Tag: History

  • [Solved] History – American history homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>American history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-american-history) – a year ago **files (1)** – ## s.afinal.docx **## s.afinal.docx** You will need to write an essay no shorter than 1000 words that analyzes a selection (included below) from Kathleen Belew’s Bring the War H…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>American history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-american-history)

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## s.afinal.docx

    **## s.afinal.docx**

    You will need to write an essay no shorter than 1000 words that analyzes a selection (included below) from Kathleen Belew’s Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).

    [Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America](https://epcc.brightspace.com/content/enforced/7289-202520-25481/Bring%20the%20War%20Home%20-%20OKC%20Bombing.pdf)

    As you analyze this source, consider the following questions:

    • What is the author’s main argument?

    • How is the Oklahoma City bombing linked to the broader white power movement in the United States? Must include pumpkins and boy bands

    • What parallels do you see between this movement in the 1990s outlined by Belew, and the white power and paramilitary movement today?

    • How does this reading tie into the discussion of extremism that you read in Chapter 30 of American Yawp?

    [https://www.americanyawp.com/text/30-the-recent-past/#II_American_Politics_before_September_11_2001](https://www.americanyawp.com/text/30-the-recent-past/#II_American_Politics_before_September_11_2001) – chapter 30 american yawp

    [https://youtu.be/L-K19rVDxoM](https://youtu.be/L-K19rVDxoM) – crash course

    [https://youtu.be/-rboN6F2g-k](https://youtu.be/-rboN6F2g-k) – crash course

    [https://youtu.be/prKS4YsSnmE](https://youtu.be/prKS4YsSnmE) – crash course

    You will NOT need to do outside research for this essay (you may use American Yawp and Crash Course). A piece of good advice: Read the selection from Bring the War Home thoroughly with the main question in mind.

    **## s.afinal.docx**

    You will need to write an essay no shorter than 1000 words that analyzes a selection (included below) from Kathleen Belew’s Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).

    [Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America](https://epcc.brightspace.com/content/enforced/7289-202520-25481/Bring%20the%20War%20Home%20-%20OKC%20Bombing.pdf)

    As you analyze this source, consider the following questions:

    • What is the author’s main argument?

    • How is the Oklahoma City bombing linked to the broader white power movement in the United States? Must include pumpkins and boy bands

    • What parallels do you see between this movement in the 1990s outlined by Belew, and the white power and paramilitary movement today?

    • How does this reading tie into the discussion of extremism that you read in Chapter 30 of American Yawp?

    [https://www.americanyawp.com/text/30-the-recent-past/#II_American_Politics_before_September_11_2001](https://www.americanyawp.com/text/30-the-recent-past/#II_American_Politics_before_September_11_2001) – chapter 30 american yawp

    [https://youtu.be/L-K19rVDxoM](https://youtu.be/L-K19rVDxoM) – crash course

    [https://youtu.be/-rboN6F2g-k](https://youtu.be/-rboN6F2g-k) – crash course

    [https://youtu.be/prKS4YsSnmE](https://youtu.be/prKS4YsSnmE) – crash course

    You will NOT need to do outside research for this essay (you may use American Yawp and Crash Course). A piece of good advice: Read the selection from Bring the War Home thoroughly with the main question in mind.

  • [Solved] Discussion Post Early US History.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>American history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-american-history) 250 Words / Chicago Style Citations / ONLY ONE QUESTION NEEDS TO BE ANSWERED. YOU CHOOSE. 1. What were the similarities of the cultures of indigenous peoples in America in 1492, and how did they differ from…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>American history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-american-history)

    250 Words / Chicago Style Citations / ONLY ONE QUESTION NEEDS TO BE ANSWERED. YOU CHOOSE.

    1. What were the similarities of the cultures of indigenous peoples in America in 1492, and how did they differ from the culture of Europe at the time?

    1. How did the Olmec, Aztec, Inca, Maya, and North American Indians differ in their ways of life and cultural achievements? How did their particular circumstances—geography, history, or the accomplishments of the societies that had preceded them, for example—serve to shape their particular traditions and cultures?

    1. What were the lasting effects of the Crusades? In what ways did they provide opportunities – both negative and positive – for cross-cultural encounters and exchanges?

    1. What were the various goals of the colonial European powers in the expansion of their empires? To what extent were they able to achieve these goals? Where did they fail?

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] week 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Ancient history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-ancient-history) – a year ago **files (12)** – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ParentsPreliminaryReview.docx – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx – ## Norman…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Ancient history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-ancient-history)

    – a year ago

    **files (12)**

    – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ParentsPreliminaryReview.docx

    – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx

    – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx

    – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentVerbal-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx

    – ## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx

    – ## week2.docx

    – ## ConsultingwithYourSupervisorandDocumentingYourProgress.docx

    – CombinedParentalConsentandParticipantsAssent11.docx
    – Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview.docx
    – Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview1.docx
    – FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx
    – FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ParentsPreliminaryReview.docx**

    **ATTENTION PARENTS OF CHURCH-GOING TEENAGERS:** I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA. For your child to participate, he or she must be a church-going teenager, or a teenager involved in church youth groups, who is between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and resides in St. Louis, MO, USA. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. If your child is interested and eligible, please contact me at anorman8@liberty.edu. A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx**

    Dear Parent,

    As a doctoral candidate in the School of Divinity at Liberty University, I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I am writing to invite your child to join my study.

    For your child to participate, he or she must reside in St. Louis, MO, be between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and actively use at least one social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter) at least once a week. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio- and video-recorded, virtual focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed.

    For your child to participate, please contact me at
    [anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:anorman8@liberty.edu).

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you allow your child to participate, you will need to sign the consent document and return it to me as an email attachment. If your child chooses to participate, he/she will need to sign the same consent form that you will sign.

    Sincerely,

    Arnita Norman

    Doctoral Candidate

    [Anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:Anorman8@liberty.edu)

    **Please note that we have created a recruitment (email) document. You will need to directly recruit parents; therefore, you will need an email recruitment document, so that interested minors can have you send that recruitment along with the consent to the parents.** The final versions of your documents will be attached to the Submission Details page of your application in Cayuse. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns. We wish you well as you conduct your research.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx**

    Dear Parent,

    As a doctoral candidate in the School of Divinity at Liberty University, I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I am writing to invite your child to join my study.

    For your child to participate, he or she must reside in St. Louis, MO, be between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and actively use at least one social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter) at least once a week. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio- and video-recorded, virtual focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed.

    For your child to participate, please contact me at
    [anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:anorman8@liberty.edu).

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you allow your child to participate, you will need to sign the consent document and return it to me as an email attachment. If your child chooses to participate, he/she will need to sign the same consent form that you will sign.

    Sincerely,

    Arnita Norman

    Doctoral Candidate

    [Anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:Anorman8@liberty.edu)

    **Please note that we have created a recruitment (email) document. You will need to directly recruit parents; therefore, you will need an email recruitment document, so that interested minors can have you send that recruitment along with the consent to the parents.** The final versions of your documents will be attached to the Submission Details page of your application in Cayuse. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns. We wish you well as you conduct your research.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentVerbal-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx**

    Hello Potential Participant,

    My name is Arnita Norman, and I am a doctoral candidate in Christian Leadership Doctoral Programs at Liberty University. I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I would like to invite you to join my study.

    Participants must be church-going teenagers, or teenagers involved in church youth groups, who are between ages 13 and 17 years old and reside in St. Louis, MO, USA. Are you a church-going teenager between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and a resident of St. Louis, MO, USA?

    [“Yes” response:] Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group.procedures listed. Participation will be completely anonymous, and no personal, identifying information will be collected. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): In the "Participant Information" section, you state, "30 members participating in the focus group sessions will be recruited from the survey participants,” so not all survey participants will be asked to complete the focus group. This was revised to reflect this. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The specific time estimates for each procedure were added here. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): You will need to use confidential data collection methods since you intend to know who completed the surveys and focus groups. This was revised to match the IRB template.

    [“No” response:] Unfortunately, you do not meet my participant criteria, so I am unable to include you in my study. Thank you for your time.

    Would you like to participate?

    [“Yes” response:] Great, could I get either your email address or your parent’s email address, so I can send you the consent form?

    [“No” response:] I understand. Thank you for your time.

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you choose to participate, you will need to save, type your name and date on the document, then return it to me as an email attachment. Because participation is anonymous, you do not need to sign and return the consent document unless you would prefer to do so. After you have read the consent form, please click the link to proceed to the survey/complete and return the survey. Doing so will indicate that you have read the consent information and would like to take part in the study. One of your parents will also need to sign the same consent document as you prior to returning the form to me. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): This sentence was added to match the IRB template. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The next sentence was added since you are not using anonymous data methods, but rather confidential ones.

    Participants will receive a $10 gift card as a token of appreciation for their time.

    Thank you for your time. Do you have any questions? Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The sentence above was deleted since your application states you will not provide compensation.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx**

    **Recruitment Strategy: Social Media** Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): This is not a proper social media recruitment document, so it was revised for you to match both the IRB template and application

    **ATTENTION CHURCH-GOING TEENAGERS:** I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA. To participate, you must be a church-going teenager, or a teenager involved in church youth groups, who is between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and resides in St. Louis, MO, USA. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. If you are interested and eligible, please contact me at anorman8@liberty.edu. A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you and your parents.

    1.
    **Define Target Group:**

    · Church-going teenagers aged 13-19.

    · Both active and occasional participants in religious services.

    2.
    **Create Outreach Materials:**

    ·
    **Flyers and Posters:** Highlight the study’s purpose, confidentiality, and potential impact.

    ·
    **Social Media Posts:** Use platforms popular among teens (Instagram, TikTok, and Google Forms platform, Analysis and Reporting

    · Use statistical analysis for quantitative data to identify trends and correlations.

    · Thematic analysis for qualitative data to capture nuanced perspectives.

    · Conclusion

    · Summarize findings and discuss implications for religious communities, parents, and educators regarding the influence of social media on the religious behavior of teenagers.

    · ) to share engaging content about the study.

    3.
    **Engage Churches:**

    · Collaborate with local churches to promote the study through announcements, newsletters, or youth group meetings.

    · Offer to present at youth events or services to explain the study.

    4.
    **Leverage Influencers:**

    · Partner with youth leaders or social media influencers within faith communities to reach a broader audience.

    5.
    **Online Surveys:**

    · Develop a user-friendly online survey to make participation easy and accessible.

    6.
    **Incentives:**

    · Consider offering small incentives (like gift cards) for participation to encourage engagement.

    **Research Focus Areas**

    1.
    **Social Media Usage:**

    · Frequency and types of social media platforms used by teenagers.

    · Content engagement related to religious themes.

    2.
    **Religious Behavior:**

    · Attendance at religious services.

    · Participation in religious discussions or activities online.

    3.
    **Perceptions and Attitudes:**

    · How social media influences their beliefs, values, and sense of community within their faith.

    4.
    **Comparative Analysis:**

    · Differences in behavior and attitudes between teens with high social media engagement and those with low engagement.

    **Data Collection Methods**

    1.
    **Surveys and Questionnaires:**

    · Use quantitative methods to gather data on social media habits and religious participation.

