[Solved] ASN Quality Improvement Professional Project

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

You can pick the topic since you are the one who will be doing it.

Let me know if you have any questions.

**files (2)**

– ## QualityImprovementProjectInstructions.pdf

– ## Rubric.docx

**## QualityImprovementProjectInstructions.pdf**

Quality Improvement Project

In this assignment, you will identify a real quality or safety issue in your clinical setting and
design a small, evidence-based quality improvement project to address it. Quality
improvement in health care is a systematic, continuous effort to improve care processes
and patient outcomes, and strong projects include a clear aim, defined measures, and a
practical intervention.

During clinical, observe nursing care, unit routines, and patient-care processes. You may
also speak with staff to better understand workflow challenges, but your project should
remain focused on one specific, manageable issue that could realistically be improved
through a small change in practice.

Project focus

Choose one issue such as the following:

• Inconsistent fall-risk precautions.

• Delays in pain reassessment.

• Incomplete patient education, such as new medication teaching or diabetes
teaching.

• Hand hygiene or PPE non-compliance.

• Communication gaps during handoff or discharge.

Your topic should be narrow enough to study clearly and practical enough to support a
small improvement plan with measurable results. Quality improvement models commonly
begin by defining the aim, identifying measures, and selecting a change to test in practice.

Written paper

Submit a 3-5 page paper, not including the title page or reference page, using APA format.

Organize your paper using the sections below:

1. Introduction to the problem
Briefly identify the issue observed in the clinical setting and state why it is
appropriate for a quality improvement project.

2. Clinical background and why the issue matters
Explain the setting, patient population, or workflow involved. Describe why the
problem matters for patient safety, quality of care, efficiency, staff communication,
or patient outcomes.

3. Evidence/literature summary
Summarize current evidence that helps explain the problem and supports
improvement efforts. Use scholarly sources to show what is already known about
the issue and which interventions have been effective.

4. Proposed quality improvement intervention
Describe the small, evidence-based change you would implement. Your
intervention should be realistic for the clinical setting and clearly connected to the
problem you identified.

5. Measurement plan and expected outcomes
Explain how you would know whether the intervention worked. Strong QI plans
include measurable indicators such as process, outcome, and sometimes
balancing measures.

6. Reflection on learning
Discuss what you learned about quality improvement in nursing, including how
nurses identify problems, use evidence, and evaluate whether change improves
care.

Paper expectations

• Use a clear, professional title.

• Write in formal academic style.

• Support key points with scholarly evidence.

• Use APA in-text citations and a reference page.

• For APA 7 student papers, use double spacing, 1-inch margins, and an appropriate
readable font used consistently throughout the paper.

• APA 7 student title pages typically include the paper title, your name, institutional
affiliation, course number and name, instructor name, and due date.

• An abstract is usually not required for student papers unless your instructor
specifically asks for one.

Presentation

Also submit a recorded PowerPoint presentation summarizing your project. The
presentation should be clear, concise, and focused on the main elements of your proposed
quality improvement plan.

Suggested length: 6-10 slides, excluding title and references slides.

Include the following:

• The identified problem.

• Why the problem is important.

• Supporting evidence.

• The proposed intervention.

• How success would be measured.

• Expected outcomes or impact on patient care.

Presentation expectations

• Keep slides focused and easy to read.

• Use brief bullet points rather than long paragraphs.

• Speak clearly and professionally in your recording.

• Make sure your narration explains the clinical issue, the evidence, and the logic for
your proposed intervention.

• Include a title slide and a references slide in APA style.

Evaluation criteria

Your project will be evaluated on:

• Clear identification of a relevant clinical quality or safety issue.

• Appropriate use of evidence to support the project.

• Feasibility and relevance of the proposed intervention.

• Quality and clarity of the measurement plan.

• Understanding of quality improvement in nursing practice.

• Organization, professionalism, and APA formatting in the paper and presentation.

Example of a strong project focus

A strong topic might be: Pain reassessment after PRN medication is inconsistently
documented on a medical-surgical unit. A reasonable intervention could be a reminder

prompt or standardized reassessment workflow, with success measured by the percentage
of patients who receive documented reassessment within the expected timeframe.

