Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Imagine you have just received your certification and are taking on your first trainee within your organization who is working towards certification. Based on the BACB® guidelines and the Ethics code, and this week's lecture, create a task analysis that you will follow to set up the supervisory relationship prior to your first supervision meeting with this trainee. What things must be in place before you begin? Are there any conditions under which will you not proceed with the supervisory relationship with this information
_Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module._
_Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (_ [_as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site._](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html) _). Failing to do so will result in point deductions._
Reflection papers consist of brief responses to a prompt related to the information shared in each week’s module. Using
both the assigned materials and external references, the student should thoughtfully and thoroughly respond to the
prompt. During the following week, students will be required to provide feedback on a peer’s reflection paper, and will be
required to paste the text of their completed peer review into their own submission comments in Canvas, which will allow
for the instructor to grade more easily. Reflection paper assignments will be graded as follows:
Category 5 points 3 points 0 points
Reflection Length*
*(excludes reference section
and direct quotes from
references that are longer
than 5 words)
Reflection paper content
was greater than 150
words.
Reflection paper content
was between 100-149
words.
Reflection paper content
was less than 99 words.
Grammar, Usage,
and Spelling
Reflection paper contained
less than 2 grammar,
usage, or spelling errors.
Reflection paper contained
3-4 grammar, usage, or
spelling errors.
Reflection paper contained
more than 5 grammar,
usage, or spelling errors
and proofreading was not
apparent.
References and
Utilization of
Outside
Resources
The author used
references from peer-
reviewed behavioral
sources in APA format and
cited one or more
original behavioral
references, outside of the
assigned readings.
Hyperlinks to the cited
external references are
provided.
The author used
references in APA format
of assigned readings but
did not include an
additional peer-reviewed
behavioral reference or did
not include a hyperlink to
the externally-cited
reference.
The author neither utilized
APA format for referenced
material used nor cited an
outside peer-reviewed
behavioral reference.
Addressing the
Prompt
The author’s reflection
paper clearly responds to
the assignment prompt,
develops ideas cogently,
organizes them logically,
and supports them through
empirical writing.
The author’s reflection
paper clearly responds to
the assignment prompt,
develops ideas cogently,
organizes them logically,
and supports them through
empirical writing.
The author’s reflection
paper does not correspond
with the assignment
prompt, mainly discusses
personal opinions,
irrelevant information, or
information is presented
with limited logic and lack
of development and
organization of ideas.
Application The author’s post clearly
demonstrates application
and relationship to the
week’s assigned
reading/topic.
The author’s post refers to
the assigned topic/reading
tangentially but does not
demonstrate application.
The author’s post does not
demonstrate application of
the week’s assigned
topic/reading.
Peer Review –
Your peer review text
must be copied and
pasted into the comments
of your own reflection
paper submission to
receive credit.
Completes peer-review of
colleague’s reflection paper
and provides well-thought-
out, thorough feedback.
Completes peer-review of
colleague’s reflection
paper, but provides only
vague, non-specific
feedback or input.
Does not complete peer-
review of a colleague’s
reflection paper or does not
copy the text into t
– a year ago