Category: Nursing

  • Essay Assignment Help

    Essay Assignment Help

    The academic landscape in 2026 is more demanding than ever. As universities integrate advanced AI-driven curricula and rigorous research standards, students often find themselves overwhelmed by the sheer volume of written requirements. Navigating this pressure requires more than just time management; it requires professional support. For students seeking the gold standard in academic assistance, 
    Online Nursing Papers
     has emerged as the premier destination for high-quality, reliable, and specialized essay assignment help.

    Essay Assignment Help Free

    While many students begin their search by looking for 
    essay assignment help free
     of charge, it is crucial to understand the limitations of “free” services. Most platforms offering zero-cost essays provide pre-written, recycled content that will fail modern plagiarism detectors like Turnitin. However, 
    Online Nursing Papers
     bridges this gap by offering valuable free resources. Their blog and sample sections provide high-level academic guides, formatting tips, and structural templates that act as a
    free “essay helper”
    for those who want to write their own papers but need a professional blueprint to follow.

    Essay Assignment Help Reddit

    The student community on Reddit is often the first place learners go to vet academic services. In discussions regarding 
    essay assignment help Reddit
     threads, users consistently emphasize the importance of human expertise over automated AI generators. 
    Online Nursing Papers
     is frequently recommended in these circles because they employ subject-matter experts rather than relying on bots. In an era where AI-generated text is easily flagged, the “human-in-the-loop” approach offered by this platform ensures that assignments pass both plagiarism and AI-detection scans.

    Essay Assignment Help Online

    The shift to digital education has made 
    essay assignment help online
     a necessity. However, the market is saturated with generic services. 
    Online Nursing Papers
     stands out by specializing in complex fields, particularly nursing and healthcare, though their expertise extends to all academic disciplines. Their online portal is designed for seamless communication, allowing students to upload instructions, track progress in real-time, and collaborate directly with their assigned writer to ensure the final product meets specific rubric requirements.

    Essay Assignment Help App

    In 2026, mobility is key to student success. While many search for a dedicated 
    essay assignment help app
    , 
    Online Nursing Papers
     offers a fully mobile-responsive platform that functions with the speed and efficiency of a high-end application. Students can manage their orders, chat with support, and download completed assignments directly from their smartphones, ensuring that academic help is always available, whether they are in a lecture hall or on the commute home.

    The Role of an Essay Helper and Writing Service

    A true 
    essay helper
     does more than just write; they educate. 
    Online Nursing Papers
     functions as a comprehensive 
    essay writing service
     that prioritizes academic integrity and student growth. Each paper is treated as a custom project, researched from scratch using peer-reviewed journals and authoritative databases. This bespoke approach ensures that the “essay assignment help” provided is not just a temporary fix for a deadline, but a study tool that helps students understand complex topics better.

    BUY A HUMAN-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    University Assignment Help Free

    Transitioning to higher education levels often leads students to seek 
    university assignment help free
     from the risks of academic dishonesty. 
    Online Nursing Papers
     supports university students by providing free revisions and free plagiarism reports with every order. This ensures that even when you are paying for premium expertise, you are receiving the security and peace of mind that usually comes with a “free” guarantee of quality.

    Why Choose Online Nursing Papers?

    When looking for a 
    free assignment writing
     resource or a professional service, the choice is clear. 
    Online Nursing Papers
     combines the accessibility of modern technology with the deep intellectual rigor required by today’s universities. They offer:

    Subject Matter Expertise:
     Writers who hold advanced degrees in their respective fields.

    24/7 Accessibility:
     A support team available at any hour to address urgent deadlines.

    Zero-Plagiarism Guarantee:
     Every paper is unique and tailored to the student’s specific prompt.

    Privacy and Security:
     Advanced encryption to protect student data and maintain confidentiality.

    In conclusion, while the search for “essay assignment help” may lead you through various apps and forums, the most reliable path to academic excellence in 2026 is 
    OnlineNursingPapers.com
    . Whether you need a comprehensive essay writing service or a specialized essay helper, this platform provides the professional edge necessary to succeed in a competitive academic environment.

  • Analyzing Blood Pressure

    Analyzing Blood Pressure Cues

    To determine relationships among gathered cues from the blood pressure assessment, the nurse connects cues and considers the relevance of cues to the patient’s blood pressure. The following guidelines help assist the nurse in this process.

    Determine Relationship Between Cues

    Organize and Link Cues

    Consider Relevance of Cues

    Consider relevance of cues to the patient’s unique situation:

    The nurse considers expected findings based upon the patient’s age, the BP measurement site, and the patient’s baseline to determine relevance.

    Some BP cues can be related to medical conditions (like hemorrhage [low BP]).

    The nurse reviews the medical diagnosis. If the patient has hypertension, the nurse can expect the BP to be high or even within the expected range (if BP medicine is effective).

    The nurse reviews the vital signs flow sheet to determine an upward/downward trend. The nurse notices a downward trend of an adult patient’s BP (135/88, 130/83, 125/78, 119/74). The nurse intervenes and measures the oxygen saturation level, reassesses the patient’s circulatory system (not just vital signs), performs a head-to-toe assessment, reviews the patient’s medication to determine if therapeutic or side effects cause the BP to decrease, and/or notifies the health care provider.

     Previous

    Blood Pressure Hypotheses with Cues

    Linking cues correctly allows the nurse to develop an individualized hypothesis. Although the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) identifies diagnoses for blood pressure as 
    Blood Pressure Within Normal Limits
     and 
    Altered Blood Pressure,
     to classify the 
    Altered Blood Pressure,
     the primary blood pressure alterations (hypertension, hypotension, and orthostatic [postural] hypotension) are the focus.

    Organizing/Linking Cues

    Cause

    ICNP Diagnosis
    /Hypothesis

    History of hypertension

    High blood pressure readings

    Can be asymptomatic

    Blurred vision

    Headaches

    Nose bleeds

    Dizziness

    Facial redness

    Elevated BP from thickening of arteries, which reduces compliance (elasticity);increasing peripheral resistance, causing the heart to pump harder; retaining fluid

    Altered Blood Pressure

    Hypertension

    Low blood pressure reading

    Shock

    Hemorrhage

    Tachycardia and tachypnea

    Thready pulse

    Cool, clammy skin

    Confusion

    Disruption in cardiovascular dynamics from hypovolemia (loss of blood and body fluids), diminished cardiac output, and/or diminished resistance in arteries

    Altered Blood Pressure

    Hypotension

    Systolic blood pressure decreases 20 mm Hg or diastolic 10 mm Hg upon position changes

    Dizziness upon position changes

    Feels faint upon standing or sitting from a lying position

    Taking blood pressure medication

    Peripheral vasodilation with no rise in cardiac output or vasoconstriction to compensate for the vasodilation

    Altered Blood Pressure

    Orthostatic (postural) hypotension

     

     

    Prioritizing Hypotheses

    The nurse prioritizes BP hypotheses to address critical needs first. The nurse uses the following guidelines to determine priority.

    Parameter

    Description

    Example

    Life-Threatening

    This is always addressed first.

    Extremely high or low BP readings are life-threatening, but airway and breathing still take priority.

    ABCs

    Airway, breathing, and circulation take precedence in that order.

    Occluded airway addressed first, then breathing issues, then BP.

    Immediate Concern

    Address the most urgent/immediate, most serious, or most likely first.

    Hypotension is an immediate concern, but airway and breathing still take precedence.

    Acute Versus Chronic

    Acute takes precedence over chronic.

    Hypotension (acute) takes precedence over a person with a history of hypertension (chronic).

    Issues Affect Other Hypotheses

    If resolved, would the issue affect other hypotheses?

    Addressing orthostatic hypotension would resolve or even prevent falls.

    Guidelines for Goals, Outcomes, and Solutions

    After hypotheses are prioritized, the nurse considers overall goals, outcomes, and solutions.

    Overall Goals

    Resolve the blood pressure alteration

    Return blood pressure to expected ranges

    Return the patient to previous level of functioning

    Example:

    Patient’s blood pressure alteration resolves.

    Expected Outcomes

    Indicate reversal of the blood pressure alteration/hypothesis

    Are written using the SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) method

    Example:

    Patient’s blood pressure will return to expected range 2 hours after treatment (timeline may vary depending upon severity of BP).

