Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 17555409982578553736331329893499.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17555409982578553736331329893499-jpg "17555409982578553736331329893499.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    17555409982578553736331329893499.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17555409982578553736331329893499-jpg "17555409982578553736331329893499.jpg")

  • [Solved] c4-ass3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## c4-ass3picot.docx **## c4-ass3picot.docx** **Assessment 3** **Applying the PICO(T) Process** [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2471896&content_id=885966) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## c4-ass3picot.docx

    **## c4-ass3picot.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Applying the PICO(T) Process**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2471896&content_id=885966) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2471900&content_id=885966) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/modules/items/2471906) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-attempts?module_item_id=2471913&content_id=885966&attempt_no=1)

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 available

    Create a 3–5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and analyze the evidence you locate to answer the question.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

    It stands for:

    · P – Patient/population/problem.

    · I – Intervention.

    · C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).

    · O – Outcomes.

    · T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

    The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are beginning to apply an evidence-based model. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

    **Reference**

    Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015).
    _Introduction to nursing research_. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

    PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

    **Scenario**

    For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

    **Instructions**

    After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

    Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source's specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

    If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICO(T) Question and Library Search template (accessible from the
    [Create PICO(T) Questions](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP/picot) page) might be helpful.

    In your submission, make sure you address the following:

    · Review the PICO(T) process.

    · Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.

    · Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.

    · Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.

    · Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    · Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).

    · Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.

    · Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.

    · Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

    **Additional Requirements**

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Length of submission**:
    Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

    ·
    **Number of references**:
    Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    ·
    **APA formatting**: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    · Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    · Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

    · Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    · Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities. Provides examples.

    **Proficient**

    Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    **Basic**

    Explains a diagnosis, but may not fully cover outcomes, risks, and complications in the explanation, including those for vulnerable populations.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis, and identifies how the question meets each of the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

    **Proficient**

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    **Basic**

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process, though the question may not be specific enough to address all the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors, and how the search process was refined to yield the best results.

    **Proficient**

    Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    **Basic**

    Describes a search of the literature, though the description may not fully include search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains the content of more than three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    **Proficient**

    Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    **Basic**

    Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, though not the credibility and relevance.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question, identifying assumptions on which the analysis is based.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    **Basic**

    Analyzes evidence without explaining the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains many errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Criterion 7**

    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.**

    **Distinguished**

    Exhibits adherence to most aspects of APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Correctly uses quotes and paraphrasing.

    **Proficient**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    **Basic**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings, and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes, and/or paraphrasing.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

    **## c4-ass3picot.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Applying the PICO(T) Process**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2471896&content_id=885966) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2471900&content_id=885966) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/modules/items/2471906) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49120/pages/assessment-3-attempts?module_item_id=2471913&content_id=885966&attempt_no=1)

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 available

    Create a 3–5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and analyze the evidence you locate to answer the question.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

    It stands for:

    · P – Patient/population/problem.

    · I – Intervention.

    · C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).

    · O – Outcomes.

    · T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

    The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are beginning to apply an evidence-based model. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

    **Reference**

    Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015).
    _Introduction to nursing research_. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    **Professional Context**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

    PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

    **Scenario**

    For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

    **Instructions**

    After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

    Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source's specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

    If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICO(T) Question and Library Search template (accessible from the
    [Create PICO(T) Questions](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP/picot) page) might be helpful.

    In your submission, make sure you address the following:

    · Review the PICO(T) process.

    · Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.

    · Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.

    · Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.

    · Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    · Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).

    · Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.

    · Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.

    · Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

    **Additional Requirements**

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Length of submission**:
    Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

    ·
    **Number of references**:
    Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    ·
    **APA formatting**: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    · Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    · Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    · Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

    · Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    · Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities. Provides examples.

    **Proficient**

    Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    **Basic**

    Explains a diagnosis, but may not fully cover outcomes, risks, and complications in the explanation, including those for vulnerable populations.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis, and identifies how the question meets each of the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

    **Proficient**

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    **Basic**

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process, though the question may not be specific enough to address all the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors, and how the search process was refined to yield the best results.

