Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Nursing Dnp Essentials

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ### **Summative Assessment** The DNP-prepared nurse in the clinical environment is responsible for leading, either formally or informally, in such a way as to be compliant with the patient safety resources and regulations. Pick one specific measure, initiative, or regulation that impacts systems and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ### **Summative Assessment**
    The DNP-prepared nurse in the clinical environment is responsible for leading, either formally or informally, in such a way as to be compliant with the patient safety resources and regulations. Pick one specific measure, initiative, or regulation that impacts systems and nursing practice. Describe the resource, initiative, or regulation in detail. How has it impacted nursing practice? Systems practice? As the DNP-prepared nurse, what is your specific role in this scenario? (Clinician, formal leader, clinical nurse specialist, clinical educator, etc) How could you mobilize the healthcare team to address compliance with the identified resource, initiative, or regulation Write  3 pages discussing the following key points:
    – Identify and describe one patient safety resource, initiative, or regulation.
    – How has the patient safety resource, initiative, or regulation impacted nursing practice? Systems practice?
    – As the DNP-prepared nurse, what is your specific role in this scenario? (Clinician, formal leader, clinical nurse specialist, clinical educator, etc)
    – How could you mobilize the healthcare team to address compliance with the identified resource, initiative, or regulation
    – Develop a presentation to use with members of the interprofessional team that identifies the current level of success as determined by associated metrics. The presentation should include speaker notes and demonstrate PowerPoint best practices, including the application of APA formatting. The presentation needs to be a minimum of 10 slides without the title and reference pages. Audio must be included within the presentation. The presentation needs to address the following:
    – Describe the initiative
    – Why is this important?
    – How can it impact patient outcomes?
    – Identify evaluation metrics. What will demonstrate successful implementation of the practice?
    – What does it mean in terms of finances and resources for the unit and healthcare system?
    – What challenges have been identified? How have they been addressed?
    – Identify improvement initiatives including a timeline and potential impact on cost and resources.
    – How will you disseminate information to all impacted stakeholders?
    ### Document Type/Template
    – Word Document and Power Point
    \
    C6-SummativeAssessmentRubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/c6-summativeassessmentrubric-pdf "C6-SummativeAssessmentRubric.pdf")

  • [Solved] Academic Success and Professional Development Plan. Final version

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To Prepare:** – Review the scope and standards of practice or competencies related to your chosen specialty in the resources for this module. – Review the MSN or PMC specializations offered at Walden by viewing the module resource, Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). – E…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To Prepare:**
    – Review the scope and standards of practice or competencies related to your chosen specialty in the resources for this module.
    – Review the MSN or PMC specializations offered at Walden by viewing the module resource, Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN).
    – Examine professional organizations related to the specialization you have chosen and identify at least one to focus on for this Assignment.
    – Reflect on the thoughts you shared in the Discussion forum regarding your choice of a specialty, any challenges you have encountered in making this choice, and any feedback you have received from colleagues in the Discussion.
    **The Assignment:**
    Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan.
    – With the resources specific to the MSN or PMC specialization and the Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) or PMC, shared in this module, write a paragraph or make a Nursing Specialty Comparison table, comparing at least two nursing specialties that include your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization.
    – Write a 2- to 3-paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN or PMC specialization. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this Module’s Discussion forum.
    – Identify the professional organization related to your chosen specialization for this Assignment, and explain how you can become an active member of this organization.
    **Module 6 | Part 4: Finalizing the Plan**
    I have considered various options for my nursing specialty, including a close look at my selected (or currently preferred) specialty and second-preferred specialty.  I have also developed a justification of my selected (or preferred) specialty. Lastly, I have examined one professional organization related to my selected or preferred specialty and considered how I can become a member of this organization.
    The results of my efforts are below.
    _Directions: Write a 2-3 paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization or PMC. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this week's Discussion Forum._
    _Complete Step 2 by writing a paragraph identifying and justifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Be sure to incorporate any feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum._
    _Complete Step 3 by examining and identifying one professional organization related to your selected or preferred specialty. Explain how you can become a member of this organization._
    **Step 1: Comparison of Nursing Specialties** **or Post Master’s Certificate**
    _Use the space below to write 2-3 paragraphs comparing the nursing specialty you have selected – or the one you prefer if your choice is still under consideration – to your second preference. Identify each specialty and describe the focus and the role that graduates are prepared for. Identify any other differentiators you feel are significant, especially those that helped or may help you reach a decision._
    **Step 2: Justification of Nursing Specialty**
    _Use the space below to write a paragraph identifying and justifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization or PMC. Be sure to incorporate any feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum._

