Tag: Nursing

[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## Competencies.docx **## Competencies.docx** ### Competencies 4 pages and 4 references ![A person in a white coat speaking into a microphone AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20931595) _How do you determine w…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## Competencies.docx

**## Competencies.docx**

### Competencies 4 pages and 4 references

![A person in a white coat speaking into a microphone AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20931595)

_How do you determine what skills or qualities will benefit you as a leader in your healthcare organization or nursing practice?_

This question might be answered through the analysis of nursing informatics competencies. The analysis of these competencies provides a context for the qualities needed to effectively lead and implement projects in your healthcare organization or nursing practice.

Appraise the Standards for Nursing Informatics Practice (Standard 1-6) and the leadership strategies addressed in Informatics leadership Standard 12, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Consider the competences that we have discussed during this course.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883561)

To Prepare

· Review the “Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice” learning resource to explore competencies related to nursing practice.

· Consider the role of competencies in nursing practice. Which competencies may be the most beneficial for project management and nursing informatics?

· Reflect on which skills you might currently possess and how you might become competent in others.

The Assignment: (4–5 pages)

· Explain what competencies are most important and beneficial for your success as a leader in your practice. Be specific and provide examples.

· Appraise the leadership strategies, addressed in Informatics Leadership Standard 12, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Be specific.

· Analyze whether or not you currently have these skills. Then, explain approaches you might recommend implementing to become competent or more proficient in this skill.

**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain what competencies are most important and beneficial for your success as a leader in your practice. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly explains in detail what competencies are most important and beneficial for success as a leader in practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the responses provided, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraise the leadership strategies, addressed in Standard 12, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Be specific. | **25 to >21.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response accurately and fully aligns with Standard 12 with sufficient detail to support the recommended strategies. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**21 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response accurately aligns with Standard 12 and may support the recommended strategies. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided.<br> <br>**19 to >16.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response inaccurately or vaguely aligns with Standard 12 and may support the recommend strategies. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**16 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely aligns with Standard 12 and does not support the recommended strategies, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the responses provided, or it is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze whether or not you currently have these skills. Then, explain approaches you might recommend implementing to become competent or more proficient in this skill. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the student already has working knowledge of and use of the skills identified. … The response accurately and clearly explains in detail approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified. … The response accurately explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified. … The response inaccurately or vaguely explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

## image1.jpeg

**## Competencies.docx**

### Competencies 4 pages and 4 references

![A person in a white coat speaking into a microphone AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20931595)

_How do you determine what skills or qualities will benefit you as a leader in your healthcare organization or nursing practice?_

This question might be answered through the analysis of nursing informatics competencies. The analysis of these competencies provides a context for the qualities needed to effectively lead and implement projects in your healthcare organization or nursing practice.

Appraise the Standards for Nursing Informatics Practice (Standard 1-6) and the leadership strategies addressed in Informatics leadership Standard 12, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Consider the competences that we have discussed during this course.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/175732/modules/items/6883561)

To Prepare

· Review the “Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice” learning resource to explore competencies related to nursing practice.

· Consider the role of competencies in nursing practice. Which competencies may be the most beneficial for project management and nursing informatics?

· Reflect on which skills you might currently possess and how you might become competent in others.

The Assignment: (4–5 pages)

· Explain what competencies are most important and beneficial for your success as a leader in your practice. Be specific and provide examples.

· Appraise the leadership strategies, addressed in Informatics Leadership Standard 12, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Be specific.

· Analyze whether or not you currently have these skills. Then, explain approaches you might recommend implementing to become competent or more proficient in this skill.

