Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Week # 7, Discussion # 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week # 7, Discussion # 4.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Create a Discussion using APA 7 format, and scholarly references no older than 5 years.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 500 words with scholarly articles(at least 2), and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.** In the context of health promotion, Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) often work with diverse populations that have varied health needs and barriers…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 500 words with scholarly articles(at least 2), and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.**
    In the context of health promotion, Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) often work with diverse populations that have varied health needs and barriers to care. Reflect on a case or scenario from your clinical experience or studies where you encountered challenges in promoting health within a specific population.

  • [Solved] Journal Response MODULE 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What methods do you employ to assess the rigor and accuracy of evidence from – ## Journalquestionweek5.docx – ## Module5JournalQues_RUBRIC.docx **## Journalquestionweek5.docx** What methods do you employ to assess the rigor and accuracy of evidence from the literature? Describe three criteria to as…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What methods do you employ to assess the rigor and accuracy of evidence from

    – ## Journalquestionweek5.docx

    – ## Module5JournalQues_RUBRIC.docx

    **## Journalquestionweek5.docx**

    What methods do you employ to assess the rigor and accuracy of evidence from the literature? Describe three criteria to assess quality information and your rationale for each selection.

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    each week. Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of
    **300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **This is a DNP LEVEL Assignment. (DOCTOR OF NURSING)**

    **## Module5JournalQues_RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module5JournalQues_RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Journalquestionweek5.docx**

    What methods do you employ to assess the rigor and accuracy of evidence from the literature? Describe three criteria to assess quality information and your rationale for each selection.

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    each week. Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of
    **300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **This is a DNP LEVEL Assignment. (DOCTOR OF NURSING)**

    **## Module5JournalQues_RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Journalquestionweek5.docx**

    What methods do you employ to assess the rigor and accuracy of evidence from the literature? Describe three criteria to assess quality information and your rationale for each selection.

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    each week. Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of
    **300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **This is a DNP LEVEL Assignment. (DOCTOR OF NURSING)**

    **## Module5JournalQues_RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:21 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-5)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956657/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Personality development career path plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_9776.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9776-jpeg "IMG_9776.jpeg") \ IMG_9775.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9775-jpeg "IMG_9775.jpeg") \ IMG_9774.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9774-jpeg "IMG_9774.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_9776.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9776-jpeg "IMG_9776.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_9775.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9775-jpeg "IMG_9775.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_9774.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9774-jpeg "IMG_9774.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Comm

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 20250811_114735.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250811-114735-jpg "20250811_114735.jpg") \ 20250811_114546.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250811-114546-jpg "20250811_114546.jpg") \ Screenshot_20250818_180656_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    20250811_114735.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250811-114735-jpg "20250811_114735.jpg")
    \
    20250811_114546.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250811-114546-jpg "20250811_114546.jpg")
    \
    Screenshot_20250818_180656_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180656-wgu-jpg "Screenshot_20250818_180656_WGU.jpg")
    \
    Screenshot_20250818_180737_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180737-wgu-jpg "Screenshot_20250818_180737_WGU.jpg")
    \
    Screenshot_20250818_180720_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180720-wgu-jpg "Screenshot_20250818_180720_WGU.jpg")
    \
    Screenshot_20250818_180807_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180807-wgu-jpg "Screenshot_20250818_180807_WGU.jpg")
    \
    Screenshot_20250818_180616_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180616-wgu-jpg "Screenshot_20250818_180616_WGU.jpg")
    \
    Screenshot_20250818_180802_WGU.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20250818-180802-wgu-jpg "Screenshot_20250818_180802_WGU.jpg")

  • [Solved] Nursing WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) updates in an organizational setting. – ## Module5Assignment.docx – ## Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## Module5Assignment.docx** Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) updates in an organizational setting.

    – ## Module5Assignment.docx

    – ## Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

    **## Module5Assignment.docx**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least fIVE (5) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week the student will develop and describe how to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) updates in an organizational setting. Describe in 2000 words the following:

    · Two strategies for the promotion of evidence in practice.

    · How you share the practice change.

    · At least two strategies for overcoming barriers to the adoption of the EBP practice change.

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length**: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Masters, K. (2023). Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421
    **. Read chapter 9.**

    Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284228823.
    **Read chapters 25 & 26.**

    Additional Resources:
    **Medcon. (2010).** Developing an evidence-based question.

    Medcom. [Video].
    ****Note: Please find this in the Aspen Library Databases, Alexander** Street: Academic Video Online (AVON):

    **APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)**

    **Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.**

    **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**

    **## Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    **## Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    **## Module5Assignment.docx**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least fIVE (5) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week the student will develop and describe how to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) updates in an organizational setting. Describe in 2000 words the following:

    · Two strategies for the promotion of evidence in practice.

    · How you share the practice change.

    · At least two strategies for overcoming barriers to the adoption of the EBP practice change.

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length**: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Masters, K. (2023). Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421
    **. Read chapter 9.**

    Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284228823.
    **Read chapters 25 & 26.**

    Additional Resources:
    **Medcon. (2010).** Developing an evidence-based question.

    Medcom. [Video].
    ****Note: Please find this in the Aspen Library Databases, Alexander** Street: Academic Video Online (AVON):

    **APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)**

    **Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.**

    **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**

    **## Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    **## Module5Assignment.docx**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least fIVE (5) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week the student will develop and describe how to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) updates in an organizational setting. Describe in 2000 words the following:

    · Two strategies for the promotion of evidence in practice.

    · How you share the practice change.

    · At least two strategies for overcoming barriers to the adoption of the EBP practice change.

    **Start by reading and following these instructions:**

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

    3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length**: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Masters, K. (2023). Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421
    **. Read chapter 9.**

    Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284228823.
    **Read chapters 25 & 26.**

    Additional Resources:
    **Medcon. (2010).** Developing an evidence-based question.

    Medcom. [Video].
    ****Note: Please find this in the Aspen Library Databases, Alexander** Street: Academic Video Online (AVON):

    **APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)**

    **Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.**

    **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..**

    **## Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Content Weight:<br>30% | 0 points<br>Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. | 21 points<br>Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. | 24 points<br>Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. | 30 points<br>In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. | / 30 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description<br>Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment<br>description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice

    inappropriate or do

    not address given

    audience, purpose,

    etc. Word choice is

    excessively

    redundant, clichéd,

    and unspecific.

    Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat

    appropriate to given

    audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is often

    unspecific, generic,

    redundant, and

    clichéd. Repetitive

    mechanical errors

    distract the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout.

    Minimal mechanical

    or typographical

    errors are present,

    but are not overly

    distracting to the

    reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-

    appropriate

    language are used.

    10

    points

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given

    audience and

    purpose, but also

    show originality and

    creativity. Word

    choice is specific,

    purposeful, dynamic

    and varied. Free of

    mechanical and

    typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective

    figures of speech

    are used. Writer is

    clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    8/7/25, 5:39 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    1/6

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956658/View 1/6

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 542 c4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## The Power of Collaboration and Teamwork in Assessment Planning Include how principals and other leaders can partner with teachers in curriculum choice, recruiting qualified teachers, scheduling collaboration, hiring instructional coaches, providing consistent feedback. Give examples and be specif…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## The Power of Collaboration and Teamwork in Assessment Planning
    Include how principals and other leaders can partner with teachers in curriculum choice, recruiting qualified teachers, scheduling collaboration, hiring instructional coaches, providing consistent feedback. Give examples and be specific. Elaborate on the characteristics of collaboration and teaming as part of this process.
    Madaus, G. F., Higgins, J., & Russell, M. K. (2009). _The Paradoxes of High Stakes Testing : How They Affect Students, Their Parents, Teachers, Principals, Schools, and Society._ Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.
    Chapter 10
    Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of title I schools. _American Educational Research Journal, 46_(4), 1006-1033. doi:10.3102/0002831209333185
    Sindelar, N. W. (2011). _Assessment-Powered Teaching._ Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.Read Chapter 6
    Udelhofen, S. K. (2005). _Keys to Curriculum Mapping : Strategies and Tools to Make It Work._ Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
    Read Chapter 1
    Helpful Websites:
    https://www.ets.org/k12/capabilities/planning/

  • [Solved] Impact plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module6Activityweek6.docx – ImpactPlan_Studentexample.docx – AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322-21-2.pdf **## Module6Activityweek6.docx** Module 6 Activity: Create an Impact Plan for your Applied Project · **Due** Tuesday by 11:59pm · **Points** 200 · **Submitting** a file upload …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module6Activityweek6.docx

    – ImpactPlan_Studentexample.docx
    – AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322-21-2.pdf

    **## Module6Activityweek6.docx**

    Module 6 Activity: Create an Impact Plan for your Applied Project

    ·
    **Due** Tuesday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Points** 200

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    ·
    **File Types** pdf, doc, docx, and rtf

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, you will develop an impact plan for your applied project or thesis.  Submit a 4 to 5 page impact plan following the instructions below.
    **Please be sure to include each of the subheadings**.

    Your applied project will study a problem of practice
    **,** with the goal of creating a research-informed solution for that problem. The solution will be some form of deliverable. (See the examples in the
    [MS-OGL start-up guide](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/files/109998191?wrap=1)

    , and please review
    [this former OGL 550 student's example](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/files/109998121?wrap=1)

    .

    **1. Challenge (aka "problem statement")**

    · Describe the problem(s) or issue to be addressed

    ·
    **Why** does this problem need to be solved? What are the consequences of
    **not** solving it?

    **2.  Project Context**

    · Information about the organization or issue you are studying. Provide an overview of the organization, its history, and unit/division/site you will focus on

    · Context: Describe the industry, sector, and other relevant information needed to situate your research in a broader context. Describe any trends (past, present, projected) related to your topic of interest

    ·
    **External**: describe relevant operating environment/industry issues. You can use categories, data, and findings from your PESTLE analysis if helpful.

    ·
    **Internal**: identify organizational factors relevant to the problem, such as team dynamics, culture, employee turnover, policies, structure, etc.

    **3. Proposed Research Solution**

    · How will your research respond to this challenge? What are you going to study? How are you going to study it?

    · Describe the type of applied research you will do (e.g., cultural audit, SWOT analysis).

    · Explain the rationale and methods for your approach. Why is this type of research the right approach for the problem you're studying?

    · What type of data do you need to inform your project design (e.g., qualitative, quantitative).

    · Where and how will you find that information needed? Describe the data sources you will use to get this information.

    · Will you look at secondary/archival sources, such as organizational records, web documents, etc.?

    · What concepts and theories can shed light on this problem (e.g., employee engagement, learning organization)?

    **4. Summarize literature to justify your planned approach. What is known about the problem and potential solutions?**

    · Provide 10 references in your literature review with appropriate in-text citations.

    · For example, if you are doing a project to identify the need for leadership development training, you would examine and summarize literature supporting why leadership development training is valuable to an organization. You would also review articles on leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations.

    · Sources can include reputable industry publications, journal articles, industry research websites, etc. that help you to understand the topic and identify questions  needing to be answered to solve the problem.

    **5. Analytical methods**

    · How will you analyze the data (e.g., pattern identification/thematic coding for qualitative; statistical analysis for quantitative, etc.)

    **6. Beneficiaries**

    · Who will benefit from or use your research? Describe the intended audience.

    · What value will your research results bring to each beneficiary?

    **7. Deliverable**

    · What deliverable you will create (e.g., website, toolkit, handbook)?

    **8. Envisioned Impact**

    · How will your research and deliverable help to solve the problem(s)? List specific anticipated outcomes.

    · Consider cultural, economic, educational, environmental, health, political, social, and technological benefits. See
    [this website](https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=881139&p=6659585) for some ideas

    **9. Ethical Considerations**

    · Show how you will ensure that your research doesn't harm participants. Detail how you will first obtain their consent before engaging in the research. Explain how you will protect participants’ dignity and privacy

    · Identify affiliations and funding sources that will support your research (if any). Declare any potential conflicts of interest.

    · Explain how you will account for potential bias in your research design, data collection, and analysis.