    Solutions

     

    Are guided by the hypothesis and outcomes

    Follows goal/outcome development

    Must consider the patient’s medical diagnosis and any cultural, spiritual, physical, mental, and emotional aspects that could cause solutions to be contraindicated or avoided

    Example:

    Lifestyle and dietary changes and antihypertensive medications for a patient with hypertension are possible solutions.

    If the patient is pregnant and has hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (a type of antihypertensive drug) are contraindicated and must be avoided.

    Putting It into Practice

    Remember

    The patient is a 73-year-old male recovering from hip replacement surgery. The patient has been experiencing dizzy spells when sitting up. The nurse assesses the patient’s blood pressure lying down, and it registers 124/85 mm Hg. Then, after sitting up for 1 minute, the blood pressure is 100/70 mm Hg. Ensuring that the patient is secure, the nurse then assesses the BP a third time while standing. This BP is 98/66 mm Hg. During the interview the nurse discovers that the patient has not been eating or drinking regularly since the surgery and that he was immobile for 5 weeks before surgery. Finally, as the nurse reviews the chart, the nurse notices that the patient is taking several new medications.

    Update

    The patient is diagnosed with orthostatic hypotension.

    Using Clinical Judgment

    Analyze Cues

    Which cues besides the
    blood pressure readings support the diagnosis
    of orthostatic hypotension?

    It occurs more frequently in older adults (73 years old).

    It may be caused by side effects from medications (taking several new medications).

    Immobility and dehydration are risk/contributing factors (not eating or drinking regularly and immobile for 5 weeks).

    Prioritize Hypotheses

    What blood pressure condition can be ruled out as a cause for a status change?

    Hypertension (the patient’s BP is decreasing, not increasing).

    Generate Solutions

    Which actions can you take to minimize risk and promote patient safety?

    Institute fall precautions (orthostatic hypotension places the patient at risk for falls).

    Remind patient to call for assistance before standing or transferring to chair or ambulating.

  • Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

    Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

    What are the prevalence and causes of congenital malformations?

    Some common multifactorial disorders, the congenital malformations, are present at birth. Others, including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and most psychiatric disorders, are seen primarily in adolescents and adults.

    These disorders are complex, and unraveling their genetics is a daunting task but significant progress is being made.

    2% of newborns present with a congenital malformation; most of these are multifactorial in etiology.

    Sibling recurrence risks for these disorders range from 1% to 5%.

    Table 5.4 lists some more common congenital malformations.

    Table 5.4 Prevalence Rates of Common Congenital Malformations in Whites

    Disorder

    Prevalence Per 1000 Births (Approximate)

    Cleft lip/palate

    1

    Clubfoot

    1

    Congenital heart defects

    4–8

    Hydrocephaly

    0.5–2.5

    Isolated cleft palate

    0.4

    Neural tube defects

    1–3

    Pyloric stenosis

    3

    Some common congenital malformations are:

    CL/P and pyloric stenosis are relatively easy to repair and are not considered to be serious problems.

    Neural tube defects, have more severe consequences.

    Some cases occur in the absence of any other problems, but they could be associated with other disorders. For example:

    Hydrocephaly and clubfoot are often seen secondary to spina bifida

    CL/P is often seen in babies with trisomy 13

    Congenital heart defects are seen in children with many other disorders, including Down syndrome (Fig. 5.4)

    Fig. 5.4 Spina Bifida and Anencephaly
    . 
    (A)
     Spina bifida in a newborn.
     (B)
     Anencephaly, showing the absence of the cranial vault. (From Jones KL, Smith DM. 
    Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation
    , 6th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006:705).

    Environmental factors also cause some congenital malformations.

    An example is thalidomide, a sedative used during pregnancy in the early 1960s.

    When ingested during early pregnancy, this drug often caused phocomelia (severely shortened limbs) in babies.

     
    Maternal exposure to retinoic acid, used to treat acne, can cause congenital defects of the heart, ear, and central nervous system.

    Maternal rubella infection can cause congenital heart defects.

     

    How does genetics affect coronary heart disease?

    With more powerful laboratory and analytic techniques available much is known about the specific genes responsible for common adult diseases.

    Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is the leading killer of Americans, accounting for approximately 25% of all deaths in the United States. The table lists the causes and the risk factors of the CHD.

    Causes

    Risk factorss

    Caused by 
    atherosclerosis
     (narrowing because of the formation of lipid-laden lesions) of the coronary arteries.

    This narrowing impedes blood flow to the heart and can eventually result in a 
    myocardial infarction
     (destruction of heart tissue caused by an inadequate supply of oxygen).

    When atherosclerosis occurs in arteries supplying blood to the brain, a 
    stroke
     can result.

    Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

    Obesity

    Cigarette smoking

    Hypertension

    Elevated cholesterol level

    Positive family history (usually defined as having one or more affected first-degree relatives)

    The person is two to seven times more likely to have heart disease than is an individual with no family history (this would be the relative risk of heart disease because of a positive family history)

    The risk increases if:

    There are more affected relatives

    The affected relative or relatives are female (the less commonly affected sex) rather than male

    The age of onset in the affected relative is early (before 55 years)

    For example, one study showed that men between the ages of 20 and 39 years had a relative risk of 3 for CHD if they had one affected first-degree relative.

    The relative risk increased to 13 if two first-degree relatives were affected with CHD before 55 years of age.

    What part do genes play in the familial clustering of heart disease?

    Due to the lipids in atherosclerosis that play a key role, focus is on the genetic determination of various lipoproteins.

    Important advance in this area is the identification of several genes that encode the processing of low-density lipoproteins and that, when mutated, can cause 
    familial hypercholesterolemia
    . (Box 5.3)

    Box 5.3 Familial Hypercholesterolemia

    Box. 5.3
     Data from Brautbar A, Leary E, Rasmussen K, et al. Genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia. 
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports
    , 2015;17:491; Roberts R, Davidson MH, Hirsh BJ, et al. Genetics and causality of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    , 2014;64(23):2525–2540; Varret MM, Abifadel M, Rabès JP, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. 
    Clinical Genetics
    , 2008; 73(1): 1–13.

    Autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an important cause of heart disease, accounting for approximately 5% of myocardial infarctions in individuals younger than 60 years of age. FH is one of the most common autosomal dominant disorders: in most populations surveyed to date, approximately 1 in 500 people is a heterozygote. Plasma cholesterol levels are approximately twice as high as normal (i.e., approximately 300–400 mg/dL), resulting in substantially accelerated atherosclerosis and distinctive cholesterol deposits in skin and tendons (
    xanthomas
     [see Fig. 5.6]). Data compiled from five studies showed that approximately 75% of men with FH developed coronary disease, and 50% had a fatal myocardial infarction by 60 years. The corresponding percentages for women were lower (45% and 15%) because women generally develop heart disease at a later age than men.

    Consistent with Hardy-Weinberg predictions, approximately 1 in 1 million births is homozygous for the FH gene. Homozygotes are much more severely affected, with cholesterol levels ranging from 600 to 1200 mg/dL. Most experience myocardial infarctions before 20 years of age, and a myocardial infarction at 18 months of age has been reported. If untreated, most FH homozygotes die before 30 years of age.

    All cells require cholesterol as a component of their plasma membrane. They can either synthesize their own cholesterol or, preferably, obtain it from the extracellular environment, where it is carried primarily by low-density lipoprotein (LDL). In a process known as 
    endocytosis
    , LDL-bound cholesterol is taken into the cell via LDL receptors on the cell’s surface (see Fig. 5.5). FH is most caused by a reduction in the number of functional LDL receptors on cell surfaces. Lacking the normal number of LDL receptors, cellular cholesterol uptake is reduced and circulating cholesterol levels increase.

    Much of what we know about endocytosis has been learned through the study of LDL receptors. The process of endocytosis and the processing of LDL in the cell are described in detail in Fig. 5.5 (endocytosis is discussed in Chapter 1). These processes result in a fine-tuned regulation of cholesterol levels within cells, and they influence the level of circulating cholesterol as well.