    **Proficient**

    Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    **Basic**

    Describes a search of the literature, though the description may not fully include search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains the content of more than three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    **Proficient**

    Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    **Basic**

    Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, though not the credibility and relevance.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question, identifying assumptions on which the analysis is based.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    **Basic**

    Analyzes evidence without explaining the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains many errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Criterion 7**

    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.**

    **Distinguished**

    Exhibits adherence to most aspects of APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Correctly uses quotes and paraphrasing.

    **Proficient**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    **Basic**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings, and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes, and/or paraphrasing.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

  • [Solved] Journal Response MODULE 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What is the purpose of an implementation model – ## Journal_question_week_6.docx – ## Module6JournalQuesRUBRIC.docx **## Journal_question_week_6.docx** What is the purpose of an implementation model? What implementation model would best fit your proposed clinical question and your organization…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What is the purpose of an implementation model

    – ## Journal_question_week_6.docx

    – ## Module6JournalQuesRUBRIC.docx

    **## Journal_question_week_6.docx**

    What is the purpose of an implementation model? What implementation model would best fit your proposed clinical question and your organization?

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.

    **No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module6JournalQuesRUBRIC.docx**

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module6JournalQuesRUBRIC.docx**

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Journal_question_week_6.docx**

    What is the purpose of an implementation model? What implementation model would best fit your proposed clinical question and your organization?

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.

    **No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module6JournalQuesRUBRIC.docx**

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Journal_question_week_6.docx**

    What is the purpose of an implementation model? What implementation model would best fit your proposed clinical question and your organization?

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.

    **No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module6JournalQuesRUBRIC.docx**

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    8/11/25, 7:25 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-6-20933955)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956660/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Nursing WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Based on the quality issue and implementation identified in Module 5, describe how you would collaborate with: \ Module6_Assignment.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module6-assignment-docx-10377877 "Module6_Assignment.docx") \ Module6Assign_Rubric.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mod…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Based on the quality issue and implementation identified in Module 5, describe how you would collaborate with:
    \
    Module6_Assignment.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module6-assignment-docx-10377877 "Module6_Assignment.docx")
    \
    Module6Assign_Rubric.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module6assign-rubric-docx "Module6Assign_Rubric.docx")

  • [Solved] week 11

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attached – ## week11.docx **## week11.docx** Question: Research an article on a patient with schizophrenia and summarize the article. Create a care plan in the discussion for a person with Schizophrenia. Article: Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in **schizophrenia*…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attached

    – ## week11.docx

    **## week11.docx**

    Question: Research an article on a patient with schizophrenia and summarize the article. Create a care plan in the discussion for a person with Schizophrenia.

    Article: Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in
    **schizophrenia**: possible mechanisms  • 12/31/2019

    Background
    **Schizophrenia** is a serious long-term psychotic disorder marked by positive and negative symptoms, severe behavioral problems and cognitive function deficits. The cause of this disorder is not completely clear, but is suggested to be multifactorial, involving both inherited and environmental factors. Since human brain regulates all behaviour, studies have focused …

    **Author:** Mei-Chi Hsu

    **Source:** Lipids in Health and Disease, p. 1

    By BioMed Central (
    ProQuest Central)

    Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in schizophrenia: possible mechanisms

    [Mei-Chi Hsu](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/docview/2424784604/abstract?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals)

    ;
    [Yung-Sheng, Huang](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/docview/2424784604/abstract?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals)

    ;
    [Wen-Chen, Ouyang](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/docview/2424784604/abstract?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals)

    **; London** [Vol. 19,](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/indexingvolumeissuelinkhandler/42587/Lipids+in+Health+and+Disease/02020Y01Y01$232020$3b++Vol.+19/19/$B?accountid=158495) (2020): 1-17.

    DOI:10.1186/s12944-020-01337-0

    **## week11.docx**

    Question: Research an article on a patient with schizophrenia and summarize the article. Create a care plan in the discussion for a person with Schizophrenia.

