional survey from Nepal. 
    Globalization and Health
    , 
    16
    (1), 1-12. 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00621-z
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Soubra, K., Tamworth, C., Kamal, Z., Brook, C., Langdon, D., & Billings, J. (2023). Health and social care workers experiences of coping while working in the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic: One year on. 
    PLOS ONE
    , 
    18
    (4), e0284306. 
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284306
    Links to an external site.
    .

    van der Goot, W. E., Duvivier, R. J., Van Yperen, N. W., de Carvalho-Filho, M. A., Noot, K. E., Ikink, R., … & Bierman, W. F. (2021). Psychological distress among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study. 
    PloS One
    , 
    16
    (8), e0255510. 
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255510
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    RS

    Romel Suason

    Oct 9, 2024 11:34am

    Reply from Romel Suason

    Evidence Base in Design

    A description of the health policy

    H.R. 6205 –Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act was introduced to the House of Representatives on November 11, 2023. The bill intends to enhance the country’s physician and nurse workforce by recapturing unutilized green cards/ immigrant visas. The bill proposes awarding 25,000 and 15,000 green cards/ unused immigrant visas from previous years to immigrant nurses and physicians, respectively, regardless of nationality (Congress.gov, n.d.). The bill is intended to reinforce the healthcare workforce and improve Americans’ access to healthcare.

    Background of the issue being addressed

    The bill seeks to resolve visa restrictions faced by migrant nurses and physicians in the United States.  Currently, thousands of nurses are held up abroad due to green card backlogs, and thousands of physicians working in the United States on temporary visas and are caught up in the green card backlog.   According to Tiwari et al. (2020), most migrant doctors get admission to the country for residency training on a J -1 exchange visitor or H-1 B temporary employment visa. Holders of J-1 visas are mandated to go back to their country of origin for two years after they finish their residency or are required to complete a three-year waiver petition in a designated underserved region before filing for a green card or legal permanent status. Holders of H- B1 visas can apply for a green card when they finish their residency.  The bill will increase the number of green cards for nurses and physicians and help the country fight the continuing shortage of nurses and physicians.

    Social determinants that most affect the policy

    Geographical location and socio-economic status are social determinants of health impacting the Health Care Workforce Resilience Act.  Americans residing in poor and rural regions often have a shortage of nurses and physicians. As Braga et al. (2024) indicate, it is difficult for poor and rural regions to attract and retain primary care doctors. Although around 20 percent of people in the United States are rural residents, these locations have only 11 percent of practicing physicians.  The geographic inequality in patients’ access to doctor services causes significant inequalities the health of rural populations.

    Evidence base to support the policy

    There is evidence base to support the policy. Over the years, immigrant doctors and nurses have played a crucial role in the United States health care system. As indicated by Braga et al. (2024), it is projected that the United States will have a shortage of around 24,000 doctors by 2034. Thus, immigrant doctors is likely to increase Americans’ access to quality care. Shaffer et al. (2021) emphasize that the employment of foreign nurses varies by state. For example, as the two states most affected by the pandemic, California and New York reported their more than 25 percent of their nurses were immigrants. Foreign-trained are a vital part of the American health system, and hospitals rely on the skills brought and care provided by immigrant nurses.  For example, in 2018, the United States health workforce comprised more than 14 million staff, with 18 percent immigrants.  In 2018, numerous states, including Florida, New Jersey, California, and New York, had at least 30 percent immigrant healthcare workers.

    A 2021 survey by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools of 1356 nurses demonstrated that 94 percent of these immigrants are registered nurses, and more than half reported having over 11 years of nursing experience. Apart from immigrant nurses providing health care services in the United States health system, their cultural knowledge and language abilities expand care access and can raise patients’ confidence levels and their understanding. Since there have been calls for domestic nursing students to be provided bilingual education and the need for the nursing workforce to have a broader language skillset, this highlights the vital role foreign-educated nurses play in the United States health system.  The Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act has the ability to assist hospitals experiencing nursing shortages (Shaffer et al., 2021). NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

     

     

    References

    Braga, B., Khanna, G., & Turner, S. (2024). Migration policy and the supply of foreign physicians: Evidence from the Conrad 30 waiver program. 
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 226,
     106682. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106682
    Links to an external site.

    Congress.gov. (n. d.). H.R. 6205 – Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act. 
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6205/text
    Links to an external site.

    Shaffer, F. A., Bakhshi, M. A., Cook, K. N., & Alvarez, T. D. (2021). The Contributions of Immigrant Nurses in the U.S. During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A CGFNS International Study. 
    Nurse Leader, 19
    (2), 198-203. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2020.11.007
    Links to an external site.

    Tiwari, V., Bhardwaj, A., Sonani, B., & Mehta, A. (2020). Urgent Issues Facing Immigrant Physicians in the United States in the COVID-19 Era. 
    Annals of Internal Medicine, 173
    (10), 838-839. doi: 10.7326/M20-4103.

     

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    KW

    Kailey Wooton

    Oct 9, 2024 11:24am
    | Last reply Oct 12, 2024 12:20pm

    Reply from Kailey Wooton

    H.R 6038- PROTECT Act

    The “PROTECT Act” is the Preventing Opportunities for Teen E-Cigarette and Tobacco Addiction Act. “This bill requires the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to develop a strategy and carry out a specific initiative to prevent and reduce the use of electronic cigarettes and emerging tobacco products among youth and young adults (
    Congress.gov
    Links to an external site.
    , n.d)”

    Social determinants affected

    Wang & Wu (2020) conducted a study to determine social determinants of cigarette/e-cigarette smoking among young adults 18 to 25 years old. It was concluded that younger people with lower educational attainment, living below the poverty line, and having poor physical health had a higher smoking prevalence. Younger people who smoked e-cigarettes were also likely to become current everyday smokers. Interventions, such as early education, must be made with teens since they are still in a distinct developmental period. Moreover, public health policies, such as H.R 6038, must regulate prevention programs and prioritize strategies that address e-cigarette use in teens (Wang & Wu, 2020).

    Liu et. al, 2022 conducted a study regarding early education to prevent tobacco use among teens. “The core constructs of Social Cognitive Theory explain how individuals learn from modeled behaviors and support how educating adolescents about social norms can help build refusal skills to resist peer pressure and influence behavior change (Liu et. al, 2022). Prevention programs must be made available to teens at no cost. These programs need to contain an updated curriculum for e-cigarettes. The study also looked into suspension for these behaviors in teens. Suspension programs have been inversely associated with achievement and positively associated with dropout and can widen racial disparities within schools. Liu et. al, 2022 states, “This evidence points towards moving away from these suspension-based approaches and instead to Alternative-to-Suspension programs to help address adolescent e-cigarette use in schools. Alternative-to-Suspension programs include a combination of educational content, goal setting, and access to resources to help students quit using e-cigarettes.” I think these are things that must be looked into when proposing and passing policies like H.R 6038.

    References:

    Liu, J., Gaiha, S. M., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2022). School-based programs to prevent adolescent e-cigarette use: A report card. 
    Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care
    , 
    52
    (6), 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2022.101204

    Wang, G., & Wu, L. (2020). Healthy people 2020: Social Determinants of cigarette smoking and electronic cigarette smoking among youth in the United States 2010–2018. 
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    , 
    17
    (20), 7503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207503

    Wasserman, D. (2023, October 24). 
    Legislative search results | congress.gov | library of Congress. 
     
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6038?s=1&r=5
    Links to an external site. 
     NURS-6050 Week 7: Discussion Evidence Base in Design

  • Rising Healthcare Costs and Financial Barriers to Access National Healthcare Issue/ stressor essay

    Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Rising Healthcare Costs and Financial Barriers to Access National Healthcare Issue/ stressor essay

     Rising Healthcare Costs

    Rising healthcare costs in the United States represent a significant national issue, impacting healthcare delivery, access, and financial sustainability. In 2023, national health expenditures reached $4.9 trillion, reflecting a 7.5% increase from the previous year and accounting for 17.6% of the U.S. gross domestic product (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS], 2023). Several factors contribute to this escalation, including increased utilization of medical services, higher prescription drug prices, advanced medical technologies, and administrative costs. These rising expenses place financial strain on healthcare systems, patients, and providers, leading to disparities in access and quality of care (Martin et al., 2025). Healthcare organizations face growing pressure to balance cost containment with the delivery of high-quality, patient-centered services.

                                                                                        How It May Impact My Workplace Setting

    Rising healthcare costs directly affect my workplace setting by increasing operational expenses, creating resource limitations, and intensifying staff workload. According to Kiss et al. (2023), budget constraints can lead to staff reductions, limited access to advanced medical technologies, and the postponement of non-urgent services. I have observed increased patient-to-nurse ratios, which compromise the quality of care and elevate the risk of errors. For example, nurses in my unit are often assigned more patients than the recommended ratio, reducing the time available for individualized care. Additionally, financial pressures have resulted in the postponement of equipment upgrades, forcing staff to rely on outdated technology that may hinder efficiency. Rising costs also impact patient access, as many individuals delay care due to high out-of-pocket expenses, leading to worsened health outcomes and increased reliance on emergency services.

    GET A HUMAN-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

                                                                                  Social Determinant Most Affecting Healthcare Costs

    Income and socioeconomic status are the social determinants most significantly affecting the impact of rising healthcare costs. Individuals with lower incomes often struggle to afford healthcare services, medications, and insurance premiums, leading to delayed or foregone care. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation (2023), nearly one in four adults in the U.S. reported skipping or delaying medical care in the past year due to cost concerns. This financial barrier disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, exacerbating health disparities and increasing the demand for safety-net services. Geographic location also influences healthcare access, particularly in rural areas where medical facilities may be scarce, and travel expenses further complicate access to care. These social determinants contribute to a cycle of poor health outcomes and increased healthcare utilization, placing additional strain on the healthcare system.

                                                                  How My Healthcare System Has Responded to the Healthcare Issue and Changes

    My healthcare system has implemented several strategies to address rising healthcare costs while maintaining quality care. One significant initiative includes the adoption of value-based care models, which focus on improving patient outcomes while controlling costs (Leao et al., 2023). This approach incentivizes providers to deliver evidence-based, efficient care, reducing unnecessary procedures and hospital readmissions. In my workplace, multidisciplinary care teams have been established to coordinate treatment plans, improving communication and reducing duplication of services. Telehealth services have also been expanded, allowing patients to access care remotely, which reduces operational costs and improves patient convenience. For instance, the implementation of virtual follow-up appointments for chronic disease management has decreased hospital readmissions by 15% over the past year.

    Additionally, my healthcare system has prioritized staff training on cost-effective care delivery, emphasizing evidence-based practices and resource optimization. Cost-saving measures, such as bulk purchasing of medical supplies and streamlining administrative processes, have been implemented to reduce overhead expenses (Hinrichs-Krapels et al., 2022). Despite these efforts, the facility still faces challenges in balancing cost containment with staff satisfaction and patient-centered care. Continued investment in technology, staff support, and community outreach programs are essential to address the long-term impact of rising healthcare costs on both patients and healthcare providers.