    The identification of the LDL receptor gene in 1984 was critical in understanding exactly how LDL receptor defects cause FH. More than 1000 different mutations, including missense and nonsense substitutions as well as insertions and deletions, have been identified in the LDL receptor gene. These can be grouped into five broad classes according to their effects on the activity of the receptor. Class 1 mutations result in no detectable protein product. Thus, heterozygotes would produce only half the normal number of LDL receptors. Class 2 mutations in the LDL receptor gene result in production of the LDL receptor, but it is altered such that it cannot leave the endoplasmic reticulum. It is eventually degraded. Class 3 mutations produce an LDL receptor that can migrate to the cell surface but incapable of normal binding to LDL. Class 4 mutations, which are comparatively rare, produce receptors that are normal except that they do not migrate specifically to coated pits and thus cannot carry LDL into the cell. The final group of mutations, class 5, produces an LDL receptor that cannot dissociate from the LDL particle after entry into the cell. The receptor cannot return to the cell surface and is degraded. Each class of mutations reduces the number of effective LDL receptors, resulting in decreased LDL uptake and hence elevated levels of circulating cholesterol. The number of effective receptors is reduced by approximately half in FH heterozygotes, and homozygotes have virtually no functional LDL receptors. LDL receptor that can migrate to the cell surface but incapable of normal binding to LDL. Class 4 mutations, which are comparatively rare, produce receptors that are normal except that they do not migrate specifically to coated pits and thus cannot carry LDL into the cell. The final group of mutations, class 5, produces an LDL receptor that cannot dissociate from the LDL particle after entry into the cell. The receptor cannot return to the cell surface and is degraded. Each class of mutations reduces the number of effective LDL receptors, resulting in decreased LDL uptake and hence elevated levels of circulating cholesterol. The number of effective receptors is reduced by approximately half in FH heterozygotes, and homozygotes have virtually no functional LDL receptors.

    Understanding the defects that lead to FH has helped to develop effective therapies for the disorder. Dietary reduction of cholesterol (primarily through the reduced intake of saturated fats) has only modest effects on cholesterol levels in FH heterozygotes. Because cholesterol is reabsorbed into the gut and then recycled through the liver (where most cholesterol synthesis takes place), serum cholesterol levels can be reduced by the administration of bile acid–absorbing resins, such as cholestyramine. The absorbed cholesterol is then excreted. It is interesting that reduced recirculation from the gut causes the liver cells to form additional LDL receptors, lowering circulating cholesterol levels. However, the decrease in the concentration of intracellular cholesterol also stimulates cholesterol synthesis by liver cells, so the overall reduction in plasma LDL level is only approximately 15% to 20%. This treatment is much more effective when combined with agents that reduce cholesterol synthesis by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (the “statin” class of drugs). Decreased synthesis leads to further production of LDL receptors. When these therapies are used in combination, serum cholesterol levels in FH heterozygotes can be reduced to approximately normal levels.

     
    The picture is less encouraging for FH homozygotes.
     The therapies just discussed can enhance cholesterol elimination and reduce its synthesis, but they are largely ineffective because homozygotes have few or no LDL receptors. Liver transplants, which provide hepatocytes that have normal LDL receptors, have been successful in some cases, but this option is often limited by a lack of donors. 
    Plasma exchange carried out every 1–2 weeks, in combination with drug therapy, can reduce cholesterol levels by approximately 50%.
     However, this therapy is difficult to continue for long periods. Somatic cell gene therapy, in which hepatocytes carrying normal LDL receptor genes are introduced into the portal circulation, is now being tested. It may eventually prove to be an effective treatment for FH homozygotes.

    FH also can be caused by inherited mutations in the gene that encodes apolipoprotein B. In addition, a small number of FH cases are caused by mutations in the gene that encodes PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), an enzyme that plays a key role in degrading LDL receptors. Gain-of-function mutations in the 
    PCSK9
     gene reduce the number of LDL receptors, causing FH. Loss-of-function mutations in this gene can increase the number of LDL receptors, resulting in exceptionally low circulating LDL levels. These findings have led to the development of drugs that inhibit PCSK9 activity, thus lowering LDL cholesterol levels. These drugs, which have been approved for clinical use, can reduce LDL cholesterol levels by approximately 50% in the general population of persons with hypercholesterolemia and produce significant effects even in those who are using statin drugs.

    The FH story illustrates how medical research has made important contributions both to our understanding of basic cell biology and to our advances in clinical therapy. The process of receptor-mediated endocytosis, elucidated largely by research on the LDL receptor defects, is of fundamental significance for cellular processes throughout the body. Equally important is that this research, by clarifying how cholesterol synthesis and uptake can be modified, has led to significant improvements in therapy for this important cause of heart disease. The discovery of rare mutations in PCSK9 has led to PCSK9 inhibitor drugs that may benefit millions of persons with high cholesterol levels.

    Data from Brautbar A, Leary E, Rasmussen K, et al. Genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia. 
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports
    , 2015; 17: 491; Roberts R, Davidson MH, Hirsh BJ, et al. Genetics and causality of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    , 2014; 64(23): 2525–2540; Varret MM, Abifadel M, Rabès JP, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. 
    Clinical Genetics
    , 2008; 73(1): 1–13.

    Many other genes involved in lipid variation, coagulation, and hypertension have been identified, including several genes encoding apolipoproteins (the protein components of lipoproteins) (Fig. 5.5).

    Fig. 5.5 Process of Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis. 
    1, The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors, which are glycoproteins, are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum of the cell. 2, From here, they pass through the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface, where part of the receptor protrudes outside the cell. 3, The circulating LDL particle is bound by the LDL receptor and localized in cell surface depressions called coated pits (so named because they are coated with a protein called clathrin). 4, The coated pit invaginates, bringing the LDL particle inside the cell. 5, Once inside the cell, the LDL particle is separated from the receptor, taken into a lysosome, and broken down into its constituents by lysosomal enzymes. 6, The LDL receptor is recirculated to the cell surface to bind another LDL particle (each LDL receptor goes through this cycle approximately once every 10minutes even if it is not occupied by an LDL particle). 7, Free cholesterol is released from the lysosome for incorporation into cell membranes or metabolism into bile acids or steroids. Excess cholesterol can be stored in the cell as a cholesterol ester or removed from the cell by associating with high-density lipoprotein (HDL). 8, As cholesterol levels in the cell rise, cellular cholesterol synthesis is reduced by inhibition of the rate-limiting enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. 9, Rising cholesterol levels also increase the activity of acyl coenzyme A (acyl CoA):cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT), an enzyme that modifies cholesterol for storage as cholesterol esters. 10, In addition, the number of LDL receptors is decreased by lowering the transcription rate of the LDL receptor gene itself. This decreases cholesterol uptake. (From Jorde LB, Carey JC, Bamshad MJ. 
    Medical genetics
    , 6th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020).

    Functional analysis of these genes is leading to an increased understanding and eventually more effective treatment of CHD. Xanthomas, which are fatty deposits, are often noted in individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (Fig. 5.6).

    Fig. 5.6 Xanthoma.
     Fatty deposits, referred to as xanthomas as seen here on the knuckles, are often noted in individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia. (From Jorde LB, Carey JC, Bamshad MJ. 
    Medical genetics
    , 6th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020).

    How do genetic and environmental factors affect blood pressure?

    Key Points

    Some common multifactorial disorders, the congenital malformations, are present at birth. Others, including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and most psychiatric disorders, are seen primarily in adolescents and adults.

    Due to the lipids in atherosclerosis that play a key role, focus is on the genetic determination of various lipoproteins. Important advance in this area is the identification of several genes that encode the processing of low-density lipoproteins and that, when mutated, can cause 
    familial hypercholesterolemia
    .

    Systemic hypertension has a worldwide prevalence of approximately 25% to 30%. It is a key risk factor for heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease.

    Women who inherit a mutation in 
    BRCA1 
    or 
    BRCA2
     experience a 50% to 80% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.

    Prostate cancer is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in men, causing more than 30,000 deaths each year.

    How do genes correlate with cancer?

    Question 1 of 3

    Which statement would accurately describe the source of a congenital malformation?

    Exactly!

    Heart defects may occur from only environmental factors.

    Club foot is an isolated condition related to birth trauma.

    Spina bifida results exclusively from genetic causes.

    Heart disease in adolescents is not genetically based.

    Heart defects may occur from only environmental factors.

    Congenital heart defects are seen in children with genetic disorders; however, there is evidence that maternal rubella infection and exposure to retinoic acid alone can cause environmental congenital defects of the heart. Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

    Club foot is an isolated condition related to birth trauma.

    Club foot is associated with multifactorial etiology that includes a genetic component. It is often seen secondary to spina bifida.

    Spina bifida results exclusively from genetic causes.

    Multifactorial etiology with a genetic component and environmental component is associated with spina bifida.

    Heart disease in adolescents is not genetically based.