    Article: Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in
    **schizophrenia**: possible mechanisms  • 12/31/2019

    Background
    **Schizophrenia** is a serious long-term psychotic disorder marked by positive and negative symptoms, severe behavioral problems and cognitive function deficits. The cause of this disorder is not completely clear, but is suggested to be multifactorial, involving both inherited and environmental factors. Since human brain regulates all behaviour, studies have focused …

    **Author:** Mei-Chi Hsu

    **Source:** Lipids in Health and Disease, p. 1

    By BioMed Central (
    ProQuest Central)

    Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in schizophrenia: possible mechanisms

    [Mei-Chi Hsu](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/docview/2424784604/abstract?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals)

    ;
    [Yung-Sheng, Huang](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/docview/2424784604/abstract?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals)

    ;
    [Wen-Chen, Ouyang](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/docview/2424784604/abstract?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals)

    **; London** [Vol. 19,](https://7120ls6uj-mp03-y-https-www-proquest-com.proxy.lirn.net/central/indexingvolumeissuelinkhandler/42587/Lipids+in+Health+and+Disease/02020Y01Y01$232020$3b++Vol.+19/19/$B?accountid=158495) (2020): 1-17.

    DOI:10.1186/s12944-020-01337-0

  • [Solved] week 7 discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Week 7** **Discussion: Conflict Management, Communication, and Team Building** For this week’s discussion, complete the self-assessment found in the textbook reading this week (Chapter 8, Page 187-Box 8.2). Self-assessment of preferred conflict-handling modes is important. As you read and answer t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Week 7** **Discussion: Conflict Management, Communication, and Team Building**
    For this week’s discussion, complete the self-assessment found in the textbook reading this week (Chapter 8, Page 187-Box 8.2).
    Self-assessment of preferred conflict-handling modes is important. As you read and answer the 30-item conflict survey, think of how you respond to conflict in professional situations. After completing the survey, tally and reflect on your scores for each of the five approaches.
    **Initial Written Response:** Based on your personality and self-assessment scores, which of the 5 conflict management approaches do you use most often? Which do you use least? What are the strengths and weaknesses of your main approach to conflict resolution?
    Describe a situation where you observed or interacted with other stakeholders where there was an opportunity to improve communication, professional civility, or reduce conflict.
    **Video Response:** Record a video where you rehearse how you would approach this situation.
    Textbooks:
    Yoder-Wise, P. S., & Sportsman, S. (2023). Leading and Managing in
    Nursing (8th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences (US).
    https://pageburstls.elsevier.com/books/9780323792080
    American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the
    American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological
    Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
    ISBN: 978-1-4338-3216-1

  • [Solved] assessment 3 4055

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a disaster recovery plan to reduce health disparities and improve access to community services after a disaster. Then develop a brochure, storyboard, or poster communicating the plan for the local system, city officials, and the disaster relief team. \ assessment3instructions.docx](https://…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a disaster recovery plan to reduce health disparities and improve access to community services after a disaster. Then develop a brochure, storyboard, or poster communicating the plan for the local system, city officials, and the disaster relief team.
    \
    assessment3instructions.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessment3instructions-docx-10377445 "assessment3instructions.docx")
    \
    rubrics3.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubrics3-docx-10377447 "rubrics3.docx")
    \
    cf_assessment_3_supplement_e.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-assessment-3-supplement-e-pdf "cf_assessment_3_supplement_e.pdf")
    \
    Educationbrochure.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/educationbrochure-docx-10377451 "Educationbrochure.docx")
    \
    Builderbrochure.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/builderbrochure-docx "Builderbrochure.docx")
    \
    Booklet.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/booklet-docx-10377455 "Booklet.docx")
    \
    Sciencetechbrochure.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sciencetechbrochure-docx-10377459 "Sciencetechbrochure.docx")
    \
    Nonprofitbrochure.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nonprofitbrochure-docx "Nonprofitbrochure.docx")
    \
    Nonprofitbrochure.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nonprofitbrochure-docx-10377463 "Nonprofitbrochure.docx")
    \
    Sciencetechbrochure.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sciencetechbrochure-docx-10377465 "Sciencetechbrochure.docx")

  • [Solved] assessment 4 4055

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1. – ## rubrics4.docx – ## assessment4instructions.docx **## rubrics4.docx** **Scoring Guide** Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated. Expand All **Criterion 1** **Present a health…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1.