     

                                                                                                                             
    References

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). 
    National Health Expenditures 2023 Highlights.
     Health Affairs. 
    https://www.cms.gov/files/document/highlights.pdf
    Links to an external site.

    Hinrichs-Krapels, S., Ditewig, B., Boulding, H., Chalkidou, A., Erskine, J., & Shokraneh, F. (2022). Purchasing high-cost medical devices and equipment in hospitals: a systematic review. 
    BMJ open
    , 
    12
    (9), e057516. 
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057516
    Links to an external site.

    Kaiser Family Foundation. (2024, May 28). 
    Health care affordability: Key facts.
     
    https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/health-care-affordability-key-facts/
    Links to an external site.

    Kiss, A., Kiss, N., & Váradi, B. (2023). Do budget constraints limit access to health care? Evidence from PCI treatments in Hungary. 
    International Journal of Health Economics and Management
    , 
    23
    (2), 281-302.  
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-023-09349-w
    Links to an external site.

    Leao, D. L., Cremers, H. P., van Veghel, D., Pavlova, M., & Groot, W. (2023). The impact of value-based payment models for networks of care and transmural care: a systematic literature review. 
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
    , 
    21
    (3), 441-466. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-023-00790-z
    Links to an external site.

    Martin, A. B., Hartman, M., Washington, B., Catlin, A., & National Health Expenditure Accounts Team. (2025). National Health Expenditures In 2023: Faster Growth As Insurance Coverage And Utilization Increased: Article examines National Health Expenditures in

     

    Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Rising Healthcare Costs and Financial Barriers to Access National Healthcare Issue/ stressor essay

    National Healthcare Issue: Rising Healthcare Costs and Financial Barriers to Access

    One of the most pressing national healthcare issues today is the rising cost of healthcare and the financial barriers that prevent patients from accessing necessary medical services. Healthcare costs continue to increase due to factors such as expensive medical technologies, administrative inefficiencies, and the high prices of prescription drugs (Slonim, 2023). These financial burdens disproportionately affect low-income individuals, leading to disparities in health outcomes.

    Impact on Work Setting

    In my healthcare setting, rising costs have led to increased financial strain on patients, resulting in delayed care, medication non-adherence, and higher rates of preventable hospitalizations. Many patients struggle with out-of-pocket expenses, making it difficult to follow through with recommended treatments. Additionally, healthcare providers face administrative challenges related to insurance processing and billing, further complicating patient access to timely care (Carter & Busby, 2023).

    Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Affecting Healthcare Costs

    Economic stability, insurance coverage, and education play significant roles in patients’ ability to afford healthcare. Uninsured and underinsured individuals are more likely to forego necessary medical care, worsening health conditions over time. Additionally, individuals with lower health literacy may not fully understand their healthcare options or how to navigate insurance systems effectively (Amalberti et al., 2019).

    Health System Response and Implemented Changes

    My healthcare institution has implemented several strategies to address financial barriers to care. One initiative includes expanding financial assistance programs and offering sliding-scale payment options for low-income patients. Additionally, efforts have been made to improve price transparency, ensuring that patients understand the costs associated with their treatments before receiving care.

    Another key initiative has been the integration of value-based care models, which focus on improving patient outcomes while reducing unnecessary healthcare expenditures. By emphasizing preventive care and chronic disease management, the healthcare system aims to lower overall costs and minimize the need for expensive emergency interventions (Slonim, 2023). Furthermore, legislative efforts such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have played a critical role in increasing insurance coverage and reducing the number of uninsured individuals (Kominski, Nonzee, & Sorensen, 2017).

    Conclusion

    Rising healthcare costs present a significant challenge to patient access and overall public health. While my healthcare setting has taken steps to mitigate financial barriers, continued policy reforms, investment in preventive care, and efforts to control prescription drug pricing are essential for long-term improvement. Addressing these financial challenges is crucial to ensuring equitable healthcare access for all individuals.

     

    References

    Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Nicklin, W., & Braithwaite, J. (2019). Coping with more people with more illness Part 1: The nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality. 
    International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31
    (2), 154–158.

    Carter, M. W., & Busby, C. R. (2023). How can operational research make a real difference in healthcare? Challenges of implementation. 
    European Journal of Operational Research, 306
    (3), 1059–1068.

    Kominski, G. F., Nonzee, N. J., & Sorensen, A. (2017). The Affordable Care Act’s impacts on access to insurance and health care for low-income populations. 
    Annual Review of Public Health, 38
    , 489-505.

    Slonim, A. (2023). Top challenges facing healthcare: Back to basics. 
    Physician Leadership Journal, 10
    (2), 12–14. 
    https://doi.org/10.55834/plj.2064149664
    .

    Xu, T., & Wickizer, T. (2020). The impact of Medicaid expansion on healthcare access, affordability, and financial security for low-income families. 
    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45
    (1), 5-27.

     

     

    Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Rising Healthcare Costs and Financial Barriers to Access National Healthcare Issue/ stressor essay

    Healthcare issue: The High Cost of Healthcare
     

    For many decades, one of the greatest obstacles facing the US healthcare system has been the exorbitant expense of medical care. It is a major national problem that impacts the economy, families, and individuals (Steinreich, 2022).

    Social determinants of health
     

    The high cost of healthcare has led to significant problems in terms of socioeconomic determinants. Social variables like socioeconomic level, education, insurance coverage, cultural views, and accessibility to medical services are contributing factors to the rising expense of healthcare (KFF, 2025). People in rural areas with little to no access to healthcare facilities, as well as individuals from lower-income families, frequently struggle to get the healthcare they need, which causes delays in treatment and, eventually, higher expenses. The high costs and high percentage of underinsured or uninsured individuals put many people at risk of becoming bankrupt in the event of a catastrophic illness, according to Harvard professor Dr. Shmerling, MD. He also emphasized that the United States does poorly on several key health measures, including life expectancy, preventable hospital admissions, suicide, and maternal mortality, while spending significantly more on healthcare than other high-income nations. In other words, the US healthcare system is not the greatest, despite its high cost. In addition, Americans are dissatisfied with the current state of the healthcare system despite all that investment (Shmerling, 2021).

    How your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue
     

    The Division of Public Health in Delaware offers services to uninsured adults and children, as well as those on Medicaid, at minimal or no cost, contingent upon income. We offer cost-effective immunizations for children and treatments for infectious disease control, including tuberculosis for immigrants or anyone at risk of exposure, as well as sexual and reproductive health services. For individuals who lack access to healthcare due to prohibitive costs and limited availability of healthcare facilities, we offer a community mobile unit that operates from Monday to Saturday, providing services such as blood pressure and cholesterol monitoring, HIV and other sexually transmitted disease testing, lead screening, and immunizations.

     
    Conclusion,
     

    Debates on how to address the high cost of
    healthcare issues
    such as insurance reform, government-provided health coverage, drug price regulation, and the sustainability of the healthcare system have been ongoing for decades. Although the Affordable Care Act was introduced, it has had little to no effect on these issues. To guarantee that everyone has access to competent and reasonably priced healthcare without experiencing financial hardship, these issues necessitate comprehensive policy adjustments.

    Telesford, I.
     
    Links to an external site.
    Winger
    Links to an external site.
    , A. & Rae, M. (2024). Beyond cost, what barriers do health care consumers 
     

    face? (Peterson-KFF)
     
    https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/beyond-cost-what-barriers-to
    Links to an external site.
    . (February 24, 2025).
     

     

    Steinreich, D. (2022). Big Med: Megaproviders and the High Cost of Health Care in
     

    America. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 25(2), 501–528.
     

    https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010135
     

     

    Shmerling, R. (2021). Is our healthcare system broken? Harvard Health publishing 
     

    https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/is-our-healthcare-system-broken-202107132542
    Links to an external site.
     
     (February 24, 2025).
    Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Rising Healthcare Costs and Financial Barriers to Access National Healthcare Issue/ stressor essay

  • Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations

    Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations

    Boards of Nursing (BONs) exist in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. Similar entities may also exist for different regions. The mission of BONs is the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice. BONs put into practice state/region regulations for nurses that, among other things, lay out the requirements for licensure and define the scope of nursing practice in that state/region.

    It can be a valuable exercise to compare regulations among various state/regional boards of nursing. Doing so can help share insights that could be useful should there be future changes in a state/region. In addition, nurses may find the need to be licensed in multiple states or regions.

    Resources

     

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    To Prepare:

    Review the Resources and reflect on the mission of state/regional boards of nursing as the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice.

    Consider how key regulations may impact nursing practice.

    Review key regulations for nursing practice of your state’s/region’s board of nursing and those of at least one other state/region and select at least two APRN regulations to focus on for this Discussion.

    By Day 3 of Week 5

    Post
     a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.

    By Day 6 of Week 5

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of your colleagues
    * on two different days
     and explain how the regulatory environment and the regulations selected by your colleague differ from your state/region. Be specific and provide examples.

     

    Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations

    Main Post

    State and regional boards of nursing (BON) focus on public protection by regulating nursing practice and setting licensing, education, and disciplinary standards. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), who are pivotal in addressing healthcare shortages, face a variety of regulatory environments across states. Due to vested interests and ongoing career involvement in the following three states, this essay compares APRN regulations in California, Oregon, and New York, evaluating differences in their scope of practice. This analysis also examines how these regulations impact APRNs’ ability to practice within their full scope of education and experience.

    Comparison of California and Oregon APRN Regulations

    In California, APRNs operate under restricted practice authority, requiring them to collaborate with physicians for certain tasks, such as prescribing medications. The California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) mandates that nurse practitioners (NPs) follow standardized procedures under physician oversight when making medical decisions and prescribing controlled substances (California Board of Registered

    Nursing, 2023). For example, NPs in California must have a collaborative agreement with a physician to prescribe medication, which limits their autonomy in clinical decision-making.

    In contrast, Oregon is among the states that grant full practice authority to APRNs. This means APRNs in Oregon can practice independently without needing physician supervision. The Oregon State Board of Nursing (OSBN) allows APRNs to diagnose, treat, and prescribe medications, including controlled substances, without physician oversight, provided they meet licensure requirements (Oregon State Board of Nursing, 2023). The full practice authority enables APRNs to fully use their skills and education, making them more effective in addressing primary care needs, especially in rural areas where physician availability is limited.

    The difference between the two states lies in the extent of APRN autonomy. While California’s regulations are restrictive, requiring physician involvement in key clinical decisions, Oregon’s regulations empower APRNs to provide comprehensive care independently. According to Neff et al. (2018), such regulatory variations have significant implications for patient access to care, particularly in underserved regions. In states like Oregon, with full practice authority, APRNs can fill critical gaps in primary care, while in restrictive states like California, access may be limited by the availability of collaborating physicians.