    Some common multifactorial disorders that include heart disease and cancer are seen primarily in adolescents and adults.

    Question 2 of 3

    Which therapy would be most effective for a patient who is homozygous for the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) gene?

    Exactly!

    Bile acid–absorbing resins

    Plasma exchange with drug therapy

    Dietary reduction of cholesterol

    Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase

    Bile acid–absorbing resins

    Combination therapies reduce serum cholesterol levels for patients that are FH heterozygotes rather than homozygous patient because homozygotes have few or no LDL receptors for the uptake of LDL cholesterol.

    Plasma exchange with drug therapy

    Plasma exchange, in combination with drug therapy, is the most effective to reduce cholesterol levels by approximately 50% for patient that are FH homozygous since medication alone is not effective.

    Dietary reduction of cholesterol

    Dietary reduction of cholesterol without medication has only modest effects on cholesterol levels in FH heterozygotes and basically no effect with homozygous patients.

    Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase

    HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are largely ineffective for FH homozygotes since LDL receptors are minimal to absent to respond to drug therapy to reduce LDL cholesterol.

    Question 3 of 3

    When a patient reports that a sister has breast cancer, which statement would indicate that the patient correctly understands the assessment of breast cancer risk?

    Exactly!

    “Genetic testing is limited to research studies.”

    “Breast cancer risks are about the same in all women.”

    “Two genes create the risk for the most breast cancer cases.”

    “Breast cancer risk increases with early onset in a relative.”

    “Genetic testing is limited to research studies.”

    Genetic testing for inherited cancer-causing mutations is used to identify risk in clinical practice and provide targeted treatment. Examples include the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

    “Breast cancer risks are about the same in all women.”

    Women who inherit a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 experience a 50% to 80% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer compared to a 1 in 8 risk for all women.

    “Two genes create the risk for the most breast cancer cases.”

    An autosomal dominant form of breast cancer accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of breast cancer cases that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes; however, this is not the major risk factor. Ninety percent of breast cancer cases are not inherited as this type of mendelian disease.

    “Breast cancer risk increases with early onset in a relative.”

    If a woman has one affected first-degree relative, her risk of developing breast cancer doubles and it increases further if the age of onset in the affected relative is early and if the cancer is bilateral.

    How does genetics affect type 1 diabetes?

    What is the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes?

    How do environmental and genetic factors contribute to obesity?

    Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 (BMI is defined as W/H2, in which W is weight in kilograms and H, is height in meters.).

    Using this criterion, more than one-third of American adults are obese, and an additional one third are overweight (BMI greater than 25 but less than 30).

    The proportion of obese adults and children continues to increase rapidly.

    Obesity itself is not a “disease,” but it is an important risk factor for several common diseases, including heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and cancers of the prostate, breast, and colon.

    There is a strong correlation between obesity in parents and their children. This could be ascribed to common environmental effects.

    Parents and children usually share similar dietary and exercise habits.

    There is good evidence for genetic components as well.

    Body weights of adopted individuals correlated significantly with their natural parents’ body weights but not with those of their adoptive parents.

    Twin studies also provide evidence for a genetic effect on body weight, with most studies yielding heritability estimates between 0.60 and 0.80.

    Research, aided substantially by mouse models, shows that many genes each play a role in human obesity. Important among these are the genes that encode leptin and its receptor.

    The leptin hormone is secreted by adipocytes (fat storage cells) and binds to receptors in the hypothalamus, the site of the body’s appetite control center.

    Cloning of the human leptin gene and its receptor led to optimistic predictions that leptin could be a key to weight loss in humans (without the perceived unpleasantness of dieting and exercise).

    Mutations in the human leptin gene and its receptor have been identified in a few humans with severe obesity (BMI >40), but they both appear to be extremely rare.

    Clinical trials using recombinant leptin have demonstrated moderate weight loss in a subset of obese individuals.

    Leptin participates in important interactions with other components of appetite control, like neuropeptide Y and α-melanocyte–stimulating hormone and its receptor, the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R).

    Mutations in the gene that encodes MC4R have been found in 3% to 5% of severely obese individuals.

    Homozygosity for a DNA variant in the 
    FTO
     gene (which is seen in 16% of Whites) has been associated with 40% and 70% increases in the risks of overweight and obesity, respectively.

    Recent evidence shows that the 
    FTO
     variant is part of an enhancer that binds to the 
    IRX
     gene, which is located 2 million base pairs away from 
    FTO
     and is involved in regulation of fat mass.

    Identification of these human genes is leading to a better understanding of natural weight control in the human, and it could eventually lead to effective treatments for some cases of obesity.

    How are genes associated with susceptibility to alcohol addiction?

    Key Points

    The genes that affect type 1 diabetes are alleles, insulin gene, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, 
    PTPN22
    , systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune thyroid disease.

    The associations between diabetes susceptibility and each of these genes have been widely replicated in multiple populations. These genes include 
    TCFL2
    , allele, and 
    KCNJ11
    .

    Mutations in the human leptin gene and its receptor have been identified in a few humans with severe obesity (BMI >40), but they both appear to be extremely rare.

    An allele of the 
    ALDH2
     gene 
    (ALDH2*2)
     results in excessive accumulation of acetaldehyde and thus in facial flushing, nausea, palpitations, and lightheadedness.

    Question 1 of 3

    Which statement would accurately describe the pathology of type 1 diabetes?

    Exactly!

    Genetic factors alone are responsible.

    Infection contributes to a genetic immune response.

    A homozygous genetic disorder alters blood glucose levels.

    An altered insulin gene occurs from an infection response.

    Genetic factors alone are responsible.

    Type 1 diabetes is not 100% concordant among identical twins indicating that genetic factors are not solely responsible for the pathology of the disorder.

    Infection contributes to a genetic immune response.

    There is evidence that specific viral infections contribute to the causation of type 1 diabetes, possibly by activating an autoimmune response that corresponds to genetic factors.

    A homozygous genetic disorder alters blood glucose levels.

    Diabetes is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by elevated blood glucose levels. Multiple genetic factors with additional environmental factors are considered to be present.

    An altered insulin gene occurs from an infection response.

    More than 50 additional genes have been shown to be associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. The altered genetics contributes to an altered response to infection and immune response rather than an infection altering the gene.

    Question 2 of 3

    Which information would accurately describe a feature for type 2 diabetes?

    Exactly!

    Identical twin risk is low

    Obesity occurrence is high

    Insulin is required for treatment

    Evidence of autoimmune disease

    Identical twin risk is low

    Identical twin risk is 0.35 to 0.60 for type 2 diabetes, which is similar to the risk for type 1 diabetes (0.30 to 0.70).

    Obesity occurrence is high

    Obesity is a feature of type 2 diabetes rather than of type 1 diabetes. This is considered both genetic and environmental factor for the disease.

    Insulin is required for treatment

    Individuals with type 2 diabetes may receive exogenous insulin or other treatments to lower blood glucose.

    Evidence of autoimmune disease

    Variation in genes associated with type 1 diabetes, not type 2 diabetes, is found with several other autoimmune diseases.

    Question 3 of 3

    Which person would have the lowest risk for alcohol use disorder?

    Exactly!

    Monozygotic twin with alcohol use disorder

    Parent treated successfully for an alcohol use disorder

    Offspring of alcoholic parent raised by nonalcoholic parents

    Adopted by alcoholic parent without alcoholic birth parent

    Monozygotic twin with alcohol use disorder

    Twin studies have yielded concordance rates for DZ twins less than 30% and concordance rates for MZ twins more than 60%.

    Parent treated successfully for an alcohol use disorder

    With one affected parent the risk is three to five times higher than for those with unaffected parents.

    Offspring of alcoholic parent raised by nonalcoholic parents

    Adoption studies show that the offspring of an alcoholic parent, even when raised by nonalcoholic parents, have a fourfold increased risk of developing the disorder.

    Adopted by alcoholic parent without alcoholic birth parent

    One study showed that the offspring of nonalcoholic parents, when reared by alcoholics, did not have an increased risk of developing alcoholism.

    How are genes associated with Alzheimer disease?

    What principles and conclusions result from studies on the genetics of complex disorders?

    The disorders represent some of the most common multifactorial disorders and for which significant progress has been made in identifying genes.

    Many other multifactorial disorders are being studied as well, and in some cases specific susceptibility genes have been identified.

    These include Parkinson disease, hearing loss, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and some forms of blindness.

