Assignment 1 | Love in a Pod
Instructions
Assignment 1 Chapters 3 & 4
You’re feeling adventurous and curious about the idea of meeting new people, even though you’re content with your current situation, whether you’re single, in a relationship, or married. While watching your favorite reality show, Love in a Pod, you come across a casting call for the new season. Just for fun, you decide to submit an audition video. Then, on a random day, to your surprise, you get a call from the casting director … and you’ve made it to the second round of interviews! (If you’re in a relationship or married, don’t worry—this is purely an exercise in imagination, focusing on how you would present yourself based on your self-concept. Consider how you might feel if you ever had to start dating again, or even imagine going through this fun process with just you and your significant other before you got into the relationship. Remember, it’s all hypothetical!
The casting team asked you to prepare another video to highlight more of who you are. More specifically, they want you to describe yourself based on what they call “pods.” These four pods include your culture, gender, reflected appraisals, and social comparisons.
In addition, the producers have requested you to include a profile essay for them to review in collaboration with your video. For this essay, you will need to define, explain, and apply the term for each of the four pods – culture, gender, reflected appraisals, and social comparisons. Remember to include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. With your adrenaline flowing about the possibilities of love becoming your reality, you excitedly get started on the assignment.
NOTE
: For this assignment, you will
ONLY submit the essay
, not your casting video.
Step One
: First, describe in one paragraph why you want to be/would be a great contestant on
Love in a Pod.
Provide enough detail so the casting team knows what your motivation is and can get a genuine perspective on your emotions if you were to find a love match on the show. In this same paragraph, make sure to provide the textbook definition for self-concept. Thirdly, list at least ten (10) items you would consider as part of your “self-concept characteristics.”
Step Two
: Categorize the contents into the
four pods
in which our self-concept develops: culture, gender, reflected appraisal, and social comparison. In paragraph format, explain how those
four
of those items from your list came to be part of your self-concept. For example, if
outgoing
is a characteristic you select, then you may begin: “As compared to many, I have a very outgoing personality and believe I would be an easy person to share with and get to know.” You would also want to be sure to discuss that this falls into the category of social comparison. From your list, be sure to include at least one self-concept characteristic that fits into each of the four pods, thereby representing all four categories of development. In addition, provide a textbook definition for each of the four pods: culture, gender, reflected appraisal, and social comparison. Each characteristic description and explanation will encompass a healthy paragraph or two. Defend each of your four explanations with detailed and specific examples as to how the characteristic is part of your self-concept and how it is relevant to you as a contestant on
Love in a Pod
.
You are also asked to include a picture/image to represent each pod. (Note: These pictures may come from your social media accounts or google images that are representative of each pod.) Please include the images in either the body of the paper, the end of the paper, or as attachment to the Assignment dropbox.
Your paper should be typed, 3-4 pages long, and double spaced.
The paper should also be proofread, and mistakes in grammar, spelling, sentence structure, formatting and other areas of paper mechanics should be kept to a minimum.
Include a complete introduction to the paper that includes a thesis statement introducing the main ideas of the paper. Organize the body of the paper into main ideas that fit with your thesis statement. Include a conclusion to the paper that reviews and summarizes the paper.
Include proper in-text citations in either APA or MLA format; be certain that you include the textbook definitions of the concepts you use and that you cite these definitions correctly. Sources that you Google or other external sources will not be accepted, we expect you to use your required course textbook, Interplay, 16th Edition. A works cited or reference page should be included at the end of your paper.
This assignment is worth
100 points
. Please refer to the Grading Rubric to understand what your instructor expects.
Criteria
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Criterion Score
Self-Concept and Explanation with 10 Characteristics
0.00 points
Characteristics and/or definition were not included in the assignment.
0.01–3.25 points
Most of the characteristics are not present in the list. Definition may be missing or incomplete.
3.26–3.75 points
Some of the characteristics are listed. The definition is provided but may be incomplete. Minimal explanation about the self-concept is included.