    2.
    **Interviews:**

    · Conduct qualitative interviews for deeper insights into personal experiences and perceptions.

    3.
    **Focus Groups:**

    · Organize discussions with groups of teenagers to explore collective views on the impact of social media.

    **Analysis and Reporting**

    · Use statistical analysis for quantitative data to identify trends and correlations.

    · Thematic analysis for qualitative data to capture nuanced perspectives.

    **Conclusion**

    Summarize findings and discuss implications for religious communities, parents, and educators regarding the influence of social media on the religious behavior of teenagers.

    **## week2.docx**

    **Quiz: Initial Dissertation Supervisor Consultation**

    **The quiz:**

    · Covers the
    **Consulting with Your Supervisor and Documenting Your Progress** and dissertation supervisor consultations material from
    **Module 2.**

    · Contains
    **2 essay** questions.

    · Is
    **unlimited** in time allotted.

    ·
    **Allows** **1 attempt**.

    · Is
    **worth 20 points**.

    This is a two-question “quiz” that provides an opportunity for you, the student, to log and report on the bi-weekly consultation held between the dissertation supervisor and yourself. The first question records the date and time of the required consultation. The second question records a summary of the contents of the consultation. Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor that the appropriate level of progress has been made. Details of the nature of and the expectations governing the consultation are found in the document entitled, “Consulting with Your Supervisor and Documenting Your Progress," that is linked below.

    This have to 200-300 word document on what we are going to do by getting the kids to come to God on social media and how are going to move forward with the documents that we submitted.

    **## ConsultingwithYourSupervisorandDocumentingYourProgress.docx**

    CLED 989

    **Consulting with Your Supervisor**

    **and Documenting Your Progress**

    Developing a strong working relationship with your supervisor and documenting your meetings together are critically important to the dissertation research and writing phase of the doctoral journey. This short reading assignment addresses what you need to know to be successful in accomplishing those two responsibilities as a doctoral student.

    1.
    **Holding Bi-Weekly Consultations.** Regular and substantive communication with the dissertation supervisor is required during the dissertation research and writing phase. You and your dissertation supervisor are free to determine the preferred communications method used for these regular interactions. Phone calls, video conference calls, email exchanges, and face-to-face interactions are all acceptable methods. Consultations are initiated by the student and are subject to the availability of the dissertation supervisor.

    _Note: A strict adherence to the late-policy will be followed for the completion of the Dissertation Supervisor Consultation quizzes._

    2.
    **Topics of your Bi-Weekly Consultations.** At each meeting, it is your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding advancements made on the dissertation research and writing process since the previous meeting.

    Your meetings may include any or all of the following:

    · IRB progress or revisions

    · Research work conducted or writing completed since the last report.

    · Questions soliciting advice on the dissertation research and writing task.

    · Submission of material for review as requested by the Supervisor or student with written feedback.

    · Problems encountered in conducting the research.

    Keep in mind that your supervisor may be working with several students therefore they may lose track of the details of your particular study. Using your research profile can be a very helpful reminder to your supervisor of your study purpose, RQs, and design. You may want to send a copy of the profile to your dissertation supervisor via email prior to your meeting.

    3.
    **Frequency of Consultations.** How many consultations should be held and how often? You are required to hold at least six of these communications (calls, emails, meetings, etc.) during the research and writing phase. These should begin no later than the second module of the CLED989 course and occur every other week. A quiz is used in Canvas for each of these consultations. You should plan to hold a consultation every other week until the dissertation first draft is submitted.

    4.
    **Documenting your Consultations.** It is important to faithfully document your dissertation supervisor consultations. To assist you with this requirement, a “quiz” has been set-up to be taken every two weeks starting in the second module. The quiz has two questions. For the first question, you will supply the time and date of your meeting or other form of communication. The second question will be a 150-to-300-word description of the content and outcome of your consultation. These documented reports are reviewed by the program director and are retained for future review by Liberty University accrediting associations.

    Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor of the appropriate level of progress has been made.

    5.
    **The Role of the Supervisor.** The dissertation supervisor provides authoritative oversight to the research process and is the chairman of the dissertation committee. The role of your dissertation supervisor includes the following.

    · Advise on the nature of the dissertation design (viability of the study, clarification of policies and protocols)

    · Assist in developing the dissertation title

    · Discuss a general strategy for the design of the research

    · Discuss avenues for literature search and review

    · Suggest helpful literature and other sources

    · Oversee the planning of the
    _Research Prospectus_ and the
    _Dissertation_

    · Set and maintain the standard of work expected

    · Offer input for improvements to draft chapters

    · Discuss possible research methods

    · Advise on dealing with outside agencies

    · Warn of major problems

    · Give feedback on argument, analyses, quality, and progress

    · Encourage, support, and acknowledge progress

    6.
    **Tips for Working with Your Dissertation Supervisor.**

    · Communicate in a respectful manner. Use their title in your contact.

    · Initiate meetings, don’t wait for your supervisor to call a meeting.

    · Try to limit meetings to once every two weeks.

    · Come prepared. Consider emailing a list of topics to be discussed prior to your meeting .

    · Keep your profile current and send it to your supervisor prior to your meeting as a discussion aid.

    · Allow at least a week for the review of your submissions. Longer submissions will take longer to review. Do not expect a 24-hour response on this level of writing.

    · Submit entire chapters for review, not short segments.

    · Discuss the problems or difficulties you are experiencing,

    · Don’t expect your supervisor to be your editor, statistician, or content expert. They are directing a process, not the content master of your particular topic.

    · Carefully review the Program Handbook and follow it.

    · Be sure your work is APA 7 compliant and that you reviewed Section 5 of the handbook. They will expect you to know and apply this.

    · Do not call or text a supervisor. Please email only.

    **CombinedParentalConsentandParticipantsAssent11.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/combinedparentalconsentandparticipantsassent11-docx)

    **Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/norman-1437combinedconsentpreliminaryreview-docx)

    **Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/norman-1437combinedconsentpreliminaryreview1-docx-10294643)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx-10296545)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx-10296545)

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ParentsPreliminaryReview.docx**

    **ATTENTION PARENTS OF CHURCH-GOING TEENAGERS:** I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA. For your child to participate, he or she must be a church-going teenager, or a teenager involved in church youth groups, who is between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and resides in St. Louis, MO, USA. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. If your child is interested and eligible, please contact me at anorman8@liberty.edu. A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx**

    Dear Parent,

    As a doctoral candidate in the School of Divinity at Liberty University, I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I am writing to invite your child to join my study.

    For your child to participate, he or she must reside in St. Louis, MO, be between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and actively use at least one social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter) at least once a week. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio- and video-recorded, virtual focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed.

    For your child to participate, please contact me at
    [anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:anorman8@liberty.edu).

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you allow your child to participate, you will need to sign the consent document and return it to me as an email attachment. If your child chooses to participate, he/she will need to sign the same consent form that you will sign.

    Sincerely,

    Arnita Norman

    Doctoral Candidate

    [Anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:Anorman8@liberty.edu)

    **Please note that we have created a recruitment (email) document. You will need to directly recruit parents; therefore, you will need an email recruitment document, so that interested minors can have you send that recruitment along with the consent to the parents.** The final versions of your documents will be attached to the Submission Details page of your application in Cayuse. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns. We wish you well as you conduct your research.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx**

    Dear Parent,

    As a doctoral candidate in the School of Divinity at Liberty University, I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I am writing to invite your child to join my study.

    For your child to participate, he or she must reside in St. Louis, MO, be between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and actively use at least one social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter) at least once a week. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio- and video-recorded, virtual focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed.

    For your child to participate, please contact me at
    [anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:anorman8@liberty.edu).

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you allow your child to participate, you will need to sign the consent document and return it to me as an email attachment. If your child chooses to participate, he/she will need to sign the same consent form that you will sign.

    Sincerely,

    Arnita Norman

    Doctoral Candidate

    [Anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:Anorman8@liberty.edu)

    **Please note that we have created a recruitment (email) document. You will need to directly recruit parents; therefore, you will need an email recruitment document, so that interested minors can have you send that recruitment along with the consent to the parents.** The final versions of your documents will be attached to the Submission Details page of your application in Cayuse. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns. We wish you well as you conduct your research.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentVerbal-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx**

    Hello Potential Participant,

    My name is Arnita Norman, and I am a doctoral candidate in Christian Leadership Doctoral Programs at Liberty University. I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I would like to invite you to join my study.

    Participants must be church-going teenagers, or teenagers involved in church youth groups, who are between ages 13 and 17 years old and reside in St. Louis, MO, USA. Are you a church-going teenager between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and a resident of St. Louis, MO, USA?

    [“Yes” response:] Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group.procedures listed. Participation will be completely anonymous, and no personal, identifying information will be collected. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): In the "Participant Information" section, you state, "30 members participating in the focus group sessions will be recruited from the survey participants,” so not all survey participants will be asked to complete the focus group. This was revised to reflect this. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The specific time estimates for each procedure were added here. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): You will need to use confidential data collection methods since you intend to know who completed the surveys and focus groups. This was revised to match the IRB template.

    [“No” response:] Unfortunately, you do not meet my participant criteria, so I am unable to include you in my study. Thank you for your time.

    Would you like to participate?

    [“Yes” response:] Great, could I get either your email address or your parent’s email address, so I can send you the consent form?

    [“No” response:] I understand. Thank you for your time.

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you choose to participate, you will need to save, type your name and date on the document, then return it to me as an email attachment. Because participation is anonymous, you do not need to sign and return the consent document unless you would prefer to do so. After you have read the consent form, please click the link to proceed to the survey/complete and return the survey. Doing so will indicate that you have read the consent information and would like to take part in the study. One of your parents will also need to sign the same consent document as you prior to returning the form to me. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): This sentence was added to match the IRB template. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The next sentence was added since you are not using anonymous data methods, but rather confidential ones.

    Participants will receive a $10 gift card as a token of appreciation for their time.

    Thank you for your time. Do you have any questions? Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The sentence above was deleted since your application states you will not provide compensation.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx**

    **Recruitment Strategy: Social Media** Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): This is not a proper social media recruitment document, so it was revised for you to match both the IRB template and application

    **ATTENTION CHURCH-GOING TEENAGERS:** I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA. To participate, you must be a church-going teenager, or a teenager involved in church youth groups, who is between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and resides in St. Louis, MO, USA. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. If you are interested and eligible, please contact me at anorman8@liberty.edu. A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you and your parents.

    1.
    **Define Target Group:**

    · Church-going teenagers aged 13-19.

    · Both active and occasional participants in religious services.

    2.
    **Create Outreach Materials:**

    ·
    **Flyers and Posters:** Highlight the study’s purpose, confidentiality, and potential impact.

    ·
    **Social Media Posts:** Use platforms popular among teens (Instagram, TikTok, and Google Forms platform, Analysis and Reporting

    · Use statistical analysis for quantitative data to identify trends and correlations.

    · Thematic analysis for qualitative data to capture nuanced perspectives.

    · Conclusion

    · Summarize findings and discuss implications for religious communities, parents, and educators regarding the influence of social media on the religious behavior of teenagers.

    · ) to share engaging content about the study.

    3.
    **Engage Churches:**

    · Collaborate with local churches to promote the study through announcements, newsletters, or youth group meetings.