    Some general principles can be drawn from the results obtained thus far on the genetics of complex disorders.

    First, the more strongly inherited forms of complex disorders generally have an earlier age of onset.

    For example, breast cancer, AD, heart disease

    Often these represent subsets of cases in which there is single-gene inheritance.

    Second, when laterality is a component, the bilateral forms are more likely to cluster strongly in families.

    For example, breast cancer

    Third, although the sex-specific threshold model fits some of the complex disorders (e.g., pyloric stenosis, CL/P, autism, heart disease), it fails to fit others (e.g., type 1 diabetes).

    A tendency exists, particularly among the lay public, to assume that the presence of a genetic component means that the course of a disease cannot be altered which is incorrect.

    Most of the diseases have both genetic and environmental components.

     
    Lifestyle modification (e.g., diet, exercise, stress reduction) often can reduce risk significantly.

    Such modification may be especially important for individuals with a family history of a disease because they are likely to develop the disease earlier in life.

    For example, those with a family history of heart disease can often add many years of productive living with relatively minor lifestyle alterations.

    By targeting those who can benefit most from intervention, genetics helps to serve the goal of preventive medicine.

     
    It should be stressed that the identification of a specific genetic lesion can lead to more effective prevention and treatment of the disease.

    Identification of mutations that cause autosomal dominant breast cancer may enable early screening and prevention of metastasis.

    Pinpointing a gene responsible for a neurotransmitter defect in a behavioral disorder such as schizophrenia could lead to the development of more effective drug treatments.

    In cases, such as those with familial hypercholesterolemia, targeted drug therapy or gene therapy may prove to be useful in treating the disease.

    It is important for health care practitioners to help individuals to understand these facts.

    Genetics of common disorders is complex and often confusing, but the community health effect of these diseases, together with the evidence for hereditary factors in their etiology, demands that genetic studies be pursued.
     Substantial progress is already being made. The next decade will undoubtedly witness many further advances in the understanding and treatment of these disorders.

    How are schizophrenia and bipolar disorder affected by genetic factors?

    Key Points

    Despite the strong association between 
    ε4
     and AD, approximately half of individuals who develop late-onset AD do not have a copy of the 
    ε4
     allele, and many who are homozygous for 
    ε4
     remain free of AD even at advanced age.

    The proportion of schizophrenic probands who have a schizophrenic parent is only approximately 5%, which is substantially lower than the risk for other first-degree relatives (e.g., siblings, affected parents and their offspring).

    Twin and family studies show that approximately 60% of the risk for bipolar disorder is attributable to genetic factors, whereas approximately 30% of the risk for unipolar disorder (major depression) is because of genetic factors.

    Lifestyle modification (e.g., diet, exercise, stress reduction) often can reduce risk significantly. Such modification may be especially important for individuals with a family history of a disease because they are likely to develop the disease earlier in life. For example, those with a family history of heart disease can often add many years of productive living with relatively minor lifestyle alterations.

    Question 1 of 3

    Which finding would be associated with early onset of Alzheimer disease?

    Exactly!

    Homozygous gene mutations

    Absent copy of the ε4 allele

    Allelic variation in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) locus

    Mutations in presenilin (
    PSEN1
     or 
    PSEN2
    ) Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

    Homozygous gene mutations

    AD is a genetically heterogeneous disorder. Approximately 5% of AD cases are considered early onset before age 65 that are considered autosomal dominant inheritance.

    Absent copy of the ε4 allele

    There is an association between absent ε4 and late-onset AD instead of early-onset AD.

    Allelic variation in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) locus

    An important risk factor for the more common late-onset form of AD is allelic variation in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) locus, which has three major alleles: ε2, ε3, and ε4.

    Mutations in presenilin (
    PSEN1
     or 
    PSEN2
    )

    Mutations in PSEN1 typically result in early-onset AD, with the first occurrence of symptoms in the fifth decade of life.

    Question 2 of 3

    Which condition would 
    most
     likely be attributed to heredity of a patient who has family history of mental health conditions?

    Exactly!

    Any psychiatric disorder

    Schizophrenia

    Bipolar disorder

    Depression

    Any psychiatric disorder

    Any psychiatric disorder includes some conditions with lower risk for hereditary factors.

    Schizophrenia

    Estimated heritability of schizophrenia is up to 85% making this the most likely condition attributed to hereditary factors.

    Bipolar disorder

    Approximately 60% of the risk for bipolar disorder is attributable to genetic factors.

    Depression

    Genetic factors are related to approximately 30% of the risk for unipolar disorder or major depression.

    Question 3 of 3

    Which benefit from genetic studies would be important to include in patient teaching? 
    Select all that apply. One, some, or all responses may be correct.

    Exactly!

    Identification of illness prevention

    Provision of early screening for disease

    Realistic expectations for life expectancy

    Development of gene therapy treatment

    Classification of diseases as genetic or environmental

    Unnecessary use of lifestyle treatment plans

    Identification of illness prevention

    Genetic studies support effective prevention and treatment of the disease.

    Provision of early screening for disease

    Early screening for disease is supported when genetic risks are identified through genetic studies. Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

    Realistic expectations for life expectancy

    Early treatment and appropriate lifestyle modifications from genetic studies may result in extended lifetime.

    Development of gene therapy treatment

    Genetic studies may contribute to gene therapy useful in treating disease with a genetic component.

    Classification of diseases as genetic or environmental

    Many diseases have both genetic and environmental components. Genetic studies support recognition of multifactorial components of disease.

    Unnecessary use of lifestyle treatment plans

    Lifestyle modifications are often recognized by genetic studies to reduce the risk of disorders with genetic components. It is incorrect to assume that disease with a genetic component may not benefit from lifestyle modifications.

    Key Points

    Some common multifactorial disorders, the congenital malformations, are present at birth. Others, including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and most psychiatric disorders, are seen primarily in adolescents and adults.

    Due to the lipids in atherosclerosis that play a key role, focus is on the genetic determination of various lipoproteins. Important advance in this area is the identification of several genes that encode the processing of low-density lipoproteins and that, when mutated, can cause 
    familial hypercholesterolemia
    .

    Systemic hypertension has a worldwide prevalence of approximately 25% to 30%. It is a key risk factor for heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease.

    Women who inherit a mutation in 
    BRCA1 
    or 
    BRCA2
     experience a 50% to 80% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.

    Prostate cancer is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in men, causing more than 30,000 deaths each year.

    The genes that affect type 1 diabetes are alleles, insulin gene, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, 
    PTPN22
    , systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune thyroid disease.

    The associations between diabetes susceptibility and each of these genes have been widely replicated in multiple populations. These genes include 
    TCFL2
    , allele, and 
    KCNJ11
    .

    Mutations in the human leptin gene and its receptor have been identified in a few humans with severe obesity (BMI >40), but they both appear to be extremely rare.

    An allele of the 
    ALDH2
     gene 
    (ALDH2*2)
     results in excessive accumulation of acetaldehyde and thus in facial flushing, nausea, palpitations, and lightheadedness.

    Despite the strong association between 
    ε4
     and AD, approximately half of individuals who develop late-onset AD do not have a copy of the 
    ε4
     allele, and many who are homozygous for 
    ε4
     remain free of AD even at advanced age.

    The proportion of schizophrenic probands who have a schizophrenic parent is only approximately 5%, which is substantially lower than the risk for other first-degree relatives (e.g., siblings, affected parents and their offspring).

    Twin and family studies show that approximately 60% of the risk for bipolar disorder is attributable to genetic factors, whereas approximately 30% of the risk for unipolar disorder (major depression) is because of genetic factors.

    Lifestyle modification (e.g., diet, exercise, stress reduction) often can reduce risk significantly. Such modification may be especially important for individuals with a family history of a disease because they are likely to develop the disease earlier in life. For example, those with a family history of heart disease can often add many years of productive living with relatively minor lifestyle alterations.

    Chapter 5, Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases Understanding Genetics of Common Diseases

  • How are schizophrenia and bipolar disorder affected by genetic factors?

    How are schizophrenia and bipolar disorder affected by genetic factors?

    The major psychiatric diseases, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder have been the subjects of numerous genetic studies.

    Twins, adoption, and family studies have shown that both disorders aggregate in families.

    Genetic studies of psychiatric disorders are challenging because these disorders are undoubtedly heterogeneous, reflecting the influence of numerous genetic and environmental factors.

    The involvement of genetic factors in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are presented.

