Executive Solution Overview
attached **files (2)** – ## TheRhetoricalAppealsTemplate1.docx – ## Assignmentbm.docx **## TheRhetoricalAppealsTemplate1.docx** **The Rhetorical Appeals Assignment Template** **Purpose:** This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
attached
**files (2)**
– ## TheRhetoricalAppealsTemplate1.docx
– ## Assignmentbm.docx
**## TheRhetoricalAppealsTemplate1.docx**
**The Rhetorical Appeals Assignment Template**
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use this template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.). Then follow these steps:
**Part 1: Define the Appeals in your own words (1-2 complete sentences per appeal)**:
| | |
| — | — |
| In your own words, define each: |
| Ethos | |
| Logos | |
| Pathos | |
Each definition should be 1–2 sentences and explain how the rhetorical appeal works in persuasion.
**Part 2: Describe the Post**
**Each response should be 1–2 complete sentences minimum.**
| | |
| — | — |
| Answer these questions: |
| Insert a screenshot of your chosen post in this response box. | |
| What is the post about? | |
| What audience is the post targeting? | |
| What is the creator trying to persuade the audience to do, think, or feel? | |
**Part 3: Identify and Explain the Appeals**
**Each response should be 1–2 complete sentences minimum.**
| | |
| — | — |
| Answer these questions to explain how the post uses each rhetorical appeal: |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**logos**? What makes it logical (or maybe where it fails to be logical)? | |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**ethos**? How is credibility or trust shown (or lost) with the target audience? | |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**pathos**? How does it create emotion? | |
**Part 4: Assess**
Which appeal do you think worked best in the post, and why?
**Answer with at least two complete sentences.**
**## Assignmentbm.docx**
Assignment: The Rhetorical Appeals
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use the attached template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.).
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart1: Definitions of Appeals | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Defines all three appeals clearly, in own words; definitions are accurate, concise (1–2 sentences), and show full understanding.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Mostly clear definitions; may have 1 minor misunderstanding or slightly vague wording. Student uses 1-2 full sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Definitions are unclear, incomplete, copied from another source, or show limited understanding and/or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Description of Post | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Post is shared (link or screenshot). Student clearly answers all four questions with relevant detail and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences. Shows understanding of purpose and audience. Student uses complete sentences.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Post link or screenshot is included. Answers most questions with some detail, though one may be vague or slightly incomplete. Student uses complete sentences and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing post link/screenshot, student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or responses are vague, incomplete, or don’t show full understanding.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Identifying Appeals | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Gives strong, specific examples of logos, ethos, and pathos from the post. Each explanation clearly connects the example to the appeal and shows insight. Each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsProficient** Gives examples of all three appeals with mostly clear explanations. Each response is a minimum of 1-2 complete sentences. One example may be underdeveloped or inaccurate.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing one or more appeals, or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or explanations are vague, inaccurate, and/or disconnected from the example.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Assessment of Effectiveness | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly identifies which appeal worked best and supports the choice with thoughtful reasoning in at least two complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Identifies an appeal and provides some reasoning in at least two complete sentences, though explanation may be general or underdeveloped.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Choice is unclear or reasoning is missing/weak; less than two sentences or not complete sentences.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader but they are not serious or frequent.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader somewhat frequently.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation make reading difficult. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 50
**## Assignmentbm.docx**
Assignment: The Rhetorical Appeals
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use the attached template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.).
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart1: Definitions of Appeals | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Defines all three appeals clearly, in own words; definitions are accurate, concise (1–2 sentences), and show full understanding.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Mostly clear definitions; may have 1 minor misunderstanding or slightly vague wording. Student uses 1-2 full sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Definitions are unclear, incomplete, copied from another source, or show limited understanding and/or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Description of Post | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Post is shared (link or screenshot). Student clearly answers all four questions with relevant detail and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences. Shows understanding of purpose and audience. Student uses complete sentences.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Post link or screenshot is included. Answers most questions with some detail, though one may be vague or slightly incomplete. Student uses complete sentences and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing post link/screenshot, student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or responses are vague, incomplete, or don’t show full understanding.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Identifying Appeals | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Gives strong, specific examples of logos, ethos, and pathos from the post. Each explanation clearly connects the example to the appeal and shows insight. Each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsProficient** Gives examples of all three appeals with mostly clear explanations. Each response is a minimum of 1-2 complete sentences. One example may be underdeveloped or inaccurate.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing one or more appeals, or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or explanations are vague, inaccurate, and/or disconnected from the example.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Assessment of Effectiveness | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly identifies which appeal worked best and supports the choice with thoughtful reasoning in at least two complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Identifies an appeal and provides some reasoning in at least two complete sentences, though explanation may be general or underdeveloped.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Choice is unclear or reasoning is missing/weak; less than two sentences or not complete sentences.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader but they are not serious or frequent.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader somewhat frequently.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation make reading difficult. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 50
**## TheRhetoricalAppealsTemplate1.docx**
**The Rhetorical Appeals Assignment Template**
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use this template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.). Then follow these steps:
**Part 1: Define the Appeals in your own words (1-2 complete sentences per appeal)**:
| | |
| — | — |
| In your own words, define each: |
| Ethos | |
| Logos | |
| Pathos | |
Each definition should be 1–2 sentences and explain how the rhetorical appeal works in persuasion.