    · Offer to present at youth events or services to explain the study.

    4.
    **Leverage Influencers:**

    · Partner with youth leaders or social media influencers within faith communities to reach a broader audience.

    5.
    **Online Surveys:**

    · Develop a user-friendly online survey to make participation easy and accessible.

    6.
    **Incentives:**

    · Consider offering small incentives (like gift cards) for participation to encourage engagement.

    **Research Focus Areas**

    1.
    **Social Media Usage:**

    · Frequency and types of social media platforms used by teenagers.

    · Content engagement related to religious themes.

    2.
    **Religious Behavior:**

    · Attendance at religious services.

    · Participation in religious discussions or activities online.

    3.
    **Perceptions and Attitudes:**

    · How social media influences their beliefs, values, and sense of community within their faith.

    4.
    **Comparative Analysis:**

    · Differences in behavior and attitudes between teens with high social media engagement and those with low engagement.

    **Data Collection Methods**

    1.
    **Surveys and Questionnaires:**

    · Use quantitative methods to gather data on social media habits and religious participation.

    2.
    **Interviews:**

    · Conduct qualitative interviews for deeper insights into personal experiences and perceptions.

    3.
    **Focus Groups:**

    · Organize discussions with groups of teenagers to explore collective views on the impact of social media.

    **Analysis and Reporting**

    · Use statistical analysis for quantitative data to identify trends and correlations.

    · Thematic analysis for qualitative data to capture nuanced perspectives.

    **Conclusion**

    Summarize findings and discuss implications for religious communities, parents, and educators regarding the influence of social media on the religious behavior of teenagers.

    **## week2.docx**

    **Quiz: Initial Dissertation Supervisor Consultation**

    **The quiz:**

    · Covers the
    **Consulting with Your Supervisor and Documenting Your Progress** and dissertation supervisor consultations material from
    **Module 2.**

    · Contains
    **2 essay** questions.

    · Is
    **unlimited** in time allotted.

    ·
    **Allows** **1 attempt**.

    · Is
    **worth 20 points**.

    This is a two-question “quiz” that provides an opportunity for you, the student, to log and report on the bi-weekly consultation held between the dissertation supervisor and yourself. The first question records the date and time of the required consultation. The second question records a summary of the contents of the consultation. Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor that the appropriate level of progress has been made. Details of the nature of and the expectations governing the consultation are found in the document entitled, “Consulting with Your Supervisor and Documenting Your Progress," that is linked below.

    This have to 200-300 word document on what we are going to do by getting the kids to come to God on social media and how are going to move forward with the documents that we submitted.

    **## ConsultingwithYourSupervisorandDocumentingYourProgress.docx**

    CLED 989

    **Consulting with Your Supervisor**

    **and Documenting Your Progress**

    Developing a strong working relationship with your supervisor and documenting your meetings together are critically important to the dissertation research and writing phase of the doctoral journey. This short reading assignment addresses what you need to know to be successful in accomplishing those two responsibilities as a doctoral student.

    1.
    **Holding Bi-Weekly Consultations.** Regular and substantive communication with the dissertation supervisor is required during the dissertation research and writing phase. You and your dissertation supervisor are free to determine the preferred communications method used for these regular interactions. Phone calls, video conference calls, email exchanges, and face-to-face interactions are all acceptable methods. Consultations are initiated by the student and are subject to the availability of the dissertation supervisor.

    _Note: A strict adherence to the late-policy will be followed for the completion of the Dissertation Supervisor Consultation quizzes._

    2.
    **Topics of your Bi-Weekly Consultations.** At each meeting, it is your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding advancements made on the dissertation research and writing process since the previous meeting.

    Your meetings may include any or all of the following:

    · IRB progress or revisions

    · Research work conducted or writing completed since the last report.

    · Questions soliciting advice on the dissertation research and writing task.

    · Submission of material for review as requested by the Supervisor or student with written feedback.

    · Problems encountered in conducting the research.

    Keep in mind that your supervisor may be working with several students therefore they may lose track of the details of your particular study. Using your research profile can be a very helpful reminder to your supervisor of your study purpose, RQs, and design. You may want to send a copy of the profile to your dissertation supervisor via email prior to your meeting.

    3.
    **Frequency of Consultations.** How many consultations should be held and how often? You are required to hold at least six of these communications (calls, emails, meetings, etc.) during the research and writing phase. These should begin no later than the second module of the CLED989 course and occur every other week. A quiz is used in Canvas for each of these consultations. You should plan to hold a consultation every other week until the dissertation first draft is submitted.

    4.
    **Documenting your Consultations.** It is important to faithfully document your dissertation supervisor consultations. To assist you with this requirement, a “quiz” has been set-up to be taken every two weeks starting in the second module. The quiz has two questions. For the first question, you will supply the time and date of your meeting or other form of communication. The second question will be a 150-to-300-word description of the content and outcome of your consultation. These documented reports are reviewed by the program director and are retained for future review by Liberty University accrediting associations.

    Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor of the appropriate level of progress has been made.

    5.
    **The Role of the Supervisor.** The dissertation supervisor provides authoritative oversight to the research process and is the chairman of the dissertation committee. The role of your dissertation supervisor includes the following.

    · Advise on the nature of the dissertation design (viability of the study, clarification of policies and protocols)

    · Assist in developing the dissertation title

    · Discuss a general strategy for the design of the research

    · Discuss avenues for literature search and review

    · Suggest helpful literature and other sources

    · Oversee the planning of the
    _Research Prospectus_ and the
    _Dissertation_

    · Set and maintain the standard of work expected

    · Offer input for improvements to draft chapters

    · Discuss possible research methods

    · Advise on dealing with outside agencies

    · Warn of major problems

    · Give feedback on argument, analyses, quality, and progress

    · Encourage, support, and acknowledge progress

    6.
    **Tips for Working with Your Dissertation Supervisor.**

    · Communicate in a respectful manner. Use their title in your contact.

    · Initiate meetings, don’t wait for your supervisor to call a meeting.

    · Try to limit meetings to once every two weeks.

    · Come prepared. Consider emailing a list of topics to be discussed prior to your meeting .

    · Keep your profile current and send it to your supervisor prior to your meeting as a discussion aid.

    · Allow at least a week for the review of your submissions. Longer submissions will take longer to review. Do not expect a 24-hour response on this level of writing.

    · Submit entire chapters for review, not short segments.

    · Discuss the problems or difficulties you are experiencing,

    · Don’t expect your supervisor to be your editor, statistician, or content expert. They are directing a process, not the content master of your particular topic.

    · Carefully review the Program Handbook and follow it.

    · Be sure your work is APA 7 compliant and that you reviewed Section 5 of the handbook. They will expect you to know and apply this.

    · Do not call or text a supervisor. Please email only.

    **CombinedParentalConsentandParticipantsAssent11.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/combinedparentalconsentandparticipantsassent11-docx)

    **Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/norman-1437combinedconsentpreliminaryreview-docx)

    **Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/norman-1437combinedconsentpreliminaryreview1-docx-10294643)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx-10296545)

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ParentsPreliminaryReview.docx**

    **ATTENTION PARENTS OF CHURCH-GOING TEENAGERS:** I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA. For your child to participate, he or she must be a church-going teenager, or a teenager involved in church youth groups, who is between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and resides in St. Louis, MO, USA. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. If your child is interested and eligible, please contact me at anorman8@liberty.edu. A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx**

    Dear Parent,

    As a doctoral candidate in the School of Divinity at Liberty University, I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I am writing to invite your child to join my study.

    For your child to participate, he or she must reside in St. Louis, MO, be between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and actively use at least one social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter) at least once a week. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio- and video-recorded, virtual focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed.

    For your child to participate, please contact me at
    [anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:anorman8@liberty.edu).

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you allow your child to participate, you will need to sign the consent document and return it to me as an email attachment. If your child chooses to participate, he/she will need to sign the same consent form that you will sign.

    Sincerely,

    Arnita Norman

    Doctoral Candidate

    [Anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:Anorman8@liberty.edu)

    **Please note that we have created a recruitment (email) document. You will need to directly recruit parents; therefore, you will need an email recruitment document, so that interested minors can have you send that recruitment along with the consent to the parents.** The final versions of your documents will be attached to the Submission Details page of your application in Cayuse. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns. We wish you well as you conduct your research.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentEmail-ParentsFinal.docx**

    Dear Parent,

    As a doctoral candidate in the School of Divinity at Liberty University, I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I am writing to invite your child to join my study.

    For your child to participate, he or she must reside in St. Louis, MO, be between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and actively use at least one social media platform (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter) at least once a week. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio- and video-recorded, virtual focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed.

    For your child to participate, please contact me at
    [anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:anorman8@liberty.edu).

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you allow your child to participate, you will need to sign the consent document and return it to me as an email attachment. If your child chooses to participate, he/she will need to sign the same consent form that you will sign.

    Sincerely,

    Arnita Norman

    Doctoral Candidate

    [Anorman8@liberty.edu](mailto:Anorman8@liberty.edu)

    **Please note that we have created a recruitment (email) document. You will need to directly recruit parents; therefore, you will need an email recruitment document, so that interested minors can have you send that recruitment along with the consent to the parents.** The final versions of your documents will be attached to the Submission Details page of your application in Cayuse. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns. We wish you well as you conduct your research.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentVerbal-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx**

    Hello Potential Participant,

    My name is Arnita Norman, and I am a doctoral candidate in Christian Leadership Doctoral Programs at Liberty University. I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA, and I would like to invite you to join my study.

    Participants must be church-going teenagers, or teenagers involved in church youth groups, who are between ages 13 and 17 years old and reside in St. Louis, MO, USA. Are you a church-going teenager between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and a resident of St. Louis, MO, USA?

    [“Yes” response:] Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group.procedures listed. Participation will be completely anonymous, and no personal, identifying information will be collected. Names and other identifying information will be requested as part of this study, but participant identities will not be disclosed. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): In the "Participant Information" section, you state, "30 members participating in the focus group sessions will be recruited from the survey participants,” so not all survey participants will be asked to complete the focus group. This was revised to reflect this. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The specific time estimates for each procedure were added here. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): You will need to use confidential data collection methods since you intend to know who completed the surveys and focus groups. This was revised to match the IRB template.

    [“No” response:] Unfortunately, you do not meet my participant criteria, so I am unable to include you in my study. Thank you for your time.

    Would you like to participate?

    [“Yes” response:] Great, could I get either your email address or your parent’s email address, so I can send you the consent form?

    [“No” response:] I understand. Thank you for your time.

    A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you. The consent document contains additional information about my research. If you choose to participate, you will need to save, type your name and date on the document, then return it to me as an email attachment. Because participation is anonymous, you do not need to sign and return the consent document unless you would prefer to do so. After you have read the consent form, please click the link to proceed to the survey/complete and return the survey. Doing so will indicate that you have read the consent information and would like to take part in the study. One of your parents will also need to sign the same consent document as you prior to returning the form to me. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): This sentence was added to match the IRB template. Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The next sentence was added since you are not using anonymous data methods, but rather confidential ones.

    Participants will receive a $10 gift card as a token of appreciation for their time.