    – ## rubrics4.docx

    – ## assessment4instructions.docx

    **## rubrics4.docx**

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.**

    **Distinguished**

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community. The presentation is professional, evidence-based, and based on specific, identified health needs and goals.

    **Proficient**

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    **Basic**

    Presents a health promotion plan, though it isn't tailored for a specific individual or group within a community.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.**

    **Distinguished**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants. Clearly explains the need for revisions to future educational sessions.

    **Proficient**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    **Basic**

    Describes educational session outcomes and the attainment of health goals without evaluating them or considering how participants might react to the session.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.**

    **Distinguished**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs. Clearly explains the need for revisions to better align future sessions with Healthy People 2030 objectives.

    **Proficient**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Basic**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes unrelated to progress toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. PowerPoint slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, and/or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Criterion 5**

    **Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.**

    **Distinguished**

    Slides are easy to read and clutter-free. Slides enhance key points, adhere to visual best practices and may utilize graphics. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **Proficient**

    Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **Basic**

    Slides are easy to read and error free. No audio or audio is not clear, difficult to hear, or not professionally presented. Transcript and speaker notes are sufficient support for the slides.

    **Non Performance**

    Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No audio, transcript, and/or speaker notes provided.

    **## assessment4instructions.docx**

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Health education is any combination of learning experiences designed to help people in a community improve their health by increasing their knowledge or influencing their attitudes (WHO, n.d.). Education is key to health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness. The health indicator framework identified in Healthy People 2030 prompts action in health services accessibility, clinical preventive services, environmental quality, injury or violence prevention, maternal, infant, and child health, mental health, nutrition, substance abuse prevention, and tobacco use cessation or prevention.

    Nurses provide accurate evidence-based information and education in formal and informal settings. They draw upon evidence-based practice to provide health promotion and disease prevention activities to create social and physical environments that are conducive to improving and maintaining community health. When provided with the tools to be successful, people demonstrate lifestyle changes (self-care) that promote health and help reduce readmissions. They are better able to tolerate stressors, including environmental changes, and enjoy a better quality of life. Also, in times of crisis, a resilient community is a safer community (Flanders, 2018; Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.).

    This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply teaching and learning concepts to a hypothetical presentation of a health promotion plan.

    **Note**: This is the second part of a two-part assessment. You must successfully complete Assessment 1 before completing this assessment.

    **References**

    Flanders, S. A. (2018). Effective patient education: Evidence and common sense.
    _Medsurg Nursing, 27_(1), 55–58.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.).
    _Healthy People 2030_. https://health.gov/healthypeople

    World Health Organization. (n.d.).
    _Health promoting schools_. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools

    **Scenario**

    In this assessment, you will develop your presentation of the health promotion plan based on the research you conducted for Assessment 1. You will plan the presentation for the community you focused on for Assessment 1.

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, your health promotion plan you completed research for in Assessment 1 to your chosen community. In this presentation, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, and evaluate the objectives of the plan. Please remember the nursing process. You must evaluate and revise the plan, as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you need to include any handouts with your presentation and a voice-over recording and speaker notes to communicate your plan.

    **Instructions**

    Complete the following:

    · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well-organized and submitted as a separate Word document. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint resources in the Academic Resources). The transcript must be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the face-to-face educational session, addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the participants in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or group within a community.

    · Tailor the presentation to the needs of your chosen community audience.

    · Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · How do you think participants would react to the session?

    · Which aspects of the session would you change?

    · How might those changes improve future outcomes?

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators (LHIs).

    · What changes would you recommend to better align the session with Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs?

    **Additional Requirements**

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides (PowerPoint recommended). If you choose an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

    The number of slides in your presentation will be dictated by nature and scope of your health promotion plan. Title and references slides are required as follows:

    · Title slide.

