NURS-6512 Week 2: Assignment 1 Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information
Effective health history-taking is critical to clinical decision-making. However, its success is dependent on the clinician’s ability to adapt to the patient’s linguistic and cultural context, communicate clearly, and establish rapport (Edelman & Kudzma, 2022). The case of WH, a 62-year-old Chinese male who has limited proficiency in the English language, demonstrates the importance of clinicians adopting culturally responsive interviewing techniques. This paper explores the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and cultural factors relevant to WH, identifies the potential issues that may require sensitivity, discusses appropriate communication strategies, summarizes an interview approach, provides targeted questions for health history taking, and justifies the risk assessment instrument suitable for the patient’s clinical context.
Socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors
Socioeconomic factors
WH is identified as a widower living with his daughter and grandchild. His social support is limited. His daughter is a nurse and acts as his primary caregiver. However, the cultural norms may cause his reluctance to accept care from his daughter. His limited proficiency in the English language may restrict his access to community support, health resources, and healthcare autonomy. WH may face socioeconomic constraints if he is financially dependent on his daughter, and this raises concerns about autonomy and role reversal within the family (Edelman & Kudzma, 2022).
Spiritual factors
Many older Chinese adults maintain traditional spiritual beliefs, which may be influenced by folk practice, Buddhism, Taoism, or Confucianism (Chan & Ho, 2022). WH’s understanding of hypertension as an imbalance rather than a biomedical condition may be influenced by his spiritual interpretation of illness. In addition, the Confucian principle of filial piety may contribute to his ambivalence about burdening his progeny with the caregiving responsibilities, fueling his resistance to his daughter’s involvement in his health management (Giger & Powell-Young, 2025).
GET HELP HERE
Lifestyle factors
The Chinese culture is suffused with dietary patterns, such as high sodium intake from traditional broths, preserved foods, or soy sauce. The dietary patterns can exacerbate WH’s hypertension risk. In addition, he may have limited physical activity, as he adheres to a sedentary lifestyle, which is common in older adults, although he may be engaging in traditional exercises, such as Tai Chi. Alcohol consumption, particularly rice wine, may be culturally relevant (Giger & Powell-Young, 2025).
Other cultural factors
WH may be underreporting his symptoms, owing to the cultural norms regarding stoicism and avoidance of expressing distress. Traditional medicine practices, such as acupuncture or herbal remedies, may be used concurrently with prescribed antihypertensive therapy. Unfamiliarity with Western medicine and mistrust could further complicating treatment adherence. Additionally, linguistic barriers could compound the cultural dynamics, limiting the patient’s ability to fully articulate preferences, concerns, and symptoms (Li & Dong, 2021) NURS-6512 Week 2: Assignment 1 Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information
Issues requiring sensitivity
Five main issues that warrant sensitivity when interacting with WH. First, language and health literacy as WH has limited proficiency in the English language. This could undermine his comprehension of health recommendations and medication instructions. Miscommunication could result in non-adherence and poor outcomes. Second, family involvement versus autonomy could present some concerns. Within the Chinese culture, health decisions are typically family centered. While his daughter is a nurse and may support understanding, WH could perceive his daughter’s involvement in his care as intrusive and threatening his masculinity and independence. Third, cultural interpretation of the illness may present a concern. WH could attribute his hypertension to fate, stress or imbalance in yin and yang, rather than biomedical causes. Clinicians provide evidence-based education even as they respect these beliefs. Fourth, generational and gender expectations may present sensitivity concerns. WH is an older male and may feel obligated to maintain his authority in the family. This may make him resistant to being dependent on his daughter. Fifth, there are end-of-life considerations. Although this may not be immediately relevant, the cultural beliefs around illness and death may influence his engagement in long-term care planning. Sensitivity in the five identified areas is essential for promoting patient-centered care, ensuring adherence, and establishing trust (Giger & Powell-Young, 2025).