    Thank you for your time. Do you have any questions? Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): The sentence above was deleted since your application states you will not provide compensation.

    **## Norman_1437RecruitmentSocial-ChildPreliminaryReview.docx**

    **Recruitment Strategy: Social Media** Comment by Brubaker, Emily Jane (Research Ethics): This is not a proper social media recruitment document, so it was revised for you to match both the IRB template and application

    **ATTENTION CHURCH-GOING TEENAGERS:** I am conducting research to better understand the digital dilemma surrounding the increased use of social media, especially among church going teenagers. The purpose of my research is to examine the impact of social media on the religious behavior of church-going teenagers in St. Louis, MO, USA. To participate, you must be a church-going teenager, or a teenager involved in church youth groups, who is between the ages of 13 and 17 years old and resides in St. Louis, MO, USA. Participants will be asked to take part in an online, confidential survey. Some participants may be asked to participate in an audio recorded, in-person focus group. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete the survey, and it should take 45 minutes to complete the focus group. If you are interested and eligible, please contact me at anorman8@liberty.edu. A combined parental consent and child assent document will be emailed to you and your parents.

    1.
    **Define Target Group:**

    · Church-going teenagers aged 13-19.

    · Both active and occasional participants in religious services.

    2.
    **Create Outreach Materials:**

    ·
    **Flyers and Posters:** Highlight the study’s purpose, confidentiality, and potential impact.

    ·
    **Social Media Posts:** Use platforms popular among teens (Instagram, TikTok, and Google Forms platform, Analysis and Reporting

    · Use statistical analysis for quantitative data to identify trends and correlations.

    · Thematic analysis for qualitative data to capture nuanced perspectives.

    · Conclusion

    · Summarize findings and discuss implications for religious communities, parents, and educators regarding the influence of social media on the religious behavior of teenagers.

    · ) to share engaging content about the study.

    3.
    **Engage Churches:**

    · Collaborate with local churches to promote the study through announcements, newsletters, or youth group meetings.

    · Offer to present at youth events or services to explain the study.

    4.
    **Leverage Influencers:**

    · Partner with youth leaders or social media influencers within faith communities to reach a broader audience.

    5.
    **Online Surveys:**

    · Develop a user-friendly online survey to make participation easy and accessible.

    6.
    **Incentives:**

    · Consider offering small incentives (like gift cards) for participation to encourage engagement.

    **Research Focus Areas**

    1.
    **Social Media Usage:**

    · Frequency and types of social media platforms used by teenagers.

    · Content engagement related to religious themes.

    2.
    **Religious Behavior:**

    · Attendance at religious services.

    · Participation in religious discussions or activities online.

    3.
    **Perceptions and Attitudes:**

    · How social media influences their beliefs, values, and sense of community within their faith.

    4.
    **Comparative Analysis:**

    · Differences in behavior and attitudes between teens with high social media engagement and those with low engagement.

    **Data Collection Methods**

    1.
    **Surveys and Questionnaires:**

    · Use quantitative methods to gather data on social media habits and religious participation.

    2.
    **Interviews:**

    · Conduct qualitative interviews for deeper insights into personal experiences and perceptions.

    3.
    **Focus Groups:**

    · Organize discussions with groups of teenagers to explore collective views on the impact of social media.

    **Analysis and Reporting**

    · Use statistical analysis for quantitative data to identify trends and correlations.

    · Thematic analysis for qualitative data to capture nuanced perspectives.

    **Conclusion**

    Summarize findings and discuss implications for religious communities, parents, and educators regarding the influence of social media on the religious behavior of teenagers.

    **## week2.docx**

    **Quiz: Initial Dissertation Supervisor Consultation**

    **The quiz:**

    · Covers the
    **Consulting with Your Supervisor and Documenting Your Progress** and dissertation supervisor consultations material from
    **Module 2.**

    · Contains
    **2 essay** questions.

    · Is
    **unlimited** in time allotted.

    ·
    **Allows** **1 attempt**.

    · Is
    **worth 20 points**.

    This is a two-question “quiz” that provides an opportunity for you, the student, to log and report on the bi-weekly consultation held between the dissertation supervisor and yourself. The first question records the date and time of the required consultation. The second question records a summary of the contents of the consultation. Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor that the appropriate level of progress has been made. Details of the nature of and the expectations governing the consultation are found in the document entitled, “Consulting with Your Supervisor and Documenting Your Progress," that is linked below.

    This have to 200-300 word document on what we are going to do by getting the kids to come to God on social media and how are going to move forward with the documents that we submitted.

    **## ConsultingwithYourSupervisorandDocumentingYourProgress.docx**

    CLED 989

    **Consulting with Your Supervisor**

    **and Documenting Your Progress**

    Developing a strong working relationship with your supervisor and documenting your meetings together are critically important to the dissertation research and writing phase of the doctoral journey. This short reading assignment addresses what you need to know to be successful in accomplishing those two responsibilities as a doctoral student.

    1.
    **Holding Bi-Weekly Consultations.** Regular and substantive communication with the dissertation supervisor is required during the dissertation research and writing phase. You and your dissertation supervisor are free to determine the preferred communications method used for these regular interactions. Phone calls, video conference calls, email exchanges, and face-to-face interactions are all acceptable methods. Consultations are initiated by the student and are subject to the availability of the dissertation supervisor.

    _Note: A strict adherence to the late-policy will be followed for the completion of the Dissertation Supervisor Consultation quizzes._

    2.
    **Topics of your Bi-Weekly Consultations.** At each meeting, it is your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding advancements made on the dissertation research and writing process since the previous meeting.

    Your meetings may include any or all of the following:

    · IRB progress or revisions

    · Research work conducted or writing completed since the last report.

    · Questions soliciting advice on the dissertation research and writing task.

    · Submission of material for review as requested by the Supervisor or student with written feedback.

    · Problems encountered in conducting the research.

    Keep in mind that your supervisor may be working with several students therefore they may lose track of the details of your particular study. Using your research profile can be a very helpful reminder to your supervisor of your study purpose, RQs, and design. You may want to send a copy of the profile to your dissertation supervisor via email prior to your meeting.

    3.
    **Frequency of Consultations.** How many consultations should be held and how often? You are required to hold at least six of these communications (calls, emails, meetings, etc.) during the research and writing phase. These should begin no later than the second module of the CLED989 course and occur every other week. A quiz is used in Canvas for each of these consultations. You should plan to hold a consultation every other week until the dissertation first draft is submitted.

    4.
    **Documenting your Consultations.** It is important to faithfully document your dissertation supervisor consultations. To assist you with this requirement, a “quiz” has been set-up to be taken every two weeks starting in the second module. The quiz has two questions. For the first question, you will supply the time and date of your meeting or other form of communication. The second question will be a 150-to-300-word description of the content and outcome of your consultation. These documented reports are reviewed by the program director and are retained for future review by Liberty University accrediting associations.

    Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor of the appropriate level of progress has been made.

    5.
    **The Role of the Supervisor.** The dissertation supervisor provides authoritative oversight to the research process and is the chairman of the dissertation committee. The role of your dissertation supervisor includes the following.

    · Advise on the nature of the dissertation design (viability of the study, clarification of policies and protocols)

    · Assist in developing the dissertation title

    · Discuss a general strategy for the design of the research

    · Discuss avenues for literature search and review

    · Suggest helpful literature and other sources

    · Oversee the planning of the
    _Research Prospectus_ and the
    _Dissertation_

    · Set and maintain the standard of work expected

    · Offer input for improvements to draft chapters

    · Discuss possible research methods

    · Advise on dealing with outside agencies

    · Warn of major problems

    · Give feedback on argument, analyses, quality, and progress

    · Encourage, support, and acknowledge progress

    6.
    **Tips for Working with Your Dissertation Supervisor.**

    · Communicate in a respectful manner. Use their title in your contact.

    · Initiate meetings, don’t wait for your supervisor to call a meeting.

    · Try to limit meetings to once every two weeks.

    · Come prepared. Consider emailing a list of topics to be discussed prior to your meeting .

    · Keep your profile current and send it to your supervisor prior to your meeting as a discussion aid.

    · Allow at least a week for the review of your submissions. Longer submissions will take longer to review. Do not expect a 24-hour response on this level of writing.

    · Submit entire chapters for review, not short segments.

    · Discuss the problems or difficulties you are experiencing,

    · Don’t expect your supervisor to be your editor, statistician, or content expert. They are directing a process, not the content master of your particular topic.

    · Carefully review the Program Handbook and follow it.

    · Be sure your work is APA 7 compliant and that you reviewed Section 5 of the handbook. They will expect you to know and apply this.

    · Do not call or text a supervisor. Please email only.

    **CombinedParentalConsentandParticipantsAssent11.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/combinedparentalconsentandparticipantsassent11-docx)

    **Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/norman-1437combinedconsentpreliminaryreview-docx)

    **Norman_1437CombinedConsentPreliminaryReview1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/norman-1437combinedconsentpreliminaryreview1-docx-10294643)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx)

    **FinalisedResearchProspectusrevised1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalisedresearchprospectusrevised1-docx-10296545)

  • [Solved] Website Analysis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>American history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-american-history) Instructions are in the files. – a year ago **files (5)** – ## MyTopicProposalMilitaryMedicine.docx – ## AssignmentExpectations.docx – ## Brief_Primer_to_Citing_Sources_in_Chicago_Humanities_Style.p…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>American history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-american-history)

    Instructions are in the files.

    – a year ago

    **files (5)**

    – ## MyTopicProposalMilitaryMedicine.docx

    – ## AssignmentExpectations.docx

    – ## Brief_Primer_to_Citing_Sources_in_Chicago_Humanities_Style.pdf

    – evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form.pdf
    – RUBRIC2.pdf

    **## MyTopicProposalMilitaryMedicine.docx**

    2

    **My Topic Proposal: Dorothea Dix and the Reform of Military Medicine During the Civil War**

    Derek Hill

    UMGC

    HIST 156 6381 History of the United States to 1865 (2255)

    May 14, 2025

    For my research, I intend to find out how military medical treatment was influenced by Dorothea Dix during the American Civil War. What is most appealing to me concerning this topic is how Dix’s position as the Superintendent of Army Nurses challenged the established gender norms and enhanced the treatment of the wounded soldiers. Being passionate about social justice and public service, I admire the fact that Dix was able to push for better, humane care in hospitals and in mental health centers. My working thesis is: Dorothea Dix, through her contribution to the civil war, revolutionized military medical practices and set a good base for women to engage in public services and later undertake healthcare and gender reforms. This topic provides me with the chance to examine medicine, gender, and civil service in interaction in the Founding Era of America, which correlates with my general academic interest.

    **## AssignmentExpectations.docx**

    Assignment Expectations: As part of your Research Project, the second assignment requirement expects students to complete a Website Evaluation of TWO websites that are acceptable for college-level academic research and contain information related to their research topic. For this assignment, students will use a search engine of their choice (e.g., Google or Bing) to find appropriate websites related to their topics. After selecting, reviewing and analyzing your two websites, students should write a 250-word analysis for each website. Keep reading to find out more about where to find websites for this assignment and what your analysis should include.

    **Transcript**

    Welcome to this Information and Library Services Tutorial on evaluating Web sites. In this tutorial, you will learn how to determine whether a Web site contains trustworthy information that is appropriate for college level research.