    · Health promotion plan title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to your references.

    · Remember to include a separate Word document of your speaker notes; this needs to submitted with your PowerPoint.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    Be sure to proofread your PowerPoint presentation and speaker notes before submitting your assessment to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    · Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **## assessment4instructions.docx**

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Health education is any combination of learning experiences designed to help people in a community improve their health by increasing their knowledge or influencing their attitudes (WHO, n.d.). Education is key to health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness. The health indicator framework identified in Healthy People 2030 prompts action in health services accessibility, clinical preventive services, environmental quality, injury or violence prevention, maternal, infant, and child health, mental health, nutrition, substance abuse prevention, and tobacco use cessation or prevention.

    Nurses provide accurate evidence-based information and education in formal and informal settings. They draw upon evidence-based practice to provide health promotion and disease prevention activities to create social and physical environments that are conducive to improving and maintaining community health. When provided with the tools to be successful, people demonstrate lifestyle changes (self-care) that promote health and help reduce readmissions. They are better able to tolerate stressors, including environmental changes, and enjoy a better quality of life. Also, in times of crisis, a resilient community is a safer community (Flanders, 2018; Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.).

    This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply teaching and learning concepts to a hypothetical presentation of a health promotion plan.

    **Note**: This is the second part of a two-part assessment. You must successfully complete Assessment 1 before completing this assessment.

    **References**

    Flanders, S. A. (2018). Effective patient education: Evidence and common sense.
    _Medsurg Nursing, 27_(1), 55–58.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.).
    _Healthy People 2030_. https://health.gov/healthypeople

    World Health Organization. (n.d.).
    _Health promoting schools_. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools

    **Scenario**

    In this assessment, you will develop your presentation of the health promotion plan based on the research you conducted for Assessment 1. You will plan the presentation for the community you focused on for Assessment 1.

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, your health promotion plan you completed research for in Assessment 1 to your chosen community. In this presentation, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, and evaluate the objectives of the plan. Please remember the nursing process. You must evaluate and revise the plan, as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you need to include any handouts with your presentation and a voice-over recording and speaker notes to communicate your plan.

    **Instructions**

    Complete the following:

    · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well-organized and submitted as a separate Word document. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint resources in the Academic Resources). The transcript must be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the face-to-face educational session, addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the participants in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or group within a community.

    · Tailor the presentation to the needs of your chosen community audience.

    · Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · How do you think participants would react to the session?

    · Which aspects of the session would you change?

    · How might those changes improve future outcomes?

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators (LHIs).

    · What changes would you recommend to better align the session with Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs?

    **Additional Requirements**

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides (PowerPoint recommended). If you choose an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

    The number of slides in your presentation will be dictated by nature and scope of your health promotion plan. Title and references slides are required as follows:

    · Title slide.

    · Health promotion plan title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to your references.

    · Remember to include a separate Word document of your speaker notes; this needs to submitted with your PowerPoint.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    Be sure to proofread your PowerPoint presentation and speaker notes before submitting your assessment to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    · Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **## rubrics4.docx**

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.**

    **Distinguished**

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community. The presentation is professional, evidence-based, and based on specific, identified health needs and goals.

    **Proficient**

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    **Basic**

    Presents a health promotion plan, though it isn't tailored for a specific individual or group within a community.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.**

    **Distinguished**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants. Clearly explains the need for revisions to future educational sessions.

    **Proficient**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    **Basic**

    Describes educational session outcomes and the attainment of health goals without evaluating them or considering how participants might react to the session.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.**

    **Distinguished**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs. Clearly explains the need for revisions to better align future sessions with Healthy People 2030 objectives.

    **Proficient**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Basic**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes unrelated to progress toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. PowerPoint slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, and/or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Criterion 5**

    **Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.**

    **Distinguished**

    Slides are easy to read and clutter-free. Slides enhance key points, adhere to visual best practices and may utilize graphics. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **Proficient**

    Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **Basic**

    Slides are easy to read and error free. No audio or audio is not clear, difficult to hear, or not professionally presented. Transcript and speaker notes are sufficient support for the slides.