**## Rubric.docx**

**Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Topic Identification & Clinical Engagement**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expetations**<br>Clear, relevant QI topic; strong collaboration; clear impact (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>QI topic identified; some collaboration; relevant (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Unclear topic; minimal collaboration (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Scholarly Paper**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Well-organized, strong evidence & analysis; excellent APA (36–40 pts)<br>**40 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Adequate evidence & organization; minor APA issues (30–35 pts)<br>**35 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Limited evidence; disorganized; APA errors (0–29 pts)<br>**29 pts** | /40 pts |
| **Professional Presentation**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Highly professional; clear delivery & visuals (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Clear presentation; adequate visuals (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Disorganized or unclear; limited prep (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Sharing Findings with Clinical Leadership**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Clearly presented; reflection on impact (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Evidence of sharing; minimal reflection (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>No clear evidence of sharing (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
| **Professionalism & Completion**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>All guidelines followed; on time (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Minor issues (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Guidelines not followed/late (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |

**## Rubric.docx**

**Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Topic Identification & Clinical Engagement**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expetations**<br>Clear, relevant QI topic; strong collaboration; clear impact (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>QI topic identified; some collaboration; relevant (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Unclear topic; minimal collaboration (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Scholarly Paper**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Well-organized, strong evidence & analysis; excellent APA (36–40 pts)<br>**40 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Adequate evidence & organization; minor APA issues (30–35 pts)<br>**35 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Limited evidence; disorganized; APA errors (0–29 pts)<br>**29 pts** | /40 pts |
| **Professional Presentation**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Highly professional; clear delivery & visuals (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Clear presentation; adequate visuals (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Disorganized or unclear; limited prep (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Sharing Findings with Clinical Leadership**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Clearly presented; reflection on impact (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Evidence of sharing; minimal reflection (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>No clear evidence of sharing (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
| **Professionalism & Completion**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>All guidelines followed; on time (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Minor issues (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Guidelines not followed/late (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |

**## QualityImprovementProjectInstructions.pdf**

Quality Improvement Project

In this assignment, you will identify a real quality or safety issue in your clinical setting and
design a small, evidence-based quality improvement project to address it. Quality
improvement in health care is a systematic, continuous effort to improve care processes
and patient outcomes, and strong projects include a clear aim, defined measures, and a
practical intervention.

During clinical, observe nursing care, unit routines, and patient-care processes. You may
also speak with staff to better understand workflow challenges, but your project should
remain focused on one specific, manageable issue that could realistically be improved
through a small change in practice.

Project focus

Choose one issue such as the following:

• Inconsistent fall-risk precautions.

• Delays in pain reassessment.

• Incomplete patient education, such as new medication teaching or diabetes
teaching.

• Hand hygiene or PPE non-compliance.

• Communication gaps during handoff or discharge.

Your topic should be narrow enough to study clearly and practical enough to support a
small improvement plan with measurable results. Quality improvement models commonly
begin by defining the aim, identifying measures, and selecting a change to test in practice.

Written paper

Submit a 3-5 page paper, not including the title page or reference page, using APA format.

Organize your paper using the sections below:

1. Introduction to the problem
Briefly identify the issue observed in the clinical setting and state why it is
appropriate for a quality improvement project.

2. Clinical background and why the issue matters
Explain the setting, patient population, or workflow involved. Describe why the
problem matters for patient safety, quality of care, efficiency, staff communication,
or patient outcomes.

3. Evidence/literature summary
Summarize current evidence that helps explain the problem and supports
improvement efforts. Use scholarly sources to show what is already known about
the issue and which interventions have been effective.

4. Proposed quality improvement intervention
Describe the small, evidence-based change you would implement. Your
intervention should be realistic for the clinical setting and clearly connected to the
problem you identified.

5. Measurement plan and expected outcomes
Explain how you would know whether the intervention worked. Strong QI plans
include measurable indicators such as process, outcome, and sometimes
balancing measures.