    Many Web sites contain trustworthy information that is appropriate to use in college-level research. But because no one regulates information placed on the Web, there are also Web sites that you would not want to use in a research paper: Web sites, for example, with out-of-date, inaccurate or biased information.

    Here are some questions you can ask that will help you critically evaluate information you find on the Web:

    · Who is the author of the Web site?

    · Does the Web site present information that is biased, one-sided?

    · Does the Web site present accurate information?

    · Is the Web site current enough for your research topic?

    This tutorial will explore those questions in more detail.

    When evaluating a Web site, ask yourself, who has written the Web site content? Are the author’s credentials given? Think about the author’s expertise and credibility. Knowing who wrote the content can help you determine the Web site’s trustworthiness.

    You may find an author whose credentials are not given on the Web site. When that happens, use Google or another search engine to see if you can find information on the author elsewhere on the Web.

    Frequently, an organization can be considered the author of a Web site. For example, the author of a Web site might be a business, a professional association or a government agency. You can usually find a link on an organization’s Web site that provides information about the organization—its activities, mission, leadership and so on. Learning about the organization can help you judge the credibility of the information on the organization’s Web site.

    When evaluating a Web site, also ask yourself, does the Web site present information that is objective and neutral as possible, or is the Web site presenting biased, one-sided information? Depending on your research project, it may be appropriate for you to use biased information.

    For example, if you are presenting both sides of an argument in a pro/con essay about the chemical industry and environmental groups, you could cite information from a chemical industry association and from environmental activists. But you need to be aware of possible bias in a Web site and use—or not use—that Web site accordingly.

    When evaluating a Web site, you should also ask, is the information on the Web site accurate? Compare the information on the Web site with knowledge you have gained from other sources in the course of your research, to see if the Web site contains errors. For example, you might compare the information in a Web site with scholarly articles you have read in library databases, with reference books and so on. Also, does the Web site give sources for the information it presents, sources you can look up and verify?

    Timeliness is another important factor, especially if you are researching a subject in which knowledge can change rapidly, like health and medicine, business or technology. Does the Web site date its information? If so, is the information is current enough for the topic you are researching?

    You can find trustworthy, useful information on all types of Web sites: commercial Web sites, organization, government, education Web sites and so on. But no matter what kind of Web site you are using, you must critically evaluate the information it contains.

    At our library Web site, you can find more information on
    [evaluating Web resources](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/evaluating-sources.cfm). And, if you have any questions about your research, please contact us via Ask a Librarian.

    Assignment Directions: After selecting, reading and analyzing your websites, please make sure each analysis follows the format below and includes the following information.

    · First, before you get started, please note what you should not do for this assignment. Please do not use the following types of sites:

    · UMGC library databases (in other words, do not use any resources found in the library database like Jstor. You will use the library for these resources for later projects)

    · Do not use Wikipedia or any other wiki site (in fact, refrain from using these sites for any part of the research project)

    · Do not use any encyclopedia websites (i.e. Britannica.org. These sites are wonderful for general knowledge, but not for the requirements of this research project)

    · Do not use any sites that require a subscription (also, do not use any of these sites for the requirements of this research paper.)

    · Okay, now on to what your Website Analysis should include:

    · Format: Each Website Analysis should be typed in a word document, with 1-inch margins, double spaced, and include no less than 250 words.

    · Bibliography: At the top of each Website Analysis, students should provide a complete bibliographic entry. This complete bibliographic entry should include a formal citation, including the URL and your date of access. You should note that the required style for this class is Chicago Humanities Style (not the author/date variant). The Effective Writing Center created a short overview on using Chicago Humanities Style called “Brief Guide to Citing Sources in Chicago.” It includes a list of sources formatted in this style. The examples labeled N=footnote/endnote format and those labeled B=bibliographic entry. A copy of this guide is located in the Writing Resources section of Course Resources under Content of this LEO class site.

    · Analysis and Content: Each Website Analysis should include a detailed summary of the main points of the article – in your own words. Ultimately, this should be written within the first two paragraphs of your analysis and include:

    · Describe the content and purpose of the website

    · Determine the author, accuracy of information presented and website’s currency.

    · Explain in detail how and why you determined the site is acceptable for use in an academic research paper

    · Each website analysis should explain how the content pertains to your research

    · Explain how the site relates to your research topic or what you found on the site that relates to your topic

    · It is important that students share more than a simple sentence in this analysis. I would like to see a paragraph dedicated to this portion of the assignment.

    **## Brief_Primer_to_Citing_Sources_in_Chicago_Humanities_Style.pdf**

    A Brief Primer to Citing Sources in Chicago
    Humanities Style

    Whenever you use a source in a paper, you must refer to it twice: once as a note and once in your
    bibliography. With the Chicago style, you have the option to use either footnotes or endnotes.

    Citation for a Direct Quote
    Whenever you use an author's exact words (direct quotation), you must provide a citation to the
    source quoted at that exact point in your text.

    How to Cite a Direct Quote

    Original Text (from Rachel Adele, Women in the Media, 1999)
    "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and
    women, but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what
    women should most fear."

    Direct Quote as Used in Your Paper
    Women have been misled, writes media critic Rachel Adele: "Lung

    cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and women,
    but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what women
    should most fear." 1

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Note (Footnote or Endnote)
    1. Rachel Adele, Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream

    Stereotypes in American Pop Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
    1999), 28.

    Subsequent References
    2. Adele, 31.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Bibliography
    Adele, Rachel. Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream Stereotypes in

    American Pop Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Please Note:

    1. A signal phrase such as Women have been misled, writes media critic Rachel Adele: is
    required to integrate the quote into the flow of your writing. Quotations must be attached
    to one of your sentences with either a comma or a colon.

    2. The superscript number at the end of the quotation refers to a footnote at the bottom of
    the page or an endnote at the end of your paper. Check with your instructor as to whether
    you should use footnotes or endnotes.

    3. The sentence period goes in front of the final quotation marks in American schools.

    Citation for a Paraphrase
    Whenever you use information from a source, even though you do not quote the source, you still
    must provide a citation to the source at that exact point in your text.

    How to Cite a Paraphrase

    Original Text (from Rachel Adele, Women in the Media, 1999)
    "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and
    women, but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what
    women should most fear."

    Your Phrasing (some key words repeated)
    Although lung cancer kills more women than any other type of

    cancer, the media have nonetheless led women to believe that breast
    cancer deaths are more common. 1

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Note (Footnote or Endnote)
    1. Rachel Adele, Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream

    Stereotypes in American Pop Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
    1999), 28.

    Subsequent References
    2. Adele, 31.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Bibliography
    Adele, Rachel. Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream Stereotypes in

    American Pop Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Please Note:

    1. In a paraphrase, it is usually necessary to repeat some key words from the original source.
    2. Although a successful paraphrase may repeat key words, it is distinguished from the

    original source by your unique phrasing or structure.
    3. The superscript number at the end goes after the sentence period.

    "But My Source is Not a Book." Not a Problem.
    The note and bibliography citations above are for a book used as a source. Increasingly, today's
    research papers include a variety of electronic sources. Not a problem. The same principle applies:
    Whenever you use a source in a paper, regardless of the type of source it is, you must refer to it
    twice: once as a note and once in your bibliography.

    What Goes in a Citation? The Chicago Manual of Style Online
    The Chicago Manual of Style (15th edition) lists over 100 different types of print and electronic
    sources, each of which has a unique citation format. To help you deal with the many different
    formats, there is the free Chicago-Style's Citation Quick Guide, a web resource maintained by the
    Chicago Style organization. However, the Chicago-Style's Citation Quick Guide is limited to about
    20 basic source types. The site does offer a 30-day free trial to the complete online version of the
    Chicago Manual of Style (15th edition).

    Academic & Commercial Web Sites
    You can find many excellent university and college web sites that provide model Chicago-style
    formats for a wide range of source types you will encounter. Always be sure to check the
    month/year of the most recent update since the Chicago Style guidelines are added to and
    revised on a frequent basis. One of the most comprehensive listings of Chicago-style formats and
    manuscript guidelines can be found at Michael Harvey's The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing.

    Citation Machines
    Currently there is one free citation machine, KnightCite, which promises to format sources for
    Chicago-style bibilography entries. Use of citation machines in school is controversial. A tool such
    as KnightCite requires you to correctly identify source types and should be not used as a
    substitute for your own knowledge of formatting guidelines. If you use the KnightCite citation
    machine, be sure to check its output for accuracy against the model formats in the Chicago
    Manual of Style (15th edition) or a web site such as Michael Harvey's The Nuts and Bolts of
    College Writing .

    In the End
    No single web site, citation machine or handbook contains a model format for every type of
    source you may find. Therefore it is important to keep in mind the basic components for any
    citation so that you can make informed choices about the source information you provide. The
    basic rule: More information is better than less. The goal of any citation is to help the reader
    evaluate the source and possibly to retrieve it, if he or she wishes. Whether it is a note or a
    bibliography entry, your citations should contain the following basic elements in approximately
    this order:

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/access/trial.epl](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/access/trial.epl)

    [http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html](http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/)

    [http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html](http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html)

    Author (or editor, translator, compiler in place of author)
    Title of work
    Title of Periodical or web site
    Volume/issue
    Pages
    Place of publication
    Publisher
    Retrieval information
    Access date

    Blue = all sources
    Purple = periodicals and web sites
    Green = periodicals
    Brown = books
    Red = digital sources

    If you are using a source that does not provide a piece of information for one of the slots, simply
    skip to the next. For example, if you are citing an article that does not list an author, your citation
    should begin with the title of the article.

    Sample Citations
    The following citations are based on the models provided in the Chicago-Style's Citation Quick
    Guide. For each source a note citation (N)and bibliography citation (B) are provided.

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    **evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form-pdf-10292099)

    **RUBRIC2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric2-pdf-10292101)

    **RUBRIC2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric2-pdf-10292101)

    **## MyTopicProposalMilitaryMedicine.docx**

    2

    **My Topic Proposal: Dorothea Dix and the Reform of Military Medicine During the Civil War**

    Derek Hill

    UMGC

    HIST 156 6381 History of the United States to 1865 (2255)

    May 14, 2025

    For my research, I intend to find out how military medical treatment was influenced by Dorothea Dix during the American Civil War. What is most appealing to me concerning this topic is how Dix’s position as the Superintendent of Army Nurses challenged the established gender norms and enhanced the treatment of the wounded soldiers. Being passionate about social justice and public service, I admire the fact that Dix was able to push for better, humane care in hospitals and in mental health centers. My working thesis is: Dorothea Dix, through her contribution to the civil war, revolutionized military medical practices and set a good base for women to engage in public services and later undertake healthcare and gender reforms. This topic provides me with the chance to examine medicine, gender, and civil service in interaction in the Founding Era of America, which correlates with my general academic interest.

    **## AssignmentExpectations.docx**

    Assignment Expectations: As part of your Research Project, the second assignment requirement expects students to complete a Website Evaluation of TWO websites that are acceptable for college-level academic research and contain information related to their research topic. For this assignment, students will use a search engine of their choice (e.g., Google or Bing) to find appropriate websites related to their topics. After selecting, reviewing and analyzing your two websites, students should write a 250-word analysis for each website. Keep reading to find out more about where to find websites for this assignment and what your analysis should include.