    Comparison of California and New York APRN Regulations

    New York’s regulations for APRNs are similar to those in California but with some distinctions. In New York, APRNs must collaborate with

    physicians to practice and prescribe medications. However, after completing 3,600 hours of clinical practice, APRNs may apply for a collaborative practice exemption, which allows them to practice more independently but still requires some limitations on prescribing controlled substances (New York State Education Department, 2023). This step towards autonomy significantly differs from California’s more consistently restrictive approach.

    Like California, New York’s semi-restrictive environment challenges APRNs who aim to use their education and training fully. However, the collaborative practice exemption offers more flexibility for experienced APRNs compared to California, where physician oversight is required throughout the APRN’s career. Bosse et al. (2017) argue that full practice authority for APRNs is essential for transforming primary care, as it allows APRNs to practice at the top of their license and meet the growing demand for healthcare services. The semi-restricted environment in New York reflects a step towards this goal, but it still falls short of full practice authority.

    Application of Regulations to Full Scope Practice

    APRNs in states with full practice authority, such as Oregon, can fully utilize their education and training to provide direct patient care. For example, an APRN in Oregon may run an independent primary care practice, diagnosing and managing conditions without needing physician approval. This ability to provide autonomous care is crucial in rural areas where healthcare providers are scarce (Bosse et al., 2017).

    In contrast, APRNs in California must adhere to physician oversight for tasks such as prescribing controlled substances. For example, an APRN in California working in a family practice setting must consult a physician for approval before prescribing certain medications. This supervisory requirement can delay care and limit the APRN’s ability to provide timely treatment (California Board of Registered Nursing, 2023). According to Neff et al. (2018), such restrictions can reduce APRN effectiveness in meeting the population’s healthcare needs, particularly in underserved communities.

    Similarly, APRNs in New York must collaborate with physicians during the initial years of practice. An example would be an NP in New York who, after completing the required 3,600 hours, applies for the collaborative practice exemption, gaining more independence but still facing limitations in prescribing controlled substances (New York State Education Department, 2023). While this provides more autonomy than California’s model, it still restricts the full utilization of APRNs’ education and training.

    Conclusion

    APRNs’ ability to practice within the full scope of their education and training depends heavily on state regulations. While Oregon offers full practice authority, allowing APRNs to practice independently, California and New York impose restrictive and semi-restrictive environments, respectively. These regulations significantly affect patient care and access, particularly in underserved areas. As seen in Oregon, full practice authority enables APRNs to maximize their role in primary care, a model that California and New York may benefit from considering as they evaluate their regulatory frameworks. With autonomy and the maximization of services being the goal, it is in my best interest as a clinician to leave California and practice as an APRN in Oregon after completing the advanced degree program.

    References

    Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.

    California Board of Registered Nursing. (2023). Advanced practice registered nurse: Nurse practitioner practice. https://www.rn.ca.gov/

    Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018). The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to care. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 379–385.

    New York State Education Department. (2023). Nurse practitioner. https://www.op.nysed.gov/registered-professional-nursing

    Oregon State Board of Nursing. (2023). Advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) licensure. https://www.oregon.gov/osbn/pages/index.aspx

    Short, N. M. (2022). Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Expand discussion thread from Brandon Grundy

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    SS

    Stephania A Senter

    Sep 24, 2024 8:52pm
    | Last reply Sep 29, 2024 2:43am

    Reply from Stephania A Senter

     APRN Board of Nursing Regulations: Ohio vs. Alabama

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) play a pivotal role in healthcare, providing advanced-level care. The regulations governing their practice vary significantly from state to state, particularly in terms of practice authority, prescriptive rights, and supervision requirements. I will focus on comparing the APRN regulations in Ohio and Alabama, outlining key differences and discussing their implications for APRNs practicing within the full scope of their education and experience.

    Comparison of APRN Regulations in Ohio and Alabama

    Practice Authority

    Ohio requires APRNs to have a Standard Care Arrangement (SCA) with a collaborating physician to diagnose, treat, and prescribe. The SCA must outline the scope of the APRN’s practice, including prescriptive authority, and the physician must review patient records at regular intervals. An example includes, An APRN working in primary care in Ohio must have a formal agreement with a physician, which limits their autonomy and mandates regular consultations for certain care decisions.

    Alabama has one of the most restrictive environments for APRNs. APRNs in Alabama are required to have a supervisory agreement with a physician. They cannot practice independently, and all prescribing and patient management decisions must be reviewed by the supervising physician. There are also limitations on how many APRNs one physician can supervise. An example includes, an APRN in Alabama working in a rural area still requires direct oversight from a physician to manage patient care, which can be challenging when physicians are scarce.

    Prescriptive Authority

    In Ohio, APRNs can prescribe medications, including controlled substances, but only under a Standard Care Arrangement. They may prescribe Schedule II controlled substances under specific conditions, such as within the first 72 hours of care in a hospital or similar setting, or after consultation with the collaborating physician. An example includes, an Ohio APRN working in a hospital can prescribe a Schedule II opioid for a patient post-surgery, but only after following strict guidelines or consulting with their collaborating physician.

    In Alabama, APRNs face tighter restrictions on prescriptive authority. They can prescribe non-controlled substances, but to prescribe controlled substances, they must have a Qualified Alabama Controlled Substances Certificate (QACSC). Even with this certification, there are limits on the type and quantity of controlled substances that can be prescribed.  Prescribing Schedule II controlled substances requires additional supervision and certification. An APRN in Alabama who wants to prescribe a Schedule II narcotic for chronic pain management must go through an additional certification process and is still subject to the oversight of a supervising physician.

     

    Differences in APRN Regulations and Impact on Practice

    The primary difference between Ohio and Alabama lies in the level of autonomy granted to APRNs. In Ohio, while APRNs are required to collaborate with a physician, they still have some degree of autonomy in managing patient care and prescribing medications. The Standard Care Arrangement allows for some flexibility in care delivery. Alabama imposes a more restrictive oversight, limiting the ability of APRNs to practice independently or to manage patient care without direct supervision.

    Ohio allows APRNs to prescribe a broader range of medications with a collaborating physician’s approval, Alabama has more stringent controls, particularly on prescribing controlled substances. This can significantly limit an APRN’s ability to treat patients in Alabama, especially in rural areas where physicians may not be as accessible.

    Application of Regulations for APRNs Practicing Within Their Full Scope

    APRNs who are trained to provide comprehensive care, including diagnosis, treatment, and prescription of medications, may face barriers in fully utilizing their skills due to state regulations.

    Ohio APRNs are restricted by the Standard Care Arrangement, but they can practice within their full scope if the collaboration with a physician is well-structured. For instance, an APRN in a hospital or primary care setting can provide patient care with some independence, though regular physician collaboration is required for certain decisions like prescribing Schedule II medications.

    Alabama APRNs, on the other hand, have a more limited scope. They are required to work under a physician’s direct supervision and cannot make autonomous decisions regarding controlled substances, which may hinder their ability to provide comprehensive care, particularly in underserved areas.

    Conclusion

    The regulatory environments in Ohio and Alabama present distinct challenges and opportunities for APRNs. While Ohio’s regulations allow for some degree of autonomy through collaboration agreements, Alabama’s restrictive practices severely limit APRN independence, particularly in prescribing controlled substances. These differences in regulations highlight the ongoing need for states to review APRN practice authority and adopt regulations that empower APRNs to practice to the full extent of their education and experience. As healthcare systems evolve, enabling APRNs to provide more autonomous care could be a crucial step in addressing healthcare provider shortages, especially in rural and underserved communities.

     

    References

    Alabama Board of Nursing. (2023). APRN scope of practice and prescriptive authority regulations. Retrieved from [Alabama Board of Nursing Website].

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). (2023). State practice environment for NPs. Retrieved from [AANP website].

    Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). 
    Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care.Links to an external site
    Links to an external site.
    . 
    Nursing Outlook, 65
    (6), 761–765.

    Ohio Board of Nursing. (2023). APRN practice and prescriptive authority guidelines. Retrieved from [Ohio Board of Nursing Website].

    Expand discussion thread from Stephania A Senter

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    3 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Ukamaka Okpalanwobi

    Sep 24, 2024 8:26pm
    | Last reply Sep 27, 2024 8:55pm

    Reply from Ukamaka Okpalanwobi

    Initial Post

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) are highly trained nurses with advanced degrees (Master’s or Doctorate) who can diagnose and treat illnesses, prescribe medications, and manage patient care across specialties like primary care, mental health, and anesthesia. They include 
    Nurse Practitioners (NPs)
    , 
    Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs)
    , 
    Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs)
    , and 
    Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs)
    . The scope of practice for APRNs varies by state, particularly when it comes to how much autonomy they have.

     California Regulations, 
    In 
    California
    , APRNs initially need to practice under physician supervision, but thanks to 
    AB 890
    , they can transition to 
    full practice authority
     after completing 
    4,600 hours
     or 
    3 years
     of supervised practice. Full practice authority means they can independently diagnose, treat, and prescribe without needing a physician. This has significantly improved healthcare access, especially in rural and underserved communities. For instance, a 
    PMHNP
     in California, after meeting the supervised practice requirement, can independently manage mental health patients, including prescribing medications, without physician oversight.

     Texas Regulations
    , In 
    Texas
    , APRNs are required to maintain a 
    collaborative practice agreement
     with a physician throughout their career. There is no pathway to full practice authority, meaning APRNs in Texas cannot practice independently. They need physician oversight for diagnosing, treating, and especially prescribing controlled substances. This collaboration requirement can cause delays in care, especially in rural settings where finding a physician to collaborate with is challenging. For example, in Texas, a 
    Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP)
     must get physician approval to prescribe certain medications, which can slow down care for patients with chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension.

     Differences and Impact on APRNs

    I’ve also noticed that interdisciplinary collaboration is more prominent in California. APRNs often work with pharmacists, social workers, and mental health professionals in comprehensive care teams. This integrated model, while less common in Texas, could be hugely beneficial for mental health care and other specialized areas (AACN, 2023). During the COVID-19 pandemic, both states issued waivers to grant APRNs more autonomy. California made some of these temporary changes permanent through 
    AB 890
    , but Texas has largely reverted to its pre-pandemic rules. This demonstrates how emergencies can lead to long-term improvements in some places but not others (AANP, 2023; NCSBN, 2023).

    Cultural and socioeconomic factors also play a role. California’s APRNs are often more involved in providing 
    culturally competent care
     for diverse populations like immigrants and Native Americans. In Texas, the medical landscape tends to reflect more conservative practices, with physician-led care models limiting the flexibility APRNs must meet the needs of diverse groups (California BRN, 2023The most significant difference is that California offers APRNs a path to 
    full practice authority
    , allowing them to work autonomously without physician oversight after meeting the requirements. In 
    Texas
    , APRNs are always dependent on a physician for certain aspects of their care, which limits their autonomy and can delay patient care in regions where physician access is limited.