**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain what competencies are most important and beneficial for your success as a leader in your practice. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly explains in detail what competencies are most important and beneficial for success as a leader in practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the responses provided, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraise the leadership strategies, addressed in Standard 12, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Be specific. | **25 to >21.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response accurately and fully aligns with Standard 12 with sufficient detail to support the recommended strategies. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**21 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response accurately aligns with Standard 12 and may support the recommended strategies. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided.<br> <br>**19 to >16.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response inaccurately or vaguely aligns with Standard 12 and may support the recommend strategies. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**16 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely aligns with Standard 12 and does not support the recommended strategies, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the responses provided, or it is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze whether or not you currently have these skills. Then, explain approaches you might recommend implementing to become competent or more proficient in this skill. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the student already has working knowledge of and use of the skills identified. … The response accurately and clearly explains in detail approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified. … The response accurately explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified. … The response inaccurately or vaguely explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

## image1.jpeg

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Week 5 discussion

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Locate a news story (Utah, USA) or other resource from the last six months regarding an issue in healthcare and answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. **Include the following sections**: 1. **Application of Course Knowledge** – Summarize the issue and provide a link to the news …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Locate a news story (Utah, USA) or other resource from the last six months regarding an issue in healthcare and answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
**Include the following sections**:
1. **Application of Course Knowledge**
– Summarize the issue and provide a link to the news story or resource.
– Discuss how the issue may impact nursing practice at the micro-, meso-, and macro-levels of the healthcare system.
– Analyze how healthcare policy impacts the issue.
– Propose one potential policy change that could help address or mitigate the issue.
2. **Integration of Evidence**: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:
– Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
– Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
– Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
– Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
– Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## MSN5550SignatureAssignmentInstructions.pdf **## MSN5550SignatureAssignmentInstructions.pdf** MSN 5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease Case Study Module 2 Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide evidence-based rationales for your an…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## MSN5550SignatureAssignmentInstructions.pdf

**## MSN5550SignatureAssignmentInstructions.pdf**

MSN 5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease
Case Study Module 2

Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide
evidence-based rationales for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed.

Due: Saturday by 23:59 pm

CASE STUDY: An Older Immigrant Couple: Mr. and Mrs. Arahan

Mr. and Mrs. Arahan, an older couple in their seventies, have been living with their oldest daughter,
her husband of 15 years, and their two children, ages 12 and 14. They all live in a middle-income
neighborhood in a suburb of a metropolitan city. Mr. and Mrs. Arahan are both college educated and
worked full-time while they were in their native country. In addition, Mr. Arahan, the only offspring
of wealthy parents, inherited a substantial amount of money and real estate. Their daughter came to
the United States as a registered nurse and met her husband, a drug company representative. The
older couple moved to the United States when their daughter became a U.S. citizen and petitioned
them as immigrants. Since the couple was facing retirement, they welcomed the opportunity to come
to the United States.

The Arahans found life in the United States different from that in their home country, but their
adjustment was not as difficult because both were healthy and spoke English fluently. Most of their
time was spent taking care of their two grandchildren and the house. As the grandchildren grew older,
the older couple found that they had more spare time. The daughter and her husband advanced in
their careers and spent a great deal more time at their jobs. There were few family dinners during
the week. On weekends, the daughter, her husband, and their children socialized with their own
friends. The couple began to feel isolated and longed for a more active life.

Mr. and Mrs. Arahan began to think that perhaps they should return to the home country, where
they still had relatives and friends. However, political and economic issues would have made it
difficult for them to live there. Besides, they had become accustomed to the way of life in the United
States with all the modern conveniences and abundance of goods that were difficult to obtain in their
country. However, they also became concerned that they might not be able to tolerate the winter
months and that minor health problems might worsen as they aged. They wondered who would take
care of them if they became very frail and where they would live, knowing that their daughter had
only saved money for their grandchildren’s college education. They expressed their sentiments to
their daughter, who became very concerned about how her parents were feeling.

This older couple had been attending church on a regular basis, but had never been active in other
church-related activities. The church bulletin announced the establishment of parish nursing with
two retired registered nurses as volunteers. The couple attended the first opening of the parish clinic.
Here, they met one of the registered nurses, who had a short discussion with them about the services
offered. The registered nurse had spent a great deal of her working years as a community health

nurse. She informed Mr. and Mrs. Arahan of her availability to help them resolve any health-related
issues.