    **Transcript**

    Welcome to this Information and Library Services Tutorial on evaluating Web sites. In this tutorial, you will learn how to determine whether a Web site contains trustworthy information that is appropriate for college level research.

    Many Web sites contain trustworthy information that is appropriate to use in college-level research. But because no one regulates information placed on the Web, there are also Web sites that you would not want to use in a research paper: Web sites, for example, with out-of-date, inaccurate or biased information.

    Here are some questions you can ask that will help you critically evaluate information you find on the Web:

    · Who is the author of the Web site?

    · Does the Web site present information that is biased, one-sided?

    · Does the Web site present accurate information?

    · Is the Web site current enough for your research topic?

    This tutorial will explore those questions in more detail.

    When evaluating a Web site, ask yourself, who has written the Web site content? Are the author’s credentials given? Think about the author’s expertise and credibility. Knowing who wrote the content can help you determine the Web site’s trustworthiness.

    You may find an author whose credentials are not given on the Web site. When that happens, use Google or another search engine to see if you can find information on the author elsewhere on the Web.

    Frequently, an organization can be considered the author of a Web site. For example, the author of a Web site might be a business, a professional association or a government agency. You can usually find a link on an organization’s Web site that provides information about the organization—its activities, mission, leadership and so on. Learning about the organization can help you judge the credibility of the information on the organization’s Web site.

    When evaluating a Web site, also ask yourself, does the Web site present information that is objective and neutral as possible, or is the Web site presenting biased, one-sided information? Depending on your research project, it may be appropriate for you to use biased information.

    For example, if you are presenting both sides of an argument in a pro/con essay about the chemical industry and environmental groups, you could cite information from a chemical industry association and from environmental activists. But you need to be aware of possible bias in a Web site and use—or not use—that Web site accordingly.

    When evaluating a Web site, you should also ask, is the information on the Web site accurate? Compare the information on the Web site with knowledge you have gained from other sources in the course of your research, to see if the Web site contains errors. For example, you might compare the information in a Web site with scholarly articles you have read in library databases, with reference books and so on. Also, does the Web site give sources for the information it presents, sources you can look up and verify?

    Timeliness is another important factor, especially if you are researching a subject in which knowledge can change rapidly, like health and medicine, business or technology. Does the Web site date its information? If so, is the information is current enough for the topic you are researching?

    You can find trustworthy, useful information on all types of Web sites: commercial Web sites, organization, government, education Web sites and so on. But no matter what kind of Web site you are using, you must critically evaluate the information it contains.

    At our library Web site, you can find more information on
    [evaluating Web resources](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/evaluating-sources.cfm). And, if you have any questions about your research, please contact us via Ask a Librarian.

    Assignment Directions: After selecting, reading and analyzing your websites, please make sure each analysis follows the format below and includes the following information.

    · First, before you get started, please note what you should not do for this assignment. Please do not use the following types of sites:

    · UMGC library databases (in other words, do not use any resources found in the library database like Jstor. You will use the library for these resources for later projects)

    · Do not use Wikipedia or any other wiki site (in fact, refrain from using these sites for any part of the research project)

    · Do not use any encyclopedia websites (i.e. Britannica.org. These sites are wonderful for general knowledge, but not for the requirements of this research project)

    · Do not use any sites that require a subscription (also, do not use any of these sites for the requirements of this research paper.)

    · Okay, now on to what your Website Analysis should include:

    · Format: Each Website Analysis should be typed in a word document, with 1-inch margins, double spaced, and include no less than 250 words.

    · Bibliography: At the top of each Website Analysis, students should provide a complete bibliographic entry. This complete bibliographic entry should include a formal citation, including the URL and your date of access. You should note that the required style for this class is Chicago Humanities Style (not the author/date variant). The Effective Writing Center created a short overview on using Chicago Humanities Style called “Brief Guide to Citing Sources in Chicago.” It includes a list of sources formatted in this style. The examples labeled N=footnote/endnote format and those labeled B=bibliographic entry. A copy of this guide is located in the Writing Resources section of Course Resources under Content of this LEO class site.

    · Analysis and Content: Each Website Analysis should include a detailed summary of the main points of the article – in your own words. Ultimately, this should be written within the first two paragraphs of your analysis and include:

    · Describe the content and purpose of the website

    · Determine the author, accuracy of information presented and website’s currency.

    · Explain in detail how and why you determined the site is acceptable for use in an academic research paper

    · Each website analysis should explain how the content pertains to your research

    · Explain how the site relates to your research topic or what you found on the site that relates to your topic

    · It is important that students share more than a simple sentence in this analysis. I would like to see a paragraph dedicated to this portion of the assignment.

    **## Brief_Primer_to_Citing_Sources_in_Chicago_Humanities_Style.pdf**

    A Brief Primer to Citing Sources in Chicago
    Humanities Style

    Whenever you use a source in a paper, you must refer to it twice: once as a note and once in your
    bibliography. With the Chicago style, you have the option to use either footnotes or endnotes.

    Citation for a Direct Quote
    Whenever you use an author's exact words (direct quotation), you must provide a citation to the
    source quoted at that exact point in your text.

    How to Cite a Direct Quote

    Original Text (from Rachel Adele, Women in the Media, 1999)
    "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and
    women, but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what
    women should most fear."

    Direct Quote as Used in Your Paper
    Women have been misled, writes media critic Rachel Adele: "Lung

    cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and women,
    but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what women
    should most fear." 1

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Note (Footnote or Endnote)
    1. Rachel Adele, Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream

    Stereotypes in American Pop Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
    1999), 28.

    Subsequent References
    2. Adele, 31.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Bibliography
    Adele, Rachel. Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream Stereotypes in

    American Pop Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Please Note:

    1. A signal phrase such as Women have been misled, writes media critic Rachel Adele: is
    required to integrate the quote into the flow of your writing. Quotations must be attached
    to one of your sentences with either a comma or a colon.

    2. The superscript number at the end of the quotation refers to a footnote at the bottom of
    the page or an endnote at the end of your paper. Check with your instructor as to whether
    you should use footnotes or endnotes.

    3. The sentence period goes in front of the final quotation marks in American schools.

    Citation for a Paraphrase
    Whenever you use information from a source, even though you do not quote the source, you still
    must provide a citation to the source at that exact point in your text.

    How to Cite a Paraphrase

    Original Text (from Rachel Adele, Women in the Media, 1999)
    "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and
    women, but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what
    women should most fear."

    Your Phrasing (some key words repeated)
    Although lung cancer kills more women than any other type of

    cancer, the media have nonetheless led women to believe that breast
    cancer deaths are more common. 1

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Note (Footnote or Endnote)
    1. Rachel Adele, Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream

    Stereotypes in American Pop Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
    1999), 28.

    Subsequent References
    2. Adele, 31.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Bibliography
    Adele, Rachel. Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream Stereotypes in

    American Pop Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Please Note:

    1. In a paraphrase, it is usually necessary to repeat some key words from the original source.
    2. Although a successful paraphrase may repeat key words, it is distinguished from the

    original source by your unique phrasing or structure.
    3. The superscript number at the end goes after the sentence period.

    "But My Source is Not a Book." Not a Problem.
    The note and bibliography citations above are for a book used as a source. Increasingly, today's
    research papers include a variety of electronic sources. Not a problem. The same principle applies:
    Whenever you use a source in a paper, regardless of the type of source it is, you must refer to it
    twice: once as a note and once in your bibliography.

    What Goes in a Citation? The Chicago Manual of Style Online
    The Chicago Manual of Style (15th edition) lists over 100 different types of print and electronic
    sources, each of which has a unique citation format. To help you deal with the many different
    formats, there is the free Chicago-Style's Citation Quick Guide, a web resource maintained by the
    Chicago Style organization. However, the Chicago-Style's Citation Quick Guide is limited to about
    20 basic source types. The site does offer a 30-day free trial to the complete online version of the
    Chicago Manual of Style (15th edition).

    Academic & Commercial Web Sites
    You can find many excellent university and college web sites that provide model Chicago-style
    formats for a wide range of source types you will encounter. Always be sure to check the
    month/year of the most recent update since the Chicago Style guidelines are added to and
    revised on a frequent basis. One of the most comprehensive listings of Chicago-style formats and
    manuscript guidelines can be found at Michael Harvey's The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing.

    Citation Machines
    Currently there is one free citation machine, KnightCite, which promises to format sources for
    Chicago-style bibilography entries. Use of citation machines in school is controversial. A tool such
    as KnightCite requires you to correctly identify source types and should be not used as a
    substitute for your own knowledge of formatting guidelines. If you use the KnightCite citation
    machine, be sure to check its output for accuracy against the model formats in the Chicago
    Manual of Style (15th edition) or a web site such as Michael Harvey's The Nuts and Bolts of
    College Writing .

    In the End
    No single web site, citation machine or handbook contains a model format for every type of
    source you may find. Therefore it is important to keep in mind the basic components for any
    citation so that you can make informed choices about the source information you provide. The
    basic rule: More information is better than less. The goal of any citation is to help the reader
    evaluate the source and possibly to retrieve it, if he or she wishes. Whether it is a note or a
    bibliography entry, your citations should contain the following basic elements in approximately
    this order:

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/access/trial.epl](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/access/trial.epl)

    [http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html](http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/)

    [http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html](http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html)

    Author (or editor, translator, compiler in place of author)
    Title of work
    Title of Periodical or web site
    Volume/issue
    Pages
    Place of publication
    Publisher
    Retrieval information
    Access date

    Blue = all sources
    Purple = periodicals and web sites
    Green = periodicals
    Brown = books
    Red = digital sources

    If you are using a source that does not provide a piece of information for one of the slots, simply
    skip to the next. For example, if you are citing an article that does not list an author, your citation
    should begin with the title of the article.

    Sample Citations
    The following citations are based on the models provided in the Chicago-Style's Citation Quick
    Guide. For each source a note citation (N)and bibliography citation (B) are provided.

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    **evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form-pdf-10292099)

    **RUBRIC2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric2-pdf-10292101)

    **## MyTopicProposalMilitaryMedicine.docx**

    2

    **My Topic Proposal: Dorothea Dix and the Reform of Military Medicine During the Civil War**

    Derek Hill

    UMGC

    HIST 156 6381 History of the United States to 1865 (2255)

    May 14, 2025

    For my research, I intend to find out how military medical treatment was influenced by Dorothea Dix during the American Civil War. What is most appealing to me concerning this topic is how Dix’s position as the Superintendent of Army Nurses challenged the established gender norms and enhanced the treatment of the wounded soldiers. Being passionate about social justice and public service, I admire the fact that Dix was able to push for better, humane care in hospitals and in mental health centers. My working thesis is: Dorothea Dix, through her contribution to the civil war, revolutionized military medical practices and set a good base for women to engage in public services and later undertake healthcare and gender reforms. This topic provides me with the chance to examine medicine, gender, and civil service in interaction in the Founding Era of America, which correlates with my general academic interest.