    An example of how this plays out is that in 
    California
    , an APRN working in primary care can independently manage a patient’s chronic illness, adjust medications, and provide follow-up care without needing physician collaboration. In 
    Texas
    , that same APRN consults a physician, which could slow treatment and reduce efficiency, especially in remote areas. 
    Impact on Practice
     in 
    California
    , APRNs with full practice authority can offer faster, more comprehensive care, especially in underserved areas, by leveraging their full training and expertise. In 
    Texas
    , APRNs are more restricted by collaborative agreements, which may delay patient care and limit their ability to practice independently, particularly in rural settings where physicians are scarce.

                                                                 References

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). (2023). 
    State Practice Environment
    . Retrieved from 
    https://www.aanp.org
    Links to an external site.

    California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN). (2023). 
    AB 890 Implementation and Full Practice Authority
    . Retrieved from                          
    https://www.rn.ca.gov
    Links to an external site.

    National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (2023). 
    Nurse Licensure Compact and APRN Practice Regulations
    . Retrieved from                
    https://www.ncsbn.org
    Links to an external site.

    Texas Board of Nursing (BON). (2023). 
    APRN Practice and Collaborative Agreements
    . Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov

     

    Comparing APRN Board of Nursing Regulations

    Scope of Practice

    Every nursing regulatory body has specific instructions as to the scope of practice of the nurses based on education, experience, and the state. In Florida, APRNs normally have a supervisory agreement with a physician as they practice. They are not allowed to practice autonomously. The need for a physician to supervise has however been removed when APRNs meet certain criteria such as completing 3000 physician-supervised clinical hours in five years, and not having been in any disciplinary action in five years, among others. This shows that Florida still limits how APRNs practice and certain areas of their scope are limited to working under a physician (Brooks, 2024).

    In New York, APRNs can practice to the full extent of their scope. They are only required to complete the 3600 physician-supervised hours of practice after which they are free to practice independently. New York has allowed APRNs full autonomy meaning they can be more independent and resourceful, especially in underserved  (Poghosyan, 2021).

    Authority to Prescribe

    In Florida, APRNs are allowed to prescribe certain medications. The authority to prescribe controlled substances is based on certain criteria. The major criteria is that the APRN must be a Master’s or Doctoral degree graduate in a specialized nursing area and trained in specialized skills. Also, for certain schedule II drugs, APRNs can only prescribe for up to 7 days unless the condition demands prolonged use. This shows that there are limits to prescribing medication in Florida, especially in controlled substances to prevent abuse and misuse (Brooks, 2024).

    In New York, APRNs can prescribe all drugs including controlled substances with fewer regulations. This is because in New York APRNs must register with the New York State Prescription Monitoring Program and the Drug Enforcement Administration. This is to monitor and control the prescription of regulated drugs to prevent misuse. This autonomy allows them to fully practice total patient care without authority challenges limiting their scope (Poghosyan et al., 2021) Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations.

    Differences Between the two States

    As noted above, Florida is still restricting the autonomy of APRNs while New York has honored it. Nurses in Florida must practice under physician supervision for at least five years and fulfill other criteria for autonomy, while those in New York can fully practice autonomously after fulfilling the hours requirement (Phillips, 2021). In Florida, there are strict regulations for prescribing while in New York, the regulations are quite friendly. Also, in Florida APRNs do not register with any other body to regulate prescription while in New York, they register with the DEA and prescription monitoring program for prescription registration (Phillips, 2021).

    Examples

    A nurse working in a rural area clinic in Florida can handle patients independently with a physician agreement and if the patient needs regulated medication, the APRN must consult with a physician for prescribing long-term use. On the other hand, a nurse working in similar conditions in New York can practice unsupervised and prescribe medication independently with regular check-ups with the prescription monitoring program for safety in controlled substances prescription.

    References

    Brooks, J. (2024). Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Autonomy in Florida: A Policy Analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Jacksonville University). https://search.proquest.com/openview/e4752108934cffe873c2bdfa1235072f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

    Phillips, S. J. (2021). 33rd annual APRN legislative update: unprecedented changes to APRN practice authority in unprecedented times. The Nurse Practitioner, 46(1), 27-55. https://journals.lww.com/tnpj/fulltext/2021/01000/33rd_Annual_APRN_Legislative_Update__Unprecedented.6.aspx

    Poghosyan, L., Ghaffari, A., Liu, J., Jin, H., & Martsolf, G. (2021). State policy change and organizational response: Expansion of nurse practitioner scope of practice regulations in New York State. Nursing Outlook, 69(1), 74-83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655420306217

    Expand discussion thread from Chhinderpal Kaur

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    NC

    Nicole Greco Carl

    Sep 24, 2024 6:22pm
    | Last reply Sep 26, 2024 9:22pm

    Reply from Nicole Greco Carl

    My state of California (CA) is a full practice state, meaning, “nurse practitioners can perform the full scope of practice without a supervising or collaborating physician. They can diagnose a patient, order tests, prescribe medication, and operate their own independent practices” (Feeney, 2024).

     

    This type of independence for Nurse practitioners (NPs) in California is fairly new, with Assembly Bill 890 (AB 890) only being passed last year on January 1, 2023 (Miec, 2023). So, as of last year, NPs have the option to apply to be a 104 NP, they can “work independently outside of a group setting, including owning their own practice, and practices without standardized procedures within the population focus of their National Certification” after working “in a group setting (a clinic, hospital, or medical group) with at least one physician for at least three years” (Miec, 2023).

     

    However, in a state like South Carolina (SC), for nurse practitioners, it is considered a restricted practice state, in this type of state, “nurse practitioners must work under the supervision of a physician for all of their scope of practice. While they may have extensive autonomy in some nurse practitioner functions, they are not acting as independent practitioners” (Feeney, 2024). This means at this time, NPs in the state of SC are unable to open their practice compared to ones in CA.

     

    In a state like CA many NPs I know are opening their own Med spas, in SC a NP can also do this but would need a medical doctor to oversee the practice. What NPs can still do in both these states is prescribe medications. In CA, “a registered nurse may dispense drugs or devices upon

    an order by a licensed physician and surgeon if the nurse is functioning within a licensed clinic” (State of California Director of consumer affairs, 2013). As well in SC, “administration of medications means the acts of preparing and giving drugs in accordance with the orders of a licensed, authorized nurse practitioner” (South Carolina code of laws unannotated, 2006).

     

     

    References

     

    Feeney, A. (2024, May 23). 
    Nurse practitioner practice authority: A state-by-state guide
    . NurseJournal.org. https://nursejournal.org/nurse-practitioner/np-practice-authority-by-state/

    Nurse practitioner expanded scope of practice in California
    . MIEC. (2023, February 16). https://www.miec.com/knowledge-library/nurse-practitioner-expanded-scope-of-practice-in-california/

    Nurse practitioners: Laws & regulations
    . State of California Director of Consumer Affairs. (2013, November 11). https://www.rn.ca.gov/pdfs/regulations/bp2834-r.pdf

    South Carolina Code of Laws Unannotated
    . Code of laws – title 40 – chapter 33 – nurses. (2006, September 30). https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t40c033.php

    Expand discussion thread from Nicole Greco Carl

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    4 Replies, 4 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    SV

    Selina Villanueva

    Sep 24, 2024 4:16pm

    Reply from Selina Villanueva

    Application to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
     

    Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) are subject to varying regulations across states, particularly concerning their scope of practice, prescriptive authority, and collaboration requirements. A comparison between two APRN boards of nursing regulations in California and Texas provides a fundamental point of analysis. The first regulation is on collaborative practice where NPs in California, are required to collaborate with a supervising physician. As part of this partnership, written protocols and standardized processes outlining the NP’s practice area, including their prescription authority, are collaboratively developed. Collaboration with a licensed physician is also a requirement in the state of Texas. APRNs must establish and maintain a formal agreement to practice and prescribe medications.

    Another significant APRN Board of Nursing regulation involves prescriptive authority. In California, unlike in most other states across the country, NPS have the prerogative of writing prescriptions and this is inclusive of the Controlled Substances, as soon as they meet the conditions laid down under the collaborative agreement. On the other hand, in Texas, where the NPs have gotten Full Practice status, they still need a supervisory agreement for prescribing controlled substances. This is a significant difference because it might limit the patient’s access to the drugs as he or she may not be able to consult the physician in charge every time he or she needs a drug. Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations This is especially so in the rural areas where the R.Ph. might be the only professional health facility available. For example, if a patient in Texas is required to have immediate access to pain management that involves a prescription of substances controlled under VITA, the NP may be confined to physician supervision. Nevertheless, the article by Bosse et al. (2017), “Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care,” strongly supports the case for full practice authority (FPA) for APRNs.

    In essence, APRNs need to have a collaborative partnership with a physician in order to work effectively. For the APRNS privileged to practice within the statutes of their education and experience, this regulation is both a strength and a weakness. Although the collaborative model provides APRNs with a support structure where they may turn to physicians for advice, this structure poses challenges to autonomous practice. This is because it may also delay care if an NP needs immediate prescribing authority to address a patient’s urgent needs, potentially impacting the overall quality of care. Prescriptive authority remains one of the APRN practice essentials that define the scope of their practice in terms of effective care delivery. Whereas, California’s independence framework for NP practice allows NPs to have more authority, limitations inherent in the Texas model hinder practice as it may lead to delayed treatments. “Allowing NPs full autonomy to practice may be a relatively simple policy mechanism for states to improve access to primary care” (Neff et al., 2018).

    APRNs in California or Texas might focus on improving their practical knowledge of the emerging trends in new treatment and continuing their education requirements. “In the fast-moving world of health care, it is vital that nurses are able to practice to the full extent of their education and abilities, in order to deliver the most efficient, quality care to patients” (American Nurses Association, n.d.)  By realizing these regulations, APRNs are well equipped to maneuver within their practice environments while observing the legalities in providing some of the best quality patient care.

     

     

    References

    American Nurses Association. (n.d.). 
    ANA enterprise
    Links to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    .

    Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary careLinks to an external site.. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.

    Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bejleri, I., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman, J. S. (2018). The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to care. 
    Nursing Outlook
    , 
    66
    (4), 379-385.

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DT

    Deco Tanjong

    Sep 24, 2024 12:09pm
    | Last reply Sep 25, 2024 10:57pm

    Reply from Deco Tanjong

          Advanced practiced registered nurse(APRN), or NP, means a Registered nurse who has completed an advanced formal graduate education program at the master’s level or Doctoral level acceptable to the board and who demonstrates advanced knowledge and skill in the assessment and management of physical and psychosocial health, illness status persons, families, and group. (Ohio Board of Nursing). Because the United States does not have a National APRN licensing board, states have different methods for evaluating credentials and qualifications.