3.76–4.25 points
All 10 characteristics are listed in the assignment. Explanation is provided for each characteristic. The definition is provided. There is some explanation for why the characteristics would be beneficial as a contestant.
4.26–5.00 points
All 10 characteristics are listed. The student defines self-concept in a way that is clear and complete. The student explains how the characteristics will help them be a successful contestant.
Score of Self-Concept and Explanation with 10 Characteristics,
/ 5
Pod # 1 Gender
0 points
The pod is not addressed in the paper.
1–9 points
There may be an attempt to explain gender but the definition is not provided and an example is not provided OR a definition is provided but a relevant example is not provided OR there is no link between the definition, example and image or symbol.
10–11 points
The paper might include an attempt to explain the pod and fail to define the pod. A characteristic is provided that is not explained and/or related to the pod. The relationship between the pod and the characteristic may be unclear or there may be a lack of evidence incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
12–13 points
The paper defines the pod correctly. At least one specific characteristic is explained and related to the pod. The paper addresses the relationship between the characteristic and the pod. Evidence is incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
14–15 points
The paper correctly defines the pod AND explains it clearly and completely. At least one specific characteristic is explained as an example of the pod. The paper demonstrates a correct understanding of the pod AND explains the relationship between the characteristic and the pod with evidence. Additional evidence is skillfully incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
Score of Pod # 1 Gender,
/ 15
Pod # 2 Culture
0 points
The pod is not addressed in the paper.
1–9 points
There may be an attempt to explain the pod, but the definition is not provided. Or a definition is provided but a relevant characteristic is not provided. Or there is no link between the definition, example and the characteristic.
10–11 points
The paper might include an attempt to explain the pod and fail to define the pod. A characteristic is provided that is not explained and/or related to the pod. The relationship between the pod and the characteristic may be unclear or there may be a lack of evidence incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
12–13 points
The paper defines the pod correctly. At least one specific characteristic is explained and related to the pod. The paper addresses the relationship between the characteristic and the pod. Evidence is incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
14–15 points
The paper correctly defines the pod AND explains it clearly and completely. At least one specific characteristic is explained as an example of the pod. The paper demonstrates a correct understanding of the pod AND explains the relationship between the characteristic and the pod with evidence. Additional evidence is skillfully incorporated to support the application of the characteristic.
Score of Pod # 2 Culture,
/ 15
Pod # 3 Reflected Appraisal
0 points
The pod is not addressed in the paper.
1–9 points
There may be an attempt to explain the pod, but the definition is not provided. Or a definition is provided but a relevant characteristic is not provided. Or there is no link between the definition, example and the characteristic.
10–11 points
The paper might include an attempt to explain the pod and fail to define the pod. A characteristic is provided that is not explained and/or related to the pod. The relationship between the pod and the characteristic may be unclear or there may be a lack of evidence incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
12–13 points
The paper defines the pod correctly. At least one specific characteristic is explained and related to the pod. The paper addresses the relationship between the characteristic and the pod. Evidence is incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
14–15 points
The paper correctly defines the pod AND explains it clearly and completely. At least one specific characteristic is explained as an example of the pod. The paper demonstrates a correct understanding of the pod AND explains the relationship between the characteristic and the pod with evidence. Additional evidence is skillfully incorporated to support the application of the characteristic.
Score of Pod # 3 Reflected Appraisal,
/ 15
Pod # 4 Social Comparison
0 points
The pod is not addressed in the paper.
1–9 points
There may be an attempt to explain the pod, but the definition is not provided. Or a definition is provided but a relevant characteristic is not provided. Or there is no link between the definition, example and the characteristic.
10–11 points
The paper might include an attempt to explain the pod and fail to define the pod. A characteristic is provided that is not explained and/or related to the pod. The relationship between the pod and the characteristic may be unclear or there may be a lack of evidence incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
12–13 points
The paper defines the pod correctly. At least one specific characteristic is explained and related to the pod. The paper addresses the relationship between the characteristic and the pod. Evidence is incorporated to support the application of the characteristic to the pod.