    **Non Performance**

    Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No audio, transcript, and/or speaker notes provided.

    **## assessment4instructions.docx**

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Health education is any combination of learning experiences designed to help people in a community improve their health by increasing their knowledge or influencing their attitudes (WHO, n.d.). Education is key to health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness. The health indicator framework identified in Healthy People 2030 prompts action in health services accessibility, clinical preventive services, environmental quality, injury or violence prevention, maternal, infant, and child health, mental health, nutrition, substance abuse prevention, and tobacco use cessation or prevention.

    Nurses provide accurate evidence-based information and education in formal and informal settings. They draw upon evidence-based practice to provide health promotion and disease prevention activities to create social and physical environments that are conducive to improving and maintaining community health. When provided with the tools to be successful, people demonstrate lifestyle changes (self-care) that promote health and help reduce readmissions. They are better able to tolerate stressors, including environmental changes, and enjoy a better quality of life. Also, in times of crisis, a resilient community is a safer community (Flanders, 2018; Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.).

    This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply teaching and learning concepts to a hypothetical presentation of a health promotion plan.

    **Note**: This is the second part of a two-part assessment. You must successfully complete Assessment 1 before completing this assessment.

    **References**

    Flanders, S. A. (2018). Effective patient education: Evidence and common sense.
    _Medsurg Nursing, 27_(1), 55–58.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.).
    _Healthy People 2030_. https://health.gov/healthypeople

    World Health Organization. (n.d.).
    _Health promoting schools_. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools

    **Scenario**

    In this assessment, you will develop your presentation of the health promotion plan based on the research you conducted for Assessment 1. You will plan the presentation for the community you focused on for Assessment 1.

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, your health promotion plan you completed research for in Assessment 1 to your chosen community. In this presentation, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, and evaluate the objectives of the plan. Please remember the nursing process. You must evaluate and revise the plan, as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you need to include any handouts with your presentation and a voice-over recording and speaker notes to communicate your plan.

    **Instructions**

    Complete the following:

    · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well-organized and submitted as a separate Word document. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint resources in the Academic Resources). The transcript must be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the face-to-face educational session, addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the participants in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or group within a community.

    · Tailor the presentation to the needs of your chosen community audience.

    · Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · How do you think participants would react to the session?

    · Which aspects of the session would you change?

    · How might those changes improve future outcomes?

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators (LHIs).

    · What changes would you recommend to better align the session with Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs?

    **Additional Requirements**

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides (PowerPoint recommended). If you choose an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

    The number of slides in your presentation will be dictated by nature and scope of your health promotion plan. Title and references slides are required as follows:

    · Title slide.

    · Health promotion plan title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to your references.

    · Remember to include a separate Word document of your speaker notes; this needs to submitted with your PowerPoint.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    Be sure to proofread your PowerPoint presentation and speaker notes before submitting your assessment to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    · Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **## rubrics4.docx**

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.**

    **Distinguished**

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community. The presentation is professional, evidence-based, and based on specific, identified health needs and goals.

    **Proficient**

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    **Basic**

    Presents a health promotion plan, though it isn't tailored for a specific individual or group within a community.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.**

    **Distinguished**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants. Clearly explains the need for revisions to future educational sessions.

    **Proficient**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    **Basic**

    Describes educational session outcomes and the attainment of health goals without evaluating them or considering how participants might react to the session.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.**

    **Distinguished**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs. Clearly explains the need for revisions to better align future sessions with Healthy People 2030 objectives.

    **Proficient**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Basic**

    Evaluates educational session outcomes unrelated to progress toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. PowerPoint slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, and/or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    **Criterion 5**

    **Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.**

    **Distinguished**

    Slides are easy to read and clutter-free. Slides enhance key points, adhere to visual best practices and may utilize graphics. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **Proficient**

    Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    **Basic**

    Slides are easy to read and error free. No audio or audio is not clear, difficult to hear, or not professionally presented. Transcript and speaker notes are sufficient support for the slides.

