NURS 6512 Assignment 2: Mike Taylor Simulation Case Studies – Influenza
Simulation Case Study #1: Obtaining a Comprehensive Health History
Obtaining an accurate and comprehensive health history is a foundational competency in advanced clinical practice. Research consistently demonstrates that a significant part of diagnoses can be accurately identified based on history alone. Beyond identifying symptoms, a comprehensive health history integrates biological, psychological, social, cultural, and environmental factors that influence health outcomes.
GET HUMAN-WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT HELP HERE
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
Required Resources
To prepare:
Download the
Week 2 Case Study Assignment Template
Download and review the
Comprehensive Health History Reference Sheet
.
Access S
imulation Case Study #1: Obtaining a Comprehensive Health History
Part I: Obtaining and Documenting a Comprehensive Health History
Using only the information provided in the initial patient presentation, complete a comprehensive adult health history as if you conducted the patient interview yourself.
Expand the history as appropriate by identifying and documenting expected history findings. You may include your own version of history sections as you see fit. In other words, you can formulate your own health history of the patient as long as it is
properly documented
.
Your written submission must include the following sections:
Identifying Data
Chief Complaint (in patient’s own words)
History of Present Illness (fully developed provider-written narrative using OLDCART or OPQRST format)
Past Medical History
Surgical History
Current Medications (including OTC and supplements)
Allergies (including reactions)
Family History
Social History (including occupation, living situation, substance use)
Social Determinants of Health (employment stability, financial strain, housing, transportation, access to care, ability to isolate, vaccine hesitancy)
Vaccination History (including influenza and COVID status)
NURS 6512 Assignment 2: Mike Taylor Simulation Case Studies – Influenza
Focused Review of Systems
Evidence-Based Practice Requirement
Your documentation must incorporate a minimum of three evidence-based scholarly references published within the last five years (≤ 5 years old). Cite all sources in APA format.
References must support:
Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of influenza
Risk stratification and high-risk populations
Current influenza vaccination recommendations
Best practices in advanced health assessment documentation
Any portion of the “reflection” section
NURS 6512 Assignment 2: Mike Taylor Simulation Case Studies – Influenza
Acceptable Sources
Peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles
CDC clinical guidelines
IDSA clinical practice guidelines
WHO clinical guidance documents
Evidence-based advanced practice nursing resources
Unacceptable Sources
Patient education websites (e.g., Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, WebMD, Healthline)
General health blogs
Wikipedia
Non–peer-reviewed commercial websites
Part II: Reflection
This reflection is designed to strengthen clinical reasoning by evaluating your interviewing process and identifying opportunities to enhance assessment quality.
After completing your comprehensive health history, submit a 1-page reflection addressing the questions listed in the assignment template.
By Sunday of Week 2
Submit the Assignment.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
Turnitin Drafts
from the
Start Here
area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
MD1Assgn2_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on
Start Assignment
near the top of the page NURS 6512 Assignment 2: Mike Taylor Simulation Case Studies – Influenza
Next, click on
Upload File
and select
Submit Assignment
for review.
Rubric
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment2_Rubric
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment2_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part I: Obtaining and Documenting a Comprehensive Health History… Demonstrates accurate and complete documentation of patient history containing only subjective data. Includes a focused (not comprehensive) review of systems.
50
to >
44.7
pts
Excellent
Provides accurate and complete documentation of patient health history containing subjective data and a focused review of systems.
44.7
to >
39.7
pts
Good
Provides a mostly accurate and complete documentation of patient health history containing subjective data and a focused review of systems.
39.7
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not provide documentation of patient health history; documentation is inaccurate and/or incomplete.
50
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II, Section 1: Additional Questions… Identify 3–5 questions you would ask the patient to further strengthen your assessment. Make sure at least one question relates to social determinants of health.
20
to >
17.88
pts
Excellent
Identifies 3–5 questions they would ask the patient to further strengthen their assessment. At least one question relates to social determinants of health
17.88
to >
15.88
pts
Good
Identifies 3–5 questions they would ask the patient to further strengthen their assessment. None of the questions relates to social determinants of health.
15.88
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not identify 3–5 questions they would ask the patient; questions provided are unclear or incomplete.
20
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II, Section 2: Professional Growth… Identify one area where you would improve your interviewing skills based on this case. Briefly explain how you plan to strengthen that area.
15
to >
13.41
pts
Excellent
Identifies one area of professional growth related to interviewing skills. Provides fully developed explanations of how they plan to strengthen their interviewing skills.
13.41
to >
11.91
pts
Good
Identifies one area of professional growth related to interviewing skills. Provides adequately developed explanations of how they plan to strengthen their interviewing skills.
11.91
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not identify one area of professional growth related to interviewing skills; explanation of how they plan to strengthen their interviewing skills is vague, unclear, or incomplete.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Uses at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old.
5
to >
4.46
pts
Excellent
Uses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
4.46
to >
3.96
pts
Good
Uses 2 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
3.96
to >
3.46
pts
Fair
Uses 1 peer-reviewed scholarly source published within the last 5 years.
3.46
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources or sources used are older than 5 years.
5
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Source Attribution and APA Formatting
5
to >
4.46
pts
Excellent
All sources are cited in APA format without any errors.
4.46
to >
3.96
pts
Good
All sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors.
3.96
to >
3.46
pts
Fair
All sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46
to >
0
pts
Poor
Missing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules.
5
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation NURS 6512 Assignment 2: Mike Taylor Simulation Case Studies – Influenza
5
to >
4.46
pts
Excellent
Correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4.46
to >
3.96
pts
Good
Correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
3.96
to >
3.46
pts
Fair
Correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
3.46
to >
0
pts
Poor
Frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
5
pts
Total Points:
100
Leave a Reply