Reflective Questions

1. What strategies could be suggested for this older adult couple to enhance their quality of life?
2. What community resources can they utilize?
3. What can the daughter and her family do to address the feelings of isolation of the older couple?
4. What health promotion activities can ensure a healthy lifestyle for them?

– CASE STUDY: An Older Immigrant Couple: Mr. and Mrs. Arahan
– Reflective Questions

**## MSN5550SignatureAssignmentInstructions.pdf**

MSN 5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease
Case Study Module 2

Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide
evidence-based rationales for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed.

Due: Saturday by 23:59 pm

CASE STUDY: An Older Immigrant Couple: Mr. and Mrs. Arahan

Mr. and Mrs. Arahan, an older couple in their seventies, have been living with their oldest daughter,
her husband of 15 years, and their two children, ages 12 and 14. They all live in a middle-income
neighborhood in a suburb of a metropolitan city. Mr. and Mrs. Arahan are both college educated and
worked full-time while they were in their native country. In addition, Mr. Arahan, the only offspring
of wealthy parents, inherited a substantial amount of money and real estate. Their daughter came to
the United States as a registered nurse and met her husband, a drug company representative. The
older couple moved to the United States when their daughter became a U.S. citizen and petitioned
them as immigrants. Since the couple was facing retirement, they welcomed the opportunity to come
to the United States.

The Arahans found life in the United States different from that in their home country, but their
adjustment was not as difficult because both were healthy and spoke English fluently. Most of their
time was spent taking care of their two grandchildren and the house. As the grandchildren grew older,
the older couple found that they had more spare time. The daughter and her husband advanced in
their careers and spent a great deal more time at their jobs. There were few family dinners during
the week. On weekends, the daughter, her husband, and their children socialized with their own
friends. The couple began to feel isolated and longed for a more active life.

Mr. and Mrs. Arahan began to think that perhaps they should return to the home country, where
they still had relatives and friends. However, political and economic issues would have made it
difficult for them to live there. Besides, they had become accustomed to the way of life in the United
States with all the modern conveniences and abundance of goods that were difficult to obtain in their
country. However, they also became concerned that they might not be able to tolerate the winter
months and that minor health problems might worsen as they aged. They wondered who would take
care of them if they became very frail and where they would live, knowing that their daughter had
only saved money for their grandchildren’s college education. They expressed their sentiments to
their daughter, who became very concerned about how her parents were feeling.

This older couple had been attending church on a regular basis, but had never been active in other
church-related activities. The church bulletin announced the establishment of parish nursing with
two retired registered nurses as volunteers. The couple attended the first opening of the parish clinic.
Here, they met one of the registered nurses, who had a short discussion with them about the services
offered. The registered nurse had spent a great deal of her working years as a community health

nurse. She informed Mr. and Mrs. Arahan of her availability to help them resolve any health-related
issues.

Reflective Questions

1. What strategies could be suggested for this older adult couple to enhance their quality of life?
2. What community resources can they utilize?
3. What can the daughter and her family do to address the feelings of isolation of the older couple?
4. What health promotion activities can ensure a healthy lifestyle for them?

– CASE STUDY: An Older Immigrant Couple: Mr. and Mrs. Arahan
– Reflective Questions

November 5, 2026
[Solved] How to apply principles of nursing to the public health system?

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering How to apply principles of nursing to the public health system?.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Theory for doctoral Nursing Practice

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

### Formative Assessment You will develop an infographic that visually summarizes key information related to the financial and logistical aspects of implementing EBP. The infographic should be engaging, informative, and reflect the student's understanding of the subtopic. 1. **Content Requirements**…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