    Differences between Ohio APRN and South Carolina APRN

    In terms of certification, Ohio APRNs must complete an application, pay fees, pass a criminal background check, and complete a master’s or Doctoral program in a nursing specialty, while in South Carolina, APRNs must have a doctorate, post-nursing master’s certificate or master’s degree in advanced Education in a specific area.

    In Ohio, APRNs must enter into collaborative agreements with physicians and other healthcare professionals for the duration of their careers. While in South Carolina, the APRN must practice in collaboration with the physician.

    For example, in the State of South Carolina, APRNs can only practice independently with direct collaboration with a physician(South Carolina Board of Nursing). However, in Ohio, APRNs can practice independently once a collaborative agreement is signed with a physician for the period of his or her career. (Ohio Board of Nursing).

    Reference:

    National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN)Links to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    . (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm

    APRN scope of practice
    . Ohio Board of nursing. (n.d.).

    APRN scope of practice
    . South Carolina board of nursing. (n.d.).

    Expand discussion thread from Deco Tanjong

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    1 Reply, 1 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    DY

    Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    Sep 24, 2024 11:47am
    | Last reply Sep 27, 2024 10:31pm

    Reply from Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    Initial post

    Comparing the APRN nursing regulation between the states of Texas, California, and Oregon

    Firstly, looking at the scope of practice between the three states:

    According to the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Texas is a “restricted practice state.” In Texas, APRNs have a supervisory or collaborative agreement with physicians to be able to provide diagnosing activities for patients, prescribe medicines, and monitor treatments (A State-by-State Breakdown of Nurse Practitioner Practice Authority Laws, n.d.). These supervisory arrangements usually need to be in writing, detailing the physician’s role as supervisor, with a notation of the frequency in which the physician will review the charts. This type of arrangement limits APRN autonomy because physicians are required to be involved in most aspects of patient care. This can make practicing difficult, especially in rural or underserved areas with a doctor shortage. California has a mixed model; it gradually moves toward full practice authority over time. Currently, some settings require NPs to have standardized protocol agreements for some aspects of their practice. NPs can apply to work without physician supervision if they have completed 4,600 hours or three years of full-time clinical work. Still, the facility must have a doctor on site
     (A State-by-State Breakdown of Nurse Practitioner Practice Authority Laws
    , n.d.). After three additional years, they can apply for full practice authority.

    There is also a written code of conduct or guidelines for APRNs in their line of duty. APRNs in California may diagnose and treat patients. Still, they cannot practice independently due to these collaborative agreements that restrict their clinical decision-making and prescription powers in the first couple of years after graduation. This, therefore, renders it impossible for APRNs to utilize their full scope, especially in clinical decision-making independent of direct physician supervision. Oregon, in contrast, is a full-practice state (ORS 678.375, Nurse Practitioners, n.d.). APRNs can evaluate patients, determine diagnoses, interpret diagnostic tests, and develop treatment plans, including ordering medications, independently of physician oversight. APRNs are educated and competent to provide this level of care; therefore, they may practice independently and provide complete care. Full practice authority in Oregon allows APRNs to utilize their complete skill and knowledge, adding accessibility and quality to healthcare, particularly in rural and impoverished communities.

    The second comparison will be based on prescriptive authority.

    In Texas, APRNs can only prescribe under the delegating authority of a physician. APRNs may prescribe drugs, including Schedule III-V controlled substances, but not Schedule II drugs unless they are in a hospital or hospice setting (NursingLicensure.org, 2021). Because of this provision, APRNs have no choice but to rely on physicians if they are to enjoy full prescribing privileges. This may delay patient care and reduce efficiency, especially in busy areas such as emergency rooms or rural clinics where doctors may be unavailable. In California, Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) can prescribe medications if they adhere to the agreed-upon standards and procedures with a supervising physician (A
     State-by-state Breakdown of Nurse Practitioner Practice Authority Laws
    , n.d.). However, like Texas, California restricts the prescribing of controlled substances, particularly Schedule II drugs, unless under specific rules or direct physician authorization. For instance, an APRN can prescribe medicines for chronic conditions. However, they must adhere to strict protocols and frequently undergo periodic evaluations by a physician. This prevents the APRN from autonomously adjusting patient care according to their evolving needs. In Oregon, however, APRNs have full prescribing practice authority. They can prescribe any medication at any time for patients, including controlled substances. Having no restrictions on their scope of practice puts APRNs in a position to use all their education and training to provide timely and effective care without physician intervention. Full prescribing authority is beneficial in primary care, where APRNs can monitor patient responses and alter treatment plans independently of physicians while managing complex medication regimens Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations.

    Comparing the three states and their regulations, Texas and California restrict the autonomy of APRNs by requiring them to collaborate with physicians or follow standardized procedures. This regulatory framework often creates barriers to achieving important goals, such as coordinating care across multiple providers, managing supervisory constraints, and processing additional paperwork. These criteria pose significant challenges to implementing APRN-led care models in healthcare facilities, even when their services are required to substitute unavailable doctors, particularly in rural areas. However, in Oregon, APRNs can practice independently in the whole practice model, making major clinical decisions without physician oversight (
    ORS 678.375, Nurse Practitioners
    , n.d.). This autonomy complements the APRN’s role as a primary care provider and provides latitude in taking responsibility for patient care, reducing healthcare expenditure, and improving accessibility to services when needed.

    Regarding healthcare access, Texas and California, for example, have strict rules that make getting care challenging, particularly in underserved areas of the states. The limited scope of practice in these states, which often burdens APRNs, impacts the entire healthcare service. This can be a disadvantage; for example, in remote regions where the need for doctors to cooperate may delay care, particularly in situations where APRNs must communicate with doctors who are not present or accessible. Oregon’s plan addresses doctor shortages by allowing APRNs to practice independently. It also facilitates the establishment of APRN-led clinics and provides direct care to patients without awaiting physicians’ consent. The plan enables access to health care, thus improving health outcomes in urban and rural areas.

    In the cases of states where APRN practice is restricted, like Texas and California, APRNs may still find ways around the rules and perform at their best. For instance, in a rural health clinic in Texas, an APRN can independently treat chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension by conducting assessments, prescribing medications with approval, and providing patient education. The APRN adheres to the regulatory requirements through a collaborative agreement with a physician who reviews the charts monthly. As limited as this arrangement may be, it still gives the APRN tremendous authority to change the level of care provided for patients and fill substantial gaps within the local healthcare personnel.

    When applying APRN rules to work in California, An APRN practicing in California can, with the help of a supervising physician, establish a standardized procedure when working in primary care. The APRN can independently perform regular examinations, provide follow-up care for chronic conditions, and order prescription medications for noncontrolled substances under these circumstances. For instance, an APRN may have a protocol that enables them to provide asthma management for pediatric patients by adjusting inhaler prescriptions per the established guidelines without direct and immediate consultation with a physician, provided the physician periodically reviews the treatment plan. These examples show how APRNs can work around strict rules to provide excellent care within the law in their states. They also show the importance of thoughtful, collaborative agreements and standard processes.

    In conclusion, the biggest problem is considerable discrepancies in the rules, making it challenging for APRNs to practice independently and utilize their entire education and training. States such as Texas and California have rigid regulations that pose a severe barrier to allowing APRNs to practice as they wish, which may reduce access to care, particularly in underserved areas. On the other hand, states like Oregon grant full practice authority to APRNs, providing examples of how giving such professionals discretion in handling all concerns pertinent to patient care can be effective. Thus, less restrictive models would make the professional role of APRNs more substantial by improving the quality of healthcare and catering to the needs of more people.

     

    Reference

    A state-by-state breakdown of nurse practitioner practice authority laws
    . (n.d.). The Intake. 
    https://www.tebra.com/theintake/checklists-and-guides/legal-and-compliance/nurse-practitioner-laws-by-state
    Links to an external site.

    NursingLicensure.org. (2021, September 21). 
    APRN license requirements in Texas | How to become a nurse practitioner in TX—NursingLicensure.org
    . NursingLicensure.org: A More Efficient Way to Find Nursing License Requirements in Your State. 
    https://www.nursinglicensure.org/np-state/texas-nurse-practitioner/
    Links to an external site.

    ORS 678.375: Nurse practitioners
    . (n.d.). Retrieved on September 22, 2024, from https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_678.375

     

     

     

     

     

    Expand discussion thread from Doreen Pokuaa Yebuah

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    2 Replies, 2 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    RS

    Romel Suason

    Sep 24, 2024 11:33am
    | Last reply Sep 27, 2024 8:16pm

    Reply from Romel Suason

    Comparing APRN Regulations in State Boards of Nursing

    Nursing practice in different states is guided by policies, standards, and regulations that allow professionals to deliver various services to meet the needs and preferences of patients and populations. In the state of California, the Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) defines the specific regulations and standards by which Advanced Nurse Practitioners (APRNs) must maintain the targeted levels of healthcare services that meet the needs and preferences of patients (California Board of Registered Nursing, 2024). These standards require that an individual seeking licensure to practice as an APRN must have a minimum of a master’s degree and a national certification in the specialty of interest. The Board of Nursing in Texas requires additional requirements, such as prescriptive authority, that include supervisory requirements in the form of collaborative agreements with a physician. The distinction outlines the level of practice, particularly the autonomy and independence of advanced nurse practitioners in prescribing medications to patients.

    In California, APRNs can prescribe treatments independently after obtaining a Nurse Practitioner Furnishing Number, which the provider attains upon meeting the full educational and certification requirements. On the other hand, Texas nurse practitioners must have a formal agreement with the supervising physician as a collaborative agreement (Texas Board of Nursing, 2021). These agreements may limit the nurse practitioners’ ability to respond quickly to the patient’s needs. These issues contribute to barriers that can delay the nurse practitioner’s ability to offer timely interventions or respond to emergencies Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations.

    Concerning the scope of practice, the nurse practitioners in California have a full practice model, allowing them to evaluate patient needs, diagnose conditions, order and interpret diagnostic tests, and initiate treatments independently. On the other hand, nurse practitioners in Texas have a restricted practice that requires them to work under the full supervision of a qualified physician (California Board of Registered Nursing, 2024). The practice status in Texas implies that nurse practitioners have limited practice, which does not allow them to practice to the fullest of their training and education. Nurse practitioners have to collaborate with the supervising physician and have limited independence in ordering and interpreting tests initiating treatments, as well as diagnosing various conditions that impact public health. In this case, although the nurse practitioner may have the necessary skills and abilities for managing patient needs, the limited practice authority by the state board requires them to collaborate with other professionals, impacting their professional autonomy.