  • [Solved] Power point

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## 611assignment4done.edited.docx – ## PowerPointPresentation.docx – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.13.58PM.png – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.14.39PM.png – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.01PM.png – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.10PM.png – 611week3asignment.docx **## 611assignment4done.edited.docx** 4 **Nursing 611 …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## 611assignment4done.edited.docx

    – ## PowerPointPresentation.docx

    – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.13.58PM.png
    – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.14.39PM.png
    – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.01PM.png
    – Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.10PM.png
    – 611week3asignment.docx

    **## 611assignment4done.edited.docx**

    4

    **Nursing 611 Assignment 4**

    **PICOT Question**

    In community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above (P), how do evidence-based nursing interventions, including health education, centralized reminders, and onsite vaccination (I), compared to standard care (C), affect influenza vaccination uptake rates (O) over six months (T)?

    **Purpose Rationale for the Scholarly Project**

    This study-oriented endeavor addresses a pressing issue in the implementation of influenza vaccination among elderly community dwellers. Since its inception, it has been the most effective means of preventing flu-like complications. However, the rates are still grossly inadequate among elderly community-dwelling individuals (Antonelli Incalzi et al., 2024). Meanwhile, from an epidemiological standpoint, influenza and its complications account for hospitalizations in approximately 45% of cases and deaths in about 58.7% of cases, predominantly affecting people older than 65 years (Du et al., 2024). The influenza vaccination disparity for elderly community residents is recognized as a major issue in public health. It has major hospitalizing and life-threatening potential, which makes its prevention an important public health concern.

    Evidence-based nursing interventions offer great benefits, both prevention-wise and economically, based on efficiency. An increase in vaccination levels would directly impact reducing morbidity and mortality figures, preventing further hospitalizations and loss of function. On a fiscal basis, the project seeks to avert expensive emergency room visits and long-term care attendance. Gains in efficiency are accrued when nursing work is undertaken systematically to maximize resources to attain optimal health outcomes.

    **Background for the Problem and Population of Interest**

                Influenza is the foremost viral respiratory infection and health threat for the older population, who experience much higher rates of mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients. Adult vaccination has existed for decades; however, acceptance has been an issue for community-dwelling elderly individuals (Jiang et al., 2022). Studies show that a lack of information about infection severity and vaccine safety is the main barrier preventing people from getting vaccinated.

                Du et al. (2024) systematically reviewed 22 RCTs involving 385,182 older adults. They concluded that combined interventions – healthcare education, centralized reminders, and onsite vaccination – were most effective in increasing vaccine uptake. Nevertheless, gaps remain in standardized nursing protocols and community-investigated, evidence-based, and tailored interventions.

    **Significance of the Issue to Nursing and Healthcare**

                The problem ties into the healthcare community's interest in preventive care, population health management, and reducing disparities among vulnerable populations. The significance encompasses public health concerns such as community immunity and the sustainability of the healthcare system. Nurses are well-placed to combat vaccine hesitancy using individual persuasion and interventions grounded in altering evidence to foster vaccine confidence in older adults (Antonelli Incalzi et al., 2024). This translation can be seen as congruous with national health priorities in preventive care delivery and chronic disease management among the aging populations.

    **Benefits of the Project to Nursing Practice**

                The project will establish standardized, evidence-based protocols to be implemented by nurses working in all communities throughout the country. Other expected outcomes are older adults receiving more vaccines, patients knowing more about influenza and its risks as well as the benefits of vaccines, and nurses becoming more confident in delivering interventions that promote vaccination.