### Formative Assessment
You will develop an infographic that visually summarizes key information related to the financial and logistical aspects of implementing EBP. The infographic should be engaging, informative, and reflect the student's understanding of the subtopic.
1. **Content Requirements**
– The infographic must include the following elements:
– **Title:** Clearly state the topic (e.g., "Financial and Logistical Implications of Evidence-Based Practice").
– **Key Financial Implications:** Summarize the costs associated with training, resources, and technology needed for EBP implementation.
– **Funding Sources:** Identify potential funding sources and budget considerations for evidence-based initiatives.
– **Logistical Challenges:** Highlight at least three logistical challenges that may arise during EBP implementation (e.g., staffing, time constraints, access to research).
– **Theoretical Frameworks:** Briefly explain how different nursing theories (e.g., the Iowa Model) can guide the evaluation of resources and support EBP initiatives.
2. **Design and Visual Appeal**
– The infographic should be visually appealing and well-organized. Consider the following:
– Use of colors, fonts, and images that enhance readability.
– Logical flow of information with clear headings and sections.
– Appropriate use of graphics, charts, or icons to represent data and information.
3. **Clarity and Accuracy**
– Ensure that all information presented in the infographic is clear, accurate, and relevant to the subtopic. Facts should be supported by recent research or literature, and citations should be included where necessary.
### Document Type/Template
– Canva, Piktochart, Adobe Spark
\
Rubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10365851 "Rubric.pdf")

November 5, 2026
[Solved] NURSE

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## work10.docx **## work10.docx** The first step in addressing any population health issue is clear identification of the problem. Identification of a population health problem typically makes use of population data, which can be generated locally – such as by a specific practice, health care, or …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## work10.docx

**## work10.docx**

The first step in addressing any population health issue is clear identification of the problem. Identification of a population health problem typically makes use of population data, which can be generated locally – such as by a specific practice, health care, or public health system – or through regional or state data aggregation such as through the
[County Health Rankings. Links to an external site.](https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings). Once researchers use data to amass compelling evidence of a health problem, interventions can be designed to address that problem.

The Population Health Proposal – Part 1 assignment will be constructed in a paper formatted consistent with 7th edition APA guidelines.

A typical Problem Identification Paper is about 3-5 pages long (not including tile and references pages).

The paper should include the following:

· A title that reflects the problem or issue

· An introduction to the population that you defined for the week 4 presentation assignment.

·
**A sufficiently detailed description** (using the data you sourced about the population)
**of the significant health or health-related problem** you identified for this group from the week 1 discussion assignment.
**NOTE:** you are required to cite the source of the data utilized to identify the significant health or health-related problem.

· A discussion of the implications of the
**significant health risk or health-related problem** for the identified population (supported with scholarly resources).

· A discussion of the implications of not addressing the identified significant health or health-related problem (e.g. what could it mean if the problem is not addressed).

· A reference list with sources matching all in-text citations.

**## work10.docx**

The first step in addressing any population health issue is clear identification of the problem. Identification of a population health problem typically makes use of population data, which can be generated locally – such as by a specific practice, health care, or public health system – or through regional or state data aggregation such as through the
[County Health Rankings. Links to an external site.](https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings). Once researchers use data to amass compelling evidence of a health problem, interventions can be designed to address that problem.

The Population Health Proposal – Part 1 assignment will be constructed in a paper formatted consistent with 7th edition APA guidelines.

A typical Problem Identification Paper is about 3-5 pages long (not including tile and references pages).

The paper should include the following:

· A title that reflects the problem or issue

· An introduction to the population that you defined for the week 4 presentation assignment.

·
**A sufficiently detailed description** (using the data you sourced about the population)
**of the significant health or health-related problem** you identified for this group from the week 1 discussion assignment.
**NOTE:** you are required to cite the source of the data utilized to identify the significant health or health-related problem.

· A discussion of the implications of the
**significant health risk or health-related problem** for the identified population (supported with scholarly resources).

· A discussion of the implications of not addressing the identified significant health or health-related problem (e.g. what could it mean if the problem is not addressed).