    · If you are considering collecting data from people or if you plan to publish your research, you will need IRB (Institutional Review Board)Links to an external site. approval to work with human subjects. Think about if your project has a realistic scope and timeline; Can your project be completed in 6-7 weeks?  Is it realistic to apply for IRB approval, conduct interviews or distribute a survey, transcribe and analyze data, research secondary sources, and produce a deliverable in 6 weeks? Consider focusing on secondary sources in developing your project/deliverable to support a manageable timeline.

    **10. Develop schedule/timeline specifying main project activities and when they will occur over the 7 week time frame of OGL593.**

    · This section would list the major activities such as contact organizational representative, identify current training practices, identify gaps/training needs, identify client’s desired outcomes, research leadership development curricula, recommend training curriculum and sketch out what a pilot program might look like.

    **10. Reflection [This will not be part of your final prospectus, it's only for this class]**

    · State initial assumptions you are making about your project

    · Identify project limitations (what is in the scope of this study, what will it not address)

    · Summary of your background/experience knowledge that qualifies you for this project

    · What excites you about this project? Why are you interested in the topic? How does it connect to your professional aspirations?

    · What concerns do you have?

    · Relate your project to at least
    **two of the ideas we covered in this class**. What have you learned here these past few weeks that could be useful as you conduct your applied project?

    **11. References**

    · Include
    **ten** supporting references, with in-text citations, to show where you drew information and ideas from. You can use APA formatting (e.g., in-text citations and a references page), footnotes, or endnotes.

    **Technical:**

    · Submit a 4-5 page single-spaced impact plan. One inch margins. Times New Roman font.

    · Ideally, your format and style will mirror that of your applied project organization (e.g., colors, font, tone). Or you can use your own branding template if you have a consulting practice (e.g., McKinsey, Bain & Co., Deloitte).

    · Please include 10 references, cited consistently and appropriately (e.g., APA, MLA) throughout your document. Include a references list at the end of the document that follows your formatting style (e.g., APA, MLA).

    Rubric

    **ImpactPlan_Studentexample.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/impactplan-studentexample-docx)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322-21-2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-21-2-pdf)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322-21-2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-21-2-pdf)

    **## Module6Activityweek6.docx**

    Module 6 Activity: Create an Impact Plan for your Applied Project

    ·
    **Due** Tuesday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Points** 200

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    ·
    **File Types** pdf, doc, docx, and rtf

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, you will develop an impact plan for your applied project or thesis.  Submit a 4 to 5 page impact plan following the instructions below.
    **Please be sure to include each of the subheadings**.

    Your applied project will study a problem of practice
    **,** with the goal of creating a research-informed solution for that problem. The solution will be some form of deliverable. (See the examples in the
    [MS-OGL start-up guide](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/files/109998191?wrap=1)

    , and please review
    [this former OGL 550 student's example](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/files/109998121?wrap=1)

    .

    **1. Challenge (aka "problem statement")**

    · Describe the problem(s) or issue to be addressed

    ·
    **Why** does this problem need to be solved? What are the consequences of
    **not** solving it?

    **2.  Project Context**

    · Information about the organization or issue you are studying. Provide an overview of the organization, its history, and unit/division/site you will focus on

    · Context: Describe the industry, sector, and other relevant information needed to situate your research in a broader context. Describe any trends (past, present, projected) related to your topic of interest

    ·
    **External**: describe relevant operating environment/industry issues. You can use categories, data, and findings from your PESTLE analysis if helpful.

    ·
    **Internal**: identify organizational factors relevant to the problem, such as team dynamics, culture, employee turnover, policies, structure, etc.

    **3. Proposed Research Solution**

    · How will your research respond to this challenge? What are you going to study? How are you going to study it?

    · Describe the type of applied research you will do (e.g., cultural audit, SWOT analysis).

    · Explain the rationale and methods for your approach. Why is this type of research the right approach for the problem you're studying?

    · What type of data do you need to inform your project design (e.g., qualitative, quantitative).

    · Where and how will you find that information needed? Describe the data sources you will use to get this information.

    · Will you look at secondary/archival sources, such as organizational records, web documents, etc.?

    · What concepts and theories can shed light on this problem (e.g., employee engagement, learning organization)?

    **4. Summarize literature to justify your planned approach. What is known about the problem and potential solutions?**

    · Provide 10 references in your literature review with appropriate in-text citations.

    · For example, if you are doing a project to identify the need for leadership development training, you would examine and summarize literature supporting why leadership development training is valuable to an organization. You would also review articles on leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations.

    · Sources can include reputable industry publications, journal articles, industry research websites, etc. that help you to understand the topic and identify questions  needing to be answered to solve the problem.

    **5. Analytical methods**

    · How will you analyze the data (e.g., pattern identification/thematic coding for qualitative; statistical analysis for quantitative, etc.)

    **6. Beneficiaries**

    · Who will benefit from or use your research? Describe the intended audience.

    · What value will your research results bring to each beneficiary?

    **7. Deliverable**

    · What deliverable you will create (e.g., website, toolkit, handbook)?

    **8. Envisioned Impact**

    · How will your research and deliverable help to solve the problem(s)? List specific anticipated outcomes.

    · Consider cultural, economic, educational, environmental, health, political, social, and technological benefits. See
    [this website](https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=881139&p=6659585) for some ideas

    **9. Ethical Considerations**

    · Show how you will ensure that your research doesn't harm participants. Detail how you will first obtain their consent before engaging in the research. Explain how you will protect participants’ dignity and privacy

    · Identify affiliations and funding sources that will support your research (if any). Declare any potential conflicts of interest.

    · Explain how you will account for potential bias in your research design, data collection, and analysis.

    · If you are considering collecting data from people or if you plan to publish your research, you will need IRB (Institutional Review Board)Links to an external site. approval to work with human subjects. Think about if your project has a realistic scope and timeline; Can your project be completed in 6-7 weeks?  Is it realistic to apply for IRB approval, conduct interviews or distribute a survey, transcribe and analyze data, research secondary sources, and produce a deliverable in 6 weeks? Consider focusing on secondary sources in developing your project/deliverable to support a manageable timeline.

