My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] reflection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering reflection.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] journal theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering journal theory.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SOC 151

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SOC 151.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NU553

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU553.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx **## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx** Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. General Instructions Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. No…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx

    **## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx**

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General Instructions

    Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Note: you may use the information you discussed in this week’s Collaboration Café. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:

    Review Wilensky, S. E., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2023). Essentials of health policy and law (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 14: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Health Policy Analysis

    Download the Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint template Download Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint templateOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReader. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

    Complete the required Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint.

    Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing.

    Use PowerPoint's Notes Page view feature to include speaker notes. Speaker notes should be included for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences.

    Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable.

    Submit the presentation as a .ppt or .pptx file to the Week 6 Dropbox. PDF files are not accepted, as speaker notes are not visible.

    Abide by Chamberlain University's academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

    Title Slide (1 slide)

    Include your name and session.

    Introduction (1 slide)

    Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    Problem Statement (1 slide)

    Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    Write the problem statement in the form of a question. You may reuse the problem you identified for this week’s collaboration café.

    Background (1-3 slides)

    Provide factual information to define the problem.

    Include general information about the topic.

    Describe why the topic is important.

    Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Landscape (1-3 slides)

    Identify relevant stakeholders.

    Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Options (1-3 slides)

    Identify at least three evidence-based options to address the problem.

    Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    Recommendation (1-3 slides)

    Identify the best option to address the problem.

    Explain why your recommendation is the best solution.

    Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Conclusion (1 slide)

    Provide a summary of the presentation.

    References

    Provide complete reference in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required.

    Presentation Format

    The presentation should total 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    Speaker notes are provided for each slide (except the title and reference slides).

    Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Statement

    2 Required Criteria

    1. Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    2. Write the problem statement in the form of a question.

    25 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    13 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Background

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Provide factual information to define the problem.

    2. Include general information about the topic.

    3. Describe why the topic is important.

    4. Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Landscape

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Identify relevant stakeholders.

    2. Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    3. Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    4. Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Options

    7 Required Criteria

    1-3. Identify at least three options to address the problem.

    4. Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    5-7. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    5-6 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3-4 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recommendation

    4 Required Criteria

    1. Identify the best option to address the problem.

    2. Explain why your recommendation is the best choice.

    3. Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    4. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    3 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Summarize key points of the presentation

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Notes

    8 Required Criteria

    Include speaker notes for all content areas except title and reference slides:

    1. Introduction

    2. Problem Statement

    3. Background

    4. Landscape

    5. Options

    6. Recommendations

    7. Conclusion

    8. Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    15 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    14 pts

    Very Good

    7 requirements met.

    12 pts

    Satisfactory

    5-6 requirements met.

    7.5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-4 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

    Citation and Reference Formation

    Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    9 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation Format

    3 Required Criteria

    1. There are a total of 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    2. Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    3. Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Requirements

    Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    4 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    3 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    2 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Template Used

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Correct template used.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    22.5 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used

    0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Penalty Deductions

    Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Assignment submitted on time. No points deducted.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    -10% points/day up to 3 days late

    0 pts

    Total Points: 225

    **## Week6Powerpointassignment.docx**

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General Instructions

    Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Note: you may use the information you discussed in this week’s Collaboration Café. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:

    Review Wilensky, S. E., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2023). Essentials of health policy and law (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 14: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Health Policy Analysis

    Download the Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint template Download Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint templateOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReader. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

    Complete the required Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint.

    Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing.

    Use PowerPoint's Notes Page view feature to include speaker notes. Speaker notes should be included for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences.

    Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable.

    Submit the presentation as a .ppt or .pptx file to the Week 6 Dropbox. PDF files are not accepted, as speaker notes are not visible.

    Abide by Chamberlain University's academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

    Title Slide (1 slide)

    Include your name and session.

    Introduction (1 slide)

    Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    Problem Statement (1 slide)

    Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    Write the problem statement in the form of a question. You may reuse the problem you identified for this week’s collaboration café.

    Background (1-3 slides)

    Provide factual information to define the problem.

    Include general information about the topic.

    Describe why the topic is important.

    Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Landscape (1-3 slides)

    Identify relevant stakeholders.

    Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Options (1-3 slides)

    Identify at least three evidence-based options to address the problem.

    Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    Recommendation (1-3 slides)

    Identify the best option to address the problem.

    Explain why your recommendation is the best solution.

    Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    Conclusion (1 slide)

    Provide a summary of the presentation.

    References

    Provide complete reference in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required.