    The state board practice authorities significantly impact the level of practice and population health outcomes. For instance, in California, where nurse practitioners have full practice, they can independently assess patient needs, order and interpret tests, and develop treatment plans to manage underlying patient needs. The practice authority contributes to the expansive access to healthcare resources among vulnerable populations (McGilton et al., 2023). On the other hand, in Texas, where the state board has limitations, access to primary care services may be limited, resulting in growing health disparities. The collaborative agreements may complicate the decision-making processes, limiting the nurse practitioner’s ability to respond effectively to patient needs (Short, 2022). The process can limit the effectiveness of patient needs, compromise responsiveness to patient needs, and result in high dissatisfaction levels among patients and populations.

    Adhering to the state board regulations requires the nurse practitioner to maintain key strategies and mechanisms that attain the desired safety and ethical code of practice and promote professional growth and ability to serve diverse populations (Short, 2022). Nurse practitioners in both state boards must maintain continuing education and adhere to the certification requirements. These strategies are necessary to promote adherence to the recommended standards and maintain the guidelines outlined by the collaborative agreements.

     

     

    References

    California Board of Registered Nursing. (2024). 
    Advanced Practice and Certification
    . Www.rn.ca.gov. 
    https://www.rn.ca.gov/applicants/ad-pract.shtml
    Links to an external site.

    McGilton, K. S., Haslam-Larmer, L., Wills, A., Krassikova, A., Babineau, J., Robert, B., Heer, C., McAiney, C., Dobell, G., Bethell, J., Kay, K., Keatings, M., Kaasalainen, S., Feldman, S., Sidani, S., & Martin-Misener, R. (2023). Nurse practitioner/physician collaborative models of care: A scoping review protocol. 
    BMC Geriatrics
    , 
    23
    (1). 
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03798-1
    Links to an external site.

    Short, N. M. (2022). 
    Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide
     (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Texas Board of Nursing. (2021). 
    Texas Board of Nursing – Practice – APRN Scope of Practice
    . Texas.gov. 
    https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_scope_of_practice_aprn.asp.html#:~:text=in%20Disaster%20Areas-
    Links to an external site.

     

    Expand discussion thread from Romel Suason

    4 Replies

    4 Replies

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    Reylynn M Dunn

    Sep 23, 2024 11:23pm
    | Last reply Sep 28, 2024 12:36pm

    Reply from Reylynn M Dunn

       When applying for an Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) license in the state of Idaho the individual must have an active Registered Nurse (RN) license, have completed an accredited advanced nurse practice graduate or post-graduate program, and be nationally certified by the desired specialty (IBON, 2023). Washington state requirements are the same as the State of Idaho as they require a copy of the individual’s national certification, official transcripts from the completed ARNP program, and an active RN license.  

       The State of Idaho requires that an APRN renewal applicant undergo a peer-review process to display competency to the regulatory board (DOPL, 2023). According to the policy, an applicant must have a peer review that includes evidence of competence according to the national standards of care by 
    either
     another ARNP, physician, or Physician’s Assistant. Competence can be displayed through clinical rounds, record reviews, and on-site peer collaboration (DOPL, 2023). The State of Washington does not require any peer-review process for ARNP renewal. Instead, the Washington State Board of Nursing (WABON) requires the applicant to provide an attestation that the applicant completed at least a minimum of thirty hours of continuing education per renewal period (WABON, n.d.). Both states, however, require an active license in addition to the peer-review process or continuing education. 

       The Washington State Scope of Practice states that the ARNP is able to “assume primary responsibility and accountability for the care of patients within their roles” (DOH, 2023, para. 1) Primary responsibility includes diagnostic testing, management of health conditions, education, and prevention (DOH, 2023, para. 2). According to the Idaho Board of Nursing, the ARNP’s scope of practice includes “assume primary responsibility for the care of their patients in diverse settings. This practice incorporates the use of professional judgment in the assessment and management of wellness and conditions appropriate to the advanced practice registered nurse’s role” (2023, p.3). Both regulations on the ARNP’s scope of practice state that the ARNP will take primary responsibility for care. Also, both Washington and Idaho state that the ARNP can manage an individual’s health & wellness.  Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations

    References
     

    ARNP License
    . Washington State Board of Nursing. (n.d.). 
    https://nursing.wa.gov/licensing/apply-license/arnp-license
    Links to an external site.
     

    Department of Health, WAC 246-840-300 ARNP Scope of Practice. Retrieved February 20, 2023, from 
    https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=246-840-300
    Links to an external site.
    . 

    Idaho Board of Nursing. (2023, March 28). IDAPA 24 – Division of Occupational and Professional Licenses. Boise, ID. 

    Renew or Reactivate a License
    . Washington State Board of Nursing. (n.d.-b). 
    https://nursing.wa.gov/licensing/renew-or-reactivate-license
    Links to an external site.
     

    State of Idaho Division Of Occupational and Professional Licenses. (2023, October 12). Idaho Board of Nursing ADVANCED PRACTICE REGISTERED NURSES POLICIES: Boise, ID. 

    Expand discussion thread from Reylynn M Dunn

    7 Replies, 5 Unread

    7 Replies, 5 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    ER

    Erin Roecker

    Sep 23, 2024 9:35pm
    | Last reply Sep 25, 2024 5:07am

    Reply from Erin Roecker

    I currently have two nursing licenses, one in South Carolina which is a compact state and one in Alaska which is not. I hold two licenses because I am a military spouse and had to get an Alaskan nursing license when we moved up here last year. It would be so helpful if all 50 states were compact states, especially for military spouses who are forced to move at a moment’s notice. I will become an APRN while living in the state of Alaska. So, I have chosen to compare the board of nursing regulations to Alaska compared to South Carolina. According to the NCSBN website, “More than 100 years ago, state and territorial governments established NRBs to protect the public’s health and welfare by overseeing and ensuring the safe practice of nursing. NRBs achieve this mission by outlining the standards for safe nursing care and issuing licenses to practice nursing (National Council of State Boards of Nursing, n.d.).” According to the state of Alaska board of nursing website, to practice as an APRN in Alaska you must first be licensed as an RN in Alaska. (Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, n.d.) Alternatively, according to the state of South Carolina board of nursing website, any nurse from a compact state with a current RN license can be licensed in the state of South Carolina as an APRN. With that said, you must have a South Carolina APRN license to work in South Carolina. The NLC requirements that apply to RN licenses are different than an APRN.  (South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, n.d.) The other difference between the two is scope of practice. Alaska allows APRNs to work a little more independently, with full prescriptive authority. Whereas South Carolina tends to have tighter guidelines and requires collaboration with a physician before prescribing medications.

    References:

    Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. (n.d.). 
    Advanced practice registered nurses (APRN)
    .
     
    https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/

    National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (n.d.). 
    About nursing regulatory bodies
    . 
    https://www.ncsbn.org/nursing-regulation/about-nursing-regulatory-bodies.page
    Links to an external site.

    South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation. (n.d.). 
    APRN update lead
    . 
    https://llr.sc.gov/nurse/Online/APRNUPDATELEAD.aspx
    Links to an external site.

    Expand discussion thread from Erin Roecker

    4 Replies, 3 Unread

    4 Replies, 3 Unread

    Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

    KW

    Kailey Wooton

    Sep 23, 2024 5:04pm
    | Last reply Sep 26, 2024 9:04pm

    Reply from Kailey Wooton

    Kentucky:

    Before prescribing controlled substances the APRN must consult with a KY physician, report that to the KBN, and have been an APRN for 1 year. All prescribed meds must be sent to the KBN (Kentucky Boards of Nursing, n.d).

    Meet with a physician with whom you’ve entered into a collaborative agreement quarterly to review the KASPER report or prescription drug monitoring report used in KY and this meeting must be sent to the KBN (Kentucky Board of Nursing, n.d).

    Tennessee:

    APRN’s can prescribe controlled substances once receiving a certificate of fitness by the State Board of Nursing (NCSL, n.d).

    APRN’s do not have to have the constant presence of a physician but one must be available to them if needed. A written protocol must be jointly developed that outlines standards of care and reviewed biennially. I was unable to find if any of this information of the prescriptions of controlled substances must be reported to the Tennessee Board of Nursing (NCSL, n.d)

     

    The difference I’m seeing between Kentucky and Tennessee is that Tennessee’s regulations on prescribing controlled substances are laxer. Kentucky Is required to meet with a physician before being able to prescribe controlled substances. The APRN then must turn this information in to the KBN. The APRN and physician must enter a “collaborative agreement” upon hiring the APRN. The physician and APRN meet quarterly to review and discuss KASPER records. This information also must be turned into the KBN (Kentucky Board of Nursing, n.d). Tennessee allows APRNs to prescribe controlled substances if they receive a certification of fitness from the Tennessee Board of Nursing. Physicians do not have to be consulted before prescribing; one must be available if needed. I did not find any information that indicated the record of controlled substances had to be turned in to their board of nursing (NCSL, n.d). One example of how APRNs must adhere to the regulations listed is ensuring that they’re meeting with a physician before prescribing controlled substances and reporting this information to the board of nursing Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations.

    APRNs who have the full legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience can perform a wider range of medical services without the need for content physician supervision in most cases. I feel like this is important in rural areas where there are not a lot of physicians or APRNs. The regulations in Kentucky are stricter on prescribing controlled substances than those in Tennessee. However, I do not feel that either state’s regulations hinder the APRN from performing to their full scope of education and experience.   Following these regulations in my state ensures that your nursing license is safe and will not be revoked due to not following rules. I feel like consulting with a physician is the safest and most patient-centered approach to prescribing controlled substances.

    References:

    Aprn Prescriptive Authority
    . Kentucky Board of Nursing. (n.d.). https://kbn.ky.gov/advanced-practice-registered-nurse/Pages/aprn-prescriptive-authority.aspx

    Tennessee Scope of Practice Policy – State Profile
    . NCSL-Scope of Practice Policy. (n.d.). https://scopeofpracticepolicy.org/states/tn/ Walden University NURS-6050 Week 5: Discussion Professional nursing and state level regulations

  • Work-related stress in healthcare workers Current Healthcare Issues/ stressor essay

    Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Work-related stress in healthcare workers Current Healthcare Issues/ stressor essay

    Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis.

    The national healthcare issue I selected to analyze is work-related stress in healthcare workers. This stress affects healthcare workers’ physical and mental well-being and interferes with the quality of care provided to patients. Healthcare workers often encounter significant stressors that lead to burnout and job dissatisfaction (Bangani et al., 2021).

    Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting.

