Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Kindly View Attachment!!
– a year ago
**files (1)**
– ## Assignment4AssessingSubjectMatter.docx
**## Assignment4AssessingSubjectMatter.docx**
**Assignment #4**
**Assessing Subject Matter Content in the Curriculum**
**(CAEP Unit Assessment #13)**
Directions:
Develop a power point presentation for teachers. The presentation will address three ways in which to assess subject matter content in a curriculum. You may choose the grade level. The presentation should last about 20 minutes. (ILA 3.3)
Post your presentation to the discussion board by the end of week 4 to receive input from your colleagues. By the end of week 5, respond to at least two of your colleagues’ presentation and collect their input for your presentation. (ILA 6.3)
Write a one-page paper describing your presentation. Include the rationale and the methods you are using and how you would accommodate diverse students to promote equity for all. Reflect upon the input you receive. Did you agree, and would you change anything in your presentation based upon that feedback?
(ILA 3.4)
Post final presentation and your paper to the assignment drop box by the end of week 6.
**Scoring Rubric for Assignment #4:**
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **Element** | **Not Met** | **Met** | **Exceeded** |
| **Points** | **0 – 15** | **16 – 19** | **20** |
| Candidates participate in and lead professional learning experiences to assist teachers in selecting, administering, analyzing, interpreting assessments, and using results for instructional dcision making in classrooms and schools (ILA Standard<br>3.3) | The candidate did not effectively address the rationale, the methods he/she was using, three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom or addressed fewer than three ways of assessment. | The candidate effectively addressed the rationale, the methods he/she was using, and three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom. | The candidate effectively addressed the rationale, the methods he/she was using and offered more than three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom |
| **Points** | **0 – 7** | **8 – 9** | **10** |
| Candidates, using both written and oral communication, explain assessment results and advocate for appropriate literacy and language practices to a variety of stakeholders, including students, administrators, teachers, other educators, and parents/ guardians. (ILA 3.4) | The candidate did not give or receive adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and/or did not write a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators. | The candidate gave and received adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators. | The candidate gave and received comprehensive input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a logical self-reflection., explaining its relevance for educators in detail. |
| Total Possible Points | | | 30 |
Points will be deducted for the following:
Late submission
Excessive grammatical, spelling, and/or mechanical errors
Incorrect APA format
Missing title page, page numbers, and/or references
Due: Week 6
Total Value: 30 points Objective 1, 8
**## Assignment4AssessingSubjectMatter.docx**
**Assignment #4**
**Assessing Subject Matter Content in the Curriculum**
**(CAEP Unit Assessment #13)**
Directions:
Develop a power point presentation for teachers. The presentation will address three ways in which to assess subject matter content in a curriculum. You may choose the grade level. The presentation should last about 20 minutes. (ILA 3.3)
Post your presentation to the discussion board by the end of week 4 to receive input from your colleagues. By the end of week 5, respond to at least two of your colleagues’ presentation and collect their input for your presentation. (ILA 6.3)
Write a one-page paper describing your presentation. Include the rationale and the methods you are using and how you would accommodate diverse students to promote equity for all. Reflect upon the input you receive. Did you agree, and would you change anything in your presentation based upon that feedback?
(ILA 3.4)
Post final presentation and your paper to the assignment drop box by the end of week 6.
**Scoring Rubric for Assignment #4:**
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **Element** | **Not Met** | **Met** | **Exceeded** |
| **Points** | **0 – 15** | **16 – 19** | **20** |
| Candidates participate in and lead professional learning experiences to assist teachers in selecting, administering, analyzing, interpreting assessments, and using results for instructional dcision making in classrooms and schools (ILA Standard<br>3.3) | The candidate did not effectively address the rationale, the methods he/she was using, three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom or addressed fewer than three ways of assessment. | The candidate effectively addressed the rationale, the methods he/she was using, and three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom. | The candidate effectively addressed the rationale, the methods he/she was using and offered more than three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom |
| **Points** | **0 – 7** | **8 – 9** | **10** |
| Candidates, using both written and oral communication, explain assessment results and advocate for appropriate literacy and language practices to a variety of stakeholders, including students, administrators, teachers, other educators, and parents/ guardians. (ILA 3.4) | The candidate did not give or receive adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and/or did not write a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators. | The candidate gave and received adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators. | The candidate gave and received comprehensive input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a logical self-reflection., explaining its relevance for educators in detail. |
| Total Possible Points | | | 30 |
Points will be deducted for the following:
Late submission
Excessive grammatical, spelling, and/or mechanical errors
Incorrect APA format
Missing title page, page numbers, and/or references
Due: Week 6
Total Value: 30 points Objective 1, 8