    **## AssignmentExpectations.docx**

    Assignment Expectations: As part of your Research Project, the second assignment requirement expects students to complete a Website Evaluation of TWO websites that are acceptable for college-level academic research and contain information related to their research topic. For this assignment, students will use a search engine of their choice (e.g., Google or Bing) to find appropriate websites related to their topics. After selecting, reviewing and analyzing your two websites, students should write a 250-word analysis for each website. Keep reading to find out more about where to find websites for this assignment and what your analysis should include.

    **Transcript**

    Welcome to this Information and Library Services Tutorial on evaluating Web sites. In this tutorial, you will learn how to determine whether a Web site contains trustworthy information that is appropriate for college level research.

    Many Web sites contain trustworthy information that is appropriate to use in college-level research. But because no one regulates information placed on the Web, there are also Web sites that you would not want to use in a research paper: Web sites, for example, with out-of-date, inaccurate or biased information.

    Here are some questions you can ask that will help you critically evaluate information you find on the Web:

    · Who is the author of the Web site?

    · Does the Web site present information that is biased, one-sided?

    · Does the Web site present accurate information?

    · Is the Web site current enough for your research topic?

    This tutorial will explore those questions in more detail.

    When evaluating a Web site, ask yourself, who has written the Web site content? Are the author’s credentials given? Think about the author’s expertise and credibility. Knowing who wrote the content can help you determine the Web site’s trustworthiness.

    You may find an author whose credentials are not given on the Web site. When that happens, use Google or another search engine to see if you can find information on the author elsewhere on the Web.

    Frequently, an organization can be considered the author of a Web site. For example, the author of a Web site might be a business, a professional association or a government agency. You can usually find a link on an organization’s Web site that provides information about the organization—its activities, mission, leadership and so on. Learning about the organization can help you judge the credibility of the information on the organization’s Web site.

    When evaluating a Web site, also ask yourself, does the Web site present information that is objective and neutral as possible, or is the Web site presenting biased, one-sided information? Depending on your research project, it may be appropriate for you to use biased information.

    For example, if you are presenting both sides of an argument in a pro/con essay about the chemical industry and environmental groups, you could cite information from a chemical industry association and from environmental activists. But you need to be aware of possible bias in a Web site and use—or not use—that Web site accordingly.

    When evaluating a Web site, you should also ask, is the information on the Web site accurate? Compare the information on the Web site with knowledge you have gained from other sources in the course of your research, to see if the Web site contains errors. For example, you might compare the information in a Web site with scholarly articles you have read in library databases, with reference books and so on. Also, does the Web site give sources for the information it presents, sources you can look up and verify?

    Timeliness is another important factor, especially if you are researching a subject in which knowledge can change rapidly, like health and medicine, business or technology. Does the Web site date its information? If so, is the information is current enough for the topic you are researching?

    You can find trustworthy, useful information on all types of Web sites: commercial Web sites, organization, government, education Web sites and so on. But no matter what kind of Web site you are using, you must critically evaluate the information it contains.

    At our library Web site, you can find more information on
    [evaluating Web resources](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/evaluating-sources.cfm). And, if you have any questions about your research, please contact us via Ask a Librarian.

    Assignment Directions: After selecting, reading and analyzing your websites, please make sure each analysis follows the format below and includes the following information.

    · First, before you get started, please note what you should not do for this assignment. Please do not use the following types of sites:

    · UMGC library databases (in other words, do not use any resources found in the library database like Jstor. You will use the library for these resources for later projects)

    · Do not use Wikipedia or any other wiki site (in fact, refrain from using these sites for any part of the research project)

    · Do not use any encyclopedia websites (i.e. Britannica.org. These sites are wonderful for general knowledge, but not for the requirements of this research project)

    · Do not use any sites that require a subscription (also, do not use any of these sites for the requirements of this research paper.)

    · Okay, now on to what your Website Analysis should include:

    · Format: Each Website Analysis should be typed in a word document, with 1-inch margins, double spaced, and include no less than 250 words.

    · Bibliography: At the top of each Website Analysis, students should provide a complete bibliographic entry. This complete bibliographic entry should include a formal citation, including the URL and your date of access. You should note that the required style for this class is Chicago Humanities Style (not the author/date variant). The Effective Writing Center created a short overview on using Chicago Humanities Style called “Brief Guide to Citing Sources in Chicago.” It includes a list of sources formatted in this style. The examples labeled N=footnote/endnote format and those labeled B=bibliographic entry. A copy of this guide is located in the Writing Resources section of Course Resources under Content of this LEO class site.

    · Analysis and Content: Each Website Analysis should include a detailed summary of the main points of the article – in your own words. Ultimately, this should be written within the first two paragraphs of your analysis and include:

    · Describe the content and purpose of the website

    · Determine the author, accuracy of information presented and website’s currency.

    · Explain in detail how and why you determined the site is acceptable for use in an academic research paper

    · Each website analysis should explain how the content pertains to your research

    · Explain how the site relates to your research topic or what you found on the site that relates to your topic

    · It is important that students share more than a simple sentence in this analysis. I would like to see a paragraph dedicated to this portion of the assignment.

    **## Brief_Primer_to_Citing_Sources_in_Chicago_Humanities_Style.pdf**

    A Brief Primer to Citing Sources in Chicago
    Humanities Style

    Whenever you use a source in a paper, you must refer to it twice: once as a note and once in your
    bibliography. With the Chicago style, you have the option to use either footnotes or endnotes.

    Citation for a Direct Quote
    Whenever you use an author's exact words (direct quotation), you must provide a citation to the
    source quoted at that exact point in your text.

    How to Cite a Direct Quote

    Original Text (from Rachel Adele, Women in the Media, 1999)
    "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and
    women, but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what
    women should most fear."

    Direct Quote as Used in Your Paper
    Women have been misled, writes media critic Rachel Adele: "Lung

    cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and women,
    but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what women
    should most fear." 1

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Note (Footnote or Endnote)
    1. Rachel Adele, Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream

    Stereotypes in American Pop Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
    1999), 28.

    Subsequent References
    2. Adele, 31.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Bibliography
    Adele, Rachel. Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream Stereotypes in

    American Pop Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Please Note:

    1. A signal phrase such as Women have been misled, writes media critic Rachel Adele: is
    required to integrate the quote into the flow of your writing. Quotations must be attached
    to one of your sentences with either a comma or a colon.

    2. The superscript number at the end of the quotation refers to a footnote at the bottom of
    the page or an endnote at the end of your paper. Check with your instructor as to whether
    you should use footnotes or endnotes.

    3. The sentence period goes in front of the final quotation marks in American schools.

    Citation for a Paraphrase
    Whenever you use information from a source, even though you do not quote the source, you still
    must provide a citation to the source at that exact point in your text.

    How to Cite a Paraphrase

    Original Text (from Rachel Adele, Women in the Media, 1999)
    "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men and
    women, but the media have made it seem that breast cancer is what
    women should most fear."

    Your Phrasing (some key words repeated)
    Although lung cancer kills more women than any other type of

    cancer, the media have nonetheless led women to believe that breast
    cancer deaths are more common. 1

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Note (Footnote or Endnote)
    1. Rachel Adele, Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream

    Stereotypes in American Pop Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
    1999), 28.

    Subsequent References
    2. Adele, 31.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Bibliography
    Adele, Rachel. Women in the Media: The Power of Mainstream Stereotypes in

    American Pop Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Please Note:

    1. In a paraphrase, it is usually necessary to repeat some key words from the original source.
    2. Although a successful paraphrase may repeat key words, it is distinguished from the

    original source by your unique phrasing or structure.
    3. The superscript number at the end goes after the sentence period.

    "But My Source is Not a Book." Not a Problem.
    The note and bibliography citations above are for a book used as a source. Increasingly, today's
    research papers include a variety of electronic sources. Not a problem. The same principle applies:
    Whenever you use a source in a paper, regardless of the type of source it is, you must refer to it
    twice: once as a note and once in your bibliography.

    What Goes in a Citation? The Chicago Manual of Style Online
    The Chicago Manual of Style (15th edition) lists over 100 different types of print and electronic
    sources, each of which has a unique citation format. To help you deal with the many different
    formats, there is the free Chicago-Style's Citation Quick Guide, a web resource maintained by the
    Chicago Style organization. However, the Chicago-Style's Citation Quick Guide is limited to about
    20 basic source types. The site does offer a 30-day free trial to the complete online version of the
    Chicago Manual of Style (15th edition).

    Academic & Commercial Web Sites
    You can find many excellent university and college web sites that provide model Chicago-style
    formats for a wide range of source types you will encounter. Always be sure to check the
    month/year of the most recent update since the Chicago Style guidelines are added to and
    revised on a frequent basis. One of the most comprehensive listings of Chicago-style formats and
    manuscript guidelines can be found at Michael Harvey's The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing.

    Citation Machines
    Currently there is one free citation machine, KnightCite, which promises to format sources for
    Chicago-style bibilography entries. Use of citation machines in school is controversial. A tool such
    as KnightCite requires you to correctly identify source types and should be not used as a
    substitute for your own knowledge of formatting guidelines. If you use the KnightCite citation
    machine, be sure to check its output for accuracy against the model formats in the Chicago
    Manual of Style (15th edition) or a web site such as Michael Harvey's The Nuts and Bolts of
    College Writing .

    In the End
    No single web site, citation machine or handbook contains a model format for every type of
    source you may find. Therefore it is important to keep in mind the basic components for any
    citation so that you can make informed choices about the source information you provide. The
    basic rule: More information is better than less. The goal of any citation is to help the reader
    evaluate the source and possibly to retrieve it, if he or she wishes. Whether it is a note or a
    bibliography entry, your citations should contain the following basic elements in approximately
    this order:

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/access/trial.epl](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/access/trial.epl)

    [http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html](http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php](http://webapps.calvin.edu/knightcite/index.php)

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/)

    [http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html](http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/chicago.html)

    Author (or editor, translator, compiler in place of author)
    Title of work
    Title of Periodical or web site
    Volume/issue
    Pages
    Place of publication
    Publisher
    Retrieval information
    Access date

    Blue = all sources
    Purple = periodicals and web sites
    Green = periodicals
    Brown = books
    Red = digital sources

    If you are using a source that does not provide a piece of information for one of the slots, simply
    skip to the next. For example, if you are citing an article that does not list an author, your citation
    should begin with the title of the article.

    Sample Citations
    The following citations are based on the models provided in the Chicago-Style's Citation Quick
    Guide. For each source a note citation (N)and bibliography citation (B) are provided.

    [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html](http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html)

    **evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evaluating-web-sites-checklist-form-pdf-10292099)

    **RUBRIC2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric2-pdf-10292101)

  • [Solved] Hum

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>World history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-world-history) Humanities – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>World history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-world-history)

    Humanities

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Lorem

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>World history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-world-history) humanities – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>World history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-world-history)

    humanities

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] help answer this question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    what is the importance of government? – a year ago **files (1)** – ## instruction.docx **## instruction.docx** A) What should the role of government be: A positive good or a necessary evil? Why? Paper Assignments: A) Paper has to be 3 – 4 pages long B) It has to be double space and one-inch margins …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    what is the importance of government?

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## instruction.docx

    **## instruction.docx**

    A) What should the role of government be: A positive good or a necessary evil?  Why?