    Schizophrenia

    It is a severe emotional disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, retreat from reality, and bizarre, withdrawn, or inappropriate behavior. (Contrary to popular belief, schizophrenia is not a “split personality” disorder.)

    Estimated heritability of schizophrenia is up to 85%.

    The risk of schizophrenia among relatives with one schizophrenic proband is eightfold.

    This increases to 11-fold for relatives with two schizophrenic probands.

    The lifetime risk for schizophrenia among offspring of one affected parent is approximately 8% to 10%, which is approximately 10 times higher than the risk in the general population.

    Empirical risks increase when more relatives are affected. For example:

    An individual with an affected sibling and an affected parent has a risk approaching 20%

    An individual with two affected parents has a risk of nearly 50%

    Risks decrease when the affected family member is a second or third-degree relative

    The proportion of schizophrenic probands who have a schizophrenic parent is only approximately 5%, which is substantially lower than the risk for other first-degree relatives (e.g., siblings, affected parents and their offspring).

    This can be explained by the fact that people with schizophrenia are less likely to marry and produce children than are other individuals.

    Thus, substantial selection against schizophrenia occurs in the population.

    Twin and adoption studies indicate that genetic factors are likely to be involved in schizophrenia.

    Twin studies data show a 47% concordance rate for MZ twins, compared with a concordance rate of only 12% for DZ twins.

    When the offspring of a schizophrenic parent are adopted by normal parents, their risk of developing the disease is approximately 10%, which is approximately the same as the risk when raised by a schizophrenic biologic parent.

    Large-scale genetic studies have revealed more than 200 loci that are associated with risk of schizophrenia.

    The most significant of these associations implicates complement component genes (
    C4A
     and 
    C4B
    ) located in the MHC region.

    These genes are expressed in neurons and affect synaptic function and likely contribute to the decline in synaptic structures observed in the brains of persons with schizophrenia.

    Other schizophrenia-associated genes encode components of the dopaminergic and glutamatergic neuronal signaling pathways. These findings are biologically plausible because the major therapeutic drugs used to treat schizophrenia block dopamine receptors.

    Bipolar Disorder

    It is also known as 
    manic depressive disorder
    . It is a form of psychosis with extreme mood swings and emotional instability.

    The prevalence for bipolar type I in the United States is approximately 1%, but it rises to 5% to 10% among those with an affected first-degree relative.

    Twin and family studies show that approximately 60% of the risk for bipolar disorder is attributable to genetic factors, whereas approximately 30% of the risk for unipolar disorder (major depression) is because of genetic factors.

    Large-scale studies have revealed more than 20 genes associated with susceptibility to bipolar disorder.

    Best-replicated genetic studies implicate genes that encode voltage-gated calcium and sodium channels.

    Ion-channel modulating drugs are frequently used as mood stabilizers, lending the genetic results functional plausibility.

    Many of the genes associated with bipolar disorder also are associated with schizophrenia. How are schizophrenia and bipolar disorder affected by genetic factors?

  • How are genes associated with Alzheimer disease?

    How are genes associated with Alzheimer disease?

    Alzheimer disease (AD) is responsible for 50% to 80% of cases of progressive cognitive impairment (dementia) among older adults.

    It affects approximately 1 in 10 individuals older than 65 years of age and 1 in 3 individuals older than 85 years of age.

    Due to the aging of the population, the number of Americans with AD is predicted to increase substantially during the coming decade.

    AD is characterized by progressive dementia and memory loss and by the formation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain, particularly in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.

    The plaques and tangles lead to progressive neuronal loss, and death usually occurs within 7 to 10 years after the first appearance of symptoms.

    The risk of developing AD doubles in individuals who have an affected first-degree relative.

    Although most cases do not appear to be caused by single loci, approximately 10% follow an autosomal dominant mode of transmission.

    Approximately 5% of AD cases occur before age 65 and are considered early onset; these are likely to be an autosomal dominant inheritance.

    AD is a genetically heterogeneous disorder.

    Approximately half of early-onset cases can be attributed to mutations in any of three genes, all of which affect amyloid-β deposition.

    Two of the genes, presenilin 1 
    (PSEN1)
     and presenilin 2 
    (PSEN2),
     are very similar to one another, and their protein products are involved in cleavage of the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP).

    When APP is not cleaved normally, a long form of it accumulates excessively and is deposited in the brain. This is thought to be a primary cause of AD.

    Mutations in 
    PSEN1
     typically result in early-onset AD, with the first occurrence of symptoms in the fifth decade of life.

    A small number of cases of early-onset AD are caused by mutations of the gene that encodes APP itself, which is located on chromosome 21.

    These mutations disrupt normal cleavage sites in APP, again leading to the accumulation of the longer protein product.

    This gene is present in three copies in trisomy 21 individuals, in which the extra gene copy leads to amyloid deposition and the occurrence of AD in those with Down syndrome.

    High-throughput DNA sequencing (techniques allowing the sequencing of massive amounts of DNA at once) studies have revealed an allele in APP that is protective against AD and may help to prevent cognitive decline.

    An important risk factor for the more common late-onset form of AD is allelic variation in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) locus, which has three major alleles
    : ε2, ε3
    , and 
    ε4
    .

    Studies conducted in diverse populations shows that persons who have one copy of the 
    ε4
     allele are at least 2 to 5 times more likely to develop AD, whereas those with two copies of this allele are at least 5 to 10 times more likely to develop AD.

    The risk varies somewhat by population, with higher 
    ε4
    -associated risks in Europeans and Japanese and relatively lower risks in Hispanics and Blacks.

    Despite the strong association between 
    ε4
     and AD, approximately half of individuals who develop late-onset AD do not have a copy of the 
    ε4
     allele, and many who are homozygous for 
    ε4
     remain free of AD even at advanced age.

    The APOE protein product is not involved in cleavage of APP but instead appears to be associated with clearance of amyloid from the brain.

    Recent studies reveal, at least 20 additional genes are associated with AD. How are genes associated with Alzheimer disease?

  • How are genes associated with susceptibility to alcohol addiction?

    How are genes associated with susceptibility to alcohol addiction?

    Alcoholism (now formally termed alcohol use disorder) is diagnosed in approximately 10% of adult males and 3% to 5% of adult females in the United States.

    The national cost of alcoholism, in terms of lost productivity and direct medical costs, is approximately $250 billion per year.

    More than 100 studies show that this disease clusters in families.

    The risk of developing alcoholism among individuals depends on different factors.

    With one affected parent the risk is three to five times higher than for those with unaffected parents.

    Twin studies have yielded concordance rates for DZ twins less than 30% and concordance rates for MZ twins more than 60%.

    Adoption studies show that the offspring of an alcoholic parent, even when raised by nonalcoholic parents, have a fourfold increased risk of developing the disorder.

    To control for possible prenatal effects in an alcoholic mother, some studies included only the offspring of alcoholic fathers.

    The results have remained the same.

     
    One study showed that the offspring of nonalcoholic parents, when reared by alcoholics, did 
    not
     have an increased risk of developing alcoholism.

    The table lists the genetic variants that increase the risk of some people to alcoholism.

    Genes

    Description

    Allele of ALDH2

    An individual’s physiologic response to alcohol can be influenced by variation in the key enzymes responsible for alcohol metabolism.

    Alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs), which convert ethanol to acetaldehyde.

    Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), which convert acetaldehyde to acetate.

    An allele of the 
    ALDH2
     gene 
    (ALDH2*2)
     results in excessive accumulation of acetaldehyde and thus in facial flushing, nausea, palpitations, and lightheadedness.

    Due to these unpleasant effects, individuals who have the 
    ALDH2*2
     allele are much less likely to become alcoholics.

    This “protective” allele is common in some Asian populations but is rare in other populations.

    Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)

    Genes that encode components of GABA receptors.

    This finding is biologically plausible, because the GABA neurotransmitter system inhibits excitatory signals in neurons, exerting a calming effect.

    Alcohol is shown to increase GABA release, and allelic variation in GABA receptor genes modulate this effect.

    It is underscored that genes increase one’s 
    susceptibility
     to alcoholism. It is a disease that requires an environmental component, regardless of genetic constitution.

  • What is the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes?

    What is the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes?

    Type 2 diabetes accounts for more than 90% of all diabetes cases and affects 10% to 20% of the adult populations of many high-income countries. Several features distinguish it from type 1 diabetes.