6. Reflection on learning
Discuss what you learned about quality improvement in nursing, including how
nurses identify problems, use evidence, and evaluate whether change improves
care.

Paper expectations

• Use a clear, professional title.

• Write in formal academic style.

• Support key points with scholarly evidence.

• Use APA in-text citations and a reference page.

• For APA 7 student papers, use double spacing, 1-inch margins, and an appropriate
readable font used consistently throughout the paper.

• APA 7 student title pages typically include the paper title, your name, institutional
affiliation, course number and name, instructor name, and due date.

• An abstract is usually not required for student papers unless your instructor
specifically asks for one.

Presentation

Also submit a recorded PowerPoint presentation summarizing your project. The
presentation should be clear, concise, and focused on the main elements of your proposed
quality improvement plan.

Suggested length: 6-10 slides, excluding title and references slides.

Include the following:

• The identified problem.

• Why the problem is important.

• Supporting evidence.

• The proposed intervention.

• How success would be measured.

• Expected outcomes or impact on patient care.

Presentation expectations

• Keep slides focused and easy to read.

• Use brief bullet points rather than long paragraphs.

• Speak clearly and professionally in your recording.

• Make sure your narration explains the clinical issue, the evidence, and the logic for
your proposed intervention.

• Include a title slide and a references slide in APA style.

Evaluation criteria

Your project will be evaluated on:

• Clear identification of a relevant clinical quality or safety issue.

• Appropriate use of evidence to support the project.

• Feasibility and relevance of the proposed intervention.

• Quality and clarity of the measurement plan.

• Understanding of quality improvement in nursing practice.

• Organization, professionalism, and APA formatting in the paper and presentation.

Example of a strong project focus

A strong topic might be: Pain reassessment after PRN medication is inconsistently
documented on a medical-surgical unit. A reasonable intervention could be a reminder

prompt or standardized reassessment workflow, with success measured by the percentage
of patients who receive documented reassessment within the expected timeframe.

**## Rubric.docx**

**Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Topic Identification & Clinical Engagement**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expetations**<br>Clear, relevant QI topic; strong collaboration; clear impact (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>QI topic identified; some collaboration; relevant (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Unclear topic; minimal collaboration (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Scholarly Paper**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Well-organized, strong evidence & analysis; excellent APA (36–40 pts)<br>**40 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Adequate evidence & organization; minor APA issues (30–35 pts)<br>**35 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Limited evidence; disorganized; APA errors (0–29 pts)<br>**29 pts** | /40 pts |
| **Professional Presentation**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Highly professional; clear delivery & visuals (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Clear presentation; adequate visuals (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Disorganized or unclear; limited prep (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Sharing Findings with Clinical Leadership**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Clearly presented; reflection on impact (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Evidence of sharing; minimal reflection (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>No clear evidence of sharing (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
| **Professionalism & Completion**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>All guidelines followed; on time (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Minor issues (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Guidelines not followed/late (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |

**## QualityImprovementProjectInstructions.pdf**

Quality Improvement Project

In this assignment, you will identify a real quality or safety issue in your clinical setting and
design a small, evidence-based quality improvement project to address it. Quality
improvement in health care is a systematic, continuous effort to improve care processes
and patient outcomes, and strong projects include a clear aim, defined measures, and a
practical intervention.

During clinical, observe nursing care, unit routines, and patient-care processes. You may
also speak with staff to better understand workflow challenges, but your project should
remain focused on one specific, manageable issue that could realistically be improved
through a small change in practice.

Project focus

Choose one issue such as the following:

• Inconsistent fall-risk precautions.

• Delays in pain reassessment.

• Incomplete patient education, such as new medication teaching or diabetes
teaching.

• Hand hygiene or PPE non-compliance.

• Communication gaps during handoff or discharge.

Your topic should be narrow enough to study clearly and practical enough to support a
small improvement plan with measurable results. Quality improvement models commonly
begin by defining the aim, identifying measures, and selecting a change to test in practice.

Written paper

Submit a 3-5 page paper, not including the title page or reference page, using APA format.