    Paper Assignments:

    A) Paper has to be 3 – 4 pages long

    B) It has to be double space and one-inch margins on all sides

    C) It has to be typed in Times New Roman Font (12)

    D) Written in MLA format and it must contain a separate Works Cited page. Needs to have at least 4 citations from 4 different reputable sources within your paper.

    E) No Wikipedia is allowed.

    F) You must provide statistical and/or specific current or historical events or facts to augment your thesis.

    In the first paragraph you must include the one you choose if it’s a positive good /or necessary evil.

    The arguments of both must be included, but focus and stating facts more on the side you choose

    IMPORTANT: MLA format

    **## instruction.docx**

    A) What should the role of government be: A positive good or a necessary evil?  Why?

    Paper Assignments:

    A) Paper has to be 3 – 4 pages long

    B) It has to be double space and one-inch margins on all sides

    C) It has to be typed in Times New Roman Font (12)

    D) Written in MLA format and it must contain a separate Works Cited page. Needs to have at least 4 citations from 4 different reputable sources within your paper.

    E) No Wikipedia is allowed.

    F) You must provide statistical and/or specific current or historical events or facts to augment your thesis.

    In the first paragraph you must include the one you choose if it’s a positive good /or necessary evil.

    The arguments of both must be included, but focus and stating facts more on the side you choose

    IMPORTANT: MLA format

  • [Solved] History

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachments – a year ago **files (1)** – ## F.pdf **## F.pdf** Answering the following questions 1. What social reform movements emerged from 1820-1850, and how did they address different issues in American society? What arguments did the abolitionist movement put forth concerning their …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachments

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## F.pdf

    **## F.pdf**

    Answering the following questions

    1. What social reform movements emerged from 1820-1850, and how did they address
    different issues in American society? What arguments did the abolitionist movement put
    forth concerning their cause? Who was involved in the abolitionist struggle and what
    strategies did they employ?

    2. What led to the U.S.-Mexican War? What were the consequences for native peoples
    and Mexicans living on the American side of the new border? How did the war bring the
    slavery issue to the forefront, and what debates/compromises were made concerning
    the new territories?

    3. What factors led to the Civil War? What was Lincoln’s initial argument for fighting the
    war, and why did his thinking change? How did the war affect northern and southern
    societies during the conflict? What were the major results of the war for the country and
    the American people?

    4. What were some of the hopes and successes of Reconstruction? What forces were
    working against change for African Americans in the South, and what were the
    setbacks? What contributed to the abrupt end of Reconstruction, and what problems
    remained in the aftermath?

    **## F.pdf**

    Answering the following questions

    1. What social reform movements emerged from 1820-1850, and how did they address
    different issues in American society? What arguments did the abolitionist movement put
    forth concerning their cause? Who was involved in the abolitionist struggle and what
    strategies did they employ?

    2. What led to the U.S.-Mexican War? What were the consequences for native peoples
    and Mexicans living on the American side of the new border? How did the war bring the
    slavery issue to the forefront, and what debates/compromises were made concerning
    the new territories?

    3. What factors led to the Civil War? What was Lincoln’s initial argument for fighting the
    war, and why did his thinking change? How did the war affect northern and southern
    societies during the conflict? What were the major results of the war for the country and
    the American people?

    4. What were some of the hopes and successes of Reconstruction? What forces were
    working against change for African Americans in the South, and what were the
    setbacks? What contributed to the abrupt end of Reconstruction, and what problems
    remained in the aftermath?

  • [Solved] week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Ancient history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-ancient-history) – a year ago **files (2)** – ## week3.docx – ## survey.docx **## week3.docx** Week 3 At this consultation, it was your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding adv…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Ancient history homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history-ancient-history)

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## week3.docx

    – ## survey.docx

    **## week3.docx**

    Week 3

    At this consultation, it was your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding advancements made on the dissertation research and writing process since the previous meeting. Record the time and date of your most recent consultation with your dissertation supervisor.

    Your consultations may include any or all of the following:

    · Research work conducted or writing completed since the last report.

    · Questions soliciting advice on the dissertation research and writing task.

    · Submission of material for review as requested by the Supervisor or student with written feedback.

    · Problems encountered in conducting the research.

    Describe, in 150 to 300 words, the content and outcome of your consultation.
    **Note:** These reports are reviewed by the program director and are retained for future review by Liberty University accrediting associations.

    Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor that the appropriate level of progress has been made.

    **## survey.docx**

    **✅ Ideal Survey Recipients**

    Since your focus is on
    **church-going teenagers**, you should aim to reach:

    **1. Teenagers (Aged ~13–19) Who Actively Attend Church**

    · Regular attendees of youth ministries, Sunday school, or church services.

    · Confirm they are active on social media (to filter relevant responses).

    **2. Gatekeepers for Access**

    Because teenagers are minors, you may need to work through:

    ·
    **Youth pastors or ministers**

    ·
    **Church leaders (e.g., pastors, priests, religious education coordinators)**

    ·
    **Parents/guardians** (for consent purposes)

    ·
    **Christian schools** (if affiliated with churches)

    **📨 Who to Send the Invitation Letters To**

    Send
    **survey invitation letters** to:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Recipient Type** | **Purpose** |
    | **Church leaders/pastors** | Gain permission and support to survey their youth |
    | **Youth pastors/ministers** | Coordinate with the youth group for participation |
    | **Parents/guardians** | Obtain consent (if participants are under 18) |
    | **Christian schools** | If relevant, to reach teens in religious settings |

    **📝 Suggested Flow**

    1.
    **Initial Letter to Church Leaders** – Requesting participation and partnership.

    2.
    **Parental Consent Letters** – If required by ethics guidelines.

    3.
    **Survey Invitation to Teenagers** – Once consent is given.

    **## survey.docx**

    **✅ Ideal Survey Recipients**

    Since your focus is on
    **church-going teenagers**, you should aim to reach:

    **1. Teenagers (Aged ~13–19) Who Actively Attend Church**

    · Regular attendees of youth ministries, Sunday school, or church services.

    · Confirm they are active on social media (to filter relevant responses).

    **2. Gatekeepers for Access**

    Because teenagers are minors, you may need to work through:

    ·
    **Youth pastors or ministers**

    ·
    **Church leaders (e.g., pastors, priests, religious education coordinators)**

    ·
    **Parents/guardians** (for consent purposes)

    ·
    **Christian schools** (if affiliated with churches)

    **📨 Who to Send the Invitation Letters To**

    Send
    **survey invitation letters** to:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Recipient Type** | **Purpose** |
    | **Church leaders/pastors** | Gain permission and support to survey their youth |
    | **Youth pastors/ministers** | Coordinate with the youth group for participation |
    | **Parents/guardians** | Obtain consent (if participants are under 18) |
    | **Christian schools** | If relevant, to reach teens in religious settings |

    **📝 Suggested Flow**

    1.
    **Initial Letter to Church Leaders** – Requesting participation and partnership.

    2.
    **Parental Consent Letters** – If required by ethics guidelines.

    3.
    **Survey Invitation to Teenagers** – Once consent is given.

    **## week3.docx**

    Week 3

    At this consultation, it was your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding advancements made on the dissertation research and writing process since the previous meeting. Record the time and date of your most recent consultation with your dissertation supervisor.

    Your consultations may include any or all of the following:

    · Research work conducted or writing completed since the last report.

    · Questions soliciting advice on the dissertation research and writing task.

    · Submission of material for review as requested by the Supervisor or student with written feedback.

    · Problems encountered in conducting the research.

    Describe, in 150 to 300 words, the content and outcome of your consultation.
    **Note:** These reports are reviewed by the program director and are retained for future review by Liberty University accrediting associations.

    Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor that the appropriate level of progress has been made.

    **## survey.docx**

    **✅ Ideal Survey Recipients**

    Since your focus is on
    **church-going teenagers**, you should aim to reach:

    **1. Teenagers (Aged ~13–19) Who Actively Attend Church**

    · Regular attendees of youth ministries, Sunday school, or church services.

    · Confirm they are active on social media (to filter relevant responses).

    **2. Gatekeepers for Access**

    Because teenagers are minors, you may need to work through:

    ·
    **Youth pastors or ministers**

    ·
    **Church leaders (e.g., pastors, priests, religious education coordinators)**

    ·
    **Parents/guardians** (for consent purposes)

    ·
    **Christian schools** (if affiliated with churches)

    **📨 Who to Send the Invitation Letters To**

    Send
    **survey invitation letters** to:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Recipient Type** | **Purpose** |
    | **Church leaders/pastors** | Gain permission and support to survey their youth |
    | **Youth pastors/ministers** | Coordinate with the youth group for participation |
    | **Parents/guardians** | Obtain consent (if participants are under 18) |
    | **Christian schools** | If relevant, to reach teens in religious settings |

    **📝 Suggested Flow**

    1.
    **Initial Letter to Church Leaders** – Requesting participation and partnership.

    2.
    **Parental Consent Letters** – If required by ethics guidelines.

    3.
    **Survey Invitation to Teenagers** – Once consent is given.

    **## week3.docx**

    Week 3

    At this consultation, it was your responsibility to provide a progress report to your dissertation supervisor regarding advancements made on the dissertation research and writing process since the previous meeting. Record the time and date of your most recent consultation with your dissertation supervisor.

    Your consultations may include any or all of the following:

    · Research work conducted or writing completed since the last report.

    · Questions soliciting advice on the dissertation research and writing task.

    · Submission of material for review as requested by the Supervisor or student with written feedback.

    · Problems encountered in conducting the research.

    Describe, in 150 to 300 words, the content and outcome of your consultation.
    **Note:** These reports are reviewed by the program director and are retained for future review by Liberty University accrediting associations.

    Points for the second question will be awarded based on documentation and verification by your Supervisor that the appropriate level of progress has been made.

    **## survey.docx**

    **✅ Ideal Survey Recipients**

    Since your focus is on
    **church-going teenagers**, you should aim to reach:

    **1. Teenagers (Aged ~13–19) Who Actively Attend Church**

    · Regular attendees of youth ministries, Sunday school, or church services.

    · Confirm they are active on social media (to filter relevant responses).

    **2. Gatekeepers for Access**

    Because teenagers are minors, you may need to work through:

    ·
    **Youth pastors or ministers**

    ·
    **Church leaders (e.g., pastors, priests, religious education coordinators)**

    ·
    **Parents/guardians** (for consent purposes)

    ·
    **Christian schools** (if affiliated with churches)

    **📨 Who to Send the Invitation Letters To**

    Send
    **survey invitation letters** to:

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Recipient Type** | **Purpose** |
    | **Church leaders/pastors** | Gain permission and support to survey their youth |
    | **Youth pastors/ministers** | Coordinate with the youth group for participation |
    | **Parents/guardians** | Obtain consent (if participants are under 18) |
    | **Christian schools** | If relevant, to reach teens in religious settings |

    **📝 Suggested Flow**

    1.
    **Initial Letter to Church Leaders** – Requesting participation and partnership.

    2.
    **Parental Consent Letters** – If required by ethics guidelines.

    3.
    **Survey Invitation to Teenagers** – Once consent is given.

  • [Solved] Jesus

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Jesus.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.