Communication techniques and strategies
Six communication techniques and strategies are identified. First, cultural humility by demonstrating openness to WH’s use of traditional practices. This helps to foster trust. It may involve asking questions that validate the patient’s cultural identity, such as whether there are any traditional remedies he is currently using that should be considered alongside the prescribed medication. Second, respect for human involvement by acknowledging that his daughter has a role while reinforcing that he has autonomy, thereby promoting shared decision-making. This ensures that WH’s voice remains central by asking questions, such as asking to hear from him about his feelings on an issue being discussed or a decision to be made. Third, use of visual aids and plain language. It is important to avoid jargon, supplement explanation with translated handouts, and use visual tools to enhance comprehension. Visual tools may include pictorial medication schedules and blood pressure charts. Fourth, adopting the teach-back method. Given the possible low health literacy, it is important to encourage WH to repeat instructions using his own words. This approach helps to verify understanding without appearing condescending. Fifth, adopting culturally sensitive non-verbal communication. In the Chinese culture, excessive physical touch may be inappropriate, and direct eye contact may be perceived as confrontational. A clinician should maintain a respectful posture, use a gentle tone, and allow pauses for processing information (DeMarco & Healey-Walsh, 2024). Sixth, professional interpreters should be used. While WH’s daughter may be bilingual, a reliance on a family member for interpretation could risk role conflicts, omissions, and errors. A certified medical interpreter could ensure communication accuracy while preserving family dynamics (Flores, 2021). The six identified communication techniques and strategies collectively build rapport, empower the patient, and minimize miscommunication.
Health history interview
A comprehensive health history interview should be conducted with WH, and this should integrate the biomedical, psychosocial, and cultural dimensions. The interview would focus on the chief complaint and follow-up on antihypertensive therapy, review of symptoms (edema, chest pain, dizziness, and headaches), medication adherence and potential side effects, and diet, physical activity and lifestyle factors. In addition, it would explore the use of complementary practices and traditional Chinese medicine, and explore the psychosocial context, including social support, caregiving dynamics, and grief from widowhood. Besides that, the interview would explore the spiritual and cultural beliefs influencing illness perception and treatment adherence (DeMarco & Healey-Walsh, 2024) NURS-6512 Week 2: Assignment 1 Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information.
Five targeted questions are identified for the patient. First, asking WH to tell in his own words how he has been feeling since he started taking the medication. For instance, “Can you tell me in your own words how you have been feeling since starting your new medication?” This is an open-ended question that would elicit the patient’s subjective experience, ensuring his voice is prioritized despite the language barriers. In addition, it assesses adherence and side effects. Second, asking what kinds of foods the patient usually eats on a typical day. For instance, “What kinds of foods do you usually eat in a typical day?” The rationale for this question is that hypertension is strongly influenced by diet. The question is neutrally framed to avoid judgment while uncovering cultural dietary patterns, such as high-sodium foods. Third, ask if the patient uses any traditional practices, herbs or remedies for his health. For instance, “Do you use any traditional remedies, herbs, or practices for your health?” The rationale for this question is that many Chinese patients integrate traditional medicine. Acknowledging this helps to foster cultural respect, avoid conflict, and identify potential drug-herb interactions. Fourth, asking how the patient usually manages worries or stress in his life. For instance, “How do you usually manage stress or worries in your life?” The rationale for this question is that stress is linked to blood pressure control. The response to the question would help with assessing coping strategies, potential mental health concerns, and cultural or spiritual practices. Fifth, asking who the patient relies on for support when he has health concerns. For instance, “Who do you rely on for support when you have health concerns?” The rationale for this question is that social support can influence adherence and emotional well-being. The question explores caregiving dynamics and highlights the patient’s reliance on his daughter and grandchild. Each of the five questions is framed in simple, patient-centered language that enhances comprehension and cultural sensitivity (Edelman & Kudzma, 2022).