**Part 2: Describe the Post**
**Each response should be 1–2 complete sentences minimum.**
| | |
| — | — |
| Answer these questions: |
| Insert a screenshot of your chosen post in this response box. | |
| What is the post about? | |
| What audience is the post targeting? | |
| What is the creator trying to persuade the audience to do, think, or feel? | |
**Part 3: Identify and Explain the Appeals**
**Each response should be 1–2 complete sentences minimum.**
| | |
| — | — |
| Answer these questions to explain how the post uses each rhetorical appeal: |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**logos**? What makes it logical (or maybe where it fails to be logical)? | |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**ethos**? How is credibility or trust shown (or lost) with the target audience? | |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**pathos**? How does it create emotion? | |
**Part 4: Assess**
Which appeal do you think worked best in the post, and why?
**Answer with at least two complete sentences.**
**## Assignmentbm.docx**
Assignment: The Rhetorical Appeals
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use the attached template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.).
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart1: Definitions of Appeals | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Defines all three appeals clearly, in own words; definitions are accurate, concise (1–2 sentences), and show full understanding.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Mostly clear definitions; may have 1 minor misunderstanding or slightly vague wording. Student uses 1-2 full sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Definitions are unclear, incomplete, copied from another source, or show limited understanding and/or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Description of Post | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Post is shared (link or screenshot). Student clearly answers all four questions with relevant detail and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences. Shows understanding of purpose and audience. Student uses complete sentences.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Post link or screenshot is included. Answers most questions with some detail, though one may be vague or slightly incomplete. Student uses complete sentences and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing post link/screenshot, student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or responses are vague, incomplete, or don’t show full understanding.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Identifying Appeals | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Gives strong, specific examples of logos, ethos, and pathos from the post. Each explanation clearly connects the example to the appeal and shows insight. Each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsProficient** Gives examples of all three appeals with mostly clear explanations. Each response is a minimum of 1-2 complete sentences. One example may be underdeveloped or inaccurate.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing one or more appeals, or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or explanations are vague, inaccurate, and/or disconnected from the example.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Assessment of Effectiveness | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly identifies which appeal worked best and supports the choice with thoughtful reasoning in at least two complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Identifies an appeal and provides some reasoning in at least two complete sentences, though explanation may be general or underdeveloped.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Choice is unclear or reasoning is missing/weak; less than two sentences or not complete sentences.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader but they are not serious or frequent.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader somewhat frequently.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation make reading difficult. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 50
**## TheRhetoricalAppealsTemplate1.docx**
**The Rhetorical Appeals Assignment Template**
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use this template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.). Then follow these steps:
**Part 1: Define the Appeals in your own words (1-2 complete sentences per appeal)**:
| | |
| — | — |
| In your own words, define each: |
| Ethos | |
| Logos | |
| Pathos | |
Each definition should be 1–2 sentences and explain how the rhetorical appeal works in persuasion.
**Part 2: Describe the Post**
**Each response should be 1–2 complete sentences minimum.**
| | |
| — | — |
| Answer these questions: |
| Insert a screenshot of your chosen post in this response box. | |
| What is the post about? | |
| What audience is the post targeting? | |
| What is the creator trying to persuade the audience to do, think, or feel? | |
**Part 3: Identify and Explain the Appeals**
**Each response should be 1–2 complete sentences minimum.**
| | |
| — | — |
| Answer these questions to explain how the post uses each rhetorical appeal: |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**logos**? What makes it logical (or maybe where it fails to be logical)? | |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**ethos**? How is credibility or trust shown (or lost) with the target audience? | |
| What’s one moment that uses <br>**pathos**? How does it create emotion? | |
**Part 4: Assess**
Which appeal do you think worked best in the post, and why?
**Answer with at least two complete sentences.**
**## Assignmentbm.docx**
Assignment: The Rhetorical Appeals
**Purpose:**
This assignment will help you define the rhetorical appeals in your own words and begin to analyze how they are used in an everyday scenario: a persuasive social media post. Use the attached template to guide you through completing each prompt.
**Instructions:**
Choose a social media post (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) that is trying to
**convince people** of something (buying a product, changing an opinion, joining a cause, etc.).
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18655009/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart1: Definitions of Appeals | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Defines all three appeals clearly, in own words; definitions are accurate, concise (1–2 sentences), and show full understanding.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Mostly clear definitions; may have 1 minor misunderstanding or slightly vague wording. Student uses 1-2 full sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Definitions are unclear, incomplete, copied from another source, or show limited understanding and/or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Description of Post | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Post is shared (link or screenshot). Student clearly answers all four questions with relevant detail and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences. Shows understanding of purpose and audience. Student uses complete sentences.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Post link or screenshot is included. Answers most questions with some detail, though one may be vague or slightly incomplete. Student uses complete sentences and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing post link/screenshot, student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or responses are vague, incomplete, or don’t show full understanding.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Identifying Appeals | **20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent** Gives strong, specific examples of logos, ethos, and pathos from the post. Each explanation clearly connects the example to the appeal and shows insight. Each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.<br> <br>**15 to >10.0 ptsProficient** Gives examples of all three appeals with mostly clear explanations. Each response is a minimum of 1-2 complete sentences. One example may be underdeveloped or inaccurate.<br> <br>**10 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Missing one or more appeals, or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or explanations are vague, inaccurate, and/or disconnected from the example.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Assessment of Effectiveness | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly identifies which appeal worked best and supports the choice with thoughtful reasoning in at least two complete sentences.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Identifies an appeal and provides some reasoning in at least two complete sentences, though explanation may be general or underdeveloped.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Choice is unclear or reasoning is missing/weak; less than two sentences or not complete sentences.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Important elements missing and/or vague | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** No serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsProficient** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader but they are not serious or frequent.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader somewhat frequently.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** Serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation make reading difficult. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 50