14–15 points
The paper correctly defines the pod AND explains it clearly and completely. At least one specific characteristic is explained as an example of the pod. The paper demonstrates a correct understanding of the pod AND explains the relationship between the characteristic and the pod with evidence. Additional evidence is skillfully incorporated to support the application of the characteristic.
Score of Pod # 4 Social Comparison,
/ 15
Message Composition
0.0 points
The paper does not include an introduction and conclusion. The body of the paper is either not complete or lacks clarity and logical sequence.
0.1–6.5 points
Composition of the message (theme, introduction, and conclusion, and a sequence of points with transitions) is unclear, not included in their entirety or is only intermittently observable in the paper.
6.6–7.5 points
Composition of the message (central theme, introduction, and conclusion, and a logical sequence of points with transitions) is observable throughout the paper.
7.6–8.5 points
Composition of the message (clear central theme, introduction, and conclusion, and a logical sequence of points with smooth transitions) is adequate and consistently observable throughout the paper.
8.6–10.0 points
Composition of the message (clear central theme, introduction, and conclusion, and a logical sequence of points with smooth transitions) is superior and observable throughout the paper.
Score of Message Composition,
/ 10
Message Delivery
0.0 points
The paper does not meet the minimum standards of effectively communicating the central message or was not completed.
0.1–6.5 points
The message delivery incorporates grammatically incorrect, inarticulate language that ineffectively communicates the central message.
6.6–7.5 points
The message delivery incorporates minimal errors in grammar and includes language that is understandable and is able to communicate the central message.
7.6–8.5 points
The message delivery incorporates grammatically correct and consistently thoughtful language that is understandable and effectively communicates the central message.
8.6–10.0 points
The message delivery incorporates grammatically correct, articulate, imaginative language that is easily understandable and effectively communicates the central message in a compelling manner.
Score of Message Delivery,
/ 10
Citation
0.0 points
The paper includes no citation of any sort.
0.1–6.5 points
There is some attempt at citation, BUT: a significant number of concepts are not cited; OR there is no in-text citation; OR paraphrases are not cited. Assignment 1 | Love in a Pod
6.6–7.5 points
Some attempt at citation is included for most concepts used in the paper that are originally explained in a printed source AND most of these ideas are cited, whether they are paraphrased or directly quoted AND in-text citation is used but it is not in a recognizable style and/or a Works Cited may not be included.
7.6–8.5 points
In-text citation is included for most concepts used in the paper that are originally explained in a printed source AND these ideas are cited, whether they are paraphrased or directly quoted AND the citation is in MLA or APA style, though there are some format errors AND a Works Cited is included at the end of the paper, though there are some format errors.
8.6–10.0 points
In-text citation is included for all concepts used in the paper that are originally explained in a printed source AND all of these ideas are cited using correct in-text citation, whether they are paraphrased or directly quoted AND the citation is in correctly formatted MLA or APA style AND a correctly formatted Works Cited is included at the end of the paper.
Score of Citation,
/ 10
Images are included for each of the four pods.
0.00 points
No images are included.
0.01–3.25 points
An attempt is made, but not all images are included.
3.26–3.75 points
Images are included for each pod, but the relationship to the pod is not clear.
3.76–4.25 points
Images are included for each pod, and the relationship to the pod is clear.
4.26–5.00 points
Images are included for each pod, and the relationship to the pod is clear, and the image is addressed in the paper.
Score of Images are included for each of the four pods.,
/ 5
Total
Score of Assignment 1 Love in a Pod,
/ 100
Overall Score
Level 5
90 points minimum
Level 4
80 points minimum
Level 3
70 points minimum
Level 2
60 points minimum
Level 1
0 points minimum
Assignment 1 | Love in a Pod