    **10. Develop schedule/timeline specifying main project activities and when they will occur over the 7 week time frame of OGL593.**

    · This section would list the major activities such as contact organizational representative, identify current training practices, identify gaps/training needs, identify client’s desired outcomes, research leadership development curricula, recommend training curriculum and sketch out what a pilot program might look like.

    **10. Reflection [This will not be part of your final prospectus, it's only for this class]**

    · State initial assumptions you are making about your project

    · Identify project limitations (what is in the scope of this study, what will it not address)

    · Summary of your background/experience knowledge that qualifies you for this project

    · What excites you about this project? Why are you interested in the topic? How does it connect to your professional aspirations?

    · What concerns do you have?

    · Relate your project to at least
    **two of the ideas we covered in this class**. What have you learned here these past few weeks that could be useful as you conduct your applied project?

    **11. References**

    · Include
    **ten** supporting references, with in-text citations, to show where you drew information and ideas from. You can use APA formatting (e.g., in-text citations and a references page), footnotes, or endnotes.

    **Technical:**

    · Submit a 4-5 page single-spaced impact plan. One inch margins. Times New Roman font.

    · Ideally, your format and style will mirror that of your applied project organization (e.g., colors, font, tone). Or you can use your own branding template if you have a consulting practice (e.g., McKinsey, Bain & Co., Deloitte).

    · Please include 10 references, cited consistently and appropriately (e.g., APA, MLA) throughout your document. Include a references list at the end of the document that follows your formatting style (e.g., APA, MLA).

    Rubric

    **ImpactPlan_Studentexample.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/impactplan-studentexample-docx)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322-21-2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-21-2-pdf)

    **## Module6Activityweek6.docx**

    Module 6 Activity: Create an Impact Plan for your Applied Project

    ·
    **Due** Tuesday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Points** 200

    ·
    **Submitting** a file upload

    ·
    **File Types** pdf, doc, docx, and rtf

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, you will develop an impact plan for your applied project or thesis.  Submit a 4 to 5 page impact plan following the instructions below.
    **Please be sure to include each of the subheadings**.

    Your applied project will study a problem of practice
    **,** with the goal of creating a research-informed solution for that problem. The solution will be some form of deliverable. (See the examples in the
    [MS-OGL start-up guide](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/files/109998191?wrap=1)

    , and please review
    [this former OGL 550 student's example](https://asu.instructure.com/courses/225986/files/109998121?wrap=1)

    .

    **1. Challenge (aka "problem statement")**

    · Describe the problem(s) or issue to be addressed

    ·
    **Why** does this problem need to be solved? What are the consequences of
    **not** solving it?

    **2.  Project Context**

    · Information about the organization or issue you are studying. Provide an overview of the organization, its history, and unit/division/site you will focus on

    · Context: Describe the industry, sector, and other relevant information needed to situate your research in a broader context. Describe any trends (past, present, projected) related to your topic of interest

    ·
    **External**: describe relevant operating environment/industry issues. You can use categories, data, and findings from your PESTLE analysis if helpful.

    ·
    **Internal**: identify organizational factors relevant to the problem, such as team dynamics, culture, employee turnover, policies, structure, etc.

    **3. Proposed Research Solution**

    · How will your research respond to this challenge? What are you going to study? How are you going to study it?

    · Describe the type of applied research you will do (e.g., cultural audit, SWOT analysis).

    · Explain the rationale and methods for your approach. Why is this type of research the right approach for the problem you're studying?

    · What type of data do you need to inform your project design (e.g., qualitative, quantitative).

    · Where and how will you find that information needed? Describe the data sources you will use to get this information.

    · Will you look at secondary/archival sources, such as organizational records, web documents, etc.?

    · What concepts and theories can shed light on this problem (e.g., employee engagement, learning organization)?

    **4. Summarize literature to justify your planned approach. What is known about the problem and potential solutions?**

    · Provide 10 references in your literature review with appropriate in-text citations.

    · For example, if you are doing a project to identify the need for leadership development training, you would examine and summarize literature supporting why leadership development training is valuable to an organization. You would also review articles on leadership development practices that have been used effectively in other organizations.

    · Sources can include reputable industry publications, journal articles, industry research websites, etc. that help you to understand the topic and identify questions  needing to be answered to solve the problem.

    **5. Analytical methods**

    · How will you analyze the data (e.g., pattern identification/thematic coding for qualitative; statistical analysis for quantitative, etc.)

    **6. Beneficiaries**

    · Who will benefit from or use your research? Describe the intended audience.

    · What value will your research results bring to each beneficiary?

    **7. Deliverable**

    · What deliverable you will create (e.g., website, toolkit, handbook)?

    **8. Envisioned Impact**

    · How will your research and deliverable help to solve the problem(s)? List specific anticipated outcomes.

    · Consider cultural, economic, educational, environmental, health, political, social, and technological benefits. See
    [this website](https://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/c.php?g=881139&p=6659585) for some ideas

    **9. Ethical Considerations**

    · Show how you will ensure that your research doesn't harm participants. Detail how you will first obtain their consent before engaging in the research. Explain how you will protect participants’ dignity and privacy

    · Identify affiliations and funding sources that will support your research (if any). Declare any potential conflicts of interest.

    · Explain how you will account for potential bias in your research design, data collection, and analysis.

    · If you are considering collecting data from people or if you plan to publish your research, you will need IRB (Institutional Review Board)Links to an external site. approval to work with human subjects. Think about if your project has a realistic scope and timeline; Can your project be completed in 6-7 weeks?  Is it realistic to apply for IRB approval, conduct interviews or distribute a survey, transcribe and analyze data, research secondary sources, and produce a deliverable in 6 weeks? Consider focusing on secondary sources in developing your project/deliverable to support a manageable timeline.

    **10. Develop schedule/timeline specifying main project activities and when they will occur over the 7 week time frame of OGL593.**

    · This section would list the major activities such as contact organizational representative, identify current training practices, identify gaps/training needs, identify client’s desired outcomes, research leadership development curricula, recommend training curriculum and sketch out what a pilot program might look like.