    Work-related stress impacts my work setting regarding delivering adequate and efficient nursing care when treating patients. I often hear amongst my colleague the feeling of burnout and inability to take vacation due to nursing staff shortage and emotional exhaustion, which may affect their ability to provide high-quality care. Sometimes, some of my co-workers can be impaired with decision-making interventions and not focus on attention to detail because of being overworked and fatigued. This can compromise patient safety and well-being, resulting in increased medical errors, longer patient recovery times, and potentially adverse health outcomes due to delay or oversight in care (Greco et al., 2022). Additionally, we have many calls off because of the overwhelming exhaustion that my co-workers may experience from an overwhelming workload they experienced during their previous shifts; this can result in staff shortage, causing more stress and pressure on my colleague’s workload. Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Work-related stress in healthcare workers Current Healthcare Issues/ stressor essay

    Which social determinant(s) most affects this health issue?

    Socioeconomic status is the social determinant affecting work-related stress in nursing healthcare staff (Senanayake et al., 2019). Nursing staff with lower social and socioeconomic status experience financial insecurity and have access to fewer resources, leading to higher stress and anxiety both at work and in their personal lives. In the workplace, these individuals may feel a loss of control over their jobs, leading to feelings of being overworked, having fewer benefits, and receiving less support from management (Senanayake et al., 2019). This emotional and physical toll on their work ethics creates a stressful work environment, making it more challenging to manage patient workload. This stress also significantly impacts the job performance of nursing staff, as well as their mental and physical health and overall well-being.

    ORDER A HUMAN-WRITTEN PAPER HERE

    Describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.

    My healthcare facility has implemented different strategies in my work setting to reduce the workload stress amongst nursing staff. For example, to help reduce the call-offs, my health system has introduced flexible scheduling that allows for better work-life balance and the introduction of new nursing staff positions. These changes help ensure that
    nursing
    staff reduce the pressure to meet high demands and improve the quality of care they can provide. There are also serenity rooms where nursing staff can take breaks and engage in mindfulness and stress-reduction relaxation time. My facility has implemented these steps in my work setting to address work-related stress and improve staff retention and patient care outcomes.

    REFERENCES

    Bangani, R. G., Menon, V., & Jovanov, E. (2021). Personalized Stress Monitoring AI System For Healthcare Workers. 
    2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
    , 2992–2997. 
    https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm52615.2021.9669321
    Links to an external site.

    Greco, E., Graziano, E. A., Stella, G. P., Mastrodascio, M., & Cedrone, F. (2022). The impact of leadership on perceived work-related stress in healthcare facilities organisations. 
    Journal of Organizational Change Management
    , 
    35
    (4/5), 734–748. 
    https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-07-2021-0201
    Links to an external site.

    Links to an external site.
    Senanayake, B., Wickramasinghe, S. I., Edirippulige, S., & Arambepola, C. (2019). Stress and its Social Determinants – A Qualitative Study Reflecting the Perceptions of a Select Small Group of the Public in Sri Lanka. 
    Indian Journal of Ps Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Work-related stress in healthcare workers Current Healthcare Issues/ stressor essay

  • New Jersey and New York Board of Nursing APRN regulations

    New Jersey and New York Board of Nursing APRN regulations

    Two APRNs Board of Nursing regulations in New Jersey and New York.

    New Jersey and New York have several similarities in their APRN regulations. Both states require APRNs to possess a valid registered nurse (RN) license before they can obtain advanced practice certification, ensuring a solid nursing foundation. Additionally, APRNs must achieve certification in their specific advanced practice roles from accredited certifying bodies, promoting a consistent level of competency. Continuing education is mandatory in both states for APRNs to maintain their certification, helping them stay updated on healthcare practices and regulations. Furthermore, APRNs in both states are permitted to perform various services, including patient assessments, diagnoses, and prescribing medications, although the specifics may differ. These shared regulations support safe and effective APRN practice in both states.

    Difference between regulations in NJ and NY with examples.

    New Jersey, APRNs must have a collaborative practice agreement with a licensed physician or dentist that outlines their scope of practice and patient care protocols. Conversely, New York requires a written practice agreement with a collaborating physician, emphasizing the collaborative aspects of care without needing a detailed scope outline.

    The scope of practice for Nurse Practitioners (NPs) differs significantly between New York and New Jersey, affecting their roles and responsibilities. In New York, NPs enjoy greater autonomy, allowing them to assess patients, diagnose conditions, interpret diagnostic tests, and initiate treatment plans independently, following the 2021 law that grants full practice authority. For example, an NP in New York can manage a patient’s diabetes, including prescribing and adjusting insulin as needed New Jersey and New York Board of Nursing APRN regulations.

    Conversely, NPs in New Jersey must establish a collaborative practice agreement with a physician, which dictates their scope of practice and patient care protocols. This means that an NP in New Jersey must consult with their collaborating physician when determining treatment plans, such as in the case of managing a patient with hypertension. These distinctions underscore New York’s focus on NP autonomy compared to New Jersey’s collaborative approach, both aiming to provide high-quality patient care tailored to their respective healthcare systems.

    How regulations I selected may apply to APRNs in NJ and NY.

    Prescriptive authority and collaboration with a physician are crucial aspects of the APRN role. In New Jersey, APRNs can prescribe medications, including controlled substances, but must do so under the protocols outlined in their collaborative practice agreements. This regulation allows APRNs to operate with a degree of independence while ensuring that they have the necessary support from a physician, especially as they navigate the early stages of their careers. Collaboration is particularly beneficial for new APRNs, as it provides a valuable learning opportunity. Working closely with a physician not only enhances their clinical knowledge and skills but also reinforces safe practices in patient care. Given that new APRNs may face risks associated with their limited experience, this partnership can help mitigate potential safety concerns. Overall, the regulatory framework in New Jersey fosters both the professional growth of APRNs and the delivery of safe, effective healthcare.

    Nurse Practitioners (NPs) in New York complete specialized pharmacology certification, allowing them to practice independently without needing a collaborative agreement with a physician. Additionally, NPs in New York must obtain national certification, which sets their educational requirements apart from those in New Jersey, further empowering them in their roles. The 2021 law enables NPs to manage conditions like diabetes on their own, including prescribing insulin and adjusting dosages. This increased autonomy not only enhances the role of NPs within the healthcare system but also alleviates some of the burdens on physicians, promoting a more collaborative approach to patient care.

    Example of how APRNs adhere to two regulations I selected.

    In the healthcare institution where I work as a nurse, I’ve observed that APRNs actively collaborate with physicians. While they conduct patient assessments, prescribe medications, and order diagnostic tests, there is always a physician to whom they report. This relationship is essential, as physicians provide guidance when any issues arise New Jersey and New York Board of Nursing APRN regulations.

    For example, if a patient is being treated for an infection and has an abnormal heart rhythm, APRNs will collaborate with a cardiologist to develop an appropriate plan of care. Before discharging the patient, APRNs ensure that follow-up appointments are scheduled with both the cardiologist and the infectious disease physician. This approach exemplifies a multidisciplinary team effort where each member works independently but remains equally accountable for the patient’s care. Such collaboration not only enhances the quality of care but also supports the ongoing learning and professional development of APRNs.

    References:

    New York State Education Department. (n.d.). 
    Advanced practice registered nursing
    . Retrieved from http://www.op.nysed.gov/

    New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs. (n.d.). 
    Advanced Practice Nursing
    . Retrieved from 
    https://www.njconsumeraffairs.gov/
    Links to an external site.
     New Jersey and New York Board of Nursing APRN regulations

  • Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor

    Walden University NURS-6053 Module 1: Discussion Review of Current Healthcare Issues – Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor

    National healthcare issue/stressor

    There are many issues and stressors that impact healthcare, one is the lack of adequate healthcare providers. The healthcare industry is facing a shortage of multiple disciplines, impacting the number of patients receiving treatment. By the year 2033 there is an expected shortage of 124,000 physicians, and hospitals are having to replace 200,000 nurses each year to keep up with care demands (American Hospital Association, 2021).  The population is increasing due to people living longer, however the number of providers to render treatment is diminishing. The population expectancy is 2 billion people by the year 2050 with most of the population having at least one chronic health condition (Amalberti et al., 2019). The number of healthcare providers needs to increase to meet the demands of the growing population.

    Impact on work setting

    The shortage of healthcare providers impacts on the work environment by not allowing patients to receive adequate treatment for illnesses. Patients are forced to go without treatment or receive less than treatment because there are not enough providers to render care. Patients are having to wait long periods of time to visit with providers and are having the least informed healthcare works decide on whether the patient should see a physician (Slonim, 2023). The number of patients a healthcare worker is having to care for is increasing, adding stress to providers and decreasing the quality-of-care patients are receiving. Healthcare providers are having to render treatment as tasks, such as needing to give medications and drawing labs, rather than being able to listen to patients, spend time with them, while still performing tasks. Physicians often spend very little time with patients due to their workload, leaving patients feeling unheard and uncared for (Slonim, 2023).

    GET WRITING HELP

    Social determinants affected  

    Healthcare and quality are the social determinants that are affected by the lack of health care providers. People already do not seek healthcare treatment for many reasons, one being the lack proximity to provider, some people do not seek specialized screenings because the provider who do the screens are not nearby (Healthy People 2030, 2018). If people are currently finding it difficult to find providers in close proximity with a even greater shortage of providers expected, then the number of people not choosing to seek treatment could increase. This leaves people at a disadvantage and an increased risk for many illnesses.

    Responded to the healthcare issue/stressor

    The changes I have witnessed in healthcare facilities are hiring providers that are from outside of the country to help with the staffing shortages. For example, one facility I worked with employed nurses that were from the Philippines and Africa, to help with nursing shortages. This phenomenon is not new and help physicians and nurses alike from other countries receive an expedited Visa authorization process in order to have these healthcare workers help with staff shortages (American Hospital Association, 2021).  While it may not be a new concept it seems that with healthcare provider shortages more facilities are using this method to help with increasing staff needs.

     

    References

    Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Nicklin, W., & Braithwaite, J. (2019). Coping with more people with more illness. Part 1: The nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality. 
    International Journal for Quality in Health Care
    , 
    31
    (2), 154–158. 
    https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy235
    Links to an external site.

    American Hospital Association. (2021). 
    Fact Sheet: Strengthening the Health Care Workforce | AHA
    . Www.aha.org; American Hospital Association. 
    https://www.aha.org/fact-sheets/2021-05-26-fact-sheet-strengthening-health-care-workforce
    Links to an external site.

    Healthy People 2030. (2018). 
    Health Care Access and Quality – Healthy People 2030 | health.gov
    . Health.gov. 
    https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/health-care-access-and-quality
    Links to an external site.

    Slonim, Anthony (2023). Top Challenges Facing Healthcare: Back to Basics.
     Physician Leadership Journal, 10
    (2), 12-14. 
    https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/top-challenges-facing-healthcare-back-basics/docview/2788462727/se-2
    Links to an external site.

     

    Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor

    National Healthcare Issue: Nurse Staffing Shortages

    One of the most pressing healthcare stressors in the U.S. is nurse staffing shortages. The increasing demand for healthcare services, the aging nursing workforce, and high burnout rates contribute to this ongoing issue. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated shortages, leading to increased workloads, stress, and job dissatisfaction among nurses.