    There is always some endogenous insulin production in people with type 2 diabetes, and the disease is often treated successfully with dietary modification and/or oral drugs.

    People with type 2 diabetes suffer from insulin resistance (i.e., their cells have difficulty in using insulin).

    This disease typically occurs among people older than age 40 and, in contrast to type 1 diabetes, is more common among the obese.

    The incidence of type 2 diabetes is rising dramatically among adolescents and young adults in developed countries and is strongly correlated with an increased incidence of obesity.

    Neither MHC associations nor autoantibodies are commonly seen in this form of diabetes.

    MZ twin concordance rates are substantially higher than those seen in type 1 diabetes, ranging from 70% to 90% (because of age dependence, the concordance rate increases if older subjects are studied).

    The empirical recurrence risks for first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetes cases are higher than those for type 1, generally ranging from 15% to 40%.

    The table outlines the differences between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

    Table 5.5 Comparison of Major Features of Types 1 and 2 Diabetes

    Feature

    Type 1 Diabetes

    Type 2 Diabetes

    Age of onset

    Usually >40 years

    Usually >40 years (except maturity-onset diabetes of the young [MODY])

    Insulin production

    None

    Partial

    Insulin resistance

    No

    Yes

    Autoimmunity

    Yes

    No

    Obesity

    Not common

    Common

    Monozygotic (MZ) twin concordance

    0.30–0.70

    0.35–0.60

    Sibling recurrence risk

    1%–6%

    10%–40%

    Studies are undertaken to identify genes that contribute to type 2 diabetes susceptibility, and more than 250 genes and more than 400 genomic variants are now known to be associated with risk of this disease.

    The table lists the associations between diabetes susceptibility and each of these genes have been widely replicated in multiple populations.

    Genes

    Description

    TCF7L2

    Encodes a transcription factor involved in the secretion of insulin.

    Its variant is associated with a 50% increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

    Allele

    Significant association is observed between type 2 diabetes and a common allele of the gene that encodes peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ), a nuclear receptor, involved in adipocyte differentiation and glucose metabolism.

    This receptor is the target of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a class of drugs used to increase insulin sensitivity in those with type 2 diabetes.

    The disease-associated allele confers only a 25% increase in the risk of developing type 2 diabetes but, it is found in more than 75% of individuals of European descent.

    KCNJ11

    Variation in 
    KCNJ11
    , which encodes a potassium channel necessary for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, confers an additional 20% increase in type 2 diabetes susceptibility.

    Two most important risk factors for type 2 diabetes are positive family history and obesity; the latter increases insulin resistance.

    The disease tends to rise in prevalence when populations adopt a diet and exercise pattern typical of U.S. and European populations.

    Increases are seen, example, among Japanese immigrants to the United States and among some native populations of the South Pacific, Australia, and the Americas.

    Due to dramatic increase in obesity in the United States and other developed countries, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is also rising rapidly, and the average age of onset is decreasing (one study estimates that up to one-third of Americans born in the year 2000 will develop type 2 diabetes).

    A small proportion of type 2 diabetes cases occurs early in life, often before 25 years of age, and typically exhibits autosomal dominant inheritance (unlike most type 2 diabetes cases). This subset is termed 
    maturity-onset diabetes of the young
     (MODY).

    Studies of MODY pedigrees shows that approximately half of cases of the disease are caused by mutations in the glucokinase gene. Glucokinase converts glucose to glucose-6-phosphate in the pancreas.

    In addition to the glucokinase gene, five other genes, are involved in pancreatic development or regulation of insulin levels, are now shown to be causes of MODY. Currently, 13 MODY genes are known.

    Studies, conducted on male and female subjects, shows that regular exercise can substantially lower one’s risk of developing type 2 diabetes, even among individuals with a family history of the disease.

    This is partly because exercise reduces obesity.

    Even in the absence of weight loss, exercise increases insulin sensitivity and improves glucose tolerance.

    What is the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes?

  • How does genetics affect type 1 diabetes?

    How does genetics affect type 1 diabetes?

    The etiology of diabetes mellitus, like other disorders, is complex and not fully understood. Progress is being made in understanding the genetic basis of this disorder, which is a leading cause of blindness, heart disease, and kidney failure.

    Diabetes is a heterogeneous group of disorders, all characterized by elevated blood glucose level. The focus here is on the two major types of diabetes:

    Type 1 (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM])

    Type 2 (non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM])

    Type 1 (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM]):

    Is characterized by T-cell infiltration of the pancreas and destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells, usually (although not always) presents before age 40

    Individuals must receive exogenous insulin to survive

    In addition to T-cell infiltration of the pancreas form autoantibodies against pancreatic cells

    The latter are observed long before clinical symptoms occur.

    These findings, along with a strong association between type 1 diabetes and the presence of several major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles, indicate that this is an autoimmune disease. Over the past few decades, the incidence of type 1 diabetes has increased substantially.

    Siblings of individuals with type 1 diabetes face a substantial elevation in risk.

    6%, as opposed to a risk of approximately 0.3% to 0.5% in the general population.

    The recurrence risk is also elevated when there is a diabetic parent, although this risk varies with the sex of the affected parent.

    The risk for offspring of diabetic mothers is only 1% to 3%, whereas it is 4% to 6% for the offspring of diabetic fathers (because type 1 diabetes affects males and females in approximately equal proportions in the general population, this risk difference is inconsistent with the sex-specific threshold model for multifactorial traits).

    Empirical risks for identical twins of people with type 1 diabetes range from 30% to 70%.

    In contrast, the concordance rates for DZ twins are 5% to 10%.

    The fact that type 1 diabetes is not 100% concordant among identical twins indicates that genetic factors are not solely responsible for the disorder.

    There is good evidence that specific viral infections contribute to the causation of type 1 diabetes in at least some individuals, possibly by activating an autoimmune response.

    The table lists the genes that cause type 1 diabetes.

    Genes

    Description

    Alleles

    In association of specific MHC class II alleles and type 1 diabetes, it is estimated that these alleles account for approximately 40% of the familial clustering of type 1 diabetes.

    95% of Whites with type 1 diabetes have the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) (part of the MHC), DR3, and/or DR4 alleles, whereas only approximately 50% of the general White population has either of these alleles.

    If an affected proband and a sibling are heterozygous for the DR3 and DR4 alleles, the sibling’s risk of developing type 1 diabetes is nearly 20% (i.e., approximately 40 times higher than the risk in the general population).

    Along with the presence of aspartic acid at position 57 of the HLA DQ chain is strongly associated with resistance to type 1 diabetes.

    Those who do not have this amino acid at position 57 (and instead are homozygous for a different amino acid) are 100 times more likely to develop type 1 diabetes.

    The aspartic acid substitution alters the shape of the HLA class II molecule and thus its ability to bind and present peptides to T cells.

    Altered T-cell recognition helps protect individuals with the aspartic acid substitution from an autoimmune episode.

    Insulin gene

    It is located on the short arm of chromosome 11, is another logical candidate for type 1 diabetes susceptibility.

    Polymorphisms within and near this gene are tested for association with type 1 diabetes.

    It is estimated that inherited genetic variation in the insulin region accounts for approximately 10% of the familial clustering of type 1 diabetes.

    Others

    More than 50 additional genes have been shown to be associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.

    Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA4): encodes a protein involved in the regulation of T-cell proliferation.

     
    PTPN22
    : encodes a lymphoid-specific tyrosine phosphatase that negatively regulates T-cell activation.

    Variation in the latter gene has been associated with several other autoimmune diseases, including:

    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

    Rheumatoid arthritis

    Autoimmune thyroid disease

  • How do genes correlate with cancer?

    How do genes correlate with cancer?

    Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States.

    It is well established that many major types of cancer (e.g., breast, colon, prostate, ovarian) cluster strongly in families.

    Clustering is caused by both inherited genes and shared environmental factors.

    Numerous cancer-causing genes are being isolated but environmental and lifestyle factors play an important role in causing cancer.

    For example, tobacco use is estimated to account for one-third of all cancer cases in the United States, making it the most important known cause of cancer.

    Recently developed techniques, including large-scale DNA sequencing, have identified hundreds of genes that are mutated in various cancers. Some of these genes contribute directly to a growth advantage in tumors and are considered primary causes of cancer.

    150 such driver genes have been described.

    A much larger number of genes undergo somatic mutations during tumorigenesis, but these genes do not directly confer a growth advantage to cells; these are termed passenger genes.

    The gene responsible for retinoblastoma, which normally acts as a �brake� on cell division, is an example of a well-known driver gene.

    The APC gene is another example.

    Many types of cancer, such as retinoblastoma or familial adenomatous polyposis, are relatively rare but study of the causative genes has provided many important insights into the nature of carcinogenesis in general. This can lead to more effective treatment and prevention of all cancers.

    Environmental factors cause cancer by creating somatic mutations in specific cell types. Thus, cancer can be caused both by inherited genetic variants and by non-inherited somatic mutations acquired during an individual�s lifetime.

    Different types of cancers caused by inherited genetic variants and non-inherited somatic mutations are presented.

    Breast Cancer

    It is the most common cancer among women, with 82% of breast cancers diagnosed among women aged 50 years and older and has surpassed lung cancer.

    13% of women (1 in 8) will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in their lifetime.

    It aggregates strongly in families; example, 
    if a woman has one affected first-degree relative, her risk of developing breast cancer doubles and it increases further if the age of onset in the affected relative is early and if the cancer is bilateral (tumors in both breasts).

    An autosomal dominant form of breast cancer accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of breast cancer cases in the United States. Genes responsible for this form of breast cancer are identified on chromosomes 17 (
    BRCA1
    ) and 13 (
    BRCA2
    ) and can be tested for inherited cancer-causing mutations.

    Women who inherit a mutation in 
    BRCA1 or BRCA2
     experience a 50% to 80% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.

    In a seminal paper of more than 8,000 unselected cases of breast or ovarian cancer, the average cumulative risk of developing breast cancer with a 
    BRCA1
     mutation was 65%.

    BRCA1
     mutations also increase the risk of ovarian cancer among women (39%), and they confer a modestly increased risk of prostate and colon cancers.

    BRCA2
     mutations also confer an increased risk of ovarian cancer (11%).

    5% to 8% of males who inherit a 
    BRCA2
     mutation will develop breast cancer, representing a 100-fold increase over the risk in the general male population.

    Evaluation of the 
    BRCA1
     and 
    BRCA2
     gene products, which are involved in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, is yielding valuable evidence on the etiology of breast cancer in general.

    BRCA1
     and 
    BRCA2
     mutations are the most known causes of inherited breast cancer but this disease also can be caused by inherited mutations in several other genes.

    For example, 
    ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, NF1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11,
     and 
    TP53
    .

    Germline mutations in a tumor-suppressor gene called PTEN are responsible for Cowden diseases.

    It is characterized by multiple benign tumors and an increased susceptibility to breast cancer.

    Despite the significance of these genes, it should be emphasized that more than 90% of breast cancer cases are not inherited as mendelian diseases.

    Colorectal Cancer

    It is second only to lung cancer in the number of cancer deaths occurring annually in the United States, with 148,000 new cases and 53,000 deaths annually.

    1 in 21 Americans will develop colorectal cancer.

    Like breast cancer, it clusters in families (in fact, familial clustering of this form of cancer was reported in the medical literature as early as 1881).

    The risk of colorectal cancer in people with one affected first-degree relative is two to three times higher than that in the general population.

    This familial aggregation is caused in part by subsets of colorectal cancer cases that are inherited as single-gene traits.

    For example, 
    familial adenomatous polyposis
     occurs in approximately 1 in 8000 Whites.

    The gene responsible for this disorder, 
    APC
    , encodes a tumor suppressor.

    Somatic mutations of 
    APC
     are found in at least 85% of all colon tumors.

    Inherited 
    APC
     mutations cause rare familial adenomatous polyposis, but somatic mutations are involved in majority of all common colorectal cancers.

    Among hereditary forms of colorectal cancer, the most frequent is hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

    It accounts for 3% to 4% of colorectal cancer cases and is caused by mutations in any of six genes.

    Research shows that all these genes are involved in the vital process of DNA repair.

    When this function is compromised, cancer-causing mutations can persist in cells, leading eventually to growth of a tumor.

    Other colorectal cancer cases are likely to be caused by a complex interaction of multiple genes.

    Environmental factors, such as a high-fat, low-fiber diet, are thought to increase the risk of colorectal cancer.

    Prostate Cancer

    It is the second most diagnosed cancer in men (after skin cancer), with 165,000 new cases annually in the United States and a lifetime risk of 11%.

    It is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in men, causing more than 30,000 deaths each year.

    Having an affected first-degree relative increases the risk of developing prostate cancer by a factor of 2 to 3, and the heritability of prostate cancer is estimated to be approximately 40%.

    The relatively late age of onset of most prostate cancer cases (median age 72 years) makes genetic analysis especially difficult.

    Loss of heterozygosity has been observed in several genomic regions in prostate tumor cells, possibly indicating the presence of genetic alterations in these regions.

    Genome-wide association studies have identified several dozen polymorphisms associated with prostate cancer risk.

    Several of these are in chromosome 8q24, which contains polymorphisms associated with several other cancers as well (colon, pancreas, and esophagus).

    Although the 8q24 region contains no protein-coding genes, it contains enhancer elements that affect expression of the MYC oncogene, located approximately 250 kilobytes (kb) from 8q24.

  • Checkoff – NG Tube Insertion – NASOGASTRIC TUBE INSERTION SKILL VALIDATION

    Checkoff – NG Tube Insertion – NASOGASTRIC TUBE INSERTION SKILL VALIDATION

    NASOGASTRIC TUBE INSERTION

    SKILL VALIDATION

     

    Student Name: _____________________________________                                         Date: _____________________

     

    Supplies Needed

    Salem sump tube, anti-reflux valve, lubricating jelly, paper tape, lopez valve, piston syringe, pH paper, admission kit, disposable straw, tongue depressor

    Equipment Needed

    Nursing Manikin, pen light

     

    GET EXAM OR WRITING HELP HERE

    Points Allowed

    1
    st
    Attempt

     

    2
    nd
    Attempt

     

    Preparation

     

    Perform I-CHECK: Introduce yourself; Check armband
    (two patient identifiers
    ); Hand hygiene; Explain procedure; Check order; Keep privacy

    +1

     

     

    Assess

    the patient prior to procedure

    ·        nasal passages

    ·        gag reflex

    ·        mental status

    ·        determine the appropriate tube size (typically 8-12 Fr for feeds/meds; 16-18 Fr for gastric decompression) Checkoff – NG Tube Insertion – NASOGASTRIC TUBE INSERTION SKILL VALIDATION

    +4

     

     

    Insertion

     

    Preparation
    :

    ·        Place the patient in high Fowler’s position & apply drape to patient

    ·        Provide an emesis basin and cup of water with straw

    +2

     

     

    Don clean gloves

    +1

     

     

    Measure the NG tube
    from nose to earlobe to xiphoid process (NEX) and mark the length

    +1

     

     

    Apply water-soluble lubricant to the tube tip and gently insert it into the most patent nostril following the natural curve (if resistance occurs, reattempt with more lubrication or use the other nostril)

    +1

     

     

    As the tube reaches the oropharynx, instruct the patient to swallow water and advance the tube with each swallow, monitoring for signs of distress

    +1

     

     

    Check for position in the back of throat

    ·        Secure the NG tube to the patient’s nose

    +2

     

     

    For Salem sump tubes, attach the one-way valve to the blue air vent and a Lopez valve to the other (for other NG tubes, attach a Lopez valve to the main lumen) Checkoff – NG Tube Insertion – NASOGASTRIC TUBE INSERTION
    SKILL VALIDATION

    +1

     

     

    Post-Procedure

     

    Verify correct placement
    by aspirating gastric contents, checking pH (≤5);

    ·        Verbalize patient would also need to go to x-ray

    +2

     

     

    If ordered, connect the NG tube to low intermittent suction

    +1

     

     

    Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene

    +1

     

     

    Document the procedure, including the date, time, size of the NG tube, insertion depth, placement verification methods, and patient’s tolerance of procedure
    No point but required

     

     

     

    Total Points (successful/Unsuccessful) 15 out of 18 needed to be successful

     

     

     

    Comments

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Evaluator Initials or Signature: _____________________________________                Date: _____________________

    1
    ST
    Attempt Pass ____________/Needs Remediation___________________

     

    Evaluator Initials or Signature: _____________________________________                Date: _____________________

    2
    nd
    Attempt Pass ____________/Lab Fail_____________________________

    Checkoff – NG Tube Insertion – NASOGASTRIC TUBE INSERTION SKILL VALIDATION