· A reference list with sources matching all in-text citations.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## SpecialConsiderationsforPatientPopulationsPaper.docx **## SpecialConsiderationsforPatientPopulationsPaper.docx** Special Considerations for Patient Populations Paper professor evaluate per Rubric To complete this assignment, you will utilize the case study assigned to you by faculty for a patie…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## SpecialConsiderationsforPatientPopulationsPaper.docx

**## SpecialConsiderationsforPatientPopulationsPaper.docx**

Special Considerations for Patient Populations Paper

professor evaluate per Rubric

To complete this assignment, you will utilize the case study assigned to you by faculty for a patient population for special consideration during prescribing practices. You will consider the specific patient and determine the appropriate medication to prescribe, based on the patient specifics and medication attributes in various case studies. You will construct a 4- to 5-page paper in which you determine the medication, the dosing, necessary patient education, and potential side effects. You will also indicate why the other medications would not be appropriate, as well as any necessary labs or diagnostics that might be needed. You will develop a plan to enhance medication adherence for the nonadherent patient.

Special Considerations for Patient Population Cases:

·
**Patient 1:** 82-year-old male presenting with cognitive decline. He had always been a very active individual. Over the past year, he has become less active in the community. Previously, he played cribbage weekly with friends at the local senior center but has been struggling with the math involved with the game and no longer attends the weekly card game. He had also volunteered as a crossing guard for the local public school. He quit doing that after he took the wrong turn to get home and drove around the town feeling lost. He acknowledges he is “sensitive” to this and can be irritable towards his children when they bring up these concerns. He was diagnosed with mild neurocognitive disorder after completing neuropsychological testing. Of the following medications, which would be the most appropriate to prescribe? Explain why you chose this medication. What would be the dosing schedule for this patient? Provide education to the patient and review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication. In addition, explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient.
**Med List:** lorazepam, olanzapine, memantine

·
**Patient 2:** 76-year-old female who recently moved from her home to an assisted living. After 1 week of moving in, she has become extremely confused. Staff have attempted to re-orient her, and she struggles to focus on what they are saying. She is only oriented to self. She has become very agitated and has even thrown breakable objects in her room. Her family is concerned stating she is “out of it.” The PCP ordered labs and UA. Labs are unremarkable outside of mild leukocytosis and positive dipstick analysis for nitrite and red blood cells.
**Med List:** valproate, alprazolam, trimethoprim

·
**Patient 3:** A 33-year-old female that is 6 weeks postpartum. She presents with depressed mood, sadness, easily emotional, difficulties with sleep even when the infant is sleeping. She has lost weight and has a poor appetite. You note psychomotor retardation. She has limited interests in hobbies or bonding with the infant. Her partner is concerned and reports she is typically active and “bubbly” and enjoys the outdoors. She is diagnosed with major depressive disorder, with postpartum onset. She denies suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, or infanticidal ideation. No psychotic symptoms are present. She is nursing the infant and wants to continue this hoping it will assist with bonding with the infant.
**Med List:** lithium, paroxetine, sertraline

·
**Patient 4:** 10-year-old male who comes in with his father. He has been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. He has constant worries that he cannot control. He feels nervous and tense. He is easily irritable. He struggles to settle down or relax. He is also quite fidgety and restless. He and his father are interested in medications to manage these symptoms.
**Med List:** quetiapine, duloxetine, fluoxetine

·
**Patient 5:** 27-year-old male with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. He has been hospitalized three (3) times in the past 1 year due to symptoms. When symptomatic, he becomes disorganized and paranoid. He will respond to auditory hallucinations. He will scream out at night after seeing a shadow in his room. He has delusions that the CIA is poisoning food and will not eat for multiple days. He has unintentionally hurt his mother after “slapping” food out of her hand, as he did not want her to ingest the “poisoned food.” Symptoms are treated very well with paliperidone, but he struggles to remember to take it.
**Med List:** paliperidone palmitate, clozapine, lamotrigine

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172199/modules/items/7087955)

To Prepare:

· Review the Learning Resources.

· Carefully review your assigned vulnerable population patient.

· Carefully review the medication list to determine the best medication to prescribe.

· Consider the implications, impact, advantages, and disadvantages of the listed medications.

The Assignment (4–5 pages)

**Construct** a paper concerning your assigned vulnerable population patient case. In your paper include the following:

· Determine which medication would be most appropriate to prescribe from the assigned vulnerable population patient case medication choices.

· Explain your rationale for choosing this medication. Explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient.

· Explain the dosing schedule for the specific patient including the therapeutic endpoint.