    These outcomes directly correlate to the evidence-based guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and their corresponding professional nursing organizations, which have all emphasized the critical role of nurses in promoting vaccination. This systematic approach to mixing various evidence-based interventions may be extended to other populations and settings to provide a replicable model for addressing vaccine hesitancy and determining best practices for chronic disease prevention interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults.

    **References**

    Antonelli Incalzi, R., Consoli, A., Lopalco, P., Maggi, S., Sesti, G., Veronese, N., & Volpe, M. (2024). Influenza vaccination for elderly, vulnerable, and high-risk subjects: a narrative review and expert opinion.
    _Internal and Emergency Medicine_,
    _19_(3), 619-640.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-023-03456-9](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-023-03456-9)

    Du, P., Jin, S., Lu, S., Wang, L., Ma, X., Wang, J., & Feng, X. (2024). Strategies to increase the coverage of influenza and pneumonia vaccination in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    _Age and ageing_,
    _53_(3), afae035.
    [https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-abstract/53/3/afae035/7626920](https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-abstract/53/3/afae035/7626920)

    Jiang, M., Yao, X., Li, P., Fang, Y., Feng, L., Hayat, K., & Atif, N. (2022). Impact of video-led educational intervention on uptake of influenza vaccine among the elderly in western China: a community-based randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Public Health_,
    _22_(1), 1128.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-022-13536-8](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-022-13536-8)

    **## PowerPointPresentation.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-20932569)**_PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Practice_**

    Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice.

    1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide information about the research problem.

    2. Based on your research question, do you believe it will best be answered by a qualitative or quantitative study ? Support your decision as to why you believe the answers would best be provided by the type of study you have chosen.

    3. Select a middle-range theory and identify the application of nursing theories to your research problem.
    Conduct a literature review.

    4. Based on your literature review answer the following questions:

    · If qualitative,

    · Identify the purpose of the study.

    · Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.

    · Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.

    · Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    · Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    · If quantitative,

    · Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    · Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Explain the sampling method and the recruitment strategy was used.

    · Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).

    · Define the terms of validity and reliability, and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.

    · Outline how the data were analyzed.

    · Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized.

    · Follow current APA format including citation of references.

    · The PowerPoint presentation should include 10-15 slides which are clear and easy to read.

    · Speaker notes expand upon and clarify content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-20932569)

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Presentation Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Presentation Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.13.58PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-13-58pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.14.39PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-14-39pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.01PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-15-01pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.10PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-15-10pm-png)

    **611week3asignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611week3asignment-docx-10370673)

    **611week3asignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611week3asignment-docx-10370673)

    **## 611assignment4done.edited.docx**

    4

    **Nursing 611 Assignment 4**

    **PICOT Question**

    In community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above (P), how do evidence-based nursing interventions, including health education, centralized reminders, and onsite vaccination (I), compared to standard care (C), affect influenza vaccination uptake rates (O) over six months (T)?

    **Purpose Rationale for the Scholarly Project**

    This study-oriented endeavor addresses a pressing issue in the implementation of influenza vaccination among elderly community dwellers. Since its inception, it has been the most effective means of preventing flu-like complications. However, the rates are still grossly inadequate among elderly community-dwelling individuals (Antonelli Incalzi et al., 2024). Meanwhile, from an epidemiological standpoint, influenza and its complications account for hospitalizations in approximately 45% of cases and deaths in about 58.7% of cases, predominantly affecting people older than 65 years (Du et al., 2024). The influenza vaccination disparity for elderly community residents is recognized as a major issue in public health. It has major hospitalizing and life-threatening potential, which makes its prevention an important public health concern.

    Evidence-based nursing interventions offer great benefits, both prevention-wise and economically, based on efficiency. An increase in vaccination levels would directly impact reducing morbidity and mortality figures, preventing further hospitalizations and loss of function. On a fiscal basis, the project seeks to avert expensive emergency room visits and long-term care attendance. Gains in efficiency are accrued when nursing work is undertaken systematically to maximize resources to attain optimal health outcomes.

    **Background for the Problem and Population of Interest**

                Influenza is the foremost viral respiratory infection and health threat for the older population, who experience much higher rates of mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients. Adult vaccination has existed for decades; however, acceptance has been an issue for community-dwelling elderly individuals (Jiang et al., 2022). Studies show that a lack of information about infection severity and vaccine safety is the main barrier preventing people from getting vaccinated.