    Presentation Format

    The presentation should total 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    Speaker notes are provided for each slide (except the title and reference slides).

    Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    NR582NP_W6_Policy Analysis Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Identify the purpose of the presentation.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Statement

    2 Required Criteria

    1. Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement.

    2. Write the problem statement in the form of a question.

    25 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    13 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Background

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Provide factual information to define the problem.

    2. Include general information about the topic.

    3. Describe why the topic is important.

    4. Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Landscape

    5 Required Criteria

    1. Identify relevant stakeholders.

    2. Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.

    3. Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.

    4. Discuss the relevance of each key factor.

    5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    4 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Options

    7 Required Criteria

    1-3. Identify at least three options to address the problem.

    4. Discuss the pros and cons of each option.

    5-7. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    5-6 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    3-4 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-2 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recommendation

    4 Required Criteria

    1. Identify the best option to address the problem.

    2. Explain why your recommendation is the best choice.

    3. Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.

    4. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.

    35 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    32 pts

    Very Good

    3 requirements met.

    29 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    18 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    35 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    1 Required Criterion

    1. Summarize key points of the presentation

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Notes

    8 Required Criteria

    Include speaker notes for all content areas except title and reference slides:

    1. Introduction

    2. Problem Statement

    3. Background

    4. Landscape

    5. Options

    6. Recommendations

    7. Conclusion

    8. Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations.

    15 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    14 pts

    Very Good

    7 requirements met.

    12 pts

    Satisfactory

    5-6 requirements met.

    7.5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1-4 requirements met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

    Citation and Reference Formation

    Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    9 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation Format

    3 Required Criteria

    1. There are a total of 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

    2. Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide.

    3. Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    All requirements met.

    8 pts

    Satisfactory

    2 requirements met.

    5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    1 requirement met.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No requirements met.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Requirements

    Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    0-1 errors.

    4 pts

    Very Good

    2-3 errors.

    3 pts

    Satisfactory

    4-5 errors.

    2 pts

    Needs Improvement

    6-7 errors.

    0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    More than 7 errors.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Template Used

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Correct template used.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    22.5 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used

    0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Penalty Deductions

    Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

    0 pts

    No Points Deducted

    Assignment submitted on time. No points deducted.

    0 pts

    Points Deducted

    -10% points/day up to 3 days late

    0 pts

    Total Points: 225

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ActiveLearningActivityWeek6.docx **## ActiveLearningActivityWeek6.docx** **Active Learning Activity Week 6** Chapter 14 in our textbook **A HISTORY OF NURSING ETHICS** The Nuremberg trials at the close of WWII offered disturbing questions. How can “good” people in traditionally honor-bound prof…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ActiveLearningActivityWeek6.docx

    **## ActiveLearningActivityWeek6.docx**

    **Active Learning Activity Week 6**

    Chapter 14 in our textbook

    **A HISTORY OF NURSING ETHICS**

    The Nuremberg trials at the close of WWII offered disturbing questions. How can “good” people in traditionally honor-bound professions become complicit in some of the worst violations of humanity in history? What happens when individual professionals are not held to account by their peers, professions, and society as a whole? The trials showed how moral individuals within organizations can engage in morally “wrong” functions. “I was just following orders,” complicit healthcare providers, doctors, and nurses claimed.

    Morality refers to principles that help determine what is “right” and what is “wrong.” Ethics is the related field that puts these principles to work to:

    apply moral principles to choose “right” actions,

    conduct relationships in an ethical manner, and

    manage situations where a “right” action is clear but for some reason not possible.

    **Using what we have learned this week- read the ethical dilemma below and explain your response and actions:**

    **_Nurse Is Instructed to Have Patient with Low Literacy Level to Sign Consent for Treatment_**

    **_Scenario:_** _Nurse Gloria is instructed by the attending physician to have Mr. Isaacs sign a consent form before a scheduled colonoscopy. As Nurse Gloria goes over the form with the patient, she notices he seems confused and is unsure where or how to sign the paperwork._

    **_Ethical Dilemma:_** _It is common for nurses to be the ones to get signatures on consent forms, especially for procedures like the one described in this scenario. When faced with a situation like the one here when the nurse is not sure that the patient understands what he is being told or if he can read, the decision of whether to delay a busy schedule to have the doctor come back and talk to the patient or explain to the best of her knowledge and get the patient's signature may seem difficult to make._

    **Now that you have read the ethical dilemma below** WHAT IS THIS PERSON FOCUSING ON EMOTIONALLY?
    **What are the** ASSOCIATED ETHICAL PRINCIPLEs AT PLAY IN THIS SCENARIO? WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE NURSE'S ACTIONS?
    **explain your responses and your current actions.**

    Please note the grading rubric.

