[Solved] paper

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Imagine you have just received your certification and are taking on your first trainee within your organization who is working towards certification. Based on the BACB® guidelines and the Ethics code, and this week's lecture, create a task analysis that you will follow to set up the supervisory relationship prior to your first supervision meeting with this trainee. What things must be in place before you begin? Are there any conditions under which will you not proceed with the supervisory relationship  with this information

_Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module._

_Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (_ [_as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site._](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html) _). Failing to do so will result in point deductions._

Reflection papers consist of brief responses to a prompt related to the information shared in each week’s module. Using

both the assigned materials and external references, the student should thoughtfully and thoroughly respond to the

prompt. During the following week, students will be required to provide feedback on a peer’s reflection paper, and will be

required to paste the text of their completed peer review into their own submission comments in Canvas, which will allow

for the instructor to grade more easily. Reflection paper assignments will be graded as follows:

Category 5 points 3 points 0 points

Reflection Length*

*(excludes reference section

and direct quotes from

references that are longer

than 5 words)

Reflection paper content

was greater than 150

words.

Reflection paper content

was between 100-149

words.

Reflection paper content

was less than 99 words.

Grammar, Usage,

and Spelling

Reflection paper contained

less than 2 grammar,

usage, or spelling errors.

Reflection paper contained

3-4 grammar, usage, or

spelling errors.

Reflection paper contained

more than 5 grammar,

usage, or spelling errors

and proofreading was not

apparent.

References and

Utilization of

Outside

Resources

The author used

references from peer-

reviewed behavioral

sources in APA format and

cited one or more

original behavioral

references, outside of the

assigned readings.

Hyperlinks to the cited

external references are

provided.

The author used

references in APA format

of assigned readings but

did not include an

additional peer-reviewed

behavioral reference or did

not include a hyperlink to

the externally-cited

reference.

The author neither utilized

APA format for referenced

material used nor cited an

outside peer-reviewed

behavioral reference.

Addressing the

Prompt

The author’s reflection

paper clearly responds to

the assignment prompt,

develops ideas cogently,

organizes them logically,

and supports them through

empirical writing.

The author’s reflection

paper clearly responds to

the assignment prompt,

develops ideas cogently,

organizes them logically,

and supports them through

empirical writing.

The author’s reflection

paper does not correspond

with the assignment

prompt, mainly discusses

personal opinions,

irrelevant information, or

information is presented

with limited logic and lack

of development and

organization of ideas.

Application The author’s post clearly

demonstrates application

and relationship to the

week’s assigned

reading/topic.

The author’s post refers to

the assigned topic/reading

tangentially but does not

demonstrate application.

The author’s post does not

demonstrate application of

the week’s assigned

topic/reading.

Peer Review –

Your peer review text

must be copied and

pasted into the comments

of your own reflection

paper submission to

receive credit.

Completes peer-review of

colleague’s reflection paper

and provides well-thought-

out, thorough feedback.

Completes peer-review of

colleague’s reflection

paper, but provides only

vague, non-specific

feedback or input.

Does not complete peer-

review of a colleague’s

reflection paper or does not

copy the text into t

– a year ago