· Provide necessary education to the patient to review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication.

· Describe any necessary labs or additional diagnostics needed prior to prescribing this medication.

· Explain how you might monitor efficacy or side effects of the medication.

· Include any additional collaboration or education to others that would be necessary for this patient. Consider family members, home health care, primary care providers, etc.

· What would you need to include in your assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with your prescribing plan for your scenario? What are alternative treatment solutions based upon how you assessed? Describe your new treatment plan.

This Assignment requires a minimum of
**five (5)** peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.

**Note:** You will need to include the APA style formatting.

**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
[Walden Writing Center Sample PaperLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general) provides an example of those required elements. All papers submitted must use this formatting.

**NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes the selected medication and explains the selection, dosing, and necessary patient education. | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that does not describe the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information, or some or all are missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection, dosing, and patient education information, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes any necessary labs or diagnostics needed prior to prescribing, as well as how side effects and efficacy will be monitored. | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response comprehensively and clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the descriptions.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the descriptions.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the descriptions.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the descriptions, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome20<br>Explains why the other medications are not appropriate | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and fully details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response clearly details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support why other medications are not appropriate, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides any additional collaboration or education necessary for the patient. Discussion includes: what would be needed to include in the assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with the prescribing plan. Discussion includes what are alternative treatment solutions based upon assessment. Describes a new treatment plan based upon these factors. | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples the information.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the information.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely provides all additional necessary information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the information.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely provides all additional necessary information, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the information, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper. | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Writes succinctly 4–7 page paper.<br> <br>**4 to >1.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic. Writes succinctly 8–9 page paper.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Does not write succinctly 10+ page paper. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5<br>Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards:<br>Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5<br>Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** format with no errors. Contains a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a one or two APA format errors. Contains a minimum of 3-4 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains three or four APA format errors. Contains a minimum of 1-2 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains five or more APA format errors. Contains no peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources. | |

**## SpecialConsiderationsforPatientPopulationsPaper.docx**

Special Considerations for Patient Populations Paper

professor evaluate per Rubric

To complete this assignment, you will utilize the case study assigned to you by faculty for a patient population for special consideration during prescribing practices. You will consider the specific patient and determine the appropriate medication to prescribe, based on the patient specifics and medication attributes in various case studies. You will construct a 4- to 5-page paper in which you determine the medication, the dosing, necessary patient education, and potential side effects. You will also indicate why the other medications would not be appropriate, as well as any necessary labs or diagnostics that might be needed. You will develop a plan to enhance medication adherence for the nonadherent patient.

Special Considerations for Patient Population Cases:

·
**Patient 1:** 82-year-old male presenting with cognitive decline. He had always been a very active individual. Over the past year, he has become less active in the community. Previously, he played cribbage weekly with friends at the local senior center but has been struggling with the math involved with the game and no longer attends the weekly card game. He had also volunteered as a crossing guard for the local public school. He quit doing that after he took the wrong turn to get home and drove around the town feeling lost. He acknowledges he is “sensitive” to this and can be irritable towards his children when they bring up these concerns. He was diagnosed with mild neurocognitive disorder after completing neuropsychological testing. Of the following medications, which would be the most appropriate to prescribe? Explain why you chose this medication. What would be the dosing schedule for this patient? Provide education to the patient and review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication. In addition, explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient.
**Med List:** lorazepam, olanzapine, memantine

·
**Patient 2:** 76-year-old female who recently moved from her home to an assisted living. After 1 week of moving in, she has become extremely confused. Staff have attempted to re-orient her, and she struggles to focus on what they are saying. She is only oriented to self. She has become very agitated and has even thrown breakable objects in her room. Her family is concerned stating she is “out of it.” The PCP ordered labs and UA. Labs are unremarkable outside of mild leukocytosis and positive dipstick analysis for nitrite and red blood cells.
**Med List:** valproate, alprazolam, trimethoprim