Organize your paper using the sections below:

1. Introduction to the problem
Briefly identify the issue observed in the clinical setting and state why it is
appropriate for a quality improvement project.

2. Clinical background and why the issue matters
Explain the setting, patient population, or workflow involved. Describe why the
problem matters for patient safety, quality of care, efficiency, staff communication,
or patient outcomes.

3. Evidence/literature summary
Summarize current evidence that helps explain the problem and supports
improvement efforts. Use scholarly sources to show what is already known about
the issue and which interventions have been effective.

4. Proposed quality improvement intervention
Describe the small, evidence-based change you would implement. Your
intervention should be realistic for the clinical setting and clearly connected to the
problem you identified.

5. Measurement plan and expected outcomes
Explain how you would know whether the intervention worked. Strong QI plans
include measurable indicators such as process, outcome, and sometimes
balancing measures.

6. Reflection on learning
Discuss what you learned about quality improvement in nursing, including how
nurses identify problems, use evidence, and evaluate whether change improves
care.

Paper expectations

• Use a clear, professional title.

• Write in formal academic style.

• Support key points with scholarly evidence.

• Use APA in-text citations and a reference page.

• For APA 7 student papers, use double spacing, 1-inch margins, and an appropriate
readable font used consistently throughout the paper.

• APA 7 student title pages typically include the paper title, your name, institutional
affiliation, course number and name, instructor name, and due date.

• An abstract is usually not required for student papers unless your instructor
specifically asks for one.

Presentation

Also submit a recorded PowerPoint presentation summarizing your project. The
presentation should be clear, concise, and focused on the main elements of your proposed
quality improvement plan.

Suggested length: 6-10 slides, excluding title and references slides.

Include the following:

• The identified problem.

• Why the problem is important.

• Supporting evidence.

• The proposed intervention.

• How success would be measured.

• Expected outcomes or impact on patient care.

Presentation expectations

• Keep slides focused and easy to read.

• Use brief bullet points rather than long paragraphs.

• Speak clearly and professionally in your recording.

• Make sure your narration explains the clinical issue, the evidence, and the logic for
your proposed intervention.

• Include a title slide and a references slide in APA style.

Evaluation criteria

Your project will be evaluated on:

• Clear identification of a relevant clinical quality or safety issue.

• Appropriate use of evidence to support the project.

• Feasibility and relevance of the proposed intervention.

• Quality and clarity of the measurement plan.

• Understanding of quality improvement in nursing practice.

• Organization, professionalism, and APA formatting in the paper and presentation.

Example of a strong project focus

A strong topic might be: Pain reassessment after PRN medication is inconsistently
documented on a medical-surgical unit. A reasonable intervention could be a reminder

prompt or standardized reassessment workflow, with success measured by the percentage
of patients who receive documented reassessment within the expected timeframe.

**## Rubric.docx**

**Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Topic Identification & Clinical Engagement**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expetations**<br>Clear, relevant QI topic; strong collaboration; clear impact (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>QI topic identified; some collaboration; relevant (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Unclear topic; minimal collaboration (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Scholarly Paper**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Well-organized, strong evidence & analysis; excellent APA (36–40 pts)<br>**40 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Adequate evidence & organization; minor APA issues (30–35 pts)<br>**35 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Limited evidence; disorganized; APA errors (0–29 pts)<br>**29 pts** | /40 pts |
| **Professional Presentation**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Highly professional; clear delivery & visuals (18–20 pts)<br>**20 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Clear presentation; adequate visuals (14–17 pts)<br>**17 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Disorganized or unclear; limited prep (0–13 pts)<br>**13 pts** | /20 pts |
| **Sharing Findings with Clinical Leadership**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>Clearly presented; reflection on impact (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Evidence of sharing; minimal reflection (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>No clear evidence of sharing (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
| **Professionalism & Completion**<br>view longer description | **Exceeds Expectations**<br>All guidelines followed; on time (9–10 pts)<br>**10 pts**<br>**Meets Expectations**<br>Minor issues (7–8 pts)<br>**8 pts**<br>**Needs Improvement**<br>Guidelines not followed/late (0–6 pts)<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |