Discharge plan for diverse population
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Discharge plan for diverse population
Tw week 5 Identify a healthcare practice process which could be improved by a technology integration or a technology that could be/has been incorporated into a graduate scholarship project. Gap Analysis Power Point: Gap analysis is a way to lay out an issue and determine where you are currently, whe…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Tw week 5
Identify a healthcare practice process which could be improved by a technology integration or a technology that could be/has been incorporated into a graduate scholarship project.
Gap Analysis Power Point:
Gap analysis is a way to lay out an issue and determine where you are currently, where you want to go, and how to get there. Many gap analyses ask the current state, what is the desired state, what gap is found, and how is that gap going to be closed. Then it is broken down to who, what, when, where, and why.
Create a power point presentation of a gap analysis to include the following elements:
the objective of your proposed technology integration
the current practice state
the desired future state
an overview of the identified gap
your proposed remedy.
Finish with a PowerPoint slide that displays the entire spectrum of the gap analysis. Use one of the template resources provided or any you may locate on your own to create a visually dynamic slide.
7-10 slides total. Not counting your title or reference slides.
Include at least 3 recent peer-reviewed journal articles to support your Gap analysis.
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 612M6A.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
Please answer the questions below. 1. Regarding your presentation assignment, what did you learn about the research project? 2. Would you have approached the assignment differently? Why or why not? **Submission Instructions:** – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Please answer the questions below.
1. Regarding your presentation assignment, what did you learn about the research project?
2. Would you have approached the assignment differently? Why or why not?
**Submission Instructions:**
– Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
– ## journal.docx **## journal.docx** Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes. …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– ## journal.docx
**## journal.docx**
Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.
This week, you will write your last and final Journal Entry, reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement. Further reflect on your pediatric patients you have seen and the conditions that you have diagnosed and treated. Review your Journal Entry that you submitted in Week 1.
**Journal Entry (2–3 pages):**
· Explain what most excited and/or concerned you throughout your pediatric clinical experience.
· Discuss how your personal definition of family and family roles has changed or stayed the same.
· How has your understanding of family and family roles influenced your assessment of children and their families?
· Explain how your understanding of culture (both the culture of the provider and that of the child and his or her family) has changed and how it may have influenced the assessments you conducted during your practicum.
· Assess how you did with accomplishing the goals and objectives you developed in Week 1 for the practicum experience.
· Based on your practicum experience, refine your existing goals and/or develop new goals for your continued education and professional practice. Be sure to consider the NAPNAP Position Statement on Age Parameters for Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Practice.
· Use title page and references according to APA.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6937080)
By Day 7
**Complete** your Journal Entry #3 Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK11Journal3+last name+first initial.**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | **50 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.<br> <br>**49 to >39.0 ptsGood** Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**39 to >30.0 ptsFair** Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**30 to >0 ptsPoor** Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | **30 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.<br> <br>**29 to >19.0 ptsGood** Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**19 to >9.0 ptsFair** Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsPoor** Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.<br> <br>**14 to >10.0 ptsGood** Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsFair** Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsPoor** Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No APA errors<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains 1-2 APA errors<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains 3-5 APA errors<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains > 5 APA errors | 5 pts |
**## journal.docx**
Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.
This week, you will write your last and final Journal Entry, reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement. Further reflect on your pediatric patients you have seen and the conditions that you have diagnosed and treated. Review your Journal Entry that you submitted in Week 1.
**Journal Entry (2–3 pages):**
· Explain what most excited and/or concerned you throughout your pediatric clinical experience.
· Discuss how your personal definition of family and family roles has changed or stayed the same.
· How has your understanding of family and family roles influenced your assessment of children and their families?
· Explain how your understanding of culture (both the culture of the provider and that of the child and his or her family) has changed and how it may have influenced the assessments you conducted during your practicum.
· Assess how you did with accomplishing the goals and objectives you developed in Week 1 for the practicum experience.
· Based on your practicum experience, refine your existing goals and/or develop new goals for your continued education and professional practice. Be sure to consider the NAPNAP Position Statement on Age Parameters for Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Practice.
· Use title page and references according to APA.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/172095/modules/items/6937080)
By Day 7
**Complete** your Journal Entry #3 Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
**Turnitin Drafts** from the
**Start Here** area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
**WK11Journal3+last name+first initial.**
2. Then, click on
**Start Assignment** near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
**Upload File** and select
**Submit Assignment** for review.
Rubric
**PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | **50 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.<br> <br>**49 to >39.0 ptsGood** Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**39 to >30.0 ptsFair** Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.<br> <br>**30 to >0 ptsPoor** Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | **30 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.<br> <br>**29 to >19.0 ptsGood** Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**19 to >9.0 ptsFair** Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsPoor** Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.<br> <br>**14 to >10.0 ptsGood** Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsFair** Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsPoor** Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No APA errors<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains 1-2 APA errors<br> <br>**3 to >1.0 ptsFair** Contains 3-5 APA errors<br> <br>**1 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains > 5 APA errors | 5 pts |
– ## NUR611assign6rubric.docx **## NUR611assign6rubric.docx** Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice. 1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– ## NUR611assign6rubric.docx
**## NUR611assign6rubric.docx**
Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice.
1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide information about the research problem.
2. Based on your research question, do you believe it will best be answered by a qualitative or quantitative study ? Support your decision as to why you believe the answers would best be provided by the type of study you have chosen.
3. Select a middle-range theory and identify the application of nursing theories to your research problem.
Conduct a literature review.
4. Based on your literature review answer the following questions:
· If qualitative,
· Identify the purpose of the study.
· Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.
· Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
· Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
· Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.
· Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
· Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
· Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.
· Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.
· Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.
· Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.
· If quantitative,
· Identify the purpose and design of the study.
· Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.
· Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
· Explain the sampling method and the recruitment strategy was used.
· Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
· Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).
· Define the terms of validity and reliability, and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.
· Outline how the data were analyzed.
· Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
· Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study.
· Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.
**Submission Instructions:**
· The presentation is original work and logically organized.
· Follow current APA format including citation of references.
· The PowerPoint presentation should include 10-15 slides which are clear and easy to read.
· Speaker notes expand upon and clarify content on the slides.
· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
· Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
**## NUR611assign6rubric.docx**
Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice.
1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide information about the research problem.
2. Based on your research question, do you believe it will best be answered by a qualitative or quantitative study ? Support your decision as to why you believe the answers would best be provided by the type of study you have chosen.
3. Select a middle-range theory and identify the application of nursing theories to your research problem.
Conduct a literature review.
4. Based on your literature review answer the following questions:
· If qualitative,
· Identify the purpose of the study.
· Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.
· Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
· Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
· Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.
· Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
· Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
· Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.
· Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.
· Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.
· Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.
· If quantitative,
· Identify the purpose and design of the study.
· Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.
· Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
· Explain the sampling method and the recruitment strategy was used.
· Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
· Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).
· Define the terms of validity and reliability, and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.
· Outline how the data were analyzed.
· Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
· Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study.
· Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.
**Submission Instructions:**
· The presentation is original work and logically organized.
· Follow current APA format including citation of references.
· The PowerPoint presentation should include 10-15 slides which are clear and easy to read.
· Speaker notes expand upon and clarify content on the slides.
· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
· Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
You will delve into these concepts and develop an understanding of person-centered care measures and outcomes and identify how this approach enhances inclusivity in collaborating with patients.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →You will delve into these concepts and develop an understanding of person-centered care measures and outcomes and identify how this approach enhances inclusivity in collaborating with patients.
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering WH D6 R.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
For this assignment, you will examine the role of the nurse in caring for clients with cognitive and/or mental health issues. You will identify your target audience (such as staff nurses, pre-licensure nursing students, etc.) and create an educational PowerPoint presentation (instructions below). Th…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →For this assignment, you will examine the role of the nurse in caring for clients with cognitive and/or mental health issues. You will identify your target audience (such as staff nurses, pre-licensure nursing students, etc.) and create an educational PowerPoint presentation (instructions below). This final assignment will reflect ability and achievement in the following areas:
– Intentional Learning, Reflection, and Clinical Judgment
– Decision Making and Evidence Based Practice
– Organization and Presentation
– Writing and APA Formatting
## Objectives
– Demonstrate collaborative standardization of safe practices through health promotion.
– Integrate course concepts within management of a cognitive alteration.
## Instructions
You are the nurse educator preparing an orientation on cognitive or mental health illness. There is a need to address the many clients with cognitive issues that seek healthcare services and how to better understand their needs. Choose a cognitive/mental health illness that you feel less knowledgeable about and address the following prompts by including two to three examples of each bullet point:
– Choose a cognitive or mental health illness.
– What is it? How is it diagnosed? How is it treated?
– How does it differ from a physical or "visible" illness?
– Address the following for your chosen diagnosis.
– Historical
– Socioeconomic impact
– Political issues or impact
– Educational needs
– Topographical findings
– Geographical impact
– Cultural impact
– Include interdisciplinary interventions for this disease.
– Discuss the impact of a patient's value systems on management of this disease.
– Address the following health-care practices:
– Acute versus preventive care
– Barriers to health care
– Impact of pain and the sick role
– Cultural practices
– Identify challenges related to:
– Learning styles
– Autonomy
– Educational preparation
– Disease management
Your presentation should be 15-20 slides (not including title, objectives, and references slides) with detailed presenter notes with in-text citations for each slide. Include at least four (4) scholarly sources. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. **Audio recording is required**. Be sure to completely answer all the prompts/questions. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with in-text citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA 7th Edition writing style for the presentation. Include at least one slide for your references at the end.
**Assignment Expectations**
– Length: 15-20 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner. Include at least four (4) scholarly sources. Below is a recommended breakdown for the assignment.
– Title: 1 slide
– Objectives/Introduction: 1 slide
– What is the cognitive/mental health disease?: at least 2 slides
– Address historical, socioeconomic, political issues, educational needs, topographical findings, geographical impact, and cultural impact: at least 4 slides
– Interdisciplinary interventions: at least 3 slides
– Address health care practices: at least 4 slides
– Identify any challenges such as learning styles, autonomy, educational preparation, or disease management: at least 3 slides
– Conclusion: 1 slide
– References: 1 slide
– Audio recording narration
**How to create an APA 7th edition formatted PowerPoint presentation:**
– In-text citations are required just as with any professional writing.
– Utilize detailed presenter’s notes.
– To open presenter’s notes, click on 'notes' in the bottom right-hand corner of PowerPoint.
– Detailed presenter’s notes should be a minimum of 75 words per body slide.
– These notes will help guide you during the audio recording.
Tips for formatting your presentation, adding slides, and applying APA 7th edition format can be found [here.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRVWZ875vYs)
**Save and Submit Your Assignment**.
When you have completed the assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place. Also, save the file to a Word Document (see video for directions). When you follow the directions, it will create a file that has your slides and your presenter notes. Then submit a copy of the PowerPoint and the Word document through Canvas. Please upload .pptx files and .docx only. Make sure the presenter's notes are visible within the PowerPoint uploads to Canvas.
A theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationship among variables. Discuss the variables you will use in your change project and the specific steps that are necessary to implement your change project in your organization. Due in 7 hours. two paragraphs
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →A theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationship among variables. Discuss the variables you will use in your change project and the specific steps that are necessary to implement your change project in your organization. Due in 7 hours. two paragraphs