                Du et al. (2024) systematically reviewed 22 RCTs involving 385,182 older adults. They concluded that combined interventions – healthcare education, centralized reminders, and onsite vaccination – were most effective in increasing vaccine uptake. Nevertheless, gaps remain in standardized nursing protocols and community-investigated, evidence-based, and tailored interventions.

    **Significance of the Issue to Nursing and Healthcare**

                The problem ties into the healthcare community's interest in preventive care, population health management, and reducing disparities among vulnerable populations. The significance encompasses public health concerns such as community immunity and the sustainability of the healthcare system. Nurses are well-placed to combat vaccine hesitancy using individual persuasion and interventions grounded in altering evidence to foster vaccine confidence in older adults (Antonelli Incalzi et al., 2024). This translation can be seen as congruous with national health priorities in preventive care delivery and chronic disease management among the aging populations.

    **Benefits of the Project to Nursing Practice**

                The project will establish standardized, evidence-based protocols to be implemented by nurses working in all communities throughout the country. Other expected outcomes are older adults receiving more vaccines, patients knowing more about influenza and its risks as well as the benefits of vaccines, and nurses becoming more confident in delivering interventions that promote vaccination.

    These outcomes directly correlate to the evidence-based guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and their corresponding professional nursing organizations, which have all emphasized the critical role of nurses in promoting vaccination. This systematic approach to mixing various evidence-based interventions may be extended to other populations and settings to provide a replicable model for addressing vaccine hesitancy and determining best practices for chronic disease prevention interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults.

    **References**

    Antonelli Incalzi, R., Consoli, A., Lopalco, P., Maggi, S., Sesti, G., Veronese, N., & Volpe, M. (2024). Influenza vaccination for elderly, vulnerable, and high-risk subjects: a narrative review and expert opinion.
    _Internal and Emergency Medicine_,
    _19_(3), 619-640.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-023-03456-9](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-023-03456-9)

    Du, P., Jin, S., Lu, S., Wang, L., Ma, X., Wang, J., & Feng, X. (2024). Strategies to increase the coverage of influenza and pneumonia vaccination in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    _Age and ageing_,
    _53_(3), afae035.
    [https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-abstract/53/3/afae035/7626920](https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-abstract/53/3/afae035/7626920)

    Jiang, M., Yao, X., Li, P., Fang, Y., Feng, L., Hayat, K., & Atif, N. (2022). Impact of video-led educational intervention on uptake of influenza vaccine among the elderly in western China: a community-based randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Public Health_,
    _22_(1), 1128.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-022-13536-8](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-022-13536-8)

    **## PowerPointPresentation.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-20932569)**_PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Practice_**

    Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice.

    1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide information about the research problem.

    2. Based on your research question, do you believe it will best be answered by a qualitative or quantitative study ? Support your decision as to why you believe the answers would best be provided by the type of study you have chosen.

    3. Select a middle-range theory and identify the application of nursing theories to your research problem.
    Conduct a literature review.

    4. Based on your literature review answer the following questions:

    · If qualitative,

    · Identify the purpose of the study.

    · Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.

    · Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.

    · Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    · Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    · If quantitative,

    · Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    · Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Explain the sampling method and the recruitment strategy was used.

    · Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).

    · Define the terms of validity and reliability, and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.

    · Outline how the data were analyzed.

    · Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized.

    · Follow current APA format including citation of references.

    · The PowerPoint presentation should include 10-15 slides which are clear and easy to read.

    · Speaker notes expand upon and clarify content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-20932569)

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Presentation Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Presentation Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.13.58PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-13-58pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.14.39PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-14-39pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.01PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-15-01pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.10PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-15-10pm-png)

    **611week3asignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611week3asignment-docx-10370673)

    **## 611assignment4done.edited.docx**

    4

    **Nursing 611 Assignment 4**

    **PICOT Question**

    In community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above (P), how do evidence-based nursing interventions, including health education, centralized reminders, and onsite vaccination (I), compared to standard care (C), affect influenza vaccination uptake rates (O) over six months (T)?

    **Purpose Rationale for the Scholarly Project**

    This study-oriented endeavor addresses a pressing issue in the implementation of influenza vaccination among elderly community dwellers. Since its inception, it has been the most effective means of preventing flu-like complications. However, the rates are still grossly inadequate among elderly community-dwelling individuals (Antonelli Incalzi et al., 2024). Meanwhile, from an epidemiological standpoint, influenza and its complications account for hospitalizations in approximately 45% of cases and deaths in about 58.7% of cases, predominantly affecting people older than 65 years (Du et al., 2024). The influenza vaccination disparity for elderly community residents is recognized as a major issue in public health. It has major hospitalizing and life-threatening potential, which makes its prevention an important public health concern.

    Evidence-based nursing interventions offer great benefits, both prevention-wise and economically, based on efficiency. An increase in vaccination levels would directly impact reducing morbidity and mortality figures, preventing further hospitalizations and loss of function. On a fiscal basis, the project seeks to avert expensive emergency room visits and long-term care attendance. Gains in efficiency are accrued when nursing work is undertaken systematically to maximize resources to attain optimal health outcomes.

    **Background for the Problem and Population of Interest**

                Influenza is the foremost viral respiratory infection and health threat for the older population, who experience much higher rates of mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients. Adult vaccination has existed for decades; however, acceptance has been an issue for community-dwelling elderly individuals (Jiang et al., 2022). Studies show that a lack of information about infection severity and vaccine safety is the main barrier preventing people from getting vaccinated.

                Du et al. (2024) systematically reviewed 22 RCTs involving 385,182 older adults. They concluded that combined interventions – healthcare education, centralized reminders, and onsite vaccination – were most effective in increasing vaccine uptake. Nevertheless, gaps remain in standardized nursing protocols and community-investigated, evidence-based, and tailored interventions.

    **Significance of the Issue to Nursing and Healthcare**

                The problem ties into the healthcare community's interest in preventive care, population health management, and reducing disparities among vulnerable populations. The significance encompasses public health concerns such as community immunity and the sustainability of the healthcare system. Nurses are well-placed to combat vaccine hesitancy using individual persuasion and interventions grounded in altering evidence to foster vaccine confidence in older adults (Antonelli Incalzi et al., 2024). This translation can be seen as congruous with national health priorities in preventive care delivery and chronic disease management among the aging populations.

    **Benefits of the Project to Nursing Practice**

                The project will establish standardized, evidence-based protocols to be implemented by nurses working in all communities throughout the country. Other expected outcomes are older adults receiving more vaccines, patients knowing more about influenza and its risks as well as the benefits of vaccines, and nurses becoming more confident in delivering interventions that promote vaccination.

    These outcomes directly correlate to the evidence-based guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and their corresponding professional nursing organizations, which have all emphasized the critical role of nurses in promoting vaccination. This systematic approach to mixing various evidence-based interventions may be extended to other populations and settings to provide a replicable model for addressing vaccine hesitancy and determining best practices for chronic disease prevention interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults.

    **References**

    Antonelli Incalzi, R., Consoli, A., Lopalco, P., Maggi, S., Sesti, G., Veronese, N., & Volpe, M. (2024). Influenza vaccination for elderly, vulnerable, and high-risk subjects: a narrative review and expert opinion.
    _Internal and Emergency Medicine_,
    _19_(3), 619-640.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-023-03456-9](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-023-03456-9)

    Du, P., Jin, S., Lu, S., Wang, L., Ma, X., Wang, J., & Feng, X. (2024). Strategies to increase the coverage of influenza and pneumonia vaccination in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    _Age and ageing_,
    _53_(3), afae035.
    [https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-abstract/53/3/afae035/7626920](https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-abstract/53/3/afae035/7626920)

    Jiang, M., Yao, X., Li, P., Fang, Y., Feng, L., Hayat, K., & Atif, N. (2022). Impact of video-led educational intervention on uptake of influenza vaccine among the elderly in western China: a community-based randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Public Health_,
    _22_(1), 1128.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-022-13536-8](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-022-13536-8)

    **## PowerPointPresentation.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-20932569)**_PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Practice_**

    Develop a PowerPoint Presentation in regards to the issue of Advanced Practice.

    1. Identify a current research problem related to advanced nursing practice that is of interest to you. Include WHY this is a problem. (Limit response to no more than 3 sentences). Develop a research question to provide information about the research problem.

    2. Based on your research question, do you believe it will best be answered by a qualitative or quantitative study ? Support your decision as to why you believe the answers would best be provided by the type of study you have chosen.

    3. Select a middle-range theory and identify the application of nursing theories to your research problem.
    Conduct a literature review.

    4. Based on your literature review answer the following questions:

    · If qualitative,

    · Identify the purpose of the study.

    · Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.

    · Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.

    · Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    · Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    · If quantitative,

    · Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    · Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Explain the sampling method and the recruitment strategy was used.

    · Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).

    · Define the terms of validity and reliability, and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.

    · Outline how the data were analyzed.

    · Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The presentation is original work and logically organized.

    · Follow current APA format including citation of references.

    · The PowerPoint presentation should include 10-15 slides which are clear and easy to read.

    · Speaker notes expand upon and clarify content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-20932569)

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Presentation Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Presentation Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts** | /4 pts |

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.13.58PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-13-58pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.14.39PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-14-39pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.01PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-15-01pm-png)

    **Screenshot2025-08-06at9.15.10PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-08-06at9-15-10pm-png)

    **611week3asignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/611week3asignment-docx-10370673)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6
    – 7

  • [Solved] discussion board reply week 9 reply 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering discussion board reply week 9 reply 2.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Resocourse

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Give a brief summary evaluation of your community’s health, the major strengths of your community, and the hopes for your community in the future. Also, discuss what has resonated with you in this course.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Give a brief summary evaluation of your community’s health, the major strengths of your community, and the hopes for your community in the future.  Also, discuss what has resonated with you in this course.

  • [Solved] nus 611 discussion 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Presentation Reflection**_ Please answer the questions below. 1. Regarding your presentation assignment, what did you learn about the research project? 2. Would you have approached the assignment differently? Why or why not? **Submission Instructions:** – Your initial post should be at least 500 …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Presentation Reflection**_
    Please answer the questions below.
    1. Regarding your presentation assignment, what did you learn about the research project?
    2. Would you have approached the assignment differently? Why or why not?
    **Submission Instructions:**
    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

  • [Solved] Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Health.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SOC 151

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SOC 151.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NU553

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU553.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx **## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx** Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. General Instructions Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. No…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx

    **## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx**

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General Instructions

    Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Note: you may use the information you discussed in this week’s Collaboration Café. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:

    Review Wilensky, S. E., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2023). Essentials of health policy and law (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 14: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Health Policy Analysis

    Download the Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint template Download Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint templateOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReader. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

    Complete the required Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint.

    Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing.

    Use PowerPoint's Notes Page view feature to include speaker notes. Speaker notes should be included for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences.

    Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable.

    Submit the presentation as a .ppt or .pptx file to the Week 6 Dropbox. PDF files are not accepted, as speaker notes are not visible.

    Abide by Chamberlain University's academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

    Title Slide (1 slide)

    Include your name and session.

    Introduction (1 slide)

    Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    Problem Statement (1 slide)

    Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    Write the problem statement in the form of a question. You may reuse the problem you identified for this week’s collaboration café.

    Background (1-3 slides)

    Provide factual information to define the problem.

    Include general information about the topic.

    Describe why the topic is important.

    Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Landscape (1-3 slides)

    Identify relevant stakeholders.

    Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Options (1-3 slides)

    Identify at least three evidence-based options to address the problem.

    Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    Recommendation (1-3 slides)

    Identify the best option to address the problem.

    Explain why your recommendation is the best solution.

    Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Conclusion (1 slide)

    Provide a summary of the presentation.

    References

    Provide complete reference in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required.

    Presentation Format

    The presentation should total 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    Speaker notes are provided for each slide (except the title and reference slides).

    Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Statement

    2 Required Criteria

    1. Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    2. Write the problem statement in the form of a question.

    25 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    13 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Background

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Provide factual information to define the problem.

    2. Include general information about the topic.

    3. Describe why the topic is important.

    4. Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Landscape

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Identify relevant stakeholders.

    2. Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    3. Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    4. Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Options

    7 Required Criteria

    1-3. Identify at least three options to address the problem.

    4. Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    5-7. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    5-6 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3-4 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recommendation

    4 Required Criteria

    1. Identify the best option to address the problem.

    2. Explain why your recommendation is the best choice.

    3. Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    4. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    3 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Summarize key points of the presentation

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Notes

    8 Required Criteria

    Include speaker notes for all content areas except title and reference slides:

    1. Introduction

    2. Problem Statement

    3. Background

    4. Landscape

    5. Options

    6. Recommendations

    7. Conclusion

    8. Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    15 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    14 pts

    Very Good

    7 requirements met.

    12 pts

    Satisfactory

    5-6 requirements met.

    7.5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-4 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

    Citation and Reference Formation

    Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    9 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation Format

    3 Required Criteria

    1. There are a total of 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    2. Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    3. Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Requirements

    Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    4 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    3 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    2 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Template Used

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Correct template used.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    22.5 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used

    0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Penalty Deductions

    Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Assignment submitted on time. No points deducted.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    -10% points/day up to 3 days late

    0 pts

    Total Points: 225

    **## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx**

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General Instructions

    Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Note: you may use the information you discussed in this week’s Collaboration Café. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:

    Review Wilensky, S. E., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2023). Essentials of health policy and law (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 14: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Health Policy Analysis

    Download the Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint template Download Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint templateOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReader. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

    Complete the required Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint.

    Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing.

    Use PowerPoint's Notes Page view feature to include speaker notes. Speaker notes should be included for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences.

    Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable.

    Submit the presentation as a .ppt or .pptx file to the Week 6 Dropbox. PDF files are not accepted, as speaker notes are not visible.

    Abide by Chamberlain University's academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

    Title Slide (1 slide)

    Include your name and session.

    Introduction (1 slide)

    Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    Problem Statement (1 slide)

    Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    Write the problem statement in the form of a question. You may reuse the problem you identified for this week’s collaboration café.

    Background (1-3 slides)

    Provide factual information to define the problem.

    Include general information about the topic.

    Describe why the topic is important.

    Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Landscape (1-3 slides)

    Identify relevant stakeholders.

    Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Options (1-3 slides)

    Identify at least three evidence-based options to address the problem.

    Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    Recommendation (1-3 slides)

    Identify the best option to address the problem.

    Explain why your recommendation is the best solution.

    Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Conclusion (1 slide)

    Provide a summary of the presentation.

    References

    Provide complete reference in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required.

    Presentation Format

    The presentation should total 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    Speaker notes are provided for each slide (except the title and reference slides).

    Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Statement

    2 Required Criteria

    1. Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    2. Write the problem statement in the form of a question.

    25 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    13 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Background

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Provide factual information to define the problem.

    2. Include general information about the topic.

    3. Describe why the topic is important.

    4. Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Landscape

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Identify relevant stakeholders.

    2. Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    3. Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    4. Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Options

    7 Required Criteria

    1-3. Identify at least three options to address the problem.

    4. Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    5-7. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    5-6 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3-4 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recommendation

    4 Required Criteria

    1. Identify the best option to address the problem.

    2. Explain why your recommendation is the best choice.

    3. Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    4. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    3 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Summarize key points of the presentation

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Notes

    8 Required Criteria

    Include speaker notes for all content areas except title and reference slides:

    1. Introduction

    2. Problem Statement

    3. Background

    4. Landscape

    5. Options

    6. Recommendations

    7. Conclusion

    8. Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    15 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    14 pts

    Very Good

    7 requirements met.

    12 pts

    Satisfactory

    5-6 requirements met.

    7.5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-4 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

    Citation and Reference Formation

    Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    9 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation Format

    3 Required Criteria

    1. There are a total of 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    2. Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    3. Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Requirements

    Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    4 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    3 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    2 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Template Used

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Correct template used.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    22.5 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used

    0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Penalty Deductions

    Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Assignment submitted on time. No points deducted.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    -10% points/day up to 3 days late

    0 pts

    Total Points: 225