Executive Solution Overview
– a year ago **files (1)** – ## Damayweek3.docx **## Damayweek3.docx** My community Miami Florida choose the topic is open The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state in which change can occur through advocacy and legislation. Nu…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– a year ago
**files (1)**
– ## Damayweek3.docx
**## Damayweek3.docx**
My community Miami Florida choose the topic is open
The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state in which change can occur through advocacy and legislation.
Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system.
Identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state. Examples of problems relevant to nursing include, but are not limited to, title "nurse" protection, sharps injury prevention, nursing shortage, nurse well-being, valuation of nursing services, etc. Research the issue you selected and use the attached "Creating Change Through Advocacy" template to complete this assignment.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
**Rubric Criteria**
**Criteria Description**
Describe a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues.
**5. Target**
18 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
**4. Acceptable**
15.3 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is detailed.
**3. Approaching**
13.5 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is present but lacks detail.
**2. Insufficient**
11.7 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Explain an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy. (C9.4) (C9.4)
**5. Target**
18 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is thorough and provides detailed support from research.
**4. Acceptable**
15.3 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is detailed and provides support from research.
**3. Approaching**
13.5 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present but lacks support from research.
**2. Insufficient**
11.7 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Identify a minimum of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years.
**5. Target**
18 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides substantive evidence of the identified issue.
**4. Acceptable**
15.3 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides evidence of the identified issue.
**3. Approaching**
13.5 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present but lacks evidence of the identified issue or falls outside of the five-year limit.
**2. Insufficient**
11.7 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why.
**5. Target**
7.5 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is thorough.
**4. Acceptable**
6.38 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is detailed.
**3. Approaching**
5.63 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is present.
**2. Insufficient**
4.88 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why.
**5. Target**
7.5 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is thorough and includes relevant detail on how to debate these considerations.
**4. Acceptable**
6.38 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is detailed and includes some detail on how to debate these considerations.
**3. Approaching**
5.63 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is present but lacks detail on how to debate these considerations.
**2. Insufficient**
4.88 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Explain the financial impact of the issue and the solution.
**5. Target**
12 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is thorough and includes relevant supporting detail from research.
**4. Acceptable**
10.2 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is detailed and includes some supporting detail from research.
**3. Approaching**
9 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is present but lacks detail from research.
**2. Insufficient**
7.8 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss how to advocate for the proposal using legislation.
**5. Target**
15 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is thorough and includes substantial detail from research.
**4. Acceptable**
12.75 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is detailed and includes some detail from research.
**3. Approaching**
11.25 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is present but lacks substantial detail from research.
**2. Insufficient**
9.75 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation.
**5. Target**
12 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is thorough and includes substantial detail.
**4. Acceptable**
10.2 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is detailed and includes some detail.
**3. Approaching**
9 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is present but lacks substantial detail.
**2. Insufficient**
7.8 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership
**5. Target**
15 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is thorough and includes substantial.
**4. Acceptable**
12.75 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is detailed and includes some detail.
**3. Approaching**
11.25 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is present but lacks substantial detail.
**2. Insufficient**
9.75 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias.
**5. Target**
15 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is thorough and includes substantial detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
**4. Acceptable**
12.75 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is detailed and includes some detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
**3. Approaching**
11.25 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present but lacks detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
**2. Insufficient**
9.75 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
**5. Target**
7.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
**4. Acceptable**
6.38 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
**3. Approaching**
5.63 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
**2. Insufficient**
4.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
**Criteria Description**
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
**5. Target**
4.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
**4. Acceptable**
3.82 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
**3. Approaching**
3.38 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
**2. Insufficient**
2.93 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total150 points
**## Damayweek3.docx**
My community Miami Florida choose the topic is open
The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state in which change can occur through advocacy and legislation.
Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system.
Identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state. Examples of problems relevant to nursing include, but are not limited to, title "nurse" protection, sharps injury prevention, nursing shortage, nurse well-being, valuation of nursing services, etc. Research the issue you selected and use the attached "Creating Change Through Advocacy" template to complete this assignment.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
**Rubric Criteria**
**Criteria Description**
Describe a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues.
**5. Target**
18 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.
**4. Acceptable**
15.3 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is detailed.
**3. Approaching**
13.5 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is present but lacks detail.
**2. Insufficient**
11.7 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Explain an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy. (C9.4) (C9.4)
**5. Target**
18 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is thorough and provides detailed support from research.
**4. Acceptable**
15.3 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is detailed and provides support from research.
**3. Approaching**
13.5 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present but lacks support from research.
**2. Insufficient**
11.7 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Identify a minimum of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years.
**5. Target**
18 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides substantive evidence of the identified issue.
**4. Acceptable**
15.3 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides evidence of the identified issue.
**3. Approaching**
13.5 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present but lacks evidence of the identified issue or falls outside of the five-year limit.
**2. Insufficient**
11.7 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why.
**5. Target**
7.5 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is thorough.
**4. Acceptable**
6.38 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is detailed.
**3. Approaching**
5.63 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is present.
**2. Insufficient**
4.88 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why.
**5. Target**
7.5 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is thorough and includes relevant detail on how to debate these considerations.
**4. Acceptable**
6.38 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is detailed and includes some detail on how to debate these considerations.
**3. Approaching**
5.63 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is present but lacks detail on how to debate these considerations.
**2. Insufficient**
4.88 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Explain the financial impact of the issue and the solution.
**5. Target**
12 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is thorough and includes relevant supporting detail from research.
**4. Acceptable**
10.2 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is detailed and includes some supporting detail from research.
**3. Approaching**
9 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is present but lacks detail from research.
**2. Insufficient**
7.8 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss how to advocate for the proposal using legislation.
**5. Target**
15 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is thorough and includes substantial detail from research.
**4. Acceptable**
12.75 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is detailed and includes some detail from research.
**3. Approaching**
11.25 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is present but lacks substantial detail from research.
**2. Insufficient**
9.75 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation.
**5. Target**
12 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is thorough and includes substantial detail.
**4. Acceptable**
10.2 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is detailed and includes some detail.
**3. Approaching**
9 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is present but lacks substantial detail.
**2. Insufficient**
7.8 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership
**5. Target**
15 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is thorough and includes substantial.
**4. Acceptable**
12.75 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is detailed and includes some detail.
**3. Approaching**
11.25 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is present but lacks substantial detail.
**2. Insufficient**
9.75 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Discuss how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias.
**5. Target**
15 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is thorough and includes substantial detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
**4. Acceptable**
12.75 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is detailed and includes some detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
**3. Approaching**
11.25 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present but lacks detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.
**2. Insufficient**
9.75 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is incomplete or incorrect.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is not present.
**Criteria Description**
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
**5. Target**
7.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
**4. Acceptable**
6.38 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
**3. Approaching**
5.63 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
**2. Insufficient**
4.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
**Criteria Description**
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
**5. Target**
4.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
**4. Acceptable**
3.82 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
**3. Approaching**
3.38 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
**2. Insufficient**
2.93 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
**1. Unsatisfactory**
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total150 points
Leave a Reply