    **10. Reflection [This will not be part of your final prospectus, it's only for this class]**

    · State initial assumptions you are making about your project

    · Identify project limitations (what is in the scope of this study, what will it not address)

    · Summary of your background/experience knowledge that qualifies you for this project

    · What excites you about this project? Why are you interested in the topic? How does it connect to your professional aspirations?

    · What concerns do you have?

    · Relate your project to at least
    **two of the ideas we covered in this class**. What have you learned here these past few weeks that could be useful as you conduct your applied project?

    **11. References**

    · Include
    **ten** supporting references, with in-text citations, to show where you drew information and ideas from. You can use APA formatting (e.g., in-text citations and a references page), footnotes, or endnotes.

    **Technical:**

    · Submit a 4-5 page single-spaced impact plan. One inch margins. Times New Roman font.

    · Ideally, your format and style will mirror that of your applied project organization (e.g., colors, font, tone). Or you can use your own branding template if you have a consulting practice (e.g., McKinsey, Bain & Co., Deloitte).

    · Please include 10 references, cited consistently and appropriately (e.g., APA, MLA) throughout your document. Include a references list at the end of the document that follows your formatting style (e.g., APA, MLA).

    Rubric

    **ImpactPlan_Studentexample.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/impactplan-studentexample-docx)

    **AppliedProjectStart-upGuide_v1_MS-OGL_051322-21-2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appliedprojectstart-upguide-v1-ms-ogl-051322-21-2-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] 542 d4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Madaus, G. F., Higgins, J., & Russell, M. K. (2009). _The Paradoxes of High Stakes Testing : How They Affect Students, Their Parents, Teachers, Principals, Schools, and Society._ Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing. Chapter 10 After reviewing the Saunders’ article on grade-level teams, discu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Madaus, G. F., Higgins, J., & Russell, M. K. (2009). _The Paradoxes of High Stakes Testing : How They Affect Students, Their Parents, Teachers, Principals, Schools, and Society._ Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.
    Chapter 10
    After reviewing the Saunders’ article on grade-level teams, discuss the benefits of grade level teams when it comes to teaching, learning, and assessment. How does accountability with others improve practice? What can school/district leaders do to encourage team collaboration?
    Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of title I schools. _American Educational Research Journal, 46_(4), 1006-1033. doi:10.3102/0002831209333185
    Sindelar, N. W. (2011). _Assessment-Powered Teaching._ Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.Read Chapter 6
    Udelhofen, S. K. (2005). _Keys to Curriculum Mapping : Strategies and Tools to Make It Work._ Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
    Read Chapter 1
    Helpful Websites:
    https://www.ets.org/k12/capabilities/planning/

  • [Solved] proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attachments – ## ShastaStrongweek1journal.docx – ## researchproposal.docx **## ShastaStrongweek1journal.docx** Shasta Strong Week 1 Journal: Research Topic Selection July 14, 2025 Social media has a big impact on teenage life and can have both positive and negative effects on mental health. Posi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attachments

    – ## ShastaStrongweek1journal.docx

    – ## researchproposal.docx

    **## ShastaStrongweek1journal.docx**

    Shasta Strong

    Week 1 Journal: Research Topic Selection

    July 14, 2025

    Social media has a big impact on teenage life and can have both positive and negative effects on mental health. Positively, it gives them the opportunity to express themselves, interact with their friends, and obtain important information, such as services for mental health. Particularly for people who might feel excluded in their offline contexts, it might help them develop a feeling of identity and belonging. Active use of social media, whether for communication or creation, can promote emotional health and social development. However, there is mounting evidence that excessive or passive social media use is associated with higher rates of anxiety, sadness, low self-esteem, and sleep disturbances. Fear of missing out (FOMO), unfavorable social comparison, and even cyberbullying can result from frequent exposure to idealized pictures and the urge to be online. Adolescents’ experiences can vary depending on personal characteristics such as age, gender, and underlying mental health issues. All things considered, social media can be a useful tool, but how, when, and why it is utilized greatly affects how it affects mental health.

    In psychology, the research of social media's effects on teenage mental health is crucial because it tackles a quickly changing facet of human behavior that has a direct impact on psychological development, particularly at a vulnerable stage of life. Online interactions now have a significant impact on identity formation, emotional regulation, and social connection during adolescence. Psychologists are in a unique position to investigate how adolescents' self-concept, mood, and conduct are shaped by their continuous exposure to carefully chosen content, peer criticism, and online comparison. Additionally, this subject expands knowledge in several subfields of psychology, such as social, developmental, and clinical psychology. In addition to helping to improve theoretical frameworks like cognitive-behavioral models and ecological systems theory, it offers insights into new trends in mental health conditions like anxiety, depression, and poor self-esteem. Practically speaking, the study can guide evidence-based treatments, digital literacy initiatives, and therapeutic philosophies that are adapted to the digital world that today's adolescents must navigate. This study closes the gap between psychological science and the everyday experiences of teenagers in a digital world by tackling a contemporary and extremely pertinent subject.

    References

    Nadine Agyapong-Opoku, Felix Agyapong-Opoku, & Andrew J. Greenshaw. (2025). Effects of

    Social Media Use on Youth and Adolescent Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Reviews.
    _Behavioral Sciences_,
    _15_(5), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050574

    **## researchproposal.docx**

    Research Proposal

    [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

    Prior to beginning work on this final paper, review your preliminary presentation, any feedback received on it, and any course materials relevant to your research idea.

    The written research proposal will be created based on a narrowly defined aspect of the topic selected in Week 1. A research proposal is a detailed plan for a specific study to be conducted at a future time. It is the document that potential researchers typically submit to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical review and approval, and/or to funding agencies to secure financial support for a research effort. This is a more detailed version of the research plan you presented in Week 5.

    The following headings for the required sections and subsections must appear in the paper. In accordance with APA Style, all references listed must be cited in the text of the paper.

    **Introduction**

    · Introduce the research topic, explain why it is important, and present an appropriately and narrowly defined research question and/or hypothesis.

    **Literature Review**

    · Evaluate the published research on the chosen topic including a minimum of three peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, making reference to the findings of previous research studies.

    · Briefly mention the research methods that have previously been used to study the topic.