·
**Patient 3:** A 33-year-old female that is 6 weeks postpartum. She presents with depressed mood, sadness, easily emotional, difficulties with sleep even when the infant is sleeping. She has lost weight and has a poor appetite. You note psychomotor retardation. She has limited interests in hobbies or bonding with the infant. Her partner is concerned and reports she is typically active and “bubbly” and enjoys the outdoors. She is diagnosed with major depressive disorder, with postpartum onset. She denies suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, or infanticidal ideation. No psychotic symptoms are present. She is nursing the infant and wants to continue this hoping it will assist with bonding with the infant.
**Med List:** lithium, paroxetine, sertraline

·
**Patient 4:** 10-year-old male who comes in with his father. He has been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. He has constant worries that he cannot control. He feels nervous and tense. He is easily irritable. He struggles to settle down or relax. He is also quite fidgety and restless. He and his father are interested in medications to manage these symptoms.
**Med List:** quetiapine, duloxetine, fluoxetine

·
**Patient 5:** 27-year-old male with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. He has been hospitalized three (3) times in the past 1 year due to symptoms. When symptomatic, he becomes disorganized and paranoid. He will respond to auditory hallucinations. He will scream out at night after seeing a shadow in his room. He has delusions that the CIA is poisoning food and will not eat for multiple days. He has unintentionally hurt his mother after “slapping” food out of her hand, as he did not want her to ingest the “poisoned food.” Symptoms are treated very well with paliperidone, but he struggles to remember to take it.
**Med List:** paliperidone palmitate, clozapine, lamotrigine

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172199/modules/items/7087955)

To Prepare:

· Review the Learning Resources.

· Carefully review your assigned vulnerable population patient.

· Carefully review the medication list to determine the best medication to prescribe.

· Consider the implications, impact, advantages, and disadvantages of the listed medications.

The Assignment (4–5 pages)

**Construct** a paper concerning your assigned vulnerable population patient case. In your paper include the following:

· Determine which medication would be most appropriate to prescribe from the assigned vulnerable population patient case medication choices.

· Explain your rationale for choosing this medication. Explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient.

· Explain the dosing schedule for the specific patient including the therapeutic endpoint.

· Provide necessary education to the patient to review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication.

· Describe any necessary labs or additional diagnostics needed prior to prescribing this medication.

· Explain how you might monitor efficacy or side effects of the medication.

· Include any additional collaboration or education to others that would be necessary for this patient. Consider family members, home health care, primary care providers, etc.

· What would you need to include in your assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with your prescribing plan for your scenario? What are alternative treatment solutions based upon how you assessed? Describe your new treatment plan.

This Assignment requires a minimum of
**five (5)** peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.

**Note:** You will need to include the APA style formatting.

**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
[Walden Writing Center Sample PaperLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general) provides an example of those required elements. All papers submitted must use this formatting.

**NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes the selected medication and explains the selection, dosing, and necessary patient education. | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that does not describe the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information, or some or all are missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection, dosing, and patient education information, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes any necessary labs or diagnostics needed prior to prescribing, as well as how side effects and efficacy will be monitored. | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response comprehensively and clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the descriptions.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the descriptions.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the descriptions.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the descriptions, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome20<br>Explains why the other medications are not appropriate | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and fully details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response clearly details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support why other medications are not appropriate, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides any additional collaboration or education necessary for the patient. Discussion includes: what would be needed to include in the assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with the prescribing plan. Discussion includes what are alternative treatment solutions based upon assessment. Describes a new treatment plan based upon these factors. | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples the information.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the information.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely provides all additional necessary information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the information.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely provides all additional necessary information, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the information, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper. | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Writes succinctly 4–7 page paper.<br> <br>**4 to >1.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic. Writes succinctly 8–9 page paper.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Does not write succinctly 10+ page paper. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5<br>Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards:<br>Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5<br>Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** format with no errors. Contains a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a one or two APA format errors. Contains a minimum of 3-4 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains three or four APA format errors. Contains a minimum of 1-2 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains five or more APA format errors. Contains no peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources. | |

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Quality Improvement Project

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (1)** – ## Week10Assign8211.docx **## Week10Assign8211.docx** **Quality Improvement Project** As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the fie…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (1)**

– ## Week10Assign8211.docx

**## Week10Assign8211.docx**

**Quality Improvement Project**

As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163557/modules/items/6589993)

**To prepare:**

· Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.

· Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.

· Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.

**The Assignment**

Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.

**## Week10Assign8211.docx**

**Quality Improvement Project**

As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/163557/modules/items/6589993)

**To prepare:**

· Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.

· Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.

· Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.

**The Assignment**

Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] journal

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– a year ago **files (1)** – ## journalinstruction.docx **## journalinstruction.docx** Journal Entr Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skil…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a year ago

**files (1)**

– ## journalinstruction.docx

**## journalinstruction.docx**

Journal Entr

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.

This week, you will write a Journal Entry, reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518882)

**To prepare:**

· Refer to the “Advanced Nursing Practice Competencies and Guidelines” found in Week 1’s Learning Resources and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced nursing practice nurses must possess in your specialty of interest.

· Refer to your “Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

· Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek and consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

**Journal Entry (450–500 words):**

**Learning from Experiences**

· Reflect on the three most challenging patients. What was most challenging for each?

· What did you learn from this experience?

· What resources did you have available?

· What evidence-based practice did you use for this patient?

· What new skills are you learning?

· What would you do differently?

· How are you managing patient flow and volume?

**Communicating and Feedback**

· Reflect on how to improve on your skills and knowledge and how to communicate that back to your Preceptor.

· How are you doing? What is missing?

· What type of feedback are you receiving from your Preceptor?

By Day 7

**Submit** your Journal Entry Assignment.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

submission information

Before submitting your final journal, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.

1. To submit your completed journal, save your Journal as
**WK10Journal_LastName_Firstinitial**

2. Then, click on
**Start Journal** near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Journal** for review.

Rubric

**PRAC_6531_Week10_Assignment2_JournalEntry_Rubric**

| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| PRAC_6531_Week10_Assignment2_JournalEntry_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **50 to >49.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. | **49 to >39.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. | **39 to >30.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples. | **30 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **30 to >29.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. | **29 to >19.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. | **19 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. | **14 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. | **10 to >5.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. | **5 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>No APA errors | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains 1-2 APA errors | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains 3-5 APA errors | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains > 5 APA errors | | 5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

[Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518873)

[Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518877)

**## journalinstruction.docx**

Journal Entr

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.

This week, you will write a Journal Entry, reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518882)

**To prepare:**

· Refer to the “Advanced Nursing Practice Competencies and Guidelines” found in Week 1’s Learning Resources and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced nursing practice nurses must possess in your specialty of interest.

· Refer to your “Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

· Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek and consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

**Journal Entry (450–500 words):**

**Learning from Experiences**

· Reflect on the three most challenging patients. What was most challenging for each?

· What did you learn from this experience?

· What resources did you have available?

· What evidence-based practice did you use for this patient?

· What new skills are you learning?

· What would you do differently?

· How are you managing patient flow and volume?

**Communicating and Feedback**

· Reflect on how to improve on your skills and knowledge and how to communicate that back to your Preceptor.

· How are you doing? What is missing?

· What type of feedback are you receiving from your Preceptor?

By Day 7

**Submit** your Journal Entry Assignment.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

submission information

Before submitting your final journal, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.

1. To submit your completed journal, save your Journal as
**WK10Journal_LastName_Firstinitial**

2. Then, click on
**Start Journal** near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Journal** for review.

Rubric

**PRAC_6531_Week10_Assignment2_JournalEntry_Rubric**

| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| PRAC_6531_Week10_Assignment2_JournalEntry_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **50 to >49.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. | **49 to >39.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. | **39 to >30.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples. | **30 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **30 to >29.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. | **29 to >19.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. | **19 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. | **14 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. | **10 to >5.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. | **5 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>No APA errors | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains 1-2 APA errors | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains 3-5 APA errors | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains > 5 APA errors | | 5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

[Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518873)

[Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518877)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] change proposal

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering change proposal.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026