    **Actions should incorporate EI, your actions and priorities, and the EBP behind your decisions.**

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. A minimum of 2 pages not counting cover and reference pages- APA must be strictly followed.

    Excellent

    Utilizes at least 3 sources and all sources are current within 5 years. Cited following APA format.

    **## ActiveLearningActivityWeek6.docx**

    **Active Learning Activity Week 6**

    Chapter 14 in our textbook

    **A HISTORY OF NURSING ETHICS**

    The Nuremberg trials at the close of WWII offered disturbing questions. How can “good” people in traditionally honor-bound professions become complicit in some of the worst violations of humanity in history? What happens when individual professionals are not held to account by their peers, professions, and society as a whole? The trials showed how moral individuals within organizations can engage in morally “wrong” functions. “I was just following orders,” complicit healthcare providers, doctors, and nurses claimed.

    Morality refers to principles that help determine what is “right” and what is “wrong.” Ethics is the related field that puts these principles to work to:

    apply moral principles to choose “right” actions,

    conduct relationships in an ethical manner, and

    manage situations where a “right” action is clear but for some reason not possible.

    **Using what we have learned this week- read the ethical dilemma below and explain your response and actions:**

    **_Nurse Is Instructed to Have Patient with Low Literacy Level to Sign Consent for Treatment_**

    **_Scenario:_** _Nurse Gloria is instructed by the attending physician to have Mr. Isaacs sign a consent form before a scheduled colonoscopy. As Nurse Gloria goes over the form with the patient, she notices he seems confused and is unsure where or how to sign the paperwork._

    **_Ethical Dilemma:_** _It is common for nurses to be the ones to get signatures on consent forms, especially for procedures like the one described in this scenario. When faced with a situation like the one here when the nurse is not sure that the patient understands what he is being told or if he can read, the decision of whether to delay a busy schedule to have the doctor come back and talk to the patient or explain to the best of her knowledge and get the patient's signature may seem difficult to make._

    **Now that you have read the ethical dilemma below** WHAT IS THIS PERSON FOCUSING ON EMOTIONALLY?
    **What are the** ASSOCIATED ETHICAL PRINCIPLEs AT PLAY IN THIS SCENARIO? WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE NURSE'S ACTIONS?
    **explain your responses and your current actions.**

    Please note the grading rubric.

    **Actions should incorporate EI, your actions and priorities, and the EBP behind your decisions.**

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. A minimum of 2 pages not counting cover and reference pages- APA must be strictly followed.

    Excellent

    Utilizes at least 3 sources and all sources are current within 5 years. Cited following APA format.

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## MediaCaseStudytoDistinguishBetweenCorrelationandCausation.docx **## MediaCaseStudytoDistinguishBetweenCorrelationandCausation.docx** **Media Case Study to Distinguish Between Correlation and Causation** Start Date Aug 4, 2025, 12:00 AM Due Date Aug 10, 2025, 11:59 PM Points 150 Rubric [View Rub…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## MediaCaseStudytoDistinguishBetweenCorrelationandCausation.docx

    **## MediaCaseStudytoDistinguishBetweenCorrelationandCausation.docx**

    **Media Case Study to Distinguish Between Correlation and Causation**

    Start Date

    Aug 4, 2025, 12:00 AM

    Due Date

    Aug 10, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Points

    150

    Rubric

    [View Rubric](https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/HLT-362V-O502-20250714/rubrics/9f65737d-2ee9-4af9-83bb-05e49d71e9a1)

    Status

    Active

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    The purpose of this assignment is to critically analyze examples of mistaken correlation versus causation and propose a study design that could be used to gain insights into the relationship in question.

    Read the "Vitamin D and SARS-CoV2 Infection, Severity and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” case example related to Vitamin D and COVID-19, located in Topic 4 Resources. It is important to understand the difference between
    _correlation_ and
    _causation_, how it can lead to misinformation, its implications, and ways to address it through proper study design. Evaluate correlation and causation to discern between relationships that are merely associative and those that are causally linked.

    **_Research and Example Selection:_**

    1. Each learner should research and find their own example of a widely reported health-related case from the media that illustrates an example of mistaken correlation versus causation. This example should involve an incorrectly drawn conclusion about a medical treatment, health supplement, or preventive measure.