    **Non Performance**

    Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No audio, transcript, and/or speaker notes provided.

    **## assessment4instructions.docx**

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Health education is any combination of learning experiences designed to help people in a community improve their health by increasing their knowledge or influencing their attitudes (WHO, n.d.). Education is key to health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness. The health indicator framework identified in Healthy People 2030 prompts action in health services accessibility, clinical preventive services, environmental quality, injury or violence prevention, maternal, infant, and child health, mental health, nutrition, substance abuse prevention, and tobacco use cessation or prevention.

    Nurses provide accurate evidence-based information and education in formal and informal settings. They draw upon evidence-based practice to provide health promotion and disease prevention activities to create social and physical environments that are conducive to improving and maintaining community health. When provided with the tools to be successful, people demonstrate lifestyle changes (self-care) that promote health and help reduce readmissions. They are better able to tolerate stressors, including environmental changes, and enjoy a better quality of life. Also, in times of crisis, a resilient community is a safer community (Flanders, 2018; Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.).

    This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply teaching and learning concepts to a hypothetical presentation of a health promotion plan.

    **Note**: This is the second part of a two-part assessment. You must successfully complete Assessment 1 before completing this assessment.

    **References**

    Flanders, S. A. (2018). Effective patient education: Evidence and common sense.
    _Medsurg Nursing, 27_(1), 55–58.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.).
    _Healthy People 2030_. https://health.gov/healthypeople

    World Health Organization. (n.d.).
    _Health promoting schools_. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools

    **Scenario**

    In this assessment, you will develop your presentation of the health promotion plan based on the research you conducted for Assessment 1. You will plan the presentation for the community you focused on for Assessment 1.

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, your health promotion plan you completed research for in Assessment 1 to your chosen community. In this presentation, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, and evaluate the objectives of the plan. Please remember the nursing process. You must evaluate and revise the plan, as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you need to include any handouts with your presentation and a voice-over recording and speaker notes to communicate your plan.

    **Instructions**

    Complete the following:

    · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well-organized and submitted as a separate Word document. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint resources in the Academic Resources). The transcript must be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the face-to-face educational session, addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the participants in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or group within a community.

    · Tailor the presentation to the needs of your chosen community audience.

    · Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · How do you think participants would react to the session?

    · Which aspects of the session would you change?

    · How might those changes improve future outcomes?

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators (LHIs).

    · What changes would you recommend to better align the session with Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs?

    **Additional Requirements**

    **Presentation Format and Length**

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides (PowerPoint recommended). If you choose an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

    The number of slides in your presentation will be dictated by nature and scope of your health promotion plan. Title and references slides are required as follows:

    · Title slide.

    · Health promotion plan title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to your references.

    · Remember to include a separate Word document of your speaker notes; this needs to submitted with your PowerPoint.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    Be sure to proofread your PowerPoint presentation and speaker notes before submitting your assessment to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

    · Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

    · Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    · Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 313Topic 3 DQ 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The Joint Commission launched the National Patient Safety Goals in 2003 and most recently updated the goals again for 2020. Many years have now passed since the inception of these goals. How has the overall focus of the goals changed in the intervening years? What conditions in the health care marke…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The Joint Commission launched the National Patient Safety Goals in 2003 and most recently updated the goals again for 2020. Many years have now passed since the inception of these goals. How has the overall focus of the goals changed in the intervening years? What conditions in the health care marketplace have driven the need for change?
    You are required to use and cite a minimum of two references to support your response.

  • [Solved] 313Topic 3 DQ 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Looking ahead, select one area of the current National Patient Safety Goals program and make a prediction as to what might change in that area based on technological or other advancements. Consider patient identification standards, communication processes, and infection control protocols, among othe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Looking ahead, select one area of the current National Patient Safety Goals program and make a prediction as to what might change in that area based on technological or other advancements. Consider patient identification standards, communication processes, and infection control protocols, among others.
    You are required to use and cite a minimum of two references to support your response.