    Impact on My Work Setting

    As a Charge Nurse in the PACU at Mary Washington Healthcare, staffing shortages directly impact patient care and nurse well-being by increasing workloads, leading to fatigue and burnout. Inadequate staffing also results in longer patient wait times, affecting post-anesthesia recovery and overall satisfaction, while higher turnover rates create a continuous need for training new staff. Additionally, limited nurse availability reduces the time for crucial patient education on post-operative care. For instance, when fewer nurses are available to manage the 20-bed PACU, patient assessments and discharges are delayed, placing added pressure on the team to maintain safe, high-quality care under stressful conditions.

     
    Social Determinants Affecting Nurse Staffing Shortages

    Nurse staffing shortages are influenced by several social determinants, including economic stability, working conditions, and education access. Budget constraints in hospitals limit the ability to hire and retain nurses, while long hours, mandatory overtime, and high patient loads contribute to burnout. Additionally, a shortage of nursing faculty and training programs restricts the pipeline of new nurses entering the workforce, further exacerbating the issue. “Nursing shortages, especially in emergency medicine (EM), where nurses face significant burnout rates, are predicted to worsen.”
     (
    Hodgson et al., 2024)

     
    Response of My Health System

    To address these challenges, Mary Washington Healthcare has implemented several strategies to improve staffing and support nurse retention. Competitive salaries, sign-on bonuses, and retention incentives encourage nurses to stay, while flexible scheduling options, including self-scheduling and PRN shifts, help maintain work-life balance. Cross-training PACU nurses in multiple areas ensures adequate coverage during staffing shortages. Additionally, the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) and remote monitoring tools streamlines documentation and reduces nurse workload. To support mental health and well-being, the hospital also offers wellness programs, counseling services, and resilience training to help staff manage stress and prevent burnout. Companies have also begun using social media to promote job openings and share valuable information to increase visibility. “Hospital and health system recruiters use social media to connect with top talent locally, regionally, and nationally.”  (Hale, 2021)

    Example of Change Implemented

    One specific change is the float pool expansion, where nurses from different units are cross trained to work in PACU when needed. This has helped fill staffing gaps during peak hours and high-acuity cases. Additionally, leadership has worked on improving communication and collaboration by implementing daily staff huddles to assess needs and reallocate resources effectively.

    Conclusion

    While staffing shortages remain a challenge, proactive strategies such as retention incentives, cross-training, and mental health support help mitigate the impact on both nurses and patients. “National work to improve nurse staffing offers specific recommendations and actions for short-term and long-term change, including recommendations to build healthy work environments and test new approaches to care delivery.” (Delgado, 2024) Continued efforts in recruitment and workforce well-being will be crucial in sustaining quality patient care.

     

    References:

    Delgado, S. D. (2024). Evidence-Based Approach to Appropriate Staffing. 
    Critical Care Nurse
    , 
    44
    (6), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2024614

    Hale, K. (2021). 
    Benefits and challenges of social media in health careLinks to an external site.
    Links to an external site.
    . 
    Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
    , 
    44
    (3), 309–315.

    Hodgson, N. R., Kwun, R., Gorbatkin, C., Davies, J., & Fisher, J. (2024). Emergency department responses to nursing shortages. 
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine
    , 
    17
    (1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00628-y

     

     

    Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor

    The United States has been battling Nursing Staff Shortage for many decades. Being in the healthcare field for almost 10 years, I believe that it has gotten worse each year after the pandemic.  This healthcare issue has significant implications for the quality, accessibility, and cost of healthcare services. The nursing shortage impacts not only inpatient services but outpatient as well. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, it was estimated that there will be a shortage of 7.2 million health workers to deliver healthcare services worldwide, and by 2035, the demand of nursing will reach 12.9 million.

    The impact of nursing staff shortage in a work setting is nurses’ experiencing burnout. Burnout syndrome has been characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a diminished sense of personal accomplishment and is typically observed to be the result of chronic workplace stress (Li et al,2024). Nurses can also experience significant physical, emotional, and mental stress due to the nature of their work. Nurses work long shifts with high patient to nurse ratios and physical demands that can contribute to burnout. I currently work in an outpatient service and the staff is overworked with the influx of patients. With the inadequate supply of nurses has notably created many negative impacts on the patient’s health-related outcome as well as challenges to fight diseases and improving health, which causes increased workload and stress levels on nurses and later results in decreasing the quality of nursing care (Tamata and Mohammed, 2022).

    Social determinants that affect the nursing staff shortage is income and financial stability, often nurses are underpaid in comparison to the level of responsibility they bear. Another social determinant is lack of cultural competence and support in a healthcare environment can lead to discrimination or unequal treatment of nurses from diverse backgrounds. Work- life balance has become big in healthcare. Nurses, especially women may face pressure to balance professional demands with family responsibilities. The lack of flexible working hours, paid family leave, and affordable childcare can discourage nurses. Multiple national medical professional associations recommend social risk screening and documentation in healthcare settings because of the compelling evidence that social risks are associated with poorer adherence to treatment plans, worse health outcomes, and increased costs of care (Tiase et al, 2022).

    The
    healthcare system
    that I work for has implemented mental health days and recruitment programs. I work in Outpatient so there is some flexibility for nurses that are mothers and have children to work 5×8 hour days or 4–10-hour days. The manager is very big on work life balance and takes the extra step by gifting us with treat, food, and celebratory parties to show her appreciation for our hard work.

    Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. 
    https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9780826135056
    Links to an external site.

    Li, L. Z., Yang, P., Singer, S.J., Mathur, M. B., & Shanafelt, T. (2024). Nurse Burnout and Patient Safety, Satisfaction, and Quality of Care: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA network open, 7 (11), e2443059. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43059

    Tiase, V., Crookston, C. D., Schoenbaum, A., & Valu, M. (2022). Nurses’ role in addressing social determinants of health. 
    Nursing
    , 
    52
    (4), 32–37. 
    https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nurse.0000823284.16666.96
    Links to an external site.

    Tamata, A. T., & Mohammadnezhad, M. (2022). A systematic review study on the factors affecting the shortage of nursing workforce in the hospitals. 
    Nursing Open
    , 
    10
    (3), 1247–1257. 
    https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1434
    Links to an external site.

     

    Nurse Staffing Shortages: National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor

    Nursing and Clinician Shortage: A National Healthcare Issue
     
     

    Nursing is a highly demanding and stressful profession. Many nurses are experiencing burnout, fatigue, and dissatisfaction with their working conditions at the bedside. According to a study by Petterson et al. (2015), cited in Broome and Marshall (2020), by the year 2035, there is expected to be a shortage of 33,000 primary care physicians. Additionally, it is estimated that 20% of nurses leave their jobs within the first year of employment. 
     

    Impact on the Work Setting
     

    Due to nursing shortages, hospitalized patients are at an increased risk of unsafe events, such as falls, reduced quality of care, poor health outcomes, and decreased patient satisfaction ratings (Quaranta, 2024). According to Lasater et al. (2021, cited in Quaranta, 2024), “The lack of nurses in hospital settings increases errors, morbidity, and mortality, and decreases patient satisfaction.” As healthcare evolves and patient demographics change, with patients living longer, there is a strong push to enhance the quality of care. Hospital reimbursement models are increasingly focusing on quality of care rather than volume of services. Furthermore, there is a growing demand for patient care outside of hospital settings, leading to a shift towards more home care and telemedicine. However, the shortage of nurses and clinicians can negatively impact the quality of care delivered through these alternatives as well.
     

    Social Determinants Affecting Shortage
     

    Some argue that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly contributed to the trend of nurses leaving the profession, while I contend that COVID may have merely been the last straw. Nurses are facing burnout, fatigue, and dissatisfaction with their working conditions at the bedside. Sixty percent of the 3.2 million nurses in the United States are employed in hospital settings (Quaranta, 2024). In 2021, over 100,000 nurses exited the profession (Auerbach et al., 2022, as cited in Quaranta, 2024). According to Quaranta (2024), nurses leave bedside positions due to unfavorable working conditions, including unsafe patient ratios, low pay, long shifts, and poor management Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor.
     

    Furthermore, financial concerns contribute to the shortages of nursing staff. Hospitals spend substantial amounts of money on hiring, training, paying salaries, covering insurance, and providing benefits such as retirement plans. These expenses may hinder hospitals from hiring additional nurses. 
    Hospital CEOs, policymakers, and legislators may not fully grasp the importance of adequate nurse staffing for ensuring the safety of both patients and nurses, improving patient outcomes, and reducing nurse burnout. Additionally, the personal experiences of those in positions of power can significantly influence these decisions, making them less empathetic to the actual needs of nurses and patients.
     

    Healthcare System Response 
     

    There is a growing population of aging individuals with health problems. In brief, people are living longer due to advancements in medicine and technology. According to Amalberti et al. (2019), “By the 2050s, over 50% of the global population will be living with a chronic illness.”
     

    In response to the shortage of clinicians, some states are granting Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) greater autonomy and flexibility. While this may help alleviate the shortage of clinicians, it does not address the ongoing shortage of nurses or the trend of nurses leaving the bedside profession. Many states in the United States do not have mandated nurse-to-patient ratios. There are currently bills pending that aim to address nursing ratios, but they have not made progress or received approval.
     

    Conclusion 
     

    The nursing and clinician shortage remains a pressing national healthcare issue with far-reaching consequences for patient care and safety. The challenges faced by nurses, including burnout, inadequate working conditions, and insufficient staffing ratios, contribute to high turnover rates and diminished quality of care. As the healthcare landscape evolves, it is crucial to address these underlying issues to cultivate a sustainable workforce. While initiatives to enhance the autonomy of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) may provide some relief, a comprehensive strategy that also focuses on improving the workplace environment for all nurses is necessary. This includes advocating for mandated nurse-to-patient ratios, addressing financial constraints for hospitals, and fostering supportive management practices. By prioritizing these changes, we can ensure a healthier future for both healthcare professionals and the patients they serve Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor.
     

     

    References 
     

    Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Nicklin, W., Braithwaite, J. (2019).  Coping with more people with more illness part 1: The nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality. 
    International Journal for Quality in Health Care
    , vol 31 (2), pages 154–158.
     
    https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy235
    Links to an external site.
     

    Broome, M., & Marshall, E. (2020). 
    Transformational Leadership in Nursing (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing LLC.
     
    https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9780826135056
    Links to an external site.
     

    Quaranta, N. (2024). Team nursing: An innovative approach to address the nursing shortage. 
    MEDSURG Nursing
    , 
    33
    (2), 79–84. 
    https://doi.org/10.62116/MSJ.2024.33.2.79
    Links to an external site.
    Nurse Staffing Shortages National Healthcare Issue/ Stressor