Risk assessment instrument
The Hypertension Self-Care Activity Levels Effects (H-SCALE) is an appropriate risk assessment instrument for use in the case study. This instrument evaluates the patient’s self-care behaviors, such as medication adherence, low-sodium diet, physical activity, weight management, and avoidance of tobacco and alcohol. It is relevant because WH has hypertension, and the instrument directly measures adherence to treatment and lifestyle modification. In addition, it is culturally adaptable as it can be translated into Cantonese or Mandarin, thereby enhancing accessibility. Besides that, it has cultural utility as the results can help to identify specific self-care deficits and guide targeted interventions, such as in exercise or diet. Additionally, it is evidence-based as it demonstrates validity and reliability in diverse populations, including Asian patients (Chen et al., 2024). H-SCALE quantifies self-care practices, thereby supplementing the health history and informing individualized care planning.
Conclusion
Building a health history for WH requires more than biomedical questioning. It necessitates sensitivity to language barriers, cultural humility, and an appreciation for traditional health beliefs and Chinese values such as filial piety. The use of targeted history taking, culturally attuned communication strategies, and employing professional interpretation ensures trust is fostered while accurate information is elicited. Tools such as the H-SCALE complement this process by operationalizing the self-care behaviors that are critical to hypertension management. Ultimately, adopting culturally competent interviewing would not only improve diagnostic accuracy, but also empower WH, and other patients in similar situations, to engage actively in their health.
References
Chan, E. A., & Ho, E. Y. (2022). Chinese cultural perspectives on health and illness.
Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 33
(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/10436596211050965
Chen, T.-Y., Kao, C.-W., Cheng, S.-M., & Liu, C.-Y. (2024). Translation, adaptation, and validation of a Chinese version of the Hypertension Self-Care Activity Level Effects (H-SCALE) for patients with hypertension.
BMC Nursing, 23
(1), Article 334.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01993-y
DeMarco, R., Healey-Walsh, J. (2024).
Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice
(4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.
Edelman, C., & Kudzma, E. C. (2022).
Health Promotion Throughout the Life Span
(10th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
Flores, G. (2021). The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: A systematic review.
Medical Care Research and Review, 78
(4), 356–372.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558720928478
Giger, J. N., & Powell-Young, M. (2025).
Transcultural Nursing
(9th ed.). Elsevier.
Li, H., & Dong, X. (2021). Cultural factors and barriers to healthcare for older Chinese immigrants.
Journal of Aging and Health, 33
(5–6), 387–396.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264321991168
BUILDING A HEALTH HISTORY: COMMUNICATING EFFECTIVELY TO GATHER APPROPRIATE HEALTH-RELATED INFORMATION
Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting.
There may also be significant cultural factors. In May 2012, Alice Randall wrote an article for
The New York Times
on the cultural factors that encouraged Black women to maintain a weight above what is considered healthy. Randall explained from her observations and her personal experience, as a Black woman, that many African American communities and cultures consider women who are overweight to be more beautiful and desirable than women at a healthier weight. As she put it, “Many black women are fat because we want to be” (Randall, 2012) NURS-6512 Week 2: Assignment 1 Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information.
Randall’s statements sparked a great deal of controversy and debate at the time; however, they emphasize an underlying reality in the healthcare field: Different populations, cultures, and groups have diverse beliefs and practices that impact their health. APRNs and other healthcare professionals should be aware of this reality and adapt their health assessment techniques and recommendations to accommodate diversity.
As an advanced practice nurse, you must build a patient health history that takes into account all of the factors that make a patient unique and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with each patient, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess a patient’s health risks.
For this first Assignment, you will take on the role of an APRN who is building a health history for a particular patient assigned by your Instructor. You will consider how social determinants of health and specific cultural considerations will influence your interview and communication techniques as you work in partnership with the patient to gather data for an accurate health history.
Note:
You are expected to draw on the resources for
both
Week 1 and Week 2 when completing your Assignment.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resource links to access the resources.
WEEK 1 WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
Reflect on your experience as an advanced practice nurse and on the information provided in the Week 1 Learning Resources on building a health history and the Week 2 Learning Resources on diversity issues in health assessments.