    · State whether the proposed study is a replication of a previous study or a new approach employing methods that have not been used before.

    · Be sure to properly cite all sources in APA style.

    **Methods**

    · Design: Create a feasible research design that incorporates appropriate methods to address the topic. Because this is a plan for research that has not yet been conducted, the Methods section should be written in the future tense and should not contain any hypothetical results.

    · Indicate whether the approach of the proposed study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.

    · Identify the specific research design and indicate whether it is experimental or nonexperimental.

    · Evaluate the chosen design and explain why this design is feasible and appropriate for the topic and how it will provide the information needed to answer the research question.

    · Cite sources on research methodology to support these choices. Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources.

    · Participants: Identify and describe the sampling strategy to be used to recruit participants for the study. Estimate the number of participants needed and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for the research design and approach.

    · Procedure/Measures: Apply the scientific method by describing the steps to be taken in carrying out the study. Identify any test, questionnaire, or measurement instrument to be utilized. If an existing published instrument will be employed, briefly describe it and cite the source. If an original questionnaire, survey, or test will be created for the project, describe the types of information that will be collected with it and explain how the validity and reliability of the instrument will be established. If such an instrument will not be used, describe how the data will be collected for the study.

    · Data Analysis: Describe the statistical techniques (if quantitative) or the analysis procedure (if qualitative) to be used to analyze the data. Cite at least one peer-reviewed source on the chosen analysis technique.

    **Ethical Issues**

    · Analyze the impact of ethical concerns on the proposed study, such as confidentiality, deception, informed consent, potential harm to participants, conflict of interest, IRB approval, etc. After analyzing the ethical issues that apply to the project, indicate what will be done to handle these concerns.

    **Conclusion**

    · Briefly summarize the major points of the paper and reiterate why the proposed study is needed.

    **Note:** The Master of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Folio portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this research proposal, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to your Folio account and upload the revised research proposal to the portfolio. Use the
    [_Setting Up and Using Folio_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/99a6a3d9-083a-46da-96ba-5ee4481323e7/1/Setting%20Up%20and%20Using%20Folio.pdf) guide to create an account if you do not already have one. The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool.

    The Research Proposal final paper

    · Must be five to seven double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.

    · Must include a separate title page with the following:

    · Title of paper in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · Student’s name

    · Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · Course name and number

    · Instructor’s name

    · Due date

    · Must utilize academic voice. See the
    [_Academic Voice_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.

    · Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    · For assistance on writing
    [_Introductions & Conclusions_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) and
    [_Writing a Thesis Statement_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis), refer to the Writing Center resources.

    · Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.

    · The
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

    · To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view
    [_Quick and Easy Library Research_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

    · Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.

    · Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the
    [_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

    Carefully review the
    [Grading RubricLinks to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/35610/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

    **## researchproposal.docx**

    Research Proposal

    [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

    Prior to beginning work on this final paper, review your preliminary presentation, any feedback received on it, and any course materials relevant to your research idea.

    The written research proposal will be created based on a narrowly defined aspect of the topic selected in Week 1. A research proposal is a detailed plan for a specific study to be conducted at a future time. It is the document that potential researchers typically submit to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical review and approval, and/or to funding agencies to secure financial support for a research effort. This is a more detailed version of the research plan you presented in Week 5.

    The following headings for the required sections and subsections must appear in the paper. In accordance with APA Style, all references listed must be cited in the text of the paper.

    **Introduction**

    · Introduce the research topic, explain why it is important, and present an appropriately and narrowly defined research question and/or hypothesis.

    **Literature Review**

    · Evaluate the published research on the chosen topic including a minimum of three peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, making reference to the findings of previous research studies.

    · Briefly mention the research methods that have previously been used to study the topic.

    · State whether the proposed study is a replication of a previous study or a new approach employing methods that have not been used before.

    · Be sure to properly cite all sources in APA style.

    **Methods**

    · Design: Create a feasible research design that incorporates appropriate methods to address the topic. Because this is a plan for research that has not yet been conducted, the Methods section should be written in the future tense and should not contain any hypothetical results.

    · Indicate whether the approach of the proposed study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.

    · Identify the specific research design and indicate whether it is experimental or nonexperimental.

    · Evaluate the chosen design and explain why this design is feasible and appropriate for the topic and how it will provide the information needed to answer the research question.

    · Cite sources on research methodology to support these choices. Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources.

    · Participants: Identify and describe the sampling strategy to be used to recruit participants for the study. Estimate the number of participants needed and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for the research design and approach.

    · Procedure/Measures: Apply the scientific method by describing the steps to be taken in carrying out the study. Identify any test, questionnaire, or measurement instrument to be utilized. If an existing published instrument will be employed, briefly describe it and cite the source. If an original questionnaire, survey, or test will be created for the project, describe the types of information that will be collected with it and explain how the validity and reliability of the instrument will be established. If such an instrument will not be used, describe how the data will be collected for the study.

    · Data Analysis: Describe the statistical techniques (if quantitative) or the analysis procedure (if qualitative) to be used to analyze the data. Cite at least one peer-reviewed source on the chosen analysis technique.

    **Ethical Issues**

    · Analyze the impact of ethical concerns on the proposed study, such as confidentiality, deception, informed consent, potential harm to participants, conflict of interest, IRB approval, etc. After analyzing the ethical issues that apply to the project, indicate what will be done to handle these concerns.

    **Conclusion**

    · Briefly summarize the major points of the paper and reiterate why the proposed study is needed.

    **Note:** The Master of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Folio portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this research proposal, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to your Folio account and upload the revised research proposal to the portfolio. Use the
    [_Setting Up and Using Folio_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/99a6a3d9-083a-46da-96ba-5ee4481323e7/1/Setting%20Up%20and%20Using%20Folio.pdf) guide to create an account if you do not already have one. The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool.

    The Research Proposal final paper

    · Must be five to seven double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.

    · Must include a separate title page with the following:

    · Title of paper in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · Student’s name

    · Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · Course name and number

    · Instructor’s name

    · Due date

    · Must utilize academic voice. See the
    [_Academic Voice_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.

    · Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    · For assistance on writing
    [_Introductions & Conclusions_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) and
    [_Writing a Thesis Statement_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis), refer to the Writing Center resources.

    · Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.

    · The
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

    · To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view
    [_Quick and Easy Library Research_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

    · Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.

    · Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the
    [_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

    Carefully review the
    [Grading RubricLinks to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/35610/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

    **## ShastaStrongweek1journal.docx**

    Shasta Strong

    Week 1 Journal: Research Topic Selection

    July 14, 2025

    Social media has a big impact on teenage life and can have both positive and negative effects on mental health. Positively, it gives them the opportunity to express themselves, interact with their friends, and obtain important information, such as services for mental health. Particularly for people who might feel excluded in their offline contexts, it might help them develop a feeling of identity and belonging. Active use of social media, whether for communication or creation, can promote emotional health and social development. However, there is mounting evidence that excessive or passive social media use is associated with higher rates of anxiety, sadness, low self-esteem, and sleep disturbances. Fear of missing out (FOMO), unfavorable social comparison, and even cyberbullying can result from frequent exposure to idealized pictures and the urge to be online. Adolescents’ experiences can vary depending on personal characteristics such as age, gender, and underlying mental health issues. All things considered, social media can be a useful tool, but how, when, and why it is utilized greatly affects how it affects mental health.

    In psychology, the research of social media's effects on teenage mental health is crucial because it tackles a quickly changing facet of human behavior that has a direct impact on psychological development, particularly at a vulnerable stage of life. Online interactions now have a significant impact on identity formation, emotional regulation, and social connection during adolescence. Psychologists are in a unique position to investigate how adolescents' self-concept, mood, and conduct are shaped by their continuous exposure to carefully chosen content, peer criticism, and online comparison. Additionally, this subject expands knowledge in several subfields of psychology, such as social, developmental, and clinical psychology. In addition to helping to improve theoretical frameworks like cognitive-behavioral models and ecological systems theory, it offers insights into new trends in mental health conditions like anxiety, depression, and poor self-esteem. Practically speaking, the study can guide evidence-based treatments, digital literacy initiatives, and therapeutic philosophies that are adapted to the digital world that today's adolescents must navigate. This study closes the gap between psychological science and the everyday experiences of teenagers in a digital world by tackling a contemporary and extremely pertinent subject.

    References

    Nadine Agyapong-Opoku, Felix Agyapong-Opoku, & Andrew J. Greenshaw. (2025). Effects of

    Social Media Use on Youth and Adolescent Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Reviews.
    _Behavioral Sciences_,
    _15_(5), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050574

    **## researchproposal.docx**

    Research Proposal

    [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

    Prior to beginning work on this final paper, review your preliminary presentation, any feedback received on it, and any course materials relevant to your research idea.

    The written research proposal will be created based on a narrowly defined aspect of the topic selected in Week 1. A research proposal is a detailed plan for a specific study to be conducted at a future time. It is the document that potential researchers typically submit to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical review and approval, and/or to funding agencies to secure financial support for a research effort. This is a more detailed version of the research plan you presented in Week 5.

    The following headings for the required sections and subsections must appear in the paper. In accordance with APA Style, all references listed must be cited in the text of the paper.

    **Introduction**

    · Introduce the research topic, explain why it is important, and present an appropriately and narrowly defined research question and/or hypothesis.

    **Literature Review**

    · Evaluate the published research on the chosen topic including a minimum of three peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, making reference to the findings of previous research studies.

    · Briefly mention the research methods that have previously been used to study the topic.

    · State whether the proposed study is a replication of a previous study or a new approach employing methods that have not been used before.

    · Be sure to properly cite all sources in APA style.

    **Methods**

    · Design: Create a feasible research design that incorporates appropriate methods to address the topic. Because this is a plan for research that has not yet been conducted, the Methods section should be written in the future tense and should not contain any hypothetical results.

    · Indicate whether the approach of the proposed study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.

    · Identify the specific research design and indicate whether it is experimental or nonexperimental.

    · Evaluate the chosen design and explain why this design is feasible and appropriate for the topic and how it will provide the information needed to answer the research question.

    · Cite sources on research methodology to support these choices. Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources.

    · Participants: Identify and describe the sampling strategy to be used to recruit participants for the study. Estimate the number of participants needed and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for the research design and approach.

    · Procedure/Measures: Apply the scientific method by describing the steps to be taken in carrying out the study. Identify any test, questionnaire, or measurement instrument to be utilized. If an existing published instrument will be employed, briefly describe it and cite the source. If an original questionnaire, survey, or test will be created for the project, describe the types of information that will be collected with it and explain how the validity and reliability of the instrument will be established. If such an instrument will not be used, describe how the data will be collected for the study.

    · Data Analysis: Describe the statistical techniques (if quantitative) or the analysis procedure (if qualitative) to be used to analyze the data. Cite at least one peer-reviewed source on the chosen analysis technique.

    **Ethical Issues**

    · Analyze the impact of ethical concerns on the proposed study, such as confidentiality, deception, informed consent, potential harm to participants, conflict of interest, IRB approval, etc. After analyzing the ethical issues that apply to the project, indicate what will be done to handle these concerns.

    **Conclusion**

    · Briefly summarize the major points of the paper and reiterate why the proposed study is needed.

    **Note:** The Master of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Folio portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this research proposal, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to your Folio account and upload the revised research proposal to the portfolio. Use the
    [_Setting Up and Using Folio_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/99a6a3d9-083a-46da-96ba-5ee4481323e7/1/Setting%20Up%20and%20Using%20Folio.pdf) guide to create an account if you do not already have one. The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool.

    The Research Proposal final paper

    · Must be five to seven double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.

    · Must include a separate title page with the following:

    · Title of paper in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · Student’s name

    · Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · Course name and number

    · Instructor’s name

    · Due date

    · Must utilize academic voice. See the
    [_Academic Voice_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.

    · Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    · For assistance on writing
    [_Introductions & Conclusions_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) and
    [_Writing a Thesis Statement_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis), refer to the Writing Center resources.

    · Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.

    · The
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

    · To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view
    [_Quick and Easy Library Research_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

    · Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.

    · Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the
    [_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

    Carefully review the
    [Grading RubricLinks to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/35610/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

    **## ShastaStrongweek1journal.docx**

    Shasta Strong

    Week 1 Journal: Research Topic Selection

    July 14, 2025

    Social media has a big impact on teenage life and can have both positive and negative effects on mental health. Positively, it gives them the opportunity to express themselves, interact with their friends, and obtain important information, such as services for mental health. Particularly for people who might feel excluded in their offline contexts, it might help them develop a feeling of identity and belonging. Active use of social media, whether for communication or creation, can promote emotional health and social development. However, there is mounting evidence that excessive or passive social media use is associated with higher rates of anxiety, sadness, low self-esteem, and sleep disturbances. Fear of missing out (FOMO), unfavorable social comparison, and even cyberbullying can result from frequent exposure to idealized pictures and the urge to be online. Adolescents’ experiences can vary depending on personal characteristics such as age, gender, and underlying mental health issues. All things considered, social media can be a useful tool, but how, when, and why it is utilized greatly affects how it affects mental health.

    In psychology, the research of social media's effects on teenage mental health is crucial because it tackles a quickly changing facet of human behavior that has a direct impact on psychological development, particularly at a vulnerable stage of life. Online interactions now have a significant impact on identity formation, emotional regulation, and social connection during adolescence. Psychologists are in a unique position to investigate how adolescents' self-concept, mood, and conduct are shaped by their continuous exposure to carefully chosen content, peer criticism, and online comparison. Additionally, this subject expands knowledge in several subfields of psychology, such as social, developmental, and clinical psychology. In addition to helping to improve theoretical frameworks like cognitive-behavioral models and ecological systems theory, it offers insights into new trends in mental health conditions like anxiety, depression, and poor self-esteem. Practically speaking, the study can guide evidence-based treatments, digital literacy initiatives, and therapeutic philosophies that are adapted to the digital world that today's adolescents must navigate. This study closes the gap between psychological science and the everyday experiences of teenagers in a digital world by tackling a contemporary and extremely pertinent subject.

    References

    Nadine Agyapong-Opoku, Felix Agyapong-Opoku, & Andrew J. Greenshaw. (2025). Effects of

    Social Media Use on Youth and Adolescent Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Reviews.
    _Behavioral Sciences_,
    _15_(5), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050574

    **## researchproposal.docx**

    Research Proposal

    [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

    Prior to beginning work on this final paper, review your preliminary presentation, any feedback received on it, and any course materials relevant to your research idea.

    The written research proposal will be created based on a narrowly defined aspect of the topic selected in Week 1. A research proposal is a detailed plan for a specific study to be conducted at a future time. It is the document that potential researchers typically submit to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical review and approval, and/or to funding agencies to secure financial support for a research effort. This is a more detailed version of the research plan you presented in Week 5.

    The following headings for the required sections and subsections must appear in the paper. In accordance with APA Style, all references listed must be cited in the text of the paper.

    **Introduction**

    · Introduce the research topic, explain why it is important, and present an appropriately and narrowly defined research question and/or hypothesis.

    **Literature Review**

    · Evaluate the published research on the chosen topic including a minimum of three peer-reviewed research articles.

    · Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, making reference to the findings of previous research studies.

    · Briefly mention the research methods that have previously been used to study the topic.

    · State whether the proposed study is a replication of a previous study or a new approach employing methods that have not been used before.

    · Be sure to properly cite all sources in APA style.

    **Methods**

    · Design: Create a feasible research design that incorporates appropriate methods to address the topic. Because this is a plan for research that has not yet been conducted, the Methods section should be written in the future tense and should not contain any hypothetical results.

    · Indicate whether the approach of the proposed study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.

    · Identify the specific research design and indicate whether it is experimental or nonexperimental.

    · Evaluate the chosen design and explain why this design is feasible and appropriate for the topic and how it will provide the information needed to answer the research question.

    · Cite sources on research methodology to support these choices. Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources.

    · Participants: Identify and describe the sampling strategy to be used to recruit participants for the study. Estimate the number of participants needed and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for the research design and approach.

    · Procedure/Measures: Apply the scientific method by describing the steps to be taken in carrying out the study. Identify any test, questionnaire, or measurement instrument to be utilized. If an existing published instrument will be employed, briefly describe it and cite the source. If an original questionnaire, survey, or test will be created for the project, describe the types of information that will be collected with it and explain how the validity and reliability of the instrument will be established. If such an instrument will not be used, describe how the data will be collected for the study.

    · Data Analysis: Describe the statistical techniques (if quantitative) or the analysis procedure (if qualitative) to be used to analyze the data. Cite at least one peer-reviewed source on the chosen analysis technique.

    **Ethical Issues**

    · Analyze the impact of ethical concerns on the proposed study, such as confidentiality, deception, informed consent, potential harm to participants, conflict of interest, IRB approval, etc. After analyzing the ethical issues that apply to the project, indicate what will be done to handle these concerns.

    **Conclusion**

    · Briefly summarize the major points of the paper and reiterate why the proposed study is needed.

    **Note:** The Master of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Folio portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this research proposal, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to your Folio account and upload the revised research proposal to the portfolio. Use the
    [_Setting Up and Using Folio_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/99a6a3d9-083a-46da-96ba-5ee4481323e7/1/Setting%20Up%20and%20Using%20Folio.pdf) guide to create an account if you do not already have one. The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool.

    The Research Proposal final paper

    · Must be five to seven double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.

    · Must include a separate title page with the following:

    · Title of paper in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · Student’s name

    · Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · Course name and number

    · Instructor’s name

    · Due date

    · Must utilize academic voice. See the
    [_Academic Voice_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.

    · Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    · For assistance on writing
    [_Introductions & Conclusions_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) and
    [_Writing a Thesis Statement_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis), refer to the Writing Center resources.

    · Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.

    · The
    [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_ Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

    · To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view
    [_Quick and Easy Library Research_ Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

    · Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
    [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.

    · Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the
    [_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

    Carefully review the
    [Grading RubricLinks to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/35610/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

    – 1
    – 2