NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
Jose Sanchez:
Stabilize VS and BG levels. Get interpreter.
Guidance: The patient’s laboratory findings indicate diabetic ketoacidosis which is life-threatening. The patient requires continuous monitoring of cardiac, respiratory, and neurological status. Frequent monitoring of BG levels, ABGs and adjustments to IV fluids and medications. In addition, the patient is non-English speaking and requires a trained interpreter for communicating.
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
Analyzing a Research Paper: Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
The diagnosis of interest for this Sentinel U simulation is diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) as seen in Jose Sanchez’s case. DKA symptoms include hyperglycemia, acidosis, ketosis, and confusion. Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential in the care of high-acuity patients to inform practice with the best available evidence to improve patient outcomes. The article by Elendu et al. (2023) provides a review of DKA, and this paper assesses its validity and clinical relevance.
Evaluation of Credibility
Fig. 1: Abstract
Table for Article Evaluation
Criteria
Analysis
Type of Study & Level of Evidence
This is a comprehensive review (secondary research study). It’s a Level I evidence on the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (JHEBP) model, high in the evidence hierarchy due to multiple studies. The research method is a literature analysis of DKA.
Credibility Factors
The article is peer-reviewed, published in a credible journal, is up-to-date (2023), has multiple expert authors, and includes a DOI. It refers to evidence-based sources and adheres to a scholarly writing format.
Importance of Diagnosis (DKA)
The article describes the key factors of DKA (hyperglycemia, ketosis, and metabolic acidosis), which are present in Jose Sanchez. It discusses common precipitating factors, including infection and diabetes, and the need for rapid treatment, which fits the patient’s symptoms.
Application to Practice/Patient Population
The findings apply to acute care settings, including emergency and critical care units. For example, interventions such as IV fluids, insulin therapy, and electrolyte monitoring can be directly applied to Jose Sanchez. The article also supports patient education and prevention strategies, including culturally appropriate care (e.g., interpreter use).
Summary of Findings and Relevance to Diagnosis
DKA is the most common hyperglycemic crisis and a common cause of death in people with diabetes, according to the article. It notes some of the classic signs and symptoms, such as hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, and ketosis, all of which are evident in Jose Sanchez. It also describes the usual precipitating factors, which include infection and insulin deficiency, both of which are present in the patient’s case. Crucially, it stresses the need for prompt hospitalization, administration of intravenous fluid, insulin, and electrolyte replacement, which are all part of the patient’s management. In addition, the article cites altered mental status, which is associated with serum osmolality, as related to the patient’s confusion. The results also confirm that DKA is potentially life-threatening if incorrectly diagnosed or improperly managed, and the need for continuous monitoring. This information is important as it supports the care being delivered to Jose Sanchez and emphasizes the need to identify and rapidly treat DKA.
GET ASSIGNMENT WRITING HELP HERE
Generalizability to Practice and Patient Population
This article is very generalizable for clinical practice, acute care, and emergency departments. The protocols for management, including fluid replacement, insulin administration, and electrolyte monitoring, can be applied to many patients presenting with DKA, regardless of where they live. This is particularly important in a variety of health care settings, including resource-poor settings where mortality from DKA remains high. The article also highlights the importance of education and the prevention of recurrent DKA. In the Sentinel U scenario, Jose Sanchez needs an education translation into Spanish to understand the management of diabetes and the importance of insulin. This article justifies culturally sensitive discharge and follow-up arrangements. It also emphasizes the need to identify triggers, such as infection, which can help nurses to prevent such triggers in other patients. Therefore, the results of the article can be readily applied to improve patient care and reduce hospital readmissions NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper.
Conclusion
The article discussed is credible, has a high level of evidence, and is relevant to a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis. The article’s conclusions align with the diagnosis and treatment of Jose Sanchez and highlight the need for evidence-based care, including fluid replacement, insulin administration, and monitoring. Additionally, the article offers valuable insights that can be applied across the spectrum of health care and is a useful resource for nursing. NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper Using credible evidence to guide patient care supports sound clinical practice, patient safety, and positive outcomes.
References
Elendu, C., David, J. A., Udoyen, A.-O., Egbunu, E. O., Ogbuiyi-Chima, I. C., Unakalamba, L. O., Temitope, A. I., Ibhiedu, J. O., Ibhiedu, A. O., Nwosu, P. U., Koroyin, M. O., Eze, C., Boluwatife, A. I., Alabi, O., Okabekwa, O. S., Fatoye, J. O., & Ramon-Yusuf, H. I. (2023). Comprehensive review of diabetic ketoacidosis: An update.
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
,
85
(6), 2802–2807.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000000894
Instructions: NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.