By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign a case study for this Assignment.
Note:
Please see the
Course Announcements
section of the classroom for your Case Study Assignment.
Reflect on the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors related to the health of your assigned patient.
Consider how you would build a health history for the patient. What questions would you ask? How might you target your questions based on the patient’s social determinants of health? How would you frame the questions to be sensitive to the patient’s background, lifestyle, and culture?
Identify any potential health-related risks, based on the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting, which should be taken into consideration.
What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with this patient?
What questions would you ask to assess the patient’s health risks?
Select
one (1)
risk assessment instrument discussed in the Learning Resources, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.
Develop
five (5)
targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks.
Think about the challenges associated with communicating with patients from a variety of specific populations. What communication techniques would be most appropriate to use with this patient? What strategies can you as an APRN employ to be sensitive to different cultural factors while gathering the pertinent information?
Assignment: Building a Health History With Cultural and Diversity Awareness
Include the following:
Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific.
Explain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.
Describe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques.
Summarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least
five (5)
targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient.
Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific.
Include a reference list with a minimum of 3 scholarly articles.
By day 7 of Week 2
Submit
your Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
Turnitin Drafts
from the
Start Here
area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK2Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on
Start Assignment
near the top of the page.
Next, click on
Upload File
and select
Submit Assignment
for review.
Rubric
NURS_6512_Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific NURS-6512 Week 2: Assignment 1 Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information
15
to >
12.0
pts
Excellent
The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.
12
to >
9.0
pts
Good
The response accurately explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.
9
to >
6.0
pts
Fair
The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.
6
to >
0
pts
Poor
The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.
15
to >
12.0
pts
Excellent
The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are clear, accurate, and detailed.
12
to >
9.0
pts
Good
The response accurately explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are accurate.
9
to >
6.0
pts
Fair
The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are vague and/or inaccurate.
6
to >
0
pts
Poor
The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are inaccurate or missing.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Describe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques.
15
to >
12.0
pts
Excellent
The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a detailed explanation of why to use these techniques.
12
to >
9.0
pts
Good
The response accurately identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an explanation of why to use these techniques.
9
to >
6.0
pts
Fair
The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a vague explanation of why to use these techniques.
6
to >
0
pts
Poor
The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of communication techniques to use with the patient, including inaccurate or missing strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an inadequate or missing explanation of why to use these techniques.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Summarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient.
25
to >
22.0
pts
Excellent
The response clearly, accurately, and in detail summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including at least five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with detailed explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.
22
to >
19.0
pts
Good
The response accurately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.
19
to >
16.0
pts
Fair
The response vaguely summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five questions to ask that are vague or lacking specificity to build the health history and assess health risks, with vague explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.
16
to >
0
pts
Poor
The response inadequately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including fewer than five questions that are inadequate for building the health history and assessing health risks, with inadequate or missing explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.
25
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific.
15
to >
12.0
pts
Excellent
The response clearly and accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides detailed and specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.
12
to >
9.0
pts
Good
The response accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.
9
to >
6.0
pts
Fair
The response vaguely identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides vague justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.
6
to >
0
pts
Poor
The response inadequately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides inadequate or missing justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph Development and Organization — Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused and neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5
to >
4.0
pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4
to >
3.0
pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3
to >
2.0
pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
2
to >
0
pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards — Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5
to >
4.0
pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4
to >
3.0
pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3
to >
2.0
pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2
to >
0
pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.
5
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Written Expression and Formatting: APA The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list with minimum of 3 scholarly articles. NURS-6512 Week 2: Assignment 1 Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information
5
to >
4.0
pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors. Contains 3 references.
4
to >
3.0
pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Contains at least 2 references
3
to >
2.0
pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Contains less than 2 references.
2
to >
0
pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding. No references listed.
5
pts
Total Points:
100