    2. The chosen example should include initial claims that were later challenged or disproven by further research or expert analysis.

    **_Written Paper_**

    Write a 750-1,000-word paper addressing the following:

    **What was the mistake?**

    1. Identify and explain the error made in the initial reporting or interpretation of the health information related to your chosen example.

    2. Highlight any assumptions or misrepresentations that contributed to the spread of misinformation. Discuss the role of correlation versus causation in the claims you evaluated.

    **What went wrong?**

    1. Discuss how the misinformation was propagated and the role of various stakeholders (e.g., media, public figures, researchers) in its dissemination.

    2. Explain the societal or public health impacts of this incorrectly drawn conclusion.

    **How could the study be changed?**

    1. Reflect on what changes could have improved the original studies or claims to prevent incorrectly drawn conclusions.

    **_General Requirements_**

    You are required to cite a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to health care.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **## MediaCaseStudytoDistinguishBetweenCorrelationandCausation.docx**

    **Media Case Study to Distinguish Between Correlation and Causation**

    Start Date

    Aug 4, 2025, 12:00 AM

    Due Date

    Aug 10, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Points

    150

    Rubric

    [View Rubric](https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/HLT-362V-O502-20250714/rubrics/9f65737d-2ee9-4af9-83bb-05e49d71e9a1)

    Status

    Active

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    The purpose of this assignment is to critically analyze examples of mistaken correlation versus causation and propose a study design that could be used to gain insights into the relationship in question.

    Read the "Vitamin D and SARS-CoV2 Infection, Severity and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” case example related to Vitamin D and COVID-19, located in Topic 4 Resources. It is important to understand the difference between
    _correlation_ and
    _causation_, how it can lead to misinformation, its implications, and ways to address it through proper study design. Evaluate correlation and causation to discern between relationships that are merely associative and those that are causally linked.

    **_Research and Example Selection:_**

    1. Each learner should research and find their own example of a widely reported health-related case from the media that illustrates an example of mistaken correlation versus causation. This example should involve an incorrectly drawn conclusion about a medical treatment, health supplement, or preventive measure.

    2. The chosen example should include initial claims that were later challenged or disproven by further research or expert analysis.

    **_Written Paper_**

    Write a 750-1,000-word paper addressing the following:

    **What was the mistake?**

    1. Identify and explain the error made in the initial reporting or interpretation of the health information related to your chosen example.

    2. Highlight any assumptions or misrepresentations that contributed to the spread of misinformation. Discuss the role of correlation versus causation in the claims you evaluated.

    **What went wrong?**

    1. Discuss how the misinformation was propagated and the role of various stakeholders (e.g., media, public figures, researchers) in its dissemination.

    2. Explain the societal or public health impacts of this incorrectly drawn conclusion.

    **How could the study be changed?**

    1. Reflect on what changes could have improved the original studies or claims to prevent incorrectly drawn conclusions.

    **_General Requirements_**

    You are required to cite a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to health care.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

  • [Solved] 313Topic 2 DQ 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Using the GCU Library, locate and summarize an allied health malpractice or negligence case study. If possible, select a case within your chosen field of study. What went wrong? What workplace safety, risk management, and/or quality improvement steps were involved? What could have been done differen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Using the GCU Library, locate and summarize an allied health malpractice or negligence case study. If possible, select a case within your chosen field of study. What went wrong? What workplace safety, risk management, and/or quality improvement steps were involved? What could have been done differently? If you were in charge of making sure this type of event never occurred again, what steps would you implement into the risk management plan?
    You are required to use and cite a minimum of two references from the GCU Library to support your response.

  • [Solved] 313Topic 2 DQ 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    A formal risk management plan demonstrates a health care organization's approach as well as support for risk management and, ultimately, patient safety. Accessing information from your own employer/organization or using the internet to find an allied health care organization located in your city or …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    A formal risk management plan demonstrates a health care organization's approach as well as support for risk management and, ultimately, patient safety. Accessing information from your own employer/organization or using the internet to find an allied health care organization located in your city or region, identify the goals and objectives, scope, and functions of an existing risk management plan. How does the plan "measure up" in terms of meeting ethical and legal responsibilities to stakeholders? How might you improve it? Explain.
    You are required to use and cite a minimum of two references from the GCU Library to support your response.

  • [Solved] 313Provision and Reimbursement of Health Care Services

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 313Provision and Reimbursement of Health Care Services.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.