Collapse All
Introduction
Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.
Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.
Preparation
Review the
What Is Scholarly?
Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:
What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?
Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.
These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper.
Also, look at the “Find EPB Articles” section of the
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences
library guide (found in the guide’s left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.
Instructions
Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper.
Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:
Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.
Review the article for the following criteria:
Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).
Credibility factors.
Importance of content to selected diagnosis.
The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.
Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the
Example of Screenshot [PDF]
document). You can refer to the instructions in the
Taking Screenshots [PDF]
Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.
Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.
Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you’ve found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?
Include a link to your article.
Include a reference to your article in APA format.
Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
Identify the credibility factors of an article.
Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
Scoring Guide
Use the NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Criterion 1
Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
Distinguished
Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.
Criterion 2
Identify the credibility factors of an article.
Distinguished
Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.
Criterion 3
Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
Distinguished
Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.
Criterion 4
Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
Distinguished
Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.
Criterion 5
Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
Distinguished
Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
What is Scholarly?
It’s important to know how to differentiate between scholarly and popular sources. While popular sources such as blogs, websites, Twitter, and magazine articles may be credible, they might not have the level of rigor expected by your program. Scholarly journals continue to be the preferred vehicle for research information. Most scholars publish their works as articles in peer-reviewed journals.
What are peer-reviewed articles?
Peer-reviewed articles are considered the gold standard in academic publishing. The phrase “peer-review” has several synonyms you may hear, such as scholarly, refereed, or juried.
What are peer-reviewed articles
What are peer-reviewed articles?
Learn more about the peer-review process and how to identify peer-reviewed articles.
View media.
Peer-review is a process many academic journals require before publishing an article to ensure they are publishing the best content. Each research article considered for a peer-reviewed journal must go through critical evaluation by subject experts (usually faculty member peers or other researchers in the field). The article is evaluated on its research methodology, literature review, discussion, results, and conclusions before it is published. If an article does not meet the standards of scholarship in the discipline, it will not be published by the journal.
Launch video player in a new window
2:03
Basics of Peer Review
The publisher CREDO shows the characteristics of peer review resources.
Hallmarks of a scholarly article
When searching for peer-reviewed articles, many databases allow you to limit your search to peer-reviewed journals. However, you should know the these characteristics of scholarly articles:
Always includes references, footnotes or a bibliography of works cited
Uses the language of the discipline
Reports new academic research studies, including methodology and data analysis
Gives author’s title, affiliation, and usually contact information
Has a long, descriptive title
Is longer than 5 pages
Has very few advertisements or images in its print or PDF version
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
Anatomy of a scholarly article
Anatomy of a scholarly article
See the different parts of a scholarly article, including how to recognize them on the fly.
View media.
Scholarly databases
Scholarly journals are not widely available for free online. You may be able to get to the first page, but these articles are tightly controlled by the publishers and you usually have to pay to read them. Online articles from subscription journals can cost $20-30 each.
Libraries, however, buy journal collections in the form of electronic databases. These databases are large collections of publications that are built to research complex academic topics through precise searching. The Capella Library purchases its databases and journal collections exclusively to match the research needs of students in Capella’s many programs. The databases can be accessed from the
library’s homepage
.
Not everything within the library databases is “scholarly.” In fact, most of the library databases contain a mixture of peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed content, such as trade publications and magazine articles. NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper Many of our academic databases allow you to remove non-scholarly content from your search results by marking a checkbox labeled “Scholarly or Peer-Reviewed Journals.”
Locating scholarly sources
Locating scholarly sources
Learn more about the world of scholarly information and how it will contribute to your assignments.
View media.
Resources
Evaluating Source Quality
Get the criteria for differentiating between scholarly and popular sources.
NURS-FPX4025 Reading List – NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3452314540006731?auth=SAML
Assessment 1: EBP, Databases, and Nursing Practice
https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3452314540006731?auth=SAML§ion=3452314550006731
American Nurses Association, . (2023).
What is evidence-based practice in nursing?
https://www.nursingworld.org/content-hub/resources/workplace/evidence-based-practice-in-nursing/
https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/citation/4230439960006731?auth=SAML
Cleary‐Holdforth, J., & O’Mathúna, D. (2022). How nursing stakeholders in the Republic of Ireland define evidence‐based practice and why it matters.
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
,
19
(5), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12593
https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/citation/4230440210006731?auth=SAML
References for Assessement 1:
eBook
Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals: Model & Guidelines, Fifth Edition
Tools for Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals: Model & Guidelines, Fifth Edition
By:
Kim Bissett
;
Judy Ascenzi
;
Madeleine Whalen
In:
2025
eBook Collection (EBSCOhost)
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
Leave a Reply